• Re: OT: BBC's Climate Lies Exposed

    From Custos Custodum@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Thu Jan 9 17:11:12 2025
    On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 23:13:08 +0000, The Natural Philosopher <[email protected]d> wrote:

    On 27/12/2024 20:29, Custos Custodum wrote:
    On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 14:54:58 +0000, S Viemeister
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 12/27/2024 2:15 PM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 27/12/2024 10:58, Jethro_uk wrote:
    On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 10:19:07 +0000, Jeff Gaines wrote:

    On 26/12/2024 in message <[email protected]> >>>>>> Cursitor Doom wrote:

    [quoted text muted]

    I made a complaint to the BBC about their using "cookies" to describe >>>>>> biscuits.

    English follows usage, not proscription. We're not French for God's sake. >>>>
    I know no one in the UK who calls biscuits 'cookies'...

    'Chocolate-chip cookies' seem to be an exception to that rule.

    And stem ginger cookies.
    What a waste of good ginger. No self respecting english person would
    make such an offence

    Of course not. Heaven forfend!

    https://tinyurl.com/a76vp9xx

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Custos Custodum@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 9 19:10:23 2025
    On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 23:26:35 +0000, Cursitor Doom <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 21:57:14 +0000, Custos Custodum <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 21:18:12 +0000, Cursitor Doom <[email protected]> >>wrote:

    On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 20:41:32 +0000, Custos Custodum <[email protected]> >>>wrote:

    On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 10:58:27 -0000 (UTC), Jethro_uk >>>><[email protected]> wrote:

    On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 10:19:07 +0000, Jeff Gaines wrote:

    On 26/12/2024 in message <[email protected]> >>>>>> Cursitor Doom wrote:

    [quoted text muted]

    I made a complaint to the BBC about their using "cookies" to describe >>>>>> biscuits.

    English follows usage, not proscription.

    Indeed, although there are some who think that English should be
    frozen within the strictures of 19th century grammarians.

    We're not French for God's sake.

    We did inherit a lot of their words, however. Including "biscuit".

    What's this got to do with the fact that the BBC are a bunch of >>>parasitic, pyschopathic liars?

    The mere act of reporting a scientist's speculation which, with
    hindsight, was inaccurate does not make anyone a liar; parasitic, >>pathological or otherwise. Perhaps you should explain that to Dyler
    Turden or whatever his name is.

    Hindsight be blowed. These parasitic liars *knew* there was no
    substance to the claim at the time they ran the story.

    You have no proof of that. It's just your own agenda. Sure, the BBC
    has agendas too but I don't think they extend to knowingly propagating
    lies about anything.

    It's hardly
    surprising the public are so ill-informed, having to rely on sources
    like the BBC for their news.

    Is that any worse than relying on out-of-date secondary sources for
    atmospheric CO2 data, or kook websites that present data outliers as
    indicative of trends?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Custos Custodum@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Thu Jan 9 19:14:35 2025
    On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 14:54:02 +0000, The Natural Philosopher <[email protected]d> wrote:

    On 27/12/2024 14:35, RJH wrote:
    On 27 Dec 2024 at 12:14:59 GMT, Jethro_uk wrote:

    On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 12:02:49 +0000, Spike wrote:

    Cursitor Doom <[email protected]> wrote:

    The BBC's motto should be changed to: "Spreading Lies at Public
    Expense"

    https://www.zerohedge.com/weather/doesnt-fit-msm-narrative-latest-
    arctic-ice-data-shows-26-larger-2012

    The BBC exists to help mould favourable views of Marx�s so-called
    �social revolution�, assisted by the promoting of those movements aimed >>>> at the dismantling of society into competing fragments. �Climate change� >>>> helps by controlling and restricting behaviour and the focussing on
    irrelevant minutiae such as �Have I put too much water in the kettle and >>>> killed a polar bear?�.

    As Karl Marx wrote: "At a certain stage of development, the material
    productive forces of society come into conflict with the existing
    relations of production or - this merely expresses the same thing in
    legal terms -
    with the property relations within the framework of which they have
    operated hitherto. From forms of development of the productive forces
    these relations turn into their fetters. Then begins an era of social
    revolution."

    He wasn't right.

    So far he has been. Revolution to follow :-)

    I have yet to find Karl Marx right on anything.

    "Religion is the opiate of the masses"?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Custos Custodum on Thu Jan 9 19:19:09 2025
    On 09/01/2025 19:14, Custos Custodum wrote:
    On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 14:54:02 +0000, The Natural Philosopher

    I have yet to find Karl Marx right on anything.

    "Religion is the opiate of the masses"?

    But Marxism is its crack cocaine.

    No. religion is not the opium of the masses. Opium is a lot nicer.

    --
    “But what a weak barrier is truth when it stands in the way of an hypothesis!”

    Mary Wollstonecraft

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sam Plusnet@21:1/5 to Custos Custodum on Wed Jan 15 18:13:48 2025
    On 09/01/2025 19:14, Custos Custodum wrote:
    On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 14:54:02 +0000, The Natural Philosopher <[email protected]d> wrote:

    On 27/12/2024 14:35, RJH wrote:
    On 27 Dec 2024 at 12:14:59 GMT, Jethro_uk wrote:

    On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 12:02:49 +0000, Spike wrote:

    Cursitor Doom <[email protected]> wrote:

    The BBC's motto should be changed to: "Spreading Lies at Public
    Expense"

    https://www.zerohedge.com/weather/doesnt-fit-msm-narrative-latest-
    arctic-ice-data-shows-26-larger-2012

    The BBC exists to help mould favourable views of Marx’s so-called
    ‘social revolution’, assisted by the promoting of those movements aimed
    at the dismantling of society into competing fragments. ‘Climate change’
    helps by controlling and restricting behaviour and the focussing on
    irrelevant minutiae such as ‘Have I put too much water in the kettle and
    killed a polar bear?’.

    As Karl Marx wrote: "At a certain stage of development, the material >>>>> productive forces of society come into conflict with the existing
    relations of production or - this merely expresses the same thing in >>>>> legal terms -
    with the property relations within the framework of which they have
    operated hitherto. From forms of development of the productive forces >>>>> these relations turn into their fetters. Then begins an era of social >>>>> revolution."

    He wasn't right.

    So far he has been. Revolution to follow :-)

    I have yet to find Karl Marx right on anything.

    "Religion is the opiate of the masses"?

    During the 16th & 17th centuries(in Europe), it was the Bolivian
    Marching Powder of the masses.

    --
    Sam Plusnet

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)