XPost: alt.politics, alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/books/article-14942867/Palace-evidence-Queen-Victoria-ghillie-John-Brown-lover-child-New-Zealand.html
The Palace has battled to cover it up for decades. But here’s
the overwhelming evidence Queen Victoria DID take ghillie John
Brown as her lover – and they had a child who was spirited away
to New Zealand
. . .
DNA tests ... some THINK they've found a descendant of
said 'love child'.
Issue - Victoria WAS kinda old, in 1800s sense, before
she'd have taken up with Mr. Brown. Not impossible to
have a child, but kinda unlikely. Yes, she DID have
the power/scope to hide it all ........
We'll see.
Wouldn't it be just fascinating if the closed-legs
Victorian morality was based on a total lie ...
while Vickie herself was opening her legs to some
dirty hunky 'commoner' ??? :-)
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)