PORTLAND, Oregon — Millions of people who've fallen behind on student
loan payments must now start repaying them or face a debt collector.
Monday's announcement from the Department of Education ends a
pandemic-era policy that let loan defaults slide.
Involuntary collection begins May 5. For some students, it will be the
first time they've ever had to confront the obligation of repaying their debt.
"It's a little scary," said Portland State University student Ella
Dansky. "With the tariffs that are happening right now, things are not
cheap, and we can't afford to pay for anything, especially the loans."
The Trump administration suggested that after five years, borrowers have
had enough time to start paying off their loans. Still, the new
financial reality is hitting several students like a ton of textbooks.
"I am in the back of my head thinking, 'What am I going to do with this
new debt when I'm out of here?'" said PSU grad student Steve Palmer.
"That's how (Trump's) transactional White House is kind of operating
right now."
Starting May 5, the Education Department will start collecting on
student loans in default, to include garnishing wages. Officials said
right now, around 5.3 million federal student loans are in default.
"American taxpayers will no longer be forced to serve as collateral for irresponsible student loan policies," said Education Secretary, Linda McMahon. "Student loans must always be paid back because they are unlike other types of consumer loans. If a borrower stops paying a mortgage or
a car payment, he will go into foreclosure or find his car repossessed. Student loans have no collateral. It is impossible to repossess a
college degree."
For several years, U.S. Representative Suzanne Bonamici has been hosting student loan forgiveness webinars, hoping to help students struggling financially. She said her experience paints a different picture of
students navigating college debt.
"Most people are trying to pay back their student loans," said Bonamici. "It's not like, 'Oh, I'm just going to go to college and get a free
ride.' That's not what's happening, and this administration doesn't understand that because as I said, they're out of touch."
Bonamici invited Oregonians to reach out to her office for help dealing
with student loans in default. She also suggested the Office of the
Ombudsman at the state's Department of Consumer and Business Services is
a good resource.
The Education Department urged borrowers in default to do one of three things:
Contact the Default Resolution Group to make a monthly payment.
Enroll in an Income Driven Repayment Plan.
Sign up for Loan Rehabilitation.
https://www.kgw.com/article/news/education/millions-people-behind-student -loans-must-start-paying/283-97da664c-1a5b-4bf1-99b7-80bd9fba1313?ref=exi t-recirc
On 4/23/2025 3:54 PM, H Karlsen wrote:
PORTLAND, Oregon — Millions of people who've fallen behind on
student loan payments must now start repaying them or face a debt
collector. Monday's announcement from the Department of Education
ends a pandemic-era policy that let loan defaults slide.
Involuntary collection begins May 5. For some students, it will be
the first time they've ever had to confront the obligation of
repaying their debt.
"It's a little scary," said Portland State University student Ella
Dansky. "With the tariffs that are happening right now, things are
not cheap, and we can't afford to pay for anything, especially the
loans."
The Trump administration suggested that after five years, borrowers
have had enough time to start paying off their loans. Still, the new
financial reality is hitting several students like a ton of
textbooks.
"I am in the back of my head thinking, 'What am I going to do with
this new debt when I'm out of here?'" said PSU grad student Steve
Palmer. "That's how (Trump's) transactional White House is kind of
operating right now."
Starting May 5, the Education Department will start collecting on
student loans in default, to include garnishing wages. Officials said
right now, around 5.3 million federal student loans are in default.
"American taxpayers will no longer be forced to serve as collateral
for irresponsible student loan policies," said Education Secretary,
Linda McMahon. "Student loans must always be paid back because they
are unlike other types of consumer loans. If a borrower stops paying
a mortgage or a car payment, he will go into foreclosure or find his
car repossessed. Student loans have no collateral. It is impossible
to repossess a college degree."
For several years, U.S. Representative Suzanne Bonamici has been
hosting student loan forgiveness webinars, hoping to help students
struggling financially. She said her experience paints a different
picture of students navigating college debt.
"Most people are trying to pay back their student loans," said
Bonamici. "It's not like, 'Oh, I'm just going to go to college and
get a free ride.' That's not what's happening, and this
administration doesn't understand that because as I said, they're out
of touch."
Bonamici invited Oregonians to reach out to her office for help
dealing with student loans in default. She also suggested the Office
of the Ombudsman at the state's Department of Consumer and Business
Services is a good resource.
The Education Department urged borrowers in default to do one of
three things:
Contact the Default Resolution Group to make a monthly payment.
Enroll in an Income Driven Repayment Plan.
Sign up for Loan Rehabilitation.
https://www.kgw.com/article/news/education/millions-people-behind-stud
ent
-loans-must-start-paying/283-97da664c-1a5b-4bf1-99b7-80bd9fba1313?ref=
exi t-recirc
The only people that got screwed were the taxpayers who got stuck with
the bill for these lazy welchers who were let off the hook for
repaying on the obligations that they willingly signed on for.
Yak <[email protected]> wrote in news:vubh70$3oqrk$[email protected]:
On 4/23/2025 3:54 PM, H Karlsen wrote:
https://www.kgw.com/article/news/education/millions-people-behind-student-loans-must-start-paying/283-97da664c-1a5b-4bf1-99b7-80bd9fba1313?ref=exit-recirc
The only people that got screwed were the taxpayers who got stuck with
the bill for these lazy welchers who were let off the hook for
repaying on the obligations that they willingly signed on for.
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still owed....
... No money came out of your pocket to forgive those loans.
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
Yak <[email protected]> wrote in news:vubh70$3oqrk$[email protected]:
On 4/23/2025 3:54 PM, H Karlsen wrote:
https://www.kgw.com/article/news/education/millions-people-behind-student-loans-must-start-paying/283-97da664c-1a5b-4bf1-99b7-80bd9fba1313?ref=exit-recirc
The only people that got screwed were the taxpayers who got stuck with
the bill for these lazy welchers who were let off the hook for
repaying on the obligations that they willingly signed on for.
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still owed....
Cite?
... No money came out of your pocket to forgive those loans.
Except tax money.
On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried — and *failed* — to bullshit:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
Gak, *fat* little Nazi cocksucker fucked up the ass by priests hundreds of times — and *admits* it — lied:
On 4/23/2025 3:54 PM, H Karlsen wrote:
https://www.kgw.com/article/news/education/millions-people-behind-student-
loans-must-start-paying/283-97da664c-1a5b-4bf1-99b7-80bd9fba1313?ref=exit-
recirc
The only people that got screwed were the taxpayers who got stuck with >>>> the bill for these lazy welchers who were let off the hook for
repaying on the obligations that they willingly signed on for.
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still owed....
Cite?
They paid, as they should have, until covid. Then, Trump45 paused it, part of the misnamed CARES Act.
On 4/24/2025 10:45 AM, Gak, *fat* little Nazi cocksucker fucked up the
ass by priests hundreds of times — and *admits* it — lied:
On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the
thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried — and
*failed* — to bullshit:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Gak, *fat* little Nazi cocksucker fucked up the ass by priests
hundreds of times — and *admits* it — lied:
On 4/23/2025 3:54 PM, H Karlsen wrote:
https://www.kgw.com/article/news/education/millions-people-behind- >>>>>> student-
loans-must-start-paying/283-97da664c-1a5b-4bf1-99b7-80bd9fba1313?r >>>>>> ef=exit- recirc
The only people that got screwed were the taxpayers who got stuck
with the bill for these lazy welchers who were let off the hook
for repaying on the obligations that they willingly signed on for.
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still owed....
Cite?
They paid, as they should have, until covid. Then, Trump45 paused it,
part of the misnamed CARES Act.
It is not "misnamed,"
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 16:05:51 -0400, Yak <[email protected]> wrote:
The only people that got screwed were the taxpayers who got stuck with
the bill for these lazy welchers who were let off the hook for repaying
on the obligations that they willingly signed on for.
Agreed. 800 Billion dollars that just vanished in a puff of smoke
into the PPP. All those businesses, loaned all that money, and all
those loans forgiven within a couple of years.
On 4/24/2025 10:45 AM, Yak <[email protected]> wrote in news:vubh70$3oqrk$[email protected]:
On 4/24/2025 12:42 PM, max headroom wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter <[email protected]> >>> typed:
Yak <[email protected]> wrote in news:vubh70$3oqrk$[email protected]:
On 4/23/2025 3:54 PM, H Karlsen wrote:
https://www.kgw.com/article/news/education/millions-people-behind-student-
loans-must-start-paying/283-97da664c-1a5b-4bf1-99b7-80bd9fba1313?ref=exit-
recirc
The only people that got screwed were the taxpayers who got stuck with >>>>> the bill for these lazy welchers who were let off the hook for
repaying on the obligations that they willingly signed on for.
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still owed....
Cite?
They paid, as they should have, until covid. Then, Trump45 paused it, part of
the misnamed CARES Act.
It is not "misnamed," you stupid priest-fucked *fat* little Nazi cocksucker. CARES, like many laws, is an acronym for Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic
Security Act.
You stupid goddamned priest-fucked *fat* little Nazi cocksucker.
In news:xdvOP.792463$[email protected], Rudy Canoza, the intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior to oozing scarlet red maxipad (whose mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch) *wrote* (not "typed"):
No, o oozing scarlet red maxipad (whose mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch).On 4/24/2025 10:45 AM, Gak, *fat* little Nazi cocksucker fucked up the ass by priests hundreds of times — and *admits* it — lied:
On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried — and *failed* — to bullshit:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter <[email protected]> >>>> typed:
Yak <[email protected]> wrote in news:vubh70$3oqrk$[email protected]:
On 4/23/2025 3:54 PM, H Karlsen wrote:
https://www.kgw.com/article/news/education/millions-people-behind-student-
loans-must-start-paying/283-97da664c-1a5b-4bf1-99b7-80bd9fba1313?ref=exit-
recirc
The only people that got screwed were the taxpayers who got stuck with >>>>>> the bill for these lazy welchers who were let off the hook for
repaying on the obligations that they willingly signed on for.
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still owed....
Cite?
They paid, as they should have, until covid. Then, Trump45 paused it, part of
the misnamed CARES Act.
It is not "misnamed," you stupid priest-fucked *fat* little Nazi cocksucker. >> CARES, like many laws, is an acronym for Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic
Security Act.
You stupid goddamned priest-fucked *fat* little Nazi cocksucker.
Hate-filled Prof. Canoza
On 4/24/2025 1:19 PM, On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whoseAre you smearing strawberry jam on sanitary napkins again?
mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried — and *failed* — to bullshit:
In news:xdvOP.792463$[email protected], Rudy Canoza, the
intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical
superior to oozing scarlet red maxipad (whose mouth waters at the
thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch) *wrote* (not
"typed"):
On 4/24/2025 10:45 AM, Gak, *fat* little Nazi cocksucker fucked up
the ass by priests hundreds of times — and *admits* it — lied:
On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the
thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried — and
*failed* — to bullshit:
No, o oozing scarlet red maxipadIn news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]>
typed:
Yak <[email protected]> wrote in news:vubh70$3oqrk$[email protected]:
On 4/23/2025 3:54 PM, H Karlsen wrote:
https://www.kgw.com/article/news/education/millions-people-behind-student-
loans-must-start-paying/283-97da664c-1a5b-4bf1-99b7-80bd9fba1313?ref=exit-
recirc
The only people that got screwed were the taxpayers who got stuck >>>>>>> with
the bill for these lazy welchers who were let off the hook for
repaying on the obligations that they willingly signed on for.
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still owed....
Cite?
They paid, as they should have, until covid. Then, Trump45 paused
it, part of
the misnamed CARES Act.
It is not "misnamed," you stupid priest-fucked *fat* little Nazi
cocksucker.
CARES, like many laws, is an acronym for Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and
Economic
Security Act.
You stupid goddamned priest-fucked *fat* little Nazi cocksucker.
Hate-filled Prof. Canoza
On 4/24/2025 1:19 PM, max headroom wrote:
In news:xdvOP.792463$[email protected], "Cunt Flaps" Canoza <[email protected]> typed:
On 4/24/2025 10:45 AM, Yak <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vubh70$3oqrk$[email protected]:
On every date, max headroom wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter <[email protected]> >>>>> typed:
Yak <[email protected]> wrote in news:vubh70$3oqrk$[email protected]:
On 4/23/2025 3:54 PM, H Karlsen wrote:
https://www.kgw.com/article/news/education/millions-people-behind-student-
loans-must-start-paying/283-97da664c-1a5b-4bf1-99b7-80bd9fba1313?ref=exit-
recirc
The only people that got screwed were the taxpayers who got stuck with >>>>>>> the bill for these lazy welchers who were let off the hook for
repaying on the obligations that they willingly signed on for.
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still owed....
Cite?
They paid, as they should have, until covid. Then, Trump45 paused it, part >>>> of the misnamed CARES Act.
It is not "misnamed," you stupid priest-fucked *fat* little Nazi cocksucker.
CARES, like many laws, is an acronym for Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and
Economic Security Act.
You stupid goddamned priest-fucked *fat* little Nazi cocksucker.
Hate-filled Cunt Flaps can't dispute the facts.
No....
On 4/24/2025 12:42 PM, max headroom wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Yak <[email protected]> wrote in news:vubh70$3oqrk$[email protected]:
On 4/23/2025 3:54 PM, H Karlsen wrote:
https://www.kgw.com/article/news/education/millions-people-behind-s
tudent-loans-must-start-paying/283-97da664c-1a5b-4bf1-99b7-80bd9fba
1313?ref=exit-recirc
The only people that got screwed were the taxpayers who got stuck
with the bill for these lazy welchers who were let off the hook for
repaying on the obligations that they willingly signed on for.
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still owed....
Cite?
They paid, as they should have, until covid. Then, Trump45 paused it,
part of the misnamed CARES Act. Along comes Biden46, waving his magic
EO pen, and issued extension after extension on the pause. The only
one's paying anything back were fed govt loan recipients with an ounce
of integrity, or private loan recipients who, by the way, got no such
favor of the pause.
Along comes the Debt Ceiling Act of 2023, which mandated resumption of payments. However, Biden, waiving his EO pen which never seems to run
out of ink, once again issued an extenstion - what he called a
'ramp-up' period to last one year. Miss a payment during that time? No problem - no default, no involuntary collections, nothing. Some were
paying, others weren't, during the ramp up period. Many of those who
did received lower payments and/or forgiveness (that's the taxpayer on
the hook part).
But wait, there's more!
Biden, in his infinite wisdom, comes up with another inappropriately
named boondoggle called the SAVE Plan, designed to reduced payments
and offer forgiveness after 10–25 years, depending on loan size
(there's that pesky taxpayer on the hook part again); and although
parts of it were correctly struck down, other parts remain.
Fast forward to September, 2024 - the ramp-up ends. Biden is in full
dementia mode, Trump47 wins, the not paying your loan party is over.
Done, kaput, time to nut up, shut up and adhere to the terms of the
loans you willingly signed up for.
... No money came out of your pocket to forgive those loans.
Except tax money.
See above.
In news:ZaxOP.1377108$[email protected], Rudy Canoza, the intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior to oozing scarlet red maxipad (whose mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch) *wrote* (not "typed"):
(not "typed"):On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried — and *failed* — to bullshit:
In news:xdvOP.792463$[email protected], Rudy Canoza, the intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior to oozing scarlet red maxipad (whose mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch) *wrote*
On 4/24/2025 10:45 AM, Gak, *fat* little Nazi cocksucker fucked up the ass by priests hundreds of times — and *admits* it — lied:
On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried — and *failed* — to bullshit:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter <[email protected]>
typed:
Gak, *fat* little Nazi cocksucker fucked up the ass by priests hundreds of times — and *admits* it — lied:
On 4/23/2025 3:54 PM, H Karlsen wrote:
https://www.kgw.com/article/news/education/millions-people-behind-student-
loans-must-start-paying/283-97da664c-1a5b-4bf1-99b7-80bd9fba1313?ref=exit-
recirc
The only people that got screwed were the taxpayers who got stuck with >>>>>>>> the bill for these lazy welchers who were let off the hook for >>>>>>>> repaying on the obligations that they willingly signed on for.
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still owed....
Cite?
They paid, as they should have, until covid. Then, Trump45 paused it, part
of the misnamed CARES Act.
It is not "misnamed," you stupid priest-fucked *fat* little Nazi cocksucker.
CARES, like many laws, is an acronym for Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and
Economic Security Act.
You stupid goddamned priest-fucked *fat* little Nazi cocksucker.
Hate-filled Prof. Canoza
No, o oozing scarlet red maxipad (whose mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch).
On 4/24/2025 10:45 AM, Gak, *fat* little Nazi cocksucker fucked up the ass by priests hundreds of times — and *admits* it — lied:
On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried — and *failed* — to bullshit:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
Gak, *fat* little Nazi cocksucker fucked up the ass by priests hundreds of times — and *admits* it — lied:
On 4/23/2025 3:54 PM, H Karlsen wrote:
https://www.kgw.com/article/news/education/millions-people-behind-student-
loans-must-start-paying/283-97da664c-1a5b-4bf1-99b7-80bd9fba1313?ref=exit-
recirc
The only people that got screwed were the taxpayers who got stuck with >>>>> the bill for these lazy welchers who were let off the hook for
repaying on the obligations that they willingly signed on for.
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still owed....
Cite?
They paid, as they should have, until covid. Then, Trump45 paused it, part of
the misnamed CARES Act.
It is not "misnamed," you stupid priest-fucked *fat* little Nazi cocksucker. CARES, like many laws, is an acronym for Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic
Security Act.
On 24 Apr 2025, Yak <[email protected]> posted some news:vudtb3$1h96b$[email protected]:
On 4/24/2025 12:42 PM, max headroom wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Yak <[email protected]> wrote in news:vubh70$3oqrk$[email protected]:
On 4/23/2025 3:54 PM, H Karlsen wrote:
https://www.kgw.com/article/news/education/millions-people-behind-s >>>>>> tudent-loans-must-start-paying/283-97da664c-1a5b-4bf1-99b7-80bd9fba >>>>>> 1313?ref=exit-recirc
The only people that got screwed were the taxpayers who got stuck
with the bill for these lazy welchers who were let off the hook for
repaying on the obligations that they willingly signed on for.
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still owed....
Cite?
They paid, as they should have, until covid. Then, Trump45 paused it,
part of the misnamed CARES Act. Along comes Biden46, waving his magic
EO pen, and issued extension after extension on the pause. The only
one's paying anything back were fed govt loan recipients with an ounce
of integrity, or private loan recipients who, by the way, got no such
favor of the pause.
Along comes the Debt Ceiling Act of 2023, which mandated resumption of
payments. However, Biden, waiving his EO pen which never seems to run
out of ink, once again issued an extenstion - what he called a
'ramp-up' period to last one year. Miss a payment during that time? No
problem - no default, no involuntary collections, nothing. Some were
paying, others weren't, during the ramp up period. Many of those who
did received lower payments and/or forgiveness (that's the taxpayer on
the hook part).
But wait, there's more!
Biden, in his infinite wisdom, comes up with another inappropriately
named boondoggle called the SAVE Plan, designed to reduced payments
and offer forgiveness after 10–25 years, depending on loan size
(there's that pesky taxpayer on the hook part again); and although
parts of it were correctly struck down, other parts remain.
Fast forward to September, 2024 - the ramp-up ends. Biden is in full
dementia mode, Trump47 wins, the not paying your loan party is over.
Done, kaput, time to nut up, shut up and adhere to the terms of the
loans you willingly signed up for.
... No money came out of your pocket to forgive those loans.
Except tax money.
See above.
Government employees with 120 payments could apply and get their loan forgiven.
https://studentaid.gov/manage-loans/forgiveness-cancellation/public- service#qualifying-employment
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 16:26:08 -0400, Yak <[email protected]> wrote:
On 4/24/2025 4:09 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 16:05:51 -0400, Yak <[email protected]> wrote:
The only people that got screwed were the taxpayers who got stuck with >>>> the bill for these lazy welchers who were let off the hook for repaying >>>> on the obligations that they willingly signed on for.
Agreed. 800 Billion dollars that just vanished in a puff of smoke
into the PPP. All those businesses, loaned all that money, and all
those loans forgiven within a couple of years.
Heh, maybe there is hope for you after all.
Dude, I've been a debt hawk since Carter. You can't have forgotten
that Swill is a Debt Hawk!
The *interest* on the debt is 2.4% GDP! Defense is only 3.4%.
The problem always was, when I showed what was causing most of the
debt, you didn't like it because ...
... most of the debt comes from Republicans.
I've got quotes from Republican leadership swearing to spend away a
surplus and drive up the deficit.
Repeatedly.
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 13:45:07 -0400, Yak <[email protected]> wrote:
They paid, as they should have, until covid.
What do you mean "until covid"?
PPP was a reaction to COVID.
Then, Trump45 paused it,
part of the misnamed CARES Act.
Wrong. PPP came after CARES.
"The CARES Act, or Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act,
is a $2.2 trillion economic stimulus bill passed by Congress in
response to the COVID-19 pandemic. It provides economic assistance to workers, families, small businesses, and industries, addressing the
issues related to the pandemic's onset. The CARES Act was signed into
law on March 27, 2020."
Along comes Biden46, waving his magic EO pen,
Like Trump waves his?
and issued extension after extension on the pause.
A Republican Congress passed it, a Republican President signed it, a Republican President issued the first pause, a Democratic President
continued the pause.
As much culbability there was from both sides, where are the lists of DEMOCRATIC congress critters who made out like a bandit with PPP?
<crickets>
The only one's
paying anything back were fed govt loan recipients with an ounce of
integrity, or private loan recipients who, by the way, got no such favor
of the pause.
So you agree that Republican Congress critters ripped off the tax
payer by borrowing money and, in the end, forgiving themselves the
debt.
Over $400B disappeared that way.
These ten Republican Congress Critters stole $14,698,000 from us. <https://www.instagram.com/votolatino/p/CuU8QjYu7rw/?hl=en>
And still, Republicans dare look you in the eye and complain about
DEBT?
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:...
On every date, max headroom wrote:
In news:ZaxOP.1377108$[email protected], "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
<[email protected]> typed:
On every date, max headroom wrote:
In news:xdvOP.792463$[email protected], "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
<[email protected]> typed:
On 4/24/2025 10:45 AM, Yak <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vubh70$3oqrk$[email protected]:
On every date, max headroom wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Yak <[email protected]> wrote in news:vubh70$3oqrk$[email protected]: >>>>>>>>> On 4/23/2025 3:54 PM, H Karlsen wrote:
https://www.kgw.com/article/news/education/millions-people-behind-student-
loans-must-start-paying/283-97da664c-1a5b-4bf1-99b7-80bd9fba1313?ref=exit-
recirc
The only people that got screwed were the taxpayers who got stuck with
the bill for these lazy welchers who were let off the hook for >>>>>>>>> repaying on the obligations that they willingly signed on for.
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still owed....
Cite?
They paid, as they should have, until covid. Then, Trump45 paused it, >>>>>> part of the misnamed CARES Act.
It is not "misnamed," you stupid priest-fucked *fat* little Nazi
cocksucker. CARES, like many laws, is an acronym for Coronavirus Aid, >>>>> Relief, and Economic Security Act.
You stupid goddamned priest-fucked *fat* little Nazi cocksucker.
Hate-filled Cunt Flaps can't dispute the facts.
No...
Looks like Max the Magnanimous forgot to say anything....
In news:vug8bf$78tf$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:...
Find one that addressed borrowers who "paid the principle, with
interest, and still owed..."
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in news:vuh7m8$147ng$[email protected]:
In news:vug8bf$78tf$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:...
Find one that addressed borrowers who "paid the principle, with
interest, and still owed..."
Ah, yes, that's where the "creative bookeeping" comes in - the student
made payments for 20 years totalling more than the original loan, but it
was all applied to the interest and not to the principle -- and after 20 years of payments, the student still owes more than he borrowed....
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in news:vuh7m8$147ng$[email protected]:
In news:vug8bf$78tf$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:...
Find one that addressed borrowers who "paid the principle, with
interest, and still owed..."
Ah, yes, that's where the "creative bookeeping" comes in - the student
made payments for 20 years totalling more than the original loan, but it
was all applied to the interest and not to the principle -- and after 20 years of payments, the student still owes more than he borrowed.
===========
Student loan payments were paused in 2020 in response to the pandemic ?
but by 2021, almost two out of every three student loan borrowers who
made voluntary payments during the COVID-19 payment pause ended up owing
a larger balance than they originally did, according to a report from the National Consumer Law Center and the Center for Responsible Lending.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/many-student-loan-borrowers-owe- 120118581.html
In news:vuhhma$1fc7n$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vuh7m8$147ng$[email protected]:
In news:vug8bf$78tf$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still
owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:...
Find one that addressed borrowers who "paid the principle, with
interest, and still owed..."
Ah, yes, that's where the "creative bookeeping" comes in - the
student made payments for 20 years totalling more than the original
loan, but it was all applied to the interest and not to the principle
-- and after 20 years of payments, the student still owes more than
he borrowed....
So they hadn't actually "paid the principle, with interest, and still owed..."
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in news:vui1jm$1te0q$[email protected]:
In news:vuhhma$1fc7n$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vuh7m8$147ng$[email protected]:
In news:vug8bf$78tf$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still
owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:...
Find one that addressed borrowers who "paid the principle, with
interest, and still owed..."
Ah, yes, that's where the "creative bookeeping" comes in - the
student made payments for 20 years totalling more than the original
loan, but it was all applied to the interest and not to the principle
-- and after 20 years of payments, the student still owes more than
he borrowed....
So they hadn't actually "paid the principle, with interest, and still owed..."
They've paid more than they borrowed.
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in news:vui1jm$1te0q$[email protected]:
In news:vuhhma$1fc7n$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vuh7m8$147ng$[email protected]:
In news:vug8bf$78tf$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still
owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:...
Find one that addressed borrowers who "paid the principle, with
interest, and still owed..."
Ah, yes, that's where the "creative bookeeping" comes in - the
student made payments for 20 years totalling more than the original
loan, but it was all applied to the interest and not to the principle
-- and after 20 years of payments, the student still owes more than
he borrowed....
So they hadn't actually "paid the principle, with interest, and still
owed..."
They've paid more than they borrowed.
On 26/4/25 22:22, Governor Swill wrote:
Ok, IMO it is highly hypocritical to say one thing and do another.
In general, Republicans voted for PPP forgiveness, but against Studen
debt forgiveness.
The part that angers me is Congress removed student loans from
bankruptcy discharge. You cannot even escape by defaulting.
I am not pleased the Insane Oranger could escape his fraud debt
with a bankruptcy.
Ok, IMO it is highly hypocritical to say one thing and do another. In general, Republicans voted for PPP forgiveness, but against Studen
debt forgiveness.
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in news:vuh7m8$147ng$[email protected]:
In news:vug8bf$78tf$[email protected], BaxterAh, yes, that's where the "creative bookeeping" comes in - the student
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:...
Find one that addressed borrowers who "paid the principle, with
interest, and still owed..."
made payments for 20 years totalling more than the original loan, but it
was all applied to the interest and not to the principle
-- and after 20 years of payments, the student still owes more than he borrowed.
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 15:05:19 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <[email protected]> wrote:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in >>news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter >>>><[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
===========
Borrowers who have been in repayment for more than 20 years
Biden�s new plan aims to automatically cancel the undergraduate debt
of anyone who has been repaying their loans for 20 years (since July
1, 2005) and forgive the graduate-school debt of anyone who has been
in repayment for 25 years (since July 1, 2000).
We know how it worked.
You were asked to cite cases of students paying loan principle plus
interest but still having a balance.
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 15:05:19 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <[email protected]> wrote:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in >>news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter >>>><[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
===========
Borrowers who have been in repayment for more than 20 years
Biden?s new plan aims to automatically cancel the undergraduate debt
of anyone who has been repaying their loans for 20 years (since July
1, 2005) and forgive the graduate-school debt of anyone who has been
in repayment for 25 years (since July 1, 2000).
We know how it worked.
You were asked to cite cases of students paying loan principle plus interest but still having a balance.
Now you're just doing MAGA sematics, aren't you?
If you've been paying for 20 years, and the amount you've paid is MORE
than you originally borrowed but now your loan balance is even higher ... can't you figure it out from there? There's bookkeeping shenanigans
going on -- simialar to shenanigans in those Subprime Mortgage bullshit.
They make these loans to unsophisiticated 18-year-olds, and the small
print lets them add any interest accumulated into the loan as principal.
So yeah, it takes the kid awhile to land a job, his loan principle keeps growing - and the intrest along with it
Stop an ask yourself if they've been paying on their student loan for 20 years why isn't already paid off? Hell you can pay of a house mortgage
in less time than that.
In article <vum2mk$1hgi9$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 15:05:19 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<[email protected]> wrote:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still
owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
===========
Borrowers who have been in repayment for more than 20 years
Biden?s new plan aims to automatically cancel the undergraduate
debt of anyone who has been repaying their loans for 20 years
(since July 1, 2005) and forgive the graduate-school debt of anyone
who has been in repayment for 25 years (since July 1, 2000).
We know how it worked.
You were asked to cite cases of students paying loan principle plus
interest but still having a balance.
Now you're just doing MAGA sematics, aren't you?
If you've been paying for 20 years, and the amount you've paid is
MORE than you originally borrowed but now your loan balance is even
higher ... can't you figure it out from there? There's bookkeeping
shenanigans going on -- simialar to shenanigans in those Subprime
Mortgage bullshit.
They make these loans to unsophisiticated 18-year-olds, and the small
print lets them add any interest accumulated into the loan as
principal. So yeah, it takes the kid awhile to land a job, his loan
principle keeps growing - and the intrest along with it
Stop an ask yourself if they've been paying on their student loan for
20 years why isn't already paid off? Hell you can pay of a house
mortgage in less time than that.
Read the small print before you sign.
On 26/4/25 22:22, Governor Swill wrote:
Ok, IMO it is highly hypocritical to say one thing and do another. In
general, Republicans voted for PPP forgiveness, but against Studen
debt forgiveness.
The part that angers me is Congress removed student loans from
bankruptcy discharge.
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 08:59:57 -0400, Yak <[email protected]> wrote:
On 4/25/2025 12:52 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 13:45:07 -0400, Yak <[email protected]> wrote:
They paid, as they should have, until covid.
What do you mean "until covid"?
I mean they paid up until covid. What's not to understand?
Ok, we're not on the same page. I'm talking about PPP, you're talking
about student debt relief.
PPP was a reaction to COVID.
No shit.
Then, Trump45 paused it,
part of the misnamed CARES Act.
Wrong. PPP came after CARES.
I never said it came before PPP. In fact, I never mentioned it because
PPP has nothing to do with student loan repayment or forgiveness.
Thus the misunderstanding.
Ok, IMO it is highly hypocritical to say one thing and do another. In general, Republicans voted for PPP forgiveness, but against Studen
debt forgiveness.
Why?
"The CARES Act, or Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act,
is a $2.2 trillion economic stimulus bill passed by Congress in
response to the COVID-19 pandemic. It provides economic assistance to
workers, families, small businesses, and industries, addressing the
issues related to the pandemic's onset. The CARES Act was signed into
law on March 27, 2020."
Along comes Biden46, waving his magic EO pen,
Like Trump waves his?
Exactly.
and issued extension after extension on the pause.
A Republican Congress passed it, a Republican President signed it, a
Republican President issued the first pause, a Democratic President
continued the pause.
Congress doesn't pass EOs.
Cares and PPP were not EOs.
Doesn't change the fact that Republicans blocked student debt relief
but "disappeared" at least $400B and were forgiven their own debt into
the bargain.
As much culbability there was from both sides, where are the lists of
DEMOCRATIC congress critters who made out like a bandit with PPP?
Nancy Pelost, Ron Wyden, Jeanne Shaheen, Susie Lee, Debbie
Mucarsel-Powell, Matt Cartwright, Conor Lamb. I can keep going, but it
doesn't matter, at least for purposes of this thread, because we're
talking about student loans here.
What did they do?
The only one's
paying anything back were fed govt loan recipients with an ounce of
integrity, or private loan recipients who, by the way, got no such favor >>>> of the pause.
So you agree that Republican Congress critters ripped off the tax
payer by borrowing money and, in the end, forgiving themselves the
debt.
Damned right I agree. No one is blameless.
Over $400B disappeared that way.
These ten Republican Congress Critters stole $14,698,000 from us.
<https://www.instagram.com/votolatino/p/CuU8QjYu7rw/?hl=en>
And still, Republicans dare look you in the eye and complain about
DEBT?
There's a reason they are called RINOs, and why they are all a Uniparty.
A RINO is someone masquerading as a Republican but actually isn't.
Trump is a RINO. He is NOT a conservative, his political leanings
have always been to Democrats and he considers himself above the law.
Maga is Trump's uniparty. They do whatever they're told.
His organizational patterns are those of a mobster. By selecting for
loyalty rather than competence, he can only hurt us, not destroy us.
I want to see responsible Republicans back in office. That does not
include the motley crew of rip offs calling themselves "Republican"
today.
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 09:01:01 -0400, Yak <[email protected]> wrote:
On 4/25/2025 1:10 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 16:26:08 -0400, Yak <[email protected]> wrote:
On 4/24/2025 4:09 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 16:05:51 -0400, Yak <[email protected]> wrote:
The only people that got screwed were the taxpayers who got stuck with >>>>>> the bill for these lazy welchers who were let off the hook for repaying >>>>>> on the obligations that they willingly signed on for.
Agreed. 800 Billion dollars that just vanished in a puff of smoke
into the PPP. All those businesses, loaned all that money, and all
those loans forgiven within a couple of years.
Heh, maybe there is hope for you after all.
Dude, I've been a debt hawk since Carter. You can't have forgotten
that Swill is a Debt Hawk!
LOLOLOL!!!! Bwahahahahahahahah!!! Yeah...and republicans are debt hawks
too.
Why you wanna be an ass? Especially about something we have in
common.
I've been on Usenet twenty years as Governor Swill, so don't act like
you're unaware of who I am.
When you measure debt by %growth and %GDP, it always grows faster
under Republican Administrations and especially with Republican
Houses.
On 4/27/2025 5:31 AM, Siri Cruz wrote:
On 26/4/25 22:22, Governor Swill wrote:
Ok, IMO it is highly hypocritical to say one thing and do another. In
general, Republicans voted for PPP forgiveness, but against Studen
debt forgiveness.
The part that angers me is Congress removed student loans from
bankruptcy discharge.
You can thank a democrat congress for that.
Yak <[email protected]> wrote in news:vunsd8$39ghe$[email protected]:
On 4/27/2025 5:31 AM, Siri Cruz wrote:
On 26/4/25 22:22, Governor Swill wrote:
Ok, IMO it is highly hypocritical to say one thing and do another. In >>>> general, Republicans voted for PPP forgiveness, but against Studen
debt forgiveness.
The part that angers me is Congress removed student loans from
bankruptcy discharge.
You can thank a democrat congress for that.
No, you can thank a Democratic Judge for
allowing student loan bankruptcies.
https://www.consumerfinancemonitor.com/2020/01/21/bankruptcy-court- discharges-student-loan-debt/
On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 20:05:41 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <[email protected]> wrote:
Now you're just doing MAGA sematics, aren't you?
If you've been paying for 20 years, and the amount you've paid is MORE
than you originally borrowed but now your loan balance is even higher
... can't you figure it out from there? There's bookkeeping
shenanigans going on -- simialar to shenanigans in those Subprime
Mortgage bullshit.
We know all this. You were asked to document individuals in this
situation. It's taken you a while to get *this* firmed up in your
cites.
Have your cites ready and carefully construct your language so as not
to be misconstrued.
On 4/27/2025 5:31 AM, Siri Cruz wrote:
On 26/4/25 22:22, Governor Swill wrote:
Ok, IMO it is highly hypocritical to say one thing and do
another. In
general, Republicans voted for PPP forgiveness, but against
Studen
debt forgiveness.
The part that angers me is Congress removed student loans from
bankruptcy discharge.
You can thank a democrat congress for that.
On 4/27/2025 1:22 AM, Governor Swill wrote:The subject, you priest-fucked *fat* little cocksucker, is government loans to people that are then forgiven.
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 08:59:57 -0400, Yak <[email protected]> wrote:
On 4/25/2025 12:52 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 13:45:07 -0400, Yak <[email protected]> wrote:
They paid, as they should have, until covid.
What do you mean "until covid"?
I mean they paid up until covid. What's not to understand?
Ok, we're not on the same page. I'm talking about PPP, you're talking
about student debt relief.
That's because the subject is student loans.
On 4/28/2025 5:23 AM, Gak, *fat* little Nazi cocksucker fucked up the
ass by priests hundreds of times — and *admits* it — lied:
On 4/27/2025 1:22 AM, Governor Swill wrote:The subject,
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 08:59:57 -0400, Yak <[email protected]> wrote:
On 4/25/2025 12:52 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 13:45:07 -0400, Yak <[email protected]> wrote:
They paid, as they should have, until covid.
What do you mean "until covid"?
I mean they paid up until covid. What's not to understand?
Ok, we're not on the same page. I'm talking about PPP, you're talking
about student debt relief.
That's because the subject is student loans.
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
In article <vum2mk$1hgi9$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 15:05:19 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<[email protected]> wrote:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still
owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
===========
Borrowers who have been in repayment for more than 20 years
Biden?s new plan aims to automatically cancel the undergraduate
debt of anyone who has been repaying their loans for 20 years
(since July 1, 2005) and forgive the graduate-school debt of anyone
who has been in repayment for 25 years (since July 1, 2000).
We know how it worked.
You were asked to cite cases of students paying loan principle plus
interest but still having a balance.
Now you're just doing MAGA sematics, aren't you?
If you've been paying for 20 years, and the amount you've paid is
MORE than you originally borrowed but now your loan balance is even
higher ... can't you figure it out from there? There's bookkeeping
shenanigans going on -- simialar to shenanigans in those Subprime
Mortgage bullshit.
They make these loans to unsophisiticated 18-year-olds, and the small
print lets them add any interest accumulated into the loan as
principal. So yeah, it takes the kid awhile to land a job, his loan
principle keeps growing - and the intrest along with it
Stop an ask yourself if they've been paying on their student loan for
20 years why isn't already paid off? Hell you can pay of a house
mortgage in less time than that.
Read the small print before you sign.
Conservaturds always blame the victim.
Did you read the small print before you voted for tRump?
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 20:05:41 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <[email protected]> wrote:
Now you're just doing MAGA sematics, aren't you?
If you've been paying for 20 years, and the amount you've paid is MORE >>than you originally borrowed but now your loan balance is even higher
... can't you figure it out from there? There's bookkeeping
shenanigans going on -- simialar to shenanigans in those Subprime >>Mortgage bullshit.
We know all this. You were asked to document individuals in this situation. It's taken you a while to get *this* firmed up in your
cites.
Have your cites ready and carefully construct your language so as not
to be misconstrued.
More important would be to talk about why Education in the US is so expensive. Other countries it is much cheaper and some places even free.
Remember the GI Bill? Word at the time (1950's. 60's, 70's) was that a
lot of those going on the GI Bill weren't actively studying, they were
just there to collect the stipend.
Then the morbidily rich decided to make war on the Middle Class -
beginning with Reagan. Keep those students struggling so they don't
protest, even after they graduate.
In article <vuo6mj$3i5p5$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 20:05:41 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<[email protected]> wrote:
Now you're just doing MAGA sematics, aren't you?
If you've been paying for 20 years, and the amount you've paid is
MORE than you originally borrowed but now your loan balance is even
higher ... can't you figure it out from there? There's bookkeeping
shenanigans going on -- simialar to shenanigans in those Subprime
Mortgage bullshit.
We know all this. You were asked to document individuals in this
situation. It's taken you a while to get *this* firmed up in your
cites.
Have your cites ready and carefully construct your language so as
not to be misconstrued.
More important would be to talk about why Education in the US is so
expensive. Other countries it is much cheaper and some places even
free.
You get what you pay for.
Remember the GI Bill? Word at the time (1950's. 60's, 70's) was that
a lot of those going on the GI Bill weren't actively studying, they
were just there to collect the stipend.
$700 a month back in 73 was a good deal.
Then the morbidily rich decided to make war on the Middle Class -
beginning with Reagan. Keep those students struggling so they don't
protest, even after they graduate.
Well they better figure out something. They ain't going on
our dime anymore.
In article <vumjj1$20ugl$[email protected]>, bax02anyone
[email protected] says...
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <vum2mk$1hgi9$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 15:05:19 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<[email protected]> wrote:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still
owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
===========
Borrowers who have been in repayment for more than 20 years
Biden?s new plan aims to automatically cancel the undergraduate
debt of anyone who has been repaying their loans for 20 years
(since July 1, 2005) and forgive the graduate-school debt of
pluswho has been in repayment for 25 years (since July 1, 2000).
We know how it worked.
You were asked to cite cases of students paying loan principle
smallinterest but still having a balance.
Now you're just doing MAGA sematics, aren't you?
If you've been paying for 20 years, and the amount you've paid is
MORE than you originally borrowed but now your loan balance is even
higher ... can't you figure it out from there? There's bookkeeping
shenanigans going on -- simialar to shenanigans in those Subprime
Mortgage bullshit.
They make these loans to unsophisiticated 18-year-olds, and the
forprint lets them add any interest accumulated into the loan as
principal. So yeah, it takes the kid awhile to land a job, his loan
principle keeps growing - and the intrest along with it
Stop an ask yourself if they've been paying on their student loan
20 years why isn't already paid off? Hell you can pay of a house
mortgage in less time than that.
Read the small print before you sign.
Conservaturds always blame the victim.
Did you read the small print before you voted for tRump?
What does that have to do with taking out a loan? You are
making criminals out to be heroes.
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
In article <vumjj1$20ugl$[email protected]>, bax02anyone
[email protected] says...
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <vum2mk$1hgi9$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 15:05:19 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<[email protected]> wrote:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still
owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
===========
Borrowers who have been in repayment for more than 20 years
Biden?s new plan aims to automatically cancel the undergraduate
debt of anyone who has been repaying their loans for 20 years
(since July 1, 2005) and forgive the graduate-school debt of
pluswho has been in repayment for 25 years (since July 1, 2000).
We know how it worked.
You were asked to cite cases of students paying loan principle
smallinterest but still having a balance.
Now you're just doing MAGA sematics, aren't you?
If you've been paying for 20 years, and the amount you've paid is
MORE than you originally borrowed but now your loan balance is even
higher ... can't you figure it out from there? There's bookkeeping
shenanigans going on -- simialar to shenanigans in those Subprime
Mortgage bullshit.
They make these loans to unsophisiticated 18-year-olds, and the
forprint lets them add any interest accumulated into the loan as
principal. So yeah, it takes the kid awhile to land a job, his loan
principle keeps growing - and the intrest along with it
Stop an ask yourself if they've been paying on their student loan
20 years why isn't already paid off? Hell you can pay of a house
mortgage in less time than that.
Read the small print before you sign.
Conservaturds always blame the victim.
Did you read the small print before you voted for tRump?
What does that have to do with taking out a loan? You are
making criminals out to be heroes.
So teens wanting to get an education are now criminals!!!.
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
In article <vuo6mj$3i5p5$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 20:05:41 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<[email protected]> wrote:
Now you're just doing MAGA sematics, aren't you?
If you've been paying for 20 years, and the amount you've paid is
MORE than you originally borrowed but now your loan balance is even
higher ... can't you figure it out from there? There's bookkeeping
shenanigans going on -- simialar to shenanigans in those Subprime
Mortgage bullshit.
We know all this. You were asked to document individuals in this
situation. It's taken you a while to get *this* firmed up in your
cites.
Have your cites ready and carefully construct your language so as
not to be misconstrued.
More important would be to talk about why Education in the US is so
expensive. Other countries it is much cheaper and some places even
free.
You get what you pay for.
You believe that bullshit myth of US exceptionalism.
Remember the GI Bill? Word at the time (1950's. 60's, 70's) was that
a lot of those going on the GI Bill weren't actively studying, they
were just there to collect the stipend.
$700 a month back in 73 was a good deal.
Non sequiteur
Then the morbidily rich decided to make war on the Middle Class -
beginning with Reagan. Keep those students struggling so they don't
protest, even after they graduate.
Well they better figure out something. They ain't going on
our dime anymore.
So you think if you let the morbidly rich ass fuck you they drop you a
crumb?
In article <vuopp9$4tab$[email protected]>, bax02even
[email protected] says...
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <vuo6mj$3i5p5$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 20:05:41 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<[email protected]> wrote:
Now you're just doing MAGA sematics, aren't you?
If you've been paying for 20 years, and the amount you've paid is
MORE than you originally borrowed but now your loan balance is
bookkeepinghigher ... can't you figure it out from there? There's
yourshenanigans going on -- simialar to shenanigans in those Subprime
Mortgage bullshit.
We know all this. You were asked to document individuals in this
situation. It's taken you a while to get *this* firmed up in
cites.
Have your cites ready and carefully construct your language so as
not to be misconstrued.
More important would be to talk about why Education in the US is so
expensive. Other countries it is much cheaper and some places even
free.
You get what you pay for.
You believe that bullshit myth of US exceptionalism.
It's life. The more you pay the better the product.
that
Remember the GI Bill? Word at the time (1950's. 60's, 70's) was
a lot of those going on the GI Bill weren't actively studying, they
were just there to collect the stipend.
$700 a month back in 73 was a good deal.
Non sequiteur
That was my GI bill.
So you think if you let the morbidly rich ass fuck you they drop you a
Then the morbidily rich decided to make war on the Middle Class -
beginning with Reagan. Keep those students struggling so they don't
protest, even after they graduate.
Well they better figure out something. They ain't going on
our dime anymore.
crumb?
That's never happened and most likely never will so I'll
let you worry about it.
In article <vuopl4$4tab$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <vumjj1$20ugl$[email protected]>, bax02anyone
[email protected] says...
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <vum2mk$1hgi9$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 15:05:19 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<[email protected]> wrote:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still
owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
===========
Borrowers who have been in repayment for more than 20 years
Biden?s new plan aims to automatically cancel the
undergraduate debt of anyone who has been repaying their
loans for 20 years (since July 1, 2005) and forgive the
graduate-school debt of
pluswho has been in repayment for 25 years (since July 1, 2000).
We know how it worked.
You were asked to cite cases of students paying loan
principle
smallinterest but still having a balance.
Now you're just doing MAGA sematics, aren't you?
If you've been paying for 20 years, and the amount you've paid
is MORE than you originally borrowed but now your loan balance
is even higher ... can't you figure it out from there? There's
bookkeeping shenanigans going on -- simialar to shenanigans in
those Subprime Mortgage bullshit.
They make these loans to unsophisiticated 18-year-olds, and the
forprint lets them add any interest accumulated into the loan as
principal. So yeah, it takes the kid awhile to land a job, his
loan principle keeps growing - and the intrest along with it
Stop an ask yourself if they've been paying on their student
loan
20 years why isn't already paid off? Hell you can pay of a
house mortgage in less time than that.
Read the small print before you sign.
Conservaturds always blame the victim.
Did you read the small print before you voted for tRump?
What does that have to do with taking out a loan? You are
making criminals out to be heroes.
So teens wanting to get an education are now criminals!!!.
Who said that? Oh YOU did.
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 09:01:01 -0400, Yak <[email protected]> wrote:
On 4/25/2025 1:10 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 16:26:08 -0400, Yak <[email protected]> wrote:
On 4/24/2025 4:09 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 16:05:51 -0400, Yak <[email protected]> wrote:
The only people that got screwed were the taxpayers who got stuck
with the bill for these lazy welchers who were let off the hook
for repaying on the obligations that they willingly signed on
for.
Agreed. 800 Billion dollars that just vanished in a puff of smoke
into the PPP. All those businesses, loaned all that money, and
all those loans forgiven within a couple of years.
Heh, maybe there is hope for you after all.
Dude, I've been a debt hawk since Carter. You can't have forgotten
that Swill is a Debt Hawk!
LOLOLOL!!!! Bwahahahahahahahah!!! Yeah...and republicans are debt
hawks too.
Why you wanna be an ass? Especially about something we have in
common.
I've been on Usenet twenty years as Governor Swill, so don't act like
you're unaware of who I am.
When you measure debt by %growth and %GDP, it always grows faster
under Republican Administrations and especially with Republican
Houses.
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 15:05:19 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<[email protected]> wrote:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:
===========
Borrowers who have been in repayment for more than 20 years
Biden�s new plan aims to automatically cancel the undergraduate debt
of anyone who has been repaying their loans for 20 years (since July
1, 2005) and forgive the graduate-school debt of anyone who has been
in repayment for 25 years (since July 1, 2000).
We know how it worked.
You were asked to cite cases of students paying loan principle plus
interest but still having a balance.
Now you're just doing MAGA sematics, aren't you?
If you've been paying for 20 years, and the amount you've paid is MORE
than you originally borrowed but now your loan balance is even higher ... can't you figure it out from there?...
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:40:12 -0400, Yak <[email protected]> wrote:
Sorry, I'm having a hard time reconciling your opposition to DOGE in
this light.
It's not the principal, it's the execution.
You can't get rid of a trillion dollars closing national parks three
days a week or by randomly slashing a chain saw about to learn who you
can and can't do without.
Deficit reduction is hard. Who said, "Who knew healthcare was so
hard?"
You have two choices, Republicans, drastically slash Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and Defense or put those tax rates back where they
were we were actually able to pay our bills.
Please note:
In news:vuirut$2jm82$[email protected], Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vui1jm$1te0q$[email protected]:
In news:vuhhma$1fc7n$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vuh7m8$147ng$[email protected]:
In news:vug8bf$78tf$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still
owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:...
Find one that addressed borrowers who "paid the principle, with
interest, and still owed..."
Ah, yes, that's where the "creative bookeeping" comes in - the
student made payments for 20 years totalling more than the original
loan, but it was all applied to the interest and not to the principle
-- and after 20 years of payments, the student still owes more than
he borrowed....
So they hadn't actually "paid the principle, with interest, and still
owed..."
They've paid more than they borrowed.
But they hadn't actually "paid the principle, with interest," had they?
In article <vuhhma$1fc7n$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vuh7m8$147ng$[email protected]:
In news:vug8bf$78tf$[email protected], BaxterAh, yes, that's where the "creative bookeeping" comes in - the student
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:...
Find one that addressed borrowers who "paid the principle, with
interest, and still owed..."
made payments for 20 years totalling more than the original loan, but it
was all applied to the interest and not to the principle -- and after 20
years of payments, the student still owes more than he borrowed.
===========
Student loan payments were paused in 2020 in response to the pandemic ?
but by 2021, almost two out of every three student loan borrowers who
made voluntary payments during the COVID-19 payment pause ended up owing
a larger balance than they originally did, according to a report from the
National Consumer Law Center and the Center for Responsible Lending.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/many-student-loan-borrowers-owe-
120118581.html
Maybe he should read the small print next time.
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 15:26:11 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <[email protected]> wrote:
More important would be to talk about why Education in the US is so
More important is to discuss it coherently.
Fact is, govt is bloated with bureaucracy and NGOs that are not, in my opinion, within the confiens of a properly defined govt'l role.
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
In article <vuopl4$4tab$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <vumjj1$20ugl$[email protected]>, bax02anyone
[email protected] says...
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <vum2mk$1hgi9$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 15:05:19 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<[email protected]> wrote:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still
owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
===========
Borrowers who have been in repayment for more than 20 years
Biden?s new plan aims to automatically cancel the
undergraduate debt of anyone who has been repaying their
loans for 20 years (since July 1, 2005) and forgive the
graduate-school debt of
pluswho has been in repayment for 25 years (since July 1, 2000).
We know how it worked.
You were asked to cite cases of students paying loan
principle
smallinterest but still having a balance.
Now you're just doing MAGA sematics, aren't you?
If you've been paying for 20 years, and the amount you've paid
is MORE than you originally borrowed but now your loan balance
is even higher ... can't you figure it out from there? There's
bookkeeping shenanigans going on -- simialar to shenanigans in
those Subprime Mortgage bullshit.
They make these loans to unsophisiticated 18-year-olds, and the
forprint lets them add any interest accumulated into the loan as
principal. So yeah, it takes the kid awhile to land a job, his
loan principle keeps growing - and the intrest along with it
Stop an ask yourself if they've been paying on their student
loan
20 years why isn't already paid off? Hell you can pay of a
house mortgage in less time than that.
Read the small print before you sign.
Conservaturds always blame the victim.
Did you read the small print before you voted for tRump?
What does that have to do with taking out a loan? You are
making criminals out to be heroes.
So teens wanting to get an education are now criminals!!!.
Who said that? Oh YOU did.
Laughs and points. Relax, we're laughing AT you - not with you.
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in news:MPG.4279be7f2d6de1ba98a095 @usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vuopp9$4tab$[email protected]>, bax02even
[email protected] says...
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <vuo6mj$3i5p5$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 20:05:41 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<[email protected]> wrote:
Now you're just doing MAGA sematics, aren't you?
If you've been paying for 20 years, and the amount you've paid is
MORE than you originally borrowed but now your loan balance is
bookkeepinghigher ... can't you figure it out from there? There's
yourshenanigans going on -- simialar to shenanigans in those Subprime
Mortgage bullshit.
We know all this. You were asked to document individuals in this
situation. It's taken you a while to get *this* firmed up in
cites.
Have your cites ready and carefully construct your language so as
not to be misconstrued.
More important would be to talk about why Education in the US is so
expensive. Other countries it is much cheaper and some places even
free.
You get what you pay for.
You believe that bullshit myth of US exceptionalism.
It's life. The more you pay the better the product.
tRump has ruined that.
that
Remember the GI Bill? Word at the time (1950's. 60's, 70's) was
a lot of those going on the GI Bill weren't actively studying, they
were just there to collect the stipend.
$700 a month back in 73 was a good deal.
Non sequiteur
That was my GI bill.
Ok - yeah, you were one of those who were just there for the money and
didn't learn anything.
So you think if you let the morbidly rich ass fuck you they drop you a
Then the morbidily rich decided to make war on the Middle Class -
beginning with Reagan. Keep those students struggling so they don't
protest, even after they graduate.
Well they better figure out something. They ain't going on
our dime anymore.
crumb?
That's never happened and most likely never will so I'll
let you worry about it.
Right - you're such a bum fuck they'll never feel the need to drop you a crumb.
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <vuhhma$1fc7n$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vuh7m8$147ng$[email protected]:
In news:vug8bf$78tf$[email protected], BaxterAh, yes, that's where the "creative bookeeping" comes in - the student
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:...
Find one that addressed borrowers who "paid the principle, with
interest, and still owed..."
made payments for 20 years totalling more than the original loan, but it >> was all applied to the interest and not to the principle -- and after 20 >> years of payments, the student still owes more than he borrowed.
===========
Student loan payments were paused in 2020 in response to the pandemic ?
but by 2021, almost two out of every three student loan borrowers who
made voluntary payments during the COVID-19 payment pause ended up owing >> a larger balance than they originally did, according to a report from the >> National Consumer Law Center and the Center for Responsible Lending.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/many-student-loan-borrowers-owe-
120118581.html
Maybe he should read the small print next time.
I ended up doing that on mine..and found that it wasn?t a simple interest loan.
-hh
On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 08:19:23 -0400, Yak <[email protected]> wrote:
People have become accustomed to the freebies in life, whether
constitutional or not.
Call freebies what they are: Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid.
Cut Medicaid and lose much poor, especially rural, support. Cut SSA
or Medicare and lose that all important elder vote. Cut defense and
lose younger voters and defense hawks terrified of an ascending China.
In article <vupat2$jvph$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in
news:MPG.4279be7f2d6de1ba98a095 @usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vuopp9$4tab$[email protected]>, bax02even
[email protected] says...
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <vuo6mj$3i5p5$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 20:05:41 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<[email protected]> wrote:
Now you're just doing MAGA sematics, aren't you?
If you've been paying for 20 years, and the amount you've
paid is MORE than you originally borrowed but now your loan
balance is
bookkeepinghigher ... can't you figure it out from there? There's
yourshenanigans going on -- simialar to shenanigans in those
Subprime Mortgage bullshit.
We know all this. You were asked to document individuals in
this situation. It's taken you a while to get *this* firmed
up in
cites.
Have your cites ready and carefully construct your language
so as not to be misconstrued.
More important would be to talk about why Education in the US
is so expensive. Other countries it is much cheaper and some
places even free.
You get what you pay for.
You believe that bullshit myth of US exceptionalism.
It's life. The more you pay the better the product.
tRump has ruined that.
How so?
that
Remember the GI Bill? Word at the time (1950's. 60's, 70's) was
a lot of those going on the GI Bill weren't actively studying,
they were just there to collect the stipend.
$700 a month back in 73 was a good deal.
Non sequiteur
That was my GI bill.
Ok - yeah, you were one of those who were just there for the money
and didn't learn anything.
Actually I did. I got paid to learn. No loans. I earned
it.
Right - you're such a bum fuck they'll never feel the need to drop
So you think if you let the morbidly rich ass fuck you they drop
Then the morbidily rich decided to make war on the Middle Class
- beginning with Reagan. Keep those students struggling so they
don't protest, even after they graduate.
Well they better figure out something. They ain't going on
our dime anymore.
you a crumb?
That's never happened and most likely never will so I'll
let you worry about it.
you a crumb.
So? They haven't so far. Why should I care. Unlike you I
ear whats mine.
He's right, you know. The Dems had the power to keep that in but they didn't.No, you can thank a Democratic Judge for
allowing student loan bankruptcies.
Fact is, govt is bloated with bureaucracy and NGOs that are not,
in my opinion, within the confiens of a properly defined govt'l
role. I default to the constitution (i.e. cite for me
max headroom <[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vuirut$2jm82$[email protected], Baxter <[email protected]> >> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vui1jm$1te0q$[email protected]:
In news:vuhhma$1fc7n$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vuh7m8$147ng$[email protected]:
In news:vug8bf$78tf$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still
owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:...
Find one that addressed borrowers who "paid the principle, with
interest, and still owed..."
Ah, yes, that's where the "creative bookeeping" comes in - the
student made payments for 20 years totalling more than the original
loan, but it was all applied to the interest and not to the principle >>>>> -- and after 20 years of payments, the student still owes more than
he borrowed....
So they hadn't actually "paid the principle, with interest, and still
owed..."
They've paid more than they borrowed.
But they hadn't actually "paid the principle, with interest," had they?
No, but that's a poor way to look at the question for two reasons.
First is that since it is a debt that is much harder to discharge...
... the interest rate should be vastly lower than what has been charged.
Second is that since the point of these loan programs is an investment in
the future which also benefits society & the economy, it also should be at discounted interest rates.
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
In article <vupat2$jvph$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in
news:MPG.4279be7f2d6de1ba98a095 @usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vuopp9$4tab$[email protected]>, bax02even
[email protected] says...
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <vuo6mj$3i5p5$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 20:05:41 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<[email protected]> wrote:
Now you're just doing MAGA sematics, aren't you?
If you've been paying for 20 years, and the amount you've
paid is MORE than you originally borrowed but now your loan
balance is
bookkeepinghigher ... can't you figure it out from there? There's
yourshenanigans going on -- simialar to shenanigans in those
Subprime Mortgage bullshit.
We know all this. You were asked to document individuals in
this situation. It's taken you a while to get *this* firmed
up in
cites.
Have your cites ready and carefully construct your language
so as not to be misconstrued.
More important would be to talk about why Education in the US
is so expensive. Other countries it is much cheaper and some
places even free.
You get what you pay for.
You believe that bullshit myth of US exceptionalism.
It's life. The more you pay the better the product.
tRump has ruined that.
How so?
that
Remember the GI Bill? Word at the time (1950's. 60's, 70's) was
a lot of those going on the GI Bill weren't actively studying,
they were just there to collect the stipend.
$700 a month back in 73 was a good deal.
Non sequiteur
That was my GI bill.
Ok - yeah, you were one of those who were just there for the money
and didn't learn anything.
Actually I did. I got paid to learn. No loans. I earned
it.
Right - you're such a bum fuck they'll never feel the need to drop
So you think if you let the morbidly rich ass fuck you they drop
Then the morbidily rich decided to make war on the Middle Class
- beginning with Reagan. Keep those students struggling so they
don't protest, even after they graduate.
Well they better figure out something. They ain't going on
our dime anymore.
you a crumb?
That's never happened and most likely never will so I'll
let you worry about it.
you a crumb.
So? They haven't so far. Why should I care. Unlike you I
ear whats mine.
We hear that bullshit "earn" all the time from the biggest welfare recipients.
On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 13:01:16 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Banks don't exist to benefit society.
Everything exists to benefit society.
Second is that since the point of these loan programs is an investment inBanks don't exist to benefit society.
the future which also benefits society & the economy, it also should be at >> >discounted interest rates.
On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 12:45:42 -0400, Yak <[email protected]> wrote:
On 4/29/2025 11:45 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 08:19:23 -0400, Yak <[email protected]> wrote:
People have become accustomed to the freebies in life, whether
constitutional or not.
Call freebies what they are: Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid.
Cut Medicaid and lose much poor, especially rural, support. Cut SSA
or Medicare and lose that all important elder vote. Cut defense and
lose younger voters and defense hawks terrified of an ascending China.
So buying off voters is mroe important than the constitution. My point
exactly. Thanks for helping me make it.
My point is that revenue needs to match spending. In this case,
spending cannot be cut to match current revenue therefore revenue must
come up.
Let's return to Clinton's tax code ca 2000, a time when our spending
was restrained and revenues were high.
On 29/4/25 3:56, Governor Swill wrote:
He's right, you know. The Dems had the power to keep that in but theyNo, you can thank a Democratic Judge for
allowing student loan bankruptcies.
didn't.
Dems are also corporate whores. Green Party is not significant
enough to be tempted.
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in news:vur69f$2d8hd$3@dont-
email.me:
On 29/4/25 3:56, Governor Swill wrote:
He's right, you know. The Dems had the power to keep that in but theyNo, you can thank a Democratic Judge for
allowing student loan bankruptcies.
didn't.
Dems are also corporate whores. Green Party is not significant
enough to be tempted.
You need to be practical in order to save our democracy.
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in news:vur69f$2d8hd$3@dont-
email.me:
On 29/4/25 3:56, Governor Swill wrote:
He's right, you know. The Dems had the power to keep that in butNo, you can thank a Democratic Judge for
allowing student loan bankruptcies.
they didn't.
Dems are also corporate whores. Green Party is not significant
enough to be tempted.
You need to be practical in order to save our democracy.
On 29 Apr 2025, Baxter <[email protected]> posted some news:vus234$3a407$[email protected]:
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in news:vur69f$2d8hd$3@dont-
email.me:
On 29/4/25 3:56, Governor Swill wrote:
He's right, you know. The Dems had the power to keep that in butNo, you can thank a Democratic Judge for
allowing student loan bankruptcies.
they didn't.
Dems are also corporate whores. Green Party is not significant
enough to be tempted.
You need to be practical in order to save our democracy.
That requirement will automatically exclude Democrats.
On 29 Apr 2025, Baxter <[email protected]> posted some news:vus234$3a407$[email protected]:
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in news:vur69f$2d8hd$3@dont-
email.me:
On 29/4/25 3:56, Governor Swill wrote:
He's right, you know. The Dems had the power to keep that in butNo, you can thank a Democratic Judge for
allowing student loan bankruptcies.
they didn't.
Dems are also corporate whores. Green Party is not significant
enough to be tempted.
You need to be practical in order to save our democracy.
That requirement will automatically exclude Democrats.
On 29/4/25 13:01, max headroom wrote:
Second is that since the point of these loan programs is anBanks don't exist to benefit society.
investment in
the future which also benefits society & the economy, it also shouldbe at
discounted interest rates.
When I attended CSU is about $100/semester and $100/books.
Pat Brown set up CSC with the understanding educate Californians would probably live and work in California at higher wages, paying higher
taxes. And then they could fund the next generation.
For random reasons a bunch of tech companies openned in California. And
they had a bunch of college educated eager young employees that made the companies profitable and in turn capitalised more and more profitable companies.
Then came Reagan.
In article <621986683.767624098.043394.recscuba_google- [email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <vuhhma$1fc7n$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vuh7m8$147ng$[email protected]:
In news:vug8bf$78tf$[email protected], BaxterAh, yes, that's where the "creative bookeeping" comes in - the student >>>> made payments for 20 years totalling more than the original loan, but it >>>> was all applied to the interest and not to the principle -- and after 20 >>>> years of payments, the student still owes more than he borrowed.
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still owed.... >>>>>Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:...
Find one that addressed borrowers who "paid the principle, with
interest, and still owed..."
===========
Student loan payments were paused in 2020 in response to the pandemic ? >>>> but by 2021, almost two out of every three student loan borrowers who
made voluntary payments during the COVID-19 payment pause ended up owing >>>> a larger balance than they originally did, according to a report from the >>>> National Consumer Law Center and the Center for Responsible Lending.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/many-student-loan-borrowers-owe-
120118581.html
Maybe he should read the small print next time.
I ended up doing that on mine..and found that it wasn?t a simple interest
loan.
-hh
Did you sign it anyway?
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in news:vur69f$2d8hd$3@dont-
email.me:
On 29/4/25 3:56, Governor Swill wrote:
He's right, you know. The Dems had the power to keep that in but theyNo, you can thank a Democratic Judge for
allowing student loan bankruptcies.
didn't.
Dems are also corporate whores. Green Party is not significant
enough to be tempted.
You need to be practical in order to save our democracy.
On 4/29/25 12:40, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <621986683.767624098.043394.recscuba_google-
[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <vuhhma$1fc7n$[email protected]>, bax02I ended up doing that on mine..and found that it wasn?t a simple
[email protected] says...
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vuh7m8$147ng$[email protected]:
In news:vug8bf$78tf$[email protected], BaxterAh, yes, that's where the "creative bookeeping" comes in - the
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still
owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:...
Find one that addressed borrowers who "paid the principle, with
interest, and still owed..."
student made payments for 20 years totalling more than the original
loan, but it was all applied to the interest and not to the
principle -- and after 20 years of payments, the student still owes
more than he borrowed.
===========
Student loan payments were paused in 2020 in response to the
pandemic ? but by 2021, almost two out of every three student loan
borrowers who made voluntary payments during the COVID-19 payment
pause ended up owing a larger balance than they originally did,
according to a report from the National Consumer Law Center and the
Center for Responsible Lending.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/many-student-loan-borrowers-owe-
120118581.html
Maybe he should read the small print next time.
interest loan.
-hh
Did you sign it anyway?
Yes, and in retrospect, it was a relatively cheap lesson learned. I was
able to subsequently revise its term to have a faster payoff schedule without penalties. Had I not done so, I could have paid it off faster
but the penalty was that I would have had to have paid all of the
interest for the original drawn-out term (hence, why it wasn't a simple interest loan) despite the shorter term. In effect, pure profit for the
bank in the form of "prepayment penalties".
To notionally illustrate, take $10K at 8% for 5 years: it's $202.76/mo,
for a total of $12,165.84 ($10K in principle + $2,165.84 in interest).
But because not a simple interest, the cost of an immediate payoff isn't $10K, but is still the same total of $12,165.84
-hh
In news:631108688.767623871.742211.recscuba_google-huntzinger.com@news.eternal-september.org, -
hh <[email protected]> typed:
max headroom <[email protected]> wrote:
...
They've paid more than they borrowed.
But they hadn't actually "paid the principle, with interest," had they?
No, but that's a poor way to look at the question for two reasons.
First is that since it is a debt that is much harder to discharge...
Why is that?
... the interest rate should be vastly lower than what has been charged.
Second is that since the point of these loan programs is an investment in
the future which also benefits society & the economy, it also should be at >> discounted interest rates.
Banks don't exist to benefit society.
On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 13:01:16 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Banks don't exist to benefit society.
Everything exists to benefit society.
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in news:vui1jm$1te0q$[email protected]:
In news:vuhhma$1fc7n$[email protected], BaxterThey've paid more than they borrowed.
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vuh7m8$147ng$[email protected]:
In news:vug8bf$78tf$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still
owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:...
Find one that addressed borrowers who "paid the principle, with
interest, and still owed..."
Ah, yes, that's where the "creative bookeeping" comes in - the
student made payments for 20 years totalling more than the original
loan, but it was all applied to the interest and not to the principle
-- and after 20 years of payments, the student still owes more than
he borrowed....
So they hadn't actually "paid the principle, with interest, and still
owed..."
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill <[email protected]> typed:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 13:01:16 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Banks don't exist to benefit society.
Everything exists to benefit society.
Really? Including rabies, hurricanes, child trafficing, and the Colorado Rockies?
On 5/2/2025 9:09 AM, max headroom wrote:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill
<[email protected]> typed:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 13:01:16 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Banks don't exist to benefit society.
Everything exists to benefit society.
Really? Including rabies, hurricanes, child trafficing, and the Colorado
Rockies?
Fuck off, Your Grace. You know he meant every human-created institution in a liberal democracy like ours - yes, the U.S. *is* a democracy -...
... exist to benefit society: banks, fire departments, libraries, and even the
Colorado Rockies, even if they do a shitty job of it.
On 4/26/2025 7:52 AM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vui1jm$1te0q$[email protected]:
In news:vuhhma$1fc7n$[email protected], BaxterThey've paid more than they borrowed.
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vuh7m8$147ng$[email protected]:
In news:vug8bf$78tf$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still
owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:...
Find one that addressed borrowers who "paid the principle, with
interest, and still owed..."
Ah, yes, that's where the "creative bookeeping" comes in - the
student made payments for 20 years totalling more than the original
loan, but it was all applied to the interest and not to the principle
-- and after 20 years of payments, the student still owes more than
he borrowed....
So they hadn't actually "paid the principle, with interest, and still
owed..."
They haven't paid off the loan according to the terms, Bugster, you
fucking moron. That's the nature of loans made with interest due. Every mortgage holder who has paid off the mortgage has paid more than they borrowed.
If you borrow $100 from a friend and he charges you 10% simple interest calculated monthly, and in exactly one month you repay him $110, you
have paid more than you borrowed. That's how it fucking *works*, Bugster.
What you're pissing and moaning about is that someone has cumulatively
paid more than she borrowed, but now the outstanding balance on the loan exceeds the amount she originally borrowed. That's because she *wasn't fucking paying enough* in each payment to reduce the principal. That's
her fucking fault, Bugster.
This has already been explained to you in the context of credit cards, Bugster. You have a credit card account with a large balance, and the
bank sends you a statement with a minimum payment due amount of $35. But
the interest on the balance for that month was, say, $70. If you make a payment of $35, you're only paying half the interest for the month. The
other $35 is added to your account balance. On your next statement, the minimum payment amount will again be $35, but the interest for the month
will be *more* than $70, because the balance grew. If you keep doing
this month after month, your balance is going to continue to grow, and eventually the sum of your $35 payments will exceed the original
balance. Is there anything "unfair" about this? Absolutely *not*. You
did it to yourself.
That's what happened with that student loan borrower. She wasn't paying enough each month on the loan. It's her own fucking fault, Bugster, you fucking dope.
In news:qgsRP.86317$[email protected], Rudy Canoza, the intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior to oozing scarlet red maxipad (whose mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch) *wrote* (not "typed"):
On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried — and *failed* — to bullshit:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill
<[email protected]> typed:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 13:01:16 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Banks don't exist to benefit society.
Everything exists to benefit society.
Really? Including rabies, hurricanes, child trafficing [sic], and the Colorado
Rockies?
Fuck off, o oozing scarlet red maxipad (whose mouth waters at the thought of his
mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch). You know he meant every human-created >> institution in a liberal democracy like ours — yes, the U.S. *is* a democracy —
exist to benefit society: banks, fire departments, libraries, and even the >> Colorado Rockies, even if they do a shitty job of it.
It's better than that-- it's
... exist to benefit society: banks, fire departments, libraries, and even the
Colorado Rockies, even if they do a shitty job of it.
Including
On 4/26/2025 7:52 AM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vui1jm$1te0q$[email protected]:
In news:vuhhma$1fc7n$[email protected], BaxterThey've paid more than they borrowed.
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vuh7m8$147ng$[email protected]:
In news:vug8bf$78tf$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still
owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:...
Find one that addressed borrowers who "paid the principle, with
interest, and still owed..."
Ah, yes, that's where the "creative bookeeping" comes in - the
student made payments for 20 years totalling more than the original
loan, but it was all applied to the interest and not to the
principle -- and after 20 years of payments, the student still owes
more than he borrowed....
So they hadn't actually "paid the principle, with interest, and
still owed..."
They haven't paid off the loan according to the terms, Bugster, you
fucking moron.
On every date, Max the Magnificent typed:antifa, Bloods, Crips, &c., &c.?
In news:qgsRP.86317$[email protected], "Cunt Flaps"Canoza typed:
On every date, Max the Magnificent typed:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill
<[email protected]> typed:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 13:01:16 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Banks don't exist to benefit society.
Everything exists to benefit society.
Really? Including rabies, hurricanes, child trafficing [sic], and the
Colorado Rockies?
Fuck off, Your Grace. You know he meant every human-created
institution in a liberal democracy like ours - yes, the U.S. *is* a
democracy -
It's better than that-- it's a republic.
It's a democracy, Master, as all educated people understand the word.
... exist to benefit society: banks, fire departments, libraries, and even >>> the Colorado Rockies, even if they do a shitty job of it.
Including La Cosa Nostra, Yakuza, MS13, triads, Tren de Aragua, Red Brigades,
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:ygsRP.86318$[email protected]:
On 4/26/2025 7:52 AM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vui1jm$1te0q$[email protected]:
In news:vuhhma$1fc7n$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vuh7m8$147ng$[email protected]:
In news:vug8bf$78tf$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still
owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:...
Find one that addressed borrowers who "paid the principle, with
interest, and still owed..."
Ah, yes, that's where the "creative bookeeping" comes in - the
student made payments for 20 years totalling more than the original
loan, but it was all applied to the interest and not to the
principle -- and after 20 years of payments, the student still owes
more than he borrowed....
So they hadn't actually "paid the principle, with interest, and
still owed..."
They've paid more than they borrowed.
They haven't paid off the loan according to the terms, Bugster, you
fucking moron.
Because that's the way the terms are written - written so they can NEVER
pay them off.
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:ygsRP.86318$[email protected]:
On 4/26/2025 7:52 AM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vui1jm$1te0q$[email protected]:
In news:vuhhma$1fc7n$[email protected], BaxterThey've paid more than they borrowed.
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vuh7m8$147ng$[email protected]:
In news:vug8bf$78tf$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still
owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:...
Find one that addressed borrowers who "paid the principle, with
interest, and still owed..."
Ah, yes, that's where the "creative bookeeping" comes in - the
student made payments for 20 years totalling more than the original
loan, but it was all applied to the interest and not to the
principle -- and after 20 years of payments, the student still owes
more than he borrowed....
So they hadn't actually "paid the principle, with interest, and
still owed..."
They haven't paid off the loan according to the terms, Bugster, you
fucking moron.
Because that's the way the terms are written - written so they can NEVER
pay them off.
Every mortgage holder who has paid off the mortgage has paid more than they borrowed.
If you borrow $100 from a friend and he charges you 10% simple interest
calculated monthly, and in exactly one month you repay him $110, you have paid
more than you borrowed. That's how it fucking *works*, Bugster.
What you're pissing and moaning about is that someone has cumulatively paid more
than she borrowed, but now the outstanding balance on the loan exceeds the >> amount she originally borrowed. That's because she *wasn't fucking paying
enough* in each payment to reduce the principal. That's her fucking fault, Bugster.
This has already been explained to you in the context of credit cards, Bugster.
You have a credit card account with a large balance, and the bank sends you a
statement with a minimum payment due amount of $35. But the interest on the >> balance for that month was, say, $70. If you make a payment of $35, you're only
paying half the interest for the month. The other $35 is added to your account
balance. On your next statement, the minimum payment amount will again be $35,
but the interest for the month will be *more* than $70, because the balance >> grew. If you keep doing this month after month, your balance is going to
continue to grow, and eventually the sum of your $35 payments will exceed the
original balance. Is there anything "unfair" about this? Absolutely *not*. You
did it to yourself.
That's what happened with that student loan borrower. She wasn't paying enough
each month on the loan. It's her own fucking fault, Bugster, you fucking dope.
In news:vv65n5$g76i$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:ygsRP.86318$[email protected]:
On 4/26/2025 7:52 AM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vui1jm$1te0q$[email protected]:
In news:vuhhma$1fc7n$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vuh7m8$147ng$[email protected]:
In news:vug8bf$78tf$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still >>>>>>>>>>> owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:...
Find one that addressed borrowers who "paid the principle, with
interest, and still owed..."
Ah, yes, that's where the "creative bookeeping" comes in - the
student made payments for 20 years totalling more than the
original loan, but it was all applied to the interest and not to
the principle -- and after 20 years of payments, the student
still owes more than he borrowed....
So they hadn't actually "paid the principle, with interest, and
still owed..."
They've paid more than they borrowed.
They haven't paid off the loan according to the terms, Bugster, you
fucking moron.
Because that's the way the terms are written - written so they can
NEVER pay them off.
My daughter did.
On 5/3/2025 3:35 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:ygsRP.86318$[email protected]:
On 4/26/2025 7:52 AM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vui1jm$1te0q$[email protected]:
In news:vuhhma$1fc7n$[email protected], BaxterThey've paid more than they borrowed.
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vuh7m8$147ng$[email protected]:
In news:vug8bf$78tf$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still >>>>>>>>>>> owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:...
Find one that addressed borrowers who "paid the principle, with
interest, and still owed..."
Ah, yes, that's where the "creative bookeeping" comes in - the
student made payments for 20 years totalling more than the
original loan, but it was all applied to the interest and not to
the principle -- and after 20 years of payments, the student
still owes more than he borrowed....
So they hadn't actually "paid the principle, with interest, and
still owed..."
They haven't paid off the loan according to the terms, Bugster, you
fucking moron.
Because that's the way the terms are written - written so they can
NEVER pay them off.
No, that's bullshit, Bugster. It's no different than a mortgage,
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in news:vv6iqn$10ghb$[email protected]:
In news:vv65n5$g76i$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:ygsRP.86318$[email protected]:
On 4/26/2025 7:52 AM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vui1jm$1te0q$[email protected]:
In news:vuhhma$1fc7n$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vuh7m8$147ng$[email protected]:
In news:vug8bf$78tf$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still >>>>>>>>>>>> owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:...
Find one that addressed borrowers who "paid the principle, with >>>>>>>> interest, and still owed..."
Ah, yes, that's where the "creative bookeeping" comes in - the
student made payments for 20 years totalling more than the
original loan, but it was all applied to the interest and not to >>>>>>> the principle -- and after 20 years of payments, the student
still owes more than he borrowed....
So they hadn't actually "paid the principle, with interest, and
still owed..."
They've paid more than they borrowed.
They haven't paid off the loan according to the terms, Bugster, you
fucking moron.
Because that's the way the terms are written - written so they can
NEVER pay them off.
My daughter did.
And when was that?...
... Those student loans started out fairly reasonable, and then many evolved into scams - depending on the resorces/advice and sophistication/education of the borrower.
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:SJARP.87832$[email protected]:
On 5/3/2025 3:35 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:ygsRP.86318$[email protected]:
On 4/26/2025 7:52 AM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vui1jm$1te0q$[email protected]:
In news:vuhhma$1fc7n$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vuh7m8$147ng$[email protected]:
In news:vug8bf$78tf$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle [sic]
with interest, and still owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:...
Find one that addressed borrowers who "paid the principle, with >>>>>>>> interest, and still owed..."
Ah, yes, that's where the "creative bookeeping" comes in - the
student made payments for 20 years totalling more than the
original loan,
but it was all applied to the interest and not to
the principle -- and after 20 years of payments, the student
still owes more than he borrowed....
They've paid more than they borrowed.
So they hadn't actually "paid the principle, with interest, and
still owed..."
They haven't paid off the loan according to the terms, Bugster, you
fucking moron.
Because that's the way the terms are written - written so they can
NEVER pay them off.
No, that's bullshit, Bugster. It's no different than a mortgage,
You mean like
PORTLAND, Oregon — Millions of people who've fallen behind on student
loan payments must now start repaying them or face a debt collector.
In news:_jwRP.53714$[email protected], Rudy Canoza, the intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior to oozing scarlet red maxipad (whose mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch) *wrote* (not "typed"):
not "typed"):On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried — and *failed* — to bullshit:
In news:qgsRP.86317$[email protected], Rudy Canoza, the intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior to oozing scarlet red maxipad (whose mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch) *wrote* (
On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried — and *failed* — to bullshit:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill
<[email protected]> typed:
On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried — and *failed* — to bullshit:
Banks don't exist to benefit society.
Everything exists to benefit society.
Really? Including rabies, hurricanes, child trafficing [sic], and the >>>>> Colorado Rockies?
Fuck off, Your Grace. You know he meant every human-created
institution in a liberal democracy like ours - yes, the U.S. *is* a
democracy -
It's better than that-- it's a republic.
It's a democracy, o oozing scarlet red maxipad (whose mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch), as all educated people understand the word.
... exist to benefit society: banks, fire departments, libraries, and even >>>> the Colorado Rockies, even if they do a shitty job of it.
Including
Question to Google AI: "What would the total of payments for a
$300,000 30 year mortgage at 5% interest be?"
Google AI answer: "For a $300,000 mortgage with a 30-year term and a
5% interest rate, the total amount paid would be approximately
$610,228.39, including both principal and interest. This translates to
a monthly payment of $1,570.08 and a total of 360 payments over 30
years."
This is *fucking normal*, Bugster, you filthy *broke* cheap commie cocksucker.
In news:vv6mnu$138d4$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vv6iqn$10ghb$[email protected]:
In news:vv65n5$g76i$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:ygsRP.86318$[email protected]:
On 4/26/2025 7:52 AM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vui1jm$1te0q$[email protected]:
In news:vuhhma$1fc7n$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vuh7m8$147ng$[email protected]:
In news:vug8bf$78tf$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still >>>>>>>>>>>>> owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:...
Find one that addressed borrowers who "paid the principle,
with interest, and still owed..."
Ah, yes, that's where the "creative bookeeping" comes in - the >>>>>>>> student made payments for 20 years totalling more than the
original loan, but it was all applied to the interest and not
to the principle -- and after 20 years of payments, the student >>>>>>>> still owes more than he borrowed....
So they hadn't actually "paid the principle, with interest, and
still owed..."
They've paid more than they borrowed.
They haven't paid off the loan according to the terms, Bugster,
you fucking moron.
Because that's the way the terms are written - written so they can
NEVER pay them off.
My daughter did.
And when was that?...
Maybe ten years ago.
... Those student loans started out fairly reasonable, and then many
evolved into scams - depending on the resorces/advice and
sophistication/education of the borrower.
That's because they're mostly public school kids.
On 4/23/2025 12:54 PM, H Karlsen wrote:
PORTLAND, Oregon — Millions of people who've fallen behind on
student loan payments must now start repaying them or face a debt
collector.
It's their own fucking fault. They borrowed huge sums of money without
giving enough thought to how they were going to repay it.
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:n3QRP.2330$[email protected]:
Question to Google AI: "What would the total of payments for a
$300,000 30 year mortgage at 5% interest be?"
Google AI answer: "For a $300,000 mortgage with a 30-year term and a
5% interest rate, the total amount paid would be approximately
$610,228.39, including both principal and interest. This translates to
a monthly payment of $1,570.08 and a total of 360 payments over 30
years."
This is *fucking normal*, Bugster, you filthy *broke* cheap commie
cocksucker.
And how did those subprime loans work?
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in news:vv6iqn$10ghb$[email protected]:Virtually *all* student loans since 2010 have been made by the federal government (Federal Student Aid office of Dept. of Education). That program came
In news:vv65n5$g76i$[email protected], BaxterAnd when was that? Those student loans started out fairly reasonable,
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:ygsRP.86318$[email protected]:
On 4/26/2025 7:52 AM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vui1jm$1te0q$[email protected]:
In news:vuhhma$1fc7n$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vuh7m8$147ng$[email protected]:
In news:vug8bf$78tf$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still >>>>>>>>>>>> owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:...
Find one that addressed borrowers who "paid the principle, with >>>>>>>> interest, and still owed..."
Ah, yes, that's where the "creative bookeeping" comes in - the
student made payments for 20 years totalling more than the
original loan, but it was all applied to the interest and not to >>>>>>> the principle -- and after 20 years of payments, the student
still owes more than he borrowed....
So they hadn't actually "paid the principle, with interest, and
still owed..."
They've paid more than they borrowed.
They haven't paid off the loan according to the terms, Bugster, you
fucking moron.
Because that's the way the terms are written - written so they can
NEVER pay them off.
My daughter did.
and then many evolved into scams - depending on the resorces/advice and sophistication/education of the borrower.
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:v3QRP.2331$[email protected]:
On 4/23/2025 12:54 PM, H Karlsen wrote:
PORTLAND, Oregon — Millions of people who've fallen behind on
student loan payments must now start repaying them or face a debt
collector.
It's their own fucking fault. They borrowed huge sums of money without
giving enough thought to how they were going to repay it.
Conservaturds love to blame the victim
never mind those predatory loan sharks
knew up front that the borrowers didn'tGetting a university degree was supposed to *provide them* with the means to pay
have a credit history nor the means to actually pay it back.
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:v3QRP.2331$[email protected]:
On 4/23/2025 12:54 PM, H Karlsen wrote:
PORTLAND, Oregon — Millions of people who've fallen behind on
student loan payments must now start repaying them or face a debt
collector.
It's their own fucking fault. They borrowed huge sums of money without
giving enough thought to how they were going to repay it.
Conservaturds love to blame the victim - never mind those predatory loan sharks knew up front that the borrowers didn't have a credit history nor
the means to actually pay it back.
On every date, Max the Magnificent typed:
In news:_jwRP.53714$[email protected], "Cunt Flaps"Canoza typed:
On every date, Max the Magnificent typed:
In news:qgsRP.86317$[email protected], "Cunt Flaps"Canoza typed:
On every date, Max the Magnificent typed:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill >>>>>> <[email protected]> typed:
On every date, Max the Magnificent typed:
Banks don't exist to benefit society.
They do.
Everything exists to benefit society.
Really? Including rabies, hurricanes, child trafficing [sic], and the >>>>>> Colorado Rockies?
Fuck off, Your Grace. You know he meant every human-created
institution in a liberal democracy like ours - yes, the U.S. *is* a
democracy -
It's better than that-- it's a republic.
It's a democracy, Master, as all educated people understand the word.
... exist to benefit society: banks, fire departments, libraries, and even
the Colorado Rockies, even if they do a shitty job of it.
Including La Cosa Nostra, Yakuza, MS13, triads, Tren de Aragua, Red
Brigades, antifa, Bloods, Crips, &c., &c.?
On 5/4/2025 1:34 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:n3QRP.2330$[email protected]:
Question to Google AI: "What would the total of payments for a
$300,000 30 year mortgage at 5% interest be?"
Google AI answer: "For a $300,000 mortgage with a 30-year term and a
5% interest rate, the total amount paid would be approximately
$610,228.39, including both principal and interest. This translates
to a monthly payment of $1,570.08 and a total of 360 payments over
30 years."
This is *fucking normal*, Bugster, you filthy *broke* cheap commie
cocksucker.
And how did those subprime loans work?
You don't have any fucking clue what a "subprime loan" is, Bugster, so
you *wouldn't* have any fucking clue how they worked. I would explain
it to you, but being a sleazy dishonest lying commie shitbag, you
would just snip the explanation and change the topic. So you can fuck
off on that.
The simple fact is, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag, it is
*normal* for the sum of total payments made on a long-term loan to be *double* the amount of the original loan. That's how interest *fucking works*, you stupid lying commie shitbag. If you don't like it, then
don't take out the loan.
On 5/3/2025 8:25 PM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote inVirtually *all* student loans since 2010 have been made by the federal government (Federal Student Aid office of Dept. of Education). That
news:vv6iqn$10ghb$[email protected]:
In news:vv65n5$g76i$[email protected], BaxterAnd when was that? Those student loans started out fairly
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:ygsRP.86318$[email protected]:
On 4/26/2025 7:52 AM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vui1jm$1te0q$[email protected]:
In news:vuhhma$1fc7n$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vuh7m8$147ng$[email protected]:
In news:vug8bf$78tf$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still >>>>>>>>>>>>> owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:...
Find one that addressed borrowers who "paid the principle,
with interest, and still owed..."
Ah, yes, that's where the "creative bookeeping" comes in - the >>>>>>>> student made payments for 20 years totalling more than the
original loan, but it was all applied to the interest and not
to the principle -- and after 20 years of payments, the student >>>>>>>> still owes more than he borrowed....
So they hadn't actually "paid the principle, with interest, and
still owed..."
They've paid more than they borrowed.
They haven't paid off the loan according to the terms, Bugster,
you fucking moron.
Because that's the way the terms are written - written so they can
NEVER pay them off.
My daughter did.
reasonable, and then many evolved into scams - depending on the
resorces/advice and sophistication/education of the borrower.
program came into being as part of the Affordable Care Act, the
signature achievement of the Obama administration. Are you saying
Obama set out to swindle student borrowers with deceptive scam loans, Bugster?
Whose responsibility is it to understand the terms of a loan before
accepting it, Bugster? God-fucking-damn it, Bugster, you are just too
stupid for words.
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:PERRP.3130$[email protected]:
On 5/3/2025 8:25 PM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote inVirtually *all* student loans since 2010 have been made by the federal
news:vv6iqn$10ghb$[email protected]:
In news:vv65n5$g76i$[email protected], BaxterAnd when was that? Those student loans started out fairly
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:ygsRP.86318$[email protected]:
On 4/26/2025 7:52 AM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vui1jm$1te0q$[email protected]:
In news:vuhhma$1fc7n$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vuh7m8$147ng$[email protected]:
In news:vug8bf$78tf$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still >>>>>>>>>>>>>> owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:...
Find one that addressed borrowers who "paid the principle, >>>>>>>>>> with interest, and still owed..."
Ah, yes, that's where the "creative bookeeping" comes in - the >>>>>>>>> student made payments for 20 years totalling more than the
original loan, but it was all applied to the interest and not >>>>>>>>> to the principle -- and after 20 years of payments, the student >>>>>>>>> still owes more than he borrowed....
So they hadn't actually "paid the principle, with interest, and >>>>>>>> still owed..."
They've paid more than they borrowed.
They haven't paid off the loan according to the terms, Bugster,
you fucking moron.
Because that's the way the terms are written - written so they can
NEVER pay them off.
My daughter did.
reasonable, and then many evolved into scams - depending on the
resorces/advice and sophistication/education of the borrower.
government (Federal Student Aid office of Dept. of Education). That
program came into being as part of the Affordable Care Act, the
signature achievement of the Obama administration. Are you saying
Obama set out to swindle student borrowers with deceptive scam loans,
Bugster?
Whose responsibility is it to understand the terms of a loan before
accepting it, Bugster? God-fucking-damn it, Bugster, you are just too
stupid for words.
If it's a government loan, then it's no big deal for the government to forgive that loan.
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:sBRRP.125269$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 1:34 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:n3QRP.2330$[email protected]:
Question to Google AI: "What would the total of payments for a
$300,000 30 year mortgage at 5% interest be?"
Google AI answer: "For a $300,000 mortgage with a 30-year term and a
5% interest rate, the total amount paid would be approximately
$610,228.39, including both principal and interest. This translates
to a monthly payment of $1,570.08 and a total of 360 payments over
30 years."
This is *fucking normal*, Bugster, you filthy *broke* cheap commie
cocksucker.
And how did those subprime loans work?
You don't have any fucking clue what a "subprime loan" is, Bugster, so
you *wouldn't* have any fucking clue how they worked. I would explain
it to you, but being a sleazy dishonest lying commie shitbag, you
would just snip the explanation and change the topic. So you can fuck
off on that.
The simple fact is, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag, it is
*normal* for the sum of total payments made on a long-term loan to be
*double* the amount of the original loan. That's how interest *fucking
works*, you stupid lying commie shitbag. If you don't like it, then
don't take out the loan.
And with that Lou Bricano runs away.
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in news:vv87fl$2epmg$[email protected]:
In news:vv6mnu$138d4$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vv6iqn$10ghb$[email protected]:
In news:vv65n5$g76i$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:ygsRP.86318$[email protected]:
On 4/26/2025 7:52 AM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vui1jm$1te0q$[email protected]:
In news:vuhhma$1fc7n$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vuh7m8$147ng$[email protected]:
In news:vug8bf$78tf$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still >>>>>>>>>>>>>> owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:...
Find one that addressed borrowers who "paid the principle, >>>>>>>>>> with interest, and still owed..."
Ah, yes, that's where the "creative bookeeping" comes in - the >>>>>>>>> student made payments for 20 years totalling more than the
original loan, but it was all applied to the interest and not >>>>>>>>> to the principle -- and after 20 years of payments, the student >>>>>>>>> still owes more than he borrowed....
So they hadn't actually "paid the principle, with interest, and >>>>>>>> still owed..."
They've paid more than they borrowed.
They haven't paid off the loan according to the terms, Bugster,
you fucking moron.
Because that's the way the terms are written - written so they can
NEVER pay them off.
My daughter did.
And when was that?...
Maybe ten years ago.
... Those student loans started out fairly reasonable, and then many
evolved into scams - depending on the resorces/advice and
sophistication/education of the borrower.
That's because they're mostly public school kids.
Conservaturds hate public schools, and have been trying for decades to
turn them into propaganda mills...
...instead of teaching critical thinking and useful skills and knowledge.
On 5/4/2025 5:30 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:PERRP.3130$[email protected]:
On 5/3/2025 8:25 PM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote inVirtually *all* student loans since 2010 have been made by the
news:vv6iqn$10ghb$[email protected]:
In news:vv65n5$g76i$[email protected], BaxterAnd when was that? Those student loans started out fairly
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:ygsRP.86318$[email protected]:
On 4/26/2025 7:52 AM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vui1jm$1te0q$[email protected]:
In news:vuhhma$1fc7n$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vuh7m8$147ng$[email protected]:
In news:vug8bf$78tf$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:...
Find one that addressed borrowers who "paid the principle, >>>>>>>>>>> with interest, and still owed..."
Ah, yes, that's where the "creative bookeeping" comes in - >>>>>>>>>> the student made payments for 20 years totalling more than >>>>>>>>>> the original loan, but it was all applied to the interest and >>>>>>>>>> not to the principle -- and after 20 years of payments, the >>>>>>>>>> student still owes more than he borrowed....
So they hadn't actually "paid the principle, with interest,
and still owed..."
They've paid more than they borrowed.
They haven't paid off the loan according to the terms, Bugster,
you fucking moron.
Because that's the way the terms are written - written so they
can NEVER pay them off.
My daughter did.
reasonable, and then many evolved into scams - depending on the
resorces/advice and sophistication/education of the borrower.
federal government (Federal Student Aid office of Dept. of
Education). That program came into being as part of the Affordable
Care Act, the signature achievement of the Obama administration. Are
you saying Obama set out to swindle student borrowers with deceptive
scam loans, Bugster?
Whose responsibility is it to understand the terms of a loan before
accepting it, Bugster? God-fucking-damn it, Bugster, you are just
too stupid for words.
If it's a government loan, then it's no big deal for the government
to forgive that loan.
*Wrong*, Bugster. It's not the government's money, Bugster, you stupid
lying commie shitbag. It's the taxpayers' money.
On 5/4/2025 5:16 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:sBRRP.125269$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 1:34 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:n3QRP.2330$[email protected]:
Question to Google AI: "What would the total of payments for a
$300,000 30 year mortgage at 5% interest be?"
Google AI answer: "For a $300,000 mortgage with a 30-year term and
a 5% interest rate, the total amount paid would be approximately
$610,228.39, including both principal and interest. This
translates to a monthly payment of $1,570.08 and a total of 360
payments over 30 years."
This is *fucking normal*, Bugster, you filthy *broke* cheap commie
cocksucker.
And how did those subprime loans work?
You don't have any fucking clue what a "subprime loan" is, Bugster,
so you *wouldn't* have any fucking clue how they worked. I would
explain it to you, but being a sleazy dishonest lying commie
shitbag, you would just snip the explanation and change the topic.
So you can fuck off on that.
The simple fact is, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag, it is
*normal* for the sum of total payments made on a long-term loan to
be *double* the amount of the original loan. That's how interest
*fucking works*, you stupid lying commie shitbag. If you don't like
it, then don't take out the loan.
And with that Lou Bricano runs away.
No, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag, I haven't run away, but
we know you're about to. You're just too fucking stupid and
hyper-emotional to understand how interest works, Bugster, you stupid
lying commie shitbag. You think there's something wrong or "unfair"
with a person paying back more than double the amount originally
borrowed, and there just isn't — you're just fucking wrong.
The student borrowers were not "scammed" or in any way taken advantage
of, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag. If they didn't
understand the terms of the loans, or if they borrowed tens of
thousands to obtain degrees that were not going to lead to high-paying
jobs, that is *wholly* on them.
You want college education to be "free," Bugster, you stupid lying
commie shitbag, and it just isn't and is never going to be. But a
stupid lying commie shitbag like you will *never* have a grasp on the
real world.
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:v3QRP.2331$[email protected]:
On 4/23/2025 12:54 PM, H Karlsen wrote:
PORTLAND, Oregon �? Millions of people who've fallen behind on
student loan payments must now start repaying them or face a debt
collector.
It's their own fucking fault. They borrowed huge sums of money without giving enough thought to how they were going to repay it.
Conservaturds love to blame the victim - never mind those predatory loan sharks knew up front that the borrowers didn't have a credit history nor
the means to actually pay it back.
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in news:vv87fl$2epmg$[email protected]:
In news:vv6mnu$138d4$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vv6iqn$10ghb$[email protected]:
In news:vv65n5$g76i$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:ygsRP.86318$[email protected]:
On 4/26/2025 7:52 AM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vui1jm$1te0q$[email protected]:
In news:vuhhma$1fc7n$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vuh7m8$147ng$[email protected]:
In news:vug8bf$78tf$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still >>>>>>>>>>>>> owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:...
Find one that addressed borrowers who "paid the principle, >>>>>>>>> with interest, and still owed..."
Ah, yes, that's where the "creative bookeeping" comes in - the >>>>>>>> student made payments for 20 years totalling more than the
original loan, but it was all applied to the interest and not >>>>>>>> to the principle -- and after 20 years of payments, the student >>>>>>>> still owes more than he borrowed....
So they hadn't actually "paid the principle, with interest, and >>>>>>> still owed..."
They've paid more than they borrowed.
They haven't paid off the loan according to the terms, Bugster,
you fucking moron.
Because that's the way the terms are written - written so they can
NEVER pay them off.
My daughter did.
And when was that?...
Maybe ten years ago.
... Those student loans started out fairly reasonable, and then many
evolved into scams - depending on the resorces/advice and
sophistication/education of the borrower.
That's because they're mostly public school kids.
Conservaturds hate public schools, and have been trying for decades to
turn them into propaganda mills instead of teaching critical thinking and useful skills and knowledge.
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:PERRP.3130$[email protected]:
On 5/3/2025 8:25 PM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote inVirtually *all* student loans since 2010 have been made by the federal government (Federal Student Aid office of Dept. of Education). That
news:vv6iqn$10ghb$[email protected]:
In news:vv65n5$g76i$[email protected], BaxterAnd when was that? Those student loans started out fairly
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:ygsRP.86318$[email protected]:
On 4/26/2025 7:52 AM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vui1jm$1te0q$[email protected]:
In news:vuhhma$1fc7n$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vuh7m8$147ng$[email protected]:
In news:vug8bf$78tf$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still >>>>>>>>>>>>> owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:...
Find one that addressed borrowers who "paid the principle, >>>>>>>>> with interest, and still owed..."
Ah, yes, that's where the "creative bookeeping" comes in - the >>>>>>>> student made payments for 20 years totalling more than the
original loan, but it was all applied to the interest and not >>>>>>>> to the principle -- and after 20 years of payments, the student >>>>>>>> still owes more than he borrowed....
So they hadn't actually "paid the principle, with interest, and >>>>>>> still owed..."
They've paid more than they borrowed.
They haven't paid off the loan according to the terms, Bugster,
you fucking moron.
Because that's the way the terms are written - written so they can
NEVER pay them off.
My daughter did.
reasonable, and then many evolved into scams - depending on the
resorces/advice and sophistication/education of the borrower.
program came into being as part of the Affordable Care Act, the
signature achievement of the Obama administration. Are you saying
Obama set out to swindle student borrowers with deceptive scam loans, Bugster?
Whose responsibility is it to understand the terms of a loan before accepting it, Bugster? God-fucking-damn it, Bugster, you are just too stupid for words.
If it's a government loan, then it's no big deal for the government to forgive that loan. Government is supposed to support education anyway.
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:%XTRP.4444$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 5:16 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:sBRRP.125269$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 1:34 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:n3QRP.2330$[email protected]:
Question to Google AI: "What would the total of payments for a
$300,000 30 year mortgage at 5% interest be?"
Google AI answer: "For a $300,000 mortgage with a 30-year term and >>>>> a 5% interest rate, the total amount paid would be approximately
$610,228.39, including both principal and interest. This
translates to a monthly payment of $1,570.08 and a total of 360
payments over 30 years."
This is *fucking normal*, Bugster, you filthy *broke* cheap commie >>>>> cocksucker.
And how did those subprime loans work?
You don't have any fucking clue what a "subprime loan" is, Bugster,
so you *wouldn't* have any fucking clue how they worked. I would
explain it to you, but being a sleazy dishonest lying commie
shitbag, you would just snip the explanation and change the topic.
So you can fuck off on that.
The simple fact is, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag, it is
*normal* for the sum of total payments made on a long-term loan to
be *double* the amount of the original loan. That's how interest
*fucking works*, you stupid lying commie shitbag. If you don't like
it, then don't take out the loan.
And with that Lou Bricano runs away.
No, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag, I haven't run away, but
we know you're about to. You're just too fucking stupid and
hyper-emotional to understand how interest works, Bugster, you stupid
lying commie shitbag. You think there's something wrong or "unfair"
with a person paying back more than double the amount originally
borrowed, and there just isn't �? you're just fucking wrong.
The student borrowers were not "scammed" or in any way taken advantage
of, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag. If they didn't
understand the terms of the loans, or if they borrowed tens of
thousands to obtain degrees that were not going to lead to high-paying jobs, that is *wholly* on them.
You want college education to be "free," Bugster, you stupid lying
commie shitbag, and it just isn't and is never going to be. But a
stupid lying commie shitbag like you will *never* have a grasp on the
real world.
Those student loans were a gamble - made to kids without any credit
history, and no guarantees of employment. "Lou Bricano" would argue that
a gambler is entitled to win at the casino. Those student loans were a
gamble
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:NWTRP.4443$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 5:30 PM, Baxter wrote:No, dickwad, once it's in government hands, it's no longer your money.
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:PERRP.3130$[email protected]:
On 5/3/2025 8:25 PM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote inVirtually *all* student loans since 2010 have been made by the
news:vv6iqn$10ghb$[email protected]:
In news:vv65n5$g76i$[email protected], BaxterAnd when was that? Those student loans started out fairly
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:ygsRP.86318$[email protected]:
On 4/26/2025 7:52 AM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vui1jm$1te0q$[email protected]:
In news:vuhhma$1fc7n$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vuh7m8$147ng$[email protected]:
In news:vug8bf$78tf$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom" >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:...
Find one that addressed borrowers who "paid the principle, >>>>>>>>>>>> with interest, and still owed..."
Ah, yes, that's where the "creative bookeeping" comes in - >>>>>>>>>>> the student made payments for 20 years totalling more than >>>>>>>>>>> the original loan, but it was all applied to the interest and >>>>>>>>>>> not to the principle -- and after 20 years of payments, the >>>>>>>>>>> student still owes more than he borrowed....
So they hadn't actually "paid the principle, with interest, >>>>>>>>>> and still owed..."
They've paid more than they borrowed.
They haven't paid off the loan according to the terms, Bugster, >>>>>>>> you fucking moron.
Because that's the way the terms are written - written so they
can NEVER pay them off.
My daughter did.
reasonable, and then many evolved into scams - depending on the
resorces/advice and sophistication/education of the borrower.
federal government (Federal Student Aid office of Dept. of
Education). That program came into being as part of the Affordable
Care Act, the signature achievement of the Obama administration. Are
you saying Obama set out to swindle student borrowers with deceptive
scam loans, Bugster?
Whose responsibility is it to understand the terms of a loan before
accepting it, Bugster? God-fucking-damn it, Bugster, you are just
too stupid for words.
If it's a government loan, then it's no big deal for the government
to forgive that loan.
*Wrong*, Bugster. It's not the government's money, Bugster, you stupid
lying commie shitbag. It's the taxpayers' money.
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:%XTRP.4444$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 5:16 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:sBRRP.125269$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 1:34 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:n3QRP.2330$[email protected]:
Question to Google AI: "What would the total of payments for a
$300,000 30 year mortgage at 5% interest be?"
Google AI answer: "For a $300,000 mortgage with a 30-year term and >>>>>> a 5% interest rate, the total amount paid would be approximately
$610,228.39, including both principal and interest. This
translates to a monthly payment of $1,570.08 and a total of 360
payments over 30 years."
This is *fucking normal*, Bugster, you filthy *broke* cheap commie >>>>>> cocksucker.
And how did those subprime loans work?
You don't have any fucking clue what a "subprime loan" is, Bugster,
so you *wouldn't* have any fucking clue how they worked. I would
explain it to you, but being a sleazy dishonest lying commie
shitbag, you would just snip the explanation and change the topic.
So you can fuck off on that.
The simple fact is, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag, it is
*normal* for the sum of total payments made on a long-term loan to
be *double* the amount of the original loan. That's how interest
*fucking works*, you stupid lying commie shitbag. If you don't like
it, then don't take out the loan.
And with that Lou Bricano runs away.
No, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag, I haven't run away, but
we know you're about to. You're just too fucking stupid and
hyper-emotional to understand how interest works, Bugster, you stupid
lying commie shitbag. You think there's something wrong or "unfair"
with a person paying back more than double the amount originally
borrowed, and there just isn't — you're just fucking wrong.
The student borrowers were not "scammed" or in any way taken advantage
of, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag. If they didn't
understand the terms of the loans, or if they borrowed tens of
thousands to obtain degrees that were not going to lead to high-paying
jobs, that is *wholly* on them.
You want college education to be "free," Bugster, you stupid lying
commie shitbag, and it just isn't and is never going to be. But a
stupid lying commie shitbag like you will *never* have a grasp on the
real world.
Those student loans were a gamble
In article <vv8isb$2otog$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vv87fl$2epmg$[email protected]:
In news:vv6mnu$138d4$[email protected], BaxterConservaturds hate public schools, and have been trying for decades
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vv6iqn$10ghb$[email protected]:
In news:vv65n5$g76i$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:ygsRP.86318$[email protected]:
On 4/26/2025 7:52 AM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vui1jm$1te0q$[email protected]:
In news:vuhhma$1fc7n$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vuh7m8$147ng$[email protected]:
In news:vug8bf$78tf$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and
still owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:...
Find one that addressed borrowers who "paid the principle,
with interest, and still owed..."
Ah, yes, that's where the "creative bookeeping" comes in -
the student made payments for 20 years totalling more than
the original loan, but it was all applied to the interest
and not to the principle -- and after 20 years of payments,
the student still owes more than he borrowed....
So they hadn't actually "paid the principle, with interest,
and still owed..."
They've paid more than they borrowed.
They haven't paid off the loan according to the terms, Bugster,
you fucking moron.
Because that's the way the terms are written - written so they
can NEVER pay them off.
My daughter did.
And when was that?...
Maybe ten years ago.
... Those student loans started out fairly reasonable, and then
many evolved into scams - depending on the resorces/advice and
sophistication/education of the borrower.
That's because they're mostly public school kids.
to turn them into propaganda mills instead of teaching critical
thinking and useful skills and knowledge.
Like tranny story time?
In article <vv9bmr$3j1fm$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:%XTRP.4444$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 5:16 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:sBRRP.125269$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 1:34 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:n3QRP.2330$[email protected]:
Question to Google AI: "What would the total of payments for a
$300,000 30 year mortgage at 5% interest be?"
Google AI answer: "For a $300,000 mortgage with a 30-year term
and a 5% interest rate, the total amount paid would be
approximately $610,228.39, including both principal and
interest. This translates to a monthly payment of $1,570.08 and
a total of 360 payments over 30 years."
This is *fucking normal*, Bugster, you filthy *broke* cheap
commie cocksucker.
And how did those subprime loans work?
You don't have any fucking clue what a "subprime loan" is,
Bugster, so you *wouldn't* have any fucking clue how they worked.
I would explain it to you, but being a sleazy dishonest lying
commie shitbag, you would just snip the explanation and change
the topic. So you can fuck off on that.
The simple fact is, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag, it
is *normal* for the sum of total payments made on a long-term
loan to be *double* the amount of the original loan. That's how
interest *fucking works*, you stupid lying commie shitbag. If you
don't like it, then don't take out the loan.
And with that Lou Bricano runs away.
No, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag, I haven't run away,
but we know you're about to. You're just too fucking stupid and
hyper-emotional to understand how interest works, Bugster, you
stupid lying commie shitbag. You think there's something wrong or
"unfair" with a person paying back more than double the amount
originally borrowed, and there just isn't �? you're just fucking
wrong.
The student borrowers were not "scammed" or in any way taken
advantage of, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag. If they
didn't understand the terms of the loans, or if they borrowed tens
of thousands to obtain degrees that were not going to lead to
high-paying jobs, that is *wholly* on them.
You want college education to be "free," Bugster, you stupid lying
commie shitbag, and it just isn't and is never going to be. But a
stupid lying commie shitbag like you will *never* have a grasp on
the real world.
Those student loans were a gamble - made to kids without any credit
history, and no guarantees of employment. "Lou Bricano" would argue
that a gambler is entitled to win at the casino. Those student loans
were a gamble
To bad, they signed. That's how it works. Maybe they
should think of trade school instead.
On 5/4/2025 8:32 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:NWTRP.4443$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 5:30 PM, Baxter wrote:No, dickwad, once it's in government hands, it's no longer your
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:PERRP.3130$[email protected]:
On 5/3/2025 8:25 PM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote inVirtually *all* student loans since 2010 have been made by the
news:vv6iqn$10ghb$[email protected]:
In news:vv65n5$g76i$[email protected], BaxterAnd when was that? Those student loans started out fairly
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:ygsRP.86318$[email protected]:
On 4/26/2025 7:52 AM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vui1jm$1te0q$[email protected]:
In news:vuhhma$1fc7n$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vuh7m8$147ng$[email protected]:
In news:vug8bf$78tf$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's >>>>>>>>>>>>>> one:...
Find one that addressed borrowers who "paid the principle, >>>>>>>>>>>>> with interest, and still owed..."
Ah, yes, that's where the "creative bookeeping" comes in - >>>>>>>>>>>> the student made payments for 20 years totalling more than >>>>>>>>>>>> the original loan, but it was all applied to the interest >>>>>>>>>>>> and not to the principle -- and after 20 years of payments, >>>>>>>>>>>> the student still owes more than he borrowed....
So they hadn't actually "paid the principle, with interest, >>>>>>>>>>> and still owed..."
They've paid more than they borrowed.
They haven't paid off the loan according to the terms,
Bugster, you fucking moron.
Because that's the way the terms are written - written so they >>>>>>>> can NEVER pay them off.
My daughter did.
reasonable, and then many evolved into scams - depending on the
resorces/advice and sophistication/education of the borrower.
federal government (Federal Student Aid office of Dept. of
Education). That program came into being as part of the Affordable
Care Act, the signature achievement of the Obama administration.
Are you saying Obama set out to swindle student borrowers with
deceptive scam loans, Bugster?
Whose responsibility is it to understand the terms of a loan
before accepting it, Bugster? God-fucking-damn it, Bugster, you
are just too stupid for words.
If it's a government loan, then it's no big deal for the government
to forgive that loan.
*Wrong*, Bugster. It's not the government's money, Bugster, you
stupid lying commie shitbag. It's the taxpayers' money.
money.
No, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag: the money was *lent* to
the borrowers with the expectation that it would be repaid. The
government only holds and spends money on behalf of taxpayers.
You're about done, Bugster.
In article <vv90qj$354q5$[email protected]>, bax02the
[email protected] says...
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:PERRP.3130$[email protected]:
On 5/3/2025 8:25 PM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vv6iqn$10ghb$[email protected]:
In news:vv65n5$g76i$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:ygsRP.86318$[email protected]:
On 4/26/2025 7:52 AM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vui1jm$1te0q$[email protected]:
In news:vuhhma$1fc7n$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vuh7m8$147ng$[email protected]:
In news:vug8bf$78tf$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still
owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:...
Find one that addressed borrowers who "paid the principle,
with interest, and still owed..."
Ah, yes, that's where the "creative bookeeping" comes in -
studentstudent made payments for 20 years totalling more than the
original loan, but it was all applied to the interest and not
to the principle -- and after 20 years of payments, the
andstill owes more than he borrowed....
So they hadn't actually "paid the principle, with interest,
canstill owed..."
They've paid more than they borrowed.
They haven't paid off the loan according to the terms, Bugster,
you fucking moron.
Because that's the way the terms are written - written so they
federalVirtually *all* student loans since 2010 have been made by theAnd when was that? Those student loans started out fairlyNEVER pay them off.
My daughter did.
reasonable, and then many evolved into scams - depending on the
resorces/advice and sophistication/education of the borrower.
loans,government (Federal Student Aid office of Dept. of Education). That
program came into being as part of the Affordable Care Act, the
signature achievement of the Obama administration. Are you saying
Obama set out to swindle student borrowers with deceptive scam
tooBugster?
Whose responsibility is it to understand the terms of a loan before
accepting it, Bugster? God-fucking-damn it, Bugster, you are just
anyway.stupid for words.
If it's a government loan, then it's no big deal for the government to
forgive that loan. Government is supposed to support education
That's not how it works. You borrow, you pay back.
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
In article <vv8isb$2otog$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vv87fl$2epmg$[email protected]:
In news:vv6mnu$138d4$[email protected], BaxterConservaturds hate public schools, and have been trying for decades
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vv6iqn$10ghb$[email protected]:
In news:vv65n5$g76i$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:ygsRP.86318$[email protected]:
On 4/26/2025 7:52 AM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vui1jm$1te0q$[email protected]:
In news:vuhhma$1fc7n$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vuh7m8$147ng$[email protected]:
In news:vug8bf$78tf$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and
still owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:...
Find one that addressed borrowers who "paid the principle,
with interest, and still owed..."
Ah, yes, that's where the "creative bookeeping" comes in -
the student made payments for 20 years totalling more than
the original loan, but it was all applied to the interest
and not to the principle -- and after 20 years of payments,
the student still owes more than he borrowed....
So they hadn't actually "paid the principle, with interest,
and still owed..."
They've paid more than they borrowed.
They haven't paid off the loan according to the terms, Bugster,
you fucking moron.
Because that's the way the terms are written - written so they
can NEVER pay them off.
My daughter did.
And when was that?...
Maybe ten years ago.
... Those student loans started out fairly reasonable, and then
many evolved into scams - depending on the resorces/advice and
sophistication/education of the borrower.
That's because they're mostly public school kids.
to turn them into propaganda mills instead of teaching critical
thinking and useful skills and knowledge.
Like tranny story time?
Drag queens are not tranny. Drag queens to promote fun in reading.
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
In article <vv9bmr$3j1fm$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:%XTRP.4444$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 5:16 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:sBRRP.125269$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 1:34 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:n3QRP.2330$[email protected]:
Question to Google AI: "What would the total of payments for a
$300,000 30 year mortgage at 5% interest be?"
Google AI answer: "For a $300,000 mortgage with a 30-year term
and a 5% interest rate, the total amount paid would be
approximately $610,228.39, including both principal and
interest. This translates to a monthly payment of $1,570.08 and
a total of 360 payments over 30 years."
This is *fucking normal*, Bugster, you filthy *broke* cheap
commie cocksucker.
And how did those subprime loans work?
You don't have any fucking clue what a "subprime loan" is,
Bugster, so you *wouldn't* have any fucking clue how they worked.
I would explain it to you, but being a sleazy dishonest lying
commie shitbag, you would just snip the explanation and change
the topic. So you can fuck off on that.
The simple fact is, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag, it
is *normal* for the sum of total payments made on a long-term
loan to be *double* the amount of the original loan. That's how
interest *fucking works*, you stupid lying commie shitbag. If you
don't like it, then don't take out the loan.
And with that Lou Bricano runs away.
No, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag, I haven't run away,
but we know you're about to. You're just too fucking stupid and
hyper-emotional to understand how interest works, Bugster, you
stupid lying commie shitbag. You think there's something wrong or
"unfair" with a person paying back more than double the amount
originally borrowed, and there just isn't �?? you're just fucking
wrong.
The student borrowers were not "scammed" or in any way taken
advantage of, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag. If they
didn't understand the terms of the loans, or if they borrowed tens
of thousands to obtain degrees that were not going to lead to
high-paying jobs, that is *wholly* on them.
You want college education to be "free," Bugster, you stupid lying
commie shitbag, and it just isn't and is never going to be. But a
stupid lying commie shitbag like you will *never* have a grasp on
the real world.
Those student loans were a gamble - made to kids without any credit
history, and no guarantees of employment. "Lou Bricano" would argue
that a gambler is entitled to win at the casino. Those student loans
were a gamble
To bad, they signed. That's how it works. Maybe they
should think of trade school instead.
Trade schools cost too - and student loans are for trades school too.
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:Ys7SP.21126$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 8:32 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:NWTRP.4443$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 5:30 PM, Baxter wrote:No, dickwad, once it's in government hands, it's no longer your
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:PERRP.3130$[email protected]:
On 5/3/2025 8:25 PM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote inVirtually *all* student loans since 2010 have been made by the
news:vv6iqn$10ghb$[email protected]:
In news:vv65n5$g76i$[email protected], BaxterAnd when was that? Those student loans started out fairly
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:ygsRP.86318$[email protected]:
On 4/26/2025 7:52 AM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vui1jm$1te0q$[email protected]:
In news:vuhhma$1fc7n$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vuh7m8$147ng$[email protected]:
In news:vug8bf$78tf$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's >>>>>>>>>>>>>> one:...
Find one that addressed borrowers who "paid the principle, >>>>>>>>>>>>> with interest, and still owed..."
Ah, yes, that's where the "creative bookeeping" comes in - >>>>>>>>>>>> the student made payments for 20 years totalling more than >>>>>>>>>>>> the original loan, but it was all applied to the interest >>>>>>>>>>>> and not to the principle -- and after 20 years of payments, >>>>>>>>>>>> the student still owes more than he borrowed....
So they hadn't actually "paid the principle, with interest, >>>>>>>>>>> and still owed..."
They've paid more than they borrowed.
They haven't paid off the loan according to the terms,
Bugster, you fucking moron.
Because that's the way the terms are written - written so they >>>>>>>> can NEVER pay them off.
My daughter did.
reasonable, and then many evolved into scams - depending on the
resorces/advice and sophistication/education of the borrower.
federal government (Federal Student Aid office of Dept. of
Education). That program came into being as part of the Affordable >>>>> Care Act, the signature achievement of the Obama administration.
Are you saying Obama set out to swindle student borrowers with
deceptive scam loans, Bugster?
Whose responsibility is it to understand the terms of a loan
before accepting it, Bugster? God-fucking-damn it, Bugster, you
are just too stupid for words.
If it's a government loan, then it's no big deal for the government
to forgive that loan.
*Wrong*, Bugster. It's not the government's money, Bugster, you
stupid lying commie shitbag. It's the taxpayers' money.
money.
No, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag: the money was *lent* to
the borrowers with the expectation that it would be repaid. The
government only holds and spends money on behalf of taxpayers.
You're about done, Bugster.
Once your tax money reaches the government it theirs and not yours. If
they loan it out, any repayment comes to the government (General Fund?)
and not to you. If the government decides to forgive the interest or even
the principle that is up to the government.
In article <vvb6dq$18l06$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
In article <vv9bmr$3j1fm$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:%XTRP.4444$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 5:16 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:sBRRP.125269$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 1:34 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:n3QRP.2330$[email protected]:
Question to Google AI: "What would the total of payments for a
$300,000 30 year mortgage at 5% interest be?"
Google AI answer: "For a $300,000 mortgage with a 30-year term
and a 5% interest rate, the total amount paid would be
approximately $610,228.39, including both principal and
interest. This translates to a monthly payment of $1,570.08 and
a total of 360 payments over 30 years."
This is *fucking normal*, Bugster, you filthy *broke* cheap
commie cocksucker.
And how did those subprime loans work?
You don't have any fucking clue what a "subprime loan" is,
Bugster, so you *wouldn't* have any fucking clue how they worked.
I would explain it to you, but being a sleazy dishonest lying
commie shitbag, you would just snip the explanation and change
the topic. So you can fuck off on that.
The simple fact is, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag, it
is *normal* for the sum of total payments made on a long-term
loan to be *double* the amount of the original loan. That's how
interest *fucking works*, you stupid lying commie shitbag. If you
don't like it, then don't take out the loan.
And with that Lou Bricano runs away.
No, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag, I haven't run away,
but we know you're about to. You're just too fucking stupid and
hyper-emotional to understand how interest works, Bugster, you
stupid lying commie shitbag. You think there's something wrong or
"unfair" with a person paying back more than double the amount
originally borrowed, and there just isn't �?? you're just fucking
wrong.
The student borrowers were not "scammed" or in any way taken
advantage of, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag. If they
didn't understand the terms of the loans, or if they borrowed tens
of thousands to obtain degrees that were not going to lead to
high-paying jobs, that is *wholly* on them.
You want college education to be "free," Bugster, you stupid lying
commie shitbag, and it just isn't and is never going to be. But a
stupid lying commie shitbag like you will *never* have a grasp on
the real world.
Those student loans were a gamble - made to kids without any credit
history, and no guarantees of employment. "Lou Bricano" would argue
that a gambler is entitled to win at the casino. Those student loans
were a gamble
To bad, they signed. That's how it works. Maybe they
should think of trade school instead.
Trade schools cost too - and student loans are for trades school too.
You can pay as you go with a trade school.
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
In article <vv8isb$2otog$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vv87fl$2epmg$[email protected]:
In news:vv6mnu$138d4$[email protected], BaxterConservaturds hate public schools, and have been trying for decades
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vv6iqn$10ghb$[email protected]:
In news:vv65n5$g76i$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:ygsRP.86318$[email protected]:
On 4/26/2025 7:52 AM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vui1jm$1te0q$[email protected]:
In news:vuhhma$1fc7n$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vuh7m8$147ng$[email protected]:
In news:vug8bf$78tf$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom" >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's one:...
Find one that addressed borrowers who "paid the principle, >>>>>>>>>>>> with interest, and still owed..."
Ah, yes, that's where the "creative bookeeping" comes in - >>>>>>>>>>> the student made payments for 20 years totalling more than >>>>>>>>>>> the original loan, but it was all applied to the interest >>>>>>>>>>> and not to the principle -- and after 20 years of payments, >>>>>>>>>>> the student still owes more than he borrowed....
So they hadn't actually "paid the principle, with interest, >>>>>>>>>> and still owed..."
They've paid more than they borrowed.
They haven't paid off the loan according to the terms, Bugster, >>>>>>>> you fucking moron.
Because that's the way the terms are written - written so they
can NEVER pay them off.
My daughter did.
And when was that?...
Maybe ten years ago.
... Those student loans started out fairly reasonable, and then
many evolved into scams - depending on the resorces/advice and
sophistication/education of the borrower.
That's because they're mostly public school kids.
to turn them into propaganda mills instead of teaching critical
thinking and useful skills and knowledge.
Like tranny story time?
Drag queens are not tranny. Drag queens to promote fun in reading.
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:Ys7SP.21126$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 8:32 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:NWTRP.4443$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 5:30 PM, Baxter wrote:No, dickwad, once it's in government hands, it's no longer your
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:PERRP.3130$[email protected]:
On 5/3/2025 8:25 PM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote inVirtually *all* student loans since 2010 have been made by the
news:vv6iqn$10ghb$[email protected]:
In news:vv65n5$g76i$[email protected], BaxterAnd when was that? Those student loans started out fairly
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:ygsRP.86318$[email protected]:
On 4/26/2025 7:52 AM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vui1jm$1te0q$[email protected]:
In news:vuhhma$1fc7n$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vuh7m8$147ng$[email protected]:
In news:vug8bf$78tf$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one:...
Find one that addressed borrowers who "paid the principle, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> with interest, and still owed..."
Ah, yes, that's where the "creative bookeeping" comes in - >>>>>>>>>>>>> the student made payments for 20 years totalling more than >>>>>>>>>>>>> the original loan, but it was all applied to the interest >>>>>>>>>>>>> and not to the principle -- and after 20 years of payments, >>>>>>>>>>>>> the student still owes more than he borrowed....
So they hadn't actually "paid the principle, with interest, >>>>>>>>>>>> and still owed..."
They've paid more than they borrowed.
They haven't paid off the loan according to the terms,
Bugster, you fucking moron.
Because that's the way the terms are written - written so they >>>>>>>>> can NEVER pay them off.
My daughter did.
reasonable, and then many evolved into scams - depending on the
resorces/advice and sophistication/education of the borrower.
federal government (Federal Student Aid office of Dept. of
Education). That program came into being as part of the Affordable >>>>>> Care Act, the signature achievement of the Obama administration.
Are you saying Obama set out to swindle student borrowers with
deceptive scam loans, Bugster?
Whose responsibility is it to understand the terms of a loan
before accepting it, Bugster? God-fucking-damn it, Bugster, you
are just too stupid for words.
If it's a government loan, then it's no big deal for the government
to forgive that loan.
*Wrong*, Bugster. It's not the government's money, Bugster, you
stupid lying commie shitbag. It's the taxpayers' money.
money.
No, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag: the money was *lent* to
the borrowers with the expectation that it would be repaid. The
government only holds and spends money on behalf of taxpayers.
You're about done, Bugster.
Once your tax money reaches the government it theirs and not yours.
Once your tax money reaches the government it theirs and not yours. If
they loan it out, any repayment comes to the government (General Fund?)
and not to you. If the government decides to forgive the interest or even
the principle that is up to the government.
In article <vvb6dq$18l06$[email protected]>, bax02@fx44.iad:
[email protected] says...
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <vv9bmr$3j1fm$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:%XTRP.4444$mVWd.2865
a
On 5/4/2025 5:16 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:sBRRP.125269$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 1:34 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:n3QRP.2330$[email protected]:
Question to Google AI: "What would the total of payments for
term$300,000 30 year mortgage at 5% interest be?"
Google AI answer: "For a $300,000 mortgage with a 30-year
andand a 5% interest rate, the total amount paid would be
approximately $610,228.39, including both principal and
interest. This translates to a monthly payment of $1,570.08
worked.a total of 360 payments over 30 years."
This is *fucking normal*, Bugster, you filthy *broke* cheap
commie cocksucker.
And how did those subprime loans work?
You don't have any fucking clue what a "subprime loan" is,
Bugster, so you *wouldn't* have any fucking clue how they
itI would explain it to you, but being a sleazy dishonest lying
commie shitbag, you would just snip the explanation and change
the topic. So you can fuck off on that.
The simple fact is, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag,
youis *normal* for the sum of total payments made on a long-term
loan to be *double* the amount of the original loan. That's how
interest *fucking works*, you stupid lying commie shitbag. If
tensdon't like it, then don't take out the loan.
And with that Lou Bricano runs away.
No, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag, I haven't run away,
but we know you're about to. You're just too fucking stupid and
hyper-emotional to understand how interest works, Bugster, you
stupid lying commie shitbag. You think there's something wrong or
"unfair" with a person paying back more than double the amount
originally borrowed, and there just isn't �?? you're just fucking
wrong.
The student borrowers were not "scammed" or in any way taken
advantage of, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag. If they
didn't understand the terms of the loans, or if they borrowed
lyingof thousands to obtain degrees that were not going to lead to
high-paying jobs, that is *wholly* on them.
You want college education to be "free," Bugster, you stupid
arguecommie shitbag, and it just isn't and is never going to be. But a
stupid lying commie shitbag like you will *never* have a grasp on
the real world.
Those student loans were a gamble - made to kids without any credit
history, and no guarantees of employment. "Lou Bricano" would
loansthat a gambler is entitled to win at the casino. Those student
were a gamble
To bad, they signed. That's how it works. Maybe they
should think of trade school instead.
Trade schools cost too - and student loans are for trades school too.
You can pay as you go with a trade school.
On 5/5/2025 1:21 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:Ys7SP.21126$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 8:32 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:NWTRP.4443$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 5:30 PM, Baxter wrote:No, dickwad, once it's in government hands, it's no longer your
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:PERRP.3130$[email protected]:
On 5/3/2025 8:25 PM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote inVirtually *all* student loans since 2010 have been made by the
news:vv6iqn$10ghb$[email protected]:
In news:vv65n5$g76i$[email protected], BaxterAnd when was that? Those student loans started out fairly
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:ygsRP.86318$[email protected]:
On 4/26/2025 7:52 AM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vui1jm$1te0q$[email protected]:
In news:vuhhma$1fc7n$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vuh7m8$147ng$[email protected]:
In news:vug8bf$78tf$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one:...
Find one that addressed borrowers who "paid the
principle, with interest, and still owed..."
Ah, yes, that's where the "creative bookeeping" comes in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - the student made payments for 20 years totalling more >>>>>>>>>>>>>> than the original loan, but it was all applied to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> interest and not to the principle -- and after 20 years >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of payments, the student still owes more than he
borrowed....
So they hadn't actually "paid the principle, with
interest, and still owed..."
They've paid more than they borrowed.
They haven't paid off the loan according to the terms,
Bugster, you fucking moron.
Because that's the way the terms are written - written so
they can NEVER pay them off.
My daughter did.
reasonable, and then many evolved into scams - depending on the >>>>>>>> resorces/advice and sophistication/education of the borrower.
federal government (Federal Student Aid office of Dept. of
Education). That program came into being as part of the
Affordable Care Act, the signature achievement of the Obama
administration. Are you saying Obama set out to swindle student
borrowers with deceptive scam loans, Bugster?
Whose responsibility is it to understand the terms of a loan
before accepting it, Bugster? God-fucking-damn it, Bugster, you
are just too stupid for words.
If it's a government loan, then it's no big deal for the
government to forgive that loan.
*Wrong*, Bugster. It's not the government's money, Bugster, you
stupid lying commie shitbag. It's the taxpayers' money.
money.
No, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag: the money was *lent*
to the borrowers with the expectation that it would be repaid. The
government only holds and spends money on behalf of taxpayers.
You're about done, Bugster.
Once your tax money reaches the government it theirs and not yours.
Then why do I get tax refunds every year, Bugster, you stupid lying
commie shitbag.
In article <MPG.4282d2bb747dcd3098a0e5
@usnews.blocknews.net>, [email protected] says...
In article <vvb6dq$18l06$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <vv9bmr$3j1fm$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:%XTRP.4444$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 5:16 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:sBRRP.125269$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 1:34 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:n3QRP.2330$[email protected]:
Question to Google AI: "What would the total of payments
for a $300,000 30 year mortgage at 5% interest be?"
Google AI answer: "For a $300,000 mortgage with a 30-year
term and a 5% interest rate, the total amount paid would
be approximately $610,228.39, including both principal and
interest. This translates to a monthly payment of
$1,570.08 and a total of 360 payments over 30 years."
This is *fucking normal*, Bugster, you filthy *broke*
cheap commie cocksucker.
And how did those subprime loans work?
You don't have any fucking clue what a "subprime loan" is,
Bugster, so you *wouldn't* have any fucking clue how they
worked. I would explain it to you, but being a sleazy
dishonest lying commie shitbag, you would just snip the
explanation and change the topic. So you can fuck off on
that.
The simple fact is, Bugster, you stupid lying commie
shitbag, it is *normal* for the sum of total payments made
on a long-term loan to be *double* the amount of the
original loan. That's how interest *fucking works*, you
stupid lying commie shitbag. If you don't like it, then
don't take out the loan.
And with that Lou Bricano runs away.
No, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag, I haven't run
away, but we know you're about to. You're just too fucking
stupid and hyper-emotional to understand how interest works,
Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag. You think there's
something wrong or "unfair" with a person paying back more
than double the amount originally borrowed, and there just
isn't �?? you're just fucking wrong.
The student borrowers were not "scammed" or in any way taken
advantage of, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag. If
they didn't understand the terms of the loans, or if they
borrowed tens of thousands to obtain degrees that were not
going to lead to high-paying jobs, that is *wholly* on them.
You want college education to be "free," Bugster, you stupid
lying commie shitbag, and it just isn't and is never going to
be. But a stupid lying commie shitbag like you will *never*
have a grasp on the real world.
Those student loans were a gamble - made to kids without any
credit history, and no guarantees of employment. "Lou Bricano"
would argue that a gambler is entitled to win at the casino.
Those student loans were a gamble
To bad, they signed. That's how it works. Maybe they
should think of trade school instead.
Trade schools cost too - and student loans are for trades school
too.
You can pay as you go with a trade school.
Oh and also get a job you can use.
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:Nearly always, Bugster — and a hell of a lot more likely than with a fine arts
In article <MPG.4282d2bb747dcd3098a0e5
@usnews.blocknews.net>, [email protected] says...
In article <vvb6dq$18l06$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <vv9bmr$3j1fm$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:%XTRP.4444$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 5:16 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:sBRRP.125269$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 1:34 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:n3QRP.2330$[email protected]:
Question to Google AI: "What would the total of payments >>>>>>>>>>> for a $300,000 30 year mortgage at 5% interest be?"
Google AI answer: "For a $300,000 mortgage with a 30-year >>>>>>>>>>> term and a 5% interest rate, the total amount paid would >>>>>>>>>>> be approximately $610,228.39, including both principal and >>>>>>>>>>> interest. This translates to a monthly payment of
$1,570.08 and a total of 360 payments over 30 years."
This is *fucking normal*, Bugster, you filthy *broke*
cheap commie cocksucker.
And how did those subprime loans work?
You don't have any fucking clue what a "subprime loan" is,
Bugster, so you *wouldn't* have any fucking clue how they
worked. I would explain it to you, but being a sleazy
dishonest lying commie shitbag, you would just snip the
explanation and change the topic. So you can fuck off on
that.
The simple fact is, Bugster, you stupid lying commie
shitbag, it is *normal* for the sum of total payments made
on a long-term loan to be *double* the amount of the
original loan. That's how interest *fucking works*, you
stupid lying commie shitbag. If you don't like it, then
don't take out the loan.
And with that Lou Bricano runs away.
No, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag, I haven't run
away, but we know you're about to. You're just too fucking
stupid and hyper-emotional to understand how interest works,
Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag. You think there's
something wrong or "unfair" with a person paying back more
than double the amount originally borrowed, and there just
isn't ā?? you're just fucking wrong.
The student borrowers were not "scammed" or in any way taken
advantage of, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag. If
they didn't understand the terms of the loans, or if they
borrowed tens of thousands to obtain degrees that were not
going to lead to high-paying jobs, that is *wholly* on them.
You want college education to be "free," Bugster, you stupid
lying commie shitbag, and it just isn't and is never going to
be. But a stupid lying commie shitbag like you will *never*
have a grasp on the real world.
Those student loans were a gamble - made to kids without any
credit history, and no guarantees of employment. "Lou Bricano"
would argue that a gambler is entitled to win at the casino.
Those student loans were a gamble
To bad, they signed. That's how it works. Maybe they
should think of trade school instead.
Trade schools cost too - and student loans are for trades school
too.
You can pay as you go with a trade school.
Oh and also get a job you can use.
Not always.
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:DgaSP.22130$[email protected]:
On 5/5/2025 1:21 PM, Baxter wrote:Your tax refund
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:Ys7SP.21126$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 8:32 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:NWTRP.4443$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 5:30 PM, Baxter wrote:No, dickwad, once it's in government hands, it's no longer your
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:PERRP.3130$[email protected]:
On 5/3/2025 8:25 PM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote inEducation). That program came into being as part of the
news:vv6iqn$10ghb$[email protected]:
In news:vv65n5$g76i$[email protected], BaxterAnd when was that? Those student loans started out fairly
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:ygsRP.86318$[email protected]:
On 4/26/2025 7:52 AM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vui1jm$1te0q$[email protected]:
In news:vuhhma$1fc7n$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:vuh7m8$147ng$[email protected]:
In news:vug8bf$78tf$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one:...
Find one that addressed borrowers who "paid the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> principle, with interest, and still owed..."
Ah, yes, that's where the "creative bookeeping" comes in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - the student made payments for 20 years totalling more >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than the original loan, but it was all applied to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interest and not to the principle -- and after 20 years >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of payments, the student still owes more than he >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> borrowed....
So they hadn't actually "paid the principle, with
interest, and still owed..."
They've paid more than they borrowed.
They haven't paid off the loan according to the terms, >>>>>>>>>>>> Bugster, you fucking moron.
Because that's the way the terms are written - written so >>>>>>>>>>> they can NEVER pay them off.
My daughter did.
reasonable, and then many evolved into scams - depending on the >>>>>>>>> resorces/advice and sophistication/education of the borrower. >>>>>>>> Virtually *all* student loans since 2010 have been made by the >>>>>>>> federal government (Federal Student Aid office of Dept. of
Affordable Care Act, the signature achievement of the Obama
administration. Are you saying Obama set out to swindle student >>>>>>>> borrowers with deceptive scam loans, Bugster?
Whose responsibility is it to understand the terms of a loan
before accepting it, Bugster? God-fucking-damn it, Bugster, you >>>>>>>> are just too stupid for words.
If it's a government loan, then it's no big deal for the
government to forgive that loan.
*Wrong*, Bugster. It's not the government's money, Bugster, you
stupid lying commie shitbag. It's the taxpayers' money.
money.
No, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag: the money was *lent*
to the borrowers with the expectation that it would be repaid. The
government only holds and spends money on behalf of taxpayers.
You're about done, Bugster.
Once your tax money reaches the government it theirs and not yours.
Then why do I get tax refunds every year, Bugster, you stupid lying
commie shitbag.
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in news:MPG.4282d2bb747dcd3098a0e5 @usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vvb6dq$18l06$[email protected]>, bax02@fx44.iad:
[email protected] says...
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <vv9bmr$3j1fm$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:%XTRP.4444$mVWd.2865
a
On 5/4/2025 5:16 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:sBRRP.125269$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 1:34 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:n3QRP.2330$[email protected]:
Question to Google AI: "What would the total of payments for
term$300,000 30 year mortgage at 5% interest be?"
Google AI answer: "For a $300,000 mortgage with a 30-year
andand a 5% interest rate, the total amount paid would be
approximately $610,228.39, including both principal and
interest. This translates to a monthly payment of $1,570.08
worked.a total of 360 payments over 30 years."
This is *fucking normal*, Bugster, you filthy *broke* cheap >>>>>>>>>> commie cocksucker.
And how did those subprime loans work?
You don't have any fucking clue what a "subprime loan" is,
Bugster, so you *wouldn't* have any fucking clue how they
itI would explain it to you, but being a sleazy dishonest lying
commie shitbag, you would just snip the explanation and change >>>>>>>> the topic. So you can fuck off on that.
The simple fact is, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag,
youis *normal* for the sum of total payments made on a long-term
loan to be *double* the amount of the original loan. That's how >>>>>>>> interest *fucking works*, you stupid lying commie shitbag. If
tensdon't like it, then don't take out the loan.
And with that Lou Bricano runs away.
No, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag, I haven't run away,
but we know you're about to. You're just too fucking stupid and
hyper-emotional to understand how interest works, Bugster, you
stupid lying commie shitbag. You think there's something wrong or
"unfair" with a person paying back more than double the amount
originally borrowed, and there just isn't ā?? you're just fucking >>>>>> wrong.
The student borrowers were not "scammed" or in any way taken
advantage of, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag. If they
didn't understand the terms of the loans, or if they borrowed
lyingof thousands to obtain degrees that were not going to lead to
high-paying jobs, that is *wholly* on them.
You want college education to be "free," Bugster, you stupid
arguecommie shitbag, and it just isn't and is never going to be. But a
stupid lying commie shitbag like you will *never* have a grasp on
the real world.
Those student loans were a gamble - made to kids without any credit
history, and no guarantees of employment. "Lou Bricano" would
loansthat a gambler is entitled to win at the casino. Those student
were a gamble
To bad, they signed. That's how it works. Maybe they
should think of trade school instead.
Trade schools cost too - and student loans are for trades school too.
You can pay as you go with a trade school.
Sure, if you got $30,000 laying around - perhaps under your mattress?
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in news:MPG.4282d2bb747dcd3098a0e5 @usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vvb6dq$18l06$[email protected]>, bax02@fx44.iad:
[email protected] says...
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <vv9bmr$3j1fm$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:%XTRP.4444$mVWd.2865
a
On 5/4/2025 5:16 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:sBRRP.125269$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 1:34 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:n3QRP.2330$[email protected]:
Question to Google AI: "What would the total of payments for
term$300,000 30 year mortgage at 5% interest be?"
Google AI answer: "For a $300,000 mortgage with a 30-year
andand a 5% interest rate, the total amount paid would be
approximately $610,228.39, including both principal and
interest. This translates to a monthly payment of $1,570.08
worked.a total of 360 payments over 30 years."
This is *fucking normal*, Bugster, you filthy *broke* cheap
commie cocksucker.
And how did those subprime loans work?
You don't have any fucking clue what a "subprime loan" is,
Bugster, so you *wouldn't* have any fucking clue how they
itI would explain it to you, but being a sleazy dishonest lying
commie shitbag, you would just snip the explanation and change
the topic. So you can fuck off on that.
The simple fact is, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag,
youis *normal* for the sum of total payments made on a long-term
loan to be *double* the amount of the original loan. That's how
interest *fucking works*, you stupid lying commie shitbag. If
tensdon't like it, then don't take out the loan.
And with that Lou Bricano runs away.
No, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag, I haven't run away,
but we know you're about to. You're just too fucking stupid and
hyper-emotional to understand how interest works, Bugster, you
stupid lying commie shitbag. You think there's something wrong or
"unfair" with a person paying back more than double the amount
originally borrowed, and there just isn't �?? you're just fucking
wrong.
The student borrowers were not "scammed" or in any way taken
advantage of, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag. If they
didn't understand the terms of the loans, or if they borrowed
lyingof thousands to obtain degrees that were not going to lead to
high-paying jobs, that is *wholly* on them.
You want college education to be "free," Bugster, you stupid
arguecommie shitbag, and it just isn't and is never going to be. But a
stupid lying commie shitbag like you will *never* have a grasp on
the real world.
Those student loans were a gamble - made to kids without any credit
history, and no guarantees of employment. "Lou Bricano" would
loansthat a gambler is entitled to win at the casino. Those student
were a gamble
To bad, they signed. That's how it works. Maybe they
should think of trade school instead.
Trade schools cost too - and student loans are for trades school too.
You can pay as you go with a trade school.
Sure, if you got $30,000 laying around - perhaps under your mattress?
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
In article <MPG.4282d2bb747dcd3098a0e5
@usnews.blocknews.net>, [email protected] says...
In article <vvb6dq$18l06$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <vv9bmr$3j1fm$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:%XTRP.4444$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 5:16 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:sBRRP.125269$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 1:34 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:n3QRP.2330$[email protected]:
Question to Google AI: "What would the total of payments
for a $300,000 30 year mortgage at 5% interest be?"
Google AI answer: "For a $300,000 mortgage with a 30-year
term and a 5% interest rate, the total amount paid would
be approximately $610,228.39, including both principal and
interest. This translates to a monthly payment of
$1,570.08 and a total of 360 payments over 30 years."
This is *fucking normal*, Bugster, you filthy *broke*
cheap commie cocksucker.
And how did those subprime loans work?
You don't have any fucking clue what a "subprime loan" is,
Bugster, so you *wouldn't* have any fucking clue how they
worked. I would explain it to you, but being a sleazy
dishonest lying commie shitbag, you would just snip the
explanation and change the topic. So you can fuck off on
that.
The simple fact is, Bugster, you stupid lying commie
shitbag, it is *normal* for the sum of total payments made
on a long-term loan to be *double* the amount of the
original loan. That's how interest *fucking works*, you
stupid lying commie shitbag. If you don't like it, then
don't take out the loan.
And with that Lou Bricano runs away.
No, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag, I haven't run
away, but we know you're about to. You're just too fucking
stupid and hyper-emotional to understand how interest works,
Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag. You think there's
something wrong or "unfair" with a person paying back more
than double the amount originally borrowed, and there just
isn't �?? you're just fucking wrong.
The student borrowers were not "scammed" or in any way taken
advantage of, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag. If
they didn't understand the terms of the loans, or if they
borrowed tens of thousands to obtain degrees that were not
going to lead to high-paying jobs, that is *wholly* on them.
You want college education to be "free," Bugster, you stupid
lying commie shitbag, and it just isn't and is never going to
be. But a stupid lying commie shitbag like you will *never*
have a grasp on the real world.
Those student loans were a gamble - made to kids without any
credit history, and no guarantees of employment. "Lou Bricano"
would argue that a gambler is entitled to win at the casino.
Those student loans were a gamble
To bad, they signed. That's how it works. Maybe they
should think of trade school instead.
Trade schools cost too - and student loans are for trades school
too.
You can pay as you go with a trade school.
Oh and also get a job you can use.
Not always.
PORTLAND, Oregon — Millions of people who've fallen behind on student
loan payments must now start repaying them or face a debt collector.
On 5/5/2025 8:14 PM, Baxter wrote:
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in news:MPG.4282d2bb747dcd3098a0e5
@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vvb6dq$18l06$[email protected]>, bax02@fx44.iad:
[email protected] says...
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <vv9bmr$3j1fm$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:%XTRP.4444$mVWd.2865
a
On 5/4/2025 5:16 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:sBRRP.125269$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 1:34 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:n3QRP.2330$[email protected]:
Question to Google AI: "What would the total of payments for
term$300,000 30 year mortgage at 5% interest be?"
Google AI answer: "For a $300,000 mortgage with a 30-year
andand a 5% interest rate, the total amount paid would be
approximately $610,228.39, including both principal and
interest. This translates to a monthly payment of $1,570.08
worked.a total of 360 payments over 30 years."
This is *fucking normal*, Bugster, you filthy *broke* cheap >>>>>>>>>>> commie cocksucker.
And how did those subprime loans work?
You don't have any fucking clue what a "subprime loan" is,
Bugster, so you *wouldn't* have any fucking clue how they
itI would explain it to you, but being a sleazy dishonest lying >>>>>>>>> commie shitbag, you would just snip the explanation and change >>>>>>>>> the topic. So you can fuck off on that.
The simple fact is, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag,
youis *normal* for the sum of total payments made on a long-term >>>>>>>>> loan to be *double* the amount of the original loan. That's how >>>>>>>>> interest *fucking works*, you stupid lying commie shitbag. If
tensdon't like it, then don't take out the loan.
And with that Lou Bricano runs away.
No, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag, I haven't run away, >>>>>>> but we know you're about to. You're just too fucking stupid and
hyper-emotional to understand how interest works, Bugster, you
stupid lying commie shitbag. You think there's something wrong or >>>>>>> "unfair" with a person paying back more than double the amount
originally borrowed, and there just isn't ā?? you're just fucking >>>>>>> wrong.
The student borrowers were not "scammed" or in any way taken
advantage of, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag. If they
didn't understand the terms of the loans, or if they borrowed
lyingof thousands to obtain degrees that were not going to lead to
high-paying jobs, that is *wholly* on them.
You want college education to be "free," Bugster, you stupid
arguecommie shitbag, and it just isn't and is never going to be. But a >>>>>>> stupid lying commie shitbag like you will *never* have a grasp on >>>>>>> the real world.
Those student loans were a gamble - made to kids without any credit >>>>>> history, and no guarantees of employment. "Lou Bricano" would
loansthat a gambler is entitled to win at the casino. Those student
were a gamble
To bad, they signed. That's how it works. Maybe they
should think of trade school instead.
Trade schools cost too - and student loans are for trades school too.
You can pay as you go with a trade school.
Sure, if you got $30,000 laying around - perhaps under your mattress?
No, Bugster, you goddamned fucking commie liar — with a combination of earnings from employment, parental contributions, and — yes! — student loans. Most trade schools cost far less than public universities, and
the programs aren't as long, so the total cost of attending one is much
less.
But you're a goddamned fucking commie who believes all schooling should
be "free" to the student, which it never will be, so you'll just keep
pissing and moaning for the short time you have remaining. You're eight-fucking-four years old, Bugster, so you've already surpassed the
life expectancy for American men. You ought to try to use whatever time
you have left more productively. It can't be very satisfying to keep
getting your ass kicked in Usenet.
On 5/5/2025 8:17 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:DgaSP.22130$[email protected]:
On 5/5/2025 1:21 PM, Baxter wrote:Your tax refund
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:Ys7SP.21126$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 8:32 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:NWTRP.4443$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 5:30 PM, Baxter wrote:No, dickwad, once it's in government hands, it's no longer your
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:PERRP.3130$[email protected]:
On 5/3/2025 8:25 PM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote inVirtually *all* student loans since 2010 have been made by the >>>>>>>>> federal government (Federal Student Aid office of Dept. of
news:vv6iqn$10ghb$[email protected]:
In news:vv65n5$g76i$[email protected], BaxterAnd when was that? Those student loans started out fairly >>>>>>>>>> reasonable, and then many evolved into scams - depending on >>>>>>>>>> the resorces/advice and sophistication/education of the
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:ygsRP.86318$[email protected]:
On 4/26/2025 7:52 AM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vui1jm$1te0q$[email protected]:
In news:vuhhma$1fc7n$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:vuh7m8$147ng$[email protected]:
In news:vug8bf$78tf$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one:...
Find one that addressed borrowers who "paid the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> principle, with interest, and still owed..."
Ah, yes, that's where the "creative bookeeping" comes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in - the student made payments for 20 years totalling >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more than the original loan, but it was all applied to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the interest and not to the principle -- and after 20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> years of payments, the student still owes more than he >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> borrowed....
So they hadn't actually "paid the principle, with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interest, and still owed..."
They've paid more than they borrowed.
They haven't paid off the loan according to the terms, >>>>>>>>>>>>> Bugster, you fucking moron.
Because that's the way the terms are written - written so >>>>>>>>>>>> they can NEVER pay them off.
My daughter did.
borrower.
Education). That program came into being as part of the
Affordable Care Act, the signature achievement of the Obama
administration. Are you saying Obama set out to swindle
student borrowers with deceptive scam loans, Bugster?
Whose responsibility is it to understand the terms of a loan >>>>>>>>> before accepting it, Bugster? God-fucking-damn it, Bugster,
you are just too stupid for words.
If it's a government loan, then it's no big deal for the
government to forgive that loan.
*Wrong*, Bugster. It's not the government's money, Bugster, you
stupid lying commie shitbag. It's the taxpayers' money.
money.
No, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag: the money was *lent*
to the borrowers with the expectation that it would be repaid. The
government only holds and spends money on behalf of taxpayers.
You're about done, Bugster.
Once your tax money reaches the government it theirs and not yours.
Then why do I get tax refunds every year, Bugster, you stupid lying
commie shitbag.
You said once the tax has been collected, Bugster, the money belongs
to the government. So why do they refund some of it to me, Bugster,
you cheap commie cocksucking liar?
On 5/5/2025 8:14 PM, Baxter wrote:
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in
news:MPG.4282d2bb747dcd3098a0e5 @usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vvb6dq$18l06$[email protected]>, bax02@fx44.iad:
[email protected] says...
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <vv9bmr$3j1fm$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:%XTRP.4444$mVWd.2865
a
On 5/4/2025 5:16 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:sBRRP.125269$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 1:34 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:n3QRP.2330$[email protected]:
Question to Google AI: "What would the total of payments for
term$300,000 30 year mortgage at 5% interest be?"
Google AI answer: "For a $300,000 mortgage with a 30-year
andand a 5% interest rate, the total amount paid would be
approximately $610,228.39, including both principal and
interest. This translates to a monthly payment of $1,570.08
worked.a total of 360 payments over 30 years."
This is *fucking normal*, Bugster, you filthy *broke* cheap >>>>>>>>>>> commie cocksucker.
And how did those subprime loans work?
You don't have any fucking clue what a "subprime loan" is,
Bugster, so you *wouldn't* have any fucking clue how they
itI would explain it to you, but being a sleazy dishonest lying >>>>>>>>> commie shitbag, you would just snip the explanation and change >>>>>>>>> the topic. So you can fuck off on that.
The simple fact is, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag,
youis *normal* for the sum of total payments made on a long-term >>>>>>>>> loan to be *double* the amount of the original loan. That's
how interest *fucking works*, you stupid lying commie shitbag. >>>>>>>>> If
tensdon't like it, then don't take out the loan.
And with that Lou Bricano runs away.
No, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag, I haven't run
away, but we know you're about to. You're just too fucking
stupid and hyper-emotional to understand how interest works,
Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag. You think there's
something wrong or "unfair" with a person paying back more than
double the amount originally borrowed, and there just isn't ā?? >>>>>>> you're just fucking wrong.
The student borrowers were not "scammed" or in any way taken
advantage of, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag. If they
didn't understand the terms of the loans, or if they borrowed
lyingof thousands to obtain degrees that were not going to lead to
high-paying jobs, that is *wholly* on them.
You want college education to be "free," Bugster, you stupid
arguecommie shitbag, and it just isn't and is never going to be. But
a stupid lying commie shitbag like you will *never* have a grasp >>>>>>> on the real world.
Those student loans were a gamble - made to kids without any
credit history, and no guarantees of employment. "Lou Bricano"
would
loansthat a gambler is entitled to win at the casino. Those student
were a gamble
To bad, they signed. That's how it works. Maybe they
should think of trade school instead.
Trade schools cost too - and student loans are for trades school
too.
You can pay as you go with a trade school.
Sure, if you got $30,000 laying around - perhaps under your mattress?
No, Bugster, you goddamned fucking commie liar — with a combination
of earnings from employment, parental contributions, and — yes! —
student loans. Most trade schools cost far less than public
universities, and the programs aren't as long, so the total cost of
attending one is much less.
But you're a goddamned fucking commie who believes all schooling
should be "free" to the student, which it never will be, so you'll
just keep pissing and moaning for the short time you have remaining.
You're eight-fucking-four years old, Bugster, so you've already
surpassed the life expectancy for American men. You ought to try to
use whatever time you have left more productively. It can't be very satisfying to keep getting your ass kicked in Usenet.
In article <vvbuss$21thc$[email protected]>, bax02year
[email protected] says...
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <MPG.4282d2bb747dcd3098a0e5
@usnews.blocknews.net>, [email protected] says...
In article <vvb6dq$18l06$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <vv9bmr$3j1fm$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:%XTRP.4444$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 5:16 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:sBRRP.125269$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 1:34 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:n3QRP.2330$[email protected]:
Question to Google AI: "What would the total of payments
for a $300,000 30 year mortgage at 5% interest be?"
Google AI answer: "For a $300,000 mortgage with a 30-
andterm and a 5% interest rate, the total amount paid would
be approximately $610,228.39, including both principal
tointerest. This translates to a monthly payment of
$1,570.08 and a total of 360 payments over 30 years."
This is *fucking normal*, Bugster, you filthy *broke*
cheap commie cocksucker.
And how did those subprime loans work?
You don't have any fucking clue what a "subprime loan" is,
Bugster, so you *wouldn't* have any fucking clue how they
worked. I would explain it to you, but being a sleazy
dishonest lying commie shitbag, you would just snip the
explanation and change the topic. So you can fuck off on
that.
The simple fact is, Bugster, you stupid lying commie
shitbag, it is *normal* for the sum of total payments made
on a long-term loan to be *double* the amount of the
original loan. That's how interest *fucking works*, you
stupid lying commie shitbag. If you don't like it, then
don't take out the loan.
And with that Lou Bricano runs away.
No, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag, I haven't run
away, but we know you're about to. You're just too fucking
stupid and hyper-emotional to understand how interest works,
Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag. You think there's
something wrong or "unfair" with a person paying back more
than double the amount originally borrowed, and there just
isn't �?? you're just fucking wrong.
The student borrowers were not "scammed" or in any way taken
advantage of, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag. If
they didn't understand the terms of the loans, or if they
borrowed tens of thousands to obtain degrees that were not
going to lead to high-paying jobs, that is *wholly* on them.
You want college education to be "free," Bugster, you stupid
lying commie shitbag, and it just isn't and is never going
Bricano"be. But a stupid lying commie shitbag like you will *never*
have a grasp on the real world.
Those student loans were a gamble - made to kids without any
credit history, and no guarantees of employment. "Lou
would argue that a gambler is entitled to win at the casino.
Those student loans were a gamble
To bad, they signed. That's how it works. Maybe they
should think of trade school instead.
Trade schools cost too - and student loans are for trades school
too.
You can pay as you go with a trade school.
Oh and also get a job you can use.
Not always.
Trades are always needed.
In article <vvbure$21thc$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in
news:MPG.4282d2bb747dcd3098a0e5 @usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vvb6dq$18l06$[email protected]>, bax02@fx44.iad:
[email protected] says...
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <vv9bmr$3j1fm$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:%XTRP.4444$mVWd.2865
a
On 5/4/2025 5:16 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:sBRRP.125269$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 1:34 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:n3QRP.2330$[email protected]:
Question to Google AI: "What would the total of payments
for
term$300,000 30 year mortgage at 5% interest be?"
Google AI answer: "For a $300,000 mortgage with a 30-year
andand a 5% interest rate, the total amount paid would be
approximately $610,228.39, including both principal and
interest. This translates to a monthly payment of
$1,570.08
worked.a total of 360 payments over 30 years."
This is *fucking normal*, Bugster, you filthy *broke*
cheap commie cocksucker.
And how did those subprime loans work?
You don't have any fucking clue what a "subprime loan" is,
Bugster, so you *wouldn't* have any fucking clue how they
itI would explain it to you, but being a sleazy dishonest
lying commie shitbag, you would just snip the explanation
and change the topic. So you can fuck off on that.
The simple fact is, Bugster, you stupid lying commie
shitbag,
youis *normal* for the sum of total payments made on a
long-term loan to be *double* the amount of the original
loan. That's how interest *fucking works*, you stupid lying
commie shitbag. If
tensdon't like it, then don't take out the loan.
And with that Lou Bricano runs away.
No, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag, I haven't run
away, but we know you're about to. You're just too fucking
stupid and hyper-emotional to understand how interest works,
Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag. You think there's
something wrong or "unfair" with a person paying back more
than double the amount originally borrowed, and there just
isn't �?? you're just fucking wrong.
The student borrowers were not "scammed" or in any way taken
advantage of, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag. If
they didn't understand the terms of the loans, or if they
borrowed
lyingof thousands to obtain degrees that were not going to lead to
high-paying jobs, that is *wholly* on them.
You want college education to be "free," Bugster, you stupid
arguecommie shitbag, and it just isn't and is never going to be.
But a stupid lying commie shitbag like you will *never* have
a grasp on the real world.
Those student loans were a gamble - made to kids without any
credit history, and no guarantees of employment. "Lou Bricano"
would
loansthat a gambler is entitled to win at the casino. Those student
were a gamble
To bad, they signed. That's how it works. Maybe they
should think of trade school instead.
Trade schools cost too - and student loans are for trades school
too.
You can pay as you go with a trade school.
Sure, if you got $30,000 laying around - perhaps under your mattress?
It beats the tons of money an Ivy League shithole wants.
In article <vvbv0j$21thc$[email protected]>, bax02@fx05.iad:
[email protected] says...
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:DgaSP.22130$eAtc.19002
@fx44.iad:
On 5/5/2025 1:21 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:Ys7SP.21126$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 8:32 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:NWTRP.4443$mVWd.44
in
On 5/4/2025 5:30 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:PERRP.3130$[email protected]:
On 5/3/2025 8:25 PM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vv6iqn$10ghb$[email protected]:
In news:vv65n5$g76i$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:ygsRP.86318$[email protected]:
On 4/26/2025 7:52 AM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vui1jm$1te0q$[email protected]:
In news:vuhhma$1fc7n$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vuh7m8$147ng$[email protected]:
In news:vug8bf$78tf$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and
still owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's
one:...
Find one that addressed borrowers who "paid the
principle, with interest, and still owed..."
Ah, yes, that's where the "creative bookeeping" comes
theAnd when was that? Those student loans started out fairly- the student made payments for 20 years totalling more
than the original loan, but it was all applied to the
interest and not to the principle -- and after 20 years
of payments, the student still owes more than he
borrowed....
So they hadn't actually "paid the principle, with
interest, and still owed..."
They've paid more than they borrowed.
They haven't paid off the loan according to the terms,
Bugster, you fucking moron.
Because that's the way the terms are written - written so
they can NEVER pay them off.
My daughter did.
reasonable, and then many evolved into scams - depending on
studentresorces/advice and sophistication/education of the borrower.Virtually *all* student loans since 2010 have been made by the
federal government (Federal Student Aid office of Dept. of
Education). That program came into being as part of the
Affordable Care Act, the signature achievement of the Obama
administration. Are you saying Obama set out to swindle
youborrowers with deceptive scam loans, Bugster?
Whose responsibility is it to understand the terms of a loan
before accepting it, Bugster? God-fucking-damn it, Bugster,
Your tax refund has nothing to do with any loans or spending by theNo, dickwad, once it's in government hands, it's no longer yourare just too stupid for words.
If it's a government loan, then it's no big deal for the
government to forgive that loan.
*Wrong*, Bugster. It's not the government's money, Bugster, you
stupid lying commie shitbag. It's the taxpayers' money.
money.
No, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag: the money was *lent*
to the borrowers with the expectation that it would be repaid. The
government only holds and spends money on behalf of taxpayers.
You're about done, Bugster.
Once your tax money reaches the government it theirs and not yours.
Then why do I get tax refunds every year, Bugster, you stupid lying
commie shitbag.
government.
Our taxes pay the govt. It's our money.
Universities in Norway offer free education to students who are citizens
of the EU/EEA. The US is supposed to be better and richer than Europe,
so why can't the US offer free college?
On 6/5/25 13:44, Baxter wrote:
Universities in Norway offer free education to students who are citizens
of the EU/EEA. The US is supposed to be better and richer than Europe,
so why can't the US offer free college?
Because students protested against Reagan.
On 4/23/2025 12:54 PM, H Karlsen wrote:
PORTLAND, Oregon — Millions of people who've fallen behind on
student
loan payments must now start repaying them or face a debt
collector.
Nothing wrong with that. It happens for all kinds of other debt
as well.
On 4/23/2025 12:54 PM, H Karlsen wrote:
PORTLAND, Oregon — Millions of people who've fallen behind on
student loan payments must now start repaying them or face a debt
collector.
Nothing wrong with that. It happens for all kinds of other debt as
well.
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in news:vvdude$3qe2g$4@dont-
email.me:
On 6/5/25 13:44, Baxter wrote:
Universities in Norway offer free education to students who are citizens >>> of the EU/EEA. The US is supposed to be better and richer than Europe,
so why can't the US offer free college?
Because students protested against Reagan.
More likely because capitalists/conservturds are greedy.
In article <vvbuss$21thc$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <MPG.4282d2bb747dcd3098a0e5
@usnews.blocknews.net>, [email protected] says...
In article <vvb6dq$18l06$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <vv9bmr$3j1fm$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:%XTRP.4444$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 5:16 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:sBRRP.125269$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 1:34 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:n3QRP.2330$[email protected]:
Question to Google AI: "What would the total of payments
for a $300,000 30 year mortgage at 5% interest be?"
Google AI answer: "For a $300,000 mortgage with a 30-year
term and a 5% interest rate, the total amount paid would
be approximately $610,228.39, including both principal and
interest. This translates to a monthly payment of
$1,570.08 and a total of 360 payments over 30 years."
This is *fucking normal*, Bugster, you filthy *broke*
cheap commie cocksucker.
And how did those subprime loans work?
You don't have any fucking clue what a "subprime loan" is,
Bugster, so you *wouldn't* have any fucking clue how they
worked. I would explain it to you, but being a sleazy
dishonest lying commie shitbag, you would just snip the
explanation and change the topic. So you can fuck off on
that.
The simple fact is, Bugster, you stupid lying commie
shitbag, it is *normal* for the sum of total payments made
on a long-term loan to be *double* the amount of the
original loan. That's how interest *fucking works*, you
stupid lying commie shitbag. If you don't like it, then
don't take out the loan.
And with that Lou Bricano runs away.
No, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag, I haven't run
away, but we know you're about to. You're just too fucking
stupid and hyper-emotional to understand how interest works,
Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag. You think there's
something wrong or "unfair" with a person paying back more
than double the amount originally borrowed, and there just
isn't â?? you're just fucking wrong.
The student borrowers were not "scammed" or in any way taken
advantage of, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag. If
they didn't understand the terms of the loans, or if they
borrowed tens of thousands to obtain degrees that were not
going to lead to high-paying jobs, that is *wholly* on them.
You want college education to be "free," Bugster, you stupid
lying commie shitbag, and it just isn't and is never going to
be. But a stupid lying commie shitbag like you will *never*
have a grasp on the real world.
Those student loans were a gamble - made to kids without any
credit history, and no guarantees of employment. "Lou Bricano"
would argue that a gambler is entitled to win at the casino.
Those student loans were a gamble
To bad, they signed. That's how it works. Maybe they
should think of trade school instead.
Trade schools cost too - and student loans are for trades school
too.
You can pay as you go with a trade school.
Oh and also get a job you can use.
Not always.
Trades are always needed.
Let Harvard go private and fund themselves. Then they can teach whatever
they want. No argument from me.
In article <vvbure$21thc$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in news:MPG.4282d2bb747dcd3098a0e5
@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vvb6dq$18l06$[email protected]>, bax02@fx44.iad:
[email protected] says...
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <vv9bmr$3j1fm$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:%XTRP.4444$mVWd.2865
a
On 5/4/2025 5:16 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:sBRRP.125269$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 1:34 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:n3QRP.2330$[email protected]:
Question to Google AI: "What would the total of payments for
term$300,000 30 year mortgage at 5% interest be?"
Google AI answer: "For a $300,000 mortgage with a 30-year
andand a 5% interest rate, the total amount paid would be
approximately $610,228.39, including both principal and
interest. This translates to a monthly payment of $1,570.08
worked.a total of 360 payments over 30 years."
This is *fucking normal*, Bugster, you filthy *broke* cheap
commie cocksucker.
And how did those subprime loans work?
You don't have any fucking clue what a "subprime loan" is,
Bugster, so you *wouldn't* have any fucking clue how they
itI would explain it to you, but being a sleazy dishonest lying
commie shitbag, you would just snip the explanation and change
the topic. So you can fuck off on that.
The simple fact is, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag,
youis *normal* for the sum of total payments made on a long-term
loan to be *double* the amount of the original loan. That's how
interest *fucking works*, you stupid lying commie shitbag. If
tensdon't like it, then don't take out the loan.
And with that Lou Bricano runs away.
No, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag, I haven't run away,
but we know you're about to. You're just too fucking stupid and
hyper-emotional to understand how interest works, Bugster, you
stupid lying commie shitbag. You think there's something wrong or
"unfair" with a person paying back more than double the amount
originally borrowed, and there just isn't â?? you're just fucking >> >> >> > wrong.
The student borrowers were not "scammed" or in any way taken
advantage of, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag. If they
didn't understand the terms of the loans, or if they borrowed
lyingof thousands to obtain degrees that were not going to lead to
high-paying jobs, that is *wholly* on them.
You want college education to be "free," Bugster, you stupid
arguecommie shitbag, and it just isn't and is never going to be. But a
stupid lying commie shitbag like you will *never* have a grasp on
the real world.
Those student loans were a gamble - made to kids without any credit
history, and no guarantees of employment. "Lou Bricano" would
loansthat a gambler is entitled to win at the casino. Those student
were a gamble
To bad, they signed. That's how it works. Maybe they
should think of trade school instead.
Trade schools cost too - and student loans are for trades school too.
You can pay as you go with a trade school.
Sure, if you got $30,000 laying around - perhaps under your mattress?
It beats the tons of money an Ivy League shithole wants.
On 5/6/2025 2:24 PM, Baxter wrote:
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in news:vvdude$3qe2g$4@dont-
email.me:
On 6/5/25 13:44, Baxter wrote:
Universities in Norway offer free education to students who are
citizens of the EU/EEA. The US is supposed to be better and richer
than Europe, so why can't the US offer free college?
Because students protested against Reagan.
More likely because capitalists/conservturds are greedy.
Capitalists are taught that hard work is rewarded. Liberals are
taught that everyone owes them a living.
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in news:vvdude$3qe2g$4@dont-
email.me:
On 6/5/25 13:44, Baxter wrote:
Universities in Norway offer free education to students who are citizens >>> of the EU/EEA. The US is supposed to be better and richer than Europe,
so why can't the US offer free college?
Because students protested against Reagan.
More likely because capitalists/conservturds are greedy.
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:ITqSP.1632$[email protected]:
On 5/5/2025 8:17 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:DgaSP.22130$[email protected]:
On 5/5/2025 1:21 PM, Baxter wrote:Your tax refund
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:Ys7SP.21126$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 8:32 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:NWTRP.4443$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 5:30 PM, Baxter wrote:No, dickwad, once it's in government hands, it's no longer your
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:PERRP.3130$[email protected]:
On 5/3/2025 8:25 PM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote inVirtually *all* student loans since 2010 have been made by the >>>>>>>>>> federal government (Federal Student Aid office of Dept. of >>>>>>>>>> Education). That program came into being as part of the
news:vv6iqn$10ghb$[email protected]:
In news:vv65n5$g76i$[email protected], BaxterAnd when was that? Those student loans started out fairly >>>>>>>>>>> reasonable, and then many evolved into scams - depending on >>>>>>>>>>> the resorces/advice and sophistication/education of the
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:ygsRP.86318$[email protected]:
On 4/26/2025 7:52 AM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:vui1jm$1te0q$[email protected]:
In news:vuhhma$1fc7n$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:vuh7m8$147ng$[email protected]:
In news:vug8bf$78tf$[email protected], Baxter >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:42:41 -0700, "max headroom" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> typed:
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still owed....
Cite?
I'll wait with you.
There are multiple loan forgiveness plans - here's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one:...
Find one that addressed borrowers who "paid the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> principle, with interest, and still owed..."
Ah, yes, that's where the "creative bookeeping" comes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in - the student made payments for 20 years totalling >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more than the original loan, but it was all applied to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the interest and not to the principle -- and after 20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> years of payments, the student still owes more than he >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> borrowed....
So they hadn't actually "paid the principle, with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interest, and still owed..."
They've paid more than they borrowed.
They haven't paid off the loan according to the terms, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bugster, you fucking moron.
Because that's the way the terms are written - written so >>>>>>>>>>>>> they can NEVER pay them off.
My daughter did.
borrower.
Affordable Care Act, the signature achievement of the Obama >>>>>>>>>> administration. Are you saying Obama set out to swindle
student borrowers with deceptive scam loans, Bugster?
Whose responsibility is it to understand the terms of a loan >>>>>>>>>> before accepting it, Bugster? God-fucking-damn it, Bugster, >>>>>>>>>> you are just too stupid for words.
If it's a government loan, then it's no big deal for the
government to forgive that loan.
*Wrong*, Bugster. It's not the government's money, Bugster, you >>>>>>>> stupid lying commie shitbag. It's the taxpayers' money.
money.
No, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag: the money was *lent* >>>>>> to the borrowers with the expectation that it would be repaid. The >>>>>> government only holds and spends money on behalf of taxpayers.
You're about done, Bugster.
Once your tax money reaches the government it theirs and not yours.
Then why do I get tax refunds every year, Bugster, you stupid lying
commie shitbag.
You said once the tax has been collected, Bugster, the money belongs
to the government. So why do they refund some of it to me, Bugster,
you cheap commie cocksucking liar?
The reason you might get a tax refund is because your tax payment wasn't officially accepted until you filed the paperwork and they processed it.
On 2025-05-06, Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <vvbuss$21thc$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <MPG.4282d2bb747dcd3098a0e5
@usnews.blocknews.net>, [email protected] says...
In article <vvb6dq$18l06$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <vv9bmr$3j1fm$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:%XTRP.4444$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 5:16 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:sBRRP.125269$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 1:34 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:n3QRP.2330$[email protected]:
Question to Google AI: "What would the total of
payments for a $300,000 30 year mortgage at 5%
interest be?"
Google AI answer: "For a $300,000 mortgage with a
30-year term and a 5% interest rate, the total amount
paid would be approximately $610,228.39, including
both principal and interest. This translates to a
monthly payment of $1,570.08 and a total of 360
payments over 30 years."
This is *fucking normal*, Bugster, you filthy *broke*
cheap commie cocksucker.
And how did those subprime loans work?
You don't have any fucking clue what a "subprime loan"
is, Bugster, so you *wouldn't* have any fucking clue how
they worked. I would explain it to you, but being a
sleazy dishonest lying commie shitbag, you would just
snip the explanation and change the topic. So you can
fuck off on that.
The simple fact is, Bugster, you stupid lying commie
shitbag, it is *normal* for the sum of total payments
made on a long-term loan to be *double* the amount of
the original loan. That's how interest *fucking works*,
you stupid lying commie shitbag. If you don't like it,
then don't take out the loan.
And with that Lou Bricano runs away.
No, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag, I haven't
run away, but we know you're about to. You're just too
fucking stupid and hyper-emotional to understand how
interest works, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag.
You think there's something wrong or "unfair" with a
person paying back more than double the amount originally
borrowed, and there just isn't â?? you're just fucking
wrong.
The student borrowers were not "scammed" or in any way
taken advantage of, Bugster, you stupid lying commie
shitbag. If they didn't understand the terms of the loans,
or if they borrowed tens of thousands to obtain degrees
that were not going to lead to high-paying jobs, that is
*wholly* on them.
You want college education to be "free," Bugster, you
stupid lying commie shitbag, and it just isn't and is
never going to be. But a stupid lying commie shitbag like
you will *never* have a grasp on the real world.
Those student loans were a gamble - made to kids without any
credit history, and no guarantees of employment. "Lou
Bricano" would argue that a gambler is entitled to win at
the casino. Those student loans were a gamble
To bad, they signed. That's how it works. Maybe they
should think of trade school instead.
Trade schools cost too - and student loans are for trades
school too.
You can pay as you go with a trade school.
Oh and also get a job you can use.
Not always.
Trades are always needed.
True.
Some become obsolete over time, but other trades take their place.
I have participated in symposiums presenting engineering as a career
to high school students looking to choose a career.
In the past I was always asked about offshoring taking jobs.
These days I have been asked about AI taking over engineering jobs.
My current answer is, do something you need to physically touch.
Be the network technician building the cables, routing them and
plugging the devices in.
Do NOT become the network engineer designing the layer one network.
Right now that can easily be accomplished by someone anywhere on earth
and AI is next.
AI will never run the fiber though.
Better yet, start a service biz.
With the boomers aging service businesses are going to be needed.
Plumber, electrician etc.
AI cannot take those jobs.
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in news:vvdude$3qe2g$4@dont-
email.me:
On 6/5/25 13:44, Baxter wrote:
Universities in Norway offer free education to students who are
citizens of the EU/EEA. The US is supposed to be better and richer
than Europe, so why can't the US offer free college?
Because students protested against Reagan.
More likely because capitalists/conservturds are greedy.
On Wed, 7 May 2025 02:45:27 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<[email protected]> wrote:
Compare that to say Harvard where they follow a far left policy, discourage conservatism
at all costs and have endowments in the BILLIONS of dollars sitting in accounts that
are mostly tax free.
Don't get me wrong, I believe in free speech however I do not want my tax dollars
funding such a left wing institution.
That's good because Harvard is a private university.
On 06 May 2025, pothead <[email protected]> posted some news:vvehtt$dhmm$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-06, Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <vvbuss$21thc$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <MPG.4282d2bb747dcd3098a0e5
@usnews.blocknews.net>, [email protected] says...
In article <vvb6dq$18l06$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <vv9bmr$3j1fm$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:%XTRP.4444$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 5:16 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:sBRRP.125269$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 1:34 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:n3QRP.2330$[email protected]:
Question to Google AI: "What would the total of
payments for a $300,000 30 year mortgage at 5%
interest be?"
Google AI answer: "For a $300,000 mortgage with a
30-year term and a 5% interest rate, the total amount
paid would be approximately $610,228.39, including
both principal and interest. This translates to a
monthly payment of $1,570.08 and a total of 360
payments over 30 years."
This is *fucking normal*, Bugster, you filthy *broke*
cheap commie cocksucker.
And how did those subprime loans work?
You don't have any fucking clue what a "subprime loan"
is, Bugster, so you *wouldn't* have any fucking clue how
they worked. I would explain it to you, but being a
sleazy dishonest lying commie shitbag, you would just
snip the explanation and change the topic. So you can
fuck off on that.
The simple fact is, Bugster, you stupid lying commie
shitbag, it is *normal* for the sum of total payments
made on a long-term loan to be *double* the amount of
the original loan. That's how interest *fucking works*,
you stupid lying commie shitbag. If you don't like it,
then don't take out the loan.
And with that Lou Bricano runs away.
No, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag, I haven't
run away, but we know you're about to. You're just too
fucking stupid and hyper-emotional to understand how
interest works, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag.
You think there's something wrong or "unfair" with a
person paying back more than double the amount originally
borrowed, and there just isn't â?? you're just fucking
wrong.
The student borrowers were not "scammed" or in any way
taken advantage of, Bugster, you stupid lying commie
shitbag. If they didn't understand the terms of the loans,
or if they borrowed tens of thousands to obtain degrees
that were not going to lead to high-paying jobs, that is
*wholly* on them.
You want college education to be "free," Bugster, you
stupid lying commie shitbag, and it just isn't and is
never going to be. But a stupid lying commie shitbag like
you will *never* have a grasp on the real world.
Those student loans were a gamble - made to kids without any
credit history, and no guarantees of employment. "Lou
Bricano" would argue that a gambler is entitled to win at
the casino. Those student loans were a gamble
To bad, they signed. That's how it works. Maybe they
should think of trade school instead.
Trade schools cost too - and student loans are for trades
school too.
You can pay as you go with a trade school.
Oh and also get a job you can use.
Not always.
Trades are always needed.
True.
Some become obsolete over time, but other trades take their place.
I have participated in symposiums presenting engineering as a career
to high school students looking to choose a career.
In the past I was always asked about offshoring taking jobs.
These days I have been asked about AI taking over engineering jobs.
AI can do a great job of basic structures. What it can't do is resolve complex issues involving boundaries. Yet.
My current answer is, do something you need to physically touch.
Be the network technician building the cables, routing them and
plugging the devices in.
Do NOT become the network engineer designing the layer one network.
Right now that can easily be accomplished by someone anywhere on earth
and AI is next.
Don't hire anybody from India for either of the above, specifically Tech Mahindra.
AI will never run the fiber though.
Better yet, start a service biz.
With the boomers aging service businesses are going to be needed.
Plumber, electrician etc.
Security camera stuff is surging right now.
Home battery replacement upgrade services for solar systems are emerging.
On 06 May 2025, Baxter <[email protected]> posted some news:vvduln$3oj4p$[email protected]:
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in news:vvdude$3qe2g$4@dont-
email.me:
On 6/5/25 13:44, Baxter wrote:
Universities in Norway offer free education to students who are
citizens of the EU/EEA. The US is supposed to be better and richer
than Europe, so why can't the US offer free college?
Because students protested against Reagan.
More likely because capitalists/conservturds are greedy.
Maximizing efficiency and profits isn't greed.
On 5/6/2025 2:24 PM, Baxter wrote:
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in news:vvdude$3qe2g$4@dont-
email.me:
On 6/5/25 13:44, Baxter wrote:
Universities in Norway offer free education to students who are
citizens of the EU/EEA. The US is supposed to be better and richer
than Europe, so why can't the US offer free college?
Because students protested against Reagan.
More likely because capitalists/conservturds are greedy.
How about because offering "free" university education is not the
proper role of government?
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:HqOSP.819$[email protected]:
On 5/6/2025 2:24 PM, Baxter wrote:
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in news:vvdude$3qe2g$4@dont-
email.me:
On 6/5/25 13:44, Baxter wrote:
Universities in Norway offer free education to students who are
citizens of the EU/EEA. The US is supposed to be better and richer
than Europe, so why can't the US offer free college?
Because students protested against Reagan.
More likely because capitalists/conservturds are greedy.
How about because offering "free" university education is not the
proper role of government?
Several European governments disagree with you.
And any logic would show that the government would want an educated
populace.
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:HqOSP.819$[email protected]:
On 5/6/2025 2:24 PM, Baxter wrote:
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in news:vvdude$3qe2g$4@dont-
email.me:
On 6/5/25 13:44, Baxter wrote:
Universities in Norway offer free education to students who are
citizens of the EU/EEA. The US is supposed to be better and richer
than Europe, so why can't the US offer free college?
Because students protested against Reagan.
More likely because capitalists/conservturds are greedy.
How about because offering "free" university education is not the
proper role of government?
Several European governments disagree with you.
And any logic would show that the government would want an educated
populace.
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:HqOSP.819$[email protected]:
On 5/6/2025 2:24 PM, Baxter wrote:
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in news:vvdude$3qe2g$4@dont-
email.me:
On 6/5/25 13:44, Baxter wrote:
Universities in Norway offer free education to students who are
citizens of the EU/EEA. The US is supposed to be better and richer
than Europe, so why can't the US offer free college?
Because students protested against Reagan.
More likely because capitalists/conservturds are greedy.
How about because offering "free" university education is not the
proper role of government?
Several European governments disagree with you.
And any logic would show that the government would want an educatedJust the opposite — governments want stupid docile subjects who are unable to discern the truth and reality.
populace.
On 8/5/25 8:12, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:HqOSP.819$[email protected]:
On 5/6/2025 2:24 PM, Baxter wrote:
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in news:vvdude$3qe2g$4@dont-
email.me:
On 6/5/25 13:44, Baxter wrote:
Universities in Norway offer free education to students who are
citizens of the EU/EEA. The US is supposed to be better and richer >>>>>> than Europe, so why can't the US offer free college?
Because students protested against Reagan.
More likely because capitalists/conservturds are greedy.
How about because offering "free" university education is not the
proper role of government?
Several European governments disagree with you.
And any logic would show that the government would want an educated
populace.
Republicans led by Reagan realise an educated populace demands an
intelligent governance.
idjt is attacking universities because their students do not fall for the usual fear and hate that Republicans exploit.
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in news:vviph8$202m0$[email protected]:
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:vviog3$1vkn4$[email protected]...
On 8/5/25 8:12, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:HqOSP.819$[email protected]:
On 5/6/2025 2:24 PM, Baxter wrote:
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvdude$3qe2g$4@dont- email.me:
On 6/5/25 13:44, Baxter wrote:
Universities in Norway offer free education to students who are >>>>>>>> citizens of the EU/EEA. The US is supposed to be better and
richer than Europe, so why can't the US offer free college?
Because students protested against Reagan.
More likely because capitalists/conservturds are greedy.
How about because offering "free" university education is not the
proper role of government?
Several European governments disagree with you.
And any logic would show that the government would want an educated
populace.
Republicans led by Reagan realise an educated populace demands an
intelligent governance.
idjt is attacking universities because their students do not fall for
the usual fear and hate that Republicans exploit.
Actually, seems to me that Democrats are pushing people to go to
college and to take degrees based on their desires,
What is wrong with people pursuing
further education in their desired field?
literature, gender
studies, advanced basket weaving, not technical courses that actually
require you to work and learn but which offer superior income once you
have a degree. Then when these liberal arts majors get out at find
their degree is worthless..
No college education is worthless.
It is an investment in yourself,
something no one can take away.
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:vviog3$1vkn4$[email protected]...
On 8/5/25 8:12, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:HqOSP.819$[email protected]:
On 5/6/2025 2:24 PM, Baxter wrote:
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvdude$3qe2g$4@dont- email.me:
On 6/5/25 13:44, Baxter wrote:
Universities in Norway offer free education to students who are
citizens of the EU/EEA. The US is supposed to be better and
richer than Europe, so why can't the US offer free college?
Because students protested against Reagan.
More likely because capitalists/conservturds are greedy.
How about because offering "free" university education is not the
proper role of government?
Several European governments disagree with you.
And any logic would show that the government would want an educated
populace.
Republicans led by Reagan realise an educated populace demands an
intelligent governance.
idjt is attacking universities because their students do not fall for
the usual fear and hate that Republicans exploit.
Actually, seems to me that Democrats are pushing people to go to
college and to take degrees based on their desires,
literature, gender
studies, advanced basket weaving, not technical courses that actually
require you to work and learn but which offer superior income once you
have a degree. Then when these liberal arts majors get out at find
their degree is worthless..
On 5/6/2025 1:38 PM, Baxter wrote:
The reason you might get a tax refund is because your tax payment
wasn't officially accepted until you filed the paperwork and they
processed it.
Ha ha ha! *HA HA HA HA HA*! You *stupid* fucking clueless commie liar:
the tax money withheld from my pay not only was "officially accepted"
when they got it, it was also *officially spent* long before I filed
any return.
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in news:vviph8$202m0$[email protected]:
Actually, seems to me that Democrats are pushing people to go to
college and to take degrees based on their desires,
What is wrong with people pursuing
further education in their desired field?
literature, gender
studies, advanced basket weaving, not technical courses that actually
require you to work and learn but which offer superior income once
you have a degree. Then when these liberal arts majors get out at
find their degree is worthless..
No college education is worthless.
It is an investment in yourself,
something no one can take away.
On 5/8/2025 8:12 AM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:HqOSP.819$[email protected]:
On 5/6/2025 2:24 PM, Baxter wrote:
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in news:vvdude$3qe2g$4@dont-
email.me:
On 6/5/25 13:44, Baxter wrote:
Universities in Norway offer free education to students who are
citizens of the EU/EEA. The US is supposed to be better and
richer than Europe, so why can't the US offer free college?
Because students protested against Reagan.
More likely because capitalists/conservturds are greedy.
How about because offering "free" university education is not the
proper role of government?
Several European governments disagree with you.
<yawn> We're not Europe.
Just the opposite — governments want stupid docile subjects who are
And any logic would show that the government would want an educated
populace.
unable to discern the truth and reality.
You don't know a fucking thing that you think you know, Bugster.
You're willfully and aggressively stupid.
"Baxter" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:vvihl5$1t4sv$[email protected]...
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:HqOSP.819$[email protected]:
On 5/6/2025 2:24 PM, Baxter wrote:
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in news:vvdude$3qe2g$4@dont-
email.me:
On 6/5/25 13:44, Baxter wrote:
Universities in Norway offer free education to students who are
citizens of the EU/EEA. The US is supposed to be better and
richer than Europe, so why can't the US offer free college?
Because students protested against Reagan.
More likely because capitalists/conservturds are greedy.
How about because offering "free" university education is not the
proper role of government?
Several European governments disagree with you.
And any logic would show that the government would want an educated
populace.
Which we clearly are not getting or they would have no issues paying
back their debts.
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:vviog3$1vkn4$[email protected]...
On 8/5/25 8:12, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:HqOSP.819$[email protected]:
On 5/6/2025 2:24 PM, Baxter wrote:
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvdude$3qe2g$4@dont- email.me:
On 6/5/25 13:44, Baxter wrote:
Universities in Norway offer free education to students who are
citizens of the EU/EEA. The US is supposed to be better and
richer than Europe, so why can't the US offer free college?
Because students protested against Reagan.
More likely because capitalists/conservturds are greedy.
How about because offering "free" university education is not the
proper role of government?
Several European governments disagree with you.
And any logic would show that the government would want an educated
populace.
Republicans led by Reagan realise an educated populace demands an
intelligent governance.
idjt is attacking universities because their students do not fall for
the usual fear and hate that Republicans exploit.
Actually, seems to me that Democrats are pushing people to go to
college and to take degrees based on their desires, literature, gender studies, advanced basket weaving, not technical courses that actually
require you to work and learn but which offer superior income once you
have a degree.
What is wrong with people pursuing
further education in their desired field?
It is when you willingly sign up to finance it, then when you
can't parlay it into a salary that can pay for it you demand
other do.
In news:[email protected],
Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> typed:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vviph8$202m0$[email protected]:
Actually, seems to me that Democrats are pushing people to go to
college and to take degrees based on their desires,
What is wrong with people pursuing
further education in their desired field?
Nothing, if they can pay for it.
literature, gender
studies, advanced basket weaving, not technical courses that actually
require you to work and learn but which offer superior income once
you have a degree. Then when these liberal arts majors get out at
find their degree is worthless..
No college education is worthless.
You'll can say, "Would you like to SuperSize that?" proudly!
It is an investment in yourself,
something no one can take away.
Sometimes investments don't pan out.
On 8/5/25 11:33, Mitchell Holman wrote:
What is wrong with people pursuing
further education in their desired field?
You get academic losers like JRR Tolkien wasting their careers on
old and middle English instead of proper studies like Italian
renaissance poetry.
On Thu, 8 May 2025 14:41:48 -0400, Yak <[email protected]> wrote:
It is when you willingly sign up to finance it, then when you can't
parlay it into a salary that can pay for it you demand other do.
Is that anything like a badly run business getting a cheap loan from
the government then being forgiven for that loan when the poorly run
business can't pay it back?
On Fri, 9 May 2025 08:09:19 -0400, Yak <[email protected]> wrote:
On 5/8/25 6:48 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Thu, 8 May 2025 14:41:48 -0400, Yak <[email protected]> wrote:
It is when you willingly sign up to finance it, then when you can't
parlay it into a salary that can pay for it you demand other do.
Is that anything like a badly run business getting a cheap loan from
the government then being forgiven for that loan when the poorly run
business can't pay it back?
It's very much like that. Why do you ask?
Then why is one not forgiven while the other is?
On 2025-05-06, Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <vvbure$21thc$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in news:MPG.4282d2bb747dcd3098a0e5
@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vvb6dq$18l06$[email protected]>, bax02@fx44.iad:
[email protected] says...
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <vv9bmr$3j1fm$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:%XTRP.4444$mVWd.2865
a
On 5/4/2025 5:16 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:sBRRP.125269$[email protected]:
On 5/4/2025 1:34 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:n3QRP.2330$[email protected]:
Question to Google AI: "What would the total of payments for
term$300,000 30 year mortgage at 5% interest be?"
Google AI answer: "For a $300,000 mortgage with a 30-year
andand a 5% interest rate, the total amount paid would be >>>>>>>>>>>> approximately $610,228.39, including both principal and >>>>>>>>>>>> interest. This translates to a monthly payment of $1,570.08
worked.a total of 360 payments over 30 years."
This is *fucking normal*, Bugster, you filthy *broke* cheap >>>>>>>>>>>> commie cocksucker.
And how did those subprime loans work?
You don't have any fucking clue what a "subprime loan" is, >>>>>>>>>> Bugster, so you *wouldn't* have any fucking clue how they
itI would explain it to you, but being a sleazy dishonest lying >>>>>>>>>> commie shitbag, you would just snip the explanation and change >>>>>>>>>> the topic. So you can fuck off on that.
The simple fact is, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag,
youis *normal* for the sum of total payments made on a long-term >>>>>>>>>> loan to be *double* the amount of the original loan. That's how >>>>>>>>>> interest *fucking works*, you stupid lying commie shitbag. If
tensdon't like it, then don't take out the loan.
And with that Lou Bricano runs away.
No, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag, I haven't run away, >>>>>>>> but we know you're about to. You're just too fucking stupid and >>>>>>>> hyper-emotional to understand how interest works, Bugster, you >>>>>>>> stupid lying commie shitbag. You think there's something wrong or >>>>>>>> "unfair" with a person paying back more than double the amount >>>>>>>> originally borrowed, and there just isn't â?? you're just fucking >>>>>>>> wrong.
The student borrowers were not "scammed" or in any way taken
advantage of, Bugster, you stupid lying commie shitbag. If they >>>>>>>> didn't understand the terms of the loans, or if they borrowed
lyingof thousands to obtain degrees that were not going to lead to
high-paying jobs, that is *wholly* on them.
You want college education to be "free," Bugster, you stupid
arguecommie shitbag, and it just isn't and is never going to be. But a >>>>>>>> stupid lying commie shitbag like you will *never* have a grasp on >>>>>>>> the real world.
Those student loans were a gamble - made to kids without any credit >>>>>>> history, and no guarantees of employment. "Lou Bricano" would
loansthat a gambler is entitled to win at the casino. Those student
You can pay as you go with a trade school.were a gamble
To bad, they signed. That's how it works. Maybe they
should think of trade school instead.
Trade schools cost too - and student loans are for trades school too. >>>>
Sure, if you got $30,000 laying around - perhaps under your mattress?
It beats the tons of money an Ivy League shithole wants.
There has been tons of fraud committed during COVID and funding, loans etc. Things were in such a frenzy, people took advantage of that and grifted the system.
However, the funding DID help many legit businesses so that was good.
Compare that to say Harvard where they follow a far left policy, discourage conservatism
at all costs and have endowments in the BILLIONS of dollars sitting in accounts that
are mostly tax free.
Don't get me wrong, I believe in free speech however I do not want my tax dollars
funding such a left wing institution.
The same goes for PBS/NPR.
And I would say the exact same thing if it were a conservative institution like say
Hillsdale.
Let Harvard go private and fund themselves. Then they can teach whatever they want.
No argument from me.
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:HqOSP.819$[email protected]:
On 5/6/2025 2:24 PM, Baxter wrote:
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in news:vvdude$3qe2g$4@dont-
email.me:
On 6/5/25 13:44, Baxter wrote:
Universities in Norway offer free education to students who are
citizens of the EU/EEA. The US is supposed to be better and
richer than Europe, so why can't the US offer free college?
Because students protested against Reagan.
More likely because capitalists/conservturds are greedy.
How about because offering "free" university education is not the
proper role of government?
Several European governments disagree with you.
And any logic would show that the government would want an educated
populace.
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in news:vvivsg$22l09$2@dont- email.me:
In news:[email protected],
Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> typed:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vviph8$202m0$[email protected]:
Actually, seems to me that Democrats are pushing people to go to
college and to take degrees based on their desires,
What is wrong with people pursuing
further education in their desired field?
Nothing, if they can pay for it.
Do high schools make students pay
for their education?
literature, gender
studies, advanced basket weaving, not technical courses that actually
require you to work and learn but which offer superior income once
you have a degree. Then when these liberal arts majors get out at
find their degree is worthless..
No college education is worthless.
You'll can say, "Would you like to SuperSize that?" proudly!
It is an investment in yourself,
something no one can take away.
Sometimes investments don't pan out.
College should be an investment
of time, not money.
https://www.accreditedschoolsonline.org/resources/which-countries-offer- free-college/
In news:vvihl5$1t4sv$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:HqOSP.819$[email protected]:
On 5/6/2025 2:24 PM, Baxter wrote:
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in news:vvdude$3qe2g$4@dont-
email.me:
On 6/5/25 13:44, Baxter wrote:
Universities in Norway offer free education to students who are
citizens of the EU/EEA. The US is supposed to be better and
richer than Europe, so why can't the US offer free college?
Because students protested against Reagan.
More likely because capitalists/conservturds are greedy.
How about because offering "free" university education is not the
proper role of government?
Several European governments disagree with you.
And any logic would show that the government would want an educated
populace.
Then why do government schools turn out so poorly educated students?
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in news:vvmehm$3a5i8$[email protected]:
In news:vvihl5$1t4sv$[email protected], BaxterThey don't. Public schools perform better than private schools.
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:HqOSP.819$[email protected]:
On 5/6/2025 2:24 PM, Baxter wrote:
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in news:vvdude$3qe2g$4@dont-
email.me:
On 6/5/25 13:44, Baxter wrote:
Universities in Norway offer free education to students who are
citizens of the EU/EEA. The US is supposed to be better and
richer than Europe, so why can't the US offer free college?
Because students protested against Reagan.
More likely because capitalists/conservturds are greedy.
How about because offering "free" university education is not the
proper role of government?
Several European governments disagree with you.
And any logic would show that the government would want an educated
populace.
Then why do government schools turn out so poorly educated students?
https://www.accreditedschoolsonline.org/resources/which-countries-offer-So you could relocate, right?
free-college/
Wrong.They don't. Public schools perform better than private schools.Then why do government schools turn out so poorly educated students?
Try again.
On 9/5/25 19:41, max headroom wrote:
https://www.accreditedschoolsonline.org/resources/which-countries-offer- >>>> free-college/
So you could relocate, right?
Why return to do their most productive work instead of stay and
pay taxes where they were schooled?
You are too stupid to understand why California had the tech boom
instead of Chapel Hill.
In news:vvmiac$3av9c$[email protected], Siri Cruz <[email protected]> typed:
On 9/5/25 19:41, max headroom wrote:
https://www.accreditedschoolsonline.org/resources/which-countries-offer- >>>>> free-college/
So you could relocate, right?
Why return to do their most productive work instead of stay and
pay taxes where they were schooled?
You are too stupid to understand why California had the tech boom
instead of Chapel Hill.
But Holman and Baxter want free universities, which UC, Cal State, and Stanford
certainly are not.
On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Wrong.They don't. Public schools perform better than private schools.Then why do government schools turn out so poorly educated students? >>>> >>
Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate everyone who shows up?
On 2025-05-10, Baxter <[email protected]> wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvmehm$3a5i8$[email protected]:
In news:vvihl5$1t4sv$[email protected], BaxterThey don't. Public schools perform better than private schools.
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:HqOSP.819$[email protected]:
On 5/6/2025 2:24 PM, Baxter wrote:
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvdude$3qe2g$4@dont- email.me:
On 6/5/25 13:44, Baxter wrote:
Universities in Norway offer free education to students who are >>>>>>>> citizens of the EU/EEA. The US is supposed to be better and
richer than Europe, so why can't the US offer free college?
Because students protested against Reagan.
More likely because capitalists/conservturds are greedy.
How about because offering "free" university education is not the
proper role of government?
Several European governments disagree with you.
And any logic would show that the government would want an educated
populace.
Then why do government schools turn out so poorly educated students?
Wrong.
Try again.
<https://www.usnews.com/education/k12/articles/private-school-vs-public -school>
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote:
On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Wrong.They don't. Public schools perform better than private schools.Then why do government schools turn out so poorly educated
students?
Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate everyone who shows up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim
2. moving the goal posts
3. ??? = -9999
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:QK5TP.42311$[email protected]:
On 5/8/2025 8:12 AM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:HqOSP.819$[email protected]:
On 5/6/2025 2:24 PM, Baxter wrote:
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in news:vvdude$3qe2g$4@dont-
email.me:
On 6/5/25 13:44, Baxter wrote:
Universities in Norway offer free education to students who are
citizens of the EU/EEA. The US is supposed to be better and
richer than Europe, so why can't the US offer free college?
Because students protested against Reagan.
More likely because capitalists/conservturds are greedy.
How about because offering "free" university education is not the
proper role of government?
Several European governments disagree with you.
<yawn> We're not Europe.
We tried it here with the GI Bill - why did Repugs kill that?
Just the opposite — governments want stupid docile subjects who are
And any logic would show that the government would want an educated
populace.
unable to discern the truth and reality.
You don't know a fucking thing that you think you know, Bugster.
You're willfully and aggressively stupid.
That's
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in news:vviph8$202m0$[email protected]:
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:vviog3$1vkn4$[email protected]...
On 8/5/25 8:12, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:HqOSP.819$[email protected]:
On 5/6/2025 2:24 PM, Baxter wrote:
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvdude$3qe2g$4@dont- email.me:
On 6/5/25 13:44, Baxter wrote:
Universities in Norway offer free education to students who are >>>>>>>> citizens of the EU/EEA. The US is supposed to be better and
richer than Europe, so why can't the US offer free college?
Because students protested against Reagan.
More likely because capitalists/conservturds are greedy.
How about because offering "free" university education is not the
proper role of government?
Several European governments disagree with you.
And any logic would show that the government would want an educated
populace.
Republicans led by Reagan realise an educated populace demands an
intelligent governance.
idjt is attacking universities because their students do not fall for
the usual fear and hate that Republicans exploit.
Actually, seems to me that Democrats are pushing people to go to
college and to take degrees based on their desires,
What is wrong with people pursuing
further education in their desired field?
literature, gender
studies, advanced basket weaving, not technical courses that actually
require you to work and learn but which offer superior income once you
have a degree. Then when these liberal arts majors get out at find
their degree is worthless..
No college education is worthless.
It is an investment in yourself,
something no one can take away.
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in news:vvmehm$3a5i8$[email protected]:That's a lie, Bugster. Why do you tell such ridiculous, easily debunked lies, Bugster?
In news:vvihl5$1t4sv$[email protected], Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid commie liar, lied:They don't. Public schools perform better than private schools.
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:HqOSP.819$[email protected]:
On 5/6/2025 2:24 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid commie liar, lied:
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in news:vvdude$3qe2g$4@dont-
email.me:
On 6/5/25 13:44, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid commie liar, lied:
Universities in Norway offer free education to students who are
citizens of the EU/EEA. The US is supposed to be better and
richer than Europe, so why can't the US offer free college?
Because students protested against Reagan.
More likely because capitalists/conservturds are greedy.
How about because offering "free" university education is not the
proper role of government?
Several European governments disagree with you.
And any logic would show that the government would want an educated
populace.
Then why do government schools turn out so poorly educated students?
pothead <[email protected]> wrote inBullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar. Nothing you have posted shows
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote:
On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Wrong.They don't. Public schools perform better than private schools.Then why do government schools turn out so poorly educated
students?
Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate everyone who shows up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim
Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal postsAnd the composition of the student body is reflected in the scores. The
3. ??? = -9999
same group of students will achieve the same performance whether in
private or public schools.
pothead <[email protected]> wrote inNo, Bugster, you stupid commie liar — *this*:
news:vvmfeh$3abbu$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid commie liar, lied: >>> "max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvmehm$3a5i8$[email protected]:
In news:vvihl5$1t4sv$[email protected], Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid commie liar, lied:They don't. Public schools perform better than private schools.
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:HqOSP.819$[email protected]: >>>>>> On 5/6/2025 2:24 PM, Baxter wrote:
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvdude$3qe2g$4@dont- email.me:
On 6/5/25 13:44, Baxter wrote:
Universities in Norway offer free education to students who are >>>>>>>>> citizens of the EU/EEA. The US is supposed to be better and >>>>>>>>> richer than Europe, so why can't the US offer free college?
Because students protested against Reagan.
More likely because capitalists/conservturds are greedy.
How about because offering "free" university education is not the
proper role of government?
Several European governments disagree with you.
And any logic would show that the government would want an educated
populace.
Then why do government schools turn out so poorly educated students?
Wrong.
Try again.
<https://www.usnews.com/education/k12/articles/private-school-vs-public
-school>
===============
The Private School Myth
It's only a worthwhile investment if it yields a return.
On 5/8/2025 11:33 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vviph8$202m0$[email protected]:
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:vviog3$1vkn4$[email protected]...
On 8/5/25 8:12, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:HqOSP.819$[email protected]:
On 5/6/2025 2:24 PM, Baxter wrote:
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvdude$3qe2g$4@dont- email.me:
On 6/5/25 13:44, Baxter wrote:
Universities in Norway offer free education to students who
are citizens of the EU/EEA. The US is supposed to be better >>>>>>>>> and richer than Europe, so why can't the US offer free
college?
Because students protested against Reagan.
More likely because capitalists/conservturds are greedy.
How about because offering "free" university education is not the
proper role of government?
Several European governments disagree with you.
And any logic would show that the government would want an
educated populace.
Republicans led by Reagan realise an educated populace demands an
intelligent governance.
idjt is attacking universities because their students do not fall
for the usual fear and hate that Republicans exploit.
Actually, seems to me that Democrats are pushing people to go to
college and to take degrees based on their desires,
What is wrong with people pursuing
further education in their desired field?
There's nothing inherently wrong with it, but if they borrowed money
for it with an expectation of landing a highly remunerated job that
doesn't materialize, they're going to have a hard time paying back the
loans, and they should not expect taxpayers' help.
Like Bugster, you think university education should be "free" for
students.
It isn't, and it likely never will be in the U.S. Americans
who wish to attend university just have to expect to pay for it
themselves. Cry all you want about how you think things "ought" to be
— they just aren't that way.
literature, gender
studies, advanced basket weaving, not technical courses that
actually require you to work and learn but which offer superior
income once you have a degree. Then when these liberal arts majors
get out at find their degree is worthless..
No college education is worthless.
It is an investment in yourself,
something no one can take away.
It's only a worthwhile investment if it yields a return.
If you
"invest" in a four year (or longer) degree with the expectation of
finding work in the field you studied, and then you can't find any
work in that field, then the investment was squandered.
If invest your
fortune into a company making buggy whips or horseshoes or some other
product that is obsolete and no longer in demand, you've wasted your
money. If you borrowed the money, now you're well and truly fucked.
On 5/9/2025 7:54 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid commie
liar, lied:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote inThat's a lie, Bugster. Why do you tell such ridiculous, easily
news:vvmehm$3a5i8$[email protected]:
In news:vvihl5$1t4sv$[email protected], Bugster, willfully andThey don't. Public schools perform better than private schools.
aggressively stupid commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:HqOSP.819$[email protected]:
On 5/6/2025 2:24 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvdude$3qe2g$4@dont- email.me:
On 6/5/25 13:44, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Universities in Norway offer free education to students who are >>>>>>>> citizens of the EU/EEA. The US is supposed to be better and
richer than Europe, so why can't the US offer free college?
Because students protested against Reagan.
More likely because capitalists/conservturds are greedy.
How about because offering "free" university education is not the
proper role of government?
Several European governments disagree with you.
And any logic would show that the government would want an educated
populace.
Then why do government schools turn out so poorly educated students?
debunked lies, Bugster?
Research has consistently shown that private school students tend
to perform better on standardized tests.
Bugster, why do you work so hard at being stupid? The GI Bill is
*still* active. But that is *not* financial aid for college for just
anyone, and it does *not* cover the full cost of tuition.
On 5/10/2025 7:58 AM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid commie
liar, lied:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote inNo, Bugster, you stupid commie liar — *this*:
news:vvmfeh$3abbu$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid commie
liar, lied:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvmehm$3a5i8$[email protected]:
In news:vvihl5$1t4sv$[email protected], Bugster, willfully andThey don't. Public schools perform better than private schools.
aggressively stupid commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:HqOSP.819$[email protected]: >>>>>>> On 5/6/2025 2:24 PM, Baxter wrote:
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvdude$3qe2g$4@dont- email.me:
On 6/5/25 13:44, Baxter wrote:
Universities in Norway offer free education to students who are >>>>>>>>>> citizens of the EU/EEA. The US is supposed to be better and >>>>>>>>>> richer than Europe, so why can't the US offer free college?
Because students protested against Reagan.
More likely because capitalists/conservturds are greedy.
How about because offering "free" university education is not the >>>>>>> proper role of government?
Several European governments disagree with you.
And any logic would show that the government would want an educated >>>>>> populace.
Then why do government schools turn out so poorly educated students? >>>>>
Wrong.
Try again.
<https://www.usnews.com/education/k12/articles/private-school-vs-public
-school>
===============
The Private School Myth
Comparing Private Schools and Public Schools Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling
Executive Summary
The goal of the study was to examine differences in mean National
Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) reading and mathematics scores between public and private schools when selected characteristics of
students and/or schools were taken into account. Among the student characteristics considered were gender, race/ethnicity, disability
status, and identification as an English language learner. Among the
school characteristics considered were school size and location, and composition of the student body and of the teaching staff. In
particular, if the student populations enrolled in the two types of
schools differed systematically with respect to background
characteristics related to achievement, then those differences would be confounded with straightforward comparisons between school types.
The present report examined results from the 2003 NAEP assessments in
reading and mathematics for grades 4 and 8. NAEP draws nationally representative samples of schools and students. In 2003, over 6,900
public schools and over 530 private schools participated in the grade 4 assessments. Over 5,500 public schools and over 550 private schools participated in the grade 8 assessments.
Hierarchical linear models (HLMs) were employed to carry out the desired adjustments. HLMs were a natural choice because they accommodate the
nested structure of the data (i.e., students clustered within schools)
and facilitate the inclusion of variables derived from student and
school characteristics. In this study, the focal parameter was the mean difference between mean NAEP scores for two populations of schools.
(This difference was not identical to the difference in mean scores
between the two student populations, though the discrepancy was
typically small.) HLMs were used to compare all private schools to all
public schools, as well as to compare, separately, certain categories of private schools (i.e., those for which sample sizes were sufficient to
report reliable estimates) to all public schools. Statistical
significance was determined at the .05 level using t tests on model
results.
Results from Grade 4
Reading
In the first set of analyses, all private schools were compared to all
public schools. The average private school mean reading score was 14.7
points higher than the average public school mean reading score, corresponding to an effect size of .41 (the ratio of the absolute value
of the estimated difference to the standard deviation of the NAEP fourth-grade reading score distribution). After adjusting for selected student characteristics, the difference in means was near zero and not significant. In the second set of analyses, Catholic schools and
Lutheran schools were each compared to all public schools. The results,
both with and without adjustments, were similar to the corresponding
results for all private schools.
Mathematics
In the first set of analyses, all private schools were again compared to
all public schools. The average private school mean mathematics score
was 7.8 points higher than the average public school mean mathematics
score, corresponding to an effect size of .29. After adjusting for
selected student characteristics, the difference in means was -4.5 and significantly different from zero. (Note that a negative difference
implies that the average school mean was higher for public schools.) In
the second set, Catholic schools and Lutheran schools were each compared
to all public schools. The results, both with and without adjustments,
were similar to the corresponding results for all private schools.
Results From Grade 8
Reading
In the first set of analyses, all private schools were compared to all
public schools. The average private school mean reading score was 18.1
points higher than the average public school mean reading score, corresponding to an effect size of .58. After adjusting for selected
student characteristics, the difference in means was 7.3 points and significantly different from zero. In the second set, Catholic,
Lutheran, and Conservative Christian schools were each compared to all
public schools. The results, both with and without adjustments, were generally similar to the corresponding results for all private schools.
The only exception was that the average difference in adjusted school
mean scores between Conservative Christian schools and all public
schools was not significantly different from zero.
Mathematics
In the first set of analyses, all private schools were again compared to
all public schools. The average private school mean mathematics score
was 12.3 points higher than the average public school mean mathematics
score, corresponding to an effect size of .38. After adjusting for
selected student characteristics, the difference in means was nearly
zero and not significant. In the second set, Catholic, Lutheran, and Conservative Christian schools were each compared to all public schools. While the results for Catholic schools, both with and without
adjustments, were very similar to the corresponding results for all
private schools, the results for the other two types differed.
The initial difference between Lutheran schools and all public schools
was substantially larger (19.5 points) than was the case for all private schools. The average difference in adjusted mean mathematics scores
between the two types of schools was 4.9 points and significantly
different from zero. On the other hand, the initial difference between Conservative Christian schools and all public schools was substantially smaller (5.1 points) and not significant. The average difference in
adjusted school means between Conservative Christian schools and all
public schools was -7.6 points (i.e., a higher average school mean for
public schools) and was significantly different from zero.
Comparison of Results for Grade 4 and Grade 8
Overall, there were many similarities in the results for the two grades.
In both reading and mathematics, analyses employing unadjusted NAEP
scores indicated that the average private school mean score was higher
than the average public school mean score, and the difference was statistically significant. Including selected student characteristics in
the model, however, resulted in a substantial reduction in the
difference in all four analyses. The reduction varied from 11 to 15
score points. For grade 4 reading and grade 8 mathematics, the average difference in adjusted school mean scores was no longer significant. For grade 4 mathematics, the difference was significant, and the adjusted
school mean was higher for public schools. Only for grade 8 reading was
the difference still significant with a higher school mean for private schools. For all four analyses, with student characteristics such as
gender and race/ethnicity incorporated in the model, the inclusion of
school characteristics (e.g., teacher experience, type of school
location, school size) had little impact on the estimate of the average difference between the two types of schools.
Variance decompositions yielded similar results for the four grade-
subject combinations. Most of the total variance was due to
heterogeneity among students within schools rather than heterogeneity
among school mean scores.
The combination of selected student and school
characteristics accounted for about one-third of the total variance for
grade 4 and about two-fifths of the total variance for grade 8.
https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pubs/studies/2006461.aspx
Private schools do better, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar. This
is settled.
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote inBullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar. Nothing you have
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote:
On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Wrong.They don't. Public schools perform better than private schools.Then why do government schools turn out so poorly educated
students?
Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate everyone who shows
up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim
Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal postsAnd the composition of the student body is reflected in the scores.
3. ??? = -9999
The same group of students will achieve the same performance whether
in private or public schools.
posted shows that.
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:fHKTP.52808$[email protected]:
On 5/9/2025 7:54 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid commie
liar, lied:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote inThat's a lie, Bugster. Why do you tell such ridiculous, easily
news:vvmehm$3a5i8$[email protected]:
In news:vvihl5$1t4sv$[email protected], Bugster, willfully andThey don't. Public schools perform better than private schools.
aggressively stupid commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:HqOSP.819$[email protected]: >>>>>> On 5/6/2025 2:24 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvdude$3qe2g$4@dont- email.me:
On 6/5/25 13:44, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Universities in Norway offer free education to students who are >>>>>>>>> citizens of the EU/EEA. The US is supposed to be better and >>>>>>>>> richer than Europe, so why can't the US offer free college?
Because students protested against Reagan.
More likely because capitalists/conservturds are greedy.
How about because offering "free" university education is not the
proper role of government?
Several European governments disagree with you.
And any logic would show that the government would want an educated
populace.
Then why do government schools turn out so poorly educated students?
debunked lies, Bugster?
Research has consistently shown that private school students tend
to perform better on standardized tests.
And that's misleading information.
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupidLiar,
commie liar, lied:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote inBullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar. Nothing you have
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote:
On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Try again.They don't. Public schools perform better than private schools. >>>>>> Wrong.Then why do government schools turn out so poorly educated >>>>>>>>>> students?
Do private schools have to accept and educate everyone who shows
up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim
Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal postsAnd the composition of the student body is reflected in the scores.
3. ??? = -9999
The same group of students will achieve the same performance whether
in private or public schools.
posted shows that.
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:XJKTP.52809$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 7:58 AM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote inNo, Bugster, you stupid commie liar — *this*:
news:vvmfeh$3abbu$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid commie
liar, lied:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvmehm$3a5i8$[email protected]:
In news:vvihl5$1t4sv$[email protected], Bugster, willfully andThey don't. Public schools perform better than private schools.
aggressively stupid commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:HqOSP.819$[email protected]:
On 5/6/2025 2:24 PM, Baxter wrote:
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvdude$3qe2g$4@dont- email.me:
On 6/5/25 13:44, Baxter wrote:
Universities in Norway offer free education to students who >>>>>>>>>>> are citizens of the EU/EEA. The US is supposed to be better >>>>>>>>>>> and richer than Europe, so why can't the US offer free
college?
Because students protested against Reagan.
More likely because capitalists/conservturds are greedy.
How about because offering "free" university education is not
the proper role of government?
Several European governments disagree with you.
And any logic would show that the government would want an
educated populace.
Then why do government schools turn out so poorly educated
students?
Wrong.
Try again.
<https://www.usnews.com/education/k12/articles/private-school-vs-publ
ic -school>
===============
The Private School Myth
It's already been explained to you
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar. The
bullshit you posted does not say anything about student body
composition.
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
After WWII, the GI Bill paid for college AND living expenses in
addition. Why did that have to end?
That shit costs money we haven't got. What the fuck is wrong with you?
On 5/10/2025 1:40 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:fHKTP.52808$[email protected]:
On 5/9/2025 7:54 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote inThat's a lie, Bugster. Why do you tell such ridiculous, easily
news:vvmehm$3a5i8$[email protected]:
In news:vvihl5$1t4sv$[email protected], Bugster, willfully andThey don't. Public schools perform better than private schools.
aggressively stupid commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:HqOSP.819$[email protected]:
On 5/6/2025 2:24 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvdude$3qe2g$4@dont- email.me:
On 6/5/25 13:44, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Universities in Norway offer free education to students who >>>>>>>>>> are citizens of the EU/EEA. The US is supposed to be better >>>>>>>>>> and richer than Europe, so why can't the US offer free
college?
Because students protested against Reagan.
More likely because capitalists/conservturds are greedy.
How about because offering "free" university education is not
the proper role of government?
Several European governments disagree with you.
And any logic would show that the government would want an
educated populace.
Then why do government schools turn out so poorly educated
students?
debunked lies, Bugster?
Research has consistently shown that private school students
tend to perform better on standardized tests.
And that's misleading information.
No, Bugster, it isn't. You just don't like it because you're a
goddamned commie liar, and it upsets you. But it's factual: private
school students outperform public school students on all measures of
academic achievement.
On 5/10/2025 1:41 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupidLiar,
commie liar, lied:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote inBullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar. Nothing you have
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote:
On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Wrong.They don't. Public schools perform better than privateThen why do government schools turn out so poorly educated >>>>>>>>>>> students?
schools.
Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate everyone who shows
up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim
Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal postsAnd the composition of the student body is reflected in the scores.
3. ??? = -9999
The same group of students will achieve the same performance
whether in private or public schools.
posted shows that.
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar. The bullshit
you posted does not say anything about student body composition.
On 10/5/25 18:08, Lou Bricano wrote:
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar. The
bullshit you posted does not say anything about student body
composition.
Are private schools required to accept autistics, fetal
alcoholic? Born deaf? Born blind?
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:BaKTP.318952$[email protected]:
Bugster, why do you work so hard at being stupid? The GI Bill isAfter WWII, the GI Bill paid for college AND living expenses in addition.
*still* active. But that is *not* financial aid for college for just
anyone, and it does *not* cover the full cost of tuition.
Why did that have to end?
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:XJSTP.165917$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:40 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:fHKTP.52808$[email protected]:
On 5/9/2025 7:54 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote inThat's a lie, Bugster. Why do you tell such ridiculous, easily
news:vvmehm$3a5i8$[email protected]:
In news:vvihl5$1t4sv$[email protected], Bugster, willfully andThey don't. Public schools perform better than private schools.
aggressively stupid commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:HqOSP.819$[email protected]:
On 5/6/2025 2:24 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid >>>>>>>> commie liar, lied:
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvdude$3qe2g$4@dont- email.me:
On 6/5/25 13:44, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid >>>>>>>>>> commie liar, lied:
Universities in Norway offer free education to students who >>>>>>>>>>> are citizens of the EU/EEA. The US is supposed to be better >>>>>>>>>>> and richer than Europe, so why can't the US offer free
college?
Because students protested against Reagan.
More likely because capitalists/conservturds are greedy.
How about because offering "free" university education is not
the proper role of government?
Several European governments disagree with you.
And any logic would show that the government would want an
educated populace.
Then why do government schools turn out so poorly educated
students?
debunked lies, Bugster?
Research has consistently shown that private school students
tend to perform better on standardized tests.
And that's misleading information.
No, Bugster, it isn't. You just don't like it because you're a
goddamned commie liar, and it upsets you. But it's factual: private
school students outperform public school students on all measures of
academic achievement.
You insist on
Students performing better on
tests is NOT proof that the *school* is better
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:xMSTP.165919$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:41 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote:
On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Then why do government schools turn out so poorly educated >>>>>>>>>>>> students?
They don't. Public schools perform better than private
schools.
Wrong.
Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate everyone who shows >>>>>>> up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim
Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal posts
3. ??? = -9999
And the composition of the student body is reflected in the scores.
The same group of students will achieve the same performance
whether in private or public schools.
Bullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar. Nothing you have
posted shows that.
Liar,
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar. The bullshit
you posted does not say anything about student body composition.
LOL forget the "commie" bullshit - conservaturds LOVE commie Putin,
commie Russia.
On 5/10/2025 7:56 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:XJSTP.165917$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:40 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:fHKTP.52808$[email protected]:
On 5/9/2025 7:54 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote inThat's a lie, Bugster. Why do you tell such ridiculous, easily
news:vvmehm$3a5i8$[email protected]:
In news:vvihl5$1t4sv$[email protected], Bugster, willfully andThey don't. Public schools perform better than private schools.
aggressively stupid commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:HqOSP.819$[email protected]:
On 5/6/2025 2:24 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively
stupid commie liar, lied:
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvdude$3qe2g$4@dont- email.me:
On 6/5/25 13:44, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid >>>>>>>>>>> commie liar, lied:
Universities in Norway offer free education to students who >>>>>>>>>>>> are citizens of the EU/EEA. The US is supposed to be
better and richer than Europe, so why can't the US offer >>>>>>>>>>>> free college?
Because students protested against Reagan.
More likely because capitalists/conservturds are greedy.
How about because offering "free" university education is not >>>>>>>>> the proper role of government?
Several European governments disagree with you.
And any logic would show that the government would want an
educated populace.
Then why do government schools turn out so poorly educated
students?
debunked lies, Bugster?
Research has consistently shown that private school students
tend to perform better on standardized tests.
And that's misleading information.
No, Bugster, it isn't. You just don't like it because you're a
goddamned commie liar, and it upsets you. But it's factual: private
school students outperform public school students on all measures of
academic achievement.
You insist on
kicking your lying fucking commie ass. Yes.
Students performing better on
tests is NOT proof that the *school* is better
It's proof that the students coming out of private schools perform
better on *every* measure of performance than the students from public school,
contrary to your lie. You claimed that public schools educate
pupils better than private schools. The evidence says you're a
bullshit liar, which you are — a bullshit commie fucking liar.
On 5/10/2025 1:36 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:BaKTP.318952$[email protected]:
Bugster, why do you work so hard at being stupid? The GI Bill isAfter WWII, the GI Bill paid for college AND living expenses in
*still* active. But that is *not* financial aid for college for just
anyone, and it does *not* cover the full cost of tuition.
addition.
It paid for *some* of that, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar,
but not all.
Why did that have to end?
It didn't end, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar. The GI Bill is
still in effect today.
On Sat, 10 May 2025 20:36:58 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <[email protected]> wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:BaKTP.318952$[email protected]:
Bugster, why do you work so hard at being stupid? The GI Bill isAfter WWII, the GI Bill paid for college AND living expenses in
*still* active. But that is *not* financial aid for college for just
anyone, and it does *not* cover the full cost of tuition.
addition. Why did that have to end? It helped to make the US the
world's leading superpower.
The stupidity is in being unable to see the benefit of an educated >>populace.
Did the GI Bill cover trade and vocational schools or higher learning
also?
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]>
wrote in >>news:82fv1kt6sithcq7nahjmvov5sosuikouft@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksu
ck ing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
After WWII, the GI Bill paid for college AND living expenses in >>>>addition. Why did that have to end?
That shit costs money we haven't got. What the fuck is wrong with
you?
So much then for "the richest nation on the planet'. Seems other
nations DO have money for free or low-cost college.
Thanks for admitting that I'm correct when I say we don't have the
money. Did you just figure this out?
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:qHUTP.128263$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:36 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:BaKTP.318952$[email protected]:
Bugster, why do you work so hard at being stupid? The GI Bill isAfter WWII, the GI Bill paid for college AND living expenses in
*still* active. But that is *not* financial aid for college for just
anyone, and it does *not* cover the full cost of tuition.
addition.
It paid for *some* of that, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar,
but not all.
Why did that have to end?
It didn't end, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar. The GI Bill is
still in effect today.
So millions are being paid to go to college in the US?
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in news:vvp2tv$3vh6s$2@dont-
email.me:
On 10/5/25 18:08, Lou Bricano wrote:
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar. The
bullshit you posted does not say anything about student body
composition.
Are private schools required to accept autistics, fetal
alcoholic? Born deaf? Born blind?
A private school drawing from families of pro footballers,
In news:vvp3ms$3vmi1$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:xMSTP.165919$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:41 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote:
On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Then why do government schools turn out so poorly educated >>>>>>>>>>>>> students?
They don't. Public schools perform better than private
schools.
Wrong.
Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate everyone who
shows up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim
Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal posts
3. ??? = -9999
And the composition of the student body is reflected in the
scores. The same group of students will achieve the same
performance whether in private or public schools.
Bullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar. Nothing you
have posted shows that.
Liar,
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar. The bullshit
you posted does not say anything about student body composition.
LOL forget the "commie" bullshit - conservaturds LOVE commie Putin,
commie Russia.
Forget the "commie" bullshit - conservatives HATE commie Putin, commie Russia,
commie Xi, commie China, commie Maduro, commie Venezuela.
In news:vvp3ms$3vmi1$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:xMSTP.165919$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:41 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote:
On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Then why do government schools turn out so poorly educated >>>>>>>>>>>>> students?
They don't. Public schools perform better than private
schools.
Wrong.
Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate everyone who
shows up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim
Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal posts
3. ??? = -9999
And the composition of the student body is reflected in the
scores. The same group of students will achieve the same
performance whether in private or public schools.
Bullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar. Nothing you
have posted shows that.
Liar,
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar. The bullshit
you posted does not say anything about student body composition.
LOL forget the "commie" bullshit - conservaturds LOVE commie Putin,
commie Russia.
Forget the "commie" bullshit - conservatives HATE commie Putin, commie Russia, commie Xi, commie China,
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:wrote
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]>
news:01312k9a9r3rglr8i7l7pc3s8apum0smqh@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck >>ing.dwarf.com:in
news:82fv1kt6sithcq7nahjmvov5sosuikouft@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksu
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]> >>>>wrote in
ck ing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
After WWII, the GI Bill paid for college AND living expenses in >>>>>>addition. Why did that have to end?
That shit costs money we haven't got. What the fuck is wrong with
you?
So much then for "the richest nation on the planet'. Seems other >>>>nations DO have money for free or low-cost college.
Thanks for admitting that I'm correct when I say we don't have the
money. Did you just figure this out?
So we're actually a poor 3rd Word country lying about being rich and
being exceptional.
A nation of liars.
Baxter thinks we have no national debt and have plenty of money. This
is typical of leftists quaffing the kool aid and think we should be
sending tranny comics to Peru.
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in news:vvqf1q$gn18$[email protected]:
In news:vvp3ms$3vmi1$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:xMSTP.165919$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:41 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote:
On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Then why do government schools turn out so poorly educated >>>>>>>>>>>>>> students?
They don't. Public schools perform better than private >>>>>>>>>>>> schools.
Wrong.
Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate everyone who
shows up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim
Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal posts
3. ??? = -9999
And the composition of the student body is reflected in the
scores. The same group of students will achieve the same
performance whether in private or public schools.
Bullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar. Nothing you
have posted shows that.
Liar,
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar. The bullshit
you posted does not say anything about student body composition.
LOL forget the "commie" bullshit - conservaturds LOVE commie Putin,
commie Russia.
Forget the "commie" bullshit - conservatives HATE commie Putin, commie
Russia,
NO you don't.
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/404017-trump- supporters-whose-pro-russia-shirts-went-viral-were-not/
commie Xi, commie China, commie Maduro, commie Venezuela.
conservatives used to be anti-comunist, but that changed when Russian
asset tRump took over.
On 5/10/2025 7:57 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid commie
liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:xMSTP.165919$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:41 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupidLiar,
commie liar, lied:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote inBullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar. Nothing you have
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote:
On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Wrong.They don't. Public schools perform better than private >>>>>>>>>>> schools.Then why do government schools turn out so poorly educated >>>>>>>>>>>>> students?
Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate everyone who shows >>>>>>>> up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim
Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal postsAnd the composition of the student body is reflected in the scores. >>>>>> The same group of students will achieve the same performance
3. ??? = -9999
whether in private or public schools.
posted shows that.
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar. The bullshit
you posted does not say anything about student body composition.
LOL forget the "commie" bullshit
No, it's an essential part of your stupidity. You *are* a goddamned
fucking commie, and it's in large part because you're fucking stupid.
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:qHUTP.128263$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:36 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:BaKTP.318952$[email protected]:
Bugster, why do you work so hard at being stupid? The GI Bill isAfter WWII, the GI Bill paid for college AND living expenses in
*still* active. But that is *not* financial aid for college for just
anyone, and it does *not* cover the full cost of tuition.
addition.
It paid for *some* of that, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar,
but not all.
Why did that have to end?
It didn't end, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar. The GI Bill is
still in effect today.
So millions are being paid to go to college in the US?
On 5/11/2025 8:44 AM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:2EUTP.187969$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 7:56 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:XJSTP.165917$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:40 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:fHKTP.52808$[email protected]:
On 5/9/2025 7:54 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote inThat's a lie, Bugster. Why do you tell such ridiculous, easily
news:vvmehm$3a5i8$[email protected]:
In news:vvihl5$1t4sv$[email protected], Bugster, willfully and >>>>>>>>> aggressively stupid commie liar, lied:They don't. Public schools perform better than private
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:HqOSP.819$[email protected]:
On 5/6/2025 2:24 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively >>>>>>>>>>> stupid commie liar, lied:
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvdude$3qe2g$4@dont- email.me:
On 6/5/25 13:44, Bugster, willfully and aggressively >>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid commie liar, lied:
Universities in Norway offer free education to students >>>>>>>>>>>>>> who are citizens of the EU/EEA. The US is supposed to be >>>>>>>>>>>>>> better and richer than Europe, so why can't the US offer >>>>>>>>>>>>>> free college?
Because students protested against Reagan.
More likely because capitalists/conservturds are greedy.
How about because offering "free" university education is >>>>>>>>>>> not the proper role of government?
Several European governments disagree with you.
And any logic would show that the government would want an >>>>>>>>>> educated populace.
Then why do government schools turn out so poorly educated
students?
schools.
debunked lies, Bugster?
Research has consistently shown that private school
students tend to perform better on standardized tests.
And that's misleading information.
No, Bugster, it isn't. You just don't like it because you're a
goddamned commie liar, and it upsets you. But it's factual:
private school students outperform public school students on all
measures of academic achievement.
You insist on
kicking your lying fucking commie ass. Yes.
Students performing better on
tests is NOT proof that the *school* is better
It's proof that the students coming out of private schools perform
better on *every* measure of performance than the students from
public school,
Which does not tell you WHY.
That's not what you've been bullshitting about, Bugster, you stupid
fucking commie liar. You've been saying — *lying* — that pupils
from private schools don't show better academic performance than those
from public schools. Now, you're admitting that they *do*, but you're quibbling about not knowing "why" they do. But at least you're
admitting now that they do.
You're stupid, Bugster — willfully and aggressively stupid.
On 5/10/2025 8:00 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in news:vvp2tv$3vh6s$2@dont-
email.me:
On 10/5/25 18:08, Lou Bricano wrote:
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar. The
bullshit you posted does not say anything about student body
composition.
Are private schools required to accept autistics, fetal
alcoholic? Born deaf? Born blind?
A private school drawing from families of pro footballers,
That has never happened, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar.
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:Eq4UP.97881$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 7:57 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:xMSTP.165919$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:41 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid commie liar, lied:Liar,
pothead <[email protected]> wrote inBullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar. Nothing you
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote:
On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Wrong.They don't. Public schools perform better than private >>>>>>>>>>>> schools.Then why do government schools turn out so poorly educated >>>>>>>>>>>>>> students?
Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate everyone who
shows up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim
Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal postsAnd the composition of the student body is reflected in the
3. ??? = -9999
scores. The same group of students will achieve the same
performance whether in private or public schools.
have posted shows that.
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar. The bullshit
you posted does not say anything about student body composition.
LOL forget the "commie" bullshit
No, it's an essential part of your stupidity. You *are* a goddamned
fucking commie, and it's in large part because you're fucking stupid.
Well, commie fits
In news:vvqn6c$i9d9$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvqf1q$gn18$[email protected]:
In news:vvp3ms$3vmi1$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:xMSTP.165919$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:41 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid >>>>>>> commie liar, lied:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote:
On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Then why do government schools turn out so poorly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> educated students?
They don't. Public schools perform better than private >>>>>>>>>>>>> schools.
Wrong.
Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate everyone who >>>>>>>>>> shows up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim
Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal posts
3. ??? = -9999
And the composition of the student body is reflected in the
scores. The same group of students will achieve the same
performance whether in private or public schools.
Bullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar. Nothing you
have posted shows that.
Liar,
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar. The
bullshit you posted does not say anything about student body
composition.
LOL forget the "commie" bullshit - conservaturds LOVE commie Putin,
commie Russia.
Forget the "commie" bullshit - conservatives HATE commie Putin,
commie Russia,
NO you don't.
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/404017-trump-
supporters-whose-pro-russia-shirts-went-viral-were-not/
That's all ya got? Two guys with joke tee shorts from February,
2018?!?
commie Xi, commie China, commie Maduro, commie Venezuela.
conservatives used to be anti-comunist, but that changed when Russian
asset tRump took over.
You are deluded. Today's communists/socialists caucus with the
Democrats.
On 5/10/2025 7:57 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:xMSTP.165919$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:41 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupidLiar,
commie liar, lied:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote inBullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar. Nothing you
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote:
On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Wrong.They don't. Public schools perform better than privateThen why do government schools turn out so poorly educated >>>>>>>>>>>>> students?
schools.
Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate everyone who
shows up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim
Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal postsAnd the composition of the student body is reflected in the
3. ??? = -9999
scores. The same group of students will achieve the same
performance whether in private or public schools.
have posted shows that.
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar. The bullshit
you posted does not say anything about student body composition.
LOL forget the "commie" bullshit
No, it's an essential part of your stupidity. You *are* a goddamned
fucking commie, and it's in large part because you're fucking stupid.
On 5/11/2025 8:45 AM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:qHUTP.128263$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:36 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:BaKTP.318952$[email protected]:
Bugster, why do you work so hard at being stupid? The GI Bill isAfter WWII, the GI Bill paid for college AND living expenses in
*still* active. But that is *not* financial aid for college for just >>>>> anyone, and it does *not* cover the full cost of tuition.
addition.
It paid for *some* of that, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar,
but not all.
Why did that have to end?
It didn't end, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar. The GI Bill is
still in effect today.
So millions are being paid to go to college in the US?
If someone offers their life for their country they should be rewarded
in some way when they survive.
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:vq4UP.97880$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:00 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupidBut students in private schools DO NOT reflect the general populace.
commie liar, lied:
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in news:vvp2tv$3vh6s$2@dont-
email.me:
On 10/5/25 18:08, Lou Bricano wrote:
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar. The
bullshit you posted does not say anything about student body
composition.
Are private schools required to accept autistics, fetal
alcoholic? Born deaf? Born blind?
A private school drawing from families of pro footballers,
That has never happened, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar.
You keep comparing apples to oranges.
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in >>news:vvqtjm$js1b$[email protected]:
In news:vvqn6c$i9d9$[email protected], BaxterCommunists and socialist are not the same thing. And there are NO
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvqf1q$gn18$[email protected]:
In news:vvp3ms$3vmi1$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:xMSTP.165919$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:41 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively
stupid commie liar, lied:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote:
On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Then why do government schools turn out so poorly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> educated students?
They don't. Public schools perform better than private >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> schools.
Wrong.
Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate everyone who >>>>>>>>>>>> shows up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim
Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal posts
3. ??? = -9999
And the composition of the student body is reflected in the >>>>>>>>>> scores. The same group of students will achieve the same
performance whether in private or public schools.
Bullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar. Nothing you >>>>>>>>> have posted shows that.
Liar,
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar. The
bullshit you posted does not say anything about student body
composition.
LOL forget the "commie" bullshit - conservaturds LOVE commie
Putin, commie Russia.
Forget the "commie" bullshit - conservatives HATE commie Putin,
commie Russia,
NO you don't.
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/404017-trump-
supporters-whose-pro-russia-shirts-went-viral-were-not/
That's all ya got? Two guys with joke tee shorts from February,
2018?!?
commie Xi, commie China, commie Maduro, commie Venezuela.
conservatives used to be anti-comunist, but that changed when
Russian asset tRump took over.
You are deluded. Today's communists/socialists caucus with the
Democrats.
actual Socialists anywhere in Congress.
Yes, there are members of Congress who identify as democratic
socialists
On 5/11/2025 1:15 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vq4UP.97880$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:00 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupidBut students in private schools DO NOT reflect the general populace.
commie liar, lied:
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in news:vvp2tv$3vh6s$2@dont-
email.me:
On 10/5/25 18:08, Lou Bricano wrote:
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar. The
bullshit you posted does not say anything about student body
composition.
Are private schools required to accept autistics, fetal
alcoholic? Born deaf? Born blind?
A private school drawing from families of pro footballers,
That has never happened, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar.
Red herring.
On 5/11/2025 1:19 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:Eq4UP.97881$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 7:57 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:xMSTP.165919$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:41 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid >>>>>>> commie liar, lied:Liar,
pothead <[email protected]> wrote inBullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar. Nothing you
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote:
On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Wrong.They don't. Public schools perform better than private >>>>>>>>>>>>> schools.Then why do government schools turn out so poorly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> educated students?
Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate everyone who >>>>>>>>>> shows up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim
Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal postsAnd the composition of the student body is reflected in the
3. ??? = -9999
scores. The same group of students will achieve the same
performance whether in private or public schools.
have posted shows that.
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar. The
bullshit you posted does not say anything about student body
composition.
LOL forget the "commie" bullshit
No, it's an essential part of your stupidity. You *are* a goddamned
fucking commie, and it's in large part because you're fucking
stupid.
Well, commie fits
*you*, Bugster, you goddamned stupid fucking commie liar. You *are* a
fucking commie. You hate private property and private enterprise and
want the state to control and do everything.
or in flophouses while illegal migrants are given cell phones, cloths, a monthly allowance,
and are staying in 4 star hotels.
The party of Satan is more concerned with the rights of an MS-13 gang member than they are
with veteran Johnny Hayseed who is wandering the streets of NYC because he suffers from
PTSD.
On 5/11/2025 1:12 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:oq4UP.97879$[email protected]:
On 5/11/2025 8:44 AM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:2EUTP.187969$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 7:56 PM,Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:XJSTP.165917$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:40 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid >>>>>>> commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:fHKTP.52808$[email protected]:
On 5/9/2025 7:54 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressivelyAnd that's misleading information.
stupid commie liar, lied:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote inThat's a lie, Bugster. Why do you tell such ridiculous, easily >>>>>>>>> debunked lies, Bugster?
news:vvmehm$3a5i8$[email protected]:
In news:vvihl5$1t4sv$[email protected], Bugster, willfully and >>>>>>>>>>> aggressively stupid commie liar, lied:They don't. Public schools perform better than private
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:HqOSP.819$[email protected]:
On 5/6/2025 2:24 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively >>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid commie liar, lied:
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvdude$3qe2g$4@dont- email.me:
On 6/5/25 13:44, Bugster, willfully and aggressively >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid commie liar, lied:
Universities in Norway offer free education to students >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who are citizens of the EU/EEA. The US is supposed to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be better and richer than Europe, so why can't the US >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> offer free college?
Because students protested against Reagan.
More likely because capitalists/conservturds are greedy. >>>>>>>>>>>How about because offering "free" university education is >>>>>>>>>>>>> not the proper role of government?
Several European governments disagree with you.
And any logic would show that the government would want an >>>>>>>>>>>> educated populace.
Then why do government schools turn out so poorly educated >>>>>>>>>>> students?
schools.
Research has consistently shown that private school
students tend to perform better on standardized tests. >>>>>>>>
No, Bugster, it isn't. You just don't like it because you're a
goddamned commie liar, and it upsets you. But it's factual:
private school students outperform public school students on all >>>>>>> measures of academic achievement.
You insist on
kicking your lying fucking commie ass. Yes.
Students performing better on
tests is NOT proof that the *school* is better
It's proof that the students coming out of private schools perform
better on *every* measure of performance than the students from
public school,
Which does not tell you WHY.
That's not what you've been bullshitting about, Bugster, you stupid
fucking commie liar. You've been saying — *lying* — that pupils
from private schools don't show better academic performance than
those from public schools. Now, you're admitting that they *do*, but
you're quibbling about not knowing "why" they do. But at least
you're admitting now that they do.
The WHY is not a quibble.
It is, when you previously were *lying* and saying they don't do
better. It's your attempt to avoid acknowledging that you were
*lying*.
And you're moving the goal posts from 'doing better on standarized
tests' to "better academic performance".
One and the same, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar.
On 11/5/25 16:56, pothead wrote:
or in flophouses while illegal migrants are given cell phones,
cloths, a monthly allowance, and are staying in 4 star hotels.
As soon as they get their asylum hearing they can be deported if
asylum is denied. Republicans block hiring enough judges. idjt
removes existing judges. You want this as a reason to overturn
the Constitution.
The party of Satan is more concerned with the rights of an MS-13 gang
member than they are with veteran Johnny Hayseed who is wandering the
streets of NYC because he suffers from PTSD.
Who is preaching empathy is evil?
As soon as they get their asylum hearing they can be deported ifWhy was Biden giving them phones and turning them loose without a
asylum is denied. Republicans block hiring enough judges. idjt
removes existing judges. You want this as a reason to overturn
the Constitution.
hearing then? Was Mayorkas not doing his job?
"The total number of Biden Article III judgeship nominees confirmed by
the United States Senate was 235, including one associate justice of
the Supreme Court of the United States, 45 judges for the United States courts of appeals, 187 judges for the United States district courts and
two judges for the United States .
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:t18UP.350335$[email protected]:
On 5/11/2025 1:19 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:Eq4UP.97881$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 7:57 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:xMSTP.165919$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:41 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid >>>>>>>> commie liar, lied:Liar,
pothead <[email protected]> wrote inBullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar. Nothing you >>>>>>>> have posted shows that.
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote:
On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Wrong.They don't. Public schools perform better than private >>>>>>>>>>>>>> schools.Then why do government schools turn out so poorly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> educated students?
Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate everyone who >>>>>>>>>>> shows up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim
Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal postsAnd the composition of the student body is reflected in the
3. ??? = -9999
scores. The same group of students will achieve the same
performance whether in private or public schools.
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar. The
bullshit you posted does not say anything about student body
composition.
LOL forget the "commie" bullshit
No, it's an essential part of your stupidity. You *are* a goddamned
fucking commie, and it's in large part because you're fucking
stupid.
Well, commie fits
*you*, Bugster, you goddamned stupid fucking commie liar. You *are* a
fucking commie. You hate private property and private enterprise and
want the state to control and do everything.
Whoosh!! Right off the cliff you go!.
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:L18UP.350353$[email protected]:
On 5/11/2025 1:12 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:oq4UP.97879$[email protected]:
On 5/11/2025 8:44 AM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:2EUTP.187969$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 7:56 PM,Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:XJSTP.165917$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:40 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid >>>>>>>> commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:fHKTP.52808$[email protected]:
On 5/9/2025 7:54 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressivelyAnd that's misleading information.
stupid commie liar, lied:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote inThat's a lie, Bugster. Why do you tell such ridiculous, easily >>>>>>>>>> debunked lies, Bugster?
news:vvmehm$3a5i8$[email protected]:
In news:vvihl5$1t4sv$[email protected], Bugster, willfully and >>>>>>>>>>>> aggressively stupid commie liar, lied:They don't. Public schools perform better than private
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:HqOSP.819$[email protected]:
On 5/6/2025 2:24 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively >>>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid commie liar, lied:
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvdude$3qe2g$4@dont- email.me:
On 6/5/25 13:44, Bugster, willfully and aggressively >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid commie liar, lied:
Universities in Norway offer free education to students >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who are citizens of the EU/EEA. The US is supposed to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be better and richer than Europe, so why can't the US >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> offer free college?
Because students protested against Reagan.
More likely because capitalists/conservturds are greedy. >>>>>>>>>>>>How about because offering "free" university education is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> not the proper role of government?
Several European governments disagree with you.
And any logic would show that the government would want an >>>>>>>>>>>>> educated populace.
Then why do government schools turn out so poorly educated >>>>>>>>>>>> students?
schools.
Research has consistently shown that private school >>>>>>>>>> students tend to perform better on standardized tests. >>>>>>>>>
No, Bugster, it isn't. You just don't like it because you're a >>>>>>>> goddamned commie liar, and it upsets you. But it's factual:
private school students outperform public school students on all >>>>>>>> measures of academic achievement.
You insist on
kicking your lying fucking commie ass. Yes.
Students performing better on
tests is NOT proof that the *school* is better
It's proof that the students coming out of private schools perform >>>>>> better on *every* measure of performance than the students from
public school,
Which does not tell you WHY.
That's not what you've been bullshitting about, Bugster, you stupid
fucking commie liar. You've been saying — *lying* — that pupils
from private schools don't show better academic performance than
those from public schools. Now, you're admitting that they *do*, but
you're quibbling about not knowing "why" they do. But at least
you're admitting now that they do.
The WHY is not a quibble.
It is, when you previously were *lying* and saying they don't do
better. It's your attempt to avoid acknowledging that you were
*lying*.
You keep twisting what I've been saying
I've never disputed that the STUDENTS didn't score better,
I dispute the claim that they score higher solely BECAUSE they're private school students.
And you're moving the goal posts from 'doing better on standarized
tests' to "better academic performance".
One and the same, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar.
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
On Sat, 10 May 2025 20:36:58 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <[email protected]> wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:BaKTP.318952$[email protected]:
Bugster, why do you work so hard at being stupid? The GI Bill isAfter WWII, the GI Bill paid for college AND living expenses in
*still* active. But that is *not* financial aid for college for just
anyone, and it does *not* cover the full cost of tuition.
addition. Why did that have to end? It helped to make the US the
world's leading superpower.
The stupidity is in being unable to see the benefit of an educated >>populace.
Did the GI Bill cover trade and vocational schools or higher learning
also?
I went to an Electronics school, it taught computer programming too. many
of the student body there talked disparagingly of those who were just
there for the GI Bill money and not actually interested in learning.
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:wrote
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]>
news:bkj32kpk79uluf3clqvhecifdhpmlpub4l@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck >>ing.dwarf.com:in
private
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:wrote
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]>
in
news:pu122kd004jlm4q4hup8708me0vfpv1r41 >>@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck
ing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>news:vvqtjm$js1b$[email protected]:
In news:vvqn6c$i9d9$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvqf1q$gn18$[email protected]:
In news:vvp3ms$3vmi1$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:xMSTP.165919$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:41 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively >>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid commie liar, lied:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Then why do government schools turn out so poorly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> educated students?
They don't. Public schools perform better than
whoschools.
Wrong.
Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate everyone
theshows up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim
Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal posts
3. ??? = -9999
And the composition of the student body is reflected in
rantyouscores. The same group of students will achieve the same >>>>>>>>>>>>>> performance whether in private or public schools.
Bullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar. Nothing
Communists and socialist are not the same thing. And there are NO >>>>>>actual Socialists anywhere in Congress.have posted shows that.
Liar,
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar. The >>>>>>>>>>> bullshit you posted does not say anything about student body >>>>>>>>>>> composition.
LOL forget the "commie" bullshit - conservaturds LOVE commie >>>>>>>>>> Putin, commie Russia.
Forget the "commie" bullshit - conservatives HATE commie Putin, >>>>>>>>> commie Russia,
NO you don't.
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/404017-trump- >>>>>>>> supporters-whose-pro-russia-shirts-went-viral-were-not/
That's all ya got? Two guys with joke tee shorts from February,
2018?!?
commie Xi, commie China, commie Maduro, commie Venezuela.
conservatives used to be anti-comunist, but that changed when
Russian asset tRump took over.
You are deluded. Today's communists/socialists caucus with the
Democrats.
Yes, there are members of Congress who identify as democratic
socialists
Democratic Socialists are not the "Socialists" that conservaturds
about.
Sorry old timer.
If you morons think Musk is "literally Hitler,: then yes, Democratic
Socialists are the socialists conservatives rant about.
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing to do
with any actual ideology.
Like "Nazi" to you freaks, right?
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:Eq4UP.97881$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 7:57 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:xMSTP.165919$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:41 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupidLiar,
commie liar, lied:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote inBullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar. Nothing you
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote:
On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Wrong.They don't. Public schools perform better than private >>>>>>>>>>> schools.Then why do government schools turn out so poorly educated >>>>>>>>>>>>> students?
Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate everyone who
shows up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim
Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal postsAnd the composition of the student body is reflected in the
3. ??? = -9999
scores. The same group of students will achieve the same
performance whether in private or public schools.
have posted shows that.
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar. The bullshit
you posted does not say anything about student body composition.
LOL forget the "commie" bullshit
No, it's an essential part of your stupidity. You *are* a goddamned
fucking commie, and it's in large part because you're fucking stupid.
Well, commie fits YOUR radical conservaturd Dark Ages stupidity.
"Creon" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 12 May 2025 08:19:06 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentö[email protected]> >>>>wrote in >>>>news:[email protected] >>>>suck ing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:wrote
Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentö[email protected]>
youin news:pu122kd004jlm4q4hup8708me0vfpv1r41 >>>>@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck
ing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>news:vvqtjm$js1b$[email protected]:
In news:vvqn6c$i9d9$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvqf1q$gn18$[email protected]:
In news:vvp3ms$3vmi1$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:xMSTP.165919$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:41 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and
aggressively stupid commie liar, lied:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Then why do government schools turn out so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> poorly educated students?
They don't. Public schools perform better than >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> private schools.
Wrong. Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everyone who shows up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim
Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal posts 3. ??? = -9999
And the composition of the student body is reflected in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the scores. The same group of students will achieve the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> same performance whether in private or public schools. >>>>>>>>>Bullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing
Communists and socialist are not the same thing. And there are >>>>>>>>NO actual Socialists anywhere in Congress.have posted shows that.
Liar,
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar. The >>>>>>>>>>>>> bullshit you posted does not say anything about student >>>>>>>>>>>>> body composition.
LOL forget the "commie" bullshit - conservaturds LOVE
commie Putin, commie Russia.
Forget the "commie" bullshit - conservatives HATE commie >>>>>>>>>>> Putin, commie Russia,
NO you don't.
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/404017-trump >>>>>>>>>> - supporters-whose-pro-russia-shirts-went-viral-were-not/
That's all ya got? Two guys with joke tee shorts from
February, 2018?!?
commie Xi, commie China, commie Maduro, commie Venezuela.
conservatives used to be anti-comunist, but that changed when >>>>>>>>>> Russian asset tRump took over.
You are deluded. Today's communists/socialists caucus with the >>>>>>>>> Democrats.
Yes, there are members of Congress who identify as democratic
socialists
Democratic Socialists are not the "Socialists" that conservaturds >>>>>>rant about.
Sorry old timer.
If you morons think Musk is "literally Hitler,: then yes,
Democratic Socialists are the socialists conservatives rant about.
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing to
do with any actual ideology.
Like "Nazi" to you freaks, right?
What's another good name for "white supremacist nationalist
fascists"?
BTW, even the famous Godwin of "Godwin's Law" has said they're Nazis.
Tell me if they were black supremacist nationalist fascists would they
still be Nazis.... if not, what term would apply to such people?
On Mon, 12 May 2025 08:19:06 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]> wrote >>in >>news:bkj32kpk79uluf3clqvhecifdhpmlpub4l@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck >>ing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]> >>wrote
in news:pu122kd004jlm4q4hup8708me0vfpv1r41 >>@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck
ing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>news:vvqtjm$js1b$[email protected]:
In news:vvqn6c$i9d9$[email protected], BaxterCommunists and socialist are not the same thing. And there are NO >>>>>>actual Socialists anywhere in Congress.
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvqf1q$gn18$[email protected]:
In news:vvp3ms$3vmi1$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:xMSTP.165919$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:41 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively >>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid commie liar, lied:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Then why do government schools turn out so poorly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> educated students?
They don't. Public schools perform better than >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> private schools.
Wrong. Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate everyone >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who shows up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim
Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal posts 3. ??? = -9999
And the composition of the student body is reflected in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> scores. The same group of students will achieve the same >>>>>>>>>>>>>> performance whether in private or public schools.
Bullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar. Nothing >>you
have posted shows that.
Liar,
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar. The >>>>>>>>>>> bullshit you posted does not say anything about student body >>>>>>>>>>> composition.
LOL forget the "commie" bullshit - conservaturds LOVE commie >>>>>>>>>> Putin, commie Russia.
Forget the "commie" bullshit - conservatives HATE commie Putin, >>>>>>>>> commie Russia,
NO you don't.
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/404017-trump- >>>>>>>> supporters-whose-pro-russia-shirts-went-viral-were-not/
That's all ya got? Two guys with joke tee shorts from February, >>>>>>> 2018?!?
commie Xi, commie China, commie Maduro, commie Venezuela.
conservatives used to be anti-comunist, but that changed when >>>>>>>> Russian asset tRump took over.
You are deluded. Today's communists/socialists caucus with the >>>>>>> Democrats.
Yes, there are members of Congress who identify as democratic
socialists
Democratic Socialists are not the "Socialists" that conservaturds rant >>>>about.
Sorry old timer.
If you morons think Musk is "literally Hitler,: then yes, Democratic
Socialists are the socialists conservatives rant about.
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing to do >>with any actual ideology.
Like "Nazi" to you freaks, right?
What's another good name for "white supremacist nationalist fascists"?
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]> wrote
in
news:3a442k98vfko65ul1gfr3f493t63vha5gi@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck ing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
wroteKlaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]>
news:bkj32kpk79uluf3clqvhecifdhpmlpub4l@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck >>ing.dwarf.com:in
private
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]> >>wrote
in
news:pu122kd004jlm4q4hup8708me0vfpv1r41 >>@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck
ing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>news:vvqtjm$js1b$[email protected]:
In news:vvqn6c$i9d9$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvqf1q$gn18$[email protected]:
In news:vvp3ms$3vmi1$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:xMSTP.165919$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:41 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively >>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid commie liar, lied:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Then why do government schools turn out so poorly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> educated students?
They don't. Public schools perform better than
whoschools.
Wrong.
Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate everyone
theshows up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim
Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal posts
3. ??? = -9999
And the composition of the student body is reflected in
rantCommunists and socialist are not the same thing. And there are NO >>>>>>actual Socialists anywhere in Congress.scores. The same group of students will achieve the same >>>>>>>>>>>>>> performance whether in private or public schools.
Bullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar. Nothing >>you
have posted shows that.
Liar,
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar. The >>>>>>>>>>> bullshit you posted does not say anything about student body >>>>>>>>>>> composition.
LOL forget the "commie" bullshit - conservaturds LOVE commie >>>>>>>>>> Putin, commie Russia.
Forget the "commie" bullshit - conservatives HATE commie Putin, >>>>>>>>> commie Russia,
NO you don't.
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/404017-trump- >>>>>>>> supporters-whose-pro-russia-shirts-went-viral-were-not/
That's all ya got? Two guys with joke tee shorts from February, >>>>>>> 2018?!?
commie Xi, commie China, commie Maduro, commie Venezuela.
conservatives used to be anti-comunist, but that changed when >>>>>>>> Russian asset tRump took over.
You are deluded. Today's communists/socialists caucus with the >>>>>>> Democrats.
Yes, there are members of Congress who identify as democratic
socialists
Democratic Socialists are not the "Socialists" that conservaturds
about.
Sorry old timer.
If you morons think Musk is "literally Hitler,: then yes, Democratic
Socialists are the socialists conservatives rant about.
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing to do >>with any actual ideology.
Like "Nazi" to you freaks, right?
You might try:
- NOT walking like a NAZI,
- NOT talking like a NAZI
- NOT acting like a NAZI
Oozing scarlet red maxipad:
Then why do government schools turn out so poorly educated
students?
Bugster the stupid lying commie:
They don't. Public schools perform better than private schools.
Lou Bricano:
That's a lie, Bugster. Why do you tell such ridiculous, easily
debunked lies, Bugster? Research has consistently shown that
private school students tend to perform better on standardized
tests.
On Mon, 12 May 2025 12:48:49 -0400, "Scout"wrote:
"Creon" <[email protected]> wrote<snip>
On Mon, 12 May 2025 08:19:06 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing to
do with any actual ideology.
Like "Nazi" to you freaks, right?
What's another good name for "white supremacist nationalist
fascists"?
BTW, even the famous Godwin of "Godwin's Law" has said they're
Nazis.
Tell me if they were black supremacist nationalist fascists would they >>still be Nazis.... if not, what term would apply to such people?
They called them "Black Panthers". There have been a few such groups.
On 5/11/2025 5:32 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:t18UP.350335$[email protected]:
On 5/11/2025 1:19 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:Eq4UP.97881$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 7:57 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:xMSTP.165919$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:41 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid >>>>>>> commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and aggressivelyLiar,
stupid commie liar, lied:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote inBullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar. Nothing you >>>>>>>>> have posted shows that.
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote:
On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Wrong.They don't. Public schools perform better than private >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> schools.Then why do government schools turn out so poorly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> educated students?
Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate everyone who >>>>>>>>>>>> shows up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim
Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal postsAnd the composition of the student body is reflected in the >>>>>>>>>> scores. The same group of students will achieve the same
3. ??? = -9999
performance whether in private or public schools.
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar. The
bullshit you posted does not say anything about student body
composition.
LOL forget the "commie" bullshit
No, it's an essential part of your stupidity. You *are* a
goddamned fucking commie, and it's in large part because you're
fucking stupid.
Well, commie fits
*you*, Bugster, you goddamned stupid fucking commie liar. You *are*
a fucking commie. You hate private property and private enterprise
and want the state to control and do everything.
Whoosh!! Right off the cliff you go!.
Nope. I described you to a T, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar. Everything I said about you, including you being willfully and
aggressively stupid, is true.
In article <vvubvv$1hrff$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvtes0$185c7$[email protected]:
Well, go ahead and point out any such Black NAZIs that have existed in
"Creon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 12 May 2025 08:19:06 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentö[email protected]>
wrote in
news:[email protected]
suck ing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:wrote
Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentö[email protected]>
@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuckin news:pu122kd004jlm4q4hup8708me0vfpv1r41
youing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvqtjm$js1b$[email protected]:
In news:vvqn6c$i9d9$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvqf1q$gn18$[email protected]:
In news:vvp3ms$3vmi1$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:xMSTP.165919$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:41 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and
aggressively stupid commie liar, lied:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote:
On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Then why do government schools turn out so
poorly educated students?
They don't. Public schools perform better than
private schools.
Wrong. Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate
everyone who shows up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim
Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal posts 3. ??? = -9999
And the composition of the student body is reflected in
the scores. The same group of students will achieve the
same performance whether in private or public schools.
Bullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar.
Nothing
Communists and socialist are not the same thing. And there arehave posted shows that.
Liar,
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar. The
bullshit you posted does not say anything about student
body composition.
LOL forget the "commie" bullshit - conservaturds LOVE
commie Putin, commie Russia.
Forget the "commie" bullshit - conservatives HATE commie
Putin, commie Russia,
NO you don't.
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/404017-trump
- supporters-whose-pro-russia-shirts-went-viral-were-not/
That's all ya got? Two guys with joke tee shorts from
February, 2018?!?
commie Xi, commie China, commie Maduro, commie Venezuela.
conservatives used to be anti-comunist, but that changed when
Russian asset tRump took over.
You are deluded. Today's communists/socialists caucus with the
Democrats.
NO actual Socialists anywhere in Congress.
Yes, there are members of Congress who identify as democratic
socialists
Democratic Socialists are not the "Socialists" that conservaturds
rant about.
Sorry old timer.
If you morons think Musk is "literally Hitler,: then yes,
Democratic Socialists are the socialists conservatives rant about.
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing to
do with any actual ideology.
Like "Nazi" to you freaks, right?
What's another good name for "white supremacist nationalist
fascists"?
BTW, even the famous Godwin of "Godwin's Law" has said they're Nazis.
Tell me if they were black supremacist nationalist fascists would they
still be Nazis.... if not, what term would apply to such people?
the world.
Would you consider a black person who supports Trump a
Nazi?
Governor Swill wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On Mon, 12 May 2025 15:13:23 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing to do >>>with any actual ideology.
Just another political swearword like commie, wokie or DEI.
You RADICAL LUNATIC LEFT LIBERAL MARXIST WOKE COMMIE DEI hire!!!!
On Mon, 12 May 2025 12:48:49 -0400, "Scout"wrote:
"Creon" <[email protected]> wrote<snip>
On Mon, 12 May 2025 08:19:06 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing to do >>>>>with any actual ideology.
Like "Nazi" to you freaks, right?
What's another good name for "white supremacist nationalist fascists"?
BTW, even the famous Godwin of "Godwin's Law" has said they're Nazis.
Tell me if they were black supremacist nationalist fascists would they >>still
be Nazis.... if not, what term would apply to such people?
They called them "Black Panthers". There have been a few such groups.
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]> wrote
in
news:3a442k98vfko65ul1gfr3f493t63vha5gi@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck ing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:wrote
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]>
news:bkj32kpk79uluf3clqvhecifdhpmlpub4l@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuckin
privateing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]> >>>wrote
in
news:pu122kd004jlm4q4hup8708me0vfpv1r41 >>>@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck
ing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>news:vvqtjm$js1b$[email protected]:
In news:vvqn6c$i9d9$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvqf1q$gn18$[email protected]:
In news:vvp3ms$3vmi1$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:xMSTP.165919$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:41 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively >>>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid commie liar, lied:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Then why do government schools turn out so poorly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> educated students?
They don't. Public schools perform better than
whoschools.
Wrong.
Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate everyone
theshows up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim
Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal posts
3. ??? = -9999
And the composition of the student body is reflected in
rantCommunists and socialist are not the same thing. And there are NO >>>>>>>actual Socialists anywhere in Congress.scores. The same group of students will achieve the same >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> performance whether in private or public schools.
Bullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar. Nothing >>>you
have posted shows that.
Liar,
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar. The >>>>>>>>>>>> bullshit you posted does not say anything about student body >>>>>>>>>>>> composition.
LOL forget the "commie" bullshit - conservaturds LOVE commie >>>>>>>>>>> Putin, commie Russia.
Forget the "commie" bullshit - conservatives HATE commie Putin, >>>>>>>>>> commie Russia,
NO you don't.
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/404017-trump- >>>>>>>>> supporters-whose-pro-russia-shirts-went-viral-were-not/
That's all ya got? Two guys with joke tee shorts from February, >>>>>>>> 2018?!?
commie Xi, commie China, commie Maduro, commie Venezuela.
conservatives used to be anti-comunist, but that changed when >>>>>>>>> Russian asset tRump took over.
You are deluded. Today's communists/socialists caucus with the >>>>>>>> Democrats.
Yes, there are members of Congress who identify as democratic
socialists
Democratic Socialists are not the "Socialists" that conservaturds
about.
Sorry old timer.
If you morons think Musk is "literally Hitler,: then yes, Democratic
Socialists are the socialists conservatives rant about.
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing to do >>>with any actual ideology.
Like "Nazi" to you freaks, right?
You might try:
- NOT walking like a NAZI,
- NOT talking like a NAZI
- NOT acting like a NAZI
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in news:vvtes0$185c7$[email protected]:
Well, go ahead and point out any such Black NAZIs that have existed in
"Creon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 12 May 2025 08:19:06 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentö[email protected]> >>>>>wrote in >>>>>news:[email protected] >>>>>suck ing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:wrote
Klaus Schadenfreude >>>>>>><klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentö[email protected]>
youin news:pu122kd004jlm4q4hup8708me0vfpv1r41 >>>>>@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck
ing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>news:vvqtjm$js1b$[email protected]:
In news:vvqn6c$i9d9$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvqf1q$gn18$[email protected]:
In news:vvp3ms$3vmi1$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:xMSTP.165919$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:41 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and
aggressively stupid commie liar, lied:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Then why do government schools turn out so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> poorly educated students?
They don't. Public schools perform better than >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> private schools.
Wrong. Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everyone who shows up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim >>>>>>>>>>Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal posts 3. ??? = -9999
And the composition of the student body is reflected in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the scores. The same group of students will achieve the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> same performance whether in private or public schools. >>>>>>>>>>Bullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing
Communists and socialist are not the same thing. And there are >>>>>>>>>NO actual Socialists anywhere in Congress.That's all ya got? Two guys with joke tee shorts fromhave posted shows that.
Liar,
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar. The >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bullshit you posted does not say anything about student >>>>>>>>>>>>>> body composition.
LOL forget the "commie" bullshit - conservaturds LOVE >>>>>>>>>>>>> commie Putin, commie Russia.
Forget the "commie" bullshit - conservatives HATE commie >>>>>>>>>>>> Putin, commie Russia,
NO you don't.
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/404017-trump >>>>>>>>>>> - supporters-whose-pro-russia-shirts-went-viral-were-not/ >>>>>>>>>>
February, 2018?!?
commie Xi, commie China, commie Maduro, commie Venezuela. >>>>>>>>>>conservatives used to be anti-comunist, but that changed when >>>>>>>>>>> Russian asset tRump took over.
You are deluded. Today's communists/socialists caucus with the >>>>>>>>>> Democrats.
Yes, there are members of Congress who identify as democratic
socialists
Democratic Socialists are not the "Socialists" that conservaturds >>>>>>>rant about.
Sorry old timer.
If you morons think Musk is "literally Hitler,: then yes,
Democratic Socialists are the socialists conservatives rant about.
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing to
do with any actual ideology.
Like "Nazi" to you freaks, right?
What's another good name for "white supremacist nationalist
fascists"?
BTW, even the famous Godwin of "Godwin's Law" has said they're Nazis.
Tell me if they were black supremacist nationalist fascists would they
still be Nazis.... if not, what term would apply to such people?
the world.
In article <vvubvv$1hrff$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvtes0$185c7$[email protected]:
Well, go ahead and point out any such Black NAZIs that have existed in
"Creon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 12 May 2025 08:19:06 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentö[email protected]>
wrote in
news:[email protected]
suck ing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:wrote
Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentö[email protected]>
@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuckin news:pu122kd004jlm4q4hup8708me0vfpv1r41
youing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvqtjm$js1b$[email protected]:
In news:vvqn6c$i9d9$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvqf1q$gn18$[email protected]:
In news:vvp3ms$3vmi1$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:xMSTP.165919$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:41 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and
aggressively stupid commie liar, lied:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote:
On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Then why do government schools turn out so
poorly educated students?
They don't. Public schools perform better than
private schools.
Wrong. Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate
everyone who shows up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim
Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal posts 3. ??? = -9999
And the composition of the student body is reflected in
the scores. The same group of students will achieve the
same performance whether in private or public schools.
Bullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar.
Nothing
Communists and socialist are not the same thing. And there arehave posted shows that.
Liar,
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar. The
bullshit you posted does not say anything about student
body composition.
LOL forget the "commie" bullshit - conservaturds LOVE
commie Putin, commie Russia.
Forget the "commie" bullshit - conservatives HATE commie
Putin, commie Russia,
NO you don't.
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/404017-trump
- supporters-whose-pro-russia-shirts-went-viral-were-not/
That's all ya got? Two guys with joke tee shorts from
February, 2018?!?
commie Xi, commie China, commie Maduro, commie Venezuela.
conservatives used to be anti-comunist, but that changed when
Russian asset tRump took over.
You are deluded. Today's communists/socialists caucus with the
Democrats.
NO actual Socialists anywhere in Congress.
Yes, there are members of Congress who identify as democratic
socialists
Democratic Socialists are not the "Socialists" that conservaturds
rant about.
Sorry old timer.
If you morons think Musk is "literally Hitler,: then yes,
Democratic Socialists are the socialists conservatives rant about.
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing to
do with any actual ideology.
Like "Nazi" to you freaks, right?
What's another good name for "white supremacist nationalist
fascists"?
BTW, even the famous Godwin of "Godwin's Law" has said they're Nazis.
Tell me if they were black supremacist nationalist fascists would they
still be Nazis.... if not, what term would apply to such people?
the world.
Would you consider a black person who supports Trump a
Nazi?
On Mon, 12 May 2025 15:13:23 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <[email protected]> wrote:
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing to do
with any actual ideology.
Just another political swearword like commie, wokie or DEI.
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On Mon, 12 May 2025 08:19:06 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]>
wrote in
news:[email protected]
ksuck ing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:wrote
Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]>
@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuckin news:pu122kd004jlm4q4hup8708me0vfpv1r41
youing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvqtjm$js1b$[email protected]:
In news:vvqn6c$i9d9$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvqf1q$gn18$[email protected]:
In news:vvp3ms$3vmi1$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:xMSTP.165919$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:41 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and
aggressively stupid commie liar, lied:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Then why do government schools turn out so
poorly educated students?
They don't. Public schools perform better than
private schools.
Wrong. Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate
everyone who shows up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim
Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal posts 3. ??? = -9999
And the composition of the student body is reflected
in the scores. The same group of students will achieve
the same performance whether in private or public
schools.
Bullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar.
Nothing
Communists and socialist are not the same thing. And there arehave posted shows that.
Liar,
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar.
The bullshit you posted does not say anything about
student body composition.
LOL forget the "commie" bullshit - conservaturds LOVE
commie Putin, commie Russia.
Forget the "commie" bullshit - conservatives HATE commie
Putin, commie Russia,
NO you don't.
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/404017-trum
p- supporters-whose-pro-russia-shirts-went-viral-were-not/
That's all ya got? Two guys with joke tee shorts from
February, 2018?!?
commie Xi, commie China, commie Maduro, commie Venezuela.
conservatives used to be anti-comunist, but that changed
when Russian asset tRump took over.
You are deluded. Today's communists/socialists caucus with
the Democrats.
NO actual Socialists anywhere in Congress.
Yes, there are members of Congress who identify as democratic
socialists
Democratic Socialists are not the "Socialists" that conservaturds
rant about.
Sorry old timer.
If you morons think Musk is "literally Hitler,: then yes,
Democratic Socialists are the socialists conservatives rant
about.
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing to
do with any actual ideology.
Like "Nazi" to you freaks, right?
What's another good name for "white supremacist nationalist
fascists"?
Baxter.
In article <vvubvv$1hrff$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvtes0$185c7$[email protected]:
Well, go ahead and point out any such Black NAZIs that have existed
"Creon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 12 May 2025 08:19:06 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentö[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]g.c
ock suck ing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:wrote
Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentö[email protected]>
@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuckin news:pu122kd004jlm4q4hup8708me0vfpv1r41
youing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvqtjm$js1b$[email protected]:
In news:vvqn6c$i9d9$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvqf1q$gn18$[email protected]:
In news:vvp3ms$3vmi1$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:xMSTP.165919$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:41 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and
aggressively stupid commie liar, lied:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Then why do government schools turn out so
poorly educated students?
They don't. Public schools perform better than
private schools.
Wrong. Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate
everyone who shows up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim
Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal posts 3. ??? = -9999
And the composition of the student body is reflected
in the scores. The same group of students will
achieve the same performance whether in private or
public schools.
Bullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar.
Nothing
Communists and socialist are not the same thing. And therehave posted shows that.
Liar,
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar.
The bullshit you posted does not say anything about
student body composition.
LOL forget the "commie" bullshit - conservaturds LOVE
commie Putin, commie Russia.
Forget the "commie" bullshit - conservatives HATE commie
Putin, commie Russia,
NO you don't.
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/404017-tr
ump -
supporters-whose-pro-russia-shirts-went-viral-were-not/
That's all ya got? Two guys with joke tee shorts from
February, 2018?!?
commie Xi, commie China, commie Maduro, commie Venezuela.
conservatives used to be anti-comunist, but that changed
when Russian asset tRump took over.
You are deluded. Today's communists/socialists caucus with
the Democrats.
are NO actual Socialists anywhere in Congress.
Yes, there are members of Congress who identify as democratic
socialists
Democratic Socialists are not the "Socialists" that
conservaturds rant about.
Sorry old timer.
If you morons think Musk is "literally Hitler,: then yes,
Democratic Socialists are the socialists conservatives rant
about.
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing
to do with any actual ideology.
Like "Nazi" to you freaks, right?
What's another good name for "white supremacist nationalist
fascists"?
BTW, even the famous Godwin of "Godwin's Law" has said they're
Nazis.
Tell me if they were black supremacist nationalist fascists would
they still be Nazis.... if not, what term would apply to such
people?
in the world.
Would you consider a black person who supports Trump a
Nazi?
On Tue, 13 May 2025 07:27:14 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Governor Swill wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On Mon, 12 May 2025 15:13:23 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing to do >>>>with any actual ideology.
Just another political swearword like commie, wokie or DEI.
You RADICAL LUNATIC LEFT LIBERAL MARXIST WOKE COMMIE DEI hire!!!!
"DEI" to me is the new term for "equal-opportunity employer".
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
In article <[email protected]>,Yeah, conservaturds claim antifa is fascist.
[email protected] says...
On Mon, 12 May 2025 08:19:06 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]>
wrote in
news:[email protected]
ksuck ing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:wrote
Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]>
@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuckin news:pu122kd004jlm4q4hup8708me0vfpv1r41
youing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvqtjm$js1b$[email protected]:
In news:vvqn6c$i9d9$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvqf1q$gn18$[email protected]:
In news:vvp3ms$3vmi1$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:xMSTP.165919$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:41 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and
aggressively stupid commie liar, lied:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Then why do government schools turn out so
poorly educated students?
They don't. Public schools perform better than
private schools.
Wrong. Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate
everyone who shows up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim
Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal posts 3. ??? = -9999
And the composition of the student body is reflected
in the scores. The same group of students will achieve
the same performance whether in private or public
schools.
Bullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar.
Nothing
Communists and socialist are not the same thing. And there arehave posted shows that.
Liar,
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar.
The bullshit you posted does not say anything about
student body composition.
LOL forget the "commie" bullshit - conservaturds LOVE
commie Putin, commie Russia.
Forget the "commie" bullshit - conservatives HATE commie
Putin, commie Russia,
NO you don't.
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/404017-trum
p- supporters-whose-pro-russia-shirts-went-viral-were-not/
That's all ya got? Two guys with joke tee shorts from
February, 2018?!?
commie Xi, commie China, commie Maduro, commie Venezuela.
conservatives used to be anti-comunist, but that changed
when Russian asset tRump took over.
You are deluded. Today's communists/socialists caucus with
the Democrats.
NO actual Socialists anywhere in Congress.
Yes, there are members of Congress who identify as democratic
socialists
Democratic Socialists are not the "Socialists" that conservaturds
rant about.
Sorry old timer.
If you morons think Musk is "literally Hitler,: then yes,
Democratic Socialists are the socialists conservatives rant
about.
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing to
do with any actual ideology.
Like "Nazi" to you freaks, right?
What's another good name for "white supremacist nationalist
fascists"?
Baxter.
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
In article <vvubvv$1hrff$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvtes0$185c7$[email protected]:
Well, go ahead and point out any such Black NAZIs that have existed
"Creon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 12 May 2025 08:19:06 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentö[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]g.c
ock suck ing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:wrote
Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentö[email protected]>
@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuckin news:pu122kd004jlm4q4hup8708me0vfpv1r41
youing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvqtjm$js1b$[email protected]:
In news:vvqn6c$i9d9$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvqf1q$gn18$[email protected]:
In news:vvp3ms$3vmi1$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:xMSTP.165919$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:41 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and
aggressively stupid commie liar, lied:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Then why do government schools turn out so
poorly educated students?
They don't. Public schools perform better than
private schools.
Wrong. Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate
everyone who shows up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim
Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal posts 3. ??? = -9999
And the composition of the student body is reflected
in the scores. The same group of students will
achieve the same performance whether in private or
public schools.
Bullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar.
Nothing
Communists and socialist are not the same thing. And therehave posted shows that.
Liar,
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar.
The bullshit you posted does not say anything about
student body composition.
LOL forget the "commie" bullshit - conservaturds LOVE
commie Putin, commie Russia.
Forget the "commie" bullshit - conservatives HATE commie
Putin, commie Russia,
NO you don't.
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/404017-tr
ump -
supporters-whose-pro-russia-shirts-went-viral-were-not/
That's all ya got? Two guys with joke tee shorts from
February, 2018?!?
commie Xi, commie China, commie Maduro, commie Venezuela.
conservatives used to be anti-comunist, but that changed
when Russian asset tRump took over.
You are deluded. Today's communists/socialists caucus with
the Democrats.
are NO actual Socialists anywhere in Congress.
Yes, there are members of Congress who identify as democratic
socialists
Democratic Socialists are not the "Socialists" that
conservaturds rant about.
Sorry old timer.
If you morons think Musk is "literally Hitler,: then yes,
Democratic Socialists are the socialists conservatives rant
about.
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing
to do with any actual ideology.
Like "Nazi" to you freaks, right?
What's another good name for "white supremacist nationalist
fascists"?
BTW, even the famous Godwin of "Godwin's Law" has said they're
Nazis.
Tell me if they were black supremacist nationalist fascists would
they still be Nazis.... if not, what term would apply to such
people?
in the world.
Would you consider a black person who supports Trump a
Nazi?
Could be. Clearly, if you lie with dogs, you get up with fleas.
"Baxter" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:vvvn18$1sqc6$[email protected]...against-male-opponents/
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <[email protected]>,https://www.metroweekly.com/2023/07/transgender-male-boxer-goes-3-0-
[email protected] says...Yeah, conservaturds claim antifa is fascist.
On Mon, 12 May 2025 08:19:06 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentö[email protected]>
wrote in
news:[email protected] >>>> >>ksuck ing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:wrote
Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentö[email protected]>
@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuckin news:pu122kd004jlm4q4hup8708me0vfpv1r41
youing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvqtjm$js1b$[email protected]:
In news:vvqn6c$i9d9$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvqf1q$gn18$[email protected]:
In news:vvp3ms$3vmi1$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:xMSTP.165919$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:41 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and
aggressively stupid commie liar, lied:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Then why do government schools turn out so
poorly educated students?
They don't. Public schools perform better than
private schools.
Wrong. Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate
everyone who shows up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim
Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal posts 3. ??? = -9999
And the composition of the student body is reflected
in the scores. The same group of students will achieve
the same performance whether in private or public
schools.
Bullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar.
Nothing
Communists and socialist are not the same thing. And there arehave posted shows that.
Liar,
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar.
The bullshit you posted does not say anything about
student body composition.
LOL forget the "commie" bullshit - conservaturds LOVE
commie Putin, commie Russia.
Forget the "commie" bullshit - conservatives HATE commie
Putin, commie Russia,
NO you don't.
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/404017-trum >>>> >>>>>>>> p- supporters-whose-pro-russia-shirts-went-viral-were-not/
That's all ya got? Two guys with joke tee shorts from
February, 2018?!?
commie Xi, commie China, commie Maduro, commie Venezuela.
conservatives used to be anti-comunist, but that changed
when Russian asset tRump took over.
You are deluded. Today's communists/socialists caucus with
the Democrats.
NO actual Socialists anywhere in Congress.
Yes, there are members of Congress who identify as democratic
socialists
Democratic Socialists are not the "Socialists" that conservaturds
rant about.
Sorry old timer.
If you morons think Musk is "literally Hitler,: then yes,
Democratic Socialists are the socialists conservatives rant
about.
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing to
do with any actual ideology.
Like "Nazi" to you freaks, right?
What's another good name for "white supremacist nationalist
fascists"?
Baxter.
Well ignoring the whole irrelevant notion of left/right let's look at what antifa stands for
1) dictatorial leadership (check)
2) centralized power (check)
3) militarism (check)
4) suppression of dissent (check)
5) rejects the idea of equality and promotes a rigid social hierarchy where some groups or individuals are considered superior to others. (check)
6) Seeks to control all aspects of society, including the economy, culture, and education. (check)
7) relies on propaganda and manipulative tactics to control the population (check)
8) opposes democratic principles like freedom of speech, free and fair elections, and rule of law (check)
in principles, policies, agenda, and action I see no real difference between this group and Nazis, they just assert they have a better reason to engage, impose, promote, advocate, or otherwise carry these things. out.
Of course, Baxter is sort of a one dimensional thinker and sees only a line, when in reality political views, agendas, methods, etc is a multidimensional grid, and whether you get it by moving right or moving left the result is
the same only the excuses for doing it are different.
On Mon, 12 May 2025 12:48:49 -0400, "Scout"wrote:Stop it. The Black Panthers were black nationalists, but were not the least bit fascist, let alone Nazi.
"Creon" <[email protected]> wrote<snip>
On Mon, 12 May 2025 08:19:06 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing to do >>>>> with any actual ideology.
Like "Nazi" to you freaks, right?
What's another good name for "white supremacist nationalist fascists"?
BTW, even the famous Godwin of "Godwin's Law" has said they're Nazis.
Tell me if they were black supremacist nationalist fascists would they still >> be Nazis.... if not, what term would apply to such people?
They called them "Black Panthers". There have been a few such groups.
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:uMwUP.192030$[email protected]:*You* just described yourself to a T, Bugster, you willfully and aggressively stupid commie liar.
On 5/11/2025 5:32 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:t18UP.350335$[email protected]:
On 5/11/2025 1:19 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:Eq4UP.97881$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 7:57 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:xMSTP.165919$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:41 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid >>>>>>>> commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and aggressivelyLiar,
stupid commie liar, lied:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote inBullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar. Nothing you >>>>>>>>>> have posted shows that.
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Wrong.They don't. Public schools perform better than private >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> schools.Then why do government schools turn out so poorly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> educated students?
Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate everyone who >>>>>>>>>>>>> shows up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim
Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal postsAnd the composition of the student body is reflected in the >>>>>>>>>>> scores. The same group of students will achieve the same >>>>>>>>>>> performance whether in private or public schools.
3. ??? = -9999
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar. The
bullshit you posted does not say anything about student body
composition.
LOL forget the "commie" bullshit
No, it's an essential part of your stupidity. You *are* a
goddamned fucking commie, and it's in large part because you're
fucking stupid.
Well, commie fits
*you*, Bugster, you goddamned stupid fucking commie liar. You *are*
a fucking commie. You hate private property and private enterprise
and want the state to control and do everything.
Whoosh!! Right off the cliff you go!.
Nope. I described you to a T, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar.
Everything I said about you, including you being willfully and
aggressively stupid, is true.
The village idiot always thinks he's the smartest person in the village.
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:oMwUP.192029$[email protected]:
On 5/11/2025 5:36 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:E18UP.350345$[email protected]:
On 5/11/2025 1:15 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupidNope.
commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vq4UP.97880$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:00 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupidBut students in private schools DO NOT reflect the general
commie liar, lied:
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvp2tv$3vh6s$2@dont- email.me:
On 10/5/25 18:08, Lou Bricano wrote:
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar. The
bullshit you posted does not say anything about student body >>>>>>>>> composition.
Are private schools required to accept autistics, fetal
alcoholic? Born deaf? Born blind?
A private school drawing from families of pro footballers,
That has never happened, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar.
populace.
Red herring.
Yes, it is.
In Algebra: if A=B, then B=A
That's not algebra, Bugster, and it has nothing to do with the stupid
shit you wrote, Bugster.
It's also Logic
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:gMwUP.192028$[email protected]:
Oozing scarlet red maxipad:
Then why do government schools turn out so poorly educated
students?
Bugster the stupid lying commie:
They don't. Public schools perform better than private schools.
Lou Bricano:
That's a lie, Bugster. Why do you tell such ridiculous, easily
debunked lies, Bugster? Research has consistently shown that
private school students tend to perform better on standardized
tests.
Nope, that's not a lie.
Public schools successfully educate a wider range of students.
They educate students that private schools would not andPrivate schools reject them because they are the incorrigible offspring of shitbags — shitbags like you.
could not teach.
"Creon" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
On Tue, 13 May 2025 07:27:14 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Governor Swill wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On Mon, 12 May 2025 15:13:23 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing to do >>>>>with any actual ideology.
Just another political swearword like commie, wokie or DEI.
You RADICAL LUNATIC LEFT LIBERAL MARXIST WOKE COMMIE DEI hire!!!!
"DEI" to me is the new term for "equal-opportunity employer".
Except it isn't equal-opportunity.. instead it is preferential
opportunity... also called discrimination.
"Baxter" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:vvvn18$1sqc6$[email protected]...
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <[email protected]>,Yeah, conservaturds claim antifa is fascist.
[email protected] says...
On Mon, 12 May 2025 08:19:06 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]g.c
oc ksuck ing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:wrote
Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]>
@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuckin news:pu122kd004jlm4q4hup8708me0vfpv1r41
youing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvqtjm$js1b$[email protected]:
In news:vvqn6c$i9d9$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvqf1q$gn18$[email protected]:
In news:vvp3ms$3vmi1$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:xMSTP.165919$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:41 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and
aggressively stupid commie liar, lied:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Then why do government schools turn out so
poorly educated students?
They don't. Public schools perform better than
private schools.
Wrong. Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate
everyone who shows up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim
Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal posts 3. ??? = -9999
And the composition of the student body is reflected
in the scores. The same group of students will
achieve the same performance whether in private or
public schools.
Bullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar.
Nothing
Communists and socialist are not the same thing. And therehave posted shows that.
Liar,
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar.
The bullshit you posted does not say anything about
student body composition.
LOL forget the "commie" bullshit - conservaturds LOVE
commie Putin, commie Russia.
Forget the "commie" bullshit - conservatives HATE commie
Putin, commie Russia,
NO you don't.
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/404017-tr
um p-
supporters-whose-pro-russia-shirts-went-viral-were-not/
That's all ya got? Two guys with joke tee shorts from
February, 2018?!?
commie Xi, commie China, commie Maduro, commie Venezuela.
conservatives used to be anti-comunist, but that changed
when Russian asset tRump took over.
You are deluded. Today's communists/socialists caucus with
the Democrats.
are NO actual Socialists anywhere in Congress.
Yes, there are members of Congress who identify as democratic
socialists
Democratic Socialists are not the "Socialists" that
conservaturds rant about.
Sorry old timer.
If you morons think Musk is "literally Hitler,: then yes,
Democratic Socialists are the socialists conservatives rant
about.
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing
to do with any actual ideology.
Like "Nazi" to you freaks, right?
What's another good name for "white supremacist nationalist
fascists"?
Baxter.
Well ignoring the whole irrelevant notion of left/right let's look at
what antifa stands for
1) dictatorial leadership (check)
2) centralized power (check)
3) militarism (check)
4) suppression of dissent (check)
5) rejects the idea of equality and promotes a rigid social hierarchy
where some groups or individuals are considered superior to others.
(check)
economy, culture, and education. (check)
7) relies on propaganda and manipulative tactics to control the
population (check)
8) opposes democratic principles like freedom of speech, free and fair elections, and rule of law (check)
In article <vvubvv$1hrff$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvtes0$185c7$[email protected]:
Well, go ahead and point out any such Black NAZIs that have existed in
"Creon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 12 May 2025 08:19:06 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentö[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote in
news:[email protected] >>>>>> suck ing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:wrote
Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentö[email protected]>
@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuckin news:pu122kd004jlm4q4hup8708me0vfpv1r41
youing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvqtjm$js1b$[email protected]:
In news:vvqn6c$i9d9$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvqf1q$gn18$[email protected]:
In news:vvp3ms$3vmi1$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:xMSTP.165919$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:41 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aggressively stupid commie liar, lied:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Then why do government schools turn out so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> poorly educated students?
They don't. Public schools perform better than >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> private schools.
Wrong. Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everyone who shows up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim >>>>>>>>>>>Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal posts 3. ??? = -9999
And the composition of the student body is reflected in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the scores. The same group of students will achieve the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> same performance whether in private or public schools. >>>>>>>>>>>Bullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing to >>>>>> do with any actual ideology.Communists and socialist are not the same thing. And there are >>>>>>>>>> NO actual Socialists anywhere in Congress.That's all ya got? Two guys with joke tee shorts fromhave posted shows that.
Liar,
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar. The >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bullshit you posted does not say anything about student >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> body composition.
LOL forget the "commie" bullshit - conservaturds LOVE >>>>>>>>>>>>>> commie Putin, commie Russia.
Forget the "commie" bullshit - conservatives HATE commie >>>>>>>>>>>>> Putin, commie Russia,
NO you don't.
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/404017-trump >>>>>>>>>>>> - supporters-whose-pro-russia-shirts-went-viral-were-not/ >>>>>>>>>>>
February, 2018?!?
commie Xi, commie China, commie Maduro, commie Venezuela. >>>>>>>>>>>conservatives used to be anti-comunist, but that changed when >>>>>>>>>>>> Russian asset tRump took over.
You are deluded. Today's communists/socialists caucus with the >>>>>>>>>>> Democrats.
Yes, there are members of Congress who identify as democratic >>>>>>>>> socialists
Democratic Socialists are not the "Socialists" that conservaturds >>>>>>>> rant about.
Sorry old timer.
If you morons think Musk is "literally Hitler,: then yes,
Democratic Socialists are the socialists conservatives rant about. >>>>>>
Like "Nazi" to you freaks, right?
What's another good name for "white supremacist nationalist
fascists"?
BTW, even the famous Godwin of "Godwin's Law" has said they're Nazis.
Tell me if they were black supremacist nationalist fascists would they
still be Nazis.... if not, what term would apply to such people?
the world.
Would you consider a black person who supports Trump a
Nazi?
Except it isn't equal-opportunity.. instead it is preferential
opportunity... also called discrimination.
On Tue, 13 May 2025 07:40:08 -0400, "Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:
"Baxter" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>news:vvubvv$1hrff$[email protected]...
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvtes0$185c7$[email protected]:
Well, go ahead and point out any such Black NAZIs that have existed in
"Creon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 12 May 2025 08:19:06 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:Tell me if they were black supremacist nationalist fascists would they >>>> still be Nazis.... if not, what term would apply to such people?
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentö[email protected]> >>>>>>>wrote in >>>>>>>news:[email protected] >>>>>>>suck ing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:wrote
Klaus Schadenfreude >>>>>>>>><klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentö[email protected]>
youin news:pu122kd004jlm4q4hup8708me0vfpv1r41 >>>>>>>@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck
ing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>news:vvqtjm$js1b$[email protected]:
In news:vvqn6c$i9d9$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvqf1q$gn18$[email protected]:
In news:vvp3ms$3vmi1$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:xMSTP.165919$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:41 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aggressively stupid commie liar, lied:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Then why do government schools turn out so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> poorly educated students?
They don't. Public schools perform better than >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> private schools.
Wrong. Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everyone who shows up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim >>>>>>>>>>>>Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal posts 3. ??? = -9999
And the composition of the student body is reflected in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the scores. The same group of students will achieve the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> same performance whether in private or public schools. >>>>>>>>>>>>Bullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing to >>>>>>>do with any actual ideology.Communists and socialist are not the same thing. And there are >>>>>>>>>>>NO actual Socialists anywhere in Congress.That's all ya got? Two guys with joke tee shorts fromhave posted shows that.
Liar,
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar. The >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bullshit you posted does not say anything about student >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> body composition.
LOL forget the "commie" bullshit - conservaturds LOVE >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commie Putin, commie Russia.
Forget the "commie" bullshit - conservatives HATE commie >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Putin, commie Russia,
NO you don't.
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/404017-trump >>>>>>>>>>>>> - supporters-whose-pro-russia-shirts-went-viral-were-not/ >>>>>>>>>>>>
February, 2018?!?
commie Xi, commie China, commie Maduro, commie Venezuela. >>>>>>>>>>>>conservatives used to be anti-comunist, but that changed when >>>>>>>>>>>>> Russian asset tRump took over.
You are deluded. Today's communists/socialists caucus with the >>>>>>>>>>>> Democrats.
Yes, there are members of Congress who identify as democratic >>>>>>>>>> socialists
Democratic Socialists are not the "Socialists" that conservaturds >>>>>>>>>rant about.
Sorry old timer.
If you morons think Musk is "literally Hitler,: then yes,
Democratic Socialists are the socialists conservatives rant about. >>>>>>>
Like "Nazi" to you freaks, right?
What's another good name for "white supremacist nationalist
fascists"?
BTW, even the famous Godwin of "Godwin's Law" has said they're Nazis. >>>>
the world.
I refer you to the past by Governor Swill admitting to their existence.
dodge / troll
On Tue, 13 May 2025 07:34:07 -0400, "Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 12 May 2025 08:19:06 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]> wrote:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]> >>>>>wrote
in >>>>>news:bkj32kpk79uluf3clqvhecifdhpmlpub4l@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck >>>>>ing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]> >>>>>wrote
in
news:pu122kd004jlm4q4hup8708me0vfpv1r41 >>>>>@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck
ing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>news:vvqtjm$js1b$[email protected]:
In news:vvqn6c$i9d9$[email protected], BaxterCommunists and socialist are not the same thing. And there are NO >>>>>>>>>actual Socialists anywhere in Congress.
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvqf1q$gn18$[email protected]:
In news:vvp3ms$3vmi1$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:xMSTP.165919$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:41 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid commie liar, lied:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Then why do government schools turn out so poorly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> educated students?
They don't. Public schools perform better than >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> private
schools.
Wrong.
Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate everyone >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who
shows up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim >>>>>>>>>>Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal posts
3. ??? = -9999
And the composition of the student body is reflected in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
scores. The same group of students will achieve the same >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> performance whether in private or public schools.
Bullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar. Nothing >>>>>you
have posted shows that.
Liar,
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar. The >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bullshit you posted does not say anything about student body >>>>>>>>>>>>>> composition.
LOL forget the "commie" bullshit - conservaturds LOVE commie >>>>>>>>>>>>> Putin, commie Russia.
Forget the "commie" bullshit - conservatives HATE commie Putin, >>>>>>>>>>>> commie Russia,
NO you don't.
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/404017-trump- >>>>>>>>>>> supporters-whose-pro-russia-shirts-went-viral-were-not/
That's all ya got? Two guys with joke tee shorts from February, >>>>>>>>>> 2018?!?
commie Xi, commie China, commie Maduro, commie Venezuela. >>>>>>>>>>conservatives used to be anti-comunist, but that changed when >>>>>>>>>>> Russian asset tRump took over.
You are deluded. Today's communists/socialists caucus with the >>>>>>>>>> Democrats.
Yes, there are members of Congress who identify as democratic
socialists
Democratic Socialists are not the "Socialists" that conservaturds >>>>>>>rant
about.
Sorry old timer.
If you morons think Musk is "literally Hitler,: then yes, Democratic >>>>>> Socialists are the socialists conservatives rant about.
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing to do >>>>>with any actual ideology.
Like "Nazi" to you freaks, right?
When I use the word "nazi" I mean it to indicate the person in
question is white, protestant, and intolerant of anybody else who is
NOT white and protestant.
So you're a racist and a bigot.
I'm defining. Historically, Nazis, even when not German and Lutheran,
are still mainly white and Christian.
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:wrote
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]>
news:3a442k98vfko65ul1gfr3f493t63vha5gi@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck >>ing.dwarf.com:in
Democratic[Baxter snips citation]Yes, there are members of Congress who identify as democratic
socialists
rantDemocratic Socialists are not the "Socialists" that conservaturds
about.
Sorry old timer.
If you morons think Musk is "literally Hitler,: then yes,
Socialists are the socialists conservatives rant about.
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing to do >>>>with any actual ideology.
Like "Nazi" to you freaks, right?
You might try:
- NOT walking like a NAZI,
- NOT talking like a NAZI
- NOT acting like a NAZI
Sure we can play this game all day.
WALKING like a socialist
TALKING like a socialist
ACTING like a socialist.
Your turn, Leroy.
On Tue, 13 May 2025 03:51:25 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
The nazi, dictator, fascist routine failed in November 2024 so one
would think that the democrats would find a new attack mantra but they
have not.
I dunno about that. I suspect it failed June 22, 1941.
On 5/12/2025 7:57 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
They educate students that private schools would not andPrivate schools reject them because they are the incorrigible
could not teach.
offspring of shitbags — shitbags like you.
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvvrv2 $1tvam$[email protected]:
"Creon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Tue, 13 May 2025 07:27:14 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Governor Swill wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On Mon, 12 May 2025 15:13:23 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing to >>>>>>do with any actual ideology.
Just another political swearword like commie, wokie or DEI.
You RADICAL LUNATIC LEFT LIBERAL MARXIST WOKE COMMIE DEI hire!!!!
"DEI" to me is the new term for "equal-opportunity employer".
Except it isn't equal-opportunity.. instead it is preferential
opportunity... also called discrimination.
Like Trump giving refugee
status to people from Africa.
As long as they are white.
On 5/12/2025 3:46 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2025 12:48:49 -0400, "Scout"wrote:
"Creon" <[email protected]> wrote<snip>
On Mon, 12 May 2025 08:19:06 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing
to do with any actual ideology.
Like "Nazi" to you freaks, right?
What's another good name for "white supremacist nationalist
fascists"?
BTW, even the famous Godwin of "Godwin's Law" has said they're
Nazis.
Tell me if they were black supremacist nationalist fascists would
they still be Nazis.... if not, what term would apply to such
people?
They called them "Black Panthers". There have been a few such
groups.
Stop it. The Black Panthers were black nationalists, but were not the
least bit fascist, let alone Nazi.
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in news:vvvrv4$1tvam$[email protected]:
"Baxter" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:vvvn18$1sqc6$[email protected]...
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <[email protected]>,Yeah, conservaturds claim antifa is fascist.
[email protected] says...
On Mon, 12 May 2025 08:19:06 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]g.c >>>>> >>oc ksuck ing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:wrote
Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]>
@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuckin news:pu122kd004jlm4q4hup8708me0vfpv1r41
youing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvqtjm$js1b$[email protected]:
In news:vvqn6c$i9d9$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvqf1q$gn18$[email protected]:
In news:vvp3ms$3vmi1$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:xMSTP.165919$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:41 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and
aggressively stupid commie liar, lied:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Then why do government schools turn out so
poorly educated students?
They don't. Public schools perform better than
private schools.
Wrong. Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate
everyone who shows up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim
Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal posts 3. ??? = -9999
And the composition of the student body is reflected
in the scores. The same group of students will
achieve the same performance whether in private or
public schools.
Bullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar.
Nothing
Communists and socialist are not the same thing. And therehave posted shows that.
Liar,
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar.
The bullshit you posted does not say anything about
student body composition.
LOL forget the "commie" bullshit - conservaturds LOVE
commie Putin, commie Russia.
Forget the "commie" bullshit - conservatives HATE commie
Putin, commie Russia,
NO you don't.
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/404017-tr >>>>> >>>>>>>> um p-
supporters-whose-pro-russia-shirts-went-viral-were-not/
That's all ya got? Two guys with joke tee shorts from
February, 2018?!?
commie Xi, commie China, commie Maduro, commie Venezuela.
conservatives used to be anti-comunist, but that changed
when Russian asset tRump took over.
You are deluded. Today's communists/socialists caucus with
the Democrats.
are NO actual Socialists anywhere in Congress.
Yes, there are members of Congress who identify as democratic
socialists
Democratic Socialists are not the "Socialists" that
conservaturds rant about.
Sorry old timer.
If you morons think Musk is "literally Hitler,: then yes,
Democratic Socialists are the socialists conservatives rant
about.
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing
to do with any actual ideology.
Like "Nazi" to you freaks, right?
What's another good name for "white supremacist nationalist
fascists"?
Baxter.
Well ignoring the whole irrelevant notion of left/right let's look at
what antifa stands for
1) dictatorial leadership (check)
There is no such organization as Antifa.
On 13 May 2025, Derek Nash <[email protected]> posted some news:OQLUP.385089$[email protected]:
On 5/12/2025 3:46 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2025 12:48:49 -0400, "Scout"wrote:
"Creon" <[email protected]> wrote<snip>
On Mon, 12 May 2025 08:19:06 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing
to do with any actual ideology.
Like "Nazi" to you freaks, right?
What's another good name for "white supremacist nationalist
fascists"?
BTW, even the famous Godwin of "Godwin's Law" has said they're
Nazis.
Tell me if they were black supremacist nationalist fascists would
they still be Nazis.... if not, what term would apply to such
people?
They called them "Black Panthers". There have been a few such
groups.
Stop it. The Black Panthers were black nationalists, but were not the
least bit fascist, let alone Nazi.
They were black radical extremists.
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:tALUP.385088$[email protected]:Not bigotry to oppose chronic anti-social and criminal behavior and not want my kid to be threatened in school.
On 5/12/2025 7:57 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
They educate students that private schools would not andPrivate schools reject them because they are the incorrigible
could not teach.
offspring of shitbags — shitbags like you.
There we get down to it - Bricano is a bigot that [sic] thinks he's better than
others.
On 13 May 2025, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> posted some news:[email protected]:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvvrv2 $1tvam$[email protected]:
"Creon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Tue, 13 May 2025 07:27:14 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Governor Swill wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On Mon, 12 May 2025 15:13:23 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing to >>>>>>>do with any actual ideology.
Just another political swearword like commie, wokie or DEI.
You RADICAL LUNATIC LEFT LIBERAL MARXIST WOKE COMMIE DEI hire!!!!
"DEI" to me is the new term for "equal-opportunity employer".
Except it isn't equal-opportunity.. instead it is preferential
opportunity... also called discrimination.
Like Trump giving refugee
status to people from Africa.
As long as they are white.
You'd prefer black?
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in news:tALUP.385088$[email protected]:
On 5/12/2025 7:57 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
They educate students that private schools would not andPrivate schools reject them because they are the incorrigible
could not teach.
offspring of shitbags �? shitbags like you.
There we get down to it - Bricano is a bigot that thinks he's better than others.
On 5/13/2025 9:27 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Baxter" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:vvvn52$1sqc6$[email protected]...
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <vvubvv$1hrff$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvtes0$185c7$[email protected]:
Well, go ahead and point out any such Black NAZIs that have existed
"Creon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 12 May 2025 08:19:06 -0700, Klaus� Schadenfreude wrote:
[Default]� Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
Klaus� Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentö[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]g.c >>>> >>>>ock suck ing.dwarf.com:
[Default]� Baxter <[email protected]> typed:wrote
Klaus� Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentö[email protected]>
@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuckin news:pu122kd004jlm4q4hup8708me0vfpv1r41
youing.dwarf.com:
[Default]� Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvqtjm$js1b$[email protected]:
In news:vvqn6c$i9d9$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvqf1q$gn18$[email protected]:
In news:vvp3ms$3vmi1$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:xMSTP.165919$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:41 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and
aggressively stupid commie liar, lied:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Then why do government schools turn out so
poorly educated students?
They don't.� Public schools perform better than >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> private schools.
Wrong. Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate
everyone who shows up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim >>>> >>>>>>>>>Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal posts 3. ???��� = -9999
And the composition of the student body is reflected >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the scores. The same group of students will
achieve the same performance whether in private or
public schools.
Bullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar.
Nothing
Communists and socialist are not the same thing.� And therehave posted shows that.
Liar,
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar. >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The bullshit you posted does not say anything about
student body composition.
LOL forget the "commie" bullshit - conservaturds LOVE
commie Putin, commie Russia.
Forget the "commie" bullshit - conservatives HATE commie >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Putin, commie Russia,
NO you don't.
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/404017-tr >>>> >>>>>>>>>> ump -
supporters-whose-pro-russia-shirts-went-viral-were-not/
That's all ya got? Two guys with joke tee shorts from
February, 2018?!?
commie Xi, commie China, commie Maduro, commie Venezuela. >>>> >>>>>>>>>conservatives used to be anti-comunist, but that changed
when Russian asset tRump took over.
You are deluded. Today's communists/socialists caucus with >>>> >>>>>>>>> the Democrats.
are NO actual Socialists anywhere in Congress.
Yes, there are members of Congress who identify as democratic >>>> >>>>>>> socialists
Democratic Socialists are not the "Socialists" that
conservaturds rant about.
Sorry old timer.
If you morons think Musk is "literally Hitler,: then yes,
Democratic Socialists are the socialists conservatives rant
about.
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun.� Has nothing
to do with any actual ideology.
Like "Nazi" to you freaks, right?
What's another good name for "white supremacist nationalist
fascists"?
BTW, even the famous Godwin of "Godwin's Law" has said they're
Nazis.
Tell me if they were black supremacist nationalist fascists would
they still be Nazis.... if not, what term would apply to such
people?
in the world.
Would you consider a black person who supports Trump a
Nazi?
Could be. Clearly, if you lie with dogs, you get up with fleas.
So I don't need to point them out, by your own assertion they exist.No, scooter, he did not assert they exist. He said they could exist.
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
In article <vvubvv$1hrff$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvtes0$185c7$[email protected]:
Well, go ahead and point out any such Black NAZIs that have existed
"Creon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 12 May 2025 08:19:06 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentö[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]g.c
ock suck ing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:wrote
Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentö[email protected]>
@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuckin news:pu122kd004jlm4q4hup8708me0vfpv1r41
youing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvqtjm$js1b$[email protected]:
In news:vvqn6c$i9d9$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvqf1q$gn18$[email protected]:
In news:vvp3ms$3vmi1$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:xMSTP.165919$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:41 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and
aggressively stupid commie liar, lied:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Then why do government schools turn out so
poorly educated students?
They don't. Public schools perform better than
private schools.
Wrong. Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate
everyone who shows up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim
Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal posts 3. ??? = -9999
And the composition of the student body is reflected
in the scores. The same group of students will
achieve the same performance whether in private or
public schools.
Bullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar.
Nothing
Communists and socialist are not the same thing. And therehave posted shows that.
Liar,
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar.
The bullshit you posted does not say anything about
student body composition.
LOL forget the "commie" bullshit - conservaturds LOVE
commie Putin, commie Russia.
Forget the "commie" bullshit - conservatives HATE commie
Putin, commie Russia,
NO you don't.
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/404017-tr
ump -
supporters-whose-pro-russia-shirts-went-viral-were-not/
That's all ya got? Two guys with joke tee shorts from
February, 2018?!?
commie Xi, commie China, commie Maduro, commie Venezuela.
conservatives used to be anti-comunist, but that changed
when Russian asset tRump took over.
You are deluded. Today's communists/socialists caucus with
the Democrats.
are NO actual Socialists anywhere in Congress.
Yes, there are members of Congress who identify as democratic
socialists
Democratic Socialists are not the "Socialists" that
conservaturds rant about.
Sorry old timer.
If you morons think Musk is "literally Hitler,: then yes,
Democratic Socialists are the socialists conservatives rant
about.
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing
to do with any actual ideology.
Like "Nazi" to you freaks, right?
What's another good name for "white supremacist nationalist
fascists"?
BTW, even the famous Godwin of "Godwin's Law" has said they're
Nazis.
Tell me if they were black supremacist nationalist fascists would
they still be Nazis.... if not, what term would apply to such
people?
in the world.
Would you consider a black person who supports Trump a
Nazi?
Could be. Clearly, if you lie with dogs, you get up with fleas.
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On Mon, 12 May 2025 08:19:06 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]>
wrote in
news:[email protected]
ksuck ing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:wrote
Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]>
@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuckin news:pu122kd004jlm4q4hup8708me0vfpv1r41
youing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvqtjm$js1b$[email protected]:
In news:vvqn6c$i9d9$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvqf1q$gn18$[email protected]:
In news:vvp3ms$3vmi1$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:xMSTP.165919$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:41 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and
aggressively stupid commie liar, lied:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Then why do government schools turn out so
poorly educated students?
They don't. Public schools perform better than
private schools.
Wrong. Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate
everyone who shows up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim
Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal posts 3. ??? = -9999
And the composition of the student body is reflected
in the scores. The same group of students will achieve
the same performance whether in private or public
schools.
Bullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar.
Nothing
Communists and socialist are not the same thing. And there arehave posted shows that.
Liar,
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar.
The bullshit you posted does not say anything about
student body composition.
LOL forget the "commie" bullshit - conservaturds LOVE
commie Putin, commie Russia.
Forget the "commie" bullshit - conservatives HATE commie
Putin, commie Russia,
NO you don't.
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/404017-trum
p- supporters-whose-pro-russia-shirts-went-viral-were-not/
That's all ya got? Two guys with joke tee shorts from
February, 2018?!?
commie Xi, commie China, commie Maduro, commie Venezuela.
conservatives used to be anti-comunist, but that changed
when Russian asset tRump took over.
You are deluded. Today's communists/socialists caucus with
the Democrats.
NO actual Socialists anywhere in Congress.
Yes, there are members of Congress who identify as democratic
socialists
Democratic Socialists are not the "Socialists" that conservaturds
rant about.
Sorry old timer.
If you morons think Musk is "literally Hitler,: then yes,
Democratic Socialists are the socialists conservatives rant
about.
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing to
do with any actual ideology.
Like "Nazi" to you freaks, right?
What's another good name for "white supremacist nationalist
fascists"?
Baxter.
Yeah, conservaturds claim antifa is fascist.
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]> wrote
in news:hl962kdp3o7jlorrhdp90ki3itk29lhn57 @Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
wroteKlaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]>
news:3a442k98vfko65ul1gfr3f493t63vha5gi@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck >>ing.dwarf.com:in
Democratic[Baxter snips citation]Yes, there are members of Congress who identify as democratic
socialists
Democratic Socialists are not the "Socialists" that conservaturds >>rant
about.
Sorry old timer.
If you morons think Musk is "literally Hitler,: then yes,
Socialists are the socialists conservatives rant about.
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing to do >>>>with any actual ideology.
Like "Nazi" to you freaks, right?
You might try:
- NOT walking like a NAZI,
- NOT talking like a NAZI
- NOT acting like a NAZI
Sure we can play this game all day.
WALKING like a socialist
TALKING like a socialist
ACTING like a socialist.
Your turn, Leroy.
'Cept I dont walk, talk or act like an actual Socialist.
On Tue, 13 May 2025 14:09:38 -0700, Derek Nash
<[email protected]> wrote:
Blowjob *still* is just too stupid to know what his tell is!
On 5/13/2025 1:50 PM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly obese
convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 13 May 2025, Derek Nash <[email protected]> posted some
news:OQLUP.385089$[email protected]:
On 5/12/2025 3:46 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2025 12:48:49 -0400, "Scout"wrote:
"Creon" <[email protected]> wrote<snip>
On Mon, 12 May 2025 08:19:06 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>> [Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing >>>>>>>>> to do with any actual ideology.
Like "Nazi" to you freaks, right?
What's another good name for "white supremacist nationalist
fascists"?
BTW, even the famous Godwin of "Godwin's Law" has said they're
Nazis.
Tell me if they were black supremacist nationalist fascists would
they still be Nazis.... if not, what term would apply to such
people?
They called them "Black Panthers". There have been a few such
groups.
Stop it. The Black Panthers were black nationalists, but were not the
least bit fascist, let alone Nazi.
They were black radical extremists.
No, Blowjob, they were not.
Yeah, asshat, they were.
On 13 May 2025, Derek Nash <[email protected]> posted some news:OQLUP.385089$[email protected]:
On 5/12/2025 3:46 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2025 12:48:49 -0400, "Scout"wrote:
"Creon" <[email protected]> wrote<snip>
On Mon, 12 May 2025 08:19:06 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing
to do with any actual ideology.
Like "Nazi" to you freaks, right?
What's another good name for "white supremacist nationalist
fascists"?
BTW, even the famous Godwin of "Godwin's Law" has said they're
Nazis.
Tell me if they were black supremacist nationalist fascists would
they still be Nazis.... if not, what term would apply to such
people?
They called them "Black Panthers". There have been a few such
groups.
Stop it. The Black Panthers were black nationalists, but were not the
least bit fascist, let alone Nazi.
They were black radical extremists.
On 13 May 2025, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> posted some news:[email protected]:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvvrv2 $1tvam$[email protected]:
"Creon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Tue, 13 May 2025 07:27:14 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Governor Swill wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On Mon, 12 May 2025 15:13:23 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing to >>>>>>> do with any actual ideology.
Just another political swearword like commie, wokie or DEI.
You RADICAL LUNATIC LEFT LIBERAL MARXIST WOKE COMMIE DEI hire!!!!
"DEI" to me is the new term for "equal-opportunity employer".
Except it isn't equal-opportunity.. instead it is preferential
opportunity... also called discrimination.
Like Trump giving refugee
status to people from Africa.
As long as they are white.
You'd prefer black?
On 13/5/25 13:50, Tim Ekula wrote:
On 13 May 2025, Derek Nash <[email protected]> posted some
news:OQLUP.385089$[email protected]:
On 5/12/2025 3:46 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2025 12:48:49 -0400, "Scout"wrote:
"Creon" <[email protected]> wrote<snip>
On Mon, 12 May 2025 08:19:06 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing >>>>>>>> to do with any actual ideology.
Like "Nazi" to you freaks, right?
What's another good name for "white supremacist nationalist
fascists"?
BTW, even the famous Godwin of "Godwin's Law" has said they're
Nazis.
Tell me if they were black supremacist nationalist fascists would
they still be Nazis.... if not, what term would apply to such
people?
They called them "Black Panthers". There have been a few such
groups.
Stop it. The Black Panthers were black nationalists, but were not the
least bit fascist, let alone Nazi.
They were black radical extremists.
No black separatist ever called me 'boy'.
On 13 May 2025, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> posted some news:[email protected]:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvvrv2 $1tvam$[email protected]:
"Creon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Tue, 13 May 2025 07:27:14 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Governor Swill wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On Mon, 12 May 2025 15:13:23 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing to >>>>>>>do with any actual ideology.
Just another political swearword like commie, wokie or DEI.
You RADICAL LUNATIC LEFT LIBERAL MARXIST WOKE COMMIE DEI hire!!!!
"DEI" to me is the new term for "equal-opportunity employer".
Except it isn't equal-opportunity.. instead it is preferential
opportunity... also called discrimination.
Like Trump giving refugee
status to people from Africa.
As long as they are white.
You'd prefer black?
On Tue, 13 May 2025 21:46:08 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<[email protected]> wrote:
So why are the democrats up in arms about a handful of Africans who
just happen to be white and waving American flags?
Because it points out your racial/ethnic hate.
Trump says America is full. You and your compatriots have argued for
the longest that we have no need of such immigrants.
But when WHITE people want to emigrate, your tune changes.
On 2025-05-13, Tim Ekula <[email protected]> wrote:
On 13 May 2025, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> posted some
news:[email protected]:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvvrv2 $1tvam$[email protected]:
"Creon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Tue, 13 May 2025 07:27:14 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Governor Swill wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On Mon, 12 May 2025 15:13:23 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing >>>>>>>>to do with any actual ideology.
Just another political swearword like commie, wokie or DEI.
You RADICAL LUNATIC LEFT LIBERAL MARXIST WOKE COMMIE DEI hire!!!!
"DEI" to me is the new term for "equal-opportunity employer".
Except it isn't equal-opportunity.. instead it is preferential
opportunity... also called discrimination.
Like Trump giving refugee
status to people from Africa.
As long as they are white.
You'd prefer black?
So why are the democrats up in arms about a handful of Africans who
just happen to be white and waving American flags?
The reason is simple.
The great replacement program and this doesn't fit into it.
These same democrats said nothing about millions of migrants, most of
which have never been persecuted like the Africans have, illegally
entering the country.
Democrats are disgusting.
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
On Tue, 13 May 2025 21:46:08 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<[email protected]> wrote:
So why are the democrats up in arms about a handful of Africans who
just happen to be white and waving American flags?
Because it points out your racial/ethnic hate.
Trump says America is full. You and your compatriots have argued for
the longest that we have no need of such immigrants.
But when WHITE people want to emigrate, your tune changes.
Just don't call them refugees = they're not. Immigrants, yes, refugees NO!
On 5/13/2025 4:34 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
Another scooterism!
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 12 May 2025 12:48:49 -0400, "Scout"wrote:
"Creon" <[email protected]> wrote<snip>
On Mon, 12 May 2025 08:19:06 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
Tell me if they were black supremacist nationalist fascists would they >>>> still"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing to >>>>>>> do
with any actual ideology.
Like "Nazi" to you freaks, right?
What's another good name for "white supremacist nationalist fascists"? >>>>>
BTW, even the famous Godwin of "Godwin's Law" has said they're Nazis. >>>>
be Nazis.... if not, what term would apply to such people?
They called them "Black Panthers". There have been a few such groups.
So where [sic] they Nazis?
Nazi-like behaviors can be extended to other groups, but true Nazis
are by definition intolerant of any group that is NOT white and/or
Christian.
So "Nazi" means white and nominally Christian.
But "nazi" means anybody as intolerant of or hostile to "others"
unlike themselves.
On Tue, 13 May 2025 14:02:00 -0400, "Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>news:[email protected]...
On Tue, 13 May 2025 07:40:08 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Baxter" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>news:vvubvv$1hrff$[email protected]...
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvtes0$185c7$[email protected]:
Well, go ahead and point out any such Black NAZIs that have existed in >>>>> the world.
"Creon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 12 May 2025 08:19:06 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentö[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>wrote in >>>>>>>>>news:[email protected] >>>>>>>>>suck ing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:wrote
Klaus Schadenfreude >>>>>>>>>>><klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentö[email protected]>
youin news:pu122kd004jlm4q4hup8708me0vfpv1r41 >>>>>>>>>@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck
ing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed: >>>>>>>>>>>>
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>news:vvqtjm$js1b$[email protected]:
In news:vvqn6c$i9d9$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:vvqf1q$gn18$[email protected]:
In news:vvp3ms$3vmi1$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:xMSTP.165919$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:41 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aggressively stupid commie liar, lied: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pothead <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Then why do government schools turn out so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> poorly educated students?
They don't. Public schools perform better than >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> private schools.
Wrong. Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everyone who shows up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Misinformation is not proof.
Bullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing2. moving the goal posts 3. ??? = -9999 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>And the composition of the student body is reflected >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
the scores. The same group of students will achieve >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
same performance whether in private or public schools. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Communists and socialist are not the same thing. And there are >>>>>>>>>>>>>NO actual Socialists anywhere in Congress.That's all ya got? Two guys with joke tee shorts from >>>>>>>>>>>>>> February, 2018?!?have posted shows that.
Liar,
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The
bullshit you posted does not say anything about student >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> body composition.
LOL forget the "commie" bullshit - conservaturds LOVE >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commie Putin, commie Russia.
Forget the "commie" bullshit - conservatives HATE commie >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Putin, commie Russia,
NO you don't.
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/404017-trump >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - supporters-whose-pro-russia-shirts-went-viral-were-not/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
commie Xi, commie China, commie Maduro, commie Venezuela. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>conservatives used to be anti-comunist, but that changed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
Russian asset tRump took over.
You are deluded. Today's communists/socialists caucus with >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
Democrats.
Yes, there are members of Congress who identify as democratic >>>>>>>>>>>> socialists
Democratic Socialists are not the "Socialists" that conservaturds >>>>>>>>>>>rant about.
Sorry old timer.
If you morons think Musk is "literally Hitler,: then yes,
Democratic Socialists are the socialists conservatives rant >>>>>>>>>> about.
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing to >>>>>>>>>do with any actual ideology.
Like "Nazi" to you freaks, right?
What's another good name for "white supremacist nationalist
fascists"?
BTW, even the famous Godwin of "Godwin's Law" has said they're
Nazis.
Tell me if they were black supremacist nationalist fascists would
they
still be Nazis.... if not, what term would apply to such people?
I refer you to the past by Governor Swill admitting to their existence. >>>>
dodge / troll
How is pointing out your admission there were Black Nazis to be a >>"dodge/troll"?
Then you should have no problem showing where in this thread I
'admitted' to the existence of Black Nazis?
I'll wait.
On 13/5/25 9:12, Scout wrote:
Except it isn't equal-opportunity.. instead it is preferential
opportunity... also called discrimination.
What to do when discrimination is proven?
On Tue, 13 May 2025 20:48:55 -0000 (UTC), Tim Ekula
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 13 May 2025, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> posted some >>news:[email protected]:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvvrv2 $1tvam$[email protected]:
"Creon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Tue, 13 May 2025 07:27:14 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Governor Swill wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On Mon, 12 May 2025 15:13:23 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing to >>>>>>>>do with any actual ideology.
Just another political swearword like commie, wokie or DEI.
You RADICAL LUNATIC LEFT LIBERAL MARXIST WOKE COMMIE DEI hire!!!!
"DEI" to me is the new term for "equal-opportunity employer".
Except it isn't equal-opportunity.. instead it is preferential
opportunity... also called discrimination.
Like Trump giving refugee
status to people from Africa.
As long as they are white.
You'd prefer black?
Dodge.
The point is, Trump wouldn't give them refugee status UNLESS they were
white.
On Tue, 13 May 2025 21:46:08 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<[email protected]> wrote:
So why are the democrats up in arms about a handful of Africans who just >>happen to be white
and waving American flags?
Because it points out your racial/ethnic hate.
Trump says America is full. You and your compatriots have argued for
the longest that we have no need of such immigrants.
But when WHITE people want to emigrate, your tune changes.
On 13/5/25 13:48, Tim Ekula wrote:
On 13 May 2025, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> posted some
news:[email protected]:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvvrv2 $1tvam$[email protected]:
"Creon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Tue, 13 May 2025 07:27:14 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Governor Swill wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On Mon, 12 May 2025 15:13:23 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing to >>>>>>>> do with any actual ideology.
Just another political swearword like commie, wokie or DEI.
You RADICAL LUNATIC LEFT LIBERAL MARXIST WOKE COMMIE DEI hire!!!!
"DEI" to me is the new term for "equal-opportunity employer".
Except it isn't equal-opportunity.. instead it is preferential
opportunity... also called discrimination.
Like Trump giving refugee
status to people from Africa.
As long as they are white.
You'd prefer black?
We should help anyone who needs help.
On 13/5/25 20:16, Baxter wrote:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Tue, 13 May 2025 21:46:08 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<[email protected]> wrote:
So why are the democrats up in arms about a handful of Africans who
just happen to be white and waving American flags?
Because it points out your racial/ethnic hate.
Trump says America is full. You and your compatriots have argued for
the longest that we have no need of such immigrants.
But when WHITE people want to emigrate, your tune changes.
Just don't call them refugees = they're not. Immigrants, yes, refugees
NO!
If they are fleeing for their lives, they are refugees.
On 5/13/2025 9:12 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
No, scooter, that's a lie. Business firms and other organizations that
"Creon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Tue, 13 May 2025 07:27:14 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Governor Swill wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On Mon, 12 May 2025 15:13:23 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing to do >>>>>> with any actual ideology.
Just another political swearword like commie, wokie or DEI.
You RADICAL LUNATIC LEFT LIBERAL MARXIST WOKE COMMIE DEI hire!!!!
"DEI" to me is the new term for "equal-opportunity employer".
Except it isn't equal-opportunity.. instead it is preferential
opportunity... also called discrimination.
commit to "DEI" are stating that they *do not* discriminate.
On Tue, 13 May 2025 12:12:03 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"DEI" to me is the new term for "equal-opportunity employer".
Except it isn't equal-opportunity.. instead it is preferential >>opportunity... also called discrimination.
Here again is an example of you allowing yourself to be taught a lie
because it lines up with other preconceptions you have.
On Tue, 13 May 2025 12:25:17 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
Well ignoring the whole irrelevant notion of left/right let's look at what >>antifa stands for
1) dictatorial leadership (check)
Not true. Antifa strives against dictatorial leadership and for the
rights of the People.
2) centralized power (check)
Wrong again.
3) militarism (check)
Just like Republicans and Democrats. If you don't believe me, ask
around in Iraq or Afghanistan.
4) suppression of dissent (check)
Wrong again. Antifa is itself a dissenting organization which, again, stresses the rights and freedoms of the People.
5) rejects the idea of equality and promotes a rigid social hierarchy
where
some groups or individuals are considered superior to others. (check)
Not merely wrong but the diametric opposite of what Antifa hopes to
achieve.
6) Seeks to control all aspects of society, including the economy,
culture,
and education. (check)
Again, wrong. Antifa supports egalitarian aims.
7) relies on propaganda and manipulative tactics to control the population >>(check)
Wrong again but again, one needs only to look at Democrats and
Republicans to see that they are masters of propganda.
8) opposes democratic principles like freedom of speech, free and fair >>elections, and rule of law (check)
Again, the very opposite of what Antifa stands for. Freedom, fairness
and especially rule of law are the core of Antifa.
in principles, policies, agenda, and action I see no real difference >>between
this group and Nazis, they just assert they have a better reason to
engage,
impose, promote, advocate, or otherwise carry these things. out.
Of course, Baxter is sort of a one dimensional thinker and sees only a >>line,
when in reality political views, agendas, methods, etc is a >>multidimensional
grid, and whether you get it by moving right or moving left the result is >>the same only the excuses for doing it are different.
Meanwhile you use antifa as a swear word like commie, wokie or librul.
You have no idea what antifa means, you've merely allowed yourself to
be taught that it's a bad thing. Why would you do this? Because you perceive antifa as being a black movement which must, therefore, be
bad.
On 13 May 2025, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> posted some news:[email protected]:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvvrv4$1tvam$[email protected]:
"Baxter" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:vvvn18$1sqc6$[email protected]...
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <[email protected]>,Yeah, conservaturds claim antifa is fascist.
[email protected] says...
On Mon, 12 May 2025 08:19:06 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]g.c >>>>>> >>oc ksuck ing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:wrote
Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]>
@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuckin news:pu122kd004jlm4q4hup8708me0vfpv1r41
youing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvqtjm$js1b$[email protected]:
In news:vvqn6c$i9d9$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvqf1q$gn18$[email protected]:
In news:vvp3ms$3vmi1$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:xMSTP.165919$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:41 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and
aggressively stupid commie liar, lied:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Then why do government schools turn out so
poorly educated students?
They don't. Public schools perform better than >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> private schools.
Wrong. Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate
everyone who shows up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim >>>>>> >>>>>>>Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal posts 3. ??? = -9999
And the composition of the student body is reflected >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the scores. The same group of students will
achieve the same performance whether in private or
public schools.
Bullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar.
Nothing
Communists and socialist are not the same thing. And therehave posted shows that.
Liar,
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The bullshit you posted does not say anything about
student body composition.
LOL forget the "commie" bullshit - conservaturds LOVE
commie Putin, commie Russia.
Forget the "commie" bullshit - conservatives HATE commie >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Putin, commie Russia,
NO you don't.
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/404017-tr >>>>>> >>>>>>>> um p-
supporters-whose-pro-russia-shirts-went-viral-were-not/
That's all ya got? Two guys with joke tee shorts from
February, 2018?!?
commie Xi, commie China, commie Maduro, commie Venezuela. >>>>>> >>>>>>>conservatives used to be anti-comunist, but that changed
when Russian asset tRump took over.
You are deluded. Today's communists/socialists caucus with >>>>>> >>>>>>> the Democrats.
are NO actual Socialists anywhere in Congress.
Yes, there are members of Congress who identify as democratic >>>>>> >>>>> socialists
Democratic Socialists are not the "Socialists" that
conservaturds rant about.
Sorry old timer.
If you morons think Musk is "literally Hitler,: then yes,
Democratic Socialists are the socialists conservatives rant
about.
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing
to do with any actual ideology.
Like "Nazi" to you freaks, right?
What's another good name for "white supremacist nationalist
fascists"?
Baxter.
Well ignoring the whole irrelevant notion of left/right let's look at
what antifa stands for
1) dictatorial leadership (check)
There is no such organization as Antifa.
There's no such thing as an intelligent Democrat either.
On 5/13/2025 9:25 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Baxter" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:vvvn18$1sqc6$[email protected]...
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <[email protected]>,Yeah, conservaturds claim antifa is fascist.
[email protected] says...
On Mon, 12 May 2025 08:19:06 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentö[email protected]> >>>>> >>wrote in
news:[email protected] >>>>> >>ksuck ing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:wrote
Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentö[email protected]>
@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuckin news:pu122kd004jlm4q4hup8708me0vfpv1r41
youing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvqtjm$js1b$[email protected]:
In news:vvqn6c$i9d9$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvqf1q$gn18$[email protected]:
In news:vvp3ms$3vmi1$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:xMSTP.165919$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:41 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and
aggressively stupid commie liar, lied:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Then why do government schools turn out so
poorly educated students?
They don't. Public schools perform better than
private schools.
Wrong. Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate
everyone who shows up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim
Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal posts 3. ??? = -9999
And the composition of the student body is reflected
in the scores. The same group of students will achieve >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the same performance whether in private or public
schools.
Bullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar.
Nothing
Communists and socialist are not the same thing. And there are >>>>> >>>>>>NO actual Socialists anywhere in Congress.have posted shows that.
Liar,
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar.
The bullshit you posted does not say anything about
student body composition.
LOL forget the "commie" bullshit - conservaturds LOVE
commie Putin, commie Russia.
Forget the "commie" bullshit - conservatives HATE commie
Putin, commie Russia,
NO you don't.
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/404017-trum >>>>> >>>>>>>> p- supporters-whose-pro-russia-shirts-went-viral-were-not/
That's all ya got? Two guys with joke tee shorts from
February, 2018?!?
commie Xi, commie China, commie Maduro, commie Venezuela.
conservatives used to be anti-comunist, but that changed
when Russian asset tRump took over.
You are deluded. Today's communists/socialists caucus with
the Democrats.
Yes, there are members of Congress who identify as democratic
socialists
Democratic Socialists are not the "Socialists" that conservaturds >>>>> >>>>rant about.
Sorry old timer.
If you morons think Musk is "literally Hitler,: then yes,
Democratic Socialists are the socialists conservatives rant
about.
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing to >>>>> >>do with any actual ideology.
Like "Nazi" to you freaks, right?
What's another good name for "white supremacist nationalist
fascists"?
Baxter.
Well ignoring the whole irrelevant notion of left/right let's look at
what antifa stands for
Every word you wrote below is a lie, scooter.
On 13 May 2025, Derek Nash <[email protected]> posted some news:OQLUP.385089$[email protected]:
On 5/12/2025 3:46 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2025 12:48:49 -0400, "Scout"wrote:
"Creon" <[email protected]> wrote<snip>
On Mon, 12 May 2025 08:19:06 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing
to do with any actual ideology.
Like "Nazi" to you freaks, right?
What's another good name for "white supremacist nationalist
fascists"?
BTW, even the famous Godwin of "Godwin's Law" has said they're
Nazis.
Tell me if they were black supremacist nationalist fascists would
they still be Nazis.... if not, what term would apply to such
people?
They called them "Black Panthers". There have been a few such
groups.
Stop it. The Black Panthers were black nationalists
but were not the
least bit fascist, let alone Nazi.
They were black radical extremists.
In article <vvvn18$1sqc6$[email protected]>, bax02
[email protected] says...
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <[email protected]>,Yeah, conservaturds claim antifa is fascist.
[email protected] says...
On Mon, 12 May 2025 08:19:06 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]>
wrote in
news:[email protected]
ksuck ing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:wrote
Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]>
@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuckin news:pu122kd004jlm4q4hup8708me0vfpv1r41
youing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvqtjm$js1b$[email protected]:
In news:vvqn6c$i9d9$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvqf1q$gn18$[email protected]:
In news:vvp3ms$3vmi1$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:xMSTP.165919$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:41 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and
aggressively stupid commie liar, lied:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Then why do government schools turn out so
poorly educated students?
They don't. Public schools perform better than
private schools.
Wrong. Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate
everyone who shows up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim
Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal posts 3. ??? = -9999
And the composition of the student body is reflected
in the scores. The same group of students will achieve
the same performance whether in private or public
schools.
Bullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar.
Nothing
Communists and socialist are not the same thing. And there arehave posted shows that.
Liar,
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar.
The bullshit you posted does not say anything about
student body composition.
LOL forget the "commie" bullshit - conservaturds LOVE
commie Putin, commie Russia.
Forget the "commie" bullshit - conservatives HATE commie
Putin, commie Russia,
NO you don't.
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/404017-trum
p- supporters-whose-pro-russia-shirts-went-viral-were-not/
That's all ya got? Two guys with joke tee shorts from
February, 2018?!?
commie Xi, commie China, commie Maduro, commie Venezuela.
conservatives used to be anti-comunist, but that changed
when Russian asset tRump took over.
You are deluded. Today's communists/socialists caucus with
the Democrats.
NO actual Socialists anywhere in Congress.
Yes, there are members of Congress who identify as democratic
socialists
Democratic Socialists are not the "Socialists" that conservaturds
rant about.
Sorry old timer.
If you morons think Musk is "literally Hitler,: then yes,
Democratic Socialists are the socialists conservatives rant
about.
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing to
do with any actual ideology.
Like "Nazi" to you freaks, right?
What's another good name for "white supremacist nationalist
fascists"?
Baxter.
They are. I watched them during the protests.
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:10013cb$2a3ef$[email protected]...
On 13/5/25 20:16, Baxter wrote:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Tue, 13 May 2025 21:46:08 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<[email protected]> wrote:
So why are the democrats up in arms about a handful of Africans who
just happen to be white and waving American flags?
Because it points out your racial/ethnic hate.
Trump says America is full. You and your compatriots have argued for
the longest that we have no need of such immigrants.
But when WHITE people want to emigrate, your tune changes.
Just don't call them refugees = they're not. Immigrants, yes, refugees
NO!
If they are fleeing for their lives, they are refugees.
Until they reach the first country where they aren't fleeing for their lives.. then they are no longer fleeing for their lives, are they?
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
On Tue, 13 May 2025 21:46:08 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<[email protected]> wrote:
So why are the democrats up in arms about a handful of Africans who just >>>happen to be white
and waving American flags?
Because it points out your racial/ethnic hate.
Trump says America is full. You and your compatriots have argued for
the longest that we have no need of such immigrants.
But when WHITE people want to emigrate, your tune changes.
Really? Show that pothead's tune has changed.
On 2025-05-14, Scout <[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Tue, 13 May 2025 21:46:08 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<[email protected]> wrote:
So why are the democrats up in arms about a handful of Africans who just >>>> happen to be white
and waving American flags?
Because it points out your racial/ethnic hate.
Trump says America is full. You and your compatriots have argued for
the longest that we have no need of such immigrants.
But when WHITE people want to emigrate, your tune changes.
Really? Show that pothead's tune has changed.
He can't because my opinion is to enter the US legally and ALL are
welcome.
The asylum card has been overplayed and literally every illegal migrant
has been coached as to what boxes to check and what to say in order to be
let into the country.
The WHITE Africans really are in danger.
Look up Plaasmoorde.
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
On Tue, 13 May 2025 12:12:03 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"DEI" to me is the new term for "equal-opportunity employer".
Except it isn't equal-opportunity.. instead it is preferential
opportunity... also called discrimination.
Here again is an example of you allowing yourself to be taught a lie
because it lines up with other preconceptions you have.
Then how does a company hit their desired diversity requirements, if
those of diversity aren't the best applicant applying for a position?
Do they hire the best candidate, or do they allow sex/race to influence
their hiring in order to obtain artificial levels decided to represent 'fairness' in hiring even if that means discriminating against better qualified candidates.
Proof?
Didn't think so.
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
On Tue, 13 May 2025 21:46:08 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<[email protected]> wrote:
So why are the democrats up in arms about a handful of Africans who
just happen to be white
and waving American flags?
Because it points out your racial/ethnic hate.
Trump says America is full. You and your compatriots have argued for
the longest that we have no need of such immigrants.
But when WHITE people want to emigrate, your tune changes.
Really? Show that pothead's tune has changed.
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:1000qnl$24l9i$[email protected]...
On 13/5/25 13:48, Tim Ekula wrote:
On 13 May 2025, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> posted some
news:[email protected]:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvvrv2 $1tvam$[email protected]:
"Creon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Tue, 13 May 2025 07:27:14 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Governor Swill wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On Mon, 12 May 2025 15:13:23 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has
nothing to do with any actual ideology.
Just another political swearword like commie, wokie or DEI.
You RADICAL LUNATIC LEFT LIBERAL MARXIST WOKE COMMIE DEI
hire!!!!
"DEI" to me is the new term for "equal-opportunity employer".
Except it isn't equal-opportunity.. instead it is preferential
opportunity... also called discrimination.
Like Trump giving refugee
status to people from Africa.
As long as they are white.
You'd prefer black?
We should help anyone who needs help.
Ok, tell us about the homeless drug addict you have sleeping on the
couch?
Or maybe how you are paying for an apartment for a homeless run-away?
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf�[email protected]>
wrote in message news:KhOUP.53143$[email protected]...
On 5/13/2025 9:12 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and
gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and
lied:
No, scooter, that's a lie. Business firms and other organizations
"Creon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Tue, 13 May 2025 07:27:14 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Governor Swill wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On Mon, 12 May 2025 15:13:23 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing
to do with any actual ideology.
Just another political swearword like commie, wokie or DEI.
You RADICAL LUNATIC LEFT LIBERAL MARXIST WOKE COMMIE DEI hire!!!!
"DEI" to me is the new term for "equal-opportunity employer".
Except it isn't equal-opportunity.. instead it is preferential
opportunity... also called discrimination.
that commit to "DEI" are stating that they *do not* discriminate.
Oh, they can state it but their actions show otherwise.
Tell me.. if your race or gender has ANY influence in hiring then
isn't that discrimination?
On Wed, 14 May 2025 08:59:43 -0400, "Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:
Like Trump giving refugee
status to people from Africa.
As long as they are white.
You'd prefer black?
Dodge.
The point is, Trump wouldn't give them refugee status UNLESS they were
white.
Proof?
Didn't think so.
I guess you've missed all the stories about Trump's efforts to expel
refugees and other immigrants, specifically those from Venezuela. They
aren't white.
On Wed, 14 May 2025 15:09:51 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
The asylum card has been overplayed and literally every illegal migrant
has been coached as to what boxes to check and what to say in order to be >>let into the country.
They are both political and economic refugees. Their dictotorial
governments have destroyed their own economies so the people are doing
what people have done since Columbus.
On Wed, 14 May 2025 09:00:52 -0400, "Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>news:[email protected]...
On Tue, 13 May 2025 21:46:08 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<[email protected]> wrote:
So why are the democrats up in arms about a handful of Africans who just >>>>happen to be white
and waving American flags?
Because it points out your racial/ethnic hate.
Trump says America is full. You and your compatriots have argued for
the longest that we have no need of such immigrants.
But when WHITE people want to emigrate, your tune changes.
Really? Show that pothead's tune has changed.
When the subject is white people refugeeing . . .
On 5/14/25 09:18, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Tue, 13 May 2025 12:12:03 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"DEI" to me is the new term for "equal-opportunity employer".
Except it isn't equal-opportunity.. instead it is preferential
opportunity... also called discrimination.
Here again is an example of you allowing yourself to be taught a lie
because it lines up with other preconceptions you have.
Then how does a company hit their desired diversity requirements, if
those of diversity aren't the best applicant applying for a position?
Do they hire the best candidate, or do they allow sex/race to influence
their hiring in order to obtain artificial levels decided to represent
'fairness' in hiring even if that means discriminating against better
qualified candidates.
One approach that I saw used back in the 1990s was similar to the baseball rule of "tie goes to the runner".
On Wed, 14 May 2025 09:18:03 -0400, "Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:
Here again is an example of you allowing yourself to be taught a lie
because it lines up with other preconceptions you have.
Then how does a company hit their desired diversity requirements, if those >>of diversity aren't the best applicant applying for a position?
Do they hire the best candidate, or do they allow sex/race to influence >>their hiring in order to obtain artificial levels decided to represent >>'fairness' in hiring even if that means discriminating against better >>qualified candidates.
They should consider all applicants and hire from them the best of the
lot.
On Wed, 14 May 2025 09:02:16 -0400, "Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>news:10013cb$2a3ef$[email protected]...
On 13/5/25 20:16, Baxter wrote:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Tue, 13 May 2025 21:46:08 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<[email protected]> wrote:
So why are the democrats up in arms about a handful of Africans who >>>>>> just happen to be white and waving American flags?
Because it points out your racial/ethnic hate.
Trump says America is full. You and your compatriots have argued for >>>>> the longest that we have no need of such immigrants.
But when WHITE people want to emigrate, your tune changes.
Just don't call them refugees = they're not. Immigrants, yes, refugees >>>> NO!
If they are fleeing for their lives, they are refugees.
Until they reach the first country where they aren't fleeing for their >>lives.. then they are no longer fleeing for their lives, are they?
Explain why white people are allowed to come here as refugees but
brown people are not.
On Tue, 13 May 2025 18:13:59 -0700, Siri Cruz <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 13/5/25 13:48, Tim Ekula wrote:
On 13 May 2025, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> posted some
news:[email protected]:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvvrv2 $1tvam$[email protected]:
"Creon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Tue, 13 May 2025 07:27:14 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Governor Swill wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:"DEI" to me is the new term for "equal-opportunity employer".
On Mon, 12 May 2025 15:13:23 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing to >>>>>>>>> do with any actual ideology.
Just another political swearword like commie, wokie or DEI.
You RADICAL LUNATIC LEFT LIBERAL MARXIST WOKE COMMIE DEI hire!!!! >>>>>>
Except it isn't equal-opportunity.. instead it is preferential
opportunity... also called discrimination.
Like Trump giving refugee
status to people from Africa.
As long as they are white.
You'd prefer black?
We should help anyone who needs help.
+1
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
On Tue, 13 May 2025 18:13:59 -0700, Siri Cruz <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 13/5/25 13:48, Tim Ekula wrote:
On 13 May 2025, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> posted some
news:[email protected]:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvvrv2 $1tvam$[email protected]:
"Creon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Tue, 13 May 2025 07:27:14 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Governor Swill wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On Mon, 12 May 2025 15:13:23 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has
nothing to do with any actual ideology.
Just another political swearword like commie, wokie or DEI.
You RADICAL LUNATIC LEFT LIBERAL MARXIST WOKE COMMIE DEI
hire!!!!
"DEI" to me is the new term for "equal-opportunity employer".
Except it isn't equal-opportunity.. instead it is preferential
opportunity... also called discrimination.
Like Trump giving refugee
status to people from Africa.
As long as they are white.
You'd prefer black?
We should help anyone who needs help.
+1
Feel free to help anyone you want with your own money. With over $36
Trillion in federal debt, and internal economic issues, as a nation we
can not afford to.
On 5/14/2025 11:04 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and
gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and
lied:
DEI is just a way to cast a wider net to get unqualified applicants,
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 09:18:03 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Here again is an example of you allowing yourself to be taught a
lie because it lines up with other preconceptions you have.
Then how does a company hit their desired diversity requirements,
if those of diversity aren't the best applicant applying for a
position?
Do they hire the best candidate, or do they allow sex/race to
influence their hiring in order to obtain artificial levels decided
to represent 'fairness' in hiring even if that means discriminating
against better qualified candidates.
They should consider all applicants and hire from them the best of
the lot.
Bingo!
scooter. You know this.
DEI is just a way to cast a wider net to get unqualified applicants,They should consider all applicants and hire from them the best of
the lot.
Bingo!
scooter. You know this.
Fixed your post.
Then how does a company hit their desired diversity requirements, if those >> >of diversity aren't the best applicant applying for a position?
Why don't you ask them?
On Wed, 14 May 2025 09:18:03 -0400, "Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:
Then how does a company hit their desired diversity requirements, if those >>of diversity aren't the best applicant applying for a position?
Do they hire the best candidate, or do they allow sex/race to influence >>their hiring in order to obtain artificial levels decided to represent >>'fairness' in hiring even if that means discriminating against better >>qualified candidates.
Why don't you ask them?
On 14/5/25 21:51, Governor Swill wrote:
Then how does a company hit their desired diversity requirements, if
those
of diversity aren't the best applicant applying for a position?
Why don't you ask them?
Because the question is bigotry. It assume skills are not uniformly distributed among the popuplation
That Those People are genetically stupid.
"-hh" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:1002gnk$2iqsi$[email protected]...
On 5/14/25 09:18, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Tue, 13 May 2025 12:12:03 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"DEI" to me is the new term for "equal-opportunity employer".
Except it isn't equal-opportunity.. instead it is preferential
opportunity... also called discrimination.
Here again is an example of you allowing yourself to be taught a lie
because it lines up with other preconceptions you have.
Then how does a company hit their desired diversity requirements, if
those of diversity aren't the best applicant applying for a position?
Do they hire the best candidate, or do they allow sex/race to
influence their hiring in order to obtain artificial levels decided
to represent 'fairness' in hiring even if that means discriminating
against better qualified candidates.
One approach that I saw used back in the 1990s was similar to the
baseball rule of "tie goes to the runner".
We're not talking a tie, we are talking a better applicant.
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
On Tue, 13 May 2025 18:13:59 -0700, Siri Cruz <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 13/5/25 13:48, Tim Ekula wrote:
On 13 May 2025, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> posted some
news:[email protected]:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvvrv2 $1tvam$[email protected]:
"Creon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Tue, 13 May 2025 07:27:14 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Governor Swill wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:"DEI" to me is the new term for "equal-opportunity employer".
On Mon, 12 May 2025 15:13:23 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has
nothing to
do with any actual ideology.
Just another political swearword like commie, wokie or DEI.
You RADICAL LUNATIC LEFT LIBERAL MARXIST WOKE COMMIE DEI hire!!!! >>>>>>>
Except it isn't equal-opportunity.. instead it is preferential
opportunity... also called discrimination.
Like Trump giving refugee
status to people from Africa.
As long as they are white.
You'd prefer black?
We should help anyone who needs help.
+1
Feel free to help anyone you want with your own money. With over $36
Trillion in federal debt, and internal economic issues, as a nation we
can not afford to.
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:10042fh$30hak$[email protected]...
On 14/5/25 21:51, Governor Swill wrote:
Then how does a company hit their desired diversity
requirements, if those
of diversity aren't the best applicant applying for a position?
Why don't you ask them?
Because the question is bigotry. It assume skills are not
uniformly distributed among the popuplation
Actually skills are not uniformly distributed among the
population or we all could be brain surgeons.
That Those People are genetically stupid.
Quite the contrary, simply states that the desired skills and a
person's proficiency with them has nothing to do with the color
of their skin..
hiring and we need to hire less qualified individuals of the
suitable races to bring the racial diversity within acceptable
standards.
On 5/14/25 14:03, Scout wrote:
"-hh" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:1002gnk$2iqsi$[email protected]...
On 5/14/25 09:18, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Tue, 13 May 2025 12:12:03 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"DEI" to me is the new term for "equal-opportunity employer".
Except it isn't equal-opportunity.. instead it is preferential
opportunity... also called discrimination.
Here again is an example of you allowing yourself to be taught a lie >>>>> because it lines up with other preconceptions you have.
Then how does a company hit their desired diversity requirements, if
those of diversity aren't the best applicant applying for a position?
Do they hire the best candidate, or do they allow sex/race to influence >>>> their hiring in order to obtain artificial levels decided to represent >>>> 'fairness' in hiring even if that means discriminating against better
qualified candidates.
One approach that I saw used back in the 1990s was similar to the
baseball rule of "tie goes to the runner".
We're not talking a tie, we are talking a better applicant.
Nope. No matter how much you want it to, their gender or the color of
their skin doesn't count in the evaluation.
On 5/14/25 14:08, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Tue, 13 May 2025 18:13:59 -0700, Siri Cruz <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 13/5/25 13:48, Tim Ekula wrote:
On 13 May 2025, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> posted some
news:[email protected]:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvvrv2 $1tvam$[email protected]:
"Creon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Tue, 13 May 2025 07:27:14 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Governor Swill wrote this post while blinking in Morse code: >>>>>>>>>"DEI" to me is the new term for "equal-opportunity employer".
On Mon, 12 May 2025 15:13:23 -0000 (UTC), BaxterYou RADICAL LUNATIC LEFT LIBERAL MARXIST WOKE COMMIE DEI hire!!!! >>>>>>>>
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing >>>>>>>>>>> to
do with any actual ideology.
Just another political swearword like commie, wokie or DEI. >>>>>>>>>
Except it isn't equal-opportunity.. instead it is preferential
opportunity... also called discrimination.
Like Trump giving refugee
status to people from Africa.
As long as they are white.
You'd prefer black?
We should help anyone who needs help.
+1
Feel free to help anyone you want with your own money. With over $36
Trillion in federal debt, and internal economic issues, as a nation we
can not afford to.
So does that then mean that you're actively opposed to the GOP's "Big Beautiful Bill" which contains additional tax cuts for the risks and makes the deficit & debt substantially worse instead of better?
On Wed, 14 May 2025 14:01:58 -0400, "Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 09:02:16 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>news:10013cb$2a3ef$[email protected]...
On 13/5/25 20:16, Baxter wrote:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Tue, 13 May 2025 21:46:08 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<[email protected]> wrote:
So why are the democrats up in arms about a handful of Africans who >>>>>>>> just happen to be white and waving American flags?
Because it points out your racial/ethnic hate.
Trump says America is full. You and your compatriots have argued >>>>>>> for
the longest that we have no need of such immigrants.
But when WHITE people want to emigrate, your tune changes.
Just don't call them refugees = they're not. Immigrants, yes,
refugees
NO!
If they are fleeing for their lives, they are refugees.
Until they reach the first country where they aren't fleeing for their >>>>lives.. then they are no longer fleeing for their lives, are they?
Explain why white people are allowed to come here as refugees but
brown people are not.
Show that is the case as a matter of policy.
The policy and practice are, is it turns out, not the same.
Since Trump is determined to deport even legals and citizens with
brown skin, you shouldn't need any further proof.
On 15/5/25 5:50, Scout wrote:
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:10042fh$30hak$[email protected]...
On 14/5/25 21:51, Governor Swill wrote:
Then how does a company hit their desired diversity
requirements, if those
of diversity aren't the best applicant applying for a position?
Why don't you ask them?
Because the question is bigotry. It assume skills are not
uniformly distributed among the popuplation
Actually skills are not uniformly distributed among the
population or we all could be brain surgeons.
That Those People are genetically stupid.
Quite the contrary, simply states that the desired skills and a
person's proficiency with them has nothing to do with the color
of their skin..
And if the distribution of skin colours of hires is significantly
different from distribution of skin colours of the population?
hiring and we need to hire less qualified individuals of the
suitable races to bring the racial diversity within acceptable
standards.
Then you ignore the evidence in favour allowing discrimination, bigot.
On Wed, 14 May 2025 14:01:58 -0400, "Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 09:02:16 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:10013cb$2a3ef$[email protected]...
On 13/5/25 20:16, Baxter wrote:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Tue, 13 May 2025 21:46:08 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<[email protected]> wrote:
So why are the democrats up in arms about a handful of Africans who >>>>>>>> just happen to be white and waving American flags?
Because it points out your racial/ethnic hate.
Trump says America is full. You and your compatriots have argued for >>>>>>> the longest that we have no need of such immigrants.
But when WHITE people want to emigrate, your tune changes.
Just don't call them refugees = they're not. Immigrants, yes, refugees >>>>>> NO!
If they are fleeing for their lives, they are refugees.
Until they reach the first country where they aren't fleeing for their >>>> lives.. then they are no longer fleeing for their lives, are they?
Explain why white people are allowed to come here as refugees but
brown people are not.
Show that is the case as a matter of policy.
The policy and practice are, is it turns out, not the same.
Since Trump is determined to deport even legals and citizens with
brown skin, you shouldn't need any further proof.
Who cares, if they are the most qualified for the job.
Otherwise, we should fire about 80% of NFL players as the
distribution of skin colors of hires are significantly different
from the distribution of skin colors of the population.
... let me guess, you're going to assert that doesn't count.
Then you ignore the evidence in favour allowing discrimination,
bigot.
Yet, you're telling me they should hire less qualified
On 2025-05-13, Tim Ekula <[email protected]> wrote:
On 13 May 2025, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> posted some
news:[email protected]:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvvrv2 $1tvam$[email protected]:
"Creon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Tue, 13 May 2025 07:27:14 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Governor Swill wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On Mon, 12 May 2025 15:13:23 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing to >>>>>>>> do with any actual ideology.
Just another political swearword like commie, wokie or DEI.
You RADICAL LUNATIC LEFT LIBERAL MARXIST WOKE COMMIE DEI hire!!!!
"DEI" to me is the new term for "equal-opportunity employer".
Except it isn't equal-opportunity.. instead it is preferential
opportunity... also called discrimination.
Like Trump giving refugee
status to people from Africa.
As long as they are white.
You'd prefer black?
So why are the democrats up in arms about a handful of Africans who just happen to be white
and waving American flags?
The reason is simple.Only gullible Nazis believe in a "great replacement program." It simply isn't real.
The great replacement program and this doesn't fit into it.
The reason is simple.
The great replacement program and this doesn't fit into it.
These same democrats said nothing about millions of migrants, most of which have never
been persecuted like the Africans have, illegally entering the country.
On Wed, 14 May 2025 13:53:48 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
I guess you've missed all the stories about Trump's efforts to expel
refugees and other immigrants, specifically those from Venezuela. They
aren't white.
Yawn.. Fallacies... you've not shown that race was the factor.
Yes, I have and so have many others.
That you continue to stick your
head up your ass in order to blind yourself to reality is not my
fault.
On Wed, 14 May 2025 10:43:39 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.entf�[email protected]> wrote:
On 5/14/2025 10:35 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is
frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
Proof?
Didn't think so.
Just like your "I paid my way thru
high school with studen loans" claim?
That is absolutely in the top 10, maybe even top five, of the stupidest >>things
scooter has ever said.
That may be one of the ten most truthful things that YOU'VE ever said.
:)
On Wed, 14 May 2025 13:55:14 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote
On Wed, 14 May 2025 09:00:52 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote .
On Tue, 13 May 2025 21:46:08 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
So why are the democrats up in arms about a handful of Africans who >>>>>>justBecause it points out your racial/ethnic hate.
happen to be white and waving American flags?
Trump says America is full. You and your compatriots have argued for >>>>> the longest that we have no need of such immigrants.
But when WHITE people want to emigrate, your tune changes.
Really? Show that pothead's tune has changed.
When the subject is white people refugeeing . . .
And yet, the only basis for that is YOUR assertion that race was the key >>factor.
It was and like any true lying-through-his-teeth rightist, you deleted
the very evidence that proved my point. The evidence YOU SPECIFICALLY REQUESTED. Pothead is just fine with refugees, as long as they're
white.
On Wed, 14 May 2025 13:55:14 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote
On Wed, 14 May 2025 09:00:52 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote .
On Tue, 13 May 2025 21:46:08 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
So why are the democrats up in arms about a handful of Africans who >>>>>>justBecause it points out your racial/ethnic hate.
happen to be white and waving American flags?
Trump says America is full. You and your compatriots have argued for >>>>> the longest that we have no need of such immigrants.
But when WHITE people want to emigrate, your tune changes.
Really? Show that pothead's tune has changed.
When the subject is white people refugeeing . . .
And yet, the only basis for that is YOUR assertion that race was the key >>factor.
It was and like any true lying-through-his-teeth rightist, you deleted
the very evidence that proved my point.
The evidence YOU SPECIFICALLY
REQUESTED.
Pothead is just fine with refugees, as long as they're
white.
It's even ok for the government to CHARTER A PLANE to get them
here.
On Wed, 14 May 2025 14:00:59 -0400, "Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 15:09:51 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
The asylum card has been overplayed and literally every illegal migrant >>>>has been coached as to what boxes to check and what to say in order to >>>>be
let into the country.
They are both political and economic refugees. Their dictotorial
governments have destroyed their own economies so the people are doing
what people have done since Columbus.
That's nice, but being a refugee does NOT necessarily mean you have to be >>taken in by the US. I know what is a concept you have issues with, but we >>do
NOT have to gramt access to every refugee in the world, much less once you >>enter another country in which those conditions no longer apply.
The thing that amazes me, it really does, is that America's greatness
and power comes directly from the diversity of thought and
contributions of immigrants from many different lands.
On Wed, 14 May 2025 17:42:56 +0000, Mitchell Holman wrote:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote<snip>
Or maybe how you are paying for an apartment for a homeless run-away?
Tell us what you think should be done
about homeless Americans, esp homeless
veterans.
IF he responds at all, it will be with the usual lame jingoes and
slogans.
On Wed, 14 May 2025 14:08:51 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote
On Tue, 13 May 2025 18:13:59 -0700, Siri Cruz wrote:
On 13/5/25 13:48, Tim Ekula wrote:
On 13 May 2025, Mitchell Holman postedWe should help anyone who needs help.
"Scout" wroteYou'd prefer black?
"Creon" <[email protected]> wroteLike Trump giving refugee
On Tue, 13 May 2025 07:27:14 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:Except it isn't equal-opportunity.. instead it is preferential
Governor Swill wrote this post while blinking in Morse code: >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 12 May 2025 15:13:23 -0000 (UTC), Baxter wrote:
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing >>>>>>>>>>> toJust another political swearword like commie, wokie or DEI. >>>>>>>>> You RADICAL LUNATIC LEFT LIBERAL MARXIST WOKE COMMIE DEI hire!!!! >>>>>>>> "DEI" to me is the new term for "equal-opportunity employer".
do with any actual ideology.
opportunity... also called discrimination.
status to people from Africa.
As long as they are white.
+1
Feel free to help anyone you want with your own money.
That's just selfish.
On 15/5/25 8:51, Scout wrote:
Who cares, if they are the most qualified for the job.
Who decides who are the most qualified?
By what objective tests do we know their decisions are correct?
Otherwise, we should fire about 80% of NFL players as the
distribution of skin colors of hires are significantly different
from the distribution of skin colors of the population.
... let me guess, you're going to assert that doesn't count.
You need sample sizes large enough to make valid statistical tests.
Then you ignore the evidence in favour allowing discrimination,
bigot.
Yet, you're telling me they should hire less qualified
How do you know who is 'less qualified', bigot?
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 17:42:56 +0000, Mitchell Holman wrote:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote<snip>
Or maybe how you are paying for an apartment for a homeless
run-away?
Tell us what you think should be done
about homeless Americans, esp homeless
veterans.
Apparently his beliefs are only for other people, after all, I've
asked him what he personally has done.. and he evades.
IF he responds at all, it will be with the usual lame jingoes and
slogans.
Like Rudy did? Where is he helping? Oh, that's right, he's not.. he
just wants to demand everyone else is forced to do so.
On Wed, 14 May 2025 14:04:25 -0400, "Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 09:18:03 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Here again is an example of you allowing yourself to be taught a lie >>>>> because it lines up with other preconceptions you have.
Then how does a company hit their desired diversity requirements, if >>>>those
of diversity aren't the best applicant applying for a position?
Do they hire the best candidate, or do they allow sex/race to influence >>>>their hiring in order to obtain artificial levels decided to represent >>>>'fairness' in hiring even if that means discriminating against better >>>>qualified candidates.
They should consider all applicants and hire from them the best of the
lot.
Bingo!
And if that candidate is not a white male?
On Thu, 15 May 2025 09:02:26 -0400, -hh wrote:
On 5/14/25 14:03, Scout wrote:<snip>
"-hh" <[email protected]> wrote
On 5/14/25 09:18, Scout wrote:
Do they hire the best candidate, or do they allow sex/race to
influence their hiring in order to obtain artificial levels decided
to represent 'fairness' in hiring even if that means discriminating
against better qualified candidates.
One approach that I saw used back in the 1990s was similar to the
baseball rule of "tie goes to the runner".
We're not talking a tie, we are talking a better applicant.
Nope. No matter how much you want it to, their gender or the color of >>their skin doesn't count in the evaluation.
Scout doesn't understand that if you were not a white male, you
wouldn't even be considered for the job
. And in the event you did get
a job, it was a job white men didn't want or at a pay rate they
weren't willing to accept.
Now that everybody regardless of color, gender, etc., must be fairly evaluated and paid,
it feels to him like he's being discriminated
against though in fact, the playing field has simply been leveled.
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 14:08:51 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote
On Tue, 13 May 2025 18:13:59 -0700, Siri Cruz wrote:
On 13/5/25 13:48, Tim Ekula wrote:
On 13 May 2025, Mitchell Holman postedWe should help anyone who needs help.
"Scout" wroteYou'd prefer black?
"Creon" <[email protected]> wroteLike Trump giving refugee
On Tue, 13 May 2025 07:27:14 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Governor Swill wrote this post while blinking in Morse code: >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 12 May 2025 15:13:23 -0000 (UTC), Baxter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> "Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has >>>>>>>>>>>> nothing to"DEI" to me is the new term for "equal-opportunity employer". >>>>>>>> Except it isn't equal-opportunity.. instead it is preferential >>>>>>>> opportunity... also called discrimination.
hire!!!!do with any actual ideology.Just another political swearword like commie, wokie or DEI. >>>>>>>>>> You RADICAL LUNATIC LEFT LIBERAL MARXIST WOKE COMMIE DEI
status to people from Africa.
As long as they are white.
+1
Feel free to help anyone you want with your own money.
That's just selfish.
Yea, it's certainly selfish to demand that you pay to help those you
assert need to be helped.
Interesting once we are talking about YOUR money... helping suddenly
isn't what you want to do.
yea, and we controlled immigration too....and deported undesirables.
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 13:55:14 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote
On Wed, 14 May 2025 09:00:52 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote .
On Tue, 13 May 2025 21:46:08 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
So why are the democrats up in arms about a handful ofBecause it points out your racial/ethnic hate.
Africans who just
happen to be white and waving American flags?
Trump says America is full. You and your compatriots have
argued for
the longest that we have no need of such immigrants.
But when WHITE people want to emigrate, your tune changes.
Really? Show that pothead's tune has changed.
When the subject is white people refugeeing . . .
And yet, the only basis for that is YOUR assertion that race
was the key
factor.
It was and like any true lying-through-his-teeth rightist, you
deleted
the very evidence that proved my point.
Then you should be able to quote it from the prior message.
Unless, of course, you are lying about it.
The evidence YOU SPECIFICALLY
REQUESTED.
which apparently you can't post
Pothead is just fine with refugees, as long as they're
white.
Your assertion and you've presented nothing to show that is his
opinion
It's even ok for the government to CHARTER A PLANE to get them
here.
Why not? You certainly seem to have had no issues with Biden
chartering planes to bring people here.
Double standard? I think so.
On 14/5/25 23:09, howie ruffe wrote:
DEI is just a way to cast a wider net to get unqualified applicants,They should consider all applicants and hire from them the best of
the lot.
Bingo!
scooter. You know this.
Fixed your post.
White men cannot jump.
Interesting how when I propose a totally neutral standard.
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 15 May 2025 09:02:26 -0400, -hh wrote:
On 5/14/25 14:03, Scout wrote:<snip>
"-hh" <[email protected]> wrote
On 5/14/25 09:18, Scout wrote:
Do they hire the best candidate, or do they allow sex/race to
influence their hiring in order to obtain artificial levels
decided
to represent 'fairness' in hiring even if that means
discriminating
against better qualified candidates.
One approach that I saw used back in the 1990s was similar
to the
baseball rule of "tie goes to the runner".
We're not talking a tie, we are talking a better applicant.
Nope. No matter how much you want it to, their gender or the
color of
their skin doesn't count in the evaluation.
Scout doesn't understand that if you were not a white male, you
wouldn't even be considered for the job
At which point existing laws against racial and sexual
discrimination would apply.
. And in the event you did get
a job, it was a job white men didn't want or at a pay rate they
weren't willing to accept.
See the comment above about racial and sexual discrimination laws.
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in news:1002825$2ho5q$[email protected]:
Tell me.. if your race or gender has ANY influence in hiring then
isn't that discrimination?
If Trump engages in "DEI" hiring
quotas how can it be wrong?
Trump vows to nominate a woman for
US supreme court
Sept 0 2020
On Wed, 14 May 2025 14:01:58 -0400, "Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 09:02:16 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
If they are fleeing for their lives, they are refugees.
Until they reach the first country where they aren't fleeing for their >>>>lives.. then they are no longer fleeing for their lives, are they?
Explain why white people are allowed to come here as refugees but
brown people are not.
Show that is the case as a matter of policy.
The policy and practice are, is it turns out, not the same.
Since Trump is determined to deport even legals and citizens with
brown skin, you shouldn't need any further proof.
On Wed, 14 May 2025 14:00:59 -0400, "Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 15:09:51 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
The asylum card has been overplayed and literally every illegal migrant >>>>has been coached as to what boxes to check and what to say in order to be >>>>let into the country.
They are both political and economic refugees. Their dictotorial
governments have destroyed their own economies so the people are doing
what people have done since Columbus.
That's nice, but being a refugee does NOT necessarily mean you have to be >>taken in by the US. I know what is a concept you have issues with, but we do >>NOT have to gramt access to every refugee in the world, much less once you >>enter another country in which those conditions no longer apply.
The thing that amazes me, it really does, is that America's greatness
and power comes directly from the diversity of thought and
contributions of immigrants from many different lands.
Yet you reject this in today's America.
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in news:10057l4$382ev$[email protected]:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 14:08:51 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
Feel free to help anyone you want with your own money.
That's just selfish.
Yea, it's certainly selfish to demand that you pay to help those you
assert need to be helped.
Interesting once we are talking about YOUR money... helping suddenly
isn't what you want to do.
I don't mind paying taxes that
support homeless shelters and a
city library and public parks.
I don't mind paying an extra dime
for a bag of fries if it means the
cooks can thus afford the daycare
they need to have a job.
I don't mind paying a national
park entry fee if it keeps the
restrooms and trails maintained.
Maybe that is the difference
between us.........
The point being there are all kinds of radical groups but for
intolerance and cruelty, National Socialism can't be beat!
Musk was supposed to cut spending by 2T, more than a *quarter* of the
budget. Ambitious is an understatement. He found, at most, about 150 million, little of that in long term spending.
On Wed, 14 May 2025 08:59:43 -0400, "Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:
Like Trump giving refugee
status to people from Africa.
As long as they are white.
You'd prefer black?
Dodge.
The point is, Trump wouldn't give them refugee status UNLESS they were
white.
Proof?
Didn't think so.
I guess you've missed all the stories about Trump's efforts to expel
refugees and other immigrants, specifically those from Venezuela. They
aren't white. Yet he's chartering planes to fly white racists...
... in from South Africa claiming refugee status and mistreatment at the hands
of the ruling class blacks.
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill <[email protected]> typed:Which includes multiple instances of double counting, o oozing scarlet red maxipad (whose mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch).
Musk was supposed to cut spending by 2T, more than a *quarter* of the
budget. Ambitious is an understatement. He found, at most, about 150
million, little of that in long term spending.
You meant $160 billion, right?
On Wed, 14 May 2025 09:48:14 -0400, "Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>news:[email protected]...
On Tue, 13 May 2025 12:25:17 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
Well ignoring the whole irrelevant notion of left/right let's look at what >>>>antifa stands for
1) dictatorial leadership (check)
Not true. Antifa strives against dictatorial leadership and for the
rights of the People.
And if you don't do what antifa wants.. they attack you, set fire to >>building, destroy stuff and otherwise inflict harm about those who don't >>conform to their desires.
Sounds rather dictatorial to me, and a violent one at that.
Rather like Timothy McVeigh or an abortion bomber.
dic�ta�to�ri�al
/?dikt?'t�re?l/
adjective
of or typical of a ruler with total power.
"a dictatorial regime"
having or showing a tendency to tell people what to do in an autocratic way.
2) centralized power (check)
Wrong again.
On the contrary they want to be in charge, to set rules and policies, and >>for everyone else to bow to their agenda.
No, they don't, they're calling for certain policies to be changed,
not seeking office.
3) militarism (check)
Just like Republicans and Democrats. If you don't believe me, ask
around in Iraq or Afghanistan.
4) suppression of dissent (check)
Wrong again. Antifa is itself a dissenting organization which, again,
stresses the rights and freedoms of the People.
Which also does not tolerate dissent against them.
Dissension against them means systemic racism.
5) rejects the idea of equality and promotes a rigid social hierarchy where >>>>some groups or individuals are considered superior to others. (check)
Not merely wrong but the diametric opposite of what Antifa hopes to
achieve.
And yet, they feel themselves to be superior to everyone else, free to >>ignore our laws, codes of conduct or even rational behavior.
No, they don't. You, otoh, clearly feel inferior to them. Why is
that? And you support a leader who is breaking laws left and right
but you have no problem with HIM ignoring our laws.
6) Seeks to control all aspects of society, including the economy, >>>>culture, and education. (check)
Again, wrong. Antifa supports egalitarian aims.
As they beat up people in the street and destroy their property.. are you >>claiming this is the sort of society we should seek to be?
The French Revolution was similarly violent despite their chants of, "Libert�, �galit�, Fraternit�." Were the French revolutionaries
seeking a society of violence, mass death and destruction?
7) relies on propaganda and manipulative tactics to control the population >>>>(check)
Wrong again but again, one needs only to look at Democrats and
Republicans to see that they are masters of propganda.
Pointing at others does not absolve them of their own propaganda and >>manipulation.
It occurs to me that all these bogus criticism of Antifa prove your
racial bias. You will deny it, but I don't hear you complaining about
right wing extremists and their destructive tendencies.
8) opposes democratic principles like freedom of speech, free and fair >>>>elections, and rule of law (check)
Again, the very opposite of what Antifa stands for. Freedom, fairness
and especially rule of law are the core of Antifa.
Really? With all the violence, looting and outright destruction.. is what >>you consider obeying the "rule of law"?
Those are demonstrations, anger being vented, not an example of the
society they wish to create.
in principles, policies, agenda, and action I see no real difference between
this group and Nazis, they just assert they have a better reason to engage, >>>>impose, promote, advocate, or otherwise carry these things. out.
Of course, Baxter is sort of a one dimensional thinker and sees only a line,
when in reality political views, agendas, methods, etc is a >>>>multidimensional grid, and whether you get it by moving right or moving >>>>left the result is the same only the excuses for doing it are different.
Meanwhile you use antifa as a swear word like commie, wokie or librul.
No, I judge them by their acts.. including their need to hide their >>identities so they can not be caught/ prosecuted for their crimes.
You have no idea what antifa means, you've merely allowed yourself to
be taught that it's a bad thing. Why would you do this? Because you
perceive antifa as being a black movement which must, therefore, be
bad.
Well, do I consider mass riots to be a bad thing?
Yes, I do
Do I consider looting to be a bad thing?
Yes, I do.
Do I consider hiding your identity while violating the law to be a bad >>thing?
Yes, I do
Do I consider physical attacks against others because they don't accept your >>views to be a bad thing?
Yes, I do.
Yet you completely ignore the aims of this movement and fail to credit
the role of anger in their activities due to the injustices they've
been subjected to for centuries.
The thing that amazes me, it really does, is that America's greatnessBecause you can't prove it.
and power comes directly from the diversity of thought and
contributions of immigrants from many different lands.
Yet you reject this in today's America.
Does China's greatness and power comes directly from the diversity of thought and contributions of immigrants from many different lands?
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill <[email protected]> typed:
The point being there are all kinds of radical groups but for
intolerance and cruelty, National Socialism can't be beat!
I think the Sinaloa cartel and ISIS would both dispute that.
In news:[email protected], Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> typed:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:10057l4$382ev$[email protected]:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 14:08:51 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
Feel free to help anyone you want with your own money.
That's just selfish.
Yea, it's certainly selfish to demand that you pay to help those you
assert need to be helped.
Interesting once we are talking about YOUR money... helping suddenly
isn't what you want to do.
I don't mind paying taxes that
support homeless shelters and a
city library and public parks.
You don't need a tax to do that-- you can donate directly and cut the administrative fees governments always keep.
I don't mind paying an extra dime
for a bag of fries if it means the
cooks can thus afford the daycare
they need to have a job.
I don't hit the fast food joints often, but I notice many of them have
a TIP jar on their counters, so feel free to indulge your humanitarian impulses.
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill
<[email protected]> typed:
Musk was supposed to cut spending by 2T, more than a *quarter* of the
budget. Ambitious is an understatement. He found, at most, about 150
million, little of that in long term spending.
You meant $160 billion, right?
On 15/5/25 9:07, Scout wrote:
yea, and we controlled immigration too....and deported undesirables.
Not until 1924.
On Thu, 15 May 2025 11:47:15 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
Meanwhile I acknowledge your allegations as a diversion from why these >>deportations are occurring, which has nothing to do with race.
Bullshit.
On Thu, 15 May 2025 12:07:36 -0400, "Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 14:00:59 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 15:09:51 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
The asylum card has been overplayed and literally every illegal >>>>>>migrant
has been coached as to what boxes to check and what to say in order to >>>>>>be
let into the country.
They are both political and economic refugees. Their dictotorial
governments have destroyed their own economies so the people are doing >>>>> what people have done since Columbus.
That's nice, but being a refugee does NOT necessarily mean you have to >>>>be
taken in by the US. I know what is a concept you have issues with, but >>>>we
do
NOT have to gramt access to every refugee in the world, much less once >>>>you
enter another country in which those conditions no longer apply.
The thing that amazes me, it really does, is that America's greatness
and power comes directly from the diversity of thought and
contributions of immigrants from many different lands.
yea, and we controlled immigration too....and deported undesirables.
Not during our period of greatest growth. After the Civil War,
millions poured in. Minimal paperwork, nearly everybody who arrived
was accepted.
On 15/5/25 9:06, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 13:55:14 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote
On Wed, 14 May 2025 09:00:52 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote .
On Tue, 13 May 2025 21:46:08 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
So why are the democrats up in arms about a handful ofBecause it points out your racial/ethnic hate.
Africans who just
happen to be white and waving American flags?
Trump says America is full. You and your compatriots have
argued for
the longest that we have no need of such immigrants.
But when WHITE people want to emigrate, your tune changes.
Really? Show that pothead's tune has changed.
When the subject is white people refugeeing . . .
And yet, the only basis for that is YOUR assertion that race
was the key
factor.
It was and like any true lying-through-his-teeth rightist, you
deleted
the very evidence that proved my point.
Then you should be able to quote it from the prior message.
Unless, of course, you are lying about it.
The evidence YOU SPECIFICALLY
REQUESTED.
which apparently you can't post
Pothead is just fine with refugees, as long as they're
white.
Your assertion and you've presented nothing to show that is his
opinion
It's even ok for the government to CHARTER A PLANE to get them
here.
Why not? You certainly seem to have had no issues with Biden
chartering planes to bring people here.
Double standard? I think so.
Yes, I agree.
On 15/5/25 10:32, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 15 May 2025 09:02:26 -0400, -hh wrote:
On 5/14/25 14:03, Scout wrote:<snip>
"-hh" <[email protected]> wrote
On 5/14/25 09:18, Scout wrote:
Do they hire the best candidate, or do they allow sex/race to
influence their hiring in order to obtain artificial levels
decided
to represent 'fairness' in hiring even if that means
discriminating
against better qualified candidates.
One approach that I saw used back in the 1990s was similar
to the
baseball rule of "tie goes to the runner".
We're not talking a tie, we are talking a better applicant.
Nope. No matter how much you want it to, their gender or the
color of
their skin doesn't count in the evaluation.
Scout doesn't understand that if you were not a white male, you
wouldn't even be considered for the job
At which point existing laws against racial and sexual
discrimination would apply.
. And in the event you did get
a job, it was a job white men didn't want or at a pay rate they
weren't willing to accept.
See the comment above about racial and sexual discrimination laws.
Because the employer will always freely admit thus.
In news:[email protected], Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> typed:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:10057l4$382ev$[email protected]:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 14:08:51 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
Feel free to help anyone you want with your own money.
That's just selfish.
Yea, it's certainly selfish to demand that you pay to help those you
assert need to be helped.
Interesting once we are talking about YOUR money... helping suddenly
isn't what you want to do.
I don't mind paying taxes that
support homeless shelters and a
city library and public parks.
You don't need a tax to do that-- you can donate directly and cut the administrative fees governments always keep.
I don't mind paying an extra dime
for a bag of fries if it means the
cooks can thus afford the daycare
they need to have a job.
I don't hit the fast food joints often, but I notice many of them have a
TIP jar on their counters, so feel free to indulge your humanitarian impulses.
I don't mind paying a national
park entry fee if it keeps the
restrooms and trails maintained.
Then you're in luck-- they're already doing that.
Maybe that is the difference
between us.........
That you want EVERYBODY to do what you want?
On Thu, 15 May 2025 13:17:01 -0400, "Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:
<snip>
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 14:08:51 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
Feel free to help anyone you want with your own money.
That's just selfish.
Yea, it's certainly selfish to demand that you pay to help those you
assert
need to be helped.
Interesting once we are talking about YOUR money... helping suddenly isn't >>what you want to do.
What would Jesus do if he saw a hungry man in rags who needed help?
On Thu, 15 May 2025 18:06:03 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in >>news:100560m$37nae$[email protected]:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 17:42:56 +0000, Mitchell Holman wrote:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote<snip>
Or maybe how you are paying for an apartment for a homeless
run-away?
Tell us what you think should be done
about homeless Americans, esp homeless
veterans.
Well, "Scout"?
Apparently his beliefs are only for other people, after all, I've
asked him what he personally has done.. and he evades.
IF he responds at all, it will be with the usual lame jingoes and
slogans.
Like Rudy did? Where is he helping? Oh, that's right, he's not.. he
just wants to demand everyone else is forced to do so.
I rest my case.
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 15 May 2025 18:06:03 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>news:100560m$37nae$[email protected]:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 17:42:56 +0000, Mitchell Holman wrote:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote<snip>
Or maybe how you are paying for an apartment for a homeless
run-away?
Tell us what you think should be done
about homeless Americans, esp homeless
veterans.
Well, "Scout"?
Yes, I'm doing well, thank you for asking.
On Thu, 15 May 2025 13:48:31 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill >><[email protected]> typed:
Musk was supposed to cut spending by 2T, more than a *quarter* of the
budget. Ambitious is an understatement. He found, at most, about 150
million, little of that in long term spending.
You meant $160 billion, right?
No. Actual cost cutting done by DOGE comes to around 150m.
The rest is bogus. There's stuff like contracts that ended being
counted as a DOGE spending cut.
Even if it was billions, where you gonna get the other 1,900 billion
Musk promised to cut?
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in news:1005t1j$3cm8j$[email protected]:
In news:[email protected], Mitchell Holman
<[email protected]> typed:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:10057l4$382ev$[email protected]:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 14:08:51 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
Feel free to help anyone you want with your own money.
That's just selfish.
Yea, it's certainly selfish to demand that you pay to help those you
assert need to be helped.
Interesting once we are talking about YOUR money... helping suddenly
isn't what you want to do.
I don't mind paying taxes that
support homeless shelters and a
city library and public parks.
You don't need a tax to do that-- you can donate directly and cut the
administrative fees governments always keep.
Do you "donate directly" to pay for
police and jails and courts and street
repairs?
I don't mind paying an extra dime
for a bag of fries if it means the
cooks can thus afford the daycare
they need to have a job.
I don't hit the fast food joints often, but I notice many of them have
a TIP jar on their counters, so feel free to indulge your humanitarian
impulses.
It is not the job of customers to [sic]
workers salaries, that is the duty of
MANAGEMENT.
Maybe that is the difference
between us.........
That you want EVERYBODY to do what you want?
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 15 May 2025 12:07:36 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 14:00:59 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 15:09:51 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
The asylum card has been overplayed and literally every illegal >>>>>>>migrant
has been coached as to what boxes to check and what to say in >>>>>>>order to be
let into the country.
They are both political and economic refugees. Their dictotorial
governments have destroyed their own economies so the people are
doing what people have done since Columbus.
That's nice, but being a refugee does NOT necessarily mean you have >>>>>to be
taken in by the US. I know what is a concept you have issues with, >>>>>but we
do
NOT have to gramt access to every refugee in the world, much less >>>>>once you
enter another country in which those conditions no longer apply.
The thing that amazes me, it really does, is that America's
greatness and power comes directly from the diversity of thought
and contributions of immigrants from many different lands.
yea, and we controlled immigration too....and deported undesirables.
Not during our period of greatest growth. After the Civil War,
millions poured in. Minimal paperwork, nearly everybody who arrived
was accepted.
But not everyone.....
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in news:1007c72$3p2r7$[email protected]:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 15 May 2025 12:07:36 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 14:00:59 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 15:09:51 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
The asylum card has been overplayed and literally every illegal migrant >>>>>>>>has been coached as to what boxes to check and what to say in order to >>>>>>>>be let into the country.
They are both political and economic refugees. Their dictotorial >>>>>>> governments have destroyed their own economies so the people are >>>>>>> doing what people have done since Columbus.
That's nice, but being a refugee does NOT necessarily mean you have to be >>>>>>taken in by the US. I know what is a concept you have issues with, but we >>>>>>do NOT have to gramt access to every refugee in the world, much less once >>>>>>you enter another country in which those conditions no longer apply.
The thing that amazes me, it really does, is that America's
greatness and power comes directly from the diversity of thought
and contributions of immigrants from many different lands.
yea, and we controlled immigration too....and deported undesirables.
Not during our period of greatest growth. After the Civil War,
millions poured in. Minimal paperwork, nearly everybody who arrived
was accepted.
But not everyone.....
Yes, everyone.
The steamship lines were forced to
take back to Europe - at their own expense -
everyone rejected for US admission. So the
liners conducted their own boarding inspections
and weeded out all the medical issue passengers
they knew would be rejected at Ellis Island.
Ergo most everyone getting to the US was admitted
to the US.
On 5/13/2025 1:48 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote inNot bigotry to oppose chronic anti-social and criminal behavior and
news:tALUP.385088$[email protected]:
On 5/12/2025 7:57 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
They educate students that private schools would not andPrivate schools reject them because they are the incorrigible
could not teach.
offspring of shitbags — shitbags like you.
There we get down to it - Bricano is a bigot that [sic] thinks he's
better than others.
not want my kid to be threatened in school.
Apart from a summer music program, my son didn't spend one day in
public schools, and I'm very pleased about that. The police were never
called to any of his schools. There was no cop ("school resource
officer") in any of his schools, ever. They are a *fixture* at a lot
of public schools.
On 5/12/2025 3:46 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2025 12:48:49 -0400, "Scout"wrote:Stop it. The Black Panthers were black nationalists, but were not the least bit
"Creon" <[email protected]> wrote<snip>
On Mon, 12 May 2025 08:19:06 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing to do >>>>>> with any actual ideology.
Like "Nazi" to you freaks, right?
What's another good name for "white supremacist nationalist fascists"? >>>>
BTW, even the famous Godwin of "Godwin's Law" has said they're Nazis.
Tell me if they were black supremacist nationalist fascists would they still
be Nazis.... if not, what term would apply to such people?
They called them "Black Panthers". There have been a few such groups.
fascist, let alone Nazi.
In news:[email protected], Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> typed:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:1007c72$3p2r7$[email protected]:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 15 May 2025 12:07:36 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 14:00:59 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>>>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 15:09:51 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
The asylum card has been overplayed and literally every illegal >>>>>>>>>migrant has been coached as to what boxes to check and what to >>>>>>>>>say in order to be let into the country.
They are both political and economic refugees. Their
dictotorial governments have destroyed their own economies so
the people are doing what people have done since Columbus.
That's nice, but being a refugee does NOT necessarily mean you >>>>>>>have to be taken in by the US. I know what is a concept you have >>>>>>>issues with, but we do NOT have to gramt access to every refugee >>>>>>>in the world, much less once you enter another country in which >>>>>>>those conditions no longer apply.
The thing that amazes me, it really does, is that America's
greatness and power comes directly from the diversity of thought
and contributions of immigrants from many different lands.
yea, and we controlled immigration too....and deported
undesirables.
Not during our period of greatest growth. After the Civil War,
millions poured in. Minimal paperwork, nearly everybody who
arrived was accepted.
But not everyone.....
Yes, everyone.
The steamship lines were forced to
take back to Europe - at their own expense -
everyone rejected for US admission. So the
liners conducted their own boarding inspections
and weeded out all the medical issue passengers
they knew would be rejected at Ellis Island.
Ergo most everyone getting to the US was admitted
to the US.
Everyone ... or most everyone?
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill <[email protected]> typed:the
On Thu, 15 May 2025 13:48:31 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill >>><[email protected]> typed:
Musk was supposed to cut spending by 2T, more than a *quarter* of
150budget. Ambitious is an understatement. He found, at most, about
amillion, little of that in long term spending.
You meant $160 billion, right?
No. Actual cost cutting done by DOGE comes to around 150m.
The rest is bogus. There's stuff like contracts that ended being
counted as a DOGE spending cut.
Cite?
If you're not going to spend what you had planned to spend, that's not
spending cut?
Even if it was billions, where you gonna get the other 1,900 billion
Musk promised to cut?
Yeah, wth? It's already been three months!
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in news:1007c72$3p2r7$[email protected]:
Yes, everyone.
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 15 May 2025 12:07:36 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 14:00:59 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 15:09:51 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
The asylum card has been overplayed and literally every illegal >>>>>>>>migrant
has been coached as to what boxes to check and what to say in >>>>>>>>order to be
let into the country.
They are both political and economic refugees. Their
dictotorial governments have destroyed their own economies so
the people are doing what people have done since Columbus.
That's nice, but being a refugee does NOT necessarily mean you
have to be
taken in by the US. I know what is a concept you have issues with, >>>>>>but we
do
NOT have to gramt access to every refugee in the world, much less >>>>>>once you
enter another country in which those conditions no longer apply.
The thing that amazes me, it really does, is that America's
greatness and power comes directly from the diversity of thought
and contributions of immigrants from many different lands.
yea, and we controlled immigration too....and deported undesirables.
Not during our period of greatest growth. After the Civil War,
millions poured in. Minimal paperwork, nearly everybody who arrived
was accepted.
But not everyone.....
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message >news:1005k33$3an28$[email protected]...
On 15/5/25 10:32, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 15 May 2025 09:02:26 -0400, -hh wrote:
On 5/14/25 14:03, Scout wrote:<snip>
"-hh" <[email protected]> wrote
On 5/14/25 09:18, Scout wrote:
Do they hire the best candidate, or do they allow sex/race to
influence their hiring in order to obtain artificial levels
decided
to represent 'fairness' in hiring even if that means
discriminating
against better qualified candidates.
One approach that I saw used back in the 1990s was similar
to the
baseball rule of "tie goes to the runner".
We're not talking a tie, we are talking a better applicant.
Nope. No matter how much you want it to, their gender or the
color of
their skin doesn't count in the evaluation.
Scout doesn't understand that if you were not a white male, you
wouldn't even be considered for the job
At which point existing laws against racial and sexual
discrimination would apply.
. And in the event you did get
a job, it was a job white men didn't want or at a pay rate they
weren't willing to accept.
See the comment above about racial and sexual discrimination laws.
Because the employer will always freely admit thus.
So, you have no real response to challenge my point.
On Thu, 15 May 2025 13:32:14 -0400, "Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:
Hardly since if that were the case.. a lot of black NFL players would need >>to be fired as per DEI standards the NFL is clearly engaged in racial >>discrimination and are absolutely engaged in gender discrimination. Not a >>single female player.
Yep, if we go with the mandates of DEI the NFL is a racist organization that >>also refuses to hire female players.
No it's not....
... You can dream but dreams are not reality.
On Thu, 15 May 2025 13:34:00 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
And if that candidate is not a white male?
Why do you think their race or gender should matter?
Are you admitting to being a racist?
Interesting how when I propose a totally neutral standard.. you want to drag >>race and gender into it.
Here you go again, pretending not to be a bigot.
It's sad to watch, really.
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in news:100827k$3tiu7$[email protected]:
In news:[email protected], Mitchell Holman
<[email protected]> typed:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:1007c72$3p2r7$[email protected]:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 15 May 2025 12:07:36 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 14:00:59 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>>>>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 15:09:51 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
The asylum card has been overplayed and literally every illegal >>>>>>>>>>migrant has been coached as to what boxes to check and what to >>>>>>>>>>say in order to be let into the country.
They are both political and economic refugees. Their
dictotorial governments have destroyed their own economies so >>>>>>>>> the people are doing what people have done since Columbus.
That's nice, but being a refugee does NOT necessarily mean you >>>>>>>>have to be taken in by the US. I know what is a concept you have >>>>>>>>issues with, but we do NOT have to gramt access to every refugee >>>>>>>>in the world, much less once you enter another country in which >>>>>>>>those conditions no longer apply.
The thing that amazes me, it really does, is that America's
greatness and power comes directly from the diversity of thought >>>>>>> and contributions of immigrants from many different lands.
yea, and we controlled immigration too....and deported >>>>>>undesirables.
Not during our period of greatest growth. After the Civil War,
millions poured in. Minimal paperwork, nearly everybody who
arrived was accepted.
But not everyone.....
Yes, everyone.
The steamship lines were forced to
take back to Europe - at their own expense -
everyone rejected for US admission. So the
liners conducted their own boarding inspections
and weeded out all the medical issue passengers
they knew would be rejected at Ellis Island.
Ergo most everyone getting to the US was admitted
to the US.
Everyone ... or most everyone?
"Official statistics record that only around
2% were refused entry to the US"
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in news:100827c$3tiu7$2 @dont-email.me:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill
<[email protected]> typed:
On Thu, 15 May 2025 13:48:31 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill >>>><[email protected]> typed:
Musk was supposed to cut spending by 2T, more than a *quarter* of the >>>>> budget. Ambitious is an understatement. He found, at most, about 150 >>>>> million, little of that in long term spending.
You meant $160 billion, right?
No. Actual cost cutting done by DOGE comes to around 150m.
The rest is bogus. There's stuff like contracts that ended being
counted as a DOGE spending cut.
Cite?
If you're not going to spend what you had planned to spend, that's not a
spending cut?
Even if it was billions, where you gonna get the other 1,900 billion
Musk promised to cut?
Yeah, wth? It's already been three months!
DOGE is actually costing more than they're saving.
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill <[email protected]> typed:
On Thu, 15 May 2025 13:32:14 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hardly since if that were the case.. a lot of black NFL players would >>>need to be fired as per DEI standards the NFL is clearly engaged in >>>racial discrimination and are absolutely engaged in gender >>>discrimination. Not a single female player.
Yep, if we go with the mandates of DEI the NFL is a racist
organization that also refuses to hire female players.
No it's not....
Yes, it is, as are MLB and NBA and NIH and most professional sports.
... You can dream but dreams are not reality.
Reality is messy.
In news:1008u18$6anv$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:100827c$3tiu7$2 @dont-email.me:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill
<[email protected]> typed:
On Thu, 15 May 2025 13:48:31 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill >>>>><[email protected]> typed:
Musk was supposed to cut spending by 2T, more than a *quarter* of
the budget. Ambitious is an understatement. He found, at most,
about 150 million, little of that in long term spending.
You meant $160 billion, right?
No. Actual cost cutting done by DOGE comes to around 150m.
The rest is bogus. There's stuff like contracts that ended being
counted as a DOGE spending cut.
Cite?
If you're not going to spend what you had planned to spend, that's
not a spending cut?
Even if it was billions, where you gonna get the other 1,900
billion Musk promised to cut?
Yeah, wth? It's already been three months!
DOGE is actually costing more than they're saving.
Cite?
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
Is Elon Musk's DOGE costing US taxpayers more than it's saving?
Leftists HATE not being able to waste money.
LOL
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:would
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in >>news:100a7ge$eft2$[email protected]:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill
<[email protected]> typed:
On Thu, 15 May 2025 13:32:14 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hardly since if that were the case.. a lot of black NFL players
need to be fired as per DEI standards the NFL is clearly engaged in >>>>>racial discrimination and are absolutely engaged in gender >>>>>discrimination. Not a single female player.
Yep, if we go with the mandates of DEI the NFL is a racist >>>>>organization that also refuses to hire female players.
No it's not....
Yes, it is, as are MLB and NBA and NIH and most professional sports.
"max headroom" thinks "Pro Sports" is sports.
"Leroy Baxter" thinks "men" can have babies.
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in news:100a7ge$eft2$[email protected]:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill
<[email protected]> typed:
On Thu, 15 May 2025 13:32:14 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hardly since if that were the case.. a lot of black NFL players would >>>>need to be fired as per DEI standards the NFL is clearly engaged in >>>>racial discrimination and are absolutely engaged in gender >>>>discrimination. Not a single female player.
Yep, if we go with the mandates of DEI the NFL is a racist
organization that also refuses to hire female players.
No it's not....
Yes, it is, as are MLB and NBA and NIH and most professional sports.
"max headroom" thinks "Pro Sports" is sports.
On 16 May 2025, Baxter <[email protected]> posted some news:1008u18$6anv$[email protected]:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in news:100827c$3tiu7$2
@dont-email.me:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swillthe
<[email protected]> typed:
On Thu, 15 May 2025 13:48:31 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill >>>>><[email protected]> typed:
Musk was supposed to cut spending by 2T, more than a *quarter* of
150budget. Ambitious is an understatement. He found, at most, about
amillion, little of that in long term spending.
You meant $160 billion, right?
No. Actual cost cutting done by DOGE comes to around 150m.
The rest is bogus. There's stuff like contracts that ended being
counted as a DOGE spending cut.
Cite?
If you're not going to spend what you had planned to spend, that's
not
spending cut?DOGE is actually costing more than they're saving.
Even if it was billions, where you gonna get the other 1,900 billion
Musk promised to cut?
Yeah, wth? It's already been three months!
Whatever it costs it's worth it.
applicationAnd then there's the claim of 40% of phone calls into SS are fraud.
DOGE put in some fancy fraud detection and found 2 fraud out of
110,000 calls.
Let's elaborate on that.
Many people fail to do the following.
Provide their correct full names when filling out government
forms.=============
Provide their correct full address when filling out government
application forms.
Fail to update their correct full address when filling out government application forms.
They stupidly use their work phone instead of their personal phone when filling out government application forms.
They signed up for a social security account and ignored the emails
telling them to move to login.gov or id.me. If they did, they didn't
follow the name and address instructions again. Totally their fault.
Those things right there cause the most problems and trigger audits.
Why did they think 40% fraud? Turns out that 40% of fraud is linked
to phone calls, but fraud is actually so rare ... you got the rest
already.
"Retired Judge, Attorney and Psychologist Indicted in $600 Million
Social Security Fraud Scheme"
"Indictment Charges Man With Stealing $117,000 in Social Security
Benefits"
"ICE arrests Brazilian national for selling fake Social Security cards
and green cards"
"Social Security employee heads to prison for creating fake children�s profiles to steal public funds"
"22 Named in Federal Cases Alleging Theft of Social Security Benefits"
"Federal prosecutors in St. Louis charged a Salem, Missouri
felon with concealing his uncle's death to steal at least $650,000 in disability benefits."
More from the horse's mouth.
https://oig.ssa.gov/news-releases/page/48/index.html
Meantime, that DOGE fraud detection stuff slowed down response times
and resolutions by weeks and customer frustration through the roof.
That's because DOGE forced the sluggards at social security to start
doing their jobs.
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:wrote
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]>
news:9vcj2khbk8g4l0f3ii2bppev63e2sl0f2r@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck >>ing.dwarf.com:in
in
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:would
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>news:100a7ge$eft2$[email protected]:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill
<[email protected]> typed:
On Thu, 15 May 2025 13:32:14 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hardly since if that were the case.. a lot of black NFL players
need to be fired as per DEI standards the NFL is clearly engaged
sports.racial discrimination and are absolutely engaged in gender >>>>>>>discrimination. Not a single female player.
Yep, if we go with the mandates of DEI the NFL is a racist >>>>>>>organization that also refuses to hire female players.
No it's not....
Yes, it is, as are MLB and NBA and NIH and most professional
"max headroom" thinks "Pro Sports" is sports.
"Leroy Baxter" thinks "men" can have babies.
KKKlaun believes Haitians were eating dogs and cats, and >>consumers-don't-pay-tariffs.
Haitian cuisine typically includes fish, chicken, pork, goat, and
beans as primary protein sources.
Consumers do not pay tariffs. But now Baxter will explain that last
time he paid a tariff
Right here ---->
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
KKKLaun can't read plain English. Perhaps that's why he supports the >>people that keep claiming that it's China and other countries and not
the US that is paying for tRump's tariffs.
As predicted, Baxter failed to provide any evidence of his specious
claim.
KKKlaun "Cunt Flaps" SchittenPantzen, impotent and harmless Nazi fake Jew and cocksucking dwarf, lied:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:wrote
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentö[email protected]>
news:9vcj2khbk8g4l0f3ii2bppev63e2sl0f2r@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuckin
ining.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:would
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:100a7ge$eft2$[email protected]:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill >>>>>> <[email protected]> typed:
On Thu, 15 May 2025 13:32:14 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hardly since if that were the case.. a lot of black NFL players
need to be fired as per DEI standards the NFL is clearly engaged
sports.racial discrimination and are absolutely engaged in gender
discrimination. Not a single female player.
Yep, if we go with the mandates of DEI the NFL is a racist
organization that also refuses to hire female players.
No it's not....
Yes, it is, as are MLB and NBA and NIH and most professional
"max headroom" thinks "Pro Sports" is sports.
"Leroy Baxter" thinks "men" can have babies.
KKKlaun believes Haitians were eating dogs and cats, and
consumers-don't-pay-tariffs.
Haitian cuisine typically includes fish, chicken, pork, goat, and
beans as primary protein sources.
But you supported the guys that claimed Haitians in Springfield were
eating people's pets.
Consumers do not pay tariffs.
Tariffs are paid by people in the country that imposes the tariffs. Everyone whoKKKLaun can't read plain English. Perhaps that's why he supports the
Right here ---->
people that keep claiming that it's China and other countries and not the
US that is paying for tRump's tariffs.
In news:[email protected], Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> typed:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:1007c72$3p2r7$[email protected]:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 15 May 2025 12:07:36 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 14:00:59 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>>>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 15:09:51 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
The asylum card has been overplayed and literally every illegal >>>>>>>>>migrant has been coached as to what boxes to check and what to say >>>>>>>>>in order to be let into the country.
They are both political and economic refugees. Their dictotorial >>>>>>>> governments have destroyed their own economies so the people are >>>>>>>> doing what people have done since Columbus.
That's nice, but being a refugee does NOT necessarily mean you have >>>>>>>to be taken in by the US. I know what is a concept you have issues >>>>>>>with, but we do NOT have to gramt access to every refugee in the >>>>>>>world, much less once you enter another country in which those >>>>>>>conditions no longer apply.
The thing that amazes me, it really does, is that America's
greatness and power comes directly from the diversity of thought
and contributions of immigrants from many different lands.
yea, and we controlled immigration too....and deported undesirables.
Not during our period of greatest growth. After the Civil War,
millions poured in. Minimal paperwork, nearly everybody who arrived
was accepted.
But not everyone.....
Yes, everyone.
The steamship lines were forced to
take back to Europe - at their own expense -
everyone rejected for US admission. So the
liners conducted their own boarding inspections
and weeded out all the medical issue passengers
they knew would be rejected at Ellis Island.
Ergo most everyone getting to the US was admitted
to the US.
Everyone ... or most everyone?
On Fri, 16 May 2025 08:28:22 -0400, "Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 15 May 2025 12:07:36 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 14:00:59 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 15:09:51 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
The asylum card has been overplayed and literally every illegal >>>>>>>>migrant
has been coached as to what boxes to check and what to say in order >>>>>>>>to
be
let into the country.
They are both political and economic refugees. Their dictotorial >>>>>>> governments have destroyed their own economies so the people are >>>>>>> doing
what people have done since Columbus.
That's nice, but being a refugee does NOT necessarily mean you have to >>>>>>be
taken in by the US. I know what is a concept you have issues with, but >>>>>>we
do
NOT have to gramt access to every refugee in the world, much less once >>>>>>you
enter another country in which those conditions no longer apply.
The thing that amazes me, it really does, is that America's greatness >>>>> and power comes directly from the diversity of thought and
contributions of immigrants from many different lands.
yea, and we controlled immigration too....and deported undesirables.
Not during our period of greatest growth. After the Civil War,
millions poured in. Minimal paperwork, nearly everybody who arrived
was accepted.
But not everyone.....
Thank you for proving my point.
Thanks for proving mine.
On Fri, 16 May 2025 18:28:02 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in >>news:1007c72$3p2r7$[email protected]:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 15 May 2025 12:07:36 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 14:00:59 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>>>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 15:09:51 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
The asylum card has been overplayed and literally every illegal >>>>>>>>>migrant
has been coached as to what boxes to check and what to say in >>>>>>>>>order to be
let into the country.
They are both political and economic refugees. Their dictotorial >>>>>>>> governments have destroyed their own economies so the people are >>>>>>>> doing what people have done since Columbus.
That's nice, but being a refugee does NOT necessarily mean you have >>>>>>>to be
taken in by the US. I know what is a concept you have issues with, >>>>>>>but we
do
NOT have to gramt access to every refugee in the world, much less >>>>>>>once you
enter another country in which those conditions no longer apply.
The thing that amazes me, it really does, is that America's
greatness and power comes directly from the diversity of thought
and contributions of immigrants from many different lands.
yea, and we controlled immigration too....and deported undesirables.
Not during our period of greatest growth. After the Civil War,
millions poured in. Minimal paperwork, nearly everybody who arrived
was accepted.
But not everyone.....
Yes, everyone.
The steamship lines were forced to
take back to Europe - at their own expense -
everyone rejected for US admission. So the
liners conducted their own boarding inspections
and weeded out all the medical issue passengers
they knew would be rejected at Ellis Island.
Ergo most everyone getting to the US was admitted
to the US.
And the only ones being weeded out were for medical reasons. There
were no quotas or limits.
On Fri, 16 May 2025 08:32:47 -0400, "Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>news:1005k33$3an28$[email protected]...
On 15/5/25 10:32, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 15 May 2025 09:02:26 -0400, -hh wrote:
On 5/14/25 14:03, Scout wrote:<snip>
"-hh" <[email protected]> wrote
On 5/14/25 09:18, Scout wrote:
Do they hire the best candidate, or do they allow sex/race to >>>>>>>>> influence their hiring in order to obtain artificial levels
decided
to represent 'fairness' in hiring even if that means
discriminating
against better qualified candidates.
One approach that I saw used back in the 1990s was similar
to the
baseball rule of "tie goes to the runner".
We're not talking a tie, we are talking a better applicant.
Nope. No matter how much you want it to, their gender or the
color of
their skin doesn't count in the evaluation.
Scout doesn't understand that if you were not a white male, you
wouldn't even be considered for the job
At which point existing laws against racial and sexual
discrimination would apply.
. And in the event you did get
a job, it was a job white men didn't want or at a pay rate they
weren't willing to accept.
See the comment above about racial and sexual discrimination laws.
Because the employer will always freely admit thus.
So, you have no real response to challenge my point.
Yoiu expect differently from Siri?
On Thu, 15 May 2025 13:32:14 -0400, "Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 15 May 2025 09:02:26 -0400, -hh wrote:
On 5/14/25 14:03, Scout wrote:<snip>
"-hh" <[email protected]> wrote
On 5/14/25 09:18, Scout wrote:
Do they hire the best candidate, or do they allow sex/race to
influence their hiring in order to obtain artificial levels decided >>>>>>> to represent 'fairness' in hiring even if that means discriminating >>>>>>> against better qualified candidates.
One approach that I saw used back in the 1990s was similar to the
baseball rule of "tie goes to the runner".
We're not talking a tie, we are talking a better applicant.
Nope. No matter how much you want it to, their gender or the color of >>>>their skin doesn't count in the evaluation.
Scout doesn't understand that if you were not a white male, you
wouldn't even be considered for the job
At which point existing laws against racial and sexual discrimination
would
apply.
. And in the event you did get
a job, it was a job white men didn't want or at a pay rate they
weren't willing to accept.
See the comment above about racial and sexual discrimination laws.
Now that everybody regardless of color, gender, etc., must be fairly
evaluated and paid,
BECAUSE of DEI (and other) mandates . . .
If that were the case then why would we need DEI mandates?
You are so determined to be right in your bigotry that you can't even
follow the thread of a conversation.
it feels to him like he's being discriminated
against though in fact, the playing field has simply been leveled.
Hardly since if that were the case.. a lot of black NFL players would need >>to be fired as per DEI standards the NFL is clearly engaged in racial >>discrimination and are absolutely engaged in gender discrimination. Not a >>single female player.
Yep, if we go with the mandates of DEI the NFL is a racist organization >>that
also refuses to hire female players.
No it's not. You can dream but dreams are not reality.
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in news:100a7ge$eft2$[email protected]:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill
<[email protected]> typed:
On Thu, 15 May 2025 13:32:14 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hardly since if that were the case.. a lot of black NFL players would >>>>need to be fired as per DEI standards the NFL is clearly engaged in >>>>racial discrimination and are absolutely engaged in gender >>>>discrimination. Not a single female player.
Yep, if we go with the mandates of DEI the NFL is a racist
organization that also refuses to hire female players.
No it's not....
Yes, it is, as are MLB and NBA and NIH and most professional sports.
"max headroom" thinks "Pro Sports" is sports.
In news:100bkdg$qkpo$[email protected], Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:100a7ge$eft2$[email protected]:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill
<[email protected]> typed:
On Thu, 15 May 2025 13:32:14 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hardly since if that were the case.. a lot of black NFL players would >>>>>need to be fired as per DEI standards the NFL is clearly engaged in >>>>>racial discrimination and are absolutely engaged in gender >>>>>discrimination. Not a single female player.
Yep, if we go with the mandates of DEI the NFL is a racist >>>>>organization that also refuses to hire female players.
No it's not....
Yes, it is, as are MLB and NBA and NIH and most professional sports.
"max headroom" thinks "Pro Sports" is sports.
Non sequitur.
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]> wrote
in
news:kahk2k99d4vkksam4fe18vms1ibklabuk9@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck ing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
KKKLaun can't read plain English. Perhaps that's why he supports the >>>people that keep claiming that it's China and other countries and not
the US that is paying for tRump's tariffs.
As predicted, Baxter failed to provide any evidence of his specious
claim.
KKKlaun demands that I provide evidence of the claim that he put in my
mouth.
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill <[email protected]> typed:
On Thu, 15 May 2025 13:34:00 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
And if that candidate is not a white male?
Why do you think their race or gender should matter?
Are you admitting to being a racist?
Interesting how when I propose a totally neutral standard.. you want to >>>drag
race and gender into it.
Here you go again, pretending not to be a bigot.
It's sad to watch, really.
Au contraire, it's hilarious watching you being hoisted on your own
petard!
On Fri, 16 May 2025 08:38:00 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
What would Jesus do if he saw a hungry man in rags who needed help?
The real question is what would YOU do.
Steal my money to keep most of it and give only a little to to the hungry >>man?
No, I'd feed him.
That's what America should do.
On Thu, 15 May 2025 13:34:00 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
And if that candidate is not a white male?
Why do you think their race or gender should matter?
Are you admitting to being a racist?
Interesting how when I propose a totally neutral standard.. you want to >>drag
race and gender into it.
Here you go again, pretending not to be a bigot.
In news:[email protected], Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:1005t1j$3cm8j$[email protected]:
In news:[email protected], Mitchell Holman
<[email protected]> typed:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:10057l4$382ev$[email protected]:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 14:08:51 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
Feel free to help anyone you want with your own money.
That's just selfish.
Yea, it's certainly selfish to demand that you pay to help those you >>>>> assert need to be helped.
Interesting once we are talking about YOUR money... helping suddenly >>>>> isn't what you want to do.
I don't mind paying taxes that
support homeless shelters and a
city library and public parks.
You don't need a tax to do that-- you can donate directly and cut the
administrative fees governments always keep.
Do you "donate directly" to pay for
police and jails and courts and street
repairs?
Very clumsy goalpost move attempt. Going from homeless shelters,
libraries, and parks to police, jails, courts, and street M&O?!? Really?
I don't mind paying an extra dime
for a bag of fries if it means the
cooks can thus afford the daycare
they need to have a job.
I don't hit the fast food joints often, but I notice many of them have
a TIP jar on their counters, so feel free to indulge your humanitarian
impulses.
It is not the job of customers to [sic]
workers salaries, that is the duty of
MANAGEMENT.
Explain yourself.
Maybe that is the difference
between us.........
That you want EVERYBODY to do what you want?
[crickets]
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:100827k$3tiu7$[email protected]...
In news:[email protected], Mitchell Holman
<[email protected]> typed:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:1007c72$3p2r7$[email protected]:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 15 May 2025 12:07:36 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 14:00:59 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>>>>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 15:09:51 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
The asylum card has been overplayed and literally every illegal >>>>>>>>>>migrant has been coached as to what boxes to check and what to say >>>>>>>>>>in order to be let into the country.
They are both political and economic refugees. Their dictotorial >>>>>>>>> governments have destroyed their own economies so the people are >>>>>>>>> doing what people have done since Columbus.
That's nice, but being a refugee does NOT necessarily mean you have >>>>>>>>to be taken in by the US. I know what is a concept you have issues >>>>>>>>with, but we do NOT have to gramt access to every refugee in the >>>>>>>>world, much less once you enter another country in which those >>>>>>>>conditions no longer apply.
The thing that amazes me, it really does, is that America's
greatness and power comes directly from the diversity of thought >>>>>>> and contributions of immigrants from many different lands.
yea, and we controlled immigration too....and deported undesirables.
Not during our period of greatest growth. After the Civil War,
millions poured in. Minimal paperwork, nearly everybody who arrived >>>>> was accepted.
But not everyone.....
Yes, everyone.
The steamship lines were forced to
take back to Europe - at their own expense -
everyone rejected for US admission. So the
liners conducted their own boarding inspections
and weeded out all the medical issue passengers
they knew would be rejected at Ellis Island.
Ergo most everyone getting to the US was admitted
to the US.
Everyone ... or most everyone?
Further immigration was clearly being controlled.. that the steamship lines were engaged in most of that doesn't alter the fact that it was occurring.
No, I'd feed him.
That's what America should do.
Ok, from now all you are responsible for feeding all the poor.
...or did you not mean what you just said?
Yep.. whether they are a sport or not is irrelevant. They are a
business and under DEI mandates their hiring practices are
discriminatory.
Duck and dodge as he wants.. he can't explain why race should be
of any consideration in hiring as DEI mandates it should.
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...dictotorial
On Fri, 16 May 2025 18:28:02 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>news:1007c72$3p2r7$[email protected]:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 15 May 2025 12:07:36 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 14:00:59 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>>>>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 15:09:51 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
The asylum card has been overplayed and literally every illegal >>>>>>>>>>migrant
has been coached as to what boxes to check and what to say in >>>>>>>>>>order to be
let into the country.
They are both political and economic refugees. Their
aregovernments have destroyed their own economies so the people
havedoing what people have done since Columbus.
That's nice, but being a refugee does NOT necessarily mean you
with,to be
taken in by the US. I know what is a concept you have issues
undesirables.but we
do
NOT have to gramt access to every refugee in the world, much less >>>>>>>>once you
enter another country in which those conditions no longer apply. >>>>>>>>
The thing that amazes me, it really does, is that America's
greatness and power comes directly from the diversity of thought >>>>>>> and contributions of immigrants from many different lands.
yea, and we controlled immigration too....and deported
arrived
Not during our period of greatest growth. After the Civil War,
millions poured in. Minimal paperwork, nearly everybody who
was accepted.
But not everyone.....
Yes, everyone.
The steamship lines were forced to
take back to Europe - at their own expense -
everyone rejected for US admission. So the
liners conducted their own boarding inspections
and weeded out all the medical issue passengers
they knew would be rejected at Ellis Island.
Ergo most everyone getting to the US was admitted
to the US.
And the only ones being weeded out were for medical reasons. There
were no quotas or limits.
So people were being weeded out.....
On 19/5/25 5:36, Scout wrote:
Yep.. whether they are a sport or not is irrelevant. They are a
business and under DEI mandates their hiring practices are
discriminatory.
Duck and dodge as he wants.. he can't explain why race should be
of any consideration in hiring as DEI mandates it should.
Is the population large enough to make statistical inferences?
On 19/5/25 5:59, Scout wrote:
No, I'd feed him.
That's what America should do.
Ok, from now all you are responsible for feeding all the poor.
...or did you not mean what you just said?
How long do you keep your job when your company has no one to sell to?
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 15 May 2025 13:32:14 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 15 May 2025 09:02:26 -0400, -hh wrote:
On 5/14/25 14:03, Scout wrote:<snip>
"-hh" <[email protected]> wrote
On 5/14/25 09:18, Scout wrote:
Do they hire the best candidate, or do they allow sex/race to
influence their hiring in order to obtain artificial levels
decided to represent 'fairness' in hiring even if that means
discriminating against better qualified candidates.
One approach that I saw used back in the 1990s was similar to
the baseball rule of "tie goes to the runner".
We're not talking a tie, we are talking a better applicant.
Nope. No matter how much you want it to, their gender or the color >>>>>of their skin doesn't count in the evaluation.
Scout doesn't understand that if you were not a white male, you
wouldn't even be considered for the job
At which point existing laws against racial and sexual discrimination >>>would
apply.
. And in the event you did get
a job, it was a job white men didn't want or at a pay rate they
weren't willing to accept.
See the comment above about racial and sexual discrimination laws.
Now that everybody regardless of color, gender, etc., must be
fairly evaluated and paid,
BECAUSE of DEI (and other) mandates . . .
Actually DEI engages, promotes and even advocates for racial and
sexual discrimination.
Whether it is or isn't does not change the fact they are
companies engaged in racially and sexual discrimination under the
DEI mandates.
Here you go again, pretending not to be a bigot.
You are the one pushing someone's race and gender into it...
you are the one showing themselves to be the bigot....
After all, for YOU clearly a person's race and/or gender is a
matter of concern to you.
On 5/19/2025 5:22 AM, "Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Fri, 16 May 2025 18:28:02 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:1007c72$3p2r7$[email protected]:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 15 May 2025 12:07:36 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
yea, and we controlled immigration too....and deported undesirables.
Not during our period of greatest growth. After the Civil War,
millions poured in. Minimal paperwork, nearly everybody who arrived >>>>>> was accepted.
But not everyone.....
Yes, everyone.
The steamship lines were forced to
take back to Europe - at their own expense -
everyone rejected for US admission. So the
liners conducted their own boarding inspections
and weeded out all the medical issue passengers
they knew would be rejected at Ellis Island.
Ergo most everyone getting to the US was admitted
to the US.
And the only ones being weeded out were for medical reasons. There
were no quotas or limits.
So people were being weeded out
Not by U.S. immigration enforcement, scooter. And not on the basis of race or national origin, as you racist Nazis want to do.
On 19/5/25 5:48, Scout wrote:
Here you go again, pretending not to be a bigot.
You are the one pushing someone's race and gender into it...
you are the one showing themselves to be the bigot....
After all, for YOU clearly a person's race and/or gender is a
matter of concern to you.
Darn. Here we go again on this law nonsense.
On 19/5/25 5:32, Scout wrote:
Whether it is or isn't does not change the fact they are
companies engaged in racially and sexual discrimination under the
DEI mandates.
Can you prove discrimination?
On 19/5/25 5:59, Scout wrote:
No, I'd feed him.
That's what America should do.
Ok, from now all you are responsible for feeding all the poor.
...or did you not mean what you just said?
How long do you keep your job when your company has no one to
sell to?
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:100fp1j$1nohi$[email protected]...
On 19/5/25 5:36, Scout wrote:
Yep.. whether they are a sport or not is irrelevant. They are a
business and under DEI mandates their hiring practices are
discriminatory.
Duck and dodge as he wants.. he can't explain why race should be
of any consideration in hiring as DEI mandates it should.
Is the population large enough to make statistical inferences?
Well, let's look at the law..
United States of America DEI reporting requirements
Who must disclose diversity information?
Under the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission employers who have at least 100 employees and federal contractors who have at least 50 employees are required to complete and submit an EEO-1 Report (a government form that requests information about employees' job categories, ethnicity, race, and gender) to EEOC and the U.S. Department of Labor every year.
https://diversio.com/north-american-dei-reporting-requirements/
Now, are there 100 or more NFL players? Yes! Yes, there are.
So.. do we fire the black players and require the NFL to replace them with a more 'appropriate' racial cross section?
Maybe we could simply require them to be unable to hire any black players until the appropriate racial cross section is obtained...
Which form of racial discrimination do you propose to resolve this issue?
On 2025-05-19, Scout <[email protected]>
wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:100827k$3tiu7$[email protected]...
In news:[email protected], Mitchell Holman
<[email protected]> typed:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:1007c72$3p2r7$[email protected]:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 15 May 2025 12:07:36 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>>>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 14:00:59 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 15:09:51 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
The asylum card has been overplayed and literally every >>>>>>>>>>>illegal migrant has been coached as to what boxes to check >>>>>>>>>>>and what to say in order to be let into the country.
They are both political and economic refugees. Their
dictotorial governments have destroyed their own economies so >>>>>>>>>> the people are doing what people have done since Columbus.
That's nice, but being a refugee does NOT necessarily mean you >>>>>>>>>have to be taken in by the US. I know what is a concept you >>>>>>>>>have issues with, but we do NOT have to gramt access to every >>>>>>>>>refugee in the world, much less once you enter another country >>>>>>>>>in which those conditions no longer apply.
The thing that amazes me, it really does, is that America's
greatness and power comes directly from the diversity of
thought and contributions of immigrants from many different
lands.
yea, and we controlled immigration too....and deported >>>>>>>undesirables.
Not during our period of greatest growth. After the Civil War,
millions poured in. Minimal paperwork, nearly everybody who
arrived was accepted.
But not everyone.....
Yes, everyone.
The steamship lines were forced to
take back to Europe - at their own expense -
everyone rejected for US admission. So the
liners conducted their own boarding inspections
and weeded out all the medical issue passengers
they knew would be rejected at Ellis Island.
Ergo most everyone getting to the US was admitted
to the US.
Everyone ... or most everyone?
Further immigration was clearly being controlled.. that the steamship
lines were engaged in most of that doesn't alter the fact that it was
occurring.
And also, based upon the ship's manifest, basic checks were done and
known criminals, bad actors were refused entry into US.
At the time that was the best they could do, but at least they tried.
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:100fele$1l6r2$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-19, Scout <[email protected]>
wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:100827k$3tiu7$[email protected]...
In news:[email protected], Mitchell Holman
<[email protected]> typed:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:1007c72$3p2r7$[email protected]:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 15 May 2025 12:07:36 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>>>>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 14:00:59 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 15:09:51 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
The asylum card has been overplayed and literally every >>>>>>>>>>>>illegal migrant has been coached as to what boxes to check >>>>>>>>>>>>and what to say in order to be let into the country.
They are both political and economic refugees. Their
dictotorial governments have destroyed their own economies so >>>>>>>>>>> the people are doing what people have done since Columbus.
That's nice, but being a refugee does NOT necessarily mean you >>>>>>>>>>have to be taken in by the US. I know what is a concept you >>>>>>>>>>have issues with, but we do NOT have to gramt access to every >>>>>>>>>>refugee in the world, much less once you enter another country >>>>>>>>>>in which those conditions no longer apply.
The thing that amazes me, it really does, is that America's
greatness and power comes directly from the diversity of
thought and contributions of immigrants from many different
lands.
yea, and we controlled immigration too....and deported >>>>>>>>undesirables.
Not during our period of greatest growth. After the Civil War,
millions poured in. Minimal paperwork, nearly everybody who
arrived was accepted.
But not everyone.....
Yes, everyone.
The steamship lines were forced to
take back to Europe - at their own expense -
everyone rejected for US admission. So the
liners conducted their own boarding inspections
and weeded out all the medical issue passengers
they knew would be rejected at Ellis Island.
Ergo most everyone getting to the US was admitted
to the US.
Everyone ... or most everyone?
Further immigration was clearly being controlled.. that the steamship
lines were engaged in most of that doesn't alter the fact that it was
occurring.
And also, based upon the ship's manifest, basic checks were done and
known criminals, bad actors were refused entry into US.
At the time that was the best they could do, but at least they tried.
You don't suppose some of those known criminals came under a different
name, perhaps even bribed the ship purser? You don't think those originating countries perfectly happy to get rid of criminals and bad
actors?
On 2025-05-19, Baxter <[email protected]> wrote:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:100fele$1l6r2$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-19, Scout <[email protected]>
wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:100827k$3tiu7$[email protected]...
In news:[email protected], Mitchell Holman
<[email protected]> typed:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:1007c72$3p2r7$[email protected]:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 15 May 2025 12:07:36 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 14:00:59 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 15:09:51 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
The asylum card has been overplayed and literally every >>>>>>>>>>>>>illegal migrant has been coached as to what boxes to check >>>>>>>>>>>>>and what to say in order to be let into the country.
They are both political and economic refugees. Their
dictotorial governments have destroyed their own economies so >>>>>>>>>>>> the people are doing what people have done since Columbus.
That's nice, but being a refugee does NOT necessarily mean you >>>>>>>>>>>have to be taken in by the US. I know what is a concept you >>>>>>>>>>>have issues with, but we do NOT have to gramt access to every >>>>>>>>>>>refugee in the world, much less once you enter another country >>>>>>>>>>>in which those conditions no longer apply.
The thing that amazes me, it really does, is that America's >>>>>>>>>> greatness and power comes directly from the diversity of
thought and contributions of immigrants from many different >>>>>>>>>> lands.
yea, and we controlled immigration too....and deported >>>>>>>>>undesirables.
Not during our period of greatest growth. After the Civil War, >>>>>>>> millions poured in. Minimal paperwork, nearly everybody who
arrived was accepted.
But not everyone.....
Yes, everyone.
The steamship lines were forced to
take back to Europe - at their own expense -
everyone rejected for US admission. So the
liners conducted their own boarding inspections
and weeded out all the medical issue passengers
they knew would be rejected at Ellis Island.
Ergo most everyone getting to the US was admitted
to the US.
Everyone ... or most everyone?
Further immigration was clearly being controlled.. that the steamship
lines were engaged in most of that doesn't alter the fact that it was
occurring.
And also, based upon the ship's manifest, basic checks were done and
known criminals, bad actors were refused entry into US.
At the time that was the best they could do, but at least they tried.
You don't suppose some of those known criminals came under a different
name, perhaps even bribed the ship purser? You don't think those
originating countries perfectly happy to get rid of criminals and bad
actors?
Of course they did.
That's why I said they did the best that they could do at the time. Duhhhhhh.....
Still, it doesn't even come close to 100 to 20 million migrants let into the US under Biden and most barely checked at all.
Not comparable.
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:100fot6$1nohi$[email protected]...
On 19/5/25 5:59, Scout wrote:
No, I'd feed him.
That's what America should do.
Ok, from now all you are responsible for feeding all the poor.
...or did you not mean what you just said?
How long do you keep your job when your company has no one to
sell to?
And just like that Siri tries to change the subject.
Apparently what America should do and what Siri should do have
nothing in common.
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:100fp1j$1nohi$[email protected]...
On 19/5/25 5:36, Scout wrote:
Yep.. whether they are a sport or not is irrelevant. They are a
business and under DEI mandates their hiring practices are
discriminatory.
Duck and dodge as he wants.. he can't explain why race should be
of any consideration in hiring as DEI mandates it should.
Is the population large enough to make statistical inferences?
Well, let's look at the law..
United States of America DEI reporting requirements
Who must disclose diversity information?
Under the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission employers
who have at least 100 employees and federal contractors who have
at least 50 employees are required to complete and submit an
EEO-1 Report (a government form that requests information about
employees' job categories, ethnicity, race, and gender) to EEOC
and the U.S. Department of Labor every year.
https://diversio.com/north-american-dei-reporting-requirements/
Now, are there 100 or more NFL players? Yes! Yes, there are.
Again, for the 1000th time, hire on merit the best person for the job.
Gay, straight, black, white, female, male etc.
Can you prove discrimination?
Under the notion of DEI, I certainly can. The racial profile of
those hired are no where close to the racial profile of the nation.
On 19/5/25 13:32, pothead wrote:
Again, for the 1000th time, hire on merit the best person for the
job. Gay, straight, black, white, female, male etc.
And for the 1000 and first time, do you anything if
discrimination is proven?
In news:W8KWP.742521$[email protected], "Cunt Flaps" Canoza <klaus.schadenfreude.entf�[email protected]> typed:
On 5/19/2025 5:22 AM, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Fri, 16 May 2025 18:28:02 +0000, Mitchell Holman
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:1007c72$3p2r7$[email protected]:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 15 May 2025 12:07:36 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
yea, and we controlled immigration too....and deported
undesirables.
Not during our period of greatest growth. After the Civil War,
millions poured in. Minimal paperwork, nearly everybody who
arrived was accepted.
But not everyone.....
Yes, everyone.
The steamship lines were forced to
take back to Europe - at their own expense -
everyone rejected for US admission. So the
liners conducted their own boarding inspections
and weeded out all the medical issue passengers
they knew would be rejected at Ellis Island.
Ergo most everyone getting to the US was admitted
to the US.
And the only ones being weeded out were for medical reasons. There
were no quotas or limits.
So people were being weeded out
Not by U.S. immigration enforcement, scooter. And not on the basis of
race or national origin, as you racist Nazis want to do.
https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/chinese-exclusion-act
Can you prove discrimination?
Under the notion of DEI, I certainly can. The racial profile of
those hired are no where close to the racial profile of the nation.
Interesting when the racial profile is switched on you, suddenly
you are the one trying to make excuses for why a lot more of one
race over another is acceptable.
Which of course is why DEI is being ripped out. It can mandate
racial or gender discrimination.... the very opposite of what it
claims to be the cure for.
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in news:100g384$1pu0h$[email protected]:
In news:W8KWP.742521$[email protected], "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
<klaus.schadenfreude.entf�[email protected]> typed:
On 5/19/2025 5:22 AM, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Fri, 16 May 2025 18:28:02 +0000, Mitchell Holman
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:1007c72$3p2r7$[email protected]:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 15 May 2025 12:07:36 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
yea, and we controlled immigration too....and deported
undesirables.
Not during our period of greatest growth. After the Civil War, >>>>>>>> millions poured in. Minimal paperwork, nearly everybody who
arrived was accepted.
But not everyone.....
Yes, everyone.
The steamship lines were forced to
take back to Europe - at their own expense -
everyone rejected for US admission. So the
liners conducted their own boarding inspections
and weeded out all the medical issue passengers
they knew would be rejected at Ellis Island.
Ergo most everyone getting to the US was admitted
to the US.
And the only ones being weeded out were for medical reasons. There
were no quotas or limits.
So people were being weeded out
Not by U.S. immigration enforcement, scooter. And not on the basis of
race or national origin, as you racist Nazis want to do.
https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/chinese-exclusion-act
That wasn't Ellis Island,...
... and it was a different time period.
On 19/5/25 8:47, Scout wrote:
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:100fp1j$1nohi$[email protected]...
On 19/5/25 5:36, Scout wrote:
Yep.. whether they are a sport or not is irrelevant. They are a
business and under DEI mandates their hiring practices are
discriminatory.
Duck and dodge as he wants.. he can't explain why race should be
of any consideration in hiring as DEI mandates it should.
Is the population large enough to make statistical inferences?
Well, let's look at the law..
United States of America DEI reporting requirements
Who must disclose diversity information?
Under the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission employers
who have at least 100 employees and federal contractors who have
at least 50 employees are required to complete and submit an
EEO-1 Report (a government form that requests information about
employees' job categories, ethnicity, race, and gender) to EEOC
and the U.S. Department of Labor every year.
https://diversio.com/north-american-dei-reporting-requirements/
Now, are there 100 or more NFL players? Yes! Yes, there are.
On a team? Each team is a its own business.
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in news:100g384$1pu0h$[email protected]:
In news:W8KWP.742521$[email protected], "Cunt Flaps" CanozaThat wasn't Ellis Island, and it was a different time period.
<klaus.schadenfreude.entf�[email protected]> typed:
On 5/19/2025 5:22 AM, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Fri, 16 May 2025 18:28:02 +0000, Mitchell Holman
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:1007c72$3p2r7$[email protected]:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 15 May 2025 12:07:36 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
yea, and we controlled immigration too....and deported
undesirables.
Not during our period of greatest growth. After the Civil War, >>>>>>>> millions poured in. Minimal paperwork, nearly everybody who
arrived was accepted.
But not everyone.....
Yes, everyone.
The steamship lines were forced to
take back to Europe - at their own expense -
everyone rejected for US admission. So the
liners conducted their own boarding inspections
and weeded out all the medical issue passengers
they knew would be rejected at Ellis Island.
Ergo most everyone getting to the US was admitted
to the US.
And the only ones being weeded out were for medical reasons. There
were no quotas or limits.
So people were being weeded out
Not by U.S. immigration enforcement, scooter. And not on the basis of
race or national origin, as you racist Nazis want to do.
https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/chinese-exclusion-act
On 19/5/25 10:21, Scout wrote:
Can you prove discrimination?
Under the notion of DEI, I certainly can. The racial profile of
those hired are no where close to the racial profile of the nation.
Which not the employer's goal.
The employer is expected to choose fairly amongst the pool of qualified applicants.
On 19/5/25 10:21, Scout wrote:
Can you prove discrimination?
Under the notion of DEI, I certainly can. The racial profile of
those hired are no where close to the racial profile of the nation.
As you cited, the laws do not kick in until a business has a hundred
worker ants. At that point you can do statistical tests whether different subpopulations are part of the same population.
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:100fele$1l6r2$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-19, Scout <[email protected]>
wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:100827k$3tiu7$[email protected]...
In news:[email protected], Mitchell Holman
<[email protected]> typed:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:1007c72$3p2r7$[email protected]:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 15 May 2025 12:07:36 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>>>>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 14:00:59 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 14 May 2025 15:09:51 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
The asylum card has been overplayed and literally every >>>>>>>>>>>>illegal migrant has been coached as to what boxes to check >>>>>>>>>>>>and what to say in order to be let into the country.
They are both political and economic refugees. Their
dictotorial governments have destroyed their own economies so >>>>>>>>>>> the people are doing what people have done since Columbus.
That's nice, but being a refugee does NOT necessarily mean you >>>>>>>>>>have to be taken in by the US. I know what is a concept you >>>>>>>>>>have issues with, but we do NOT have to gramt access to every >>>>>>>>>>refugee in the world, much less once you enter another country >>>>>>>>>>in which those conditions no longer apply.
The thing that amazes me, it really does, is that America's
greatness and power comes directly from the diversity of
thought and contributions of immigrants from many different
lands.
yea, and we controlled immigration too....and deported >>>>>>>>undesirables.
Not during our period of greatest growth. After the Civil War,
millions poured in. Minimal paperwork, nearly everybody who
arrived was accepted.
But not everyone.....
Yes, everyone.
The steamship lines were forced to
take back to Europe - at their own expense -
everyone rejected for US admission. So the
liners conducted their own boarding inspections
and weeded out all the medical issue passengers
they knew would be rejected at Ellis Island.
Ergo most everyone getting to the US was admitted
to the US.
Everyone ... or most everyone?
Further immigration was clearly being controlled.. that the steamship
lines were engaged in most of that doesn't alter the fact that it was
occurring.
And also, based upon the ship's manifest, basic checks were done and
known criminals, bad actors were refused entry into US.
At the time that was the best they could do, but at least they tried.
You don't suppose some of those known criminals came under a different
name, perhaps even bribed the ship purser? You don't think those originating countries perfectly happy to get rid of criminals and bad
actors?
On 19/5/25 8:47, Scout wrote:
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:100fp1j$1nohi$[email protected]...
On 19/5/25 5:36, Scout wrote:
Yep.. whether they are a sport or not is irrelevant. They are a
business and under DEI mandates their hiring practices are
discriminatory.
Duck and dodge as he wants.. he can't explain why race should be
of any consideration in hiring as DEI mandates it should.
Is the population large enough to make statistical inferences?
Well, let's look at the law..
United States of America DEI reporting requirements
Who must disclose diversity information?
Under the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission employers
who have at least 100 employees and federal contractors who have
at least 50 employees are required to complete and submit an
EEO-1 Report (a government form that requests information about
employees' job categories, ethnicity, race, and gender) to EEOC
and the U.S. Department of Labor every year.
https://diversio.com/north-american-dei-reporting-requirements/
Now, are there 100 or more NFL players? Yes! Yes, there are.
On a team? Each team is a its own business.
On 19/5/25 13:32, pothead wrote:
Again, for the 1000th time, hire on merit the best person for the job.
Gay, straight, black, white, female, male etc.
And for the 1000 and first time, do you anything if discrimination is
proven?
On 19/5/25 8:56, Scout wrote:
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:100fot6$1nohi$[email protected]...
On 19/5/25 5:59, Scout wrote:
No, I'd feed him.
That's what America should do.
Ok, from now all you are responsible for feeding all the poor.
...or did you not mean what you just said?
How long do you keep your job when your company has no one to
sell to?
And just like that Siri tries to change the subject.
Apparently what America should do and what Siri should do have
nothing in common.
You are too stupid to understand why things like food stamps and social security were creted.
In news:100gqp6$222dt$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:100g384$1pu0h$[email protected]:
In news:W8KWP.742521$[email protected], "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
<klaus.schadenfreude.entf�[email protected]> typed:
On 5/19/2025 5:22 AM, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Fri, 16 May 2025 18:28:02 +0000, Mitchell Holman
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:1007c72$3p2r7$[email protected]:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 15 May 2025 12:07:36 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
yea, and we controlled immigration too....and deported
undesirables.
Not during our period of greatest growth. After the Civil War, >>>>>>>>> millions poured in. Minimal paperwork, nearly everybody who
arrived was accepted.
But not everyone.....
Yes, everyone.
The steamship lines were forced to
take back to Europe - at their own expense -
everyone rejected for US admission. So the
liners conducted their own boarding inspections
and weeded out all the medical issue passengers
they knew would be rejected at Ellis Island.
Ergo most everyone getting to the US was admitted
to the US.
And the only ones being weeded out were for medical reasons. There >>>>>> were no quotas or limits.
So people were being weeded out
Not by U.S. immigration enforcement, scooter. And not on the basis of
race or national origin, as you racist Nazis want to do.
https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/chinese-exclusion-act
That wasn't Ellis Island,...
Exactly. There are scores of Ports of Entry and the Chinese Exclusion Act applied to all.
... and it was a different time period.
Nope, the Chinese Exclusion Act became law in 1882.
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:100gibj$1smsn$[email protected]...
On 19/5/25 13:32, pothead wrote:
Again, for the 1000th time, hire on merit the best person for
the job.
Gay, straight, black, white, female, male etc.
And for the 1000 and first time, do you anything if
discrimination is proven?
Yes, the racial profile doesn't closely match the population
profile as DEI requires.
You asked me to show you.. now you are refusing to even look at
the evidence you asked be presented.
[Default] "Scout" <[email protected]> typed:
"Baxter" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>news:100gqp6$222dt$[email protected]...
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:100g384$1pu0h$[email protected]:
In news:W8KWP.742521$[email protected], "Cunt Flaps" CanozaThat wasn't Ellis Island, and it was a different time period.
<klaus.schadenfreude.entf�[email protected]> typed:
On 5/19/2025 5:22 AM, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Fri, 16 May 2025 18:28:02 +0000, Mitchell Holman
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:1007c72$3p2r7$[email protected]:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 15 May 2025 12:07:36 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
yea, and we controlled immigration too....and deported
undesirables.
Not during our period of greatest growth. After the Civil War, >>>>>>>>>> millions poured in. Minimal paperwork, nearly everybody who >>>>>>>>>> arrived was accepted.
But not everyone.....
Yes, everyone.
The steamship lines were forced to
take back to Europe - at their own expense -
everyone rejected for US admission. So the
liners conducted their own boarding inspections
and weeded out all the medical issue passengers
they knew would be rejected at Ellis Island.
Ergo most everyone getting to the US was admitted
to the US.
And the only ones being weeded out were for medical reasons. There >>>>>>> were no quotas or limits.
So people were being weeded out
Not by U.S. immigration enforcement, scooter. And not on the basis of >>>>> race or national origin, as you racist Nazis want to do.
https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/chinese-exclusion-act
Was it "after the Civil War"?
That was the condition you set.
Baxter was so traumatized when we took his slaves away that he can't
remember when that was.
In news:100gqp6$222dt$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:100g384$1pu0h$[email protected]:
In news:W8KWP.742521$[email protected], "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
<klaus.schadenfreude.entf�[email protected]> typed:
On 5/19/2025 5:22 AM, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Fri, 16 May 2025 18:28:02 +0000, Mitchell Holman
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:1007c72$3p2r7$[email protected]:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 15 May 2025 12:07:36 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
yea, and we controlled immigration too....and deported
undesirables.
Not during our period of greatest growth. After the Civil War, >>>>>>>>> millions poured in. Minimal paperwork, nearly everybody who
arrived was accepted.
But not everyone.....
Yes, everyone.
The steamship lines were forced to
take back to Europe - at their own expense -
everyone rejected for US admission. So the
liners conducted their own boarding inspections
and weeded out all the medical issue passengers
they knew would be rejected at Ellis Island.
Ergo most everyone getting to the US was admitted
to the US.
And the only ones being weeded out were for medical reasons.
There were no quotas or limits.
So people were being weeded out
Not by U.S. immigration enforcement, scooter. And not on the basis
of race or national origin, as you racist Nazis want to do.
https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/chinese-exclusion-act
That wasn't Ellis Island,...
Exactly. There are scores of Ports of Entry and the Chinese Exclusion
Act applied to all.
... and it was a different time period.
Nope, the Chinese Exclusion Act became law in 1882.
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in news:100a7ge$eft2$[email protected]:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill
<[email protected]> typed:
On Thu, 15 May 2025 13:32:14 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hardly since if that were the case.. a lot of black NFL players would
need to be fired as per DEI standards the NFL is clearly engaged in
racial discrimination and are absolutely engaged in gender
discrimination. Not a single female player.
Yep, if we go with the mandates of DEI the NFL is a racist
organization that also refuses to hire female players.
No it's not....
Yes, it is, as are MLB and NBA and NIH and most professional sports.
"max headroom" thinks "Pro Sports" is sports.
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in news:100i5hr$29pvq$[email protected]:
In news:100gqp6$222dt$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:100g384$1pu0h$[email protected]:
In news:W8KWP.742521$[email protected], "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
<klaus.schadenfreude.entf�[email protected]> typed:
On 5/19/2025 5:22 AM, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Fri, 16 May 2025 18:28:02 +0000, Mitchell Holman
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:1007c72$3p2r7$[email protected]:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 15 May 2025 12:07:36 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
yea, and we controlled immigration too....and deported
undesirables.
Not during our period of greatest growth. After the Civil War, >>>>>>>>>> millions poured in. Minimal paperwork, nearly everybody who >>>>>>>>>> arrived was accepted.
But not everyone.....
Yes, everyone.
The steamship lines were forced to
take back to Europe - at their own expense -
everyone rejected for US admission. So the
liners conducted their own boarding inspections
and weeded out all the medical issue passengers
they knew would be rejected at Ellis Island.
Ergo most everyone getting to the US was admitted
to the US.
And the only ones being weeded out were for medical reasons.
There were no quotas or limits.
So people were being weeded out
Not by U.S. immigration enforcement, scooter. And not on the basis
of race or national origin, as you racist Nazis want to do.
https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/chinese-exclusion-act
That wasn't Ellis Island,...
Exactly. There are scores of Ports of Entry and the Chinese Exclusion
Act applied to all.
... and it was a different time period.
Nope, the Chinese Exclusion Act became law in 1882.
Ellis Island was 20 years later and on the opposite coast.
On 2025-05-19, Baxter <[email protected]> wrote:Not even close to a fact.
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:100fele$1l6r2$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-19, Scout <[email protected]>
wrote:
Still, it doesn't even come close to 100 to 20 million migrants let into the US under Biden and most barely checked at all.
On Mon, 19 May 2025 20:25:33 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Ask the people of China because China's sales of goods is very heavily biased >>towards outside sales.
IOW they are not selling within country, overall.
Do you have a cite on this? China has a rapidly growing car market.
They're the number one consumer of electric vehicles.
And they are rioting in the streets due to not being paid.
I haven't heard anything about that.
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill <[email protected]> typed:
On Thu, 15 May 2025 13:34:00 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
And if that candidate is not a white male?
Why do you think their race or gender should matter?
Are you admitting to being a racist?
Interesting how when I propose a totally neutral standard.. you want to >>>drag
race and gender into it.
Here you go again, pretending not to be a bigot.
It's sad to watch, really.
Au contraire, it's hilarious watching you being hoisted on your own
petard!
On 20/5/25 4:37, Scout wrote:
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:100gibj$1smsn$[email protected]...
On 19/5/25 13:32, pothead wrote:
Again, for the 1000th time, hire on merit the best person for
the job.
Gay, straight, black, white, female, male etc.
And for the 1000 and first time, do you anything if
discrimination is proven?
Yes, the racial profile doesn't closely match the population
profile as DEI requires.
You asked me to show you.. now you are refusing to even look at
the evidence you asked be presented.
Nothing. Your bigotry goes unpunished.
On Tue, 20 May 2025 07:27:31 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
Indeed, I bet Indians today wish their ancestors had limited immigration >>into their lands
It's not as if they didn't try.
On Mon, 19 May 2025 14:19:26 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
And also, based upon the ship's manifest, basic checks were done and known >>criminals, bad actors were refused entry into US.
At the time that was the best they could do, but at least they tried.
"The best they could do?"
You act as if they would have controlled immigration if they could.
On Mon, 19 May 2025 21:34:15 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-05-19, Baxter <[email protected]> wrote:<snip>
You don't suppose some of those known criminals came under a different
name, perhaps even bribed the ship purser? You don't think those
originating countries perfectly happy to get rid of criminals and bad
actors?
Of course they did.
That's why I said they did the best that they could do at the time. >>Duhhhhhh.....
Still, it doesn't even come close to 100 to 20 million migrants let into >>the
US under Biden and most barely checked at all.
Not comparable.
Considering the current unemployment rate, it would appear the country
has been able to absorb and develop this source of cheap labor.
On Mon, 19 May 2025 08:22:15 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote<snip>
And the only ones being weeded out were for medical reasons. There
were no quotas or limits.
So people were being weeded out.....
And they could be weeded out now if they were crossing only at
authorized entry points.
You can't "weed out" the sick and infirm crossing the fence. Thirst, exposure and accidents do that.
Either way, consider them weeded.
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in news:100i5hr$29pvq$[email protected]:
In news:100gqp6$222dt$[email protected], BaxterEllis Island was 20 years later and on the opposite coast.
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:100g384$1pu0h$[email protected]:
In news:W8KWP.742521$[email protected], "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
<klaus.schadenfreude.entf�[email protected]> typed:
On 5/19/2025 5:22 AM, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Fri, 16 May 2025 18:28:02 +0000, Mitchell Holman
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:1007c72$3p2r7$[email protected]:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 15 May 2025 12:07:36 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
yea, and we controlled immigration too....and deported
undesirables.
Not during our period of greatest growth. After the Civil War, >>>>>>>>>> millions poured in. Minimal paperwork, nearly everybody who >>>>>>>>>> arrived was accepted.
But not everyone.....
Yes, everyone.
The steamship lines were forced to
take back to Europe - at their own expense -
everyone rejected for US admission. So the
liners conducted their own boarding inspections
and weeded out all the medical issue passengers
they knew would be rejected at Ellis Island.
Ergo most everyone getting to the US was admitted
to the US.
And the only ones being weeded out were for medical reasons.
There were no quotas or limits.
So people were being weeded out
Not by U.S. immigration enforcement, scooter. And not on the basis
of race or national origin, as you racist Nazis want to do.
https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/chinese-exclusion-act
That wasn't Ellis Island,...
Exactly. There are scores of Ports of Entry and the Chinese Exclusion
Act applied to all.
... and it was a different time period.
Nope, the Chinese Exclusion Act became law in 1882.
On Mon, 19 May 2025 20:25:33 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Ask the people of China because China's sales of goods is very heavily >>biased towards
outside sales.
IOW they are not selling within country, overall.
Do you have a cite on this? China has a rapidly growing car market.
They're the number one consumer of electric vehicles.
On Mon, 19 May 2025 09:06:08 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
Well apparently he thinks only government can do things, when in reality >>government is often the worst organization for the job.
But only the government is required to make these all available to the general public.
On Mon, 19 May 2025 08:59:49 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
Ok, from now all you are responsible for feeding all the poor.
Nope. Doesn't work like that.
On 5/17/2025 8:33 PM, Baxter wrote:would
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:100a7ge$eft2$[email protected]:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill
<[email protected]> typed:
On Thu, 15 May 2025 13:32:14 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hardly since if that were the case.. a lot of black NFL players
need to be fired as per DEI standards the NFL is clearly engaged in
racial discrimination and are absolutely engaged in gender
discrimination. Not a single female player.
Yep, if we go with the mandates of DEI the NFL is a racist
organization that also refuses to hire female players.
No it's not....
Yes, it is, as are MLB and NBA and NIH and most professional sports.
"max headroom" thinks "Pro Sports" is sports.
I suppose where you live it's "water sports"?
ralph <[email protected]> wrote in news:100j1sb$32n4q$[email protected]:
On 5/17/2025 8:33 PM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:100a7ge$eft2$[email protected]:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill
<[email protected]> typed:
On Thu, 15 May 2025 13:32:14 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hardly since if that were the case.. a lot of black NFL players would >>>>>> need to be fired as per DEI standards the NFL is clearly engaged in >>>>>> racial discrimination and are absolutely engaged in gender
discrimination. Not a single female player.
Yep, if we go with the mandates of DEI the NFL is a racist
organization that also refuses to hire female players.
No it's not....
Yes, it is, as are MLB and NBA and NIH and most professional sports.
"max headroom" thinks "Pro Sports" is sports.
I suppose where you live it's "water sports"?
It's a for-profit entertainment business.
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 19 May 2025 21:34:15 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-05-19, Baxter <[email protected]> wrote:<snip>
You don't suppose some of those known criminals came under a different >>>> name, perhaps even bribed the ship purser? You don't think those
originating countries perfectly happy to get rid of criminals and bad
actors?
Of course they did.
That's why I said they did the best that they could do at the time.
Duhhhhhh.....
Still, it doesn't even come close to 100 to 20 million migrants let
into the
US under Biden and most barely checked at all.
Not comparable.
Considering the current unemployment rate, it would appear the country
has been able to absorb and develop this source of cheap labor.
Right.. meanwhile citizens complain of the lack of jobs, and inadequate wages....
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 19 May 2025 14:19:26 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
And also, based upon the ship's manifest, basic checks were done and known >>>criminals, bad actors were refused entry into US.
At the time that was the best they could do, but at least they tried.
"The best they could do?"
You act as if they would have controlled immigration if they could.
They did control immigration....
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill <[email protected]> typed:
On Mon, 19 May 2025 20:25:33 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Ask the people of China because China's sales of goods is very heavily biased
towards outside sales.
IOW they are not selling within country, overall.
Do you have a cite on this? China has a rapidly growing car market.
They're the number one consumer of electric vehicles.
https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/china-alone-trade-war-trump-tariffs
And they are rioting in the streets due to not being paid.
I haven't heard anything about that.
I'm not surprised.
https://nypost.com/2025/05/06/world-news/protests-erupt-in-china-as-trumps-steep-tariffs-bite-extremely-anxious/
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:in
ralph <[email protected]> wrote in news:100j1sb$32n4q$[email protected]:
On 5/17/2025 8:33 PM, Baxter wrote:would
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:100a7ge$eft2$[email protected]:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill
<[email protected]> typed:
On Thu, 15 May 2025 13:32:14 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hardly since if that were the case.. a lot of black NFL players
need to be fired as per DEI standards the NFL is clearly engaged
sports.racial discrimination and are absolutely engaged in gender
discrimination. Not a single female player.
Yep, if we go with the mandates of DEI the NFL is a racist
organization that also refuses to hire female players.
No it's not....
Yes, it is, as are MLB and NBA and NIH and most professional
"max headroom" thinks "Pro Sports" is sports.
I suppose where you live it's "water sports"?
It's a for-profit entertainment business.
Baxter says if it's for profit and entertainment it's OK to
discriminate
On 5/21/2025 5:29 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:Yes they did.
They did not,
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 19 May 2025 14:19:26 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
And also, based upon the ship's manifest, basic checks were done and
known
criminals, bad actors were refused entry into US.
At the time that was the best they could do, but at least they tried.
"The best they could do?"
You act as if they would have controlled immigration if they could.
They did control immigration....
On 5/21/2025 5:30 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 19 May 2025 21:34:15 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-05-19, Baxter <[email protected]> wrote:<snip>
You don't suppose some of those known criminals came under a different >>>>> name, perhaps even bribed the ship purser? You don't think those >>>>> originating countries perfectly happy to get rid of criminals and bad >>>>> actors?
Of course they did.
That's why I said they did the best that they could do at the time.
Duhhhhhh.....
Still, it doesn't even come close to 100 to 20 million migrants let
into the
US under Biden and most barely checked at all.
Not comparable.
Considering the current unemployment rate, it would appear the country
has been able to absorb and develop this source of cheap labor.
Right.. meanwhile citizens complain of the lack of jobs, and
inadequate wages....
Fuck sheep
On 5/21/2025 5:32 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:aren't entering legally now. They are being smuggled in via Mexico.
Asians
"Baxter" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:100ioom$2dhki$[email protected]...
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:100i5hr$29pvq$[email protected]:
In news:100gqp6$222dt$[email protected], BaxterEllis Island was 20 years later and on the opposite coast.
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:100g384$1pu0h$[email protected]:
In news:W8KWP.742521$[email protected], "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
<klaus.schadenfreude.entf�[email protected]> typed:
On 5/19/2025 5:22 AM, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Fri, 16 May 2025 18:28:02 +0000, Mitchell Holman
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>> news:1007c72$3p2r7$[email protected]:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 15 May 2025 12:07:36 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
yea, and we controlled immigration too....and deported >>>>>>>>>>>>> undesirables.
Not during our period of greatest growth. After the Civil War, >>>>>>>>>>>> millions poured in. Minimal paperwork, nearly everybody who >>>>>>>>>>>> arrived was accepted.
But not everyone.....
Yes, everyone.
The steamship lines were forced to
take back to Europe - at their own expense -
everyone rejected for US admission. So the
liners conducted their own boarding inspections
and weeded out all the medical issue passengers
they knew would be rejected at Ellis Island.
Ergo most everyone getting to the US was admitted
to the US.
And the only ones being weeded out were for medical reasons. >>>>>>>>> There were no quotas or limits.
So people were being weeded out
Not by U.S. immigration enforcement, scooter. And not on the basis >>>>>>> of race or national origin, as you racist Nazis want to do.
https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/chinese-exclusion-act
That wasn't Ellis Island,...
Exactly. There are scores of Ports of Entry and the Chinese Exclusion
Act applied to all.
... and it was a different time period.
Nope, the Chinese Exclusion Act became law in 1882.
And federal law applies throughout the United States.....
On 5/21/2025 1:05 AM, max headroom wrote:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill
<[email protected]> typed:
On Mon, 19 May 2025 20:25:33 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Ask the people of China because China's sales of goods is very
heavily biased towards outside sales.
IOW they are not selling within country, overall.
Do you have a cite on this? China has a rapidly growing car market.
They're the number one consumer of electric vehicles.
https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/china-alone-trade-war
-trump-tariffs
And they are rioting in the streets due to not being paid.
I haven't heard anything about that.
I'm not surprised.
https://nypost.com/2025/05/06/world-news/protests-erupt-in-china-as-tr
umps-steep-tariffs-bite-extremely-anxious/
Democrats will claim Trump is being mean to Chinese workers, starving
their children, taking food from their mouths, etc.
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]> wrote
in
news:ph3s2k1jjur7va3966n5dn1rioubih278v@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck ing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
ralph <[email protected]> wrote in news:100j1sb$32n4q$[email protected]:
On 5/17/2025 8:33 PM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:100a7ge$eft2$[email protected]:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill >>>>>> <[email protected]> typed:
On Thu, 15 May 2025 13:32:14 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hardly since if that were the case.. a lot of black NFL players would >>>>>>>> need to be fired as per DEI standards the NFL is clearly engaged in >>>>>>>> racial discrimination and are absolutely engaged in gender
discrimination. Not a single female player.
Yep, if we go with the mandates of DEI the NFL is a racist
organization that also refuses to hire female players.
No it's not....
Yes, it is, as are MLB and NBA and NIH and most professional sports.
"max headroom" thinks "Pro Sports" is sports.
I suppose where you live it's "water sports"?
It's a for-profit entertainment business.
Baxter says if it's for profit and entertainment it's OK to
discriminate
KKKlaun loves to twist things. Like the rest of the Entertainment
industry, Pro "sports" has to choose from the pool of available talent.
DEI doesn't enter into it.
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 19 May 2025 21:34:15 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-05-19, Baxter <[email protected]> wrote:<snip>
You don't suppose some of those known criminals came under a different >>>> name, perhaps even bribed the ship purser? You don't think those
originating countries perfectly happy to get rid of criminals and bad
actors?
Of course they did.
That's why I said they did the best that they could do at the time. >>>Duhhhhhh.....
Still, it doesn't even come close to 100 to 20 million migrants let into >>>the
US under Biden and most barely checked at all.
Not comparable.
Considering the current unemployment rate, it would appear the country
has been able to absorb and develop this source of cheap labor.
Right.. meanwhile citizens complain of the lack of jobs, and inadequate wages....
On 5/21/25 08:30, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 19 May 2025 21:34:15 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-05-19, Baxter <[email protected]> wrote:<snip>
You don't suppose some of those known criminals came under a
different name, perhaps even bribed the ship purser? You don't
think those originating countries perfectly happy to get rid of
criminals and bad actors?
Of course they did.
That's why I said they did the best that they could do at the time.
Duhhhhhh.....
Still, it doesn't even come close to 100 to 20 million migrants let
into the
US under Biden and most barely checked at all.
Not comparable.
Considering the current unemployment rate, it would appear the
country has been able to absorb and develop this source of cheap
labor.
Right.. meanwhile citizens complain of the lack of jobs, and
inadequate wages....
Lack of the jobs they want ... and at the wage level they want...
Still doesn't change the fact that the official unemployment rate U3, currently at 4.2%, has been at or below the "Full Employment"
definition for nine years except for eighteen months of the CoVid
shock.
Indeed, even the rate for those with less than a high school diploma
is trending under 6%, which is roughly 20% lower than its twenty year average:
<https://www.bls.gov/charts/employment-situation/unemployment-rates-for- >persons-25-years-and-older-by-educational-attainment.htm>
ralph <[email protected]> wrote in
news:100j1sb$32n4q$[email protected]:
On 5/17/2025 8:33 PM, Baxter wrote:would
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:100a7ge$eft2$[email protected]:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill
<[email protected]> typed:
On Thu, 15 May 2025 13:32:14 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hardly since if that were the case.. a lot of black NFL players
need to be fired as per DEI standards the NFL is clearly engaged
in racial discrimination and are absolutely engaged in gender
discrimination. Not a single female player.
Yep, if we go with the mandates of DEI the NFL is a racist
organization that also refuses to hire female players.
No it's not....
Yes, it is, as are MLB and NBA and NIH and most professional
sports.
"max headroom" thinks "Pro Sports" is sports.
I suppose where you live it's "water sports"?
It's a for-profit entertainment business.
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:34:15 -0400, "Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 19 May 2025 08:22:15 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote<snip>
And the only ones being weeded out were for medical reasons. There
were no quotas or limits.
So people were being weeded out.....
And they could be weeded out now if they were crossing only at
authorized entry points.
Which by law they are required to do.
But can't do because quotas are so tight. It can take literally years
to get permission to emigrate to the US.
On 21 May 2025, -hh <[email protected]> posted some news:100kt83$2fadq$[email protected]:
On 5/21/25 08:30, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 19 May 2025 21:34:15 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-05-19, Baxter <[email protected]> wrote:<snip>
You don't suppose some of those known criminals came under a
different name, perhaps even bribed the ship purser? You don't >>>>>> think those originating countries perfectly happy to get rid of
criminals and bad actors?
Of course they did.
That's why I said they did the best that they could do at the time.
Duhhhhhh.....
Still, it doesn't even come close to 100 to 20 million migrants let
into the
US under Biden and most barely checked at all.
Not comparable.
Considering the current unemployment rate, it would appear the
country has been able to absorb and develop this source of cheap
labor.
Right.. meanwhile citizens complain of the lack of jobs, and
inadequate wages....
Lack of the jobs they want ... and at the wage level they want...
Still doesn't change the fact that the official unemployment rate U3,
currently at 4.2%, has been at or below the "Full Employment"
definition for nine years except for eighteen months of the CoVid
shock.
Indeed, even the rate for those with less than a high school diploma
is trending under 6%, which is roughly 20% lower than its twenty year
average:
<https://www.bls.gov/charts/employment-situation/unemployment-rates-for-
persons-25-years-and-older-by-educational-attainment.htm>
"U-3 is the most commonly reported unemployment rate and is calculated by dividing the number of unemployed individuals (those who are not working, have actively sought work in the past four weeks."
"four weeks"
The working percentage of the available US working force is a few hairs
short of 61%. That means roughly 40% of US workers are unemployed.
The
U3 stat, the stat most commonly cited by Democrat politicians and left-
wing media dildos, is essentially bogus and completely misrepresentative
when cited without object criteria.
On Wed, 21 May 2025 16:22:42 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Enter legally and you will be welcomed.
This is your racism talking again. You know well the tight quotas
that effectively limit immigration to only tiny numbers from select
places.
Iow, most people wanting to immigrate *can't* come here legally.
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
On Wed, 21 May 2025 16:22:42 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Enter legally and you will be welcomed.
This is your racism talking again. You know well the tight quotas
that effectively limit immigration to only tiny numbers from select
places.
Iow, most people wanting to immigrate *can't* come here legally.
They are deporting immigrants that entered legally. Some even had green cards.
ralph <[email protected]> wrote in news:100j1sb$32n4q$[email protected]:
On 5/17/2025 8:33 PM, Baxter wrote:would
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:100a7ge$eft2$[email protected]:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill
<[email protected]> typed:
On Thu, 15 May 2025 13:32:14 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hardly since if that were the case.. a lot of black NFL players
need to be fired as per DEI standards the NFL is clearly engaged in >>>>>> racial discrimination and are absolutely engaged in gender
discrimination. Not a single female player.
Yep, if we go with the mandates of DEI the NFL is a racist
organization that also refuses to hire female players.
No it's not....
Yes, it is, as are MLB and NBA and NIH and most professional sports.
"max headroom" thinks "Pro Sports" is sports.
I suppose where you live it's "water sports"?
It's a for-profit entertainment business.
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
Like the rest of the Entertainment
industry, Pro "sports" has to choose from the pool of available talent.
DEI doesn't enter into it.
That's because they want to succeed,
unlike leftists who think DEI
will actually solve a problem.
On Wed, 21 May 2025 16:22:42 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Enter legally and you will be welcomed.
This is your racism talking again. You know well the tight quotas
that effectively limit immigration to only tiny numbers from select
places.
Iow, most people wanting to immigrate *can't* come here legally.
On 5/21/2025 5:29 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
They did not, scooter. Stop lying, you pointless Nazi fucktard.
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 19 May 2025 14:19:26 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
And also, based upon the ship's manifest, basic checks were done and
known
criminals, bad actors were refused entry into US.
At the time that was the best they could do, but at least they tried.
"The best they could do?"
You act as if they would have controlled immigration if they could.
They did control immigration....
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
On Wed, 21 May 2025 16:22:42 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Enter legally and you will be welcomed.
This is your racism talking again. You know well the tight quotas
that effectively limit immigration to only tiny numbers from select
places.
Iow, most people wanting to immigrate *can't* come here legally.
They are deporting immigrants that entered legally. Some even had green cards.
On 5/21/2025 5:30 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 19 May 2025 21:34:15 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-05-19, Baxter <[email protected]> wrote:<snip>
You don't suppose some of those known criminals came under a different >>>>> name, perhaps even bribed the ship purser? You don't think those
originating countries perfectly happy to get rid of criminals and bad >>>>> actors?
Of course they did.
That's why I said they did the best that they could do at the time.
Duhhhhhh.....
Still, it doesn't even come close to 100 to 20 million migrants let
into the
US under Biden and most barely checked at all.
Not comparable.
Considering the current unemployment rate, it would appear the country
has been able to absorb and develop this source of cheap labor.
Right.. meanwhile citizens complain of the lack of jobs, and inadequate
wages....
Fuck off, scooter. Biden bequeathed the Orange Fat Fuck an unemployment
rate barely over 4%.
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:30:20 -0400, "Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:
Right.. meanwhile citizens complain of the lack of jobs, and inadequate >>wages....
Yeah, whiny layabouts who can't be bothered doing a days work and
lying reporters complaining about problems that don't exist.
With unemployment at 5% (or less), anybody unable to find a job today
doesn't want one.
On 5/21/2025 5:32 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
Asians weren't entering the U.S. at Ellis Island, scooter.
"Baxter" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:100ioom$2dhki$[email protected]...
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:100i5hr$29pvq$[email protected]:
In news:100gqp6$222dt$[email protected], BaxterEllis Island was 20 years later and on the opposite coast.
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:100g384$1pu0h$[email protected]:
In news:W8KWP.742521$[email protected], "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
<klaus.schadenfreude.entf�[email protected]> typed:
On 5/19/2025 5:22 AM, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Fri, 16 May 2025 18:28:02 +0000, Mitchell Holman
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>> news:1007c72$3p2r7$[email protected]:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 15 May 2025 12:07:36 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
yea, and we controlled immigration too....and deported >>>>>>>>>>>>> undesirables.
Not during our period of greatest growth. After the Civil War, >>>>>>>>>>>> millions poured in. Minimal paperwork, nearly everybody who >>>>>>>>>>>> arrived was accepted.
But not everyone.....
Yes, everyone.
The steamship lines were forced to
take back to Europe - at their own expense -
everyone rejected for US admission. So the
liners conducted their own boarding inspections
and weeded out all the medical issue passengers
they knew would be rejected at Ellis Island.
Ergo most everyone getting to the US was admitted
to the US.
And the only ones being weeded out were for medical reasons. >>>>>>>>> There were no quotas or limits.
So people were being weeded out
Not by U.S. immigration enforcement, scooter. And not on the basis >>>>>>> of race or national origin, as you racist Nazis want to do.
https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/chinese-exclusion-act
That wasn't Ellis Island,...
Exactly. There are scores of Ports of Entry and the Chinese Exclusion
Act applied to all.
... and it was a different time period.
Nope, the Chinese Exclusion Act became law in 1882.
And federal law applies throughout the United States.....
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:34:15 -0400, "Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 19 May 2025 08:22:15 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote<snip>
And the only ones being weeded out were for medical reasons. There
were no quotas or limits.
So people were being weeded out.....
And they could be weeded out now if they were crossing only at
authorized entry points.
Which by law they are required to do.
But can't do because quotas are so tight.
On 5/21/25 16:02, Governor Swill wrote:
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:34:15 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 19 May 2025 08:22:15 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote<snip>
And the only ones being weeded out were for medical reasons. There >>>>>> were no quotas or limits.
So people were being weeded out.....
And they could be weeded out now if they were crossing only at
authorized entry points.
Which by law they are required to do.
But can't do because quotas are so tight. It can take literally years
to get permission to emigrate to the US.
"years"? Try decades.
IIRC, legal immigration for the Philippines has a 70+ year long waitlist.
Since Trump is opening the doors to white Afrikaners, the MAGA claim of
"No more! WE'RE FULL!" is clearly seen as the racist lie that it is.
On Tue, 20 May 2025 14:47:03 -0400, "Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>news:100id3v$2ba12$[email protected]...
On 20/5/25 4:37, Scout wrote:
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:100gibj$1smsn$[email protected]...
On 19/5/25 13:32, pothead wrote:
Again, for the 1000th time, hire on merit the best person for
the job.
Gay, straight, black, white, female, male etc.
And for the 1000 and first time, do you anything if
discrimination is proven?
Yes, the racial profile doesn't closely match the population
profile as DEI requires.
You asked me to show you.. now you are refusing to even look at
the evidence you asked be presented.
Nothing. Your bigotry goes unpunished.
Says the person engaged in her own bigotry. I mean you DO know what it >>means
right?
However, if you want to say that calling for the best person to be hired
is
bigotry.. then everyone who hires on merit is a bigot according to you.
She said no such thing. You manufactured words for me to have said
recently as well.
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]> wrote
in
news:ph3s2k1jjur7va3966n5dn1rioubih278v@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck ing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:in
ralph <[email protected]> wrote in news:100j1sb$32n4q$[email protected]:
On 5/17/2025 8:33 PM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:100a7ge$eft2$[email protected]:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill >>>>>> <[email protected]> typed:
On Thu, 15 May 2025 13:32:14 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hardly since if that were the case.. a lot of black NFL players >>>would
need to be fired as per DEI standards the NFL is clearly engaged
sports.racial discrimination and are absolutely engaged in gender
discrimination. Not a single female player.
Yep, if we go with the mandates of DEI the NFL is a racist
organization that also refuses to hire female players.
No it's not....
Yes, it is, as are MLB and NBA and NIH and most professional
"max headroom" thinks "Pro Sports" is sports.
I suppose where you live it's "water sports"?
It's a for-profit entertainment business.
Baxter says if it's for profit and entertainment it's OK to
discriminate
KKKlaun loves to twist things. Like the rest of the Entertainment
industry, Pro "sports" has to choose from the pool of available talent.
DEI doesn't enter into it.
On Tue, 20 May 2025 14:48:02 -0400, "Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>news:100a7ga$eft2$[email protected]...
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill
<[email protected]> typed:
On Thu, 15 May 2025 13:34:00 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
And if that candidate is not a white male?
Why do you think their race or gender should matter?
Are you admitting to being a racist?
Interesting how when I propose a totally neutral standard.. you want to >>>>>drag
race and gender into it.
Here you go again, pretending not to be a bigot.
It's sad to watch, really.
Au contraire, it's hilarious watching you being hoisted on your own
petard!
Did I break Swill? He suddenly doesn't want to talk anymore.
About what?
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:36:57 -0400, "Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 19 May 2025 08:59:49 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
Ok, from now all you are responsible for feeding all the poor.
Nope. Doesn't work like that.
"No, I'd feed him. That's what America should do."
So lied when you said you would feed him,
Are your hormones out of whack or have you just gone blind? Look at
my sentence above that you've quoted, "No, I'd feed him. That's what
America should do." You've deleted everything else.
On Wed, 21 May 2025 01:05:27 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill >><[email protected]> typed:
On Mon, 19 May 2025 20:25:33 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Ask the people of China because China's sales of goods is very heavily >>>>biased
towards outside sales.
IOW they are not selling within country, overall.
Do you have a cite on this? China has a rapidly growing car market.
They're the number one consumer of electric vehicles.
https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/china-alone-trade-war-trump-tariffs
Your own cite just proved you wrong.
"Equally important is the strength of China's domestic economy. The
editorial notes that 85 percent of export-oriented firms also serve
the domestic market, with internal sales accounting for 75 percent of
their revenue-offering a built-in buffer against external
disruptions."
Did you catch that? 85% of export oriented firms have domestic sales
of 75% of their revenue. Domestic oriented firms clearly have an even
higher rate of domestic sales.
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:45:07 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
In short.. money is flowing INTO China's economy and flowing OUT of our >>economy. In the case of the US that is currently $918 Billion Dollars per >>year leaving our economy. $918 Billion dollars of goods, services, and
jobs
leaving our economy....
What difference does that make when *we* control the money supply?
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:46:20 -0400, "Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 19 May 2025 09:06:08 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
Well apparently he thinks only government can do things, when in reality >>>>government is often the worst organization for the job.
But only the government is required to make these all available to the
general public.
Well, then we simply remove the requirements.. and boy is that pissing off >>the liberals to no end.
Ah! So in your universe, it is ok for tax dollars to be spent on
social facilities that belong to private entities and at the same
time, disallow the public from using what they paid for.
In article <100m4gp$396cq$[email protected]>, bax02green
[email protected] says...
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Wed, 21 May 2025 16:22:42 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Enter legally and you will be welcomed.
This is your racism talking again. You know well the tight quotas
that effectively limit immigration to only tiny numbers from select
places.
Iow, most people wanting to immigrate *can't* come here legally.
They are deporting immigrants that entered legally. Some even had
cards.
If they commit crimes they gotta go.
Private enterprise has been shown to be consistently more efficient
that government.
On 5/22/2025 6:37 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
No, scooter, you idiotic liar. The MAGA (fucknozzles) cry *is* "No
"-hh" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:100lshe$2ve2q$[email protected]...
On 5/21/25 16:02, Governor Swill wrote:
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:34:15 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 19 May 2025 08:22:15 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote<snip>
And the only ones being weeded out were for medical reasons. >>>>>>>> There were no quotas or limits.
So people were being weeded out.....
And they could be weeded out now if they were crossing only at
authorized entry points.
Which by law they are required to do.
But can't do because quotas are so tight. It can take literally
years to get permission to emigrate to the US.
"years"? Try decades.
IIRC, legal immigration for the Philippines has a 70+ year long
waitlist.
Since Trump is opening the doors to white Afrikaners, the MAGA claim
of "No more! WE'RE FULL!" is clearly seen as the racist lie that it
is.
No, that would be true only if all immigration were shut down.
more! WE'RE FULL!" The fucknozzles *want* all immigration to be shut
down, scooter.
In article <100m4gp$396cq$[email protected]>, bax02So you're saying that rather than pardon the 1500 violent insurrectionists, Trump should have sent them to El Salvador instead.
[email protected] says...
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Wed, 21 May 2025 16:22:42 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Enter legally and you will be welcomed.
This is your racism talking again. You know well the tight quotas
that effectively limit immigration to only tiny numbers from select
places.
Iow, most people wanting to immigrate *can't* come here legally.
They are deporting immigrants that entered legally. Some even had green
cards.
If they commit crimes they gotta go.
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in news:MPG.4298af2a7ea9303198a158 @usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <100m4gp$396cq$[email protected]>, bax02green
[email protected] says...
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Wed, 21 May 2025 16:22:42 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Enter legally and you will be welcomed.
This is your racism talking again. You know well the tight quotas
that effectively limit immigration to only tiny numbers from select
places.
Iow, most people wanting to immigrate *can't* come here legally.
They are deporting immigrants that entered legally. Some even had
cards.
If they commit crimes they gotta go.
They are deporting/disppearing immigrants that have committed no crime -
not here, not anywhere.
===========
MSNBC anchor Katy Tur spoke to NBC News national correspondent David
Noriega this week about Widmer Josneyder Agelviz Sanguino, a Venezuelan refugee who entered the U.S. legally but has since been arrested,
deported, and jailed in El Salvador.
?He entered the United States legally. He was thoroughly vetted by the government?s refugee resettlement program, and he?s got no criminal
record to speak of. Yet, Widmer Agelvis is sitting in El Salvador?s CECOT prison,? Tur began, before asking Noriega for more details.
https://www.mediaite.com/media/tv/nbc-news-reports-trump-admin- effectively-disappeared-migrant-refugee-who-entered-the-u-s-legally/
============
HOUSTON, Texas (KTRK) -- Two Houston attorneys are fighting against the
U.S. government to find out where a Venezuelan refugee was taken after disappearing from ICE custody in March.
Now, a federal judge is demanding that the U.S. government, including ICE
and Homeland Security, confirm the whereabouts of Widmer Agelviz-Sanguino
and restore attorney-client communication.
"Widmer and his family were referred to refugee resettlement in the
United States through a UN program after being identified in Ecuador and
were vetted and granted permission to come to the United States," Rivera said.
Attorneys tell ABC13 that Sanguino, his two younger siblings, and his mom flew into Houston at George Bush Intercontinental Airport in September to start a new life.
"After being invited, after being provided travel documents to come to
the United States, he was arrested at the airport and told he was a gang member and we're going to deport you back to the place you fear most,"
Rivera said.
Rivera says border agents questioned Sanguino about his arm tattoo of a
rose, owl, and clock.
"They use tattoos as their end-all be-all for membership in this gang," Rivera said.
Sanguino's attorneys claim the tattoos all have special meanings to him. Rivera says the rose was a nod to Sanguino's grandmother, who loved her
rose bush garden. They say the owl and clock represent the area he grew
up in, which had owls that would always come in the middle of the night.
Attorneys say Sanguino was immediately taken into ICE custody from the airport.
https://abc13.com/post/us-government-ordered-grant-houston-attorneys- access-where-venezuelan-refugee-was-taken-disappearing-ice/16498932/
In article <46KXP.575024$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On 5/22/2025 3:49 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <100m4gp$396cq$[email protected]>, bax02So you're saying that rather than pardon the 1500 violent insurrectionists, >> Trump should have sent them to El Salvador instead.
[email protected] says...
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Wed, 21 May 2025 16:22:42 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Enter legally and you will be welcomed.
This is your racism talking again. You know well the tight quotas
that effectively limit immigration to only tiny numbers from select
places.
Iow, most people wanting to immigrate *can't* come here legally.
They are deporting immigrants that entered legally. Some even had green >>>> cards.
If they commit crimes they gotta go.
For once, you and I agree on something.
But I never said that
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:30:20 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Right.. meanwhile citizens complain of the lack of jobs, and inadequate
wages....
Yeah, whiny layabouts who can't be bothered doing a days work and
lying reporters complaining about problems that don't exist.
With unemployment at 5% (or less), anybody unable to find a job today
doesn't want one.
Excellent.. so you're saying we can suspend Welfare and Unemployment
benefits to everyone currently on them?
12.5% on welfare another 4.2% on unemployment...
That should do wonders to balance the budget.
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:34:15 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 19 May 2025 08:22:15 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote<snip>
And the only ones being weeded out were for medical reasons. There >>>>>> were no quotas or limits.
So people were being weeded out.....
And they could be weeded out now if they were crossing only at
authorized entry points.
Which by law they are required to do.
But can't do because quotas are so tight.
Oh, they can.. they just refuse to do so.
On 5/22/25 09:26, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:30:20 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Right.. meanwhile citizens complain of the lack of jobs, and
inadequate wages....
Yeah, whiny layabouts who can't be bothered doing a days work and
lying reporters complaining about problems that don't exist.
With unemployment at 5% (or less), anybody unable to find a job
today doesn't want one.
Excellent.. so you're saying we can suspend Welfare and Unemployment
benefits to everyone currently on them?
12.5% on welfare another 4.2% on unemployment...
That should do wonders to balance the budget.
72% of those on welfare (SNAP) have jobs, dummy.
On 5/22/25 09:26, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:30:20 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Right.. meanwhile citizens complain of the lack of jobs, and inadequate >>>> wages....
Yeah, whiny layabouts who can't be bothered doing a days work and
lying reporters complaining about problems that don't exist.
With unemployment at 5% (or less), anybody unable to find a job today
doesn't want one.
Excellent.. so you're saying we can suspend Welfare and Unemployment benefits
to everyone currently on them?
12.5% on welfare another 4.2% on unemployment...
That should do wonders to balance the budget.
72% of those on welfare (SNAP) have jobs, dummy.
On 5/22/2025 1:38 PM, -hh wrote:
On 5/22/25 09:26, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:30:20 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Right.. meanwhile citizens complain of the lack of jobs, and inadequate >>>>> wages....
Yeah, whiny layabouts who can't be bothered doing a days work and
lying reporters complaining about problems that don't exist.
With unemployment at 5% (or less), anybody unable to find a job today
doesn't want one.
Excellent.. so you're saying we can suspend Welfare and Unemployment benefits
to everyone currently on them?
12.5% on welfare another 4.2% on unemployment...
That should do wonders to balance the budget.
72% of those on welfare (SNAP) have jobs, dummy.
Incorrect.
Age distribution of SNAP participants by age, fiscal year 2022
Adults age 18-59 — 42.2%
Adults age 60 and older — 18.3%
Children younger than 5 — 11.6%
Children ages 5-17 — 28.0%
So 39.6% of all SNAP recipients are children below the age of 18, and 18.3% are
adults age 60 and older, most of whom are retired. That means no more than 50-55% of SNAP recipients might be working.
In article <2TLXP.1943$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On 5/22/2025 1:23 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <46KXP.575024$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On 5/22/2025 3:49 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <100m4gp$396cq$[email protected]>, bax02So you're saying that rather than pardon the 1500 violent insurrectionists,
[email protected] says...
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Wed, 21 May 2025 16:22:42 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Enter legally and you will be welcomed.
This is your racism talking again. You know well the tight quotas >>>>>>> that effectively limit immigration to only tiny numbers from select >>>>>>> places.
Iow, most people wanting to immigrate *can't* come here legally.
They are deporting immigrants that entered legally. Some even had green >>>>>> cards.
If they commit crimes they gotta go.
Trump should have sent them to El Salvador instead.
For once, you and I agree on something.
But I never said that
You did.
Nope.
Excellent.. so you're saying we can suspend Welfare and
Unemployment benefits to everyone currently on them?
12.5% on welfare another 4.2% on unemployment...
That should do wonders to balance the budget.
72% of those on welfare (SNAP) have jobs, dummy.
On 5/22/25 09:26, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:30:20 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Right.. meanwhile citizens complain of the lack of jobs, and inadequate >>> wages....
Yeah, whiny layabouts who can't be bothered doing a days work and
lying reporters complaining about problems that don't exist.
With unemployment at 5% (or less), anybody unable to find a job today
doesn't want one.
Excellent.. so you're saying we can suspend Welfare and Unemployment benefits to everyone currently on them?
12.5% on welfare another 4.2% on unemployment...
That should do wonders to balance the budget.
72% of those on welfare (SNAP) have jobs, dummy.
-hh
In article <USMXP.10759$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On 5/22/2025 2:40 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <2TLXP.1943$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On 5/22/2025 1:23 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <46KXP.575024$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On 5/22/2025 3:49 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <100m4gp$396cq$[email protected]>, bax02So you're saying that rather than pardon the 1500 violent insurrectionists,
[email protected] says...
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Wed, 21 May 2025 16:22:42 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:They are deporting immigrants that entered legally. Some even had green
Enter legally and you will be welcomed.
This is your racism talking again. You know well the tight quotas >>>>>>>>> that effectively limit immigration to only tiny numbers from select >>>>>>>>> places.
Iow, most people wanting to immigrate *can't* come here legally. >>>>>>>>
cards.
If they commit crimes they gotta go.
Trump should have sent them to El Salvador instead.
For once, you and I agree on something.
But I never said that
You did.
Nope.
Yep. I win again. I always win.
Once again, you said nothing.
That's right.
On Thu, 22 May 2025 13:56:56 -0700, Alan Bond <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 5/22/2025 1:38 PM, -hh wrote:
On 5/22/25 09:26, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:30:20 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Right.. meanwhile citizens complain of the lack of jobs, and inadequate >>>>>> wages....
Yeah, whiny layabouts who can't be bothered doing a days work and
lying reporters complaining about problems that don't exist.
With unemployment at 5% (or less), anybody unable to find a job today >>>>> doesn't want one.
Excellent.. so you're saying we can suspend Welfare and Unemployment benefits
to everyone currently on them?
12.5% on welfare another 4.2% on unemployment...
That should do wonders to balance the budget.
72% of those on welfare (SNAP) have jobs, dummy.
Incorrect.
Age distribution of SNAP participants by age, fiscal year 2022
Adults age 18-59 — 42.2%
Adults age 60 and older — 18.3%
Children younger than 5 — 11.6%
Children ages 5-17 — 28.0%
So 39.6% of all SNAP recipients are children below the age of 18, and 18.3% are
adults age 60 and older, most of whom are retired. That means no more than >> 50-55% of SNAP recipients might be working.
Nobody is citing?
On 22 May 2025, -hh <[email protected]> posted some news:100o1vb$3l8cq$[email protected]:
On 5/22/25 09:26, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:30:20 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Right.. meanwhile citizens complain of the lack of jobs, and
inadequate wages....
Yeah, whiny layabouts who can't be bothered doing a days work and
lying reporters complaining about problems that don't exist.
With unemployment at 5% (or less), anybody unable to find a job
today doesn't want one.
Excellent.. so you're saying we can suspend Welfare and Unemployment
benefits to everyone currently on them?
12.5% on welfare another 4.2% on unemployment...
That should do wonders to balance the budget.
72% of those on welfare (SNAP) have jobs, dummy.
Bullshit they do. Homeless druggies and sex offenders get it and they
don't have jobs. Illegal aliens get it and
they don't have jobs.
On Wed, 21 May 2025 01:05:27 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill >><[email protected]> typed:
On Mon, 19 May 2025 20:25:33 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Ask the people of China because China's sales of goods is very heavily >>>>biased towards outside sales.
IOW they are not selling within country, overall.
Do you have a cite on this? China has a rapidly growing car market.
They're the number one consumer of electric vehicles.
https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/china-alone-trade-war-trump-tariffs
Your own cite just proved you wrong.
"Equally important is the strength of China's domestic economy. The
editorial notes that 85 percent of export-oriented firms also serve
the domestic market, with internal sales accounting for 75 percent of
their revenue-offering a built-in buffer against external disruptions."
Did you catch that? 85% of export oriented firms have domestic sales
of 75% of their revenue. Domestic oriented firms clearly have an even
higher rate of domestic sales.
So I was right, China IS selling to itself and in large quantities.
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:29:21 -0400, "Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 19 May 2025 14:19:26 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
And also, based upon the ship's manifest, basic checks were done and known >>>>criminals, bad actors were refused entry into US.
At the time that was the best they could do, but at least they tried.
"The best they could do?"
You act as if they would have controlled immigration if they could.
They did control immigration....
Yeah, they limited it to twenty million over forty years at a time
when the total US population was less than eighty million.
"Between 1880 and 1920, over 20 million European immigrants arrived in
the United States. This period, which followed the Civil War and ended
with the beginning of World War I, saw a significant increase in
European immigration, driven by factors like rapid industrialization
and urbanization in the US, as well as economic and political
pressures in Europe"
Iow, by the end of the first world war, 25% of the US population were immigrants.
To match this performance, we would have to have allowed 70 million in
since 1984.
On 5/22/2025 7:50 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
Private enterprise has been shown to be consistently more efficient
that [sic] government.
What does "more efficient that government" mean, scooter? It appears I
may need to add that/than to the list of scooterisms.
There are some services that *only* government can provide, scooter,
meaning that even if you consider the provision of them to be
"inefficient," it is more efficient than not having it at all.
On Thu, 22 May 2025 09:36:10 -0400, "Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:There
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:34:15 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 19 May 2025 08:22:15 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote<snip>
And the only ones being weeded out were for medical reasons.
were no quotas or limits.
So people were being weeded out.....
And they could be weeded out now if they were crossing only at
authorized entry points.
Which by law they are required to do.
But can't do because quotas are so tight.
Oh, they can.. they just refuse to do so.
Bullshit. Stop lying to yourself. The waiting lists for legal entry
can run from years to decades.
Unless you're a white South African.
Which means they are willfully breaking the law and therefore should be >>weeded out. We do not need more criminals.
Then send those Africaners home.
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill <[email protected]> typed:
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:29:21 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 19 May 2025 14:19:26 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
And also, based upon the ship's manifest, basic checks were done and known
criminals, bad actors were refused entry into US.
At the time that was the best they could do, but at least they tried.
"The best they could do?"
You act as if they would have controlled immigration if they could.
They did control immigration....
Yeah, they limited it to twenty million over forty years at a time
when the total US population was less than eighty million.
"Between 1880 and 1920, over 20 million European immigrants arrived in
the United States. This period, which followed the Civil War and ended
with the beginning of World War I, saw a significant increase in
European immigration, driven by factors like rapid industrialization
and urbanization in the US, as well as economic and political
pressures in Europe"
Iow, by the end of the first world war, 25% of the US population were
immigrants.
To match this performance, we would have to have allowed 70 million in
since 1984.
70 million over 40 years. Biden let in over 10 million over 4 years.
Klaus Schadenfreude <[email protected]> wrote in news:LTHXP.27085$[email protected]:
On 5/22/2025 7:50 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
=============Private enterprise has been shown to be consistently more efficient
that [sic] government.
What does "more efficient that government" mean, scooter? It appears I
may need to add that/than to the list of scooterisms.
There are some services that *only* government can provide, scooter,
meaning that even if you consider the provision of them to be
"inefficient," it is more efficient than not having it at all.
AI Overview
There's no conclusive evidence to suggest that private companies are inherently more efficient than government organizations. While some
studies suggest private sector efficiency in certain areas, others show
that government can be just as, or even more, efficient. Efficiency differences depend on factors like the specific service, context, and how efficiency is defined.
This all happens*because* they're illegal. If they were legal, these problems would all go away.
I should have said that when local females mate with these sterilizedScrewworm flies lay their eggs in wounds in cattle and other
livestock, even humans. They hatch and begin feeding on the live
flesh causing pain and infection.
In labs in the US, we breed screwflies in specialized facilities.
These are then sterilized by radiation and dropped on breeding areas.
Using this sterile insect technique, Uncle has eliminated them here at
home. But it's more cost effective to only have to treat tiny Panama
rather than than half the lower 48. We've eliminated the flies in
Mexico and all the way south to Panama so we only have to treat there.
males, they lay eggs that won't hatch.
Skeeter OG <[email protected]> wrote in news:MPG.4298af2a7ea9303198a158 @usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <100m4gp$396cq$[email protected]>, bax02green
[email protected] says...
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Wed, 21 May 2025 16:22:42 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Enter legally and you will be welcomed.
This is your racism talking again. You know well the tight quotas
that effectively limit immigration to only tiny numbers from select
places.
Iow, most people wanting to immigrate *can't* come here legally.
They are deporting immigrants that entered legally. Some even had
cards.
If they commit crimes they gotta go.
They are deporting/disppearing immigrants that have committed no crime -
not here, not anywhere.
On 5/22/2025 6:38 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Tue, 20 May 2025 14:47:03 -0400, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper >>> and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and
lied:
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:100id3v$2ba12$[email protected]...
On 20/5/25 4:37, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
She said no such thing. You manufactured words for me to have said
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:100gibj$1smsn$[email protected]...
On 19/5/25 13:32, pothead wrote:
Again, for the 1000th time, hire on merit the best person for
the job.
Gay, straight, black, white, female, male etc.
And for the 1000 and first time, do you anything if
discrimination is proven?
Yes, the racial profile doesn't closely match the population
profile as DEI requires.
You asked me to show you.. now you are refusing to even look at
the evidence you asked be presented.
Nothing. Your bigotry goes unpunished.
Says the person engaged in her own bigotry. I mean you DO know what it >>>> means
right?
However, if you want to say that calling for the best person to be
hired is
bigotry.. then everyone who hires on merit is a bigot according to you. >>>
recently as well.
I manufactured NOTHING..
That's a lie, scooter. It's your usual straw man lying. "you want to say
that calling for the best person to be hired is bigotry" is a straw man, scooter.
On 5/22/2025 6:34 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:yKnXP.16951$[email protected]...
On 5/21/2025 5:32 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
Asians weren't entering the U.S. at Ellis Island, scooter.
"Baxter" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:100ioom$2dhki$[email protected]...
On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the >>>>> thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried — and
*failed* — to bullshit:
In news:100gqp6$222dt$[email protected], BaxterEllis Island was 20 years later and on the opposite coast.
<[email protected]> typed:
On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the >>>>>>> thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried — and >>>>>>> *failed* — to bullshit:
In news:W8KWP.742521$[email protected], Rudy Canoza, the
intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical >>>>>>>> superior to oozing scarlet red maxipad (whose mouth waters at the >>>>>>>> thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch) *wrote* (not >>>>>>>> "typed"):
On 5/19/2025 5:22 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and >>>>>>>>> gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled >>>>>>>>> and lied:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]...
On Fri, 16 May 2025 18:28:02 +0000, Mitchell Holman
<[email protected]> wrote:
scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit >>>>>>>>>>>> who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied: >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 15 May 2025 12:07:36 -0400, scooter, the drunken >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
yea, and we controlled immigration too....and deported >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> undesirables.
Not during our period of greatest growth. After the Civil >>>>>>>>>>>>>> War,
millions poured in. Minimal paperwork, nearly everybody who >>>>>>>>>>>>>> arrived was accepted.
But not everyone.....
Yes, everyone.
The steamship lines were forced to
take back to Europe - at their own expense -
everyone rejected for US admission. So the
liners conducted their own boarding inspections
and weeded out all the medical issue passengers
they knew would be rejected at Ellis Island.
Ergo most everyone getting to the US was admitted
to the US.
And the only ones being weeded out were for medical reasons. >>>>>>>>>>> There were no quotas or limits.
So people were being weeded out
Not by U.S. immigration enforcement, scooter. And not on the basis >>>>>>>>> of race or national origin, as you racist Nazis want to do.
https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/chinese-exclusion-act >>>>>>That wasn't Ellis Island,...
Exactly. There are scores of Ports of Entry and the Chinese Exclusion >>>>>> Act applied to all.
... and it was a different time period.
Nope, the Chinese Exclusion Act became law in 1882.
And federal law applies throughout the United States.....
Of course not, due to the Chinese Exclusion Act..
No, scooter — because they would have arrived on the west coast, you
stupid fuckwit, and that act didn't exclude all Asians. Fuck, you're
stupid!
On 5/22/2025 6:40 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Baxter" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:100l65g$2vm86$[email protected]...
KKKlaun "Cunt Flaps" SchittenPantzen, impotent and harmless Nazi fake
Jew and cocksucking dwarf, lied:
No one is "forced" to do that, scooter, and that's not what DEI is about.
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:in
ralph <[email protected]> wrote in
news:100j1sb$32n4q$[email protected]:
On 5/17/2025 8:33 PM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:100a7ge$eft2$[email protected]:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> typed:
On Thu, 15 May 2025 13:32:14 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hardly since if that were the case.. a lot of black NFL players >>>>> would
need to be fired as per DEI standards the NFL is clearly engaged
sports.racial discrimination and are absolutely engaged in gender >>>>>>>>>> discrimination. Not a single female player.
Yep, if we go with the mandates of DEI the NFL is a racist >>>>>>>>>> organization that also refuses to hire female players.
No it's not....
Yes, it is, as are MLB and NBA and NIH and most professional
"max headroom" thinks "Pro Sports" is sports.
I suppose where you live it's "water sports"?
It's a for-profit entertainment business.
Baxter says if it's for profit and entertainment it's OK to
discriminate
KKKlaun loves to twist things. Like the rest of the Entertainment
industry, Pro "sports" has to choose from the pool of available talent.
DEI doesn't enter into it.
Wow.. they can select from the available talent.. but everyone else has
to select based on racial profile...
You can't cite a single instance of anyone hiring a less qualified person
for any position because of your caricature of DEI.
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]> wrote
in news:jres2k17t92mb3iicd0k9cm4roemdu4a6r@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuckin g.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
Like the rest of the Entertainment
industry, Pro "sports" has to choose from the pool of available talent. >>>DEI doesn't enter into it.
That's because they want to succeed,
Where "success" = money, greed
On 5/22/2025 7:19 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Tue, 20 May 2025 14:48:02 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:100a7ga$eft2$[email protected]...
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill
<[email protected]> typed:
On Thu, 15 May 2025 13:34:00 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
And if that candidate is not a white male?
Why do you think their race or gender should matter?
Are you admitting to being a racist?
Interesting how when I propose a totally neutral standard.. you want >>>>>>> to
drag
race and gender into it.
Here you go again, pretending not to be a bigot.
It's sad to watch, really.
Au contraire, it's hilarious watching you being hoisted on your own
petard!
Did I break Swill? He suddenly doesn't want to talk anymore.
About what?
And just like that,
A scooterism
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:36:57 -0400, "Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 19 May 2025 08:59:49 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
Ok, from now all you are responsible for feeding all the poor.
Nope. Doesn't work like that.
"No, I'd feed him. That's what America should do."
So lied when you said you would feed him,
Are your hormones out of whack or have you just gone blind? Look at
my sentence above that you've quoted, "No, I'd feed him. That's what
America should do." You've deleted everything else.
On 5/22/2025 7:20 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
No, scooter, you liar. He applies them to all of us, scooter.
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:36:57 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 19 May 2025 08:59:49 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
Ok, from now all you are responsible for feeding all the poor.
Nope. Doesn't work like that.
"No, I'd feed him. That's what America should do."
So lied when you said you would feed him,
Are your hormones out of whack or have you just gone blind? Look at
my sentence above that you've quoted, "No, I'd feed him. That's what
America should do." You've deleted everything else.
I see.. so your principles are only for OTHER PEOPLE... they don't apply
to you.
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:46:20 -0400, "Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 19 May 2025 09:06:08 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
Well apparently he thinks only government can do things, when in reality >>>>government is often the worst organization for the job.
But only the government is required to make these all available to the
general public.
Well, then we simply remove the requirements.. and boy is that pissing off >>the liberals to no end.
Ah! So in your universe, it is ok for tax dollars to be spent on
social facilities that belong to private entities and at the same
time, disallow the public from using what they paid for.
--
https://www.usgovernmentspending.com/federal_budget
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:46:20 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 19 May 2025 09:06:08 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
Well apparently he thinks only government can do things, when in
reality
government is often the worst organization for the job.
But only the government is required to make these all available to the >>>> general public.
Well, then we simply remove the requirements.. and boy is that
pissing off
the liberals to no end.
Ah! So in your universe, it is ok for tax dollars to be spent on
social facilities that belong to private entities and at the same
time, disallow the public from using what they paid for.
--
https://www.usgovernmentspending.com/federal_budget
Nope, you are the one suggesting the government become involved. Why
should our tax money be involved in the bulk of what government gets
involved in?
On 5/22/25 1:20 PM, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:46:20 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 19 May 2025 09:06:08 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
Well apparently he thinks only government can do things, when in
reality
government is often the worst organization for the job.
But only the government is required to make these all available to
the general public.
Well, then we simply remove the requirements.. and boy is that
pissing off
the liberals to no end.
Ah! So in your universe, it is ok for tax dollars to be spent on
social facilities that belong to private entities and at the same
time, disallow the public from using what they paid for.
--
https://www.usgovernmentspending.com/federal_budget
Nope, you are the one suggesting the government become involved. Why
should our tax money be involved in the bulk of what government gets
involved in?
government fucks up everything it touches.
On Thu, 22 May 2025 10:50:25 -0400, "Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:46:20 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 19 May 2025 09:06:08 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
Well apparently he thinks only government can do things, when in >>>>>>reality
government is often the worst organization for the job.
But only the government is required to make these all available to the >>>>> general public.
Well, then we simply remove the requirements.. and boy is that pissing >>>>off
the liberals to no end.
Ah! So in your universe, it is ok for tax dollars to be spent on
social facilities that belong to private entities and at the same
time, disallow the public from using what they paid for.
Private enterprise has been shown to be consistently more efficient that >>government.
So?
One does not have to commit a crime to become deportable.
Affiliation with a criminal gang is totally adequate, Lying to
officials, even civil offenses can be cause.
On Thu, 22 May 2025 10:48:27 -0400, "Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 01:05:27 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill >>>><[email protected]> typed:
On Mon, 19 May 2025 20:25:33 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Ask the people of China because China's sales of goods is very heavily >>>>>>biased
towards outside sales.
IOW they are not selling within country, overall.
Do you have a cite on this? China has a rapidly growing car market. >>>>> They're the number one consumer of electric vehicles.
https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/china-alone-trade-war-trump-tariffs
Your own cite just proved you wrong.
"Equally important is the strength of China's domestic economy. The
editorial notes that 85 percent of export-oriented firms also serve
the domestic market, with internal sales accounting for 75 percent of
their revenue-offering a built-in buffer against external
disruptions."
Did you catch that? 85% of export oriented firms have domestic sales
of 75% of their revenue. Domestic oriented firms clearly have an even
higher rate of domestic sales.
Yea, and now you show us where we are the same or better....
No. I proved you were wrong. That's enough.
On Thu, 22 May 2025 09:19:07 -0400, "Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 16:22:42 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Enter legally and you will be welcomed.
This is your racism talking again. You know well the tight quotas
that effectively limit immigration to only tiny numbers from select
places.
Iow, most people wanting to immigrate *can't* come here legally.
Sure they can.. they just have to 'get in line' like everyone else.
That can take decades. We need to open the flow up some.
On Thu, 22 May 2025 09:20:18 -0400, "Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:
"Baxter" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>news:100m4gp$396cq$[email protected]...
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Wed, 21 May 2025 16:22:42 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Enter legally and you will be welcomed.
This is your racism talking again. You know well the tight quotas
that effectively limit immigration to only tiny numbers from select
places.
Iow, most people wanting to immigrate *can't* come here legally.
They are deporting immigrants that entered legally. Some even had green
cards.
Yep, when they commit crime or lied about their involvement with criminal >>gangs, or otherwise were identified as having lied to gain entry.. they >>become immediately deportable.
Which is the judge's decision.
Due Process.
On 5/22/25 09:36, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:34:15 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 19 May 2025 08:22:15 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote<snip>
And the only ones being weeded out were for medical reasons. There >>>>>>> were no quotas or limits.
So people were being weeded out.....
And they could be weeded out now if they were crossing only at
authorized entry points.
Which by law they are required to do.
But can't do because quotas are so tight.
Oh, they can.. they just refuse to do so.
But if that were true, there wouldn't be wait times.
On Thu, 22 May 2025 09:36:10 -0400, "Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:34:15 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 19 May 2025 08:22:15 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote<snip>
And the only ones being weeded out were for medical reasons. There >>>>>>> were no quotas or limits.
So people were being weeded out.....
And they could be weeded out now if they were crossing only at
authorized entry points.
Which by law they are required to do.
But can't do because quotas are so tight.
Oh, they can.. they just refuse to do so.
Bullshit. Stop lying to yourself. The waiting lists for legal entry
can run from years to decades.
On 22/5/25 10:01, Scout wrote:
One does not have to commit a crime to become deportable.
Affiliation with a criminal gang is totally adequate, Lying to
officials, even civil offenses can be cause.
We have laws on what is deportable. And with that comes due process to determine whether a law has been triggerred. I do not have to agree with a law to demand it be obeyed--including the Bill of Rights.
On Tue, 20 May 2025 14:48:02 -0400, "Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>news:100a7ga$eft2$[email protected]...
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill
<[email protected]> typed:
On Thu, 15 May 2025 13:34:00 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
And if that candidate is not a white male?
Why do you think their race or gender should matter?
Are you admitting to being a racist?
Interesting how when I propose a totally neutral standard.. you want to >>>>>drag
race and gender into it.
Here you go again, pretending not to be a bigot.
It's sad to watch, really.
Au contraire, it's hilarious watching you being hoisted on your own
petard!
Did I break Swill? He suddenly doesn't want to talk anymore.
About what?
On 5/22/25 1:20 PM, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:46:20 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 19 May 2025 09:06:08 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
Well apparently he thinks only government can do things, when in
reality
government is often the worst organization for the job.
But only the government is required to make these all available to the >>>>> general public.
Well, then we simply remove the requirements.. and boy is that pissing >>>> off
the liberals to no end.
Ah! So in your universe, it is ok for tax dollars to be spent on
social facilities that belong to private entities and at the same
time, disallow the public from using what they paid for.
--
https://www.usgovernmentspending.com/federal_budget
Nope, you are the one suggesting the government become involved. Why
should our tax money be involved in the bulk of what government gets
involved in?
government fucks up everything it touches.
We have laws on what is deportable. And with that comes due
process to determine whether a law has been triggerred. I do
not have to agree with a law to demand it be obeyed--including
the Bill of Rights.
"The Supreme Court unanimously ruled Tuesday that federal courts
cannot review immigration officials' decisions to revoke
previously approved visa petitions, a decision that could
significantly strengthen executive power over immigration.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, writing for a unanimous Court,
stated that visa revocations are purely discretionary decisions
by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) that Congress has
placed beyond judicial review."
https://www.boundless.com/blog/supreme-court-rules-courts-cant-review-visa-revocations/
You were saying?
That I could agree with, but we have to do it the right way.. not
simply decide to ignore the law.
In article <100o1vb$3l8cq$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On 5/22/25 09:26, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:30:20 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Right.. meanwhile citizens complain of the lack of jobs, and inadequate >>>>> wages....
Yeah, whiny layabouts who can't be bothered doing a days work and
lying reporters complaining about problems that don't exist.
With unemployment at 5% (or less), anybody unable to find a job today
doesn't want one.
Excellent.. so you're saying we can suspend Welfare and Unemployment
benefits to everyone currently on them?
12.5% on welfare another 4.2% on unemployment...
That should do wonders to balance the budget.
72% of those on welfare (SNAP) have jobs, dummy.
-hh
Then get better jobs.
On 5/22/2025 1:38 PM, -hh wrote:
On 5/22/25 09:26, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:30:20 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Right.. meanwhile citizens complain of the lack of jobs, and
inadequate
wages....
Yeah, whiny layabouts who can't be bothered doing a days work and
lying reporters complaining about problems that don't exist.
With unemployment at 5% (or less), anybody unable to find a job today
doesn't want one.
Excellent.. so you're saying we can suspend Welfare and Unemployment
benefits to everyone currently on them?
12.5% on welfare another 4.2% on unemployment...
That should do wonders to balance the budget.
72% of those on welfare (SNAP) have jobs, dummy.
Incorrect.
Age distribution of SNAP participants by age, fiscal year 2022
Adults age 18-59 — 42.2%
Adults age 60 and older — 18.3%
Children younger than 5 — 11.6%
Children ages 5-17 — 28.0%
So 39.6% of all SNAP recipients are children below the age of 18, and
18.3% are adults age 60 and older, most of whom are retired. That means
no more than 50-55% of SNAP recipients might be working.
Bullshit. Stop lying to yourself. The waiting lists for legal
entry
can run from years to decades.
Well shit... I guess they have to wait then.
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 22 May 2025 09:36:10 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:34:15 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 19 May 2025 08:22:15 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote<snip>
And the only ones being weeded out were for medical reasons. There >>>>>>>> were no quotas or limits.
So people were being weeded out.....
And they could be weeded out now if they were crossing only at
authorized entry points.
Which by law they are required to do.
But can't do because quotas are so tight.
Oh, they can.. they just refuse to do so.
Bullshit. Stop lying to yourself. The waiting lists for legal entry
can run from years to decades.
Well shit... I guess they have to wait then.
"-hh" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:100o29f$3l8cq$[email protected]...
On 5/22/25 09:36, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:34:15 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 19 May 2025 08:22:15 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote<snip>
And the only ones being weeded out were for medical reasons. There >>>>>>>> were no quotas or limits.
So people were being weeded out.....
And they could be weeded out now if they were crossing only at
authorized entry points.
Which by law they are required to do.
But can't do because quotas are so tight.
Oh, they can.. they just refuse to do so.
But if that were true, there wouldn't be wait times.
And you are saying they can't/shouldn't wait because???
When I come over, I will remember that I don't have to wait for
you to answer the door, I should just walk in.
On 5/22/2025 9:07 AM, max headroom wrote:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill
<[email protected]> typed:
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:29:21 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 19 May 2025 14:19:26 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
And also, based upon the ship's manifest, basic checks were done
and known
criminals, bad actors were refused entry into US.
At the time that was the best they could do, but at least they tried.
"The best they could do?"
You act as if they would have controlled immigration if they could.
They did control immigration....
Yeah, they limited it to twenty million over forty years at a time
when the total US population was less than eighty million.
"Between 1880 and 1920, over 20 million European immigrants arrived in
the United States. This period, which followed the Civil War and ended
with the beginning of World War I, saw a significant increase in
European immigration, driven by factors like rapid industrialization
and urbanization in the US, as well as economic and political
pressures in Europe"
Iow, by the end of the first world war, 25% of the US population were
immigrants.
To match this performance, we would have to have allowed 70 million in
since 1984.
70 million over 40 years. Biden let in over 10 million over 4 years.
Easily.
He didn't do much about the overstays either.
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 22 May 2025 09:19:07 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 16:22:42 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Enter legally and you will be welcomed.
This is your racism talking again. You know well the tight quotas
that effectively limit immigration to only tiny numbers from select
places.
Iow, most people wanting to immigrate *can't* come here legally.
Sure they can.. they just have to 'get in line' like everyone else.
That can take decades. We need to open the flow up some.
That I could agree with, but we have to do it the right way.. not simply decide to ignore the law.
Private enterprise has been shown to be consistently more
efficient that
government.
So?
So it goes to my point. Which you apparently missed or ignored,
again.
Diversity, equity, inclusion. Which of these do the red boys fear the
most?
On Thu, 22 May 2025 09:36:10 -0400, "Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:34:15 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 19 May 2025 08:22:15 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote
<snip>
And the only ones being weeded out were for medical reasons. There >>>>>>> were no quotas or limits.
So people were being weeded out.....
And they could be weeded out now if they were crossing only at
authorized entry points.
Which by law they are required to do.
But can't do because quotas are so tight.
Oh, they can.. they just refuse to do so.
Bullshit. Stop lying to yourself. The waiting lists for legal entry
can run from years to decades.
Unless you're a white South African.
Which means they are willfully breaking the law and therefore should be >>weeded out. We do not need more criminals.
Then send those Africaners home.
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in news:100negt$3h5nl$[email protected]:
Private enterprise has been shown to be consistently more efficient
that government.
Then why is private enterprize always...
... turning to government for a
bailout and price supports?
On Thu, 22 May 2025 10:50:25 -0400, "Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:
Private enterprise has been shown to be consistently more efficient that >>government.
So?
Does that mean we should put private business in charge of say, city
parks? Trash collection? Prisons? Water systems?
We've been privatizing stuff like this for decades and the end result
has been more black money in more political pockets.
On 5/22/25 17:47, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <100o1vb$3l8cq$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On 5/22/25 09:26, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:30:20 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Right.. meanwhile citizens complain of the lack of jobs, and inadequate >>>>> wages....
Yeah, whiny layabouts who can't be bothered doing a days work and
lying reporters complaining about problems that don't exist.
With unemployment at 5% (or less), anybody unable to find a job today >>>> doesn't want one.
Excellent.. so you're saying we can suspend Welfare and Unemployment
benefits to everyone currently on them?
12.5% on welfare another 4.2% on unemployment...
That should do wonders to balance the budget.
72% of those on welfare (SNAP) have jobs, dummy.
-hh
Then get better jobs.
No, raising the Federal Minimum Wage is what's required.
Because its officially a ?poverty wage,? as its annual earnings
potential for a single adult working full-time, year-round falls below
the DHHS's poverty threshold of $15,650.
This is an illustration of how companies like WalMart benefit from
indirect forms of Corporate Welfare such as this.
Of course, if we're not going to simply raise the minimum, one could
propose having a database crosswalk between tax records and things like
the SNAP program to be able backcharge the employer ... but we also know
that the consequence of doing that is that they would discriminate by choosing to avoid hiring workers who may have children/etc. Even so,
the above poverty metric is already "single adult".
-hh
On 5/23/2025 6:49 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 22 May 2025 10:50:25 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:46:20 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 19 May 2025 09:06:08 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
Well apparently he thinks only government can do things, when
in reality government is often the worst organization for the
job.
But only the government is required to make these all available
to the general public.
Well, then we simply remove the requirements.. and boy is that
pissing off the liberals to no end.
Ah! So in your universe, it is ok for tax dollars to be spent on
social facilities that belong to private entities and at the same
time, disallow the public from using what they paid for.
Private enterprise has been shown to be consistently more efficient
that government.
So?
So it goes to my point. Which you apparently missed or ignored,
again.
You've never had a substantive point in over two decades of pissing
away your worthless time in Usenet, scooter. You're just a really
shitty troll, scooter.
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill <[email protected]> typed:
On Thu, 22 May 2025 09:36:10 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:34:15 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 19 May 2025 08:22:15 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote
<snip>
And the only ones being weeded out were for medical reasons.
There were no quotas or limits.
So people were being weeded out.....
And they could be weeded out now if they were crossing only at
authorized entry points.
Which by law they are required to do.
But can't do because quotas are so tight.
Oh, they can.. they just refuse to do so.
Bullshit. Stop lying to yourself. The waiting lists for legal entry
can run from years to decades.
Unless you're a white South African.
Which means they are willfully breaking the law and therefore should
be weeded out. We do not need more criminals.
Then send those Africaners home.
What crimes did they commit?
On 5/23/2025 6:46 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Tue, 20 May 2025 14:48:02 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:100a7ga$eft2$[email protected]...
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill
<[email protected]> typed:
On Thu, 15 May 2025 13:34:00 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
And if that candidate is not a white male?
Why do you think their race or gender should matter?
Are you admitting to being a racist?
Interesting how when I propose a totally neutral standard.. you
want to drag
race and gender into it.
Here you go again, pretending not to be a bigot.
It's sad to watch, really.
Au contraire, it's hilarious watching you being hoisted on your
own petard!
Did I break Swill? He suddenly doesn't want to talk anymore.
About what?
Now Swill pretends to have no idea why while ignoring the point I
made above.
You didn't make a point, scooter. You never make a substantive point, scooter, you lying shitbag.
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill <[email protected]> typed:
Diversity, equity, inclusion. Which of these do the red boys fear the
most?
Equity. When you mandate equal outcomes, everybody becomes lazy.
On 22/5/25 22:08, Governor Swill wrote:
I should have said that when local females mate with these sterilizedScrewworm flies lay their eggs in wounds in cattle and other
livestock, even humans. They hatch and begin feeding on the live
flesh causing pain and infection.
In labs in the US, we breed screwflies in specialized facilities.
These are then sterilized by radiation and dropped on breeding areas. >>>>Using this sterile insect technique, Uncle has eliminated them here at >>>>home. But it's more cost effective to only have to treat tiny Panama >>>>rather than than half the lower 48. We've eliminated the flies in >>>>Mexico and all the way south to Panama so we only have to treat there.
males, they lay eggs that won't hatch.
Birth control is immoral. It is an affront to the gods. If
wimmenflies are going to screw any screwfly that waddles by, they
deserve to get pregnant.
In <100pmae$2btf$[email protected]> Siri said:areas.
On 22/5/25 22:08, Governor Swill wrote:
Screwworm flies lay their eggs in wounds in cattle and other >>>>>livestock, even humans. They hatch and begin feeding on the live >>>>>flesh causing pain and infection.
In labs in the US, we breed screwflies in specialized facilities. >>>>>These are then sterilized by radiation and dropped on breeding
atUsing this sterile insect technique, Uncle has eliminated them here
Panamahome. But it's more cost effective to only have to treat tiny
there.rather than than half the lower 48. We've eliminated the flies in >>>>>Mexico and all the way south to Panama so we only have to treat
I should have said that when local females mate with these sterilized
males, they lay eggs that won't hatch.
Birth control is immoral. It is an affront to the gods. If
wimmenflies are going to screw any screwfly that waddles by, they
deserve to get pregnant.
If they kept their wings together they wouldn't have that problem.
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in news:100q766$5mmp$[email protected]:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill
<[email protected]> typed:
On Thu, 22 May 2025 09:36:10 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:34:15 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>>news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 19 May 2025 08:22:15 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote
<snip>
And the only ones being weeded out were for medical reasons. >>>>>>>>> There were no quotas or limits.
So people were being weeded out.....
And they could be weeded out now if they were crossing only at
authorized entry points.
Which by law they are required to do.
But can't do because quotas are so tight.
Oh, they can.. they just refuse to do so.
Bullshit. Stop lying to yourself. The waiting lists for legal entry
can run from years to decades.
Unless you're a white South African.
Which means they are willfully breaking the law and therefore should
be weeded out. We do not need more criminals.
Then send those Africaners home.
What crimes did they commit?
They lied about genocide.
On 5/22/25 17:47, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <100o1vb$3l8cq$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On 5/22/25 09:26, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:30:20 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Right.. meanwhile citizens complain of the lack of jobs, and inadequate >>>>>> wages....
Yeah, whiny layabouts who can't be bothered doing a days work and
lying reporters complaining about problems that don't exist.
With unemployment at 5% (or less), anybody unable to find a job today >>>>> doesn't want one.
Excellent.. so you're saying we can suspend Welfare and Unemployment
benefits to everyone currently on them?
12.5% on welfare another 4.2% on unemployment...
That should do wonders to balance the budget.
72% of those on welfare (SNAP) have jobs, dummy.
-hh
Then get better jobs.
No, raising the Federal Minimum Wage is what's required.
Because its officially a “poverty wage,” as its annual earnings potential for a
single adult working full-time, year-round falls below the DHHS's poverty threshold of $15,650.
This is an illustration of how companies like WalMart benefit from indirect forms of Corporate Welfare such as this.
Of course, if we're not going to simply raise the minimum, one could propose having a database crosswalk between tax records and things like the SNAP program
to be able backcharge the employer ... but we also know that the consequence of
doing that is that they would discriminate by choosing to avoid hiring workers
who may have children/etc. Even so, the above poverty metric is already "single
adult".
-hh
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:100q76c$5mmp$3@dont- email.me:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill"Equity" is NOT about "equal" - it is: "the quality of being fair and >>impartial."
<[email protected]> typed:
Diversity, equity, inclusion. Which of these do the red boys fear
the most?
Equity. When you mandate equal outcomes, everybody becomes lazy.
DEI is not about any of that.
On 5/23/2025 8:40 AM, -hh wrote:
On 5/22/25 17:47, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <100o1vb$3l8cq$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On 5/22/25 09:26, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:30:20 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Right.. meanwhile citizens complain of the lack of jobs, and
inadequate wages....
Yeah, whiny layabouts who can't be bothered doing a days work and
lying reporters complaining about problems that don't exist.
With unemployment at 5% (or less), anybody unable to find a job
today doesn't want one.
Excellent.. so you're saying we can suspend Welfare and
Unemployment benefits to everyone currently on them?
12.5% on welfare another 4.2% on unemployment...
That should do wonders to balance the budget.
72% of those on welfare (SNAP) have jobs, dummy.
-hh
Then get better jobs.
No, raising the Federal Minimum Wage is what's required.
Because its officially a “poverty wage,” as its annual earnings
potential for a single adult working full-time, year-round falls
below the DHHS's poverty threshold of $15,650.
This is an illustration of how companies like WalMart benefit from
indirect forms of Corporate Welfare such as this.
No, they don't. Welfare benefits to low income people *raise* the
reservation wage. It means Walmart has to pay people *more* than they otherwise would.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reservation_wage https://www.nber.org/digest/jun14/what-determines-reservation-wage-unem ployed-workers
Parents, teach your boys to respect girls/women.
On 5/23/2025 8:40 AM, -hh wrote:
On 5/22/25 17:47, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <100o1vb$3l8cq$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On 5/22/25 09:26, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:30:20 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Right.. meanwhile citizens complain of the lack of jobs, and inadequate >>>>>>> wages....
Yeah, whiny layabouts who can't be bothered doing a days work and
lying reporters complaining about problems that don't exist.
With unemployment at 5% (or less), anybody unable to find a job today >>>>>> doesn't want one.
Excellent.. so you're saying we can suspend Welfare and Unemployment >>>>> benefits to everyone currently on them?
12.5% on welfare another 4.2% on unemployment...
That should do wonders to balance the budget.
72% of those on welfare (SNAP) have jobs, dummy.
-hh
Then get better jobs.
No, raising the Federal Minimum Wage is what's required.
Because its officially a “poverty wage,†as its annual earnings potential for a
single adult working full-time, year-round falls below the DHHS's poverty
threshold of $15,650.
This is an illustration of how companies like WalMart benefit from indirect >> forms of Corporate Welfare such as this.
No, they don't. Welfare benefits to low income people *raise* the reservation wage. It means Walmart has to pay people *more* than they otherwise would.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reservation_wage https://www.nber.org/digest/jun14/what-determines-reservation-wage-unemployed-workers
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 22 May 2025 09:19:07 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 16:22:42 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Enter legally and you will be welcomed.
This is your racism talking again. You know well the tight quotas
that effectively limit immigration to only tiny numbers from select
places.
Iow, most people wanting to immigrate *can't* come here legally.
Sure they can.. they just have to 'get in line' like everyone else.
That can take decades. We need to open the flow up some.
That I could agree with, but we have to do it the right way.. not simply decide to ignore the law.
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in news:100q76c$5mmp$3@dont- >>email.me:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill"Equity" is NOT about "equal" - it is: "the quality of being fair and >>impartial."
<[email protected]> typed:
Diversity, equity, inclusion. Which of these do the red boys fear the >>>> most?
Equity. When you mandate equal outcomes, everybody becomes lazy.
DEI is not about any of that.
On 5/22/2025 7:50 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:46:20 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 19 May 2025 09:06:08 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
Well apparently he thinks only government can do things, when in
reality
government is often the worst organization for the job.
But only the government is required to make these all available to the >>>>> general public.
Well, then we simply remove the requirements.. and boy is that
pissing off
the liberals to no end.
Ah! So in your universe, it is ok for tax dollars to be spent on
social facilities that belong to private entities and at the same
time, disallow the public from using what they paid for.
Private enterprise has been shown to be consistently more efficient
that [sic]
government.
What does "more efficient that government" mean, scooter? It appears I
may need to add that/than to the list of scooterisms.
There are some services that *only* government can provide, scooter,
meaning that even if you consider the provision of them to be
"inefficient," it is more efficient than not having it at all.
On 5/19/2025 6:06 AM, scooter [wrote]:
Well apparently he thinks only government can do things, when in
reality government is often the worst organization for the job.
scooter thinks national defense, air traffic control and the courts
system can be provided by private enterprise. scooter thinks a lot of
stupid bullshit.
On 5/22/25 11:49, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
On 5/19/2025 6:06 AM, scooter [wrote]:
Well apparently he thinks only government can do things, when in
reality government is often the worst organization for the job.
scooter thinks national defense, air traffic control and the courts
system can be provided by private enterprise. scooter thinks a lot of
stupid bullshit.
Well, to some level they _can_, but the question will be how much more
do they cost since there's the additional expense of profit incentive,
plus that of contracts management. Defense contractors being a prime example.
On 2025-05-24, Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter>
wrote:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>news:100q76c$5mmp$3@dont- email.me:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill"Equity" is NOT about "equal" - it is: "the quality of being fair and >>>impartial."
<[email protected]> typed:
Diversity, equity, inclusion. Which of these do the red boys fear
the most?
Equity. When you mandate equal outcomes, everybody becomes lazy.
DEI is not about any of that.
It's not.
DEI is actually racism in reverse.
In the 60's and 70's affirmative action failed and so will DEI.
Hire the most qualified applicant for the position.
On 2025-05-23, Scout <[email protected]>
wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 22 May 2025 09:19:07 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 16:22:42 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Enter legally and you will be welcomed.
This is your racism talking again. You know well the tight quotas
that effectively limit immigration to only tiny numbers from
select places.
Iow, most people wanting to immigrate *can't* come here legally.
Sure they can.. they just have to 'get in line' like everyone else.
That can take decades. We need to open the flow up some.
That I could agree with, but we have to do it the right way.. not
simply decide to ignore the law.
The system is a mess and needs to be streamlined.
That should be the next step after deporting as many of the illegals
as possible. And then, people who truly want to come to US and improve
their lives can apply and be assured that they will have a hearing
quickly instead of waiting years.
On 2025-05-24, Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter> wrote:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in news:100q76c$5mmp$3@dont- >>> email.me:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill"Equity" is NOT about "equal" - it is: "the quality of being fair and
<[email protected]> typed:
Diversity, equity, inclusion. Which of these do the red boys fear the >>>>> most?
Equity. When you mandate equal outcomes, everybody becomes lazy.
impartial."
DEI is not about any of that.
It's not.
DEI is actually racism in reverse.
In the 60's and 70's affirmative action failed and so will DEI.
Hire the most qualified applicant for the position.
End of story.
On 5/25/2025 8:27 AM, -hh wrote:
On 5/22/25 11:49, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:In public finance economics, defense — and lighthouses — are the *classic*
On 5/19/2025 6:06 AM, scooter wrote:
Well apparently he thinks only government can do things, when in reality >>>> government is often the worst organization for the job.
scooter thinks national defense, air traffic control and the courts system >>> can be provided by private enterprise. scooter thinks a lot of stupid bullshit.
Well, to some level they _can_, but the question will be how much more do they
cost since there's the additional expense of profit incentive, plus that of >> contracts management. Defense contractors being a prime example.
public goods that, for practical reasons, need to be provided by the government.
A public good is defined as a good for which one person's consumption does not
reduce the amount available for someone else. If strategic bombers provide reliable protection against nuclear attack, then if I am protected against nuclear attack, that doesn't reduce the protection provided to you or anyone else. A can of beer, by contrast, is a private good, or what economists call "rivalrous" goods: if I drink it, you can.
Public goods need to be provided by the government because of the free rider problem. People want the good but have no incentive to pay for it if they think
someone else will pay for it. But if everyone thinks that, and they will, then
*no one* will pay for it, and the good will not be produced and provided.
It all comes down to the ability to exclude free riders. If free riders can be
excluded costlessly, or at low cost, they will be and the public good becomes a
private good. An example is a sporting event or a concert. If two teams play baseball in a public park, anyone can walk up and watch the game (up to a point
— if 500,000 surround the playing field, those at the back won't be able to see
the game being played). But if you put the contest or a music concert inside an
arena or stadium, and allow the provider to exclude non-paying fans, now you've
converted the public good into a private one, and anyone wishing to consume the
event *must* pay to get inside.
The lighthouse is the true classic public good. If one ship is safely guided past the rocks into the harbor, that doesn't reduce the amount of lighthouse services available for other ships. But no ship owner has an incentive to pay for the construction and operation of the lighthouse. So, the government builds
the lighthouse, and either charges all citizens for it — because that's who
benefits ultimately from cargo ships — or apportions the cost to the shipping
companies through docking fees.
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:100v7ln$1cvf9$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-24, Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter>
wrote:
Default Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>news:100q76c$5mmp$3@dont- email.me:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill"Equity" is NOT about "equal" - it is: "the quality of being fair and >>>>impartial."
<[email protected]> typed:
Diversity, equity, inclusion. Which of these do the red boys fear >>>>>> the most?
Equity. When you mandate equal outcomes, everybody becomes lazy.
DEI is not about any of that.
It's not.
DEI is actually racism in reverse.
In the 60's and 70's affirmative action failed and so will DEI.
Hire the most qualified applicant for the position.
That's not happening. Hiring "most qualified applicant for the
position" is the heart of DEI
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:100v4c9$1ch5q$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-23, Scout <[email protected]>What about the people that have already applied and are grabbed at their hearings?
wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 22 May 2025 09:19:07 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 16:22:42 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Enter legally and you will be welcomed.
This is your racism talking again. You know well the tight quotas >>>>>> that effectively limit immigration to only tiny numbers from
select places.
Iow, most people wanting to immigrate *can't* come here legally.
Sure they can.. they just have to 'get in line' like everyone else.
That can take decades. We need to open the flow up some.
That I could agree with, but we have to do it the right way.. not
simply decide to ignore the law.
The system is a mess and needs to be streamlined.
That should be the next step after deporting as many of the illegals
as possible. And then, people who truly want to come to US and improve
their lives can apply and be assured that they will have a hearing
quickly instead of waiting years.
In <100vsot$1hud4$[email protected]> Baxter wrote:quotas
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:100v4c9$1ch5q$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-23, Scout <[email protected]>
wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 22 May 2025 09:19:07 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 16:22:42 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Enter legally and you will be welcomed.
This is your racism talking again. You know well the tight
improvethat effectively limit immigration to only tiny numbers from
select places.
Iow, most people wanting to immigrate *can't* come here legally.
Sure they can.. they just have to 'get in line' like everyone else. >>>>>>
That can take decades. We need to open the flow up some.
That I could agree with, but we have to do it the right way.. not
simply decide to ignore the law.
The system is a mess and needs to be streamlined.
That should be the next step after deporting as many of the illegals
as possible. And then, people who truly want to come to US and
theirtheir lives can apply and be assured that they will have a hearingWhat about the people that have already applied and are grabbed at
quickly instead of waiting years.
mentalhearings?
If they get denied for whatever reason they are fair game.
Just because their native country has laws against queers and trannys
doesn't mean they are entitled to come force themselves and their
illness(es) somewhere else. We don't want their felons either. That
is not a valid reason for amnesty.
Riiiight.DEI is actually racism in reverse.
In the 60's and 70's affirmative action failed and so will DEI.
Hire the most qualified applicant for the position.
That's not happening. Hiring "most qualified applicant for the
position" is the heart of DEI
Kamala Harris was qualified to do what?
<snip>
Kamala Harris was qualified to do what?
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:<klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter>
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in >>news:100v7ln$1cvf9$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-24, Klaus Schadenfreude
fearwrote:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>news:100q76c$5mmp$3@dont- email.me:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill >>>>>> <[email protected]> typed:
Diversity, equity, inclusion. Which of these do the red boys
and"Equity" is NOT about "equal" - it is: "the quality of being fairthe most?
Equity. When you mandate equal outcomes, everybody becomes lazy.
impartial."
DEI is not about any of that.
It's not.
DEI is actually racism in reverse.
In the 60's and 70's affirmative action failed and so will DEI.
Hire the most qualified applicant for the position.
That's not happening. Hiring "most qualified applicant for the
position" is the heart of DEI
ROFLMAO
Tell us you have no idea what DEI is without saying "I have no idea
what DEI is."
In <100vssa$1hud4$[email protected]> Baxter wrote:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:100v7ln$1cvf9$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-24, Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter> >>> wrote:
Default Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>news:100q76c$5mmp$3@dont- email.me:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill >>>>>> <[email protected]> typed:"Equity" is NOT about "equal" - it is: "the quality of being fair and >>>>>impartial."
Diversity, equity, inclusion. Which of these do the red boys fear >>>>>>> the most?
Equity. When you mandate equal outcomes, everybody becomes lazy.
DEI is not about any of that.
It's not.
DEI is actually racism in reverse.
In the 60's and 70's affirmative action failed and so will DEI.
Hire the most qualified applicant for the position.
That's not happening. Hiring "most qualified applicant for the
position" is the heart of DEI
Riiiight.
Kamala Harris was qualified to do what?
On 2025-05-26, 41 - 21 <[email protected]> wrote:
In <100vssa$1hud4$[email protected]> Baxter wrote:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:100v7ln$1cvf9$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-24, Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter> wrote:
Default Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>news:100q76c$5mmp$3@dont- email.me:
In news:[email protected], Governor"Equity" is NOT about "equal" - it is: "the quality of being fair >>>>>>and impartial."
Swill <[email protected]> typed:
Diversity, equity, inclusion. Which of these do the red boys
fear the most?
Equity. When you mandate equal outcomes, everybody becomes lazy. >>>>>>>
DEI is not about any of that.
It's not.
DEI is actually racism in reverse.
In the 60's and 70's affirmative action failed and so will DEI.
Hire the most qualified applicant for the position.
That's not happening. Hiring "most qualified applicant for the
position" is the heart of DEI
Riiiight.
Kamala Harris was qualified to do what?
Hahaha!
The poster child for why DEI doesn't work.
Pete Buttigieg is another one.
All those degrees and still no brains.
"Talk to any CEO of a major Fortune 500 company. They�ll tell you that
their bottom line, dollar wise, does better when there�s more diversity
in the room," Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey, a former civil rights
lawyer and a Democrat, recently told the New York Times.
On 5/22/25 12:01, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza typed:
On 5/22/2025 7:50 AM, Scout typed:
Private enterprise has been shown to be consistently more efficient
that [sic] government.
What does "more efficient that government" mean, scooter? It appears I
may need to add that/than to the list of scooterisms.
Indeed you do, because the conservation of money: the only ways that Enterprise really can be "more efficient" is either by:
a) providing lower employee compensation
b) violate labor laws to increase productivity
c) cheat workers out of pay
d) cheat the public by not delivering
e) violate various laws/regulations such as on workplace safety
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:the people!
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]>
wrote in >>news:sbu83ktg31f3uneaq4ra65cgj93raq0d2f@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksu
ck ing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:<klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter>
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>news:100v7ln$1cvf9$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-24, Klaus Schadenfreude
fearwrote:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>news:100q76c$5mmp$3@dont- email.me:
In news:[email protected], Governor
Swill <[email protected]> typed:
Diversity, equity, inclusion. Which of these do the red boys
and"Equity" is NOT about "equal" - it is: "the quality of being fairthe most?
Equity. When you mandate equal outcomes, everybody becomes
lazy.
KKKlaun hates honest corporations.impartial."
DEI is not about any of that.
It's not.
DEI is actually racism in reverse.
In the 60's and 70's affirmative action failed and so will DEI.
Hire the most qualified applicant for the position.
That's not happening. Hiring "most qualified applicant for the >>>>position" is the heart of DEI
ROFLMAO
Tell us you have no idea what DEI is without saying "I have no idea
what DEI is."
==============
DEI stands for diversity, equity and inclusion. Beyond that, there is >>little agreement on what it means.
No, all normal American's know what it means.
CEO: This board will come to order!
KKKlaun's Strawman: How come we have no black lesbians on your board?
CEO [to CFO] Who let this fucker in here?
KKKlaun's Strawman: How come we have no trans women on your board?
CEO: We have three trans women working for us. None of them are
qualified to be on the board.
KKKlaun's Strawman: RACIST! NAZI! REPUG! Your board doesn't represent
CEO: You have Congress for that, you senile fuck.
On Sun, 25 May 2025 00:22:22 -0500, Praetor Mandrake
<snip>
Because I don't buy that Communism is working.
What's communism got to do with the United States?
In news:100vc3d$nugo$[email protected], -hh <[email protected]> typed:
On 5/22/25 12:01, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza typed:
On 5/22/2025 7:50 AM, Scout typed:
Private enterprise has been shown to be consistently more efficient
that [sic] government.
What does "more efficient that government" mean, scooter? It appears I
may need to add that/than to the list of scooterisms.
Indeed you do, because the conservation of money: the only ways that
Enterprise really can be "more efficient" is either by:
a) providing lower employee compensation
b) violate labor laws to increase productivity
c) cheat workers out of pay
d) cheat the public by not delivering
e) violate various laws/regulations such as on workplace safety
Anyone who's ever seen a county road crew patch pot holes knows that's bullshit-- three guys leaning on shovels while a fourth tamps the mix and a fifth moves the truck.
On 23/5/25 6:30, Scout wrote:
That I could agree with, but we have to do it the right way.. not
simply decide to ignore the law.
Yes. Our laws were written by the finger of Eris herself on the sides of
Mt Rushmore. It is not like we made our laws ourselves, or that we can
change ourselves.
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:100v4c9$1ch5q$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-23, Scout <[email protected]>What about the people that have already applied and are grabbed at their hearings?
wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 22 May 2025 09:19:07 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 16:22:42 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Enter legally and you will be welcomed.
This is your racism talking again. You know well the tight quotas >>>>>> that effectively limit immigration to only tiny numbers from
select places.
Iow, most people wanting to immigrate *can't* come here legally.
Sure they can.. they just have to 'get in line' like everyone else.
That can take decades. We need to open the flow up some.
That I could agree with, but we have to do it the right way.. not
simply decide to ignore the law.
The system is a mess and needs to be streamlined.
That should be the next step after deporting as many of the illegals
as possible. And then, people who truly want to come to US and improve
their lives can apply and be assured that they will have a hearing
quickly instead of waiting years.
On 5/23/25 09:30, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 22 May 2025 09:19:07 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 16:22:42 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Enter legally and you will be welcomed.
This is your racism talking again. You know well the tight quotas
that effectively limit immigration to only tiny numbers from select
places.
Iow, most people wanting to immigrate *can't* come here legally.
Sure they can.. they just have to 'get in line' like everyone else.
That can take decades. We need to open the flow up some.
That I could agree with, but we have to do it the right way.. not simply
decide to ignore the law.
I'm reminded of a conversation I had on COLA with RonB awhile back on this topic, so I'll pose the same basic question:
For an immigration candidate who passes all tests for suitability, what do you think is a fair amount of time that they should have to wait to immigrate?
FYI, this question is deliberately phrased so that we're not talking about anyone who is rejected: it is specifically for those who pass, asking how long their application should take to process.
America First - Screw Illegal Aliens <go-home-and-protest-
[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
In <100vsot$1hud4$[email protected]> Baxter wrote:quotas
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:100v4c9$1ch5q$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-23, Scout <[email protected]>
wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 22 May 2025 09:19:07 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>>>news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 16:22:42 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Enter legally and you will be welcomed.
This is your racism talking again. You know well the tight
improvethat effectively limit immigration to only tiny numbers fromSure they can.. they just have to 'get in line' like everyone else. >>>>>>>
select places.
Iow, most people wanting to immigrate *can't* come here legally. >>>>>>>
That can take decades. We need to open the flow up some.
That I could agree with, but we have to do it the right way.. not
simply decide to ignore the law.
The system is a mess and needs to be streamlined.
That should be the next step after deporting as many of the illegals
as possible. And then, people who truly want to come to US and
theirtheir lives can apply and be assured that they will have a hearingWhat about the people that have already applied and are grabbed at
quickly instead of waiting years.
mentalhearings?
If they get denied for whatever reason they are fair game.
Just because their native country has laws against queers and trannys
doesn't mean they are entitled to come force themselves and their
illness(es) somewhere else. We don't want their felons either. That
is not a valid reason for amnesty.
A mother wast taken into custody outside the Baltimore court while
holding her days-old infant. Yeah, sure, she was criminal, queer and or tranny. In a pig's eye.
On 5/23/25 09:42, Scout wrote:
"-hh" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:100o29f$3l8cq$[email protected]...
On 5/22/25 09:36, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:34:15 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 19 May 2025 08:22:15 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote<snip>
And the only ones being weeded out were for medical reasons. >>>>>>>>> There
were no quotas or limits.
So people were being weeded out.....
And they could be weeded out now if they were crossing only at
authorized entry points.
Which by law they are required to do.
But can't do because quotas are so tight.
Oh, they can.. they just refuse to do so.
But if that were true, there wouldn't be wait times.
And you are saying they can't/shouldn't wait because???
No, what I'm saying is that allowing one group in instantly (e.g.
Afrikaners) while making others wait a lifetime is gross & unjust.
When I come over, I will remember that I don't have to wait for you to
answer the door, I should just walk in.
Nope, deliberately wrong interpretation.
Point is that the length of the line varies by **who you are** and very obviously has a huge racist preference for whites over all others.
On 23/5/25 6:43, Scout wrote:
Bullshit. Stop lying to yourself. The waiting lists for legal
entry
can run from years to decades.
Well shit... I guess they have to wait then.
Why waste the money pretending to have immigration if we just do not allow any?
On 5/23/25 09:43, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 22 May 2025 09:36:10 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:34:15 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 19 May 2025 08:22:15 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote<snip>
And the only ones being weeded out were for medical reasons. >>>>>>>>> There
were no quotas or limits.
So people were being weeded out.....
And they could be weeded out now if they were crossing only at
authorized entry points.
Which by law they are required to do.
But can't do because quotas are so tight.
Oh, they can.. they just refuse to do so.
Bullshit. Stop lying to yourself. The waiting lists for legal entry
can run from years to decades.
Well shit... I guess they have to wait then.
Then stop trying to dishonestly compare it to the negligible wait times
than your "legal" ancestors benefited from.
On 5/23/2025 6:43 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 22 May 2025 09:36:10 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:34:15 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 19 May 2025 08:22:15 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote<snip>
And the only ones being weeded out were for medical reasons. >>>>>>>>> There
were no quotas or limits.
So people were being weeded out.....
And they could be weeded out now if they were crossing only at
authorized entry points.
Which by law they are required to do.
But can't do because quotas are so tight.
Oh, they can.. they just refuse to do so.
Bullshit. Stop lying to yourself. The waiting lists for legal entry
can run from years to decades.
Well shit... I guess they have to wait then.
Or, they can sneak in, scooter
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:100q76c$5mmp$3@dont-
email.me:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill"Equity" is NOT about "equal" - it is: "the quality of being fair and impartial."
<[email protected]> typed:
Diversity, equity, inclusion. Which of these do the red boys fear the
most?
Equity. When you mandate equal outcomes, everybody becomes lazy.
On 25/5/25 6:58, pothead wrote:
On 2025-05-24, Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter>
wrote:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:100q76c$5mmp$3@dont-
email.me:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill"Equity" is NOT about "equal" - it is: "the quality of being fair and
<[email protected]> typed:
Diversity, equity, inclusion. Which of these do the red boys fear >>>>>> the
most?
Equity. When you mandate equal outcomes, everybody becomes lazy.
impartial."
DEI is not about any of that.
It's not.
DEI is actually racism in reverse.
In the 60's and 70's affirmative action failed and so will DEI.
Hire the most qualified applicant for the position.
End of story.
And when that provably does not happen?
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]> wrote
in
news:uk243kprh450g9e30sp6pqlt568v5jred4@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck ing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>news:100q76c$5mmp$3@dont- email.me:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill"Equity" is NOT about "equal" - it is: "the quality of being fair and >>>impartial."
<[email protected]> typed:
Diversity, equity, inclusion. Which of these do the red boys fear
the most?
Equity. When you mandate equal outcomes, everybody becomes lazy.
DEI is not about any of that.
The "E" in DEI stands for Equity.
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]> wrote
in
news:sbu83ktg31f3uneaq4ra65cgj93raq0d2f@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck ing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:<klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter>
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in >>>news:100v7ln$1cvf9$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-24, Klaus Schadenfreude
fearwrote:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>news:100q76c$5mmp$3@dont- email.me:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill >>>>>>> <[email protected]> typed:
Diversity, equity, inclusion. Which of these do the red boys
and"Equity" is NOT about "equal" - it is: "the quality of being fairthe most?
Equity. When you mandate equal outcomes, everybody becomes lazy. >>>>>>>
KKKlaun hates honest corporations.impartial."
DEI is not about any of that.
It's not.
DEI is actually racism in reverse.
In the 60's and 70's affirmative action failed and so will DEI.
Hire the most qualified applicant for the position.
That's not happening. Hiring "most qualified applicant for the
position" is the heart of DEI
ROFLMAO
Tell us you have no idea what DEI is without saying "I have no idea
what DEI is."
==============
DEI stands for diversity, equity and inclusion. Beyond that, there is
little agreement on what it means.
On the one hand, DEI is a broad-brush term that refers to the policies
and measures that organizations use to prevent discrimination, comply
with civil rights laws and create environments more welcoming to people
from marginalized backgrounds.
Supporters of these diversity programs say they help companies hire and retain top talent and boost innovation and profits.
"Talk to any CEO of a major Fortune 500 company. They'll tell you that
their bottom line, dollar wise, does better when there's more diversity
in the room," Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey, a former civil rights
lawyer and a Democrat, recently told the New York Times.
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:100v7ln$1cvf9$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-24, Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter>
wrote:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>news:100q76c$5mmp$3@dont- email.me:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill"Equity" is NOT about "equal" - it is: "the quality of being fair and >>>>impartial."
<[email protected]> typed:
Diversity, equity, inclusion. Which of these do the red boys fear >>>>>> the most?
Equity. When you mandate equal outcomes, everybody becomes lazy.
DEI is not about any of that.
It's not.
DEI is actually racism in reverse.
In the 60's and 70's affirmative action failed and so will DEI.
Hire the most qualified applicant for the position.
That's not happening. Hiring "most qualified applicant for the
position" is the heart of DEI
On Sun, 25 May 2025 00:22:22 -0500, Praetor Mandrake <[email protected]> wrote:
Governor Swill wrote:
On Sat, 24 May 2025 20:44:26 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<[email protected]> wrote:
Jerry Buchanan <[email protected]> wrote in
news:NkoYP.54479$[email protected]:
On 5/23/2025 8:40 AM, -hh wrote:
On 5/22/25 17:47, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <100o1vb$3l8cq$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On 5/22/25 09:26, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:30:20 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Right.. meanwhile citizens complain of the lack of jobs, and >>>>>>>>>>> inadequate wages....
Yeah, whiny layabouts who can't be bothered doing a days work and >>>>>>>>>> lying reporters complaining about problems that don't exist. >>>>>>>>>>
With unemployment at 5% (or less), anybody unable to find a job >>>>>>>>>> today doesn't want one.
Excellent.. so you're saying we can suspend Welfare and
Unemployment benefits to everyone currently on them?
12.5% on welfare another 4.2% on unemployment...
That should do wonders to balance the budget.
72% of those on welfare (SNAP) have jobs, dummy.
-hh
Then get better jobs.
No, raising the Federal Minimum Wage is what's required.
Because its officially a “poverty wage,�? as its annual earnings >>>>>> potential for a single adult working full-time, year-round falls
below the DHHS's poverty threshold of $15,650.
This is an illustration of how companies like WalMart benefit from >>>>>> indirect forms of Corporate Welfare such as this.
No, they don't. Welfare benefits to low income people *raise* the
reservation wage. It means Walmart has to pay people *more* than they >>>>> otherwise would.
<laughs and points>
-
America is the richest, most powerful, most influential, most a
dmired nation that has ever existed in the whole of human history.
Why can't MAGAs be satisfied with that?
Because I don't buy that Communism is working.
What's communism got to do with the United States?
On Fri, 23 May 2025 21:37:53 -0000 (UTC), Bill Flitt <[email protected]> wrote:
On 23 May 2025, Klaus Schadenfreude <[email protected]> posted some >>news:OJ1YP.90240$[email protected]:
On 5/23/2025 6:46 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Tue, 20 May 2025 14:48:02 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:100a7ga$eft2$[email protected]...
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill >>>>>>> <[email protected]> typed:
On Thu, 15 May 2025 13:34:00 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
And if that candidate is not a white male?
Why do you think their race or gender should matter?
Are you admitting to being a racist?
Interesting how when I propose a totally neutral standard.. you >>>>>>>>> want to drag
race and gender into it.
Here you go again, pretending not to be a bigot.
It's sad to watch, really.
Au contraire, it's hilarious watching you being hoisted on your
own petard!
Did I break Swill? He suddenly doesn't want to talk anymore.
About what?
Now Swill pretends to have no idea why while ignoring the point I
made above.
You didn't make a point, scooter. You never make a substantive point,
scooter, you lying shitbag.
Says the broken pencil.
It's just Scout doing a Nobody impersonation.
5:05 PM Scout Posts
5:15 PM Scout posts a complaint that his post hasn't been answered
yet.
1:27 PM next day Respondant replies to Scout's first post.
1:27 PM next day Scout looks like a idiot.
"-hh" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:100q5np$3l8cq$[email protected]...
On 5/23/25 09:30, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 22 May 2025 09:19:07 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 16:22:42 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Enter legally and you will be welcomed.
This is your racism talking again. You know well the tight quotas >>>>>> that effectively limit immigration to only tiny numbers from select >>>>>> places.
Iow, most people wanting to immigrate *can't* come here legally.
Sure they can.. they just have to 'get in line' like everyone else.
That can take decades. We need to open the flow up some.
That I could agree with, but we have to do it the right way.. not
simply decide to ignore the law.
I'm reminded of a conversation I had on COLA with RonB awhile back on
this topic, so I'll pose the same basic question:
For an immigration candidate who passes all tests for suitability,
what do you think is a fair amount of time that they should have to
wait to immigrate?
FYI, this question is deliberately phrased so that we're not talking
about anyone who is rejected: it is specifically for those who pass,
asking how long their application should take to process.
Depends on the quotas set and the number of people ahead of them in line.
"-hh" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:100q5d6$3l8cq$[email protected]...
On 5/23/25 09:42, Scout wrote:
"-hh" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:100o29f$3l8cq$[email protected]...
On 5/22/25 09:36, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:34:15 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 19 May 2025 08:22:15 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote<snip>
And the only ones being weeded out were for medical reasons. >>>>>>>>>> There
were no quotas or limits.
So people were being weeded out.....
And they could be weeded out now if they were crossing only at >>>>>>>> authorized entry points.
Which by law they are required to do.
But can't do because quotas are so tight.
Oh, they can.. they just refuse to do so.
But if that were true, there wouldn't be wait times.
And you are saying they can't/shouldn't wait because???
No, what I'm saying is that allowing one group in instantly (e.g.
Afrikaners) while making others wait a lifetime is gross & unjust.
Depends on the circumstances for each group.
When I come over, I will remember that I don't have to wait for you
to answer the door, I should just walk in.
Nope, deliberately wrong interpretation.
Point is that the length of the line varies by **who you are** and
very obviously has a huge racist preference for whites over all others.
If that were the only factor you might have a point, that you don't even realize there are other issues involved.. that just makes you sound like
a bigot.
"-hh" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:100q54k$3l8cq$[email protected]...
On 5/23/25 09:43, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 22 May 2025 09:36:10 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:34:15 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 19 May 2025 08:22:15 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote<snip>
And the only ones being weeded out were for medical reasons. >>>>>>>>>> There
were no quotas or limits.
So people were being weeded out.....
And they could be weeded out now if they were crossing only at >>>>>>>> authorized entry points.
Which by law they are required to do.
But can't do because quotas are so tight.
Oh, they can.. they just refuse to do so.
Bullshit. Stop lying to yourself. The waiting lists for legal entry >>>> can run from years to decades.
Well shit... I guess they have to wait then.
Then stop trying to dishonestly compare it to the negligible wait
times than your "legal" ancestors benefited from.
Shit changes.
As far as my ancestors, some of them were legal, others
could have been illegal.
In either case they have NOTHING to do with the
discussion of the current situation.
As such you are trying a rather
underhanded tactic of implied criminality to assert my position should somehow be different now because of what others did then.
Makes me wonder what practices your ancestors engaged in which you
should accept being done to people today no matter what they were.
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:100vrum$1hq56$[email protected]...
On 25/5/25 6:58, pothead wrote:
On 2025-05-24, Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter>
wrote:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:100q76c$5mmp$3@dont-
email.me:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill >>>>>> <[email protected]> typed:"Equity" is NOT about "equal" - it is: "the quality of being fair and >>>>> impartial."
Diversity, equity, inclusion. Which of these do the red boys
fear the
most?
Equity. When you mandate equal outcomes, everybody becomes lazy.
DEI is not about any of that.
It's not.
DEI is actually racism in reverse.
In the 60's and 70's affirmative action failed and so will DEI.
Hire the most qualified applicant for the position.
End of story.
And when that provably does not happen?
Assuming it doesn't happen, THEN you have a potential case for discrimination.
Telling a company they have to hire x% of minorities and y% of women and
so on....
causes discrimination against more qualified candidates who
may not be of the 'appropriate race or gender' for the company to hit
those benchmarks.
It makes skin color and gender a factor in the hiring process which is directly contrary what it claims to be for.
On 2025-05-26, max headroom <[email protected]> wrote:
In news:100vc3d$nugo$[email protected], -hh
<[email protected]> typed:
On 5/22/25 12:01, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza typed:
On 5/22/2025 7:50 AM, Scout typed:
Private enterprise has been shown to be consistently more
efficient that [sic] government.
What does "more efficient that government" mean, scooter? It
appears I may need to add that/than to the list of scooterisms.
Indeed you do, because the conservation of money: the only ways
that Enterprise really can be "more efficient" is either by:
a) providing lower employee compensation
b) violate labor laws to increase productivity
c) cheat workers out of pay
d) cheat the public by not delivering
e) violate various laws/regulations such as on workplace safety
Anyone who's ever seen a county road crew patch pot holes knows
that's bullshit-- three guys leaning on shovels while a fourth tamps
the mix and a fifth moves the truck.
And at least in NY they make certain to do a substandard job so they
can come back in 6 months to repair it once again.
It's job security.
On 5/27/25 10:18, Scout wrote:
"-hh" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:100q5np$3l8cq$[email protected]...
On 5/23/25 09:30, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 22 May 2025 09:19:07 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 16:22:42 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Enter legally and you will be welcomed.
This is your racism talking again. You know well the tight quotas >>>>>>> that effectively limit immigration to only tiny numbers from select >>>>>>> places.
Iow, most people wanting to immigrate *can't* come here legally.
Sure they can.. they just have to 'get in line' like everyone else. >>>>>>
That can take decades. We need to open the flow up some.
That I could agree with, but we have to do it the right way.. not
simply decide to ignore the law.
I'm reminded of a conversation I had on COLA with RonB awhile back on
this topic, so I'll pose the same basic question:
For an immigration candidate who passes all tests for suitability, what
do you think is a fair amount of time that they should have to wait to
immigrate?
FYI, this question is deliberately phrased so that we're not talking
about anyone who is rejected: it is specifically for those who pass,
asking how long their application should take to process.
Depends on the quotas set and the number of people ahead of them in line.
Not at all, for this is asking a basic question on fairness.
Th current system is clearly unfair because it requires some immigrants to wait literally decades whereas others can just saunter right on in.
On 5/27/2025 7:18 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"-hh" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:100q5np$3l8cq$[email protected]...
On 5/23/25 09:30, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 22 May 2025 09:19:07 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 16:22:42 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Enter legally and you will be welcomed.
This is your racism talking again. You know well the tight quotas >>>>>>> that effectively limit immigration to only tiny numbers from select >>>>>>> places.
Iow, most people wanting to immigrate *can't* come here legally.
Sure they can.. they just have to 'get in line' like everyone else. >>>>>>
That can take decades. We need to open the flow up some.
That I could agree with, but we have to do it the right way..
You *don't* agree with it, scooter. You're lying about that.
On 5/27/25 10:48, Scout wrote:
"-hh" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:100q5d6$3l8cq$[email protected]...
On 5/23/25 09:42, Scout wrote:
"-hh" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:100o29f$3l8cq$[email protected]...
On 5/22/25 09:36, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:34:15 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 19 May 2025 08:22:15 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote<snip>
And the only ones being weeded out were for medical reasons. >>>>>>>>>>> There
were no quotas or limits.
So people were being weeded out.....
And they could be weeded out now if they were crossing only at >>>>>>>>> authorized entry points.
Which by law they are required to do.
But can't do because quotas are so tight.
Oh, they can.. they just refuse to do so.
But if that were true, there wouldn't be wait times.
And you are saying they can't/shouldn't wait because???
No, what I'm saying is that allowing one group in instantly (e.g.
Afrikaners) while making others wait a lifetime is gross & unjust.
Depends on the circumstances for each group.
And just which "circumstances" are these? They're already disallowed if they're criminals/etc.
When I come over, I will remember that I don't have to wait for you to >>>> answer the door, I should just walk in.
Nope, deliberately wrong interpretation.
Point is that the length of the line varies by **who you are** and very
obviously has a huge racist preference for whites over all others.
If that were the only factor you might have a point, that you don't even
realize there are other issues involved.. that just makes you sound like
a bigot.
And just what are these alleged "other issues involved", other than it
being a racial bias based on country of origin? A religious bias?
On 5/27/2025 7:15 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:Rudyisms:
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:100q4q7$566n$2@dont- email.me...
On 23/5/25 6:30, Scout wrote:
That I could agree with, but we have to do it the right way.. not
simply decide to ignore the law.
Yes. Our laws were written by the finger of Eris herself on the sides
of Mt Rushmore. It is not like we made our laws ourselves, or that we
can change ourselves.
And just like that
Another scooterism.
scooterisms:
On 5/27/2025 7:18 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"-hh" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:100q5np$3l8cq$[email protected]...
On 5/23/25 09:30, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 22 May 2025 09:19:07 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 16:22:42 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Enter legally and you will be welcomed.
This is your racism talking again. You know well the tight quotas >>>>>>> that effectively limit immigration to only tiny numbers from select >>>>>>> places.
Iow, most people wanting to immigrate *can't* come here legally.
Sure they can.. they just have to 'get in line' like everyone else. >>>>>>
That can take decades. We need to open the flow up some.
That I could agree with, but we have to do it the right way..
You *don't* agree with it, scooter. You're lying about that.
I'm reminded of a conversation I had on COLA with RonB awhile back on
this topic, so I'll pose the same basic question:
For an immigration candidate who passes all tests for suitability,
what do you think is a fair amount of time that they should have to
wait to immigrate?
FYI, this question is deliberately phrased so that we're not talking
about anyone who is rejected: it is specifically for those who pass,
asking how long their application should take to process.
Depends on the quotas set and
You're begging the question, scooter. *Why* are there quotas, scooter?
And if there are going to be quotas, scooter, why are they set so low?
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:100q4q7$566n$[email protected]...
On 23/5/25 6:30, Scout wrote:
That I could agree with, but we have to do it the right way.. not
simply decide to ignore the law.
Yes. Our laws were written by the finger of Eris herself on the sides
of Mt Rushmore. It is not like we made our laws ourselves, or that we
can change ourselves.
And just like that Siri blows a gasket and wanders off into liberal delusions....
"-hh" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:1014pe6$2ke4h$[email protected]...
On 5/27/25 10:18, Scout wrote:
"-hh" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:100q5np$3l8cq$[email protected]...
On 5/23/25 09:30, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 22 May 2025 09:19:07 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 16:22:42 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:Sure they can.. they just have to 'get in line' like everyone else. >>>>>>>
Enter legally and you will be welcomed.
This is your racism talking again. You know well the tight quotas >>>>>>>> that effectively limit immigration to only tiny numbers from select >>>>>>>> places.
Iow, most people wanting to immigrate *can't* come here legally. >>>>>>>
That can take decades. We need to open the flow up some.
That I could agree with, but we have to do it the right way.. not
simply decide to ignore the law.
I'm reminded of a conversation I had on COLA with RonB awhile back
on this topic, so I'll pose the same basic question:
For an immigration candidate who passes all tests for suitability,
what do you think is a fair amount of time that they should have to
wait to immigrate?
FYI, this question is deliberately phrased so that we're not talking
about anyone who is rejected: it is specifically for those who
pass, asking how long their application should take to process.
Depends on the quotas set and the number of people ahead of them in
line.
Not at all, for this is asking a basic question on fairness.
Fairness is getting in line and waiting your turn like everyone else...
Th current system is clearly unfair because it requires some
immigrants to wait literally decades whereas others can just saunter
right on in.
Well, shit, I suppose there are a lot more immigrants from some places
than others and they fill up the quotas sooner.
"-hh" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:1014pj7$2ke4h$[email protected]...
On 5/27/25 10:48, Scout wrote:
"-hh" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:100q5d6$3l8cq$[email protected]...
On 5/23/25 09:42, Scout wrote:
"-hh" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:100o29f$3l8cq$[email protected]...
On 5/22/25 09:36, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:34:15 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 19 May 2025 08:22:15 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote<snip>
And the only ones being weeded out were for medical reasons. >>>>>>>>>>>> There
were no quotas or limits.
So people were being weeded out.....
And they could be weeded out now if they were crossing only at >>>>>>>>>> authorized entry points.
Which by law they are required to do.
But can't do because quotas are so tight.
Oh, they can.. they just refuse to do so.
But if that were true, there wouldn't be wait times.
And you are saying they can't/shouldn't wait because???
No, what I'm saying is that allowing one group in instantly (e.g.
Afrikaners) while making others wait a lifetime is gross & unjust.
Depends on the circumstances for each group.
And just which "circumstances" are these? They're already disallowed
if they're criminals/etc.
Nature of the reason for their desire to immigrate. Their ability to
care for themselves once they arrive. The number of people from that
country attempting to immigrate. The number of immigrants we can
process. The level of funding we have for this process. The impacts on America and Americans as it comes to maintaining their standard of
living, available housing, jobs, etc. due to the influx of immigrants
and type of immigrants.
You know.. the details.. which you seem willing to utterly ignore.
If that were the only factor you might have a point, that you don'tWhen I come over, I will remember that I don't have to wait for you
to answer the door, I should just walk in.
Nope, deliberately wrong interpretation.
Point is that the length of the line varies by **who you are** and
very obviously has a huge racist preference for whites over all others. >>>
even realize there are other issues involved.. that just makes you
sound like a bigot.
And just what are these alleged "other issues involved", other than it
being a racial bias based on country of origin? A religious bias?
Well, if that's all you can think of.. then you are not properly
prepared to even discuss the issue.
Good Bye.
On 26/5/25 23:19, Governor Swill wrote:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 00:22:22 -0500, Praetor Mandrake
<[email protected]> wrote:
Governor Swill wrote:
On Sat, 24 May 2025 20:44:26 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<[email protected]> wrote:
Jerry Buchanan <[email protected]> wrote in
news:NkoYP.54479$[email protected]:
On 5/23/2025 8:40 AM, -hh wrote:
On 5/22/25 17:47, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <100o1vb$3l8cq$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On 5/22/25 09:26, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:30:20 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Right.. meanwhile citizens complain of the lack of jobs, >>>>>>>>>>>> and inadequate wages....
Yeah, whiny layabouts who can't be bothered doing a days >>>>>>>>>>> work and lying reporters complaining about problems that >>>>>>>>>>> don't exist.
With unemployment at 5% (or less), anybody unable to find a >>>>>>>>>>> job today doesn't want one.
Excellent.. so you're saying we can suspend Welfare and
Unemployment benefits to everyone currently on them?
12.5% on welfare another 4.2% on unemployment...
That should do wonders to balance the budget.
72% of those on welfare (SNAP) have jobs, dummy.
-hh
Then get better jobs.
No, raising the Federal Minimum Wage is what's required.
Because its officially a “poverty wage,�? as its annual
earnings potential for a single adult working full-time,
year-round falls below the DHHS's poverty threshold of $15,650.
This is an illustration of how companies like WalMart benefit
from indirect forms of Corporate Welfare such as this.
No, they don't. Welfare benefits to low income people *raise* the
reservation wage. It means Walmart has to pay people *more* than
they otherwise would.
<laughs and points>
-
America is the richest, most powerful, most influential, most a
dmired nation that has ever existed in the whole of human history.
Why can't MAGAs be satisfied with that?
Because I don't buy that Communism is working.
What's communism got to do with the United States?
Because the world's fourth largest economy is communist.
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in
news:1014nii$2mk9v$[email protected]:
On 26/5/25 23:19, Governor Swill wrote:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 00:22:22 -0500, Praetor Mandrake
<[email protected]> wrote:
Governor Swill wrote:
On Sat, 24 May 2025 20:44:26 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<[email protected]> wrote:
Jerry Buchanan <[email protected]> wrote
in news:NkoYP.54479$[email protected]:
On 5/23/2025 8:40 AM, -hh wrote:
On 5/22/25 17:47, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <100o1vb$3l8cq$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On 5/22/25 09:26, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:30:20 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Right.. meanwhile citizens complain of the lack of jobs, >>>>>>>>>>>>> and inadequate wages....
Yeah, whiny layabouts who can't be bothered doing a days >>>>>>>>>>>> work and lying reporters complaining about problems that >>>>>>>>>>>> don't exist.
With unemployment at 5% (or less), anybody unable to find a >>>>>>>>>>>> job today doesn't want one.
Excellent.. so you're saying we can suspend Welfare and
Unemployment benefits to everyone currently on them?
12.5% on welfare another 4.2% on unemployment...
That should do wonders to balance the budget.
72% of those on welfare (SNAP) have jobs, dummy.
-hh
Then get better jobs.
No, raising the Federal Minimum Wage is what's required.
Because its officially a “poverty wage,� as its annual >>>>>>>> earnings potential for a single adult working full-time,
year-round falls below the DHHS's poverty threshold of $15,650. >>>>>>>>
This is an illustration of how companies like WalMart benefit
from indirect forms of Corporate Welfare such as this.
No, they don't. Welfare benefits to low income people *raise*
the reservation wage. It means Walmart has to pay people *more*
than they otherwise would.
<laughs and points>
-
America is the richest, most powerful, most influential, most a
dmired nation that has ever existed in the whole of human history.
Why can't MAGAs be satisfied with that?
Because I don't buy that Communism is working.
What's communism got to do with the United States?
Because the world's fourth largest economy is communist.
Neither India nor California are communist.
On Tue, 27 May 2025 12:32:06 -0400, -hh wrote:
On 5/27/25 10:18, Scout wrote:<snip>
"-hh" <[email protected]> wrote
FYI, this question is deliberately phrased so that we're not talking
about anyone who is rejected: it is specifically for those who pass,
asking how long their application should take to process.
Depends on the quotas set and the number of people ahead of them in
line.
Not at all, for this is asking a basic question on fairness.
Th current system is clearly unfair because it requires some immigrants
to wait literally decades whereas others can just saunter right on in.
Exactly. Just go ahead and let half a million a year in. That's a
trickle compared to the flood between the Civil War and the 1920s.
That's the 'immigration period' in US history when anybody who wasn't
sick or too old to work was let in.
On 27 May 2025, "Scout" <[email protected]>
posted some news:1014l1d$2m981$[email protected]:
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:100q4q7$566n$[email protected]...
On 23/5/25 6:30, Scout wrote:
That I could agree with, but we have to do it the right way.. not
simply decide to ignore the law.
Yes. Our laws were written by the finger of Eris herself on the sides
of Mt Rushmore. It is not like we made our laws ourselves, or that we
can change ourselves.
And just like that Siri blows a gasket and wanders off into liberal
delusions....
Mushrooms I'm thinking.
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
On Tue, 27 May 2025 12:32:06 -0400, -hh wrote:
On 5/27/25 10:18, Scout wrote:<snip>
"-hh" <[email protected]> wrote
FYI, this question is deliberately phrased so that we're not
talking
about anyone who is rejected: it is specifically for those
who pass,
asking how long their application should take to process.
Depends on the quotas set and the number of people ahead of
them in line.
Not at all, for this is asking a basic question on fairness.
Th current system is clearly unfair because it requires some
immigrants
to wait literally decades whereas others can just saunter
right on in.
Exactly. Just go ahead and let half a million a year in.
That's a
trickle compared to the flood between the Civil War and the 1920s.
That's the 'immigration period' in US history when anybody who
wasn't
sick or too old to work was let in.
That was then, this is now, and the situation is far different.
On 28/5/25 5:33, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Tue, 27 May 2025 12:32:06 -0400, -hh wrote:
On 5/27/25 10:18, Scout wrote:<snip>
"-hh" <[email protected]> wrote
FYI, this question is deliberately phrased so that we're not
talking
about anyone who is rejected: it is specifically for those
who pass,
asking how long their application should take to process.
Depends on the quotas set and the number of people ahead of
them in line.
Not at all, for this is asking a basic question on fairness.
Th current system is clearly unfair because it requires some
immigrants
to wait literally decades whereas others can just saunter
right on in.
Exactly. Just go ahead and let half a million a year in.
That's a
trickle compared to the flood between the Civil War and the 1920s.
That's the 'immigration period' in US history when anybody who
wasn't
sick or too old to work was let in.
That was then, this is now, and the situation is far different.
Bigots like you get listenned to.
That was then, this is now, and the situation is far different.
Bigots like you get listenned to.
I see.. so we should be able to openly carry guns in public..
including court houses, and places serving alcohol without anyone
saying a word....
Your ignorance doesn't make me a bigot.. it just makes you look
like a fool.
On Tue, 27 May 2025 12:32:06 -0400, -hh wrote:
On 5/27/25 10:18, Scout wrote:
"-hh" <[email protected]> wrote
<snip>
FYI, this question is deliberately phrased so that we're not talking
about anyone who is rejected: it is specifically for those who pass,
asking how long their application should take to process.
Depends on the quotas set and the number of people ahead of them in line.
Not at all, for this is asking a basic question on fairness.
Th current system is clearly unfair because it requires some immigrants
to wait literally decades whereas others can just saunter right on in.
Exactly. Just go ahead and let half a million a year in. That's a
trickle compared to the flood between the Civil War and the 1920s.
That's the 'immigration period' in US history when anybody who wasn't
sick or too old to work was let in.
On 28/5/25 8:52, Scout wrote:
That was then, this is now, and the situation is far different.
Bigots like you get listenned to.
I see.. so we should be able to openly carry guns in public..
including court houses, and places serving alcohol without anyone
saying a word....
Your ignorance doesn't make me a bigot.. it just makes you look
like a fool.
California outlaws open carry. Conceal carry requires special procedures.
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill <[email protected]> typed:
On Tue, 27 May 2025 12:32:06 -0400, -hh wrote:
On 5/27/25 10:18, Scout wrote:
"-hh" <[email protected]> wrote
<snip>
FYI, this question is deliberately phrased so that we're not talking >>>>> about anyone who is rejected: it is specifically for those who pass, >>>>> asking how long their application should take to process.
Depends on the quotas set and the number of people ahead of them in
line.
Not at all, for this is asking a basic question on fairness.
Th current system is clearly unfair because it requires some immigrants >>>to wait literally decades whereas others can just saunter right on in.
Exactly. Just go ahead and let half a million a year in. That's a
trickle compared to the flood between the Civil War and the 1920s.
That's the 'immigration period' in US history when anybody who wasn't
sick or too old to work was let in.
Unless they were Chinese.
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:100gfad$1s759$[email protected]...
On 19/5/25 8:56, Scout wrote:
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:100fot6$1nohi$[email protected]...
On 19/5/25 5:59, Scout wrote:
No, I'd feed him.
That's what America should do.
Ok, from now all you are responsible for feeding all the poor.
...or did you not mean what you just said?
How long do you keep your job when your company has no one to
sell to?
And just like that Siri tries to change the subject.
Apparently what America should do and what Siri should do have
nothing in common.
You are too stupid to understand why things like food stamps and
social security were creted.
I understand what they were created to do... and I also understand what
they have become...
The safety net has become a hammock.
Indeed if you dig into how they work these days, you will see how the
current laws actually seem designed to trap those in the system into a
cycle of poverty and dependency.
Are you aware that we are now on our 3rd generation (and possibly 4th)
that will are on and fully expect to spend their entire lives on welfare?
At what point do we realize that what was intended at a temporary
support aid to allow people to get back on their feet and evolved into a
bed in which they expect to spend their entire lives?
If the system isn't designed to get people off of it by requiring them
to again become self sufficient then what is it's purpose and long long
do we continue bleeding the workers to support the lazy?
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill <[email protected]> typed:
On Tue, 27 May 2025 12:32:06 -0400, -hh wrote:
On 5/27/25 10:18, Scout wrote:
"-hh" <[email protected]> wrote
<snip>
FYI, this question is deliberately phrased so that we're not talking >>>>> about anyone who is rejected: it is specifically for those who pass, >>>>> asking how long their application should take to process.
Depends on the quotas set and the number of people ahead of them in line.
Not at all, for this is asking a basic question on fairness.
Th current system is clearly unfair because it requires some immigrants
to wait literally decades whereas others can just saunter right on in.
Exactly. Just go ahead and let half a million a year in. That's a
trickle compared to the flood between the Civil War and the 1920s.
That's the 'immigration period' in US history when anybody who wasn't
sick or too old to work was let in.
Unless they were Chinese.
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:45:07 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
In short.. money is flowing INTO China's economy and flowing OUT of our
economy. In the case of the US that is currently $918 Billion Dollars
per
year leaving our economy. $918 Billion dollars of goods, services,
and jobs
leaving our economy....
What difference does that make when *we* control the money supply?
Yea, because hyperinflation really helps people out,.
Gold per ounce
1965 - $35.50
1975 - $160.86
1985 - $317.42
1995 - $387.00
2005 - $444.99
2015 - $1298.00
2025 - $3,302.97 (current)
In which time a dollar has lost 99.98% of it's value.
Minimum wage
1965 - $1.25
1975 - $2.10
1985 - $3.35
1995 - $4.25
2005 - $5.15
2015 - $7.25
2025 - $16.50
Meanwhile wages have not kept up with inflation...
Add in the increase of taxation* from 18% of gross pay to 50-60% of
gross pay...
Hence the current issue of where people lack the means their parents
had, and more so for their grandparents.
* - Includes direct and indirect taxation
See *WE* do not control the money supply. The politicians do, and we
really don't even control them, and they are driving us into poverty,
and the nation into bankruptcy.
Indeed, I bet most people under 30 will remain in debt for their whole
lives.
This is simply not sustainable.
And look at the Geometric Progression.. as the curve closes in on
becoming vertical kicking the can down the road ceases to be possible
and only those who own assets in excess of their debt will have any
hope, ASSUMING they can realize that value as who would be buying at
full price?
So, yes, we need to consider our own economy and we need to do so now..
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:1017jmj$3camm$[email protected]...
On 28/5/25 8:52, Scout wrote:
That was then, this is now, and the situation is far different.
Bigots like you get listenned to.
I see.. so we should be able to openly carry guns in public..
including court houses, and places serving alcohol without anyone
saying a word....
Your ignorance doesn't make me a bigot.. it just makes you look
like a fool.
California outlaws open carry. Conceal carry requires special
procedures.
So you're saying we should listen to bigots like yourself because the situation is the same as it's ever been and if it was legal then, it
should be legal now.
You set that standard.. and the moment I apply it you suddenly want to
assert that it's "different" making you a bigot by your own standard.
On 28 May 2025, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:1017jmj$3camm$[email protected]...
On 28/5/25 8:52, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
That was then, this is now, and the situation is far different.
Bigots like you get listenned to.
I see.. so we should be able to openly carry guns in public..
including court houses, and places serving alcohol without anyone
saying a word....
Your ignorance doesn't make me a bigot.. it just makes you look
like a fool.
California outlaws open carry. Conceal carry requires special
procedures.
So you're saying we should listen to bigots like yourself because the
situation is the same as it's ever been and if it was legal then, it
should be legal now.
You set that standard.. and the moment I apply it you suddenly want to
assert that it's "different" making you a bigot by your own standard.
At one time
On 28 May 2025, "Scout" <[email protected]>
posted some news:1017la8$3cn2j$[email protected]:
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:1017jmj$3camm$[email protected]...
On 28/5/25 8:52, Scout wrote:
That was then, this is now, and the situation is far different.
Bigots like you get listenned to.
I see.. so we should be able to openly carry guns in public..
including court houses, and places serving alcohol without anyone
saying a word....
Your ignorance doesn't make me a bigot.. it just makes you look
like a fool.
California outlaws open carry. Conceal carry requires special
procedures.
So you're saying we should listen to bigots like yourself because the
situation is the same as it's ever been and if it was legal then, it
should be legal now.
You set that standard.. and the moment I apply it you suddenly want to
assert that it's "different" making you a bigot by your own standard.
At one time California was the "open carry" capital of the country.
They pushed their luck and challenged the police. It was a choice ofAt one time California was the "open carry" capital of the country.
Then Black Panthers open carried. The law was quickly changed.
killing them all for the good of the city, or doing the usual Democrat
thing and penalizing the majority for the actions of a few idiots.
On 29/5/25 9:52, Earl Scheib wrote:
On 28 May 2025, "Scout" <[email protected]>
posted some news:1017la8$3cn2j$[email protected]:
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:1017jmj$3camm$[email protected]...
On 28/5/25 8:52, Scout wrote:
That was then, this is now, and the situation is far different.
Bigots like you get listenned to.
I see.. so we should be able to openly carry guns in public..
including court houses, and places serving alcohol without anyone
saying a word....
Your ignorance doesn't make me a bigot.. it just makes you look
like a fool.
California outlaws open carry. Conceal carry requires special
procedures.
So you're saying we should listen to bigots like yourself because
the situation is the same as it's ever been and if it was legal
then, it should be legal now.
You set that standard.. and the moment I apply it you suddenly want
to assert that it's "different" making you a bigot by your own
standard.
At one time California was the "open carry" capital of the country.
Then Black Panthers open carried. The law was quickly changed.
On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried — and *failed* — to bullshit:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill
<[email protected]> typed:
On Tue, 27 May 2025 12:32:06 -0400, -hh wrote:
On 5/27/25 10:18, Scout wrote:
"-hh" <[email protected]> wrote
<snip>
FYI, this question is deliberately phrased so that we're not talking >>>>>> about anyone who is rejected: it is specifically for those who pass, >>>>>> asking how long their application should take to process.
Depends on the quotas set and the number of people ahead of them in line. >>Not at all, for this is asking a basic question on fairness.
Th current system is clearly unfair because it requires some immigrants >>>> to wait literally decades whereas others can just saunter right on in.
Exactly. Just go ahead and let half a million a year in. That's a
trickle compared to the flood between the Civil War and the 1920s.
That's the 'immigration period' in US history when anybody who wasn't
sick or too old to work was let in.
Unless they were Chinese.
Via the Immigration Act of 1917 (Barred Zone Act), which created “barred zone”But they weren't shut out and prevented from immigrating. They just faced prejudice and discrimination once they arrived.
extending from the Middle East to Southeast Asia from which no persons were allowed to enter the USA because of the 'Yellow Threat'.
There was also exclusion of many Europeans, particularly of Slavic and Mediterranean, including Italy & Greece because in this era they were considered
to be non-whites.
<https://andscape.com/features/white-immigrants-werent-always-considered-white-
and-acceptable/>
On 5/28/2025 12:21 PM, -hh wrote:
On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the
thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried â€" and
*failed* â€" to bullshit:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill
<[email protected]> typed:
On Tue, 27 May 2025 12:32:06 -0400, -hh wrote:
On 5/27/25 10:18, Scout wrote:
"-hh" <[email protected]> wrote
<snip>
FYI, this question is deliberately phrased so that we're not
talking about anyone who is rejected: it is specifically for
those who pass, asking how long their application should take to >>>>>>> process.
Depends on the quotas set and the number of people ahead of them
in line.
Not at all, for this is asking a basic question on fairness.
Th current system is clearly unfair because it requires some
immigrants to wait literally decades whereas others can just
saunter right on in.
Exactly. Just go ahead and let half a million a year in. That's >>>> a trickle compared to the flood between the Civil War and the
1920s.
That's the 'immigration period' in US history when anybody who
wasn't sick or too old to work was let in.
Unless they were Chinese.
*Lots* of Chinese immigrated prior to the Chinese Exclusion act, o
oozing scarlet red maxipad (whose mouth waters at the thought of his
mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch). How the fuck do you think Wong
Kim Ark managed to be born in San Francisco in 1873, o oozing scarlet
red maxipad (whose mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch)?
On 28/5/25 8:52, Scout wrote:
That was then, this is now, and the situation is far different.
Bigots like you get listenned to.
I see.. so we should be able to openly carry guns in public..
including court houses, and places serving alcohol without anyone
saying a word....
Your ignorance doesn't make me a bigot.. it just makes you look
like a fool.
California outlaws open carry. Conceal carry requires special
procedures.
On 5/22/25 10:46, Scout wrote:
See *WE* do not control the money supply. The politicians do, and we
really don't even control them, and they are driving us into poverty,
and the nation into bankruptcy.
By giving even more tax cuts to the richest 10%.
FYI, if there had been made no GOP income tax cuts since 1980 and we
didn't change our actual Federal budgets ... the current Federal deficit would be ZERO.
Indeed, I bet most people under 30 will remain in debt for their whole
lives.
This is simply not sustainable.
And look at the Geometric Progression.. as the curve closes in on
becoming vertical kicking the can down the road ceases to be possible
and only those who own assets in excess of their debt will have any
hope, ASSUMING they can realize that value as who would be buying at
full price?
So, yes, we need to consider our own economy and we need to do so now..
When one looks at this 'Geometric Progression', what's quite obvious is
that tax collection rates have collapsed due to repeated tax cuts.
Where the top 2% is charged a marginal income tax rate today of 37%, it
used to be 70%.
On Wed, 28 May 2025 15:28:11 -0400, -hh
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 5/20/25 07:50, Scout wrote:
<snip>
Are you aware that we are now on our 3rd generation (and possibly 4th)
that will are on and fully expect to spend their entire lives on welfare?
Well, when you choose to only provide a weak band-aide and never
anything proactive, it is a logical that you get what you wanted.
At what point do we realize that what was intended at a temporary
support aid to allow people to get back on their feet and evolved into a >>> bed in which they expect to spend their entire lives?
When you realize that you failed to follow through with more than merely >>temporary band-aids.
If the system isn't designed to get people off of it by requiring them
to again become self sufficient then what is it's purpose and long long
do we continue bleeding the workers to support the lazy?
Its purpose is then of shallow window dressing to make it look like
one's politicians are doing *something* but without actually solving the >>root causes of the problem. For example, to complain about hordes of >>immigrants who stay here forever while waiting for their cases while
voting in opposition of adequately funding the Immigration
courts...because doing so maintains the political narrative they get >>reelected on.
Thus the Republicans shot down both of Biden's early requests for more immigration funding before shutting down a REPUBLICAN bill because it
was an election year and Trump wanted to campaign on the issue.
Their excuse was always the same, "The bill doesn't go far enough."
So instead of taking the hors d'oerve and waiting for supper, they
chose to go hungry.
On 29/5/25 11:34, Jim Coyote wrote:
At one time California was the "open carry" capital of the country.
They pushed their luck and challenged the police. It was a choice ofThen Black Panthers open carried. The law was quickly changed.
killing them all for the good of the city, or doing the usual Democrat
thing and penalizing the majority for the actions of a few idiots.
Their open carry was legal. The police had no basis to interfere.
Racist legislators stopped them but the new law had to be race
neutral, so it now applies to everyone. Everyone is happy with it.
On 5/20/25 07:50, Scout wrote:
Indeed if you dig into how they work these days, you will see how the
current laws actually seem designed to trap those in the system into a
cycle of poverty and dependency.
The 'trap' is in making them keep on having to prove their need, which consumes finite resources. Its more common in Southern Red States.
Are you aware that we are now on our 3rd generation (and possibly 4th)
that will are on and fully expect to spend their entire lives on welfare?
Well, when you choose to only provide a weak band-aide and never
anything proactive, it is a logical that you get what you wanted.
What federal agency could survive on its 1980 appropriation today?
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill <[email protected]> typed:
On Wed, 28 May 2025 15:28:11 -0400, -hh
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 5/20/25 07:50, Scout wrote:
<snip>
Are you aware that we are now on our 3rd generation (and possibly
4th) that will are on and fully expect to spend their entire lives
on welfare?
Well, when you choose to only provide a weak band-aide and never
anything proactive, it is a logical that you get what you wanted.
At what point do we realize that what was intended at a temporary
support aid to allow people to get back on their feet and evolved
into a bed in which they expect to spend their entire lives?
When you realize that you failed to follow through with more than
merely temporary band-aids.
If the system isn't designed to get people off of it by requiring
them to again become self sufficient then what is it's purpose and
long long do we continue bleeding the workers to support the lazy?
Its purpose is then of shallow window dressing to make it look like
one's politicians are doing *something* but without actually solving
the root causes of the problem. For example, to complain about
hordes of immigrants who stay here forever while waiting for their
cases while voting in opposition of adequately funding the
Immigration courts...because doing so maintains the political
narrative they get reelected on.
Thus the Republicans shot down both of Biden's early requests for
more immigration funding before shutting down a REPUBLICAN bill
because it was an election year and Trump wanted to campaign on the
issue.
Their excuse was always the same, "The bill doesn't go far enough."
So instead of taking the hors d'oerve and waiting for supper, they
chose to go hungry.
They were waiting for a new chef ... who delivered.
On 29/5/25 19:03, max headroom wrote:
What federal agency could survive on its 1980 appropriation today?
Have you written to Congress that spending that benefits you must
be cut?
In news:101b58f$9h72$[email protected], Siri Cruz <[email protected]> typed:
On 29/5/25 19:03, max headroom wrote:
What federal agency could survive on its 1980 appropriation today?
Have you written to Congress that spending that benefits you must
be cut?
The Queen of Non Sequitur returns!
On 29/5/25 20:35, max headroom wrote:
In news:101b58f$9h72$[email protected], Siri Cruz <[email protected]> typed:
On 29/5/25 19:03, max headroom wrote:
What federal agency could survive on its 1980 appropriation today?
Have you written to Congress that spending that benefits you must
be cut?
The Queen of Non Sequitur returns!
Now it is Your deficit.
On 5/28/2025 12:21 PM, -hh wrote:
On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the
thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried — and
*failed* — to bullshit:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill
<[email protected]> typed:
On Tue, 27 May 2025 12:32:06 -0400, -hh wrote:
On 5/27/25 10:18, Scout wrote:
"-hh" <[email protected]> wrote
<snip>
FYI, this question is deliberately phrased so that we're not talking >>>>>>> about anyone who is rejected: it is specifically for those who pass, >>>>>>> asking how long their application should take to process.
Depends on the quotas set and the number of people ahead of them
in line.
Not at all, for this is asking a basic question on fairness.
Th current system is clearly unfair because it requires someExactly. Just go ahead and let half a million a year in. That's a
immigrants
to wait literally decades whereas others can just saunter right on in. >>>
trickle compared to the flood between the Civil War and the 1920s.
That's the 'immigration period' in US history when anybody who wasn't
sick or too old to work was let in.
Unless they were Chinese.
*Lots* of Chinese immigrated prior to the Chinese Exclusion act, o
oozing scarlet red maxipad (whose mouth waters at the thought of his
mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch). How the fuck do you think Wong
Kim Ark managed to be born in San Francisco in 1873, o oozing scarlet
red maxipad (whose mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch)?
Via the Immigration Act of 1917 (Barred Zone Act), which created
“barred zone” extending from the Middle East to Southeast Asia from
which no persons were allowed to enter the USA because of the 'Yellow
Threat'.
There was also exclusion of many Europeans, particularly of Slavic and
Mediterranean, including Italy & Greece because in this era they were
considered to be non-whites.
<https://andscape.com/features/white-immigrants-werent-always-
considered-white- and-acceptable/>
But they weren't shut out and prevented from immigrating. They just
faced prejudice and discrimination once they arrived.
In news:1017od8$3d2lf$[email protected], -hh <[email protected]> typed:
On 5/22/25 10:46, Scout wrote:
See *WE* do not control the money supply. The politicians do, and we
really don't even control them, and they are driving us into poverty,
and the nation into bankruptcy.
By giving even more tax cuts to the richest 10%.
FYI, if there had been made no GOP income tax cuts since 1980 and we
didn't change our actual Federal budgets ... the current Federal deficit
would be ZERO.
What federal agency could survive on its 1980 appropriation today?
Indeed, I bet most people under 30 will remain in debt for their whole
lives.
This is simply not sustainable.
And look at the Geometric Progression.. as the curve closes in on
becoming vertical kicking the can down the road ceases to be possible
and only those who own assets in excess of their debt will have any
hope, ASSUMING they can realize that value as who would be buying at
full price?
So, yes, we need to consider our own economy and we need to do so now..
When one looks at this 'Geometric Progression', what's quite obvious is
that tax collection rates have collapsed due to repeated tax cuts.
Where the top 2% is charged a marginal income tax rate today of 37%, it
used to be 70%.
In the U.K., it used to be 95%. Look how well that worked for them.
In 2022, 40% of Americans paid no income tax. How about "they pay their fair share"?
On 5/29/25 22:03, max headroom wrote:
In news:1017od8$3d2lf$[email protected], -hh
<[email protected]> typed:
On 5/22/25 10:46, Scout wrote:
See *WE* do not control the money supply. The politicians do, and
we really don't even control them, and they are driving us into
poverty, and the nation into bankruptcy.
By giving even more tax cuts to the richest 10%.
FYI, if there had been made no GOP income tax cuts since 1980 and we
didn't change our actual Federal budgets ... the current Federal
deficit would be ZERO.
What federal agency could survive on its 1980 appropriation today?
Non sequitur, because this statement is referring to tax collection
rates, not absolute dollars collected: it is noting that the
*current* budget would not only be fully funded through these
collections, but with a surplus which would have been sufficient to
have completely wiped out our current $36T National Debt ...
... and FYI, this is without bothering to have counted the elimination
of debt interest payments which have been in our Federal budget that
wouldn't have existed to have paid.
Indeed, I bet most people under 30 will remain in debt for their
whole lives.
This is simply not sustainable.
And look at the Geometric Progression.. as the curve closes in on
becoming vertical kicking the can down the road ceases to be
possible and only those who own assets in excess of their debt will
have any hope, ASSUMING they can realize that value as who would be
buying at full price?
So, yes, we need to consider our own economy and we need to do so
now..
When one looks at this 'Geometric Progression', what's quite obvious
is that tax collection rates have collapsed due to repeated tax
cuts. Where the top 2% is charged a marginal income tax rate today
of 37%, it used to be 70%.
In the U.K., it used to be 95%. Look how well that worked for them.
It used to be 94% in the USA: look how cutting it too much has
"worked" for us in terms of debt & debt servicing costs.
In 2022, 40% of Americans paid no income tax. How about "they pay
their fair share"?
So? Just because they pay no Federal income tax doesn't mean that
they pay nothing in taxes.
And since Scout was including both direct & indirect taxes, you can't honestly try to retroactively ignore the indirect taxes now.
Then they became civilized.You set that standard.. and the moment I apply it you suddenly want to
assert that it's "different" making you a bigot by your own standard.
At one time California was the "open carry" capital of the country.
On 30/5/25 10:47, Governor Swill wrote:
You set that standard.. and the moment I apply it you suddenly want to >>>> >>assert that it's "different" making you a bigot by your own standard.
At one time California was the "open carry" capital of the country. Then >>> >they became civilized.
Nope. Black Panthers open carried in the state Capitol. The
farmers in Sacto were afeared.
In news:101d5gj$ltvd$[email protected], Siri Cruz <[email protected]> typed:
On 30/5/25 10:47, Governor Swill wrote:
You set that standard.. and the moment I apply it you suddenly want to >>>>> >>assert that it's "different" making you a bigot by your own standard.
At one time California was the "open carry" capital of the country. Then >>>> >they became civilized.
Nope. Black Panthers open carried in the state Capitol. The
farmers in Sacto were afeared.
And pinkies wonder why those in flyover country feel disrespected.
On Thu, 29 May 2025 19:03:49 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In 2022, 40% of Americans paid no income tax. How about "they pay
their fair share"?
I doubt the veracity of that statistic. That said, you can't get
blood out of a turnip.
Are you excluding retirees not taxed on some pension/SS benefits?
Are you excluding the President who certainly has not paid his share?
On Thu, 29 May 2025 19:08:04 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:101aa29$q2r$[email protected], Siri Cruz <[email protected]> typed: >>
On 29/5/25 11:34, Jim Coyote wrote:
At one time California was the "open carry" capital of the country.
They pushed their luck and challenged the police. It was a choice ofThen Black Panthers open carried. The law was quickly changed.
killing them all for the good of the city, or doing the usual Democrat >>>> thing and penalizing the majority for the actions of a few idiots.
Their open carry was legal. The police had no basis to interfere.
Racist legislators stopped them but the new law had to be race
neutral, so it now applies to everyone. Everyone is happy with it.
Not true.
Cite the facts.
On Fri, 30 May 2025 03:30:54 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <[email protected]> wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:101b459$5jpu$[email protected]:
In news:[email protected], Governor SwillTACOs
<[email protected]> typed:
On Wed, 28 May 2025 15:28:11 -0400, -hh
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 5/20/25 07:50, Scout wrote:
<snip>
Are you aware that we are now on our 3rd generation (and possibly
4th) that will are on and fully expect to spend their entire lives >>>>>> on welfare?
Well, when you choose to only provide a weak band-aide and never
anything proactive, it is a logical that you get what you wanted.
At what point do we realize that what was intended at a temporary
support aid to allow people to get back on their feet and evolved
into a bed in which they expect to spend their entire lives?
When you realize that you failed to follow through with more than
merely temporary band-aids.
If the system isn't designed to get people off of it by requiring
them to again become self sufficient then what is it's purpose and >>>>>> long long do we continue bleeding the workers to support the lazy?
Its purpose is then of shallow window dressing to make it look like
one's politicians are doing *something* but without actually solving >>>>> the root causes of the problem. For example, to complain about
hordes of immigrants who stay here forever while waiting for their
cases while voting in opposition of adequately funding the
Immigration courts...because doing so maintains the political
narrative they get reelected on.
Thus the Republicans shot down both of Biden's early requests for
more immigration funding before shutting down a REPUBLICAN bill
because it was an election year and Trump wanted to campaign on the
issue.
Their excuse was always the same, "The bill doesn't go far enough."
So instead of taking the hors d'oerve and waiting for supper, they
chose to go hungry.
They were waiting for a new chef ... who delivered.
LOL!
max headroom wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
In news:101d5gj$ltvd$[email protected], Siri Cruz <[email protected]> typed:
On 30/5/25 10:47, Governor Swill wrote:
You set that standard.. and the moment I apply it you suddenly want to >>>>>> >>assert that it's "different" making you a bigot by your own standard.
At one time California was the "open carry" capital of the country. Then >>>>> >they became civilized.
Nope. Black Panthers open carried in the state Capitol. The
farmers in Sacto were afeared.
And pinkies wonder why those in flyover country feel disrespected.
Non sequitur
On Thu, 29 May 2025 19:08:04 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:101aa29$q2r$[email protected], Siri Cruz <[email protected]> typed: >>> On 29/5/25 11:34, Jim Coyote wrote:
At one time California was the "open carry" capital of the country.
Then Black Panthers open carried. The law was quickly changed.
They pushed their luck and challenged the police. It was a choice of
killing them all for the good of the city, or doing the usual Democrat >>>> thing and penalizing the majority for the actions of a few idiots.
Their open carry was legal. The police had no basis to interfere.
Racist legislators stopped them but the new law had to be race
neutral, so it now applies to everyone. Everyone is happy with it.
Not true.
Cite the facts.
On Thu, 29 May 2025 19:06:04 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill >><[email protected]> typed:
On Wed, 28 May 2025 15:28:11 -0400, -hh
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 5/20/25 07:50, Scout wrote:
<snip>
Are you aware that we are now on our 3rd generation (and possibly 4th) >>>>> that will are on and fully expect to spend their entire lives on welfare?
Well, when you choose to only provide a weak band-aide and never >>>>anything proactive, it is a logical that you get what you wanted.
At what point do we realize that what was intended at a temporary
support aid to allow people to get back on their feet and evolved into a >>>>> bed in which they expect to spend their entire lives?
When you realize that you failed to follow through with more than merely >>>>temporary band-aids.
If the system isn't designed to get people off of it by requiring them >>>>> to again become self sufficient then what is it's purpose and long long >>>>> do we continue bleeding the workers to support the lazy?
Its purpose is then of shallow window dressing to make it look like >>>>one's politicians are doing *something* but without actually solving the >>>>root causes of the problem. For example, to complain about hordes of >>>>immigrants who stay here forever while waiting for their cases while >>>>voting in opposition of adequately funding the Immigration >>>>courts...because doing so maintains the political narrative they get >>>>reelected on.
Thus the Republicans shot down both of Biden's early requests for more
immigration funding before shutting down a REPUBLICAN bill because it
was an election year and Trump wanted to campaign on the issue.
Their excuse was always the same, "The bill doesn't go far enough."
So instead of taking the hors d'oerve and waiting for supper, they
chose to go hungry.
They were waiting for a new chef ... who delivered.
Actually, he hasn't. Not so much as a whisper of crafting a new
immigration bill that truly solves the problem....
... Just a lot of lawbreaking and drama over getting rid of a few tattoo encrusted brown guys....
At the rate he's going he'll have them ALL deported in 18 years!
Beasley Brattford wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On 27 May 2025, Baxter <[email protected]> posted some
<snip>
Neither India nor California are communist.
Hollywood is.
LMAO
On 28/5/25 3:58, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
LMAONeither India nor California are communist.
Hollywood is.
People out east are so bad at capitalism because they cannot
recognise it.
In <1016tb6$37qgc$[email protected]> Siri wrote:
On 28/5/25 3:58, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
LMAONeither India nor California are communist.
Hollywood is.
People out east are so bad at capitalism because they cannot
recognise it.
Democrats out West couldn't balance a bank account to save their lives.
In news:101dkba$oiha$[email protected], Chris Ahlstrom <[email protected]> typed:
max headroom wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
In news:101d5gj$ltvd$[email protected], Siri Cruz <[email protected]> typed:
On 30/5/25 10:47, Governor Swill wrote:
You set that standard.. and the moment I apply it you suddenly want to >>>>>>> >>assert that it's "different" making you a bigot by your own standard.
At one time California was the "open carry" capital of the country. Then
they became civilized.
Nope. Black Panthers open carried in the state Capitol. The
farmers in Sacto were afeared.
And pinkies wonder why those in flyover country feel disrespected.
Non sequitur
Siri's elitism and provincialism seep into her every post.
In <1016q9k$37094$[email protected]> some idiot wrote:
Beasley Brattford wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On 27 May 2025, Baxter <[email protected]> posted some
<snip>
Neither India nor California are communist.
Hollywood is.
LMAO
It's expected that an Illinois hillbilly wouldn't know that.
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill <[email protected]> typed:
On Thu, 29 May 2025 19:08:04 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:101aa29$q2r$[email protected], Siri Cruz <[email protected]> typed:
On 29/5/25 11:34, Jim Coyote wrote:
At one time California was the "open carry" capital of the country.
Then Black Panthers open carried. The law was quickly changed.
They pushed their luck and challenged the police. It was a choice of >>>>> killing them all for the good of the city, or doing the usual Democrat >>>>> thing and penalizing the majority for the actions of a few idiots.
Their open carry was legal. The police had no basis to interfere.
Racist legislators stopped them but the new law had to be race
neutral, so it now applies to everyone. Everyone is happy with it.
Not true.
Cite the facts.
Only a deluded pinkie would believe that ALL 39 million+ residents are happy about anything.
max headroom wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
In news:101dkba$oiha$[email protected], Chris Ahlstrom <[email protected]> >> typed:
max headroom wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
In news:101d5gj$ltvd$[email protected], Siri Cruz <[email protected]> >>>> typed:
On 30/5/25 10:47, Governor Swill wrote:
You set that standard.. and the moment I apply it you suddenly want to >>>>>>>> >>assert that it's "different" making you a bigot by your own standard.
At one time California was the "open carry" capital of the country. >>>>>>> >Then they became civilized.
Nope. Black Panthers open carried in the state Capitol. The
farmers in Sacto were afeared.
And pinkies wonder why those in flyover country feel disrespected.
Non sequitur
Siri's elitism and provincialism seep into her every post.
I guess I shouldn't bother with a poster who uses words like "pinkies".
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 29 May 2025 19:03:49 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In 2022, 40% of Americans paid no income tax. How about "they pay
their fair share"?
I doubt the veracity of that statistic. That said, you can't get
blood out of a turnip.
Are you excluding retirees not taxed on some pension/SS benefits?
Are you excluding the President who certainly has not paid his share?
If 40% don't pay income tax, that's an indictment of the wage system - they're not able to earn enough to pay.
On 30/5/25 22:30, max headroom wrote:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill
<[email protected]> typed:
On Thu, 29 May 2025 19:08:04 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:101aa29$q2r$[email protected], Siri Cruz <[email protected]>
typed:
On 29/5/25 11:34, Jim Coyote wrote:
At one time California was the "open carry" capital of the country.
Then Black Panthers open carried. The law was quickly changed.
They pushed their luck and challenged the police. It was a choice of >>>>>> killing them all for the good of the city, or doing the usual Democrat >>>>>> thing and penalizing the majority for the actions of a few idiots.
Their open carry was legal. The police had no basis to interfere.
Racist legislators stopped them but the new law had to be race
neutral, so it now applies to everyone. Everyone is happy with it.
Not true.
Cite the facts.
Only a deluded pinkie would believe that ALL 39 million+ residents are happy >> about anything.
It is not that hard to register to vote. Then you can start your
own petition.
On Thu, 29 May 2025 20:35:37 -0700, "max headroom" wrote:
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> typed:
On 29/5/25 19:03, max headroom wrote:
What federal agency could survive on its 1980 appropriation today?
Have you written to Congress that spending that benefits you must
be cut?
The Queen of Non Sequitur returns!
I didn't think you'd want to answer that question and I was right.
In news:101emls$12j21$[email protected], Chris Ahlstrom <[email protected]> typed:
max headroom wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
In news:101dkba$oiha$[email protected], Chris Ahlstrom <[email protected]>
typed:
max headroom wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
In news:101d5gj$ltvd$[email protected], Siri Cruz <[email protected]> >>>>> typed:
On 30/5/25 10:47, Governor Swill wrote:
You set that standard.. and the moment I apply it you suddenly want to
assert that it's "different" making you a bigot by your own standard.
At one time California was the "open carry" capital of the country. >>>>>>>> >Then they became civilized.
Nope. Black Panthers open carried in the state Capitol. The
farmers in Sacto were afeared.
And pinkies wonder why those in flyover country feel disrespected.
Non sequitur
Siri's elitism and provincialism seep into her every post.
I guess I shouldn't bother with a poster who uses words like "pinkies".
Not if you wish to maintain the fiction of your superiority.
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill <[email protected]> typed:
On Thu, 29 May 2025 19:08:04 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:101aa29$q2r$[email protected], Siri Cruz <[email protected]> >>>typed:
On 29/5/25 11:34, Jim Coyote wrote:
At one time California was the "open carry" capital of the
country.
Then Black Panthers open carried. The law was quickly changed.
They pushed their luck and challenged the police. It was a choice
of killing them all for the good of the city, or doing the usual
Democrat thing and penalizing the majority for the actions of a
few idiots.
Their open carry was legal. The police had no basis to interfere.
Racist legislators stopped them but the new law had to be race
neutral, so it now applies to everyone. Everyone is happy with it.
Not true.
Cite the facts.
Only a deluded pinkie would believe that ALL 39 million+ residents are
happy about anything.
On 30 May 2025, -hh <[email protected]> posted some news:101cbrc$g4gf$[email protected]:
On 5/29/25 22:03, max headroom wrote:
In news:1017od8$3d2lf$[email protected], -hh
<[email protected]> typed:
On 5/22/25 10:46, Scout wrote:
See *WE* do not control the money supply. The politicians do, and
we really don't even control them, and they are driving us into
poverty, and the nation into bankruptcy.
By giving even more tax cuts to the richest 10%.
FYI, if there had been made no GOP income tax cuts since 1980 and we
didn't change our actual Federal budgets ... the current Federal
deficit would be ZERO.
What federal agency could survive on its 1980 appropriation today?
Non sequitur, because this statement is referring to tax collection
rates, not absolute dollars collected: it is noting that the
*current* budget would not only be fully funded through these
collections, but with a surplus which would have been sufficient to
have completely wiped out our current $36T National Debt ...
... and FYI, this is without bothering to have counted the elimination
of debt interest payments which have been in our Federal budget that
wouldn't have existed to have paid.
Indeed, I bet most people under 30 will remain in debt for their
whole lives.
This is simply not sustainable.
And look at the Geometric Progression.. as the curve closes in on
becoming vertical kicking the can down the road ceases to be
possible and only those who own assets in excess of their debt will
have any hope, ASSUMING they can realize that value as who would be
buying at full price?
So, yes, we need to consider our own economy and we need to do so
now..
When one looks at this 'Geometric Progression', what's quite obvious
is that tax collection rates have collapsed due to repeated tax
cuts. Where the top 2% is charged a marginal income tax rate today
of 37%, it used to be 70%.
In the U.K., it used to be 95%. Look how well that worked for them.
It used to be 94% in the USA: look how cutting it too much has
"worked" for us in terms of debt & debt servicing costs.
In 2022, 40% of Americans paid no income tax. How about "they pay
their fair share"?
So? Just because they pay no Federal income tax doesn't mean that
they pay nothing in taxes.
Who collects and reports the taxes on EBT cards used for illegal
drug purchases?
And since Scout was including both direct & indirect taxes, you can't
honestly try to retroactively ignore the indirect taxes now.
To require everyone to be happy?Only a deluded pinkie would believe that ALL 39 million+ residents are happy
It is not that hard to register to vote. Then you can start yourabout anything.
own petition.
I guess I shouldn't bother with a poster who uses words like "pinkies".Not if you wish to maintain the fiction of your superiority.
On 30/5/25 22:30, max headroom wrote:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill
<[email protected]> typed:
On Thu, 29 May 2025 19:08:04 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:101aa29$q2r$[email protected], Siri Cruz
<[email protected]> typed:
On 29/5/25 11:34, Jim Coyote wrote:
At one time California was the "open carry" capital of the country.
Then Black Panthers open carried. The law was quickly changed.
They pushed their luck and challenged the police. It was a choice of >>>>>> killing them all for the good of the city, or doing the usual
Democrat
thing and penalizing the majority for the actions of a few idiots.
Their open carry was legal. The police had no basis to interfere.
Racist legislators stopped them but the new law had to be race
neutral, so it now applies to everyone. Everyone is happy with it.
Not true.
Cite the facts.
Only a deluded pinkie would believe that ALL 39 million+ residents are
happy
about anything.
It is not that hard to register to vote. Then you can start your own petition.
Fudge Packers <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
In <1016tb6$37qgc$[email protected]> Siri wrote:
On 28/5/25 3:58, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
LMAONeither India nor California are communist.
Hollywood is.
People out east are so bad at capitalism because they cannot
recognise it.
Democrats out West couldn't balance a bank account to save their lives.
Who needs a bank balance when they still have a credit card that allows them to spend money they don't have to begin with?
In news:101dqe7$tdij$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 29 May 2025 19:03:49 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In 2022, 40% of Americans paid no income tax. How about "they
pay their fair share"?
I doubt the veracity of that statistic. That said, you can't
get blood out of a turnip.
Are you excluding retirees not taxed on some pension/SS
benefits?
Are you excluding the President who certainly has not paid his
share?
If 40% don't pay income tax, that's an indictment of the wage
system - they're not able to earn enough to pay.
Or they're smarter than you and they know how to reduce their taxable
income below the federal threshold.
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in news:101e7qb$102f6$[email protected]:
In news:[email protected], Governor SwillOnly a deluded conservaturd (redundant, I know) would believe that
<[email protected]> typed:
On Thu, 29 May 2025 19:08:04 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:101aa29$q2r$[email protected], Siri Cruz
<[email protected]> typed:
On 29/5/25 11:34, Jim Coyote wrote:
At one time California was the "open carry" capital of
the country.
Then Black Panthers open carried. The law was quickly
changed.
They pushed their luck and challenged the police. It was a
choice of killing them all for the good of the city, or
doing the usual Democrat thing and penalizing the majority
for the actions of a few idiots.
Their open carry was legal. The police had no basis to
interfere. Racist legislators stopped them but the new law
had to be race neutral, so it now applies to everyone.
Everyone is happy with it.
Not true.
Cite the facts.
Only a deluded pinkie would believe that ALL 39 million+ residents
are happy about anything.
ALL 39 million+ residents are angry about anything.
On 5/31/2025 6:08 AM, max headroom wrote:
In news:101dqe7$tdij$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 29 May 2025 19:03:49 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In 2022, 40% of Americans paid no income tax. How about "they
pay their fair share"?
I doubt the veracity of that statistic. That said, you can't
get blood out of a turnip.
Are you excluding retirees not taxed on some pension/SS
benefits?
Are you excluding the President who certainly has not paid his
share?
If 40% don't pay income tax, that's an indictment of the wage
system - they're not able to earn enough to pay.
Or they're smarter than you and they know how to reduce their taxable
income below the federal threshold.
Winner!
On 5/31/2025 7:43 AM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:101e7qb$102f6$[email protected]:
In news:[email protected], Governor SwillOnly a deluded conservaturd (redundant, I know) would believe that
<[email protected]> typed:
On Thu, 29 May 2025 19:08:04 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:101aa29$q2r$[email protected], Siri Cruz
<[email protected]> typed:
On 29/5/25 11:34, Jim Coyote wrote:
At one time California was the "open carry" capital of
the country.
Then Black Panthers open carried. The law was quickly
changed.
They pushed their luck and challenged the police. It was a
choice of killing them all for the good of the city, or
doing the usual Democrat thing and penalizing the majority
for the actions of a few idiots.
Their open carry was legal. The police had no basis to
interfere. Racist legislators stopped them but the new law
had to be race neutral, so it now applies to everyone.
Everyone is happy with it.
Not true.
Cite the facts.
Only a deluded pinkie would believe that ALL 39 million+ residents
are happy about anything.
ALL 39 million+ residents are angry about anything.
Let's take that another direction. 50% and growing each day, believe
Trump has the country on the right track.
Oven Repair <[email protected]> wrote in news:101fog5$gpa$10 @toxic.dizum.net:
On 5/31/2025 7:43 AM, Baxter wrote:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:101e7qb$102f6$[email protected]:
In news:[email protected], Governor SwillOnly a deluded conservaturd (redundant, I know) would believe that
<[email protected]> typed:
On Thu, 29 May 2025 19:08:04 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:101aa29$q2r$[email protected], Siri Cruz
<[email protected]> typed:
On 29/5/25 11:34, Jim Coyote wrote:
At one time California was the "open carry" capital of
the country.
Then Black Panthers open carried. The law was quickly
changed.
They pushed their luck and challenged the police. It was a
choice of killing them all for the good of the city, or
doing the usual Democrat thing and penalizing the majority
for the actions of a few idiots.
Their open carry was legal. The police had no basis to
interfere. Racist legislators stopped them but the new law
had to be race neutral, so it now applies to everyone.
Everyone is happy with it.
Not true.
Cite the facts.
Only a deluded pinkie would believe that ALL 39 million+ residents
are happy about anything.
ALL 39 million+ residents are angry about anything.
Let's take that another direction. 50% and growing each day, believe
Trump has the country on the right track.
Yeah, you LOVE those tariffs, don't you? And giving away National
Secrets too!
Oven Repair <[email protected]> wrote in news:101fn12$gpa$8 @toxic.dizum.net:
On 5/31/2025 6:08 AM, max headroom wrote:
In news:101dqe7$tdij$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 29 May 2025 19:03:49 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In 2022, 40% of Americans paid no income tax. How about "they
pay their fair share"?
I doubt the veracity of that statistic. That said, you can't
get blood out of a turnip.
Are you excluding retirees not taxed on some pension/SS
benefits?
Are you excluding the President who certainly has not paid his
share?
If 40% don't pay income tax, that's an indictment of the wage
system - they're not able to earn enough to pay.
Or they're smarter than you and they know how to reduce their taxable
income below the federal threshold.
Winner!
that's how the TACO describes himself.
You misspelled, "weakly". I read that Trump has done quite a shakeup
at ICE out of his disappointment at the sluggishness of deportations.
On 29/5/25 11:34, Jim Coyote wrote:
They pushed their luck and challenged the police. It was a choice ofAt one time California was the "open carry" capital of the country.
Then Black Panthers open carried. The law was quickly changed.
killing them all for the good of the city, or doing the usual Democrat
thing and penalizing the majority for the actions of a few idiots.
Their open carry was legal. The police had no basis to interfere. Racist legislators stopped them but the new law had to be race neutral, so it now applies to everyone. Everyone is happy with it.
In news:1017jmj$3camm$[email protected], Siri Cruz <[email protected]> typed:
On 28/5/25 8:52, Scout wrote:
That was then, this is now, and the situation is far different.
Bigots like you get listenned to.
I see.. so we should be able to openly carry guns in public..
including court houses, and places serving alcohol without anyone
saying a word....
Your ignorance doesn't make me a bigot.. it just makes you look
like a fool.
California outlaws open carry. Conceal carry requires special
procedures.
No, just donations to selected Democrats.
On Wed, 28 May 2025 15:21:24 -0400, -hh
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 5/28/25 09:06, max headroom wrote:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill
<[email protected]> typed:
On Tue, 27 May 2025 12:32:06 -0400, -hh wrote:
On 5/27/25 10:18, Scout wrote:
"-hh" <[email protected]> wrote
<snip>
FYI, this question is deliberately phrased so that we're not talking >>>>>>> about anyone who is rejected: it is specifically for those who pass, >>>>>>> asking how long their application should take to process.
Depends on the quotas set and the number of people ahead of them in >>>>>> line.
Not at all, for this is asking a basic question on fairness.
Th current system is clearly unfair because it requires someExactly. Just go ahead and let half a million a year in. That's a
immigrants
to wait literally decades whereas others can just saunter right on in. >>>
trickle compared to the flood between the Civil War and the 1920s.
That's the 'immigration period' in US history when anybody who wasn't
sick or too old to work was let in.
Unless they were Chinese.
Via the Immigration Act of 1917 (Barred Zone Act), which created "barred >>zone" extending from the Middle East to Southeast Asia from which no >>persons were allowed to enter the USA because of the 'Yellow Threat'.
There was also exclusion of many Europeans, particularly of Slavic and >>Mediterranean, including Italy & Greece because in this era they were >>considered to be non-whites.
<https://andscape.com/features/white-immigrants-werent-always-considered-white-and-acceptable/>
Ok, anybody WHITE who wasn't sick or too old to work was let in.
On Wed, 28 May 2025 15:28:11 -0400, -hh
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 5/20/25 07:50, Scout wrote:<snip>
Are you aware that we are now on our 3rd generation (and possibly 4th)
that will are on and fully expect to spend their entire lives on
welfare?
Well, when you choose to only provide a weak band-aide and never
anything proactive, it is a logical that you get what you wanted.
At what point do we realize that what was intended at a temporary
support aid to allow people to get back on their feet and evolved into a >>> bed in which they expect to spend their entire lives?
When you realize that you failed to follow through with more than merely >>temporary band-aids.
If the system isn't designed to get people off of it by requiring them
to again become self sufficient then what is it's purpose and long long
do we continue bleeding the workers to support the lazy?
Its purpose is then of shallow window dressing to make it look like
one's politicians are doing *something* but without actually solving the >>root causes of the problem. For example, to complain about hordes of >>immigrants who stay here forever while waiting for their cases while
voting in opposition of adequately funding the Immigration
courts...because doing so maintains the political narrative they get >>reelected on.
Thus the Republicans shot down both of Biden's early requests for more immigration funding before shutting down a REPUBLICAN bill because it
was an election year and Trump wanted to campaign on the issue.
On Wed, 28 May 2025 15:32:56 -0400, -hh
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 5/22/25 10:46, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:45:07 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
In short.. money is flowing INTO China's economy and flowing OUT of
our
economy. In the case of the US that is currently $918 Billion Dollars >>>>> per
year leaving our economy. $918 Billion dollars of goods, services,
and jobs
leaving our economy....
What difference does that make when *we* control the money supply?
Yea, because hyperinflation really helps people out,.
Gold per ounce
1965 - $35.50
1975 - $160.86
1985 - $317.42
1995 - $387.00
2005 - $444.99
2015 - $1298.00
2025 - $3,302.97 (current)
In which time a dollar has lost 99.98% of it's value.
Good luck buying groceries with gold dust.
Minimum wage
1965 - $1.25
1975 - $2.10
1985 - $3.35
1995 - $4.25
2005 - $5.15
2015 - $7.25
2025 - $16.50
Nope: Fed Minimum wage is still just $7.25/hr.
Meanwhile wages have not kept up with inflation...
Add in the increase of taxation* from 18% of gross pay to 50-60% of
gross pay...
I've never paid more than 30% for all deductions.
Hence the current issue of where people lack the means their parents
had, and more so for their grandparents.
* - Includes direct and indirect taxation
Oh, so taxation including direct & indirect used to be just 18%? What
year was this, and for what income level?
See *WE* do not control the money supply. The politicians do, and we
really don't even control them, and they are driving us into poverty,
and the nation into bankruptcy.
The money supply is based on faith in the United States. Trump is
destroying that as quickly as he can.
By giving even more tax cuts to the richest 10%.
FYI, if there had been made no GOP income tax cuts since 1980 and we
didn't change our actual Federal budgets ... the current Federal deficit >>would be ZERO.
As I recall, the economy was booming in the nineties. Why don't we
return to the income tax code ca 1995 when we had slow debt growth and
budget surpluses?
In news:1017od8$3d2lf$[email protected], -hh
<[email protected]> typed:
On 5/22/25 10:46, Scout wrote:
See *WE* do not control the money supply. The politicians do, and we
really don't even control them, and they are driving us into poverty,
and the nation into bankruptcy.
By giving even more tax cuts to the richest 10%.
FYI, if there had been made no GOP income tax cuts since 1980 and we
didn't change our actual Federal budgets ... the current Federal deficit
would be ZERO.
What federal agency could survive on its 1980 appropriation today?
Indeed, I bet most people under 30 will remain in debt for their whole
lives.
This is simply not sustainable.
And look at the Geometric Progression.. as the curve closes in on
becoming vertical kicking the can down the road ceases to be possible
and only those who own assets in excess of their debt will have any
hope, ASSUMING they can realize that value as who would be buying at
full price?
So, yes, we need to consider our own economy and we need to do so now..
When one looks at this 'Geometric Progression', what's quite obvious is
that tax collection rates have collapsed due to repeated tax cuts.
Where the top 2% is charged a marginal income tax rate today of 37%, it
used to be 70%.
In the U.K., it used to be 95%. Look how well that worked for them.
In 2022, 40% of Americans paid no income tax. How about "they pay their
fair share"?
On Thu, 29 May 2025 16:52:17 -0000 (UTC), Earl Scheib
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 28 May 2025, "Scout" <[email protected]>
posted some news:1017la8$3cn2j$[email protected]:
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:1017jmj$3camm$[email protected]...
On 28/5/25 8:52, Scout wrote:
That was then, this is now, and the situation is far different.
Bigots like you get listenned to.
I see.. so we should be able to openly carry guns in public..
including court houses, and places serving alcohol without anyone
saying a word....
Your ignorance doesn't make me a bigot.. it just makes you look
like a fool.
California outlaws open carry. Conceal carry requires special
procedures.
So you're saying we should listen to bigots like yourself because the
situation is the same as it's ever been and if it was legal then, it
should be legal now.
You set that standard.. and the moment I apply it you suddenly want to
assert that it's "different" making you a bigot by your own standard.
At one time California was the "open carry" capital of the country.
Then they became civilized.
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
On Thu, 29 May 2025 19:03:49 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
If 40% don't pay income tax, that's an indictment of the wage system - they're not able to earn enough to pay.In 2022, 40% of Americans paid no income tax. How about "they pay
their fair share"?
I doubt the veracity of that statistic. That said, you can't get
blood out of a turnip.
Are you excluding retirees not taxed on some pension/SS benefits?
Are you excluding the President who certainly has not paid his share?
On Fri, 30 May 2025 23:31:36 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill >><[email protected]> typed:
On Thu, 29 May 2025 19:06:04 -0700, "max headroom"
<[email protected]> wrote:
In news:[email protected], Governor Swill >>>><[email protected]> typed:
On Wed, 28 May 2025 15:28:11 -0400, -hh
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 5/20/25 07:50, Scout wrote:
<snip>
Are you aware that we are now on our 3rd generation (and possibly >>>>>>> 4th)
that will are on and fully expect to spend their entire lives on >>>>>>> welfare?
Well, when you choose to only provide a weak band-aide and never >>>>>>anything proactive, it is a logical that you get what you wanted.
At what point do we realize that what was intended at a temporary >>>>>>> support aid to allow people to get back on their feet and evolved >>>>>>> into a
bed in which they expect to spend their entire lives?
When you realize that you failed to follow through with more than >>>>>>merely
temporary band-aids.
If the system isn't designed to get people off of it by requiring >>>>>>> them
to again become self sufficient then what is it's purpose and long >>>>>>> long
do we continue bleeding the workers to support the lazy?
Its purpose is then of shallow window dressing to make it look like >>>>>>one's politicians are doing *something* but without actually solving >>>>>>the
root causes of the problem. For example, to complain about hordes of >>>>>>immigrants who stay here forever while waiting for their cases while >>>>>>voting in opposition of adequately funding the Immigration >>>>>>courts...because doing so maintains the political narrative they get >>>>>>reelected on.
Thus the Republicans shot down both of Biden's early requests for more >>>>> immigration funding before shutting down a REPUBLICAN bill because it >>>>> was an election year and Trump wanted to campaign on the issue.
Their excuse was always the same, "The bill doesn't go far enough."
So instead of taking the hors d'oerve and waiting for supper, they
chose to go hungry.
They were waiting for a new chef ... who delivered.
Actually, he hasn't. Not so much as a whisper of crafting a new
immigration bill that truly solves the problem....
That's Congress' job.
That's a misleading cop out. Presidents routinely craft legislation.
... Just a lot of lawbreaking and drama over getting rid of a few
tattoo
encrusted brown guys....
Which sent enraged pinkies to their favorite judges to try to get them >>brought
back.
That's a barefaced lie. The only ones being returned were US citizens
or otherwise here legally without a criminal record. Those kind of
people need to be returned.
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:101aa29$q2r$[email protected]...
On 29/5/25 11:34, Jim Coyote wrote:
They pushed their luck and challenged the police. It was aAt one time California was the "open carry" capital of the
country.
Then Black Panthers open carried. The law was quickly changed.
choice of
killing them all for the good of the city, or doing the usual
Democrat
thing and penalizing the majority for the actions of a few
idiots.
Their open carry was legal. The police had no basis to
interfere. Racist legislators stopped them but the new law had
to be race neutral, so it now applies to everyone. Everyone is
happy with it.
And thus we see the motivations of Democrats..... they disarmed
everyone because they can't stand the idea that Blacks might
chose to be armed.
On 30/5/25 7:09, Scout wrote:
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:101aa29$q2r$[email protected]...
On 29/5/25 11:34, Jim Coyote wrote:
They pushed their luck and challenged the police. It was aAt one time California was the "open carry" capital of the
country.
Then Black Panthers open carried. The law was quickly changed.
choice of
killing them all for the good of the city, or doing the usual
Democrat
thing and penalizing the majority for the actions of a few
idiots.
Their open carry was legal. The police had no basis to
interfere. Racist legislators stopped them but the new law had
to be race neutral, so it now applies to everyone. Everyone is
happy with it.
And thus we see the motivations of Democrats..... they disarmed
everyone because they can't stand the idea that Blacks might
chose to be armed.
California has had deeply racist eras. Until 1995 it was Republican as
often as Democrat.
On 30/5/25 7:09, Scout wrote:
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:101aa29$q2r$[email protected]...
On 29/5/25 11:34, Jim Coyote wrote:
They pushed their luck and challenged the police. It was aAt one time California was the "open carry" capital of the
country.
Then Black Panthers open carried. The law was quickly changed.
choice of
killing them all for the good of the city, or doing the usual
Democrat
thing and penalizing the majority for the actions of a few
idiots.
Their open carry was legal. The police had no basis to
interfere. Racist legislators stopped them but the new law had
to be race neutral, so it now applies to everyone. Everyone is
happy with it.
And thus we see the motivations of Democrats..... they disarmed
everyone because they can't stand the idea that Blacks might
chose to be armed.
California has had deeply racist eras. Until 1995 it was
Republican as often as Democrat.
On 02 Jun 2025, Siri Cruz <[email protected]> posted some news:101knku$3e5el$[email protected]:
On 30/5/25 7:09, Scout wrote:
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:101aa29$q2r$[email protected]...
On 29/5/25 11:34, Jim Coyote wrote:
They pushed their luck and challenged the police. It was aAt one time California was the "open carry" capital of the
country.
Then Black Panthers open carried. The law was quickly changed.
choice of
killing them all for the good of the city, or doing the usual
Democrat
thing and penalizing the majority for the actions of a few
idiots.
Their open carry was legal. The police had no basis to
interfere. Racist legislators stopped them but the new law had
to be race neutral, so it now applies to everyone. Everyone is
happy with it.
And thus we see the motivations of Democrats..... they disarmed
everyone because they can't stand the idea that Blacks might
chose to be armed.
California has had deeply racist eras. Until 1995 it was
Republican as often as Democrat.
Why is enforcing laws that Democrats pass racist? Is there something
wrong with the legislation in the first place?
On 30/5/25 7:09, Scout wrote:
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:101aa29$q2r$[email protected]...
On 29/5/25 11:34, Jim Coyote wrote:
They pushed their luck and challenged the police. It was aAt one time California was the "open carry" capital of the
country.
Then Black Panthers open carried. The law was quickly changed.
choice of
killing them all for the good of the city, or doing the usual
Democrat
thing and penalizing the majority for the actions of a few
idiots.
Their open carry was legal. The police had no basis to
interfere. Racist legislators stopped them but the new law had
to be race neutral, so it now applies to everyone. Everyone is
happy with it.
And thus we see the motivations of Democrats..... they disarmed
everyone because they can't stand the idea that Blacks might
chose to be armed.
California has had deeply racist eras. Until 1995 it was Republican as
often as Democrat.
On 2/6/25 12:33, Raymond Schnauzer wrote:
On 02 Jun 2025, Siri Cruz <[email protected]> posted some
news:101knku$3e5el$[email protected]:
On 30/5/25 7:09, Scout wrote:
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:101aa29$q2r$[email protected]...
On 29/5/25 11:34, Jim Coyote wrote:
They pushed their luck and challenged the police. It wasAt one time California was the "open carry" capital of
the country.
Then Black Panthers open carried. The law was quickly
changed.
a choice of killing them all for the good of the city, or
doing the usual Democrat thing and penalizing the majority
for the actions of a few idiots.
Their open carry was legal. The police had no basis to
interfere. Racist legislators stopped them but the new law
had to be race neutral, so it now applies to everyone.
Everyone is happy with it.
And thus we see the motivations of Democrats..... they
disarmed everyone because they can't stand the idea that Blacks
might chose to be armed.
California has had deeply racist eras. Until 1995 it was
Republican as often as Democrat.
Why is enforcing laws that Democrats pass racist? Is there
something wrong with the legislation in the first place?
California was responsible for the Japanese Internment. And a big
pusher for Mexican repatriation including US citizens in 1930s and
1950s. California experimented with Jaime Crow laws. Some laws and
orders were racist.
In 1995 it was the Republican turn for racist law because white dudes
were freaking out we were becoming a minority majority state. The
difference this time is that Chicanoes did not agree to be punching
bags. They registerred to vote and Democrats helped them find their
voice. So they still support Democrats.
And Democrats learned racism no longer works. The state has become
more egalitarian.
And with the whole country becoming minority majority white dudes are
again in a panic and hired idjt to create apartheid.
On 6/2/2025 2:01 PM, Siri Cruz wrote:
On 2/6/25 12:33, Raymond Schnauzer wrote:
On 02 Jun 2025, Siri Cruz <[email protected]> posted some
news:101knku$3e5el$[email protected]:
On 30/5/25 7:09, Scout wrote:
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:101aa29$q2r$[email protected]...
On 29/5/25 11:34, Jim Coyote wrote:
They pushed their luck and challenged the police. It wasAt one time California was the "open carry" capital of
the country.
Then Black Panthers open carried. The law was quickly
changed.
a choice of killing them all for the good of the city, or
doing the usual Democrat thing and penalizing the majority
for the actions of a few idiots.
Their open carry was legal. The police had no basis to interfere. Racist >>>>>> legislators stopped them but the new law
had to be race neutral, so it now applies to everyone.
Everyone is happy with it.
And thus we see the motivations of Democrats..... they
disarmed everyone because they can't stand the idea that Blacks
might chose to be armed.
California has had deeply racist eras. Until 1995 it was Republican as often
as Democrat.
Why is enforcing laws that Democrats pass racist? Is there
something wrong with the legislation in the first place?
California was responsible for the Japanese Internment. And a big
pusher for Mexican repatriation including US citizens in 1930s and
1950s. California experimented with Jaime Crow laws. Some laws and
orders were racist.
I'd bet you've never been to Manzanar.
In 1995 it was the Republican turn for racist law because white dudes
were freaking out we were becoming a minority majority state. The difference
this time is that Chicanoes
did not agree to be punching bags. They
registerred
to vote and Democrats helped them find their voice. So they still
support Democrats.
And Democrats learned racism no longer works.
The state has become more egalitarian.
And with the whole country becoming minority majority white dudes are
again in a panic and hired idjt to create apartheid.
Democrats find yet another reason to attack and hate men.
On Sun, 1 Jun 2025 19:42:45 -0000 (UTC), Baxter wrote:
Governor Swill <[email protected]>
You misspelled, "weakly". I read that Trump has done quite aMeanwhile one of those ICE thugs was spotted in Martha's Vinyard
shakeup at ICE out of his disappointment at the sluggishness of
deportations.
sporting a valknot tattoo. How many other ICE agents are members of
White Nationalist gangs?
That's handy to know. Do you have a cite for it?
On 6/2/2025 10:39 AM, Siri Cruz wrote:
On 30/5/25 7:09, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:101aa29$q2r$[email protected]...
On 29/5/25 11:34, Jim Coyote wrote:
They pushed their luck and challenged the police. It was aAt one time California was the "open carry" capital of the
country.
Then Black Panthers open carried. The law was quickly changed.
choice of
killing them all for the good of the city, or doing the usual
Democrat
thing and penalizing the majority for the actions of a few
idiots.
Their open carry was legal. The police had no basis to
interfere. Racist legislators stopped them but the new law had
to be race neutral, so it now applies to everyone. Everyone is
happy with it.
And thus we see the motivations of Democrats..... they disarmed
everyone because they can't stand the idea that Blacks might
chose to be armed.
California has had deeply racist eras. Until 1995 it was Republican as often >> as Democrat.
It was a much nicer state in those days.
I have been. It was very moving. Not like when I went to Dachau,
because of course we didn't try to exterminate the
Japanese-Americans, but pretty moving all the same. Some time
later, I came across some hate speech by some right-wingnut cunt
who claimed Manzanar was a "hoax." It wasn't. It was a real
concentration camp, just not an extermination camp.
On Tue, 13 May 2025 17:05:58 -0700, Derek Nash
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 5/13/2025 4:05 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Tue, 13 May 2025 14:09:38 -0700, Derek Nash
<[email protected]> wrote:
Blowjob *still* is just too stupid to know what his tell is!
On 5/13/2025 1:50 PM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly obese >>>> convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 13 May 2025, Derek Nash <[email protected]> posted some
news:OQLUP.385089$[email protected]:
On 5/12/2025 3:46 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2025 12:48:49 -0400, "Scout"wrote:
"Creon" <[email protected]> wrote<snip>
On Mon, 12 May 2025 08:19:06 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>>>> [Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing >>>>>>>>>>> to do with any actual ideology.
Like "Nazi" to you freaks, right?
What's another good name for "white supremacist nationalist
fascists"?
BTW, even the famous Godwin of "Godwin's Law" has said they're >>>>>>>>> Nazis.
Tell me if they were black supremacist nationalist fascists would >>>>>>>> they still be Nazis.... if not, what term would apply to such
people?
They called them "Black Panthers". There have been a few such
groups.
Stop it. The Black Panthers were black nationalists, but were not the >>>>>> least bit fascist, let alone Nazi.
They were black radical extremists.
No, Blowjob, they were not.
Yeah, asshat, they were.
No, touchhole, they were not.
Yes they were. Our revered founding fathers were also radical
extremists.
On Wed, 14 May 2025 13:05:10 -0400, Governor Swill
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, 13 May 2025 17:05:58 -0700, Derek Nash
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 5/13/2025 4:05 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Tue, 13 May 2025 14:09:38 -0700, Derek Nash
<[email protected]> wrote:
Blowjob *still* is just too stupid to know what his tell is!
On 5/13/2025 1:50 PM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly
obese convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 13 May 2025, Derek Nash <[email protected]> posted some
news:OQLUP.385089$[email protected]:
On 5/12/2025 3:46 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2025 12:48:49 -0400, "Scout"wrote:
"Creon" <[email protected]> wrote<snip>
On Mon, 12 May 2025 08:19:06 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
wrote:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has >>>>>>>>>>>> nothing to do with any actual ideology.
Like "Nazi" to you freaks, right?
What's another good name for "white supremacist nationalist >>>>>>>>>> fascists"?
BTW, even the famous Godwin of "Godwin's Law" has said
they're Nazis.
Tell me if they were black supremacist nationalist fascists
would they still be Nazis.... if not, what term would apply to >>>>>>>>> such people?
They called them "Black Panthers". There have been a few such >>>>>>>> groups.
Stop it. The Black Panthers were black nationalists, but were
not the least bit fascist, let alone Nazi.
They were black radical extremists.
No, Blowjob, they were not.
Yeah, asshat, they were.
No, touchhole, they were not.
Yes they were. Our revered founding fathers were also radical
extremists.
By today's
I'm currently reading the Kindle edition of Alexander Hamilton by Ron Chernow, and yes, by today's measure of what's considered extremist
you're right.
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]>
wrote in news:3a442k98vfko65ul1gfr3f493t63vha5gi@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksu
ck ing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:wrote
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]>
news:bkj32kpk79uluf3clqvhecifdhpmlpub4l@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuin
ck
privateing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]> >>>wrote
in
news:pu122kd004jlm4q4hup8708me0vfpv1r41 >>>@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck
ing.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>news:vvqtjm$js1b$[email protected]:
In news:vvqn6c$i9d9$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvqf1q$gn18$[email protected]:
In news:vvp3ms$3vmi1$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:xMSTP.165919$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:41 PM, Baxter wrote:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively >>>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid commie liar, lied:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Then why do government schools turn out so poorly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> educated students?
They don't. Public schools perform better than
whoschools.
Wrong.
Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate everyone
theshows up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim
Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal posts
3. ??? = -9999
And the composition of the student body is reflected in
rantyouscores. The same group of students will achieve the same >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> performance whether in private or public schools.
Bullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing
Communists and socialist are not the same thing. And there are >>>>>>>NO actual Socialists anywhere in Congress.have posted shows that.
Liar,
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar. The >>>>>>>>>>>> bullshit you posted does not say anything about student >>>>>>>>>>>> body composition.
LOL forget the "commie" bullshit - conservaturds LOVE commie >>>>>>>>>>> Putin, commie Russia.
Forget the "commie" bullshit - conservatives HATE commie
Putin, commie Russia,
NO you don't.
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/404017-trump- >>>>>>>>> supporters-whose-pro-russia-shirts-went-viral-were-not/
That's all ya got? Two guys with joke tee shorts from February, >>>>>>>> 2018?!?
commie Xi, commie China, commie Maduro, commie Venezuela.
conservatives used to be anti-comunist, but that changed when >>>>>>>>> Russian asset tRump took over.
You are deluded. Today's communists/socialists caucus with the >>>>>>>> Democrats.
Yes, there are members of Congress who identify as democratic
socialists
Democratic Socialists are not the "Socialists" that conservaturds
about.
Sorry old timer.
If you morons think Musk is "literally Hitler,: then yes,
Democratic Socialists are the socialists conservatives rant about.
"Socialist" is just a opprobrious word to KKKlaun. Has nothing to do >>>with any actual ideology.
Like "Nazi" to you freaks, right?
You might try:
- NOT walking like a NAZI,
- NOT talking like a NAZI
- NOT acting like a NAZI
On 5/11/2025 5:36 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:E18UP.350345$[email protected]:
On 5/11/2025 1:15 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupidNope.
commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vq4UP.97880$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:00 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupidBut students in private schools DO NOT reflect the general
commie liar, lied:
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvp2tv$3vh6s$2@dont- email.me:
On 10/5/25 18:08, Lou Bricano wrote:
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar. The
bullshit you posted does not say anything about student body
composition.
Are private schools required to accept autistics, fetal
alcoholic? Born deaf? Born blind?
A private school drawing from families of pro footballers,
That has never happened, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar.
populace.
Red herring.
Yes, it is.
In Algebra: if A=B, then B=A
That's not algebra, Bugster, and it has nothing to do with the stupid
shit you wrote, Bugster.
On 5/11/2025 5:32 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:t18UP.350335$[email protected]:
On 5/11/2025 1:19 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:Eq4UP.97881$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 7:57 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:xMSTP.165919$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:41 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid >>>>>>> commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and aggressivelyLiar,
stupid commie liar, lied:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote inBullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar. Nothing you >>>>>>>>> have posted shows that.
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote:
On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Wrong.They don't. Public schools perform better than private >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> schools.Then why do government schools turn out so poorly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> educated students?
Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate everyone who >>>>>>>>>>>> shows up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim
Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal postsAnd the composition of the student body is reflected in the >>>>>>>>>> scores. The same group of students will achieve the same
3. ??? = -9999
performance whether in private or public schools.
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar. The
bullshit you posted does not say anything about student body
composition.
LOL forget the "commie" bullshit
No, it's an essential part of your stupidity. You *are* a
goddamned fucking commie, and it's in large part because you're
fucking stupid.
Well, commie fits
*you*, Bugster, you goddamned stupid fucking commie liar. You *are*
a fucking commie. You hate private property and private enterprise
and want the state to control and do everything.
Whoosh!! Right off the cliff you go!.
Nope. I described you to a T, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar. Everything I said about you, including you being willfully and
aggressively stupid, is true.
On 12 May 2025, Lou Bricano <[email protected]> posted some news:oMwUP.192029$[email protected]:No, Blowjob, you stupid *fat* cuck.
On 5/11/2025 5:36 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:E18UP.350345$[email protected]:
On 5/11/2025 1:15 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupidNope.
commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vq4UP.97880$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:00 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupidBut students in private schools DO NOT reflect the general
commie liar, lied:
Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vvp2tv$3vh6s$2@dont- email.me:
On 10/5/25 18:08, Lou Bricano wrote:
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar. The
bullshit you posted does not say anything about student body >>>>>>>>> composition.
Are private schools required to accept autistics, fetal
alcoholic? Born deaf? Born blind?
A private school drawing from families of pro footballers,
That has never happened, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar.
populace.
Red herring.
Yes, it is.
In Algebra: if A=B, then B=A
That's not algebra, Bugster, and it has nothing to do with the stupid
shit you wrote, Bugster.
"symmetric property" geometry. Means the same thing.
On 12 May 2025, Lou Bricano <[email protected]> posted some news:uMwUP.192030$[email protected]:If you say so, Blowjob, you *fat* stupid cuck.
On 5/11/2025 5:32 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:t18UP.350335$[email protected]:
On 5/11/2025 1:19 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:Eq4UP.97881$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 7:57 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid
commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:xMSTP.165919$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 1:41 PM, Bugster, willfully and aggressively stupid >>>>>>>> commie liar, lied:
Lou Bricano <[email protected]> wrote in
news:KKKTP.52810$[email protected]:
On 5/10/2025 8:05 AM, Bugster, willfully and aggressivelyLiar,
stupid commie liar, lied:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote inBullshit, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar. Nothing you >>>>>>>>>> have posted shows that.
news:vvnkjh$3i25t$[email protected]:
On 2025-05-10, Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/5/25 19:59, pothead wrote:
Wrong.They don't. Public schools perform better than private >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> schools.Then why do government schools turn out so poorly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> educated students?
Try again.
Do private schools have to accept and educate everyone who >>>>>>>>>>>>> shows up?
1. snipping the proof offered to counter your claim
Misinformation is not proof.
2. moving the goal postsAnd the composition of the student body is reflected in the >>>>>>>>>>> scores. The same group of students will achieve the same >>>>>>>>>>> performance whether in private or public schools.
3. ??? = -9999
Yes, Bugster, you are a goddamned fucking commie liar. The
bullshit you posted does not say anything about student body
composition.
LOL forget the "commie" bullshit
No, it's an essential part of your stupidity. You *are* a
goddamned fucking commie, and it's in large part because you're
fucking stupid.
Well, commie fits
*you*, Bugster, you goddamned stupid fucking commie liar. You *are*
a fucking commie. You hate private property and private enterprise
and want the state to control and do everything.
Whoosh!! Right off the cliff you go!.
Nope. I described you to a T, Bugster, you stupid fucking commie liar.
Everything I said about you, including you being willfully and
aggressively stupid, is true.
He shit in my mouth, hunh?
On 4/24/2025 12:42 PM, max headroom wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Yak <[email protected]> wrote in news:vubh70$3oqrk$[email protected]:
On 4/23/2025 3:54 PM, H Karlsen wrote:
https://www.kgw.com/article/news/education/millions-people-behind-s
tudent-loans-must-start-paying/283-97da664c-1a5b-4bf1-99b7-80bd9fba
1313?ref=exit-recirc
The only people that got screwed were the taxpayers who got stuck
with the bill for these lazy welchers who were let off the hook for
repaying on the obligations that they willingly signed on for.
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still owed....
Cite?
They paid, as they should have, until covid. Then, Trump45 paused it,
part of the misnamed CARES Act. Along comes Biden46, waving his magic
EO pen, and issued extension after extension on the pause. The only
one's paying anything back were fed govt loan recipients with an ounce
of integrity, or private loan recipients who, by the way, got no such
favor of the pause.
Along comes the Debt Ceiling Act of 2023, which mandated resumption of payments. However, Biden, waiving his EO pen which never seems to run
out of ink, once again issued an extenstion - what he called a
'ramp-up' period to last one year. Miss a payment during that time? No problem - no default, no involuntary collections, nothing. Some were
paying, others weren't, during the ramp up period. Many of those who
did received lower payments and/or forgiveness (that's the taxpayer on
the hook part).
But wait, there's more!
Biden, in his infinite wisdom, comes up with another inappropriately
named boondoggle called the SAVE Plan, designed to reduced payments
and offer forgiveness after 10–25 years, depending on loan size
(there's that pesky taxpayer on the hook part again); and although
parts of it were correctly struck down, other parts remain.
Fast forward to September, 2024 - the ramp-up ends. Biden is in full
dementia mode, Trump47 wins, the not paying your loan party is over.
Done, kaput, time to nut up, shut up and adhere to the terms of the
loans you willingly signed up for.
... No money came out of your pocket to forgive those loans.
Except tax money.
See above.
On 24 Apr 2025, Yak <[email protected]> posted some news:vudtb3$1h96b$[email protected]:
On 4/24/2025 12:42 PM, max headroom wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Yak <[email protected]> wrote in news:vubh70$3oqrk$[email protected]:
On 4/23/2025 3:54 PM, H Karlsen wrote:
https://www.kgw.com/article/news/education/millions-people-behind-s >>>>>> tudent-loans-must-start-paying/283-97da664c-1a5b-4bf1-99b7-80bd9fba >>>>>> 1313?ref=exit-recirc
The only people that got screwed were the taxpayers who got stuck
with the bill for these lazy welchers who were let off the hook for
repaying on the obligations that they willingly signed on for.
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still owed....
Cite?
They paid, as they should have, until covid. Then, Trump45 paused it,
part of the misnamed CARES Act. Along comes Biden46, waving his magic
EO pen, and issued extension after extension on the pause. The only
one's paying anything back were fed govt loan recipients with an ounce
of integrity, or private loan recipients who, by the way, got no such
favor of the pause.
Along comes the Debt Ceiling Act of 2023, which mandated resumption of
payments. However, Biden, waiving his EO pen which never seems to run
out of ink, once again issued an extenstion - what he called a
'ramp-up' period to last one year. Miss a payment during that time? No
problem - no default, no involuntary collections, nothing. Some were
paying, others weren't, during the ramp up period. Many of those who
did received lower payments and/or forgiveness (that's the taxpayer on
the hook part).
But wait, there's more!
Biden, in his infinite wisdom, comes up with another inappropriately
named boondoggle called the SAVE Plan, designed to reduced payments
and offer forgiveness after 10–25 years, depending on loan size
(there's that pesky taxpayer on the hook part again); and although
parts of it were correctly struck down, other parts remain.
Fast forward to September, 2024 - the ramp-up ends. Biden is in full
dementia mode, Trump47 wins, the not paying your loan party is over.
Done, kaput, time to nut up, shut up and adhere to the terms of the
loans you willingly signed up for.
... No money came out of your pocket to forgive those loans.
Except tax money.
See above.
Lots of poor broke people living in car parking lots
Lots of poor broke people living in car parking lots thanks to JoeBiden.
No, Blowjob,
On 24 Apr 2025, Yak <[email protected]> posted some news:vudtb3$1h96b$[email protected]:s
On 4/24/2025 12:42 PM, max headroom wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Yak <[email protected]> wrote in news:vubh70$3oqrk$[email protected]:
On 4/23/2025 3:54 PM, H Karlsen wrote:
https://www.kgw.com/article/news/education/millions-people-behind-
80bd9fbatudent-loans-must-start-paying/283-97da664c-1a5b-4bf1-99b7-
Biden.1313?ref=exit-recirc
The only people that got screwed were the taxpayers who got stuck
with the bill for these lazy welchers who were let off the hook for
repaying on the obligations that they willingly signed on for.
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still owed....
Cite?
They paid, as they should have, until covid. Then, Trump45 paused it,
part of the misnamed CARES Act. Along comes Biden46, waving his magic
EO pen, and issued extension after extension on the pause. The only
one's paying anything back were fed govt loan recipients with an ounce
of integrity, or private loan recipients who, by the way, got no such
favor of the pause.
Along comes the Debt Ceiling Act of 2023, which mandated resumption of
payments. However, Biden, waiving his EO pen which never seems to run
out of ink, once again issued an extenstion - what he called a
'ramp-up' period to last one year. Miss a payment during that time? No
problem - no default, no involuntary collections, nothing. Some were
paying, others weren't, during the ramp up period. Many of those who
did received lower payments and/or forgiveness (that's the taxpayer on
the hook part).
But wait, there's more!
Biden, in his infinite wisdom, comes up with another inappropriately
named boondoggle called the SAVE Plan, designed to reduced payments
and offer forgiveness after 10–25 years, depending on loan size
(there's that pesky taxpayer on the hook part again); and although
parts of it were correctly struck down, other parts remain.
Fast forward to September, 2024 - the ramp-up ends. Biden is in full
dementia mode, Trump47 wins, the not paying your loan party is over.
Done, kaput, time to nut up, shut up and adhere to the terms of the
loans you willingly signed up for.
... No money came out of your pocket to forgive those loans.
Except tax money.
See above.
Lots of poor broke people living in car parking lots thanks to Joe
On 7/5/2025 6:12 PM, Clarence Callahan wrote:
Blowjob is too stupid to realize his tell. What a fucking idiot!
On 7/5/2025 2:48 PM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly obese convicted
child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 24 Apr 2025, Yak <[email protected]> posted some
news:vudtb3$1h96b$[email protected]:
On 4/24/2025 12:42 PM, max headroom wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Yak <[email protected]> wrote in news:vubh70$3oqrk$[email protected]:
On 4/23/2025 3:54 PM, H Karlsen wrote:
https://www.kgw.com/article/news/education/millions-people-behind-s >>>>>>>> tudent-loans-must-start-paying/283-97da664c-1a5b-4bf1-99b7-80bd9fba >>>>>>>> 1313?ref=exit-recirc
The only people that got screwed were the taxpayers who got stuck >>>>>>> with the bill for these lazy welchers who were let off the hook for >>>>>>> repaying on the obligations that they willingly signed on for.
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still owed....
Cite?
They paid, as they should have, until covid. Then, Trump45 paused it,
part of the misnamed CARES Act. Along comes Biden46, waving his magic
EO pen, and issued extension after extension on the pause. The only
one's paying anything back were fed govt loan recipients with an ounce >>>> of integrity, or private loan recipients who, by the way, got no such
favor of the pause.
Along comes the Debt Ceiling Act of 2023, which mandated resumption of >>>> payments. However, Biden, waiving his EO pen which never seems to run
out of ink, once again issued an extenstion - what he called a
'ramp-up' period to last one year. Miss a payment during that time? No >>>> problem - no default, no involuntary collections, nothing. Some were
paying, others weren't, during the ramp up period. Many of those who
did received lower payments and/or forgiveness (that's the taxpayer on >>>> the hook part).
But wait, there's more!
Biden, in his infinite wisdom, comes up with another inappropriately
named boondoggle called the SAVE Plan, designed to reduced payments
and offer forgiveness after 10–25 years, depending on loan size
(there's that pesky taxpayer on the hook part again); and although
parts of it were correctly struck down, other parts remain.
Fast forward to September, 2024 - the ramp-up ends. Biden is in full
dementia mode, Trump47 wins, the not paying your loan party is over.
Done, kaput, time to nut up, shut up and adhere to the terms of the
loans you willingly signed up for.
... No money came out of your pocket to forgive those loans.
Except tax money.
See above.
Lots of poor broke people living in car parking lots
No, Blowjob, there aren't, you stupid fucking *fat* cocksucker and draft dodger
and Social Security dole scrounger. But when Trump craters the economy very >> shortly, there will be.
Rudy kicks my flabby doughy pimply unemployable ass once again.
left hand <[email protected]> wrote in news:104c6if$3godg$12 @news.tcpreset.net:
<snip>
Lots of poor broke people living in car parking lots thanks to
Joe Biden.
That's what conservaturds do - project, commit crimes (legal or
moral) and claim someone else did it.
That's what conservaturds do - project, commit crimes (legal or"left hand" is probably posting from his car in a parking lot
moral) and claim someone else did it.
using stolen wifi.
-- "Language shapes the way we think, and determines what we can think about." -- B. L. Whorf
Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
That's what conservaturds do - project, commit crimes (legal or"left hand" is probably posting from his car in a parking lot
moral) and claim someone else did it.
using stolen wifi.
Las Vegas has weird drainage. You do not want to be parking garage
during a flash flood.
-- "Language shapes the way we think, and determines what we can think
about." -- B. L. Whorf
The Whorf-Sapir hypothesis is dead. Each language can express whatever
the speakers want to, changing the language as needed.
Rudy tries to kiss ass once again.
Yes,
On 7/6/2025 9:24 AM, Clarence Callahan wrote:
Blowjob is too stupid to realize his tell. What a fucking idiot!
On 7/6/2025 12:07 AM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly obese
convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 7/5/2025 6:12 PM, Clarence Callahan wrote:
Blowjob is too stupid to realize his tell. What a fucking idiot!
On 7/5/2025 2:48 PM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly obese >>>> convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 24 Apr 2025, Yak <[email protected]> posted some
news:vudtb3$1h96b$[email protected]:
On 4/24/2025 12:42 PM, max headroom wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Yak <[email protected]> wrote in news:vubh70$3oqrk$[email protected]: >>>>>>>>> On 4/23/2025 3:54 PM, H Karlsen wrote:Cite?
https://www.kgw.com/article/news/education/millions-people-behind-s >>>>>>>>>> tudent-loans-must-start-paying/283-97da664c-1a5b-4bf1-99b7-80bd9fba >>>>>>>>>> 1313?ref=exit-recirc
The only people that got screwed were the taxpayers who got stuck >>>>>>>>> with the bill for these lazy welchers who were let off the hook for >>>>>>>>> repaying on the obligations that they willingly signed on for. >>>>>>>Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still owed.... >>>>>>>
They paid, as they should have, until covid. Then, Trump45 paused it, >>>>>> part of the misnamed CARES Act. Along comes Biden46, waving his magic >>>>>> EO pen, and issued extension after extension on the pause. The only >>>>>> one's paying anything back were fed govt loan recipients with an ounce >>>>>> of integrity, or private loan recipients who, by the way, got no such >>>>>> favor of the pause.
Along comes the Debt Ceiling Act of 2023, which mandated resumption of >>>>>> payments. However, Biden, waiving his EO pen which never seems to run >>>>>> out of ink, once again issued an extenstion - what he called a
'ramp-up' period to last one year. Miss a payment during that time? No >>>>>> problem - no default, no involuntary collections, nothing. Some were >>>>>> paying, others weren't, during the ramp up period. Many of those who >>>>>> did received lower payments and/or forgiveness (that's the taxpayer on >>>>>> the hook part).
But wait, there's more!
Biden, in his infinite wisdom, comes up with another inappropriately >>>>>> named boondoggle called the SAVE Plan, designed to reduced payments >>>>>> and offer forgiveness after 10–25 years, depending on loan size
(there's that pesky taxpayer on the hook part again); and although >>>>>> parts of it were correctly struck down, other parts remain.
Fast forward to September, 2024 - the ramp-up ends. Biden is in full >>>>>> dementia mode, Trump47 wins, the not paying your loan party is over. >>>>>> Done, kaput, time to nut up, shut up and adhere to the terms of the >>>>>> loans you willingly signed up for.
... No money came out of your pocket to forgive those loans.
Except tax money.
See above.
Lots of poor broke people living in car parking lots
No, Blowjob, there aren't, you stupid fucking *fat* cocksucker and draft >>>> dodger and Social Security dole scrounger. But when Trump craters the economy
very shortly, there will be.
Rudy kicks my flabby doughy pimply unemployable ass once again.
Yes, Blowjob, you stupid fucking *fat* cocksucker and draft dodger and Social
Security dole scrounger, that's exactly what happened — again.
Rudy spots me, Blowjob, every fucking time.
"chine.bleu" <[email protected]> wrote in news:104eoqt$2ep2h$1@dont- email.me:
Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
That's what conservaturds do - project, commit crimes (legal or"left hand" is probably posting from his car in a parking lot
moral) and claim someone else did it.
using stolen wifi.
Las Vegas has weird drainage. You do not want to be parking garage
during a flash flood.
-- "Language shapes the way we think, and determines what we can think
about." -- B. L. Whorf
The Whorf-Sapir hypothesis is dead. Each language can express whatever
the speakers want to, changing the language as needed.
Speakers can't concieve something they have no language for.
On 7/7/2025 6:32 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
You're not making any sense as usual, scooter.
"Baxter" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:104euut$2gihh$[email protected]...
"chine.bleu" <[email protected]> wrote in news:104eoqt$2ep2h$1@dont-
email.me:
Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
That's what conservaturds do - project, commit crimes (legal or"left hand" is probably posting from his car in a parking lot
moral) and claim someone else did it.
using stolen wifi.
Las Vegas has weird drainage. You do not want to be parking garage
during a flash flood.
-- "Language shapes the way we think, and determines what we can think >>>>> about." -- B. L. Whorf
The Whorf-Sapir hypothesis is dead. Each language can express whatever >>>> the speakers want to, changing the language as needed.
Speakers can't concieve something they have no language for.
Then how do we come up with the word for concepts you assert no one can
conceive of until the word for it exists?
left hand <[email protected]> wrote in news:104c6if$3godg$12 @news.tcpreset.net:
On 24 Apr 2025, Yak <[email protected]> posted somes
news:vudtb3$1h96b$[email protected]:
On 4/24/2025 12:42 PM, max headroom wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Yak <[email protected]> wrote in news:vubh70$3oqrk$[email protected]:
On 4/23/2025 3:54 PM, H Karlsen wrote:
https://www.kgw.com/article/news/education/millions-people-behind >>>>>>> -
80bd9fbatudent-loans-must-start-paying/283-97da664c-1a5b-4bf1-99b7-
Biden.1313?ref=exit-recirc
The only people that got screwed were the taxpayers who got stuck
with the bill for these lazy welchers who were let off the hook
for repaying on the obligations that they willingly signed on
for.
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still owed....
Cite?
They paid, as they should have, until covid. Then, Trump45 paused
it, part of the misnamed CARES Act. Along comes Biden46, waving his
magic EO pen, and issued extension after extension on the pause. The
only one's paying anything back were fed govt loan recipients with
an ounce of integrity, or private loan recipients who, by the way,
got no such favor of the pause.
Along comes the Debt Ceiling Act of 2023, which mandated resumption
of payments. However, Biden, waiving his EO pen which never seems to
run out of ink, once again issued an extenstion - what he called a
'ramp-up' period to last one year. Miss a payment during that time?
No problem - no default, no involuntary collections, nothing. Some
were paying, others weren't, during the ramp up period. Many of
those who did received lower payments and/or forgiveness (that's the
taxpayer on the hook part).
But wait, there's more!
Biden, in his infinite wisdom, comes up with another inappropriately
named boondoggle called the SAVE Plan, designed to reduced payments
and offer forgiveness after 10–25 years, depending on loan size
(there's that pesky taxpayer on the hook part again); and although
parts of it were correctly struck down, other parts remain.
Fast forward to September, 2024 - the ramp-up ends. Biden is in full
dementia mode, Trump47 wins, the not paying your loan party is over.
Done, kaput, time to nut up, shut up and adhere to the terms of the
loans you willingly signed up for.
... No money came out of your pocket to forgive those loans.
Except tax money.
See above.
Lots of poor broke people living in car parking lots thanks to Joe
That's what conservaturds do - project, commit crimes (legal or moral)
and claim someone else did it.
On 06 Jul 2025, Baxter <[email protected]> posted some news:104e4p8$29164$[email protected]:behind
left hand <[email protected]> wrote in news:104c6if$3godg$12
@news.tcpreset.net:
On 24 Apr 2025, Yak <[email protected]> posted some
news:vudtb3$1h96b$[email protected]:
On 4/24/2025 12:42 PM, max headroom wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Yak <[email protected]> wrote in news:vubh70$3oqrk$[email protected]:
On 4/23/2025 3:54 PM, H Karlsen wrote:
https://www.kgw.com/article/news/education/millions-people-
s-
80bd9fbatudent-loans-must-start-paying/283-97da664c-1a5b-4bf1-99b7-
Biden.1313?ref=exit-recirc
The only people that got screwed were the taxpayers who got stuck >>>>>>> with the bill for these lazy welchers who were let off the hook
for repaying on the obligations that they willingly signed on
for.
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still owed....
Cite?
They paid, as they should have, until covid. Then, Trump45 paused
it, part of the misnamed CARES Act. Along comes Biden46, waving his
magic EO pen, and issued extension after extension on the pause. The
only one's paying anything back were fed govt loan recipients with
an ounce of integrity, or private loan recipients who, by the way,
got no such favor of the pause.
Along comes the Debt Ceiling Act of 2023, which mandated resumption
of payments. However, Biden, waiving his EO pen which never seems to
run out of ink, once again issued an extenstion - what he called a
'ramp-up' period to last one year. Miss a payment during that time?
No problem - no default, no involuntary collections, nothing. Some
were paying, others weren't, during the ramp up period. Many of
those who did received lower payments and/or forgiveness (that's the
taxpayer on the hook part).
But wait, there's more!
Biden, in his infinite wisdom, comes up with another inappropriately
named boondoggle called the SAVE Plan, designed to reduced payments
and offer forgiveness after 10–25 years, depending on loan size
(there's that pesky taxpayer on the hook part again); and although
parts of it were correctly struck down, other parts remain.
Fast forward to September, 2024 - the ramp-up ends. Biden is in full
dementia mode, Trump47 wins, the not paying your loan party is over.
Done, kaput, time to nut up, shut up and adhere to the terms of the
loans you willingly signed up for.
... No money came out of your pocket to forgive those loans.
Except tax money.
See above.
Lots of poor broke people living in car parking lots thanks to Joe
That's what conservaturds do - project, commit crimes (legal or moral)
and claim someone else did it.
Obama and Biden are Republicans?
Martin <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
On 06 Jul 2025, Baxter <[email protected]> posted some news:104e4p8$29164$[email protected]:
behindleft hand <[email protected]> wrote in news:104c6if$3godg$12
@news.tcpreset.net:
On 24 Apr 2025, Yak <[email protected]> posted some
news:vudtb3$1h96b$[email protected]:
On 4/24/2025 12:42 PM, max headroom wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Yak <[email protected]> wrote in news:vubh70$3oqrk$[email protected]: >>>>>>> On 4/23/2025 3:54 PM, H Karlsen wrote:
https://www.kgw.com/article/news/education/millions-people-
s-
80bd9fbatudent-loans-must-start-paying/283-97da664c-1a5b-4bf1-99b7-
Biden.Cite?1313?ref=exit-recirc
The only people that got screwed were the taxpayers who got stuck >>>>>>> with the bill for these lazy welchers who were let off the hook >>>>>>> for repaying on the obligations that they willingly signed on
for.
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still owed.... >>>>>
They paid, as they should have, until covid. Then, Trump45 paused
it, part of the misnamed CARES Act. Along comes Biden46, waving his
magic EO pen, and issued extension after extension on the pause. The >>>> only one's paying anything back were fed govt loan recipients with
an ounce of integrity, or private loan recipients who, by the way,
got no such favor of the pause.
Along comes the Debt Ceiling Act of 2023, which mandated resumption
of payments. However, Biden, waiving his EO pen which never seems to >>>> run out of ink, once again issued an extenstion - what he called a
'ramp-up' period to last one year. Miss a payment during that time?
No problem - no default, no involuntary collections, nothing. Some
were paying, others weren't, during the ramp up period. Many of
those who did received lower payments and/or forgiveness (that's the >>>> taxpayer on the hook part).
But wait, there's more!
Biden, in his infinite wisdom, comes up with another inappropriately >>>> named boondoggle called the SAVE Plan, designed to reduced payments
and offer forgiveness after 10�?25 years, depending on loan size
(there's that pesky taxpayer on the hook part again); and although
parts of it were correctly struck down, other parts remain.
Fast forward to September, 2024 - the ramp-up ends. Biden is in full >>>> dementia mode, Trump47 wins, the not paying your loan party is over. >>>> Done, kaput, time to nut up, shut up and adhere to the terms of the
loans you willingly signed up for.
... No money came out of your pocket to forgive those loans.
Except tax money.
See above.
Lots of poor broke people living in car parking lots thanks to Joe
That's what conservaturds do - project, commit crimes (legal or moral)
and claim someone else did it.
Obama and Biden are Republicans?
See? You're doing it now - tRump is the criminal, so you pretend Obama
and Biden ...
On Wed, 9 Jul 2025 08:06:03 -0600, Skeeter OG wrote:
Show how Obummer and his side kick
were not criminals?
Show that they were.
Martin <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
On 06 Jul 2025, Baxter <[email protected]> posted somebehind
news:104e4p8$29164$[email protected]:
left hand <[email protected]> wrote in news:104c6if$3godg$12
@news.tcpreset.net:
On 24 Apr 2025, Yak <[email protected]> posted some
news:vudtb3$1h96b$[email protected]:
On 4/24/2025 12:42 PM, max headroom wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Yak <[email protected]> wrote in news:vubh70$3oqrk$[email protected]: >>>>>>>> On 4/23/2025 3:54 PM, H Karlsen wrote:
https://www.kgw.com/article/news/education/millions-people-
s-
80bd9fbatudent-loans-must-start-paying/283-97da664c-1a5b-4bf1-99b7-
Biden.1313?ref=exit-recirc
The only people that got screwed were the taxpayers who got
stuck with the bill for these lazy welchers who were let off
the hook for repaying on the obligations that they willingly
signed on for.
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still
owed....
Cite?
They paid, as they should have, until covid. Then, Trump45 paused
it, part of the misnamed CARES Act. Along comes Biden46, waving
his magic EO pen, and issued extension after extension on the
pause. The only one's paying anything back were fed govt loan
recipients with an ounce of integrity, or private loan recipients
who, by the way, got no such favor of the pause.
Along comes the Debt Ceiling Act of 2023, which mandated
resumption of payments. However, Biden, waiving his EO pen which
never seems to run out of ink, once again issued an extenstion -
what he called a 'ramp-up' period to last one year. Miss a payment
during that time? No problem - no default, no involuntary
collections, nothing. Some were paying, others weren't, during the
ramp up period. Many of those who did received lower payments
and/or forgiveness (that's the taxpayer on the hook part).
But wait, there's more!
Biden, in his infinite wisdom, comes up with another
inappropriately named boondoggle called the SAVE Plan, designed to
reduced payments and offer forgiveness after 10–25 years,
depending on loan size (there's that pesky taxpayer on the hook
part again); and although parts of it were correctly struck down,
other parts remain.
Fast forward to September, 2024 - the ramp-up ends. Biden is in
full dementia mode, Trump47 wins, the not paying your loan party
is over. Done, kaput, time to nut up, shut up and adhere to the
terms of the loans you willingly signed up for.
... No money came out of your pocket to forgive those loans.
Except tax money.
See above.
Lots of poor broke people living in car parking lots thanks to Joe
That's what conservaturds do - project, commit crimes (legal or
moral) and claim someone else did it.
Obama and Biden are Republicans?
See? You're doing it now - tRump is the criminal, so you pretend
Obama and Biden ...
On 07 Jul 2025, Baxter <[email protected]> posted some news:104i0vk$3b6oc$[email protected]:didn't
Martin <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On 06 Jul 2025, Baxter <[email protected]> posted somebehind
news:104e4p8$29164$[email protected]:
left hand <[email protected]> wrote in news:104c6if$3godg$12
@news.tcpreset.net:
On 24 Apr 2025, Yak <[email protected]> posted some
news:vudtb3$1h96b$[email protected]:
On 4/24/2025 12:42 PM, max headroom wrote:
In news:vucb17$mjrm$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
Yak <[email protected]> wrote in news:vubh70$3oqrk$[email protected]: >>>>>>>>> On 4/23/2025 3:54 PM, H Karlsen wrote:
https://www.kgw.com/article/news/education/millions-people-
s-
80bd9fbatudent-loans-must-start-paying/283-97da664c-1a5b-4bf1-99b7-
Biden.1313?ref=exit-recirc
The only people that got screwed were the taxpayers who got
stuck with the bill for these lazy welchers who were let off >>>>>>>>> the hook for repaying on the obligations that they willingly >>>>>>>>> signed on for.
Except they paid the principle, with interest, and still
owed....
Cite?
They paid, as they should have, until covid. Then, Trump45 paused
it, part of the misnamed CARES Act. Along comes Biden46, waving
his magic EO pen, and issued extension after extension on the
pause. The only one's paying anything back were fed govt loan
recipients with an ounce of integrity, or private loan recipients
who, by the way, got no such favor of the pause.
Along comes the Debt Ceiling Act of 2023, which mandated
resumption of payments. However, Biden, waiving his EO pen which
never seems to run out of ink, once again issued an extenstion -
what he called a 'ramp-up' period to last one year. Miss a payment >>>>>> during that time? No problem - no default, no involuntary
collections, nothing. Some were paying, others weren't, during the >>>>>> ramp up period. Many of those who did received lower payments
and/or forgiveness (that's the taxpayer on the hook part).
But wait, there's more!
Biden, in his infinite wisdom, comes up with another
inappropriately named boondoggle called the SAVE Plan, designed to >>>>>> reduced payments and offer forgiveness after 10–25 years,
depending on loan size (there's that pesky taxpayer on the hook
part again); and although parts of it were correctly struck down,
other parts remain.
Fast forward to September, 2024 - the ramp-up ends. Biden is in
full dementia mode, Trump47 wins, the not paying your loan party
is over. Done, kaput, time to nut up, shut up and adhere to the
terms of the loans you willingly signed up for.
... No money came out of your pocket to forgive those loans.
Except tax money.
See above.
Lots of poor broke people living in car parking lots thanks to Joe
That's what conservaturds do - project, commit crimes (legal or
moral) and claim someone else did it.
Obama and Biden are Republicans?
See? You're doing it now - tRump is the criminal, so you pretend
Obama and Biden ...
Obama sold uranium rights to Russia, laundering them through a Canadian company while he was POTUS. I'd call that a hanging crime. They
call Joe, "Bribin' Biden" for nothing.
On 7/7/2025 6:32 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
You're not making any sense as usual, scooter. People use a multitude
"Baxter" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:104euut$2gihh$[email protected]...
"chine.bleu" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:104eoqt$2ep2h$1@dont- email.me:
Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
That's what conservaturds do - project, commit crimes (legal or"left hand" is probably posting from his car in a parking lot
moral) and claim someone else did it.
using stolen wifi.
Las Vegas has weird drainage. You do not want to be parking garage
during a flash flood.
-- "Language shapes the way we think, and determines what we can
think about." -- B. L. Whorf
The Whorf-Sapir hypothesis is dead. Each language can express
whatever the speakers want to, changing the language as needed.
Speakers can't concieve something they have no language for.
Then how do we come up with the word for concepts you assert no one
can conceive of until the word for it exists?
of words to describe the concept before eventually settling on "the"
word that then replaces the jumble of other words.
On 07 Jul 2025, Klaus Schadenfreude <[email protected]> posted some news:BrTaQ.95345$[email protected]:
On 7/7/2025 6:32 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
You're not making any sense as usual, scooter. People use a multitude
"Baxter" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:104euut$2gihh$[email protected]...
"chine.bleu" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:104eoqt$2ep2h$1@dont- email.me:
Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
That's what conservaturds do - project, commit crimes (legal or"left hand" is probably posting from his car in a parking lot
moral) and claim someone else did it.
using stolen wifi.
Las Vegas has weird drainage. You do not want to be parking garage
during a flash flood.
-- "Language shapes the way we think, and determines what we can
think about." -- B. L. Whorf
The Whorf-Sapir hypothesis is dead. Each language can express
whatever the speakers want to, changing the language as needed.
Speakers can't concieve something they have no language for.
Then how do we come up with the word for concepts you assert no one
can conceive of until the word for it exists?
of words to describe the concept before eventually settling on "the"
word that then replaces the jumble of other words.
Kamala Harris word salad then.
"It is time for us to do what we have been doing. And that time is
every day. Every day it is time for us to agree that there are things
and tools that are available to us to slow this thing down."
"We invested an additional $12 billion into community banks, because
we know community banks are in the community, and understand the needs
and desires of that community as well as the talent and capacity of community."
"I’d vote for the person I don’t hate, because the person I
don’t hate matters."
"I can imagine what can be, and be unburdened by what has been."
On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 17:49:21 +0200, Seth Meyers\,\ Trump Advocate <[email protected]> wrote:
Obama sold uranium rights to Russia, laundering them through a Canadian
company while he was POTUS. I'd call that a hanging crime.
I call it a lie.
On Wed, 16 Jul 2025 20:44:46 -0700, "chine.bleu"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Governor Swill wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 17:49:21 +0200, Seth Meyers\,\ Trump Advocate
<[email protected]> wrote:
Obama sold uranium rights to Russia, laundering them through a Canadian >>>> company while he was POTUS. I'd call that a hanging crime.
I call it a lie.
'Rights' irrelevant. US and Canada refuse to ship uranium.
Exactly. The 'rights' were about the rights to manage mines, not to
remove mined material from the country.
At least in the past. I wonder how Canada feels now.
<squeezesqueeze>
Soft and fluffy.
On 5/22/2025 3:49 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted
another content-free batch of lies:
In article <100m4gp$396cq$[email protected]>, bax02So you're saying that rather than pardon the 1500 violent
[email protected] says...
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Wed, 21 May 2025 16:22:42 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Enter legally and you will be welcomed.
This is your racism talking again. You know well the tight quotas
that effectively limit immigration to only tiny numbers from select
places.
Iow, most people wanting to immigrate *can't* come here legally.
They are deporting immigrants that entered legally. Some even had
green cards.
If they commit crimes they gotta go.
insurrectionists, Trump should have sent them to El Salvador instead.
For once, you and I agree on something.
On 5/23/2025 6:34 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 22 May 2025 09:20:18 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Baxter" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:100m4gp$396cq$[email protected]...
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Wed, 21 May 2025 16:22:42 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Enter legally and you will be welcomed.
This is your racism talking again. You know well the tight
quotas that effectively limit immigration to only tiny numbers
from select places.
Iow, most people wanting to immigrate *can't* come here legally.
They are deporting immigrants that entered legally. Some even had
green cards.
Yep, when they commit crime or lied about their involvement with
criminal gangs, or otherwise were identified as having lied to gain
entry.. they become immediately deportable.
Which is the judge's decision.
Actually it's usually up to INS,
There is no "INS" any more, scooter, you ignorant fat fuck. It was
dissolved in 2003 with the creation of the extremely Orwellian named Department of Homeland Security.
On 5/27/2025 7:18 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"-hh" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:100q5np$3l8cq$[email protected]...
On 5/23/25 09:30, Scout wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Thu, 22 May 2025 09:19:07 -0400, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 16:22:42 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Enter legally and you will be welcomed.
This is your racism talking again. You know well the tight
quotas that effectively limit immigration to only tiny numbers
from select places.
Iow, most people wanting to immigrate *can't* come here legally.
Sure they can.. they just have to 'get in line' like everyone
else.
That can take decades. We need to open the flow up some.
That I could agree with, but we have to do it the right way..
You *don't* agree with it, scooter. You're lying about that.
I'm reminded of a conversation I had on COLA with RonB awhile back
on this topic, so I'll pose the same basic question:
For an immigration candidate who passes all tests for suitability,
what do you think is a fair amount of time that they should have to
wait to immigrate?
FYI, this question is deliberately phrased so that we're not talking
about anyone who is rejected:Â it is specifically for those who
pass, asking how long their application should take to process.
Depends on the quotas set and
You're begging the question, scooter. *Why* are there quotas, scooter?
And if there are going to be quotas, scooter, why are they set so low?
On 5/29/2025 9:52 AM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly
obese convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 28 May 2025, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Siri Cruz" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:1017jmj$3camm$[email protected]...
On 28/5/25 8:52, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
That was then, this is now, and the situation is far different.
Bigots like you get listenned to.
I see.. so we should be able to openly carry guns in public..
including court houses, and places serving alcohol without anyone
saying a word....
Your ignorance doesn't make me a bigot.. it just makes you look
like a fool.
California outlaws open carry. Conceal carry requires special
procedures.
So you're saying we should listen to bigots like yourself because
the situation is the same as it's ever been and if it was legal
then, it should be legal now.
You set that standard.. and the moment I apply it you suddenly want
to assert that it's "different" making you a bigot by your own
standard.
At one time
Fuck off, Blowjob, you stupid fat cuck.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 716 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 55:47:21 |
| Calls: | 12,117 |
| Files: | 15,010 |
| Messages: | 6,518,660 |
