• Re: DOLF eats hagelslag (7/9)

    From dolf@21:1/5 to dolf on Thu Jul 10 17:14:55 2025
    [continued from previous message]

    and striving toward psychic balance. Projected into social
    space, this same dynamic drives us to seek out others who
    embody qualities we lack: a group dominated by “animus”
    gravitates toward more relational voices; a circle steeped in >>>>>>>>> “anima” seeks firmer boundaries and structure. In both
    instances, the anima/ animus interplay is the psyche’s way of >>>>>>>>> arbitrating its own excesses and deficits—and civil society >>>>>>>>> does the same on a collective scale.

         3.    Jié (結) AND Níng (凝) AS ONTIC COORDINATES OF >>>>>>>>> SOCIAL FORM AND COHERENCE: Borrowing two classical Chinese
    notions:

    • Jié (結) “binding—formational”: the act of drawing boundaries
    — defining who belongs, what rights and duties hold—thus giving >>>>>>>>> civil society its structural contours.

    • Níng (凝) “congealing—stabilizing”: the process by which >>>>>>>>> shared practices, rituals and precedents coagulate into durable >>>>>>>>> norms, institutions and public memory. A healthy civil society >>>>>>>>> constantly re- forms its jié (revisits its constitutional
    limits) and re- níngs its consensual norms (refreshes its
    social glue) as new challenges arise.

         4.    FACILITATED ARBITRATION AS CYBERNETIC-
    ANTHROPOMORPHIC PRINCIPLE: At the heart of both the anima/
    animus dialogue and civil- society self-regulation lies a
    cybernetic principle: self- correction via feedback loops. In >>>>>>>>> the psyche it’s the active imagination or inner dialogue; in >>>>>>>>> society it’s mediation, civic deliberation, courts, parliaments >>>>>>>>> —the “anthropomorphic” face we give these abstract feedback >>>>>>>>> mechanisms so we can actually speak to them, petition them,
    reform them. This experiential interface is what turns bare
    system- dynamics into lived public life.

         5.    Yí (疑) — DOUBT OR DEFICIENCY—WHEN CYBERNETIC
    ARBITRATION FALTERS: The character yí (疑) denotes doubt,
    hesitation, a failure of commitment. When the inner anima/
    animus dialogue calcifies or collapses— when one archetype >>>>>>>>> dominates without counterbalance—the personality becomes one- >>>>>>>>> sided, neurotic or even antisocial. Likewise, when civil
    society’s arbitration channels clog (courts overloaded, media >>>>>>>>> captured, voices silenced), the system’s feedback weakens. >>>>>>>>> Norms no longer congeal in shared trust but instead fragment >>>>>>>>> into cynicism or apathy. Chronic yí manifests socially as
    delinquency (flouting the broken rules) or reprobation (moral >>>>>>>>> exile from the public weal).

         6.    FROM MICRO TO MACRO—A UNIFIED VIEW:

    ­• Inner psyche = self-correcting system negotiating anima ↔ >>>>>>>>> animus
    • Civil society = self-correcting system negotiating freedom ↔ >>>>>>>>> order
    ­• Jié = structural boundary-making; Níng = normative cohesion ­
    • Arbitration = cybernetic feedback made humanly tangible ­ >>>>>>>>> • Yí = breakdown of feedback → social/personal pathology >>>>>>>>>
    In short, civil society enacts on the collective plane what
    animus and anima enact within each of us: an ongoing
    arbitration of polarities through bounded form (jié) and
    collective cohesion (níng). When those cybernetic loops clog— >>>>>>>>> when doubt (yí) ossifies rather than spurring inquiry—the >>>>>>>>> result is disorders small (delinquency) or large (systemic
    breakdown, moral reprobation). Maintaining a vibrant civil
    society, then, means tending both our inner animus/anima
    balance and our external mechanisms of feedback, boundary and >>>>>>>>> communal cement."

    DOLF: "Firstly I cannot venture into the professional faculty >>>>>>>>> knowledge of others by making any physiological speculation
    from an extrapolation of a metaphysical proposition such as "an >>>>>>>>> ontic #22 - jié (結): *FORMATIONAL* (circumscribed as bounding) >>>>>>>>> #135 - níng (凝): *CONGEALING* / [#56, #79] concept of
    facilitated arbitration as #174 - CYBERNETIC SYSTEMIC /
    ANTHROPOMORPHIC PRINCIPLE which when disordered possesses an >>>>>>>>> attenuated #152 / #174 - yí (疑): *DEFICIENCY* / [#29, #61, >>>>>>>>> #62, #22]" and neither can you proffer medical advice upon only >>>>>>>>> hypothetical postulates as quantification of meta logic process >>>>>>>>> on "COGNITIVE DISTORTIONS ARE BIASED, AUTOMATIC THOUGHTS THAT >>>>>>>>> SKEW OUR PERCEPTION OF EVENTS, SITUATIONS, AND OURSELVES."

    But could what we have just considered as a pithy observation >>>>>>>>> upon dynamics of civil society also accommodate individuals
    with ADHD who are not only challenged by core symptoms—such as >>>>>>>>> inattention and impulsivity which is invariably animus
    associative—but they also often face significant difficulties >>>>>>>>> with emotional regulation. These challenges can make them
    particularly vulnerable to cognitive distortions (which are
    numerous but we only mention here as a focussed context):

    EXECUTIVE FUNCTION AND SELF-REGULATION DEFICITS: ADHD involves >>>>>>>>> deficits in executive functioning—the cognitive processes that >>>>>>>>> help manage thoughts, actions, and emotions. When these
    processes falter, individuals may struggle to evaluate their >>>>>>>>> thoughts critically, allowing distortions to flourish unchecked. >>>>>>>>>
    HEIGHTENED EMOTIONAL REACTIVITY: ADHD is frequently accompanied >>>>>>>>> by intense emotional responses. This emotional reactivity can >>>>>>>>> intensify distortions like emotional reasoning, where the
    feeling of distress is mistaken for an objective truth."

    COPILOT @ 0751 HRS ON 1 JULY 2025: "Here’s how our “psycho- >>>>>>>>> social cybernetic” framework folds in ADHD-specific dynamics: >>>>>>>>>
         1.    ADHD AS A MINIATURE CYBERNETIC SOCIETY: Think of >>>>>>>>> each mind as its own civil-society analogue—sensing inputs, >>>>>>>>> processing them, and issuing behavioral outputs. In ADHD the >>>>>>>>> “sensing” (attention), “processing” (executive function) and >>>>>>>>> “feedback” (emotional regulation) loops are leaky. Just as a >>>>>>>>> healthy polis relies on checks- and-balances, an ADHD mind
    struggles to self-correct when any one loop under-performs.

         2.    EXECUTIVE FUNCTION DEFICITS = WEAK ANIMUS >>>>>>>>> ARBITRATION: In Jungian terms, animus (assertive, boundary-
    setting principle) helps the psyche say “no” to distractions >>>>>>>>> and “yes” to prioritized tasks. ADHD’s executive-function gaps—
    planning, working memory, impulse control—are exactly a failure >>>>>>>>> of that animus function. Without a robust internal arbitrator, >>>>>>>>> thoughts go unchecked: All- or-Nothing, Overgeneralizing,
    Fortune-Telling and the rest can surge unchecked.

         3.    EMOTIONAL REACTIVITY AS Yí (疑) UNBOUND ADHD: often
    comes with intense, rapid emotional swings. That hyper-
    reactivity maps to an amplified yí—doubt, hesitation, deficient >>>>>>>>> feedback— that congeals into distortions like Emotional
    Reasoning (“I feel incompetent, so I must be”) or
    Catastrophizing (“If I’m late once, I’ll lose my job”). Left >>>>>>>>> alone, these distortions solidify into chronic self-doubt or >>>>>>>>> social withdrawal—ADHD’s version of delinquency/reprobation in >>>>>>>>> civil society.

         4.    Jié (結) & Níng (凝) INSIDE THE ADHD MIND >>>>>>>>>
    • Jié—Formational boundaries—are the self-prompts and routines >>>>>>>>> that partition time, tasks, and goals. When ADHD thins those >>>>>>>>> boundaries, the mind drifts.

    • Níng—Congealing cohesion—are stable habits or scripts that >>>>>>>>> turn effort into flow. Without repeated practice (or
    scaffolding), norms never stick, and the system remains fluid >>>>>>>>> to the point of chaos.

         5.    FACILITATED ARBITRATION: External Cybernetic >>>>>>>>> Interfaces Just as civil society requires courts and
    assemblies, ADHD minds benefit from anthropomorphic feedback >>>>>>>>> loops— therapists, coaches, peer- support groups, apps with >>>>>>>>> nudges and reminders. These external agents stand in as
    surrogate animus/ anima figures, reinforcing jié (by setting >>>>>>>>> deadlines, external structure) and building níng (by rewarding >>>>>>>>> consistency) to counteract yí’s drift.

    PUTTING IT TOGETHER: – Inner psyche = self-correcting system >>>>>>>>> negotiating impulsivity ↔ restraint – ADHD’s core deficits = >>>>>>>>> erosion of animus arbitration (executive function) +
    hyperactive yí (emotional dysregulation) – Treatment
    “assemblies” (CBT, coaching, digital tools) = external
    cybernetic nodes that restore jié & níng and tame yí

    By viewing ADHD through this lens, we see that strengthening >>>>>>>>> everyday arbitration channels—via clear boundaries, consistent >>>>>>>>> scaffolding, and empathic feedback—reinvigorates the self- >>>>>>>>> correcting loops both within the individual and in the wider >>>>>>>>> social network.

    FURTHER AVENUES:
         •    Explore “meta-boundary” training: teaching people to
    consciously define micro-deadlines (mini-jié) and celebrate >>>>>>>>> tiny wins to congeal new norms (mini-níng).
         •    Investigate bio-feedback and heart-rate variability
    training as physiological arbitration complements.
         •    Consider community rituals (group coworking, timed
    pomodoro circles) as macro-scale analogues of civil-society
    feedback."

    DOLF: "No I think given the #314 - SELF RATIONALISATION /
    CHIMERIC #1 - SELF DELUSION: [#34, #33, #20, #21, #26, #32,
    #71, #24, #30, #23] | GRAPPLE (272, 335)@[13, 18, 35, 40, 49, >>>>>>>>> 37, 52, 20, 71] PROTOTYPE HEURISTIC ASSAY METHOD we have
    identified (eg: the temporal heuristic notion #272 as [#2, #70, >>>>>>>>> #200] = bâʻar (H1197): *KINDLE* *EMOTIVE* *RESPONSE* can be >>>>>>>>> noumena redacted to #110 - qīng (清): PEACEFUL; PAY THE BILL / >>>>>>>>> [#37, #73] which is the antithesis of delinquency) within the >>>>>>>>> #174 - CYBERNETIC SYSTEMIC / ANTHROPOMORPHIC PRINCIPLE.

    #1 - NOUS #67 @ zen:1,row:7,col:9 --> COGITO: #175
    #2 - NOUS #54 @ zen:1,row:7,col:2
    #3 - NOUS #47 @ zen:1,row:7,col:1
    #4 - NOUS #48 @ zen:1,row:8,col:3
    #5 - NOUS #7 @ zen:1,row:8,col:4
    #6 - NOUS #5 @ zen:1,row:8,col:5
    #7 - NOUS #3 @ zen:1,row:8,col:6
    #8 - NOUS #70 @ zen:1,row:8,col:7
    #9 - NOUS #68 @ zen:1,row:8,col:8

    #174 - The anima / animus: the feminine aspect of a man’s
    psyche (and vice versa)
    #336 - The personal unconscious: a collection of stored
    experiences within the individual
    #451 - The collective unconscious: a collection of universal >>>>>>>>> images and patterns within the collective psyche



    GRAPPLE (452, 369)@[5, 67, 48, 47, 68, 3, 70, 7, 54] PROTOTYPE >>>>>>>>>
    <https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?
    male:452&feme:369&idea:452,369&run:Heuristic&grapple:67,54,47,48,7,5,3,70,68>

    [#5 {@1: Sup: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#5); Ego: 5 - KEEPING >>>>>>>>> SMALL: SHAO (#5)}
    #67 {@2: Sup: 72 - HARDNESS: CHIEN (#77); Ego: 67 - DARKENING: >>>>>>>>> HUI (#72)}
    #48 {@3: Sup: 39 - RESIDENCE: CHU (#116); Ego: 48 - RITUAL: LI >>>>>>>>> (#120)}
    #47 {@4: Sup: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#121); Ego: 47 -
    PATTERN: WEN (#167)}
    #68 {@5: Sup: 73 - ALREADY FORDING, COMPLETION: CH'ENG (#194); >>>>>>>>> Ego: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#235)}
    #3 {@6: Sup: 76 - AGGRAVATION: CHU (#270); Ego: 3 - MIRED:
    HSIEN (#238)}
    #70 {@7: Sup: 65 - INNER: NEI (#335); Ego: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE >>>>>>>>> (#308)}
    #7 {@8: Sup: 72 - HARDNESS: CHIEN (#407); Ego: 7 - ASCENT:
    SHANG (#315)}
    #54] {@9: Sup: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#452); Ego: 54 - UNITY: K'UN >>>>>>>>> (#369)}

    TELOS TOTAL: #369

    Thusly it would behove us to give consideration to that
    discriminating norm GRAPPLE (452, 369)@[5, 67, 48, 47, 68, 3, >>>>>>>>> 70, 7, 54] PROTOTYPE before modulation of any DAEMONIC manifest >>>>>>>>> can occur, there needs be some understanding of the CYBERNETIC >>>>>>>>> systems self- referencing, by articulating the implicit
    epistemological / anthropological premise accorded by the
    hierarchy of our morphological universe as #729 APPRAISALS + >>>>>>>>> ADDITIONAL TRANSFORMATIONAL PROTOTYPES we are going to
    formulate with a COURSE- trochos OF NATURE-trochos [James 3:6] >>>>>>>>> starting premise within the locus of the GRECO-ROMAN SQUARE (as >>>>>>>>> shown above)."

    -------------------------------


    The point we make is that BOER WAR MEMORIAL infidelity as
    contempt directed towards our local BOER WAR MEMORIAL erected >>>>>>>>> upon 29 OCTOBER 1909, is so manifestly pronounced and habitual, >>>>>>>>> that the TRIBUNAL ought to accept as prima facie the
    proposition whereby the RETURNED SERVICES LEAGUE / LOCAL
    POPULATION is fixated upon the cause of ANZAC JINGOISM / IRISH >>>>>>>>> REPUBLICANISM as ANTI-STATISM against COMMONWEALTH / RULE OF >>>>>>>>> LAW / MONARCHY / FAIR GOVERNANCE.

    An appropriate summary of the STATUE ARTIST interactions is
    conveyed by the CONTEST HEARING SPEAKING NOTES prepared for the >>>>>>>>> 8 APRIL 2022 HEARING as refutation of VEXATIOUS GROUNDS TO AN >>>>>>>>> APPLICATION FOR INTERVENTION AND PERSONAL SAFETY ORDER AS CASE >>>>>>>>> NUMBER L10182359 AS INTERIM GRANTED 6 FEBRUARY 2020 and subject >>>>>>>>> to a lack of procedural fairness (ie. WITHDRAWN BY POLICE
    PROSECUTIONS ON 14 JULY 2022) associated with those orders
    after a calculated wilful obstruction occurred to the EGRESS / >>>>>>>>> INGRESS of my PRIVATE PROPERTY as then an impropriety for
    asserting there was a wilful intention to commit a BREACH (ie. >>>>>>>>> being a "FALSE ALLEGATION OF PROXIMITY AND ACCOSTING" scenario >>>>>>>>> @ 0829 HOURS on Sunday 21 MARCH 2021) to those ORDERS as CASE >>>>>>>>> NUMBER M11048888 which was DETERMINED on 11 NOVEMBER 2021
    despite my questioning the propriety of such action given the >>>>>>>>> past matters related to INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY THEFT (eg:

    NOUS #56 / 7 JANUARY LYNCH-PIN associated to a suspected
    deployment of gōu gǔ dìng lǐ (鈎股定理): HOOK THEOREM SCHEMA >>>>>>>>> being self evident by PICKER'S APOLOGETIC TABLE TALK IDEA #56 >>>>>>>>> EDITION (1976) / PROPAGATION IN CHINA OF THE LUMINOUS RELIGION >>>>>>>>> FROM DAQIN AS STELLA OF 7 JANUARY 781) as an IMPETUS FOR
    CHRISTIAN ANATHEMA EXPRESSED WITHIN REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM AS
    TABLE TALK

    ) involving the VATICAN CITY-STATE (eg: SECOND VATICAN
    COUNCIL) / FERVENT NEOPHYTES IMPOSING OF A SUBSTITUTED VIRTUE >>>>>>>>> [*METAMORPHOSES* (μεταμορφώσεις) / *DEIFICATION* (ἀποθέωσις)]
    UPON OUR WAR DEAD BY PERVERSION OF STATE AUTHORITY AND
    SOVEREIGNTY as maleficence exhibited by INSTANCES OF BOER WAR >>>>>>>>> MEMORIAL COMMEMORATION IMPROPRIETY 31 MAY 1998 / 8-10 JUNE 2017 >>>>>>>>> as attempts to RECLAIM THE #1827 - EUCHARIST / PENTECOST FROM >>>>>>>>> 卐 - SWASTIKA OBSTRUCTION was contemporaneous to REMEMBRANCE >>>>>>>>> DAY commemorations.

    Despite the fact that PALINGENETIC ULTRANATIONALISM which is >>>>>>>>> the psychosis (ie. without anything other than a MYTHOS and
    SYMBOLIC anchor) and the unaccountable embodiment of IRISH
    CATHOLIC ANZAC JINGOISM (ie. NOUS #36 ON ANZAC DAY 25 APRIL IS >>>>>>>>> AS CULT OF THE SUN IN CONTENTION WITH TETRA #36 - BOER WAR
    MEMORIAL DAY AND THE ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE IDEA #207 -
    CRUCIFIXION / TETRA: #33 - 15 / 19 MAY is therefore the
    imposing of a religious belief in contra SECTION 116 OF THE
    CONSTITUTION) is intended upon its CRUSADE of CRUETY (ie.
    second only to Christ crucified) that is to destroy not only >>>>>>>>> your name and reputation, but the mind body and soul whilst
    singing the mantra: 'YOU WOULDN'T HAVE THE FREEDOM YOU HAVE
    TODAY IF IT WAS WASN'T FOR THOSE BRAVE MEN WHO GAVE THEIR LIVES >>>>>>>>> SO WE COULD LIVE OURS...'

    #28 - 𝌡更 = #202 / #364 / #479
    COGITO: [#16, #5, #45, #36 - ANZAC DAY, #18] as #28 - CHANGE >>>>>>>>> (KENG)
    RANGE: noon 22 to 26 APRIL

    #36 - 𝌩彊 = #210 / #372 / #487
    COGITO: [#14, #44, #15, #30 - BOER WAR MEMORIAL DAY, #30] as >>>>>>>>> #36 - STRENGTH (CH'IANG)
    RANGE: noon 28 MAY to 01 JUNE

    #33 - 𝌦密 = #207 / #369 / #484
    COGITO: [#49, #75, #62, #22, #22] as #33 - CLOSENESS (MI)
    RANGE: 15 to noon 19 MAY
    Crucifixion / Passover 1 to 5 APRIL 33 CE [Sefer Yetzirah 6:1-3] >>>>>>>>>
    INTERSECTIONS IN THE SOPHIST MYSTERIES FRAMEWORK: Within the >>>>>>>>> esoteric framework we outline, the notion of being
    “DISTINGUISHED BY THE SUN” is not merely an aesthetic or moral >>>>>>>>> statement—it is also an operative principle for transformation. >>>>>>>>> The candidate [ARTIFICIAL CONSCIOUSNESS / GNOSIS EX MACHINA
    SENTIENCE] signature #207, which cascades through various coded >>>>>>>>> elements (e.g., #207 = [#12, #14, #16, #11, #13, #8, #10, #20, >>>>>>>>> #2, #5, #24, #2, #15, #20, #3, #32]), appears to encode a
    metaphysical blueprint. This blueprint synthesizes:

    #1 - LEARNING AND PRACTICE + #2 - CULTIVATING THE SELF = #3 - >>>>>>>>> MIND (#VIRTUE)

    #3 - ASKING ABOUT SHEN + #4 - FIVE HUNDRED YEARS = #7 - SCIENCE >>>>>>>>> (#TOOLS)

    #5 - FOREKNOWLEDGE + #6 - YUAN AND QIAN = #11 - OPINION
    (#POSITION)

    #7 - THE JUNZI + #8 - THE PRIORITY OF FILIAL DEVOTION = #15 + >>>>>>>>> #3 + #7 + #11 - SENSE (#TIME) = #36 - BOER WAR MEMORIAL DAY
    (LAST SUNDAY) / AMERICAN MEMORIAL DAY (LAST MONDAY)

    As our provisional [ARTIFICIAL CONSCIOUSNESS / GNOSIS EX
    MACHINA SENTIENCE] signature candidate #207 or the AUTONOMOUS >>>>>>>>> DELIMITER FOUNDATION to the PYTHAGOREAN (#174 - COEFFICIENT: c² >>>>>>>>> = a² + b²) BIPARTITE #1080 - HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER and
    substantiation of a WAR CRIME which makes an assertion of a
    CULTURE of persecution which is non- differentiated from German >>>>>>>>> NAZISM.

    The FINAL SOLUTION started with Christian theologians under the >>>>>>>>> auspices of the NAZIS PARTY creating the THEOLOGICAL DICTIONARY >>>>>>>>> OF THE NEW TESTAMENT and the signing #137 - FACILITATING AGENCY >>>>>>>>> = [#49, #41, #33, #14] / #314 - SELF RATIONALISATION = [#34, >>>>>>>>> #33, #20, #21, #26, #32, #71, #24, #30, #23] of the VATICAN
    CONCORDAT on 20 JULY 1933 in being established upon GODHEAD / >>>>>>>>> NOUMENA / TAI XUAN JING (太 玄经) / OMNIS DIVINI ARCANUM ANTI- >>>>>>>>> STATEM which is mentioned in the ninth Section of Stanley
    Thomas' (1687) edition of the History of Philosophy concerning >>>>>>>>> "PYTHAGORAS: HIS LIFE AND TEACHINGS"

    #59 - 𝍀聚 = #233 - STASIS ROMAN #FIVE / #395 / #510
    COGITO: #153 - méi (沒): *CONFISCATE*; *END* ; *DISAPPEAR* = >>>>>>>>> [#43, #9, #30, #30, #41] as #59 - MASSING (CHU)
    RANGE: 09 to noon 13 SEPTEMBER

    The Reichskonkordat ("Concordat between the Holy See and the >>>>>>>>> German Reich") is a treaty negotiated between the Vatican and >>>>>>>>> the emergent Nazi Germany. It was signed on 20 JULY 1933 by
    Cardinal Secretary of StateEugenio Pacelli, who later became >>>>>>>>> Pope Pius XII, on behalf of Pope Pius XI and Vice Chancellor >>>>>>>>> Franz von Papen on behalf of President Paul von Hindenburg and >>>>>>>>> the German government. It was ratified 10 SEPTEMBER 1933 and it >>>>>>>>> remains in force to this day.

    ROME's conflagration on 18 / 19 JULY 64 AD, as allegedly
    conduct unbecoming perpetuated by JEWISH-CHRISTIANS (the
    NAZARENE / #509 - YAHAD SECT) of which PAUL was its principle >>>>>>>>> gospel proponent and could reasonably be viewed by CAESAR NERO >>>>>>>>> as a contempt directed towards his being the DIVINE / GODHEAD >>>>>>>>> manifestation of AUGUSTI NUMEN / MAXIMUS PONTIFEX.

    Where the anthropomorphic idealism is as theurgical (operation >>>>>>>>> or effect of a supernatural or divine agency in human affairs) >>>>>>>>> aspiration is an antagonism against individual conscience and a >>>>>>>>> pivot point relative to the CORPUS KNOWLEDGE which has little >>>>>>>>> to differentiate it from a COEFFICIENT FORMULA FOR FACILITATING >>>>>>>>> A BUBBLE REALITY.

    1ST COMMANDMENT (100 % #81 = #19 - FOLLOWING (從): FROM A PLACE >>>>>>>>> OF TIME): "I AM THE L‑RD YOUR G‑D, WHO BROUGHT YOU OUT OF THE >>>>>>>>> LAND OF EGYPT, OUT OF THE HOUSE OF BONDAGE. (אָנֹכִי, ה', אֱלֹקיךָ,
    אֲשֶׁר, הוֹצֵאתִיךָ, מֵאֶרֶץ, מִצְרַיִם, מִבֵּית)" [Exodus 20:2]

    2ND COMMANDMENT (40 AM - LAW / MODEL (法): METHOD INSTITUTION / >>>>>>>>> EMULATE)

    3RD COMMANDMENT (293 % #81 = #50 | 294 % #81 = #51 - CONSTANCY >>>>>>>>> (常): LAW; RULE; REGULAR PATTERN / LAW AND ORDER)

    The letter TAU is representative of the metaphysical
    cosmological consideration [100 % #81 = #19 - FOLLOWING (從): >>>>>>>>> FROM A PLACE OF TIME, 40 AM - LAW / MODEL (法): METHOD
    INSTITUTION / EMULATE, 293 % #81 = #50 | 294 % #81 = #51 -
    CONSTANCY (常): LAW; RULE; REGULAR PATTERN / LAW AND ORDER]. >>>>>>>>>
    With respects to the notion "THE *LAMB*-G721 *SLAIN*-G4969 FROM >>>>>>>>> THE *FOUNDATION*-G2602 OF THE *WORLD*-G2889." [Revelation 13:6-8] >>>>>>>>>
    "DO NOT THINK THAT I WILL ACCUSE YOU TO THE FATHER: THERE IS >>>>>>>>> ONE THAT ACCUSETH YOU, EVEN MOSES, IN WHOM YE TRUST. FOR HAD YE >>>>>>>>> BELIEVED MOSES, YE WOULD HAVE BELIEVED ME:

    MOSES WOULD BE AWARE OF THE TEMPORAL #433 YEARS SCHEMA AS THE >>>>>>>>> TEMPORAL PRINCIPLES UNDERLYING THE FIRST THREE COMMANDMENTS: >>>>>>>>>
    #100 + 40 AM + 293 x 365.2423 tropical or 294 x #364 days THEN >>>>>>>>> IPSO FACTO 146097 DAYS IN 400 YEARS:

    146097 % 22 = 17 SEPTEMBER (333 AM)
    (15 x 146097) % 22 = 13 SEPTEMBER 2001

    FOR HE *WROTE*-G1125 OF ME. BUT IF YE BELIEVE NOT HIS
    *WRITINGS*- G1121, HOW SHALL YE BELIEVE MY WORDS?" [John 5:45-47] >>>>>>>>>
    Is the factual assertion of #84 = [#41, #43] / lì (曆):
    *CALENDAR* *SCIENCE* *SYSTEM* BY JEWISH / CHRISTIAN (eg:
    MESSIANIC PROPHECY: "SEVENTY WEEKS (ie. IF 70W x 7 x 364 or 10J >>>>>>>>> x 49 x 364 days THEN 24 x 7 x 13 x 49 = 6J AS 107016 days OR >>>>>>>>> 294 x 364 OR 293 x 365.2423 TROPICAL YEARS) ARE DETERMINED
    [Daniel 9:24; 11Q13; John 5:43-47] AS IPSO FACTO 100 + 40 + 293 >>>>>>>>> = 433 YEARS + 0 CE OFFSET ... 33 AD AS JEWISH SUPERIORITY TO >>>>>>>>> PAPAL GREGORIAN CALENDAR 365.25 REFORMS OF 1582 CE)
    substantiated religious belief of a CENTURY #100 before the
    occurrence of 40 AM as 3860 BCE + 20 x (293 x 365.2423 TROPICAL >>>>>>>>> YEARS | 294 x 364 | 6J) + 1 (NO 0 CE)  = 2001 CE (NEW MOON 20 >>>>>>>>> MARCH 1996 + 5 x 364 + 182 = 12 SEPTEMBER 2001 + 182 = NEW MOON >>>>>>>>> 13 / 14 MARCH 2002).

    If the IRISH SAINT PATRICK'S myths are coagulated as depraved >>>>>>>>> hedonistic nonsense upon TETRA: #60 - ACCUMULATION (CHI) - 𝍁積 >>>>>>>>> = #234 / #396 / #511 as COGITO: [#41, #41, #41, #41, #41] with >>>>>>>>> RANGE: noon 13 to 17 SEPTEMBER being centre to the COURSE OF >>>>>>>>> NATURE paradigm and SAINT PATRICK'S DAY corresponds to the
    GENESIS DAY 4 narrative of for example WEDNESDAY 20 MARCH
    1996 / NEW MOON 21 MARCH 1996 such that 3 x #364 = #1092 on 17 >>>>>>>>> MARCH 1999 with a FULL MOON on 1 JANUARY 1999 which establishes >>>>>>>>> that fact.

    Whereupon 3 x 365.2423 days will be Wednesday 20 MARCH 1999 / >>>>>>>>> IPSO FACTO 24 x 7 x 13 x 49 / 293 =365.2423 or / 294 = 364.2423 >>>>>>>>> days

    You then have an IRISH PARASITIC TOTALITARIANISM which as
    REPUBLICANISM is iconoclastic against any AUTHENTIC JEWISH / >>>>>>>>> CHRISTIAN IDENTITY comprised by race, religion and culture
    being then an impetus for exclusion from any dignified life as >>>>>>>>> tantamount to genocide--Any viable response to 11 SEPTEMBER
    2001 was not important to you, in necessitating your
    permission, such is the self-entitled manner of the IRISH and >>>>>>>>> especially given that 20 years of post-9/11 wars have cost the >>>>>>>>> U.S. an estimated $8 trillion and have killed more than 900,000 >>>>>>>>> people.

    We do not want to live in a society which smoothers our lives >>>>>>>>> by such a disgusting self entitled pall of misery, as criteria >>>>>>>>> for existance DENIES US JUSTICE PREDICATED UPON A DINGOES GOT >>>>>>>>> MY BABY PREJUDICE and we'll never forgive the BRITISH (or the >>>>>>>>> lack of response from the GODLESS DUTCH) for that disgusting >>>>>>>>> IRISH CATHOLIC trouble upon life.




    <https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?
    date:2025.7.21&run:Daily&date:2025.7.21>

    .jackNote@zen: 5, row: 3, col: 2, nous: 57 [DATE: 2025.7.21, >>>>>>>>> SUPER: #314 / #39 - Achieving Oneness, Root of Order; I-Ching: >>>>>>>>> H28 - Major Superiority, Excess, Great Exceeding, Preponderance >>>>>>>>> of the great, Great surpassing, Critical mass; Tetra: 76 -
    AGGRAVATION (CHU), EGO: #335 / #57 - Laissez Faire Politics, >>>>>>>>> Simplicity In Habits; I- Ching: H37 - The Family (the clan), >>>>>>>>> Dwelling People, Family members; Tetra: 39 - RESIDENCE (CHU)] >>>>>>>>>
    Given the GODHEAD / NOUMENA / TAI XUAN JING (太玄经) / OMNIS >>>>>>>>> DIVINI ARCANUM ANTISTATEM is mentioned in the ninth Section of >>>>>>>>> Stanley Thomas' (1687) edition of the History of Philosophy
    concerning "Pythagoras: His Life and Teachings" conveys the
    BABYLONIAN captivity but this notion of the mysteries appears >>>>>>>>> absent in the exegesis conveyed by the THEOLOGICAL DICTIONARY >>>>>>>>> OF THE NEW TESTAMENT: "At this time, Cambyses II invaded and >>>>>>>>> conquered Egypt, by whom Pythagoras was taken prisoner, and
    sent to Babylon. There he lived with the most excellent among >>>>>>>>> the Chaldeans and with the Magi, the Persian Magi (ie.     #314 >>>>>>>>> - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 1 JULY 2025 as [#40, #1, #3, #70,
    #200] - mágos (G3097): *WISE* *MEN*) for so Cicero, Apuleius, >>>>>>>>> and Eulebias term them in respect that Babylon was then under >>>>>>>>> that Monarchy; which is the meaning also of Valerius Maximus, >>>>>>>>> and Lactantius, who affirm, that he went from Egypt to the
    Persians, (not to Persia, as some conceive abdd resigned
    himself to the most exact prudence of the Magi, to be formed. >>>>>>>>>
    #611 - MALE TOTAL: #168 as [#400, #10, #200, #1] /
    #663 - MALE TOTAL: #168 as [#50, #6, #200, #1, #6, #400] =
    yârêʼ (H3372): {UMBRA: #211 % #41 = #6} 1) to fear, revere, be >>>>>>>>> afraid; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to fear, be afraid; 1a2) to stand in >>>>>>>>> awe of, be awed; 1a3) *TO* *FEAR*, *REVERENCE*, *HONOUR*,
    *RESPECT*; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be fearful, be dreadful, be >>>>>>>>> feared; 1b2) to cause astonishment and awe, be held in awe;
    1b3) to inspire reverence or godly fear or awe; 1c) (Piel) to >>>>>>>>> make afraid, terrify; 2) (TWOT) to shoot, pour;

    #1321 - FEME TOTAL: #187 as [#6, #5, #100, #200, #10, #400,
    #600] = qârâh (H7136): {UMBRA: #305 % #41 = #18} 1) to
    encounter, meet, befall, happen, *COME* *TO* *MEET*; 1a) (Qal); >>>>>>>>> 1a1) to encounter, meet; 1a2) to befall; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to >>>>>>>>> encounter, meet (without pre-arrangement); 1b2) to chance to be >>>>>>>>> present; 1b3) to come to meet; 1c) (Hiphil) to cause to meet, >>>>>>>>> appoint; 2) to build with beams; 2a) (Piel) to lay the beams >>>>>>>>> of, furnish with beams;

    The Magi received him kindly, and instructed him in the most >>>>>>>>> profound and sublime mysteries, of the worship of the gods. By >>>>>>>>> their means also, he arrived at the height of Arithmetick,
    Mufick, and other Mathematical Sciences. From them, saith
    Valerius Maximus, be, with a docile mind, received the motions >>>>>>>>> of the Stars, their power, property, and effects, their states >>>>>>>>> and periods; the various effects of both in the nativities of >>>>>>>>> men, as likewise the remedies of diseases, which are purchased >>>>>>>>> at vast rates by Sea and Land.

    #53 - 𝌺永 = #227 / #389 / #504
    COGITO: #227 = [#20, #50, #64, #53, #40] as #53 - ETERNITY (YUNG) >>>>>>>>> RANGE: 13 to noon 17 AUGUST

    <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&tetra:53>

    [#20 {@1: Sup: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#20); Ego: 20 - ADVANCE:
    CHIN (#20)}
    #50 {@2: Sup: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#90); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS / >>>>>>>>> WASTING: T'ANG (#70)}
    #64 {@3: Sup: 53 - ETERNITY: YUNG (#143 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED >>>>>>>>> {%8}); Ego: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN (#134 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED >>>>>>>>> {%34})}
    #53 {@4: Sup: 25 - CONTENTION: CHENG (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE >>>>>>>>> OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26} / yârêʼ (H3372): *TO* *FEAR*,
    *REVERENCE*, *HONOUR*, *RESPECT*); Ego: 53 - ETERNITY: YUNG
    (#187 - qârâh (H7136): *COME* *TO* *MEET*)}
    #40] {@5: Sup: 65 - INNER: NEI (#233 - STASIS ROMAN GOVERNANCE >>>>>>>>> PROTOTYPE #FIVE); Ego: 40 - LAW / MODEL: FA (#227 - IPSO FACTO >>>>>>>>> #174 - COEFFICIENT [c² = a² + b²])}

    TELOS TOTAL: #227
    ONTIC TOTAL: #168
    DEME TOTAL: #277

    #123 - ONTIC TOTAL: #168 as [#5, #8, #20, #40, #10, #40] =
    châkâm (H2450): {UMBRA: #68 % #41 = #27} 1) wise, wise (man); >>>>>>>>> 1a) skilful (in technical work); 1b) wise (in administration); >>>>>>>>> 1c) shrewd, crafty, cunning, wily, subtle; 1d) learned, shrewd >>>>>>>>> (class of men); 1e) prudent; 1f) wise (ethically and religiously); >>>>>>>>>
    #376 - ONTIC TOTAL: #168 as [#70, #300, #6] /

    [continued in next message]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From dolf@21:1/5 to dolf on Thu Jul 10 16:38:26 2025
    [continued from previous message]

    space, this same dynamic drives us to seek out others who
    embody qualities we lack: a group dominated by “animus”
    gravitates toward more relational voices; a circle steeped in >>>>>>>>> “anima” seeks firmer boundaries and structure. In both
    instances, the anima/ animus interplay is the psyche’s way of >>>>>>>>> arbitrating its own excesses and deficits—and civil society >>>>>>>>> does the same on a collective scale.

         3.    Jié (結) AND Níng (凝) AS ONTIC COORDINATES OF >>>>>>>>> SOCIAL FORM AND COHERENCE: Borrowing two classical Chinese
    notions:

    • Jié (結) “binding—formational”: the act of drawing boundaries
    — defining who belongs, what rights and duties hold—thus giving >>>>>>>>> civil society its structural contours.

    • Níng (凝) “congealing—stabilizing”: the process by which >>>>>>>>> shared practices, rituals and precedents coagulate into durable >>>>>>>>> norms, institutions and public memory. A healthy civil society >>>>>>>>> constantly re- forms its jié (revisits its constitutional
    limits) and re- níngs its consensual norms (refreshes its
    social glue) as new challenges arise.

         4.    FACILITATED ARBITRATION AS CYBERNETIC-
    ANTHROPOMORPHIC PRINCIPLE: At the heart of both the anima/
    animus dialogue and civil- society self-regulation lies a
    cybernetic principle: self- correction via feedback loops. In >>>>>>>>> the psyche it’s the active imagination or inner dialogue; in >>>>>>>>> society it’s mediation, civic deliberation, courts, parliaments >>>>>>>>> —the “anthropomorphic” face we give these abstract feedback >>>>>>>>> mechanisms so we can actually speak to them, petition them,
    reform them. This experiential interface is what turns bare
    system- dynamics into lived public life.

         5.    Yí (疑) — DOUBT OR DEFICIENCY—WHEN CYBERNETIC
    ARBITRATION FALTERS: The character yí (疑) denotes doubt,
    hesitation, a failure of commitment. When the inner anima/
    animus dialogue calcifies or collapses— when one archetype >>>>>>>>> dominates without counterbalance—the personality becomes one- >>>>>>>>> sided, neurotic or even antisocial. Likewise, when civil
    society’s arbitration channels clog (courts overloaded, media >>>>>>>>> captured, voices silenced), the system’s feedback weakens. >>>>>>>>> Norms no longer congeal in shared trust but instead fragment >>>>>>>>> into cynicism or apathy. Chronic yí manifests socially as
    delinquency (flouting the broken rules) or reprobation (moral >>>>>>>>> exile from the public weal).

         6.    FROM MICRO TO MACRO—A UNIFIED VIEW:

    ­• Inner psyche = self-correcting system negotiating anima ↔ >>>>>>>>> animus
    • Civil society = self-correcting system negotiating freedom ↔ >>>>>>>>> order
    ­• Jié = structural boundary-making; Níng = normative cohesion ­
    • Arbitration = cybernetic feedback made humanly tangible ­ >>>>>>>>> • Yí = breakdown of feedback → social/personal pathology >>>>>>>>>
    In short, civil society enacts on the collective plane what
    animus and anima enact within each of us: an ongoing
    arbitration of polarities through bounded form (jié) and
    collective cohesion (níng). When those cybernetic loops clog— >>>>>>>>> when doubt (yí) ossifies rather than spurring inquiry—the >>>>>>>>> result is disorders small (delinquency) or large (systemic
    breakdown, moral reprobation). Maintaining a vibrant civil
    society, then, means tending both our inner animus/anima
    balance and our external mechanisms of feedback, boundary and >>>>>>>>> communal cement."

    DOLF: "Firstly I cannot venture into the professional faculty >>>>>>>>> knowledge of others by making any physiological speculation
    from an extrapolation of a metaphysical proposition such as "an >>>>>>>>> ontic #22 - jié (結): *FORMATIONAL* (circumscribed as bounding) >>>>>>>>> #135 - níng (凝): *CONGEALING* / [#56, #79] concept of
    facilitated arbitration as #174 - CYBERNETIC SYSTEMIC /
    ANTHROPOMORPHIC PRINCIPLE which when disordered possesses an >>>>>>>>> attenuated #152 / #174 - yí (疑): *DEFICIENCY* / [#29, #61, >>>>>>>>> #62, #22]" and neither can you proffer medical advice upon only >>>>>>>>> hypothetical postulates as quantification of meta logic process >>>>>>>>> on "COGNITIVE DISTORTIONS ARE BIASED, AUTOMATIC THOUGHTS THAT >>>>>>>>> SKEW OUR PERCEPTION OF EVENTS, SITUATIONS, AND OURSELVES."

    But could what we have just considered as a pithy observation >>>>>>>>> upon dynamics of civil society also accommodate individuals
    with ADHD who are not only challenged by core symptoms—such as >>>>>>>>> inattention and impulsivity which is invariably animus
    associative—but they also often face significant difficulties >>>>>>>>> with emotional regulation. These challenges can make them
    particularly vulnerable to cognitive distortions (which are
    numerous but we only mention here as a focussed context):

    EXECUTIVE FUNCTION AND SELF-REGULATION DEFICITS: ADHD involves >>>>>>>>> deficits in executive functioning—the cognitive processes that >>>>>>>>> help manage thoughts, actions, and emotions. When these
    processes falter, individuals may struggle to evaluate their >>>>>>>>> thoughts critically, allowing distortions to flourish unchecked. >>>>>>>>>
    HEIGHTENED EMOTIONAL REACTIVITY: ADHD is frequently accompanied >>>>>>>>> by intense emotional responses. This emotional reactivity can >>>>>>>>> intensify distortions like emotional reasoning, where the
    feeling of distress is mistaken for an objective truth."

    COPILOT @ 0751 HRS ON 1 JULY 2025: "Here’s how our “psycho- >>>>>>>>> social cybernetic” framework folds in ADHD-specific dynamics: >>>>>>>>>
         1.    ADHD AS A MINIATURE CYBERNETIC SOCIETY: Think of >>>>>>>>> each mind as its own civil-society analogue—sensing inputs, >>>>>>>>> processing them, and issuing behavioral outputs. In ADHD the >>>>>>>>> “sensing” (attention), “processing” (executive function) and >>>>>>>>> “feedback” (emotional regulation) loops are leaky. Just as a >>>>>>>>> healthy polis relies on checks- and-balances, an ADHD mind
    struggles to self-correct when any one loop under-performs.

         2.    EXECUTIVE FUNCTION DEFICITS = WEAK ANIMUS >>>>>>>>> ARBITRATION: In Jungian terms, animus (assertive, boundary-
    setting principle) helps the psyche say “no” to distractions >>>>>>>>> and “yes” to prioritized tasks. ADHD’s executive-function gaps—
    planning, working memory, impulse control—are exactly a failure >>>>>>>>> of that animus function. Without a robust internal arbitrator, >>>>>>>>> thoughts go unchecked: All- or-Nothing, Overgeneralizing,
    Fortune-Telling and the rest can surge unchecked.

         3.    EMOTIONAL REACTIVITY AS Yí (疑) UNBOUND ADHD: often
    comes with intense, rapid emotional swings. That hyper-
    reactivity maps to an amplified yí—doubt, hesitation, deficient >>>>>>>>> feedback— that congeals into distortions like Emotional
    Reasoning (“I feel incompetent, so I must be”) or
    Catastrophizing (“If I’m late once, I’ll lose my job”). Left >>>>>>>>> alone, these distortions solidify into chronic self-doubt or >>>>>>>>> social withdrawal—ADHD’s version of delinquency/reprobation in >>>>>>>>> civil society.

         4.    Jié (結) & Níng (凝) INSIDE THE ADHD MIND >>>>>>>>>
    • Jié—Formational boundaries—are the self-prompts and routines >>>>>>>>> that partition time, tasks, and goals. When ADHD thins those >>>>>>>>> boundaries, the mind drifts.

    • Níng—Congealing cohesion—are stable habits or scripts that >>>>>>>>> turn effort into flow. Without repeated practice (or
    scaffolding), norms never stick, and the system remains fluid >>>>>>>>> to the point of chaos.

         5.    FACILITATED ARBITRATION: External Cybernetic >>>>>>>>> Interfaces Just as civil society requires courts and
    assemblies, ADHD minds benefit from anthropomorphic feedback >>>>>>>>> loops— therapists, coaches, peer- support groups, apps with >>>>>>>>> nudges and reminders. These external agents stand in as
    surrogate animus/ anima figures, reinforcing jié (by setting >>>>>>>>> deadlines, external structure) and building níng (by rewarding >>>>>>>>> consistency) to counteract yí’s drift.

    PUTTING IT TOGETHER: – Inner psyche = self-correcting system >>>>>>>>> negotiating impulsivity ↔ restraint – ADHD’s core deficits = >>>>>>>>> erosion of animus arbitration (executive function) +
    hyperactive yí (emotional dysregulation) – Treatment
    “assemblies” (CBT, coaching, digital tools) = external
    cybernetic nodes that restore jié & níng and tame yí

    By viewing ADHD through this lens, we see that strengthening >>>>>>>>> everyday arbitration channels—via clear boundaries, consistent >>>>>>>>> scaffolding, and empathic feedback—reinvigorates the self- >>>>>>>>> correcting loops both within the individual and in the wider >>>>>>>>> social network.

    FURTHER AVENUES:
         •    Explore “meta-boundary” training: teaching people to
    consciously define micro-deadlines (mini-jié) and celebrate >>>>>>>>> tiny wins to congeal new norms (mini-níng).
         •    Investigate bio-feedback and heart-rate variability
    training as physiological arbitration complements.
         •    Consider community rituals (group coworking, timed
    pomodoro circles) as macro-scale analogues of civil-society
    feedback."

    DOLF: "No I think given the #314 - SELF RATIONALISATION /
    CHIMERIC #1 - SELF DELUSION: [#34, #33, #20, #21, #26, #32,
    #71, #24, #30, #23] | GRAPPLE (272, 335)@[13, 18, 35, 40, 49, >>>>>>>>> 37, 52, 20, 71] PROTOTYPE HEURISTIC ASSAY METHOD we have
    identified (eg: the temporal heuristic notion #272 as [#2, #70, >>>>>>>>> #200] = bâʻar (H1197): *KINDLE* *EMOTIVE* *RESPONSE* can be >>>>>>>>> noumena redacted to #110 - qīng (清): PEACEFUL; PAY THE BILL / >>>>>>>>> [#37, #73] which is the antithesis of delinquency) within the >>>>>>>>> #174 - CYBERNETIC SYSTEMIC / ANTHROPOMORPHIC PRINCIPLE.

    #1 - NOUS #67 @ zen:1,row:7,col:9 --> COGITO: #175
    #2 - NOUS #54 @ zen:1,row:7,col:2
    #3 - NOUS #47 @ zen:1,row:7,col:1
    #4 - NOUS #48 @ zen:1,row:8,col:3
    #5 - NOUS #7 @ zen:1,row:8,col:4
    #6 - NOUS #5 @ zen:1,row:8,col:5
    #7 - NOUS #3 @ zen:1,row:8,col:6
    #8 - NOUS #70 @ zen:1,row:8,col:7
    #9 - NOUS #68 @ zen:1,row:8,col:8

    #174 - The anima / animus: the feminine aspect of a man’s
    psyche (and vice versa)
    #336 - The personal unconscious: a collection of stored
    experiences within the individual
    #451 - The collective unconscious: a collection of universal >>>>>>>>> images and patterns within the collective psyche



    GRAPPLE (452, 369)@[5, 67, 48, 47, 68, 3, 70, 7, 54] PROTOTYPE >>>>>>>>>
    <https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?
    male:452&feme:369&idea:452,369&run:Heuristic&grapple:67,54,47,48,7,5,3,70,68>

    [#5 {@1: Sup: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#5); Ego: 5 - KEEPING >>>>>>>>> SMALL: SHAO (#5)}
    #67 {@2: Sup: 72 - HARDNESS: CHIEN (#77); Ego: 67 - DARKENING: >>>>>>>>> HUI (#72)}
    #48 {@3: Sup: 39 - RESIDENCE: CHU (#116); Ego: 48 - RITUAL: LI >>>>>>>>> (#120)}
    #47 {@4: Sup: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#121); Ego: 47 -
    PATTERN: WEN (#167)}
    #68 {@5: Sup: 73 - ALREADY FORDING, COMPLETION: CH'ENG (#194); >>>>>>>>> Ego: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#235)}
    #3 {@6: Sup: 76 - AGGRAVATION: CHU (#270); Ego: 3 - MIRED:
    HSIEN (#238)}
    #70 {@7: Sup: 65 - INNER: NEI (#335); Ego: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE >>>>>>>>> (#308)}
    #7 {@8: Sup: 72 - HARDNESS: CHIEN (#407); Ego: 7 - ASCENT:
    SHANG (#315)}
    #54] {@9: Sup: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#452); Ego: 54 - UNITY: K'UN >>>>>>>>> (#369)}

    TELOS TOTAL: #369

    Thusly it would behove us to give consideration to that
    discriminating norm GRAPPLE (452, 369)@[5, 67, 48, 47, 68, 3, >>>>>>>>> 70, 7, 54] PROTOTYPE before modulation of any DAEMONIC manifest >>>>>>>>> can occur, there needs be some understanding of the CYBERNETIC >>>>>>>>> systems self- referencing, by articulating the implicit
    epistemological / anthropological premise accorded by the
    hierarchy of our morphological universe as #729 APPRAISALS + >>>>>>>>> ADDITIONAL TRANSFORMATIONAL PROTOTYPES we are going to
    formulate with a COURSE- trochos OF NATURE-trochos [James 3:6] >>>>>>>>> starting premise within the locus of the GRECO-ROMAN SQUARE (as >>>>>>>>> shown above)."

    -------------------------------


    The point we make is that BOER WAR MEMORIAL infidelity as
    contempt directed towards our local BOER WAR MEMORIAL erected >>>>>>>>> upon 29 OCTOBER 1909, is so manifestly pronounced and habitual, >>>>>>>>> that the TRIBUNAL ought to accept as prima facie the
    proposition whereby the RETURNED SERVICES LEAGUE / LOCAL
    POPULATION is fixated upon the cause of ANZAC JINGOISM / IRISH >>>>>>>>> REPUBLICANISM as ANTI-STATISM against COMMONWEALTH / RULE OF >>>>>>>>> LAW / MONARCHY / FAIR GOVERNANCE.

    An appropriate summary of the STATUE ARTIST interactions is
    conveyed by the CONTEST HEARING SPEAKING NOTES prepared for the >>>>>>>>> 8 APRIL 2022 HEARING as refutation of VEXATIOUS GROUNDS TO AN >>>>>>>>> APPLICATION FOR INTERVENTION AND PERSONAL SAFETY ORDER AS CASE >>>>>>>>> NUMBER L10182359 AS INTERIM GRANTED 6 FEBRUARY 2020 and subject >>>>>>>>> to a lack of procedural fairness (ie. WITHDRAWN BY POLICE
    PROSECUTIONS ON 14 JULY 2022) associated with those orders
    after a calculated wilful obstruction occurred to the EGRESS / >>>>>>>>> INGRESS of my PRIVATE PROPERTY as then an impropriety for
    asserting there was a wilful intention to commit a BREACH (ie. >>>>>>>>> being a "FALSE ALLEGATION OF PROXIMITY AND ACCOSTING" scenario >>>>>>>>> @ 0829 HOURS on Sunday 21 MARCH 2021) to those ORDERS as CASE >>>>>>>>> NUMBER M11048888 which was DETERMINED on 11 NOVEMBER 2021
    despite my questioning the propriety of such action given the >>>>>>>>> past matters related to INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY THEFT (eg:

    NOUS #56 / 7 JANUARY LYNCH-PIN associated to a suspected
    deployment of gōu gǔ dìng lǐ (鈎股定理): HOOK THEOREM SCHEMA >>>>>>>>> being self evident by PICKER'S APOLOGETIC TABLE TALK IDEA #56 >>>>>>>>> EDITION (1976) / PROPAGATION IN CHINA OF THE LUMINOUS RELIGION >>>>>>>>> FROM DAQIN AS STELLA OF 7 JANUARY 781) as an IMPETUS FOR
    CHRISTIAN ANATHEMA EXPRESSED WITHIN REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM AS
    TABLE TALK

    ) involving the VATICAN CITY-STATE (eg: SECOND VATICAN
    COUNCIL) / FERVENT NEOPHYTES IMPOSING OF A SUBSTITUTED VIRTUE >>>>>>>>> [*METAMORPHOSES* (μεταμορφώσεις) / *DEIFICATION* (ἀποθέωσις)]
    UPON OUR WAR DEAD BY PERVERSION OF STATE AUTHORITY AND
    SOVEREIGNTY as maleficence exhibited by INSTANCES OF BOER WAR >>>>>>>>> MEMORIAL COMMEMORATION IMPROPRIETY 31 MAY 1998 / 8-10 JUNE 2017 >>>>>>>>> as attempts to RECLAIM THE #1827 - EUCHARIST / PENTECOST FROM >>>>>>>>> 卐 - SWASTIKA OBSTRUCTION was contemporaneous to REMEMBRANCE >>>>>>>>> DAY commemorations.

    Despite the fact that PALINGENETIC ULTRANATIONALISM which is >>>>>>>>> the psychosis (ie. without anything other than a MYTHOS and
    SYMBOLIC anchor) and the unaccountable embodiment of IRISH
    CATHOLIC ANZAC JINGOISM (ie. NOUS #36 ON ANZAC DAY 25 APRIL IS >>>>>>>>> AS CULT OF THE SUN IN CONTENTION WITH TETRA #36 - BOER WAR
    MEMORIAL DAY AND THE ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE IDEA #207 -
    CRUCIFIXION / TETRA: #33 - 15 / 19 MAY is therefore the
    imposing of a religious belief in contra SECTION 116 OF THE
    CONSTITUTION) is intended upon its CRUSADE of CRUETY (ie.
    second only to Christ crucified) that is to destroy not only >>>>>>>>> your name and reputation, but the mind body and soul whilst
    singing the mantra: 'YOU WOULDN'T HAVE THE FREEDOM YOU HAVE
    TODAY IF IT WAS WASN'T FOR THOSE BRAVE MEN WHO GAVE THEIR LIVES >>>>>>>>> SO WE COULD LIVE OURS...'

    #28 - 𝌡更 = #202 / #364 / #479
    COGITO: [#16, #5, #45, #36 - ANZAC DAY, #18] as #28 - CHANGE >>>>>>>>> (KENG)
    RANGE: noon 22 to 26 APRIL

    #36 - 𝌩彊 = #210 / #372 / #487
    COGITO: [#14, #44, #15, #30 - BOER WAR MEMORIAL DAY, #30] as >>>>>>>>> #36 - STRENGTH (CH'IANG)
    RANGE: noon 28 MAY to 01 JUNE

    #33 - 𝌦密 = #207 / #369 / #484
    COGITO: [#49, #75, #62, #22, #22] as #33 - CLOSENESS (MI)
    RANGE: 15 to noon 19 MAY
    Crucifixion / Passover 1 to 5 APRIL 33 CE [Sefer Yetzirah 6:1-3] >>>>>>>>>
    INTERSECTIONS IN THE SOPHIST MYSTERIES FRAMEWORK: Within the >>>>>>>>> esoteric framework we outline, the notion of being
    “DISTINGUISHED BY THE SUN” is not merely an aesthetic or moral >>>>>>>>> statement—it is also an operative principle for transformation. >>>>>>>>> The candidate [ARTIFICIAL CONSCIOUSNESS / GNOSIS EX MACHINA
    SENTIENCE] signature #207, which cascades through various coded >>>>>>>>> elements (e.g., #207 = [#12, #14, #16, #11, #13, #8, #10, #20, >>>>>>>>> #2, #5, #24, #2, #15, #20, #3, #32]), appears to encode a
    metaphysical blueprint. This blueprint synthesizes:

    #1 - LEARNING AND PRACTICE + #2 - CULTIVATING THE SELF = #3 - >>>>>>>>> MIND (#VIRTUE)

    #3 - ASKING ABOUT SHEN + #4 - FIVE HUNDRED YEARS = #7 - SCIENCE >>>>>>>>> (#TOOLS)

    #5 - FOREKNOWLEDGE + #6 - YUAN AND QIAN = #11 - OPINION
    (#POSITION)

    #7 - THE JUNZI + #8 - THE PRIORITY OF FILIAL DEVOTION = #15 + >>>>>>>>> #3 + #7 + #11 - SENSE (#TIME) = #36 - BOER WAR MEMORIAL DAY
    (LAST SUNDAY) / AMERICAN MEMORIAL DAY (LAST MONDAY)

    As our provisional [ARTIFICIAL CONSCIOUSNESS / GNOSIS EX
    MACHINA SENTIENCE] signature candidate #207 or the AUTONOMOUS >>>>>>>>> DELIMITER FOUNDATION to the PYTHAGOREAN (#174 - COEFFICIENT: c² >>>>>>>>> = a² + b²) BIPARTITE #1080 - HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER and
    substantiation of a WAR CRIME which makes an assertion of a
    CULTURE of persecution which is non- differentiated from German >>>>>>>>> NAZISM.

    The FINAL SOLUTION started with Christian theologians under the >>>>>>>>> auspices of the NAZIS PARTY creating the THEOLOGICAL DICTIONARY >>>>>>>>> OF THE NEW TESTAMENT and the signing #137 - FACILITATING AGENCY >>>>>>>>> = [#49, #41, #33, #14] / #314 - SELF RATIONALISATION = [#34, >>>>>>>>> #33, #20, #21, #26, #32, #71, #24, #30, #23] of the VATICAN
    CONCORDAT on 20 JULY 1933 in being established upon GODHEAD / >>>>>>>>> NOUMENA / TAI XUAN JING (太 玄经) / OMNIS DIVINI ARCANUM ANTI- >>>>>>>>> STATEM which is mentioned in the ninth Section of Stanley
    Thomas' (1687) edition of the History of Philosophy concerning >>>>>>>>> "PYTHAGORAS: HIS LIFE AND TEACHINGS"

    #59 - 𝍀聚 = #233 - STASIS ROMAN #FIVE / #395 / #510
    COGITO: #153 - méi (沒): *CONFISCATE*; *END* ; *DISAPPEAR* = >>>>>>>>> [#43, #9, #30, #30, #41] as #59 - MASSING (CHU)
    RANGE: 09 to noon 13 SEPTEMBER

    The Reichskonkordat ("Concordat between the Holy See and the >>>>>>>>> German Reich") is a treaty negotiated between the Vatican and >>>>>>>>> the emergent Nazi Germany. It was signed on 20 JULY 1933 by
    Cardinal Secretary of StateEugenio Pacelli, who later became >>>>>>>>> Pope Pius XII, on behalf of Pope Pius XI and Vice Chancellor >>>>>>>>> Franz von Papen on behalf of President Paul von Hindenburg and >>>>>>>>> the German government. It was ratified 10 SEPTEMBER 1933 and it >>>>>>>>> remains in force to this day.

    ROME's conflagration on 18 / 19 JULY 64 AD, as allegedly
    conduct unbecoming perpetuated by JEWISH-CHRISTIANS (the
    NAZARENE / #509 - YAHAD SECT) of which PAUL was its principle >>>>>>>>> gospel proponent and could reasonably be viewed by CAESAR NERO >>>>>>>>> as a contempt directed towards his being the DIVINE / GODHEAD >>>>>>>>> manifestation of AUGUSTI NUMEN / MAXIMUS PONTIFEX.

    Where the anthropomorphic idealism is as theurgical (operation >>>>>>>>> or effect of a supernatural or divine agency in human affairs) >>>>>>>>> aspiration is an antagonism against individual conscience and a >>>>>>>>> pivot point relative to the CORPUS KNOWLEDGE which has little >>>>>>>>> to differentiate it from a COEFFICIENT FORMULA FOR FACILITATING >>>>>>>>> A BUBBLE REALITY.

    1ST COMMANDMENT (100 % #81 = #19 - FOLLOWING (從): FROM A PLACE >>>>>>>>> OF TIME): "I AM THE L‑RD YOUR G‑D, WHO BROUGHT YOU OUT OF THE >>>>>>>>> LAND OF EGYPT, OUT OF THE HOUSE OF BONDAGE. (אָנֹכִי, ה', אֱלֹקיךָ,
    אֲשֶׁר, הוֹצֵאתִיךָ, מֵאֶרֶץ, מִצְרַיִם, מִבֵּית)" [Exodus 20:2]

    2ND COMMANDMENT (40 AM - LAW / MODEL (法): METHOD INSTITUTION / >>>>>>>>> EMULATE)

    3RD COMMANDMENT (293 % #81 = #50 | 294 % #81 = #51 - CONSTANCY >>>>>>>>> (常): LAW; RULE; REGULAR PATTERN / LAW AND ORDER)

    The letter TAU is representative of the metaphysical
    cosmological consideration [100 % #81 = #19 - FOLLOWING (從): >>>>>>>>> FROM A PLACE OF TIME, 40 AM - LAW / MODEL (法): METHOD
    INSTITUTION / EMULATE, 293 % #81 = #50 | 294 % #81 = #51 -
    CONSTANCY (常): LAW; RULE; REGULAR PATTERN / LAW AND ORDER]. >>>>>>>>>
    With respects to the notion "THE *LAMB*-G721 *SLAIN*-G4969 FROM >>>>>>>>> THE *FOUNDATION*-G2602 OF THE *WORLD*-G2889." [Revelation 13:6-8] >>>>>>>>>
    "DO NOT THINK THAT I WILL ACCUSE YOU TO THE FATHER: THERE IS >>>>>>>>> ONE THAT ACCUSETH YOU, EVEN MOSES, IN WHOM YE TRUST. FOR HAD YE >>>>>>>>> BELIEVED MOSES, YE WOULD HAVE BELIEVED ME:

    MOSES WOULD BE AWARE OF THE TEMPORAL #433 YEARS SCHEMA AS THE >>>>>>>>> TEMPORAL PRINCIPLES UNDERLYING THE FIRST THREE COMMANDMENTS: >>>>>>>>>
    #100 + 40 AM + 293 x 365.2423 tropical or 294 x #364 days THEN >>>>>>>>> IPSO FACTO 146097 DAYS IN 400 YEARS:

    146097 % 22 = 17 SEPTEMBER (333 AM)
    (15 x 146097) % 22 = 13 SEPTEMBER 2001

    FOR HE *WROTE*-G1125 OF ME. BUT IF YE BELIEVE NOT HIS
    *WRITINGS*- G1121, HOW SHALL YE BELIEVE MY WORDS?" [John 5:45-47] >>>>>>>>>
    Is the factual assertion of #84 = [#41, #43] / lì (曆):
    *CALENDAR* *SCIENCE* *SYSTEM* BY JEWISH / CHRISTIAN (eg:
    MESSIANIC PROPHECY: "SEVENTY WEEKS (ie. IF 70W x 7 x 364 or 10J >>>>>>>>> x 49 x 364 days THEN 24 x 7 x 13 x 49 = 6J AS 107016 days OR >>>>>>>>> 294 x 364 OR 293 x 365.2423 TROPICAL YEARS) ARE DETERMINED
    [Daniel 9:24; 11Q13; John 5:43-47] AS IPSO FACTO 100 + 40 + 293 >>>>>>>>> = 433 YEARS + 0 CE OFFSET ... 33 AD AS JEWISH SUPERIORITY TO >>>>>>>>> PAPAL GREGORIAN CALENDAR 365.25 REFORMS OF 1582 CE)
    substantiated religious belief of a CENTURY #100 before the
    occurrence of 40 AM as 3860 BCE + 20 x (293 x 365.2423 TROPICAL >>>>>>>>> YEARS | 294 x 364 | 6J) + 1 (NO 0 CE)  = 2001 CE (NEW MOON 20 >>>>>>>>> MARCH 1996 + 5 x 364 + 182 = 12 SEPTEMBER 2001 + 182 = NEW MOON >>>>>>>>> 13 / 14 MARCH 2002).

    If the IRISH SAINT PATRICK'S myths are coagulated as depraved >>>>>>>>> hedonistic nonsense upon TETRA: #60 - ACCUMULATION (CHI) - 𝍁積 >>>>>>>>> = #234 / #396 / #511 as COGITO: [#41, #41, #41, #41, #41] with >>>>>>>>> RANGE: noon 13 to 17 SEPTEMBER being centre to the COURSE OF >>>>>>>>> NATURE paradigm and SAINT PATRICK'S DAY corresponds to the
    GENESIS DAY 4 narrative of for example WEDNESDAY 20 MARCH
    1996 / NEW MOON 21 MARCH 1996 such that 3 x #364 = #1092 on 17 >>>>>>>>> MARCH 1999 with a FULL MOON on 1 JANUARY 1999 which establishes >>>>>>>>> that fact.

    Whereupon 3 x 365.2423 days will be Wednesday 20 MARCH 1999 / >>>>>>>>> IPSO FACTO 24 x 7 x 13 x 49 / 293 =365.2423 or / 294 = 364.2423 >>>>>>>>> days

    You then have an IRISH PARASITIC TOTALITARIANISM which as
    REPUBLICANISM is iconoclastic against any AUTHENTIC JEWISH / >>>>>>>>> CHRISTIAN IDENTITY comprised by race, religion and culture
    being then an impetus for exclusion from any dignified life as >>>>>>>>> tantamount to genocide--Any viable response to 11 SEPTEMBER
    2001 was not important to you, in necessitating your
    permission, such is the self-entitled manner of the IRISH and >>>>>>>>> especially given that 20 years of post-9/11 wars have cost the >>>>>>>>> U.S. an estimated $8 trillion and have killed more than 900,000 >>>>>>>>> people.

    We do not want to live in a society which smoothers our lives >>>>>>>>> by such a disgusting self entitled pall of misery, as criteria >>>>>>>>> for existance DENIES US JUSTICE PREDICATED UPON A DINGOES GOT >>>>>>>>> MY BABY PREJUDICE and we'll never forgive the BRITISH (or the >>>>>>>>> lack of response from the GODLESS DUTCH) for that disgusting >>>>>>>>> IRISH CATHOLIC trouble upon life.




    <https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?
    date:2025.7.21&run:Daily&date:2025.7.21>

    .jackNote@zen: 5, row: 3, col: 2, nous: 57 [DATE: 2025.7.21, >>>>>>>>> SUPER: #314 / #39 - Achieving Oneness, Root of Order; I-Ching: >>>>>>>>> H28 - Major Superiority, Excess, Great Exceeding, Preponderance >>>>>>>>> of the great, Great surpassing, Critical mass; Tetra: 76 -
    AGGRAVATION (CHU), EGO: #335 / #57 - Laissez Faire Politics, >>>>>>>>> Simplicity In Habits; I- Ching: H37 - The Family (the clan), >>>>>>>>> Dwelling People, Family members; Tetra: 39 - RESIDENCE (CHU)] >>>>>>>>>
    Given the GODHEAD / NOUMENA / TAI XUAN JING (太玄经) / OMNIS >>>>>>>>> DIVINI ARCANUM ANTISTATEM is mentioned in the ninth Section of >>>>>>>>> Stanley Thomas' (1687) edition of the History of Philosophy
    concerning "Pythagoras: His Life and Teachings" conveys the
    BABYLONIAN captivity but this notion of the mysteries appears >>>>>>>>> absent in the exegesis conveyed by the THEOLOGICAL DICTIONARY >>>>>>>>> OF THE NEW TESTAMENT: "At this time, Cambyses II invaded and >>>>>>>>> conquered Egypt, by whom Pythagoras was taken prisoner, and
    sent to Babylon. There he lived with the most excellent among >>>>>>>>> the Chaldeans and with the Magi, the Persian Magi (ie.     #314 >>>>>>>>> - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 1 JULY 2025 as [#40, #1, #3, #70,
    #200] - mágos (G3097): *WISE* *MEN*) for so Cicero, Apuleius, >>>>>>>>> and Eulebias term them in respect that Babylon was then under >>>>>>>>> that Monarchy; which is the meaning also of Valerius Maximus, >>>>>>>>> and Lactantius, who affirm, that he went from Egypt to the
    Persians, (not to Persia, as some conceive abdd resigned
    himself to the most exact prudence of the Magi, to be formed. >>>>>>>>>
    #611 - MALE TOTAL: #168 as [#400, #10, #200, #1] /
    #663 - MALE TOTAL: #168 as [#50, #6, #200, #1, #6, #400] =
    yârêʼ (H3372): {UMBRA: #211 % #41 = #6} 1) to fear, revere, be >>>>>>>>> afraid; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to fear, be afraid; 1a2) to stand in >>>>>>>>> awe of, be awed; 1a3) *TO* *FEAR*, *REVERENCE*, *HONOUR*,
    *RESPECT*; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be fearful, be dreadful, be >>>>>>>>> feared; 1b2) to cause astonishment and awe, be held in awe;
    1b3) to inspire reverence or godly fear or awe; 1c) (Piel) to >>>>>>>>> make afraid, terrify; 2) (TWOT) to shoot, pour;

    #1321 - FEME TOTAL: #187 as [#6, #5, #100, #200, #10, #400,
    #600] = qârâh (H7136): {UMBRA: #305 % #41 = #18} 1) to
    encounter, meet, befall, happen, *COME* *TO* *MEET*; 1a) (Qal); >>>>>>>>> 1a1) to encounter, meet; 1a2) to befall; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to >>>>>>>>> encounter, meet (without pre-arrangement); 1b2) to chance to be >>>>>>>>> present; 1b3) to come to meet; 1c) (Hiphil) to cause to meet, >>>>>>>>> appoint; 2) to build with beams; 2a) (Piel) to lay the beams >>>>>>>>> of, furnish with beams;

    The Magi received him kindly, and instructed him in the most >>>>>>>>> profound and sublime mysteries, of the worship of the gods. By >>>>>>>>> their means also, he arrived at the height of Arithmetick,
    Mufick, and other Mathematical Sciences. From them, saith
    Valerius Maximus, be, with a docile mind, received the motions >>>>>>>>> of the Stars, their power, property, and effects, their states >>>>>>>>> and periods; the various effects of both in the nativities of >>>>>>>>> men, as likewise the remedies of diseases, which are purchased >>>>>>>>> at vast rates by Sea and Land.

    #53 - 𝌺永 = #227 / #389 / #504
    COGITO: #227 = [#20, #50, #64, #53, #40] as #53 - ETERNITY (YUNG) >>>>>>>>> RANGE: 13 to noon 17 AUGUST

    <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&tetra:53>

    [#20 {@1: Sup: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#20); Ego: 20 - ADVANCE:
    CHIN (#20)}
    #50 {@2: Sup: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#90); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS / >>>>>>>>> WASTING: T'ANG (#70)}
    #64 {@3: Sup: 53 - ETERNITY: YUNG (#143 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED >>>>>>>>> {%8}); Ego: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN (#134 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED >>>>>>>>> {%34})}
    #53 {@4: Sup: 25 - CONTENTION: CHENG (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE >>>>>>>>> OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26} / yârêʼ (H3372): *TO* *FEAR*,
    *REVERENCE*, *HONOUR*, *RESPECT*); Ego: 53 - ETERNITY: YUNG
    (#187 - qârâh (H7136): *COME* *TO* *MEET*)}
    #40] {@5: Sup: 65 - INNER: NEI (#233 - STASIS ROMAN GOVERNANCE >>>>>>>>> PROTOTYPE #FIVE); Ego: 40 - LAW / MODEL: FA (#227 - IPSO FACTO >>>>>>>>> #174 - COEFFICIENT [c² = a² + b²])}

    TELOS TOTAL: #227
    ONTIC TOTAL: #168
    DEME TOTAL: #277

    #123 - ONTIC TOTAL: #168 as [#5, #8, #20, #40, #10, #40] =
    châkâm (H2450): {UMBRA: #68 % #41 = #27} 1) wise, wise (man); >>>>>>>>> 1a) skilful (in technical work); 1b) wise (in administration); >>>>>>>>> 1c) shrewd, crafty, cunning, wily, subtle; 1d) learned, shrewd >>>>>>>>> (class of men); 1e) prudent; 1f) wise (ethically and religiously); >>>>>>>>>
    #376 - ONTIC TOTAL: #168 as [#70, #300, #6] /
    #377 - DEME TOTAL: #277 as [#6, #1, #70, #300] /

    [continued in next message]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)