• Heavy Debate Over Claims of Vast Under-structures Beneath Pyramids

    From c186282@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 27 02:09:29 2025
    XPost: alt.history, alt.archeology, alt.science
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-14539481/vast-city-exists-Giza-Pyramids-Egypt-new-discovery.html

    . . .

    Ok, nut-shell : Team CLAIMS there are vast under-structures
    beneath the pyramids - going down maybe 4000 feet - that
    look like 'wells' or 'mines' with 'chambers' and 'staircases'.

    They used 'radar tomography' techniques - a sort of ground
    penetrating radar trick - to find this. Some comm satellites
    give off signals that CAN penetrate rather deeply. By using
    two or three, and building up the subsurface reflections
    over time, the team CLAIMS to see all this new stuff.

    First off, the result is VERY VERY low-rez. Limits of the
    tech alas. It's kinda so bad that you see more or less
    what you WANT to see.

    Next, the water table in the region has NEVER been below
    4000 feet for a million years or more. The pumping tech
    required to go that deep ... just unthinkable. With the
    Nile nearby ... wow ......

    COULD there have been kinda sophisticated pre-ice-age
    civs around there ? Of course - I kinda expect such -
    people are people and 'civ' just kinda pops up in all
    its glory once you get enough people in an area. But,
    based on artifacts, best to look in southern Turkey.

    On the flip - NO archeological artifacts ever found
    suggesting such a sophisticated Egyptian civ. It's
    a fairly good area for preserving such, but nothing
    except maybe a 20,000 year slow-growth in the region
    has left anything to see. 4000-foot wells/mines would
    require roughly 18th/19th-century techniques and THAT
    would leave LOTS of signs. Higher-tech doesn't just
    appear like magic, there's a long build-up and
    LOTS of 'junk' left around.

    SO, apologies, but I'm not gonna go with this groups
    analysis. IMHO, at best, we're looking at random
    underground rock formations, maybe with some caves
    and channels from long water seepage.

    STILL - interesting approach. The rez/accuracy CAN be
    improved for sure. Give it time. It's just amazing
    how LITTLE we know about pre-ice-age human civ - we
    likely know more about Mars. Stronger LOCAL multi-
    frequency transmitters can be employed, more time
    to build up the tomographic picture. Better yet, put
    down some small wells a mile or so from the site
    and use SOUND waves to build up a picture.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)