• "Birthright" - Sorry, But It's 100% Constitutional

    From c186282@21:1/5 to All on Sat May 17 01:15:57 2025
    XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Trump - for good reasons - would LIKE to end
    "Birthright Citizenship".

    Alas it IS hard-writ in the constitution.

    Admittedly it was a politic for a VERY NEW
    underpopulated nation ... they wanted to
    suck-in as many as possible. Could NOT have
    foreseen the effects and gross abuses 200+
    years down the line.

    SO, IMHO, we're STUCK with it.

    Going FORWARD, it MAY be possible for the
    legislature to craft a new law that somehow
    puts illegal immigrants into a sort of
    legal limbo - not REALLY in the USA.

    But we'd have to GET such a law writ and
    vetted. Will NOT be easy or prompt.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mitchell Holman@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Sat May 17 13:32:03 2025
    XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    c186282 <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:

    Trump - for good reasons - would LIKE to end
    "Birthright Citizenship".

    Alas it IS hard-writ in the constitution.


    Prove your citizenship without using a birth certificate.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From F. Georg McDuffee@21:1/5 to All on Sat May 17 12:54:28 2025
    XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    On 5/16/2025 10:15 PM, c186282, Nazi pseudo-sage and cipher fuckscum, took his hands and mouth off Xi's dick long enough to peck:

    Trump - for good reasons - would LIKE [shrieking] to end
    "Birthright Citizenship".

    Alas it IS [shrieking] hard-writ in the constitution.

    Admittedly it was a politic for a VERY NEW [shrieking]
    underpopulated nation ... they wanted to
    suck-in as many as possible. Could NOT [shrieking] have
    foreseen the effects and gross abuses 200+
    years down the line.

    SO, IMHO [sic], we're STUCK [shrieking] with it.

    You have literally zero humility.



    Going FORWARD [shrieking], it MAY [shrieking] be possible for the
    legislature to craft a new law that somehow
    puts illegal immigrants into a sort of
    legal limbo - not REALLY [shrieking] in the USA.

    But we'd have to GET [shrieking] such a law writ and
    vetted. Will NOT [shrieking] be easy or prompt.


    Fuck off with all your goddamned shrieking, you fucking Nazi pseudo-sage and cipher.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From c186282@21:1/5 to F. Georg McDuffee on Sat May 17 23:03:20 2025
    XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    On 5/17/25 3:54 PM, F. Georg McDuffee wrote:
    On 5/16/2025 10:15 PM, c186282, Nazi pseudo-sage and cipher fuckscum,
    took his hands and mouth off Xi's dick long enough to peck:

    Trump - for good reasons - would LIKE [shrieking] to end
    "Birthright Citizenship".

    Alas it IS [shrieking] hard-writ in the constitution.

    Admittedly it was a politic for a VERY NEW [shrieking] underpopulated
    nation ... they wanted to
    suck-in as many as possible. Could NOT [shrieking] have
    foreseen the effects and gross abuses 200+
    years down the line.

    SO, IMHO [sic], we're STUCK [shrieking] with it.

    You have literally zero humility.

    Zero.

    And I'll [shreik] AS NEEDED. Fuck off
    ya commie butt-boy.

    Going FORWARD [shrieking], it MAY [shrieking] be possible for the
    legislature to craft a new law that somehow
    puts illegal immigrants into a sort of
    legal limbo - not REALLY [shrieking] in the USA.

    But we'd have to GET [shrieking] such a law writ and
    vetted. Will NOT [shrieking] be easy or prompt.


    Fuck off with all your goddamned shrieking, you fucking Nazi pseudo-sage
    and cipher.

    LEFTIES are allowed to [shriek] all they want
    however, right ? :-)

    In any case, the THEME here is that Trump cannot
    really do much about "birthright" TO DATE. However
    the legislature CAN craft some kind of legal
    "bubble" or "special semi-reality" for the FUTURE
    that CAN limit "birthright" WITHOUT having to
    go against the constitution.

    SHRIEK, SHRIEK, SHRIEK !!! :-)

    Now go drop 'em for Vlad.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Siri Cruz@21:1/5 to Grimble Crumble on Mon May 19 23:20:42 2025
    XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    On 19/5/25 22:54, Grimble Crumble wrote:
    c186282 <[email protected]> wrote:
    Trump - for good reasons - would LIKE to end
    "Birthright Citizenship".

    Alas it IS hard-writ in the constitution.

    Admittedly it was a politic for a VERY NEW
    underpopulated nation ... they wanted to
    suck-in as many as possible. Could NOT have
    foreseen the effects and gross abuses 200+
    years down the line.

    SO, IMHO, we're STUCK with it.

    Going FORWARD, it MAY be possible for the
    legislature to craft a new law that somehow
    puts illegal immigrants into a sort of
    legal limbo - not REALLY in the USA.

    But we'd have to GET such a law writ and
    vetted. Will NOT be easy or prompt.



    I think trying to undermine the constitution by "crafting" a new law is way too dangerous. That sets precedent that the constitution can be overriden without the amendment process. Also, why shouldn't these American Nationals who have grown up in the United States be citizens? They were born and
    raised in this country; they're Americans.


    Republicans are in a spasm. The US is about to become a minority
    majority country. White dudes want to remain in control despite
    being minorities. Don Jello was hired to kneecap Those People so
    white dudes would remain in charge. They tried that here in 1995.
    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-999. Disavowed. Denied. @
    'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 4.0 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mitchell Holman@21:1/5 to All on Tue May 20 13:04:03 2025
    XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Grimble Crumble <[email protected]> wrote in news:613146337.769415262.000982.grimblecrumble870-gmail.com@news.newsdemo n.com:

    I'm Siri Cruz <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 19/5/25 22:54, Grimble Crumble wrote:
    c186282 <[email protected]> wrote:
    Trump - for good reasons - would LIKE to end
    "Birthright Citizenship".

    Alas it IS hard-writ in the constitution.

    Admittedly it was a politic for a VERY NEW
    underpopulated nation ... they wanted to
    suck-in as many as possible. Could NOT have
    foreseen the effects and gross abuses 200+
    years down the line.

    SO, IMHO, we're STUCK with it.

    Going FORWARD, it MAY be possible for the
    legislature to craft a new law that somehow
    puts illegal immigrants into a sort of
    legal limbo - not REALLY in the USA.

    But we'd have to GET such a law writ and
    vetted. Will NOT be easy or prompt.



    I think trying to undermine the constitution by "crafting" a new law
    is way too dangerous. That sets precedent that the constitution can
    be overriden without the amendment process. Also, why shouldn't
    these American Nationals who have grown up in the United States be
    citizens? They were born and raised in this country; they're
    Americans.


    Republicans are in a spasm. The US is about to become a minority
    majority country. White dudes want to remain in control despite
    being minorities. Don Jello was hired to kneecap Those People so
    white dudes would remain in charge. They tried that here in 1995.

    The fact that race is such a big deal in our politics is bad enough,
    and Trump's anti-immigrant rhetoric doesn't help at all. I don't
    understand it. He even lied to his voters (I know! What a shocker!)
    that he only cared about handling illegal immigrants.

    Some republicans have gone batshit crazy. You know the man who was
    deported to El Salvador without due process? Well, some conservative
    news channels started accusing him of absuing his wife. He had *no due process*; how can one accuse him of that, and use it as basis for deportation???

    Why does it seem that no one cares about the constitution anymore?



    Trump started out with deportation
    of illegal aliens. Now he is moving up
    the ladder to legal aliens, then to
    naturalized citizens, now to native
    born American citizens.



    "Homegrowns are next": Trump hopes to
    deport and jail U.S. citizens abroad
    APRIL 16, 2025

    https://www.npr.org/2025/04/16/nx-s1-5366178/trump-deport-jail-u-s- citizens-homegrowns-el-salvador

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mitchell Holman@21:1/5 to All on Tue May 20 17:46:08 2025
    XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Grimble Crumble <[email protected]> wrote in news:800483544.769449344.435645.grimblecrumble870-gmail.com@news.newsdemo n.com:

    Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> wrote:


    Trump started out with deportation
    of illegal aliens. Now he is moving up
    the ladder to legal aliens, then to
    naturalized citizens, now to native
    born American citizens.



    "Homegrowns are next": Trump hopes to
    deport and jail U.S. citizens abroad
    APRIL 16, 2025

    https://www.npr.org/2025/04/16/nx-s1-5366178/trump-deport-jail-u-s-
    citizens-homegrowns-el-salvador





    Though, that also calls into question his ability to carry it out. We
    both know that ICE is essentially under his thumb, ready to do all
    they can. However, ICE doesn't have unilateral power, even in
    practice. He'd still have to use the deportation process, as sending
    American prisoners abroad isn't a codified procedure. However, one
    cannot deport American Citizens, so it makes me wonder how he plans on getting it done. It would be extremely difficult to fudge the process
    for deporting American Citizens.

    What really scares me is that people WILL support this. They'll say
    "get 'em outta here" 20k times before they consider "maybe that puts
    us all at danger since there's no due process".





    "First they came for the Jews
    but I am not a Jew so I did nothing.

    Then they came for unionists, but I
    am not in a union, so I said nothing.

    Then they came for the communists,
    but I am not a communist, so........"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)