• Re: Terminating SWA into the back of a plastic box

    From Fredxx@21:1/5 to Theo on Fri Apr 4 00:04:42 2025
    On 03/04/2025 23:30, Theo wrote:
    I have a piece of SWA emerging from a wooden post into the back of a plastic outdoor socket. How should I terminate the SWA? This is only a temporary setup (I'll be swapping out the socket someyear) but I need it to pass Part
    P as a new circuit installation. I'm not planning on earthing the armour at this end (separate earth core), that'll be terminated at the other end, so it's just about properly dealing with the armour.

    If I use a traditional SWA gland with boot it would mean drilling a large hole in the post, which I'd rather avoid as it would be unsightly once removed. I could I suppose terminate the SWA at the bottom of a box at the rear of the post and then run bare cores through the post, but I'd rather
    not do that (hard to protect from water ingress). Doing that at the front would be both unsightly and have an awkward bend radius.

    The plastic socket is only supposed to sit a couple of mm off the surface.
    I suppose I could add a chunky wooden block behind to hide a gland in, but that would be ugly.

    Presumably SWA coming through a wall and terminating inside a box must not be uncommon? How's it normally done?

    A technique I have used is to include a loop, where the cable changes
    direction by 180 degrees. That way you have access and total length is
    not critical where the loop can be adjusted.

    Another technique I have used is to terminate SWA into a metal junction
    box and then carry the conductors and a new earth conductor connected to
    the armour onwards in trucking into a socket.

    I'm not sure why you don't fit the final socket now?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 3 23:30:33 2025
    I have a piece of SWA emerging from a wooden post into the back of a plastic outdoor socket. How should I terminate the SWA? This is only a temporary setup (I'll be swapping out the socket someyear) but I need it to pass Part
    P as a new circuit installation. I'm not planning on earthing the armour at this end (separate earth core), that'll be terminated at the other end, so
    it's just about properly dealing with the armour.

    If I use a traditional SWA gland with boot it would mean drilling a large
    hole in the post, which I'd rather avoid as it would be unsightly once
    removed. I could I suppose terminate the SWA at the bottom of a box at the rear of the post and then run bare cores through the post, but I'd rather
    not do that (hard to protect from water ingress). Doing that at the front would be both unsightly and have an awkward bend radius.

    The plastic socket is only supposed to sit a couple of mm off the surface.
    I suppose I could add a chunky wooden block behind to hide a gland in, but
    that would be ugly.

    Presumably SWA coming through a wall and terminating inside a box must not be uncommon? How's it normally done?

    Cheers,
    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Rumm@21:1/5 to Theo on Fri Apr 4 00:25:19 2025
    On 03/04/2025 23:30, Theo wrote:
    I have a piece of SWA emerging from a wooden post into the back of a plastic outdoor socket. How should I terminate the SWA? This is only a temporary setup (I'll be swapping out the socket someyear) but I need it to pass Part
    P as a new circuit installation. I'm not planning on earthing the armour at this end (separate earth core), that'll be terminated at the other end, so it's just about properly dealing with the armour.

    Ideally you will need a gland of some sort to terminate the SWA
    somewhere. If you are isolating the armour at that end and not making connection to it, then you could get away with a plastic gland.

    (Normally you will need a gland to allow adequate fixing and restraint
    of the heavy cable)

    As this is outside you will want a waterproof termination of the cable -
    even if it is "inside" the post.

    What length of spare cable do you have to play with?

    If I use a traditional SWA gland with boot it would mean drilling a large hole in the post, which I'd rather avoid as it would be unsightly once removed. I could I suppose terminate the SWA at the bottom of a box at the rear of the post and then run bare cores through the post, but I'd rather
    not do that (hard to protect from water ingress). Doing that at the front would be both unsightly and have an awkward bend radius.

    You could have a JB on the back of the post, and transition to something
    easier to work with like hi-tuff. Clip that up the back of the post and
    then take it into a hole though the post into the back of your
    enclosure. (with the through hole at an angle that would encourage water
    not to run into the post)

    You could also bend the SWA into a hole if it is not too thick and you angle/bevel the edge of the hole to create enough radius.

    Here is an example where I took an extension from a side of a wall
    mounted socket and wanted to feed it through the wall. I drilled the
    through hole at an angle and chipped away some of the edge on the inside
    of the bend to allow a larger radius turn:

    https://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php/File:PPWall3MakeGoodCorner.jpg

    The plastic socket is only supposed to sit a couple of mm off the surface.
    I suppose I could add a chunky wooden block behind to hide a gland in, but that would be ugly.

    Presumably SWA coming through a wall and terminating inside a box must not be uncommon? How's it normally done?

    You would normally come through a wall and then into the side of a wall
    mounted box with an appropriate gland.

    --
    Cheers,

    John.

    /=================================================================\
    | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------|
    | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ARW@21:1/5 to Theo on Fri Apr 4 17:45:09 2025
    On 04/04/2025 17:19, Theo wrote:
    John Rumm <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 03/04/2025 23:30, Theo wrote:
    I have a piece of SWA emerging from a wooden post into the back of a plastic
    outdoor socket. How should I terminate the SWA? This is only a temporary >>> setup (I'll be swapping out the socket someyear) but I need it to pass Part >>> P as a new circuit installation. I'm not planning on earthing the armour at
    this end (separate earth core), that'll be terminated at the other end, so >>> it's just about properly dealing with the armour.

    Ideally you will need a gland of some sort to terminate the SWA
    somewhere. If you are isolating the armour at that end and not making
    connection to it, then you could get away with a plastic gland.

    (Normally you will need a gland to allow adequate fixing and restraint
    of the heavy cable)

    As this is outside you will want a waterproof termination of the cable -
    even if it is "inside" the post.

    What length of spare cable do you have to play with?

    As much as needed :-) I haven't terminated the other end yet, so can pull some slack through. I want to leave slack anyway for future changes.

    If I use a traditional SWA gland with boot it would mean drilling a large >>> hole in the post, which I'd rather avoid as it would be unsightly once
    removed. I could I suppose terminate the SWA at the bottom of a box at the >>> rear of the post and then run bare cores through the post, but I'd rather >>> not do that (hard to protect from water ingress). Doing that at the front >>> would be both unsightly and have an awkward bend radius.

    You could have a JB on the back of the post, and transition to something
    easier to work with like hi-tuff. Clip that up the back of the post and
    then take it into a hole though the post into the back of your
    enclosure. (with the through hole at an angle that would encourage water
    not to run into the post)

    I think that's probably the best option. JB in rear of the post, then
    thread the cores through (I want to avoid jointing it) perhaps in some kind of conduit for protection (I have some white plastic 20mm that may do it).
    If I can find a box big enough I can coil some slack of the cores in the box for future use. Seal up both ends of the conduit with silicone. Perhaps some kind of gland or grommet to secure the conduit and waterproof the rear.



    Gland it into a galv through box and just take the inner of the SWA
    unsheathed out the other end of the box through a stuffing gland up to
    to the socket?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to John Rumm on Fri Apr 4 17:19:13 2025
    John Rumm <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 03/04/2025 23:30, Theo wrote:
    I have a piece of SWA emerging from a wooden post into the back of a plastic
    outdoor socket. How should I terminate the SWA? This is only a temporary setup (I'll be swapping out the socket someyear) but I need it to pass Part P as a new circuit installation. I'm not planning on earthing the armour at
    this end (separate earth core), that'll be terminated at the other end, so it's just about properly dealing with the armour.

    Ideally you will need a gland of some sort to terminate the SWA
    somewhere. If you are isolating the armour at that end and not making connection to it, then you could get away with a plastic gland.

    (Normally you will need a gland to allow adequate fixing and restraint
    of the heavy cable)

    As this is outside you will want a waterproof termination of the cable -
    even if it is "inside" the post.

    What length of spare cable do you have to play with?

    As much as needed :-) I haven't terminated the other end yet, so can pull
    some slack through. I want to leave slack anyway for future changes.

    If I use a traditional SWA gland with boot it would mean drilling a large hole in the post, which I'd rather avoid as it would be unsightly once removed. I could I suppose terminate the SWA at the bottom of a box at the rear of the post and then run bare cores through the post, but I'd rather not do that (hard to protect from water ingress). Doing that at the front would be both unsightly and have an awkward bend radius.

    You could have a JB on the back of the post, and transition to something easier to work with like hi-tuff. Clip that up the back of the post and
    then take it into a hole though the post into the back of your
    enclosure. (with the through hole at an angle that would encourage water
    not to run into the post)

    I think that's probably the best option. JB in rear of the post, then
    thread the cores through (I want to avoid jointing it) perhaps in some kind
    of conduit for protection (I have some white plastic 20mm that may do it).
    If I can find a box big enough I can coil some slack of the cores in the box for future use. Seal up both ends of the conduit with silicone. Perhaps
    some kind of gland or grommet to secure the conduit and waterproof the rear.

    Presumably SWA coming through a wall and terminating inside a box must not be
    uncommon? How's it normally done?

    You would normally come through a wall and then into the side of a wall mounted box with an appropriate gland.

    Would the SWA just poke through the brick or should there be some kind of cover? I've seen through-to-down right-angle covers for aerial cables and similar, but the bend radius of those would be too much for SWA.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to ARW on Fri Apr 4 18:40:12 2025
    ARW <[email protected]> wrote:
    Gland it into a galv through box and just take the inner of the SWA unsheathed out the other end of the box through a stuffing gland up to
    to the socket?

    Hmm, would a 20mm gland screw on to 20mm conduit boxes? https://www.tlc-direct.co.uk/Products/CO20BX1BOG.html

    or this (25mm inlet) with a hole drilled in the back: https://www.tlc-direct.co.uk/Products/COCL1G.html

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to John Rumm on Fri Apr 4 20:03:10 2025
    John Rumm <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 04/04/2025 17:19, Theo wrote:

    I think that's probably the best option. JB in rear of the post, then thread the cores through (I want to avoid jointing it) perhaps in some kind

    Rather than taking the bare cores, take the cores still in their bedding layer as one "flex", and only strip back the bedding once into your
    socket enclosure.

    That's what I'd do, but I don't think the bedding offers any mechanical protection, it's just to make the SWA bend without buckling. Plastic
    conduit gives it a bit of protection.

    I have not seen a cover used like that (they are popular with the less skilled aerial / telecoms fitters since they can blast through the wall
    from the inside with their SDS, spall of a massive "exit wound" and then cover with the plate.

    Yep, I have some of those :-( Particularly galling when you don't actually need the cable any more but the exit wound remains. Both before my time,
    but the trail of blame leads to Sky and Openreach...

    (OR didn't even bother fitting such a cover)

    Normally I transition using a surface mounting box of some kind - a waterproof JB[1] to terminate the SWA on the outside, with a normal
    exterior gland into the box, and then drill through the back of the box through the wall and use regular T&E or whatever.

    [1] I often use an exterior socket as the box - then I get an extra
    garden socket into the bargain :-)

    That works if sockets are allowed. If it's say a run between a main CU and
    a shed CU then that's less good to have a random socket in the way. It does mean the box on the wall has a purpose though, not just a blank box.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Rumm@21:1/5 to Theo on Fri Apr 4 19:43:51 2025
    On 04/04/2025 17:19, Theo wrote:
    John Rumm <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 03/04/2025 23:30, Theo wrote:
    I have a piece of SWA emerging from a wooden post into the back of a plastic
    outdoor socket. How should I terminate the SWA? This is only a temporary >>> setup (I'll be swapping out the socket someyear) but I need it to pass Part >>> P as a new circuit installation. I'm not planning on earthing the armour at
    this end (separate earth core), that'll be terminated at the other end, so >>> it's just about properly dealing with the armour.

    Ideally you will need a gland of some sort to terminate the SWA
    somewhere. If you are isolating the armour at that end and not making
    connection to it, then you could get away with a plastic gland.

    (Normally you will need a gland to allow adequate fixing and restraint
    of the heavy cable)

    As this is outside you will want a waterproof termination of the cable -
    even if it is "inside" the post.

    What length of spare cable do you have to play with?

    As much as needed :-) I haven't terminated the other end yet, so can pull some slack through. I want to leave slack anyway for future changes.

    If I use a traditional SWA gland with boot it would mean drilling a large >>> hole in the post, which I'd rather avoid as it would be unsightly once
    removed. I could I suppose terminate the SWA at the bottom of a box at the >>> rear of the post and then run bare cores through the post, but I'd rather >>> not do that (hard to protect from water ingress). Doing that at the front >>> would be both unsightly and have an awkward bend radius.

    You could have a JB on the back of the post, and transition to something
    easier to work with like hi-tuff. Clip that up the back of the post and
    then take it into a hole though the post into the back of your
    enclosure. (with the through hole at an angle that would encourage water
    not to run into the post)

    I think that's probably the best option. JB in rear of the post, then
    thread the cores through (I want to avoid jointing it) perhaps in some kind

    Rather than taking the bare cores, take the cores still in their bedding
    layer as one "flex", and only strip back the bedding once into your
    socket enclosure.

    of conduit for protection (I have some white plastic 20mm that may do it).
    If I can find a box big enough I can coil some slack of the cores in the box for future use. Seal up both ends of the conduit with silicone. Perhaps some kind of gland or grommet to secure the conduit and waterproof the rear.

    Presumably SWA coming through a wall and terminating inside a box must not be
    uncommon? How's it normally done?

    You would normally come through a wall and then into the side of a wall
    mounted box with an appropriate gland.

    Would the SWA just poke through the brick or should there be some kind of cover? I've seen through-to-down right-angle covers for aerial cables and similar, but the bend radius of those would be too much for SWA.

    I have not seen a cover used like that (they are popular with the less
    skilled aerial / telecoms fitters since they can blast through the wall
    from the inside with their SDS, spall of a massive "exit wound" and then
    cover with the plate.

    Normally I transition using a surface mounting box of some kind - a
    waterproof JB[1] to terminate the SWA on the outside, with a normal
    exterior gland into the box, and then drill through the back of the box
    through the wall and use regular T&E or whatever.

    [1] I often use an exterior socket as the box - then I get an extra
    garden socket into the bargain :-)

    --
    Cheers,

    John.

    /=================================================================\
    | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------|
    | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fredxx@21:1/5 to Theo on Fri Apr 4 22:53:44 2025
    On 04/04/2025 18:40, Theo wrote:
    ARW <[email protected]> wrote:
    Gland it into a galv through box and just take the inner of the SWA
    unsheathed out the other end of the box through a stuffing gland up to
    to the socket?

    Hmm, would a 20mm gland screw on to 20mm conduit boxes? https://www.tlc-direct.co.uk/Products/CO20BX1BOG.html

    or this (25mm inlet) with a hole drilled in the back: https://www.tlc-direct.co.uk/Products/COCL1G.html

    Unless you are using SWA of a very large diameter the 20mm gland should
    be fine. There are two sizes to accommodate different range of SWA
    diameters. The conduit box has a M20 thread to match the gland.

    ARW's suggestion, close to mine, is to use:
    https://www.tlc-direct.co.uk/Products/CO20BX2G.html [1]

    where you carry on the inner sheath containing the conductors through a standard gland:
    https://www.tlc-direct.co.uk/Products/EK252R.html

    That will be far more flexible than the original SWA cable. The sheath
    can be removed when entering your socket to provide the separated cores.

    [1] It is useful to note that these conduit boxes have a M4 tapped hold
    to make an electrical earth connection to the armour.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Rumm@21:1/5 to Theo on Sat Apr 5 11:21:33 2025
    On 04/04/2025 20:03, Theo wrote:
    John Rumm <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 04/04/2025 17:19, Theo wrote:

    I think that's probably the best option. JB in rear of the post, then
    thread the cores through (I want to avoid jointing it) perhaps in some kind >>
    Rather than taking the bare cores, take the cores still in their bedding
    layer as one "flex", and only strip back the bedding once into your
    socket enclosure.

    That's what I'd do, but I don't think the bedding offers any mechanical protection, it's just to make the SWA bend without buckling. Plastic
    conduit gives it a bit of protection.

    If you place your box on the location of the hole through the post, the
    SWA can run up the back of the post into the side of the box using a
    normal SWA gland. You then take the cores plus bedding through the back
    of the box, though the post, and into your socket box. In the socket box
    you strip the bedding to expose the cores.

    Alternatively you can SWA gland into a box, then compression / packing
    gland the bedding out of it. Small drip loop on that and into the hole
    in the post. Minimal exposure of the cable without armour.

    I have not seen a cover used like that (they are popular with the less
    skilled aerial / telecoms fitters since they can blast through the wall
    from the inside with their SDS, spall of a massive "exit wound" and then
    cover with the plate.

    Yep, I have some of those :-( Particularly galling when you don't actually need the cable any more but the exit wound remains. Both before my time,
    but the trail of blame leads to Sky and Openreach...

    (OR didn't even bother fitting such a cover)

    Normally I transition using a surface mounting box of some kind - a
    waterproof JB[1] to terminate the SWA on the outside, with a normal
    exterior gland into the box, and then drill through the back of the box
    through the wall and use regular T&E or whatever.

    [1] I often use an exterior socket as the box - then I get an extra
    garden socket into the bargain :-)

    That works if sockets are allowed. If it's say a run between a main CU and
    a shed CU then that's less good to have a random socket in the way. It does mean the box on the wall has a purpose though, not just a blank box.

    The socket does not need to be fed directly from the sub main, it can
    initially serve just as a way to get the SWA submain connected, and fed
    to the next CU. YOu can then have a circuit that originates in that CU
    which powers socket.

    i.e. here would be two internal cables to the socket. One to take the
    sub main to the CU, and the other to connect the local circuit to the
    terminals of the socket.

    --
    Cheers,

    John.

    /=================================================================\
    | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------|
    | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ARW@21:1/5 to Fredxx on Sat Apr 5 16:03:47 2025
    On 04/04/2025 22:53, Fredxx wrote:
    On 04/04/2025 18:40, Theo wrote:
    ARW <[email protected]> wrote:
    Gland it into a galv through box and just take the inner of the SWA
    unsheathed out the other end of the box through a stuffing gland up to
    to the socket?

    Hmm, would a 20mm gland screw on to 20mm conduit boxes?
    https://www.tlc-direct.co.uk/Products/CO20BX1BOG.html

    or this (25mm inlet) with a hole drilled in the back:
    https://www.tlc-direct.co.uk/Products/COCL1G.html

    Unless you are using SWA of a very large diameter the 20mm gland should
    be fine. There are two sizes to accommodate different range of SWA
    diameters. The conduit box has a M20 thread to match the gland.

    ARW's suggestion, close to mine, is to use:
      https://www.tlc-direct.co.uk/Products/CO20BX2G.html [1]

    where you carry on the inner sheath containing the conductors through a standard gland:
      https://www.tlc-direct.co.uk/Products/EK252R.html

    That will be far more flexible than the original SWA cable. The sheath
    can be removed when entering your socket to provide the separated cores.

    [1] It is useful to note that these conduit boxes have a M4 tapped hold
    to make an electrical earth connection to the armour.


    That's about what I wanted to say but did not have time to type it all
    out in detail :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)