XPost: alt.politics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
c186282 wrote:
On 3/31/25 11:03 AM, pothead wrote:
On 2025-03-31, c186282 <[email protected]> wrote:
https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20250330-us-will-not-get-greenland-island-s-new-pm-says-in-response-to-trump-comments
Not THAT many people there - but it seems they WILL resist
any US take-over. Expect Denmark/EU to be on their side.
DUH, Greenland is overseen by Denmark.
Dunno WHY Trump keeps pushing this - excuse to totally
strip-mine the place ??? Defense against Russia - the
USA already has bases there, could lease MORE, no prob.
IF Trump demands Greenland he will have to go FULL
IMPERIALIST there - means KILLING all locals who
dare resist. This is BAD, not what the USA is
BAD he says? What an idiot.
supposed to be about.
At least short-term, Trump really seems to be in
Dictator Mode. Internally, maybe not so bad, but
internationally - how do we tell him from Putin ?
Just sayin'
Trump needs to work out deal with Greenland/Denmark where the USA can
increase the amount of military stationed there.
It would achieve pretty much the same results as taking over the country
by force without the USA looking like Putin Part II.
Greenland/Denmark had no prob with US bases there
past or present. Lease a square of land and put
Idiots. That was by treaty and mutual agreement.
We DID NOT invade or anything.
what you need there. As such I have some doubts
about the mil excuse for invading,
The strip-mining angle ... maybe more likely.
In any case, Trump seems to be setting the wrong tone
for sure. He's good - but not infallible.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)