In article <vubp47$2cpu$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2025-04-23 15:10, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubn47$u2a$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2025-04-23 14:45, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubccj$3kpek$[email protected]>, [email protected]Multiple sources which agree.
says...
On 2025-04-22 13:34, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vu8kom$do42$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2025-04-21 20:22, AlleyCat wrote:
Why?
On Mon, 21 Apr 2025 18:50:13 -0700, Alan says...
Read it again, stupid rich kid.
On 2025-04-21 18:30, AlleyCat wrote:
Give ONE example of such a Jan 6 prisoner...
An MS-13 terrorist illegal alien from El Salvador - who was merely >>>>>>>>>>> returned to his own country as the law requires - has received more >>>>>>>>>>> 'due process" than was made available to virtually any innocent >>>>>>>>>>> American citizen persecuted by their government during the Biden >>>>>>>>>>> Administration.
Many of the January 6 prisoners did not have due process for years >>>>>>>>>>> and were American citizens, yet nobody in the media spoke for them. >>>>>>>>>>> They allowed it to happen.
...and I bet I can show you all the court appearances, etc. >>>>>>>>>
Will it change the fact that you claimed that "Many of the January 6 >>>>>>>> prisoners did not have due process for years"...
...but cannot name a single actual example?
https://nypost.com/2023/03/08/an-egregious-denial-of-due-
process-for-jan-6-protesters/
NY Post?
LOL!
What makes you think your sources are any better?
Same here.
And yet you rarely provide sources at all.
That doesn't mean they aren't credible.
In article <vudru3$1vtst$[email protected]>, nuh-You stupid fucking dickless penniless moron.
[email protected] says...
On 2025-04-24 07:15, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vuccjh$nned$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2025-04-23 20:31, AlleyCat wrote:
So the statements by Hegseth's subordinates are credible then?
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 18:57:00 -0700, Alan says...
And yet you rarely provide sources at all.
That doesn't mean they aren't credible.
Sources that aren't provided aren't credible.
Yes, the statements are, unless you can refute them, which you RARELY do. >>>>
Are they news?
They certainly are.
What news network do they work for?
In article <R0vOP.2472670$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On 4/24/2025 10:37 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <vudru3$1vtst$[email protected]>, nuh-You stupid fucking dickless penniless moron.
[email protected] says...
On 2025-04-24 07:15, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vuccjh$nned$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2025-04-23 20:31, AlleyCat wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 18:57:00 -0700, Alan says...
And yet you rarely provide sources at all.
That doesn't mean they aren't credible.
Sources that aren't provided aren't credible.
Yes, the statements are, unless you can refute them, which you RARELY do.
So the statements by Hegseth's subordinates are credible then?
Are they news?
They certainly are.
What news network do they work for?
Since there is no answer
In article <JmvOP.124610$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On 4/24/2025 11:18 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <R0vOP.2472670$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On 4/24/2025 10:37 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <vudru3$1vtst$[email protected]>, nuh-You stupid fucking dickless penniless moron.
[email protected] says...
On 2025-04-24 07:15, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vuccjh$nned$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2025-04-23 20:31, AlleyCat wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 18:57:00 -0700, Alan says...
And yet you rarely provide sources at all.
That doesn't mean they aren't credible.
Sources that aren't provided aren't credible.
Yes, the statements are, unless you can refute them, which you RARELY do.
So the statements by Hegseth's subordinates are credible then?
Are they news?
They certainly are.
What news network do they work for?
Since there is no answer
You *never* have a meaningful answer, just lame bullshit.
Well since we were talking about me.
"so?"
"so what?"
"who cares?"
"bring it bitch"
"TINW"
"you poor thing"
"why do you care?"
"were you there?"
Zero meaning in anything the fascist fat fuck posts.
In <R0vOP.2472670$[email protected]> Rudy said:
Most right-wingnuts are.
On 4/24/2025 10:37 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <vudru3$1vtst$[email protected]>, nuh-You stupid fucking dickless penniless moron.
[email protected] says...
On 2025-04-24 07:15, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vuccjh$nned$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2025-04-23 20:31, AlleyCat wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 18:57:00 -0700, Alan says...
And yet you rarely provide sources at all.
That doesn't mean they aren't credible.
Sources that aren't provided aren't credible.
Yes, the statements are, unless you can refute them, which you RARELY do.
So the statements by Hegseth's subordinates are credible then?
Are they news?
They certainly are.
What news network do they work for?
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 32:12:19 |
| Calls: | 12,109 |
| Files: | 15,006 |
| Messages: | 6,518,294 |