Ron Dean wrote:
Dexter wrote:
Ron Dean wrote:
vallor wrote:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 12:37:52 -0400, Ron Dean <[email protected]>
wrote in <AdXNN.93920$[email protected]>:
RonO wrote:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/03/22/west-virginia-
intelligent-design-religion-teaching/367f8bba- e894-11ee-9eba-1558f848ec25_story.html
The claim is that if a student asks a teacher about some alternative
"theory" the teacher can answer that question, but there is no recommendation on what an honest and acceptable answer would be since the "theory" that they want to get into the public schools isn't a scientific theory, and should probably be labeled as to what it is in any discussion on the topic. If the legislators believe otherwise they should have made that clear in the act, and they should have been more honest as to what they were doing.
Considering the Intelligent design argument does not identify a designer? How should this question be answered? A student wanted to know why Intellignet Design is wrong,
The answer to the question is "mu".
(The burden of proof is on the ID proponents to present evidence
that it is "right".)
Additionally, I see you aren't using a spell checker. Is that
a new development, or were you fibbing when you said your spell checker "corrected" the name "Osama" to someone else in your bigoted statement, hmmm?
My bigotry is directed towards terrorist. I hate terrorist violence. I question that you love terrorist. But what other reason for challenging my view?
-------------------------------------
Interesting that you should introduce the topic of terrorism in this thread.
If one examines recent christian history, I think it could properly be said that christianity shares some distinct terroristic tendencies with other contemporary religions.
In my view, there is absolutely no justification for any terrorism regardless of who's the perpetrator or whatever is the cause. I made this clear: so, why do you bring this up?
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1957842/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/abortviolence/stories/atlanta.htm
https://www.justice.gov/crt/recent-cases-violence-against-reproductive-health-care-providers
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Eric-Rudolph
https://prochoice.org/violence-against-abortion-providers-continues-to-rise-following-roe-reversal-new-report-finds/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-abortion_violence
-------------------------------------
You're the one who noted your bigotry was towards terror and terrorists.
Aren't the actions noted in these links those of terrorists who's motives are based on their religious beliefs? It seems I may have found your blind spot.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)