Alan B <
[email protected]d> wrote:
David Kennedy <[email protected]> wrote:
On 13/06/2025 08:03, D.M. Procida wrote:
I've could get a larger HDD for my AirPort Time Capsule, currently on 2TB. >>
Or, turn one of the Raspberry Pis I have lying about into a backup system, >> with an external 2.5" drive.
I'm a bit surprised how expensive 3.5" HDDs are. GBP 60 for 2 TB now, and GBP
50 more than 10 years ago. And I am sure this has been explained to me before,
but why are USB external drives cheaper than bare drives?
Market segregation - they can get more money for drives that go into servers than they do for consumer drives. Also the consumer drives can be slightly lower spec / warranty / etc.
Sometimes you can shuck a USB drive and find a SATA drive inside, but some
are USB-only (not sure if that's 3.5" now or just 2.5")
I imagine nobody is buying 2TB HDD now (2TB SSD is approaching parity,
cheapest Gen4 NVMe on Scan is £88 and 50x faster) and the sweet spot for HDD has more TB. After all, HDD are a great hunk of metal and metal has not got cheaper.
Daniele
Wasn't there something in this weeks announcements about support for time capsules being discontinued?
Next year.
<https://www.macrumors.com/2025/06/10/macos-27-wont-support-airport-time-capsule/>
AFP has been deprecated a loooong time now, so no surprise.
A third party NAS that supports SMB is another option.
But a RPi-based NAS gives you more flexibility, if not such a nice
enclosure.
Theo
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)