"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:42:44 -0500, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>news:[email protected]...
On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 08:36:02 -0500, "Scout"
<[email protected]> wrote:
"Joel" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>news:[email protected]...
pothead <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2024-09-19, Joel <[email protected]> wrote:
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>"Joel" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>news:[email protected]...Been to N. Korea lately?
Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>[Default] Joel <[email protected]> typed:
"Leroy N. Soetoro" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>wrote:
https://nypost.com/2022/06/18/detransitioned-teens-explain-w >>>>>>>>>>>>>hy-they- regret-changing-genders/
Spoiler alert, this is hysterical cherry-picking of people >>>>>>>>>>>>who detransitioned, it's not related to the meaningful data >>>>>>>>>>>>on transitions' success.
It illustrates exactly why we should outlaw this hideous >>>>>>>>>>>process and
imprison any doctors and nurses who perform it.
For life.
That's authoritarian.
And yet you have no problems with authority REQUIRING they do >>>>>>>>>so?
If one is authoritarianism.. then so is the other.
No one can be required to do a job they don't wish to do.
How about China?
I'm not talking about those countries.
I see, so you're cherry picking only examples that support your >>>>>claims.
that's dishonest.
His conversation was about the United States. Pothead tried to
change the
subject.
No, he claimed that no one can be required to do a job they don't
wish to do... I pointed to examples that refuted his claims.
While deliberately misunderstanding that the conversation wasn't
global.
How can it not be global when the issue is authoritarianism? Are you
saying that only occurs in the US?
Further people can indeed be required to do a job.
Ever hear of "community service"?
"Joel" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:
It's [GAC surgery] never done below the age of 16, rarely before
18. This isn't a
real problem, just a rhetorical point for the phobes,
dishonestly.
Frankly it should be illegal below 18. Under 18 it's child abuse.
It is unnecessary and purely elective cosmetic surgery.
Wrong.
No, that's exactly factual.
16 and 17 year-old people are not children.
They are according to the law.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 08:17:06 |
| Calls: | 12,100 |
| Files: | 15,003 |
| Messages: | 6,517,952 |