• "Technology" Ed - The Bad Influence of "Guilds"

    From c186282@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jul 12 23:33:33 2025
    XPost: alt.politics, alt.history, alt.politics.usa

    https://www.caltech.edu/about/news/concept-of-technology-in-late-18th-century-Germany

    . . .

    Gist ... up until the 1700s, "technology" was mostly
    a compendium of "how-to" methods for common tasks.

    "Guilds" had developed much earlier. The idea was to
    keep the knowledge required for common/important
    structural/engineering tasks SECRET, very much
    compartmentalized. Having/controlling such "secret"
    knowledge made you IMPORTANT, a real player, powers
    State and biz had to DEAL with.

    Stonemasonry figured large for 500+ years ... only
    those in that guild knew how to properly build large
    stone structures. Metallurgy - weapons esp but also
    gold/silver tech - also figured large.

    Problem, highly compartmentalized practical knowledge
    might have political/financial advantages, but was NOT
    good for ADVANCING said knowledge. Many eyes, many
    players, is better for that.

    By the 1800s, the influence and relevance of the
    guilds considerably diminished. However the question
    is now much, how long, the guild system DELAYED
    western sci/tech advances. It MAY be as bad or worse
    than the HRCC grip on science.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)