Moderation equals censorship.
Agree with the little tin god or f**k off.
Is that what you really want here?
On 04/08/2022 09:27, Jim Stewart ... wrote:
On 04/08/2022 07:56, nospam wrote:
it would be like youtube only comments that praise you up allowed ....
Moderation equals censorship.
Agree with the little tin god or f**k off.
Is that what you really want here?
As a matter of interest, I first sent my comments to
the "Censored" group, but it has never appeared. The
little tin god obviously doesn't allow adverse comments
about censorship to be read. Dead giveaway or what!
On 04/08/2022 09:27, Jim Stewart ... wrote:
On 04/08/2022 07:56, nospam wrote:
it would be like youtube only comments that praise you up allowed ....
Moderation equals censorship.
Agree with the little tin god or f**k off.
Is that what you really want here?
As a matter of interest, I first sent my comments to
the "Censored" group, but it has never appeared. The
little tin god obviously doesn't allow adverse comments
about censorship to be read. Dead giveaway or what!
On 4 Aug 2022 at 15:22:29 BST, "nospam" <[email protected]> wrote:
On 04/08/2022 09:27, Jim Stewart ... wrote:
On 04/08/2022 07:56, nospam wrote:
it would be like youtube only comments that praise you up allowed ....
Moderation equals censorship.
Agree with the little tin god or f**k off.
Is that what you really want here?
As a matter of interest, I first sent my comments to
the "Censored" group, but it has never appeared. The
little tin god obviously doesn't allow adverse comments
about censorship to be read. Dead giveaway or what!
If it is that interesting posters without a valid email address can find out what happened to their post (providing it ever got to the moderators) at:
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/ucgi/~webstump/l.uram
On 04/08/2022 07:56, nospam wrote:
it would be like youtube only comments that praise you up allowed ....
Moderation equals censorship.
Agree with the little tin god or f**k off.
Is that what you really want here?
On 04/08/2022 09:27, Jim Stewart ... wrote:
On 04/08/2022 07:56, nospam wrote:
it would be like youtube only comments that praise you up allowed ....
Moderation equals censorship.
Agree with the little tin god or f**k off.
Is that what you really want here?
As a matter of interest, I first sent my comments to the "Censored"
group, but it has never appeared. The little tin god obviously doesn't
allow adverse comments about censorship to be read. Dead giveaway or
what!
On 04/08/2022 15:22, nospam wrote:
On 04/08/2022 09:27, Jim Stewart ... wrote:who are the moderators anyway? hayter, dij and cole?.....
On 04/08/2022 07:56, nospam wrote:As a matter of interest, I first sent my comments to
it would be like youtube only comments that praise you up allowed ....
Moderation equals censorship.
Agree with the little tin god or f**k off.
Is that what you really want here?
the "Censored" group, but it has never appeared. The
little tin god obviously doesn't allow adverse comments
about censorship to be read. Dead giveaway or what!
On Thu, 04 Aug 2022 15:22:29 +0100, nospam wrote:
On 04/08/2022 09:27, Jim Stewart ... wrote:
On 04/08/2022 07:56, nospam wrote:
it would be like youtube only comments that praise you up allowed ....
Moderation equals censorship.
Agree with the little tin god or f**k off.
Is that what you really want here?
As a matter of interest, I first sent my comments to the "Censored"
group, but it has never appeared. The little tin god obviously doesn't
allow adverse comments about censorship to be read. Dead giveaway or
what!
Retarded twat.
On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 14:59:15 -0000 (UTC), Radio Man <[email protected]d> wrote:
On Thu, 04 Aug 2022 15:22:29 +0100, nospam wrote:
On 04/08/2022 09:27, Jim Stewart ... wrote:
On 04/08/2022 07:56, nospam wrote:
it would be like youtube only comments that praise you up allowed
Moderation equals censorship.
Agree with the little tin god or f**k off.
Is that what you really want here?
....
As a matter of interest, I first sent my comments to the "Censored"
group, but it has never appeared. The little tin god obviously doesn't
allow adverse comments about censorship to be read. Dead giveaway or
what!
Retarded twat.
Cool!! ..a rattled Brian Reay.
In message <tcgnhd$2ratt$[email protected]>, Jim Stewart ... <[email protected]> writes
On 04/08/2022 15:22, nospam wrote:
On 04/08/2022 09:27, Jim Stewart ... wrote:who are the moderators anyway? hayter, dij and cole?.....
On 04/08/2022 07:56, nospam wrote:As a matter of interest, I first sent my comments to
it would be like youtube only comments that praise you up allowed ....
Moderation equals censorship.
Agree with the little tin god or f**k off.
Is that what you really want here?
the "Censored" group, but it has never appeared. The
little tin god obviously doesn't allow adverse comments
about censorship to be read. Dead giveaway or what!
Moderators:what a shower....tee hee
(Last revised, May 2017)
Brian Howie, GM4DIJ
Roger Hayter, GW8BFO
Thomas Gray, HB9FUH
Ian Clifton
David Taylor GM8ARV
Matthew Vernon is not a moderator, but maintains the moderation machinery.
It can be seen in the monthly posting .
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/uram/
Cheers
Brian GM4DIJ
On 04/08/2022 18:28, brian wrote:pair of M3 class Bs
In message <tcgnhd$2ratt$[email protected]>, Jim Stewart ...what a shower....tee hee
<[email protected]> writes
On 04/08/2022 15:22, nospam wrote:
On 04/08/2022 09:27, Jim Stewart ... wrote:who are the moderators anyway? hayter, dij and cole?.....
On 04/08/2022 07:56, nospam wrote:the "Censored" group, but it has never appeared. The
it would be like youtube only comments that praise you up allowed .... >>>> As a matter of interest, I first sent my comments to
Moderation equals censorship.
Agree with the little tin god or f**k off.
Is that what you really want here?
little tin god obviously doesn't allow adverse comments
about censorship to be read. Dead giveaway or what!
Moderators:
(Last revised, May 2017)
Brian Howie, GM4DIJ
Roger Hayter, GW8BFO
Thomas Gray, HB9FUH
Ian Clifton
David Taylor GM8ARV
Matthew Vernon is not a moderator, but maintains the moderation
machinery.
It can be seen in the monthly posting .
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/uram/
Cheers
Brian GM4DIJ
Radio Man <[email protected]d> wrote:
Retarded twat.
Cool!! ..a rattled Brian Reay.
On 04/08/2022 18:28, brian wrote:
In message <tcgnhd$2ratt$[email protected]>, Jim Stewart ... >><[email protected]> writeswhat a shower....tee hee
On 04/08/2022 15:22, nospam wrote:Moderators:
On 04/08/2022 09:27, Jim Stewart ... wrote:who are� the moderators anyway? hayter, dij and cole?.....
On 04/08/2022 07:56, nospam wrote:the "Censored" group, but it has never appeared. The
it would be like youtube only comments that praise you up allowed .... >>>> �As a matter of interest, I first sent my comments to
Moderation equals censorship.
Agree with the little tin god or f**k off.
Is that what you really want here?
little tin god obviously doesn't allow adverse comments
about censorship to be read. Dead giveaway or what!
(Last revised, May 2017)
Brian Howie, GM4DIJ
Roger Hayter, GW8BFO
Thomas Gray, HB9FUH
Ian Clifton
David Taylor GM8ARV
Matthew Vernon is not a moderator, but maintains the moderation >>machinery.
It can be seen in the monthly posting .
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/uram/
Cheers
Brian GM4DIJ
In message <tcige6$33bmp$[email protected]>, Jim Stewart ... <[email protected]> writes
On 04/08/2022 18:28, brian wrote:
In message <tcgnhd$2ratt$[email protected]>, Jim Stewart ...what a shower....tee hee
<[email protected]> writes
On 04/08/2022 15:22, nospam wrote:Moderators:
On 04/08/2022 09:27, Jim Stewart ... wrote:who are the moderators anyway? hayter, dij and cole?.....
On 04/08/2022 07:56, nospam wrote:As a matter of interest, I first sent my comments to
it would be like youtube only comments that praise you up allowed
Moderation equals censorship.
Agree with the little tin god or f**k off.
Is that what you really want here?
....
the "Censored" group, but it has never appeared. The
little tin god obviously doesn't allow adverse comments
about censorship to be read. Dead giveaway or what!
(Last revised, May 2017)
Brian Howie, GM4DIJ
Roger Hayter, GW8BFO
Thomas Gray, HB9FUH
Ian Clifton
David Taylor GM8ARV
Matthew Vernon is not a moderator, but maintains the moderation
machinery.
It can be seen in the monthly posting .
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/uram/
Cheers
Brian GM4DIJ
Best there is.best you could get...tee hee
B
On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 22:35:27 -0000 (UTC), Radio Man <[email protected]d> wrote:cute
On Thu, 04 Aug 2022 23:09:15 +0100, Rambo wrote:Ohh kook.. An even more ratlled Brian Reay !
On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 14:59:15 -0000 (UTC), Radio Man
<[email protected]d> wrote:
On Thu, 04 Aug 2022 15:22:29 +0100, nospam wrote:
On 04/08/2022 09:27, Jim Stewart ... wrote:
On 04/08/2022 07:56, nospam wrote:
it would be like youtube only comments that praise you up allowed
Moderation equals censorship.
Agree with the little tin god or f**k off.
Is that what you really want here?
....
As a matter of interest, I first sent my comments to the "Censored"
group, but it has never appeared. The little tin god obviously doesn't >>>>> allow adverse comments about censorship to be read. Dead giveaway or >>>>> what!
Retarded twat.
Cool!! ..a rattled Brian Reay.
Ludicrous fantasist halfwit.
On Thu, 04 Aug 2022 23:09:15 +0100, Rambo wrote:Ohh kook.. An even more ratlled Brian Reay !
On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 14:59:15 -0000 (UTC), Radio Man
<[email protected]d> wrote:
On Thu, 04 Aug 2022 15:22:29 +0100, nospam wrote:
On 04/08/2022 09:27, Jim Stewart ... wrote:
On 04/08/2022 07:56, nospam wrote:
it would be like youtube only comments that praise you up allowed
Moderation equals censorship.
Agree with the little tin god or f**k off.
Is that what you really want here?
....
As a matter of interest, I first sent my comments to the "Censored"
group, but it has never appeared. The little tin god obviously doesn't >>>> allow adverse comments about censorship to be read. Dead giveaway or
what!
Retarded twat.
Cool!! ..a rattled Brian Reay.
Ludicrous fantasist halfwit.
On 04/08/2022 22:09, Rambo wrote:
Radio Man <[email protected]d> wrote:
Retarded twat.
Cool!! ..a rattled Brian Reay.
Tin gods do tend to rattle, don't they?
Moderation equals censorship.
On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 07:56:36 +0100, nospam wrote:
Moderation equals censorship.
Yes it does, but it is voluntary censorship. If you post to a moderated group, then you are acknowledging that you agree with the rules of the
group and if you break those rules, then you will be ignored by the moderator.
On Usenet, the ultimate power comes from the user. If you post off-topic articles or act like a jerk, I can personally ban you with my killfile.
I think it's a good thing that both options exist. Moderated groups for
those who don't want to deal with trolls and spammers and un-moderated
groups for those who want a little more freedom at the risk of being
ignored by everyone if you make a fool of yourself.
Faux Dameron <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 07:56:36 +0100, nospam wrote:
Moderation equals censorship.
Yes it does, but it is voluntary censorship. If you post to a
moderated group, then you are acknowledging that you agree with the
rules of the group and if you break those rules, then you will be
ignored by the moderator.
On Usenet, the ultimate power comes from the user. If you post
off-topic articles or act like a jerk, I can personally ban you
with my killfile.
I think it's a good thing that both options exist. Moderated groups
for those who don't want to deal with trolls and spammers and
un-moderated groups for those who want a little more freedom at the
risk of being ignored by everyone if you make a fool of yourself.
Those who rant about moderation are invariably trolls, those who
don’t know how to behave, stalkers, those with no interest in the
group topic - beyond using it as a weapon, or worse ( sex offenders
etc). In real life, they tend to be social inadequates and
underachievers- they tend to invent persona / backgrounds/ “tough” * screen names. Others use a string of improbable names. The typical description of the keyboard thug.
Many suffer from substance abuse problems. Financial issues are
common - linked to their under achieving- as are relationship issues.
In real life, they don’t have many genuine friends or good
relationships with neighbours.
They are probably employed ( or formerly) in a junior position. Low
rank civil servant, public sector / private sector worker etc,
perhaps constantly changing jobs. Criticising former employers/
colleagues is common. …… If retired, they may well need to work to
top up a pension, claim benefits, struggle, or a spouse still works.
They always blame others for events, including personal failures. They
refuse to accept any responsibility for their life events.
* often similar to tough characters / heroes from fiction.
Faux Dameron <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 07:56:36 +0100, nospam wrote:
Moderation equals censorship.
Yes it does, but it is voluntary censorship. If you post to a moderated
group, then you are acknowledging that you agree with the rules of the
group and if you break those rules, then you will be ignored by the
moderator.
On Usenet, the ultimate power comes from the user. If you post off-topic
articles or act like a jerk, I can personally ban you with my killfile.
I think it's a good thing that both options exist. Moderated groups for
those who don't want to deal with trolls and spammers and un-moderated
groups for those who want a little more freedom at the risk of being
ignored by everyone if you make a fool of yourself.
Those who rant about moderation are invariably trolls, those who don’t know how to behave, stalkers, those with no interest in the group topic - beyond using it as a weapon, or worse ( sex offenders etc). In real life, they tend to be social inadequates and underachievers- they tend to invent
persona / backgrounds/ “tough” * screen names. Others use a string of improbable names. The typical description of the keyboard thug.
Many suffer from substance abuse problems. Financial issues are common - linked to their under achieving- as are relationship issues. In real life, they don’t have many genuine friends or good relationships with neighbours.
They are probably employed ( or formerly) in a junior position. Low rank civil servant, public sector / private sector worker etc, perhaps
constantly changing jobs. Criticising former employers/ colleagues is
common. …… If retired, they may well need to work to top up a pension, claim benefits, struggle, or a spouse still works.
They always blame others for events, including personal failures. They
refuse to accept any responsibility for their life events.
* often similar to tough characters / heroes from fiction.have you accepted resposibilty yet for your stroke fatso ? .....
Faux Dameron <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 07:56:36 +0100, nospam wrote:
Moderation equals censorship.
Yes it does, but it is voluntary censorship. If you post to a moderated
group, then you are acknowledging that you agree with the rules of the
group and if you break those rules, then you will be ignored by the
moderator.
On Usenet, the ultimate power comes from the user. If you post off-topic
articles or act like a jerk, I can personally ban you with my killfile.
I think it's a good thing that both options exist. Moderated groups for
those who don't want to deal with trolls and spammers and un-moderated
groups for those who want a little more freedom at the risk of being
ignored by everyone if you make a fool of yourself.
Those who rant about moderation are invariably trolls, those who don�t know >how to behave, stalkers, those with no interest in the group topic - beyond >using it as a weapon, or worse ( sex offenders etc). In real life, they >tend to be social inadequates and underachievers- they tend to invent
persona / backgrounds/ �tough� * screen names. Others use a string of >improbable names. The typical description of the keyboard thug.
Many suffer from substance abuse problems. Financial issues are common - >linked to their under achieving- as are relationship issues. In real life, >they don�t have many genuine friends or good relationships with neighbours.
They are probably employed ( or formerly) in a junior position. Low rank >civil servant, public sector / private sector worker etc, perhaps
constantly changing jobs. Criticising former employers/ colleagues is
common. �� If retired, they may well need to work to top up a pension,
claim benefits, struggle, or a spouse still works.
They always blame others for events, including personal failures. They
refuse to accept any responsibility for their life events.
* often similar to tough characters / heroes from fiction.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 153:53:59 |
| Calls: | 12,091 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 15,000 |
| Messages: | 6,517,674 |