• Something funny with Gridwatch?

    From David@21:1/5 to All on Tue Apr 8 13:50:28 2025
    Only the grid frequency is on the stops low, and wind power is almost zero despite a decent breeze, at least on the East Coast.

    Problem with the readings, or wind power?

    Cheers



    Dave R

    --
    AMD FX-6300 in GA-990X-Gaming SLI-CF running Windows 10 x64

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mm0fmf@21:1/5 to David on Tue Apr 8 15:48:22 2025
    On 08/04/2025 14:50, David wrote:
    or wind power?

    There's not a breath of wind up here about 15m West of Edinburgh. I was
    amazed to see so many of the hundreds of wind turbines stationary as I
    walked the dog in the hills this lunchtime.

    I'm surprised nobody commented about Ed 'fuckwitt' Milliband and his
    huge new offshore wind power station in The English Channel off Dover
    and how it will power "one million homes" (see Saturday's Times
    5-4-2025). Not today it wont.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David@21:1/5 to All on Tue Apr 8 15:04:55 2025
    On Tue, 08 Apr 2025 15:48:22 +0100, mm0fmf wrote:

    On 08/04/2025 14:50, David wrote:
    or wind power?

    There's not a breath of wind up here about 15m West of Edinburgh. I was amazed to see so many of the hundreds of wind turbines stationary as I
    walked the dog in the hills this lunchtime.

    I'm surprised nobody commented about Ed 'fuckwitt' Milliband and his
    huge new offshore wind power station in The English Channel off Dover
    and how it will power "one million homes" (see Saturday's Times
    5-4-2025). Not today it wont.

    Dover wind speed around 10 mph gusting to 20 mph.
    Should be enough to turn a turbine or two.

    So a wind farm off Dover could be a reasonable proposition.
    The ones off Clacton and around should still be turning nicely today.

    Which is why I was wondering at the display showing 0.73 GW for the whole
    of the country.

    Something is not right on the data Gridwatch is reporting.

    Cheers


    Dave R

    --
    AMD FX-6300 in GA-990X-Gaming SLI-CF running Windows 10 x64

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Hogg@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Tue Apr 8 16:07:29 2025
    On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 15:48:22 +0100, mm0fmf <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 08/04/2025 14:50, David wrote:
    or wind power?

    There's not a breath of wind up here about 15m West of Edinburgh. I was >amazed to see so many of the hundreds of wind turbines stationary as I
    walked the dog in the hills this lunchtime.

    I'm surprised nobody commented about Ed 'fuckwitt' Milliband and his
    huge new offshore wind power station in The English Channel off Dover
    and how it will power "one million homes" (see Saturday's Times
    5-4-2025). Not today it wont.

    I often wonder about these claims by millibrain and the like, that such-and-such a scheme will power x-squillion homes, whether that
    figure has taken into account the capacity factor, or whether that's
    the measure when all the generators, wind and/or solar, are going full
    belt.

    --

    Chris

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David@21:1/5 to David on Tue Apr 8 14:48:50 2025
    On Tue, 08 Apr 2025 13:50:28 +0000, David wrote:

    Only the grid frequency is on the stops low, and wind power is almost
    zero despite a decent breeze, at least on the East Coast.

    Problem with the readings, or wind power?

    Frequency picked up again, but now showing at 0 Hz.


    --
    AMD FX-6300 in GA-990X-Gaming SLI-CF running Windows 10 x64

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Layman@21:1/5 to David on Tue Apr 8 17:21:48 2025
    On 08/04/2025 16:04, David wrote:

    Dover wind speed around 10 mph gusting to 20 mph.
    Should be enough to turn a turbine or two.

    So a wind farm off Dover could be a reasonable proposition.

    From the wiki on the English Channel:
    "The English Channel, also known as the Channel, is an arm of the
    Atlantic Ocean that separates Southern England from northern France. It
    links to the southern part of the North Sea by the Strait of Dover at
    its northeastern end. It is the busiest shipping area in the world."

    Somehow I can't see wind turbines being placed in "the busiest shipping
    area in the world."

    --
    Jeff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mm0fmf@21:1/5 to Jeff Layman on Tue Apr 8 17:40:30 2025
    On 08/04/2025 17:21, Jeff Layman wrote:
    On 08/04/2025 16:04, David wrote:

    Somehow I can't see wind turbines being placed in "the busiest shipping
    area in the world."


    The already are. However, I mixed up Dover with Brighton. Well the area
    is bland and populated with soft, Southern shandy drinkers so any one
    town blends into the next.

    https://www.4coffshore.com/news/uk-government-gives-the-go-ahead-to-rampion-2-offshore-wind-farm-project-off-the-sussex-coast.-nid30980.html

    So there you go, more wind turbines being placed in the busiest shipping
    area in the world.

    You're welcome.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David@21:1/5 to Jeff Layman on Tue Apr 8 17:06:40 2025
    On Tue, 08 Apr 2025 17:21:48 +0100, Jeff Layman wrote:

    On 08/04/2025 16:04, David wrote:

    Dover wind speed around 10 mph gusting to 20 mph.
    Should be enough to turn a turbine or two.

    So a wind farm off Dover could be a reasonable proposition.

    From the wiki on the English Channel:
    "The English Channel, also known as the Channel, is an arm of the
    Atlantic Ocean that separates Southern England from northern France. It
    links to the southern part of the North Sea by the Strait of Dover at
    its northeastern end. It is the busiest shipping area in the world."

    Somehow I can't see wind turbines being placed in "the busiest shipping
    area in the world."

    Probably won't put them in the deepest part of the shipping lanes.
    There might be a convenient mud/sand bank just off the main thoroughfare
    with nice shallow water, of course.

    Cheers



    Dave R

    --
    AMD FX-6300 in GA-990X-Gaming SLI-CF running Windows 10 x64

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David@21:1/5 to David on Tue Apr 8 17:09:09 2025
    On Tue, 08 Apr 2025 13:50:28 +0000, David wrote:

    Only the grid frequency is on the stops low, and wind power is almost
    zero despite a decent breeze, at least on the East Coast.

    Problem with the readings, or wind power?

    Frequency still showing 0, so definitely something amiss in the works.

    --
    AMD FX-6300 in GA-990X-Gaming SLI-CF running Windows 10 x64

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Layman@21:1/5 to All on Tue Apr 8 18:40:15 2025
    On 08/04/2025 17:40, mm0fmf wrote:
    On 08/04/2025 17:21, Jeff Layman wrote:
    On 08/04/2025 16:04, David wrote:

    Somehow I can't see wind turbines being placed in "the busiest shipping
    area in the world."


    The already are. However, I mixed up Dover with Brighton. Well the area
    is bland and populated with soft, Southern shandy drinkers so any one
    town blends into the next.

    https://www.4coffshore.com/news/uk-government-gives-the-go-ahead-to-rampion-2-offshore-wind-farm-project-off-the-sussex-coast.-nid30980.html

    So there you go, more wind turbines being placed in the busiest shipping
    area in the world.

    You're welcome.

    Rampion is off the coast of West Sussex, almost 100 miles from the
    Strait of Dover. The channel at Rampion is over 80 miles wide, compared
    to 22 miles at Dover. From the ref you provided, Rampion will be take up
    less than 5 miles of the 80+miles of the channel width there.

    --
    Jeff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Layman@21:1/5 to David on Tue Apr 8 18:48:53 2025
    On 08/04/2025 18:06, David wrote:
    On Tue, 08 Apr 2025 17:21:48 +0100, Jeff Layman wrote:

    On 08/04/2025 16:04, David wrote:

    Dover wind speed around 10 mph gusting to 20 mph.
    Should be enough to turn a turbine or two.

    So a wind farm off Dover could be a reasonable proposition.

    From the wiki on the English Channel:
    "The English Channel, also known as the Channel, is an arm of the
    Atlantic Ocean that separates Southern England from northern France. It
    links to the southern part of the North Sea by the Strait of Dover at
    its northeastern end. It is the busiest shipping area in the world."

    Somehow I can't see wind turbines being placed in "the busiest shipping
    area in the world."

    Probably won't put them in the deepest part of the shipping lanes.
    There might be a convenient mud/sand bank just off the main thoroughfare
    with nice shallow water, of course.

    Cheers

    There are some offshore Kent wind farms, but well away from Dover (<https://lindyenergy.com/wind-farms-in-kent/>). Generating capacity
    total seems to be just over 1GW.

    --
    Jeff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Layman@21:1/5 to Jeff Layman on Tue Apr 8 18:50:35 2025
    On 08/04/2025 18:40, Jeff Layman wrote:

    Rampion is off the coast of West Sussex, almost 100 miles from the
    Strait of Dover.

    Apologies - that should be almost 100 miles from Dover.

    --
    Jeff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to David on Tue Apr 8 19:36:37 2025
    On 08/04/2025 14:50, David wrote:
    Only the grid frequency is on the stops low, and wind power is almost zero despite a decent breeze, at least on the East Coast.

    No wind here inland.
    The frequency is anomalous.
    Uptsream issue

    Problem with the readings, or wind power?

    Cheers



    Dave R


    --
    Of what good are dead warriors? … Warriors are those who desire battle
    more than peace. Those who seek battle despite peace. Those who thump
    their spears on the ground and talk of honor. Those who leap high the
    battle dance and dream of glory … The good of dead warriors, Mother, is
    that they are dead.
    Sheri S Tepper: The Awakeners.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to David on Tue Apr 8 19:27:12 2025
    David wrote:

    Only the grid frequency is on the stops low, and wind power is almost
    zero despite a decent breeze, at least on the East Coast.

    Problem with the readings, or wind power?

    Wind being low isn't too surprising, don't think many were spinning on
    my way home.

    Frequency still showing 0, so definitely something amiss in the works.

    This site is pretty good at measuring grid frequency, it shows normal,

    <https://www.mainsfrequency.com>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Tue Apr 8 19:29:57 2025
    Andy Burns wrote:

    This site is pretty good at measuring grid frequency, it shows normal,

    <https://www.mainsfrequency.com>
    Sorry that's for Europe, I meant this one for UK

    <http://mainsfrequency.uk>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roland Perry@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 10 14:18:51 2025
    In message <[email protected]>, at 16:07:29 on
    Tue, 8 Apr 2025, Chris Hogg <[email protected]> remarked:
    There's not a breath of wind up here about 15m West of Edinburgh. I was >>amazed to see so many of the hundreds of wind turbines stationary as I >>walked the dog in the hills this lunchtime.

    I'm surprised nobody commented about Ed 'fuckwitt' Milliband and his
    huge new offshore wind power station in The English Channel off Dover
    and how it will power "one million homes" (see Saturday's Times
    5-4-2025). Not today it wont.

    I often wonder about these claims by millibrain and the like, that >such-and-such a scheme will power x-squillion homes, whether that
    figure has taken into account the capacity factor, or whether that's
    the measure when all the generators, wind and/or solar, are going full
    belt.

    There's a rule of thumb where they divide the full-power output by some surprisingly small kWh, which is apparently the long term average power consumption of households.
    --
    Roland Perry

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Nomad@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 10 14:04:33 2025
    On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 14:46:03 +0100, Andy Burns <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    Roland Perry wrote:

    There's a rule of thumb where they divide the full-power output by some
    surprisingly small kWh, which is apparently the long term average power
    consumption of households.

    I used 721 kWh during Jan to Mar, so 1/3 kW sounds right, for a
    one-person household.

    Here, base load is about 550W one person, but a bit of tech on 24/7/52

    Suspect when I eventually get round to moving to the mini-PC rather than
    this full tower jobby it'll drop a bit.

    Avpx

    --
    He looked sideways into the leering faces of men who would kill him
    sooner than think , and in fact would find it a lot easier.
    (Sourcery)
    Thu 11545 Sep 15:00:01 BST 1993
    15:00:01 up 3 days, 2 min, 2 users, load average: 0.99, 0.83, 0.76

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Roland Perry on Thu Apr 10 14:46:03 2025
    Roland Perry wrote:

    There's a rule of thumb where they divide the full-power output by some surprisingly small kWh, which is apparently the long term average power consumption of households.

    I used 721 kWh during Jan to Mar, so 1/3 kW sounds right, for a
    one-person household.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From nib@21:1/5 to The Nomad on Thu Apr 10 15:28:03 2025
    On 2025-04-10 15:04, The Nomad wrote:
    On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 14:46:03 +0100, Andy Burns <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    Roland Perry wrote:

    There's a rule of thumb where they divide the full-power output by some
    surprisingly small kWh, which is apparently the long term average power
    consumption of households.

    I used 721 kWh during Jan to Mar, so 1/3 kW sounds right, for a
    one-person household.

    Here, base load is about 550W one person, but a bit of tech on 24/7/52

    Suspect when I eventually get round to moving to the mini-PC rather than
    this full tower jobby it'll drop a bit.

    Avpx


    I was just thinking I was extravagant at average 400W for 1 person! Plus
    about another 160W for the car, depending on use.

    nib

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Thu Apr 10 15:34:28 2025
    On 10/04/2025 14:46, Andy Burns wrote:
    Roland Perry wrote:

    There's a rule of thumb where they divide the full-power output by
    some surprisingly small kWh, which is apparently the long term average
    power consumption of households.

    I used 721 kWh during Jan to Mar, so 1/3 kW sounds right, for a
    one-person household.
    Its around 700W per household

    --
    “Progress is precisely that which rules and regulations did not foresee,”

    – Ludwig von Mises

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nick Finnigan@21:1/5 to Roland Perry on Thu Apr 10 15:37:56 2025
    On 10/04/2025 14:18, Roland Perry wrote:

    There's a rule of thumb where they divide the full-power output by some surprisingly small kWh, which is apparently the long term average power consumption of households.


    https://rampion2.com/benefits/

    With a maximum planned capacity of 1200 MW of electricity, Rampion 2 could power the equivalent of over one million homes¹ and reduce carbon emissions
    by around 1.8 million tonnes² per year. Put another way, Rampion 2 could generate around three-quarters of all the electricity demands for the whole
    of Sussex³ and combined with the operating Rampion Wind Farm, could power
    the entire electricity demand for Sussex.


    References:

    ¹Based on total electricity consumption (GWh) in East Sussex, West Sussex
    and Brighton & Hove 2022 (DESNZ, 2024)

    ²Based on an average annual domestic household electricity consumption of 3,509 kWh (Dept Energy Security & Net Zero, 2024).

    ³The calculation made using a static figure of 446g/kWh representing the energy mix in the UK (BEIS, July 2020)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to Nick Finnigan on Thu Apr 10 16:11:35 2025
    Nick Finnigan <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 10/04/2025 14:18, Roland Perry wrote:

    There's a rule of thumb where they divide the full-power output by some
    surprisingly small kWh, which is apparently the long term average power
    consumption of households.


    https://rampion2.com/benefits/

    With a maximum planned capacity of 1200 MW of electricity, Rampion 2 could power the equivalent of over one million homes¹ and reduce carbon emissions by around 1.8 million tonnes² per year. Put another way, Rampion 2 could generate around three-quarters of all the electricity demands for the whole of Sussex³ and combined with the operating Rampion Wind Farm, could power the entire electricity demand for Sussex.


    References:

    ¹Based on total electricity consumption (GWh) in East Sussex, West Sussex and Brighton & Hove 2022 (DESNZ, 2024)

    ²Based on an average annual domestic household electricity consumption of 3,509 kWh (Dept Energy Security & Net Zero, 2024).

    ³The calculation made using a static figure of 446g/kWh representing the energy mix in the UK (BEIS, July 2020)

    There was a short piece on the local TV news last night about
    decommissioning Hinckley B. I’m reasonably sure someone there said it
    powered all the homes from Lands End to Gloucester for (many years).

    Now that’s what you call a reliable electricity supply…

    If the governments of the day had got off their fat *rses Hinckley C would
    have been online to replace B, but no…

    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Nick Finnigan on Thu Apr 10 17:13:32 2025
    Nick Finnigan wrote:

    Rampion 2 could generate around three-quarters of all the
    electricity demands for the whole of Sussex

    Until half of Sussex buys an EV and/or heatpump, and tries to use them
    at once ...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Thu Apr 10 17:19:50 2025
    The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    Andy Burns wrote:

    I used 721 kWh during Jan to Mar, so 1/3 kW sounds right, for a one-
    person household.

    Its around 700W per household
    One Dobbin per family?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From SteveW@21:1/5 to nib on Thu Apr 10 19:22:06 2025
    On 10/04/2025 15:28, nib wrote:
    On 2025-04-10 15:04, The Nomad wrote:
    On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 14:46:03 +0100, Andy Burns <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    Roland Perry wrote:

    There's a rule of thumb where they divide the full-power output by some >>>> surprisingly small kWh, which is apparently the long term average power >>>> consumption of households.

    I used 721 kWh during Jan to Mar, so 1/3 kW sounds right, for a
    one-person household.

    Here, base load is about 550W one person, but a bit of tech on 24/7/52

    Suspect when I eventually get round to moving to the mini-PC rather than
    this full tower jobby it'll drop a bit.

    Avpx


    I was just thinking I was extravagant at average 400W for 1 person! Plus about another 160W for the car, depending on use.

    While our average is higher (not surprising with 3 to 5 of us here at
    different times of the year, one disabled and here almost all the time
    and an EV), at night, consumption drops down as low as 130W ... not bad
    for a home server, router, network switch, plus three satellite boxes on standby and a few other odds and ends.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Vir Campestris@21:1/5 to Nick Finnigan on Tue Apr 15 11:22:32 2025
    On 10/04/2025 15:37, Nick Finnigan wrote:

    https://rampion2.com/benefits/

    With a maximum planned capacity of 1200 MW of electricity, Rampion 2
    could power the equivalent of over one million homes¹ and reduce carbon emissions by around 1.8 million tonnes² per year. Put another way,
    Rampion 2 could generate around three-quarters of all the electricity
    demands for the whole of Sussex³ and combined with the operating Rampion Wind Farm, could power the entire electricity demand for Sussex.


    References:

    ¹Based on total electricity consumption (GWh) in East Sussex, West
    Sussex and Brighton & Hove 2022 (DESNZ, 2024)

    ²Based on an average annual domestic household electricity consumption
    of 3,509 kWh (Dept Energy Security & Net Zero, 2024).

    ³The calculation made using a static figure of 446g/kWh representing the energy mix in the UK (BEIS, July 2020)

    Go look at the data for 22nd January.

    SFA from wind or solar. Apparently we nearly ran out of gas too.

    Andy

    --
    Do not listen to rumour, but, if you do, do not believe it.
    Ghandi.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim Streater@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Tue Apr 15 11:02:13 2025
    On 15 Apr 2025 at 11:22:32 BST, "Vir Campestris" <[email protected]d> wrote:

    On 10/04/2025 15:37, Nick Finnigan wrote:

    https://rampion2.com/benefits/

    With a maximum planned capacity of 1200 MW of electricity, Rampion 2
    could power the equivalent of over one million homes¹ and reduce carbon
    emissions by around 1.8 million tonnes² per year. Put another way,
    Rampion 2 could generate around three-quarters of all the electricity
    demands for the whole of Sussex³ and combined with the operating Rampion
    Wind Farm, could power the entire electricity demand for Sussex.


    References:

    ¹Based on total electricity consumption (GWh) in East Sussex, West
    Sussex and Brighton & Hove 2022 (DESNZ, 2024)

    ²Based on an average annual domestic household electricity consumption
    of 3,509 kWh (Dept Energy Security & Net Zero, 2024).

    ³The calculation made using a static figure of 446g/kWh representing the
    energy mix in the UK (BEIS, July 2020)

    Go look at the data for 22nd January.

    SFA from wind or solar. Apparently we nearly ran out of gas too.

    You can't rely on wind/solar for baseload. Doesn't Our Nick get this yet?

    --
    Tim

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to Tim Streater on Tue Apr 15 12:26:06 2025
    Tim Streater <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 15 Apr 2025 at 11:22:32 BST, "Vir Campestris" <[email protected]d> wrote:

    On 10/04/2025 15:37, Nick Finnigan wrote:

    https://rampion2.com/benefits/

    With a maximum planned capacity of 1200 MW of electricity, Rampion 2
    could power the equivalent of over one million homes¹ and reduce carbon >>> emissions by around 1.8 million tonnes² per year. Put another way,
    Rampion 2 could generate around three-quarters of all the electricity
    demands for the whole of Sussex³ and combined with the operating Rampion >>> Wind Farm, could power the entire electricity demand for Sussex.


    References:

    ¹Based on total electricity consumption (GWh) in East Sussex, West
    Sussex and Brighton & Hove 2022 (DESNZ, 2024)

    ²Based on an average annual domestic household electricity consumption
    of 3,509 kWh (Dept Energy Security & Net Zero, 2024).

    ³The calculation made using a static figure of 446g/kWh representing the >>> energy mix in the UK (BEIS, July 2020)

    Go look at the data for 22nd January.

    SFA from wind or solar. Apparently we nearly ran out of gas too.

    You can't rely on wind/solar for baseload. Doesn't Our Nick get this yet?

    When Nick quoted “Rampion 2 could generate around three-quarters of all the electricity demands for the whole of Sussex³ and combined with the
    operating Rampion Wind Farm, could power the entire electricity demand for Sussex” he forgot to note the absence of the qualifier of ‘reliably’.

    Something else is needed to provide Sussex with reliable electricity, and
    at the moment it’s gas.

    Anyone who thinks of battery storage as an answer would seem unable to do
    sums, such as those needed to calculate the energy required and also what
    would be needed to recharge such storage.

    The link given is full of claptrap, such as

    “The UK Government has formally declared a Climate Emergency.”

    LOL.

    “Coal plant is being phased out by 2025”

    So the article is out of date.

    “meanwhile electric vehicles, hydrogen heating and heat pumps are all
    taking off across the UK”

    No they aren’t. Few people are buying EVs now the incentives have ended, hydrogen has gone up in smoke as an energy source, and heat pumps have
    their drawbacks, such as becoming inefficient in winter.

    “To ensure society’s growing thirst for electricity is sustainable – generation from renewables is key”

    Nope. Nuclear is the key.

    “Offshore wind can meet this demand at scale”

    Not 24/7 it can’t.

    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nick Finnigan@21:1/5 to Spike on Tue Apr 15 14:46:06 2025
    On 15/04/2025 13:26, Spike wrote:
    Tim Streater <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 15 Apr 2025 at 11:22:32 BST, "Vir Campestris"
    <[email protected]d> wrote:

    On 10/04/2025 15:37, Nick Finnigan wrote:

    https://rampion2.com/benefits/

    With a maximum planned capacity of 1200 MW of electricity, Rampion 2
    could power the equivalent of over one million homes¹ and reduce carbon >>>> emissions by around 1.8 million tonnes² per year. Put another way,
    Rampion 2 could generate around three-quarters of all the electricity
    demands for the whole of Sussex³ and combined with the operating Rampion >>>> Wind Farm, could power the entire electricity demand for Sussex.


    References:

    ¹Based on total electricity consumption (GWh) in East Sussex, West
    Sussex and Brighton & Hove 2022 (DESNZ, 2024)

    ²Based on an average annual domestic household electricity consumption >>>> of 3,509 kWh (Dept Energy Security & Net Zero, 2024).

    ³The calculation made using a static figure of 446g/kWh representing the >>>> energy mix in the UK (BEIS, July 2020)

    Go look at the data for 22nd January.

    SFA from wind or solar. Apparently we nearly ran out of gas too.

    You can't rely on wind/solar for baseload. Doesn't Our Nick get this yet?

    When Nick quoted “Rampion 2 could generate around three-quarters of all the electricity demands for the whole of Sussex³ and combined with the
    operating Rampion Wind Farm, could power the entire electricity demand for Sussex” he forgot to note the absence of the qualifier of ‘reliably’.

    I was intentionally quoting, without commenting, nor even calculating.
    And I am well aware that we can't rely on wind nor solar. And that nuclear
    can be used for load following where appropriate.

    Something else is needed to provide Sussex with reliable electricity, and
    at the moment it’s gas.

    Anyone who thinks of battery storage as an answer would seem unable to do sums, such as those needed to calculate the energy required and also what would be needed to recharge such storage.

    I read 'without the hot air' when it came out.

    The link given is full of claptrap,

    and people were wondering what the basis of the claim was.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim Streater@21:1/5 to Spike on Tue Apr 15 15:54:17 2025
    On 15 Apr 2025 at 13:26:06 BST, "Spike" <[email protected]> wrote:

    “Offshore wind can meet this demand at scale”

    Not 24/7 it can’t.

    And in winter, solar *really* produces fuck-all, even on a sunny winter's day you only get a few hours. Out of 24.

    --
    If socialism helps the poor, why are the poor in socialist countries so much poorer than the poor in capitalist countries?

    Mark

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)