• Re: Confederacy group sues Georgia park for planning an exhibit on slav

    From c186282@21:1/5 to Auric Hellman on Thu Jul 17 04:04:48 2025
    XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.history

    On 7/17/25 12:44 AM, Auric Hellman wrote:
    The Georgia chapter of a Confederacy group filed a lawsuit Tuesday
    against a state park with the largest Confederate monument in the
    country, arguing officials broke state law by planning an exhibit on
    ties to slavery, segregation and white supremacy. Stone Mountain’s
    massive carving depicts Confederate President Jefferson Davis, Gen.
    Robert E. Lee and Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson on horseback … State law protects the carving from any changes … Sons of the Confederate Veterans members have defended the carvings as honoring Confederate soldiers. The
    new exhibit would “completely repurpose the Stone Mountain Memorial
    Park” and “utterly ignore the purpose of the Georgia legislature in creating and maintaining” the park, the lawsuit says.

    https://apnews.com/article/stone-mountain-confederate-monument-slavery-exhibit-lawsuit-77610fe6f25f279f91292ced5a81d00b

    We're looking at Perceptions -vs- Perceptions here,
    alt histories -vs- alt histories.

    There was nothing really monolithic about the
    Confederacy. LOTS of different viewpoints about
    LOTS of subjects involved. Some WERE anti-slavery,
    but opposed to northern biz restrictions and
    exploitations.

    Note the "north" HAD made laws and policies very
    intentionally designed to squash and punish southern
    biz/power. They HAD to sell direct to northern states
    and get bottom-dollar rather than make foreign deals
    of their own. The 'south' had been reduced to mere
    'servant' role. This pissed off a LOT of people. The
    'slavery' thing was often kind of secondary to the
    pol/econ inequality.

    The US Civil War was COMPLICATED. This isn't the
    story we usually hear today, but it's very true.

    And yes, there WAS a segment demanding to keep
    the nigs down under foot forever and ever - don't
    ignore THEM either. SO many priorities.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From chine.bleu@21:1/5 to Governor Swill on Thu Jul 17 19:15:32 2025
    XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.history

    Governor Swill wrote:
    On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 04:04:48 -0400, c186282 <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/17/25 12:44 AM, Auric Hellman wrote:
    The Georgia chapter of a Confederacy group filed a lawsuit Tuesday
    against a state park with the largest Confederate monument in the
    country, arguing officials broke state law by planning an exhibit on
    ties to slavery, segregation and white supremacy. Stone Mountain�s
    massive carving depicts Confederate President Jefferson Davis, Gen.
    Robert E. Lee and Thomas �Stonewall� Jackson on horseback � State law
    protects the carving from any changes � Sons of the Confederate Veterans >>> members have defended the carvings as honoring Confederate soldiers. The >>> new exhibit would �completely repurpose the Stone Mountain Memorial
    Park� and �utterly ignore the purpose of the Georgia legislature in
    creating and maintaining� the park, the lawsuit says.

    https://apnews.com/article/stone-mountain-confederate-monument-slavery-exhibit-lawsuit-77610fe6f25f279f91292ced5a81d00b

    What a load of shit. Stone Mountain park far predates the sculpture.

    So it's ok to dedicate a park to traitors who rebelled against the US
    but it's not ok to include a memorial to their victims?

    We're looking at Perceptions -vs- Perceptions here,
    alt histories -vs- alt histories.

    There was nothing really monolithic about the
    Confederacy. LOTS of different viewpoints about
    LOTS of subjects involved. Some WERE anti-slavery,
    but opposed to northern biz restrictions and
    exploitations.

    Note the "north" HAD made laws and policies very
    intentionally designed to squash and punish southern
    biz/power. They HAD to sell direct to northern states
    and get bottom-dollar rather than make foreign deals
    of their own. The 'south' had been reduced to mere
    'servant' role. This pissed off a LOT of people. The
    'slavery' thing was often kind of secondary to the
    pol/econ inequality.

    The US Civil War was COMPLICATED. This isn't the
    story we usually hear today, but it's very true.

    And yes, there WAS a segment demanding to keep
    the nigs down under foot forever and ever - don't
    ignore THEM either. SO many priorities.

    Well said.


    We need the Taliban to destroy it artillery.

    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
    Thank goodness my iron lung is working again! /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)