• Advice on a new PC motherboard 'bundle'

    From Sam Plusnet@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 14 00:41:06 2025
    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not run on
    'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly recent & decent.

    Having thought about it some more, I realise most of my PC dates from
    2016 so regardless of Microsoft's messing around, it is time for a refresh.

    I'm happy with the peripherals I have, so it's just the
    Motherboard/CPU/RAM/CPU Cooler that I want to replace. To make life
    easier, I want to buy a ready built & tested bundle.

    Last time around,I bought such a bundle from Novatech, and I was very
    happy with the result. I might still buy from them, but their bundles
    get very expensive very quickly (e.g. a modest bundle is ~£300, the next
    is £740 and sharply up from there).

    Question: Can anyone recommend other firms which offer such (built &
    tested) bundles, and are they good if/when things need attention?
    (I can recommend Novatech since they replaced my first bundle without a
    quibble when it suddenly died after a year of use.)

    Question 2: My current system is Intel-based. Is there any advantage
    to going for a Ryzen-based system at the moment?
    I am not into the latest & greatest in gaming, so I have no interest in overclocking the thing into meltdown.

    --
    Sam Plusnet

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Sam Plusnet on Mon Apr 14 00:39:58 2025
    On Sun, 4/13/2025 7:41 PM, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not run on 'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly recent & decent.

    Having thought about it some more, I realise most of my PC dates from 2016 so regardless of Microsoft's messing around, it is time for a refresh.

    I'm happy with the peripherals I have, so it's just the Motherboard/CPU/RAM/CPU Cooler that I want to replace.  To make life easier, I want to buy a ready built & tested bundle.

    Last time around,I bought such a bundle from Novatech, and I was very happy with the result.  I might still buy from them, but their bundles get very expensive very quickly (e.g. a modest bundle is ~£300, the next is £740 and sharply up from there).

    Question:  Can anyone recommend other firms which offer such (built & tested) bundles, and are they good if/when things need attention?
    (I can recommend Novatech since they replaced my first bundle without a quibble when it suddenly died after a year of use.)

    Question 2:  My current system is Intel-based.  Is there any advantage to going for a Ryzen-based system at the moment?
    I am not into the latest & greatest in gaming, so I have no interest in overclocking the thing into meltdown.


    To give the folks a flavour of what you've got currently, give us a dump on your hardware.
    We can use this information, to give you a comparable system closer to what you've
    got, without going overboard on the shiny aspect.

    Using the CPUZ utility, you get CPU, motherboard, RAM, Graphics-Card.

    The "Save Report" button gives a text file, and it can include
    your hard drive detail, such as "Samsung SSD 870 EVO 4TB" that
    is not shown in the graphical output here.

    https://i.postimg.cc/cWkhGqTz/CPUZ-before-5600-G.gif

    The CPUZ download is here. If any "garbage" pops up, use the "reload" icon
    on your browser to reload the page. Do NOT click any dialogs thrown up,
    just refresh around them. This is the portable version that does not
    need to be installed. You can unpack in your Downloads folder and use
    the EXE file from there. If you Save Report, it can go into your
    Downloads as well. The author of this, has not used advertising in the
    past, but he has to pay for his server, and it is what it is.
    (People use rental servers, these are not "servers in your basement".)

    https://www.cpuid.com/downloads/cpu-z/cpu-z_2.15-en.zip

    *******

    If you're on Linux, "inxi -F" will give a dump of similar details.
    Being a daily driver that had a bit of an illness, this thing
    has been round-the-block a few times. It's actually on its third
    processor, but don't tell anyone :-)

    $ inxi -F
    System:
    Host: TICTAK Kernel: 6.8.0-51-generic arch: x86_64 bits: 64
    Desktop: Cinnamon v: 6.4.6 Distro: Linux Mint 22.1 Xia
    Machine:
    Type: Desktop Mobo: Micro-Star model: MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) v: 1.0
    serial: <superuser required> UEFI: American Megatrends LLC. v: 1.I0
    date: 07/13/2024
    CPU:
    Info: 6-core model: AMD Ryzen 5 5600G with Radeon Graphics bits: 64
    type: MT MCP cache: L2: 3 MiB
    Speed (MHz): avg: 616 min/max: 400/4464 cores: 1: 400 2: 400 3: 400
    4: 2994 5: 400 6: 400 7: 400 8: 400 9: 400 10: 400 11: 400 12: 400 Graphics:
    Device-1: AMD Cezanne [Radeon Vega Series / Radeon Mobile Series]
    driver: amdgpu v: kernel
    Display: x11 server: X.Org v: 21.1.11 with: Xwayland v: 23.2.6 driver: X:
    loaded: amdgpu unloaded: fbdev,modesetting,vesa dri: radeonsi gpu: amdgpu
    resolution: 1920x1080~75Hz
    API: EGL v: 1.5 drivers: radeonsi,swrast platforms: x11,surfaceless,device
    API: OpenGL v: 4.6 compat-v: 4.5 vendor: amd mesa v: 24.0.9-0ubuntu0.3
    renderer: AMD Radeon Graphics (radeonsi renoir LLVM 17.0.6 DRM 3.57 <=== this is iGPU inside the CPU
    6.8.0-51-generic)
    Audio:
    Device-1: AMD Renoir Radeon High Definition Audio driver: snd_hda_intel
    Device-2: AMD Family 17h/19h HD Audio driver: snd_hda_intel
    API: ALSA v: k6.8.0-51-generic status: kernel-api
    Server-1: PipeWire v: 1.0.5 status: active
    Network:
    Device-1: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8211/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet
    driver: r8169
    IF: enp42s0 state: up speed: 1000 Mbps duplex: full mac:
    Drives:
    Local Storage: total: 465.76 GiB used: 7.43 GiB (1.6%)
    ID-1: /dev/sda vendor: Western Digital model: WD5003ABYZ-011FA0 <=== Some old hard drive
    size: 465.76 GiB
    Partition:
    ID-1: / size: 39.08 GiB used: 7.35 GiB (18.8%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda7
    ID-2: /boot/efi size: 96 MiB used: 79.6 MiB (82.9%) fs: vfat
    dev: /dev/sda1
    Swap:
    Alert: No swap data was found.
    Sensors: <=== No driver for sensor in Win or Linux!
    System Temperatures: cpu: 36.4 C mobo: N/A gpu: amdgpu temp: 29.0 C
    Fan Speeds (rpm): N/A <=== That is why fan speed is unknown
    Info:
    Memory: total: 64 GiB note: est. available: 62.19 GiB used: 1.65 GiB (2.7%)
    Processes: 296 Uptime: 1m Shell: Bash inxi: 3.3.34

    *******

    Sometimes, your graphics card can't be recycled, because the VBIOS is too old. Some of the new motherboards, want a GOP VBIOS for UEFI usage, and they
    may reject an old video card. You can handle this at build time, see
    the video card is no good, try to pick up a cheap one (if the CPU
    does not have an iGPU). The 5600G for example, has an iGPU and does
    not need a video card purchase to work. Just recently, the later
    Zen line has also just put out an APU-like thing with a decent GPU
    in it as well. That's an AMD processor. Intel does similar things,
    like maybe a 14400 with iGPU would be a quad core and fairly cheap.

    Two sticks of RAM, and the usage of the XMP setting, and the RAM
    "snaps to attention". You (or the provider) makes sure the RAM
    is within range of the hardware, and the XMP feature runs the RAM
    at whatever whizzy speed it's been tested with. For example, the
    system above was DDR4-3200 and that's pretty well exactly what it
    supports, and zero problems. The DDR5 systems today are DDR5-5600
    and two sticks, flip on XMP, and job done. If you're fairly unconcerned
    about the RAM, it can today be practically friction-less to get going.

    Some boxes, the CPU won't start, and that's part of your "tested system" philosophy. The machine I'm typing on, did not start the first time :-)
    I wasn't particularly surprised. I knew I needed to flash up the
    motherboard BIOS chip, and it took *all evening* to get the stupid
    machine to read the USB stick with the flash image on it. I was ready
    to smack someone. The manual had minimal instructions. When I thought
    the flashing red LED meant it was programming the flash... that was
    actually an error indicator :-) Doh. But I eventually got a different
    flashing pattern out of it, and I relaxed and waited for it to finish.
    No problem after that, came up, pressed <Del> and entered the BIOS.
    Switch on XMP. Now my RAM is ready. And so on.

    On a tested system, you will be spared these moments of aggravation.
    Only if the CMOS battery fell out, might you take a step backwards
    (have to set up the BIOS again, not a big deal). As it is, you still
    have to enter the BIOS and set certain things with respect to keeping
    the "new" Windows happy (TPM, VT-X, and so on). Windows uses virtualization,
    so the VT-X or things near that, need to be switched on. Your TPM can
    be a separate plug-in hardware module, or it can be the fTPM emulation
    the BIOS provides. I would recommend to people to use the physical
    TPM module (to avoid the stutter bug on AMD at least), but you may decide differently.
    The price on those has shot up like crazy, for no particular reason.
    Several years ago, they were like "jelly-beans" at the shop I use.
    I really should have bought two.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Layman@21:1/5 to Sam Plusnet on Mon Apr 14 08:30:50 2025
    On 14/04/2025 00:41, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not run on
    'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly recent & decent.

    Having thought about it some more, I realise most of my PC dates from
    2016 so regardless of Microsoft's messing around, it is time for a refresh.

    You might like to consider something like Linux Mint. I moved from Win7
    to Ubuntu and after a couple of years Linux Mint, and have never wanted
    to go back. I suggest you create a bootable iso of Linux Mint (try
    version 22.0), and boot your old PC from it just to see what it looks
    like, and perhaps have a play. <https://linuxmint-installation-guide.readthedocs.io/en/latest/index.html>

    I'm happy with the peripherals I have, so it's just the Motherboard/CPU/RAM/CPU Cooler that I want to replace. To make life
    easier, I want to buy a ready built & tested bundle.

    Last time around,I bought such a bundle from Novatech, and I was very
    happy with the result. I might still buy from them, but their bundles
    get very expensive very quickly (e.g. a modest bundle is ~£300, the next
    is £740 and sharply up from there).

    Just over 10 years ago I bought a "Clearance" laptop from Novatech. At
    the time, their machines were rebadged Clevo laptops. The laptop I
    bought was half the price it would have been new about 12 - 18 months previously, and was very highly specced. It worked faultlessly for over
    8 years until the HDD started playing up (I've since replaced it with an
    SSD after getting a new laptop, and it now works ok. However, it /is/ an
    old machine, so things like electrolytic capacitors might be getting a
    little dodgy). I wanted to replace the laptop with another Novatech, but
    they no longer used Clevo machines. So I looked elsewhere.

    Question: Can anyone recommend other firms which offer such (built &
    tested) bundles, and are they good if/when things need attention?
    (I can recommend Novatech since they replaced my first bundle without a quibble when it suddenly died after a year of use.)

    I found that PCSpecialist (<https://www.pcspecialist.co.uk/>) sell fully-configurable Clevo laptops, so got one from them. Their service
    was very good, and I'm /fairly/ pleased with the new laptop. Why only
    /fairly/? Well, like everything new "progress" comes at a cost -
    generally a lower cost by doing things more cheaply, or following what everybody else is doing. The new laptop doesn't have a removable
    battery, easily-accessible disk drive replacement, no internal CD/DVD
    drive, and most annoyingly a clickpad rather than a trackpad with
    separate left and right click buttons (but if you're using a PC with a
    mouse that will be of no consequence).

    Another company you might want to look at is <https://novacustom.com/>.
    They were incredibly helpful getting my new Clevo's led keyboard to work properly even though they hadn't sold me the machine!

    Question 2: My current system is Intel-based. Is there any advantage
    to going for a Ryzen-based system at the moment?
    I am not into the latest & greatest in gaming, so I have no interest in overclocking the thing into meltdown.

    You'll have to decide what processor you want on a cost/performance basis.

    --
    Jeff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Jeff Layman on Mon Apr 14 04:31:01 2025
    On Mon, 4/14/2025 3:30 AM, Jeff Layman wrote:

    Just over 10 years ago I bought a "Clearance" laptop from Novatech. At the time, their machines were rebadged Clevo laptops. The laptop I bought was half the price it would have been new about 12 - 18 months previously, and was very highly specced. It
    worked faultlessly for over 8 years until the HDD started playing up (I've since replaced it with an SSD after getting a new laptop, and it now works ok. However, it /is/ an old machine, so things like electrolytic capacitors might be getting a little
    dodgy). I wanted to replace the laptop with another Novatech, but they no longer used Clevo machines. So I looked elsewhere.

    Capacitors aren't that fragile.
    You have to antagonize them.

    I've had two motherboard failures here, and the root cause was *not* caps.

    It was different during the capacitor plague. It was so bad then, a capacitor could fail in two years, while cold, and not under bias. The pH of the liquid inside was such, it just ate through the casing. I bought an Antec power supply,
    it sat on the shelf for two years (as a "spare"), and when I went to use it,
    it was behaving in an unstable manner. When I opened it for a look, the four +5V output caps were leaking and brown fluid was coming out the top on the
    vent lines (the metal is thinnest there).

    Today, a design can use Polymer caps (no fluid) or electrolytics.

    The electrolytic in my electric lawn mower, is 33 years old. It has
    not exploded, the can is intact, it's really quite amazing, in terms
    of service life. I got to check it, when I changed out the brushes.

    This one is 100% polymer caps.

    https://c1.neweggimages.com/productimage/nb1280/13-119-686-03.png

    The companies making motherboards, know which cap brands to avoid, in
    terms of shenanigans.

    Clevo is an ODM, so just about everyone rebadges their stuff.
    They expect it to be rebadged. The Eurocom store near me,
    uses a lot of Clevo, and they put the Eurocom sticker on it.
    Clevo doesn't build battleships like it used to, the machines
    are losing weight, and whatever tactical advantage they had,
    is disappearing. You could have a laptop for example, with
    four SSDs in it. They don't do them exactly like that any more.
    The machines are toned down a bit. Can Clevo survive by making
    laptops that way ? I can't see this ending well. We want four
    SSDs, two MXM modules, and two wall adapters for power, like
    all good battleships. No one can steal your laptop, because
    it's too heavy. And some of those machines could cost 7000.
    To give you some idea how over the top they were. part of the
    price might be Quadro graphics (for CAD work).

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Rumm@21:1/5 to Sam Plusnet on Mon Apr 14 10:00:34 2025
    On 14/04/2025 00:41, Sam Plusnet wrote:

    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not run on
    'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly recent & decent.

    Having thought about it some more, I realise most of my PC dates from
    2016 so regardless of Microsoft's messing around, it is time for a refresh.

    I have had this conversation with quite a few customers recently, and
    have had to point out that yup it is a right pain that MS are forcing
    you to ditch a perfectly serviceable machine, but many of them are 10+
    years old, and they might actually be pleasantly surprised how much of
    an improvement in performance the new one will bring along with lower
    running costs.

    I'm happy with the peripherals I have, so it's just the Motherboard/CPU/ RAM/CPU Cooler that I want to replace.  To make life easier, I want to
    buy a ready built & tested bundle.

    OOI what peripherals are you referring to?

    You could just pick a motherboard that meets your needs, and then look
    at the makers hardware compatibility lists. Then just pick a RAM/CPU combination from the list, and you know that it is a tested combination
    that will work.

    Question:  Can anyone recommend other firms which offer such (built & tested) bundles, and are they good if/when things need attention?
    (I can recommend Novatech since they replaced my first bundle without a quibble when it suddenly died after a year of use.)

    Not something I have ever bought, so not really.

    (I could probably sell you a bundle though!)

    Question 2:  My current system is Intel-based.  Is there any advantage
    to going for a Ryzen-based system at the moment?

    Better cost / performance ratio at the moment. Intel are not doing as
    well in the desktop space as in the past. Their 13th/14th gen chips
    still seem to have a number of issues. (12th gen can actually be a more reliable bet at a lower price)

    I am not into the latest & greatest in gaming, so I have no interest in overclocking the thing into meltdown.

    Any interest in gaming? (i.e. do you need a dedicated graphics card, or
    are you happy with built in GPU on the CPU)

    --
    Cheers,

    John.

    /=================================================================\
    | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------|
    | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Paul on Mon Apr 14 09:54:12 2025
    Paul wrote:

    I've had two motherboard failures here, and the root cause wasnot caps.

    The only motherboard I've had (still have) that failed due to caps was
    the infamous Abit BP6

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Paul on Mon Apr 14 10:21:52 2025
    On 14/04/2025 09:31, Paul wrote:
    On Mon, 4/14/2025 3:30 AM, Jeff Layman wrote:

    Just over 10 years ago I bought a "Clearance" laptop from Novatech. At the time, their machines were rebadged Clevo laptops. The laptop I bought was half the price it would have been new about 12 - 18 months previously, and was very highly specced. It
    worked faultlessly for over 8 years until the HDD started playing up (I've since replaced it with an SSD after getting a new laptop, and it now works ok. However, it /is/ an old machine, so things like electrolytic capacitors might be getting a little
    dodgy). I wanted to replace the laptop with another Novatech, but they no longer used Clevo machines. So I looked elsewhere.

    Capacitors aren't that fragile.
    You have to antagonize them.

    Well no, they *are* that fragile. Especially the eletrolytic types.
    Remember that to get high capacitance the dielectric needs to be as thin
    as possible.
    In the case of an electrolytic it is a thin layer of generally aluminium
    oxide. Created by electrochemistry . If it starts to leak the eletrolyte
    can break down and off gas and distort the capacitor leading to a short
    or a popped case spewing corrosive material over the board

    It its a ceramic the ceramic can crack under shock load, or sometimes
    break enough to short the electrodes out.

    Blown caps are the most common failure mode for modern electronics
    followed by chip failures - usually due to overheating

    I've had two motherboard failures here, and the root cause was *not* caps.

    It was different during the capacitor plague. It was so bad then, a capacitor could fail in two years, while cold, and not under bias. The pH of the liquid inside was such, it just ate through the casing. I bought an Antec power supply,
    it sat on the shelf for two years (as a "spare"), and when I went to use it, it was behaving in an unstable manner. When I opened it for a look, the four +5V output caps were leaking and brown fluid was coming out the top on the vent lines (the metal is thinnest there).

    Today, a design can use Polymer caps (no fluid) or electrolytics.

    The electrolytic in my electric lawn mower, is 33 years old. It has
    not exploded, the can is intact, it's really quite amazing, in terms
    of service life. I got to check it, when I changed out the brushes.

    One swallow doesn't make a summer. Smaller higher capacitance devices
    are pushing the limits



    --
    WOKE is an acronym... Without Originality, Knowledge or Education.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Layman@21:1/5 to Paul on Mon Apr 14 10:15:32 2025
    On 14/04/2025 09:31, Paul wrote:
    On Mon, 4/14/2025 3:30 AM, Jeff Layman wrote:

    Just over 10 years ago I bought a "Clearance" laptop from Novatech. At the time, their machines were rebadged Clevo laptops. The laptop I bought was half the price it would have been new about 12 - 18 months previously, and was very highly specced. It
    worked faultlessly for over 8 years until the HDD started playing up (I've since replaced it with an SSD after getting a new laptop, and it now works ok. However, it /is/ an old machine, so things like electrolytic capacitors might be getting a little
    dodgy). I wanted to replace the laptop with another Novatech, but they no longer used Clevo machines. So I looked elsewhere.

    Capacitors aren't that fragile.
    You have to antagonize them.

    I've had two motherboard failures here, and the root cause was *not* caps.

    Well, I did say /might/. I don't know how old this Dell monitor was, but
    this thread is very recent: <http://al.howardknight.net/?STYPE=msgid&MSGI=%3C0921d12b5112cf38b75a1339eeb4abf3%40www.novabbs.com%3E>
    I can't see a date on the capacitors or anywhere else on the board.

    It was different during the capacitor plague.

    It was an awful time for manufacturers.

    The electrolytic in my electric lawn mower, is 33 years old. It has
    not exploded, the can is intact, it's really quite amazing, in terms
    of service life. I got to check it, when I changed out the brushes.

    Is it a start or run capacitor? They are intended for pretty tough
    service, but even then problems can occur: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motor_capacitor#Failure_modes>

    Clevo is an ODM, so just about everyone rebadges their stuff.
    They expect it to be rebadged. The Eurocom store near me,
    uses a lot of Clevo, and they put the Eurocom sticker on it.
    Clevo doesn't build battleships like it used to, the machines
    are losing weight, and whatever tactical advantage they had,
    is disappearing. You could have a laptop for example, with
    four SSDs in it. They don't do them exactly like that any more.
    The machines are toned down a bit. Can Clevo survive by making
    laptops that way ? I can't see this ending well. We want four
    SSDs, two MXM modules, and two wall adapters for power, like
    all good battleships. No one can steal your laptop, because
    it's too heavy. And some of those machines could cost 7000.
    To give you some idea how over the top they were. part of the
    price might be Quadro graphics (for CAD work).

    I was a bit disappointed with the new laptop, but I doubt it would have
    been different with any ODM (or OEM for that matter). The original
    laptop was intended for business, gaming, or any other use it could have
    been put to. It had an i5-3230M, 8GB ram, a Radeon HD 7970M video card, fingerprint reader, and the FireWire port. It /was/ (/is/!) built like a battleship, and the power brick even more so - it is rated at 180W!

    --
    Jeff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob Eager@21:1/5 to Sam Plusnet on Mon Apr 14 09:38:52 2025
    On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 00:41:06 +0100, Sam Plusnet wrote:

    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not run on
    'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly recent &
    decent.

    Having thought about it some more, I realise most of my PC dates from
    2016 so regardless of Microsoft's messing around, it is time for a
    refresh.

    I'm happy with the peripherals I have, so it's just the Motherboard/CPU/RAM/CPU Cooler that I want to replace. To make life
    easier, I want to buy a ready built & tested bundle.

    I am in the same situation, and in fact one of the three machines I have
    to upgrade has just died (CPU or motherboard) anyway.

    I will avoid the obligatory 'install Linux <pick distro of the moment>
    comment; that was useless for me as all three systems must run Windows for
    good technical reasons.

    I chose my own bundle using pangoly.com, which shows you options and
    (mostly) checks compatibility. Take a look.



    --
    My posts are my copyright and if @diy_forums or Home Owners' Hub
    wish to copy them they can pay me £1 a message.
    Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org
    *lightning surge protection* - a w_tom conductor

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Rumm@21:1/5 to Sam Plusnet on Mon Apr 14 10:43:04 2025
    On 14/04/2025 00:41, Sam Plusnet wrote:

    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not run on
    'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly recent & decent.

    There are a couple of ways round the hardware requirements for Win 11...
    Not necessarily things I would recommend for all users, but for home
    user prepared to take the less common path, might be worth considering.

    One example would be to run win 11 as a guest OS in a VM. Many of the hypervisors can emulate a TPM even if the host of the hypervisor does
    not have one. (if you currently have Win 10 pro, then Hyper-V is
    included and can be enabled. That is a type 1 "bare metal" hypervisor
    that introduces very little overhead). So you would use Win 10 only for
    the purposes of access so the Win 11 virtual machine.




    --
    Cheers,

    John.

    /=================================================================\
    | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------|
    | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From wasbit@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Mon Apr 14 10:53:47 2025
    On 14/04/2025 09:54, Andy Burns wrote:
    Paul wrote:

    I've had two motherboard failures here, and the root cause wasnot caps.

    The only motherboard I've had (still have) that failed due to caps was
    the infamous Abit BP6

    I had a router fail with bad caps. An Asus IIRC.
    Lost connectivity on 3 of the 4 ports in a period of several months.


    --
    Regards
    wasbit

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From wasbit@21:1/5 to Sam Plusnet on Mon Apr 14 10:59:00 2025
    On 14/04/2025 00:41, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not run on
    'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly recent & decent.

    Snip <

    Not strictly true.
    I'm triple booting windows 8.1/10/11 on ancient hardware.


    --
    Regards
    wasbit

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to John Rumm on Mon Apr 14 11:48:09 2025
    John Rumm <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 00:41, Sam Plusnet wrote:

    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not run on 'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly recent & decent.

    Having thought about it some more, I realise most of my PC dates from
    2016 so regardless of Microsoft's messing around, it is time for a refresh.

    I have had this conversation with quite a few customers recently, and
    have had to point out that yup it is a right pain that MS are forcing
    you to ditch a perfectly serviceable machine, but many of them are 10+
    years old, and they might actually be pleasantly surprised how much of
    an improvement in performance the new one will bring along with lower
    running costs.

    I'm happy with the peripherals I have, so it's just the Motherboard/CPU/ RAM/CPU Cooler that I want to replace.  To make life easier, I want to
    buy a ready built & tested bundle.

    OOI what peripherals are you referring to?

    You could just pick a motherboard that meets your needs, and then look
    at the makers hardware compatibility lists. Then just pick a RAM/CPU combination from the list, and you know that it is a tested combination
    that will work.

    It's also worth considering whether a change of form factor would make
    sense. eg now that primary storage is mostly M.2 NVMe SSDs rather than spinning hard drives, you only need find space for a half credit card sized
    PCB rather than an almost-VHS sized lump. If you don't need to house a
    lump, you can make the case much smaller.

    Also, laptop-class CPUs are often 'good enough' nowadays, and they use less power and so need less cooling, which means you can get away with a tiny heatsink and fan rather than a heatsink the size of a mug. That also allows the case to be smaller. Because they're lower power and the graphics may be good enough to not need a discrete GPU, you don't need a giant PSU you can
    run the whole system from a power brick. etc etc

    Once you go down this road, you might find you can pick up a whole mini PC
    for £200-300 which is the price of a mobo/CPU/RAM combo. Even less if
    you're prepared to consider a used ex-office mini PC.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to John Rumm on Mon Apr 14 06:29:00 2025
    On Mon, 4/14/2025 5:43 AM, John Rumm wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 00:41, Sam Plusnet wrote:

    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not run on 'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly recent & decent.

    There are a couple of ways round the hardware requirements for Win 11... Not necessarily things I would recommend for all users, but for home user prepared to take the less common path, might be worth considering.

    One example would be to run win 11 as a guest OS in a VM. Many of the hypervisors can emulate a TPM even if the host of the hypervisor does not have one. (if you currently have Win 10 pro, then Hyper-V is included and can be enabled. That is a type 1 "
    bare metal" hypervisor that introduces very little overhead). So you would use Win 10 only for the purposes of access so the Win 11 virtual machine.


    Example of a setup.

    The Guest RAM needs to be bumped up, to meet
    the new requirement for 16GB. But since the
    computer has no NPU (and VMs do not currently
    pass thru the NPU), the OS saves 8GB right there
    (does not have to host an 8GB AI file constantly),
    and should not need nearly that much RAM for a Guest.
    8GB (AI) + 2.6GB (Sandbox) + 5.4GB (Lowly User) = 16GB
    That's a rough allocation plan, plus or minus. The user
    is free to buy more memory than that for a host.

    [Picture]

    https://i.postimg.cc/brGrBhDx/W11-Guest-on-W11-Host.gif

    VMWare does TPM, via a TPM emulation called SWTPM.

    Whereas VirtualBox uses TPM passthru, and the Host has
    to have a TPM or fTPM to pass thru. And I could not
    get a machine with fTPM to work in pass thru mode (Virtualbox 7).
    and I don't know what's wrong with the setup. Whereas
    the VMWare just works.

    My monitor is pretty small for doing stuff like this.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Theo on Mon Apr 14 12:05:49 2025
    On 14/04/2025 11:48, Theo wrote:
    Once you go down this road, you might find you can pick up a whole mini PC for £200-300 which is the price of a mobo/CPU/RAM combo. Even less if you're prepared to consider a used ex-office mini PC.

    Yes indeed.

    Gone are the days of rolling upgrades to old PCs. You can pick up a win
    11 capable refurb in the £150-£300 price bracket ...unless you want
    gaming level performance old office out of warranty PCS are excellent value.

    In fact they are often cheaper than the CPU they contain.

    https://www.laptopsdirect.co.uk/refurbished-hp-elitedesk-800-g4-sff-core-i7-8th-gen-16gb-256gb-windows-11-p-t1-800g4i716gb256gbw11p/version.asp

    That's a nice chunky trad desktop with lots of ram ...and a reasonable
    SSD. Probably not NVMe but that's no big deal

    And it comes ready to go.


    --
    It is the folly of too many to mistake the echo of a London coffee-house
    for the voice of the kingdom.

    Jonathan Swift

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJH@21:1/5 to Theo on Mon Apr 14 11:12:30 2025
    On 14 Apr 2025 at 11:48:09 BST, Theo wrote:

    John Rumm <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 00:41, Sam Plusnet wrote:

    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not run on
    'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly recent & decent. >>>
    Having thought about it some more, I realise most of my PC dates from
    2016 so regardless of Microsoft's messing around, it is time for a refresh. >>
    I have had this conversation with quite a few customers recently, and
    have had to point out that yup it is a right pain that MS are forcing
    you to ditch a perfectly serviceable machine, but many of them are 10+
    years old, and they might actually be pleasantly surprised how much of
    an improvement in performance the new one will bring along with lower
    running costs.

    I'm happy with the peripherals I have, so it's just the Motherboard/CPU/ >>> RAM/CPU Cooler that I want to replace. To make life easier, I want to
    buy a ready built & tested bundle.

    OOI what peripherals are you referring to?

    You could just pick a motherboard that meets your needs, and then look
    at the makers hardware compatibility lists. Then just pick a RAM/CPU
    combination from the list, and you know that it is a tested combination
    that will work.

    It's also worth considering whether a change of form factor would make
    sense. eg now that primary storage is mostly M.2 NVMe SSDs rather than spinning hard drives, you only need find space for a half credit card sized PCB rather than an almost-VHS sized lump. If you don't need to house a
    lump, you can make the case much smaller.

    Also, laptop-class CPUs are often 'good enough' nowadays, and they use less power and so need less cooling, which means you can get away with a tiny heatsink and fan rather than a heatsink the size of a mug. That also allows the case to be smaller. Because they're lower power and the graphics may be good enough to not need a discrete GPU, you don't need a giant PSU you can run the whole system from a power brick. etc etc

    Once you go down this road, you might find you can pick up a whole mini PC for £200-300 which is the price of a mobo/CPU/RAM combo. Even less if you're prepared to consider a used ex-office mini PC.


    Going the other way price-wise, I've just bought a new Mac Mini - astonishing bit of kit for the size and price (£600, although quite easy to get discounts).

    --
    Cheers, Rob, Sheffield UK

    "My humble friend, we know not how to live this life which is so short yet seek one that never ends."
    -- Anatole France

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Pancho@21:1/5 to RJH on Mon Apr 14 12:59:57 2025
    On 4/14/25 12:12, RJH wrote:
    On 14 Apr 2025 at 11:48:09 BST, Theo wrote:


    Going the other way price-wise, I've just bought a new Mac Mini - astonishing bit of kit for the size and price (£600, although quite easy to get discounts).

    Secondhand Mac Mini M1 going for about £300. I would buy one if I
    thought I could get Linux to run on it.

    This kind of thread confuses me because I don't know what people want.
    Almost all modern PCs are fast enough for general use.

    The new Beelink N100/N150 W11 is cheap and fast enough for general use.
    An Orange Pi 5 is about the same speed, faster than my 10 year old Windows/Intel PC, which was still fast enough.

    The only reason I can see for building a PC would be if you have a
    specific use in mind, in which case it would be good to say up front,
    because it would affect the build requirements.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to RJH on Mon Apr 14 12:23:17 2025
    RJH <[email protected]> wrote:
    Going the other way price-wise, I've just bought a new Mac Mini - astonishing bit of kit for the size and price (£600, although quite easy to get discounts).

    Given the way MS have been abusing their customers, foisting things on them they don't want (forced-upgrades, removing features from W11 over W10, telemetry, adverts, AI, Recall, 'forgetting' that you disabled those things every time it updates, etc), that's not a bad option if you can stomach switching to a different platform. If the base 16GB RAM / 256GB storage
    isn't enough and you don't want to pay the Apple tax, there are now third
    party storage upgrades.

    Or switch to Linux, where there's no arbitrary CPU age cutoff.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Green@21:1/5 to Theo on Mon Apr 14 12:27:59 2025
    Theo <[email protected]> wrote:

    Once you go down this road, you might find you can pick up a whole mini PC for £200-300 which is the price of a mobo/CPU/RAM combo. Even less if you're prepared to consider a used ex-office mini PC.

    Yes, that's what I use as my 'desktop' machine now. I have a Fujitsu
    Esprimo Q957 bought refurbished from eBay for £142. I don't think
    it's quite up to Windows 11 but I'm sure similar later models will be.

    --
    Chris Green
    ·

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Theo on Mon Apr 14 14:10:16 2025
    On 14/04/2025 12:23, Theo wrote:
    RJH <[email protected]> wrote:
    Going the other way price-wise, I've just bought a new Mac Mini - astonishing
    bit of kit for the size and price (£600, although quite easy to get
    discounts).

    Given the way MS have been abusing their customers, foisting things on them they don't want (forced-upgrades, removing features from W11 over W10, telemetry, adverts, AI, Recall, 'forgetting' that you disabled those things every time it updates, etc), that's not a bad option if you can stomach switching to a different platform. If the base 16GB RAM / 256GB storage isn't enough and you don't want to pay the Apple tax, there are now third party storage upgrades.

    Or switch to Linux, where there's no arbitrary CPU age cutoff.

    Absolutely. 16GB ram 256GB storage is under £300 for quality refurbs ...running win11 or Linux ...And with 16GB RAM you can run Virtualbox
    for those must have windows programs..

    Does anybody actually *want* win 11?

    Theo

    --
    There is something fascinating about science. One gets such wholesale
    returns of conjecture out of such a trifling investment of fact.

    Mark Twain

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Pancho on Mon Apr 14 14:17:57 2025
    On 14/04/2025 12:59, Pancho wrote:
    On 4/14/25 12:12, RJH wrote:
    On 14 Apr 2025 at 11:48:09 BST, Theo wrote:


    Going the other way price-wise, I've just bought a new Mac Mini -
    astonishing
    bit of kit for the size and price (£600, although quite easy to get
    discounts).

    Secondhand Mac Mini M1 going for about £300. I would buy one if I
    thought I could get Linux to run on it.

    It will.

    This kind of thread confuses me because I don't know what people want.
    Almost all modern PCs are fast enough for general use.

    The new Beelink N100/N150 W11 is cheap and fast enough for general use.
    An Orange Pi 5 is about the same speed, faster than my 10 year old Windows/Intel PC, which was still fast enough.

    The only reason I can see for building a PC would be if you have a
    specific use in mind, in which case it would be good to say up front,
    because it would affect the build requirements.

    I always used to get a PC and keep upgrading it. But it's no longer
    worth it.

    The market is flooded with ex leased corporate PCs 2-5 years old that
    are unbelievable value for money.

    Contractually these are always bought in bulk without disks (they get
    crushed for security) and are therefore equipped with new SSDS and
    Windows 10/11

    The only reason to build a PC today is for a special usage - usually gaming

    If you just want a PC for normal stuff, buy refurbed ex leased kit.


    --
    There is something fascinating about science. One gets such wholesale
    returns of conjecture out of such a trifling investment of fact.

    Mark Twain

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to Chris Green on Mon Apr 14 15:45:53 2025
    Chris Green <[email protected]> wrote:
    Theo <[email protected]> wrote:

    Once you go down this road, you might find you can pick up a whole mini PC for £200-300 which is the price of a mobo/CPU/RAM combo. Even less if you're prepared to consider a used ex-office mini PC.

    Yes, that's what I use as my 'desktop' machine now. I have a Fujitsu
    Esprimo Q957 bought refurbished from eBay for £142. I don't think
    it's quite up to Windows 11 but I'm sure similar later models will be.

    Yes, look for machines that have at least an 8th gen Intel or a Ryzen 3000.

    If you're running Linux or Win10 (or prepared to run Win 11 unsupported),
    there are some very good deals on the 7th gen/2000 series machines which officially won't run Win 11 - they start at about £50 including RAM and SSD
    on ebay.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joe@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Mon Apr 14 16:07:27 2025
    On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 14:10:16 +0100
    The Natural Philosopher <[email protected]d> wrote:

    On 14/04/2025 12:23, Theo wrote:
    RJH <[email protected]> wrote:
    Going the other way price-wise, I've just bought a new Mac Mini -
    astonishing bit of kit for the size and price (£600, although
    quite easy to get discounts).

    Given the way MS have been abusing their customers, foisting things
    on them they don't want (forced-upgrades, removing features from
    W11 over W10, telemetry, adverts, AI, Recall, 'forgetting' that you disabled those things every time it updates, etc), that's not a bad
    option if you can stomach switching to a different platform. If
    the base 16GB RAM / 256GB storage isn't enough and you don't want
    to pay the Apple tax, there are now third party storage upgrades.

    Or switch to Linux, where there's no arbitrary CPU age cutoff.

    Absolutely. 16GB ram 256GB storage is under £300 for quality refurbs ...running win11 or Linux ...And with 16GB RAM you can run Virtualbox
    for those must have windows programs..

    Does anybody actually *want* win 11?


    I don't think anyone in business wanted anything after Win7, or maybe
    even XP. But just as most sharks have to keep swimming to breathe, MS
    has to keep pulling rabbits, or turkeys, out of the hat to stay in
    business.

    Office has been rented for some time, something that MS always wanted
    to do with all its software, so I suppose it's only a matter of time
    before Windows goes subscription-only, and they don't have to keep
    pretending to develop it. Newer and better applications will always
    happen, but in general the OS doesn't need 'a complete rewrite' (not
    that it really happens) every few years.

    Much of the change in Linux is due to having to keep up with hardware
    changes that new versions of Windows require the manufacturers to keep
    making. I still have a 32-bit netbook running the latest version of
    Debian, but that will be the last version with 386 code.

    --
    Joe

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Gaines@21:1/5 to Joe on Mon Apr 14 16:09:39 2025
    On 14/04/2025 in message
    <[email protected]> Joe wrote:

    Office has been rented for some time, something that MS always wanted
    to do with all its software, so I suppose it's only a matter of time
    before Windows goes subscription-only, and they don't have to keep
    pretending to develop it. Newer and better applications will always
    happen, but in general the OS doesn't need 'a complete rewrite' (not
    that it really happens) every few years.

    The problem for me is that the "rewrites" consist of obscuring things and taking useful functionality (like being able to download updates but
    waiting to be told to install them) away.

    Programs I wrote for Win98 still work in Windows 10, a sign the underlying
    API is still the same.

    --
    Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
    You know it's cold outside when you go outside and it's cold.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From No mail@21:1/5 to Sam Plusnet on Mon Apr 14 17:38:56 2025
    Sam Plusnet wrote:
    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not run on
    'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly recent & decent.

    Having thought about it some more, I realise most of my PC dates from
    2016 so regardless of Microsoft's messing around, it is time for a refresh.

    I'm happy with the peripherals I have, so it's just the Motherboard/CPU/RAM/CPU Cooler that I want to replace.  To make life
    easier, I want to buy a ready built & tested bundle.

    Last time around,I bought such a bundle from Novatech, and I was very
    happy with the result.  I might still buy from them, but their bundles
    get very expensive very quickly (e.g. a modest bundle is ~£300, the next
    is £740 and sharply up from there).

    Question:  Can anyone recommend other firms which offer such (built & tested) bundles, and are they good if/when things need attention?
    (I can recommend Novatech since they replaced my first bundle without a quibble when it suddenly died after a year of use.)

    Question 2:  My current system is Intel-based.  Is there any advantage
    to going for a Ryzen-based system at the moment?
    I am not into the latest & greatest in gaming, so I have no interest in overclocking the thing into meltdown.

    Consider whether you *need* a desktop machine. A re-furb laptop (from
    the likes of Tier1) will come with an in-built UPS ...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From GB@21:1/5 to No mail on Mon Apr 14 18:26:45 2025
    On 14/04/2025 17:38, No mail wrote:

    Consider whether you *need* a desktop machine. A re-furb laptop (from
    the likes of Tier1) will come with an in-built UPS ...


    The OP asked about a new mb for his desktop, but you can buy a quite
    capable N100 machine for £100, or so. That will run browsers, email,
    etc, which probably covers 90% of users.

    https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005006997281548.html

    There are codes around to get the price down a bit.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sam Plusnet@21:1/5 to Paul on Mon Apr 14 19:03:29 2025
    On 14/04/2025 05:39, Paul wrote:
    On Sun, 4/13/2025 7:41 PM, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not run on 'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly recent & decent.

    Having thought about it some more, I realise most of my PC dates from 2016 so regardless of Microsoft's messing around, it is time for a refresh.

    I'm happy with the peripherals I have, so it's just the Motherboard/CPU/RAM/CPU Cooler that I want to replace.  To make life easier, I want to buy a ready built & tested bundle.

    Last time around,I bought such a bundle from Novatech, and I was very happy with the result.  I might still buy from them, but their bundles get very expensive very quickly (e.g. a modest bundle is ~£300, the next is £740 and sharply up from there).

    Question:  Can anyone recommend other firms which offer such (built & tested) bundles, and are they good if/when things need attention?
    (I can recommend Novatech since they replaced my first bundle without a quibble when it suddenly died after a year of use.)

    Question 2:  My current system is Intel-based.  Is there any advantage to going for a Ryzen-based system at the moment?
    I am not into the latest & greatest in gaming, so I have no interest in overclocking the thing into meltdown.


    To give the folks a flavour of what you've got currently, give us a dump on your hardware.
    We can use this information, to give you a comparable system closer to what you've
    got, without going overboard on the shiny aspect.

    Using a different utility I already had loaded:

    Intel Core i7-6700K
    GIGABYTE Z170XP-SLI-CF
    16 GB RAM (2 off Kingston KHX2666C15D4/8G) @1333 MHz
    GPU NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB

    I have a mixture of drives. An M.2 SSD, a SATA SSD, and a few HDDs in
    this machine, which will mostly go into the new setup.


    --
    Sam Plusnet

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sam Plusnet@21:1/5 to Theo on Mon Apr 14 19:36:41 2025
    On 14/04/2025 15:45, Theo wrote:
    Chris Green <[email protected]> wrote:
    Theo <[email protected]> wrote:

    Once you go down this road, you might find you can pick up a whole mini PC >>> for £200-300 which is the price of a mobo/CPU/RAM combo. Even less if
    you're prepared to consider a used ex-office mini PC.

    Yes, that's what I use as my 'desktop' machine now. I have a Fujitsu
    Esprimo Q957 bought refurbished from eBay for £142. I don't think
    it's quite up to Windows 11 but I'm sure similar later models will be.

    Yes, look for machines that have at least an 8th gen Intel or a Ryzen 3000.

    If you're running Linux or Win10 (or prepared to run Win 11 unsupported), there are some very good deals on the 7th gen/2000 series machines which officially won't run Win 11 - they start at about £50 including RAM and SSD on ebay.

    There are plenty of refurbished machines[1] for sale which say they come
    with Win11 Pro.
    I _suspect_ a fair number of those do not meet the Win11 hardware
    requirements - but the sellers have installed that OS via one of the work-arounds.
    I wonder if those machines will be able to get later OS updates?

    [1] I was looking at a range of Dell Optiflex PCs


    --
    Sam Plusnet

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sam Plusnet@21:1/5 to Theo on Mon Apr 14 19:30:09 2025
    On 14/04/2025 11:48, Theo wrote:
    John Rumm <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 00:41, Sam Plusnet wrote:

    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not run on
    'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly recent & decent. >>>
    Having thought about it some more, I realise most of my PC dates from
    2016 so regardless of Microsoft's messing around, it is time for a refresh. >>
    I have had this conversation with quite a few customers recently, and
    have had to point out that yup it is a right pain that MS are forcing
    you to ditch a perfectly serviceable machine, but many of them are 10+
    years old, and they might actually be pleasantly surprised how much of
    an improvement in performance the new one will bring along with lower
    running costs.

    I'm happy with the peripherals I have, so it's just the Motherboard/CPU/ >>> RAM/CPU Cooler that I want to replace.  To make life easier, I want to
    buy a ready built & tested bundle.

    OOI what peripherals are you referring to?

    You could just pick a motherboard that meets your needs, and then look
    at the makers hardware compatibility lists. Then just pick a RAM/CPU
    combination from the list, and you know that it is a tested combination
    that will work.

    It's also worth considering whether a change of form factor would make
    sense. eg now that primary storage is mostly M.2 NVMe SSDs rather than spinning hard drives, you only need find space for a half credit card sized PCB rather than an almost-VHS sized lump. If you don't need to house a
    lump, you can make the case much smaller.

    True, but I have a decent full-sized case with plenty of space inside.
    It sits at the back of my desk behind the monitor so it isn't in the way.

    Also, laptop-class CPUs are often 'good enough' nowadays, and they use less power and so need less cooling, which means you can get away with a tiny heatsink and fan rather than a heatsink the size of a mug. That also allows the case to be smaller. Because they're lower power and the graphics may be good enough to not need a discrete GPU, you don't need a giant PSU you can run the whole system from a power brick. etc etc

    Once you go down this road, you might find you can pick up a whole mini PC for £200-300 which is the price of a mobo/CPU/RAM combo. Even less if you're prepared to consider a used ex-office mini PC.

    I have thought about one of the many Dell Optiflex machines which seem
    to dominate the second hand market, but I suspect I would end up
    replacing that fairly quickly - and I do dislike all the hassle involved
    in transferring my applications & data onto a new(er) setup.


    --
    Sam Plusnet

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sam Plusnet@21:1/5 to Bob Eager on Mon Apr 14 19:38:20 2025
    On 14/04/2025 10:38, Bob Eager wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 00:41:06 +0100, Sam Plusnet wrote:

    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not run on
    'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly recent &
    decent.

    Having thought about it some more, I realise most of my PC dates from
    2016 so regardless of Microsoft's messing around, it is time for a
    refresh.

    I'm happy with the peripherals I have, so it's just the
    Motherboard/CPU/RAM/CPU Cooler that I want to replace. To make life
    easier, I want to buy a ready built & tested bundle.

    I am in the same situation, and in fact one of the three machines I have
    to upgrade has just died (CPU or motherboard) anyway.

    I will avoid the obligatory 'install Linux <pick distro of the moment> comment; that was useless for me as all three systems must run Windows for good technical reasons.

    I chose my own bundle using pangoly.com, which shows you options and
    (mostly) checks compatibility. Take a look.

    Thanks for that. I hadn't heard of them, so this kind of information is exactly what I was looking for.

    --
    Sam Plusnet

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to Sam Plusnet on Mon Apr 14 19:44:15 2025
    Sam Plusnet <[email protected]> wrote:
    Using a different utility I already had loaded:

    Intel Core i7-6700K
    GIGABYTE Z170XP-SLI-CF
    16 GB RAM (2 off Kingston KHX2666C15D4/8G) @1333 MHz
    GPU NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB

    I have a mixture of drives. An M.2 SSD, a SATA SSD, and a few HDDs in
    this machine, which will mostly go into the new setup.

    That's a decent spec, and just missed the boat by a couple of years - it
    would be a shame to ditch it. Before you buy anything, I'd probably try the many hacks to install W11 'unofficially' - you could try it on a new
    secondary 240GB SSD for a few quid. Keep all your apps and data on the
    other drives. If it ever stops working you can revert to W10 and consider
    your options.

    Another option is to install Windows 10 LTSC, which gets you security
    updates and no W11 junk. Not sure how easy that is if you don't have a W10 Enterprise licence. I think LTSC 2021 gets updates until Jan 2027, the IoT version until 2032 - not sure of the differences.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sam Plusnet@21:1/5 to No mail on Mon Apr 14 19:45:41 2025
    On 14/04/2025 17:38, No mail wrote:
    Sam Plusnet wrote:
    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not run on
    'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly recent &
    decent.

    Having thought about it some more, I realise most of my PC dates from
    2016 so regardless of Microsoft's messing around, it is time for a
    refresh.

    I'm happy with the peripherals I have, so it's just the Motherboard/
    CPU/RAM/CPU Cooler that I want to replace.  To make life easier, I
    want to buy a ready built & tested bundle.

    Last time around,I bought such a bundle from Novatech, and I was very
    happy with the result.  I might still buy from them, but their bundles
    get very expensive very quickly (e.g. a modest bundle is ~£300, the
    next is £740 and sharply up from there).

    Question:  Can anyone recommend other firms which offer such (built &
    tested) bundles, and are they good if/when things need attention?
    (I can recommend Novatech since they replaced my first bundle without
    a quibble when it suddenly died after a year of use.)

    Question 2:  My current system is Intel-based.  Is there any advantage
    to going for a Ryzen-based system at the moment?
    I am not into the latest & greatest in gaming, so I have no interest
    in overclocking the thing into meltdown.

    Consider whether you *need* a desktop machine. A re-furb laptop (from
    the likes of Tier1) will come with an in-built UPS ...

    I have a laptop (2 actually)[1], but I can never get used to the tiny
    screen, lousy keyboard and... that touchpad experience - ugh!

    Yes, I could use an external keyboard and mouse - and maybe plug in an
    external monitor, but that takes me back to a desktop machine.

    [1] I generally buy refurbished Thinkpads.

    --
    Sam Plusnet

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sam Plusnet@21:1/5 to wasbit on Mon Apr 14 19:40:42 2025
    On 14/04/2025 10:59, wasbit wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 00:41, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not run on
    'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly recent &
    decent.

    Snip <

    Not strictly true.
    I'm triple booting windows 8.1/10/11 on ancient hardware.

    If you install Win11 via one of the published work-arounds, will you
    still get OS updates in future?

    --
    Sam Plusnet

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Rumm@21:1/5 to Sam Plusnet on Mon Apr 14 20:27:18 2025
    On 14/04/2025 19:40, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 10:59, wasbit wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 00:41, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not run on
    'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly recent &
    decent.

    Snip <

    Not strictly true.
    I'm triple booting windows 8.1/10/11 on ancient hardware.

    If you install Win11 via one of the published work-arounds, will you
    still get OS updates in future?

    It will probably get the patch Tuesday ones. It might not do the six
    monthly feature updates without more fiddling.

    I have a 6th gen i3 Intel NUC in the workshop - mainly used to play
    music or look at drawings etc. That has 11 pro on it, and it seems to be getting some updates at least. Not sure how long it will continue.



    --
    Cheers,

    John.

    /=================================================================\
    | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------|
    | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Rumm@21:1/5 to Joe on Mon Apr 14 20:19:16 2025
    On 14/04/2025 16:07, Joe wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 14:10:16 +0100
    The Natural Philosopher <[email protected]d> wrote:

    On 14/04/2025 12:23, Theo wrote:
    RJH <[email protected]> wrote:
    Going the other way price-wise, I've just bought a new Mac Mini -
    astonishing bit of kit for the size and price (£600, although
    quite easy to get discounts).

    Given the way MS have been abusing their customers, foisting things
    on them they don't want (forced-upgrades, removing features from
    W11 over W10, telemetry, adverts, AI, Recall, 'forgetting' that you
    disabled those things every time it updates, etc), that's not a bad
    option if you can stomach switching to a different platform. If
    the base 16GB RAM / 256GB storage isn't enough and you don't want
    to pay the Apple tax, there are now third party storage upgrades.

    Or switch to Linux, where there's no arbitrary CPU age cutoff.

    Absolutely. 16GB ram 256GB storage is under £300 for quality refurbs
    ...running win11 or Linux ...And with 16GB RAM you can run Virtualbox
    for those must have windows programs..

    Does anybody actually *want* win 11?


    I don't think anyone in business wanted anything after Win7, or maybe
    even XP. But just as most sharks have to keep swimming to breathe, MS
    has to keep pulling rabbits, or turkeys, out of the hat to stay in
    business.

    Less so these days - they have now moved to their customers being the
    product that they sell most of. They don't seem to care about selling
    windows as much as previously. (they fact that they leave the tools
    required to circumvent windows licensing hosted on github (which they
    own) is a bit of a clue).

    Office has been rented for some time, something that MS always wanted

    You can still buy normal licenses for office.

    to do with all its software, so I suppose it's only a matter of time
    before Windows goes subscription-only, and they don't have to keep
    pretending to develop it. Newer and better applications will always
    happen, but in general the OS doesn't need 'a complete rewrite' (not
    that it really happens) every few years.

    I expect their main goal is to reduce the cost and hassle of maintaining multiple forks of the OS.

    Much of the change in Linux is due to having to keep up with hardware
    changes that new versions of Windows require the manufacturers to keep making.

    Huh? Windows seems to be mostly following the hardware curve, not
    pushing it.

    I still have a 32-bit netbook running the latest version of
    Debian, but that will be the last version with 386 code.

    Well the 386 is 40 years old now!



    --
    Cheers,

    John.

    /=================================================================\
    | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------|
    | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Rumm@21:1/5 to Sam Plusnet on Mon Apr 14 20:38:07 2025
    On 14/04/2025 19:45, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 17:38, No mail wrote:
    Sam Plusnet wrote:
    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not run on
    'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly recent &
    decent.

    Having thought about it some more, I realise most of my PC dates from
    2016 so regardless of Microsoft's messing around, it is time for a
    refresh.

    I'm happy with the peripherals I have, so it's just the Motherboard/
    CPU/RAM/CPU Cooler that I want to replace.  To make life easier, I
    want to buy a ready built & tested bundle.

    Last time around,I bought such a bundle from Novatech, and I was very
    happy with the result.  I might still buy from them, but their
    bundles get very expensive very quickly (e.g. a modest bundle is
    ~£300, the next is £740 and sharply up from there).

    Question:  Can anyone recommend other firms which offer such (built &
    tested) bundles, and are they good if/when things need attention?
    (I can recommend Novatech since they replaced my first bundle without
    a quibble when it suddenly died after a year of use.)

    Question 2:  My current system is Intel-based.  Is there any
    advantage to going for a Ryzen-based system at the moment?
    I am not into the latest & greatest in gaming, so I have no interest
    in overclocking the thing into meltdown.

    Consider whether you *need* a desktop machine. A re-furb laptop (from
    the likes of Tier1) will come with an in-built UPS ...

    I have a laptop (2 actually)[1], but I can never get used to the tiny
    screen, lousy keyboard and... that touchpad experience - ugh!

    Yes, I could use an external keyboard and mouse - and maybe plug in an external monitor, but that takes me back to a desktop machine.

    It does, but you then have the option of taking it out and about on the
    rare occasions that might be useful.

    [1] I generally buy refurbished Thinkpads.

    Probably what i will replace my ageing 3rd gen i5 laptop with. I got
    caught out a while ago attempting to debug what seemed like an under
    performing 1 Gbps FTTC connection. While it could easily saturate its
    1Gbps ethernet, what it turned out it could not do, was run any of the broadband speed test web sites at much over 300Mbps - even when PPPTPed
    direct into the ONT.

    --
    Cheers,

    John.

    /=================================================================\
    | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------|
    | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Rumm@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 14 20:30:53 2025
    On 14/04/2025 18:26, GB wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 17:38, No mail wrote:

    Consider whether you *need* a desktop machine. A re-furb laptop (from
    the likes of Tier1) will come with an in-built UPS ...


    The OP asked about a new mb for his desktop, but you can buy a quite
    capable N100 machine for £100, or so.  That will run browsers, email,
    etc, which probably covers 90% of users.

    Them that can put up with pretty lame performance anyway! i5 / Ryzen 5
    would be a better starting point for a general purpose machine. The N100
    might be alright for a media (consumption) PC.



    --
    Cheers,

    John.

    /=================================================================\
    | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------|
    | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Wade@21:1/5 to Sam Plusnet on Mon Apr 14 20:33:48 2025
    On 14/04/2025 19:36, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 15:45, Theo wrote:
    Chris Green <[email protected]> wrote:
    Theo <[email protected]> wrote:

    Once you go down this road, you might find you can pick up a whole
    mini PC
    for £200-300 which is the price of a mobo/CPU/RAM combo.  Even less if >>>> you're prepared to consider a used ex-office mini PC.

    Yes, that's what I use as my 'desktop' machine now. I have a Fujitsu
    Esprimo Q957 bought refurbished from eBay for £142.  I don't think
    it's quite up to Windows 11 but I'm sure similar later models will be.

    Yes, look for machines that have at least an 8th gen Intel or a Ryzen
    3000.

    If you're running Linux or Win10 (or prepared to run Win 11 unsupported),
    there are some very good deals on the 7th gen/2000 series machines which
    officially won't run Win 11 - they start at about £50 including RAM
    and SSD
    on ebay.

    There are plenty of refurbished machines[1] for sale which say they come
    with Win11 Pro.
    I _suspect_ a fair number of those do not meet the Win11 hardware requirements - but the sellers have installed that OS via one of the work-arounds.
    I wonder if those machines will be able to get later OS updates?

    [1] I was looking at a range of Dell Optiflex PCs


    I thought that but having checked briefly and those coming from dealers
    appear to conform to the Win/11 requirements. I believe many of these
    have agreements with Microsoft, which they would break if they sold
    machines incompatible with the OS installed.

    For example Tier-1 only have Optiplex (not Optiflex) with Gen-8 I3/I5/I7
    CPUs which I think are the minium for Windows/11. I assume these will
    all have TPM 2. I note there are instructions on the Dell site for
    upgrading the TPM on some PCs.

    . on the other hand I see there are some Lenovo T470s on E-Bay with
    Windows/11 and its not supported on those machines...

    .. I suppose its Buyer Beware...

    Dave
    G4UGM

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Rumm@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Mon Apr 14 20:21:15 2025
    On 14/04/2025 14:17, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 12:59, Pancho wrote:
    On 4/14/25 12:12, RJH wrote:
    On 14 Apr 2025 at 11:48:09 BST, Theo wrote:


    Going the other way price-wise, I've just bought a new Mac Mini -
    astonishing
    bit of kit for the size and price (£600, although quite easy to get
    discounts).

    Secondhand Mac Mini M1 going for about £300. I would buy one if I
    thought I could get Linux to run on it.

    It will.

    This kind of thread confuses me because I don't know what people want.
    Almost all modern PCs are fast enough for general use.

    The new Beelink N100/N150 W11 is cheap and fast enough for general
    use. An Orange Pi 5 is about the same speed, faster than my 10 year
    old Windows/Intel PC, which was still fast enough.

    The only reason I can see for building a PC would be if you have a
    specific use in mind, in which case it would be good to say up front,
    because it would affect the build requirements.

    I always used to get a PC and keep upgrading it. But it's no longer
    worth it.

    The market is flooded with ex leased corporate PCs 2-5 years old that
    are unbelievable value for money.

    Contractually these are always bought in bulk without disks (they get
    crushed for security) and are therefore equipped with new SSDS and
    Windows 10/11

    The only reason to build a PC today is for a special usage - usually gaming

    or if you want a bit more oomph than the average corporate desk top box,
    say for video rendering, CAD, or hosting multiple VMs etc.

    --
    Cheers,

    John.

    /=================================================================\
    | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------|
    | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Gaines@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 14 21:08:20 2025
    On 14/04/2025 in message <R5cLP.92376$[email protected]> Sam Plusnet
    wrote:

    Using a different utility I already had loaded:

    Intel Core i7-6700K
    GIGABYTE Z170XP-SLI-CF
    16 GB RAM (2 off Kingston KHX2666C15D4/8G) @1333 MHz
    GPU NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB

    I have a mixture of drives. An M.2 SSD, a SATA SSD, and a few HDDs in
    this machine, which will mostly go into the new setup.

    The Z170 motherboards are one of the best, I have 4 x PCs with the Asus versions. They are from the Win 8 era and run it very well. Mine are all
    set up (via the BIOS) so they won't run Win 11.

    --
    Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
    Every day is a good day for chicken, unless you're a chicken.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Gaines@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Mon Apr 14 21:14:25 2025
    On 14/04/2025 in message <vtjggl$1n0pc$[email protected]> GB wrote:

    On 14/04/2025 17:38, No mail wrote:

    Consider whether you need a desktop machine. A re-furb laptop (from the >>likes of Tier1) will come with an in-built UPS ...


    The OP asked about a new mb for his desktop, but you can buy a quite
    capable N100 machine for £100, or so. That will run browsers, email,
    etc, which probably covers 90% of users.

    https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005006997281548.html

    There are codes around to get the price down a bit.

    You almost have to buy one for that price :-)

    --
    Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
    Are you confused about gender?
    Try milking a bull, you'll learn real quick.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Gaines@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 14 21:17:16 2025
    On 14/04/2025 in message <pJcLP.38435$[email protected]> Sam Plusnet
    wrote:

    Consider whether you need a desktop machine. A re-furb laptop (from the >>likes of Tier1) will come with an in-built UPS ...

    I have a laptop (2 actually)[1], but I can never get used to the tiny
    screen, lousy keyboard and... that touchpad experience - ugh!

    Yes, I could use an external keyboard and mouse - and maybe plug in an >external monitor, but that takes me back to a desktop machine.

    [1] I generally buy refurbished Thinkpads.

    I have 2 x Lenovo V17 both bought when they were previous generation for
    about £600 each new with 17" screens.

    --
    Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
    I was standing in the park wondering why Frisbees got bigger as they get closer.
    Then it hit me.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Pancho@21:1/5 to John Rumm on Mon Apr 14 22:34:22 2025
    On 4/14/25 20:30, John Rumm wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 18:26, GB wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 17:38, No mail wrote:

    Consider whether you *need* a desktop machine. A re-furb laptop (from
    the likes of Tier1) will come with an in-built UPS ...


    The OP asked about a new mb for his desktop, but you can buy a quite
    capable N100 machine for £100, or so.  That will run browsers, email,
    etc, which probably covers 90% of users.

    Them that can put up with pretty lame performance anyway! i5 / Ryzen 5
    would be a better starting point for a general purpose machine. The N100 might be alright for a media (consumption) PC.



    Where do you think this lame performance manifests itself, on a general
    purpose machine?

    What activities benefit from the Ryzen 5?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sam Plusnet@21:1/5 to John Rumm on Mon Apr 14 22:46:36 2025
    On 14/04/2025 20:38, John Rumm wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 19:45, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 17:38, No mail wrote:
    Sam Plusnet wrote:
    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not run
    on 'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly recent
    & decent.

    Having thought about it some more, I realise most of my PC dates
    from 2016 so regardless of Microsoft's messing around, it is time
    for a refresh.

    I'm happy with the peripherals I have, so it's just the Motherboard/
    CPU/RAM/CPU Cooler that I want to replace.  To make life easier, I
    want to buy a ready built & tested bundle.

    Last time around,I bought such a bundle from Novatech, and I was
    very happy with the result.  I might still buy from them, but their
    bundles get very expensive very quickly (e.g. a modest bundle is
    ~£300, the next is £740 and sharply up from there).

    Question:  Can anyone recommend other firms which offer such (built
    & tested) bundles, and are they good if/when things need attention?
    (I can recommend Novatech since they replaced my first bundle
    without a quibble when it suddenly died after a year of use.)

    Question 2:  My current system is Intel-based.  Is there any
    advantage to going for a Ryzen-based system at the moment?
    I am not into the latest & greatest in gaming, so I have no interest
    in overclocking the thing into meltdown.

    Consider whether you *need* a desktop machine. A re-furb laptop (from
    the likes of Tier1) will come with an in-built UPS ...

    I have a laptop (2 actually)[1], but I can never get used to the tiny
    screen, lousy keyboard and... that touchpad experience - ugh!

    Yes, I could use an external keyboard and mouse - and maybe plug in an
    external monitor, but that takes me back to a desktop machine.

    It does, but you then have the option of taking it out and about on the
    rare occasions that might be useful.

    [1] I generally buy refurbished Thinkpads.

    Probably what i will replace my ageing 3rd gen i5 laptop with. I got
    caught out a while ago attempting to debug what seemed like an under performing 1 Gbps FTTC connection. While it could easily saturate its
    1Gbps ethernet, what it turned out it could not do, was run any of the broadband speed test web sites at much over 300Mbps - even when PPPTPed direct into the ONT.

    Connections with that sort of speed remain strictly science fiction in
    this house.

    --
    Sam Plusnet

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to wasbit on Mon Apr 14 17:48:47 2025
    On Mon, 4/14/2025 5:59 AM, wasbit wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 00:41, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not run on 'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly recent & decent.

    Snip <

    Not strictly true.
    I'm triple booting windows 8.1/10/11 on ancient hardware.

    I think the reference is to "being ready for whatever whim
    Microsoft has next".

    The NPU situation seems not all that good on desktops. Almost
    like the add-on video card will be tasked with inference (the best
    video card can do 1000 TOPs). The software is not nearly ready,
    for supporting AI tasks on all your hardware. Not even close.
    (They've actually been working on that for *four* years.)

    One AMD desktop product claimed to have an NPU, but the TOPs value was so
    low, I couldn't find an actual spec for it. Which means it
    was a 10 or a 13, and not a 50 TOPS NPU. There are laptop
    processors that meet the Microsoft TOPS spec. The purpose of an
    NPU in a laptop, was supposed to be a lower power way of supporting
    the little tasks for AI (OCR, voice recognition, image sharpen).

    The following selected for a slice of mid-range pricing.
    It's just an attempt at a slice, not driven by requirements.

    https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/sku/241674/intel-core-ultra-5-processor-235-24m-cache-up-to-5-00-ghz/specifications.html

    Performance-cores 6
    Efficient-cores 8
    Total Threads 14 (no hyperthreading)
    Max Turbo Frequency 5 GHz

    NPU Peak TOPS (Int8) 13

    Processor Base Power 65 W

    https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/sku/236799/intel-core-i5-processor-14600k-24m-cache-up-to-5-30-ghz/specifications.html

    Performance-cores 6
    Efficient-cores 8
    Total Threads 20 (hyperthreading)
    Max Turbo Frequency 5.3 GHz

    NPU Peak TOPS (Int8) 0

    Processor Base Power 125 W

    https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/desktops/ryzen/9000-series/amd-ryzen-7-9700x.html

    Performance-cores 8

    Total Threads 16 (hyperthreading)
    Max Turbo Frequency 5.5 GHz

    NPU Peak TOPS (Int8) 0

    Processor Base Power 65 W

    As the price goes up, the solution space changes. It's hard to
    say how much ordinary applications benefit from huge L3. Some
    of the AMD processors are good at gaming, because of their L3.
    The only thing I've ever seen that goes faster with cache,
    was 7ZIP compression (large dictionary).

    The power numbers tend to be meaningless, as the turbo value
    can be quite a bit higher than the listed numbers. All that
    the listed numbers can be used for is a "class" indication.
    A 65W can be cooled with an in-box cooler. A higher base power
    than that, the heatsink can get pretty big, to bring the
    closed loop temperature control to heel. I had to toss a 150W
    cooler, because the software was reporting 90C fake spikes,
    and I wasn't about to leave it like that. A 250W cooler made it
    behave. The lower power cooler wasn't wasted - it's on my daily
    driver 65W CPU (8 cores).

    My high power processor, runs turbo forever. It is not
    limited to 28 seconds or 56 seconds. But the processor
    also has a power limit, and the clock frequency comes down
    to cause the power to meet the power envelope. So while
    it's doing its best, it isn't all that impressive. It will
    definitely runs 5GHz on one core, which is what we want for
    a Microsoft desktop. On 16 cores it runs 4.4Ghz (and sucks
    down ~200W). It finishes Windows Update a little faster
    than the other machine :-/ But not by much. Yes, there is
    currently some fan noise.

    [Picture]

    https://i.postimg.cc/N0Q5VDM0/colourful-computer-crap.jpg

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From wasbit@21:1/5 to Sam Plusnet on Tue Apr 15 10:07:48 2025
    On 14/04/2025 19:40, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 10:59, wasbit wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 00:41, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not run on
    'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly recent &
    decent.

    Snip <

    Not strictly true.
    I'm triple booting windows 8.1/10/11 on ancient hardware.

    If you install Win11 via one of the published work-arounds, will you
    still get OS updates in future?


    Who knows? It's up to the vagaries of Microsoft.

    I should also say that it is installed as a technical exercise & for familiarity. There is no personal information on there.


    --
    Regards
    wasbit

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From wasbit@21:1/5 to Sam Plusnet on Tue Apr 15 09:54:08 2025
    On 14/04/2025 19:30, Sam Plusnet wrote:

    snip <

    I have thought about one of the many Dell Optiflex machines which seem
    to dominate the second hand market, but I suspect I would end up
    replacing that fairly quickly - and I do dislike all the hassle involved
    in transferring my applications & data onto a new(er) setup.

    There are a number of free programmes that say that they can do that but
    I have never tried any of them for this purpose.

    Clonezilla - http://clonezilla.org
    Disk Genius Free (was Partition Guru - also Portable 32/64bit)- https://www.diskgenius.com/download.php
    Hasleo Disk Clone - https://www.easyuefi.com/disk-clone/disk-clone-home.html Macrium Reflect - https://www.softpedia.com/get/System/Back-Up-and-Recovery/Macrium-Reflect-Free-Edition.shtml

    NB: Acronis True Image, Paragon Drive Copy need the non freeware versions.


    --
    Regards
    wasbit

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim Streater@21:1/5 to wasbit on Tue Apr 15 09:30:24 2025
    On 15 Apr 2025 at 10:07:48 BST, "wasbit" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 14/04/2025 19:40, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 10:59, wasbit wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 00:41, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not run on
    'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly recent &
    decent.

    Snip <> Not strictly true.
    I'm triple booting windows 8.1/10/11 on ancient hardware.

    If you install Win11 via one of the published work-arounds, will you
    still get OS updates in future?


    Who knows? It's up to the vagaries of Microsoft.

    I should also say that it is installed as a technical exercise & for familiarity. There is no personal information on there.

    Win-11 runs nicely in a VirtualBox VM on my Mac Mini.

    It's the first Win OS that I remember, that has decent fonts instead of all
    the dotty ones. So it even looks nice.

    --
    "Once you adopt the unix paradigm, the variants cease to be a problem - you bitch, of course, but that's because bitching is fun, unlike M$ OS's, where bitching is required to keep your head from exploding." - S Stremler in afc

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Pancho@21:1/5 to wasbit on Tue Apr 15 10:27:45 2025
    On 4/15/25 09:54, wasbit wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 19:30, Sam Plusnet wrote:

    snip <

    I have thought about one of the many Dell Optiflex machines which seem
    to dominate the second hand market, but I suspect I would end up
    replacing that fairly quickly - and I do dislike all the hassle
    involved in transferring my applications & data onto a new(er) setup.

    There are a number of free programmes that say that they can do that but
    I have never tried any of them for this purpose.

    Clonezilla - http://clonezilla.org
    Disk Genius Free (was Partition Guru - also Portable 32/64bit)- https:// www.diskgenius.com/download.php
    Hasleo Disk Clone - https://www.easyuefi.com/disk-clone/disk-clone-
    home.html
    Macrium Reflect - https://www.softpedia.com/get/System/Back-Up-and- Recovery/Macrium-Reflect-Free-Edition.shtml

    NB: Acronis True Image, Paragon Drive Copy need the non freeware versions.


    I put a W10 SDD, from a scrapped desktop, into an old laptop that had previously failed W10 upgrade compatibility. Everything just worked. I
    hadn't expected it to, but it did. None of the old hardware specific
    driver installation. The only thing I needed to do was get a W10 licence.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Sam Plusnet on Tue Apr 15 11:24:21 2025
    On 14/04/2025 19:30, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    I do dislike all the hassle involved in transferring my applications &
    data onto a new(er) setup.
    Well put the data on a server or something - or a usb drive. Or install
    the old data disk in the new computer etc.

    --
    The theory of Communism may be summed up in one sentence: Abolish all
    private property.

    Karl Marx

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Jeff Gaines on Tue Apr 15 11:32:28 2025
    On 14/04/2025 22:14, Jeff Gaines wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 in message <vtjggl$1n0pc$[email protected]> GB wrote:

    On 14/04/2025 17:38, No mail wrote:

    Consider whether you need a desktop machine. A re-furb laptop (from
    the likes of Tier1) will come with an in-built UPS ...


    The OP asked about a new mb for his desktop, but you can buy a quite
    capable N100 machine for £100, or so.  That will run browsers, email,
    etc, which probably covers 90% of users.

    https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005006997281548.html

    There are codes around to get the price down a bit.

    You almost have to buy one for that price :-)

    Bugger. I paid 9.60 for these two days ago

    https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005008120181701.html

    (Cut down raspberry pi PICO)


    --
    “But what a weak barrier is truth when it stands in the way of an hypothesis!”

    Mary Wollstonecraft

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim Streater@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Tue Apr 15 11:07:52 2025
    On 15 Apr 2025 at 11:34:34 BST, "The Natural Philosopher"
    <[email protected]d> wrote:

    On 14/04/2025 22:46, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    an under performing 1 Gbps FTTC connection.

    FTTC is not capable of more tnan around 80Mps

    Depends just where the cab is, I suppose. Here is about a quarter of a mile down the road and its copper from there. Much better than copper to the next village, however, as it used to be.

    --
    When I saw how the European Union was developing, it was very obvious what they had in mind was not democratic. In Britain you vote for a government so the government has to listen to you, and if you don't like it you can change it.

    Tony Benn

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Sam Plusnet on Tue Apr 15 11:34:34 2025
    On 14/04/2025 22:46, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    an under performing 1 Gbps FTTC connection.

    FTTC is not capable of more tnan around 80Mps


    --
    "When one man dies it's a tragedy. When thousands die it's statistics."

    Josef Stalin

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Tim Streater on Tue Apr 15 12:37:59 2025
    On 15/04/2025 12:07, Tim Streater wrote:
    On 15 Apr 2025 at 11:34:34 BST, "The Natural Philosopher" <[email protected]d> wrote:

    On 14/04/2025 22:46, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    an under performing 1 Gbps FTTC connection.

    FTTC is not capable of more tnan around 80Mps

    Depends just where the cab is, I suppose. Here is about a quarter of a mile down the road and its copper from there. Much better than copper to the next village, however, as it used to be.

    1/4 mile of copper with VDSL is at best 70Mbps

    https://www.increasebroadbandspeed.co.uk/chart-of-bt-fttc-vdsl2-speed-against-distance-from-the-cabinet

    Even gigabit Ethernet can only do about 300meters


    --
    WOKE is an acronym... Without Originality, Knowledge or Education.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Rumm@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Tue Apr 15 12:56:09 2025
    On 15/04/2025 11:34, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 22:46, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    an under performing 1 Gbps FTTC connection.

    Sorry my typo - FTTP


     FTTC is not capable of more tnan around 80Mps

    Actually it can go to about 140 on SoGEA lines (i.e. VDSL without POTS)


    --
    Cheers,

    John.

    /=================================================================\
    | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------|
    | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Rumm@21:1/5 to Pancho on Tue Apr 15 12:53:39 2025
    On 14/04/2025 22:34, Pancho wrote:
    On 4/14/25 20:30, John Rumm wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 18:26, GB wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 17:38, No mail wrote:

    Consider whether you *need* a desktop machine. A re-furb laptop
    (from the likes of Tier1) will come with an in-built UPS ...


    The OP asked about a new mb for his desktop, but you can buy a quite
    capable N100 machine for £100, or so.  That will run browsers, email,
    etc, which probably covers 90% of users.

    Them that can put up with pretty lame performance anyway! i5 / Ryzen 5
    would be a better starting point for a general purpose machine. The
    N100 might be alright for a media (consumption) PC.



    Where do you think this lame performance manifests itself, on a general purpose machine?

    Comparatively sluggish response and general lacklustre performance. Poor experience with VMs or any CPU intensive task like transcoding/rendering
    video.

    If you are used to using low end machines, then you might be ok with it.
    If you are more used to a reasonable business spec machine then a low
    end CPU will feel like a very poor relation.

    What activities benefit from the Ryzen 5?

    Less of the above!

    --
    Cheers,

    John.

    /=================================================================\
    | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------|
    | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to John Rumm on Tue Apr 15 15:25:09 2025
    John Rumm <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 15/04/2025 11:34, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 22:46, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    an under performing 1 Gbps FTTC connection.

    Sorry my typo - FTTP


     FTTC is not capable of more tnan around 80Mps

    Actually it can go to about 140 on SoGEA lines (i.e. VDSL without POTS)

    Are Openreach offering >80Mbps profiles? My line is around 76Mbps (Huawei cabinet, Broadcom modem) so I think it could go higher if a higher speed profile was available.

    Deutsche Telekom will sell you 250Mbps VDSL. For a time BT would sell you 300Mbps G.FAST which is like having VDSL with the cabinet at the top of your pole, although I think the access layer is different (TDD not FDD).

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Tim Streater on Tue Apr 15 16:49:58 2025
    Tim Streater wrote:

    The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    FTTC is not capable of more tnan around 80Mps

    Depends just where the cab is, I suppose. Here is about a quarter of a mile down the road
    When I was the only person in the street who had FTTC, my router
    estimated it could achieve 100 Mbps down and 30 Mbps up, but BT's 17a
    profile won't allow faster than 80/20, so that's what I got.

    Now (different router) with lots of the street using FTTC (some have
    moved to virgin FTTP) I still get the full 80/20, but with lower
    estimated max achievable.

    Downstream Upstream
    Actual Rate 79990 Kbps 19999 Kbps
    Attainable Rate 84642 Kbps 25238 Kbps

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Theo on Tue Apr 15 16:56:01 2025
    Theo wrote:

    John Rumm wrote:
    The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    FTTC is not capable of more tnan around 80Mps

    Actually it can go to about 140 on SoGEA lines (i.e. VDSL without POTS)

    Are Openreach offering >80Mbps profiles?
    My speed didn't budge when I switched to SoGEA, didn't think openreach
    used profile 35b due to interference? Might be nice if the offered it
    after POTS finally dies in 2027?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Sam Plusnet on Tue Apr 15 16:44:19 2025
    On 14/04/2025 00:41, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not run on
    'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly recent & decent.

    Having thought about it some more, I realise most of my PC dates from
    2016 so regardless of Microsoft's messing around, it is time for a refresh.

    I'm happy with the peripherals I have, so it's just the Motherboard/CPU/RAM/CPU Cooler that I want to replace.  To make life
    easier, I want to buy a ready built & tested bundle.

    Last time around,I bought such a bundle from Novatech, and I was very
    happy with the result.  I might still buy from them, but their bundles
    get very expensive very quickly (e.g. a modest bundle is ~£300, the next
    is £740 and sharply up from there).

    Snap.

    My Novatech 'bundle' dates back to 2011 with 4Gb ram and
    6-core AMD something running Win 10 Pro/32 which is now getting
    a bit slow, but OK for emails and general browsing. The power
    supply dates back to 2006 :-)

    Lightroom V3.6 is still running but struggles sometimes,

    *BUT*, it has a Firewire I/F which I still need for my
    expensive Nikon Coolscan slide scanner which I am reluctant
    to part with.

    What next, after October 2025 ?.

    The Nikon scan software only ever ran on windows and Apple
    Macs <= 2008, so Linux is presumably out of the running. Moving
    to new hardware is not straightforward because of the limited
    options for firewire (but I have posted this before and people
    have pointed out the availability of pcie firewire boards. I
    suspect I will have to go down the apple mac mini route + adapters
    but only as a last resort since it still needs software to run
    an obsolete scanner.

    There are 3rd party Windows scanner software packages that still
    target my scanner, like Silverfast but I tried that as a demo download
    and it was complicated to learn.

    Andrew

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Tim Streater on Tue Apr 15 16:56:07 2025
    On 15/04/2025 10:30, Tim Streater wrote:
    On 15 Apr 2025 at 10:07:48 BST, "wasbit" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 14/04/2025 19:40, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 10:59, wasbit wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 00:41, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not run on >>>>> 'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly recent &
    decent.

    Snip <> Not strictly true.
    I'm triple booting windows 8.1/10/11 on ancient hardware.

    If you install Win11 via one of the published work-arounds, will you
    still get OS updates in future?


    Who knows? It's up to the vagaries of Microsoft.

    I should also say that it is installed as a technical exercise & for
    familiarity. There is no personal information on there.

    Win-11 runs nicely in a VirtualBox VM on my Mac Mini.

    It's the first Win OS that I remember, that has decent fonts instead of all the dotty ones. So it even looks nice.


    Interesting.

    If the official apple adapters were use to end up with a
    firewire I/F, I wonder if the Win-11 image would be able to
    connect to my Nikon scanner via those adapters.

    Which mac mini is it, and how much ram is needed ?.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nick Finnigan@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Tue Apr 15 17:41:50 2025
    On 15/04/2025 16:56, Andy Burns wrote:
    Theo wrote:

    John Rumm wrote:
    The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    FTTC is not capable of more tnan around 80Mps

    Actually it can go to about 140 on SoGEA lines (i.e. VDSL without POTS)

    Are Openreach offering >80Mbps profiles?
    My speed didn't budge when I switched to SoGEA, didn't think openreach used profile 35b due to interference?  Might be nice if the offered it after
    POTS finally dies in 2027?

    Mine did: 28 with POTS, which fits with the graph for 1km from the
    cabinet; now seeing 48.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Andrew on Tue Apr 15 18:08:30 2025
    On 15/04/2025 16:44, Andrew wrote:
    The Nikon scan software only ever ran on windows and Apple
    Macs <= 2008, so Linux is presumably out of the running.
    Not necessarily


    Vuescan should work on all platforms. Its a free download. Try it on
    windows first, if it works there it will work on Linux.



    --
    Climate Change: Socialism wearing a lab coat.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Tue Apr 15 18:50:35 2025
    On 15/04/2025 18:08, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 15/04/2025 16:44, Andrew wrote:
    The Nikon scan software only ever ran on windows and Apple
    Macs <= 2008, so Linux is presumably out of the running.
    Not necessarily


    Vuescan should work on all platforms. Its a free download. Try it on
    windows first, if it works there it will work on Linux.


    Update. Its not free if you want all features, including slide scanning :(



    --
    The biggest threat to humanity comes from socialism, which has utterly
    diverted our attention away from what really matters to our existential survival, to indulging in navel gazing and faux moral investigations
    into what the world ought to be, whilst we fail utterly to deal with
    what it actually is.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Rumm@21:1/5 to Theo on Tue Apr 15 18:24:44 2025
    On 15/04/2025 15:25, Theo wrote:
    John Rumm <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 15/04/2025 11:34, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 22:46, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    an under performing 1 Gbps FTTC connection.

    Sorry my typo - FTTP


     FTTC is not capable of more tnan around 80Mps

    Actually it can go to about 140 on SoGEA lines (i.e. VDSL without POTS)

    Are Openreach offering >80Mbps profiles? My line is around 76Mbps (Huawei cabinet, Broadcom modem) so I think it could go higher if a higher speed profile was available.

    It seems that they are but typically only on FTTC SoGEA connections.

    Deutsche Telekom will sell you 250Mbps VDSL. For a time BT would sell you 300Mbps G.FAST which is like having VDSL with the cabinet at the top of your pole, although I think the access layer is different (TDD not FDD).

    Yup Gfast goes quicker, although I have not seen more than about 160Mbps
    so far.

    This setup has a pair of normal lines from the cab about 100m away. One
    was upgraded to GFast, but the other is ali cable, and so is not up to it!

    https://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php/File:FTTCGFastStats.png

    (a setup with load balanced dual WAN, one ordinary FTTC, and one GFast)

    --
    Cheers,

    John.

    /=================================================================\
    | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------|
    | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sam Plusnet@21:1/5 to Tim Streater on Tue Apr 15 20:33:10 2025
    On 15/04/2025 10:30, Tim Streater wrote:
    On 15 Apr 2025 at 10:07:48 BST, "wasbit" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 14/04/2025 19:40, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 10:59, wasbit wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 00:41, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not run on >>>>> 'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly recent &
    decent.

    Snip <> Not strictly true.
    I'm triple booting windows 8.1/10/11 on ancient hardware.

    If you install Win11 via one of the published work-arounds, will you
    still get OS updates in future?


    Who knows? It's up to the vagaries of Microsoft.

    I should also say that it is installed as a technical exercise & for
    familiarity. There is no personal information on there.

    Win-11 runs nicely in a VirtualBox VM on my Mac Mini.

    It's the first Win OS that I remember, that has decent fonts instead of all the dotty ones. So it even looks nice.

    Mention of dotty fonts brought back memories of my first (dot matrix)
    printer. Cost me a fortune and didn't even do proper descenders (only 7
    pin).

    --
    Sam Plusnet

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sam Plusnet@21:1/5 to wasbit on Tue Apr 15 20:29:42 2025
    On 15/04/2025 09:54, wasbit wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 19:30, Sam Plusnet wrote:

    snip <

    I have thought about one of the many Dell Optiflex machines which seem
    to dominate the second hand market, but I suspect I would end up
    replacing that fairly quickly - and I do dislike all the hassle
    involved in transferring my applications & data onto a new(er) setup.

    There are a number of free programmes that say that they can do that but
    I have never tried any of them for this purpose.

    Clonezilla - http://clonezilla.org
    Disk Genius Free (was Partition Guru - also Portable 32/64bit)- https:// www.diskgenius.com/download.php
    Hasleo Disk Clone - https://www.easyuefi.com/disk-clone/disk-clone-
    home.html
    Macrium Reflect - https://www.softpedia.com/get/System/Back-Up-and- Recovery/Macrium-Reflect-Free-Edition.shtml

    NB: Acronis True Image, Paragon Drive Copy need the non freeware versions.


    If I set up a new machine, I would want to do a clean install and then gradually move things over on to it. I have "apps"[1] and data
    scattered around on 5 HDDs & SSDs - some of which I haven't used in more
    than a decade, so a lot of housekeeping really ought to be done.
    It's that housekeeping which I regard as a hassle.

    [1] In the broadest sense of the term.

    --
    Sam Plusnet

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to Andrew on Tue Apr 15 21:07:04 2025
    Andrew <[email protected]> wrote:
    Interesting.

    If the official apple adapters were use to end up with a
    firewire I/F, I wonder if the Win-11 image would be able to
    connect to my Nikon scanner via those adapters.

    The Firewire interface shows up as a PCIe device, so if Virtualbox on Mac
    will let you do PCIe passthrough then it might.

    Which mac mini is it, and how much ram is needed ?.

    Another option is just to buy an old Intel Mac Mini with onboard Firewire
    and then install Windows on it. I think they may have only supported Win7 natively but it may be possible to upgrade it through 10 to 11.

    The last Mini with native FW was the Late 2012 and people have got W11
    working on 2011s/2012s. They start at about £40-50 on ebay.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From GB@21:1/5 to John Rumm on Tue Apr 15 21:13:19 2025
    On 15/04/2025 12:53, John Rumm wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 22:34, Pancho wrote:
    On 4/14/25 20:30, John Rumm wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 18:26, GB wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 17:38, No mail wrote:

    Consider whether you *need* a desktop machine. A re-furb laptop
    (from the likes of Tier1) will come with an in-built UPS ...


    The OP asked about a new mb for his desktop, but you can buy a quite
    capable N100 machine for £100, or so.  That will run browsers,
    email, etc, which probably covers 90% of users.

    Them that can put up with pretty lame performance anyway! i5 / Ryzen
    5 would be a better starting point for a general purpose machine. The
    N100 might be alright for a media (consumption) PC.



    Where do you think this lame performance manifests itself, on a
    general purpose machine?

    Comparatively sluggish response and general lacklustre performance. Poor experience with VMs or any CPU intensive task like transcoding/rendering video.

    I agree with you, for those tasks.

    I bought an N100 machine, and for a bit of light word processing and
    browsing, it's not really slower than my current desktop (i7). The N100
    uses far less electricity.




    If you are used to using low end machines, then you might be ok with it.
    If you are more used to a reasonable business spec machine then a low
    end CPU will feel like a very poor relation.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to Nick Finnigan on Tue Apr 15 21:14:04 2025
    Nick Finnigan <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 15/04/2025 16:56, Andy Burns wrote:
    Theo wrote:

    John Rumm wrote:
    The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    FTTC is not capable of more tnan around 80Mps

    Actually it can go to about 140 on SoGEA lines (i.e. VDSL without POTS) >>
    Are Openreach offering >80Mbps profiles?
    My speed didn't budge when I switched to SoGEA, didn't think openreach used profile 35b due to interference?  Might be nice if the offered it after POTS finally dies in 2027?

    Mine did: 28 with POTS, which fits with the graph for 1km from the
    cabinet; now seeing 48.

    Modem firmware can make a big difference too. eg when I had a BT Homehub 5a running OpenWRT I could load different firmware for the VDSL modem part of
    the chip and it would change from 55 to 72 Mbps depending on the firmware version.

    When using a ISP Broadcom-based router (where there's no open source OS with DSL support so I'm using the ISP's OS) I get 76, so obviously there's been
    some tweaking - it seems like the preferred firmware varies depending on whether you're on a Huawei or ECI cabinet.

    So it's possible a router swap can also affect your line speed, if you
    changed that at the same time as switching to SOGEA.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Tue Apr 15 21:18:15 2025
    The Natural Philosopher <[email protected]d> wrote:
    On 15/04/2025 18:08, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 15/04/2025 16:44, Andrew wrote:
    The Nikon scan software only ever ran on windows and Apple
    Macs <= 2008, so Linux is presumably out of the running.
    Not necessarily


    Vuescan should work on all platforms. Its a free download. Try it on windows first, if it works there it will work on Linux.


    Update. Its not free if you want all features, including slide scanning :(

    It's £100 if you want slide scanning. But it could be a price worth paying compared with buying more hardware.

    Although you can buy Firewire PCIe cards for a tenner on ebay, so a modern machine with PCIe slots may well be able to run the Windows software
    (assuming it still works under W10/11).

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From No mail@21:1/5 to Sam Plusnet on Tue Apr 15 22:11:37 2025
    Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 15/04/2025 10:30, Tim Streater wrote:
    On 15 Apr 2025 at 10:07:48 BST, "wasbit" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On 14/04/2025 19:40, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 10:59, wasbit wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 00:41, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not run on >>>>>> 'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly recent & >>>>>> decent.

    Snip <> Not strictly true.
    I'm triple booting windows 8.1/10/11 on ancient hardware.

    If you install Win11 via one of the published work-arounds, will you
    still get OS updates in future?


    Who knows? It's up to the vagaries of Microsoft.

    I should also say that it is installed as a technical exercise & for
    familiarity. There is no personal information on there.

    Win-11 runs nicely in a VirtualBox VM on my Mac Mini.

    It's the first Win OS that I remember, that has decent fonts instead
    of all
    the dotty ones. So it even looks nice.

    Mention of dotty fonts brought back memories of my first (dot matrix) printer.  Cost me a fortune and didn't even do proper descenders (only 7 pin).

    Be grateful that you never had to develop an interface for daisy wheel
    printers - timing the hammer fire and wheel rotation was a nightmare.
    ESD wasn't completely understood and a discharge during printing often
    resulted in showers of "petals" - but the print quality was great. Swing
    the lamp!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bernard Peek@21:1/5 to wasbit on Tue Apr 15 21:49:15 2025
    On 2025-04-15, wasbit <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 19:40, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 10:59, wasbit wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 00:41, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not run on
    'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly recent &
    decent.

    Snip <

    Not strictly true.
    I'm triple booting windows 8.1/10/11 on ancient hardware.

    If you install Win11 via one of the published work-arounds, will you
    still get OS updates in future?


    Who knows? It's up to the vagaries of Microsoft.

    I have a machine that had one of those bodges. It stopped working when MS
    did an update. I wouldn't count on them working indefinitely.


    --
    Bernard Peek
    [email protected]
    Wigan

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to David Wade on Wed Apr 16 00:07:49 2025
    On Mon, 4/14/2025 3:33 PM, David Wade wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 19:36, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 15:45, Theo wrote:
    Chris Green <[email protected]> wrote:
    Theo <[email protected]> wrote:

    Once you go down this road, you might find you can pick up a whole mini PC
    for £200-300 which is the price of a mobo/CPU/RAM combo.  Even less if >>>>> you're prepared to consider a used ex-office mini PC.

    Yes, that's what I use as my 'desktop' machine now. I have a Fujitsu
    Esprimo Q957 bought refurbished from eBay for £142.  I don't think
    it's quite up to Windows 11 but I'm sure similar later models will be.

    Yes, look for machines that have at least an 8th gen Intel or a Ryzen 3000. >>>
    If you're running Linux or Win10 (or prepared to run Win 11 unsupported), >>> there are some very good deals on the 7th gen/2000 series machines which >>> officially won't run Win 11 - they start at about £50 including RAM and SSD
    on ebay.

    There are plenty of refurbished machines[1] for sale which say they come with Win11 Pro.
    I _suspect_ a fair number of those do not meet the Win11 hardware requirements - but the sellers have installed that OS via one of the work-arounds.
    I wonder if those machines will be able to get later OS updates?

    [1] I was looking at a range of Dell Optiflex PCs


    I thought that but having checked  briefly and those coming from dealers appear to conform to the Win/11 requirements. I believe many of these have agreements with Microsoft, which they would break if they sold machines incompatible with the OS
    installed.

    For example Tier-1 only have Optiplex (not Optiflex) with Gen-8 I3/I5/I7 CPUs which I think are the minium for Windows/11. I assume these will all have TPM 2. I note there are instructions on the Dell site for upgrading the TPM on some PCs.

    . on the other hand I see there are some Lenovo T470s on E-Bay with Windows/11 and its not supported on those machines...

    .. I suppose its Buyer Beware...

    Dave
    G4UGM

    The Refurbisher OS supplied by commercial refurbishers, is under Microsoft terms.
    They're not particularly allowed to "hack" an OS in with Rufus. The hardware for Windows 11 should be compliant enough, that an Upgrade Install would work on it.

    TPM support is tricky. The BIOS only supports fixed versions of it. My machine across the way, the BIOS can only do attestation with a TPM 1.4. If I plugged in a TPM 2.0, it would not Secure Boot. It is apparently possible for a motherboard
    with a TPM 2.0, to run a TPM 1.4 (assuming you could actually find a module, used).
    You can also "flash back" a TPM 2.0 chip, to be compatible with TPM 1.4.

    My Dell Optiplex 780 (a "simulation platform for rescue"), it supports a TPM 1.4,
    there is a TPM module in it, but the BIOS does not have attestation. This means it would not have Secure Booted with the TPM 1.4 standard. All you can do, is support BitLocker with it (whatever primitives Bitlocker might have used).

    The TPM issue is *not* as simple as it looks. The Refurbisher is going to
    be shipping machines of a more recent vintage, with a full BIOS support for
    TPM 2.0. Otherwise, there would be rough edges for the customer to cut themselves on.

    The suppliers of the motherboard across the way, they didn't even offer a TPM 2.0
    for sale. At first, we thought they were just laggards. But those people already knew that the BIOS would not know what to do with a TPM 2.0 module,
    and the support for TPM is unlikely to be available in source code form,
    to the motherboard manufacturer. The BIOS would be well out of support,
    and even if they wanted to do it, the BIOS company (Award, AMI, Phoenix, Insyde)
    would have to help them do it (for a price).

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Joe on Tue Apr 15 23:51:52 2025
    On Mon, 4/14/2025 11:07 AM, Joe wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 14:10:16 +0100
    The Natural Philosopher <[email protected]d> wrote:

    On 14/04/2025 12:23, Theo wrote:
    RJH <[email protected]> wrote:
    Going the other way price-wise, I've just bought a new Mac Mini -
    astonishing bit of kit for the size and price (£600, although
    quite easy to get discounts).

    Given the way MS have been abusing their customers, foisting things
    on them they don't want (forced-upgrades, removing features from
    W11 over W10, telemetry, adverts, AI, Recall, 'forgetting' that you
    disabled those things every time it updates, etc), that's not a bad
    option if you can stomach switching to a different platform. If
    the base 16GB RAM / 256GB storage isn't enough and you don't want
    to pay the Apple tax, there are now third party storage upgrades.

    Or switch to Linux, where there's no arbitrary CPU age cutoff.

    Absolutely. 16GB ram 256GB storage is under £300 for quality refurbs
    ...running win11 or Linux ...And with 16GB RAM you can run Virtualbox
    for those must have windows programs..

    Does anybody actually *want* win 11?


    I don't think anyone in business wanted anything after Win7, or maybe
    even XP. But just as most sharks have to keep swimming to breathe, MS
    has to keep pulling rabbits, or turkeys, out of the hat to stay in
    business.

    Office has been rented for some time, something that MS always wanted
    to do with all its software, so I suppose it's only a matter of time
    before Windows goes subscription-only, and they don't have to keep
    pretending to develop it. Newer and better applications will always
    happen, but in general the OS doesn't need 'a complete rewrite' (not
    that it really happens) every few years.

    Much of the change in Linux is due to having to keep up with hardware
    changes that new versions of Windows require the manufacturers to keep making. I still have a 32-bit netbook running the latest version of
    Debian, but that will be the last version with 386 code.


    A significant problem with Linux, is video card support. It's
    been undermined by the delivery of binary blobs. Nouveau could have
    been the answer... if we could get hardware specs.

    I looked at this, to address the "how much help will I give to
    the 400,000,000 people throwing away computers". And the mish-mash
    of unnecessary standards changes, makes the scavenging of machines
    labour intensive.

    Here's how it goes. Kernel 5.15 *works* for old hardware. But it is
    going out of support soon, and if I sell some victim needing rescue
    on that, they'll be back in a year, two years, with a "I just installed
    this new thing, and my machine won't...". Then what do I do for an answer ?

    The expectation of the people, is we will keep this perfectly
    adequate material running forever. And sadly, that's not how the
    Linux ecosystem sees it (Wayland, UEFI, GOP video cards, Secure Boot...). That's no way to rescue hardware. PCi Express cards, the user could be
    holding one in their hand, the slot in the machines will be PCI Express,
    but the cards can't be moved just anywhere. And the industry had a
    hand in ensuring they broke that. It's what you expect of scumbags.

    As a "simulation" of a rescue, I took a 7900GT PCI Express card from
    my dead motherboard, put it in another box and tried to "rescue" the
    other box. Linux booted, the screen froze with some graphics on it.
    The card is out of support from a DKMS perspective (no NVidia driver).
    and it's a legacy VBIOS card. If I buy a 2025 motheboard, I can't
    even reuse that card. Windows 10, running on that simulation setup,
    ran the video card OK... but it's on a hairs edge of being out of
    support.

    Just the collecting of information and handling of details, will
    slow down the rates for the rescue operation. It would never have
    been possible to rescue 400,000,000 machines -- it would require too
    much organization to do it properly. But even piece-meal rescue,
    it's just not going to work.

    Google makes ChromeOS, a follow-on for Neverware CloudReady. I installed CloudReady on one desktop - it worked. I tried on a second NVidia machine,
    it didn't work. Batting average 0.5 . Well, the Google version of this
    *only works on iGPUs*. It has no intention of working with regular video
    cards. Now, think about what percentage of 400,000,000 machines fit
    the iGPU time span they support. I thought they would at least keep the
    NVidia card support in the source code they were given, but the installer
    just flat out refuses to move forward (no necessary buttons appear on
    the starting installer interface), which is how Google tells you "your
    video card sucks". They don't even put a text error message up. And no,
    it wasn't an inability to draw on the screen. They could draw on it.
    I booted a machine with an iGPU, not to install that OS, but at least
    to verify what the installer screen was supposed to look like.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Andrew on Wed Apr 16 00:22:10 2025
    On Tue, 4/15/2025 11:56 AM, Andrew wrote:
    On 15/04/2025 10:30, Tim Streater wrote:
    On 15 Apr 2025 at 10:07:48 BST, "wasbit" <[email protected]> wrote: >>
    On 14/04/2025 19:40, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 10:59, wasbit wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 00:41, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not run on >>>>>> 'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly recent & >>>>>> decent.

    Snip <> Not strictly true.
    I'm triple booting windows 8.1/10/11 on ancient hardware.

    If you install Win11 via one of the published work-arounds, will you
    still get OS updates in future?


    Who knows? It's up to the vagaries of Microsoft.

    I should also say that it is installed as a technical exercise & for
    familiarity. There is no personal information on there.

    Win-11 runs nicely in a VirtualBox VM on my Mac Mini.

    It's the first Win OS that I remember, that has decent fonts instead of all >> the dotty ones. So it even looks nice.


    Interesting.

    If the official apple adapters were use to end up with a
    firewire I/F, I wonder if the Win-11 image would be able to
    connect to my Nikon scanner via those adapters.

    Which mac mini is it, and how much ram is needed ?.


    The Windows was supposed to remove the *network* driver for Firewire.
    A mode of operation that is pretty obscure (it could work point-to-point
    or the hardware could work with a Firewire router box). The other modes
    would still be there. As a joke, I was looking in DriverStore,
    and there is a 68881.sys in there, which is one of the old
    Firewire drivers. It's getting hard, on the Internet, to even
    discover what the names of the old Firewire drivers were. The
    68881 allows connection of a camcorder and recording of camcorder
    tape playback. You start the camcorder running first, and connect it.
    It's something like that.

    If you are using virtualization, there has to be a passthru or an
    emulation to the host side.

    If Windows will run straight on the hardware (and the Mac is using
    UEFI), it just might work with one of the remaining Windows drivers.
    If we happened to discover what driver makes a scanner work.

    Generally, for virtualization, I remain somewhat hopeful that a
    minimal USB capability might exist, but other standards I generally
    expect there won't be a mechanism for it.

    Running a slide scanner, it's worth keeping an old computer around
    to run it. The scanner in front of me, it's been driven by an old
    computer (and async SCSI), and that's all the old computer is there for.
    Is to run that scanner. I considered moving it to some other computer,
    but it would be nothing but a continuing hassle to keep running. A computer with a frozen OS, is perfect for the job.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Layman@21:1/5 to No mail on Wed Apr 16 08:22:48 2025
    On 15/04/2025 22:11, No mail wrote:

    Be grateful that you never had to develop an interface for daisy wheel printers - timing the hammer fire and wheel rotation was a nightmare.
    ESD wasn't completely understood and a discharge during printing often resulted in showers of "petals" - but the print quality was great. Swing
    the lamp!

    My first printer was a Smith Corona daisywheel (I've still got it
    somewhere!). For reasons long forgotten I decided that I didn't want the
    font that usually came with it, so I bought "Tempo". I really liked it,
    and, as you note, the print quality of a daisywheel was superb.

    --
    Jeff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Pancho@21:1/5 to John Rumm on Wed Apr 16 08:18:55 2025
    On 4/15/25 12:53, John Rumm wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 22:34, Pancho wrote:
    On 4/14/25 20:30, John Rumm wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 18:26, GB wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 17:38, No mail wrote:

    Consider whether you *need* a desktop machine. A re-furb laptop
    (from the likes of Tier1) will come with an in-built UPS ...


    The OP asked about a new mb for his desktop, but you can buy a quite
    capable N100 machine for £100, or so.  That will run browsers,
    email, etc, which probably covers 90% of users.

    Them that can put up with pretty lame performance anyway! i5 / Ryzen
    5 would be a better starting point for a general purpose machine. The
    N100 might be alright for a media (consumption) PC.



    Where do you think this lame performance manifests itself, on a
    general purpose machine?

    Comparatively sluggish response and general lacklustre performance. Poor experience with VMs or any CPU intensive task like transcoding/rendering video.


    The thing is, I don't think VMs or rendering video are general usage.

    The usecase for VMs massively decreased with Docker, and the main
    constraint was RAM not CPU. I used to use them all the time, but not so
    much in the last 10 years. Now we have WSL2, pretty much never.

    I'm not sure why people would render video. I last bought a DVD 15-20
    years ago. If I were interested, I suspect I would be looking at
    offloading that onto a purpose designed machine with an appropriate
    video card.

    If I was transcoding, it would probably be on a lot of the time and I
    would be concerned about electricity cost. Not something I would use a
    general purpose PC for.

    So it feels like requirements for powerful hardware are "you ain't going
    to need it" for most people. It's like advising a fat middle-aged
    cyclist to buy a £5000 carbon Bike, or an amateur golfer to buy
    professional clubs.

    If you are used to using low end machines, then you might be ok with it.
    If you are more used to a reasonable business spec machine then a low
    end CPU will feel like a very poor relation.


    The thing is, I'm sitting using an Orange Pi5, which is a 2-watt toy.
    The problem isn't that it feels slow, it doesn't. The problem is that
    the OS is buggy, not fully implemented.

    I think Apple got this right, switching to an Arm chip for the Mac Mini.
    That is what the common man wants. So we should be careful when we offer
    advice on which PC to buy.

    What activities benefit from the Ryzen 5?

    Less of the above!


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim Streater@21:1/5 to No mail on Wed Apr 16 07:49:44 2025
    On 15 Apr 2025 at 22:11:37 BST, "No mail" <[email protected]> wrote:

    Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 15/04/2025 10:30, Tim Streater wrote:
    On 15 Apr 2025 at 10:07:48 BST, "wasbit" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On 14/04/2025 19:40, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 10:59, wasbit wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 00:41, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not run on >>>>>>> 'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly recent & >>>>>>> decent.

    Snip <> Not strictly true.
    I'm triple booting windows 8.1/10/11 on ancient hardware.

    If you install Win11 via one of the published work-arounds, will you >>>>> still get OS updates in future?


    Who knows? It's up to the vagaries of Microsoft.

    I should also say that it is installed as a technical exercise & for
    familiarity. There is no personal information on there.

    Win-11 runs nicely in a VirtualBox VM on my Mac Mini.

    It's the first Win OS that I remember, that has decent fonts instead
    of all
    the dotty ones. So it even looks nice.

    Mention of dotty fonts brought back memories of my first (dot matrix)
    printer. Cost me a fortune and didn't even do proper descenders (only 7
    pin).

    Be grateful that you never had to develop an interface for daisy wheel printers - timing the hammer fire and wheel rotation was a nightmare.
    ESD wasn't completely understood and a discharge during printing often resulted in showers of "petals" - but the print quality was great. Swing
    the lamp!

    Huh. Be grateful you never had to develop on an Elliott 803B. 8k of store, the only I/O device being a slowish 5-hole paper tape reader/punch, the only way
    of developing source tapes (using Elliott Autocode, which itself was pretty limited), being a teletype which occasionally mispunched the typed character onto the tape.

    My first exposure to a real computer, however, so it was still fascinating.

    --
    All of science is either physics or stamp-collecting.

    Ernest Rutherford

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim Streater@21:1/5 to Paul on Wed Apr 16 07:53:53 2025
    On 16 Apr 2025 at 05:22:10 BST, "Paul" <[email protected]d> wrote:

    Running a slide scanner, it's worth keeping an old computer around
    to run it. The scanner in front of me, it's been driven by an old
    computer (and async SCSI), and that's all the old computer is there for.
    Is to run that scanner. I considered moving it to some other computer,
    but it would be nothing but a continuing hassle to keep running. A computer with a frozen OS, is perfect for the job.

    This is the only viable approach, and is what I do. Old Mac Mini running Snow Leopard or so.

    --
    When I saw how the European Union was developing, it was very obvious what they had in mind was not democratic. In Britain you vote for a government so the government has to listen to you, and if you don't like it you can change it.

    Tony Benn

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Sam Plusnet on Wed Apr 16 03:56:34 2025
    On Mon, 4/14/2025 2:03 PM, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 05:39, Paul wrote:
    On Sun, 4/13/2025 7:41 PM, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not run on 'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly recent & decent.

    Having thought about it some more, I realise most of my PC dates from 2016 so regardless of Microsoft's messing around, it is time for a refresh.

    I'm happy with the peripherals I have, so it's just the Motherboard/CPU/RAM/CPU Cooler that I want to replace.  To make life easier, I want to buy a ready built & tested bundle.

    Last time around,I bought such a bundle from Novatech, and I was very happy with the result.  I might still buy from them, but their bundles get very expensive very quickly (e.g. a modest bundle is ~£300, the next is £740 and sharply up from there)
    .

    Question:  Can anyone recommend other firms which offer such (built & tested) bundles, and are they good if/when things need attention?
    (I can recommend Novatech since they replaced my first bundle without a quibble when it suddenly died after a year of use.)

    Question 2:  My current system is Intel-based.  Is there any advantage to going for a Ryzen-based system at the moment?
    I am not into the latest & greatest in gaming, so I have no interest in overclocking the thing into meltdown.


    To give the folks a flavour of what you've got currently, give us a dump on your hardware.
    We can use this information, to give you a comparable system closer to what you've
    got, without going overboard on the shiny aspect.

    Using a different utility I already had loaded:

    Intel Core i7-6700K
    GIGABYTE Z170XP-SLI-CF
    16 GB RAM (2 off Kingston KHX2666C15D4/8G) @1333 MHz
    GPU  NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB

    I have a mixture of drives.  An M.2 SSD, a SATA SSD, and a few HDDs in this machine, which will mostly go into the new setup.



    6700K

    https://www.cpubenchmark.net/singleThread.html#desktop-thread

    Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.00GHz 2,505

    https://www.cpubenchmark.net/mid_range_cpus.html

    Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.00GHz 8,943 # Would have been 4*2505 if perfect scaling, multi-thread bench

    *******

    The pricing here, is highly specious, and some of these have had multiple price drops.
    You can use camelcamelcamel to get a graph of pricing, in some cases. My daily driver
    is a 5700G, the more powerful machine sits off to the side on a table by itself. 32 watts idle
    (has a cheap NVidia card, or the number would be even lower than that).

    The single thread (left column), determines the "Windows feel". Sometimes Windows Update
    finishes a bit sooner on the faster single thread machine. the right column (multithread)
    helps determine how fast 7ZIP runs, or Cinebench, or Blender or the like. Just recently,
    for the first time, I watched as Windows Defender opened a .7z by itself, used libarchive,
    libarchive had a multi-thread decompressor for 7z and all the cores lit up. The first time
    I've ever seen Windows use all the cores without prompting.

    Intel Core i5-14400 3,766 25,253 $178.96 6*2 + 4 threads Faster than your 6700K
    Intel Core i7-14700K 4,478 52,711 $319.00 8*2 + 12 threads Selected for single thread, high clock
    Intel Core Ultra 7 265K 4,870 58,789 $332.99 8 + 12 threads No-HT, 13 TOPS NPU

    AMD 5700G (Zen3) 3,284 24,477 $148.00 8*2 threads
    AMD 7700X (Zen4) 4,192 35,862 8*2 threads $400
    AMD 8700G (Zen4) 3,916 31,619 $307.88 8*2 threads Better iGPU, 16TOP via IFPU, unstable/biosfix
    AMD 9700X (Zen5) 4,658 37,223 $326.99 8*2 threads , good single thread, for Windows $360
    AMD 9800X3D 4,434 40,068 8*2 threads , extra L3 cache (for games) $479

    The purpose of having a high single thread, is insurance against moves in the future to slow the processor down. It's not your imagination, if you think things are more sluggish than they used to be. By measurement, NTFS file deletion is slower than it used to be (maybe 600 items per second now).

    An item with extra L3 cache, the cache is faster than system memory, but the ratio
    is not all that great. The L1 and L2 are unimaginably fast, and have to be, to keep
    an instruction pipeline filled at 5GHz. On 7ZIP, the L3 helps with the "dictionary",
    and the dictionary would be biggest (cache busting) on random data, such as an encrypted file. That's why you don't compress an encrypted file, you compress first,
    then you encrypt.

    Can you buy a refurb ? Of course.

    But weight them and measure them first. If they don't have
    some measure of future proofing, they might not be a good
    value.

    For the 14 series Intel, you should find the BIOS file that
    contains the "overvoltage/damage CPU" fix, before running
    the processor for any period of time. While the 14 series has
    an issue, a BIOS fix is available for it. Only "fresh" 14 series CPU
    are safe -- don't buy used ones, or a motherboard where the BIOS
    status is dodgy. A person could sell you a 14 series, because
    it's cooked.

    It makes it easier to select a bundle, once you have some
    idea what direction you're taking. But at least compare them,
    compare them to your 6700K, before going too much further.
    These things are enough of a nuisance as home projects,
    without adding selection uncertainty to the mix. My last upgrade
    was a "wild ride". Not nearly as easy as projects in the past.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Paul on Wed Apr 16 09:03:09 2025
    On 16/04/2025 04:51, Paul wrote:
    On Mon, 4/14/2025 11:07 AM, Joe wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 14:10:16 +0100
    The Natural Philosopher <[email protected]d> wrote:

    On 14/04/2025 12:23, Theo wrote:
    RJH <[email protected]> wrote:
    Going the other way price-wise, I've just bought a new Mac Mini -
    astonishing bit of kit for the size and price (£600, although
    quite easy to get discounts).

    Given the way MS have been abusing their customers, foisting things
    on them they don't want (forced-upgrades, removing features from
    W11 over W10, telemetry, adverts, AI, Recall, 'forgetting' that you
    disabled those things every time it updates, etc), that's not a bad
    option if you can stomach switching to a different platform. If
    the base 16GB RAM / 256GB storage isn't enough and you don't want
    to pay the Apple tax, there are now third party storage upgrades.

    Or switch to Linux, where there's no arbitrary CPU age cutoff.

    Absolutely. 16GB ram 256GB storage is under £300 for quality refurbs
    ...running win11 or Linux ...And with 16GB RAM you can run Virtualbox
    for those must have windows programs..

    Does anybody actually *want* win 11?


    I don't think anyone in business wanted anything after Win7, or maybe
    even XP. But just as most sharks have to keep swimming to breathe, MS
    has to keep pulling rabbits, or turkeys, out of the hat to stay in
    business.

    Office has been rented for some time, something that MS always wanted
    to do with all its software, so I suppose it's only a matter of time
    before Windows goes subscription-only, and they don't have to keep
    pretending to develop it. Newer and better applications will always
    happen, but in general the OS doesn't need 'a complete rewrite' (not
    that it really happens) every few years.

    Much of the change in Linux is due to having to keep up with hardware
    changes that new versions of Windows require the manufacturers to keep
    making. I still have a 32-bit netbook running the latest version of
    Debian, but that will be the last version with 386 code.


    A significant problem with Linux, is video card support. It's
    been undermined by the delivery of binary blobs. Nouveau could have
    been the answer... if we could get hardware specs.

    You have to be 15 years out of date
    First of all, even Nvidias own drivers (the problem was Nvidias closed
    source) were and still are pretty good.
    Secondly on board chipsets now comfortably outperform a traditional
    entry lvele Nvidia/Radeon card.

    This machione was going to get a graphics update but the Intel chipset
    simply was
    good enough, so I never bothered



    I looked at this, to address the "how much help will I give to
    the 400,000,000 people throwing away computers". And the mish-mash
    of unnecessary standards changes, makes the scavenging of machines
    labour intensive.

    Here's how it goes. Kernel 5.15 *works* for old hardware. But it is
    going out of support soon, and if I sell some victim needing rescue
    on that, they'll be back in a year, two years, with a "I just installed
    this new thing, and my machine won't...". Then what do I do for an answer ?

    The expectation of the people, is we will keep this perfectly
    adequate material running forever. And sadly, that's not how the
    Linux ecosystem sees it (Wayland, UEFI, GOP video cards, Secure Boot...). That's no way to rescue hardware. PCi Express cards, the user could be holding one in their hand, the slot in the machines will be PCI Express,
    but the cards can't be moved just anywhere. And the industry had a
    hand in ensuring they broke that. It's what you expect of scumbags.

    My old hardware just died. It didn't run out of Linux support.

    You can still ruin older 32 bit Linux if you must.

    It is still just about available.



    As a "simulation" of a rescue, I took a 7900GT PCI Express card from
    my dead motherboard, put it in another box and tried to "rescue" the
    other box. Linux booted, the screen froze with some graphics on it.
    The card is out of support from a DKMS perspective (no NVidia driver).
    and it's a legacy VBIOS card. If I buy a 2025 motheboard, I can't
    even reuse that card. Windows 10, running on that simulation setup,
    ran the video card OK... but it's on a hairs edge of being out of
    support.

    I haven't had that happen since around 2005
    IIRC that was Ubuntu on an old laptop. It just didn't work. But IIRC
    Mint did.


    Just the collecting of information and handling of details, will
    slow down the rates for the rescue operation. It would never have
    been possible to rescue 400,000,000 machines -- it would require too
    much organization to do it properly. But even piece-meal rescue,
    it's just not going to work.


    No one needs to rescue anything really. You cant run latest Linux on an
    IBM PC either.

    If you want a machine like that, run DOS.

    Linux is perfectly capable of running on up to about 15 year old
    hardware if the hardware itself is still OK.


    Google makes ChromeOS, a follow-on for Neverware CloudReady. I installed CloudReady on one desktop - it worked. I tried on a second NVidia machine,
    it didn't work. Batting average 0.5 . Well, the Google version of this
    *only works on iGPUs*. It has no intention of working with regular video cards. Now, think about what percentage of 400,000,000 machines fit
    the iGPU time span they support. I thought they would at least keep the NVidia card support in the source code they were given, but the installer just flat out refuses to move forward (no necessary buttons appear on
    the starting installer interface), which is how Google tells you "your
    video card sucks". They don't even put a text error message up. And no,
    it wasn't an inability to draw on the screen. They could draw on it.
    I booted a machine with an iGPU, not to install that OS, but at least
    to verify what the installer screen was supposed to look like.


    You are just pushing the edges. Its not worth it.
    If you have standard hardware live boot a simple distro like Mint, see
    if it all works, if it does, install it. If it doesn't not much time wasted.

    Paul


    --
    The lifetime of any political organisation is about three years before
    its been subverted by the people it tried to warn you about.

    Anon.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Pancho on Wed Apr 16 08:36:45 2025
    Pancho wrote:

    The usecase for VMs massively decreased with Docker, and the main
    constraint was RAM not CPU. I used to use them all the time, but not so
    much in the last 10 years. Now we have WSL2, pretty much never.

    Huh? WSL2 VMs sit on top of Hyper-V ...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Wed Apr 16 04:27:27 2025
    On Wed, 4/16/2025 3:36 AM, Andy Burns wrote:
    Pancho wrote:

    The usecase for VMs massively decreased with Docker, and the main constraint was RAM not CPU. I used to use them all the time, but not so much in the last 10 years. Now we have WSL2, pretty much never.

    Huh?  WSL2 VMs sit on top of Hyper-V ...

    *Everything* sits on Hyper-V.

    Even the regular Windows is virtualized.

    https://web.archive.org/web/20170404130558/https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc768520%28v=bts.10%29.aspx

    What we could use today, is another version of that diagram,
    with WSL2 penciled in, VirtualBox penciled in, Sandbox,
    and so on. Something showing the spectrum of what is in there.
    Even if it doesn't show some of the dependencies (such as why
    Nested Virtualization doesn't work on my AMD systems). One
    of these days, I have another test case to run, where I switch
    everything off in Windows, then try to get Nested Virtualization
    working. The docuverse stubbornly claims it does work,
    but not in evidence here. You cannot use all the "features" in
    the OS and use Nested Virtualization too.

    We used to have Nested Virtualization at work, on one of the early virtualization products. So we did do demos of "how slow" the
    inner-most OS is, when you do that. That's software that had
    no hardware virtualization support at all, and it was
    molasses-slow. On this platform, it should work a lot better,
    if I could get it to run.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob Eager@21:1/5 to Tim Streater on Wed Apr 16 08:25:55 2025
    On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 07:49:44 +0000, Tim Streater wrote:

    On 15 Apr 2025 at 22:11:37 BST, "No mail" <[email protected]> wrote:

    Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 15/04/2025 10:30, Tim Streater wrote:
    On 15 Apr 2025 at 10:07:48 BST, "wasbit" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On 14/04/2025 19:40, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 10:59, wasbit wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 00:41, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not >>>>>>>> run on 'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly >>>>>>>> recent & decent.

    Snip <> Not strictly true.
    I'm triple booting windows 8.1/10/11 on ancient hardware.

    If you install Win11 via one of the published work-arounds, will
    you still get OS updates in future?


    Who knows? It's up to the vagaries of Microsoft.

    I should also say that it is installed as a technical exercise & for >>>>> familiarity. There is no personal information on there.

    Win-11 runs nicely in a VirtualBox VM on my Mac Mini.

    It's the first Win OS that I remember, that has decent fonts instead
    of all the dotty ones. So it even looks nice.

    Mention of dotty fonts brought back memories of my first (dot matrix)
    printer. Cost me a fortune and didn't even do proper descenders (only
    7 pin).

    Be grateful that you never had to develop an interface for daisy wheel
    printers - timing the hammer fire and wheel rotation was a nightmare.
    ESD wasn't completely understood and a discharge during printing often
    resulted in showers of "petals" - but the print quality was great.
    Swing the lamp!

    Huh. Be grateful you never had to develop on an Elliott 803B. 8k of
    store, the only I/O device being a slowish 5-hole paper tape
    reader/punch, the only way of developing source tapes (using Elliott Autocode, which itself was pretty limited), being a teletype which occasionally mispunched the typed character onto the tape.

    My first exposure to a real computer, however, so it was still
    fascinating.

    If anyone is interested, I have 803 stuff here:

    http://www.ancientgeek.org.uk/Elliott/803/



    --
    My posts are my copyright and if @diy_forums or Home Owners' Hub
    wish to copy them they can pay me £1 a message.
    Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org
    *lightning surge protection* - a w_tom conductor

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Pancho on Wed Apr 16 09:18:27 2025
    On 16/04/2025 08:18, Pancho wrote:
    The thing is, I don't think VMs or rendering video are general usage.

    For some people they are.

    Making video content about themselves has replaced masturbation as the
    goto way to obtain a cheap thrill...

    The usecase for VMs massively decreased with Docker, and the main
    constraint was RAM not CPU. I used to use them all the time, but not so
    much in the last 10 years. Now we have WSL2, pretty much never.

    I still run WinXP with a couple of apps I prefer to use for some things.
    Some people like to play DOS games.


    I'm not sure why people would render video. I last bought a DVD 15-20
    years ago. If I were interested, I suspect I would be looking at
    offloading that onto a purpose designed machine with an appropriate
    video card.

    Video content creation.

    If I was transcoding, it would probably be on a lot of the time and I
    would be concerned about electricity cost. Not something I would use a general purpose PC for.

    So it feels like requirements for powerful hardware are "you ain't going
    to need it" for most people. It's like advising a fat middle-aged
    cyclist to buy a £5000 carbon Bike, or an amateur golfer to buy
    professional clubs.

    That is certainly true.

    About ten years ago my MV died and I got a new one with a core i
    something instead of a pentium,. and a Nvidia graffix card

    Ran faster and cooler and would run my real time video game.

    Two years ago I bought this HP EliteDesk (Core i5) for a couple of
    hundred and some change, and it ran the video game straight off.

    All I had to do was increase its RAM when the burden of a 4GB WinXP
    virtual machine plus some RAM hungry slicer software for 3D printing got
    to be too much when watching videos on you tube and playing that game,
    as well.

    The point being that it all depends what you DO on your PC. If you like
    to play 3D real time games at HD plus resolutions, you are going to need
    some fairly fancy hardware.

    If you are going to do artwork creation. you probably need a big screen

    If you are creating videos, you want a lot of CPU

    If you are using a tool chain that comprises many elements, like 3D
    printing, you probably want a lot of RAM. Multiple open browser windows
    have the same problem.



    If you are used to using low end machines, then you might be ok with
    it. If you are more used to a reasonable business spec machine then a
    low end CPU will feel like a very poor relation.


    The thing is, I'm sitting using an Orange Pi5, which is a 2-watt toy.
    The problem isn't that it feels slow, it doesn't. The problem is that
    the OS is buggy, not fully implemented.

    Should have gone to Raspberry...Raspios is pretty tidy these days.

    I think Apple got this right, switching to an Arm chip for the Mac Mini.
    That is what the common man wants. So we should be careful when we offer advice on which PC to buy.

    Its certainly getting to the point where a Pi 5 is probably better than
    an old 32 bit Intel machine.

    BUT the availability of precompiled ARM software is simply not as good
    yet as on INTEL

    I cant at this stage get rid of my INTEL desktop.


    --
    “Some people like to travel by train because it combines the slowness of
    a car with the cramped public exposure of 
an airplane.”

    Dennis Miller

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joe@21:1/5 to Bernard Peek on Wed Apr 16 09:30:37 2025
    On 15 Apr 2025 21:49:15 GMT
    Bernard Peek <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 2025-04-15, wasbit <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 19:40, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 10:59, wasbit wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 00:41, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not
    run on 'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly
    recent & decent.

    Snip <

    Not strictly true.
    I'm triple booting windows 8.1/10/11 on ancient hardware.

    If you install Win11 via one of the published work-arounds, will
    you still get OS updates in future?


    Who knows? It's up to the vagaries of Microsoft.

    I have a machine that had one of those bodges. It stopped working
    when MS did an update. I wouldn't count on them working indefinitely.



    It doesn't seem widely known that there are multiple generations of
    Win11, with some earlier Win11 machines not able to upgrade to the later
    one(s) and the early ones are now out of support. Later versions will
    not work with the early Trusted Platform hardware, even when it's real.

    "Windows 11 has an annual feature update cadence. Feature updates are
    released in the second half of the calendar year and come with 24
    months of support for Home, Pro, Pro for Workstations, and Pro
    Education editions;"

    "Windows 11 version 22H2 reached the end of life for Home and Pro
    editions on October 8, 2024. This means that Microsoft stopped
    providing security updates and non-security updates for these editions"

    So there are two versions of Win11 gone end-of-life before Win10, and
    many refurbished computers will soon lose the ability to run a
    supported Win11, even when sold with it installed. This would seem to
    be an escalation of Microsoft's normal planned obsolescence policy.

    --
    Joe

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Paul on Wed Apr 16 09:39:49 2025
    On 16/04/2025 08:56, Paul wrote:

    <TL-DR>

    t makes it easier to select a bundle, once you have some
    idea what direction you're taking. But at least compare them,
    compare them to your 6700K, before going too much further.
    These things are enough of a nuisance as home projects,
    without adding selection uncertainty to the mix. My last upgrade
    was a "wild ride". Not nearly as easy as projects in the past.

    Look. It really is not that complicated.
    Simpley look at what the machine is going to be used for, and use that
    to determine the CPU spec and RAM size.

    And RAM can usually be increased later.

    All machines are going to have 256GB+ of SSD of one sort or another.

    All machines except seriously old cheap shit are going to run Linux or
    Win 11 just fine

    Search for a machine that fits that budget, bearing in mind that a new
    Mobo and CPU is likely to cost more than a whole refurbed 4 years old ex corporate PC with pre installed windows


    No one wants to mess with OS and hardware upgrades unless they have to.

    Pick the shortest route to the desired destination unless you enjoy the journey.



    --
    There’s a mighty big difference between good, sound reasons and reasons
    that sound good.

    Burton Hillis (William Vaughn, American columnist)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Wed Apr 16 09:55:56 2025
    On 16/04/2025 09:49, Andy Burns wrote:
    Paul wrote:

       Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.00GHz   2,505

    Mine's a Xeon E3-1245v3, which is essentially a slower clocked version
    of that, it's a decade old, but not feeling slow yet ... thankfully it doesn't run Windows, so lack of TPM and generation of CPU isn't an issue.



    Mine is Intel® Core™ i5-6600T CPU @ 2.70GHz × 4

    It's perfectly adequate for everything I am doing


    --
    I would rather have questions that cannot be answered...
    ...than to have answers that cannot be questioned

    Richard Feynman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Joe on Wed Apr 16 09:43:56 2025
    On 16/04/2025 09:30, Joe wrote:
    On 15 Apr 2025 21:49:15 GMT
    Bernard Peek <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 2025-04-15, wasbit <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 19:40, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 10:59, wasbit wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 00:41, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not
    run on 'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly
    recent & decent.

    Snip <

    Not strictly true.
    I'm triple booting windows 8.1/10/11 on ancient hardware.

    If you install Win11 via one of the published work-arounds, will
    you still get OS updates in future?


    Who knows? It's up to the vagaries of Microsoft.

    I have a machine that had one of those bodges. It stopped working
    when MS did an update. I wouldn't count on them working indefinitely.



    It doesn't seem widely known that there are multiple generations of
    Win11, with some earlier Win11 machines not able to upgrade to the later one(s) and the early ones are now out of support. Later versions will
    not work with the early Trusted Platform hardware, even when it's real.

    "Windows 11 has an annual feature update cadence. Feature updates are released in the second half of the calendar year and come with 24
    months of support for Home, Pro, Pro for Workstations, and Pro
    Education editions;"

    "Windows 11 version 22H2 reached the end of life for Home and Pro
    editions on October 8, 2024. This means that Microsoft stopped
    providing security updates and non-security updates for these editions"

    So there are two versions of Win11 gone end-of-life before Win10, and
    many refurbished computers will soon lose the ability to run a
    supported Win11, even when sold with it installed. This would seem to
    be an escalation of Microsoft's normal planned obsolescence policy.

    What a dogs dinner.

    Sadly support for this linux version is ending in a week or so, and I am
    really contemplating just letting it not get updated any more.

    And rather buy a new machine, install the latest LTS version and slowly migrate. Which is a pain.

    Which is a pity, because this is a good machine.
    Maybe I could dual boot it...


    --
    “when things get difficult you just have to lie”

    ― Jean Claud Jüncker

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Paul on Wed Apr 16 09:49:19 2025
    Paul wrote:

    Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.00GHz 2,505

    Mine's a Xeon E3-1245v3, which is essentially a slower clocked version
    of that, it's a decade old, but not feeling slow yet ... thankfully it
    doesn't run Windows, so lack of TPM and generation of CPU isn't an issue.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Joe on Wed Apr 16 10:20:32 2025
    Joe wrote:

    So there are two versions of Win11 gone end-of-life before Win10, and
    many refurbished computers will soon lose the ability to run a
    supported Win11, even when sold with it installed. This would seem to
    be an escalation of Microsoft's normal planned obsolescence policy.

    That's not right (low-rent vloggers inventing issues to get likes).

    Microsoft don't support OEMs supplying latest Win11 on older hardware,
    but any hardware that came with Win11 installed back when, can upgrade
    to the latest Win11 now.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJH@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Wed Apr 16 09:42:21 2025
    On 16 Apr 2025 at 09:39:49 BST, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 16/04/2025 08:56, Paul wrote:

    <TL-DR>

    t makes it easier to select a bundle, once you have some
    idea what direction you're taking. But at least compare them,
    compare them to your 6700K, before going too much further.
    These things are enough of a nuisance as home projects,
    without adding selection uncertainty to the mix. My last upgrade
    was a "wild ride". Not nearly as easy as projects in the past.

    Look. It really is not that complicated.
    Simpley look at what the machine is going to be used for, and use that
    to determine the CPU spec and RAM size.

    Well, if you want what you do to be done more quickly, or quietly, or look better and made from better and longer lasting components, with decent I/O,
    you might want to pay more for a higher specced machine.

    There's also the issue of future proofing. Things like OS upgrades (how long will W11 last?). My 5 year old Mac wouldn't run some of the latest features - AI in particular. That might be something of interest in the future, and a lower spec machine might not cope.
    --
    Cheers, Rob, Sheffield UK

    "Our government has kept us in a perpetual state of fear, kept us in a continuous stampede of patriotic fervor, with the cry of grave national emergency. Always there has been some terrible evil at home or some monstrous foreign power that was going
    to gobble us up if we did not blindly rally behind it."
    -- General Douglas MacArthur

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJH@21:1/5 to Pancho on Wed Apr 16 09:34:38 2025
    On 16 Apr 2025 at 08:18:55 BST, Pancho wrote:

    I'm not sure why people would render video. I last bought a DVD 15-20
    years ago. If I were interested, I suspect I would be looking at
    offloading that onto a purpose designed machine with an appropriate
    video card.


    I use it to reduce file sizes of ripped DVDs (etc) for storage on a media server. My current PC (a new model Mac Mini) will compress a DVD to a fifth of its original size in minutes - at about 600 frames a second. I'd imagine a NUC would take considerably longer. There's also the issue of moving large files around.

    If I was transcoding, it would probably be on a lot of the time and I
    would be concerned about electricity cost. Not something I would use a general purpose PC for.


    Only a couple of minutes. Not even long enough for the fan to become audible. In fact I've never heard the fan - it just sits there stone cold. If I was compressing hundreds of video files, then yes, probably, but I don't think
    this machine consumes much more than about 30W even if stretched. <10W most of the time.> So it feels like requirements for powerful hardware are "you ain't going
    to need it" for most people. It's like advising a fat middle-aged
    cyclist to buy a £5000 carbon Bike, or an amateur golfer to buy
    professional clubs.

    Yes, maybe for most people. I use some fairly bloated software (MS Office,
    QGIS for example - as well as whatever the Apple OS and apps add), and edit
    and store thousands of photos, sometimes uncompressed. I'm sure I could manage on a low spec PC. I just choose/am lucky enough to spend a couple of hundred quid extra on decent hardware.

    Where it's not wanted, I don't. The media server is a 14 year old Mac Mini -
    so maybe £50 on ebay. No need for anything more powerful. It struggles with very high definition video files (10GB+ heavily compressed) but they're of no interest to me. 4k H265 files play fine. That said, I'm not sure what takes
    the load - the TV or the Mini. Videos are played through Plex, served from the Mini, played on the TV's app.

    --
    Cheers, Rob, Sheffield UK

    "I'm ineffably tired of pro-war ideologues moaning about how the anti-war folk are just 'complaining' without 'offering solutions' to global dilemmas. Peace doesn't need a moral, ethical, economical, or political qualification; war does. Peace doesn't
    ravage, plunder, rape, or kill; war does. Peace does not need justification, war does."
    -- <|OnAir|>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Wed Apr 16 06:01:03 2025
    On Wed, 4/16/2025 4:39 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 16/04/2025 08:56, Paul wrote:

    <TL-DR>

    t makes it easier to select a bundle, once you have some
    idea what direction you're taking. But at least compare them,
    compare them to your 6700K, before going too much further.
    These things are enough of a nuisance as home projects,
    without adding selection uncertainty to the mix. My last upgrade
    was a "wild ride". Not nearly as easy as projects in the past.

    Look. It really is not that complicated.
    Simpley look at what the machine is going to be used for, and use that to determine the CPU spec and RAM size.

    And RAM can usually be increased later.

    All machines are going to have 256GB+ of SSD of one sort or another.

    All machines except seriously old cheap shit are going to run Linux or Win 11 just fine

    Search for a machine  that fits that budget, bearing in mind that a new Mobo and CPU is likely to cost more than a whole refurbed 4 years old ex corporate PC with pre installed windows


    No one wants to mess with OS and hardware upgrades unless they have to.

    Pick the shortest route to the desired destination unless you enjoy the journey.

    Look, it's simple.

    Identify an item I can give a person, for a *flawless* experience.

    That's what it takes to rescue 400,000,000 machines.

    What you propose is fine for people with years of experience.

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1b/Linux_Distribution_Timeline.svg

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim Streater@21:1/5 to Bob Eager on Wed Apr 16 11:04:45 2025
    On 16 Apr 2025 at 09:25:55 BST, "Bob Eager" <[email protected]> wrote:

    If anyone is interested, I have 803 stuff here:

    http://www.ancientgeek.org.uk/Elliott/803/

    Thanks Bob - just having a quick look now.

    --
    “It is not the truth of Marxism that explains the willingness of intellectuals to believe it, but the power that it confers on intellectuals, in their attempts to control the world. And since ... it is futile to reason someone out of a thing that he
    was not reasoned into, we can conclude that Marxism owes its remarkable power to survive every criticism to the fact that it is not a truth-directed but a power-directed system of thought.”

    Sir Roger Scruton

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joe@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Wed Apr 16 11:20:11 2025
    On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 10:20:32 +0100
    Andy Burns <[email protected]> wrote:

    Joe wrote:

    So there are two versions of Win11 gone end-of-life before Win10,
    and many refurbished computers will soon lose the ability to run a supported Win11, even when sold with it installed. This would seem
    to be an escalation of Microsoft's normal planned obsolescence
    policy.

    That's not right (low-rent vloggers inventing issues to get likes).

    Microsoft don't support OEMs supplying latest Win11 on older
    hardware, but any hardware that came with Win11 installed back when,
    can upgrade to the latest Win11 now.

    I bought a refurb Win11 HP a couple of months ago, specifying one with
    VGA and optical drive, as the advert stated. It arrived with neither,
    but I fired it up out of curiosity and got the 'Windows has reached end
    of servicing, please upgrade' message. I tried the upgrade, and got an 'insufficient resources' message. I didn't investigate further as the
    machine was going back anyway, but there was one computer which wouldn't upgrade Win11 to a supported version, so I know it can happen.

    Only then did I investigate, and there's plenty of material on the Net,
    it had just never occurred to me that the latest/current MS OS could
    already be EOL, as I knew Win10 would be soon. My first quotation was
    from:

    https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/release-health/windows11-release-information

    which I suppose might qualify as a low-rent vlogger. They now call it
    'end of servicing', which means no more upgrades, security or
    otherwise, exactly as 'end of life' did. 21H2 and 22H2 are already EOL,
    23H2 will be this year. Currently supported Win11 requires TPM2,
    whereas early versions would work with TPM1 hardware.
    I assume the later versions want more RAM, but I've never known
    Windows to refuse to work at all on low RAM, just run very slowly.

    --
    Joe

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim Streater@21:1/5 to Bob Eager on Wed Apr 16 11:03:48 2025
    On 16 Apr 2025 at 09:25:55 BST, "Bob Eager" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 07:49:44 +0000, Tim Streater wrote:

    On 15 Apr 2025 at 22:11:37 BST, "No mail" <[email protected]> wrote:

    [snip]

    Be grateful that you never had to develop an interface for daisy wheel
    printers - timing the hammer fire and wheel rotation was a nightmare.
    ESD wasn't completely understood and a discharge during printing often
    resulted in showers of "petals" - but the print quality was great.
    Swing the lamp!

    Huh. Be grateful you never had to develop on an Elliott 803B. 8k of
    store, the only I/O device being a slowish 5-hole paper tape
    reader/punch, the only way of developing source tapes (using Elliott
    Autocode, which itself was pretty limited), being a teletype which
    occasionally mispunched the typed character onto the tape.

    My first exposure to a real computer, however, so it was still
    fascinating.

    If anyone is interested, I have 803 stuff here:

    http://www.ancientgeek.org.uk/Elliott/803/

    The one I used was in the Optics Dept of the Physics Building at Imperial. Supposedly it was to be used by the Optics Dept to do ray tracing for (I imagine) lens design. But I never saw it used by anyone other than myself and another student, at the time members of the Astronomical Society.

    At that time, planetary ephemera (if that's the word) were mainly computed by
    a couple of dotty old Revds - by hand. No real astronomer seemed interested in where Saturn might be in the sky, next Tuesday fortnight. We had the conceit that we could automate that, but never got anywhere close. We didn't know enough, and were anyway to be defeated by the poor language availability.

    Still - I did learn an important lesson - that floating point numbers have limited precision and in some cases the number you want to enter can't be exactly represented.

    I lurk on the SQLite User Forum, and even today about every three months someone writes in that they entered this giant number into a database cell,
    but didn't get exactly that back when they asked for it later. "Is this a bug?". Someone then politely points them to (e.g.) the Wikipedia article on floating point.

    --
    HAL 9000: Dave. Put down those Windows disks. Dave. DAVE!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Rumm@21:1/5 to Pancho on Wed Apr 16 12:46:50 2025
    On 16/04/2025 08:18, Pancho wrote:
    On 4/15/25 12:53, John Rumm wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 22:34, Pancho wrote:
    On 4/14/25 20:30, John Rumm wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 18:26, GB wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 17:38, No mail wrote:

    Consider whether you *need* a desktop machine. A re-furb laptop
    (from the likes of Tier1) will come with an in-built UPS ...


    The OP asked about a new mb for his desktop, but you can buy a
    quite capable N100 machine for £100, or so.  That will run
    browsers, email, etc, which probably covers 90% of users.

    Them that can put up with pretty lame performance anyway! i5 / Ryzen
    5 would be a better starting point for a general purpose machine.
    The N100 might be alright for a media (consumption) PC.



    Where do you think this lame performance manifests itself, on a
    general purpose machine?

    Comparatively sluggish response and general lacklustre performance.
    Poor experience with VMs or any CPU intensive task like transcoding/
    rendering video.


    The thing is, I don't think VMs or rendering video are general usage.

    Perhaps not, but IME you will immediately "feel" the difference between
    a new mid range business spec machine and a new "low end" or ageing mid
    range desktop system.

    For example, I have recently rolling out some software updates to a
    fleet of machines. The process is not that complicated - quit a couple
    of running apps, uninstall a couple, download and install a couple,
    start one of the new ones, and then do a bit of config. Most of it
    automated in a batch file. Doing it on a >= 10th gen machine gets it
    done in less than 5 mins. On a 6th gen i5 it is more like 10, and for a
    3rd or 4th gen it is often 15 min. These are all Win 10 or 11 boxes with
    SSDs.

    How much that will affect your workflow will depend much on what you do
    and how you do it. If you load a couple of programs and then live in
    them all day - the impact of a slower machine is less noticeable. If you
    need to run multiple things, and frequently switch between jobs, it is a
    much bigger impact.


    The usecase for VMs massively decreased with Docker, and the main
    constraint was RAM not CPU. I used to use them all the time, but not so
    much in the last 10 years. Now we have WSL2, pretty much never.

    Yup WSL2 is handy, but VMs are still very useful and docker is not
    always a suitable replacement. Quite often for things like developing
    and testing on a variety of systems in different configurations, or for security when doing malware analysis or testing unknown code.

    I'm not sure why people would render video. I last bought a DVD 15-20

    One of the dangers of assuming that your own particular uses for a
    machine will be the same for everyone else.

    years ago. If I were interested, I suspect I would be looking at
    offloading that onto a purpose designed machine with an appropriate
    video card.

    You can end up rendering video in a multitude of use cases, not just manipulating DVDs. Just doing jobs like trimming or joining video files.
    Using Handbrake to reduce video file sizes etc. Rending an animation
    from CAD etc.

    If I was transcoding, it would probably be on a lot of the time and I
    would be concerned about electricity cost. Not something I would use a general purpose PC for.

    So it feels like requirements for powerful hardware are "you ain't going
    to need it" for most people. It's like advising a fat middle-aged
    cyclist to buy a £5000 carbon Bike, or an amateur golfer to buy
    professional clubs.

    I could sand something with a cheap £50 RoS from one of the sheds, but I choose to use a professional Mirka RoS at many times the price.

    The better tool is not "necessary" in the sense that I could do the job
    more cheaply with a budget tool. However because it is so much more
    comfortable to use, does the job better and faster, and gives better
    results, I no longer care that it cost 8 times as much because it is a
    much nicer user experience.

    You could make the same argument for the posh golf clubs or bike. Will
    the occasional user really get the best out of the higher end option?
    Probably not. Will if feel better / be more enjoyable / get better
    results? Probably.

    If you are used to using low end machines, then you might be ok with
    it. If you are more used to a reasonable business spec machine then a
    low end CPU will feel like a very poor relation.


    The thing is, I'm sitting using an Orange Pi5, which is a 2-watt toy.
    The problem isn't that it feels slow, it doesn't. The problem is that
    the OS is buggy, not fully implemented.

    I think Apple got this right, switching to an Arm chip for the Mac Mini.
    That is what the common man wants. So we should be careful when we offer advice on which PC to buy.

    Erm, I think the OPs message title kind of invited " Advice on a new PC motherboard 'bundle'".

    If I am giving general advice without much detail on the specifics, then specifying something that will cope with most applications comfortably,
    and allow for a bit of future proofing, rather than just suggesting the cheapest option for a narrow use case is normally the "safest"
    recommendation IMHO




    --
    Cheers,

    John.

    /=================================================================\
    | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------|
    | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to RJH on Wed Apr 16 09:51:37 2025
    On Wed, 4/16/2025 5:42 AM, RJH wrote:
    On 16 Apr 2025 at 09:39:49 BST, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 16/04/2025 08:56, Paul wrote:

    <TL-DR>

    t makes it easier to select a bundle, once you have some
    idea what direction you're taking. But at least compare them,
    compare them to your 6700K, before going too much further.
    These things are enough of a nuisance as home projects,
    without adding selection uncertainty to the mix. My last upgrade
    was a "wild ride". Not nearly as easy as projects in the past.

    Look. It really is not that complicated.
    Simpley look at what the machine is going to be used for, and use that
    to determine the CPU spec and RAM size.

    Well, if you want what you do to be done more quickly, or quietly, or look better and made from better and longer lasting components, with decent I/O, you might want to pay more for a higher specced machine.

    There's also the issue of future proofing. Things like OS upgrades (how long will W11 last?). My 5 year old Mac wouldn't run some of the latest features - AI in particular. That might be something of interest in the future, and a lower spec machine might not cope.


    The pattern I'm seeing, is maybe desktops won't be getting a real NPU.
    AI computation can be done with a dedicated NPU (multiply-accumulate array), but it can also be done with the resources of a video card. Some video
    cards have Tensor cores.

    Some laptops have the goods. (A few models have 50 TOPS dedicated NPU.)

    https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/laptops/best-ai-pc

    But everyone knows, in a gold rush, the real money is made on
    selling mules and shovels. And they want to make sure we
    end up buying unnecessarily-expensive mules for this application.

    Maybe somebody will make a mule rental shop, and you can
    go in there and play on an expensive system for an hour or two,
    and see if the gold rush is real or not.

    The video cards can't do too much of this stuff, until
    the name of the software for it is more public. AMD has ROCM,
    which has just recently been split into two parts. I don't
    recollect the NVidia offering to have a name. While some
    review articles have AI benchmarks, that too isn't all that
    known by individual users.

    There is ONNX-DirectML for some purpose, but when someone
    in the newsgroups tried to use that, the software was incapable
    of moving forward because it tripped over some drivers (that
    should have been tested).

    There's a healthy dose of incompetence out there.

    If it's one thing I've learned about hardware over the years,
    you never buy a hardware where "the cheque is in the mail".
    If the software isn't ready, you just don't buy the goods.
    You want the software ready. You want the software tested
    by more than one test-donkey to prove the software is
    real, and not a bug-zoo.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Theo on Wed Apr 16 16:07:40 2025
    On 15/04/2025 21:07, Theo wrote:
    Andrew <[email protected]> wrote:
    Interesting.

    If the official apple adapters were use to end up with a
    firewire I/F, I wonder if the Win-11 image would be able to
    connect to my Nikon scanner via those adapters.

    The Firewire interface shows up as a PCIe device, so if Virtualbox on Mac will let you do PCIe passthrough then it might.

    Which mac mini is it, and how much ram is needed ?.

    Another option is just to buy an old Intel Mac Mini with onboard Firewire
    and then install Windows on it. I think they may have only supported Win7 natively but it may be possible to upgrade it through 10 to 11.

    The last Mini with native FW was the Late 2012 and people have got W11 working on 2011s/2012s. They start at about £40-50 on ebay.

    Theo
    2012 is only 1 year on from the Novatech M/B bundle that I bought
    in 2011 and am still using. 13 years is too long ago for safety,
    so I need to upgrade to something newer (or new).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Tim Streater on Wed Apr 16 16:10:32 2025
    On 16/04/2025 08:53, Tim Streater wrote:
    On 16 Apr 2025 at 05:22:10 BST, "Paul" <[email protected]d> wrote:

    Running a slide scanner, it's worth keeping an old computer around
    to run it. The scanner in front of me, it's been driven by an old
    computer (and async SCSI), and that's all the old computer is there for.
    Is to run that scanner. I considered moving it to some other computer,
    but it would be nothing but a continuing hassle to keep running. A computer >> with a frozen OS, is perfect for the job.

    This is the only viable approach, and is what I do. Old Mac Mini running Snow Leopard or so.


    I might just as well keep to old mini-tower box and disconnect
    it from internet access. Problem is I use ethernet to back it
    up to an ageing WD MyCloud device.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Bob Eager on Wed Apr 16 16:21:56 2025
    On 16/04/2025 09:25, Bob Eager wrote:
    On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 07:49:44 +0000, Tim Streater wrote:

    On 15 Apr 2025 at 22:11:37 BST, "No mail" <[email protected]> wrote:

    Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 15/04/2025 10:30, Tim Streater wrote:
    On 15 Apr 2025 at 10:07:48 BST, "wasbit" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On 14/04/2025 19:40, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 10:59, wasbit wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 00:41, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not >>>>>>>>> run on 'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly >>>>>>>>> recent & decent.

    Snip <> Not strictly true.
    I'm triple booting windows 8.1/10/11 on ancient hardware.

    If you install Win11 via one of the published work-arounds, will >>>>>>> you still get OS updates in future?


    Who knows? It's up to the vagaries of Microsoft.

    I should also say that it is installed as a technical exercise & for >>>>>> familiarity. There is no personal information on there.

    Win-11 runs nicely in a VirtualBox VM on my Mac Mini.

    It's the first Win OS that I remember, that has decent fonts instead >>>>> of all the dotty ones. So it even looks nice.

    Mention of dotty fonts brought back memories of my first (dot matrix)
    printer. Cost me a fortune and didn't even do proper descenders (only >>>> 7 pin).

    Be grateful that you never had to develop an interface for daisy wheel
    printers - timing the hammer fire and wheel rotation was a nightmare.
    ESD wasn't completely understood and a discharge during printing often
    resulted in showers of "petals" - but the print quality was great.
    Swing the lamp!

    Huh. Be grateful you never had to develop on an Elliott 803B. 8k of
    store, the only I/O device being a slowish 5-hole paper tape
    reader/punch, the only way of developing source tapes (using Elliott
    Autocode, which itself was pretty limited), being a teletype which
    occasionally mispunched the typed character onto the tape.

    My first exposure to a real computer, however, so it was still
    fascinating.

    If anyone is interested, I have 803 stuff here:

    http://www.ancientgeek.org.uk/Elliott/803/




    ROFL. The London Hospital had one of those before they
    'upgraded' to a Univac 418-III (complete with a FastRand
    horizontal drum where the read/heads were on a bar that
    oscillated from side to side). It also had 4 'spindryer'
    fixed head drums with an access time of 4.25 millsecs which
    was super fast in those days.

    They wrote an entire runtime system supporting 128 terminals
    around the hospital (1024 character VDU's, 16*64), pre and
    post journalling to tape with proper logical transactions.
    This was the late 60's and early 70's when most commercial
    dataprocessing still used punch cards/key-to-disk etc. The
    entire runtime system ran as a continuous batch job 23 hours
    a day under RTOS the Univac OS which only supported 16 files.
    The runtime system created its own relational file system
    contained within one of those RTOS files.

    All the runtime software was written in Univac assembler,
    using punch cards. No VDU's for editting code on the fly !.

    I seem to remember hearing that the 803 used magnetic tape
    with sprocket holes ???

    Andrew

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Theo on Wed Apr 16 17:06:50 2025
    On 15/04/2025 21:18, Theo wrote:
    The Natural Philosopher <[email protected]d> wrote:
    On 15/04/2025 18:08, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 15/04/2025 16:44, Andrew wrote:
    The Nikon scan software only ever ran on windows and Apple
    Macs <= 2008, so Linux is presumably out of the running.
    Not necessarily


    Vuescan should work on all platforms. Its a free download. Try it on
    windows first, if it works there it will work on Linux.


    Update. Its not free if you want all features, including slide scanning :(

    It's £100 if you want slide scanning. But it could be a price worth paying compared with buying more hardware.

    Although you can buy Firewire PCIe cards for a tenner on ebay, so a modern machine with PCIe slots may well be able to run the Windows software (assuming it still works under W10/11).

    Theo

    Thanks. I'll have a browse through the Silverfast site to see
    how they manage with Win 10/11

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sam Plusnet@21:1/5 to Tim Streater on Wed Apr 16 20:06:47 2025
    On 16/04/2025 08:49, Tim Streater wrote:
    On 15 Apr 2025 at 22:11:37 BST, "No mail" <[email protected]> wrote:

    Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 15/04/2025 10:30, Tim Streater wrote:
    On 15 Apr 2025 at 10:07:48 BST, "wasbit" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On 14/04/2025 19:40, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 10:59, wasbit wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 00:41, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not run on >>>>>>>> 'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly recent & >>>>>>>> decent.

    Snip <> Not strictly true.
    I'm triple booting windows 8.1/10/11 on ancient hardware.

    If you install Win11 via one of the published work-arounds, will you >>>>>> still get OS updates in future?


    Who knows? It's up to the vagaries of Microsoft.

    I should also say that it is installed as a technical exercise & for >>>>> familiarity. There is no personal information on there.

    Win-11 runs nicely in a VirtualBox VM on my Mac Mini.

    It's the first Win OS that I remember, that has decent fonts instead
    of all
    the dotty ones. So it even looks nice.

    Mention of dotty fonts brought back memories of my first (dot matrix)
    printer. Cost me a fortune and didn't even do proper descenders (only 7 >>> pin).

    Be grateful that you never had to develop an interface for daisy wheel
    printers - timing the hammer fire and wheel rotation was a nightmare.
    ESD wasn't completely understood and a discharge during printing often
    resulted in showers of "petals" - but the print quality was great. Swing
    the lamp!

    Huh. Be grateful you never had to develop on an Elliott 803B. 8k of store, the
    only I/O device being a slowish 5-hole paper tape reader/punch, the only way of developing source tapes (using Elliott Autocode, which itself was pretty limited), being a teletype which occasionally mispunched the typed character onto the tape.

    My first exposure to a real computer, however, so it was still fascinating.

    Mention of paper tape reminded me of the Ferranti FM1600B used on RN
    ships(not that they used paper - finest quality mylar). The spooler & re-spooler for tape handling were stand alone boxes, each weighing much
    more than this desktop PC.

    --
    Sam Plusnet

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Adrian Caspersz@21:1/5 to David Wade on Wed Apr 16 21:05:59 2025
    On 14/04/2025 20:33, David Wade wrote:

    I thought that but having checked  briefly and those coming from dealers appear to conform to the Win/11 requirements. I believe many of these
    have agreements with Microsoft, which they would break if they sold
    machines incompatible with the OS installed.

    For example Tier-1 only have Optiplex (not Optiflex) with Gen-8 I3/I5/I7
    CPUs which I think are the minium for Windows/11. I assume these will
    all have TPM 2. I note there are instructions on the Dell site for
    upgrading the TPM on some PCs.

    . on the other hand I see there are some Lenovo T470s on E-Bay with Windows/11 and its not supported on those machines...

    HP Elitebook 840 G5
    16 GB DDR4
    Intel Core i7-8550U 8th Gen
    13" / 14"

    Are about £120-140 on eBay.

    I think this is the cheapest entrant to Win11.

    --
    Adrian C

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Tim Streater on Wed Apr 16 20:43:15 2025
    On 15/04/2025 10:30, Tim Streater wrote:
    On 15 Apr 2025 at 10:07:48 BST, "wasbit" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 14/04/2025 19:40, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 10:59, wasbit wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 00:41, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not run on >>>>> 'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly recent &
    decent.

    Snip <> Not strictly true.
    I'm triple booting windows 8.1/10/11 on ancient hardware.

    If you install Win11 via one of the published work-arounds, will you
    still get OS updates in future?


    Who knows? It's up to the vagaries of Microsoft.

    I should also say that it is installed as a technical exercise & for
    familiarity. There is no personal information on there.

    Win-11 runs nicely in a VirtualBox VM on my Mac Mini.

    It's the first Win OS that I remember, that has decent fonts instead of all the dotty ones. So it even looks nice.

    Another question. I have an HP 32 inch IPS monitor which supports
    2560*1440 (orsomething like that) with DVI-D, HDMI and Display Port
    interfaces.

    Does a Mac mini support this ?.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to Adrian Caspersz on Wed Apr 16 21:41:58 2025
    Adrian Caspersz <[email protected]d> wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 20:33, David Wade wrote:

    I thought that but having checked  briefly and those coming from dealers appear to conform to the Win/11 requirements. I believe many of these
    have agreements with Microsoft, which they would break if they sold machines incompatible with the OS installed.

    For example Tier-1 only have Optiplex (not Optiflex) with Gen-8 I3/I5/I7 CPUs which I think are the minium for Windows/11. I assume these will
    all have TPM 2. I note there are instructions on the Dell site for upgrading the TPM on some PCs.

    . on the other hand I see there are some Lenovo T470s on E-Bay with Windows/11 and its not supported on those machines...

    HP Elitebook 840 G5
    16 GB DDR4
    Intel Core i7-8550U 8th Gen
    13" / 14"

    Are about £120-140 on eBay.

    I think this is the cheapest entrant to Win11.

    Dell Vostro with 8th gen CPU start at about £80-90: https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/335908586432
    https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/276886237926
    https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/236056819045

    Note that the displays are often TN and have awful viewing angles.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob Eager@21:1/5 to Andrew on Wed Apr 16 20:54:06 2025
    On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 16:21:56 +0100, Andrew wrote:

    On 16/04/2025 09:25, Bob Eager wrote:
    On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 07:49:44 +0000, Tim Streater wrote:

    On 15 Apr 2025 at 22:11:37 BST, "No mail" <[email protected]> wrote:

    Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 15/04/2025 10:30, Tim Streater wrote:
    On 15 Apr 2025 at 10:07:48 BST, "wasbit" <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote:

    On 14/04/2025 19:40, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 10:59, wasbit wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 00:41, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not >>>>>>>>>> run on 'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was
    fairly recent & decent.

    Snip <> Not strictly true.
    I'm triple booting windows 8.1/10/11 on ancient hardware.

    If you install Win11 via one of the published work-arounds, will >>>>>>>> you still get OS updates in future?


    Who knows? It's up to the vagaries of Microsoft.

    I should also say that it is installed as a technical exercise & >>>>>>> for familiarity. There is no personal information on there.

    Win-11 runs nicely in a VirtualBox VM on my Mac Mini.

    It's the first Win OS that I remember, that has decent fonts
    instead of all the dotty ones. So it even looks nice.

    Mention of dotty fonts brought back memories of my first (dot
    matrix) printer. Cost me a fortune and didn't even do proper
    descenders (only 7 pin).

    Be grateful that you never had to develop an interface for daisy
    wheel printers - timing the hammer fire and wheel rotation was a
    nightmare. ESD wasn't completely understood and a discharge during
    printing often resulted in showers of "petals" - but the print
    quality was great. Swing the lamp!

    Huh. Be grateful you never had to develop on an Elliott 803B. 8k of
    store, the only I/O device being a slowish 5-hole paper tape
    reader/punch, the only way of developing source tapes (using Elliott
    Autocode, which itself was pretty limited), being a teletype which
    occasionally mispunched the typed character onto the tape.

    My first exposure to a real computer, however, so it was still
    fascinating.

    If anyone is interested, I have 803 stuff here:

    http://www.ancientgeek.org.uk/Elliott/803/




    ROFL. The London Hospital had one of those before they 'upgraded' to a
    Univac 418-III (complete with a FastRand horizontal drum where the
    read/heads were on a bar that oscillated from side to side). It also had
    4 'spindryer' fixed head drums with an access time of 4.25 millsecs
    which was super fast in those days.

    They wrote an entire runtime system supporting 128 terminals around the hospital (1024 character VDU's, 16*64), pre and post journalling to tape
    with proper logical transactions. This was the late 60's and early 70's
    when most commercial dataprocessing still used punch cards/key-to-disk
    etc. The entire runtime system ran as a continuous batch job 23 hours a
    day under RTOS the Univac OS which only supported 16 files.
    The runtime system created its own relational file system contained
    within one of those RTOS files.

    All the runtime software was written in Univac assembler, using punch
    cards. No VDU's for editting code on the fly !.

    I seem to remember hearing that the 803 used magnetic tape with sprocket holes ???

    Not sure about that, but the tape drives used spring loaded arms rather
    than vacuum columns.




    --
    My posts are my copyright and if @diy_forums or Home Owners' Hub
    wish to copy them they can pay me £1 a message.
    Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org
    *lightning surge protection* - a w_tom conductor

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob Eager@21:1/5 to Tim Streater on Wed Apr 16 20:58:30 2025
    On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 11:03:48 +0000, Tim Streater wrote:

    On 16 Apr 2025 at 09:25:55 BST, "Bob Eager" <[email protected]> wrote:

    If anyone is interested, I have 803 stuff here:

    http://www.ancientgeek.org.uk/Elliott/803/

    The one I used was in the Optics Dept of the Physics Building at
    Imperial. Supposedly it was to be used by the Optics Dept to do ray
    tracing for (I imagine) lens design. But I never saw it used by anyone
    other than myself and another student, at the time members of the Astronomical Society.

    The University of Kent 803 was placed by a 4130 the year before I arrived.
    So I never got to play with it.

    I don't know of an emulator, although there is one for the 903.

    --
    My posts are my copyright and if @diy_forums or Home Owners' Hub
    wish to copy them they can pay me £1 a message.
    Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org
    *lightning surge protection* - a w_tom conductor

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to Andrew on Wed Apr 16 21:43:57 2025
    Andrew <[email protected]> wrote:
    Another question. I have an HP 32 inch IPS monitor which supports
    2560*1440 (orsomething like that) with DVI-D, HDMI and Display Port interfaces.

    Does a Mac mini support this ?.

    DVI-D is messy, but it should support that over HDMI and DP via a USB-C adapter. USB-C to DP is easier as it's a passive adapter while HDMI needs a converter chip.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bernard Peek@21:1/5 to Joe on Wed Apr 16 21:25:01 2025
    On 2025-04-16, Joe <[email protected]> wrote:

    which I suppose might qualify as a low-rent vlogger. They now call it
    'end of servicing', which means no more upgrades, security or
    otherwise, exactly as 'end of life' did. 21H2 and 22H2 are already EOL,
    23H2 will be this year. Currently supported Win11 requires TPM2,
    whereas early versions would work with TPM1 hardware.

    Some beta versions would work with TP1 but TP2 was officially required
    from go-live. The compatibility tester that was released before W11 checked
    for TP2 and if it didn't find one said that the system would not support
    W11.

    There was a bodge, a registry hack, that would stop W11 from checking. MS
    said that they would close that loophole, and did.


    --
    Bernard Peek
    [email protected]
    Wigan

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nick Finnigan@21:1/5 to David Wade on Wed Apr 16 23:09:07 2025
    On 14/04/2025 20:33, David Wade wrote:


    For example Tier-1 only have Optiplex (not Optiflex) with Gen-8 I3/I5/I7
    CPUs which I think are the minium for Windows/11. I assume these will all have TPM 2. I note there are instructions on the Dell site for upgrading
    the TPM on some PCs.

    I have upgraded the TPM on an OptiPlex, but apparently the i5-3470 isn't
    even supported for Windows 10.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bernard Peek@21:1/5 to Andrew on Wed Apr 16 21:43:06 2025
    On 2025-04-16, Andrew <[email protected]> wrote:

    I might just as well keep to old mini-tower box and disconnect
    it from internet access. Problem is I use ethernet to back it
    up to an ageing WD MyCloud device.

    I have a NAS device that can't be trusted to connect to the Internet, it
    always picks up malware. But it was relatively easy to create an SAN that can't see or be seen from the router.

    --
    Bernard Peek
    [email protected]
    Wigan

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Nick Finnigan on Thu Apr 17 01:45:14 2025
    On Wed, 4/16/2025 6:09 PM, Nick Finnigan wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 20:33, David Wade wrote:


    For example Tier-1 only have Optiplex (not Optiflex) with Gen-8 I3/I5/I7 CPUs which I think are the minium for Windows/11. I assume these will all have TPM 2. I note there are instructions on the Dell site for upgrading the TPM on some PCs.

     I have upgraded the TPM on an OptiPlex, but apparently the i5-3470 isn't even supported for Windows 10.

    As long as you use the Rufus installer (rufus.ie someone in Ireland),
    you can override most of the issues. but then every Upgrade Install you
    do, won't work through Windows Update, and you have to use Rufus each
    year until support is over.

    The i5-3470 would not have MBEC hardware support, or a workaround
    like some of the later processors can manage.

    This is your processor. A 4C 4T device.

    https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/sku/68316/intel-core-i53470-processor-6m-cache-up-to-3-60-ghz/specifications.html

    This is a processor with MBEC support, to show what the entry looks like.

    https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/sku/236773/intel-core-i9-processor-14900k-36m-cache-up-to-6-00-ghz/specifications.html

    Mode-based Execute Control (MBEC) Yes

    On processors where the feature is missing, the feature is simply
    removed from the list. They don't like to make that entry and
    write "No" next to it, because for the older generations, some
    have software workarounds when that is missing. However, on really
    old CPUs, the usage of this is prohibitive (too much impact from
    its usage).

    When the processors were invented, the MBEC was a "hidden feature"
    and did not appear on any of the web pages. They had to go back
    and edit the pages of the processors that have hardware support
    for the issue, and add it to their description.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Level_Address_Translation

    "Mode Based Execution Control

    Mode Based Execution Control (MBEC) is an extension to x86 SLAT implementations
    first available in Intel Kaby Lake and AMD Zen+ CPUs (known on the latter as
    Guest Mode Execute Trap or GMET).[10] The extension extends the execute bit in
    the extended page table (guest page table) into 2 bits - one for user execute,
    and one for supervisor execute.[11]

    MBE was introduced to speed up guest usermode unsigned code execution with
    kernelmode code integrity enforcement. Under this configuration, unsigned
    code pages can be marked as execute under usermode, but must be marked as
    no-execute under kernelmode. To maintain integrity by ensuring all guest kernelmode
    executable code are signed even when the guest kernel is compromised, the
    guest kernel does not have permission to modify the execute bit of any
    memory pages. Modification of the execute bit, or switching of the guest page table
    which contains the execute bit, is delegated to a higher privileged entity, in this
    case the host hypervisor. Without MBE, each entrance from unsigned usermode
    execution to signed kernelmode execution must be accompanied by a VM exit to the
    hypervisor to perform a switch to the kernelmode page table. On the reverse
    operation, an exit from signed kernelmode to unsigned usermode must be accompanied
    by a VM exit to perform another page table switch. VM exits significantly impact
    code execution performance.[12][13] With MBE, the same page table can be shared
    between unsigned usermode code and signed kernelmode code, with two sets of
    execute permission depending on the execution context. VM exits are no longer
    necessary when execution context switches between unsigned usermode and
    signed kernel mode."

    The Windows OS is a Guest of the Hypervisor, the Hypervisor (which is not an OS)
    is the boss of the Guests. That's an Inverted Hypervisor for virtualization. Because it's an x86-on-x86 situation, most of the instructions fall through
    to the hardware, without penalty. But things involving privilege issues,
    those can cause performance slowdowns, and Windows is chock full of those
    sorts of issues. The "CPU core spikes when typing in Classic Outlook", is
    an example of what sort of shenanigans go on inside your computer. That's
    the wasting of performance, and highlights the need to have afterburners
    on the computer, to compensate for such waste and carelessness.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Pancho@21:1/5 to John Rumm on Thu Apr 17 11:28:53 2025
    On 4/16/25 12:46, John Rumm wrote:
    On 16/04/2025 08:18, Pancho wrote:
    On 4/15/25 12:53, John Rumm wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 22:34, Pancho wrote:
    On 4/14/25 20:30, John Rumm wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 18:26, GB wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 17:38, No mail wrote:

    Consider whether you *need* a desktop machine. A re-furb laptop
    (from the likes of Tier1) will come with an in-built UPS ...


    The OP asked about a new mb for his desktop, but you can buy a
    quite capable N100 machine for £100, or so.  That will run
    browsers, email, etc, which probably covers 90% of users.

    Them that can put up with pretty lame performance anyway! i5 /
    Ryzen 5 would be a better starting point for a general purpose
    machine. The N100 might be alright for a media (consumption) PC.



    Where do you think this lame performance manifests itself, on a
    general purpose machine?

    Comparatively sluggish response and general lacklustre performance.
    Poor experience with VMs or any CPU intensive task like transcoding/
    rendering video.


    The thing is, I don't think VMs or rendering video are general usage.

    Perhaps not, but IME you will immediately "feel" the difference between
    a new mid range business spec machine and a new "low end" or ageing mid
    range desktop system.

    For example, I have recently rolling out some software updates to a
    fleet of machines. The process is not that complicated - quit a couple
    of running apps, uninstall a couple, download and install a couple,
    start one of the new ones, and then do a bit of config. Most of it
    automated in a batch file. Doing it on a >= 10th gen machine gets it
    done in less than 5 mins. On a 6th gen i5 it is more like 10, and for a
    3rd or 4th gen it is often 15 min. These are all Win 10 or 11 boxes with SSDs.

    How much that will affect your workflow will depend much on what you do
    and how you do it. If you load a couple of programs and then live in
    them all day - the impact of a slower machine is less noticeable. If you
    need to run multiple things, and frequently switch between jobs, it is a
    much bigger impact.


    This is the nub of my objection. On my toy computer Spreadsheet,
    Browser, IDE, and MPV Video Player all start in under 5 seconds. Yes I
    would notice if these apps started in 2 seconds, and I would like it,
    but it wouldn't really affect my workflow.

    The toy computer also has advantages, it uses so little power it can be
    left on all the time, it is tiny, it is absolutely silent. Having apps
    start in 2 seconds wouldn't be worth the cost of losing these qualities,
    or the additional cost.

    I don't know for sure, but I suspect my usage patterns are normal for
    people without specific requirements such as gaming, video editing.

    I do look at new PCs and I think eventually they will combine speed with
    low size/low idle power. I think the Mac Mini, points the way. When such
    machines exists outside Apple's locked down world, I'll buy one. The
    new 20 core Intel and AMD CPUs also look exciting, but that is the first
    time in 10 years, I've thought I might want to buy.

    I've never believed in future proofing. In the past, when it was a
    problem, it was normally better to buy cheap, buy often.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From GB@21:1/5 to John Rumm on Thu Apr 17 11:28:10 2025
    On 16/04/2025 12:46, John Rumm wrote:

    Perhaps not, but IME you will immediately "feel" the difference between
    a new mid range business spec machine and a new "low end" or ageing mid
    range desktop system.

    I'm sure that's true. So, if I were still in business, I'd buy a decent
    spec machine. (Like this machine I built years ago, with an i7 CPU. It
    cut the recalculation time on some very large spreadsheets down from 30
    minutes to 5.)

    As it is, though, I generally only have TBird and Chrome open on the PC
    these days, and the N100 machine seems perfectly fast enough for my
    current usage.

    I'm not sure that the OP has said what he plans to do with his machine?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Bernard Peek on Thu Apr 17 06:24:47 2025
    On Wed, 4/16/2025 5:25 PM, Bernard Peek wrote:
    On 2025-04-16, Joe <[email protected]> wrote:

    which I suppose might qualify as a low-rent vlogger. They now call it
    'end of servicing', which means no more upgrades, security or
    otherwise, exactly as 'end of life' did. 21H2 and 22H2 are already EOL,
    23H2 will be this year. Currently supported Win11 requires TPM2,
    whereas early versions would work with TPM1 hardware.

    Some beta versions would work with TP1 but TP2 was officially required
    from go-live. The compatibility tester that was released before W11 checked for TP2 and if it didn't find one said that the system would not support
    W11.

    There was a bodge, a registry hack, that would stop W11 from checking. MS said that they would close that loophole, and did.



    This is an old machine. About fourth generation.

    [Picture]

    https://i.postimg.cc/t4RQVS1j/W11-alive-4930-K.gif

    But it's not clear whether it's worth it. Putting W11 on it.

    When that system was booted, File Explorer failed to work
    properly. I killed it multiple times and restarted it and
    the symptoms did not change. I got a file off that machine
    using Bluetooth SendTo, so I was not concerned about
    losing the screenshot. This may have been the KIR Patch Tuesday
    rollback, as that machine does not normally act out like that.
    After the reboot, subsequent usage of File Explorer was "normal".

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Thu Apr 17 06:39:12 2025
    On Wed, 4/16/2025 4:18 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 16/04/2025 08:18, Pancho wrote:
    The thing is, I don't think VMs or rendering video are general usage.

    For some people they are.

    Making video content about themselves has replaced masturbation as the goto way to obtain a cheap thrill...

    Um, some media devices only accept certain formats.
    The media being played may arrive in some other format.

    Some people have set up conversion setups, just to
    recompress in the playable format.

    The video card can do some of these operations at 330FPS.
    Or in round numbers, about ten times as fast as the playback
    rate. You can process an hour of Hollywood content in six minutes.
    On a high end video card, there are three video SIPs at 60 watts
    each, and you can do three videos at the same time. I don't
    know of any software, right off hand, that takes advantage of
    those video blocks as a dispatch-able thing.

    Doing that on the processor, doesn't go quite that fast,
    but you can also do two-pass conversion that way.

    And Windows 11 is already using virtualization without
    your consent. The OS itself is actually a Guest.
    A Guest of the Inverted Hypervisor. Not clear whether
    the arch supports "normal" operation with the OS as a
    mere Host, and no virtualization at all. Both W10 and
    W11 can shut off subsystems where the hardware support is
    not sensed to exist, on a particular boot cycle. If you want
    to play with it, you could turn off VT-X in the BIOS and
    see what happens (Vanterpool and Pacifica, being alternate names).

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Pancho@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Thu Apr 17 11:56:25 2025
    On 4/16/25 09:18, The Natural Philosopher wrote:


    About ten years ago my MV died and I got a new one with a core i
    something instead of a pentium,. and a Nvidia graffix card

    Ran faster and cooler and would run my real time video game.


    I gave up playing video games 30 years ago, due to blood pressure
    problems. I'm surprised you can play.

    Although to be fair, I feel better now than I did then. I always
    expected to be dead long before the age I am now. Modern medicine is a wonderful thing (and clean living - :o( )

    [snip]

    The thing is, I'm sitting using an Orange Pi5, which is a 2-watt toy.
    The problem isn't that it feels slow, it doesn't. The problem is that
    the OS is buggy, not fully implemented.

    Should have gone to Raspberry...Raspios is pretty tidy these days.


    I have both. My perception is that the oPi5 is better performance, but
    it's not a fair test, I never got around to installing the rPi5 OS on
    NVME as opposed to SD card. I use them both to drive TV screens, a kind
    of very smart TV/standard PC. The oPi5 TV is in front of the comfy chair.

    I still use an rPi4 as my main always on server as it is fast enough.


    I think Apple got this right, switching to an Arm chip for the Mac
    Mini. That is what the common man wants. So we should be careful when
    we offer advice on which PC to buy.

    Its certainly getting to the point where a Pi 5 is probably better than
    an old 32 bit Intel machine.

    BUT the availability of precompiled ARM software is simply not as good
    yet as on INTEL


    Yes, I was debating Remote Desktop servers the other day, I said it
    worked on Gnome 47. I neglected to mention I don't think it works on
    Aarch64.

    I cant at this stage get rid of my INTEL desktop.


    I still like MS Excel, but I can remote desktop into Windows/Intel PCs.
    Big old towers, hidden away.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Pancho on Thu Apr 17 12:49:44 2025
    On 17/04/2025 11:28, Pancho wrote:
    I don't know for sure, but I suspect my usage patterns are normal for
    people without specific requirements such as gaming, video editing.

    The problem is that there is no 'normal usage pattern'. In an office,
    maybe - Office tools, a spreadsheet, browser and email perhaps.

    At home for 'social domestic and pleasure' people are creating videos,
    creating 3D designs and printing them, designing circuit boards, playing
    online games, drawing incredible pictures with painting tools, writing
    books & songs, creating music, playing cards - patience and online multi-player, processing holiday snapshots, scanning yonks old slides
    and negatives...

    I have a friend who is doing mathematical research into enormous
    matrices that require a supercomputer to run: He is writing code to run
    on various platforms...

    Are any of these 'normal'?

    If all you are is a *consumer* of content, then get an I-pad!

    Some people want power in a huge laptop. I dont. I do power computing on
    a desktop.
    Other people want Apple fashion accessories. I dont.


    There is no 'normal'. At best there is a core of stuff - email and
    browsing typically - that most people want. But most of them want
    something else as well.


    --
    All political activity makes complete sense once the proposition that
    all government is basically a self-legalising protection racket, is
    fully understood.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Pancho on Thu Apr 17 12:54:04 2025
    On 17/04/2025 11:56, Pancho wrote:
    On 4/16/25 09:18, The Natural Philosopher wrote:


    About ten years ago my MV died and I got a new one with a core i
    something instead of a pentium,. and a Nvidia graffix card

    Ran faster and cooler and would run my real time video game.


    I gave up playing video games 30 years ago, due to blood pressure
    problems. I'm surprised you can play.

    Oh its not shoot em ups. More MPORPG strategy games


    Although to be fair, I feel better now than I did then. I always
    expected to be dead long before the age I am now. Modern medicine is a wonderful thing (and clean living - :o( )

    Indeed. I didnt expect to survive much past 1980.
    [snip]

    The thing is, I'm sitting using an Orange Pi5, which is a 2-watt toy.
    The problem isn't that it feels slow, it doesn't. The problem is that
    the OS is buggy, not fully implemented.

    Should have gone to Raspberry...Raspios is pretty tidy these days.


    I have both. My perception is that the oPi5 is better performance, but
    it's not a fair test, I never got around to installing the rPi5 OS on
    NVME as opposed to SD card. I use them both to drive TV screens, a kind
    of very smart TV/standard PC. The oPi5 TV is in front of the comfy chair.

    Yup. Pis are very good ta that. I have one driving my Hifi...

    I still use an rPi4 as my main always on server as it is fast enough.


    Building mine is an ongoing project.

    I think Apple got this right, switching to an Arm chip for the Mac
    Mini. That is what the common man wants. So we should be careful when
    we offer advice on which PC to buy.

    Its certainly getting to the point where a Pi 5 is probably better
    than an old 32 bit Intel machine.

    BUT the availability of precompiled ARM software is simply not as good
    yet as on INTEL


    Yes, I was debating Remote Desktop servers the other day, I said it
    worked on Gnome 47. I neglected to mention I don't think it works on
    Aarch64.

    I cant at this stage get rid of my INTEL desktop.


    I still like MS Excel, but I can remote desktop into Windows/Intel PCs.
    Big old towers, hidden away.


    I am all linux, but I do need a windows VM for Corel Draw and Rhino CAD.

    I never found anything better than Corel Draw for some purposes.

    --
    Canada is all right really, though not for the whole weekend.

    "Saki"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Andrew on Thu Apr 17 13:51:34 2025
    On 15/04/2025 16:56, Andrew wrote:
    On 15/04/2025 10:30, Tim Streater wrote:
    On 15 Apr 2025 at 10:07:48 BST, "wasbit" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On 14/04/2025 19:40, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 10:59, wasbit wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 00:41, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not run on >>>>>> 'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly recent & >>>>>> decent.

    Snip <> Not strictly true.
    I'm triple booting windows 8.1/10/11 on ancient hardware.

    If you install Win11 via one of the published work-arounds, will you
    still get OS updates in future?


    Who knows? It's up to the vagaries of Microsoft.

    I should also say that it is installed as a technical exercise & for
    familiarity. There is no personal information on there.

    Win-11 runs nicely in a VirtualBox VM on my Mac Mini.

    It's the first Win OS that I remember, that has decent fonts instead
    of all
    the dotty ones. So it even looks nice.


    Interesting.

    If the official apple adapters were use to end up with a
    firewire I/F, I wonder if the Win-11 image would be able to
    connect to my Nikon scanner via those adapters.

    DRAT !,

    Apple seem to have discontinued the Thunderbolt2->Firewire
    adapter (A1463) so only 2nd hand ones seem to be available,
    at a (stupid) price.

    So that rules out getting a MAc mini, what is the point.

    OTOH I read somewhere that a japanese guy has taken on
    support and development of the linux firewire driver until
    2029 which is better than nothing. The downside is that I
    don't like linux, it's really not a plug'n'play solution.

    I wonder how long my 2011 Novatech M/B,cpu,ram upgrade will
    live on for (and a 2006 power supply), and would it be
    worth paying for a Win10 support extension ?.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 17 14:10:15 2025
    On 17/04/2025 11:28, GB wrote:
    On 16/04/2025 12:46, John Rumm wrote:

    Perhaps not, but IME you will immediately "feel" the difference
    between a new mid range business spec machine and a new "low end" or
    ageing mid range desktop system.

    I'm sure that's true. So, if I were still in business, I'd buy a decent
    spec machine. (Like this machine I built years ago, with an i7 CPU. It
    cut the recalculation time on some very large spreadsheets down from 30 minutes to 5.)

    As it is, though, I generally only have TBird and Chrome open on the PC
    these days, and the N100 machine seems perfectly fast enough for my
    current usage.

    Pretty much how I use my PC, plus online banking and SIPP+ISA
    management, and occasionally into Lightroom and less occasionally
    my Nikon slide scanner.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Andrew on Thu Apr 17 18:23:13 2025
    On 17/04/2025 13:51, Andrew wrote:
    I
    don't like linux, it's really not a plug'n'play solution.

    It has been for me for the last ten years or so

    Notice how few posters there are here saying 'I cant get my Linux to
    work' compared with Windows/Mac users...

    --
    “Progress is precisely that which rules and regulations did not foresee,”

    – Ludwig von Mises

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim Streater@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Thu Apr 17 21:01:28 2025
    On 17 Apr 2025 at 18:23:13 BST, "The Natural Philosopher"
    <[email protected]d> wrote:

    On 17/04/2025 13:51, Andrew wrote:
    I
    don't like linux, it's really not a plug'n'play solution.

    It has been for me for the last ten years or so

    Notice how few posters there are here saying 'I cant get my Linux to
    work' compared with Windows/Mac users...

    It's extremely rare that you'll see a Mac-related question here.

    1) It mostly works and better than Windows. And I look forward to the time
    when I can drop an App on the Mint Taskbar and have it trivially create all
    the stuff needed to have the app as a clickable item there.

    2) And why would we post here? We'd post on uk.comp.sys.mac

    --
    "I love the way that Microsoft follows standards. In much the same manner as fish follow migrating caribou."
    - Paul Tomblin, ASR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Tim Streater on Fri Apr 18 01:30:10 2025
    On 17/04/2025 22:01, Tim Streater wrote:
    On 17 Apr 2025 at 18:23:13 BST, "The Natural Philosopher" <[email protected]d> wrote:

    On 17/04/2025 13:51, Andrew wrote:
    I
    don't like linux, it's really not a plug'n'play solution.

    It has been for me for the last ten years or so

    Notice how few posters there are here saying 'I cant get my Linux to
    work' compared with Windows/Mac users...

    It's extremely rare that you'll see a Mac-related question here.

    1) It mostly works and better than Windows. And I look forward to the time when I can drop an App on the Mint Taskbar and have it trivially create all the stuff needed to have the app as a clickable item there.

    That's how mine (MATE) works
    All though it isn't an 'app' in the nomenclature

    2) And why would we post here? We'd post on uk.comp.sys.mac

    Well yes..:-)

    I gave up on Macs because it became clear that no mac users actually
    knew anything about Macintoshes or OS/X.

    There was no support beyond 'buy a new one' 'reinstall everything'


    --
    “when things get difficult you just have to lie”

    ― Jean Claud Jüncker

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From wasbit@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Fri Apr 18 09:47:37 2025
    On 17/04/2025 18:23, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 17/04/2025 13:51, Andrew wrote:
    I
    don't like linux, it's really not a plug'n'play solution.

    It has been for me for the last ten years or so

    Notice how few posters there are here saying 'I cant get my Linux to
    work' compared with Windows/Mac users...


    Linux users tend to be more technically minded.


    --
    Regards
    wasbit

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Wade@21:1/5 to wasbit on Fri Apr 18 10:57:09 2025
    On 18/04/2025 09:47, wasbit wrote:
    On 17/04/2025 18:23, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 17/04/2025 13:51, Andrew wrote:
    I
    don't like linux, it's really not a plug'n'play solution.

    It has been for me for the last ten years or so

    Notice how few posters there are here saying 'I cant get my Linux to
    work' compared with Windows/Mac users...


    Linux users tend to be more technically minded.


    But in addition if figures are to be believed Linux accounts for around
    4% of "real pc" users compared to 71% for windows so its hardly
    surprising there are fewer Linux questions.

    Dave

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim Streater@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Fri Apr 18 09:41:53 2025
    On 18 Apr 2025 at 01:30:10 BST, "The Natural Philosopher"
    <[email protected]d> wrote:

    On 17/04/2025 22:01, Tim Streater wrote:
    On 17 Apr 2025 at 18:23:13 BST, "The Natural Philosopher"
    <[email protected]d> wrote:

    On 17/04/2025 13:51, Andrew wrote:
    I
    don't like linux, it's really not a plug'n'play solution.

    It has been for me for the last ten years or so

    Notice how few posters there are here saying 'I cant get my Linux to
    work' compared with Windows/Mac users...

    It's extremely rare that you'll see a Mac-related question here.

    1) It mostly works and better than Windows. And I look forward to the time >> when I can drop an App on the Mint Taskbar and have it trivially create all >> the stuff needed to have the app as a clickable item there.

    That's how mine (MATE) works

    Thanks that's useful to know. I'll be sticking with Mint as I have worked out how to do it by hand, and usage of Lin/Win for me is limited to providing a testbed for my email software as I want to be able to support all three desktops to the extent possible.

    All though it isn't an 'app' in the nomenclature

    2) And why would we post here? We'd post on uk.comp.sys.mac

    Well yes..:-)

    I gave up on Macs because it became clear that no mac users actually
    knew anything about Macintoshes or OS/X.

    Only let's say naive users. But then the same is true for Windows. And why
    not, at that level.

    There was no support beyond 'buy a new one' 'reinstall everything'

    Perhaps you might like to lurk there for a while to see what gets discussed. :-)

    --
    "Hard" and "Soft" Brexit are code words for Leaving or Staying in the EU, rather than for the terms of our departure.

    Jacob Rees-Mogg MP

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to David Wade on Fri Apr 18 12:25:19 2025
    On 18/04/2025 10:57, David Wade wrote:
    On 18/04/2025 09:47, wasbit wrote:
    On 17/04/2025 18:23, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 17/04/2025 13:51, Andrew wrote:
    I
    don't like linux, it's really not a plug'n'play solution.

    It has been for me for the last ten years or so

    Notice how few posters there are here saying 'I cant get my Linux to
    work' compared with Windows/Mac users...


    Linux users tend to be more technically minded.


    But in addition if figures are to be believed Linux accounts for around
    4% of "real pc" users compared to 71% for windows so its hardly
    surprising there are fewer Linux questions.

    Well Linux users don't ask here, but linux questions tend to be far more
    in depth. No one has any problem installing it....or with upgrades
    borking it.

    Dave

    --
    "It is an established fact to 97% confidence limits that left wing
    conspirators see right wing conspiracies everywhere"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Tim Streater on Fri Apr 18 12:26:08 2025
    On 18/04/2025 10:41, Tim Streater wrote:
    On 18 Apr 2025 at 01:30:10 BST, "The Natural Philosopher" <[email protected]d> wrote:

    On 17/04/2025 22:01, Tim Streater wrote:
    On 17 Apr 2025 at 18:23:13 BST, "The Natural Philosopher"
    <[email protected]d> wrote:

    On 17/04/2025 13:51, Andrew wrote:
    I
    don't like linux, it's really not a plug'n'play solution.

    It has been for me for the last ten years or so

    Notice how few posters there are here saying 'I cant get my Linux to
    work' compared with Windows/Mac users...

    It's extremely rare that you'll see a Mac-related question here.

    1) It mostly works and better than Windows. And I look forward to the time >>> when I can drop an App on the Mint Taskbar and have it trivially create all >>> the stuff needed to have the app as a clickable item there.

    That's how mine (MATE) works

    Thanks that's useful to know. I'll be sticking with Mint as I have worked out how to do it by hand, and usage of Lin/Win for me is limited to providing a testbed for my email software as I want to be able to support all three desktops to the extent possible.

    All though it isn't an 'app' in the nomenclature

    2) And why would we post here? We'd post on uk.comp.sys.mac

    Well yes..:-)

    I gave up on Macs because it became clear that no mac users actually
    knew anything about Macintoshes or OS/X.

    Only let's say naive users. But then the same is true for Windows. And why not, at that level.

    There was no support beyond 'buy a new one' 'reinstall everything'

    Perhaps you might like to lurk there for a while to see what gets discussed. :-)

    I did.
    It profited me not one bit.

    --
    "It is an established fact to 97% confidence limits that left wing
    conspirators see right wing conspiracies everywhere"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Wade@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Fri Apr 18 12:46:04 2025
    On 18/04/2025 12:25, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 18/04/2025 10:57, David Wade wrote:
    On 18/04/2025 09:47, wasbit wrote:
    On 17/04/2025 18:23, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 17/04/2025 13:51, Andrew wrote:
    I
    don't like linux, it's really not a plug'n'play solution.

    It has been for me for the last ten years or so

    Notice how few posters there are here saying 'I cant get my Linux to
    work' compared with Windows/Mac users...


    Linux users tend to be more technically minded.


    But in addition if figures are to be believed Linux accounts for
    around 4% of "real pc" users compared to 71% for windows so its hardly
    surprising there are fewer Linux questions.

    Well Linux users don't ask here, but linux questions tend to be far more
    in depth.  No one has any problem installing it....or with upgrades
    borking it.

    I have an HP MiniServer with Ubuntu, which has "borked" twice on
    upgrades. It also wiped one of the desktops. Its really just there as a test-bed for a package I work on. It spends more time applying updates
    than doing work....


    Dave


    Dave

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Pancho on Fri Apr 18 09:11:19 2025
    On Thu, 4/17/2025 6:28 AM, Pancho wrote:
    On 4/16/25 12:46, John Rumm wrote:
    On 16/04/2025 08:18, Pancho wrote:
    On 4/15/25 12:53, John Rumm wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 22:34, Pancho wrote:
    On 4/14/25 20:30, John Rumm wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 18:26, GB wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 17:38, No mail wrote:

    Consider whether you *need* a desktop machine. A re-furb laptop (from the likes of Tier1) will come with an in-built UPS ...


    The OP asked about a new mb for his desktop, but you can buy a quite capable N100 machine for £100, or so.  That will run browsers, email, etc, which probably covers 90% of users.

    Them that can put up with pretty lame performance anyway! i5 / Ryzen 5 would be a better starting point for a general purpose machine. The N100 might be alright for a media (consumption) PC.



    Where do you think this lame performance manifests itself, on a general purpose machine?

    Comparatively sluggish response and general lacklustre performance. Poor experience with VMs or any CPU intensive task like transcoding/ rendering video.


    The thing is, I don't think VMs or rendering video are general usage.

    Perhaps not, but IME you will immediately "feel" the difference between a new mid range business spec machine and a new "low end" or ageing mid range desktop system.

    For example, I have recently rolling out some software updates to a fleet of machines. The process is not that complicated - quit a couple of running apps, uninstall a couple, download and install a couple, start one of the new ones, and then do a bit
    of config. Most of it automated in a batch file. Doing it on a >= 10th gen machine gets it done in less than 5 mins. On a 6th gen i5 it is more like 10, and for a 3rd or 4th gen it is often 15 min. These are all Win 10 or 11 boxes with SSDs.

    How much that will affect your workflow will depend much on what you do and how you do it. If you load a couple of programs and then live in them all day - the impact of a slower machine is less noticeable. If you need to run multiple things, and
    frequently switch between jobs, it is a much bigger impact.


    This is the nub of my objection. On my toy computer Spreadsheet, Browser, IDE, and MPV Video Player all start in under 5 seconds. Yes I would notice if these apps started in 2 seconds, and I would like it, but it wouldn't really affect my workflow.

    The toy computer also has advantages, it uses so little power it can be left on all the time, it is tiny, it is absolutely silent. Having apps start in 2 seconds wouldn't be worth the cost of losing these qualities, or the additional cost.

    I don't know for sure, but I suspect my usage patterns are normal for people without specific requirements such as gaming, video editing.

    I do look at new PCs and I think eventually they will combine speed with low size/low idle power. I think the Mac Mini, points the way. When such  machines exists outside Apple's locked down world, I'll buy one. The new 20 core Intel and AMD CPUs also
    look exciting, but that is the first time in 10 years, I've thought I might want to buy.

    I've never believed in future proofing. In the past, when it was a problem, it was normally better to buy cheap, buy often.

    The thread count on Intel is coming down. HT is off on the silicon. The third one is the newest
    of the three examples. It has 20 threads instead of 28 threads, as the 8 P-cores no longer
    have hyperthreading. And, it hasn't hurt performance, when compared to the 14700K. Stare
    as I might, looking at the Wikipedia Intel lists, I find it almost impossible to spot
    a strategy on their sockets/CPU designs for desktops. The 265K was likely selected to
    get roughly into a mid-price range.

    single multi
    thread thread

    Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.00GHz 2,505 8,943 4 threads
    Intel Core i5-14400 3,766 25,253 $178.96 6*2 + 4 threads Faster than your 6700K
    Intel Core i7-14700K 4,478 52,711 $319.00 8*2 + 12 threads Selected for single thread, high clock
    Intel Core Ultra 7 265K 4,870 58,789 $332.99 8 + 12 threads No-HT, 13 TOPS NPU

    E8400 1,234 1,210 2 threads (example of CPU where W11 cannot be installed now)
    N4000 1,036 1,428 2 threads
    N5000 1,130 2,610 4 threads (seems a starved design...)

    AMD 5700G (Zen3) 3,284 24,477 $148.00 8*2 threads \___ selected for cheapness (price varies, like tomatoes)
    AMD 5600G (Zen3) 3,187 19,804 $148.00 6*2 threads / may be unavailable, depending on the tide table

    Example system, power measured with a Kill-O-Watt meter at the wall.

    5600G, 4 sticks DDR4, DVD drive, SSD boot, 2 fans

    18W idle (no DVD, other as title)
    19W idle 18.8W four sticks of RAM, vs 18.5W one stick of RAM (I wasn't expecting so little improvement!)
    48W SuperPI 1.5 XS 8 minutes 0 seconds for 32M PI (not smoking fast) [3 minutes on a better processor, L3 should help]
    89W 7ZBench All threads power number

    The SuperPI or the "single thread" column, are a proxy for how annoying Microsoft Windows will be.
    A fast single thread pays dividends. Few activities use "all cores" with regularity,
    which is why heavy iron only pays off for heavy iron work. When people select some of the heavy iron numbers, it's just to get a better single thread clock. It is too bad they don't sell screaming fast 2 core CPUs.

    My very first gutless PC (Celeron 300), used to idle at 150W
    and single threaded benchmarks drew 153W. The idle power
    has changed quite a bit since then. One of the processors
    I put in that machine, it drew a whole 35W, so the power wasn't
    exactly going where it counted. Nothing was power optimized back
    then. Even my CRT monitor, it drew just as much power on a loss
    of signal, as it drew with a signal (that is *dreadfully* bad
    as these things go).

    And the above class of machine in the example, does quite frequently get left on when not in usage. My networking equipment draws 17W and must be left running for the VOIP ATA box to work.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Fri Apr 18 20:48:09 2025
    On 17/04/2025 18:23, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 17/04/2025 13:51, Andrew wrote:
    I
    don't like linux, it's really not a plug'n'play solution.

    It has been for me for the last ten years or so

    Notice how few posters there are here saying 'I cant get my Linux to
    work' compared with Windows/Mac users...


    The worlds oldest linux peripheral

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35N5vKKGDy8

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Rumm@21:1/5 to Sam Plusnet on Sat Apr 19 02:37:42 2025
    On 14/04/2025 19:30, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 11:48, Theo wrote:
    John Rumm <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 00:41, Sam Plusnet wrote:

    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not run on
    'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly recent &
    decent.


    Once you go down this road, you might find you can pick up a whole
    mini PC
    for £200-300 which is the price of a mobo/CPU/RAM combo.  Even less if
    you're prepared to consider a used ex-office mini PC.

    I have thought about one of the many Dell Optiflex machines which seem
    to dominate the second hand market, but I suspect I would end up
    replacing that fairly quickly - and I do dislike all the hassle involved
    in transferring my applications & data onto a new(er) setup.

    Win10 is quite good at adapting to new hardware. So you would probably
    find if you made a clone[1] of your existing disk and showed it into
    your "new" machine, it would book ok and then sort out finding the right drivers etc. If the new machine already had Win 10 on it, it would
    reactivate with a digital license as well.


    [1] You could stick your current disk straight in, but that would put
    your only original at risk.

    --
    Cheers,

    John.

    /=================================================================\
    | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------|
    | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob Eager@21:1/5 to John Rumm on Sat Apr 19 09:09:44 2025
    On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 02:37:42 +0100, John Rumm wrote:

    Win10 is quite good at adapting to new hardware. So you would probably
    find if you made a clone[1] of your existing disk and showed it into
    your "new" machine, it would book ok and then sort out finding the right drivers etc. If the new machine already had Win 10 on it, it would
    reactivate with a digital license as well.

    Except, as I discovered this week...

    The old machine didn't support UEFI. I installed Win10 about two years
    ago.

    Updated the motherboard this week, and it refused to boot from the disk.
    Turns out that Win10 didn't bother to install a UEFI partition.

    --
    My posts are my copyright and if @diy_forums or Home Owners' Hub
    wish to copy them they can pay me £1 a message.
    Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org
    *lightning surge protection* - a w_tom conductor

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Gaines@21:1/5 to All on Sat Apr 19 10:07:56 2025
    On 19/04/2025 in message <[email protected]> Bob Eager
    wrote:

    On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 02:37:42 +0100, John Rumm wrote:

    Win10 is quite good at adapting to new hardware. So you would probably
    find if you made a clone[1] of your existing disk and showed it into
    your "new" machine, it would book ok and then sort out finding the right >>drivers etc. If the new machine already had Win 10 on it, it would >>reactivate with a digital license as well.

    Except, as I discovered this week...

    The old machine didn't support UEFI. I installed Win10 about two years
    ago.

    Updated the motherboard this week, and it refused to boot from the disk. >Turns out that Win10 didn't bother to install a UEFI partition.

    Installing Win 10 to legacy BIOS/MBR is what I do to stop Win 11 being installed as an "update". You may need to set the BIOS to match your installation, it probably defaults to UEFI/Secure Boot.

    --
    Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
    Remember, the Flat Earth Society has members all around the globe.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob Eager@21:1/5 to Jeff Gaines on Sat Apr 19 10:49:01 2025
    On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 10:07:56 +0000, Jeff Gaines wrote:

    On 19/04/2025 in message <[email protected]> Bob Eager
    wrote:

    On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 02:37:42 +0100, John Rumm wrote:

    Win10 is quite good at adapting to new hardware. So you would probably >>>find if you made a clone[1] of your existing disk and showed it into
    your "new" machine, it would book ok and then sort out finding the
    right drivers etc. If the new machine already had Win 10 on it, it
    would reactivate with a digital license as well.

    Except, as I discovered this week...

    The old machine didn't support UEFI. I installed Win10 about two years
    ago.

    Updated the motherboard this week, and it refused to boot from the disk. >>Turns out that Win10 didn't bother to install a UEFI partition.

    Installing Win 10 to legacy BIOS/MBR is what I do to stop Win 11 being installed as an "update". You may need to set the BIOS to match your installation, it probably defaults to UEFI/Secure Boot.

    The BIOS kept switching it back. In any case, Win 11 insists on UEFI, and
    I'm upgrading to that soon anyway.

    So I'm just installing Win 11 a bit earlier.



    --
    My posts are my copyright and if @diy_forums or Home Owners' Hub
    wish to copy them they can pay me £1 a message.
    Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org
    *lightning surge protection* - a w_tom conductor

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Bob Eager on Sat Apr 19 10:10:49 2025
    On Sat, 4/19/2025 6:49 AM, Bob Eager wrote:
    On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 10:07:56 +0000, Jeff Gaines wrote:

    On 19/04/2025 in message <[email protected]> Bob Eager
    wrote:

    On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 02:37:42 +0100, John Rumm wrote:

    Win10 is quite good at adapting to new hardware. So you would probably >>>> find if you made a clone[1] of your existing disk and showed it into
    your "new" machine, it would book ok and then sort out finding the
    right drivers etc. If the new machine already had Win 10 on it, it
    would reactivate with a digital license as well.

    Except, as I discovered this week...

    The old machine didn't support UEFI. I installed Win10 about two years
    ago.

    Updated the motherboard this week, and it refused to boot from the disk. >>> Turns out that Win10 didn't bother to install a UEFI partition.

    Installing Win 10 to legacy BIOS/MBR is what I do to stop Win 11 being
    installed as an "update". You may need to set the BIOS to match your
    installation, it probably defaults to UEFI/Secure Boot.

    The BIOS kept switching it back. In any case, Win 11 insists on UEFI, and
    I'm upgrading to that soon anyway.

    So I'm just installing Win 11 a bit earlier.

    The only route I can think of, is go back to the old machine, clone
    the disk, use the MBR2GPT.exe executable and convert the cloned
    disk to GPT... and hopefully UEFI. I think it will add an ESP for you
    (even if it doesn't put the partitions in the correct order, ESP
    goes on the left). But I don't know how it manages to populate
    the ESP with anything useful.

    C:\Windows\System32\MBR2GPT.exe 340KB
    H:\Windows\System32\MBR2GPT.exe 1149KB <=== win10 one is bigger

    After you do the conversion, it's quite possible the old machine
    won't be able to boot on it. But the new machine might be able to
    boot on it (now that it is converted).

    The Macrium Rescue CD has a boot repair option, which uses maybe
    four different windows-included routines, for boot repair. And
    that does not have files to stick in an ESP. Once the MBR2GPT is finished
    with the disk drive, you can try a boot repair with Macrium CD.

    {Picture] Example of of a GPT disk with a UEFI ESP ("EFI System Partition")

    https://i.postimg.cc/15SjSR2v/UEFI-GPT-disk-with-ESP-Partition.gif

    the MBR2GPT is far from perfect, because it violates the first law
    of partition management. It does a ton of changes without user input.
    Most partition managers support "primitive" operations, operating
    on a single partition at a time. the MBR2GPT program is an attempt
    by somebody, to batch up the necessary steps... and it only works
    on very simple disk configurations. Most of the time, it will reject
    your disk as unworkable (for its feeble logic), which is fine if it
    is only going to make a mess. This is one of the reasons you work
    with a clone of the disk, versus using your one and only copy of
    the old boot drive.

    I managed to run MGR2GPT.exe once, on a VM setup here, but I only
    marveled that the run completed, and I didn't spend any time testing
    the thing after the conversion was done. I just noted some partitions
    weren't in the order I'd hoped for. I had been thwarted on previous
    runs, by complains it could not handle what I was giving it. But
    by the time I was down to three partition, it decided to work.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob Eager@21:1/5 to Paul on Sat Apr 19 14:51:38 2025
    On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 10:10:49 -0400, Paul wrote:

    On Sat, 4/19/2025 6:49 AM, Bob Eager wrote:
    On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 10:07:56 +0000, Jeff Gaines wrote:

    On 19/04/2025 in message <[email protected]> Bob Eager
    wrote:

    On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 02:37:42 +0100, John Rumm wrote:

    Win10 is quite good at adapting to new hardware. So you would
    probably find if you made a clone[1] of your existing disk and
    showed it into your "new" machine, it would book ok and then sort
    out finding the right drivers etc. If the new machine already had
    Win 10 on it, it would reactivate with a digital license as well.

    Except, as I discovered this week...

    The old machine didn't support UEFI. I installed Win10 about two
    years ago.

    Updated the motherboard this week, and it refused to boot from the
    disk.
    Turns out that Win10 didn't bother to install a UEFI partition.

    Installing Win 10 to legacy BIOS/MBR is what I do to stop Win 11 being
    installed as an "update". You may need to set the BIOS to match your
    installation, it probably defaults to UEFI/Secure Boot.

    The BIOS kept switching it back. In any case, Win 11 insists on UEFI,
    and I'm upgrading to that soon anyway.

    So I'm just installing Win 11 a bit earlier.

    The only route I can think of, is go back to the old machine, clone the
    disk, use the MBR2GPT.exe executable and convert the cloned disk to
    GPT...

    I would do that. But the old machine has died irretrievably.

    I am installing on a fresh SSD on the new machine. I will then install the (relatively few) applications. There is no worry about the data because
    the home directory is on the house file server.

    Not many applications as this is my workshop machine. Applications for the oscilloscope, multimeter, function generator, and PSU. Zoom (I use that
    room for quietness) and Office. Not much else.

    The old disks are still in there if I find I have missed anything. They
    will be accessible for data.



    --
    My posts are my copyright and if @diy_forums or Home Owners' Hub
    wish to copy them they can pay me £1 a message.
    Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org
    *lightning surge protection* - a w_tom conductor

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Rumm@21:1/5 to Jeff Layman on Sun Apr 20 02:49:08 2025
    On 16/04/2025 08:22, Jeff Layman wrote:
    On 15/04/2025 22:11, No mail wrote:

    Be grateful that you never had to develop an interface for daisy wheel
    printers - timing the hammer fire and wheel rotation was a nightmare.
    ESD wasn't completely understood and a discharge during printing often
    resulted in showers of "petals" - but the print quality was great. Swing
    the lamp!

    My first printer was a Smith Corona daisywheel (I've still got it somewhere!). For reasons long forgotten I decided that I didn't want the
    font that usually came with it, so I bought "Tempo". I really liked it,
    and, as you note, the print quality of a daisywheel was superb.


    I remember having a *graphics* screen dump routine that printed on a
    daisy wheel... it used the full stop for a dot, and the micro
    justification, and ascender / descender shift commands to achieve XY positioning of the full stop. Took 40 mins to print a page I seem to
    recall being told (I never had a daisy wheel printer that I could
    actually try it on)

    --
    Cheers,

    John.

    /=================================================================\
    | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------|
    | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From No mail@21:1/5 to Bob Eager on Sun Apr 20 11:05:16 2025
    Bob Eager wrote:
    Not many applications as this is my workshop machine. Applications for the oscilloscope, multimeter, function generator, and PSU

    Bob, I'd be interested in hearing more about these Apps (with apols. for
    thread creep)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob Eager@21:1/5 to No mail on Sun Apr 20 15:19:16 2025
    On Sun, 20 Apr 2025 11:05:16 +0100, No mail wrote:

    Bob Eager wrote:
    Not many applications as this is my workshop machine. Applications for
    the oscilloscope, multimeter, function generator, and PSU

    Bob, I'd be interested in hearing more about these Apps (with apols. for thread creep)

    They are specifically for Siglent equipment, supplied by the manufacturer.

    But there is other software out there. The API is open.

    <https://www.ni.com/en/support/documentation/supplemental/06/ni-virtual- instrument-software-architecture.html>




    --
    My posts are my copyright and if @diy_forums or Home Owners' Hub
    wish to copy them they can pay me £1 a message.
    Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org
    *lightning surge protection* - a w_tom conductor

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sam Plusnet@21:1/5 to No mail on Mon Apr 21 19:09:44 2025
    On 20/04/2025 11:05, No mail wrote:
    Bob Eager wrote:
    Not many applications as this is my workshop machine. Applications for
    the
    oscilloscope, multimeter, function generator, and PSU

    Bob, I'd be interested in hearing more about these Apps (with apols. for thread creep)

    Apologies?!? Surely thread creep is the very lifeblood of this newsgroup.

    --
    Sam Plusnet

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Sam Plusnet on Tue Apr 22 09:49:09 2025
    On 21/04/2025 19:09, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 20/04/2025 11:05, No mail wrote:
    Bob Eager wrote:
    Not many applications as this is my workshop machine. Applications
    for the
    oscilloscope, multimeter, function generator, and PSU

    Bob, I'd be interested in hearing more about these Apps (with apols.
    for thread creep)

    Apologies?!?  Surely thread creep is the very lifeblood of this newsgroup.

    More interesting facts revealed by thread creep than by adherence to the newsgroup ethos

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and
    wrong.

    H.L.Mencken

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Sam Plusnet on Tue Apr 22 10:28:50 2025
    On Mon, 4/21/2025 2:09 PM, Sam Plusnet wrote:
    On 20/04/2025 11:05, No mail wrote:
    Bob Eager wrote:
    Not many applications as this is my workshop machine. Applications for the >>> oscilloscope, multimeter, function generator, and PSU

    Bob, I'd be interested in hearing more about these Apps (with apols. for thread creep)

    Apologies?!?  Surely thread creep is the very lifeblood of this newsgroup.


    The prices on these, seem a bit rich in places.

    https://www.novatech.co.uk/motherboardbundles/

    I'd look at getting a local computer shop that
    does builds for a fee over and above the parts
    cost, and see if they can compete with a Novatech
    bundle. On the web sites, there is usually a separate
    section where shop build prices are shown. My shop now,
    only has one person in the build area, as they've cut
    back on staff.

    with Windows, they don't have to install a license
    key in it -- it can be activated later. A lot of
    Windows installation is automated, so the labour time
    involved is lower than it used to be. Twenty five years
    ago, they were opening boxes and saving the CD/DVD discs
    for software installation, and doing those steps
    sequentially, taking some amount of time. A lot of the
    OS materials download and install onto the machine
    without help now.

    Since you probably won't be asking for a separate video card (expensive),
    the video in the CPU will be good enough for test. Video can
    be unstable, in a few cases (really new items can have
    half-finished drivers). But if you're using less bleeding
    edge kit, to save money, the drivers are more likely to be
    mature.

    I couldn't have predicted what happened to mine. It
    ran fine at first. About a year after acquisition, I
    started getting black screens. But, these weren't ordinary
    black screens. Something in the machine was attempting to
    communicate with me. The machine was turning off the 5V rail
    that powers keyboard and mouse, so I would not be able to
    press Ctrl-Alt-Delete. My guess at the time, is a video driver
    was doing this. Windows does have "emergency responses"
    claimed in some previous blog articles, but we don't know
    what those responses are, so I can't blame what happened
    on the Windows kernel.

    That's all I could figure. My conclusion
    after a while, is the root cause was an address map error
    in the BIOS code, where it poorly planned how memory was to
    be used, and two address spaces overlapped in some way. By
    turning off the iGPU and RealTek NIC, and installing
    a cheap video card and Intel NIC (PCIe), the weird black
    screens stopped. But it cost me a bundle for the gear to
    test and isolate to that solution. For example, I could
    have sent the CPU in, under warranty, and it would have come
    back NFF and just my time would be wasted. So I tested the CPU
    locally, in the room, and the CPU was just fine... on
    yet another new motherboard.

    The lesson there is, I could have had a "tested bundle"
    on day one, and a year later, that could still have happened
    to me. I don't understand the timing, whether it was an
    "improvement" to Windows, that caused that to happen, but
    that's unlike anything that has happened to me in previous builds.
    I could not find a matching symptom set, in Google when
    that happened. It could happen on average, every second day.
    What you were doing with the machine at the time (idle or busy),
    made no difference.

    Today, like every day, the machine is just fine. 200+ for
    a cheap video card, 70 for a NIC (because it obviously could
    not be another RealTek NIC :-) ). If a brand lets you down,
    you show it the door.

    As for the motherboard companies, we're kinda running out
    of brands to recommend. Maybe my next one will be PCChips.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim Streater@21:1/5 to David on Mon Apr 28 14:34:45 2025
    On 28 Apr 2025 at 15:18:22 BST, "David" <[email protected]> wrote:

    Probable also a DVD writer for old time's sake.

    I spent £10 on an Amazon Basics USB DVD writer, some 15 years ago, it seems to have sat in a box for most of the time since then.

    --
    All of science is either physics or stamp-collecting.

    Ernest Rutherford

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Gaines@21:1/5 to David on Mon Apr 28 14:57:25 2025
    On 28/04/2025 in message <[email protected]> David wrote:

    On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 00:41:06 +0100, Sam Plusnet wrote:

    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not run on >>'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly recent &
    decent.

    Having thought about it some more, I realise most of my PC dates from
    2016 so regardless of Microsoft's messing around, it is time for a
    refresh.

    I'm happy with the peripherals I have, so it's just the >>Motherboard/CPU/RAM/CPU Cooler that I want to replace. To make life >>easier, I want to buy a ready built & tested bundle.

    Last time around,I bought such a bundle from Novatech, and I was very
    happy with the result. I might still buy from them, but their bundles
    get very expensive very quickly (e.g. a modest bundle is ~£300, the next >>is £740 and sharply up from there).

    Question: Can anyone recommend other firms which offer such (built & >>tested) bundles, and are they good if/when things need attention?
    (I can recommend Novatech since they replaced my first bundle without a >>quibble when it suddenly died after a year of use.)

    Question 2: My current system is Intel-based. Is there any advantage
    to going for a Ryzen-based system at the moment?
    I am not into the latest & greatest in gaming, so I have no interest in >>overclocking the thing into meltdown.

    I too am looking for a motherboard bundle.
    I have laptops, but I want to be able to use a tower case to host a number
    of HDD.
    Probable also a DVD writer for old time's sake.

    So I need a new MoBo or a recent business machine with a proper tower case >with some real estate.

    I haven't finished going through every posting in the thread, but
    (although entertaining in parts) the thread drift is killing my will to
    live.

    So - Mobo or decent tower case with plenty of disc slots and option card >slots, anyone?

    M.2 NVMe slot would be a bonus.

    My last bundle from OverClockers cost me around £200 but that was a while >back. [See signature.]


    Cheers



    Dave R

    I have just built an Asus Z170P into this case:

    SilverStone CS380 V2 Mid Towe Chassis, ATX/MicroATX/Mini-ITX, 8x 2.5/3.5" Hot-Swap Bays 3x120mm Fans, 2x USB 3.0 83KS0

    From Scan

    8 x disk bays with backplane, rare beasts!

    --
    Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
    Most people have heard of Karl Marx the philosopher but few know of his
    sister Onya the Olympic runner.
    Her name is still mentioned at the start of every race.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David@21:1/5 to Sam Plusnet on Mon Apr 28 14:18:22 2025
    On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 00:41:06 +0100, Sam Plusnet wrote:

    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not run on
    'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly recent &
    decent.

    Having thought about it some more, I realise most of my PC dates from
    2016 so regardless of Microsoft's messing around, it is time for a
    refresh.

    I'm happy with the peripherals I have, so it's just the Motherboard/CPU/RAM/CPU Cooler that I want to replace. To make life
    easier, I want to buy a ready built & tested bundle.

    Last time around,I bought such a bundle from Novatech, and I was very
    happy with the result. I might still buy from them, but their bundles
    get very expensive very quickly (e.g. a modest bundle is ~£300, the next
    is £740 and sharply up from there).

    Question: Can anyone recommend other firms which offer such (built &
    tested) bundles, and are they good if/when things need attention?
    (I can recommend Novatech since they replaced my first bundle without a quibble when it suddenly died after a year of use.)

    Question 2: My current system is Intel-based. Is there any advantage
    to going for a Ryzen-based system at the moment?
    I am not into the latest & greatest in gaming, so I have no interest in overclocking the thing into meltdown.

    I too am looking for a motherboard bundle.
    I have laptops, but I want to be able to use a tower case to host a number
    of HDD.
    Probable also a DVD writer for old time's sake.

    So I need a new MoBo or a recent business machine with a proper tower case
    with some real estate.

    I haven't finished going through every posting in the thread, but
    (although entertaining in parts) the thread drift is killing my will to
    live.

    So - Mobo or decent tower case with plenty of disc slots and option card
    slots, anyone?

    M.2 NVMe slot would be a bonus.

    My last bundle from OverClockers cost me around £200 but that was a while back. [See signature.]


    Cheers



    Dave R


    --
    AMD FX-6300 in GA-990X-Gaming SLI-CF running Windows 10 x64

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From SH@21:1/5 to David on Mon Apr 28 19:12:20 2025
    On 28/04/2025 15:18, David wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 00:41:06 +0100, Sam Plusnet wrote:

    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not run on
    'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly recent &
    decent.

    Having thought about it some more, I realise most of my PC dates from
    2016 so regardless of Microsoft's messing around, it is time for a
    refresh.

    I'm happy with the peripherals I have, so it's just the
    Motherboard/CPU/RAM/CPU Cooler that I want to replace. To make life
    easier, I want to buy a ready built & tested bundle.

    Last time around,I bought such a bundle from Novatech, and I was very
    happy with the result. I might still buy from them, but their bundles
    get very expensive very quickly (e.g. a modest bundle is ~£300, the next
    is £740 and sharply up from there).

    Question: Can anyone recommend other firms which offer such (built &
    tested) bundles, and are they good if/when things need attention?
    (I can recommend Novatech since they replaced my first bundle without a
    quibble when it suddenly died after a year of use.)

    Question 2: My current system is Intel-based. Is there any advantage
    to going for a Ryzen-based system at the moment?
    I am not into the latest & greatest in gaming, so I have no interest in
    overclocking the thing into meltdown.

    I too am looking for a motherboard bundle.
    I have laptops, but I want to be able to use a tower case to host a number
    of HDD.
    Probable also a DVD writer for old time's sake.

    So I need a new MoBo or a recent business machine with a proper tower case with some real estate.

    I haven't finished going through every posting in the thread, but
    (although entertaining in parts) the thread drift is killing my will to
    live.

    So - Mobo or decent tower case with plenty of disc slots and option card slots, anyone?

    M.2 NVMe slot would be a bonus.

    My last bundle from OverClockers cost me around £200 but that was a while back. [See signature.]


    Cheers



    Dave R




    Would you be interested in buying a 2nd hand White Tower case or a Black
    tower case?

    Location is Northampton.

    This is literally just the case, will take a minimum of 6 x 5.25 drives,
    min of 3 x 3.5 inch drives

    SO you'd need to supply everything else including the PSU!

    It won't look brand new but at least any would be thieves will think its
    a low spect older machine and ignore it!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From SH@21:1/5 to Tim Streater on Mon Apr 28 19:13:24 2025
    On 28/04/2025 15:34, Tim Streater wrote:
    On 28 Apr 2025 at 15:18:22 BST, "David" <[email protected]> wrote:

    Probable also a DVD writer for old time's sake.

    I spent £10 on an Amazon Basics USB DVD writer, some 15 years ago, it seems to
    have sat in a box for most of the time since then.

    When I build a machine, I always fit two DVD burners......

    my current machine is now 5 years old and I can count the number of
    times on one hand where I have inserted a DVD into said burners......

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim Streater@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Mon Apr 28 21:50:09 2025
    On 28 Apr 2025 at 19:13:24 BST, "SH" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 28/04/2025 15:34, Tim Streater wrote:
    On 28 Apr 2025 at 15:18:22 BST, "David" <[email protected]> wrote:

    Probable also a DVD writer for old time's sake.

    I spent £10 on an Amazon Basics USB DVD writer, some 15 years ago, it seems to
    have sat in a box for most of the time since then.

    When I build a machine, I always fit two DVD burners......

    my current machine is now 5 years old and I can count the number of
    times on one hand where I have inserted a DVD into said burners......

    This is why I can't understand why anyone would buy a tower these days. Any
    Mac Mini has ample ports and is small and quiet. And takes next to no space on the desk.

    --
    Tim

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob Martin@21:1/5 to Tim Streater on Tue Apr 29 04:53:52 2025
    On 28 Apr 2025 at 21:50:09, Tim Streater <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 28 Apr 2025 at 19:13:24 BST, "SH" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 28/04/2025 15:34, Tim Streater wrote:
    On 28 Apr 2025 at 15:18:22 BST, "David" <[email protected]> wrote:

    Probable also a DVD writer for old time's sake.

    I spent £10 on an Amazon Basics USB DVD writer, some 15 years ago, it seems to
    have sat in a box for most of the time since then.

    When I build a machine, I always fit two DVD burners......

    my current machine is now 5 years old and I can count the number of
    times on one hand where I have inserted a DVD into said burners......

    This is why I can't understand why anyone would buy a tower these days. Any Mac Mini has ample ports and is small and quiet. And takes next to no space on
    the desk.

    I replaced my 3 towers with 3 refurbished Lenovo M93p at about �70 each,

    Quiet, small, fast enough and with more than enough USB ports.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJH@21:1/5 to Bob Martin on Tue Apr 29 05:59:17 2025
    On 29 Apr 2025 at 05:53:52 BST, Bob Martin wrote:

    On 28 Apr 2025 at 21:50:09, Tim Streater <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 28 Apr 2025 at 19:13:24 BST, "SH" <[email protected]> wrote:

    This is why I can't understand why anyone would buy a tower these days. Any >> Mac Mini has ample ports and is small and quiet. And takes next to no space on
    the desk.

    I replaced my 3 towers with 3 refurbished Lenovo M93p at about £70 each,

    Quiet, small, fast enough and with more than enough USB ports.

    Are you sure about the 'quiet'? I borrowed one recently and it had a quite noticeable fan on most of the time.

    Otherwise impressed - built like a tank and ran W11 nicely.
    --
    Cheers, Rob, Sheffield UK

    "Our government has kept us in a perpetual state of fear, kept us in a continuous stampede of patriotic fervor, with the cry of grave national emergency. Always there has been some terrible evil at home or some monstrous foreign power that was going
    to gobble us up if we did not blindly rally behind it."
    -- General Douglas MacArthur

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Gaines@21:1/5 to All on Tue Apr 29 07:25:37 2025
    On 28/04/2025 in message <[email protected]> Tim Streater
    wrote:

    When I build a machine, I always fit two DVD burners......

    my current machine is now 5 years old and I can count the number of
    times on one hand where I have inserted a DVD into said burners......

    This is why I can't understand why anyone would buy a tower these days. Any >Mac Mini has ample ports and is small and quiet. And takes next to no
    space on
    the desk.

    It depends on the machine's use. My home server is in a Silverstone tower
    with 8 x drives accessible from behind the door, supposed to be hot swap
    but I've never tried it.

    --
    Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
    The facts, although interesting, are irrelevant

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to All on Tue Apr 29 12:10:30 2025
    On 28/04/2025 19:12, SH wrote:
    On 28/04/2025 15:18, David wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 00:41:06 +0100, Sam Plusnet wrote:

    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not run on
    'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly recent &
    decent.

    Having thought about it some more, I realise most of my PC dates from
    2016 so regardless of Microsoft's messing around, it is time for a
    refresh.

    I'm happy with the peripherals I have, so it's just the
    Motherboard/CPU/RAM/CPU Cooler that I want to replace.  To make life
    easier, I want to buy a ready built & tested bundle.

    Last time around,I bought such a bundle from Novatech, and I was very
    happy with the result.  I might still buy from them, but their bundles
    get very expensive very quickly (e.g. a modest bundle is ~£300, the next >>> is £740 and sharply up from there).

    Question:  Can anyone recommend other firms which offer such (built &
    tested) bundles, and are they good if/when things need attention?
    (I can recommend Novatech since they replaced my first bundle without a
    quibble when it suddenly died after a year of use.)

    Question 2:  My current system is Intel-based.  Is there any advantage >>> to going for a Ryzen-based system at the moment?
    I am not into the latest & greatest in gaming, so I have no interest in
    overclocking the thing into meltdown.

    I too am looking for a motherboard bundle.
    I have laptops, but I want to be able to use a tower case to host a
    number
    of HDD.
    Probable also a DVD writer for old time's sake.

    So I need a new MoBo or a recent business machine with a proper tower
    case
    with some real estate.

    I haven't finished going through every posting in the thread, but
    (although entertaining in parts) the thread drift is killing my will to
    live.

    So - Mobo or decent tower case with plenty of disc slots and option card
    slots, anyone?

    M.2 NVMe slot would be a bonus.

    My last bundle from OverClockers cost me around £200 but that was a while >> back. [See signature.]


    Cheers



    Dave R




    Would you be interested in buying a 2nd hand White Tower case or a Black tower case?

    Location is Northampton.

    This is literally just the case, will take a minimum of 6 x 5.25 drives,
    min of 3 x 3.5 inch drives

    SO you'd need to supply everything else including the PSU!

    It won't look brand new but at least any would be thieves will think its
    a low spect older machine and ignore it!

    Ive got one in suffolk and know of two more in herts, those have working
    MoBos. Mine is no longer working and I cant be arsed to fix it. Power
    hungry pentium

    Networked storage doesn't need grunt , or windows. Minimal linux plus
    SAMBA will get you there



    --
    There is nothing a fleet of dispatchable nuclear power plants cannot do
    that cannot be done worse and more expensively and with higher carbon
    emissions and more adverse environmental impact by adding intermittent renewable energy.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to All on Tue Apr 29 12:12:29 2025
    On 28/04/2025 19:13, SH wrote:
    On 28/04/2025 15:34, Tim Streater wrote:
    On 28 Apr 2025 at 15:18:22 BST, "David" <[email protected]> wrote:

    Probable also a DVD writer for old time's sake.

    I spent £10 on an Amazon Basics USB DVD writer, some 15 years ago, it
    seems to
    have sat in a box for most of the time since then.

    When I build a machine, I always fit two DVD burners......

    my current machine is now 5 years old and I can count the number of
    times on one hand where I have inserted a DVD into said burners......


    I used to use it to make bootable linux disks, but some computers are no
    longer coming with the ability to read DVDs so I only use it now for
    ripping DVDS and CDs onto my server.

    USB sticks being the alternative to install linux with.


    --
    There is nothing a fleet of dispatchable nuclear power plants cannot do
    that cannot be done worse and more expensively and with higher carbon
    emissions and more adverse environmental impact by adding intermittent renewable energy.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Tim Streater on Tue Apr 29 12:13:48 2025
    On 28/04/2025 22:50, Tim Streater wrote:
    On 28 Apr 2025 at 19:13:24 BST, "SH" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 28/04/2025 15:34, Tim Streater wrote:
    On 28 Apr 2025 at 15:18:22 BST, "David" <[email protected]> wrote:

    Probable also a DVD writer for old time's sake.

    I spent £10 on an Amazon Basics USB DVD writer, some 15 years ago, it seems to
    have sat in a box for most of the time since then.

    When I build a machine, I always fit two DVD burners......

    my current machine is now 5 years old and I can count the number of
    times on one hand where I have inserted a DVD into said burners......

    This is why I can't understand why anyone would buy a tower these days. Any Mac Mini has ample ports and is small and quiet. And takes next to no space on
    the desk.

    Towers have capacity for a lot of spinning rust and/or massive video cards.
    If you need either, you get a tower.


    --
    If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will
    eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such
    time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic
    and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally
    important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for
    the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the
    truth is the greatest enemy of the State.

    Joseph Goebbels

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From GB@21:1/5 to David on Tue Apr 29 13:19:12 2025
    On 28/04/2025 15:18, David wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 00:41:06 +0100, Sam Plusnet wrote:

    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not run on
    'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly recent &
    decent.

    Having thought about it some more, I realise most of my PC dates from
    2016 so regardless of Microsoft's messing around, it is time for a
    refresh.

    I'm happy with the peripherals I have, so it's just the
    Motherboard/CPU/RAM/CPU Cooler that I want to replace. To make life
    easier, I want to buy a ready built & tested bundle.

    Last time around,I bought such a bundle from Novatech, and I was very
    happy with the result. I might still buy from them, but their bundles
    get very expensive very quickly (e.g. a modest bundle is ~£300, the next
    is £740 and sharply up from there).

    Question: Can anyone recommend other firms which offer such (built &
    tested) bundles, and are they good if/when things need attention?
    (I can recommend Novatech since they replaced my first bundle without a
    quibble when it suddenly died after a year of use.)

    Question 2: My current system is Intel-based. Is there any advantage
    to going for a Ryzen-based system at the moment?
    I am not into the latest & greatest in gaming, so I have no interest in
    overclocking the thing into meltdown.

    I too am looking for a motherboard bundle.
    I have laptops, but I want to be able to use a tower case to host a number
    of HDD.
    Probable also a DVD writer for old time's sake.

    So I need a new MoBo or a recent business machine with a proper tower case with some real estate.

    I was thinking of getting a Ryzen 5 3400G CPU, plus a £50-60 motherboard (probably A520 or B450), as I don't need too much computing power.

    Ebuyer do an incredibly cheap B450 mobo for £30. https://www.ebuyer.com/2277295-biostar-amd-b450-am4-ddr4-micro-atx-gaming-motherboard-b450mhp

    And, they'll sell you a 3400G for £60. Total cost £90.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David@21:1/5 to All on Tue Apr 29 15:10:35 2025
    On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 19:12:20 +0100, SH wrote:

    On 28/04/2025 15:18, David wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 00:41:06 +0100, Sam Plusnet wrote:

    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not run on
    'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly recent &
    decent.

    Having thought about it some more, I realise most of my PC dates from
    2016 so regardless of Microsoft's messing around, it is time for a
    refresh.

    I'm happy with the peripherals I have, so it's just the
    Motherboard/CPU/RAM/CPU Cooler that I want to replace. To make life
    easier, I want to buy a ready built & tested bundle.

    Last time around,I bought such a bundle from Novatech, and I was very
    happy with the result. I might still buy from them, but their bundles
    get very expensive very quickly (e.g. a modest bundle is ~£300, the
    next is £740 and sharply up from there).

    Question: Can anyone recommend other firms which offer such (built &
    tested) bundles, and are they good if/when things need attention?
    (I can recommend Novatech since they replaced my first bundle without
    a quibble when it suddenly died after a year of use.)

    Question 2: My current system is Intel-based. Is there any advantage
    to going for a Ryzen-based system at the moment?
    I am not into the latest & greatest in gaming, so I have no interest
    in overclocking the thing into meltdown.

    I too am looking for a motherboard bundle.
    I have laptops, but I want to be able to use a tower case to host a
    number of HDD.
    Probable also a DVD writer for old time's sake.

    So I need a new MoBo or a recent business machine with a proper tower
    case with some real estate.

    I haven't finished going through every posting in the thread, but
    (although entertaining in parts) the thread drift is killing my will to
    live.

    So - Mobo or decent tower case with plenty of disc slots and option
    card slots, anyone?

    M.2 NVMe slot would be a bonus.

    My last bundle from OverClockers cost me around £200 but that was a
    while back. [See signature.]


    Would you be interested in buying a 2nd hand White Tower case or a Black tower case?

    Location is Northampton.

    This is literally just the case, will take a minimum of 6 x 5.25 drives,
    min of 3 x 3.5 inch drives

    SO you'd need to supply everything else including the PSU!

    It won't look brand new but at least any would be thieves will think its
    a low spect older machine and ignore it!

    I already have a tower case, with a brand new PSU and plenty of capacity
    for HDDs.
    Various other components as well including a graphics card.

    I am suffering from intermittent halts where the PC just powers off.
    I suspected the PSU but this is still happening with a brand new PSU
    fitted.

    So I need at a minimum a new MoBo to go into the existing case.
    I am open to suggestions for a used full W11 compatible tower system if
    this is significantly cheaper than a new MoBo.

    I also have other cases waiting fettling.

    Cheers



    Dave R


    --
    AMD FX-6300 in GA-990X-Gaming SLI-CF running Windows 10 x64

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David@21:1/5 to All on Tue Apr 29 16:00:09 2025
    On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 19:12:20 +0100, SH wrote:

    On 28/04/2025 15:18, David wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 00:41:06 +0100, Sam Plusnet wrote:

    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not run on
    'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly recent &
    decent.

    Having thought about it some more, I realise most of my PC dates from
    2016 so regardless of Microsoft's messing around, it is time for a
    refresh.

    I'm happy with the peripherals I have, so it's just the
    Motherboard/CPU/RAM/CPU Cooler that I want to replace. To make life
    easier, I want to buy a ready built & tested bundle.

    Last time around,I bought such a bundle from Novatech, and I was very
    happy with the result. I might still buy from them, but their bundles
    get very expensive very quickly (e.g. a modest bundle is ~£300, the
    next is £740 and sharply up from there).

    Question: Can anyone recommend other firms which offer such (built &
    tested) bundles, and are they good if/when things need attention?
    (I can recommend Novatech since they replaced my first bundle without
    a quibble when it suddenly died after a year of use.)

    Question 2: My current system is Intel-based. Is there any advantage
    to going for a Ryzen-based system at the moment?
    I am not into the latest & greatest in gaming, so I have no interest
    in overclocking the thing into meltdown.

    I too am looking for a motherboard bundle.
    I have laptops, but I want to be able to use a tower case to host a
    number of HDD.
    Probable also a DVD writer for old time's sake.

    So I need a new MoBo or a recent business machine with a proper tower
    case with some real estate.

    I haven't finished going through every posting in the thread, but
    (although entertaining in parts) the thread drift is killing my will to
    live.

    So - Mobo or decent tower case with plenty of disc slots and option
    card slots, anyone?

    M.2 NVMe slot would be a bonus.

    My last bundle from OverClockers cost me around £200 but that was a
    while back. [See signature.]


    Would you be interested in buying a 2nd hand White Tower case or a Black tower case?

    Location is Northampton.

    This is literally just the case, will take a minimum of 6 x 5.25 drives,
    min of 3 x 3.5 inch drives

    SO you'd need to supply everything else including the PSU!

    It won't look brand new but at least any would be thieves will think its
    a low spect older machine and ignore it!

    I was just replying to this when the machine died on me again.

    I already have a tower case and a brand new PSU.
    I replaced the PSU in case that was the cause of the problems.
    Next step is to replace the MoBo.

    I do need some space for spinning rust.

    Cheers



    Dave R



    --
    AMD FX-6300 in GA-990X-Gaming SLI-CF running Windows 10 x64

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to David on Tue Apr 29 21:13:32 2025
    On 29/04/2025 16:10, David wrote:
    I am suffering from intermittent halts where the PC just powers off.
    I suspected the PSU but this is still happening with a brand new PSU
    fitted.

    And fan?

    Ive seen that behavior caused by a failed CPU fan

    So I need at a minimum a new MoBo to go into the existing case.

    Probly thats all you need.

    Maybe a new CPU is worth installing if its very old to get power
    consumption down


    I am open to suggestions for a used full W11 compatible tower system if
    this is significantly cheaper than a new MoBo.

    I think Dell still do some towers
    But in the main its gamers who use them and those PCs go for silly money.

    You wont get a PC in a tower much less than £400

    A mobo + RAM is much cheaper than that if you have the case

    https://www.laptopsdirect.co.uk/gigabyte-h510m-h-v2-intel-h470-lga-1200-ddr4-micro-atx-motherboard-h510m-h-v2/version.asp

    £51 for that INTEL compatible mobo. DDR4 RAM needed .

    --
    “Puritanism: The haunting fear that someone, somewhere, may be happy.”

    H.L. Mencken, A Mencken Chrestomathy

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to David on Tue Apr 29 21:15:22 2025
    On 29/04/2025 17:00, David wrote:
    On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 19:12:20 +0100, SH wrote:

    On 28/04/2025 15:18, David wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 00:41:06 +0100, Sam Plusnet wrote:

    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not run on
    'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly recent &
    decent.

    Having thought about it some more, I realise most of my PC dates from
    2016 so regardless of Microsoft's messing around, it is time for a
    refresh.

    I'm happy with the peripherals I have, so it's just the
    Motherboard/CPU/RAM/CPU Cooler that I want to replace. To make life
    easier, I want to buy a ready built & tested bundle.

    Last time around,I bought such a bundle from Novatech, and I was very
    happy with the result. I might still buy from them, but their bundles >>>> get very expensive very quickly (e.g. a modest bundle is ~£300, the
    next is £740 and sharply up from there).

    Question: Can anyone recommend other firms which offer such (built &
    tested) bundles, and are they good if/when things need attention?
    (I can recommend Novatech since they replaced my first bundle without
    a quibble when it suddenly died after a year of use.)

    Question 2: My current system is Intel-based. Is there any advantage >>>> to going for a Ryzen-based system at the moment?
    I am not into the latest & greatest in gaming, so I have no interest
    in overclocking the thing into meltdown.

    I too am looking for a motherboard bundle.
    I have laptops, but I want to be able to use a tower case to host a
    number of HDD.
    Probable also a DVD writer for old time's sake.

    So I need a new MoBo or a recent business machine with a proper tower
    case with some real estate.

    I haven't finished going through every posting in the thread, but
    (although entertaining in parts) the thread drift is killing my will to
    live.

    So - Mobo or decent tower case with plenty of disc slots and option
    card slots, anyone?

    M.2 NVMe slot would be a bonus.

    My last bundle from OverClockers cost me around £200 but that was a
    while back. [See signature.]


    Would you be interested in buying a 2nd hand White Tower case or a Black
    tower case?

    Location is Northampton.

    This is literally just the case, will take a minimum of 6 x 5.25 drives,
    min of 3 x 3.5 inch drives

    SO you'd need to supply everything else including the PSU!

    It won't look brand new but at least any would be thieves will think its
    a low spect older machine and ignore it!

    I was just replying to this when the machine died on me again.

    I already have a tower case and a brand new PSU.
    I replaced the PSU in case that was the cause of the problems.
    Next step is to replace the MoBo.

    I do need some space for spinning rust.

    Then keep the case. New Mobos from £50 upwards. May need new RAM but if
    you have working processors you wont need that

    I've had gigabyte mobos in the past and been happy with them

    Cheers



    Dave R




    --
    “The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to
    fill the world with fools.”

    Herbert Spencer

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to All on Tue Apr 29 21:03:28 2025
    On Mon, 4/28/2025 2:13 PM, SH wrote:
    On 28/04/2025 15:34, Tim Streater wrote:
    On 28 Apr 2025 at 15:18:22 BST, "David" <[email protected]> wrote:

    Probable also a DVD writer for old time's sake.

    I spent £10 on an Amazon Basics USB DVD writer, some 15 years ago, it seems to
    have sat in a box for most of the time since then.

    When I build a machine, I always fit two DVD burners......

    my current machine is now 5 years old and I can count the number of times on one hand where I have inserted a DVD into said burners......



    If I don't have a USB stick handy for an OS test,
    I use the DVD drive to prepare media.

    It helps if you have media to use. That gives more
    of a reason to have the drive handy.

    You can also use an enclosure on the end of a USB cable,
    as an alternative solution. This helps when a case
    has no 5.25 bays any more.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob Martin@21:1/5 to RJH on Wed Apr 30 05:29:28 2025
    On 29 Apr 2025 at 05:59:17, RJH <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 29 Apr 2025 at 05:53:52 BST, Bob Martin wrote:

    On 28 Apr 2025 at 21:50:09, Tim Streater <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 28 Apr 2025 at 19:13:24 BST, "SH" <[email protected]> wrote:

    This is why I can't understand why anyone would buy a tower these days. Any >>> Mac Mini has ample ports and is small and quiet. And takes next to no space on
    the desk.

    I replaced my 3 towers with 3 refurbished Lenovo M93p at about £70 each,

    Quiet, small, fast enough and with more than enough USB ports.

    Are you sure about the 'quiet'? I borrowed one recently and it had a quite noticeable fan on most of the time.

    Yes, all 3 are absolutely silent.


    Otherwise impressed - built like a tank and ran W11 nicely.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJH@21:1/5 to Bob Martin on Wed Apr 30 08:59:08 2025
    On 30 Apr 2025 at 06:29:28 BST, Bob Martin wrote:

    On 29 Apr 2025 at 05:59:17, RJH <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 29 Apr 2025 at 05:53:52 BST, Bob Martin wrote:

    On 28 Apr 2025 at 21:50:09, Tim Streater <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 28 Apr 2025 at 19:13:24 BST, "SH" <[email protected]> wrote:

    This is why I can't understand why anyone would buy a tower these days. Any
    Mac Mini has ample ports and is small and quiet. And takes next to no space on
    the desk.

    I replaced my 3 towers with 3 refurbished Lenovo M93p at about £70 each, >>>
    Quiet, small, fast enough and with more than enough USB ports.

    Are you sure about the 'quiet'? I borrowed one recently and it had a quite >> noticeable fan on most of the time.

    Yes, all 3 are absolutely silent.


    Ah - my mistake, I read Lenovo as a laptop, didn't realise it meant desktops too.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Rumm@21:1/5 to David on Wed Apr 30 18:21:38 2025
    On 29/04/2025 17:00, David wrote:

    I was just replying to this when the machine died on me again.

    One very obscure cause of this can be a faulty power button switch...
    Try turning it on, then disconnecting the wire to the mobo from the
    front panel switch. See if it stays on then.



    --
    Cheers,

    John.

    /=================================================================\
    | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------|
    | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Rumm@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Wed Apr 30 18:17:01 2025
    On 29/04/2025 12:13, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 28/04/2025 22:50, Tim Streater wrote:
    On 28 Apr 2025 at 19:13:24 BST, "SH" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 28/04/2025 15:34, Tim Streater wrote:
    On 28 Apr 2025 at 15:18:22 BST, "David" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>
    Probable also a DVD writer for old time's sake.

    I spent £10 on an Amazon Basics USB DVD writer, some 15 years ago,
    it seems to
    have sat in a box for most of the time since then.

    When I build a machine, I always fit two DVD burners......

    my current machine is now 5 years old and I can count the number of
    times on one hand where I have inserted a DVD into said burners......

    This is why I can't understand why anyone would buy a tower these
    days. Any
    Mac Mini has ample ports and is small and quiet. And takes next to no
    space on
    the desk.

    Towers have capacity for  a lot of spinning rust and/or massive video
    cards.
    If you need either, you get a tower.

    Also if you want space for lots of *quiet* cooling...

    Plus fixing and upgrading machines with standard off the shelf parts and
    mobo's is much easier.

    --
    Cheers,

    John.

    /=================================================================\
    | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------|
    | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob Eager@21:1/5 to John Rumm on Wed Apr 30 21:06:01 2025
    On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 18:17:01 +0100, John Rumm wrote:

    Towers have capacity for  a lot of spinning rust and/or massive video
    cards.
    If you need either, you get a tower.

    Also if you want space for lots of *quiet* cooling...

    Plus fixing and upgrading machines with standard off the shelf parts and mobo's is much easier.

    Indeed. I built six tower machines in 2012, and made them as future proof
    as possible. The only changes over the years have been a beefier graphics
    card in one, and more memory in two. Plus disk upgrades.

    I have finally replced the motherboard in one, and parts arriving tomorrow
    for another two. They run Windows 10 so you can see where this is going.

    They are all decent size Corsair towers.


    --
    My posts are my copyright and if @diy_forums or Home Owners' Hub
    wish to copy them they can pay me £1 a message.
    Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org
    *lightning surge protection* - a w_tom conductor

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sam Plusnet@21:1/5 to John Rumm on Wed Apr 30 22:16:00 2025
    On 30/04/2025 18:21, John Rumm wrote:
    On 29/04/2025 17:00, David wrote:

    I was just replying to this when the machine died on me again.

    One very obscure cause of this can be a faulty power button switch...
    Try turning it on, then disconnecting the wire to the mobo from the
    front panel switch. See if it stays on then.

    When the PSU fires up, the mobo sends back a signal to say all is well.
    IIRC it pulls a line in one of the power leads low.
    If that line goes high the PSU will shut off.
    That happened to me some time back and it was a sod of a job finding out
    if it was a PSU, a mobo, or a cable/connector problem.

    --
    Sam Plusnet

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David@21:1/5 to Bob Eager on Thu May 1 08:56:01 2025
    On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 21:06:01 +0000, Bob Eager wrote:

    On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 18:17:01 +0100, John Rumm wrote:

    Towers have capacity for  a lot of spinning rust and/or massive video
    cards.
    If you need either, you get a tower.

    Also if you want space for lots of *quiet* cooling...

    Plus fixing and upgrading machines with standard off the shelf parts
    and mobo's is much easier.

    Indeed. I built six tower machines in 2012, and made them as future
    proof as possible. The only changes over the years have been a beefier graphics card in one, and more memory in two. Plus disk upgrades.

    I have finally replced the motherboard in one, and parts arriving
    tomorrow for another two. They run Windows 10 so you can see where this
    is going.

    They are all decent size Corsair towers.


    Which MoBos did you choose, and which supplier?

    TIA



    Dave R


    --
    AMD FX-6300 in GA-990X-Gaming SLI-CF running Windows 10 x64

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David@21:1/5 to Sam Plusnet on Thu May 1 08:54:41 2025
    On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 22:16:00 +0100, Sam Plusnet wrote:

    On 30/04/2025 18:21, John Rumm wrote:
    On 29/04/2025 17:00, David wrote:

    I was just replying to this when the machine died on me again.

    One very obscure cause of this can be a faulty power button switch...
    Try turning it on, then disconnecting the wire to the mobo from the
    front panel switch. See if it stays on then.

    When the PSU fires up, the mobo sends back a signal to say all is well.
    IIRC it pulls a line in one of the power leads low.
    If that line goes high the PSU will shut off.
    That happened to me some time back and it was a sod of a job finding out
    if it was a PSU, a mobo, or a cable/connector problem.

    Interesting proposition.
    How did you diagnose?

    Also, is it possible to just buy another front panel switch and fit it temporarily?
    That could prove/disprove.

    Thanks also to John.

    Cheers



    Dave R


    --
    AMD FX-6300 in GA-990X-Gaming SLI-CF running Windows 10 x64

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to Sam Plusnet on Thu May 1 11:04:38 2025
    Sam Plusnet <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 30/04/2025 18:21, John Rumm wrote:
    On 29/04/2025 17:00, David wrote:

    I was just replying to this when the machine died on me again.

    One very obscure cause of this can be a faulty power button switch...
    Try turning it on, then disconnecting the wire to the mobo from the
    front panel switch. See if it stays on then.

    When the PSU fires up, the mobo sends back a signal to say all is well.
    IIRC it pulls a line in one of the power leads low.
    If that line goes high the PSU will shut off.
    That happened to me some time back and it was a sod of a job finding out
    if it was a PSU, a mobo, or a cable/connector problem.

    T'other way round. Mobo pulls PS_ON low to say it wants power. PSU starts
    up. When things are stable PSU sends back PWR_GOOD. Then the mobo can fire everything up. If the mobo doesn't see PWR_GOOD it won't try and start up. Possibly the mobo then drops PS_ON so the PSU turns off.

    (there's always power from 5V_STANDBY to run this logic, but only at a low current)

    Thep

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David@21:1/5 to Theo on Thu May 1 13:10:41 2025
    On Thu, 01 May 2025 11:04:38 +0100, Theo wrote:

    Sam Plusnet <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 30/04/2025 18:21, John Rumm wrote:
    On 29/04/2025 17:00, David wrote:

    I was just replying to this when the machine died on me again.

    One very obscure cause of this can be a faulty power button switch...
    Try turning it on, then disconnecting the wire to the mobo from the
    front panel switch. See if it stays on then.

    When the PSU fires up, the mobo sends back a signal to say all is well.
    IIRC it pulls a line in one of the power leads low.
    If that line goes high the PSU will shut off.
    That happened to me some time back and it was a sod of a job finding
    out if it was a PSU, a mobo, or a cable/connector problem.

    T'other way round. Mobo pulls PS_ON low to say it wants power. PSU
    starts up. When things are stable PSU sends back PWR_GOOD. Then the
    mobo can fire everything up. If the mobo doesn't see PWR_GOOD it won't
    try and start up. Possibly the mobo then drops PS_ON so the PSU turns
    off.

    (there's always power from 5V_STANDBY to run this logic, but only at a
    low current)

    Thep

    So if the MoBo for some reason is dropping PS_ON this would match the
    symptoms.

    However why would the MoBo do this?

    Unless it thinks the power switch has been turned off.

    Cheers



    Dave R


    --
    AMD FX-6300 in GA-990X-Gaming SLI-CF running Windows 10 x64

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David@21:1/5 to David on Thu May 1 13:12:15 2025
    On Thu, 01 May 2025 13:10:41 +0000, David wrote:

    On Thu, 01 May 2025 11:04:38 +0100, Theo wrote:

    Sam Plusnet <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 30/04/2025 18:21, John Rumm wrote:
    On 29/04/2025 17:00, David wrote:

    I was just replying to this when the machine died on me again.

    One very obscure cause of this can be a faulty power button
    switch...
    Try turning it on, then disconnecting the wire to the mobo from the
    front panel switch. See if it stays on then.

    When the PSU fires up, the mobo sends back a signal to say all is
    well.
    IIRC it pulls a line in one of the power leads low.
    If that line goes high the PSU will shut off.
    That happened to me some time back and it was a sod of a job finding
    out if it was a PSU, a mobo, or a cable/connector problem.

    T'other way round. Mobo pulls PS_ON low to say it wants power. PSU
    starts up. When things are stable PSU sends back PWR_GOOD. Then the
    mobo can fire everything up. If the mobo doesn't see PWR_GOOD it won't
    try and start up. Possibly the mobo then drops PS_ON so the PSU turns
    off.

    (there's always power from 5V_STANDBY to run this logic, but only at a
    low current)

    Thep

    So if the MoBo for some reason is dropping PS_ON this would match the symptoms.

    However why would the MoBo do this?

    Unless it thinks the power switch has been turned off.

    In which case replacing the MoBo wouldn't solve this.
    Hmmm...

    Cheers



    Dave R


    --
    AMD FX-6300 in GA-990X-Gaming SLI-CF running Windows 10 x64

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to David on Thu May 1 16:51:57 2025
    David <[email protected]> wrote:
    So if the MoBo for some reason is dropping PS_ON this would match the symptoms.

    However why would the MoBo do this?

    Unless it thinks the power switch has been turned off.

    As John says, a stuck power button can do this. You press in the button, PC turns on. The button doesn't release so after 10/30/whatever seconds it
    sees that as the 'PC unresponsive; hard power off' signal and turns off
    again. Possibly the plastic button releases but the actual switch behind is gummed up and stays pushed in. If you keep the switch closed for longer
    it might do more power up/down cycles.

    A variation of same is using an ATX PSU in an AT case. On AT the power
    switch is a rocker so it has defined on/off states. If you wire that to an
    ATX PSU and flip the rocker to the 'on' state it'll behave as above. For
    ATX rack cases which have a rocker power switch for the industrial aesthetic[1], the rocker is a momentary switch and won't latch in the 'on' position.

    Theo

    [1] more likely they didn't bother to update the tooling since 1988

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob Eager@21:1/5 to David on Thu May 1 15:20:29 2025
    On Thu, 01 May 2025 08:56:01 +0000, David wrote:

    On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 18:17:01 +0100, John Rumm wrote:

    Towers have capacity for  a lot of spinning rust and/or massive video >>>> cards.
    If you need either, you get a tower.

    Also if you want space for lots of *quiet* cooling...

    Plus fixing and upgrading machines with standard off the shelf parts
    and mobo's is much easier.

    Indeed. I built six tower machines in 2012, and made them as future
    proof as possible. The only changes over the years have been a beefier
    graphics card in one, and more memory in two. Plus disk upgrades.

    I have finally replced the motherboard in one, and parts arriving
    tomorrow for another two. They run Windows 10 so you can see where this
    is going.

    They are all decent size Corsair towers.


    Which MoBos did you choose, and which supplier?

    A mid range MSI gaming board (although there is no gaming). I wanted
    integrated graphics and space for expansion (again). One of the B760 ones.



    --
    My posts are my copyright and if @diy_forums or Home Owners' Hub
    wish to copy them they can pay me £1 a message.
    Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org
    *lightning surge protection* - a w_tom conductor

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David@21:1/5 to Theo on Thu May 1 17:35:24 2025
    On Thu, 01 May 2025 16:51:57 +0100, Theo wrote:

    David <[email protected]> wrote:
    So if the MoBo for some reason is dropping PS_ON this would match the
    symptoms.

    However why would the MoBo do this?

    Unless it thinks the power switch has been turned off.

    As John says, a stuck power button can do this. You press in the
    button, PC turns on. The button doesn't release so after 10/30/whatever seconds it sees that as the 'PC unresponsive; hard power off' signal and turns off again. Possibly the plastic button releases but the actual
    switch behind is gummed up and stays pushed in. If you keep the switch closed for longer it might do more power up/down cycles.

    A variation of same is using an ATX PSU in an AT case. On AT the power switch is a rocker so it has defined on/off states. If you wire that to
    an ATX PSU and flip the rocker to the 'on' state it'll behave as above.
    For ATX rack cases which have a rocker power switch for the industrial aesthetic[1], the rocker is a momentary switch and won't latch in the
    'on' position.

    Theo

    [1] more likely they didn't bother to update the tooling since 1988

    That doesn't describe the issue, though, if I understand you correctly..
    The PC can run for days, sometimes weeks, before falling over.
    Then it can fall over a couple of times within an hour or so.
    Never within seconds/minutes of power on.

    Cheers



    Dave R

    --
    AMD FX-6300 in GA-990X-Gaming SLI-CF running Windows 10 x64

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sam Plusnet@21:1/5 to Theo on Thu May 1 20:40:40 2025
    On 01/05/2025 11:04, Theo wrote:
    Sam Plusnet <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 30/04/2025 18:21, John Rumm wrote:
    On 29/04/2025 17:00, David wrote:

    I was just replying to this when the machine died on me again.

    One very obscure cause of this can be a faulty power button switch...
    Try turning it on, then disconnecting the wire to the mobo from the
    front panel switch. See if it stays on then.

    When the PSU fires up, the mobo sends back a signal to say all is well.
    IIRC it pulls a line in one of the power leads low.
    If that line goes high the PSU will shut off.
    That happened to me some time back and it was a sod of a job finding out
    if it was a PSU, a mobo, or a cable/connector problem.

    T'other way round. Mobo pulls PS_ON low to say it wants power. PSU starts up. When things are stable PSU sends back PWR_GOOD. Then the mobo can fire everything up. If the mobo doesn't see PWR_GOOD it won't try and start up. Possibly the mobo then drops PS_ON so the PSU turns off.

    (there's always power from 5V_STANDBY to run this logic, but only at a low current)

    Thanks. It was some time back and my brain had carefully blanked out
    the gory details.

    Years back I used to build PCs which formed part of the control system
    for a large scale bit of kit.
    Life was so much easier when you had plenty of spare parts to use in substitution fault-finding.


    --
    Sam Plusnet

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to Jeff Gaines on Thu May 1 22:45:28 2025
    Jeff Gaines <[email protected]> wrote:
    From Scan

    8 x disk bays with backplane, rare beasts!

    Not if you have a 3D printer :-)

    https://www.printables.com/model/1278847-12-bay-atx-nas-case https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7FyS37KHms

    (although no backplane, it's designed for SATA->SFF8086 cable
    harnesses)

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Gaines@21:1/5 to Theo on Fri May 2 07:48:54 2025
    On 01/05/2025 in message <Crc*[email protected]> Theo wrote:

    Jeff Gaines <[email protected]> wrote:
    From Scan

    8 x disk bays with backplane, rare beasts!

    Not if you have a 3D printer :-)

    https://www.printables.com/model/1278847-12-bay-atx-nas-case >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7FyS37KHms

    (although no backplane, it's designed for SATA->SFF8086 cable
    harnesses)

    Theo

    Wow that's really something!

    I haven't tried 3D printing. I did find the software for feet on my
    Corsair cases and sent it off to a printer who produced the feet. Perfect
    fit but the plastic was too brittle and they snapped on insertion.

    --
    Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
    The fact that there's a highway to hell and only a stairway to heaven says
    a lot about anticipated traffic numbers.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Jeff Gaines on Fri May 2 08:57:14 2025
    Jeff Gaines wrote:

    I haven't tried 3D printing. I did find the software for feet on my
    Corsair cases and sent it off to a printer who produced the feet.
    Perfect fit but the plastic was too brittle and they snapped on insertion.

    If you're using a commercial 3D printing company, they usually have
    equipment capable of using a wider range of filaments (at a price) I'm
    sure there'd be a suitable material ...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Gaines@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 2 08:54:24 2025
    On 02/05/2025 in message <[email protected]> Andy Burns
    wrote:

    Theo wrote:

    Jeff Gaines wrote:

    8 x disk bays with backplane, rare beasts!

    Not if you have a 3D printer :-)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7FyS37KHms
    I assumed that was going to be the one that had popped-up on my youtube >suggestions yesterday, but it's a different one, link is to the completed >NAS, rewind to see the build if interested ...

    <https://youtu.be/NXIu-B52WPU?t=880>

    That is DIY and a half :-)

    --
    Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
    Every day is a good day for chicken, unless you're a chicken.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Theo on Fri May 2 09:28:36 2025
    Theo wrote:

    Jeff Gaines wrote:

    8 x disk bays with backplane, rare beasts!

    Not if you have a 3D printer :-)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7FyS37KHms
    I assumed that was going to be the one that had popped-up on my youtube suggestions yesterday, but it's a different one, link is to the
    completed NAS, rewind to see the build if interested ...

    <https://youtu.be/NXIu-B52WPU?t=880>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Fri May 2 11:21:18 2025
    Andy Burns <[email protected]> wrote:
    Theo wrote:

    Jeff Gaines wrote:

    8 x disk bays with backplane, rare beasts!

    Not if you have a 3D printer :-)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7FyS37KHms
    I assumed that was going to be the one that had popped-up on my youtube suggestions yesterday, but it's a different one, link is to the
    completed NAS, rewind to see the build if interested ...

    <https://youtu.be/NXIu-B52WPU?t=880>

    That was a suggested video from the 12 bay one. Physical design looks nice, but I'm not a great fan of the 'Zimaboard' - too many compromises. And his choice of PSU is awful - sketchy Chinese junk, as he found out. And it
    needs a custom PCB. And I'm a bit dubious about his choice of SATA
    controller (no details in the video but I suspect it's a consumer grade controller).

    But maybe there's enough space underneath to fit a RPi + SATA HAT or a mini ITX.

    PS if you don't have a 3D printer the hot new thing is the Elegoo Centauri Carbon at $299 - two NAS cases and it's paid for itself.
    (well, minus electricity, filament, screws, magnets etc)

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to David on Fri May 2 11:30:27 2025
    On 01/05/2025 14:10, David wrote:
    So if the MoBo for some reason is dropping PS_ON this would match the symptoms.

    However why would the MoBo do this?

    Unless it thinks the power switch has been turned off.

    I've watched a lot of repair videos on YouTube. Often there is some kind
    of power monitoring circuitry that ultimately switches stuff off if a
    short is detected.

    The repaiir dudses use visual inspection, Ohm checks on power rails and,
    in the limit voltage injection onto the power rails at very low voltage
    with a thermal camera to find the short. It's usually either a capacitor
    or a chip.

    These are repair shops dealing with $1000 laptops that are worth fixing,
    that have access to hundreds of scrap motherboards (ones where the cost
    of replacing e.g. a CPU exceeds the cost of a new board etc)

    The sad fact is that if the CPU and if fitted GPU are OK and easily
    swapped a mobo swap is by far and away the cheapest and easiest route


    --
    WOKE is an acronym... Without Originality, Knowledge or Education.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Theo on Fri May 2 11:45:27 2025
    On 02/05/2025 11:21, Theo wrote:
    Andy Burns <[email protected]> wrote:
    Theo wrote:

    Jeff Gaines wrote:

    8 x disk bays with backplane, rare beasts!

    Not if you have a 3D printer :-)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7FyS37KHms
    I assumed that was going to be the one that had popped-up on my youtube
    suggestions yesterday, but it's a different one, link is to the
    completed NAS, rewind to see the build if interested ...

    <https://youtu.be/NXIu-B52WPU?t=880>

    That was a suggested video from the 12 bay one. Physical design looks nice, but I'm not a great fan of the 'Zimaboard' - too many compromises. And his choice of PSU is awful - sketchy Chinese junk, as he found out. And it
    needs a custom PCB. And I'm a bit dubious about his choice of SATA controller (no details in the video but I suspect it's a consumer grade controller).

    But maybe there's enough space underneath to fit a RPi + SATA HAT or a mini ITX.

    PS if you don't have a 3D printer the hot new thing is the Elegoo Centauri Carbon at $299 - two NAS cases and it's paid for itself.
    (well, minus electricity, filament, screws, magnets etc)

    Theo
    I got a Creality K1 with camera - buying them separately was cheaper -
    not cheap but its proved invaluable at making odd little plastic parts
    that have broken or got lost

    Its quite a steep learning curve though...


    --
    “Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedies.”
    ― Groucho Marx

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Theo on Fri May 2 11:59:24 2025
    Theo wrote:

    if you don't have a 3D printer the hot new thing > is the Elegoo Centauri Carbon at $299

    I have an Elegoo Neptune4 Pro ... there's never a good time to buy.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to David on Sat May 3 17:37:13 2025
    On Tue, 4/29/2025 11:10 AM, David wrote:
    On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 19:12:20 +0100, SH wrote:

    On 28/04/2025 15:18, David wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 00:41:06 +0100, Sam Plusnet wrote:

    I was bliddy annoyed when MS decided that Windows 11 would not run on
    'older' systems, since I considered my main PC was fairly recent &
    decent.

    Having thought about it some more, I realise most of my PC dates from
    2016 so regardless of Microsoft's messing around, it is time for a
    refresh.

    I'm happy with the peripherals I have, so it's just the
    Motherboard/CPU/RAM/CPU Cooler that I want to replace. To make life
    easier, I want to buy a ready built & tested bundle.

    Last time around,I bought such a bundle from Novatech, and I was very
    happy with the result. I might still buy from them, but their bundles >>>> get very expensive very quickly (e.g. a modest bundle is ~£300, the
    next is £740 and sharply up from there).

    Question: Can anyone recommend other firms which offer such (built &
    tested) bundles, and are they good if/when things need attention?
    (I can recommend Novatech since they replaced my first bundle without
    a quibble when it suddenly died after a year of use.)

    Question 2: My current system is Intel-based. Is there any advantage >>>> to going for a Ryzen-based system at the moment?
    I am not into the latest & greatest in gaming, so I have no interest
    in overclocking the thing into meltdown.

    I too am looking for a motherboard bundle.
    I have laptops, but I want to be able to use a tower case to host a
    number of HDD.
    Probable also a DVD writer for old time's sake.

    So I need a new MoBo or a recent business machine with a proper tower
    case with some real estate.

    I haven't finished going through every posting in the thread, but
    (although entertaining in parts) the thread drift is killing my will to
    live.

    So - Mobo or decent tower case with plenty of disc slots and option
    card slots, anyone?

    M.2 NVMe slot would be a bonus.

    My last bundle from OverClockers cost me around £200 but that was a
    while back. [See signature.]


    Would you be interested in buying a 2nd hand White Tower case or a Black
    tower case?

    Location is Northampton.

    This is literally just the case, will take a minimum of 6 x 5.25 drives,
    min of 3 x 3.5 inch drives

    SO you'd need to supply everything else including the PSU!

    It won't look brand new but at least any would be thieves will think its
    a low spect older machine and ignore it!

    I already have a tower case, with a brand new PSU and plenty of capacity
    for HDDs.
    Various other components as well including a graphics card.

    I am suffering from intermittent halts where the PC just powers off.
    I suspected the PSU but this is still happening with a brand new PSU
    fitted.

    So I need at a minimum a new MoBo to go into the existing case.
    I am open to suggestions for a used full W11 compatible tower system if
    this is significantly cheaper than a new MoBo.

    I also have other cases waiting fettling.

    Cheers

    Dave R

    The +5VSB rail has limited amperes to offer, and it does not matter
    whether the PC is 500 watts or 1500 watts. The rating is typically
    +5VSB at 3 amps or so. It is easy to overload that 15 watt source,
    for a hobbyist with a lot of pocket change for toys.

    Look carefully at such things as "USB bus powered loads" or
    "USB charging loads". When the +5VSB shuts off on overload,
    it takes out the operation of the PC with it.

    Roughly the same behavior occurs on CPU THERMTRIP. Check
    the standing CPU temperature with a utility, to see whether
    it is too hot and the cooler needs "maintenance". THERMTRIP
    is roughly 20 degrees above the throttle temperature. The machine
    would slow down a bit, if it was getting too hot. Sometimes,
    a characteristics smell can tell you that the machine is
    not all that happy with how you've been treating it.
    (Such machines usually have very slow exhaust fans.)

    If a heatsink falls off a CPU, it only takes around
    two seconds (at full power) to destroy a CPU. This is why THERMTRIP
    was invented, to stop the event before it toasts the chip.
    The thermal protection afforded by "BIOS checks" was not
    fast enough to avoid damage. A hardware based scheme
    was invented to take its place. This was introduced around
    the end of the AthlonXP era (when I bought my motherboard
    for the Athlon at the time, I made sure it had the
    small 14 pin Attansic chip that switches off the power for that).
    Later implementations, the signal comes right out of the
    CPU, to halt the action and drop the PC instantly. Both AMD and
    Intel had that signal, after the importance of protection was
    recognized.

    For some of the (latching) power events, you have to
    use the switch on the back of the PC, switch it OFF,
    switch it ON, to allow an attempt to start it again.
    You can't just push the front button, after it's been
    dropped on a serious fault cause. It takes some back
    button or cord-action, to recover it.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to All on Sat May 3 17:44:04 2025
    On Tue, 4/29/2025 8:19 AM, GB wrote:


    I was thinking of getting a Ryzen 5 3400G CPU, plus a £50-60 motherboard (probably A520 or B450), as I don't need too much computing power.

    Ebuyer do an incredibly cheap B450 mobo for £30. https://www.ebuyer.com/2277295-biostar-amd-b450-am4-ddr4-micro-atx-gaming-motherboard-b450mhp

    And, they'll sell you a 3400G for £60.  Total cost £90.

    Buy the DDR4 RAM you need soon. If there is any economic leverage
    applied to computer sales, the memory companies may respond by
    only selling the chip type that makes money, and that is DDR5.
    The DDR4 memory type could be discontinued.

    Previous behavior of memory companies was not like that. Some
    good products continued to be available for years afterward.
    It's not quite the same today. When buying a trailing edge
    system, make sure there is still a quality product available
    for the RAM. If you were thinking of "I'll buy one stick today
    and leave the second stick for purchase tomorrow", that's not
    a good strategy particularly. Buy what you need now, as it's
    not going to get any cheaper. This is the perfect time
    of year for the purchase, anyway, not in the second
    half of the year.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ajh@21:1/5 to John Rumm on Tue May 13 15:51:19 2025
    On 14/04/2025 10:00, John Rumm wrote:
    I have had this conversation with quite a few customers recently, and
    have had to point out that yup it is a right pain that MS are forcing
    you to ditch a perfectly serviceable machine, but many of them are 10+
    years old, and they might actually be pleasantly surprised how much of
    an improvement in performance the new one will bring along with lower
    running costs.

    I have tried to follow this thread, because I am using a 2015 I5
    desktop, which on the whole suits me, but what I cannot see is what a
    moderate home user like myself should be looking at for an upgrade which
    will perform with modern OSs and software?

    As long as it connects to my 24" monitor and some speakers I don't mind
    if it is a tower or laptop, new or secondhand and I have not played a
    computer game in 30 years so that is not a requirement.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to ajh on Tue May 13 17:55:44 2025
    ajh <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 14/04/2025 10:00, John Rumm wrote:
    I have had this conversation with quite a few customers recently, and
    have had to point out that yup it is a right pain that MS are forcing
    you to ditch a perfectly serviceable machine, but many of them are 10+ years old, and they might actually be pleasantly surprised how much of
    an improvement in performance the new one will bring along with lower running costs.

    I have tried to follow this thread, because I am using a 2015 I5
    desktop, which on the whole suits me, but what I cannot see is what a moderate home user like myself should be looking at for an upgrade which
    will perform with modern OSs and software?

    As long as it connects to my 24" monitor and some speakers I don't mind
    if it is a tower or laptop, new or secondhand and I have not played a computer game in 30 years so that is not a requirement.

    I suggest looking on ebay for a refurbished Dell, HP or Lenovo business box. Get one with an 8th generation Intel or Ryzen 3000 or later and it'll
    support Windows 11.

    They come in a variety of sizes from Tiny/Mini/Micro (like a hardback book) through 'SFF' (small form factor, roughly the size of a hifi separate) to
    tower versions.

    They should be perfectly adequate for office-type use, with none of the overheads of having a giant PSU or motherboard for putting a gamer graphics card in.

    On most of them the RAM and storage can be upgraded easily - on refurbs
    often the old owner keeps the storage and the refurbisher puts in a small
    cheap SSD like 128GB or 256GB, which are easy to swap out for something
    bigger.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ajh@21:1/5 to Theo on Wed May 14 08:28:27 2025
    On 13/05/2025 17:55, Theo wrote:
    I suggest looking on ebay for a refurbished Dell, HP or Lenovo business box. Get one with an 8th generation Intel or Ryzen 3000 or later and it'll
    support Windows 11.

    Thanks for that but what's the differences between generation and
    between I5 and I7?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to ajh on Wed May 14 11:19:30 2025
    ajh <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 13/05/2025 17:55, Theo wrote:
    I suggest looking on ebay for a refurbished Dell, HP or Lenovo business box.
    Get one with an 8th generation Intel or Ryzen 3000 or later and it'll support Windows 11.

    Thanks for that but what's the differences between generation and
    between I5 and I7?

    Intel's 'generation' = year, roughly. '8th gen' = 2018
    'i5' and 'i7' = performance grade, kinda like BMW 5 or 7 series.
    Intel suffix letters (U/T/H/HQ/S/K/...) = mostly power class (laptop, desktop, ...), although sometimes other things (F = no onboard graphics)

    AMD have a different numbering scheme, although they also do 'Ryzen 3/5/7'
    to roughly compare with i3/i5/i7.

    Sometimes there isn't a lot of difference between generations, and then
    there can be a big leap the next year.

    Performance wise, I'd find out the exact model number (eg i7-9700k) including suffix letters then search and add it to a comparison here: https://www.cpubenchmark.net/

    to compare against your current CPU model number and other models you might
    be interested in. That gives two numbers: single thread, which is roughly how 'responsive' or 'snappy' you'll find the system, and multi thread, which is
    how it'll perform at more heavyweight tasks (assuming software is designed
    to use multiple cores, which most modern software is).

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ajh@21:1/5 to Theo on Wed May 14 22:16:36 2025
    On 14/05/2025 11:19, Theo wrote:
    ajh <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 13/05/2025 17:55, Theo wrote:
    I suggest looking on ebay for a refurbished Dell, HP or Lenovo business box.
    Get one with an 8th generation Intel or Ryzen 3000 or later and it'll
    support Windows 11.

    Thanks for that but what's the differences between generation and
    between I5 and I7?

    Intel's 'generation' = year, roughly. '8th gen' = 2018
    'i5' and 'i7' = performance grade, kinda like BMW 5 or 7 series.
    Intel suffix letters (U/T/H/HQ/S/K/...) = mostly power class (laptop, desktop,
    ...), although sometimes other things (F = no onboard graphics)

    AMD have a different numbering scheme, although they also do 'Ryzen 3/5/7'
    to roughly compare with i3/i5/i7.

    Sometimes there isn't a lot of difference between generations, and then
    there can be a big leap the next year.

    Performance wise, I'd find out the exact model number (eg i7-9700k) including suffix letters then search and add it to a comparison here: https://www.cpubenchmark.net/

    to compare against your current CPU model number and other models you might be interested in. That gives two numbers: single thread, which is roughly how
    'responsive' or 'snappy' you'll find the system, and multi thread, which is how it'll perform at more heavyweight tasks (assuming software is designed
    to use multiple cores, which most modern software is).

    Theo


    Thanks Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to ajh on Wed May 14 19:07:43 2025
    On Wed, 5/14/2025 5:16 PM, ajh wrote:
    On 14/05/2025 11:19, Theo wrote:
    ajh <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 13/05/2025 17:55, Theo wrote:
    I suggest looking on ebay for a refurbished Dell, HP or Lenovo business box.
    Get one with an 8th generation Intel or Ryzen 3000 or later and it'll
    support Windows 11.

    Thanks for that but what's the differences between generation and
    between I5 and I7?

    Intel's 'generation' = year, roughly.  '8th gen' = 2018
    'i5' and 'i7' = performance grade, kinda like BMW 5 or 7 series.
    Intel suffix letters (U/T/H/HQ/S/K/...) = mostly power class (laptop, desktop,
    ...), although sometimes other things (F = no onboard graphics)

    AMD have a different numbering scheme, although they also do 'Ryzen 3/5/7' >> to roughly compare with i3/i5/i7.

    Sometimes there isn't a lot of difference between generations, and then
    there can be a big leap the next year.

    Performance wise, I'd find out the exact model number (eg i7-9700k) including
    suffix letters then search and add it to a comparison here:
    https://www.cpubenchmark.net/

    to compare against your current CPU model number and other models you might >> be interested in.  That gives two numbers: single thread, which is roughly how
    'responsive' or 'snappy' you'll find the system, and multi thread, which is >> how it'll perform at more heavyweight tasks (assuming software is designed >> to use multiple cores, which most modern software is).

    Theo


    Thanks Theo

    Processors have been made into "Price points", and it is up to
    you to discover what the difference is. Since most of the "pep"
    in CPUs, comes from the clock speed on a single thread, this is
    the best metric for "improvement".

    https://www.cpubenchmark.net/singleThread.html

    Intel Core i9-14900K 4,707 # Example of a reference war-horse.
    Intel Core i5-14400 3,765 # Don't buy the 14400F, as it has no iGPU!
    E8400 1,234 (Optiplex 780 refurb, retired)

    In Google, you can enter

    site:intel.com E8400

    site:techpowerup.com E8400

    and get the datasheet for each Intel processor. If Intel is too stupid to
    list their own product, Techpowerup will have to do.

    https://www.techpowerup.com/cpu-specs/core-2-duo-e8400.c467

    *******

    The multi-thread rating, is applicable to situations where you are
    using WinRAR or 7ZIP compression or decompression. Some of those use
    all cores. These numbers help a bit for gaming (up to a point). For
    example, one of the flight simulators uses 8 cores. My best processor
    can compress at around 50MB/sec, the E8400 was about 2MB/sec by comparison. Most of the time, these excess cores are a waste. The really powerful machine stays off, most of the time (just the fan noise alone, sees to it).
    The fan noise level on my eight core daily driver (65W), is low.

    https://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html

    Intel Core i9-14900K 58,998
    Intel Core i5-14400 25,317
    E8400 1,210 # This number is likely wrong...
    # It's to show what old stock looks like.
    # This processor *cannot* run Win11 24H2 or 25H2.
    # If you arrange to test this, it will crash!
    # This processor has no SSE4.2 Population Count SIMD instruction

    When you identify a processor or a socket ("LGA1851"), then on motherboard maker web sites, they list CPU compatibility of the processors, with
    the motherboards on offer, info on memory compatibility, and so on.
    There is a "discovery order" to investigating computer kit.

    The OS on the computer, represents a "tax" on your usage.
    If all you want to do is web surf and email, you still need
    enough horsepower to finish Windows Update in a decently short
    period of time.

    The same goes for the TPM 2.0 module they insist on, or the
    MBEC support for virtualization (used for sandboxing the
    win32 programs you run, for "highest security"). Not a lot
    of the security rubbish is turned on here, or the machine
    would be like a molasses factory.

    *******

    The influence of the OS and its scheduler is not on display here.
    About all I can do, is show you I can run two very specific different browsers.

    [Picture]

    https://i.postimg.cc/9FWvJdGb/Windows-vs-Bash-Shell-Kernel.gif

    By optional (free) install, I can run Bash Shell (Ubuntu) and it
    has its own Linux kernel. The Linux kernel is a Guest of the Inverted Hypervisor. The sandbox would be a Guest of the Hypervisor. Even
    the "main windows OS" is a Guest of the Hypervisor.

    Now, you might ask, why does this matter ? The threading model
    on the (Linux hosted) browser on the right, is better than
    the (Windows hosted) browser on the left. If I visit a site like
    Newegg, the left browser gets slower and slower to respond. The
    browser on the right, does not! The threading simply works better
    on the right.

    So when I'm trying to shop, and the Javascript is thick as thieves,
    it is the browser on the right that allows me to finish my search.
    I write down the details.

    Then, I boot the Win7 machine and make the purchase :-) So no errant
    software can be taking snapshots of my machine, that's why. It's
    a Trust Issue. Fuck with my machine ? Earn my Distrust. That's how
    it works.

    This is one of the things I've always had on computers. Multiple
    OSes. This started with SoftWindows at work, on my Unix box, so
    we could run Windows Office (slowly). It continued with
    Connectix VirtualPC on my Mac (run two OSes). In the picture,
    I am still running two OSes, to select the best of a given
    situation. This is also why my machines have a little more
    RAM than the average. It's to run two OSes.

    The browser on the right, is a "rootless window" that appears
    on the desktop, via WSLg support (the graphics path). That's not
    quite the same as VirtualBox which presents a "rooted desktop view"
    with the entire OS visible in a single rectangular region. This allows
    that browser on the right to "fit in", without being too intrusive.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to pinnerite on Thu May 15 04:52:22 2025
    On Wed, 5/14/2025 5:45 PM, pinnerite wrote:
    On Tue, 13 May 2025 15:51:19 +0100
    ajh <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 14/04/2025 10:00, John Rumm wrote:
    I have had this conversation with quite a few customers recently, and
    have had to point out that yup it is a right pain that MS are forcing
    you to ditch a perfectly serviceable machine, but many of them are 10+
    years old, and they might actually be pleasantly surprised how much of
    an improvement in performance the new one will bring along with lower
    running costs.

    I have tried to follow this thread, because I am using a 2015 I5
    desktop, which on the whole suits me, but what I cannot see is what a
    moderate home user like myself should be looking at for an upgrade which
    will perform with modern OSs and software?

    As long as it connects to my 24" monitor and some speakers I don't mind
    if it is a tower or laptop, new or secondhand and I have not played a
    computer game in 30 years so that is not a requirement.

    I have been building my own computers for over 40 years.
    I tend to buy components one stage back from bleeding edge.

    Last August I started on a new build, the first yonks.
    I learned two things:

    1) Manufacturers had become sloppy about quality control.
    2) The biggest gain in performance was by deploying a solid state drive.

    It took months, literally of returning stuff for testing.
    The supplier eBuyer were terrific but it drove me crazy.

    Anyway, I would not worry too mmuch about the processor if you are not running games.

    HTH

    Alan

    I would agree with this opinion.

    "Manufacturers had become sloppy"

    The thing is, if they are three months late delivering
    products like their competitors, the feeling is they
    will "miss out" on the marketing window. This is what
    encourages manufacturers to ship things that don't work
    properly or will never work properly.

    But the more recent observable problem, is the quality
    control really is slipping. There is not enough test.
    Some manufacturers have "continuous" security issues, like
    everything they do is an "exploit waiting to happen". One
    manufacturer even got censured and is supposed to be audited
    on a regular basis. It just isn't working, and they're still
    emitting crap.

    The result of this, is a gradual increase in price, as the
    retailer selling the materials have to charge more, to cover
    all the returns they are getting and the amount of service
    needed to handle all of it.

    The normal failure rate on motherboards is 3% by the way.
    One in thirty three new motherboards, will have some issue
    severe enough to require returning the board. Not all problems
    are the fault of the manufacturer. But there have been batches
    of boards with socket damage, and it's unknown how that is
    happening (a swapping of bad boards for good, by someone
    at the factory?). The boards receive a two minute functional
    test, on a table, before having the PNP cap installed and
    the lid on the retail box is closed up. It should all be
    working.

    Today, you flash up the BIOS, even when it does not need it,
    as that is now "standard security practice".

    Someone in another group, has been working on a build for months.
    He wants working ECC. A couple days ago, he was getting ready
    to return the motherboard. I kept his nose to the grind stone,
    and he got it working :-/ It means I have to write extra missives
    to "keep trying, you're closer than you think".

    What a time to be alive.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Rod Speed on Fri May 23 21:35:35 2025
    On Fri, 5/23/2025 8:45 PM, Rod Speed wrote:


    Which one is that ?

    "Millions of PC Motherboards Were Sold With a Firmware Backdoor
    www.reddit.com › hardware › comments › millions_of_pc_motherboards_...
    May 31, 2023 · Most, if not all, motherboard manufacturers appear to be
    really bad at security... <=== There have been multiple incidents, that's where
    " this idea comes from.

    Here's an example for you.

    https://news.sophos.com/en-us/2023/05/09/low-level-motherboard-security-keys-leaked-in-msi-breach-claim-researchers/

    Normally, signing services are air gapped and "you have to go into this
    little room, to sign something". You don't leave any sort of important
    keys, on the general company LAN or WAN.

    when the Linux shims for booting were last signed (to handle the situation where Microsoft revoked an important key in UEFI and it took Microsoft
    a year to push out that change into hardware), they fly to specific places
    for the air-gapped signing ceremony. The signing cannot be conducted
    by just emailing the materials to the party doing the signing, and having
    them emailed back. It requires a person to physically travel to the
    little room, to get the signing done. They hand the goods to a trusted employee who enters the room and signs the item, then it is handed back to the traveller who flies home. The item stays in hand until they get home (can't be left in the luggage during the plane flight).

    That's how responsible parties do security.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)