fred <
[email protected]> wrote:
Andy Burns <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
<https://www.thetimes.com/uk/crime/article/universities-urged-monitor-3 d-printed-guns-f67fxkswr>
"Universities are being warned by The National Crime Agency
(NCA) to be on the lookout for students with an interest in
3D printers following a surge in homemade guns."
I suppose the challenge will be 3D printing the ammunition. That said I'm sure a frequent poster here might suggest the making of soft nose
projectiles with car body filler.
AIUI the usual problem with '3d printed' guns is because a 'gun' is defined
as the bit which holds the trigger mechanism, and the 'gun' is the
controlled part. The actual explodey bit is in the barrel, which needs to
made of metal (or ceramic or whatever). In the US you are allowed to buy barrels as spare parts, but you aren't allowed to buy the 'gun' part without controls. But the 'gun' doesn't need to handle the explosion, so you can
make that out of polymer (as many mass produced guns are). Hence you can
'3d print a gun' by printing the plastic bit and fitting a 'spare' barrel.
I'm not sure if that applies here, or whether the other parts are also controlled.
"It's not a barrel, hofficer, it's just a piece of threaded pipe..."
Theo
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)