XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sac.politics, alt.politics.immigration
XPost: or.politics, mn.politics
"Baxter" <
[email protected]> wrote in message news:102q73o$1u1nl$
[email protected]...
krueger <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
On 16 Jun 2025, Baxter <[email protected]> posted some
news:102pucn$1rl10$[email protected]:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:102ph10$1ob3m$[email protected]:
"Baxter" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:102pcb5$1n069$[email protected]...
why should I have to prove that?
Well for one thing to set the standard in which you show people how
they should support their claims...
YOU never, ever prove any of your
claims.
Instead of acting like the people who you are complaining about as
not
supporting their claims.
this is a perfect chance for you to show him and the rest of us
exactly how it should be done.
The only question is whether you can back up your claim and can you
do
so according to your own standards.
So here's your chance to show up all of us by demonstrating exactly
how you think to needs to be done.
The only question is whether you can do so..... or will you invent
excuses because you can't hold yourself to your own standard thus
exposing yourself as a hypocrite
So, you got stringent rules for liberals/Dems that you and none of
your
conservaturds never, ever follow yourselves.
Those who live in glass houses.
"Rules for thee, but not for me." That's right out of the Democrat
guidebook.
Bullshit! That's out of the Conservaturd/Repug playbook
So you're claiming to be following the Conservaturd/Repug playbook?
What a strange think for a hardcore Democrat to do.
Tell me are you regularly such a hypocrite or is this a special case of hypocrisy?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)