XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc, alt.politics.immigration
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf�
[email protected]> wrote in message news:pjvLP.1326377$
[email protected]...
On 4/15/2025 6:01 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Tariffying" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:vtjsa8$o15$[email protected]...
On 13 Apr 2025, Rudy Canoza <[email protected]> posted some
news:y%RKP.2203483$[email protected]:
On 4/12/2025 9:12 PM, c186282 wrote:
On 4/12/25 10:47 PM, awinstead wrote:
On 12 Apr 2025, c186282 <[email protected]> posted some
news:[email protected]:
On 4/12/25 4:38 PM, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <RsyKP.532043$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
  From the Supreme Court:
      As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable
alien to       remain in the United States.
      United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United >>>>>>>>> States      Â
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
      https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227 >>>>>>>>>
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful
presence is not.
The border is now considered military property. Cross now
and you get no breaks.
   Rudy also seems to miss the significance of "unlawful" >>>>>>>    in "unlawful presence" .........
He misses the toilet a lot when he pees too.
 Well, not SO unusual for males ... but is Rudy
 actually 'male', at least anymore ?  :-)
 Rudy's beloved Mex cartels/invaders
I have never expressed support for drug cartels *or* improper entry. I >>>> just oppose the racist demonization of undocumented immigrants,
blaming them both for fictitious problems as well as real problems
that they don't cause.
Rape, murder, theft of private and public property aren't problems?
For that matter as "undocumented immigrants" doesn't that automatically
indicate "improper entry"?
No, scooter. I have instructed you on this point literally dozens of
times,
So undocumented means they have a visa.. or other documentation that their entry was legal?
scooter. Improper entry is but one way to become unlawfully present.
But unlawfully presence isn't the issue in question
The issue is they are Undocumented and therefore engaged in improper entry otherwise they would be documented. QED.
So now that we've dealt with and showed your attempt at diversion to be the diversion it is.. do you have anything that actually addresses what I said?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)