• Re: International Women's Day

    From c186282@21:1/5 to David Dalton on Sat Mar 8 21:12:14 2025
    XPost: alt.politics, alt.politics.international, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    On 3/8/25 1:53 AM, David Dalton wrote:
    Happy International Women’s Day (March 8)!

    And may conditions soon improve for women in
    countries where they have been oppressed.

    Hasn't really happened much, anywhere, in the
    past 10,000 years. Seems to be going the other
    way again in lots of the world. Kept up with
    the new Taliban regulations ? Iran and friends
    are a-OK with treading on 'womens rights' too.
    Even India - most populous - women are kinda
    just 'things' ... the uppity are fair game,
    Daddy doesn't pay the dowry and they set fire
    to the bride.

    Queens, even warrior queens, are not unknown - but
    relatively rare. None, not even QE-1, seem to have
    "improved things for all women" while they ruled.

    Before 10,000 years ago - no records. Very likely
    kinda the same. Did come upon a partial list of
    laws from the city of Uruk - maybe 4000+ years old -
    and even in this first known big city "womens place"
    and slavery were already obvious. You DID have to
    pay a fine for raping someone else's slave girl
    however ...

    "If a man proceeded by force, and deflowered the virgin
    female slave of another man, that man must pay five
    shekels of silver."


    https://www.ancientpages.com/2016/03/11/codes-of-ur-nammu-worlds-oldest-known-law-code/

    I guess buggering slave BOYS was a-ok ....

    Basically, women get the most rights/respect/scope
    in longstanding 1st-world societies - where things
    are generally good enough so men don't feel they
    have to keep a steel death-grip on EVERYTHING.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mitchell Holman@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Sun Mar 9 02:45:11 2025
    XPost: alt.politics, alt.politics.international, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    c186282 <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:

    On 3/8/25 1:53 AM, David Dalton wrote:
    Happy International Women’s Day (March 8)!

    And may conditions soon improve for women in
    countries where they have been oppressed.

    Hasn't really happened much, anywhere, in the
    past 10,000 years. Seems to be going the other
    way again in lots of the world. Kept up with
    the new Taliban regulations ? Iran and friends
    are a-OK with treading on 'womens rights' too.
    Even India - most populous - women are kinda
    just 'things' ... the uppity are fair game,
    Daddy doesn't pay the dowry and they set fire
    to the bride.

    Queens, even warrior queens, are not unknown - but
    relatively rare. None, not even QE-1, seem to have
    "improved things for all women" while they ruled.

    Before 10,000 years ago - no records. Very likely
    kinda the same. Did come upon a partial list of
    laws from the city of Uruk - maybe 4000+ years old -
    and even in this first known big city "womens place"
    and slavery were already obvious. You DID have to
    pay a fine for raping someone else's slave girl
    however ...

    "If a man proceeded by force, and deflowered the virgin
    female slave of another man, that man must pay five
    shekels of silver."





    If a man happens to meet a virgin who
    is not pledged to be married and rapes
    her and they are discovered, he shall
    pay her father fifty shekels of silver.
    He must marry the young woman, for he has
    violated her. He can never divorce her as
    long as he lives.
    Deuteronomy 22:28-29

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Dalton@21:1/5 to All on Sun Mar 9 00:53:05 2025
    XPost: alt.politics, alt.politics.international, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    On Mar 8, 2025, c186282 wrote
    (in article<[email protected]>):

    On 3/8/25 1:53 AM, David Dalton wrote:
    Happy International Women’s Day (March 8)!

    And may conditions soon improve for women in
    countries where they have been oppressed.

    Hasn't really happened much, anywhere, in the
    past 10,000 years. Seems to be going the other
    way again in lots of the world. Kept up with
    the new Taliban regulations ? Iran and friends
    are a-OK with treading on 'womens rights' too.
    Even India - most populous - women are kinda
    just 'things' ... the uppity are fair game,
    Daddy doesn't pay the dowry and they set fire
    to the bride.

    Queens, even warrior queens, are not unknown - but
    relatively rare. None, not even QE-1, seem to have
    "improved things for all women" while they ruled.

    Before 10,000 years ago - no records. Very likely
    kinda the same. Did come upon a partial list of
    laws from the city of Uruk - maybe 4000+ years old -
    and even in this first known big city "womens place"
    and slavery were already obvious. You DID have to
    pay a fine for raping someone else's slave girl
    however ...

    "If a man proceeded by force, and deflowered the virgin
    female slave of another man, that man must pay five
    shekels of silver."

    https://www.ancientpages.com/2016/03/11/codes-of-ur-nammu-worlds-oldest-known-
    law-code/

    I guess buggering slave BOYS was a-ok ....

    Basically, women get the most rights/respect/scope
    in longstanding 1st-world societies - where things
    are generally good enough so men don't feel they
    have to keep a steel death-grip on EVERYTHING.

    Even in “longstanding 1st-world societies” there is
    an epidemic of domestic abuse, mostly of women.

    And in Canada the problem of missing and murdered
    indigenous girls and women has not yet been
    fully solved.

    --
    David Dalton [email protected] https://www.nfld.com/~dalton (home page) https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns (mystic page) “And now the angry morning; Gives the early signs of warning; You must
    face alone the plans you make; Decisions they will try to break" (S.McL.)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)