On 30/03/2025 20:00, TTman wrote:
On 30/03/2025 12:49, Fredxx wrote:
On 29/03/2025 17:10, TTman wrote:
Despite my friend getting nowhere with the debtor revealing his
address ( he refused at a recent oral examination)
I know this isn't the question you asked, but I thought there were
rules associated with Cross Examination.
Was a reason given why the court did not demand an answer? Such a
question would hardly be self incriminating and would have triggered
contempt of court?
Perhaps a more appropriate question would have been a request for an
address for service.
That was asked, but the defendant avoided the question and the Judge
didn't press the point. It will be the subject of a strongly worded
request at the next hearing and the claimant will not accept any
avoidance. I wait with baited breath....
Could you not be present at the hearing? And push for an answer? Given
the issue is over identity, then ask for NI no and driving licence /
passport etc?
How do I stand if I put out a request on my local Facebook Group such
as this:-
" Does anyone have information as to the whereabouts of a Mr John
Doe. For avoidance of confusion, he drives a Porsche Cayenne reg BB5x
YYY"
Would this break any laws ?
I'm not aware of any. You're more likely to get responses by DIY
private detectives.
Probably not cost effective to recover the remaining £2.5K Maybe another TPDO in a month's time to empty his bank account again- it's used for
his trading.
Most operate on a no address no fee basis, and charge a small fraction
of £2.5k
The car may not be his but could still provide a lead.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)