On 19/01/2024 07:07 pm, Simon Mason wrote:
QUOTE: She did not accept she was speeding but was convicted by a jury after a trial in November. ENDS
AND
QUOTE: Mr Kevin Hopper, defending, said speed was one of the causes of the "accident" ENDS
There is no dissonance there, M'Lud.
One reference is to the trial (resulting in a conviction) and the other
is to the sentencing phase, where mitigation was required.
Fancy a learned lawyer like you not realising [sorry - four syllables] that!
Fancy having a Mr Arsehole that contradicts the main tenet of you own defence.
No matter - SIX AND A HALF YEARS IN JAIL.
How does it feel for you, M'Lud, knowing that you so consistently wrong
about more or less everything?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)