• FTP from G3 to Mini

    From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to All on Sat May 11 10:19:14 2024
    I am trying to set up IP addresses so that I can FTP by Ethernet from my
    G3 to my Mini.

    In the Mini I have set DHCP with manual address to 192.168.1.104, which
    does not clash with any of the other devices (which are nn.100,101,102
    &103). In the G3 (running OS 8.6) I have put the same IP address into
    Fetch. It also requires a username and password, I have tried the
    Mini's Admin and my personal names and passwords, but the connection is
    always refused.

    I have set the Desktpo and Documents folders of the Mini to 'Everyone
    Read and Write'. The Ethernet setup panel shows it is connected with
    the correct IP address and it can get access to the Web through the
    (wired) router. Other computers on the same Ethernet are connecting
    correctly.

    What have I done wrong?

    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Graham J@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Sat May 11 10:56:28 2024
    Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    I am trying to set up IP addresses so that I can FTP by Ethernet from my
    G3 to my Mini.

    In the Mini I have set DHCP with manual address to 192.168.1.104, which
    does not clash with any of the other devices (which are nn.100,101,102
    &103). In the G3 (running OS 8.6) I have put the same IP address into
    Fetch. It also requires a username and password, I have tried the
    Mini's Admin and my personal names and passwords, but the connection is always refused.

    Your terminology is confusing me.

    If the mini uses DHCP then the router provides it with an IP address.
    Some routers can be configured to issue a specific address linked to a
    MAC address - this is usually called binding. So have you configured
    your router to issue a static IP to the mini?

    Alternatively, if the Mini is configured to NOT use DHCP then you should
    be able to configure it with a static IP address, together with a subnet
    mask and default gateway.

    Whatever, you should be able to PING the mini from all the other devices
    on your LAN.

    I have set the Desktop and Documents folders of the Mini to 'Everyone
    Read and Write'. The Ethernet setup panel shows it is connected with
    the correct IP address and it can get access to the Web through the
    (wired) router. Other computers on the same Ethernet are connecting correctly.

    I think 'Everyone Read and Write' implies file sharing between devices.
    This may be restricted in that different versions of Apple operating
    systems might not communicate with each other. Other people here will
    be able to advise.

    But you mentioned FTP. Why do you want to use FTP?

    Whatever, I suspect the Mini needs to have the FTP service installed and running, and correctly configured. You are probably able to configure a username and password for the FTP service, which need not be the same as
    the credentials for the Mini's operating system.

    Does the FTP client on the G3 work correctly? You could test it against
    a publicly available FTP server on the internet.

    --
    Graham J

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to Graham J on Sat May 11 11:30:01 2024
    Graham J <[email protected]> wrote:

    Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    I am trying to set up IP addresses so that I can FTP by Ethernet from my
    G3 to my Mini.

    In the Mini I have set DHCP with manual address to 192.168.1.104, which does not clash with any of the other devices (which are nn.100,101,102 &103). In the G3 (running OS 8.6) I have put the same IP address into Fetch. It also requires a username and password, I have tried the
    Mini's Admin and my personal names and passwords, but the connection is always refused.

    Your terminology is confusing me.

    I feel I'm a bit out of my depth in this area, so I might not have used
    the correct terminology.

    If the mini uses DHCP then the router provides it with an IP address.
    Some routers can be configured to issue a specific address linked to a
    MAC address - this is usually called binding. So have you configured
    your router to issue a static IP to the mini?

    That sounds like the cause of the problem, I'll investigate the router settings.

    [...]
    But you mentioned FTP. Why do you want to use FTP?

    Because it is the only way of transferring files from OS8.6 to OSX. If
    someone sends me a URL by e-mail or on this group, I have to create a
    text file of it and then FTP that to the Mini, which has an up-to-date
    browser. It is getting worse now that OSX can't recognise a Simple Text
    file and tries to do something clever with it.


    Does the FTP client on the G3 work correctly? You could test it against
    a publicly available FTP server on the internet.

    Fetch has been working with my other machines for the last 10 years and uploading my websites for well over 20 years, so I think it was worth
    the cost of the magazine I had to buy to get it on a 'freebie' CD.

    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to Graham J on Sat May 11 14:20:48 2024
    Graham J <[email protected]> wrote:

    [...]
    If the mini uses DHCP then the router provides it with an IP address.
    Some routers can be configured to issue a specific address linked to a
    MAC address - this is usually called binding. So have you configured
    your router to issue a static IP to the mini?

    The router does have that ability but there is something odd going on:

    The Mini seems to be connected to the router twice, once with the name "Admins-Mac-Mini" and once with the name "Lizs-Mini" (which is what I
    changed it to in the Sharing preference). The first one in the DHCP
    Clients List shows the same MAC address as the "About this computer"
    info, the second one has a different MAC address and I can't see where
    that has come from. The first one's IP is n.n.n.103, the second is
    n.n.n.100 and the Mini's Preferences panel shows it is connected to
    n.n.n.100

    Using 'Refresh' on the list updates the "valid time" which is about 2
    hours for the first one and abot 24 hours for the second - but it
    doesn't remove either of them. Plugging and unplugging the Ethernet
    connection results in the same addresses being reloaded (Wireless is
    off). Shutting down and restarting the Mini makes no difference.

    There is an "Address reservation" screen in the DHPC pages of the router software and also the "Binding" you mentioned. Adding the Mini's
    details to either of those lists with an IP of n.n.n.104 and clicking
    "Save" doesn't alter the result.


    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce Horrocks@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Sat May 11 21:12:51 2024
    On 11/05/2024 10:19, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    I am trying to set up IP addresses so that I can FTP by Ethernet from my
    G3 to my Mini.

    In the Mini I have set DHCP with manual address to 192.168.1.104, which
    does not clash with any of the other devices (which are nn.100,101,102
    &103). In the G3 (running OS 8.6) I have put the same IP address into
    Fetch. It also requires a username and password, I have tried the
    Mini's Admin and my personal names and passwords, but the connection is always refused.

    I have set the Desktpo and Documents folders of the Mini to 'Everyone
    Read and Write'. The Ethernet setup panel shows it is connected with
    the correct IP address and it can get access to the Web through the
    (wired) router. Other computers on the same Ethernet are connecting correctly.

    What have I done wrong?


    Your terminology is a little wrong but I think it's understandable.

    Essentially you have configured the Mini to have IP address
    192.168.1.104. Whether you have done that by fixing the address in the
    Mini (static IP) or configuring DHCP to always issue the same IP to the
    Mini doesn't really matter.

    I suspect the main reason the G3 can't connect is because you haven't
    enabled FTP file sharing on the Mini. In System Settings, look under
    Sharing and iirc FTP is one of the options there.


    --
    Bruce Horrocks
    Surrey, England

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Graham J@21:1/5 to Bruce Horrocks on Sat May 11 23:42:50 2024
    Bruce Horrocks wrote:

    [snip]

    I suspect the main reason the G3 can't connect is because you haven't
    enabled FTP file sharing on the Mini. In System Settings, look under
    Sharing and iirc FTP is one of the options there.



    Which is what I suggested at the end of my reply at 10:56 this morning.

    --
    Graham J

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Graham J@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Sat May 11 23:31:03 2024
    Liz Tuddenham wrote:

    [snip]

    But you mentioned FTP. Why do you want to use FTP?

    Because it is the only way of transferring files from OS8.6 to OSX. If someone sends me a URL by e-mail or on this group, I have to create a
    text file of it and then FTP that to the Mini, which has an up-to-date browser. It is getting worse now that OSX can't recognise a Simple Text
    file and tries to do something clever with it.

    I think we've covered this before, but surely there is an
    Apple-proprietary file sharing mechanism that works between all flavours
    of OS from OS7 to OSX.

    I worked with Macs connected to PCs in around 1985 and don't remember
    any sort of problem. Nothing worked faster than 10base2, until we
    bought some very expensive interfaces that worked at 100 Mbits/sec


    --
    Graham J

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Graham J@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Sat May 11 23:40:31 2024
    Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Graham J <[email protected]> wrote:

    [...]

    The router does have that ability but there is something odd going on:

    The Mini seems to be connected to the router twice, once with the name "Admins-Mac-Mini" and once with the name "Lizs-Mini" (which is what I
    changed it to in the Sharing preference). The first one in the DHCP
    Clients List shows the same MAC address as the "About this computer"
    info, the second one has a different MAC address and I can't see where
    that has come from. The first one's IP is n.n.n.103, the second is
    n.n.n.100 and the Mini's Preferences panel shows it is connected to
    n.n.n.100

    Using 'Refresh' on the list updates the "valid time" which is about 2
    hours for the first one and abot 24 hours for the second - but it
    doesn't remove either of them. Plugging and unplugging the Ethernet connection results in the same addresses being reloaded (Wireless is
    off). Shutting down and restarting the Mini makes no difference.


    [snip]

    Where do you see these two names? "Admins-Mac-Mini" and "Lizs-Mini"

    Are they both shown in the DHCP clients list in the router?

    Can you ping both their IP addresses (n.n.n.103 and n.n.n.10) from all
    the other machines on the LAN?

    What is the make & model of your router? Does it forget the DHCP
    clients list if you disconnect all the devices (except one) and power it off/on?

    Is there any other device on the LAN which is providing name resolution?

    Al though this is confusing and prevents good diagnostics, I doubt that
    is will prevent FTP from operating.

    --
    Graham J

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to Graham J on Sun May 12 08:27:37 2024
    Graham J <[email protected]> wrote:

    Liz Tuddenham wrote:

    [snip]

    But you mentioned FTP. Why do you want to use FTP?

    Because it is the only way of transferring files from OS8.6 to OSX. If someone sends me a URL by e-mail or on this group, I have to create a
    text file of it and then FTP that to the Mini, which has an up-to-date browser. It is getting worse now that OSX can't recognise a Simple Text file and tries to do something clever with it.

    I think we've covered this before, but surely there is an
    Apple-proprietary file sharing mechanism that works between all flavours
    of OS from OS7 to OSX.

    If there is, I haven't found it. All the pre-OSX machines talk to each
    other, but FTP seems to be the only way of communicating between OS8.6
    and OSX. I seem to remember that one 'packet' would be sent and nothing
    more.

    In any case, they now don't have enough in common to be useful,
    everything has to be communicated in text because they have no programs
    in common.



    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to Bruce Horrocks on Sun May 12 08:27:38 2024
    Bruce Horrocks <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 11/05/2024 10:19, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    I am trying to set up IP addresses so that I can FTP by Ethernet from my
    G3 to my Mini.

    In the Mini I have set DHCP with manual address to 192.168.1.104, which does not clash with any of the other devices (which are nn.100,101,102 &103). In the G3 (running OS 8.6) I have put the same IP address into Fetch. It also requires a username and password, I have tried the
    Mini's Admin and my personal names and passwords, but the connection is always refused.

    I have set the Desktpo and Documents folders of the Mini to 'Everyone
    Read and Write'. The Ethernet setup panel shows it is connected with
    the correct IP address and it can get access to the Web through the
    (wired) router. Other computers on the same Ethernet are connecting correctly.

    What have I done wrong?


    Your terminology is a little wrong but I think it's understandable.

    Essentially you have configured the Mini to have IP address
    192.168.1.104. Whether you have done that by fixing the address in the
    Mini (static IP) or configuring DHCP to always issue the same IP to the
    Mini doesn't really matter.

    I suspect the main reason the G3 can't connect is because you haven't
    enabled FTP file sharing on the Mini. In System Settings, look under
    Sharing and iirc FTP is one of the options there.

    In System Preferences there is a section 'Sharing'.with the following:

    Screen sharing
    File sharing
    Media sharing
    Printer sharing
    Remote Login
    Remote Management
    Remote Apple Events
    Bluetooth Sharing
    Internet Sharing
    Content Caching

    With Remote Login and Remote Management turned on, there was no
    improvement, but after working my way through all the hoops, loops and
    warnings of Internet Sharing, I finally got Fetch to make a connection.
    It timed-out without displaying any files and the address is still 192.168.1.100 ...but that's a start.


    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Sun May 12 08:43:00 2024
    Liz Tuddenham <[email protected]d> wrote:

    Bruce Horrocks <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 11/05/2024 10:19, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    I am trying to set up IP addresses so that I can FTP by Ethernet from my G3 to my Mini.

    In the Mini I have set DHCP with manual address to 192.168.1.104, which does not clash with any of the other devices (which are nn.100,101,102 &103). In the G3 (running OS 8.6) I have put the same IP address into Fetch. It also requires a username and password, I have tried the
    Mini's Admin and my personal names and passwords, but the connection is always refused.

    I have set the Desktpo and Documents folders of the Mini to 'Everyone Read and Write'. The Ethernet setup panel shows it is connected with
    the correct IP address and it can get access to the Web through the (wired) router. Other computers on the same Ethernet are connecting correctly.

    What have I done wrong?


    Your terminology is a little wrong but I think it's understandable.

    Essentially you have configured the Mini to have IP address
    192.168.1.104. Whether you have done that by fixing the address in the
    Mini (static IP) or configuring DHCP to always issue the same IP to the Mini doesn't really matter.

    I suspect the main reason the G3 can't connect is because you haven't enabled FTP file sharing on the Mini. In System Settings, look under Sharing and iirc FTP is one of the options there.

    In System Preferences there is a section 'Sharing'.with the following:

    Screen sharing
    File sharing
    Media sharing
    Printer sharing
    Remote Login
    Remote Management
    Remote Apple Events
    Bluetooth Sharing
    Internet Sharing
    Content Caching

    With Remote Login and Remote Management turned on, there was no
    improvement, but after working my way through all the hoops, loops and warnings of Internet Sharing, I finally got Fetch to make a connection.
    It timed-out without displaying any files and the address is still 192.168.1.100 ...but that's a start.

    I've now used the Manual DHCP and managed to get a connection on
    192.168.1.104 ...but still no files appear in the Fetch window.

    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to Graham J on Sun May 12 08:31:15 2024
    Graham J <[email protected]> wrote:

    Bruce Horrocks wrote:

    [snip]

    I suspect the main reason the G3 can't connect is because you haven't enabled FTP file sharing on the Mini. In System Settings, look under Sharing and iirc FTP is one of the options there.



    Which is what I suggested at the end of my reply at 10:56 this morning.

    There wasn't any FTP setting, but I have now found it under 'Internet'
    [see my other reply for details].

    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Graham J@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Sun May 12 09:35:10 2024
    Liz Tuddenham wrote:

    [snip]

    Can you ping both their IP addresses (n.n.n.103 and n.n.n.10) from all
    the other machines on the LAN?

    I haven't found out how to 'Ping' devices (don't think there was
    anything that did that in OS8.6 and I have never properly explored OSX)

    OS8 is a long time ago for me and I can't really remember. Can't find
    anything on giggle. I suspect there was a Control Panel utility where
    one could set Auto / Manual IP and there was a button to test the
    configuration where one could specify an IP to ping.

    It's inconceivable that Apple did not provide a Ping function - is is
    essential to debugging networks. But then, Apple never provided a
    command line until OSX !!!

    OSX provides Ping in Terminal - see simple guide at:

    <https://www.hellotech.com/guide/for/how-to-do-a-ping-test-on-mac>

    --
    Graham J

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce Horrocks@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Sun May 12 09:28:57 2024
    On 12/05/2024 08:43, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Liz Tuddenham <[email protected]d> wrote:

    Bruce Horrocks <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 11/05/2024 10:19, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    I am trying to set up IP addresses so that I can FTP by Ethernet from my >>>> G3 to my Mini.

    In the Mini I have set DHCP with manual address to 192.168.1.104, which >>>> does not clash with any of the other devices (which are nn.100,101,102 >>>> &103). In the G3 (running OS 8.6) I have put the same IP address into >>>> Fetch. It also requires a username and password, I have tried the
    Mini's Admin and my personal names and passwords, but the connection is >>>> always refused.

    I have set the Desktpo and Documents folders of the Mini to 'Everyone
    Read and Write'. The Ethernet setup panel shows it is connected with
    the correct IP address and it can get access to the Web through the
    (wired) router. Other computers on the same Ethernet are connecting
    correctly.

    What have I done wrong?


    Your terminology is a little wrong but I think it's understandable.

    Essentially you have configured the Mini to have IP address
    192.168.1.104. Whether you have done that by fixing the address in the
    Mini (static IP) or configuring DHCP to always issue the same IP to the
    Mini doesn't really matter.

    I suspect the main reason the G3 can't connect is because you haven't
    enabled FTP file sharing on the Mini. In System Settings, look under
    Sharing and iirc FTP is one of the options there.

    In System Preferences there is a section 'Sharing'.with the following:

    Screen sharing
    File sharing
    Media sharing
    Printer sharing
    Remote Login
    Remote Management
    Remote Apple Events
    Bluetooth Sharing
    Internet Sharing
    Content Caching

    With Remote Login and Remote Management turned on, there was no
    improvement, but after working my way through all the hoops, loops and
    warnings of Internet Sharing, I finally got Fetch to make a connection.
    It timed-out without displaying any files and the address is still
    192.168.1.100 ...but that's a start.

    I've now used the Manual DHCP and managed to get a connection on 192.168.1.104 ...but still no files appear in the Fetch window.

    Internet Sharing is something else that you don't need at the moment.
    Turn it off so as not to confuse things and go into File Sharing. There
    should be a "share files by FTP" type setting in there. (Or maybe 'FTP
    Server' but that's a bit too techie-phrasing for Apple).

    --
    Bruce Horrocks
    Surrey, England

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Graham J@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Sun May 12 09:40:04 2024
    Liz Tuddenham wrote:

    [snip]

    I've now used the Manual DHCP and managed to get a connection on 192.168.1.104 ...but still no files appear in the Fetch window.

    You're still confused. Your Mac gets is IP ***either*** by DHCP or
    manually. If you set the IP manually in the Mac you are not using DHCP.

    If you set the IP manually in the Mac you have to take full
    responsibility for getting it right - including the subnet mask and
    default gateway parameters.

    What you configure in the router is quite different.


    --
    Graham J

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Graham J@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Sun May 12 09:21:41 2024
    Liz Tuddenham wrote:

    [snip]


    I think we've covered this before, but surely there is an
    Apple-proprietary file sharing mechanism that works between all flavours
    of OS from OS7 to OSX.

    If there is, I haven't found it. All the pre-OSX machines talk to each other, but FTP seems to be the only way of communicating between OS8.6
    and OSX. I seem to remember that one 'packet' would be sent and nothing more.

    Back in about 1985-1990 I remember working with Mac II running OS7 which
    used Ethernet to communicate with a Unix system. I worked on a NuBus
    interface to connect to a phototypesetter, so the files that were moved
    across the network were in Postscript.

    I think more modern Macs can also communicate with Unix, so I don't see
    why old and new Macs can't communicate with each other.

    Maybe somebody here can help?

    In any case, they now don't have enough in common to be useful,
    everything has to be communicated in text because they have no programs
    in common.

    Copying a file from one OS to another ought to work. Opening a file to
    achieve anything useful is another matter, but as you say both OS's can
    open text files. I suspect both can open .JPG and .WAV files for
    pictures and music.


    --
    Graham J

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Graham J@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Sun May 12 09:54:06 2024
    Liz Tuddenham wrote:

    [snip]


    Where do you see these two names? "Admins-Mac-Mini" and "Lizs-Mini"

    Are they both shown in the DHCP clients list in the router?

    They are in 'DHCP Server .> clients list'. "This page displays
    information on all DHCP clients on the network"

    Two things have happened since I last posted:

    The first line of the table disappeared about 3 hours after I first saw
    it, so it looks as though that line timed out at the end of 'valid
    time'.


    [snip]

    Fair comment. But the two different MAC addresses you mentioned are
    confusing. Does the machine "Lizs-Mini" have WiFi? Is it possible that
    at some point in the past it was enabled?

    Different routers remember things differently, sometimes even across
    power off/on.

    I suspect the only parameters your router needs are the connection
    username and password for your ISP. If so, factory reset it, and
    re-enter these two items, with only one computer connected to it
    (obviously, to manage it). View its DHCP table and note the IP issued
    to the connected device. Make the router remember it so it always
    issues the same IP to that device.

    Then connect all the other machines one-at-a-time binding their IP
    addresses as you go.

    Then test: power everything off. Wait a minute: power on the router -
    wait until it shows it has an internet connection, then power on all the computers - simultaneously if you like. All should show they have the
    IP addresses you bound in the router. Note that this might not work if
    you power everything including the router back on at the same time,
    because the router may take much longer to come to life than the
    computers so the computers may fail to get a sensible IP address. Be
    aware of this if you get mains power cuts.

    --
    Graham J

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to Bruce Horrocks on Sun May 12 10:36:30 2024
    Bruce Horrocks <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 12/05/2024 08:43, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Liz Tuddenham <[email protected]d> wrote:

    Bruce Horrocks <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 11/05/2024 10:19, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    I am trying to set up IP addresses so that I can FTP by Ethernet from my >>>> G3 to my Mini.

    In the Mini I have set DHCP with manual address to 192.168.1.104, which >>>> does not clash with any of the other devices (which are nn.100,101,102 >>>> &103). In the G3 (running OS 8.6) I have put the same IP address into >>>> Fetch. It also requires a username and password, I have tried the
    Mini's Admin and my personal names and passwords, but the connection is >>>> always refused.

    I have set the Desktpo and Documents folders of the Mini to 'Everyone >>>> Read and Write'. The Ethernet setup panel shows it is connected with >>>> the correct IP address and it can get access to the Web through the
    (wired) router. Other computers on the same Ethernet are connecting >>>> correctly.

    What have I done wrong?


    Your terminology is a little wrong but I think it's understandable.

    Essentially you have configured the Mini to have IP address
    192.168.1.104. Whether you have done that by fixing the address in the >>> Mini (static IP) or configuring DHCP to always issue the same IP to the >>> Mini doesn't really matter.

    I suspect the main reason the G3 can't connect is because you haven't
    enabled FTP file sharing on the Mini. In System Settings, look under
    Sharing and iirc FTP is one of the options there.

    In System Preferences there is a section 'Sharing'.with the following:

    Screen sharing
    File sharing
    Media sharing
    Printer sharing
    Remote Login
    Remote Management
    Remote Apple Events
    Bluetooth Sharing
    Internet Sharing
    Content Caching

    With Remote Login and Remote Management turned on, there was no
    improvement, but after working my way through all the hoops, loops and
    warnings of Internet Sharing, I finally got Fetch to make a connection.
    It timed-out without displaying any files and the address is still
    192.168.1.100 ...but that's a start.

    I've now used the Manual DHCP and managed to get a connection on 192.168.1.104 ...but still no files appear in the Fetch window.

    Internet Sharing is something else that you don't need at the moment.
    Turn it off so as not to confuse things and go into File Sharing. There should be a "share files by FTP" type setting in there. (Or maybe 'FTP Server' but that's a bit too techie-phrasing for Apple).

    I have everything turned on in File Sharing, but I get "Connection
    Refused" unless Internet Sharing is on. (This is with DHCP allowing
    the router to choose its own address (which is invariably 192.168.1.100)

    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to Graham J on Sun May 12 10:36:30 2024
    Graham J <[email protected]> wrote:

    Liz Tuddenham wrote:

    [snip]


    Where do you see these two names? "Admins-Mac-Mini" and "Lizs-Mini"

    Are they both shown in the DHCP clients list in the router?

    They are in 'DHCP Server .> clients list'. "This page displays
    information on all DHCP clients on the network"

    Two things have happened since I last posted:

    The first line of the table disappeared about 3 hours after I first saw
    it, so it looks as though that line timed out at the end of 'valid
    time'.


    [snip]

    Fair comment. But the two different MAC addresses you mentioned are confusing. Does the machine "Lizs-Mini" have WiFi? Is it possible that
    at some point in the past it was enabled?

    It does, and I have turned it on and off at various time. It comes up
    as 192.168.1.101


    Different routers remember things differently, sometimes even across
    power off/on.

    I suspect the only parameters your router needs are the connection
    username and password for your ISP. If so, factory reset it, and
    re-enter these two items, with only one computer connected to it
    (obviously, to manage it). View its DHCP table and note the IP issued
    to the connected device. Make the router remember it so it always
    issues the same IP to that device.

    Then connect all the other machines one-at-a-time binding their IP
    addresses as you go.

    The other oddity is that all this time I have had the G3 running and
    connected to the router (that's how I am connecting to UCSM) but the
    router has never shown it.



    Then test: power everything off. Wait a minute: power on the router -
    wait until it shows it has an internet connection, then power on all the computers - simultaneously if you like. All should show they have the
    IP addresses you bound in the router. Note that this might not work if
    you power everything including the router back on at the same time,
    because the router may take much longer to come to life than the
    computers so the computers may fail to get a sensible IP address. Be
    aware of this if you get mains power cuts.

    Thanks, I'll do that once I have established reliable access of any
    sort.


    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jaimie Vandenbergh@21:1/5 to Graham J on Sun May 12 10:09:17 2024
    On 12 May 2024 at 09:40:04 BST, "Graham J" <[email protected]> wrote:

    Liz Tuddenham wrote:

    [snip]

    I've now used the Manual DHCP and managed to get a connection on
    192.168.1.104 ...but still no files appear in the Fetch window.

    You're still confused. Your Mac gets is IP ***either*** by DHCP or
    manually. If you set the IP manually in the Mac you are not using DHCP.

    Look in any network connection's TCP/IP settings, and you'll see there
    are four choices for it:

    Using DHCP
    Using DHCP with manual address <== this'll be what Liz is using
    Manually
    Off

    It's been like this in OS X for so long I cannot recall if it ever
    wasn't.

    Cheers - Jaimie
    --
    Thank you for your input. Now, if you have something
    substantive to bring to the discussion, kindly do.
    Otherwise, isn't there an eternal flamefest that would
    peter out if you won't keep feeding it?
    -- Cosmin Corbea, r.a.b

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Graham J@21:1/5 to Jaimie Vandenbergh on Sun May 12 12:58:59 2024
    Jaimie Vandenbergh wrote:

    [snip]

    Look in any network connection's TCP/IP settings, and you'll see there
    are four choices for it:

    Using DHCP
    Using DHCP with manual address <== this'll be what Liz is using
    Manually
    Off

    It's been like this in OS X for so long I cannot recall if it ever
    wasn't.

    I don't have OSX here to refer to, but:

    Jamie please explain - what is:

    "DHCP with manual address"

    To me that is a complete contradiction - it either gets its address from
    the DHCP server, or it does not.

    Confused ....


    --
    Graham J

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Graham J@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Sun May 12 13:25:42 2024
    Liz Tuddenham wrote:

    [snip]
    Internet Sharing is something else that you don't need at the moment.
    Turn it off so as not to confuse things and go into File Sharing. There
    should be a "share files by FTP" type setting in there. (Or maybe 'FTP
    Server' but that's a bit too techie-phrasing for Apple).

    I have everything turned on in File Sharing, but I get "Connection
    Refused" unless Internet Sharing is on. (This is with DHCP allowing
    the router to choose its own address (which is invariably 192.168.1.100)

    No - the router does not "choose its own address" - it issues an address
    to the computer. Is this what you meant?

    To repeat what Bruce Horrocks wrote:

    "Internet Sharing is something else that you don't need at the moment."

    This is a feature whereby one computer uses one of two (or more) network interfaces to connect to the internet, traditionally using a modem
    rather than a router; and another network interface to supply internet connectivity to one (or more) other computers. The computer therefore
    behaves as a router, and implements NAT.

    It's a hangover from the days of dial-up internet connections, before
    there was such a thing as an internet router. The first network
    interface would have been the modem device - possibly a plug-in card -
    or a serial connection to a separate modem - so it would not have been
    an Ethernet interface as we know it today.

    The feature will work with a real Ethernet interface. The first
    interface would connect to a router, and get its IP address from that
    router. The second interface would have a static IP address on a
    separate subnet (possibly hard-coded by the actual implementation), and
    would be associated with a primitive DHCP server.

    Other computers could connect to this second interface. Physically you
    would need a network switch to achieve connection of more than one other computer. (In the past this would have been 10base5 or 10Base2 cable in
    a daisy chain between these computers.) These other computers would
    have obtained their IP address settings from first computer.

    This might explain your two IP addresses associated with different MAC addresses.

    It is theoretically possible that you could have a legitimate reason for
    using Internet Sharing (sometimes more meaningfully called Internet
    Connection Sharing) - developing a firewall product might be one such
    reason.

    But in your case YOU DO NOT NEED IT so disable it and get your network
    to work properly before attempting any file sharing.

    Please confirm that each of your computers has its own network cable
    connecting to a LAN port on your router.

    --
    Graham J

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TimH@21:1/5 to Graham J on Sun May 12 13:30:55 2024
    On 12 May 2024 at 12:58:59 PM BST, "Graham J" <[email protected]> wrote:

    Jaimie Vandenbergh wrote:

    [snip]

    Look in any network connection's TCP/IP settings, and you'll see there
    are four choices for it:

    Using DHCP
    Using DHCP with manual address <== this'll be what Liz is using> Manually
    Off

    It's been like this in OS X for so long I cannot recall if it ever
    wasn't.

    I don't have OSX here to refer to, but:

    Jamie please explain - what is:

    "DHCP with manual address"

    To me that is a complete contradiction - it either gets its address from
    the DHCP server, or it does not.

    Confused ....

    IIRC (and if I don't Jaimie will correct me), it's just a convenience: it
    saves you having to fill in the subnet mask (and maybe other options) but
    still allows a manually assigned address.
    --
    TimH
    pull tooth to reply by email

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jaimie Vandenbergh@21:1/5 to All on Sun May 12 14:30:20 2024
    On 12 May 2024 at 14:30:55 BST, "TimH" <[email protected]d>
    wrote:

    On 12 May 2024 at 12:58:59 PM BST, "Graham J" <[email protected]> wrote:

    Jaimie Vandenbergh wrote:

    [snip]

    Look in any network connection's TCP/IP settings, and you'll see there
    are four choices for it:

    Using DHCP
    Using DHCP with manual address <== this'll be what Liz is using> Manually >>> Off

    It's been like this in OS X for so long I cannot recall if it ever
    wasn't.

    I don't have OSX here to refer to, but:

    Jamie please explain - what is:

    "DHCP with manual address"

    To me that is a complete contradiction - it either gets its address from
    the DHCP server, or it does not.

    Confused ....

    IIRC (and if I don't Jaimie will correct me), it's just a convenience: it saves you having to fill in the subnet mask (and maybe other options) but still allows a manually assigned address.

    Yep, exactly. Everything comes from the DHCP server, but you can choose
    your own IP.
    It is a pretty odd thing, but it's been here for years.

    Cheers - Jaimie
    --
    Hell hath no fury like someone who is enraged that
    someone else is getting away with something they're
    scared to try. - lilairen, LJ

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TimS@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Sun May 12 15:44:31 2024
    On 12 May 2024 at 15:30:20 BST, "Jaimie Vandenbergh" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 12 May 2024 at 14:30:55 BST, "TimH" <[email protected]d>
    wrote:

    On 12 May 2024 at 12:58:59 PM BST, "Graham J" <[email protected]> wrote:

    Jaimie Vandenbergh wrote:

    [snip]

    Look in any network connection's TCP/IP settings, and you'll see there >>>> are four choices for it:

    Using DHCP
    Using DHCP with manual address <== this'll be what Liz is using> Manually >>>> Off

    It's been like this in OS X for so long I cannot recall if it ever
    wasn't.

    I don't have OSX here to refer to, but:

    Jamie please explain - what is:

    "DHCP with manual address"

    To me that is a complete contradiction - it either gets its address from >>> the DHCP server, or it does not.

    Confused ....

    IIRC (and if I don't Jaimie will correct me), it's just a convenience: it
    saves you having to fill in the subnet mask (and maybe other options) but
    still allows a manually assigned address.

    Yep, exactly. Everything comes from the DHCP server, but you can choose
    your own IP.
    It is a pretty odd thing, but it's been here for years.

    I don't actually do that, here, but I probably should. Why? Because I debug Xojo stuff using Win-10 and Linux VMs, and a Pi. I ought really to assign
    fixed addresses for all those, in DHCP. Then allow DHCP to assign what it
    feels like to the printer, file server, and SWMBO and my Minis.

    The reason to assign fixed addresses is because the Xojo IDE needs to know
    them in order to initiate remote debugging to the right device/VM. These
    change occasionally if I reboot a VM and that's then a nuisance.

    --
    Tim

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to Graham J on Sun May 12 17:10:55 2024
    Graham J <[email protected]> wrote:

    [...]
    It is theoretically possible that you could have a legitimate reason for using Internet Sharing (sometimes more meaningfully called Internet Connection Sharing) - developing a firewall product might be one such
    reason.

    But in your case YOU DO NOT NEED IT so disable it and get your network
    to work properly before attempting any file sharing.

    I have now switched it off. The Ethernet was dropping out
    intermittently when it was switched on.


    Please confirm that each of your computers has its own network cable connecting to a LAN port on your router.

    The router is in the front bedroom next to the telephone drop wire
    termination and filter. One Ethernet port is connected directly to the MacBook. Another Ethernet port is connected by a single cable to a hub
    in the 'office' (back bedroom) which feeds two printers, the G3 and the
    Mini. That hub also feeds a cable to another hub in the 'studio'
    (downstairs front room) where it connects to two more G3s and an iMac
    (which is usually switched off). All the'studio' machines were off
    during the recent tests but that hub was still powered.

    The 'office' G3 has been set up with manual TCP/IP at 192.168.1.200,
    subnet 255.255.255.0 and router address 192.168.1.1, it handles e-mails
    and Usenet, as well as all the office work and FTP to websites.

    The MacBook has been set up with manual TCP/IP at 192.168.1.102, subnet 255.255.255.0 and router address 192.168.1.1; it also has a Wi-Fi
    connection to the router enabled, so that takes over when the Ethernet
    plug drops out and I don't happen to spot it.


    ======= GOT IT!!! =======

    In the MacBook, the File Sharing > Options panel has three boxes:
    SMB, FTP and AFP, in the Mini there are only two ...the FTP option is
    missing.

    Is it elsewhere or have they just left it out altogether?



    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Graham J@21:1/5 to Jaimie Vandenbergh on Sun May 12 17:41:34 2024
    Jaimie Vandenbergh wrote:

    [snip]


    "DHCP with manual address"

    To me that is a complete contradiction - it either gets its address from >>> the DHCP server, or it does not.

    Confused ....

    IIRC (and if I don't Jaimie will correct me), it's just a convenience: it
    saves you having to fill in the subnet mask (and maybe other options) but
    still allows a manually assigned address.

    Yep, exactly. Everything comes from the DHCP server, but you can choose
    your own IP.
    It is a pretty odd thing, but it's been here for years.

    Cheers - Jaimie

    Thank you both. Very strange!



    --
    Graham J

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce Horrocks@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Sun May 12 18:02:29 2024
    On 12/05/2024 17:10, Liz Tuddenham wrote:

    ======= GOT IT!!! =======

    In the MacBook, the File Sharing > Options panel has three boxes:
    SMB, FTP and AFP, in the Mini there are only two ...the FTP option is missing.

    Is it elsewhere or have they just left it out altogether?

    So, Googling, it seems Apple dropped FTP a while back - I'd forgotten tbh.

    Your options would seem to be to turn on file sharing - either SMB or
    AFP. AFP is the native Apple one but it too got dropped later so let's
    go for SMB.

    1) Enable SMB File Sharing on the Mini.

    2) On the G3 choose Finder -> Connect to server and choose Browse (if
    that dialogue hasn't changed)

    There will then be some prompts for username and password and fingers
    crossed you can access the Mini from the G3 just by dragging and
    dropping files into the Finder window.

    --
    Bruce Horrocks
    Surrey, England

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Graham J@21:1/5 to TimS on Sun May 12 17:52:09 2024
    TimS wrote:

    [snip]


    I don't actually do that, here, but I probably should. Why? Because I debug Xojo stuff using Win-10 and Linux VMs, and a Pi. I ought really to assign fixed addresses for all those, in DHCP. Then allow DHCP to assign what it feels like to the printer, file server, and SWMBO and my Minis.

    The reason to assign fixed addresses is because the Xojo IDE needs to know them in order to initiate remote debugging to the right device/VM. These change occasionally if I reboot a VM and that's then a nuisance.

    Using DHCP to bind addresses is always good when debugging things. It
    also documents the addresses allocated - useful reference.

    It's also useful to assign static addresses to printers and file
    servers, particularly if you require access to those things via a VPN
    from a remote location.

    Be aware, that following a power failure, whatever functions as the DHCP
    server may take longer to start working than many of the clients, and if
    those clients connect via a network switch they might configure
    themselves with autoconfiguration IPs. (169.254.x.y)


    --
    Graham J

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Graham J@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Sun May 12 18:04:39 2024
    Liz Tuddenham wrote:

    [snip]

    I have now switched it off. The Ethernet was dropping out
    intermittently when it was switched on.

    Good. I can't begin to imagine what chaos it was causing!

    Please confirm that each of your computers has its own network cable
    connecting to a LAN port on your router.

    The router is in the front bedroom next to the telephone drop wire termination and filter. One Ethernet port is connected directly to the MacBook. Another Ethernet port is connected by a single cable to a hub
    in the 'office' (back bedroom) which feeds two printers, the G3 and the
    Mini. That hub also feeds a cable to another hub in the 'studio'
    (downstairs front room) where it connects to two more G3s and an iMac
    (which is usually switched off). All the 'studio' machines were off
    during the recent tests but that hub was still powered.

    By "hub" do you really mean "Network Switch" or "Network Repeater"?

    I ask because "Hub" is often used by Openreach and the like to mean a
    router with several LAN ports ...

    The 'office' G3 has been set up with manual TCP/IP at 192.168.1.200,
    subnet 255.255.255.0 and router address 192.168.1.1, it handles e-mails
    and Usenet, as well as all the office work and FTP to websites.

    The MacBook has been set up with manual TCP/IP at 192.168.1.102, subnet 255.255.255.0 and router address 192.168.1.1; it also has a Wi-Fi
    connection to the router enabled, so that takes over when the Ethernet
    plug drops out and I don't happen to spot it.

    Please don't do that. Either get a new Ethernet patch cable with a barb
    on the plug so it doesn't fall out, or use WiFi permanently. The
    Macbook may well have two different IP addresses (one for wired, the
    other for WiFi) which will make debugging difficult, and could well
    impact performance.

    ======= GOT IT!!! =======

    In the MacBook, the File Sharing > Options panel has three boxes:
    SMB, FTP and AFP, in the Mini there are only two ...the FTP option is missing.

    Is it elsewhere or have they just left it out altogether?

    Do the Macbook and Mini have the same version of Operating System?

    SMB is used for sharing with MS Windows devices.

    AFP is Apple File Sharing, and I think was present all the way back to
    OS8. If you enable it on all your devices it might get file sharing to
    work ...


    --
    Graham J

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to Bruce Horrocks on Sun May 12 19:00:17 2024
    Bruce Horrocks <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 12/05/2024 17:10, Liz Tuddenham wrote:

    ======= GOT IT!!! =======

    In the MacBook, the File Sharing > Options panel has three boxes:
    SMB, FTP and AFP, in the Mini there are only two ...the FTP option is missing.

    Is it elsewhere or have they just left it out altogether?

    So, Googling, it seems Apple dropped FTP a while back - I'd forgotten tbh.

    Your options would seem to be to turn on file sharing - either SMB or
    AFP. AFP is the native Apple one but it too got dropped later so let's
    go for SMB.

    1) Enable SMB File Sharing on the Mini.

    That was on by default. I've also tried switching on AFP, but it
    doesn't seem to help.


    2) On the G3 choose Finder -> Connect to server and choose Browse (if
    that dialogue hasn't changed)

    Not sure about that, selecting Finder in OS8.6 just finds things.

    To connect to anything it either needs an FTP program like 'Fetch' or it
    goes through 'Chooser' (which was 'Printer Chooser' in earlier versions)
    and then Appleshare. The Appleshare window shows a list of servers -
    but only Classic Macs will appear in the list.


    There will then be some prompts for username and password and fingers
    crossed you can access the Mini from the G3 just by dragging and
    dropping files into the Finder window.

    That sounds like the way OS8.6 works once another OS8.6 machine has been selected, but it doesn't seem to work between OS8.6 and OSX.


    There is a reference in the 'Help' of the Mini that suggests contacting
    the Apple Store for an FTP app. Is that a possible way to go?

    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to Graham J on Sun May 12 19:00:16 2024
    Graham J <[email protected]> wrote:

    Liz Tuddenham wrote:

    [snip]

    I have now switched it off. The Ethernet was dropping out
    intermittently when it was switched on.

    Good. I can't begin to imagine what chaos it was causing!

    Please confirm that each of your computers has its own network cable
    connecting to a LAN port on your router.

    The router is in the front bedroom next to the telephone drop wire termination and filter. One Ethernet port is connected directly to the MacBook. Another Ethernet port is connected by a single cable to a hub
    in the 'office' (back bedroom) which feeds two printers, the G3 and the Mini. That hub also feeds a cable to another hub in the 'studio' (downstairs front room) where it connects to two more G3s and an iMac (which is usually switched off). All the 'studio' machines were off
    during the recent tests but that hub was still powered.

    By "hub" do you really mean "Network Switch" or "Network Repeater"?

    A powered box with a lot of Ethernet cables plugged into it so that they
    can talk to each other. It doesn't do anything else.

    [...] The
    Macbook may well have two different IP addresses (one for wired, the
    other for WiFi) which will make debugging difficult, and could well
    impact performance.

    It does have two different IP addresses, which means I can choose
    between them when FTPing from the office G3. The reason is that the
    connection to the Wi-Fi aerial in the MacBook is not reliable, so
    Ethernet is preferred ...when the plug will stay in.

    My experience of doing public address work has taught me that locking
    plugs are a menace: When anyone trips over the cable, they will either
    rip the cable out of the plug or pull valuable equipment onto the floor.
    Tying the cable to something solid to prevent the plug being pulled will
    most likely result in someone falling over. It is much easier to put a
    plug back into a socket than it is to put a cable back into a plug or
    deal with a lawsuit for injury..



    ======= GOT IT!!! =======

    In the MacBook, the File Sharing > Options panel has three boxes:
    SMB, FTP and AFP, in the Mini there are only two ...the FTP option is missing.

    Is it elsewhere or have they just left it out altogether?

    Do the Macbook and Mini have the same version of Operating System?

    No. The MacBook is running OS10.6.8, the Mini is running OS10.15.7

    SMB is used for sharing with MS Windows devices.

    AFP is Apple File Sharing, and I think was present all the way back to
    OS8. If you enable it on all your devices it might get file sharing to
    work ...

    The menus on the G3 have always confused me, as the system appears to
    have been a bit of a 'Topsy' and just growed a bit at a time.

    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TimS@21:1/5 to Bruce Horrocks on Sun May 12 18:12:46 2024
    On 12 May 2024 at 18:02:29 BST, "Bruce Horrocks" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 12/05/2024 17:10, Liz Tuddenham wrote:

    ======= GOT IT!!! =======

    In the MacBook, the File Sharing > Options panel has three boxes:
    SMB, FTP and AFP, in the Mini there are only two ...the FTP option is
    missing.

    Is it elsewhere or have they just left it out altogether?

    So, Googling, it seems Apple dropped FTP a while back - I'd forgotten tbh.

    Your options would seem to be to turn on file sharing - either SMB or
    AFP. AFP is the native Apple one but it too got dropped later so let's
    go for SMB.

    But did any version of classic macOS support SMB?

    --
    Tim

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Graham J@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Sun May 12 20:15:25 2024
    Liz Tuddenham wrote:

    [snip]

    By "hub" do you really mean "Network Switch" or "Network Repeater"?

    A powered box with a lot of Ethernet cables plugged into it so that they
    can talk to each other. It doesn't do anything else.

    Make and model number?

    [...] The
    Macbook may well have two different IP addresses (one for wired, the
    other for WiFi) which will make debugging difficult, and could well
    impact performance.

    It does have two different IP addresses, which means I can choose
    between them when FTPing from the office G3. The reason is that the connection to the Wi-Fi aerial in the MacBook is not reliable, so
    Ethernet is preferred ...when the plug will stay in.

    My experience of doing public address work has taught me that locking
    plugs are a menace: When anyone trips over the cable, they will either
    rip the cable out of the plug or pull valuable equipment onto the floor. Tying the cable to something solid to prevent the plug being pulled will
    most likely result in someone falling over. It is much easier to put a
    plug back into a socket than it is to put a cable back into a plug or
    deal with a lawsuit for injury..

    This is a different environment. Tie your cables away well above
    ground, where nobody can trip over them. Having said that, the barb on
    a RJ45 plug won't resist a strong pull.

    Living with unreliable connections is a nightmare.


    --
    Graham J

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to Graham J on Sun May 12 20:30:26 2024
    Graham J <[email protected]> wrote:

    Liz Tuddenham wrote:

    [snip]

    By "hub" do you really mean "Network Switch" or "Network Repeater"?

    A powered box with a lot of Ethernet cables plugged into it so that they can talk to each other. It doesn't do anything else.

    Make and model number?

    The 'office' one is a MRI 10T/8, the 'studio' one might be the same or
    very similar, but it is well hidden and would take some time and effort
    to excavate. They have always 'just worked'.


    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to TimS on Sun May 12 20:30:27 2024
    TimS <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 12 May 2024 at 18:02:29 BST, "Bruce Horrocks" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 12/05/2024 17:10, Liz Tuddenham wrote:

    ======= GOT IT!!! =======

    In the MacBook, the File Sharing > Options panel has three boxes:
    SMB, FTP and AFP, in the Mini there are only two ...the FTP option is
    missing.

    Is it elsewhere or have they just left it out altogether?

    So, Googling, it seems Apple dropped FTP a while back - I'd forgotten tbh.

    Your options would seem to be to turn on file sharing - either SMB or
    AFP. AFP is the native Apple one but it too got dropped later so let's
    go for SMB.

    But did any version of classic macOS support SMB?

    I have never heard of it in OS 8.6


    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TimS@21:1/5 to All on Sun May 12 19:44:21 2024
    On 12 May 2024 at 20:30:27 BST, "Liz Tuddenham" <Liz Tuddenham> wrote:

    TimS <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 12 May 2024 at 18:02:29 BST, "Bruce Horrocks" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 12/05/2024 17:10, Liz Tuddenham wrote:

    ======= GOT IT!!! =======

    In the MacBook, the File Sharing > Options panel has three boxes:
    SMB, FTP and AFP, in the Mini there are only two ...the FTP option is >>>> missing.

    Is it elsewhere or have they just left it out altogether?

    So, Googling, it seems Apple dropped FTP a while back - I'd forgotten tbh. >>>
    Your options would seem to be to turn on file sharing - either SMB or
    AFP. AFP is the native Apple one but it too got dropped later so let's
    go for SMB.

    But did any version of classic macOS support SMB?

    I have never heard of it in OS 8.6

    So one end can do SMB but no longer AFP, the other can do AFP and not SMB.

    If I'm not mistaken, for FTP you'd need a server at one end and an FTP client at the other.

    --
    Tim

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TimS@21:1/5 to All on Sun May 12 19:48:27 2024
    On 12 May 2024 at 20:30:27 BST, "Liz Tuddenham" <Liz Tuddenham> wrote:

    TimS <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 12 May 2024 at 18:02:29 BST, "Bruce Horrocks" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 12/05/2024 17:10, Liz Tuddenham wrote:

    ======= GOT IT!!! =======

    In the MacBook, the File Sharing > Options panel has three boxes:
    SMB, FTP and AFP, in the Mini there are only two ...the FTP option is >>>> missing.

    Is it elsewhere or have they just left it out altogether?

    So, Googling, it seems Apple dropped FTP a while back - I'd forgotten tbh. >>>
    Your options would seem to be to turn on file sharing - either SMB or
    AFP. AFP is the native Apple one but it too got dropped later so let's
    go for SMB.

    But did any version of classic macOS support SMB?

    I have never heard of it in OS 8.6

    Does this need to be FTP, or would any mechanism to transfer files be satisfactory?

    --
    Tim

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to Bruce Horrocks on Sun May 12 21:03:59 2024
    Bruce Horrocks <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 12/05/2024 17:10, Liz Tuddenham wrote:

    ======= GOT IT!!! =======

    In the MacBook, the File Sharing > Options panel has three boxes:
    SMB, FTP and AFP, in the Mini there are only two ...the FTP option is missing.

    Is it elsewhere or have they just left it out altogether?

    So, Googling, it seems Apple dropped FTP a while back - I'd forgotten tbh.

    Your options would seem to be to turn on file sharing - either SMB or
    AFP.

    As discussed in another part of this thread, SMB doesn't appear to be
    available for earlier Macs. I've switched on AFP in the Mini and tried
    logging into it by typing its IP address into the Appleshare window of
    the G3. I get a message which says 'This server [presumably the Mini]
    is using an incompatible version of AFP. You cannot connect to it.
    Contact the server's administrator'.

    This suggest that the G3 has made cotact with the Mini, so the IP
    problem has been sorted out. The next step is to find something in
    common between the two machine that will allow file transfer.

    Is there any mileage in downloading software to configure the Mini as an
    FTP server, or is that just going to be blocked by its lack of support
    for FTP? The various freeware FTP server programs on PureMac all say
    OSX, without mentioning any particular incompatible versions.


    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to TimS on Sun May 12 21:13:27 2024
    TimS <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 12 May 2024 at 20:30:27 BST, "Liz Tuddenham" <Liz Tuddenham> wrote:

    TimS <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 12 May 2024 at 18:02:29 BST, "Bruce Horrocks" <[email protected]> >>wrote:

    On 12/05/2024 17:10, Liz Tuddenham wrote:

    ======= GOT IT!!! =======

    In the MacBook, the File Sharing > Options panel has three boxes:
    SMB, FTP and AFP, in the Mini there are only two ...the FTP option is >>>> missing.

    Is it elsewhere or have they just left it out altogether?

    So, Googling, it seems Apple dropped FTP a while back - I'd forgotten tbh.

    Your options would seem to be to turn on file sharing - either SMB or
    AFP. AFP is the native Apple one but it too got dropped later so let's >>> go for SMB.

    But did any version of classic macOS support SMB?

    I have never heard of it in OS 8.6

    Does this need to be FTP, or would any mechanism to transfer files be satisfactory?

    I suppose it would.

    Currently I am using the original AFP between the G3s and FTP from a G3
    to OSX machines (the MacBook and the Mac Pro, before it went pop).
    Adding yet anothermechanism is something I would prefer to avoid. I
    suppose I could use the G3 to FTP my files to a drop box on the <poppyrecords.co.uk> server and then download them with the Mini - but
    what a rigmarole.


    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to TimS on Sun May 12 21:06:40 2024
    TimS <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 12 May 2024 at 20:30:27 BST, "Liz Tuddenham" <Liz Tuddenham> wrote:

    TimS <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 12 May 2024 at 18:02:29 BST, "Bruce Horrocks" <[email protected]> >>wrote:

    On 12/05/2024 17:10, Liz Tuddenham wrote:

    ======= GOT IT!!! =======

    In the MacBook, the File Sharing > Options panel has three boxes:
    SMB, FTP and AFP, in the Mini there are only two ...the FTP option is >>>> missing.

    Is it elsewhere or have they just left it out altogether?

    So, Googling, it seems Apple dropped FTP a while back - I'd forgotten tbh.

    Your options would seem to be to turn on file sharing - either SMB or
    AFP. AFP is the native Apple one but it too got dropped later so let's >>> go for SMB.

    But did any version of classic macOS support SMB?

    I have never heard of it in OS 8.6

    So one end can do SMB but no longer AFP, the other can do AFP and not SMB.

    If I'm not mistaken, for FTP you'd need a server at one end and an FTP client at the other.

    Those are the lines I am thinking along, install FTP server software in
    the Mini?

    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to TimS on Sun May 12 21:40:41 2024
    TimS <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 12 May 2024 at 21:06:40 BST, "Liz Tuddenham" <Liz Tuddenham> wrote:

    TimS <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 12 May 2024 at 20:30:27 BST, "Liz Tuddenham" <Liz Tuddenham> wrote:

    TimS <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 12 May 2024 at 18:02:29 BST, "Bruce Horrocks" <[email protected]> >>>> wrote:

    On 12/05/2024 17:10, Liz Tuddenham wrote:

    ======= GOT IT!!! =======

    In the MacBook, the File Sharing > Options panel has three boxes: >>>>>> SMB, FTP and AFP, in the Mini there are only two ...the FTP option >>>>>> is missing.

    Is it elsewhere or have they just left it out altogether?

    So, Googling, it seems Apple dropped FTP a while back - I'd >>>>>forgotten tbh.

    Your options would seem to be to turn on file sharing - either SMB >>>>> or AFP. AFP is the native Apple one but it too got dropped later so >>>>> let's go for SMB.

    But did any version of classic macOS support SMB?

    I have never heard of it in OS 8.6

    So one end can do SMB but no longer AFP, the other can do AFP and not >>SMB.

    If I'm not mistaken, for FTP you'd need a server at one end and an FTP
    client at the other.

    Those are the lines I am thinking along, install FTP server software in the Mini?

    If you don't need actual FTP, you could use an email client on each machine. Add the files to be transferred, as attachments, to an email. Then email from one machine to the other via whichever email system you use. Crude but perhaps
    workable. If you don't want to use your internet bandwidth for that, then I can offer a simple as-close-as-possible-to-zero-configuration POP3/SMTP server
    which could run on your Mini and the email clients can use that instead of your offsite mail host. I wrote this server so that SWMBO and I can send each other mails via the LAN at home. May sound silly, but we often get mails that the other needs too.

    That sounds like a really useful (and novel) possibility. A lot of the transfers originate from e-mails or are just text, which could go in the
    body of the e-mail; only pictures would need to be sent as attachments.
    It certsinly beats a USB memory stick as a transfer medium.

    I would like to give it a try, even if the FTP problem is eventually
    solved.


    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TimS@21:1/5 to All on Sun May 12 20:33:06 2024
    On 12 May 2024 at 21:06:40 BST, "Liz Tuddenham" <Liz Tuddenham> wrote:

    TimS <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 12 May 2024 at 20:30:27 BST, "Liz Tuddenham" <Liz Tuddenham> wrote:

    TimS <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 12 May 2024 at 18:02:29 BST, "Bruce Horrocks" <[email protected]> >>>> wrote:

    On 12/05/2024 17:10, Liz Tuddenham wrote:

    ======= GOT IT!!! =======

    In the MacBook, the File Sharing > Options panel has three boxes:
    SMB, FTP and AFP, in the Mini there are only two ...the FTP option is >>>>>> missing.

    Is it elsewhere or have they just left it out altogether?

    So, Googling, it seems Apple dropped FTP a while back - I'd forgotten tbh.

    Your options would seem to be to turn on file sharing - either SMB or >>>>> AFP. AFP is the native Apple one but it too got dropped later so let's >>>>> go for SMB.

    But did any version of classic macOS support SMB?

    I have never heard of it in OS 8.6

    So one end can do SMB but no longer AFP, the other can do AFP and not SMB. >>
    If I'm not mistaken, for FTP you'd need a server at one end and an FTP client
    at the other.

    Those are the lines I am thinking along, install FTP server software in the Mini?

    If you don't need actual FTP, you could use an email client on each machine. Add the files to be transferred, as attachments, to an email. Then email from one machine to the other via whichever email system you use. Crude but perhaps workable. If you don't want to use your internet bandwidth for that, then I
    can offer a simple as-close-as-possible-to-zero-configuration POP3/SMTP server which could run on your Mini and the email clients can use that instead of
    your offsite mail host. I wrote this server so that SWMBO and I can send each other mails via the LAN at home. May sound silly, but we often get mails that the other needs too.

    --
    Tim

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TimS@21:1/5 to All on Sun May 12 20:50:22 2024
    On 12 May 2024 at 21:40:41 BST, "Liz Tuddenham" <Liz Tuddenham> wrote:

    TimS <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 12 May 2024 at 21:06:40 BST, "Liz Tuddenham" <Liz Tuddenham> wrote:

    TimS <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 12 May 2024 at 20:30:27 BST, "Liz Tuddenham" <Liz Tuddenham> wrote: >>>>
    TimS <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 12 May 2024 at 18:02:29 BST, "Bruce Horrocks" <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote:

    On 12/05/2024 17:10, Liz Tuddenham wrote:

    ======= GOT IT!!! =======

    In the MacBook, the File Sharing > Options panel has three boxes: >>>>>>>> SMB, FTP and AFP, in the Mini there are only two ...the FTP option >>>>>>>> is missing.

    Is it elsewhere or have they just left it out altogether?

    So, Googling, it seems Apple dropped FTP a while back - I'd
    forgotten tbh.

    Your options would seem to be to turn on file sharing - either SMB >>>>>>> or AFP. AFP is the native Apple one but it too got dropped later so >>>>>>> let's go for SMB.

    But did any version of classic macOS support SMB?

    I have never heard of it in OS 8.6

    So one end can do SMB but no longer AFP, the other can do AFP and not
    SMB.

    If I'm not mistaken, for FTP you'd need a server at one end and an FTP >>>> client at the other.

    Those are the lines I am thinking along, install FTP server software in the >>> Mini?

    If you don't need actual FTP, you could use an email client on each machine. >> Add the files to be transferred, as attachments, to an email. Then email from
    one machine to the other via whichever email system you use. Crude but perhaps
    workable. If you don't want to use your internet bandwidth for that, then I >> can offer a simple as-close-as-possible-to-zero-configuration POP3/SMTP server
    which could run on your Mini and the email clients can use that instead of >> your offsite mail host. I wrote this server so that SWMBO and I can send each
    other mails via the LAN at home. May sound silly, but we often get mails that
    the other needs too.

    That sounds like a really useful (and novel) possibility. A lot of the transfers originate from e-mails or are just text, which could go in the
    body of the e-mail; only pictures would need to be sent as attachments.
    It certsinly beats a USB memory stick as a transfer medium.

    I would like to give it a try, even if the FTP problem is eventually
    solved.

    Fine. Go to:

    https://www.iletter.org.uk

    Downloads are free of charge - this is all freeware. The app in question is called iServer (OK, not very original :-) There are versions for macOS (intel and ARM), Linux (intel, and ARM for the Pi), and Win-10.

    The .dmg you would be downloading also has a User Guide.

    --
    Tim

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to TimS on Sun May 12 22:15:38 2024
    TimS <[email protected]> wrote:

    [...]

    Fine. Go to:

    https://www.iletter.org.uk

    Downloads are free of charge - this is all freeware. The app in question is called iServer (OK, not very original :-) There are versions for macOS (intel and ARM), Linux (intel, and ARM for the Pi), and Win-10.

    The .dmg you would be downloading also has a User Guide.

    On the <....downloads-iserver-1.php> page I filled in my correct e-mail
    address (the one that is shown slightly munged in the header of this
    post), but when I click the "Vaidate download request" button it says my
    e-mail address isn't a valid one.


    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Graham J@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Mon May 13 08:30:15 2024
    Liz Tuddenham wrote:

    [snip]


    On the <....downloads-iserver-1.php> page I filled in my correct e-mail address (the one that is shown slightly munged in the header of this
    post), but when I click the "Vaidate download request" button it says my e-mail address isn't a valid one.

    I've known other websites - even quite well-known shopping sites - fail
    in much the same way. Too many / too few characters in the email
    address, or it contains numbers. I have several different email
    addresses, and use a mail server where I can create more addresses as
    needed, so I've always been able to work around it.

    Having said that, it may be checking the DNS records and has noted your
    lack of an MX record - which of course does not actually prevent emails
    from reaching you, but could be interpreted as a malicious setup.

    Have you any other email addresses you can try?

    --
    Graham J

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TimS@21:1/5 to Graham J on Mon May 13 07:57:10 2024
    On 13 May 2024 at 08:30:15 BST, "Graham J" <[email protected]> wrote:

    Liz Tuddenham wrote:

    [snip]

    On the <....downloads-iserver-1.php> page I filled in my correct e-mail
    address (the one that is shown slightly munged in the header of this
    post), but when I click the "Vaidate download request" button it says my
    e-mail address isn't a valid one.

    I've known other websites - even quite well-known shopping sites - fail
    in much the same way. Too many / too few characters in the email
    address, or it contains numbers. I have several different email
    addresses, and use a mail server where I can create more addresses as
    needed, so I've always been able to work around it.

    Having said that, it may be checking the DNS records and has noted your
    lack of an MX record - which of course does not actually prevent emails
    from reaching you, but could be interpreted as a malicious setup.

    Well spotted - I was just starting to look into it now. Indeed I do some
    checks on the proffered email address using PHP's getmxrr method. First time I've had this fail thus - but then I suppose I'd never know, as I don't log
    the failures, only the successes. I'm just after preventing the [email protected] style of email address.

    --
    Tim

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TimS@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 13 08:02:48 2024
    On 12 May 2024 at 22:15:38 BST, "Liz Tuddenham" <Liz Tuddenham> wrote:

    TimS <[email protected]> wrote:

    [...]

    Fine. Go to:

    https://www.iletter.org.uk

    Downloads are free of charge - this is all freeware. The app in question is >> called iServer (OK, not very original :-) There are versions for macOS (intel
    and ARM), Linux (intel, and ARM for the Pi), and Win-10.

    The .dmg you would be downloading also has a User Guide.

    On the <....downloads-iserver-1.php> page I filled in my correct e-mail address (the one that is shown slightly munged in the header of this
    post), but when I click the "Vaidate download request" button it says my e-mail address isn't a valid one.

    OK - I've disabled that check for now, Liz, so give it another go.

    --
    Tim

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Graham J@21:1/5 to TimS on Mon May 13 09:24:44 2024
    TimS wrote:

    [snip]

    Having said that, it may be checking the DNS records and has noted your
    lack of an MX record - which of course does not actually prevent emails
    from reaching you, but could be interpreted as a malicious setup.

    Well spotted - I was just starting to look into it now. Indeed I do some checks on the proffered email address using PHP's getmxrr method. First time I've had this fail thus - but then I suppose I'd never know, as I don't log the failures, only the successes. I'm just after preventing the [email protected] style of email address.


    I suggested years ago that Liz should regularise her email setup.

    --
    Graham J

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to TimS on Mon May 13 10:58:57 2024
    TimS <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 12 May 2024 at 22:15:38 BST, "Liz Tuddenham" <Liz Tuddenham> wrote:

    TimS <[email protected]> wrote:

    [...]

    Fine. Go to:

    https://www.iletter.org.uk

    Downloads are free of charge - this is all freeware. The app in
    question is called iServer (OK, not very original :-) There are
    versions for macOS (intel and ARM), Linux (intel, and ARM for the Pi),
    and Win-10.

    The .dmg you would be downloading also has a User Guide.

    On the <....downloads-iserver-1.php> page I filled in my correct e-mail address (the one that is shown slightly munged in the header of this
    post), but when I click the "Vaidate download request" button it says my e-mail address isn't a valid one.

    OK - I've disabled that check for now, Liz, so give it another go.

    In the meantime I have used another address and that logged in OK

    I'm now working on the setup - you can expect queries as I am the tester
    from Hell.


    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to TimS on Mon May 13 11:57:19 2024
    TimS <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 13 May 2024 at 10:58:57 BST, "Liz Tuddenham" <Liz Tuddenham> wrote:
    [...]
    I'm now working on the setup - you can expect queries as I am the tester from Hell.

    It soundeth good to me :-)

    First query on its way.

    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TimS@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 13 10:35:52 2024
    On 13 May 2024 at 10:58:57 BST, "Liz Tuddenham" <Liz Tuddenham> wrote:

    TimS <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 12 May 2024 at 22:15:38 BST, "Liz Tuddenham" <Liz Tuddenham> wrote:

    TimS <[email protected]> wrote:

    [...]

    Fine. Go to:

    https://www.iletter.org.uk

    Downloads are free of charge - this is all freeware. The app in
    question is called iServer (OK, not very original :-) There are
    versions for macOS (intel and ARM), Linux (intel, and ARM for the Pi), >>>> and Win-10.

    The .dmg you would be downloading also has a User Guide.

    On the <....downloads-iserver-1.php> page I filled in my correct e-mail
    address (the one that is shown slightly munged in the header of this
    post), but when I click the "Vaidate download request" button it says my >>> e-mail address isn't a valid one.

    OK - I've disabled that check for now, Liz, so give it another go.

    In the meantime I have used another address and that logged in OK

    I'm now working on the setup - you can expect queries as I am the tester
    from Hell.

    It soundeth good to me :-)

    --
    Tim

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TimS@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 13 13:28:31 2024
    On 13 May 2024 at 11:57:19 BST, "Liz Tuddenham" <Liz Tuddenham> wrote:

    TimS <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 13 May 2024 at 10:58:57 BST, "Liz Tuddenham" <Liz Tuddenham> wrote:
    [...]
    I'm now working on the setup - you can expect queries as I am the tester >>> from Hell.

    It soundeth good to me :-)

    First query on its way.

    My app, iServer, uses ports 9091 to listen for POP3 requests, and 9092 for
    SMTP requests, by default. These are users settable. However, when Liz sets this up and runs the app on her Mini (Catalina) and then configures an email client (also on her Mini) to contact iServer using those port numbers (instead of the usual 25 etc), the email client errors with network error 22, which means "Invalid argument", apparently. Both Liz and I use the local IP address directly in the email client (such as 192.168.1.7).

    Duplicating that setup here, also on a Mini, albeit under Sonoma, gives expected behaviour rather than an error.

    Anything wrong with those port numbers? Anyone got any skinny on error 22 that might be useful?

    --
    Tim

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Graham J@21:1/5 to TimS on Mon May 13 14:48:43 2024
    TimS wrote:

    [nip]


    My app, iServer, uses ports 9091 to listen for POP3 requests, and 9092 for SMTP requests, by default. These are users settable. However, when Liz sets this up and runs the app on her Mini (Catalina) and then configures an email client (also on her Mini) to contact iServer using those port numbers (instead
    of the usual 25 etc), the email client errors with network error 22, which means "Invalid argument", apparently. Both Liz and I use the local IP address directly in the email client (such as 192.168.1.7).

    Duplicating that setup here, also on a Mini, albeit under Sonoma, gives expected behaviour rather than an error.

    Anything wrong with those port numbers? Anyone got any skinny on error 22 that
    might be useful?

    You might find 127.0.0.1 called localhost is what Liz needs.

    Alternatively, Liz's system is so old that a 4-digit port number may be illegal. Try configuring your iServer for POP port 110 and SMTP port 25.

    Also try running the client on a different machine on the LAN - that
    might tell you whether it is the IP address or the port number which is
    in error.

    Does your iServer write a log file? You could compile a new version
    that does - so you could see why iServer rejects the argument.


    --
    Graham J

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to Graham J on Mon May 13 15:10:22 2024
    Graham J <[email protected]> wrote:

    TimS wrote:

    [nip]


    My app, iServer, uses ports 9091 to listen for POP3 requests, and 9092
    for SMTP requests, by default. These are users settable. However, when
    Liz sets this up and runs the app on her Mini (Catalina) and then configures an email client (also on her Mini) to contact iServer using those port numbers (instead of the usual 25 etc), the email client
    errors with network error 22, which means "Invalid argument",
    apparently. Both Liz and I use the local IP address directly in the
    email client (such as 192.168.1.7).

    Duplicating that setup here, also on a Mini, albeit under Sonoma, gives expected behaviour rather than an error.

    Anything wrong with those port numbers? Anyone got any skinny on error
    22 that might be useful?

    You might find 127.0.0.1 called localhost is what Liz needs.

    Alternatively, Liz's system is so old that a 4-digit port number may be illegal. Try configuring your iServer for POP port 110 and SMTP port 25.

    This is running on Catalina in the 'new' part of the system.

    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?=@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Mon May 13 16:16:08 2024
    On 13.05.24 16:10, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Graham J <[email protected]> wrote:
    You might find 127.0.0.1 called localhost is what Liz needs.

    Alternatively, Liz's system is so old that a 4-digit port number may be
    illegal. Try configuring your iServer for POP port 110 and SMTP port 25.

    This is running on Catalina in the 'new' part of the system.

    10.15.7 alias Catalina is not supported any more since July 2022.

    --
    "Alea iacta est." (Julius Caesar)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TimS@21:1/5 to Graham J on Mon May 13 14:45:45 2024
    On 13 May 2024 at 14:48:43 BST, "Graham J" <[email protected]> wrote:

    TimS wrote:

    [nip]


    My app, iServer, uses ports 9091 to listen for POP3 requests, and 9092 for >> SMTP requests, by default. These are users settable. However, when Liz sets >> this up and runs the app on her Mini (Catalina) and then configures an email >> client (also on her Mini) to contact iServer using those port numbers (instead
    of the usual 25 etc), the email client errors with network error 22, which >> means "Invalid argument", apparently. Both Liz and I use the local IP address
    directly in the email client (such as 192.168.1.7).

    Duplicating that setup here, also on a Mini, albeit under Sonoma, gives
    expected behaviour rather than an error.

    Anything wrong with those port numbers? Anyone got any skinny on error 22 that
    might be useful?

    You might find 127.0.0.1 called localhost is what Liz needs.

    This worked OK here. Probably better to use that as it doesn't change (if the app is boing hosted on one's own machine).

    Alternatively, Liz's system is so old that a 4-digit port number may be illegal. Try configuring your iServer for POP port 110 and SMTP port 25.

    Ha ha - this *would* require a recompile - I forbid ports < 1024. I'll comment that out in the next test.

    --
    Tim

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TimS@21:1/5 to Graham J on Mon May 13 14:38:16 2024
    On 13 May 2024 at 14:48:43 BST, "Graham J" <[email protected]> wrote:

    TimS wrote:

    [nip]


    My app, iServer, uses ports 9091 to listen for POP3 requests, and 9092 for >> SMTP requests, by default. These are users settable. However, when Liz sets >> this up and runs the app on her Mini (Catalina) and then configures an email >> client (also on her Mini) to contact iServer using those port numbers (instead
    of the usual 25 etc), the email client errors with network error 22, which >> means "Invalid argument", apparently. Both Liz and I use the local IP address
    directly in the email client (such as 192.168.1.7).

    Duplicating that setup here, also on a Mini, albeit under Sonoma, gives
    expected behaviour rather than an error.

    Anything wrong with those port numbers? Anyone got any skinny on error 22 that
    might be useful?

    You might find 127.0.0.1 called localhost is what Liz needs.

    That's certainly worth trying.

    Alternatively, Liz's system is so old that a 4-digit port number may be illegal. Try configuring your iServer for POP port 110 and SMTP port 25.

    I can try these here too.

    Also try running the client on a different machine on the LAN - that
    might tell you whether it is the IP address or the port number which is
    in error.

    Does your iServer write a log file? You could compile a new version
    that does - so you could see why iServer rejects the argument.

    It does, but iServer was not the rejecting item. The error message came from within the email client. That client, also one of mine, certainly writes a log file


    --
    Tim

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TimS@21:1/5 to Graham J on Mon May 13 15:00:28 2024
    On 13 May 2024 at 14:48:43 BST, "Graham J" <[email protected]> wrote:

    TimS wrote:

    [nip]

    My app, iServer, uses ports 9091 to listen for POP3 requests, and 9092 for >> SMTP requests, by default. These are users settable. However, when Liz sets >> this up and runs the app on her Mini (Catalina) and then configures an email >> client (also on her Mini) to contact iServer using those port numbers (instead
    of the usual 25 etc), the email client errors with network error 22, which >> means "Invalid argument", apparently. Both Liz and I use the local IP address
    directly in the email client (such as 192.168.1.7).

    Duplicating that setup here, also on a Mini, albeit under Sonoma, gives
    expected behaviour rather than an error.

    Anything wrong with those port numbers? Anyone got any skinny on error 22 that
    might be useful?

    You might find 127.0.0.1 called localhost is what Liz needs.

    Alternatively, Liz's system is so old that a 4-digit port number may be illegal. Try configuring your iServer for POP port 110 and SMTP port 25.

    iServer was actually devleoped under Catalina (I moved to Sonoma a couple of months later - should have stuck at Monterey), and gave no problems of the
    type experienced. Changing to ports 25 and 110 made no difference here either.

    I'll keep chasing error code 22.

    --
    Tim

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Mon May 13 16:51:24 2024
    =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?= <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 13.05.24 16:10, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Graham J <[email protected]> wrote:
    You might find 127.0.0.1 called localhost is what Liz needs.

    Alternatively, Liz's system is so old that a 4-digit port number may be
    illegal. Try configuring your iServer for POP port 110 and SMTP port 25.

    This is running on Catalina in the 'new' part of the system.

    10.15.7 alias Catalina is not supported any more since July 2022.

    That's why I put 'new' in inverted commas. It isn't the latest system
    but it is a lot newer than OS8.6, which is the old part of my system
    that Graham was referring to.


    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to Graham J on Mon May 13 17:34:39 2024
    Graham J <[email protected]> wrote:

    [...]
    You might find 127.0.0.1 called localhost is what Liz needs.

    I've just tried it -- still gives Error 22.


    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TimS@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 13 17:38:01 2024
    On 13 May 2024 at 16:51:24 BST, "Liz Tuddenham" <Liz Tuddenham> wrote:

    =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?= <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 13.05.24 16:10, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Graham J <[email protected]> wrote:
    You might find 127.0.0.1 called localhost is what Liz needs.

    Alternatively, Liz's system is so old that a 4-digit port number may be >>>> illegal. Try configuring your iServer for POP port 110 and SMTP port 25. >>>
    This is running on Catalina in the 'new' part of the system.

    10.15.7 alias Catalina is not supported any more since July 2022.

    That's why I put 'new' in inverted commas. It isn't the latest system
    but it is a lot newer than OS8.6, which is the old part of my system
    that Graham was referring to.

    I'd have stuck with Catalina except that Safari was getting out of date and there's some funny new image format it couldn't render. I made the mistake of going from there to Sonoma rather than Monterey.

    --
    Tim

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to TimS on Mon May 13 20:24:57 2024
    TimS <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 13 May 2024 at 11:57:19 BST, "Liz Tuddenham" <Liz Tuddenham> wrote:

    TimS <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 13 May 2024 at 10:58:57 BST, "Liz Tuddenham" <Liz Tuddenham> wrote:
    [...]
    I'm now working on the setup - you can expect queries as I am the tester >>> from Hell.

    It soundeth good to me :-)

    First query on its way.

    My app, iServer, uses ports 9091 to listen for POP3 requests, and 9092 for SMTP requests, by default. These are users settable. However, when Liz
    sets this up and runs the app on her Mini (Catalina) and then configures
    an email client (also on her Mini) to contact iServer using those port numbers (instead of the usual 25 etc), the email client errors with
    network error 22, which means "Invalid argument", apparently. Both Liz
    and I use the local IP address directly in the email client (such as 192.168.1.7).

    Duplicating that setup here, also on a Mini, albeit under Sonoma, gives expected behaviour rather than an error.

    Anything wrong with those port numbers? Anyone got any skinny on error 22 that might be useful?

    EINVAL is a fairly generic error so doesn't leave much to go on, but
    suggests something is wrong with the socket code, probably on the client
    end. There's nothing wrong with 9091 and 9092 - they are both above 1024
    below which you need root privileges to listen.

    You could try talking to it via 'nc' in terminal:

    % nc -v smtp.gmail.com 25
    Connection to smtp.gmail.com port 25 [tcp/smtp] succeeded!
    220 smtp.gmail.com ESMTP ffacd0b85a97d-3502b896a1dsm11709103f8f.32 - gsmtp
    HELO world
    250 smtp.gmail.com at your service
    QUIT
    221 2.0.0 closing connection ffacd0b85a97d-3502b896a1dsm11709103f8f.32 - gsmtp

    (the commands in caps I typed)

    and similarly:

    % nc -v pop3.plus.net 110
    Connection to pop3.plus.net port 110 [tcp/pop3] succeeded!
    +OK POP3 perditon ready on mail.plus.net 00029b7c
    USER nonexistent
    +OK USER nonexistent set, mate
    PASS secret
    -ERR Login failed.
    STAT
    -ERR Mate, the command must be one of CAPA, USER, PASS or QUIT
    QUIT
    +OK QUIT

    (that POP3 server is rather... matey)


    so you would type in Terminal:
    nc -v 127.0.0.1 9091

    and you should get something out of the SMTP side, and 9092 for the POP3
    side.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TimS@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 13 21:35:54 2024
    On 13 May 2024 at 20:24:57 BST, "Theo" <[email protected]> wrote:

    TimS <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 13 May 2024 at 11:57:19 BST, "Liz Tuddenham" <Liz Tuddenham> wrote:

    TimS <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 13 May 2024 at 10:58:57 BST, "Liz Tuddenham" <Liz Tuddenham> wrote:
    [...]
    I'm now working on the setup - you can expect queries as I am the tester >>>>> from Hell.

    It soundeth good to me :-)

    First query on its way.

    My app, iServer, uses ports 9091 to listen for POP3 requests, and 9092 for >> SMTP requests, by default. These are users settable. However, when Liz
    sets this up and runs the app on her Mini (Catalina) and then configures
    an email client (also on her Mini) to contact iServer using those port
    numbers (instead of the usual 25 etc), the email client errors with
    network error 22, which means "Invalid argument", apparently. Both Liz
    and I use the local IP address directly in the email client (such as
    192.168.1.7).

    Duplicating that setup here, also on a Mini, albeit under Sonoma, gives
    expected behaviour rather than an error.

    Anything wrong with those port numbers? Anyone got any skinny on error 22 >> that might be useful?

    EINVAL is a fairly generic error so doesn't leave much to go on, but
    suggests something is wrong with the socket code, probably on the client
    end. There's nothing wrong with 9091 and 9092 - they are both above 1024 below which you need root privileges to listen.

    You could try talking to it via 'nc' in terminal:

    % nc -v smtp.gmail.com 25
    Connection to smtp.gmail.com port 25 [tcp/smtp] succeeded!
    220 smtp.gmail.com ESMTP ffacd0b85a97d-3502b896a1dsm11709103f8f.32 - gsmtp HELO world
    250 smtp.gmail.com at your service
    QUIT
    221 2.0.0 closing connection ffacd0b85a97d-3502b896a1dsm11709103f8f.32 - gsmtp

    (the commands in caps I typed)

    and similarly:

    % nc -v pop3.plus.net 110
    Connection to pop3.plus.net port 110 [tcp/pop3] succeeded!
    +OK POP3 perditon ready on mail.plus.net 00029b7c
    USER nonexistent
    +OK USER nonexistent set, mate
    PASS secret
    -ERR Login failed.
    STAT
    -ERR Mate, the command must be one of CAPA, USER, PASS or QUIT
    QUIT
    +OK QUIT

    (that POP3 server is rather... matey)


    so you would type in Terminal:
    nc -v 127.0.0.1 9091

    and you should get something out of the SMTP side, and 9092 for the POP3 side.

    It transpires that error 22 means that the remote server is not running (at least in this context).

    --
    Tim

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce Horrocks@21:1/5 to TimS on Tue May 14 00:01:05 2024
    On 13/05/2024 16:00, TimS wrote:

    I'll keep chasing error code 22.

    22 is EINVAL - invalid value which isn't terribly specific. Basically
    something invalid in your connect() or other socket related code.

    Also calling bind(2) twice on the same socket can generate it.

    --
    Bruce Horrocks
    Surrey, England

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce Horrocks@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Tue May 14 00:27:12 2024
    On 12/05/2024 21:06, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    TimS <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 12 May 2024 at 20:30:27 BST, "Liz Tuddenham" <Liz Tuddenham> wrote:

    TimS <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 12 May 2024 at 18:02:29 BST, "Bruce Horrocks" <[email protected]> >>>> wrote:

    On 12/05/2024 17:10, Liz Tuddenham wrote:

    ======= GOT IT!!! =======

    In the MacBook, the File Sharing > Options panel has three boxes:
    SMB, FTP and AFP, in the Mini there are only two ...the FTP option is >>>>>> missing.

    Is it elsewhere or have they just left it out altogether?

    So, Googling, it seems Apple dropped FTP a while back - I'd forgotten tbh.

    Your options would seem to be to turn on file sharing - either SMB or >>>>> AFP. AFP is the native Apple one but it too got dropped later so let's >>>>> go for SMB.

    But did any version of classic macOS support SMB?

    D'oh sorry. Whenever I see "G3" I automatically think of something
    running an early MacOSX rather than classic.


    I have never heard of it in OS 8.6

    So one end can do SMB but no longer AFP, the other can do AFP and not SMB. >>
    If I'm not mistaken, for FTP you'd need a server at one end and an FTP client
    at the other.

    Those are the lines I am thinking along, install FTP server software in
    the Mini?

    If you decide to go down this route then the Filezilla client has always
    been rock-solid for me on various machines and it seems they have a
    server version:

    <https://filezilla-project.org/download.php?platform=osx&type=server>

    --
    Bruce Horrocks
    Surrey, England

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Graham J@21:1/5 to TimS on Tue May 14 07:50:01 2024
    TimS wrote:

    [snip]


    It transpires that error 22 means that the remote server is not running (at least in this context).


    So in Liz's context, where client and server are running on the same
    machine this is clearly stupid. Perhaps the Mac does not allow
    multitasking?

    --
    Graham J

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to Graham J on Tue May 14 09:28:59 2024
    Graham J <[email protected]> wrote:

    TimS wrote:

    [snip]


    It transpires that error 22 means that the remote server is not running (at least in this context).


    So in Liz's context, where client and server are running on the same
    machine this is clearly stupid. Perhaps the Mac does not allow
    multitasking?

    I'm sorry to say the explanation is much simpler - and it was my stupid
    fault: I had Quit the server, so it wasn't running and the client
    couldn't contact it.

    Apologies to all who have been racking their brains for a more elegant
    answer.


    The next stage is to set up Claris Emailer on the G3 so that it sends
    e-mails to the Mini - that is not proving easy.
    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)