XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.law-enforcement, or.politics
XPost: seattle.politics, fl.politics
In news:vpihp2$1dgd3$
[email protected], Baxter <
[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in news:vpid2k$1b6pb$[email protected]:
In news:vpi47q$15ugp$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vpi37s$15kh3$[email protected]:
In news:vp2a8r$1ontt$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
"max headroom" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:vp1asp$1jes1$[email protected]:
In news:voui37$111cv$[email protected], Baxter
<[email protected]> typed:
a425couple <[email protected]> wrote in
news:tLusP.134998$[email protected]:
On 2/16/25 12:55, John Smyth wrote:
'A Weaponized FBI: It’s Real, Whistleblowers Testify,
Boasting Scars to Prove It'
<https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/02/weaponized-fbi-its-rea >>>>>>>>> l- wh is tleblowers-testify-boasting-scars/>
============
Overall, we rate The Gateway Pundit Questionable based on extreme >>>>>>> right- wing bias, promotion of conspiracies, and numerous
instances of publishing false (fake) news.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-gateway-pundit/
=================
Can you refute the article?
You love posting fake shit and then demanding others refute your
garbage.
If it's fake/garbage, you should have no trouble refuting it. Can
you?
already did - "publishing false (fake) news"
No, you did not. Attacking the messenger doesn't refute the message.
On the contrary, we know your source is a liar.
According to your amateur evaluator.
You can't refute the article although you hate the source.
https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/republicans-judiciary.ho
use.gov/files/evo-media-document/Horowitz%20Testimony.pdf
So?
Evidence.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)