• MacBook display UV output

    From D.M. Procida@21:1/5 to All on Sat Nov 16 17:18:47 2024
    I've been experimenting with cyanotypes. I am pleased how light-sensitive they are - even on a very heavily-overcast day with no direct light, I've been able to get very rapid results.

    Naturally right now, I have an inverted (i.e. negative) image open in Preview, with a sheet of paper coated in the solution pressed against it, under a sheet of glass.

    Just maybe, there will be enough UV from the display to expose an image. No sign of any reaction at all after 30 minutes, and quite possibly there won't
    be enough to produce any reaction.

    Daniele

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Tobin@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Sat Nov 16 20:32:01 2024
    In article <[email protected]>,
    D.M. Procida <[email protected]> wrote:
    I've been experimenting with cyanotypes. I am pleased how light-sensitive they >are - even on a very heavily-overcast day with no direct light, I've been able >to get very rapid results.

    Naturally right now, I have an inverted (i.e. negative) image open in Preview, >with a sheet of paper coated in the solution pressed against it, under a sheet >of glass.

    Just maybe, there will be enough UV from the display to expose an image. No >sign of any reaction at all after 30 minutes, and quite possibly there won't >be enough to produce any reaction.

    Interesting! I think the UV from both LED-backlit LCD displays and OLED displays
    is negligible, so I doubt it will work.

    -- Richard

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D.M. Procida@21:1/5 to All on Sat Nov 16 22:02:21 2024
    On 16 Nov 2024 at 20:32:01 GMT, "Richard Tobin" <Richard Tobin> wrote:

    In article <[email protected]>,
    D.M. Procida <[email protected]> wrote:
    I've been experimenting with cyanotypes. I am pleased how light-sensitive they
    are - even on a very heavily-overcast day with no direct light, I've been able
    to get very rapid results.

    Naturally right now, I have an inverted (i.e. negative) image open in Preview,
    with a sheet of paper coated in the solution pressed against it, under a sheet
    of glass.

    Just maybe, there will be enough UV from the display to expose an image. No >> sign of any reaction at all after 30 minutes, and quite possibly there won't >> be enough to produce any reaction.

    Interesting! I think the UV from both LED-backlit LCD displays and OLED displays
    is negligible, so I doubt it will work.

    So far the results have been quite disappointing. I suppose I should be glad not to be spending most of my days with my face in front of a UV light source.

    I have an ancient 5" B&W video monitor in the garage... do you suppose that will put out significantly more UV? I would need to find something with a composite video output to drive it.

    Daniele

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to D.M. Procida on Sat Nov 16 22:22:14 2024
    D.M. Procida <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 16 Nov 2024 at 20:32:01 GMT, "Richard Tobin" <Richard Tobin> wrote:

    In article <[email protected]>,
    D.M. Procida <[email protected]> wrote:
    I've been experimenting with cyanotypes. I am pleased how
    light-sensitive they are - even on a very heavily-overcast day with no
    direct light, I've been able to get very rapid results.

    Naturally right now, I have an inverted (i.e. negative) image open in
    Preview, with a sheet of paper coated in the solution pressed against
    it, under a sheet of glass.

    Just maybe, there will be enough UV from the display to expose an
    image. No sign of any reaction at all after 30 minutes, and quite
    possibly there won't be enough to produce any reaction.

    Interesting! I think the UV from both LED-backlit LCD displays and OLED displays
    is negligible, so I doubt it will work.

    So far the results have been quite disappointing. I suppose I should be glad not to be spending most of my days with my face in front of a UV light source.

    I have an ancient 5" B&W video monitor in the garage... do you suppose that will put out significantly more UV?

    I wouldn't have thought so, it uses similar phosphors to LEDs.

    If you have a laser printer you can print on overhead projector
    transparencies and shine a proper ultraviolet light source through them
    to expose the sensitised paper.


    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D.M. Procida@21:1/5 to All on Sun Nov 17 12:00:19 2024
    On 16 Nov 2024 at 20:32:01 GMT, "Richard Tobin" <Richard Tobin> wrote:

    In article <[email protected]>,
    D.M. Procida <[email protected]> wrote:

    I've been experimenting with cyanotypes. I am pleased how light-sensitive they
    are - even on a very heavily-overcast day with no direct light, I've been able
    to get very rapid results.

    Naturally right now, I have an inverted (i.e. negative) image open in Preview,
    with a sheet of paper coated in the solution pressed against it, under a sheet
    of glass.

    Interesting! I think the UV from both LED-backlit LCD displays and OLED displays
    is negligible, so I doubt it will work.

    A result, of sorts.

    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/59xz6lz38jtm6lkfo2vpj/cyanotype.jpg?rlkey=w8ptyb9wqors7dkdio8ag8qf1&dl=0

    That took about three hours. The blues are pretty feeble. When I washed it,
    the paper failed to keep the image - that could be because of the paper
    though, I was just doing a test on some scrap paper.

    I should try with a mirror pressing the sheet to the screen, to reflect back any extra light.

    Daniele

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Hill@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Mon Nov 18 08:19:16 2024
    On 17 Nov 2024 at 12:00:19 GMT, "D.M. Procida" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 16 Nov 2024 at 20:32:01 GMT, "Richard Tobin" <Richard Tobin> wrote:

    In article <[email protected]>,
    D.M. Procida <[email protected]> wrote:

    I've been experimenting with cyanotypes. I am pleased how light-sensitive they
    are - even on a very heavily-overcast day with no direct light, I've been able
    to get very rapid results.

    Naturally right now, I have an inverted (i.e. negative) image open in Preview,
    with a sheet of paper coated in the solution pressed against it, under a sheet
    of glass.

    Interesting! I think the UV from both LED-backlit LCD displays and OLED
    displays
    is negligible, so I doubt it will work.

    A result, of sorts.

    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/59xz6lz38jtm6lkfo2vpj/cyanotype.jpg?rlkey=w8ptyb9wqors7dkdio8ag8qf1&dl=0

    That took about three hours. The blues are pretty feeble. When I washed it, the paper failed to keep the image - that could be because of the paper though, I was just doing a test on some scrap paper.

    I should try with a mirror pressing the sheet to the screen, to reflect back any extra light.

    A piece of aluminium foil, perhaps, with either the mirror or the matt side towards the glass?

    Old John..

    --
    An infinitely complex system can fail in an infinite number of ways.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)