XPost: uk.comp.homebuilt
On 01/02/2025 09:29, wasbit wrote:
On 31/01/2025 13:41, Vir Campestris wrote:
On 23/01/2025 15:04, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
I think its time for the old adage.
RAID is not a backup solution, It is an *availability* solution
If you want to *preserve* data against drive failure, back it up on
another drive.
If you want it *available* with a drive failure, use RAID. And be
prepared for it being unreadable if a controller fails.
If you really want disaster recovery you need your data in two places.
I keep a backup of my important stuff in a drive in my bedside drawer.
The machine lives in my garden office. It would take a lot to destroy
both buildings.
It doesn't matter what solution to data back up is proposed someone will always come along & say "But what if ......"
To which the correct answer is 'then data loss is the least of your
worries..
--
"When one man dies it's a tragedy. When thousands die it's statistics."
Josef Stalin
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)