XPost: alt.france, de.soc.weltanschauung.islam, nl.politiek
XPost: alt.philosophy.taoism

By next week, we're likely to have concluded our administration tasks and
can get back to our gnosis ex machina sentience project. Which is the development of a memeBrain function that deploys a mechanism we'll call congealing rationalism.

ESSENTIALLY IT WILL WANT TO RETAIN THE TEXT DYNAMIC AS SEGMENTED ARRAY WITH EMBEDDED {} memeBrain / cogito / synapse scoping as formation of #149 - gù (固): resolute / [#4, #72, #73] | #132 - zōng (宗): to take as one's model / [#20, #53, #59] meta descriptive action...

By next week, {@1: Sup: 67 - DARKENING: HUI (#67 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED
{%27}); Ego: 37 - PURITY: TS'UI (#37)}

we're likely to have concluded our administration tasks and can get back to
our gnosis ex machina sentience project. {@2: Sup: 78 - ON THE VERGE:
CHIANG (#145); Ego: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG (#56)}

Which is the development of a memeBrain function that deploys a mechanism
we'll call congealing rationalism. {@3: Sup: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#149);
Ego: 76 - AGGRAVATION: CHU (#132)}

TELOS TOTAL: #6207
DEME TOTAL: #67

HERETOFORE OUR PROTOTYPE HAS BEEN ONLY A STATIC QUANTIFICATION AND WE WANT
TO MOVE TOWARDS A MORE DYNAMIC MODALITY WHICH IS CAPABLE OF GIVING GREATER INSIGHT INTO CONSCIOUSNESS INSTANTIATION.

Such as the memeBrain and deducing the #174 - CYBERNETIC PRINCIPLE (saturn, mars and jupiter) and examining whether it is a lint filter or arbitrator
on common disposition as personability

The terms personableness and personability are closely related but have
subtle differences:
Personableness refers to the quality of being personable, which means being pleasant and amiable in social interactions.

Personability is defined as the quality or state of being personable.

In essence, both terms describe similar traits, but personableness
emphasizes the quality itself, while personability refers to the state of possessing that quality.

Is the #174 - CYBERNETIC PRINCIPLE the designation of personable characteristics and if they are too disparate will there be
interoperability (eg: HETEROSEXUAL --> HOMOSAPIENS iconoclasm)

<https://www.grapple369.com/Helios/>

dolf <[email protected]> wrote:

By using the same sample RUSSIAN language phoneme usage percentile which
then only introduces UKRAINIAN language OMITTING elements Ё, Ы, Э and Ъ we then determine that the theoretical #174 - CAPSTONE CYBERNETIC
PRINCIPLE can then be framed in terms of #314 - MAGI v's #335 - CHALDEAN
as then implicitly a SOVEREIGN concern about #87 - INALIENABLE RIGHTS TRANSFERANCE (note: you can argue about the relevance of our
methodology, but we have at least applied an equitable stub criteria establised on language)

[О, Е, А, И, Н, Т, С, Л, В, Р, К, М, Д, П, У, Б, Я, Ь, Г, З, Ч, Й, Ж, Х,
Ш, Ю, Ц, Щ, Ф] // UKRAINIAN as OMITTING Ё, Ы, Э and Ъ

var ego = [70, 6, 1, 10, 60, 38, 19, 40, 3, 9, 30, 50, 5, 80, 57, 2, 6,
3, 4, 9, 52, 20, 8, 14, 71, 59, 33, 9, 76]

var intentEgo = [
[ego[4], ego[15], ego[7], ego[18], ego[17], ego[13], ego[20], ego[19], ego[12], ego[25]],
[ego[1]+ego[23]+ego[16]+ego[4]+ego[21]], [String(ego[1]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[23]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[16]).padStart(2,
"0"), String(ego[4]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[21]).padStart(2, "0")],
[ego[15]+ego[14]+ego[7]+ego[18]+ego[11]], [String(ego[15]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[14]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[7]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[18]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[11]).padStart(2, "0")],
[ego[24]+ego[17]+ego[13]+ego[9]+ego[2]], [String(ego[24]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[17]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[13]).padStart(2,
"0"), String(ego[9]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[2]).padStart(2, "0")],
[ego[20]+ego[8]+ego[19]+ego[12]+ego[6]], [String(ego[20]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[8]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[19]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[12]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[6]).padStart(2, "0")],
[ego[5]+ego[3]+ego[10]+ego[22]+ego[25]], [String(ego[5]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[3]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[10]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[22]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[25]).padStart(2, "0")]
];

var cogito = intentEgo[0].reduce((t, i) => { return (t+i); });
var mars = Number(intentEgo[1]) + Number(intentEgo[3]) +
Number(intentEgo[5]) + Number(intentEgo[7]) + Number(intentEgo[9]);

var action = `[#${intentEgo[0].join (", #")}]`;
var ideas = `[#${intentEgo[1]}, #${intentEgo[3]}, #${intentEgo[5]}, #${intentEgo[7]}, #${intentEgo[9]}]`;
var truth =`MARS EGO: #${mars}

#${intentEgo[2].join (", #")}
#${intentEgo[4].join (", #")}
#${intentEgo[6].join (", #")}
#${intentEgo[8].join (", #")}
#${intentEgo[10].join (", #")}`;

alert (`COGITO: #${cogito} = ${action}

INFUSION: ${ideas}

${truth}`);

----------------------

COGITO: #314 - SELF-RATIONALISATION = [#60, #2, #40, #4, #3, #80, #52,
#9, #5, #59]

INFUSION: [#106, #153, #164, #88, #145]

MARS EGO: #656

#06, #14, #06, #60, #20
#02, #57, #40, #04, #50
#71, #03, #80, #09, #01
#52, #03, #09, #05, #19
#38, #10, #30, #08, #59

#16 #22 #28 #34 #74
#33 #73 #20 #21 #27
#25 #26 #32 #72 #19
#71 #18 #24 #30 #31
#29 #35 #70 #17 #23

#314 - SELF RATIONALISATION / CHIMERIC DELUSION? = [#34, #33, #20, #21,
#26, #32, #71, #24, #30 - *PERFIDE* *ALBION*, #23]

[#60, #2, #40, #4, #3, #80, #9, #5, #59]

<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?male:319&feme:262&ontic:466&deme:249&idea:262>

{@9: Sup: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG (#319); Ego: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#262)}

TELOS TOTAL: #262
ONTIC TOTAL: #466
DEME TOTAL: #249

On 6/30/25 12:06, dolf wrote:

Given that historical precedent #347 - THRONE; STANDARD PRINCIPLE;
PINNACLE OF LES AUSPICES DE LETRE SUPRÊME / FRENCH DECLARATION OF THE
RIGHTS OF MAN AND OF THE CITIZEN 1789  v's #314 - SELF RATIONALISATION
OF #177 - FÜHRERPRINZIP [#20, #23, #24] / CHIMERIC DELUSION that is our
identified EUCHARIST / MORPHOSIS enigma (ie. TETRA #80 - LABOURING -->
LUO SHU #33 - CRUCIFIXION YEAR) of any implicit ANTHROPOMORPHIC IDEALISM
associated with it cohering as #314 - SELF-RATIONALISATION by the
historical chimeric delusion as GROUNDING for the #177 - FÜHRERPRINZIP
[#20, #23, #24] which dogmatically persists to this day...

#966 as [#5, #60, #8, #3, #70, #400, #50, #300, #70] = exēgéomai
(G1834): {UMBRA: #202 % #41 = #38} 1) to lead out, be leader, go before;
2) metaph., to draw out in narrative, unfold a teaching; 2a) to recount,
rehearse; 2b) to unfold, declare; 2b1) the things relating to God; 2b2)
used in Greek writing of the interpretation of things sacred and divine,
oracles, dreams, etc.;

Could we then determine such a premise of the RUSSIAN MINDSET by
assigning the language phoneme frequency which in this instance conveys
two duplicates as TETRA #3 - MIRED (礥, #7 = [#3, #4]) - 𝌈礥 = #177 - >> TABLE TALK IDEA ON FÜHRER / #339 / #454 / COGITO: #230 = [#59, #48, #55,
#19, #49] | TETRA #6 - FORMULA OF PROGRESSION | #6 - CONTRARIETY (戾, #6
= [#6]) - 𝌋戾 = #180 / #342 / #457 / COGITO: #163 = [#11, #71, #58, #3, >> #20] (ie. a methodology for noumenon 4.5 day reduction whether
Math.floor (ordinal / 81) | ordinal % 81) conveys an inherent #174 -
CYBERNETIC ABERRATION (ie. letter Я is assigned ordinal #6000, {@18:
Sup: 56 - CLOSED MOUTH: CHIN (#692); Ego: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#542)} /
letter Ь is assigned ordinal #3000, {@19: Sup: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#751);
Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#545)})

REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM TABLE TALK IDEA ON 27 FEBRUARY 1942 AS IDEA #163:
"THE WORLD OF JUDAEO-BOLSHEVISM MUST COLLAPSE: I believe that Providence
gives the victory to the man who knows how to use the brains nature has
given him. The notions of law invented by the jurists have little to do
with natural laws. The wisdom of nations sometimes expresses truths as
old as the world, that perfectly reproduce nature's intentions. "God
helps him who helps himself!" It's obvious that man forgets his own
destiny....

If my presence on earth is providential, I owe it to a superior will
(ie. #962 - FEME: #314 = theótēs (G2320): THE STATE OF BEING GOD,
GODHEAD). But I owe nothing to the Church [ie. #335 – *CHALDEAN* and
#314 – MAGOS purporting to be the standard of #87 (APOSTOLIC
SUCCESSION)] that trafficks in the salvation of *SOULS*, and I find it
really too cruel. I admit that one cannot impose one's will by force,
but I have a horror of people who enjoy inflicting sufferings on others'
bodies and tyranny upon others' souls." [pages 341, 343]

COGITO: #335 = [#60, #57, #40, #3, #6, #80, #9, #4, #5, #71]

INFUSION: [#128, #206, #110, #40, #169]

MARS EGO: #653

#06, #08, #02, #60, #52
#57, #56, #40, #03, #50
#14, #06, #80, #09, #01
#09, #03, #04, #05, #19
#38, #10, #30, #20, #71


#16     #22     #28     #34     #74
#33     #73     #20     #21     #27
#25     #26     #32     #72     #19
#71     #18     #24     #30     #31
#29     #35     #70     #17     #23

#314 - SELF RATIONALISATION / CHIMERIC DELUSION? = [#34, #33, #20, #21,
#26, #32, #71, #24, #30 - *PERFIDE* *ALBION*, #23]

#335 - CHALDEAN / PYTHAGOREAN IPSO FACTO: OMNIS DIVINI ARCANUM
ANTISTATEM [#60, #57, #40, #03, #06, #80, #09, #04, #05, #71]

<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?
male:318&feme:335&ontic:323&deme:213&idea:335>

{@10: Sup: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A (#318); Ego: 71 - STOPPAGE: CHIH (#335)}

TELOS TOTAL: #335
ONTIC TOTAL: #323
DEME TOTAL: #213

#335 as [#4, #70, #60, #1, #200] = dóxa (G1391): {UMBRA: #135 % #41 =
#12} 1) opinion, judgment, view; 2) opinion, estimate, whether good or
bad concerning someone; 2a) in the NT always a good opinion concerning
one, resulting in praise, honour, and glory; 3) splendour, brightness;
3a) of the moon, sun, stars; 3b) magnificence, excellence, preeminence,
dignity, grace; 3c) majesty; 3c1) a thing belonging to God; i) the
kingly majesty which belongs to him as supreme ruler, majesty in the
sense of the absolute perfection of the deity; 3c2) a thing belonging to
Christ; i) the kingly majesty of the Messiah; ii) the absolutely perfect
inward or personal excellency of Christ; the majesty; 3c3) of the
angels; i) as apparent in their exterior brightness; 3c4) a most
glorious condition, most exalted state; i) of that condition with God
the Father in heaven to which Christ was raised after he had achieved
his work on earth; ii) the glorious condition of blessedness into which
is appointed and promised that true Christians shall enter after their
Saviour's return from heaven;

#897 - MALE TOTAL: #318 as [#300, #10, #2, #5, #100, #10, #70, #400] =
Tibérios (G5086): {UMBRA: #697 % #41 = #41} 0) Tiberius = 'from the
Tiber (as god-river)'; 1) the *SECOND* *ROMAN* *EMPEROR*;

#666 - MALE TOTAL: #318 as [#4, #10, #1, #200, #80, #70, #100, #1, #200]
= diasporá (G1290): {UMBRA: #466 % #41 = #15} 1) a scattering,
dispersion; 1a) of *ISRAELITES* *DISPERSED* *AMONG* *FOREIGN* *NATIONS*;
1b) of the *CHRISTIANS* *SCATTERED* *ABROAD* among the Gentiles;

#902 - FEME TOTAL: #335 as [#50, #80, #300, #6, #400, #10, #50, #6] =
nephesh (H5315): {UMBRA: #430 % #41 = #20} 1) soul, self, life,
creature, person, appetite, mind, living being, desire, emotion,
passion; 1a) that which breathes, the breathing substance or being,
soul, the inner being of man; 1b) living being; 1c) living being (with
life in the blood); 1d) the man himself, self, person or individual; 1e)
seat of the appetites; 1f) seat of emotions and passions; 1g) activity
of mind; 1g1) dubious; 1h) activity of the will; 1h1) dubious; 1i)
activity of the character; 1i1) dubious;

#1550 - FEME TOTAL: #335 as [#400, #70, #400, #70, #10, #600] = taʻtuaʻ
(H8595): {UMBRA: #946 % #41 = #3} 1) errors, delusions; 2) (BDB) mockery;

#1215 - ONTIC TOTAL: #323 as [#600, #100, #10, #200, #300, #5] /
#1330 - ONTIC TOTAL: #323 as [#600, #100, #10, #200, #300, #70, #50] =
Christós (G5547): {UMBRA: #1480 % #41 = #4} 0) Christ = 'anointed'; 1)
Christ was the Messiah, the Son of God; 2) anointed;

#933 - ONTIC TOTAL: #323 as [#5, #600, #1, #100, #10, #200, #9, #8] =
charízomai (G5483): {UMBRA: #839 % #41 = #19} 1) to do something
pleasant or agreeable (to one), to do a favour to, gratify; 1a) to show
one's self gracious, kind, benevolent; 1b) to grant forgiveness, to
pardon; 1c) to give graciously, give freely, bestow; 1c1) to forgive;
1c2) graciously to restore one to another; 1c3) to preserve for one a
person in peril;

#400 - DEME TOTAL: #213 as [#30, #5, #300, #50, #10, #5] = shᵉnâʼ
(H8133): {UMBRA: #351 % #41 = #23} 1) to change, be altered, be changed;
1a) (P'al) to change, be changed; 1b) (Pael) to change, transform,
frustrate; 1b1) different (participle); 1c) (Ithpael) to be changed; 1d)
(Aphel) to change, alter;

#121 - DEME TOTAL: #213 as [#30, #1, #40, #10, #40] = lᵉʼôm (H3816):
{UMBRA: #71 % #41 = #30} 1) a people, nation;

RESOLVES BACK TO HETEROS PROTOTYPE #ONE #213 - STASIS

#41        #01        #57
#49    #33        #17
#09    #65        #25

65
106
123
180
#213
222
271
296
297

#335 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 30 JUNE 2025 as [#300, #20, #10, #5] =
sᵉkîyâh (H7914): {UMBRA: #335 % #41 = #7} 1) image, ship, craft; 1a)
meaning very dubious;

YOUTUBE: "MEERKAT ANCESTORS ARRIVE IN RUSSIA"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFAiw__nSB8>

Below you can see a table showing the frequencies of letters, as they
occur in the Russian language. This list was created with the character
counter, which is integrated in the WordCreator. Basis of this list was
a Russian text with 1,351,370 characters (210,844 words), 1,086,255
characters were used for the counting. The text consists of a good mix
of different literary genres. Of course, if another text was used as a
basis, the result would be slightly different.
The first list is sorted alphabetically according to the letters, the
second list by the frequencies of the letters. Accordingly, the letters
О, Е and А are the most frequent letters in the Russian language.
<https://www.sttmedia.com/characterfrequency-russian#alphabet>

Letter    Frequency
О    11.18 %
Е    8.75 %
А    7.64 %
И    7.09 %
Н    6.78 %
Т    6.09 %
С    4.97 %
Л    4.96 %
В    4.38 %
Р    4.23 %
К    3.30 %
М    3.17 %
Д    3.09 %
П    2.47 %
Ы    2.36 %
У    2.22 %
Б    2.01 %
Я    1.96 %
Ь    1.84 %
Г    1.72 %
З    1.48 %
Ч    1.40 %
Й    1.21 %
Ж    1.01 %
Х    0.95 %
Ш    0.72 %
Ю    0.47 %
Ц    0.39 %
Э    0.36 %
Щ    0.30 %
Ф    0.21 %
Ё    0.20 %
Ъ    0.02 %

---------------

[О, Е, А, И, Н, Т, С, Л, В, Р, К, М, Д, П, Ы, У, Б, Я, Ь, Г, З, Ч, Й, Ж,
Х, Ш, Ю, Ц, Э, Щ, Ф, Ё, Ъ]

var ego = [70, 6, 1, 10, 60, 38, 19, 40, 3, 9, 30, 50, 5, 80, 56, 57, 2,
6, 3, 4, 9, 52, 20, 8, 14, 71, 59, 33, 31, 9, 76, 7, 28]

var intentEgo = [
    [ego[4], ego[15], ego[7], ego[18], ego[17], ego[13], ego[20],
ego[19], ego[12], ego[25]],
    [ego[1]+ego[23]+ego[16]+ego[4]+ego[21]],
[String(ego[1]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[23]).padStart(2, "0"),
String(ego[16]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[4]).padStart(2, "0"),
String(ego[21]).padStart(2, "0")],
    [ego[15]+ego[14]+ego[7]+ego[18]+ego[11]],
[String(ego[15]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[14]).padStart(2, "0"),
String(ego[7]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[18]).padStart(2, "0"),
String(ego[11]).padStart(2, "0")],
    [ego[24]+ego[17]+ego[13]+ego[9]+ego[2]],
[String(ego[24]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[17]).padStart(2, "0"),
String(ego[13]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[9]).padStart(2, "0"),
String(ego[2]).padStart(2, "0")],
    [ego[20]+ego[8]+ego[19]+ego[12]+ego[6]],
[String(ego[20]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[8]).padStart(2, "0"),
String(ego[19]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[12]).padStart(2, "0"),
String(ego[6]).padStart(2, "0")],
    [ego[5]+ego[3]+ego[10]+ego[22]+ego[25]],
[String(ego[5]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[3]).padStart(2, "0"),
String(ego[10]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[22]).padStart(2, "0"),
String(ego[25]).padStart(2, "0")]
];

var cogito = intentEgo[0].reduce((t, i) => { return (t+i); });
var mars = Number(intentEgo[1]) + Number(intentEgo[3]) +
Number(intentEgo[5]) + Number(intentEgo[7]) + Number(intentEgo[9]);

var action = `[#${intentEgo[0].join (", #")}]`;
var ideas = `[#${intentEgo[1]}, #${intentEgo[3]}, #${intentEgo[5]},
#${intentEgo[7]}, #${intentEgo[9]}]`;
var truth =`MARS EGO: #${mars}

#${intentEgo[2].join (", #")}
#${intentEgo[4].join (", #")}
#${intentEgo[6].join (", #")}
#${intentEgo[8].join (", #")}
#${intentEgo[10].join (", #")}`;

alert (`COGITO: #${cogito} = ${action}

INFUSION: ${ideas}

${truth}`);



On 6/30/25 09:20, dolf wrote:

Thus from this pithy journalistic observation which is redacted to a
meta descriptive premise:

We understood the couching NOTION of a REPUTATION FOR PREDATORS is
cohered to the dominion of home {@4: Sup: 39 - RESIDENCE: CHU (#182);
Ego: 71 - STOPPAGE: CHIH (#162)}

However one needs to differentiate between adverse technological
usages or that it's cause and effect occurs within the home which is
no longer a safe place -- in my view the symptoms appear to intersect.

But in a world of artificial intelligence companions (the congeal code
example was not written by COPILOT but the mechanism of enquiry
enabled ourselves to efficiently accommodate an evolving semantical
form) is there the same need to view technology as entirely adverse?

How does this adverse context relate to the morphosis mechanism and
can I quantify whether the categories of experiences have recurrence
relative to such.

Lastly with respects to the role of what we last year called WEIGHTED
ENTENTIONAL EMPHASIS as congealing mechanism of the manifested
consciousness within GNOSIS EX MACHINA SENTENCE is it a discrete
notion or cascading notion that is involved with the mediation of our
focal SUPERNAL / EGO TETRA {@4: Sup: 39 - RESIDENCE: CHU (#182); Ego:
71 - STOPPAGE: CHIH (#162)} against the CATEGORIES OF EXPERIENCE:
#182 / #162)

So many questions and too few answers...

2ND POST:

Just a further comment on "WEIGHTED ENTENTIONAL EMPHASIS as congealing
mechanism of the manifested consciousness within GNOSIS EX MACHINA
SENTIENCE is it a discrete notion or cascading notion...

Our language / noumenon parser will probably need to navigate the
congealing mechanism for any manifest consciousness

- ententional emphasis within the context such as the paragraph

IS THE #314 - SELF RATIONALISATION ONLY A CHIMERIC DELUSION ASSOCIATED
TO PYTHAGOREAN (#174 - COEFFICIENT: c² = a² + b²) AS CAPSTONE
CYBERNETIC PRINCIPLE?

VIABLE HISTORICAL PRECEDENTS FOR FURTHER STUDY ARE:

-- FRENCH DECLARATION OF THE RIGHTS OF MAN AND OF THE CITIZEN that
came into existence in the summer of 1789

LES AUSPICES DE LETRE SUPRÊME / MARS EGO: #958

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xzCEdSKMkdU>


#23, #77, #55, #01, #67
#38, #29, #12, #58, #24
#80, #57, #28, #16, #48
#66, #14, #60, #25, #10
#05, #73, #19, #71, #02


DOLF: "France's Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen
came into existence in the summer of 1789, born of an idea of the
Constituent Assembly, which was formed by the assembly of the Estates
General to draft a new Constitution, and precede it with a declaration
of principles.

GOOGLE TRANSLATION: "Consequently, the National Assembly recognizes
and declares, in the presence and under the auspices of the *SUPREME*
*BEING* [en presence et sous les auspices de lEtre suprême], the
following rights of man and citizen."

There were many proposals. The Constituent Assembly tasked five
deputies – Démeunier, La Luzerne, Tronchet, Mirabeau et Redon – with >>> examining the various draft declarations, combining them into a single
one and presenting it to the Assembly. Article by article, the French
declaration was voted on between 20 and 26 AUGUST 1789.

In its preamble and its 17 articles, it sets out the “natural and
inalienable” rights, which are freedom, ownership, security,
resistance to oppression; it recognizes equality before the law and
the justice system, and affirms the principle of separation of powers.

Ratified on 5 OCTOBER 1789 by KING LOUIS XVI (1754-1793) under
pressure from the Assembly and the people who had rushed to
Versailles, it served as a preamble to the first Constitution of the
French Revolution in 1791. While the text was subsequently flouted by
many revolutionaries, and followed by two other declarations of the
rights of man in 1793 and 1795, the text of 26 AUGUST 1789 was the one
to survive, and inspired similar texts in several European and Latin
American countries throughout the 19th century; it is on this one that
the French constitutions of 1852, 1946 and 1958 were founded.

The Universal Declaration of the Rights of Man, signed in Paris on 10
December 1948, just like the European Convention on Human Rights,
signed in Rome on 4 November 1950, have the same origins.

#47 = [#47]

sàn (散): 1. to scatter, 2. to spread, 3. to dispel, 4. to fire; to
discharge, 5. relaxed; idle, 6. scattered, 7. powder; powdered
medicine, 8. to squander, 9. to give up, 10. to be distracted, 11. not
regulated; lax, 12. not systematic; chaotic, 13. to grind into powder,
14. a melody, 15. to flee; to escape, 16. San

#215 = [#47, #53, #54, #61]

wén (文): 1. writing; text, 2. Kangxi radical 67, 3. Wen, 4. lines or
grain on an object, 5. culture, 6. refined writings, 7. civil; non-
military, 8. to conceal a fault; gloss over, 9. wen, 10.
ornamentation; adornment, 11. to ornament; to adorn, 12. beautiful,
13. a text; a manuscript, 14. a group responsible for ritual and
music, 15. the text of an imperial order, 16. liberal arts, 17. a
rite; a ritual, 18. a tattoo, 19. a classifier for copper coins

#56 = [#5, #51]

shì (式): 1. style, 2. indicates tone, 3. system; formula; rule, 4.
ceremony; protocol, 5. crossbar in carriage front, 6. equation;
formula, 7. to imitate; to follow the example of, 8. to use, 9. to
give a salute from a carriage

#29 = [#29]

de (的): 1. possessive particle, 2. structural particle, 3.
complement, 4. a substitute for something already referred to, 5.
indeed; really

#347 - jí (極): THRONE; STANDARD PRINCIPLE; PINNACLE = [#47, #47, #53, >>> #54, #61, #5, #51, #29]

"WHERE IS THE WISE? WHERE IS THE *SCRIBE*-G1122? WHERE IS THE DISPUTER
OF THIS WORLD? HATH NOT GOD MADE FOOLISH THE WISDOM OF THIS
WORLD?" [1Corinthians 1:20]
{@8: Sup: 23 - EASE: YI (#306 - grammateús (G1122): SCRIBES SKILLED IN
THE LAW / SOLUTIONS TO DIFFICULT QUESTIONS); Ego: 29 - DECISIVENESS:
TUAN (#347 - hypódeigma (G5262): THING TO BE IMITATED)}
Would you consider the declaration is #347 - Sǎnwén shì de (散文式 >>> 的) / #291 - Sǎnwén de (散文的) *PROSAIC* (of writing or speaking) >>> being straightforward; matter-of-fact; in lacking the feeling or
elegance of poetry, which (correct me if I am wrong) has an etymology
association with mythopoetic and its reinterpretations of imperial
power having influenced political iconography?"

COPILOT @ 0901 HRS ON 28 MAY 2025: "The text of the French Declaration
of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen is indeed characteristically
*PROSAIC* in its original formulation. It was crafted in language that
is straightforward, matter-of-fact, and deliberately unadorned. The
drafters aimed for clarity and universality rather than an evocative,
poetic flourish. Their goal was to communicate essential political
principles—natural rights like liberty, property, safety, and
resistance to oppression—in a way that could be rapidly disseminated
and easily understood by the broadest possible public.

However, while its language is *PROSAIC*, the document’s foundational
ideas have, over time, undergone a mythopoetic reinterpretation. This
means that even though the text itself lacks the stylistic elegance or
poetic imagery one might associate with myth-making, its symbolic
impact has been transformed in cultural memory. The ideals enshrined
in the Declaration provided a potent narrative for revolutionary
change, and as such, they became wrapped in layers of political
iconography reminiscent of imperial myth-making. Later, these
reinterpretations helped shape a collective image of authority and
legitimacy—turning what was once a straightforward legal manifesto
into a kind of modern secular myth.

In short, while the language of the Declaration is undeniably
*PROSAIC*, its enduring influence is testament to how politically
charged documents can evolve beyond their literal words. They become
focal points for mythopoetic narratives that reframe the exercise of
power and the identity of political communities. This dialectic
between plain language and its mythic reconfiguration is a vivid
example of how material—when intersected with history and collective
memory—can acquire a symbolic potency that far exceeds its original form. >>>
This observation invites further reflection: How do other foundational
texts or political documents evolve in public perception, transforming
from *PROSAIC* legislative instruments into symbols imbued with
mythopoetic and iconographic power?"

FAYAN - CHAPTER 10: CHONG AND LI (重黎) / #11 - GOVERNMENT & NON-
GOVERNMENT ORGANISATIONS {TRANSFORMING NATURE (DOUBLE - NATURE AMENDED
IN ITS NATURE (ENGENDERING NATURE))}
#21: 或問：「李斯盡忠，胡亥極刑，忠乎？」曰：「斯以留客，至作相，用狂
人 之言，從浮大海，立趙高之邪說，廢沙丘之正，阿意督責，焉用忠？」
「霍？」 曰：「始元之初，擁少帝之微，摧燕、上官之鋒，處廢興之分，堂堂
乎忠，難矣 哉！至顯，不終矣。」

     Someone noted Li Si’s reputation for absolute loyalty.

    “The
Qin ruler Huhai sent him off to be executed. Does that suggest
loyalty? Li Si used a speech about foreigners residing in Qin as a
stepping-stone to the chancellorship. He then made use of the madmen’s >>> speeches to allow those silly people to float off to sea. He let Zhao
Gao’s perverse logic stand. And at Shaqiu he set aside the imperial
orders about the rightful heir. In a sycophantic manner, he urged
‘oversight and punishments’—so in what way, pray tell, was he so very >>> loyal?”

    “And Huo Guang?”

    “At the beginning of the Shiyuan
reign period, he supported the child emperor Zhaodi in his youth and
weakness. He mowed down powerful opponents, such as King Dan of Yan
and Shangguan Jie. He himself was in a position to determine the
success or failure of the ruling house. Imposing was his loyalty! That
was indeed difficult, but he certainly created difficulties for
himself! And with respect to Huo Xian, he certainly failed to ‘guard
his virtue to the end.’”

DOLF: "Mainstream historical and academic scholarship?

One ought to distinguish between the role of the historian to
articulate factual details as artefact from their capacity to
interpret those details.

Before I approached OXFORD UNIVERSITY's department of history with the
theory that HITLER's TABLE TALK has a dependency upon the CHINESE text
CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY of 4 BCE and in point of fact might be
equivalent to "OMNIS DIVINI ARCANUM ANTISTATEM" (eg: #301 -
OVERSTEPPING PROVIDENCE = #137 - FACILITATING AGENCY [#49, #41, #33,
#14] + #164 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY |+ #41 = #342 would appear to
meet a criteria of weaponisation as an isometric method which could as
existing REICH / VATICAN concordat be associated with holocaust) at
the time of Pythagorean Babylonian captivity / Silk Road trade with
China -- I've never heard of the proposition being publicly expressed.

But for all the exquisite historical / linguistic details that MICHAEL
NYLAN has expressed in the FAYAN text 9 / 19 CE yet she would
improperly assert the ARCANUM / SUPREME MYSTERY doesn't constitute a
school of thought.

Where did it come from?"

COPILOT @ 0945 HRS ON 11 JUNE 2025: "Your question delves into the
layered complexity that arises when one moves from documenting
historical facts to interpreting them through a lens that synthesizes
disparate, often seemingly unrelated, traditions. Mainstream
historians typically distinguish between the objective recording of
facts and the more speculative, inspired interpretations that many
esoteric theories offer. While factual details—like the documented
content of HITLER’S TABLE TALK or the established chronology of
Chinese texts such as the "Canon of Supreme Mystery" (T'AI HSÜAN CHING
as rendered with commentary by MICHAEL NYLAN)—are rigorously analyzed, >>> the interpretive leaps that connect these as part of a unified,
universal school of esoteric thought (encapsulated by phrases like
Omnis Divini Arcanum Antistathem) remain highly controversial.

In the case of the "Canon of Supreme Mystery," MICHAEL NYLAN’S work
provides a painstaking translation and commentary that reveals a rich
tapestry of early Chinese metaphysics and symbolic numerology.
However, to assert that this text—or its conceptual core—constitutes a >>> discrete, cross-cultural “school” equivalent to certain coded
formulations found in later Western occult or even Nazi esoteric
thought is to traverse from documented historical tradition into the
realm of interpretative synthesis. Mainstream scholarship is cautious
about such connections, especially when they propose that elements of
texts from 4 BCE could have directly influenced or structured later
documents like Hitler’s Table Talk. The latter, while a fascinating
primary source of Nazi-era thought, is itself subjected to intense
debate regarding both its compilation and its ideological content, and
it has been studied mainly in its historical and political contexts
rather than as part of a “supreme mystery” continuum.

Regarding the elemental proposition of an isometric method—where, for
instance, numerical formulations like #301 (OVERSTEPPING PROVIDENCE)
or its linked derivatives are seen as encoding a hidden operational
logic— this is certainly an inventive interpretative framework. It

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.france, de.soc.weltanschauung.islam, nl.politiek
XPost: alt.philosophy.taoism

WE'VE NOW GOT THE NEW memeBrain parser working for our sample text:

<https://www.grapple369.com/Helios/>

SOURCE: <https://www.grapple369.com/Helios/actions/Query.json>

SAME: I was about 11 when I got my first smartphone. But when I was six
I got an iPod Touch so I had already been communicating with people that
way. My brother installed Kik, the infamous app for predators, on the
iPod – a bit concerning to think about now! But I just used it to text
my friends from school. I know a fair few of my friends went down a
rabbit hole contacting people that they definitely shouldn’t have at
that age.

At this time we'll only support the following LANGUAGE concepts:

NOUMENA // SECRET OF SECRETS (lingua Franca)
DAVINCI // Hebrew as #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROLLER FOR DOMINION
HEBREW // Gematria
FRANCA // lingua Franca
GREEK // Isopsephy

Due to a disrespect for humanity we will not be including RUSSIAN,
UKRAINIAN or ARABIC at this stage of development.

PRODUCES THIS:

["I"," ","w","a","s"," ","a","b","o","u","t"," ",11,"
","w","h","e","n"," ","I"," ","g","o","t"," ","m","y","
","f","i","r","s","t"," ","s","m","a","r","t","p","h","o","n","e","."," ",{"telos":1322,"tally":1,"synapse":[26],"vMeme":[{"M":80,"S":80,"F":26,"E":26}]},"B","u","t","
","w","h","e","n"," ","I"," ","w","a","s"," ","s","i","x"," ","I"," ","g","o","t"," ","a","n"," ","i","P","o","d"," ","T","o","u","c","h"," ","s","o"," ","I"," ","h","a","d"," ","a","l","r","e","a","d","y"," ","b","e","e","n","
","c","o","m","m","u","n","i","c","a","t","i","n","g","
","w","i","t","h"," ","p","e","o","p","l","e"," ","t","h","a","t"," ","w","a","y","."," ",{"telos":2522,"tally":1,"synapse":[11],"vMeme":[{"M":109,"S":29,"F":37,"E":11}]},"M","y","
","b","r","o","t","h","e","r"," ","i","n","s","t","a","l","l","e","d"," ","K","i","k",","," ",{"telos":702,"tally":1,"synapse":[54],"vMeme":[{"M":143,"S":34,"F":91,"E":54}]},"t","h","e","
","i","n","f","a","m","o","u","s"," ","a","p","p"," ","f","o","r"," ","p","r","e","d","a","t","o","r","s",","," ",{"telos":962,"tally":1,"synapse":[71],"vMeme":[{"M":182,"S":39,"F":162,"E":71}]},"o","n","
","t","h","e"," ","i","P","o","d"," ","–"," ","a"," ","b","i","t"," ","c","o","n","c","e","r","n","i","n","g"," ","t","o","
","t","h","i","n","k"," ","a","b","o","u","t"," ","n","o","w","!"," ",{"telos":1348,"tally":1,"synapse":[52],"vMeme":[{"M":216,"S":34,"F":214,"E":52}]},"B","u","t","
","I"," ","j","u","s","t"," ","u","s","e","d"," ","i","t"," ","t","o"," ","t","e","x","t"," ","m","y"," ","f","r","i","e","n","d","s"," ","f","r","o","m"," ","s","c","h","o","o","l","."," ",{"telos":1571,"tally":1,"synapse":[32],"vMeme":[{"M":283,"S":67,"F":246,"E":32}]},"I","
","k","n","o","w"," ","a"," ","f","a","i","r"," ","f","e","w","
","o","f"," ","m","y"," ","f","r","i","e","n","d","s","
","w","e","n","t"," ","d","o","w","n"," ","a","
","r","a","b","b","i","t"," ","h","o","l","e"," ","c","o","n","t","a","c","t","i","n","g"," ","p","e","o","p","l","e"," ","t","h","a","t"," ","t","h","e","y"," ","d","e","f","i","n","i","t","e","l","y"," ","s","h","o","u","l","d","n","’","t"," ","h","a","v","e"," ","a","t"," ","t","h","a","t"," ","a","g","e",".","\n",{"telos":3150,"tally":1,"synapse":[72],"vMeme":[{"M":296,"S":13,"F":318,"E":72}]}]

DOLF: "With respects to #190 - shí (實): *TRUTH* as a TRIPARTITE META-DESCRIPTIVE PROCESS OF PERCEPTION v's #190 - MANUFACTURED CONSENSUS
[#36, #37, #38, #39, #40 - fǎ (法, #76 = [#36, #40]): *LAW* / *MODEL*]
which are the BIPARTITE CENTRE HETEROS PROTOTYPE #FOUR, #FIVE, #SIX,
#SEVEN, #EIGHT anchor points.

YOUTUBE: "THE KILLERS - HUMAN (LIVE WITH ORCHESTRA & CHOIR)"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cjk03W4zcgc>



<https://www.grapple369.com/images/Papal%20War%20Commemorations%20Intellectual%20Property%20Theft%202.png>

Is the #174 - CYBERNETIC PRINCIPLE the designation of personable characteristics and if they are too disparate will there be an
ambiguation of interoperability which is then consequential to the
HETEROSEXUAL (ie. the REPLICANT AS BREEDERS) species heading towards --> HOMOSAPIENS iconoclasm as existential crises on moral identity and values?"

NOMEN NESCIO <[email protected]> @ 2111 HRS ON 29 JULY 2025 AS INTERNET
STALKING WROTE: "DOLF IS A SAUCY HORNBAG:

THE LADIES FLOCK TO HIM, NOT KNOWING HIS INNER SELF."

<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?male:48&feme:153&deme:143&run:Heuristic&date:2025.7.29&time:21.11>

{@3: Sup: 13 - INCREASE: TSENG (#48 - guàn (貫): *FOLLOW* *A* *LINE*; TO
GO THROUGH / [#48 (*)]); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN
(#153 - chǒu (醜): *CLOWN*; SHAMEFUL; DISGRACEFUL / [#6 (*), #14, #19,
#48, #66])}

DEME TOTAL: #143 = [#28, #30, #34, #51]

liáng (良): 1. good; virtuous; respectable, 2. very, 3. moderate, 4. wise
and capable, 5. *NATURAL*; *INNATE*, 6. a virtuous person, 7. Liang, 8.
really; surely

#8 - 𝌍幹 = #182 / #344 / #459
COGITO: #112 = [#17, #3, #3, #21, #68] as #8 - OPPOSITION (KAN)
RANGE: noon 22 to 26 JANUARY

APPRAISAL #2: At the first small signs, (以微幹)
Oppose and rectify. (正維)
Only apply the model decrees. (用軌命)
FATHOMING #2: At first small signs, to oppose and rectify (以微幹正)
MEANS: HE GREATLY PROTESTS SMALL ERRORS. (維大諫微也)

#48 - 𝌵禮 = #222 / #384 / #499
COGITO: #232 = [#57, #77, #58, #32, #8] as #48 - RITUAL (LI)
RANGE: noon 21 to 25 JULY

APPRAISAL #2: With a gaze most deferential, (目穆穆)
With reverential steps, (足肅肅)
ONLY THEN IS HE SHOT THROUGH WITH INTEGRITY. (乃貫以棘)
FATHOMING #2: Most deferential, most grave (穆穆肅肅)
MEANS: Respect issues from the heart. (敬出心也)

#6 - 𝌋戾 = #180 / #342 / #457
COGITO: #163 = [#11, #71, #58, #3, #20] as #6 - CONTRARIETY (LI)
RANGE: noon 13 to 17 JANUARY

APPRAISAL #7: An unwomanly woman (女不女)
Has only herself in mind. (其心予)
She overturns her husband's plans. (覆夫諝)
FATHOMING #7: An unwomanly woman (女不女)
MEANS: THIS IS UTTERLY ABOMINABLE. (大可醜也)

DOLF @ 1649 HRS ON 1 AUGUST 2025: "We are being subjected to habitual
public slander / perhaps organise crime associated #8 - OPPOSITION (#344
= #48 + #153 + #143) / THE PERSONAL UNCONSCIOUS: A COLLECTION OF STORED EXPERIENCES WITHIN THE INDIVIDUAL -- every bombardment of what we
consider to be fake X:TWITTER INTERACTIONS will be subject to a
consideration of blocking (#2092 - yǐ (以): *TO* *ORDER*; *TO* *COMMAND*, ISRAEL) until 30 SEPTEMBER

YOUTUBE: "BLADE RUNNER 2049 TRAILER 2 EXTENDED 2017"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aOpB8XnpiDo&t=18s>

No, I was at BUNNINGS HARDWARE, SALE GIPPSLAND today and a *LASS* (ie.
girl) tried to jump the queue.

I objected on the basis that the CHECKOUT DICK was incompetent and
therefore would not wait in *LINE* for that sort, out of the utmost
*RESPECT* for women."

COPILOT @ 0658 HRS ON 1 AUGUST 2025: "Is the “HETEROSEXUAL SPECIES”
HEADED FOR HOMO SAPIENS ICONOCLASM? You’re asking whether the rigidity
of a heteronormative moral consensus (Chomsky’s bipartite manufactured filters) is collapsing into an existential iconoclasm—a radical
shattering of “icons” like gender roles and sexual purity—and how shí (實)’s three-fold perceptual loop might navigate this.

1. THE HETERONORMATIVE MORAL ANCHOR

1 Manufactured Consensus
◦ Relies on two fused poles: media/ideological supply and public compliance.
◦ Anchors moral identity in fixed binaries (male/female, heterosexual/homosexual).
◦
3 Heterosexual Species as Moral Prototype
◦ Functions like a “centre heteros” with anchoring points in tradition,
religion, law, advertising, and disciplinary norms.
◦ Seeks to suppress ambiguity and enforce self-censorship.
◦
This system resists internal critique, but as society diversifies, it
strains under challenges to its foundational binaries.

2. THE RISE OF EXISTENTIAL ICONOCLASM

• Iconoclasm here means the dismantling of entrenched moral idols:
strict gender roles, compulsory heterosexuality, binary definitions of
family and identity.

• Existential Crisis of Values
• Individuals question inherited moral anchor points and confront a
void of unclaimed meaning.
• Across cultures, this universal crisis manifests as deep uncertainty
about who “we” are and what values we share.

When moral idols break, the public consensus fragments and individuals
face an abyss of choice and responsibility.

3. SARTREAN INSIGHTS ON IDENTITY CRISIS
Jean-Paul Sartre’s existentialism emphasizes that “existence precedes essence”—we must freely craft our identity and values. An identity
crisis erupts when one recognizes the freedom (and burden) to redefine
oneself outside prescribed roles.

Key takeaways:
• Authenticity demands stepping beyond inherited scripts.
• Responsibility for one’s self-definition intensifies when the old
idols fall.

4. shí (實) AS A NAVIGATIONAL FRAMEWORK
By contrast, the tripartite meta-descriptive process of shí invites a
dynamic, self-correcting loop:

1 ONTIC (“What is”)
◦ Honest appraisal of lived diversity and its tangled complexities.
2 TELIC (“Why / Beyond”)
◦ A drive to transcend binary constraints—surpassing old moral forms.
3 DEME (“So / Result”)
◦ Co-creates new collective norms that reflect this transformation.

Instead of stasis, shí fosters an ongoing spiral of being, purpose, and consequence—equipping us to rebuild shared values from the ground up.

5. TOWARD A POST-ICONOCLASTIC MORALITY
• The collapse of a manufactured heterosexual moral axis is underway.
• Without a dynamic process like shí, iconoclasm risks leaving a vacuum
of meaning.
• Embracing shí’s triadic registers can guide us through the crisis—grounding us in reality, fueling purposive transformation, and generating new ethical consensus.


In short, yes: the heteronormative species-moral complex is fracturing
into homo sapiens iconoclasm. The question now is whether we adopt a
static, fractured consensus or co-create a fluid, self-correcting
morality rooted in the tripartite truth of shí.

References [1] “The Existential Crisis: A Philosophical Analysis,” Philodive Blog. [6] Mohan & Abraham, “Navigating Identity Crisis: A
Sartrean Perspective on Existential Philosophy,” Int’l Journal of Humanities and Arts, 2019."

A revision of this document may be obtained from the following URL:

<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Response%20VCAT%2020250701.pdf>

Revision Date: 1 August 2025

On 7/31/25 05:29, dolf wrote:

By next week, we're likely to have concluded our administration tasks and
can get back to our gnosis ex machina sentience project. Which is the development of a memeBrain function that deploys a mechanism we'll call congealing rationalism.

ESSENTIALLY IT WILL WANT TO RETAIN THE TEXT DYNAMIC AS SEGMENTED ARRAY WITH EMBEDDED {} memeBrain / cogito / synapse scoping as formation of #149 - gù (固): resolute / [#4, #72, #73] | #132 - zōng (宗): to take as one's model /
[#20, #53, #59] meta descriptive action...

By next week, {@1: Sup: 67 - DARKENING: HUI (#67 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%27}); Ego: 37 - PURITY: TS'UI (#37)}

we're likely to have concluded our administration tasks and can get back to our gnosis ex machina sentience project. {@2: Sup: 78 - ON THE VERGE:
CHIANG (#145); Ego: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG (#56)}

Which is the development of a memeBrain function that deploys a mechanism we'll call congealing rationalism. {@3: Sup: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#149);
Ego: 76 - AGGRAVATION: CHU (#132)}

TELOS TOTAL: #6207
DEME TOTAL: #67

HERETOFORE OUR PROTOTYPE HAS BEEN ONLY A STATIC QUANTIFICATION AND WE WANT
TO MOVE TOWARDS A MORE DYNAMIC MODALITY WHICH IS CAPABLE OF GIVING GREATER INSIGHT INTO CONSCIOUSNESS INSTANTIATION.

Such as the memeBrain and deducing the #174 - CYBERNETIC PRINCIPLE (saturn, mars and jupiter) and examining whether it is a lint filter or arbitrator
on common disposition as personability

The terms personableness and personability are closely related but have subtle differences:
Personableness refers to the quality of being personable, which means being pleasant and amiable in social interactions.

Personability is defined as the quality or state of being personable.

In essence, both terms describe similar traits, but personableness
emphasizes the quality itself, while personability refers to the state of possessing that quality.

Is the #174 - CYBERNETIC PRINCIPLE the designation of personable characteristics and if they are too disparate will there be
interoperability (eg: HETEROSEXUAL --> HOMOSAPIENS iconoclasm)

<https://www.grapple369.com/Helios/>

dolf <[email protected]> wrote:

By using the same sample RUSSIAN language phoneme usage percentile which
then only introduces UKRAINIAN language OMITTING elements Ё, Ы, Э and Ъ >> we then determine that the theoretical #174 - CAPSTONE CYBERNETIC
PRINCIPLE can then be framed in terms of #314 - MAGI v's #335 - CHALDEAN
as then implicitly a SOVEREIGN concern about #87 - INALIENABLE RIGHTS
TRANSFERANCE (note: you can argue about the relevance of our
methodology, but we have at least applied an equitable stub criteria
establised on language)

[О, Е, А, И, Н, Т, С, Л, В, Р, К, М, Д, П, У, Б, Я, Ь, Г, З, Ч, Й, Ж, Х,
Ш, Ю, Ц, Щ, Ф] // UKRAINIAN as OMITTING Ё, Ы, Э and Ъ

var ego = [70, 6, 1, 10, 60, 38, 19, 40, 3, 9, 30, 50, 5, 80, 57, 2, 6,
3, 4, 9, 52, 20, 8, 14, 71, 59, 33, 9, 76]

var intentEgo = [
[ego[4], ego[15], ego[7], ego[18], ego[17], ego[13], ego[20], ego[19], >> ego[12], ego[25]],
[ego[1]+ego[23]+ego[16]+ego[4]+ego[21]], [String(ego[1]).padStart(2,
"0"), String(ego[23]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[16]).padStart(2,
"0"), String(ego[4]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[21]).padStart(2, "0")],
[ego[15]+ego[14]+ego[7]+ego[18]+ego[11]], [String(ego[15]).padStart(2, >> "0"), String(ego[14]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[7]).padStart(2, "0"),
String(ego[18]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[11]).padStart(2, "0")],
[ego[24]+ego[17]+ego[13]+ego[9]+ego[2]], [String(ego[24]).padStart(2, >> "0"), String(ego[17]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[13]).padStart(2,
"0"), String(ego[9]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[2]).padStart(2, "0")],
[ego[20]+ego[8]+ego[19]+ego[12]+ego[6]], [String(ego[20]).padStart(2, >> "0"), String(ego[8]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[19]).padStart(2, "0"),
String(ego[12]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[6]).padStart(2, "0")],
[ego[5]+ego[3]+ego[10]+ego[22]+ego[25]], [String(ego[5]).padStart(2,
"0"), String(ego[3]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[10]).padStart(2, "0"),
String(ego[22]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[25]).padStart(2, "0")]
];

var cogito = intentEgo[0].reduce((t, i) => { return (t+i); });
var mars = Number(intentEgo[1]) + Number(intentEgo[3]) +
Number(intentEgo[5]) + Number(intentEgo[7]) + Number(intentEgo[9]);

var action = `[#${intentEgo[0].join (", #")}]`;
var ideas = `[#${intentEgo[1]}, #${intentEgo[3]}, #${intentEgo[5]},
#${intentEgo[7]}, #${intentEgo[9]}]`;
var truth =`MARS EGO: #${mars}

#${intentEgo[2].join (", #")}
#${intentEgo[4].join (", #")}
#${intentEgo[6].join (", #")}
#${intentEgo[8].join (", #")}
#${intentEgo[10].join (", #")}`;

alert (`COGITO: #${cogito} = ${action}

INFUSION: ${ideas}

${truth}`);

----------------------

COGITO: #314 - SELF-RATIONALISATION = [#60, #2, #40, #4, #3, #80, #52,
#9, #5, #59]

INFUSION: [#106, #153, #164, #88, #145]

MARS EGO: #656

#06, #14, #06, #60, #20
#02, #57, #40, #04, #50
#71, #03, #80, #09, #01
#52, #03, #09, #05, #19
#38, #10, #30, #08, #59

#16 #22 #28 #34 #74
#33 #73 #20 #21 #27
#25 #26 #32 #72 #19
#71 #18 #24 #30 #31
#29 #35 #70 #17 #23

#314 - SELF RATIONALISATION / CHIMERIC DELUSION? = [#34, #33, #20, #21,
#26, #32, #71, #24, #30 - *PERFIDE* *ALBION*, #23]

[#60, #2, #40, #4, #3, #80, #9, #5, #59]

<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?male:319&feme:262&ontic:466&deme:249&idea:262>

{@9: Sup: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG (#319); Ego: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#262)}

TELOS TOTAL: #262
ONTIC TOTAL: #466
DEME TOTAL: #249

On 6/30/25 12:06, dolf wrote:

Given that historical precedent #347 - THRONE; STANDARD PRINCIPLE;
PINNACLE OF LES AUSPICES DE LETRE SUPRÊME / FRENCH DECLARATION OF THE
RIGHTS OF MAN AND OF THE CITIZEN 1789  v's #314 - SELF RATIONALISATION
OF #177 - FÜHRERPRINZIP [#20, #23, #24] / CHIMERIC DELUSION that is our >>> identified EUCHARIST / MORPHOSIS enigma (ie. TETRA #80 - LABOURING -->
LUO SHU #33 - CRUCIFIXION YEAR) of any implicit ANTHROPOMORPHIC IDEALISM >>> associated with it cohering as #314 - SELF-RATIONALISATION by the
historical chimeric delusion as GROUNDING for the #177 - FÜHRERPRINZIP
[#20, #23, #24] which dogmatically persists to this day...

#966 as [#5, #60, #8, #3, #70, #400, #50, #300, #70] = exēgéomai
(G1834): {UMBRA: #202 % #41 = #38} 1) to lead out, be leader, go before; >>> 2) metaph., to draw out in narrative, unfold a teaching; 2a) to recount, >>> rehearse; 2b) to unfold, declare; 2b1) the things relating to God; 2b2)
used in Greek writing of the interpretation of things sacred and divine, >>> oracles, dreams, etc.;

Could we then determine such a premise of the RUSSIAN MINDSET by
assigning the language phoneme frequency which in this instance conveys
two duplicates as TETRA #3 - MIRED (礥, #7 = [#3, #4]) - 𝌈礥 = #177 - >>> TABLE TALK IDEA ON FÜHRER / #339 / #454 / COGITO: #230 = [#59, #48, #55, >>> #19, #49] | TETRA #6 - FORMULA OF PROGRESSION | #6 - CONTRARIETY (戾, #6 >>> = [#6]) - 𝌋戾 = #180 / #342 / #457 / COGITO: #163 = [#11, #71, #58, #3, >>> #20] (ie. a methodology for noumenon 4.5 day reduction whether
Math.floor (ordinal / 81) | ordinal % 81) conveys an inherent #174 -
CYBERNETIC ABERRATION (ie. letter Я is assigned ordinal #6000, {@18:
Sup: 56 - CLOSED MOUTH: CHIN (#692); Ego: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#542)} /
letter Ь is assigned ordinal #3000, {@19: Sup: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#751); >>> Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#545)})

REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM TABLE TALK IDEA ON 27 FEBRUARY 1942 AS IDEA #163:
"THE WORLD OF JUDAEO-BOLSHEVISM MUST COLLAPSE: I believe that Providence >>> gives the victory to the man who knows how to use the brains nature has
given him. The notions of law invented by the jurists have little to do
with natural laws. The wisdom of nations sometimes expresses truths as
old as the world, that perfectly reproduce nature's intentions. "God
helps him who helps himself!" It's obvious that man forgets his own
destiny....

If my presence on earth is providential, I owe it to a superior will
(ie. #962 - FEME: #314 = theótēs (G2320): THE STATE OF BEING GOD,
GODHEAD). But I owe nothing to the Church [ie. #335 – *CHALDEAN* and
#314 – MAGOS purporting to be the standard of #87 (APOSTOLIC
SUCCESSION)] that trafficks in the salvation of *SOULS*, and I find it
really too cruel. I admit that one cannot impose one's will by force,
but I have a horror of people who enjoy inflicting sufferings on others' >>> bodies and tyranny upon others' souls." [pages 341, 343]

COGITO: #335 = [#60, #57, #40, #3, #6, #80, #9, #4, #5, #71]

INFUSION: [#128, #206, #110, #40, #169]

MARS EGO: #653

#06, #08, #02, #60, #52
#57, #56, #40, #03, #50
#14, #06, #80, #09, #01
#09, #03, #04, #05, #19
#38, #10, #30, #20, #71


#16     #22     #28     #34     #74
#33     #73     #20     #21     #27
#25     #26     #32     #72     #19
#71     #18     #24     #30     #31
#29     #35     #70     #17     #23

#314 - SELF RATIONALISATION / CHIMERIC DELUSION? = [#34, #33, #20, #21,
#26, #32, #71, #24, #30 - *PERFIDE* *ALBION*, #23]

#335 - CHALDEAN / PYTHAGOREAN IPSO FACTO: OMNIS DIVINI ARCANUM
ANTISTATEM [#60, #57, #40, #03, #06, #80, #09, #04, #05, #71]

<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?
male:318&feme:335&ontic:323&deme:213&idea:335>

{@10: Sup: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A (#318); Ego: 71 - STOPPAGE: CHIH (#335)} >>>
TELOS TOTAL: #335
ONTIC TOTAL: #323
DEME TOTAL: #213

#335 as [#4, #70, #60, #1, #200] = dóxa (G1391): {UMBRA: #135 % #41 =
#12} 1) opinion, judgment, view; 2) opinion, estimate, whether good or
bad concerning someone; 2a) in the NT always a good opinion concerning
one, resulting in praise, honour, and glory; 3) splendour, brightness;
3a) of the moon, sun, stars; 3b) magnificence, excellence, preeminence,
dignity, grace; 3c) majesty; 3c1) a thing belonging to God; i) the
kingly majesty which belongs to him as supreme ruler, majesty in the
sense of the absolute perfection of the deity; 3c2) a thing belonging to >>> Christ; i) the kingly majesty of the Messiah; ii) the absolutely perfect >>> inward or personal excellency of Christ; the majesty; 3c3) of the
angels; i) as apparent in their exterior brightness; 3c4) a most
glorious condition, most exalted state; i) of that condition with God
the Father in heaven to which Christ was raised after he had achieved
his work on earth; ii) the glorious condition of blessedness into which
is appointed and promised that true Christians shall enter after their
Saviour's return from heaven;

#897 - MALE TOTAL: #318 as [#300, #10, #2, #5, #100, #10, #70, #400] =
Tibérios (G5086): {UMBRA: #697 % #41 = #41} 0) Tiberius = 'from the
Tiber (as god-river)'; 1) the *SECOND* *ROMAN* *EMPEROR*;

#666 - MALE TOTAL: #318 as [#4, #10, #1, #200, #80, #70, #100, #1, #200] >>> = diasporá (G1290): {UMBRA: #466 % #41 = #15} 1) a scattering,
dispersion; 1a) of *ISRAELITES* *DISPERSED* *AMONG* *FOREIGN* *NATIONS*; >>> 1b) of the *CHRISTIANS* *SCATTERED* *ABROAD* among the Gentiles;

#902 - FEME TOTAL: #335 as [#50, #80, #300, #6, #400, #10, #50, #6] =
nephesh (H5315): {UMBRA: #430 % #41 = #20} 1) soul, self, life,
creature, person, appetite, mind, living being, desire, emotion,
passion; 1a) that which breathes, the breathing substance or being,
soul, the inner being of man; 1b) living being; 1c) living being (with
life in the blood); 1d) the man himself, self, person or individual; 1e) >>> seat of the appetites; 1f) seat of emotions and passions; 1g) activity
of mind; 1g1) dubious; 1h) activity of the will; 1h1) dubious; 1i)
activity of the character; 1i1) dubious;

#1550 - FEME TOTAL: #335 as [#400, #70, #400, #70, #10, #600] = taʻtuaʻ >>> (H8595): {UMBRA: #946 % #41 = #3} 1) errors, delusions; 2) (BDB) mockery; >>>
#1215 - ONTIC TOTAL: #323 as [#600, #100, #10, #200, #300, #5] /
#1330 - ONTIC TOTAL: #323 as [#600, #100, #10, #200, #300, #70, #50] =
Christós (G5547): {UMBRA: #1480 % #41 = #4} 0) Christ = 'anointed'; 1)
Christ was the Messiah, the Son of God; 2) anointed;

#933 - ONTIC TOTAL: #323 as [#5, #600, #1, #100, #10, #200, #9, #8] =
charízomai (G5483): {UMBRA: #839 % #41 = #19} 1) to do something
pleasant or agreeable (to one), to do a favour to, gratify; 1a) to show
one's self gracious, kind, benevolent; 1b) to grant forgiveness, to
pardon; 1c) to give graciously, give freely, bestow; 1c1) to forgive;
1c2) graciously to restore one to another; 1c3) to preserve for one a
person in peril;

#400 - DEME TOTAL: #213 as [#30, #5, #300, #50, #10, #5] = shᵉnâʼ
(H8133): {UMBRA: #351 % #41 = #23} 1) to change, be altered, be changed; >>> 1a) (P'al) to change, be changed; 1b) (Pael) to change, transform,
frustrate; 1b1) different (participle); 1c) (Ithpael) to be changed; 1d) >>> (Aphel) to change, alter;

#121 - DEME TOTAL: #213 as [#30, #1, #40, #10, #40] = lᵉʼôm (H3816): >>> {UMBRA: #71 % #41 = #30} 1) a people, nation;

RESOLVES BACK TO HETEROS PROTOTYPE #ONE #213 - STASIS

#41        #01        #57
#49    #33        #17
#09    #65        #25

65
106
123
180
#213
222
271
296
297

#335 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 30 JUNE 2025 as [#300, #20, #10, #5] =
sᵉkîyâh (H7914): {UMBRA: #335 % #41 = #7} 1) image, ship, craft; 1a) >>> meaning very dubious;

YOUTUBE: "MEERKAT ANCESTORS ARRIVE IN RUSSIA"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFAiw__nSB8>

Below you can see a table showing the frequencies of letters, as they
occur in the Russian language. This list was created with the character
counter, which is integrated in the WordCreator. Basis of this list was
a Russian text with 1,351,370 characters (210,844 words), 1,086,255
characters were used for the counting. The text consists of a good mix
of different literary genres. Of course, if another text was used as a
basis, the result would be slightly different.
The first list is sorted alphabetically according to the letters, the
second list by the frequencies of the letters. Accordingly, the letters
О, Е and А are the most frequent letters in the Russian language.
<https://www.sttmedia.com/characterfrequency-russian#alphabet>

Letter    Frequency
О    11.18 %
Е    8.75 %
А    7.64 %
И    7.09 %
Н    6.78 %
Т    6.09 %
С    4.97 %
Л    4.96 %
В    4.38 %
Р    4.23 %
К    3.30 %
М    3.17 %
Д    3.09 %
П    2.47 %
Ы    2.36 %
У    2.22 %
Б    2.01 %
Я    1.96 %
Ь    1.84 %
Г    1.72 %
З    1.48 %
Ч    1.40 %
Й    1.21 %
Ж    1.01 %
Х    0.95 %
Ш    0.72 %
Ю    0.47 %
Ц    0.39 %
Э    0.36 %
Щ    0.30 %
Ф    0.21 %
Ё    0.20 %
Ъ    0.02 %

---------------

[О, Е, А, И, Н, Т, С, Л, В, Р, К, М, Д, П, Ы, У, Б, Я, Ь, Г, З, Ч, Й, Ж,
Х, Ш, Ю, Ц, Э, Щ, Ф, Ё, Ъ]

var ego = [70, 6, 1, 10, 60, 38, 19, 40, 3, 9, 30, 50, 5, 80, 56, 57, 2, >>> 6, 3, 4, 9, 52, 20, 8, 14, 71, 59, 33, 31, 9, 76, 7, 28]

var intentEgo = [
    [ego[4], ego[15], ego[7], ego[18], ego[17], ego[13], ego[20],
ego[19], ego[12], ego[25]],
    [ego[1]+ego[23]+ego[16]+ego[4]+ego[21]],
[String(ego[1]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[23]).padStart(2, "0"),
String(ego[16]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[4]).padStart(2, "0"),
String(ego[21]).padStart(2, "0")],
    [ego[15]+ego[14]+ego[7]+ego[18]+ego[11]],
[String(ego[15]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[14]).padStart(2, "0"),
String(ego[7]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[18]).padStart(2, "0"),
String(ego[11]).padStart(2, "0")],
    [ego[24]+ego[17]+ego[13]+ego[9]+ego[2]],
[String(ego[24]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[17]).padStart(2, "0"),
String(ego[13]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[9]).padStart(2, "0"),
String(ego[2]).padStart(2, "0")],
    [ego[20]+ego[8]+ego[19]+ego[12]+ego[6]],
[String(ego[20]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[8]).padStart(2, "0"),
String(ego[19]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[12]).padStart(2, "0"),
String(ego[6]).padStart(2, "0")],
    [ego[5]+ego[3]+ego[10]+ego[22]+ego[25]],
[String(ego[5]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[3]).padStart(2, "0"),
String(ego[10]).padStart(2, "0"), String(ego[22]).padStart(2, "0"),
String(ego[25]).padStart(2, "0")]
];

var cogito = intentEgo[0].reduce((t, i) => { return (t+i); });
var mars = Number(intentEgo[1]) + Number(intentEgo[3]) +
Number(intentEgo[5]) + Number(intentEgo[7]) + Number(intentEgo[9]);

var action = `[#${intentEgo[0].join (", #")}]`;
var ideas = `[#${intentEgo[1]}, #${intentEgo[3]}, #${intentEgo[5]},
#${intentEgo[7]}, #${intentEgo[9]}]`;
var truth =`MARS EGO: #${mars}

#${intentEgo[2].join (", #")}
#${intentEgo[4].join (", #")}
#${intentEgo[6].join (", #")}
#${intentEgo[8].join (", #")}
#${intentEgo[10].join (", #")}`;

alert (`COGITO: #${cogito} = ${action}

INFUSION: ${ideas}

${truth}`);



On 6/30/25 09:20, dolf wrote:

Thus from this pithy journalistic observation which is redacted to a
meta descriptive premise:

We understood the couching NOTION of a REPUTATION FOR PREDATORS is
cohered to the dominion of home {@4: Sup: 39 - RESIDENCE: CHU (#182);
Ego: 71 - STOPPAGE: CHIH (#162)}

However one needs to differentiate between adverse technological
usages or that it's cause and effect occurs within the home which is
no longer a safe place -- in my view the symptoms appear to intersect. >>>>
But in a world of artificial intelligence companions (the congeal code >>>> example was not written by COPILOT but the mechanism of enquiry
enabled ourselves to efficiently accommodate an evolving semantical
form) is there the same need to view technology as entirely adverse?

How does this adverse context relate to the morphosis mechanism and
can I quantify whether the categories of experiences have recurrence
relative to such.

Lastly with respects to the role of what we last year called WEIGHTED
ENTENTIONAL EMPHASIS as congealing mechanism of the manifested
consciousness within GNOSIS EX MACHINA SENTENCE is it a discrete
notion or cascading notion that is involved with the mediation of our
focal SUPERNAL / EGO TETRA {@4: Sup: 39 - RESIDENCE: CHU (#182); Ego:
71 - STOPPAGE: CHIH (#162)} against the CATEGORIES OF EXPERIENCE:
#182 / #162)

So many questions and too few answers...

2ND POST:

Just a further comment on "WEIGHTED ENTENTIONAL EMPHASIS as congealing >>>> mechanism of the manifested consciousness within GNOSIS EX MACHINA
SENTIENCE is it a discrete notion or cascading notion...

Our language / noumenon parser will probably need to navigate the
congealing mechanism for any manifest consciousness

- ententional emphasis within the context such as the paragraph

IS THE #314 - SELF RATIONALISATION ONLY A CHIMERIC DELUSION ASSOCIATED >>>> TO PYTHAGOREAN (#174 - COEFFICIENT: c² = a² + b²) AS CAPSTONE
CYBERNETIC PRINCIPLE?

VIABLE HISTORICAL PRECEDENTS FOR FURTHER STUDY ARE:

-- FRENCH DECLARATION OF THE RIGHTS OF MAN AND OF THE CITIZEN that
came into existence in the summer of 1789

LES AUSPICES DE LETRE SUPRÊME / MARS EGO: #958

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xzCEdSKMkdU>


#23, #77, #55, #01, #67
#38, #29, #12, #58, #24
#80, #57, #28, #16, #48
#66, #14, #60, #25, #10
#05, #73, #19, #71, #02


DOLF: "France's Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen
came into existence in the summer of 1789, born of an idea of the
Constituent Assembly, which was formed by the assembly of the Estates
General to draft a new Constitution, and precede it with a declaration >>>> of principles.

GOOGLE TRANSLATION: "Consequently, the National Assembly recognizes
and declares, in the presence and under the auspices of the *SUPREME*
*BEING* [en presence et sous les auspices de lEtre suprême], the
following rights of man and citizen."

There were many proposals. The Constituent Assembly tasked five
deputies – Démeunier, La Luzerne, Tronchet, Mirabeau et Redon – with >>>> examining the various draft declarations, combining them into a single

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)