• Re: Tsunami

    From Mark Carver@21:1/5 to Tweed on Wed Jul 30 17:37:22 2025
    On 30/07/2025 14:24, Tweed wrote:
    JMB99 <[email protected]> wrote:
    Just watching BBC News talking to someone in Alaska about the Tsunami
    and there was no noticeable satellite delay?


    Fibre connection or Starlink?

    Yes. Satellites are rarely used these days for News Gathering it's all
    mostly IP via fibres and 5G. If it was someone in their home or office
    via Teams, Zoom etc, then obviously no satellite uplink is involved.

    (That's not to say you don't get latency, you can and do of course).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Williamson@21:1/5 to Mark Carver on Wed Jul 30 18:14:04 2025
    On 30/07/2025 17:37, Mark Carver wrote:
    On 30/07/2025 14:24, Tweed wrote:
    JMB99 <[email protected]> wrote:
    Just watching BBC News talking to someone in Alaska about the Tsunami
    and there was no noticeable satellite delay?


    Fibre connection or Starlink?

    Yes. Satellites are rarely used these days for News Gathering it's all mostly IP via fibres and 5G. If it was someone in their home or office
    via Teams, Zoom etc, then obviously no satellite uplink is involved.

    (That's not to say you don't get latency, you can and do of course).

    What you don'tt get so ften now is the delay from groundd level to a geostaionary orbit and back. Sometimes twice, if the satellites are in
    the wrong place.

    --
    Tciao for Now!

    John.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark Carver@21:1/5 to John Williamson on Wed Jul 30 18:31:57 2025
    On 30/07/2025 18:14, John Williamson wrote:
    On 30/07/2025 17:37, Mark Carver wrote:
    On 30/07/2025 14:24, Tweed wrote:
    JMB99 <[email protected]> wrote:
    Just watching BBC News talking to someone in Alaska about the Tsunami
    and there was no noticeable satellite delay?


    Fibre connection or Starlink?

     Yes. Satellites are rarely used these days for News Gathering it's all
    mostly IP via fibres and 5G. If it was someone in their home or office
    via Teams, Zoom etc, then obviously no satellite uplink is involved.

    (That's not to say you don't get  latency, you can and do of course).

    What you don'tt get so ften now is the delay from groundd level to a geostaionary orbit and back. Sometimes twice, if the satellites are in
    the wrong place.

    That delay is only about half a second for a single Geostationary
    up/down, that's nothing compared with some latencies that can be seconds
    with some codecs.

    BBC 1 HD on Freeview is about 8-9 seconds behind 'live'. No satellites
    involved anywhere in the chain (and part of that delay is within your
    telly)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NY@21:1/5 to Mark Carver on Wed Jul 30 18:53:53 2025
    On 30/07/2025 18:31, Mark Carver wrote:
    BBC 1 HD on Freeview is about 8-9 seconds behind 'live'. No satellites involved anywhere in the chain (and part of that delay is within your
    telly)

    I'm always surprised at how incredibly long the latency is on digital
    TV, whether terrestrial or satellite. I used to think the latency of
    satellite was due to the large uplink/downlink distance, until I did the calculation and found it was only 1/4 second second each way.

    Presumably latency is controllable at the encoding end. Does longer
    latency give greater resilience to brief periods of data loss? Is that
    why it is do long?

    Is there a way of reducing latency for satellite inserts ("over to our
    reporter live at the scene") in news bulletins? Even if it is only the newsreader's voice that the remote reporter uses for cueing when he
    should start speaking. It looks a bit unprofessional for a newsreader to
    hand over to the reporter and see him stand there like a wally for
    several seconds until he gets his cue to start speaking. Or is *all* the latency that we see due to the delay between reporter and studio, with
    the newsreader's cue to the reporter being very much shorter?

    Do satellite links of this sort tend to have a special cueing version of
    the newsreader's voice, or do they just the use off-air version from the
    local terrestrial transmitter (or the off-air satellite)?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NY@21:1/5 to Mark Carver on Wed Jul 30 19:06:04 2025
    On 30/07/2025 17:37, Mark Carver wrote:
     Yes. Satellites are rarely used these days for News Gathering it's all mostly IP via fibres and 5G. If it was someone in their home or office
    via Teams, Zoom etc, then obviously no satellite uplink is involved.

    (That's not to say you don't get  latency, you can and do of course).

    I hadn't realised that news gathering rarely uses satellites these days.
    I would have thought that satellite allows much more flexibility over
    where the van is sited, because it doesn't have to be near a fibre point
    or in an area that actually has 5G coverage (the latter seems to be only cities, and not smaller towns or village-every-few-miles rural
    locations, if the 4G/5G indicator on a mobile phone is anything to go
    by). (*)

    How stable does a dish have to be to get a strong signal to a satellite?
    Are there ever cases of someone getting in/out of the van and moving the
    dish (as the van shifts on its suspension) enough to affect the signal strength?


    (*) Mind you, Starlink satellite internet can be used on ships which
    pitch and roll in the sea, and yet the dish manages to track the
    satellite very accurately. Does that use geostationary satellites or
    those in a lower orbit like GPS satellites? The power of the motors
    which shifts the dish must be immense to allow very rapid acceleration
    to compensate for ship movement: it's no good if the dish always points
    at where the ship was facing a couple of seconds earlier ;-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. P. Gilliver@21:1/5 to Mark Carver on Thu Jul 31 00:27:25 2025
    On 2025/7/30 18:31:57, Mark Carver wrote:
    On 30/07/2025 18:14, John Williamson wrote:
    On 30/07/2025 17:37, Mark Carver wrote:
    On 30/07/2025 14:24, Tweed wrote:
    JMB99 <[email protected]> wrote:
    Just watching BBC News talking to someone in Alaska about the Tsunami >>>>> and there was no noticeable satellite delay?


    Fibre connection or Starlink?

     Yes. Satellites are rarely used these days for News Gathering it's all >>> mostly IP via fibres and 5G. If it was someone in their home or office
    via Teams, Zoom etc, then obviously no satellite uplink is involved.

    (That's not to say you don't get  latency, you can and do of course).

    What you don'tt get so ften now is the delay from groundd level to a
    geostaionary orbit and back. Sometimes twice, if the satellites are in
    the wrong place.

    That delay is only about half a second for a single Geostationary
    up/down, that's nothing compared with some latencies that can be seconds with some codecs.

    BBC 1 HD on Freeview is about 8-9 seconds behind 'live'. No satellites involved anywhere in the chain (and part of that delay is within your
    telly)

    I presume JMB99 (OP) was talking about the delay (or lack of it) in the conversation between studio and person in Alaska, rather than overall delay.

    I've noticed BBC1 HD is usually noticeably behind SD (channel 101 vs.
    channel 1), which puzzles me as I'd have assumed if there was going to
    be any difference, it'd be the other way round. Could that it takes _my_
    kit longer to decode HD, of course.
    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    When we shake the ketchup bottle
    At first none comes and then a lot'll.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. P. Gilliver@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 31 00:30:14 2025
    On 2025/7/30 18:53:53, NY wrote:

    []

    Is there a way of reducing latency for satellite inserts ("over to our reporter live at the scene") in news bulletins? Even if it is only the newsreader's voice that the remote reporter uses for cueing when he
    should start speaking. It looks a bit unprofessional for a newsreader to
    hand over to the reporter and see him stand there like a wally for
    several seconds until he gets his cue to start speaking. Or is *all* the

    I see that often enough. Not infrequently when there's no great distance involved, such as within Britain. (Especially when an unexpected event
    such as a disaster, though there maybe it _is_ satellite, set up in a
    hurry.)

    []
    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    When we shake the ketchup bottle
    At first none comes and then a lot'll.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JMB99@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jul 30 12:13:07 2025
    Just watching BBC News talking to someone in Alaska about the Tsunami
    and there was no noticeable satellite delay?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)