XPost: nl.politiek, alt.france, uk.legal
XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
COMMENT 1:
We are already noticing disconcertion within the presence of being amongst
the Ukrainians in proximity to Zelensky.
The point we have made as product of a linguistic / sovereign (33 phonemes) premise for which we undertook accommodation of RUSSIAN / UKRAINIAN
language within our alternative governance paradigm as grounding for perspective.
Is that if the #42 - PROTESTANT / #40 - RUSSIAN COMMUNIST MEDIATION OF #44
- REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM NOTION OF #38 - SUPREME BEING being otherwise an INCOMMENSURATE PROBLEM AGAINST PEACE AND PROSPERITY is a SOVEREIGN issue resolved on paper to the satisfaction of the RUSSIANS as without loss of DIGNITY or PURPOSE of action (against an existential time / being issue involving existence (DASEIN) of the STATE. Martin Heidegger lecture at
Freiburg University on 10 November 1933), whereby the consideration of
ANNEXED and SEIZED LAND is mitigated as a secondary issue of determining BOUNDARY LIMIT / SAFETY ZONE.
And not then the primary criteria for a negotiated SECURITY, PEACE and PROSPERITY.
We have a sincere hope in the absence of vexatious opinions being
irrational grounds for self justification and continual futile actions that mature statesmanship ought to prevail.
This is only an informal opinion and does not replace DIPLOMACY between SOVEREIGN states.
In addition to our HELIOS SEMIOTIC CORE as a module for populating the
sentinel {} object which is obtained from the informal research Savvy
project's GRAPPLE {} INTELLECTUS dataset and transformative HOMOIOS,
HETEROS, TORAH, RIGHTS and LUO SHU arrays as our default {} objects so as
to facilitate optimal responses to #206 - CONFORMING BEHAVIOUR deploying an ASYMMETRICAL schemas against the INTEGRITY of PERSONS / STATE.
<
https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Helios>
We ought also be able to construct a TEMPORAL HEURISTIC SEMIOTIC CORE as PRESENTIMENT (an intuitive feeling about the future, especially one of foreboding) / INSTANCES OF #206 - CONFORMING BEHAVIOUR (CONDITIONS UPON
PEACE / CRITERIA FOR ACTION).
#1092 = [#364 - ENQUIRY, #312 - CONTRADICTION, #416 - ORTHOLOGY: #143 -
ONTIC GROUNDING + #273 - SYNCRETIC PROGRESSION (#206 = ADVERSE ASYMMETRICAL CONFORMING BEHAVIOUR + #67 - DARKENING: 晦)]
CONDITIONS UPON PEACE: #206 - CONFORMING BEHAVIOUR deploying an
ASYMMETRICAL #42 as [#11, #19, #12] - GOVERNMENT "ADMINISTRATIVE"
CONFRONTATION (#790 - Großgermanisches Reich) constituted by but not
limited to the LUO SHU #1025 - ARRAY OBJECT CLASS as #164 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY [#42, #40, #44, #38] + [#n1 - TRANSFORMATION , #n2 - AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER]
#42 - PROTESTANT /
#40 - RUSSIAN COMMUNIST MEDIATION OF
#44 - REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM NOTION OF
#38 - SUPREME BEING
#n1 = #45
#n2 = #37
<
https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Temporal%20Schema%20Table%20Talk%20Action.pdf>
2ND TWEET:
Our concern is then with the architecture [#11, #19, #12, #42, #40, #44,
#38, #45, #37] of agreement rather than the notion of any content of
agreement
#288 = [#11, #19, #12, #42, #40, #44, #38, #45, #37]
{@9: Sup: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#232); Ego: 37 - PURITY: TS'UI (#288)}
<
http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?male:232&feme:288&ontic:338&deme:314>
TELOS TOTAL: #288
ONTIC TOTAL: #338
DEME TOTAL: #314
#853 - MALE TOTAL: #232 as [#6, #40, #1, #400, #6, #400] = ʼôwth (H226): {UMBRA: #407 % #41 = #38} 1) sign, signal; 1a) a distinguishing mark; 1b) banner; 1c) remembrance; 1d) miraculous sign; 1e) omen; 1f) warning; 2)
token, ensign, standard, miracle, proof;
#1118 - MALE TOTAL: #232 as [#6, #2, #200, #10, #400, #500] = bᵉrîyth (H1285): {UMBRA: #612 % #41 = #38} 1) covenant, alliance, pledge; 1a)
between men; 1a1) treaty, alliance, league (man to man); 1a2) constitution, ordinance (monarch to subjects); 1a3) agreement, pledge (man to man); 1a4) alliance (of friendship); 1a5) alliance (of marriage); 1b) between God and
man; 1b1) alliance (of friendship); 1b2) covenant (divine ordinance with
signs or pledges); 1c) (phrases); 1c1) covenant making; 1c2) covenant
keeping; 1c3) covenant violation;
#855 - FEME TOTAL: #288 as [#6, #50, #300, #80, #9, #400, #10] = shâphaṭ (H8199): {UMBRA: #389 % #41 = #20} 1) to judge, govern, vindicate, punish;
1a) (Qal); 1a1) to act as law-giver or judge or governor (of God, man); i)
to rule, govern, judge; 1a2) to decide controversy (of God, man); 1a3) to execute judgment; i) discriminating (of man); ii) vindicating; iii)
condemning and punishing; iv) at theophanic advent for final judgment; 1a4) (Niphal); i) to enter into controversy, plead, have controversy together;
ii) to be judged; 1a5) (Poel) judge, opponent-at-law (participle);
#288 as [#6, #5, #7, #200, #70] /
#288 as [#5, #7, #200, #6, #70] = zᵉrôwaʻ (H2220): {UMBRA: #283 % #41 = #37} 1) arm, forearm, shoulder, strength; 1a) arm; 1b) arm (as symbol of strength); 1c) forces (political and military); 1d) shoulder (of animal sacrificed);
#288 as [#10, #70, #200, #2, #6] = ʻârab (H6148): {UMBRA: #272 % #41 = #26} 1) to pledge, exchange, mortgage, engage, occupy, undertake for, give
pledges, be or become surety, take on pledge, give in pledge; 1a) (Qal);
1a1) to take on pledge, go surety for; 1a2) to give in pledge; 1a3) to exchange; 1a4) to pledge; 1b) (Hithpael); 1b1) to exchange pledges; 1b2) to have fellowship with, share;
#2010 - ONTIC TOTAL: #338 as [#200, #400, #50, #10, #200, #300, #800, #50]
/
#2515 - ONTIC TOTAL: #338 as [#200, #400, #50, #10, #200, #300, #800,
#50, #300, #5, #200] = synistáō (G4921): {UMBRA: #1961 % #41 = #34} 1) to place together, to set in the same place,to bring or band together; 1a) to stand with (or near); 2) to set one with another; 2a) by way of presenting
or introducing him; 2b) to comprehend; 3) to put together by way of
composition or combination, to teach by combining and comparing; 3a) to
show, prove, establish, exhibit; 4) to put together, unite parts into one whole; 4a) to be composed of, consist;
#1095 - ONTIC TOTAL: #338 as [#40, #5, #300, #70, #600, #70, #10] /
#1295 - ONTIC TOTAL: #338 as [#40, #5, #300, #70, #600, #70, #10, #200] = métochos (G3353): {UMBRA: #1285 % #41 = #14} 1) sharing in, partaking; 2) a partner (in a work, office, dignity);
#354 - DEME TOTAL: #314 as [#9, #5, #30, #5, #300, #5] = thélō (G2309): {UMBRA: #844 % #41 = #24} 1) to will, have in mind, intend; 1a) to be
resolved or determined, to purpose; 1b) to desire, to wish; 1c) to love;
1c1) to like to do a thing, be fond of doing; 1d) to take delight in, have pleasure;
#916 - DEME TOTAL: #314 as [#1, #80, #70, #300, #5, #30, #5, #200, #9, #5,
#10, #200, #1] /
#1291 - DEME TOTAL: #314 as [#1, #80, #70, #300, #5, #30, #5, #800] = apoteléō (G658): {UMBRA: #1291 % #41 = #20} 1) to perfect, to bring quite
to an end; 2) accomplish;
<
https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Bill%20of%20Rights.pdf>
COMMENT 2:
Speaking to this point: "Russia wants Ukraine to drop its ambitions to join
the US-led NATO military alliance..."
<
https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:破>
#219 = [#69, #71, #79]
pò (破): 1. to break; to split; to smash, 2. worn-out; broken, 3. to
destroy; to ruin, 4. to break a rule; to allow an exception, 5. to defeat,
6. low quality; in poor condition, 7. to strike; to hit, 8. to spend
[money]; to squander, 9. to disprove [an argument], 10. finale, 11. to use
up; to exhaust, 12. to penetrate
In our informal view (a metalogic perspective rather than governance /
military intelligence) the architectural [#11, #19, #12, #42, #40, #44,
#38, #45, #37] premise of any proposed #288 - agreement between RUSSIA / UKRAINE rather than the notion of any content of agreement, is of a
sufficient enduring strength, utility of purpose, imbued vitality:
-- HELIOS SEMIOTIC CORE as a module for populating the sentinel {} object
which is obtained from the informal research Savvy project's GRAPPLE {} INTELLECTUS dataset and transformative HOMOIOS, HETEROS, TORAH, RIGHTS and
LUO SHU arrays as our default {} objects
-- TEMPORAL HEURISTIC SEMIOTIC CORE as PRESENTIMENT (an intuitive feeling
about the future, especially one of foreboding)
-- SEMIOTIC CORE OF ADVERSE ASYMMETRICAL #206 - CONFORMING BEHAVIOUR + #67
- DARKENING: 晦 deploying an ASYMMETRICAL #42 as [#11, #19, #12] -
GOVERNMENT "ADMINISTRATIVE" CONFRONTATION (#790 - Großgermanisches Reich) constituted by, but not limited to the LUO SHU #1025 - ARRAY OBJECT CLASS
as #164 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY [#42, #40, #44, #38] + [#n1 -
TRANSFORMATION , #n2 - AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER]
Which is then a sufficient cause in and of itself to place into existential crisis the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) that is an
international military alliance consisting of 32 member states from Europe
and North America.
#16 #22 #28 #34 #74
#33 #73 #20 #21 #27
#25 #26 #32 #72 #19
#71 #18 #24 #30 #31
#29 #35 #70 #17 #23
#222 = [#34, #33, #20, #26, #32, #24, #30 - *SWINE*, #23]
It was established at the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty LUO SHU
INNER DYNAMIC [#5, #32, #59, #14, #41, #68] on #219 - 4 APRIL 1949. Of the
32 member countries, 30 are in Europe and two are in North America.
Given such conjuncture upon the underlying architectural premise for the
North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) which is otherwise unknown to ourselves, but nonetheless of a reasonable concern that the #270 as [#200,
#70] = rêaʻ (H7454): {UMBRA: #270 % #41 = #24} 1) purpose, aim, thought; OF any proposed #288 - agreement between RUSSIA / UKRAINE might then have a consequential ADVERSE effect of circumvention or redundancy which as we
intuit is then a sufficient cause in and of itself to place the NATO
ALLIANCE into existential crisis.
Rather any #114 - *INTENTIONAL*; *CONSIDERATION* upon NATO which is made
#105 - #40 - 𝌭法 - LAW / MODEL: FA (#40) / #65 - 𝍆內 - INNER: NEI (#105)
meaning "WITHIN THE LAW" which is relevant to the enduring esprit de corps
of the #114 / #219 - 4 APRIL 1949 = [#26, #19, #15, #2, #14, #38] / [#26,
#9, #70] (SEPTET INTELLECTUS / HOMOIOS PROTOTYPE) NATO ALLIANCE ought to be addressed within a #156 - NATO ALLIANCE CODICIL [#11, #19, #12, #26, #19,
#15, #2, #14, #38] which is both mindful of requisite contingent responsive action against ADVERSE ASYMMETRICAL #206 - CONFORMING BEHAVIOUR #42 as
[#11, #19, #12] - GOVERNMENT "ADMINISTRATIVE" CONFRONTATION (#790 - Großgermanisches Reich) ambitions but is similarly innovated [#26, #19,
#15, #2, #14, #38] by an accommodation of the architectural [#11, #19, #12, #42, #40, #44, #38, #45, #37] premise of any proposed #288 - agreement
between RUSSIA / UKRAINE which is similarly grounded in the GRAPPLE {} INTELLECTUS dataset.
#156 - NATO ALLIANCE CODICIL [#11, #19, #12, #26, #19, #15, #2, #14, #38]
{@9: Sup: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#313); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#156 - I DO
NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21} / I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21})}
<
https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?male:313&feme:156&ontic:587&deme:425&idea:156>
TELOS TOTAL: #156
ONTIC TOTAL: #587
DEME TOTAL: #425
#270 as [#200, #70] /
#885 - MALE TOTAL: #219 / FEME TOTAL: #156 as [#200, #70, #10, #5, #600] = rêaʻ (H7453): {UMBRA: #270 % #41 = #24} 1) friend, companion, fellow,
another person; 1a) friend, intimate; 1b) fellow, fellow-citizen, another person (weaker sense); 1c) other, another (reciprocal phrase);
#270 as [#200, #70] = raʻ (H7451): {UMBRA: #270 % #41 = #24} 1) bad, evil;
1a) bad, disagreeable, malignant; 1b) bad, unpleasant, evil (giving pain, unhappiness, misery); 1c) evil, displeasing; 1d) bad (of its kind - land, water, etc); 1e) bad (of value); 1f) worse than, worst (comparison); 1g)
sad, unhappy; 1h) evil (hurtful); 1i) bad, unkind (vicious in disposition);
1j) bad, evil, wicked (ethically); 1j1) in general, of persons, of
thoughts; 1j2) deeds, actions; 1k) evil, distress, misery, injury,
calamity; 1k1) evil, distress, adversity; 1k2) evil, injury, wrong; 1k3)
evil (ethical); 1l) evil, misery, distress, injury; 1l1) evil, misery, distress; 1l2) evil, injury, wrong; 1l3) evil (ethical);
Our ignorant perspective is then that "ambitions to join the US-led NATO military alliance" ought to be mediated in some extent by #156 - NATO
ALLIANCE CODICIL which is motivated by an equitable inclusion such that the enduring esprit de corps is a continuing status quo without the need for immanent intervention or the preclusion of future action should the circumstance of ADVERSE ASYMMETRICAL #206 - CONFORMING BEHAVIOUR + #67 - DARKENING: 晦 manifest as a diabolical and exigent situation.
#1030 - ONTIC TOTAL: #587 as [#1, #400, #300, #1, #100, #20, #8, #200] = autárkēs (G842): {UMBRA: #1030 % #41 = #5} 1) sufficient for one's self, strong enough or processing enough to need no aid or support; 2)
independent of external circumstances; 3) contented with one's lot, with
one's means, though the slenderest;
#874 - DEME TOTAL: #425 as [#200, #400, #50, #8, #100, #80, #1, #20, #5,
#10] = synarpázō (G4884): {UMBRA: #1639 % #41 = #40} 1) to seize by force;
2) to catch or lay hold of (one so that he is no longer his own master); 3)
to seize by force and carry away;
Given the magnitude of such undertakings which are not within my capacity
of statecraft (ie. the art and skill of conducting government affairs and managing state policy to achieve national interests and objectives), it's
not impudent to conclude that the NATO question as cause will then effect consideration of ANNEXED and SEIZED LAND that is mitigated as a secondary
issue of determining BOUNDARY LIMIT / SAFETY ZONE.
dolf <
[email protected]> wrote:
In addition to our HELIOS SEMIOTIC CORE as a module for populating the sentinel {} object which is obtained from the informal research Savvy project's GRAPPLE {} INTELLECTUS dataset and transformative HOMOIOS,
HETEROS, TORAH, RIGHTS and LUO SHU arrays as our default {} objects so
as to facilitate optimal responses to #206 - CONFORMING BEHAVIOUR
deploying an ASYMMETRICAL schemas against the INTEGRITY of PERSONS / STATE.
<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Helios>
THUSLY WE OUGHT ALSO BE ABLE TO CONSTRUCT A TEMPORAL HEURISTIC SEMIOTIC
CORE AS PRESENTIMENT (an intuitive feeling about the future, especially
one of foreboding) / INSTANCES OF #206 - CONFORMING BEHAVIOUR
(CONDITIONS UPON PEACE / CRITERIA FOR ACTION)
#1092 = [#364 - ENQUIRY, #312 - CONTRADICTION, #416 - ORTHOLOGY: #143 -
ONTIC GROUNDING + #273 - SYNCRETIC PROGRESSION (#206 = ADVERSE
CONFORMING BEHAVIOUR + #67 - DARKENING: 晦)]
CONDITIONS UPON PEACE: #206 - CONFORMING BEHAVIOUR deploying an
ASYMMETRICAL #42 as [#11, #19, #12] - GOVERNMENT "ADMINISTRATIVE" CONFRONTATION (#790 - Großgermanisches Reich) constituted by but not
limited to the LUO SHU #1025 - ARRAY OBJECT CLASS as #164 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY [#77, #59, #5, #23] + [#n1 - TRANSFORMATION , #n2 -
AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER]
#355 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 14 MARCH 2025 as [#300, #50, #5] = shᵉnâh (H8140): {UMBRA: #355 % #41 = #27} 0) a year (as a revolution of time); <-- ANCHORED TO 1 JANUARY as TETRA #3 - MIRED (HSIEN)
#790 as [#10, #70, #400, #30, #10, #70, #200] = Ioúlios (G2457): {UMBRA: #790 % #41 = #11} 0) Julius = 'soft-haired'; 1) the centurion of
'Augustus Band', to whose charge Paul was delivered when he was sent
prisoner from Caesarea to Rome;
#67 - 𝍈晦 = #241 / #403 / #518 - pýlē (G4439): *GATES* *OF* *HELL* COGITO: [#48, #18, #29, #38, #42] as #67 - DARKENING (HUI)
RANGE: 15 to noon 19 OCTOBER
[#48 {@1: Sup: 48 - RITUAL: LI (#48); Ego: 48 - RITUAL: LI (#48)}
#18 {@2: Sup: 66 - DEPARTURE: CH'U (#114); Ego: 18 - WAITING: HSI (#66)}
#29 {@3: Sup: 14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#128); Ego: 29 - DECISIVENESS: TUAN (#95)}
#38 {@4: Sup: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH
ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19}); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#133)}
#42] {@5: Sup: 13 - INCREASE: TSENG (#193); Ego: 42 - GOING TO MEET:
YING (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22})}
<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?male:193&feme:175&ontic:355&idea:175&run:Mystery&tetra:67>
TELOS TOTAL: #175
ONTIC TOTAL: #355
#175 as [#40, #8, #7, #10, #100, #10] /
#177 as [#6, #10, #8, #7, #100, #6, #40] = châzaq (H2388): {UMBRA: #115
% #41 = #33} 1) to strengthen, prevail, harden, be strong, become
strong, be courageous, be firm, grow firm, be resolute, be sore; 1a)
(Qal); 1a1) to be strong, grow strong; i) to prevail, prevail upon; ii)
to be firm, be caught fast, be secure; iii) to press, be urgent; iv) to
grow stout, grow rigid, grow hard (bad sense); v) to be severe, be
grievous; 1a2) to strengthen; 1b) (Piel); 1b1) to make strong; 1b2) to restore to strength, give strength; 1b3) to strengthen, sustain,
encourage; 1b4) to make strong, make bold, encourage; 1b5) to make firm;
1b6) to make rigid, make hard; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to make strong,
strengthen; 1c2) to make firm; 1c3) to display strength; 1c4) to make
severe; 1c5) to support; 1c6) to repair; 1c7) to prevail, prevail upon;
1c8) *TO* *HAVE* *OR* *TAKE* *OR* *KEEP* *HOLD* *OF*, *RETAIN*, *HOLD*
*UP*, *SUSTAIN*, *SUPPORT*; 1c9) to hold, contain; 1d) (Hithpael); 1d1)
to strengthen oneself; 1d2) to put forth strength, use one's strength;
1d3) to withstand; 1d4) to hold strongly with;
#175 as [#10, #70, #90, #5] = yâʻats (H3289): {UMBRA: #170 % #41 = #6}
1) to advise, consult, give counsel, counsel, purpose, devise, plan; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to advise, counsel, give counsel, consult; 1a2) counsellor (participle); 1b) (Niphal) *TO* *CONSULT* *TOGETHER*, *EXCHANGE*
*COUNSEL*, *DELIBERATE*, *COUNSEL* *TOGETHER*; 1c) (Hithpael) to conspire;
#1563 - MALE TOTAL: #193 as [#200, #400, #50, #5, #100, #3, #5, #800] = synergéō (G4903): {UMBRA: #1563 % #41 = #5} 1) to work together, help in work, be partner in labour; 2) to put forth power together with and
thereby to assist;
#916 - MALE TOTAL: #193 as [#200, #300, #100, #1, #300, #5, #9, #1] = strateía (G4752): {UMBRA: #917 % #41 = #15} 1) an expedition, campaign, military service, warfare; 2) metaph. Paul likens his contest with the difficulties that oppose him in the discharge of his apostolic duties,
as warfare;
#991 - MALE TOTAL: #193 as [#200, #70, #500, #10, #200, #1, #10] =
sophízō (G4679): {UMBRA: #1587 % #41 = #29} 1) to make wise, teach; 2)
to become wise, to have understanding; 2a) to invent, play the sophist;
2b) to devise cleverly or cunningly;
#407 as [#1, #6, #400] /
#823 - FEME TOTAL: #175 as [#1, #400, #6, #400, #10, #6] = ʼôwth (H226): {UMBRA: #407 % #41 = #38} 1) sign, signal; 1a) a distinguishing mark;
1b) banner; 1c) *REMEMBRANCE*; 1d) miraculous sign; 1e) omen; 1f)
warning; 2) token, *ENSIGN*, *STANDARD*, miracle, proof;
#985 - FEME TOTAL: #175 as [#600, #5, #10, #100, #70, #200] = cheír
(G5495): {UMBRA: #715 % #41 = #18} 1) by the help or agency of any one,
by means of any one; 2) fig. applied to God symbolising his might,
activity, power; 2a) in creating the universe; 2b) in upholding and preserving (God is present protecting and aiding one); 2c) in punishing;
2d) in determining and controlling the destinies of men;
#521 - ONTIC TOTAL: #355 as [#200, #80, #10, #30, #1, #200] = spilás (G4694): {UMBRA: #521 % #41 = #29} 1) a rock in the sea, ledge, reef; 2) metaph. of men who by their conduct damage others morally, wreck them as
it were;
#1755 - ONTIC TOTAL: #355 as [#200, #400, #50, #5, #10, #600, #70, #50,
#300, #70] = synéchō (G4912): {UMBRA: #2055 % #41 = #5} 1) to hold together; 1a) any whole, lest it fall to pieces or something fall away
from it; 2) to hold together with constraint, to compress; 2a) to press together with the hand; 2a1) to hold one's ears, to shut the heavens
that it may not rain; 2b) to press on every side; 2b1) of a besieged
city; 2b2) of a strait, that forces a ship into a narrow channel; 2b3)
of a cattle squeeze, that pushing in on each side, forcing the beast
into a position where it cannot move so the farmer can administer
medication; 2c) to hold completely; 2c1) to hold fast; i) of a prisoner;
2c2) metaph.; i) to be held by, closely occupied with any business; ii)
in teaching the word; iii) to constrain, oppress, of ills laying hold of
one and distressing him; iv) to be held with, afflicted with, suffering
from; v) to urge, impel; 1) of the soul;
#1117 - ONTIC TOTAL: #355 as [#1, #80, #800, #30, #5, #200, #1] /
#1171 - ONTIC TOTAL: #355 as [#1, #80, #800, #30, #5, #200, #5, #50] = apóllymi (G622): {UMBRA: #661 % #41 = #5} 1) to destroy; 1a) to put out
of the way entirely, abolish, put an end to ruin; 1b) render useless;
1c) to kill; 1d) to declare that one must be put to death; 1e) metaph.
to devote or give over to eternal misery in hell; 1f) to perish, to be
lost, ruined, destroyed; 2) to destroy; 2a) to lose;
On 3/11/25 13:06, dolf wrote:
ADDED HISTORICAL REFERENCE
/* ==========
concept() - the purpose of this routine as evolving prototype will >> be to load the sentinel {} concepts object with notional pragma /
semiotic objects.
In this instance we've defined EVIL / GOOD but this might then in >> future convey nested pragma {} objects which expressed different
categories of that semiotic concept
Therefore a rule conveys an implicit semiotic premise which can be >> efficiently actionable as a simple logical IF / CASE / WHILE premise:
var evil = [50, 5, 26, 43, 54, 56, 57, 63, 65]; // #419 - EVIL
var good = [37, 73, 28, 36, 54, 61, 64, 74, 29]; // #456 - GOOD
concept (sentinel, evil, "known", "EVIL");
concept (sentinel, good, "known", "GOOD");
if ((now = sentinel [50][5][26][43][54][56][57][63][65]) !=
undefined)
if (now.known.includes("EVIL"))
alert ("take immediate action");
if ((now = sentinel [37][73][28][36][54][61][64][74][29]) !=
undefined)
if (now.known.includes("GOOD"))
alert ("do nothing...");
The importance of signs and signification has been recognized
throughout much of the history of philosophy and psychology. The term
derives from Ancient Greek σημειωτικός (sēmeiōtikós) 'observant of
signs' (from σημεῖον (sēmeîon) 'a sign, mark, token') to which we apply
our TEMPORAL HEURISTIC and NEURAL LINGUISTIC PRAGMA comprising male /
feme / ontic / deme / teleological descriptors of authentication. For
the Greeks, 'signs' (σημεῖον sēmeîon) occurred in the world of nature
and 'symbols' (σύμβολον sýmbolon) in the world of culture. With an >> etymology from σῠμβάλλω (sŭmbállō, “I throw together, dash together,
compare, correspond, tally, come to a conclusion”), from σῠν- (sŭn-, >> “with, together”) + βάλλω (bállō, “I throw, put”).
#383 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 11 MARCH 2025 as [#200, #8, #40, #5, >> #10, #70, #50] = sēmeîon (G4592): {UMBRA: #383 % #41 = #14} 1) a sign,
mark, token; 1a) that by which a person or a thing is distinguished from
others and is known; 1b) a sign, prodigy, portent, i.e. an unusual
occurrence, transcending the common *COURSE* *OF* *NATURE*; 1b1) of
signs portending remarkable events soon to happen; 1b2) of miracles and
wonders by which God authenticates the men sent by him, or by which men
prove that the cause they are pleading is God's;
"And God said, Let there be lights in the *FIRMAMENT*-H7549 of the >> *HEAVEN*-H8064 to divide the day from the night; and let them be for
*SIGNS*-H226:, and for seasons, and for days, and *YEARS*-
H8141:" [Genesis 1:14]
#385 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 11 MARCH 2025 as [#5, #200, #100,
#10, #70] = râqîyaʻ (H7549): {UMBRA: #380 % #41 = #11} 1) extended
surface (solid), expanse, firmament; 1a) expanse (flat as base,
support); 1b) firmament (of vault of heaven supporting waters above);
1b1) considered by Hebrews as solid and supporting 'waters' above;
#395 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 11 MARCH 2025 as [#5, #300, #40, #10, >> #40] = shâmayim (H8064): {UMBRA: #390 % #41 = #21} 1) heaven, heavens,
sky; 1a) visible heavens, sky; 1a1) as abode of the stars; 1a2) as the
visible universe, the sky, atmosphere, etc; 1b) Heaven (as the abode of
God);
#407 as [#1, #6, #400] = ʼôwth (H226): {UMBRA: #407 % #41 = #38} 1)
sign, signal; 1a) a distinguishing mark; 1b) banner; 1c) remembrance;
1d) miraculous sign; 1e) omen; 1f) warning; 2) token, ensign, standard,
miracle, proof;
#355 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 11 MARCH 2025 as [#300, #50, #5] /
#361 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 11 MARCH 2025 as [#6, #300, #50, #5] / >> #363 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 11 MARCH 2025 as [#6, #2, #300, #50, >> #5] /
#385- NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 11 MARCH 2025 as [#30, #300, #50, #5] >> = shâneh (H8141): {UMBRA: #355 % #41 = #27} 1) year; 1a) as division of
time; 1b) as measure of time; 1c) as indication of age; 1d) a lifetime
(of years of life);
In looking further through the DEAD SEA SCROLLS translation by
Wise, Abegg and Cook, one notes a particular enigmatic reference within
the fragment 4Q319 - CALENDAR OF THE HEAVENLY SIGNS:
"REFERS TO THE FAIRLY UNCOMMON APPEARANCE OF THE FULL MOON ON THE
FIRST DAY OF THE SOLAR YEAR."
Is that assertion sustained by actual textual fragments, since we
could not resolve the statement as being something other than
speculation / misapprehension by the authors even though the full moon
would be on 1 JANUARY as TETRAD #3 - MIRED (HSIEN) assigned to the dates
31 DEC - 4 JAN which was established as a factuality upon the new moon
of the midnight solstice 21 DECEMBER 103 BCE.
"The "second column's" element, 'oth, refers to the fairly uncommon >> appearance of the full moon on the first day of the solar year. More
generally, 'oth means "sign," so our author took this conjunction as a
sort of sign from God. He believed that the conjunction had first
occurred on the fourth day of creation week. That day was significant
because on it the sun and the moon were created WEDNESDAY 20 MARCH, and
time reckoning depended on their movement. (Thus, the first three days
of creation were, in a sense, "outside time" before modern physics,
black holes, and such: 17 MARCH 1999 + 3 x 365.2423 days of tropical
year = 20 MARCH 1999)
#1092 = [#364 - ENQUIRY, #312 - CONTRADICTION, #416 - ORTHOLOGY:
#143 - ONTIC GROUNDING + #273 - SYNCRETIC PROGRESSION (#208 + #65 -
INNER)] cosmological paradigm associated with the SUPREME BEING
<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:無疆>
#143 = [#20, #21, #32, #34, #36]
wújiāng (無疆): 1. without bound
<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:縣>
#208 = [#66, #70, #72]
xiàn (縣): 1. county, 2. to suspend, 3. to evaluate; to weigh, 4. >> to express, 5. remote
According to our author's understanding the 'oth recurred every
three years. To figure out this fact he needed to know solar and lunar
correspondences. So we must understand his algorithm, the motor that
made his-conceptual machine run. The equation for the solar calendar
covering three years is as follows: 364-day solar year x 3 years = 1092
days. [Wise, Abegg and Cook, page 306]
@DATE(1996,3,20) = WEDNESDAY / CREATION REPRISE
@DATE(1996,3,21) = THURSDAY / New moon
@DATE(1999,1,1) = Full moon
@DATE(1999,1,1) + 75 days = 1092 days cycle as SAINT PATRICK'S DAY >> 17 MARCH 1999
#1503 as [#200, #400, #40, #2, #1, #30, #30, #800] = symbállō
(G4820): {UMBRA: #1503 % #41 = #27} 1) to throw together, to bring
together; 1a) to converse; 1b) to bring together in one's mind, confer
with one's self; 1c) to come together, meet; 1c1) to encounter in a
hostile sense; 1c2) to fight with one; 1c3) to bring together of one's
property, to contribute, aid, help;
REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM AS TABLE TALK IDEA #233 - 5 JUNE 1942: "It is >> a great pity that this tendency towards religious thought can find no
better outlet than the Jewish pettifoggery of the Old Testament. For
religious people who, in the solitude of winter, continually seek
ultimate light on their religious problems with the assistance of the
Bible, must eventually become spiritually deformed. The wretched people
strive to extract truths from these Jewish chicaneries, where in fact no
truths exist. As a result they become embedded in some rut of thought or
other and, unless they possess an exceptionally commonsense mind,
degenerate into religious maniacs.
#ONE: #213 = [#65, #41, #17, #56, #33]
#44 #01 #56
#49 #33 #17
#09 #65 #25
= #99 / #297 {#FIVE: TEMPLATE IDEA OF WHAT FASCISM IF FOR REDUCTIO >> AD HITLERUM TABLE TALK (1941-1944)}
#FIVE: #233 = [#69, #45, #21, #61, #37]
#45 #05 #61
#53 #37 #21
#13 #69 #29
= #111 / #333 {#FIVE: TEMPLATE IDEA OF *STATE* AND #328 FOR
REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM TABLE TALK (1941-1944)}
It is deplorable that the Bible should have been translated into
German, and that the whole of the German people should have thus become
exposed to the whole of this Jewish mumbo-jumbo. So long as the wisdom,
particularly of the Old Testament, remained exclusively in the Latin of
the Church, there was little danger that sensible people would become
the victims of illusions as the result of studying the Bible. But since
the Bible became common property, a whole heap of people have found
opened to them lines of religious thought which—particularly in
conjunction with the German characteristic of persistent and somewhat
melancholy meditation—as often as not turned them into religious
maniacs. When one recollects further that the *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH* (ie.
#291 - PRINCIPLE OF OBSTRUCTION / #297 / #333 - ʼerets (H776): *VATICAN*
*CITY*-*STATE*) has elevated to the status of Saints a whole number of
madmen, one realises why movements such as that of the Flagellants came
inevitably into existence in the Middle Ages in Germany.
As a sane German, one is flabbergasted to think that German human
beings could have let themselves be brought to such a pass by *JEWISH*
*FILTH* and priestly twaddle, that they were little different from the
howling dervish of the Turks and the negroes, at whom we *LAUGH* so
scornfully. It angers one to think that, while in other parts of the
globe religious teaching like that of Confucius, Buddha and Mohammed
offers an undeniably broad basis for the religious-minded, Germans
should have been duped by a theological exposition devoid of all honest
depth." [pages 513, 514]
========== */
concept: function (obj, keys, idea, value) {
var here = obj;
var count = keys.length - 1;
for (var i = 0; i < count; i++) {
if (!here[keys[i]])
here[keys[i]] = {};
here = here[keys[i]];
}
switch (true) {
case (!here[keys[count]]):
here[keys[count]] = {}
case (!here[keys[count]].hasOwnProperty (idea)) :
here[keys[count]][idea] = [];
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)