• SOMETHING Needs To Be Done About "Executive Orders"

    From c186282@21:1/5 to All on Sat May 3 22:38:35 2025
    XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Modern US presidents seem to rely more and more
    on rule-by-fiat ... executive orders and similar.

    IMHO this is NOT a great trend - no matter the
    party holding the office at the moment.

    The preferred approach is for for the legislature
    to be responsive and draft laws/reg ... then the
    POTUS either signs or vetoes.

    XOs *do* have a certain place - mostly for time-
    critical 'emergency' situations ... the legislative
    process there may simply be TOO slow.

    I'm going to propose a law that puts a rather
    strict time-limit on XOs. Within 30 days the
    Congress must vote it up or down - straight
    simple majority vote. If they do nothing then
    the order simply expires. If this gakes a
    monthly "XO Afternoon" of voting then so be it.

    This gives the POTUS the needed 'emergency' powers
    but leaves the legislature to make the longer-term
    decision.

    Oh, no repeated XOs on the same subject ...

    In just the past few years we've seen both Joe
    and Trump kinda go wild with XOs. They won't be
    the last either - UNLESS ......

    In the end, the Congress/Senate SHOULD have the
    most ultimate political power - it's best for
    the USA. That's part of the MAGA thing.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David LaRue@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Mon May 5 00:24:39 2025
    XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    c186282 <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:

    Modern US presidents seem to rely more and more
    on rule-by-fiat ... executive orders and similar.

    IMHO this is NOT a great trend - no matter the
    party holding the office at the moment.

    The preferred approach is for for the legislature
    to be responsive and draft laws/reg ... then the
    POTUS either signs or vetoes.

    XOs *do* have a certain place - mostly for time-
    critical 'emergency' situations ... the legislative
    process there may simply be TOO slow.

    I'm going to propose a law that puts a rather
    strict time-limit on XOs. Within 30 days the
    Congress must vote it up or down - straight
    simple majority vote. If they do nothing then
    the order simply expires. If this gakes a
    monthly "XO Afternoon" of voting then so be it.

    This gives the POTUS the needed 'emergency' powers
    but leaves the legislature to make the longer-term
    decision.

    Oh, no repeated XOs on the same subject ...

    In just the past few years we've seen both Joe
    and Trump kinda go wild with XOs. They won't be
    the last either - UNLESS ......

    In the end, the Congress/Senate SHOULD have the
    most ultimate political power - it's best for
    the USA. That's part of the MAGA thing.

    Until Congress gets its act together and codifies any of the good XOs, they
    can be changed by new presidents. IMO there is little incentive for life
    long congressional beaurocrats to do anything productive except further
    their own interests, like getting election funding from the military
    complex and the deep state. Your suggestion of slowing XOs would prevent
    good policies from any president. Everyone loves enacting bad policies
    because they hurt people enough to vote for the government to promise to do something good, and they never will. IMHO all levels of government no
    longer serve The People. Sadly this does not bode well for the longevity
    of the USA. The party doesn't matter any more. Once in the government the elected have achieved their goals and are unable to do good before
    becomming "part of the system". What the public wants has become
    irrevalent. This seems to be true across the globe for those that have a choice in their government.

    We're in a functioning government that no longer serves it's people. It
    has been this way for a long time. The government could do good, but it is easier to be disfunctional and fool the people. In other words we're just
    as bad as other government systems that choose to abuse their people.
    Those in the USA legally have options to correct the situation, but likely
    just want to be taken care of and ignore what has been done to them. Sadly
    few are even taught this, and thus the public chooses to fight the wrong
    causes and solutions.

    We are not ready for good to prevail and thus choose not to fight for it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From c186282@21:1/5 to David LaRue on Sun May 4 21:59:06 2025
    XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    On 5/4/25 8:24 PM, David LaRue wrote:
    c186282 <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:

    Modern US presidents seem to rely more and more
    on rule-by-fiat ... executive orders and similar.

    IMHO this is NOT a great trend - no matter the
    party holding the office at the moment.

    The preferred approach is for for the legislature
    to be responsive and draft laws/reg ... then the
    POTUS either signs or vetoes.

    XOs *do* have a certain place - mostly for time-
    critical 'emergency' situations ... the legislative
    process there may simply be TOO slow.

    I'm going to propose a law that puts a rather
    strict time-limit on XOs. Within 30 days the
    Congress must vote it up or down - straight
    simple majority vote. If they do nothing then
    the order simply expires. If this gakes a
    monthly "XO Afternoon" of voting then so be it.

    This gives the POTUS the needed 'emergency' powers
    but leaves the legislature to make the longer-term
    decision.

    Oh, no repeated XOs on the same subject ...

    In just the past few years we've seen both Joe
    and Trump kinda go wild with XOs. They won't be
    the last either - UNLESS ......

    In the end, the Congress/Senate SHOULD have the
    most ultimate political power - it's best for
    the USA. That's part of the MAGA thing.

    Until Congress gets its act together and codifies any of the good XOs, they can be changed by new presidents. IMO there is little incentive for life long congressional beaurocrats to do anything productive except further
    their own interests, like getting election funding from the military
    complex and the deep state. Your suggestion of slowing XOs would prevent good policies from any president. Everyone loves enacting bad policies because they hurt people enough to vote for the government to promise to do something good, and they never will. IMHO all levels of government no
    longer serve The People. Sadly this does not bode well for the longevity
    of the USA. The party doesn't matter any more. Once in the government the elected have achieved their goals and are unable to do good before
    becomming "part of the system". What the public wants has become
    irrevalent. This seems to be true across the globe for those that have a choice in their government.

    We're in a functioning government that no longer serves it's people. It
    has been this way for a long time. The government could do good, but it is easier to be disfunctional and fool the people. In other words we're just
    as bad as other government systems that choose to abuse their people.
    Those in the USA legally have options to correct the situation, but likely just want to be taken care of and ignore what has been done to them. Sadly few are even taught this, and thus the public chooses to fight the wrong causes and solutions.

    We are not ready for good to prevail and thus choose not to fight for it.


    You seem to assume everything Trump does is EVIL ...

    TDS has sharp teeth, consumes mind and soul.

    My worry is that Trump and Joe aren't NEARLY the
    worst we may see in future presidents. Those two
    at least kinda THOUGHT they were doing the right
    things. Next or next POTUS ... deliberate evil
    may be the prime agenda. One closet extremist
    and it gets really bad really fast.

    AS SUCH, given the clear trend towards dictation
    via XOs, it's time for Congress to take firmer
    control - including my mentioned time-limits
    on XOs. This is something I think they could pass
    with a big enough margin to over-ride a veto.

    Note also the good POLITICS involved in my
    proposal. No pol wants to be seen voting
    with The Other Guys. By creating a 30/60 day
    AUTOMATIC expiry to XOs the pols won't have
    to DO anything if they don't like the XO.
    Time will be up and the authority of the XO
    just goes away.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mitchell Holman@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Mon May 5 02:13:47 2025
    XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    c186282 <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:




    You seem to assume everything Trump does is EVIL ...


    Not so much evil as stupid:



    Fire a bunch of people, then immediately rehire them.

    Announce a big tariff, then declare a moratorium on it.

    Insult a country, then ask a favor from it.

    Claim a new Golden Age, then blame bad news on Biden.

    Blast a treaty as unfair to America, forgetting he signed it.



    Even toddlers behave better than that..........

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David LaRue@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Mon May 5 04:48:32 2025
    XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    c186282 <[email protected]> wrote in news:Jo- [email protected]:

    On 5/4/25 8:24 PM, David LaRue wrote:
    c186282 <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:[email protected]:

    Modern US presidents seem to rely more and more
    on rule-by-fiat ... executive orders and similar.

    IMHO this is NOT a great trend - no matter the
    party holding the office at the moment.

    The preferred approach is for for the legislature
    to be responsive and draft laws/reg ... then the
    POTUS either signs or vetoes.

    XOs *do* have a certain place - mostly for time-
    critical 'emergency' situations ... the legislative
    process there may simply be TOO slow.

    I'm going to propose a law that puts a rather
    strict time-limit on XOs. Within 30 days the
    Congress must vote it up or down - straight
    simple majority vote. If they do nothing then
    the order simply expires. If this gakes a
    monthly "XO Afternoon" of voting then so be it.

    This gives the POTUS the needed 'emergency' powers
    but leaves the legislature to make the longer-term
    decision.

    Oh, no repeated XOs on the same subject ...

    In just the past few years we've seen both Joe
    and Trump kinda go wild with XOs. They won't be
    the last either - UNLESS ......

    In the end, the Congress/Senate SHOULD have the
    most ultimate political power - it's best for
    the USA. That's part of the MAGA thing.

    Until Congress gets its act together and codifies any of the good XOs,
    they
    can be changed by new presidents. IMO there is little incentive for
    life
    long congressional beaurocrats to do anything productive except further
    their own interests, like getting election funding from the military
    complex and the deep state. Your suggestion of slowing XOs would
    prevent
    good policies from any president. Everyone loves enacting bad policies
    because they hurt people enough to vote for the government to promise to
    do
    something good, and they never will. IMHO all levels of government no
    longer serve The People. Sadly this does not bode well for the
    longevity
    of the USA. The party doesn't matter any more. Once in the government
    the
    elected have achieved their goals and are unable to do good before
    becomming "part of the system". What the public wants has become
    irrevalent. This seems to be true across the globe for those that have
    a
    choice in their government.

    We're in a functioning government that no longer serves it's people. It
    has been this way for a long time. The government could do good, but it
    is
    easier to be disfunctional and fool the people. In other words we're
    just
    as bad as other government systems that choose to abuse their people.
    Those in the USA legally have options to correct the situation, but
    likely
    just want to be taken care of and ignore what has been done to them.
    Sadly
    few are even taught this, and thus the public chooses to fight the wrong
    causes and solutions.

    We are not ready for good to prevail and thus choose not to fight for
    it.


    You seem to assume everything Trump does is EVIL ...

    Quite the contrary. He has done a wonderful job working under a government that refuses to make meaninful changes.

    I've always supported him since becoming a reasonable option for the presidency.

    TDS has sharp teeth, consumes mind and soul.

    My worry is that Trump and Joe aren't NEARLY the
    worst we may see in future presidents. Those two
    at least kinda THOUGHT they were doing the right
    things. Next or next POTUS ... deliberate evil
    may be the prime agenda. One closet extremist
    and it gets really bad really fast.

    We were somewhat lucky that Biden's handlers weren't true evil.

    AS SUCH, given the clear trend towards dictation
    via XOs, it's time for Congress to take firmer
    control - including my mentioned time-limits
    on XOs. This is something I think they could pass
    with a big enough margin to over-ride a veto.

    Laws passed by congress are harder to change than XOs.

    XOs work for presidents while they have power. My statement above covers
    why I think Congress is unwilling to actually make meaningful changes
    quickly even when all parties agree to what must be done.

    Note also the good POLITICS involved in my
    proposal. No pol wants to be seen voting
    with The Other Guys. By creating a 30/60 day
    AUTOMATIC expiry to XOs the pols won't have
    to DO anything if they don't like the XO.
    Time will be up and the authority of the XO
    just goes away.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Pat@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 5 17:02:27 2025
    XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Not so much evil as stupid:



    Fire a bunch of people, then immediately rehire them.

    Announce a big tariff, then declare a moratorium on it.

    Insult a country, then ask a favor from it.

    Claim a new Golden Age, then blame bad news on Biden.

    Blast a treaty as unfair to America, forgetting he signed it.



    Even toddlers behave better than that..........


    That's what happens when the POTUS is a feeble old mental case in severe cognitive decline. It's great watching that old fool die slowly right
    before our eyes in public.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ragan@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 5 17:04:28 2025
    XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Quite the contrary. He has done a wonderful job working under a
    government
    that refuses to make meaninful changes.

    I've always supported him since becoming a reasonable option for the >presidency.

    Traitors like you are fed to the woodchipper. We're going to have fun
    killing you off.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mitchell Holman@21:1/5 to Pat on Mon May 5 18:10:10 2025
    XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Pat <[email protected]> wrote in news:vvaqv3$3d2lg$[email protected]:

    Not so much evil as stupid:



    Fire a bunch of people, then immediately rehire them.

    Announce a big tariff, then declare a moratorium on it.

    Insult a country, then ask a favor from it.

    Claim a new Golden Age, then blame bad news on Biden.

    Blast a treaty as unfair to America, forgetting he signed it.



    Even toddlers behave better than that..........


    That's what happens when the POTUS is a feeble old mental case in severe cognitive decline. It's great watching that old fool die slowly right before our eyes in public.



    At least aged presidents like Wilson
    and FDR and Reagan and Biden filled their
    cabinets with capable people who knew their
    jobs. Trump will appoint any manifest idiot
    as long as they sing his praises loud enough.
    The puppy killer and Director Brainworm and
    alcoholic running the Pentagon? Where does he
    find these people?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From super70s@21:1/5 to David LaRue on Mon May 5 14:55:13 2025
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa

    On 2025-05-05 04:48:32 +0000, David LaRue said:

    c186282 <[email protected]> wrote in news:Jo- [email protected]:

    On 5/4/25 8:24 PM, David LaRue wrote:
    c186282 <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:[email protected]:

    Modern US presidents seem to rely more and more
    on rule-by-fiat ... executive orders and similar.

    IMHO this is NOT a great trend - no matter the
    party holding the office at the moment.

    The preferred approach is for for the legislature
    to be responsive and draft laws/reg ... then the
    POTUS either signs or vetoes.

    XOs *do* have a certain place - mostly for time-
    critical 'emergency' situations ... the legislative
    process there may simply be TOO slow.

    I'm going to propose a law that puts a rather
    strict time-limit on XOs. Within 30 days the
    Congress must vote it up or down - straight
    simple majority vote. If they do nothing then
    the order simply expires. If this gakes a
    monthly "XO Afternoon" of voting then so be it.

    This gives the POTUS the needed 'emergency' powers
    but leaves the legislature to make the longer-term
    decision.

    Oh, no repeated XOs on the same subject ...

    In just the past few years we've seen both Joe
    and Trump kinda go wild with XOs. They won't be
    the last either - UNLESS ......

    In the end, the Congress/Senate SHOULD have the
    most ultimate political power - it's best for
    the USA. That's part of the MAGA thing.

    Until Congress gets its act together and codifies any of the good XOs, they >>> can be changed by new presidents. IMO there is little incentive for life >>> long congressional beaurocrats to do anything productive except further
    their own interests, like getting election funding from the military
    complex and the deep state. Your suggestion of slowing XOs would prevent >>> good policies from any president. Everyone loves enacting bad policies
    because they hurt people enough to vote for the government to promise to do >>> something good, and they never will. IMHO all levels of government no
    longer serve The People. Sadly this does not bode well for the longevity >>> of the USA. The party doesn't matter any more. Once in the government the >>> elected have achieved their goals and are unable to do good before
    becomming "part of the system". What the public wants has become
    irrevalent. This seems to be true across the globe for those that have a >>> choice in their government.

    We're in a functioning government that no longer serves it's people. It >>> has been this way for a long time. The government could do good, but it is >>> easier to be disfunctional and fool the people. In other words we're just >>> as bad as other government systems that choose to abuse their people.
    Those in the USA legally have options to correct the situation, but likely >>> just want to be taken care of and ignore what has been done to them. Sadly >>> few are even taught this, and thus the public chooses to fight the wrong >>> causes and solutions.

    We are not ready for good to prevail and thus choose not to fight for it. >>

    You seem to assume everything Trump does is EVIL ...

    Quite the contrary. He has done a wonderful job working under a government that refuses to make meaninful changes.

    I've always supported him since becoming a reasonable option for the presidency.

    "The party doesn't matter any more," you say.

    That's what rightwinguts like to do when they're in power and the
    situation is hopelessly screwed -- spread the blame around to everybody.

    Donald Trump and Donald Trump alone (plus his Republican enablers in
    Congress) is solely responsible for this economic shit storm that's
    getting ready to happen.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Siri Cruz@21:1/5 to Mitchell Holman on Mon May 5 12:22:30 2025
    XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    On 5/5/25 11:10, Mitchell Holman wrote:
    Pat <[email protected]> wrote in news:vvaqv3$3d2lg$[email protected]:

    Not so much evil as stupid:



    Fire a bunch of people, then immediately rehire them.

    Announce a big tariff, then declare a moratorium on it.

    Insult a country, then ask a favor from it.

    Claim a new Golden Age, then blame bad news on Biden.

    Blast a treaty as unfair to America, forgetting he signed it.



    Even toddlers behave better than that..........


    That's what happens when the POTUS is a feeble old mental case in severe
    cognitive decline. It's great watching that old fool die slowly right
    before our eyes in public.



    At least aged presidents like Wilson
    and FDR and Reagan and Biden filled their
    cabinets with capable people who knew their
    jobs. Trump will appoint any manifest idiot
    as long as they sing his praises loud enough.
    The puppy killer and Director Brainworm and
    alcoholic running the Pentagon? Where does he
    find these people?

    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freaks_%281932_film%29>

    One of us!
    One of us!
    One of us!

    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-999. Disavowed. Denied. @
    'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 4.0 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Siri Cruz@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 5 16:18:11 2025
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa

    On 5/5/25 12:55, super70s wrote:
    Quite the contrary. He has done a wonderful job working under
    a government
    that refuses to make meaninful changes.

    I've always supported him since becoming a reasonable option
    for the
    presidency.

    "The party doesn't matter any more," you say.

    That's what rightwinguts like to do when they're in power and the
    situation is hopelessly screwed -- spread the blame around to
    everybody.

    Donald Trump and Donald Trump alone (plus his Republican enablers
    in Congress) is solely responsible for this economic shit storm
    that's getting ready to happen.

    Very few EOs are based on the presidents powers in Article 2.
    Look at EOs and they usually include references to US Code where
    Congress decides not put every detail in USC, but give the
    President some discretion. The problem is Congress does not pull
    back if the discretion is abused.

    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-999. Disavowed. Denied. @
    'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 4.0 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David LaRue@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Tue May 6 00:15:04 2025
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa

    super70s <[email protected]d> wrote in news:vvb531$17mmc$1@dont- email.me:

    On 2025-05-05 04:48:32 +0000, David LaRue said:

    c186282 <[email protected]> wrote in news:Jo-
    [email protected]:

    On 5/4/25 8:24 PM, David LaRue wrote:
    c186282 <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:[email protected]:

    Modern US presidents seem to rely more and more
    on rule-by-fiat ... executive orders and similar.

    IMHO this is NOT a great trend - no matter the
    party holding the office at the moment.

    The preferred approach is for for the legislature
    to be responsive and draft laws/reg ... then the
    POTUS either signs or vetoes.

    XOs *do* have a certain place - mostly for time-
    critical 'emergency' situations ... the legislative
    process there may simply be TOO slow.

    I'm going to propose a law that puts a rather
    strict time-limit on XOs. Within 30 days the
    Congress must vote it up or down - straight
    simple majority vote. If they do nothing then
    the order simply expires. If this gakes a
    monthly "XO Afternoon" of voting then so be it.

    This gives the POTUS the needed 'emergency' powers
    but leaves the legislature to make the longer-term
    decision.

    Oh, no repeated XOs on the same subject ...

    In just the past few years we've seen both Joe
    and Trump kinda go wild with XOs. They won't be
    the last either - UNLESS ......

    In the end, the Congress/Senate SHOULD have the
    most ultimate political power - it's best for
    the USA. That's part of the MAGA thing.

    Until Congress gets its act together and codifies any of the good XOs, they
    can be changed by new presidents. IMO there is little incentive for
    life
    long congressional beaurocrats to do anything productive except
    further
    their own interests, like getting election funding from the military
    complex and the deep state. Your suggestion of slowing XOs would
    prevent
    good policies from any president. Everyone loves enacting bad
    policies
    because they hurt people enough to vote for the government to promise
    to do
    something good, and they never will. IMHO all levels of government no >>>> longer serve The People. Sadly this does not bode well for the
    longevity
    of the USA. The party doesn't matter any more. Once in the
    government the
    elected have achieved their goals and are unable to do good before
    becomming "part of the system". What the public wants has become
    irrevalent. This seems to be true across the globe for those that
    have a
    choice in their government.

    We're in a functioning government that no longer serves it's people.
    It
    has been this way for a long time. The government could do good, but
    it is
    easier to be disfunctional and fool the people. In other words we're
    just
    as bad as other government systems that choose to abuse their people.
    Those in the USA legally have options to correct the situation, but
    likely
    just want to be taken care of and ignore what has been done to them.
    Sadly
    few are even taught this, and thus the public chooses to fight the
    wrong
    causes and solutions.

    We are not ready for good to prevail and thus choose not to fight for
    it.


    You seem to assume everything Trump does is EVIL ...

    Quite the contrary. He has done a wonderful job working under a
    government
    that refuses to make meaninful changes.

    I've always supported him since becoming a reasonable option for the
    presidency.

    "The party doesn't matter any more," you say.

    That's what rightwinguts like to do when they're in power and the
    situation is hopelessly screwed -- spread the blame around to everybody.

    Donald Trump and Donald Trump alone (plus his Republican enablers in Congress) is solely responsible for this economic shit storm that's
    getting ready to happen.

    Prices are down here and employers are begging for workers. There hasn't
    been time for any of the madness you complain about to reach the consumer market. If your politicians complain about a little turmoil it will likely
    be over in 1200 days.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)