• case summary for an application notice

    From =?UTF-8?Q?Nicholas_Collin_Paul_de_G@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 31 10:06:05 2023
    XPost: free.uk.legal, england.legal, free.uk.legal.public-law

    This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
    while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

    A case summary is needed for an application notice but files at Gov.UK are
    not consistent about case summaries. Is the following by me - based on
    Form PLO2 (04.08) plo2-eng.doc - good enough?

    "Case Summary
    Claim No. KB-2023-002906
    de Glouceſter versus Lonergan and others

    This process is about defamations; malicious falsehoods; misuses of
    private and confidential informations; breaches against confidence, data-protection legislation and the Communications Act 2003; harassment
    by publication; and intentional infliction of mental harm concealing
    torture and another crime against humanity (namely persecution); and
    murders happened because de these defamations; and Portugal tortured on
    behalf de a fraudster paid by UK taxes.

    A judge falsely said on 14/07/2023 that this court cannot give remedies. Please set aside or vary that order.

    Agreed Key Issues:
    On 02/06/2010 this 3rd defendant invited this claimant to write to it,
    which he did.
    This 3rd defendant and a representative thereof don’t understand Gaelic.
    No defendant disputes these proposed meanings.

    Related processes:
    Process
    Parties
    Court/Body
    Stage reached
    Comments

    Process Number 373/13.5TBCBR
    Portugal and this claimant
    3º Juízo Criminal de Coimbra
    concluded
    This claimant was defamed and tortured (verified by a European Court of
    Human Rights) with no lawyer with no interpreter to sign a false
    confession (which he did not understand is false because he was lied to
    about what it means).

    335/14.5BECBR
    This claimant and Portugal’s Foundation for Science and Technology
    Tribunal Central Administrativo Norte
    concluded



    This claimant and Coimbra University

    ongoing
    Commenced during 2012. Administrative.

    This claimant and Coimbra University

    ongoing
    Anti-defamation.
    00259/12.0BECBR
    This claimant and Instituto Superior Politécnico de Coimbra
    Tribunal Central Administrativo Norte
    concluded

    1197/12.2TACBR
    This claimant and Paulo Alexandre Cunha Gomes
    Public-prosecution service prevents reaching court by admittedly
    accepting known perjury to be true

    slander
    220/14.0T9CBR
    This claimant and Rui Miguel Curado da Silva
    Public-prosecution service prevents reaching court


    322/17.1PCCBR
    This claimant and Rui Miguel Curado da Silva
    Public-prosecution service prevents reaching court: rejected


    229328/2013 2013224596
    This claimant and Coimbra University
    Alternative dispute resolution
    failed

    333/11.0BECBR
    This claimant and Portugal’s Foundation for Science and Technology
    Tribunal Central Administrativo Norte
    concluded

    ...




    123/14.9PFCBR
    Portugal; Maria Filomena de Osório Pinto dos Santos Figueiredo; Coimbra University; and this claimant
    Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Coimbra,
    Juízo Central Criminal de Coimbra – Juiz 2
    concluded



    Key Date
    Step to be taken
    Reason for non-compliance
    09/03/2023
    Cooperation by these 1st and 2nd defendants with a pre-action protocol.
    These 1st to 2nd defendants are guilty.
    03/05/2023
    Answers to these questions: “Where are the readers of these articles? (Clearly one reader of an article about me by Cofina Media, S.A. is in
    England and Wales. How many readers of each such article is in England
    and Wales?) What are the words about me that Cofina Media, S.A. published
    to The Color Company (TM) Limited?”
    These 1st to 2nd defendants refuse to cooperate. Supposedly “the letter
    was not very clear” says a representative for this 3rd defendant.
    03/05/2023
    Satisfactory response to: “Did those communications of 02/06/2010 benefit me? I do not know of a report by Cofina Media, S.A. which is based on any
    of those communications. Please give me a copy of each such report.” Supposedly “the letter was not very clear” says a representative for this 3rd defendant."
    said Nicholas Collin Paul de Glouceſter.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)