• Trump Makes It Plain - He WILL Bomb Iran Again If Needed For Nukes

    From c186282@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 27 19:37:04 2025
    XPost: alt.defense, alt.politics, alt.politics.usa
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    https://www.politico.com/news/2025/06/27/trump-iran-bombing-uranium-00429599

    President Donald Trump said on Friday he would bomb Iran
    again “without question” if intelligence suggests Iran continues
    to have the ability to enrich uranium.

    The president was asked by a reporter at a Friday press briefing
    if he would bomb Iran again if the country can enrich uranium
    “to a level that concerns you,” even as he and his administration
    have maintained that an offensive strike by the U.S. last
    weekend obliterated three Iranian nuclear sites.

    . . .

    It ain't over until it's over. The long-stated goal
    is that Iran must not have nuclear weapons, but
    unlike other presidents he's DOING stuff to ensure that.

    I still suspect Iran has enough good uranium to build
    a few bombs ... if it hasn't already ... but this is
    where not only sat surveillance/analysis but on-the-ground
    SPIES are especially important. Israel managed to deeply
    infiltrate the Iranian mil apparatus and we should encourage
    them to keep it up.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From chine.bleu@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 27 17:25:59 2025
    XPost: alt.defense, alt.politics, alt.politics.usa
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    c186282 wrote:
    It ain't over until it's over. The long-stated goal
    is that Iran must not have nuclear weapons, but
    unlike other presidents he's DOING stuff to ensure that.


    When did DPRK build its nuclear weapons?

    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
    Thank goodness my iron lung is working again! /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mitchell Holman@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 28 02:10:27 2025
    XPost: alt.defense, alt.politics, alt.politics.usa
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    super70s <[email protected]d> wrote in news:super70s- [email protected]:



    Iran was attacked because it didn't have the bomb.


    India attacked Pakistan, which has the bomb.

    Pakistan attacked India, which has the bomb.

    Ukraine attacked Russia, which has the bomb.

    Gaza attacked Israel, which has the bomb.

    Argentina attacked Britain, which has the bomb.


    Seems having the bomb doesn't matter to
    countries attacking each other.........

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From super70s@21:1/5 to chine.bleu on Fri Jun 27 20:56:13 2025
    XPost: alt.defense, alt.politics, alt.politics.usa
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    In article <103ncql$escb$[email protected]>,
    "chine.bleu" <[email protected]> wrote:

    c186282 wrote:
    It ain't over until it's over. The long-stated goal
    is that Iran must not have nuclear weapons, but
    unlike other presidents he's DOING stuff to ensure that.


    When did DPRK build its nuclear weapons?

    Back during Clinton, they haven't bombed anyone and the world hasn't
    come to an end.

    They did their testing deep underground and nobody knew they had a bomb
    until they did.

    Now nobody dares attack NK.

    Iran was attacked because it didn't have the bomb.

    There are countries in the Middle East who have the bomb who are just as hostile to Israel as Iran, Israel just wants to single them out.

    One of these days Iran is going to announce it has a bomb and Israel is
    going to be forced to mind its own business and quit waging "preemptive"
    war on its neighbors.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From pothead@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Sat Jun 28 23:38:18 2025
    XPost: alt.defense, alt.politics, alt.politics.usa
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    On 2025-06-27, c186282 <[email protected]> wrote:
    https://www.politico.com/news/2025/06/27/trump-iran-bombing-uranium-00429599

    President Donald Trump said on Friday he would bomb Iran
    again “without question” if intelligence suggests Iran continues
    to have the ability to enrich uranium.

    The president was asked by a reporter at a Friday press briefing
    if he would bomb Iran again if the country can enrich uranium
    “to a level that concerns you,” even as he and his administration
    have maintained that an offensive strike by the U.S. last
    weekend obliterated three Iranian nuclear sites.

    . . .

    It ain't over until it's over. The long-stated goal
    is that Iran must not have nuclear weapons, but
    unlike other presidents he's DOING stuff to ensure that.

    I still suspect Iran has enough good uranium to build
    a few bombs ... if it hasn't already ... but this is
    where not only sat surveillance/analysis but on-the-ground
    SPIES are especially important. Israel managed to deeply
    infiltrate the Iranian mil apparatus and we should encourage
    them to keep it up.

    I suspect Iran has nuke stuff scattered about the country. They aren't stupid and they know full well that their main facilities are top targets.

    What is more difficult to relocate is the gas centrifuges.
    In fact it's almost impossible without a lot of planning and
    a lot of time and since those sites were under surveillance it's
    unlikely they could sneak a test tube out of the place without people
    knowing.
    And of course Iran could purchase a nuke from another country, which is likely.

    What the TDS folks are ignoring is that whether or not Iran's nuke aspirations have been destroyed or not, the USA demonstrated what our military is capable of
    and that in effect put Russia, China, Hamas, etc on notice that we have far more
    power than needed to destroy a good portion of you and that we, at least under Trump,
    are not afraid to use it.

    Peace through strength instead of weakness through appeasement like the last administration.




    --
    "No Kings" Protests.....
    Brought to you by the party who anointed
    Kamala to be their candidate w/o a single vote....

    Let *that* sink in.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mannix@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 29 00:08:04 2025
    XPost: alt.defense, alt.politics, alt.politics.usa
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    So he's admitting the last raid was a failure.

    The Trump failures mount.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mitchell Holman@21:1/5 to pothead on Sun Jun 29 02:06:51 2025
    XPost: alt.defense, alt.politics, alt.politics.usa
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:103puda$14aqj$[email protected]:


    Peace through strength instead of weakness through appeasement like
    the last administration.


    Which administration sat down
    with Taliban and cut a surrender
    deal with them?


    Trump's deal with the Taliban set the stage
    for the Afghan collapse
    08/17/21

    "...this was a "withdrawal" agreement between
    the U.S. and the Taliban that set the terms
    for the complete departure of American troops
    from Afghanistan by May 2021.

    What did the United States gain in exchange for
    this withdrawal, for which the Taliban had been
    fighting for 20 years? Nothing but vague,
    unenforceable promises that the Taliban would not
    engage in hostilities against the departing U.S.
    troops and would "send a clear message� to al
    Qaeda that it �had no place" in Afghanistan. So
    eager Trump was to withdraw, we did not even
    hold out for a clear, firm commitment that the
    Taliban would not provide aid, safe harbor or
    weaponry to al Qaeda and like-minded groups.
    The agreement contained no enforcement
    mechanisms and included no penalties on the
    Taliban for failing to comply with its terms."
    https://tinyurl.com/bdcutktt

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From c186282@21:1/5 to pothead on Sat Jun 28 23:40:09 2025
    XPost: alt.defense, alt.politics, alt.politics.usa
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    On 6/28/25 7:38 PM, pothead wrote:
    On 2025-06-27, c186282 <[email protected]> wrote:
    https://www.politico.com/news/2025/06/27/trump-iran-bombing-uranium-00429599 >>
    President Donald Trump said on Friday he would bomb Iran
    again “without question” if intelligence suggests Iran continues
    to have the ability to enrich uranium.

    The president was asked by a reporter at a Friday press briefing
    if he would bomb Iran again if the country can enrich uranium
    “to a level that concerns you,” even as he and his administration
    have maintained that an offensive strike by the U.S. last
    weekend obliterated three Iranian nuclear sites.

    . . .

    It ain't over until it's over. The long-stated goal
    is that Iran must not have nuclear weapons, but
    unlike other presidents he's DOING stuff to ensure that.

    I still suspect Iran has enough good uranium to build
    a few bombs ... if it hasn't already ... but this is
    where not only sat surveillance/analysis but on-the-ground
    SPIES are especially important. Israel managed to deeply
    infiltrate the Iranian mil apparatus and we should encourage
    them to keep it up.

    I suspect Iran has nuke stuff scattered about the country. They aren't stupid and they know full well that their main facilities are top targets.

    What is more difficult to relocate is the gas centrifuges.
    In fact it's almost impossible without a lot of planning and
    a lot of time and since those sites were under surveillance it's
    unlikely they could sneak a test tube out of the place without people knowing.
    And of course Iran could purchase a nuke from another country, which is likely.

    What the TDS folks are ignoring is that whether or not Iran's nuke aspirations
    have been destroyed or not, the USA demonstrated what our military is capable of
    and that in effect put Russia, China, Hamas, etc on notice that we have far more
    power than needed to destroy a good portion of you and that we, at least under Trump,
    are not afraid to use it.

    Peace through strength instead of weakness through appeasement like the last administration.


    SOME people WANT Iran to have nukes - figure that will
    make the evil horrible West LISTEN, empower the wonderful
    Islamists.

    The usual crowd of pols who NEVER what to do anything
    lest they get critique keep screaming "diplomacy !"
    even though that's had zero effect with Iran for decades.

    Of late, some wanted Trump accused of war crimes or
    something if he attacked Iranian nuke facilities.
    THEN they mysteriously insisted on 101% good results
    from such attacks. Either way, Trump would be a
    failure in their rhetoric.

    IMHO, Trump HELPED things. He's bought us some TIME.
    No attacked foe is defeated forever unless you
    physically invade - and that's kind of OUT here.
    You set back their goals instead, hope other factors
    do the rest of the work for you.

    Iran WILL salvage what it can from the bomb sites
    and WILL eventually set up new industry. So, we
    have to find ways to delay/ruin such plans for long
    enough so that they just give up.

    Nothing's perfect.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From chine.bleu@21:1/5 to pothead on Sat Jun 28 20:41:15 2025
    XPost: alt.defense, alt.politics, alt.politics.usa
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    pothead wrote:
    Peace through strength instead of weakness through appeasement like the last administration.


    As Israelis flee Israel being reduced splinters and ash.

    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
    Thank goodness my iron lung is working again! /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From chine.bleu@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 28 20:51:46 2025
    XPost: alt.defense, alt.politics, alt.politics.usa
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    c186282 wrote:
    SOME people WANT Iran to have nukes - figure that will
    make the evil horrible West LISTEN, empower the wonderful
    Islamists.

    Operation Ajax.

    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
    Thank goodness my iron lung is working again! /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Crag@21:1/5 to Mitchell Holman on Sun Jun 29 03:34:52 2025
    XPost: alt.defense, alt.politics, alt.politics.usa
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Mitchell Holman wrote:



    Which administration sat down
    with Taliban and cut a surrender
    deal with them?


    Trump's deal with the Taliban set the stage
    for the Afghan collapse
    08/17/21


    Hell, you've seen him with the Saudis and Qataris. Trump obviously has the hots for Muslim penis.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Oleg Smirnov@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 29 12:15:34 2025
    XPost: alt.politics, alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    pothead, <news:103puda$14aqj$[email protected]>
    On 2025-06-27, c186282 <[email protected]> wrote:

    What the TDS folks are ignoring is that whether or not Iran's nuke aspirations
    have been destroyed or not, the USA demonstrated what our military is
    capable of
    and that in effect put Russia, China, Hamas, etc on notice that we have
    far more
    power than needed to destroy a good portion of you and that we, at least under Trump,
    are not afraid to use it.
    Peace through strength instead of weakness through appeasement like the
    last administration.

    Try to defeat those Houthis for starters.

    ...

    One must be an ignorant right-winger - which are known to be
    of lower IQ - to beieve it might somehow impress Russia or
    China. The B-2 planes can be counted stealthy only when in
    combination with some else techniques. S-300 can catch these
    planes. The way the bombing of the Iran's facilities was
    implemented, those planes would've been pretty easy targets
    if only Iran had a functional air defense. The fact it was
    dysfunctional is due to their government's abuse of religious
    rigidity that created conditions for Israelis to recruit/buy
    enough sabotage agents within the country. It has nothing to
    do with American military might.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From c186282@21:1/5 to Oleg Smirnov on Tue Jul 1 02:32:21 2025
    XPost: alt.politics, alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    On 6/29/25 5:15 AM, Oleg Smirnov wrote:
    pothead, <news:103puda$14aqj$[email protected]>
    On 2025-06-27, c186282 <[email protected]> wrote:

    What the TDS folks are ignoring is that whether or not Iran's nuke
    aspirations
    have been destroyed or not, the USA demonstrated what our military is
    capable of
    and that in effect put Russia, China, Hamas, etc on notice that we
    have far more
    power than needed to destroy a good portion of you and that we, at
    least under Trump,
    are not afraid to use it.
    Peace through strength instead of weakness through appeasement like
    the last administration.

    Try to defeat those Houthis for starters.

    OLEG ... Vlad taken his dick out of your mouth
    long enough to post ???

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)