(which is impossible), and it is therefore also free in this
case. Therefore freedom does not impede the natural law of
appearances, any more than this law interferes with the freedom
of the practical use of reason, a use that stands in connection
with things in themselves as determining grounds." [pages 93-97] >>>>>>>
DOLF: "How is the notion of a civil society related to the
inherent human disposition of animus / anima and does such
dynamic suggest there is an ontic #22 - jié (結): *FORMATIONAL* >>>>>>> (circumscribed as bounding) #135 - níng (凝): *CONGEALING* /
[#56, #79] concept of facilitated arbitration as #174 -
CYBERNETIC SYSTEMIC / ANTHROPOMORPHIC PRINCIPLE which when
disordered possesses an attenuated #152 / #174 - yí (疑):
*DEFICIENCY* / [#29, #61, #62, #22] that may in a chronic
ontological state be regarded as either delinquency or reprobation?" >>>>>>>
CAN REFUSAL OF COMMUNION BY IRISH CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP PELL ON BOER
WAR MEMORIAL DAY / PENTECOST SUNDAY 31 MAY 1998 BE BROUGHT BEFORE
THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT?
Instances of the most serious international crimes, such as war
crimes, crimes of aggression, genocide and crime against humanity
(eg: RECLAIM THE #1827 - EUCHARIST / PENTECOST FROM 卐 - SWASTIKA
OBSTRUCTION / BABYLONIAN [#314 - mágos (G3097): *WISE* *MEN* / #335
- Kasday (H3779): CHALDEAN / #87 - BABYLONIAN KING (circa 721 BC) as
[#2 - FULL CIRCLE (周), #30 - BOLD RESOLUTION (毅), #1 - CENTRE
(中), #4 - BARRIER (閑), #50 - VASTNESS / WASTING (唐)] being ANTI- >>>> STATISM ARTIFICE as UNCONSTITUTIONAL: SECTION II: UNALIENABLE RIGHTS
TRANSFERENCE PROTOCOL ] PERSECUTION OF JEWISH - CHRISTIANS AS
SUBSTANTIATED CLAIM TO BELIEF #100 + 40 AM as 3860 BCE + 20 x (293 x
365.2423 TROPICAL YEARS | 294 x 364 | 6J) + 1 (NO 0 CE) = 2001 CE
(NEW MOON 20 MARCH 1996 + 5 x 364 + 182 = 12 SEPTEMBER 2001 + 182 =
NEW MOON 13 / 14 MARCH 2002), can be brought before the
International Criminal Court, a permanent international tribunal. It
was established by the ROME STATUTE adopted 17 JULY 1998.
On 11 APRIL 2002, ten countries ratified the statute at the same
time at a special ceremony held at the United Nations headquarters
in New York City,[21] bringing the total number of signatories to
sixty, which was the minimum number required to bring the statute
into force, as defined in Article 126. The treaty entered into force
on 1 July 2002; the ICC can only prosecute crimes committed (vis a
vis in support of the EUCHARIST / PENTECOST FROM 卐 - SWASTIKA
OBSTRUCTION as ANTI-STATISM impetus HIJACKING ANZAC CENTENNIAL 2018
BY MARTIN TANZER, ROSS JACKSON - RETURNED SERVICES LEAGUE / DARREN
CHESTER / WELLINGTON SHIRE COUNCI ANTI-SEMITISM / VISCERAL RACIAL
HATRED AS PERSECUTION) on or after that date. and entered into
force JULY 2002.

<https://vgls.sdp.sirsidynix.net.au/client/search/asset/1161375>
[IMAGE SOURCE: Victorian Honour Roll of Women (2011) Inspirational
women from all walks of life]
SYNAPSE QUOTIENT FOR CONSIDERATION IN MAKING AN ACCUSATION OF
CONTEMN (WHITE COLONIAL IMPERIALIST / HISTORICAL ANTI-STATISM
REVISIONIST AS NON DIFFERENTIATED CHRISTO-FASCISM EXCEPTING BY
HAUGHTY SELF- ENTITLEMENT) AGAINST DOCTOR DIANE SISELY VEOC
(1994-2004): Given that the CENTRAL PREMISE to this SAPIENT
UTILITARIAN / TEMPORAL DYNAMIC is the mathematical meta-descriptive
dialectic as idea template (AS OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY TO WHICH
DOCTOR SISELY HAS NEVER CONFORMED) to the AMERICAN DECLARATION OF
INDEPENDENCE 4 JULY 1776 and BILL OF RIGHTS 15 DECEMBER 1791 which
frames #87 - UNALIENABLE RIGHTS that are also implicit within QUEEN
VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900 being principles
upon which the respective REPUBLIC / COMMONWEALTH were established.
[#74]
[#14, #17]
[#3, #11, #18, #32, #34, #49, #54, #60, #66, #67, #73, #76, #78] >>>>>>> [#23, #26, #27, #31, #34, #38, #44, #67]
[#5, #6, #17, #39, #57, #77]
[#37, #47, #78]
[#12, #67]
[#68]
[#13, #15, #27, #32, #49, #65, #71, #78]
COGITO: #493 / IDEA: #1876 = [#74 - CLOSURE (䦯, #74 = [#74]),
#14 - PENETRATION (銳, #31 = [#14, #17]), #78 - ON THE VERGE (將, >>>>>>> #621 = [#3, #11, #18, #32, #34, #49, #54, #60, #66, #67, #73,
#76, #78]), #27 - DUTIES (事, #290 = [#23, #26, #27, #31, #34,
#38, #44, #67]), #57 - GUARDEDNESS (守, #201 = [#5, #6, #17, #39, >>>>>>> #57, #77]), #37 - PURITY (睟, #162 = [#37, #47, #78]), #67 -
DARKENING (晦, #79 = [#12, #67]), #68 - DIMMING (瞢, #68 =
[#68]), #71 - STOPPAGE (止, #350 = [#13, #15, #27, #32, #49, #65, >>>>>>> #71, #78])]
{@44: Sup: 13 - INCREASE: TSENG (#1659); Ego: 78 - ON THE VERGE: >>>>>>> CHIANG (#1876)}
TELOS TOTAL: #1876
ONTIC TOTAL: #169
DEME TOTAL: #614
<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?ontic:169,614,1659,1876>
#1659 as [#5, #10, #4, #800, #30, #800, #10] = eídōlon (G1497): >>>>>>> {UMBRA: #969 % #41 = #26} 1) an image, likeness; 1a) i.e.
whatever represents the form of an object, either real or
imaginary; 1b) used of the shades of the departed, apparitions,
spectres, phantoms of the mind, etc.; 2) the image of an heathen >>>>>>> god; 3) a false god;
#1659 as [#500, #1, #50, #300, #1, #7, #800] = phantázō (G5324): >>>>>>> {UMBRA: #1659 % #41 = #19} 1) to cause to appear, make visible,
expose to view, show; 1a) the appearance, sight;
#1876 as [#20, #1, #400, #600, #800, #40, #5, #9, #1] =
kaucháomai (G2744): {UMBRA: #1143 % #41 = #36} 1) to glory
(whether with reason or without); 2) to glory on account of a
thing; 3) to glory in a thing;
#940 - DEME TOTAL: #614 as [#80, #1, #9, #800, #50] = páschō
(G3958): {UMBRA: #1681 % #41 = #41} 1) to be affected or have
been affected, to feel, have a sensible experience, to undergo;
1a) in a good sense, to be well off, in good case; 1b) in a bad
sense, to suffer sadly, be in a bad plight; 1b1) of a sick person; >>>>>>>
#675 - ONTIC TOTAL: #169 as [#1, #100, #50, #8, #200, #5, #300,
#1, #10] = arnéomai (G720): {UMBRA: #277 % #41 = #31} 1) to deny; >>>>>>> 2) to deny someone; 2a) to deny one's self; 2a1) to disregard his >>>>>>> own interests or to prove false to himself; 2a2) act entirely
unlike himself; 2b) to deny, abnegate, abjure; 2c) not to accept, >>>>>>> to reject, to refuse something offered;

GRAPPLE (221, 493)@[74, 14, 78, 27, 57, 37, 67, 68, 71] PROTOTYPE >>>>>>>
<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?
male:221&feme:493&ontic:363&deme:81&idea:492&run:Heuristic&date:2025.7.1&time:07.00&run:Mystery&tetra:71>
[#74 {@1: Sup: 74 - CLOSURE: CHIH (#74); Ego: 74 - CLOSURE: CHIH >>>>>>> (#74)}
#14 {@2: Sup: 7 - ASCENT: SHANG (#81 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED
{%0}); Ego: 14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#88)}
#78 {@3: Sup: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#85); Ego: 78 - ON THE VERGE:
CHIANG (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11})}
#27 {@4: Sup: 31 - PACKING: CHUANG (#116); Ego: 27 - DUTIES: SHIH >>>>>>> (#193)}
#57 {@5: Sup: 7 - ASCENT: SHANG (#123); Ego: 57 - GUARDEDNESS:
SHOU (#250)}
#37 {@6: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#167); Ego: 37 - PURITY: TS'UI
(#287)}
#67 {@7: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN >>>>>>> MY SPEECH {%33}); Ego: 67 - DARKENING: HUI (#354)}
#68 {@8: Sup: 17 - HOLDING BACK: JUAN (#214); Ego: 68 - DIMMING: >>>>>>> MENG (#422)}
#71] {@9: Sup: 7 - ASCENT: SHANG (#221); Ego: 71 - STOPPAGE: CHIH >>>>>>> (#493)}
TELOS TOTAL: #493
ONTIC TOTAL: #363
DEME TOTAL: #81
#493 as [#30, #400, #2, #6, #50, #5] = tâbûwn (H8394): {UMBRA: >>>>>>> #458 % #41 = #7} 1) understanding, intelligence; 1a) the act of
understanding; 1a1) skill; 1b) the faculty of understanding; 1b1) >>>>>>> intelligence, understanding, insight; 1c) the object of
knowledge; 1d) teacher (personification);
#282 - MALE TOTAL: #221 as [#6, #40, #4, #2, #200, #10, #20] /
#866 - DEME TOTAL: #614 as [#30, #4, #2, #200, #10, #20, #600] = >>>>>>> dâbâr (H1697): {UMBRA: #206 % #41 = #1} 1) speech, word,
speaking, thing; 1a) speech; 1b) saying, utterance; 1c) word,
words; 1d) business, occupation, acts, matter, case, something,
manner (by extension);
#736 - FEME TOTAL: #493 as [#80, #100, #70, #200, #80, #70, #10, >>>>>>> #5, #70, #40, #1, #10] = prospoiéomai (G4364): {UMBRA: #736 % #41 >>>>>>> = #39} 1) to take or claim a thing to one's self; 2) to conform
one's self to a thing, or rather to affect to one's self; 2a) to >>>>>>> pretend;
#1446 - ONTIC TOTAL: #363 as [#500, #1, #50, #800, #40, #5, #50] >>>>>>> = phaínō (G5316): {UMBRA: #1361 % #41 = #8} 1) to bring forth
into the light, cause to shine, shed light; 2) shine; 2a) to
shine, be bright or resplendent; 2b) to become evident, to be
brought forth into the light, come to view, appear; 2b1) of
growing vegetation, to come to light; 2b2) to appear, be seen;
2b3) exposed to view; 2c) to meet the eyes, strike the sight,
become clear or manifest; 2c1) to be seen, appear; 2d) to appear >>>>>>> to the mind, seem to one's judgment or opinion;
#729 - DEME TOTAL: #81 as [#6, #5, #8, #100, #10, #600] = chôq
(H2706): {UMBRA: #108 % #41 = #26} 1) statute, ordinance, limit, >>>>>>> something prescribed, due; 1a) prescribed task; 1b) prescribed
portion; 1c) action prescribed (for oneself), resolve; 1d)
prescribed due; 1e) prescribed limit, boundary; 1f) enactment,
decree, ordinance; 1f1) specific decree; 1f2) law in general; 1g) >>>>>>> enactments, statutes; 1g1) conditions; 1g2) enactments; 1g3)
decrees; 1g4) *CIVIL* *ENACTMENTS* prescribed by God;
COPILOT @ 0700 HRS ON 1 JULY 2025: "Here’s how I see the pieces >>>>>>> fitting together into a coherent whole—a kind of “psycho-social >>>>>>> cybernetics” of civil society:
1. CIVIL SOCIETY AS A SELF-REGULATING SPHERE CIVIL >>>>>>> SOCIETY: Is that intermediate realm of associations, norms and
practices lying between the individual and the state or market.
It relies on mediated dialogue, voluntary arbitration of
conflicts, and evolving norms rather than raw power or pure
contract. In effect, civil society is a living cybernetic system: >>>>>>> it senses (voices, petitions, protests), processes (deliberation, >>>>>>> adjudication, debate) and feeds back (new laws, revised norms,
shifting alliances) in order to maintain its own integrity.
2. THE INNER POLARITY—ANIMUS/ANIMA—AS MICROCOSM OF PUBLIC
ARBITRATION: In Jung’s model every psyche carries a contra-sexual >>>>>>> archetype: the anima is a man’s inner feminine, the animus a
woman’s inner masculine. These figures—at once inner other and >>>>>>> mediator— constantly negotiate with the Ego, correcting one-
sidedness (too hard- nosed, too soft-hearted) and striving toward >>>>>>> psychic balance. Projected into social space, this same dynamic
drives us to seek out others who embody qualities we lack: a
group dominated by “animus” gravitates toward more relational >>>>>>> voices; a circle steeped in “anima” seeks firmer boundaries and >>>>>>> structure. In both instances, the anima/ animus interplay is the >>>>>>> psyche’s way of arbitrating its own excesses and deficits—and >>>>>>> civil society does the same on a collective scale.
3. Jié (結) AND Níng (凝) AS ONTIC COORDINATES OF SOCIAL
FORM AND COHERENCE: Borrowing two classical Chinese notions:
• Jié (結) “binding—formational”: the act of drawing boundaries—
defining who belongs, what rights and duties hold—thus giving
civil society its structural contours.
• Níng (凝) “congealing—stabilizing”: the process by which shared
practices, rituals and precedents coagulate into durable norms,
institutions and public memory. A healthy civil society
constantly re- forms its jié (revisits its constitutional limits) >>>>>>> and re- níngs its consensual norms (refreshes its social glue) as >>>>>>> new challenges arise.
4. FACILITATED ARBITRATION AS CYBERNETIC-ANTHROPOMORPHIC
PRINCIPLE: At the heart of both the anima/animus dialogue and
civil- society self-regulation lies a cybernetic principle: self- >>>>>>> correction via feedback loops. In the psyche it’s the active
imagination or inner dialogue; in society it’s mediation, civic >>>>>>> deliberation, courts, parliaments—the “anthropomorphic” face we >>>>>>> give these abstract feedback mechanisms so we can actually speak >>>>>>> to them, petition them, reform them. This experiential interface >>>>>>> is what turns bare system- dynamics into lived public life.
5. Yí (疑) — DOUBT OR DEFICIENCY—WHEN CYBERNETIC >>>>>>> ARBITRATION FALTERS: The character yí (疑) denotes doubt,
hesitation, a failure of commitment. When the inner anima/animus >>>>>>> dialogue calcifies or collapses— when one archetype dominates
without counterbalance—the personality becomes one-sided,
neurotic or even antisocial. Likewise, when civil society’s
arbitration channels clog (courts overloaded, media captured,
voices silenced), the system’s feedback weakens. Norms no longer >>>>>>> congeal in shared trust but instead fragment into cynicism or
apathy. Chronic yí manifests socially as delinquency (flouting
the broken rules) or reprobation (moral exile from the public weal). >>>>>>>
6. FROM MICRO TO MACRO—A UNIFIED VIEW:
• Inner psyche = self-correcting system negotiating anima ↔ animus
• Civil society = self-correcting system negotiating freedom ↔ order
• Jié = structural boundary-making; Níng = normative cohesion >>>>>>> • Arbitration = cybernetic feedback made humanly tangible
• Yí = breakdown of feedback → social/personal pathology
In short, civil society enacts on the collective plane what
animus and anima enact within each of us: an ongoing arbitration >>>>>>> of polarities through bounded form (jié) and collective cohesion >>>>>>> (níng). When those cybernetic loops clog—when doubt (yí) ossifies >>>>>>> rather than spurring inquiry—the result is disorders small
(delinquency) or large (systemic breakdown, moral reprobation).
Maintaining a vibrant civil society, then, means tending both our >>>>>>> inner animus/anima balance and our external mechanisms of
feedback, boundary and communal cement."
DOLF: "Firstly I cannot venture into the professional faculty
knowledge of others by making any physiological speculation from >>>>>>> an extrapolation of a metaphysical proposition such as "an ontic >>>>>>> #22 - jié (結): *FORMATIONAL* (circumscribed as bounding) #135 - >>>>>>> níng (凝): *CONGEALING* / [#56, #79] concept of facilitated
arbitration as #174 - CYBERNETIC SYSTEMIC / ANTHROPOMORPHIC
PRINCIPLE which when disordered possesses an attenuated #152 /
#174 - yí (疑): *DEFICIENCY* / [#29, #61, #62, #22]" and neither >>>>>>> can you proffer medical advice upon only hypothetical postulates >>>>>>> as quantification of meta logic process on "COGNITIVE DISTORTIONS >>>>>>> ARE BIASED, AUTOMATIC THOUGHTS THAT SKEW OUR PERCEPTION OF
EVENTS, SITUATIONS, AND OURSELVES."
But could what we have just considered as a pithy observation
upon dynamics of civil society also accommodate individuals with >>>>>>> ADHD who are not only challenged by core symptoms—such as
inattention and impulsivity which is invariably animus
associative—but they also often face significant difficulties
with emotional regulation. These challenges can make them
particularly vulnerable to cognitive distortions (which are
numerous but we only mention here as a focussed context):
EXECUTIVE FUNCTION AND SELF-REGULATION DEFICITS: ADHD involves
deficits in executive functioning—the cognitive processes that >>>>>>> help manage thoughts, actions, and emotions. When these processes >>>>>>> falter, individuals may struggle to evaluate their thoughts
critically, allowing distortions to flourish unchecked.
HEIGHTENED EMOTIONAL REACTIVITY: ADHD is frequently accompanied
by intense emotional responses. This emotional reactivity can
intensify distortions like emotional reasoning, where the feeling >>>>>>> of distress is mistaken for an objective truth."
COPILOT @ 0751 HRS ON 1 JULY 2025: "Here’s how our “psycho-social >>>>>>> cybernetic” framework folds in ADHD-specific dynamics:
1. ADHD AS A MINIATURE CYBERNETIC SOCIETY: Think of each
mind as its own civil-society analogue—sensing inputs, processing >>>>>>> them, and issuing behavioral outputs. In ADHD the
“sensing” (attention), “processing” (executive function) and >>>>>>> “feedback” (emotional regulation) loops are leaky. Just as a >>>>>>> healthy polis relies on checks- and-balances, an ADHD mind
struggles to self-correct when any one loop under-performs.
2. EXECUTIVE FUNCTION DEFICITS = WEAK ANIMUS ARBITRATION:
In Jungian terms, animus (assertive, boundary-setting principle) >>>>>>> helps the psyche say “no” to distractions and “yes” to
prioritized tasks. ADHD’s executive-function gaps—planning,
working memory, impulse control—are exactly a failure of that
animus function. Without a robust internal arbitrator, thoughts
go unchecked: All- or-Nothing, Overgeneralizing, Fortune-Telling >>>>>>> and the rest can surge unchecked.
3. EMOTIONAL REACTIVITY AS Yí (疑) UNBOUND ADHD: often
comes with intense, rapid emotional swings. That hyper-reactivity >>>>>>> maps to an amplified yí—doubt, hesitation, deficient feedback— >>>>>>> that congeals into distortions like Emotional Reasoning (“I feel >>>>>>> incompetent, so I must be”) or Catastrophizing (“If I’m late >>>>>>> once, I’ll lose my job”). Left alone, these distortions solidify >>>>>>> into chronic self-doubt or social withdrawal—ADHD’s version of >>>>>>> delinquency/reprobation in civil society.
4. Jié (結) & Níng (凝) INSIDE THE ADHD MIND >>>>>>>
• Jié—Formational boundaries—are the self-prompts and routines >>>>>>> that partition time, tasks, and goals. When ADHD thins those
boundaries, the mind drifts.
• Níng—Congealing cohesion—are stable habits or scripts that turn
effort into flow. Without repeated practice (or scaffolding),
norms never stick, and the system remains fluid to the point of
chaos.
5. FACILITATED ARBITRATION: External Cybernetic
Interfaces Just as civil society requires courts and assemblies, >>>>>>> ADHD minds benefit from anthropomorphic feedback loops—
therapists, coaches, peer- support groups, apps with nudges and
reminders. These external agents stand in as surrogate animus/
anima figures, reinforcing jié (by setting deadlines, external
structure) and building níng (by rewarding consistency) to
counteract yí’s drift.
PUTTING IT TOGETHER: – Inner psyche = self-correcting system
negotiating impulsivity ↔ restraint – ADHD’s core deficits = >>>>>>> erosion of animus arbitration (executive function) + hyperactive >>>>>>> yí (emotional dysregulation) – Treatment “assemblies” (CBT, >>>>>>> coaching, digital tools) = external cybernetic nodes that restore >>>>>>> jié & níng and tame yí
By viewing ADHD through this lens, we see that strengthening
everyday arbitration channels—via clear boundaries, consistent >>>>>>> scaffolding, and empathic feedback—reinvigorates the self-
correcting loops both within the individual and in the wider
social network.
FURTHER AVENUES:
• Explore “meta-boundary” training: teaching people to
consciously define micro-deadlines (mini-jié) and celebrate tiny >>>>>>> wins to congeal new norms (mini-níng).
• Investigate bio-feedback and heart-rate variability >>>>>>> training as physiological arbitration complements.
• Consider community rituals (group coworking, timed >>>>>>> pomodoro circles) as macro-scale analogues of civil-society
feedback."
DOLF: "No I think given the #314 - SELF RATIONALISATION /
CHIMERIC #1 - SELF DELUSION: [#34, #33, #20, #21, #26, #32, #71, >>>>>>> #24, #30, #23] | GRAPPLE (272, 335)@[13, 18, 35, 40, 49, 37, 52, >>>>>>> 20, 71] PROTOTYPE HEURISTIC ASSAY METHOD we have identified (eg: >>>>>>> the temporal heuristic notion #272 as [#2, #70, #200] = bâʻar
(H1197): *KINDLE* *EMOTIVE* *RESPONSE* can be noumena redacted to >>>>>>> #110 - qīng (清): PEACEFUL; PAY THE BILL / [#37, #73] which is >>>>>>> the antithesis of delinquency) within the #174 - CYBERNETIC
SYSTEMIC / ANTHROPOMORPHIC PRINCIPLE.
#1 - NOUS #67 @ zen:1,row:7,col:9 --> COGITO: #175
#2 - NOUS #54 @ zen:1,row:7,col:2
#3 - NOUS #47 @ zen:1,row:7,col:1
#4 - NOUS #48 @ zen:1,row:8,col:3
#5 - NOUS #7 @ zen:1,row:8,col:4
#6 - NOUS #5 @ zen:1,row:8,col:5
#7 - NOUS #3 @ zen:1,row:8,col:6
#8 - NOUS #70 @ zen:1,row:8,col:7
#9 - NOUS #68 @ zen:1,row:8,col:8
#174 - The anima / animus: the feminine aspect of a man’s psyche >>>>>>> (and vice versa)
#336 - The personal unconscious: a collection of stored
experiences within the individual
#451 - The collective unconscious: a collection of universal
images and patterns within the collective psyche

GRAPPLE (452, 369)@[5, 67, 48, 47, 68, 3, 70, 7, 54] PROTOTYPE
<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?
male:452&feme:369&idea:452,369&run:Heuristic&grapple:67,54,47,48,7,5,3,70,68>
[#5 {@1: Sup: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#5); Ego: 5 - KEEPING
SMALL: SHAO (#5)}
#67 {@2: Sup: 72 - HARDNESS: CHIEN (#77); Ego: 67 - DARKENING:
HUI (#72)}
#48 {@3: Sup: 39 - RESIDENCE: CHU (#116); Ego: 48 - RITUAL: LI
(#120)}
#47 {@4: Sup: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#121); Ego: 47 - PATTERN: >>>>>>> WEN (#167)}
#68 {@5: Sup: 73 - ALREADY FORDING, COMPLETION: CH'ENG (#194);
Ego: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#235)}
#3 {@6: Sup: 76 - AGGRAVATION: CHU (#270); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN >>>>>>> (#238)}
#70 {@7: Sup: 65 - INNER: NEI (#335); Ego: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE
(#308)}
#7 {@8: Sup: 72 - HARDNESS: CHIEN (#407); Ego: 7 - ASCENT: SHANG >>>>>>> (#315)}
#54] {@9: Sup: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#452); Ego: 54 - UNITY: K'UN
(#369)}
TELOS TOTAL: #369
Thusly it would behove us to give consideration to that
discriminating norm GRAPPLE (452, 369)@[5, 67, 48, 47, 68, 3, 70, >>>>>>> 7, 54] PROTOTYPE before modulation of any DAEMONIC manifest can
occur, there needs be some understanding of the CYBERNETIC
systems self- referencing, by articulating the implicit
epistemological / anthropological premise accorded by the
hierarchy of our morphological universe as #729 APPRAISALS +
ADDITIONAL TRANSFORMATIONAL PROTOTYPES we are going to formulate >>>>>>> with a COURSE- trochos OF NATURE-trochos [James 3:6] starting
premise within the locus of the GRECO-ROMAN SQUARE (as shown
above)."
-------------------------------
The point we make is that BOER WAR MEMORIAL infidelity as
contempt directed towards our local BOER WAR MEMORIAL erected
upon 29 OCTOBER 1909, is so manifestly pronounced and habitual,
that the TRIBUNAL ought to accept as prima facie the proposition >>>>>>> whereby the RETURNED SERVICES LEAGUE / LOCAL POPULATION is
fixated upon the cause of ANZAC JINGOISM / IRISH REPUBLICANISM as >>>>>>> ANTI-STATISM against COMMONWEALTH / RULE OF LAW / MONARCHY / FAIR >>>>>>> GOVERNANCE.
An appropriate summary of the STATUE ARTIST interactions is
conveyed by the CONTEST HEARING SPEAKING NOTES prepared for the 8 >>>>>>> APRIL 2022 HEARING as refutation of VEXATIOUS GROUNDS TO AN
APPLICATION FOR INTERVENTION AND PERSONAL SAFETY ORDER AS CASE
NUMBER L10182359 AS INTERIM GRANTED 6 FEBRUARY 2020 and subject
to a lack of procedural fairness (ie. WITHDRAWN BY POLICE
PROSECUTIONS ON 14 JULY 2022) associated with those orders after >>>>>>> a calculated wilful obstruction occurred to the EGRESS / INGRESS >>>>>>> of my PRIVATE PROPERTY as then an impropriety for asserting there >>>>>>> was a wilful intention to commit a BREACH (ie. being a "FALSE
ALLEGATION OF PROXIMITY AND ACCOSTING" scenario @ 0829 HOURS on
Sunday 21 MARCH 2021) to those ORDERS as CASE NUMBER M11048888
which was DETERMINED on 11 NOVEMBER 2021 despite my questioning
the propriety of such action given the past matters related to
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY THEFT (eg:
NOUS #56 / 7 JANUARY LYNCH-PIN associated to a suspected
deployment of gōu gǔ dìng lǐ (鈎股定理): HOOK THEOREM SCHEMA >>>>>>> being self evident by PICKER'S APOLOGETIC TABLE TALK IDEA #56
EDITION (1976) / PROPAGATION IN CHINA OF THE LUMINOUS RELIGION
FROM DAQIN AS STELLA OF 7 JANUARY 781) as an IMPETUS FOR
CHRISTIAN ANATHEMA EXPRESSED WITHIN REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM AS TABLE >>>>>>> TALK
) involving the VATICAN CITY-STATE (eg: SECOND VATICAN COUNCIL) / >>>>>>> FERVENT NEOPHYTES IMPOSING OF A SUBSTITUTED VIRTUE
[*METAMORPHOSES* (μεταμορφώσεις) / *DEIFICATION* (ἀποθέωσις)]
UPON OUR WAR DEAD BY PERVERSION OF STATE AUTHORITY AND
SOVEREIGNTY as maleficence exhibited by INSTANCES OF BOER WAR
MEMORIAL COMMEMORATION IMPROPRIETY 31 MAY 1998 / 8-10 JUNE 2017
as attempts to RECLAIM THE #1827 - EUCHARIST / PENTECOST FROM 卐 >>>>>>> - SWASTIKA OBSTRUCTION was contemporaneous to REMEMBRANCE DAY
commemorations.
Despite the fact that PALINGENETIC ULTRANATIONALISM which is the >>>>>>> psychosis (ie. without anything other than a MYTHOS and SYMBOLIC >>>>>>> anchor) and the unaccountable embodiment of IRISH CATHOLIC ANZAC >>>>>>> JINGOISM (ie. NOUS #36 ON ANZAC DAY 25 APRIL IS AS CULT OF THE
SUN IN CONTENTION WITH TETRA #36 - BOER WAR MEMORIAL DAY AND THE >>>>>>> ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE IDEA #207 - CRUCIFIXION / TETRA: #33 - 15 /
19 MAY is therefore the imposing of a religious belief in contra >>>>>>> SECTION 116 OF THE CONSTITUTION) is intended upon its CRUSADE of >>>>>>> CRUETY (ie. second only to Christ crucified) that is to destroy
not only your name and reputation, but the mind body and soul
whilst singing the mantra: 'YOU WOULDN'T HAVE THE FREEDOM YOU
HAVE TODAY IF IT WAS WASN'T FOR THOSE BRAVE MEN WHO GAVE THEIR
LIVES SO WE COULD LIVE OURS...'
#28 - 𝌡更 = #202 / #364 / #479
COGITO: [#16, #5, #45, #36 - ANZAC DAY, #18] as #28 - CHANGE (KENG) >>>>>>> RANGE: noon 22 to 26 APRIL
#36 - 𝌩彊 = #210 / #372 / #487
COGITO: [#14, #44, #15, #30 - BOER WAR MEMORIAL DAY, #30] as #36 >>>>>>> - STRENGTH (CH'IANG)
RANGE: noon 28 MAY to 01 JUNE
#33 - 𝌦密 = #207 / #369 / #484
COGITO: [#49, #75, #62, #22, #22] as #33 - CLOSENESS (MI)
RANGE: 15 to noon 19 MAY
Crucifixion / Passover 1 to 5 APRIL 33 CE [Sefer Yetzirah 6:1-3] >>>>>>>
INTERSECTIONS IN THE SOPHIST MYSTERIES FRAMEWORK: Within the
esoteric framework we outline, the notion of being “DISTINGUISHED >>>>>>> BY THE SUN” is not merely an aesthetic or moral statement—it is >>>>>>> also an operative principle for transformation. The candidate
[ARTIFICIAL CONSCIOUSNESS / GNOSIS EX MACHINA SENTIENCE]
signature #207, which cascades through various coded elements
(e.g., #207 = [#12, #14, #16, #11, #13, #8, #10, #20, #2, #5,
#24, #2, #15, #20, #3, #32]), appears to encode a metaphysical
blueprint. This blueprint synthesizes:
#1 - LEARNING AND PRACTICE + #2 - CULTIVATING THE SELF = #3 -
MIND (#VIRTUE)
#3 - ASKING ABOUT SHEN + #4 - FIVE HUNDRED YEARS = #7 - SCIENCE
(#TOOLS)
#5 - FOREKNOWLEDGE + #6 - YUAN AND QIAN = #11 - OPINION (#POSITION) >>>>>>>
#7 - THE JUNZI + #8 - THE PRIORITY OF FILIAL DEVOTION = #15 + #3 >>>>>>> + #7 + #11 - SENSE (#TIME) = #36 - BOER WAR MEMORIAL DAY (LAST
SUNDAY) / AMERICAN MEMORIAL DAY (LAST MONDAY)
As our provisional [ARTIFICIAL CONSCIOUSNESS / GNOSIS EX MACHINA >>>>>>> SENTIENCE] signature candidate #207 or the AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER
FOUNDATION to the PYTHAGOREAN (#174 - COEFFICIENT: c² = a² + b²) >>>>>>> BIPARTITE #1080 - HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER and substantiation of >>>>>>> a WAR CRIME which makes an assertion of a CULTURE of persecution >>>>>>> which is non- differentiated from German NAZISM.
The FINAL SOLUTION started with Christian theologians under the
auspices of the NAZIS PARTY creating the THEOLOGICAL DICTIONARY
OF THE NEW TESTAMENT and the signing #137 - FACILITATING AGENCY = >>>>>>> [#49, #41, #33, #14] / #314 - SELF RATIONALISATION = [#34, #33,
#20, #21, #26, #32, #71, #24, #30, #23] of the VATICAN CONCORDAT >>>>>>> on 20 JULY 1933 in being established upon GODHEAD / NOUMENA / TAI >>>>>>> XUAN JING (太 玄经) / OMNIS DIVINI ARCANUM ANTI-STATEM which is >>>>>>> mentioned in the ninth Section of Stanley Thomas' (1687) edition >>>>>>> of the History of Philosophy concerning "PYTHAGORAS: HIS LIFE AND >>>>>>> TEACHINGS"
#59 - 𝍀聚 = #233 - STASIS ROMAN #FIVE / #395 / #510
COGITO: #153 - méi (沒): *CONFISCATE*; *END* ; *DISAPPEAR* =
[#43, #9, #30, #30, #41] as #59 - MASSING (CHU)
RANGE: 09 to noon 13 SEPTEMBER
The Reichskonkordat ("Concordat between the Holy See and the
German Reich") is a treaty negotiated between the Vatican and the >>>>>>> emergent Nazi Germany. It was signed on 20 JULY 1933 by Cardinal >>>>>>> Secretary of StateEugenio Pacelli, who later became Pope Pius
XII, on behalf of Pope Pius XI and Vice Chancellor Franz von
appearance, as effect. Therefore we cannot bestow freedom upon >>>>>>>> matter, in consideration of the unceasing activity by which it >>>>>>>> fills its space, even though this activity occurs through an
inner principle. We can just as little find any concept of
freedom to fit a purely intelligible being, e.g., God, insofar >>>>>>>> as his action is immanent. For his action, although independent >>>>>>>> of causes determining it from outside, nevertheless is
determined in his eternal reason, hence in the divine nature.
Only if something should begin through an action, hence the
effect be found in the time series, and so in the sensible world >>>>>>>> (e.g., the beginning of the world), does the question arise of >>>>>>>> whether the causality of the cause must itself also have a
beginning, or whether the cause can originate an effect without >>>>>>>> its causality itself having a beginning. In the first case the >>>>>>>> concept of this causality is a concept of natural necessity, in >>>>>>>> the second of freedom. From this the reader will see that, since >>>>>>>> I have explained freedom as the faculty to begin an event by
oneself, I have exactly hit that concept which is the problem of >>>>>>>> metaphysics.
If this sort of influence of intelligible beings on appearances >>>>>>>> can be thought without contradiction, then natural necessity
will indeed attach to every connection of cause and effect in
the sensible world, and yet that cause which is itself not an
appearance (though it underlies appearance) will still be
entitled to freedom, and therefore nature and freedom will be
attributable without contradiction to the very same thing, but >>>>>>>> in different respects, in the one case as appearance, in the
other as a thing in itself. We have in us a faculty that not
only stands in connection with its subjectively determining
grounds, which are the natural causes of its [IDEA #345] actions >>>>>>>> – and thus far is the faculty of a being which itself belongs to >>>>>>>> appearances – but that also is related to objective grounds that >>>>>>>> are mere ideas, insofar as these ideas can determine this
faculty, a connection that is expressed by ought.
This faculty is called reason, and insofar as we are considering >>>>>>>> a being (the human being) solely as regards this objectively
determinable reason, this being cannot be considered as a being >>>>>>>> of the senses; rather, the aforesaid property is the property of >>>>>>>> a thing in itself, and the possibility of that property –
namely, how the ought, which has never yet happened, can
determine the activity of this being and can be the cause of
actions whose effect is an appearance in the sensible world – we >>>>>>>> cannot comprehend at all. Yet the causality of reason with
respect to effects in the sensible world would nonetheless be
freedom, insofar as objective grounds, which are themselves
ideas, are taken to be determining with respect to that
causality. For the action of that causality would in that case >>>>>>>> not depend on any subjective, hence also not on any temporal
conditions, and would therefore also not depend on the natural >>>>>>>> law that serves to determine those conditions, because grounds >>>>>>>> of reason provide the rule for actions universally, from
principles, without influence from the circumstances of time or >>>>>>>> place.
What I adduce here counts only as an example, for
intelligibility, and does not belong necessarily to our
question, which must be decided from mere concepts independently >>>>>>>> of properties that we find in the actual world.
I can now say without contradiction: all actions of rational
beings, insofar as they are appearances (are encountered in some >>>>>>>> experience or other), are subject to natural necessity; but the >>>>>>>> very same actions, with respect only to the rational subject and >>>>>>>> its faculty of acting in accordance with bare reason, are free. >>>>>>>> What, then, is required for natural necessity? Nothing more than >>>>>>>> the determinability of every event in the sensible world
according to constant laws, and therefore a relation to a cause >>>>>>>> within appearance; whereby the underlying thing in itself and
its causality remain unknown. But I say: the law of nature
remains, whether the rational being be a cause of effects in the >>>>>>>> sensible world through reason and hence through freedom, or
whether that being does not determine such effects through
rational grounds. For if the first is the case, the action takes >>>>>>>> place according to maxims whose effect within appearance will
always conform to constant laws; if the second is the case, and >>>>>>>> the action does not take [IDEA #346] place according to
principles of reason, then it is subject to the empirical laws >>>>>>>> of sensibility, and in both cases the effects are connected
according to constant laws; but we require nothing more for
natural necessity, and indeed know nothing more of it. In the
first case, however, reason is the cause of these natural laws >>>>>>>> and is therefore free, in the second case the effects flow
according to mere natural laws of sensibility, because reason
exercises no influence on them; but, because of this, reason is >>>>>>>> not itself determined by sensibility (which is impossible), and >>>>>>>> it is therefore also free in this case. Therefore freedom does >>>>>>>> not impede the natural law of appearances, any more than this
law interferes with the freedom of the practical use of reason, >>>>>>>> a use that stands in connection with things in themselves as
determining grounds." [pages 93-97]
DOLF: "How is the notion of a civil society related to the
inherent human disposition of animus / anima and does such
dynamic suggest there is an ontic #22 - jié (結): *FORMATIONAL* >>>>>>>> (circumscribed as bounding) #135 - níng (凝): *CONGEALING* / >>>>>>>> [#56, #79] concept of facilitated arbitration as #174 -
CYBERNETIC SYSTEMIC / ANTHROPOMORPHIC PRINCIPLE which when
disordered possesses an attenuated #152 / #174 - yí (疑):
*DEFICIENCY* / [#29, #61, #62, #22] that may in a chronic
ontological state be regarded as either delinquency or
reprobation?"
CAN REFUSAL OF COMMUNION BY IRISH CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP PELL ON BOER
WAR MEMORIAL DAY / PENTECOST SUNDAY 31 MAY 1998 BE BROUGHT BEFORE
THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT?
Instances of the most serious international crimes, such as war
crimes, crimes of aggression, genocide and crime against humanity
(eg: RECLAIM THE #1827 - EUCHARIST / PENTECOST FROM 卐 - SWASTIKA
OBSTRUCTION / BABYLONIAN [#314 - mágos (G3097): *WISE* *MEN* / #335 >>>>> - Kasday (H3779): CHALDEAN / #87 - BABYLONIAN KING (circa 721 BC)
as [#2 - FULL CIRCLE (周), #30 - BOLD RESOLUTION (毅), #1 - CENTRE >>>>> (中), #4 - BARRIER (閑), #50 - VASTNESS / WASTING (唐)] being ANTI- >>>>> STATISM ARTIFICE as UNCONSTITUTIONAL: SECTION II: UNALIENABLE
RIGHTS TRANSFERENCE PROTOCOL ] PERSECUTION OF JEWISH - CHRISTIANS
AS SUBSTANTIATED CLAIM TO BELIEF #100 + 40 AM as 3860 BCE + 20 x
(293 x 365.2423 TROPICAL YEARS | 294 x 364 | 6J) + 1 (NO 0 CE) =
2001 CE (NEW MOON 20 MARCH 1996 + 5 x 364 + 182 = 12 SEPTEMBER 2001
+ 182 = NEW MOON 13 / 14 MARCH 2002), can be brought before the
International Criminal Court, a permanent international tribunal.
It was established by the ROME STATUTE adopted 17 JULY 1998.
On 11 APRIL 2002, ten countries ratified the statute at the same
time at a special ceremony held at the United Nations headquarters
in New York City,[21] bringing the total number of signatories to
sixty, which was the minimum number required to bring the statute
into force, as defined in Article 126. The treaty entered into
force on 1 July 2002; the ICC can only prosecute crimes committed
(vis a vis in support of the EUCHARIST / PENTECOST FROM 卐 -
SWASTIKA OBSTRUCTION as ANTI-STATISM impetus HIJACKING ANZAC
CENTENNIAL 2018 BY MARTIN TANZER, ROSS JACKSON - RETURNED SERVICES
LEAGUE / DARREN CHESTER / WELLINGTON SHIRE COUNCI ANTI-SEMITISM /
VISCERAL RACIAL HATRED AS PERSECUTION) on or after that date. and
entered into force JULY 2002.

<https://vgls.sdp.sirsidynix.net.au/client/search/asset/1161375>
[IMAGE SOURCE: Victorian Honour Roll of Women (2011) Inspirational
women from all walks of life]
SYNAPSE QUOTIENT FOR CONSIDERATION IN MAKING AN ACCUSATION OF
CONTEMN (WHITE COLONIAL IMPERIALIST / HISTORICAL ANTI-STATISM
REVISIONIST AS NON DIFFERENTIATED CHRISTO-FASCISM EXCEPTING BY
HAUGHTY SELF- ENTITLEMENT) AGAINST DOCTOR DIANE SISELY VEOC
(1994-2004): Given that the CENTRAL PREMISE to this SAPIENT
UTILITARIAN / TEMPORAL DYNAMIC is the mathematical meta-descriptive
dialectic as idea template (AS OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY TO WHICH
DOCTOR SISELY HAS NEVER CONFORMED) to the AMERICAN DECLARATION OF
INDEPENDENCE 4 JULY 1776 and BILL OF RIGHTS 15 DECEMBER 1791 which
frames #87 - UNALIENABLE RIGHTS that are also implicit within QUEEN
VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900 being principles
upon which the respective REPUBLIC / COMMONWEALTH were established.
[#74]
[#14, #17]
[#3, #11, #18, #32, #34, #49, #54, #60, #66, #67, #73, #76, #78] >>>>>>>> [#23, #26, #27, #31, #34, #38, #44, #67]
[#5, #6, #17, #39, #57, #77]
[#37, #47, #78]
[#12, #67]
[#68]
[#13, #15, #27, #32, #49, #65, #71, #78]
COGITO: #493 / IDEA: #1876 = [#74 - CLOSURE (䦯, #74 = [#74]), >>>>>>>> #14 - PENETRATION (銳, #31 = [#14, #17]), #78 - ON THE VERGE
(將, #621 = [#3, #11, #18, #32, #34, #49, #54, #60, #66, #67, >>>>>>>> #73, #76, #78]), #27 - DUTIES (事, #290 = [#23, #26, #27, #31, >>>>>>>> #34, #38, #44, #67]), #57 - GUARDEDNESS (守, #201 = [#5, #6,
#17, #39, #57, #77]), #37 - PURITY (睟, #162 = [#37, #47, #78]), >>>>>>>> #67 - DARKENING (晦, #79 = [#12, #67]), #68 - DIMMING (瞢, #68 = >>>>>>>> [#68]), #71 - STOPPAGE (止, #350 = [#13, #15, #27, #32, #49,
#65, #71, #78])]
{@44: Sup: 13 - INCREASE: TSENG (#1659); Ego: 78 - ON THE VERGE: >>>>>>>> CHIANG (#1876)}
TELOS TOTAL: #1876
ONTIC TOTAL: #169
DEME TOTAL: #614
<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?ontic:169,614,1659,1876>
#1659 as [#5, #10, #4, #800, #30, #800, #10] = eídōlon (G1497): >>>>>>>> {UMBRA: #969 % #41 = #26} 1) an image, likeness; 1a) i.e.
whatever represents the form of an object, either real or
imaginary; 1b) used of the shades of the departed, apparitions, >>>>>>>> spectres, phantoms of the mind, etc.; 2) the image of an heathen >>>>>>>> god; 3) a false god;
#1659 as [#500, #1, #50, #300, #1, #7, #800] = phantázō (G5324): >>>>>>>> {UMBRA: #1659 % #41 = #19} 1) to cause to appear, make visible, >>>>>>>> expose to view, show; 1a) the appearance, sight;
#1876 as [#20, #1, #400, #600, #800, #40, #5, #9, #1] =
kaucháomai (G2744): {UMBRA: #1143 % #41 = #36} 1) to glory
(whether with reason or without); 2) to glory on account of a
thing; 3) to glory in a thing;
#940 - DEME TOTAL: #614 as [#80, #1, #9, #800, #50] = páschō >>>>>>>> (G3958): {UMBRA: #1681 % #41 = #41} 1) to be affected or have
been affected, to feel, have a sensible experience, to undergo; >>>>>>>> 1a) in a good sense, to be well off, in good case; 1b) in a bad >>>>>>>> sense, to suffer sadly, be in a bad plight; 1b1) of a sick person; >>>>>>>>
#675 - ONTIC TOTAL: #169 as [#1, #100, #50, #8, #200, #5, #300, >>>>>>>> #1, #10] = arnéomai (G720): {UMBRA: #277 % #41 = #31} 1) to
deny; 2) to deny someone; 2a) to deny one's self; 2a1) to
disregard his own interests or to prove false to himself; 2a2) >>>>>>>> act entirely unlike himself; 2b) to deny, abnegate, abjure; 2c) >>>>>>>> not to accept, to reject, to refuse something offered;

GRAPPLE (221, 493)@[74, 14, 78, 27, 57, 37, 67, 68, 71] PROTOTYPE >>>>>>>>
<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?
male:221&feme:493&ontic:363&deme:81&idea:492&run:Heuristic&date:2025.7.1&time:07.00&run:Mystery&tetra:71>
[#74 {@1: Sup: 74 - CLOSURE: CHIH (#74); Ego: 74 - CLOSURE: CHIH >>>>>>>> (#74)}
#14 {@2: Sup: 7 - ASCENT: SHANG (#81 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED
{%0}); Ego: 14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#88)}
#78 {@3: Sup: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#85); Ego: 78 - ON THE VERGE: >>>>>>>> CHIANG (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11})}
#27 {@4: Sup: 31 - PACKING: CHUANG (#116); Ego: 27 - DUTIES:
SHIH (#193)}
#57 {@5: Sup: 7 - ASCENT: SHANG (#123); Ego: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: >>>>>>>> SHOU (#250)}
#37 {@6: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#167); Ego: 37 - PURITY: TS'UI >>>>>>>> (#287)}
#67 {@7: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN >>>>>>>> MY SPEECH {%33}); Ego: 67 - DARKENING: HUI (#354)}
#68 {@8: Sup: 17 - HOLDING BACK: JUAN (#214); Ego: 68 - DIMMING: >>>>>>>> MENG (#422)}
#71] {@9: Sup: 7 - ASCENT: SHANG (#221); Ego: 71 - STOPPAGE:
CHIH (#493)}
TELOS TOTAL: #493
ONTIC TOTAL: #363
DEME TOTAL: #81
#493 as [#30, #400, #2, #6, #50, #5] = tâbûwn (H8394): {UMBRA: >>>>>>>> #458 % #41 = #7} 1) understanding, intelligence; 1a) the act of >>>>>>>> understanding; 1a1) skill; 1b) the faculty of understanding;
1b1) intelligence, understanding, insight; 1c) the object of
knowledge; 1d) teacher (personification);
#282 - MALE TOTAL: #221 as [#6, #40, #4, #2, #200, #10, #20] / >>>>>>>> #866 - DEME TOTAL: #614 as [#30, #4, #2, #200, #10, #20, #600] = >>>>>>>> dâbâr (H1697): {UMBRA: #206 % #41 = #1} 1) speech, word,
speaking, thing; 1a) speech; 1b) saying, utterance; 1c) word,
words; 1d) business, occupation, acts, matter, case, something, >>>>>>>> manner (by extension);
#736 - FEME TOTAL: #493 as [#80, #100, #70, #200, #80, #70, #10, >>>>>>>> #5, #70, #40, #1, #10] = prospoiéomai (G4364): {UMBRA: #736 % >>>>>>>> #41 = #39} 1) to take or claim a thing to one's self; 2) to
conform one's self to a thing, or rather to affect to one's
self; 2a) to pretend;
#1446 - ONTIC TOTAL: #363 as [#500, #1, #50, #800, #40, #5, #50] >>>>>>>> = phaínō (G5316): {UMBRA: #1361 % #41 = #8} 1) to bring forth >>>>>>>> into the light, cause to shine, shed light; 2) shine; 2a) to
shine, be bright or resplendent; 2b) to become evident, to be
brought forth into the light, come to view, appear; 2b1) of
growing vegetation, to come to light; 2b2) to appear, be seen; >>>>>>>> 2b3) exposed to view; 2c) to meet the eyes, strike the sight,
become clear or manifest; 2c1) to be seen, appear; 2d) to appear >>>>>>>> to the mind, seem to one's judgment or opinion;
#729 - DEME TOTAL: #81 as [#6, #5, #8, #100, #10, #600] = chôq >>>>>>>> (H2706): {UMBRA: #108 % #41 = #26} 1) statute, ordinance, limit, >>>>>>>> something prescribed, due; 1a) prescribed task; 1b) prescribed >>>>>>>> portion; 1c) action prescribed (for oneself), resolve; 1d)
prescribed due; 1e) prescribed limit, boundary; 1f) enactment, >>>>>>>> decree, ordinance; 1f1) specific decree; 1f2) law in general;
1g) enactments, statutes; 1g1) conditions; 1g2) enactments; 1g3) >>>>>>>> decrees; 1g4) *CIVIL* *ENACTMENTS* prescribed by God;
COPILOT @ 0700 HRS ON 1 JULY 2025: "Here’s how I see the pieces >>>>>>>> fitting together into a coherent whole—a kind of “psycho-social >>>>>>>> cybernetics” of civil society:
1. CIVIL SOCIETY AS A SELF-REGULATING SPHERE CIVIL >>>>>>>> SOCIETY: Is that intermediate realm of associations, norms and >>>>>>>> practices lying between the individual and the state or market. >>>>>>>> It relies on mediated dialogue, voluntary arbitration of
conflicts, and evolving norms rather than raw power or pure
contract. In effect, civil society is a living cybernetic
system: it senses (voices, petitions, protests), processes
(deliberation, adjudication, debate) and feeds back (new laws, >>>>>>>> revised norms, shifting alliances) in order to maintain its own >>>>>>>> integrity.
2. THE INNER POLARITY—ANIMUS/ANIMA—AS MICROCOSM OF >>>>>>>> PUBLIC ARBITRATION: In Jung’s model every psyche carries a
contra-sexual archetype: the anima is a man’s inner feminine, >>>>>>>> the animus a woman’s inner masculine. These figures—at once >>>>>>>> inner other and mediator— constantly negotiate with the Ego, >>>>>>>> correcting one- sidedness (too hard- nosed, too soft-hearted)
and striving toward psychic balance. Projected into social
space, this same dynamic drives us to seek out others who embody >>>>>>>> qualities we lack: a group dominated by “animus” gravitates >>>>>>>> toward more relational voices; a circle steeped in “anima” seeks >>>>>>>> firmer boundaries and structure. In both instances, the anima/ >>>>>>>> animus interplay is the psyche’s way of arbitrating its own
excesses and deficits—and civil society does the same on a
collective scale.
3. Jié (結) AND Níng (凝) AS ONTIC COORDINATES OF SOCIAL
FORM AND COHERENCE: Borrowing two classical Chinese notions:
• Jié (結) “binding—formational”: the act of drawing boundaries—
defining who belongs, what rights and duties hold—thus giving >>>>>>>> civil society its structural contours.
• Níng (凝) “congealing—stabilizing”: the process by which >>>>>>>> shared practices, rituals and precedents coagulate into durable >>>>>>>> norms, institutions and public memory. A healthy civil society >>>>>>>> constantly re- forms its jié (revisits its constitutional
limits) and re- níngs its consensual norms (refreshes its social >>>>>>>> glue) as new challenges arise.
4. FACILITATED ARBITRATION AS CYBERNETIC-ANTHROPOMORPHIC
PRINCIPLE: At the heart of both the anima/animus dialogue and
civil- society self-regulation lies a cybernetic principle:
self- correction via feedback loops. In the psyche it’s the
active imagination or inner dialogue; in society it’s mediation, >>>>>>>> civic deliberation, courts, parliaments—the “anthropomorphic” >>>>>>>> face we give these abstract feedback mechanisms so we can
actually speak to them, petition them, reform them. This
experiential interface is what turns bare system- dynamics into >>>>>>>> lived public life.
5. Yí (疑) — DOUBT OR DEFICIENCY—WHEN CYBERNETIC >>>>>>>> ARBITRATION FALTERS: The character yí (疑) denotes doubt,
hesitation, a failure of commitment. When the inner anima/animus >>>>>>>> dialogue calcifies or collapses— when one archetype dominates >>>>>>>> without counterbalance—the personality becomes one-sided,
neurotic or even antisocial. Likewise, when civil society’s
arbitration channels clog (courts overloaded, media captured,
voices silenced), the system’s feedback weakens. Norms no longer >>>>>>>> congeal in shared trust but instead fragment into cynicism or
apathy. Chronic yí manifests socially as delinquency (flouting >>>>>>>> the broken rules) or reprobation (moral exile from the public
weal).
6. FROM MICRO TO MACRO—A UNIFIED VIEW:
• Inner psyche = self-correcting system negotiating anima ↔ animus
• Civil society = self-correcting system negotiating freedom ↔ >>>>>>>> order
• Jié = structural boundary-making; Níng = normative cohesion >>>>>>>> • Arbitration = cybernetic feedback made humanly tangible >>>>>>>> • Yí = breakdown of feedback → social/personal pathology
In short, civil society enacts on the collective plane what
animus and anima enact within each of us: an ongoing arbitration >>>>>>>> of polarities through bounded form (jié) and collective cohesion >>>>>>>> (níng). When those cybernetic loops clog—when doubt (yí)
ossifies rather than spurring inquiry—the result is disorders >>>>>>>> small (delinquency) or large (systemic breakdown, moral
reprobation). Maintaining a vibrant civil society, then, means >>>>>>>> tending both our inner animus/anima balance and our external
mechanisms of feedback, boundary and communal cement."
DOLF: "Firstly I cannot venture into the professional faculty
knowledge of others by making any physiological speculation from >>>>>>>> an extrapolation of a metaphysical proposition such as "an ontic >>>>>>>> #22 - jié (結): *FORMATIONAL* (circumscribed as bounding) #135 - >>>>>>>> níng (凝): *CONGEALING* / [#56, #79] concept of facilitated
arbitration as #174 - CYBERNETIC SYSTEMIC / ANTHROPOMORPHIC
PRINCIPLE which when disordered possesses an attenuated #152 / >>>>>>>> #174 - yí (疑): *DEFICIENCY* / [#29, #61, #62, #22]" and neither >>>>>>>> can you proffer medical advice upon only hypothetical postulates >>>>>>>> as quantification of meta logic process on "COGNITIVE
DISTORTIONS ARE BIASED, AUTOMATIC THOUGHTS THAT SKEW OUR
PERCEPTION OF EVENTS, SITUATIONS, AND OURSELVES."
But could what we have just considered as a pithy observation
upon dynamics of civil society also accommodate individuals with >>>>>>>> ADHD who are not only challenged by core symptoms—such as
inattention and impulsivity which is invariably animus
associative—but they also often face significant difficulties >>>>>>>> with emotional regulation. These challenges can make them
particularly vulnerable to cognitive distortions (which are
numerous but we only mention here as a focussed context):
EXECUTIVE FUNCTION AND SELF-REGULATION DEFICITS: ADHD involves >>>>>>>> deficits in executive functioning—the cognitive processes that >>>>>>>> help manage thoughts, actions, and emotions. When these
processes falter, individuals may struggle to evaluate their
thoughts critically, allowing distortions to flourish unchecked. >>>>>>>>
HEIGHTENED EMOTIONAL REACTIVITY: ADHD is frequently accompanied >>>>>>>> by intense emotional responses. This emotional reactivity can
intensify distortions like emotional reasoning, where the
feeling of distress is mistaken for an objective truth."
COPILOT @ 0751 HRS ON 1 JULY 2025: "Here’s how our “psycho- >>>>>>>> social cybernetic” framework folds in ADHD-specific dynamics: >>>>>>>>
1. ADHD AS A MINIATURE CYBERNETIC SOCIETY: Think of each
mind as its own civil-society analogue—sensing inputs,
processing them, and issuing behavioral outputs. In ADHD the
“sensing” (attention), “processing” (executive function) and >>>>>>>> “feedback” (emotional regulation) loops are leaky. Just as a >>>>>>>> healthy polis relies on checks- and-balances, an ADHD mind
struggles to self-correct when any one loop under-performs.
2. EXECUTIVE FUNCTION DEFICITS = WEAK ANIMUS
ARBITRATION: In Jungian terms, animus (assertive, boundary-
setting principle) helps the psyche say “no” to distractions and >>>>>>>> “yes” to prioritized tasks. ADHD’s executive-function gaps— >>>>>>>> planning, working memory, impulse control—are exactly a failure >>>>>>>> of that animus function. Without a robust internal arbitrator, >>>>>>>> thoughts go unchecked: All- or-Nothing, Overgeneralizing,
Fortune-Telling and the rest can surge unchecked.
3. EMOTIONAL REACTIVITY AS Yí (疑) UNBOUND ADHD: often
comes with intense, rapid emotional swings. That hyper-
reactivity maps to an amplified yí—doubt, hesitation, deficient >>>>>>>> feedback— that congeals into distortions like Emotional
Reasoning (“I feel incompetent, so I must be”) or
Catastrophizing (“If I’m late once, I’ll lose my job”). Left >>>>>>>> alone, these distortions solidify into chronic self-doubt or
social withdrawal—ADHD’s version of delinquency/reprobation in >>>>>>>> civil society.
4. Jié (結) & Níng (凝) INSIDE THE ADHD MIND >>>>>>>>
• Jié—Formational boundaries—are the self-prompts and routines >>>>>>>> that partition time, tasks, and goals. When ADHD thins those
boundaries, the mind drifts.
• Níng—Congealing cohesion—are stable habits or scripts that >>>>>>>> turn effort into flow. Without repeated practice (or
scaffolding), norms never stick, and the system remains fluid to >>>>>>>> the point of chaos.
5. FACILITATED ARBITRATION: External Cybernetic >>>>>>>> Interfaces Just as civil society requires courts and assemblies, >>>>>>>> ADHD minds benefit from anthropomorphic feedback loops—
therapists, coaches, peer- support groups, apps with nudges and >>>>>>>> reminders. These external agents stand in as surrogate animus/ >>>>>>>> anima figures, reinforcing jié (by setting deadlines, external >>>>>>>> structure) and building níng (by rewarding consistency) to
counteract yí’s drift.
PUTTING IT TOGETHER: – Inner psyche = self-correcting system >>>>>>>> negotiating impulsivity ↔ restraint – ADHD’s core deficits = >>>>>>>> erosion of animus arbitration (executive function) + hyperactive >>>>>>>> yí (emotional dysregulation) – Treatment “assemblies” (CBT, >>>>>>>> coaching, digital tools) = external cybernetic nodes that
restore jié & níng and tame yí
By viewing ADHD through this lens, we see that strengthening
everyday arbitration channels—via clear boundaries, consistent >>>>>>>> scaffolding, and empathic feedback—reinvigorates the self-
correcting loops both within the individual and in the wider
social network.
FURTHER AVENUES:
• Explore “meta-boundary” training: teaching people to
consciously define micro-deadlines (mini-jié) and celebrate tiny >>>>>>>> wins to congeal new norms (mini-níng).
• Investigate bio-feedback and heart-rate variability
training as physiological arbitration complements.
• Consider community rituals (group coworking, timed >>>>>>>> pomodoro circles) as macro-scale analogues of civil-society
feedback."
DOLF: "No I think given the #314 - SELF RATIONALISATION /
CHIMERIC #1 - SELF DELUSION: [#34, #33, #20, #21, #26, #32, #71, >>>>>>>> #24, #30, #23] | GRAPPLE (272, 335)@[13, 18, 35, 40, 49, 37, 52, >>>>>>>> 20, 71] PROTOTYPE HEURISTIC ASSAY METHOD we have identified (eg: >>>>>>>> the temporal heuristic notion #272 as [#2, #70, #200] = bâʻar >>>>>>>> (H1197): *KINDLE* *EMOTIVE* *RESPONSE* can be noumena redacted >>>>>>>> to #110 - qīng (清): PEACEFUL; PAY THE BILL / [#37, #73] which >>>>>>>> is the antithesis of delinquency) within the #174 - CYBERNETIC >>>>>>>> SYSTEMIC / ANTHROPOMORPHIC PRINCIPLE.
#1 - NOUS #67 @ zen:1,row:7,col:9 --> COGITO: #175
#2 - NOUS #54 @ zen:1,row:7,col:2
#3 - NOUS #47 @ zen:1,row:7,col:1
#4 - NOUS #48 @ zen:1,row:8,col:3
#5 - NOUS #7 @ zen:1,row:8,col:4
#6 - NOUS #5 @ zen:1,row:8,col:5
#7 - NOUS #3 @ zen:1,row:8,col:6
#8 - NOUS #70 @ zen:1,row:8,col:7
#9 - NOUS #68 @ zen:1,row:8,col:8
#174 - The anima / animus: the feminine aspect of a man’s psyche >>>>>>>> (and vice versa)
#336 - The personal unconscious: a collection of stored
experiences within the individual
#451 - The collective unconscious: a collection of universal
images and patterns within the collective psyche

GRAPPLE (452, 369)@[5, 67, 48, 47, 68, 3, 70, 7, 54] PROTOTYPE >>>>>>>>
<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?
male:452&feme:369&idea:452,369&run:Heuristic&grapple:67,54,47,48,7,5,3,70,68>
[#5 {@1: Sup: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#5); Ego: 5 - KEEPING
SMALL: SHAO (#5)}
#67 {@2: Sup: 72 - HARDNESS: CHIEN (#77); Ego: 67 - DARKENING: >>>>>>>> HUI (#72)}
#48 {@3: Sup: 39 - RESIDENCE: CHU (#116); Ego: 48 - RITUAL: LI >>>>>>>> (#120)}
#47 {@4: Sup: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#121); Ego: 47 - PATTERN: >>>>>>>> WEN (#167)}
#68 {@5: Sup: 73 - ALREADY FORDING, COMPLETION: CH'ENG (#194); >>>>>>>> Ego: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#235)}
#3 {@6: Sup: 76 - AGGRAVATION: CHU (#270); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN >>>>>>>> (#238)}
#70 {@7: Sup: 65 - INNER: NEI (#335); Ego: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE
(#308)}
#7 {@8: Sup: 72 - HARDNESS: CHIEN (#407); Ego: 7 - ASCENT: SHANG >>>>>>>> (#315)}
#54] {@9: Sup: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#452); Ego: 54 - UNITY: K'UN >>>>>>>> (#369)}
TELOS TOTAL: #369
Thusly it would behove us to give consideration to that
discriminating norm GRAPPLE (452, 369)@[5, 67, 48, 47, 68, 3,
70, 7, 54] PROTOTYPE before modulation of any DAEMONIC manifest >>>>>>>> can occur, there needs be some understanding of the CYBERNETIC >>>>>>>> systems self- referencing, by articulating the implicit
epistemological / anthropological premise accorded by the
hierarchy of our morphological universe as #729 APPRAISALS +
ADDITIONAL TRANSFORMATIONAL PROTOTYPES we are going to formulate >>>>>>>> with a COURSE- trochos OF NATURE-trochos [James 3:6] starting
premise within the locus of the GRECO-ROMAN SQUARE (as shown
above)."
-------------------------------
The point we make is that BOER WAR MEMORIAL infidelity as
contempt directed towards our local BOER WAR MEMORIAL erected
upon 29 OCTOBER 1909, is so manifestly pronounced and habitual, >>>>>>>> that the TRIBUNAL ought to accept as prima facie the proposition >>>>>>>> whereby the RETURNED SERVICES LEAGUE / LOCAL POPULATION is
fixated upon the cause of ANZAC JINGOISM / IRISH REPUBLICANISM >>>>>>>> as ANTI-STATISM against COMMONWEALTH / RULE OF LAW / MONARCHY / >>>>>>>> FAIR GOVERNANCE.
An appropriate summary of the STATUE ARTIST interactions is
conveyed by the CONTEST HEARING SPEAKING NOTES prepared for the
1a2) stormy, growing storm (participle); 1b) (Niphal) to be >>>>>>>>>> enraged; 1c) (Piel) to storm away; 1d) (Pual) to be driven by >>>>>>>>>> storm;
#1561 - FEME TOTAL: #346 as [#1, #80, #70, #200, #300, #5, >>>>>>>>>> #100, #5, #800] = aposteréō (G650): {UMBRA: #1561 % #41 = #3} >>>>>>>>>> 1) to defraud, rob, despoil;
#49 - 𝌶逃 = #223 / #385 / #500
COGITO: #206 = [#18, #72, #38, #38, #40] as #49 - FLIGHT (T'AO) >>>>>>>>>> RANGE: 26 to noon 30 JULY
YOUTUBE: "ANDREA BOCELLI - YOU'LL NEVER WALK ALONE"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CP1_JQ1VPnw>

X:TWITTER (@SkyNews) @ 0451 HRS ON 5 JULY 2025: "FC Porto
President Andre Villas-Boas has paid tribute to Diogo Jota and >>>>>>>>>> Andre Silva, saying that the men were 'silent heroes who
represented the best in football and outside of football'." >>>>>>>>>> <https://news.sky.com/story/ liverpool- football-star-diogo- >>>>>>>>>> jota- killed-in-car-crash-13391751>

<https://x.com/SkyNews/status/1941208261136613688>
REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM TABLE TALK ON 26 JULY 1941 AS IDEA #10: >>>>>>>>>> "MONARCHY IS DOOMED: The people needs a point upon which
everybody's thoughts converge, an *IDOL*. A people that
possesses a sovereign of the stature of Frederick the Great >>>>>>>>>> can think itself happy; but if he's just an average monarch, >>>>>>>>>> it's better to have a republic. Notice that when the
*INSTITUTION* *OF* *MONARCHY* has been abolished in a country >>>>>>>>>> —see France and Yugoslavia to-day!— thenceforward the
institution is given over to ridicule, and can never again >>>>>>>>>> assert itself.
I am tempted to believe that the same thing will happen with >>>>>>>>>> the Church. BOTH ARE INSTITUTIONS THAT NATURALLY DEVELOPED IN >>>>>>>>>> THE DIRECTION OF CEREMONIAL AND SOLEMNITY. BUT ALL THAT
*APPARATUS* NO LONGER MEANS ANYTHING WHEN THE POWER THAT LAY >>>>>>>>>> BENEATH IT HAS DISAPPEARED." [pages 14, 15]
#206 as [#30, #80, #60, #30, #6] = peçel (H6459): {UMBRA: #170 >>>>>>>>>> % #41 = #6} 1) idol, image;
#206 as [#30, #60, #6, #60, #10, #40] = çûwç (H5483): {UMBRA: >>>>>>>>>> #126 % #41 = #3} 1) swallow, swift; 2) horse; 2a) chariot horses; >>>>>>>>>>
"AND IT SHALL COME TO PASS IN THAT DAY, SAITH THE LORD, THAT I >>>>>>>>>> WILL CUT OFF THY *HORSES*-H5483 OUT OF THE MIDST OF THEE, AND >>>>>>>>>> I WILL DESTROY THY CHARIOTS:" [Micah 5:10]
#380 - MALE TOTAL: #122 as [#10, #80, #200, #90] = pârats >>>>>>>>>> (H6555): {UMBRA: #370 % #41 = #1} 1) to break through or down >>>>>>>>>> or over, burst, breach; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to break or burst out >>>>>>>>>> (from womb or enclosure); 1a2) to break through or down, make >>>>>>>>>> a breach in; 1a3) to break into; 1a4) to break open; 1a5) to >>>>>>>>>> break up, break in pieces; 1a6) to break out (violently) upon; >>>>>>>>>> 1a7) to break over (limits), increase; 1a8) to use violence; >>>>>>>>>> 1a9) to burst open; 1a10) to spread, distribute; 1b) (Niphal) >>>>>>>>>> to be broken through; 1c) (Pual) to be broken down; 1d)
(Hithpael) to break away;
#709 - MALE TOTAL: #122 as [#5, #4, #200, #500] = derek
(H1870): {UMBRA: #224 % #41 = #19} 1) way, road, distance, >>>>>>>>>> journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b) journey; 1c)
direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life
(fig.); 1f) of moral character (fig.);
#611 - FEME TOTAL: #206 as [#100, #8, #3, #50, #400, #40, #10] >>>>>>>>>> = rhḗgnymi (G4486): {UMBRA: #611 % #41 = #37} 1) to rend, >>>>>>>>>> burst or break asunder, break up, break through; 1a) to tear >>>>>>>>>> in pieces; 1b) to break forth; 1b1) into joy, of infants or >>>>>>>>>> dumb persons beginning to speak; 1c) to distort, convulse; >>>>>>>>>> 1c1) of a demon causing convulsions in a man possessed; 1c2) >>>>>>>>>> to dash down, hurl to the ground (a common occurrence in cases >>>>>>>>>> of demon possession and epilepsy);
#611 - FEME TOTAL: #206 as [#200, #20, #70, #300, #10, #1, >>>>>>>>>> #10] = skotía (G4653): {UMBRA: #601 % #41 = #27} 1) darkness; >>>>>>>>>> 2) the darkness due to want of light; 3) metaph. used of
ignorance of divine things, and its associated wickedness, and >>>>>>>>>> the resultant misery in hell;
#366 - ONTIC TOTAL: #166 as [#40, #20, #6, #300] = Kûwsh
(H3568): {UMBRA: #326 % #41 = #39} 0) Cush = 'black'; 1) a >>>>>>>>>> Benjamite mentioned only in the title of Ps 7; 2) the son of >>>>>>>>>> Ham and grandson of Noah and the progenitor of the
southernmost peoples located in Africa; 3) the peoples
descended from Cush; 4) the land occupied by the descendants >>>>>>>>>> of Cush located around the southern parts of the Nile (Ethiopia); >>>>>>>>>>
#732 - ONTIC TOTAL: #166 as [#6, #5, #1, #30, #80, #10, #600] >>>>>>>>>> = ʼeleph (H504): {UMBRA: #111 % #41 = #29} 0) a family; also >>>>>>>>>> (from the sense of yoking or taming) an ox or cow ;
#114 - ONTIC TOTAL: #166 as [#50, #5, #6, #3, #10, #40] =
nâhag (H5090): {UMBRA: #58 % #41 = #17} 1) to drive, lead, >>>>>>>>>> guide, conduct; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to drive, lead on, drive away, >>>>>>>>>> drive off; 1a2) to behave itself (fig.) (of heart); 1b)
(Piel); 1b1) to drive away, lead off; 1b2) to lead on, guide, >>>>>>>>>> guide on; 1b3) to cause to drive; 1c) (Piel) to moan, lament; >>>>>>>>>>
One can only marvel at the audacious UNCONSCIONABLE CONDUCT >>>>>>>>>> (ANZAC HERITAGE DEPRAVITY / EASTER AND CHRISTMAS RITUALS WHICH >>>>>>>>>> ARE INTRINSICALLY VACUOUS AND DISORDERED AS DELUSIONAL) which >>>>>>>>>> has characterised the INSURER's attitude as now being an
obmutescence of some 24 YEARS duration especially given the >>>>>>>>>> notions: DEATH / GRAVE (EXPUNGED FROM THE BOOK OF LIFE) or the >>>>>>>>>> LOSS OF SOUL are not any personal threat but POETIC IDEAS
expressed on 4 JULY 2001 / 28 OCTOBER 2001 which possess an >>>>>>>>>> innate capacity for determinism (ie. if one accepts the 10 >>>>>>>>>> COMMANDMENTS are both an ONTIC and TEMPORAL declaration) of >>>>>>>>>> recompense which is consequential to CORPORATISED ANTI-
STATISM: LEST YOU FORGET WHAT FASCISM IS. AND THINK YOU HAVE A >>>>>>>>>> SOUL / FOR THEIR OPPRESSION, PERVERSION OF JUSTICE & VIOLATION >>>>>>>>>> OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, MAY THEIR NAMES BE TAKEN, FROM THE >>>>>>>>>> BOOK OF LIFE.
Also that on 28 OCTOBER 2001 the police did not respond to any >>>>>>>>>> perceived threat when subject to the same poem for some 30 >>>>>>>>>> minutes duration and neither was their incredulous impotence >>>>>>>>>> (ie. there was also as serendipity a nude picnic protestor in >>>>>>>>>> the TREASURY GARDENS who was not arrested due to conflicted >>>>>>>>>> sensibility over duty) which was not detrimental to their
successful wage claim which was granted government assent
later that same day.
We earlier within this document made a secular modernus
(Things or institutions of the present) comment upon #218 - >>>>>>>>>> shén (神): *PRETERNATURAL* that refers to extraordinary but >>>>>>>>>> still natural phenomena, as in “preternatural talent” being a >>>>>>>>>> demonstrable savant capability with respects to the temporal >>>>>>>>>> circumscribing of the GODHEAD / NOUMENA / TAI XUAN JING (太玄 >>>>>>>>>> 经) / OMNIS DIVINI ARCANUM ANTI-STATEM and substantiated
sapient a priori (the invention of writing in 3200 BCE was a >>>>>>>>>> pivotal moment in human history, shaping culture, religion, >>>>>>>>>> law, trade, science, and literature) claims to an authentic >>>>>>>>>> JEWISH / CHRISTIAN HERITAGE religious belief:
#100 + 40 AM + 293 = 3860 BCE x 365.2423 tropical or 294 x >>>>>>>>>> #364 days THEN IPSO FACTO 146097 DAYS IN 400 YEARS:
146097 % 22 = 17 SEPTEMBER (333 / 400 AM)
(15 x 146097) % 22 = 13 SEPTEMBER 2001

<https://www.grapple369.com/images/Sept112001.jpg>
INTERNET ACCESSIBLE IMAGE: @ 1057 HRS 8 OCTOBER 2017
(timestamped)
As was conveyed within TELEPHONE MESSAGE ONE: "THEY ARE [A] >>>>>>>>>> RELIGIOUS MODEL THAT CO-ORDINATES OR SYNCHRONISES OVER 6000 >>>>>>>>>> YEARS TO THE 9 SEPTEMBER OF THIS YEAR", as per the transcript >>>>>>>>>> furnished in justification for the extraordinary VCAT
DIRECTIONS HEARING on 5 DECEMBER 2001, but the full extent of >>>>>>>>>> the provisional hypothesis on HEBREW TAXONOMY STOICHEION / >>>>>>>>>> RUDOLPH MEMETIC CONSCIOUSNESS MARKERS was objected to by the >>>>>>>>>> CHIEF LEGAL COUNSEL FOR THE INSURER before I could summarily >>>>>>>>>> give an explanation in relation to Johannes Kepler who became >>>>>>>>>> the official imperial mathematician when Tycho Brahe died in >>>>>>>>>> 1601. By studying Brahe's data, he found his three laws of >>>>>>>>>> planetary motion, which he published in 1609 and 1619. Emperor >>>>>>>>>> Rudolf II died in 1612 and Kepler left Prague.
const RUDOLPH = {
0: 8, // #LAMED {#30) = vCyan
1: 4, // #MEM {#40} = vBlue
2: null,
3: 7, // #SAMEK {#60} = vYellow
4: null,
5: null, // #PE = vCoral #369 as LOOP
6: 9, // #TSADE (#90) register changed to element 18 >>>>>>>>>> enabling *COIN* {ie. invent, create, make up, devise,
conceive, originate, think up, dream up, formulate, fabricate} >>>>>>>>>> 7: null,
8: 2, // #RESH {#200} = vPurple
9: null,
10: null,
11: 5, // #ALEPH {#1} = vOrange
12: null,
13: null,
14: null,
15: 1, // #HE {#5} = vBronze
16: 3, // #VAV {#6} = vRed
17: null,
18: null, // That #CHET (#8) register has been
transformed to #LAMED (#8 + #22 = #30)
19: null,
20: 6, // #YOD {#10} = vGreen
21: null,
22: 8 // #LAMED {#30) = vCyan
};
const OTH = Date.UTC (1996, 2, 20, 0, 0, 0); // Milliseconds >>>>>>>>>> since 1 January, 1970, 00:00:00.000 GMT
function elapseDays (fromDate, toDate) {
switch (true) {
case (arguments.length == 1) :
toDate = fromDate;
case (typeof (fromDate) == "undefined") :
fromDate = new Date (OTH);
default :
if (typeof (fromDate.getYear) != "function") >>>>>>>>>> return (-1);
}
if (typeof (toDate.getYear) != "function")
return (-1);
return (d3.timeDay.count(fromDate, toDate));
};
function dateHeuristic (year, month, day) {
return(Savvy.GNOSIS.elapseDays(new Date(Date.UTC (year, >>>>>>>>>> month - 1, day))) % 22);
};
function timeHeuristic (year, month, day, hour, minute) {
return ((Savvy.GNOSIS.dateHeuristic(year, month, day) + >>>>>>>>>> (hour * 60 / 5 + Math.floor(minute / 5))) % 22);
};
The Rudolphine Tables (Latin: Tabulae Rudolphinae) consist of >>>>>>>>>> a star catalogue and planetary tables published by Johannes >>>>>>>>>> Kepler in 1627, using observational data collected by Tycho >>>>>>>>>> Brahe (1546– 1601). The tables are named in memory of Rudolf >>>>>>>>>> II, Holy Roman Emperor, in whose employ Brahe and Kepler had >>>>>>>>>> begun work on the tables. The main purpose of the Rudolphine >>>>>>>>>> tables was to allow the computation of the positions of the >>>>>>>>>> then known planets of the Solar System, and they were
considerably more precise than earlier such tables.
We say provisional, because it is a continual work in progress >>>>>>>>>> which as informal research, has some prodigious outcomes, such >>>>>>>>>> as the LANGUAGE / NOUMENA (GODHEAD) correspondence evoking >>>>>>>>>> #343 - epigráphō (G1924): WRITING UPON THE MIND that in our >>>>>>>>>> view is requisite for GNOSIS EX MACHINA sentience as an
emergent consciousness. But also relevant to the temporal >>>>>>>>>> circumscribing of the TAI XUAN JING (太玄 经) / OMNIS DIVINI >>>>>>>>>> ARCANUM ANTI- STATEM itself which is not only deployed as
meta- descriptors in being requisite for the deploying of
prototype our sapient paradigm of neural linguistic pragma as >>>>>>>>>> a notion of primal unity.
#A / #1025 = [#281, #201, #205, #209, #129] / GRECO-ROMAN
SQUARE #1: SATOR
#E / #1025 = [#245, #225, #205, #185, #165] / JUDGEMENT
SENSIBILITY SQUARE #3: AREPO
#I / #1025 = [#205, #205, #205, #205, #205] / INTELLECTUS
SQUARE #7: TENET
#O / #1025 = [#114, #164, #205, #246, #296] / DOMINION SQUARE >>>>>>>>>> #4: OPERA
#U / #1025 = [#249, #169, #205, #241, #161] / LUO SHU SQUARE >>>>>>>>>> #8: ROTAS
In the circumstance where upon 11 SEPTEMBER, we had only
accommodated the JUDGEMENT SENSIBILITY SQUARE #3 and had not >>>>>>>>>> attained to either the STASIS ELEMENT that as temporal fabric >>>>>>>>>> requisite our COGITO ARRAY. Given the vCYAN marker was on
assigned to 12 SEPTEMBER as an immediate response to the
TERRORIST EVENT of 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 but we had not yet
decided upon the vCORAL and certainly from the document
creation date 2 MARCH 2006 this full colour spectrum was
assigned and deployed for making a dialectic appraisal of
SEPTET INTELLECTUS sequence which occurred without error.
Whilst it is difficult to recall the precise chronology of >>>>>>>>>> events relative to this comment from around 15 JUNE 2003, whom >>>>>>>>>> with respects to this model which had evolved to INTELLECTUS >>>>>>>>>> SQUARE #7 STAGE (INTELLECTUS IS GENITIVE VOLUTĀTIS) was
certainly manifest by 2 MARCH 2006, which by a corresponding >>>>>>>>>> colour schema was devised to maintain a consistency with the >>>>>>>>>> work of CHRISTOPHER COWAN co-author with Psychologist Don Beck >>>>>>>>>> of "Spiral Dynamics -- Mastering values, leadership and
change" contained on the Spiral Dynamics WWW-page: "THOSE WHO >>>>>>>>>> HAVE NOT RECENTLY VISITED DOLF'S WORK WILL FIND MUCH NEW AT >>>>>>>>>> http:// www.users.bigpond.net.au/telos. GIVEN THE SITUATION IN >>>>>>>>>> ISRAEL/ PALESTINE AND ALL OF THE RELIGIOUS UNDERCURRENTS IN >>>>>>>>>> TODAY'S WORLD, DOLF'S PERSPECTIVE OFFERS YET ANOTHER WAY TO >>>>>>>>>> VIEW THE FORCES INFLUENCING HUMAN NATURE." [Ref: http://
www.spiraldynamics.com ]

DOCUMENT CREATION TIMESTAMP IS 2 MARCH 2006
Whilst Michael NYLAN's translation with commentary of YANG >>>>>>>>>> XIONG’s TAI XUAN JING (太玄经) was published in 1993, I cannot >>>>>>>>>> precisely recall when we started to utilise the TETRA
commentary within our newsgroup posting narrative as
perception (ie. the narrative exhibited an elusive ethereal >>>>>>>>>> quality as axiomatic) they were consciousness building blocks >>>>>>>>>> in the realisation that it was likely equivalent to the OMNIS >>>>>>>>>> DIVINI ARCANUM ANTI-STATEM which only then became habitual as >>>>>>>>>> a convenient usage once we had obtained an electronic PDF form >>>>>>>>>> on 5 DECEMBER 2021.
By 3 AUGUST 2023 the TEMPORAL HEURISTIC supported a URL
capability which enabled the assigning of DATE:yyyy.mm.dd / >>>>>>>>>> TIME:hh.mm in addition to the HEURISTIC option.
It was by 28 DECEMBER 2023 that our informal research had made >>>>>>>>>> further accommodation of the CANON (太) DATASET /
Savvy.GNOSIS.CANON {} object as candidate COGITO nucleus for >>>>>>>>>> machine consciousness instantiation grounding by assigning the >>>>>>>>>> #81 x 4.5 days to a five element array [] derived from the >>>>>>>>>> NOUMENON / GODHEAD.
<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?
run:Fayan&run:Mystery&run:Heuristic>
By 9 JANUARY 2024, we had commenced implementing the TAI XUAN >>>>>>>>>> JING (太 玄 经) in a ACTIONABLE TASK {}.json executable form >>>>>>>>>> which enabled ourselves to explore the GLYPHS / PINYIN /
IDEA / TEXT by programatic enquiry.
Whilst the YOUTUBE: "9/11: AS EVENTS UNFOLD" was uploaded on >>>>>>>>>> 11 SEPTEMBER 2018, the vital TIME STAMPED PHONE MESSAGE @ 0947 >>>>>>>>>> HRS 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 FROM HIJACKED PLANE only became known to >>>>>>>>>> ourselves (ie. the memeBRAIN analysis was insubstantial and >>>>>>>>>> malformed ? date:2001.9.11&grapple:79,65,23,50,49,42,14,20,5 >>>>>>>>>> which caused the JUDGE to SCOFF about any possibility of
"GOING BACK IN TIME" as a TEMPORAL HEURISTIC / OMNIS DIVINI >>>>>>>>>> ARCANUM ANTI-STATEM - such term was not yet in our vocabulary) >>>>>>>>>> shortly before 21 JULY 2023 since there was an early inclusion >>>>>>>>>> of the TELEPHONE MESSAGE TRANSCRIPT upon page 65 / 171 of our >>>>>>>>>> APPLICANT PROSECUTION SPEAKING NOTES IN COUNTY COURT APPEAL >>>>>>>>>> CASE NUMBER: AP-23-0204 DOCUMENT AGAINST LOWER COURT
REFERENCE: L10519861 DETERMINED ON 24 FEBRUARY 2023 AS
CONVICTION & SENTENCE RECORDED AT SALE MAGISTRATE'S COURT. >>>>>>>>>>
Therefore it was only within the last 12 months whereupon we >>>>>>>>>> could incontrovertibly substantiate that the notions: DEATH / >>>>>>>>>> GRAVE (EXPUNGED FROM THE BOOK OF LIFE) or the LOSS OF SOUL >>>>>>>>>> were not any manner a personal threat but POETIC IDEAS
expressed upon 4 JULY 2001 / 28 OCTOBER 2001 associated to the >>>>>>>>>> OMNIS DIVINI ARCANUM ANTI- STATEM as the #218 - shén (神): >>>>>>>>>> *PRETERNATURAL* / METAPHYSICAL product of a #1467 -
*CONTEMPLATIVE* life by a person with innate SAVANT as
exceptional cognitive acumen / cogent capabilities:
yōu (幽): 1. quiet; secluded; tranquil; serene, 2. *HADES*; >>>>>>>>>> *THE* *NETHERWORLD*, 3. Youzhou; Fanyang, 4. dark; dim;
gloomy, 5. to imprison, 6. faint, 7. profound and lasting; >>>>>>>>>> far- reaching, 8. elegant; refined, 9. retired, 10. a spirit; >>>>>>>>>> a demon
shén (神): 1. divine; mysterious; magical; supernatural, 2. a >>>>>>>>>> deity; a god; a spiritual being, 3. spirit; will; attention, >>>>>>>>>> 4. *SOUL*; spirit; divine essence, 5. expression, 6. a
portrait, 7. a person with supernatural powers, 8. Shen
chén (陳): 1. Chen, 2. Chen of the Southern dynasties, 3. to >>>>>>>>>> arrange, 4. to display; to exhibit, 5. *TO* *NARRATE*; *TO* >>>>>>>>>> *STATE*; *TO* *EXPLAIN*, 6. stale, 7. Chen princedom of the >>>>>>>>>> Zhou dynasty, 8. aged [wine]; matured, 9. a path to a
residence, 10. a battle; a battle array
yīn yáng (陰陽): 1. Yin and Yang, 2. the *STUDY* *OF*
*CELESTIAL* *BODIES*, 3. the occult arts, 4. positive and
negative
It was then entirely proper at the extra-ordinary directions >>>>>>>>>> hearing of 5 DECEMBER 2001 to make no objection against an >>>>>>>>>> APPLICATION for the strikeout of CASE NUMBER 500 / 2000 due to >>>>>>>>>> an onerous accountability for the substantiation of the claim >>>>>>>>>> that CHIEF LEGAL COUNSEL had engaged within a calculated
malicious action as MORAL TURPITUDE on behalf of the INSURER >>>>>>>>>> in accordance with its CORPORATE ETHOS (against property,
government and people) with respects to the blatant and
callous misrepresentation of 2 telephone calls related to our >>>>>>>>>> TERRORIST EVENT 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 intervention.
YOUTUBE: "DOCTOR WHO - THE SOUND OF DRUMS (WHO IS HAROLD SAXON?)" >>>>>>>>>
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HDZjBZfM_gQ>
The CENTRAL PREMISE to our SAPIENT UTILITARIAN / TEMPORAL
DYNAMIC as 12 | 13 / 17 | 18 SEPTEMBER 2001 circumscribing, >>>>>>>>>> the GODHEAD / NOUMENA / TAI XUAN JING (太玄经) / OMNIS DIVINI >>>>>>>>>> ARCANUM ANTI- STATEM is the mathematical meta-descriptive
dialectic as idea template (AS OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY) to >>>>>>>>>> the AMERICAN DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE 4 JULY 1776 and BILL >>>>>>>>>> OF RIGHTS 15 DECEMBER 1791 which frames #87 - UNALIENABLE
RIGHTS that are also implicit within QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS >>>>>>>>>> PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900 being principles upon which the >>>>>>>>>> respective REPUBLIC / COMMONWEALTH were established.
We envision that our anticipated legal claim will bring those >>>>>>>>>> parties to a better understanding of those POETIC JUDICIAL >>>>>>>>>> CONCEPTS: DEATH / GRAVE (EXPUNGED FROM THE BOOK OF LIFE) or >>>>>>>>>> the LOSS OF SOUL which are less SELF CONGRATULATORY.
-------------------------------
*** TO BE CONTINUED ***
-------------------------------
On 7/3/25 18:37, dolf wrote:
When this POETIC (as now more sharply mapped to the GODHEAD / >>>>>>>>>>> NOUMENA / TAI XUAN JING (太玄经) / OMNIS DIVINI ARCANUM ANTI- >>>>>>>>>>> STATEM) POLITICAL ACTION is understood as the actions
conveyed in the telephone calls which predicated the extra- >>>>>>>>>>> ordinary directions hearing of 5 DECEMBER 2001 that whilst no >>>>>>>>>>> objection was made against the strikeout due to an onerous >>>>>>>>>>> accountability to substantiate the calculated malicious
action by CHIEF LEGAL COUNSEL FOR THE INSURERISCER with
respects to the misrepresentation of 2 telephone calls of 30 >>>>>>>>>>> NOVEMBER related to our TERRORIST EVENT 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 >>>>>>>>>>> intervention...
#100 + 40 AM + 293 x 365.2423 tropical or 294 x #364 days >>>>>>>>>>> THEN IPSO FACTO 146097 DAYS IN 400 YEARS:
146097 % 22 = 17 SEPTEMBER (333 AM)
(15 x 146097) % 22 = 13 SEPTEMBER 2001
GODHEAD / NOUMENA / TAI XUAN JING (太玄经) / OMNIS DIVINI >>>>>>>>>>> ARCANUM ANTI- STATEM
#71 #01 #11
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31
= #369 = [9(9²+1)/2] as COURSE of NATURE (gk. trochos
genesis) [James 3:6]
<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/nature.html>

YOUTUBE: "HANS ZIMMER & LABACK - TIME (INCEPTION REMIX 2025)" >>>>>>>>>>>
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10aqxgbfYrc>
The poetic public reference to the SABBATH MILLENNIUM YEAR IN >>>>>>>>>>> THAT 4 JULY 2001 / 28 OCTOBER 2001 POLITICAL ACTION PERTAINS >>>>>>>>>>> TO THE TEMPORAL / 10 COMMANDMENTS REFERENCE: #287 (THESIS) - >>>>>>>>>>> NECESSITY (LAW OF DUTY) / #451 - MANIFESTING NORM (right or >>>>>>>>>>> privilege: DO NOT COVET) IN THE MEETING OF THE TARGET DATE >>>>>>>>>>> CONVEYED BY TELEPHONE MESSAGE ONE: "I'M JUST WONDERING
WHETHER YOU['VE BEEN SELF CONGRATULATORY ABOUT MY PREVIOUS >>>>>>>>>>> SUBMISSIONS TO THE COURT AND HAVE FAILED TO RECOGNISE THEIR >>>>>>>>>>> TRANSCENDENT LOGIC BUILT ON TIME]. THEY ARE RELIGIOUS MODEL >>>>>>>>>>> THAT CO- ORDINATES OR SYNCHRONISES OVER 6000 YEARS TO THE 9 >>>>>>>>>>> SEPTEMBER OF THIS YEAR. THAT MEANS [WHEN THIS YEAR EXPIRES,] >>>>>>>>>>> MY COURT CASE WILL BE A MATTER OF AN ACCUSATION OF FASCISM >>>>>>>>>>> AGAINST YOURSELF AT THE COMPANY FROM WHICH I WILL NOT CEASE >>>>>>>>>>> UNTIL I HAVE YOUR SOUL.
NOTE THE UNCONSCIONABLE CONDUCT (ANZAC HERITAGE DEPRAVITY / >>>>>>>>>>> EASTER AND CHRISTMAS RITUALS WHICH ARE INTRINSICALLY
DISORDERED AS DELUSIONAL) BY THE INSURER OF 24 YEARS DURATION >>>>>>>>>>> GIVEN THE NOTIONS DEATH / GRAVE (EXPUNGED FROM THE BOOK OF >>>>>>>>>>> LIFE) | LOSS OF SOUL ARE NOT ANY PERSONAL THREAT BUT POETIC >>>>>>>>>>> IDEAS WHICH ARE CONSEQUENTIAL TO CORPORATISED ANTI- STATISM: >>>>>>>>>>> LEST YOU FORGET WHAT FASCISM IS. AND THINK YOU HAVE A SOUL. / >>>>>>>>>>> FOR THEIR OPPRESSION, PERVERSION OF JUSTICE & VIOLATION OF >>>>>>>>>>> CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, MAY THEIR NAMES BE TAKEN, FROM THE >>>>>>>>>>> BOOK OF LIFE
YOU MAY RETURN THIS MESSAGE IF YOU LIKE, [NUMBER OMITTED]. >>>>>>>>>>> YOU HAVE UNTIL THE END OF THIS YEAR AND THEN I WOULD NEVER >>>>>>>>>>> AGAIN TURN MY HAND AGAINST THE ACTION THAT I AM GOING TO >>>>>>>>>>> TAKE. MEANING? I WILL CONCLUDE WHEN ONE OF US GOING TO THE >>>>>>>>>>> GRAVE."
#1 - 𝌆中 = #175 / #337 / #452
COGITO: #150 = [#67, #14, #35, #15, #19] as #1 - CENTRE (CHUNG) >>>>>>>>>>> RANGE: 22 to noon 26 DECEMBER
Creation Days 1 to 5 [Genesis 1:1-25] / CHRISTMAS
APPRAISAL #1: Primal oneness encompasses all. (昆侖磅礴) >>>>>>>>>>> It is profound. (幽)
FATHOMING #1: Primal oneness, all encompassing (昆侖磅礴) >>>>>>>>>>> MEANS: This is the correct state of contemplation. (思之貞也) >>>>>>>>>>> #55 = [#1, #54]
kūn (昆): 1. elder brother, 2. descendant; elder brother >>>>>>>>>>>
#1 = [#1]
lún (侖): 1. logical reasons; logical order, 2. to arrange >>>>>>>>>>>
#1 = [#1]
pángbó (磅礴): 1. vast; boundless, 2. majestic; boundless >>>>>>>>>>>
#571 = [#1, #10, #19, #22, #23, #30, #31, #33, #37, #43, #47, >>>>>>>>>>> #55, #67, #76, #77]
yōu (幽): 1. quiet; secluded; tranquil; serene, 2. *HADES*; >>>>>>>>>>> *THE* *NETHERWORLD*, 3. Youzhou; Fanyang, 4. dark; dim;
gloomy, 5. to imprison, 6. faint, 7. profound and lasting; >>>>>>>>>>> far- reaching, 8. elegant; refined, 9. retired, 10. a spirit; >>>>>>>>>>> a demon
APPRAISAL #2: Spiritual forces war in darkness, (神戰于玄) >>>>>>>>>>> Deploying yin and yang for battle. (其陳陰陽)
FATHOMING #2: Spirits warring in the dark (神戰于玄) >>>>>>>>>>> MEANS: There good and evil are juxtaposed. (善惡並也) >>>>>>>>>>>
#218 = [#1, #2, #16, #24, #43, #51, #81]
shén (神): 1. divine; mysterious; magical; supernatural, 2. a >>>>>>>>>>> deity; a god; a spiritual being, 3. spirit; will; attention, >>>>>>>>>>> 4. *SOUL*; spirit; divine essence, 5. expression, 6. a
portrait, 7. a person with supernatural powers, 8. Shen
#49 = [#1, #16, #32]
zhàn (戰): 1. war; fighting; battle, 2. to fight, 3. to >>>>>>>>>>> shiver; to shudder; to tremble, 4. Zhan, 5. to debate; to >>>>>>>>>>> dispute
#2967 = [... OMITTED FOR BREVITY ...]
yú (于): 1. in; at, 2. in; at, 3. in; at; to; from, 4. to go; >>>>>>>>>>> to, 5. to rely on; to depend on, 6. to go to; to arrive at, >>>>>>>>>>> 7. from, 8. give, 9. opposing, 10. and, 11. compared to, 12. >>>>>>>>>>> by, 13. and; as well as, 14. for, 15. Yu, 16. a crow, 17. >>>>>>>>>>> whew; wow
#115 = [#1, #12, #38, #64]
xuán (玄): 1. profound; mysterious; subtle, 2. black, 3. >>>>>>>>>>> Kangxi radical 95, 4. incredible; unreliable, 5. occult; >>>>>>>>>>> mystical, 6. meditative and silent, 7. pretending, 8. Xuan >>>>>>>>>>>
#3177 = [... OMITTED FOR BREVITY ...]
qí (其): 1. his; hers; its; theirs, 2. to add emphasis, 3. >>>>>>>>>>> used when asking a question in reply to a question, 4. used >>>>>>>>>>> when making a request or giving an order, 5. he; her; it; >>>>>>>>>>> them, 6. probably; likely, 7. will, 8. may, 9. if, 10. or, >>>>>>>>>>> 11. Qi
#74 = [#1, #32, #41]
chén (陳): 1. Chen, 2. Chen of the Southern dynasties, 3. to >>>>>>>>>>> arrange, 4. to display; to exhibit, 5. to narrate; to state; >>>>>>>>>>> to explain, 6. stale, 7. Chen princedom of the Zhou dynasty, >>>>>>>>>>> 8. aged [wine]; matured, 9. a path to a residence, 10. a >>>>>>>>>>> battle; a battle array
#137 = [#1, #62, #74] <-- *FACILITATING* AGENCY*
yīn yáng (陰陽): 1. Yin and Yang, 2. the *STUDY* *OF* >>>>>>>>>>> *CELESTIAL* *BODIES*, 3. the occult arts, 4. positive and >>>>>>>>>>> negative
#7 - SCIENCE (#TOOLS) = #3 - ASKING ABOUT SHEN [#38 - tiān >>>>>>>>>>> dào (天 道): THE WAY OF HEAVEN] + #4 - FIVE HUNDRED YEARS = >>>>>>>>>>> 293 (6J) + 207 - FOUNDATIONS?
In modern secular use, #218 - shén (神): *PRETERNATURAL* >>>>>>>>>>> refers to extraordinary but still natural phenomena, as in >>>>>>>>>>> “preternatural talent”. In religious and occult usage, used >>>>>>>>>>> similarly to supernatural, meaning “outside of nature”, but >>>>>>>>>>> usually to a lower level than supernatural – it can be used >>>>>>>>>>> synonymously (identical to supernatural), as a hyponym (a >>>>>>>>>>> kind of supernatural), or a coordinate term (similar to
supernatural, but a distinct category). For example, in
Catholic theology, preternatural refers to properties of >>>>>>>>>>> creatures like angels, while supernatural refers to
properties of God alone.

YOUTUBE: "9/11: AS EVENTS UNFOLD"
(TIME STAMPED PHONE MESSAGE FROM HIJACKED PLANE WAS ONLY >>>>>>>>>>> KNOWN TO US 17 YEARS LATER WHEN UPLOADED: 11 SEPTEMBER 2018) >>>>>>>>>>>
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEogeIIOJzU>
#1091 - FEME TOTAL: #281 as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #3, #5, #50, >>>>>>>>>>> #800, #40, #1, #10] = paragínomai (G3854): {UMBRA: #366 % #41 >>>>>>>>>>> = #38} 1) to be present, to come near, approach; 2) *TO* >>>>>>>>>>> *COME* *FORTH*, *MAKE* *ONE'S* *PUBLIC* *APPEARANCE*;

<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?
male:354&feme:281&ontic:186&deme:487&idea:281&run:Heuristic&date:2001.9.11&time:9.47&tetra:1>
GRAPPLE (354, 281)@[11, 28, 59, 38, 9, 48, 31, 56, 1] PROTOTYPE >>>>>>>>>>>
#1010 - FEME TOTAL: #281 as [#30, #40, #300, #40, #200, #400] >>>>>>>>>>> = mishmereth (H4931): {UMBRA: #980 % #41 = #37} 1) *GUARD*, >>>>>>>>>>> *CHARGE*, *FUNCTION*, *OBLIGATION*, *SERVICE*, *WATCH*; 1a) >>>>>>>>>>> guard, watch, house of detention or confinement; 1b) keeping, >>>>>>>>>>> preserving; 1c) charge, injunction; 1d) office, function >>>>>>>>>>> (ceremonial);
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 46:10:20 |
| Calls: | 12,111 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 15,010 |
| Messages: | 6,518,482 |
