XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism
XPost: alt.fun, alt.politics.democrats.d
Blowjob is too stupid to realize his many glaring tells. What a fucking idiot!
On 7/14/2025 11:13 PM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly obese convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 14 Jul 2025, Klaus Schadenfreude <[email protected]> posted some news:PbcdQ.458278$[email protected]:
On 7/14/2025 10:12 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:juadQ.152362$[email protected]...
On 7/14/2025 5:59 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless >>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Lane "Stonehowler" Waldby" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>> news:[email protected]...
Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Lane "Stonehowler" Waldby wrote this post while blinking in Morse code: >>>>>>>
Governor Swill wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jul 2025 "Lane \"Stonehowler\" Waldby" wrote:
Here's what I said:
"That's because science has never said anything with absolute or 100%
certainty."
The very fact you are posting on
this network is proof that science
works.
When did I say science doesn't work? Do you understand what 100% means?
Do you understand what absolute means? You are off topic, troll. >>>>>>>>>
But that's not what you wrote. You wrote that science has *never* >>>>>>>>> said anything with absolute certainty. In fact, science has said >>>>>>>>> *many* things with absolute certainty.
It has not because science corrects itself all the time. It is wrong >>>>>>>> and it corrects itself. It has mistaken information and is brought up >>>>>>>> to date. There is always some subtle change around the corner, I >>>>>>>> contend. It cannot speak with absolute certainty because it is wide open
to change.
Science is not "wide open" to change. When properly implemented (sometimes it
is not), it has strict controls on how it is done, with peer review and >>>>>>> feedback from the scientific communities.
You also need to distinguish between the "hard" sciences (e.g. chemistry and
physics) and "soft" sciences (e.g. sociology). In physics, for example, there
is no "mistaken information". Rather, there are ongoing refinements at the
deep end as accelerators provide ever higher energies. The physics that >>>>>>> underlies space flight,
Then why can't Elon launch a space ship without putting on a fireworks show?
Because there is a gap between science and engineering.
Muskrat understands neither, scooter.
That's ok, because you understand
everything worth understanding better than you, scooter. That's right, scooter.
Musk knows *neither* science nor engineering, scooter.
You're the one who kicks my ass every time.
That's right, Blowjob, you stupid fucking *fat* cocksucker and draft dodger and Social Security dole scrounger.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)