THIS IS A GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY TO BECOME WEALTHY. A $10,000.000 PRIZE.
IF EVOLUTION IS A REALITY OF NATURE. THERE IS NO REASON FOR SOMEONE
_NOT_ TO WIN THIS PRIZE.
EVOLUTION 2.0 PRIZE KEY FACTS: Evolution 2.0 is a $10 million
technology prize backed by a private equity investment group formed to identify a naturally occurring code. The Prize came about from the
group’s inaugural meeting May 31, 2019, at The Royal Society of Great Britain.
The judges are: George Church. Denis Noble, Michael Ruse
https://evo2.org/theprize/
On 3/19/24 10:06 AM, Richmond wrote:
Ron Dean <[email protected]> writes:I have sneaking suspicion nobody's going to win this. This isn't new;
THIS IS A GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY TO BECOME WEALTHY. A $10,000.000 PRIZE.What do you mean by code? Like a dress code?
IF EVOLUTION IS A REALITY OF NATURE. THERE IS NO REASON FOR SOMEONE
_NOT_ TO WIN THIS PRIZE.
EVOLUTION 2.0 PRIZE KEY FACTS: Evolution 2.0 is a $10 million
technology prize backed by a private equity investment group formed to
identify a naturally occurring code. The Prize came about from the
group’s inaugural meeting May 31, 2019, at The Royal Society of Great
Britain.
The judges are: George Church. Denis Noble, Michael Ruse
https://evo2.org/theprize/
it's been around since 2006, maybe earlier. There's even a book: https://www.amazon.com/Evolution-2-0-Breaking-Deadlock-Between/dp/1940363802
The usual "atheists vs. ID proponents" are featured.
On 3/19/24 10:01 AM, Ron Dean wrote:
How would you recognize a naturally occurring code? And why isn't the
THIS IS A GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY TO BECOME WEALTHY. A $10,000.000 PRIZE.
IF EVOLUTION IS A REALITY OF NATURE. THERE IS NO REASON FOR SOMEONE
_NOT_ TO WIN THIS PRIZE.
EVOLUTION 2.0 PRIZE KEY FACTS:
Evolution 2.0 is a $10 million technology prize backed by a private
equity investment group formed to identify a naturally occurring code.
The Prize came about from the group’s inaugural meeting May 31, 2019,
at The Royal Society of Great Britain.
The judges are:
George Church. Denis Noble, Michael Ruse
https://evo2.org/theprize/
genetic code an example therof?
On 3/19/24 10:01 AM, Ron Dean wrote:
How would you recognize a naturally occurring code? And why isn't the
THIS IS A GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY TO BECOME WEALTHY. A $10,000.000 PRIZE.
IF EVOLUTION IS A REALITY OF NATURE. THERE IS NO REASON FOR SOMEONE
_NOT_ TO WIN THIS PRIZE.
EVOLUTION 2.0 PRIZE KEY FACTS:
Evolution 2.0 is a $10 million technology prize backed by a private
equity investment group formed to identify a naturally occurring code.
The Prize came about from the group’s inaugural meeting May 31, 2019,
at The Royal Society of Great Britain.
The judges are:
George Church. Denis Noble, Michael Ruse
https://evo2.org/theprize/
genetic code an example therof?
erik simpson <[email protected]> writes:
On 3/19/24 10:06 AM, Richmond wrote:
Ron Dean <[email protected]> writes:I have sneaking suspicion nobody's going to win this. This isn't new;
THIS IS A GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY TO BECOME WEALTHY. A $10,000.000 PRIZE.What do you mean by code? Like a dress code?
IF EVOLUTION IS A REALITY OF NATURE. THERE IS NO REASON FOR SOMEONE
_NOT_ TO WIN THIS PRIZE.
EVOLUTION 2.0 PRIZE KEY FACTS: Evolution 2.0 is a $10 million
technology prize backed by a private equity investment group formed to >>>> identify a naturally occurring code. The Prize came about from the
group’s inaugural meeting May 31, 2019, at The Royal Society of Great >>>> Britain.
The judges are: George Church. Denis Noble, Michael Ruse
https://evo2.org/theprize/
it's been around since 2006, maybe earlier. There's even a book:
https://www.amazon.com/Evolution-2-0-Breaking-Deadlock-Between/dp/1940363802 >>
The usual "atheists vs. ID proponents" are featured.
That page appears to have the answer, DNA is a code. DNA is naturally occuring. I claim my $10 million dollars. I'd like it paid in
gold.
On 19/03/2024 17:33, Richmond wrote:
erik simpson <[email protected]> writes:
On 3/19/24 10:06 AM, Richmond wrote:appears to have the answer, DNA is a code. DNA is naturally
Ron Dean <[email protected]> writes:I have sneaking suspicion nobody's going to win this. This isn't
THIS IS A GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY TO BECOME WEALTHY. A $10,000.000code?
PRIZE.
IF EVOLUTION IS A REALITY OF NATURE. THERE IS NO REASON FOR
SOMEONE _NOT_ TO WIN THIS PRIZE.
EVOLUTION 2.0 PRIZE KEY FACTS: Evolution 2.0 is a $10 million
technology prize backed by a private equity investment group
formed to identify a naturally occurring code. The Prize came
about from the group’s inaugural meeting May 31, 2019, at The
Royal Society of Great Britain.
The judges are: George Church. Denis Noble, Michael Ruse
https://evo2.org/theprize/ What do you mean by code? Like a dress
new; it's been around since 2006, maybe earlier. There's even a
book:
https://www.amazon.com/Evolution-2-0-Breaking-Deadlock-Between/dp/1940363802
The usual "atheists vs. ID proponents" are featured. That page
occuring. I claim my $10 million dollars. I'd like it paid in gold.
Ron Dean conflated abiogenesis and evolution. The challenge is to
cause the equivalent of the genetic code to spontaneously form in real
time. You can't point to the evolution of SARS-COV-2 in real time to
win the prize, but that doesn't mean that the evolution of SARS-COV-2
isn't part of the reality of nature. (Alternatively, stellar evolution
is part of the reality of nature, but that doesn't mean that one can reasonably expect to form a star in the laboratory.)
Ron Dean also misrepresented the criterion for winning. As stated
previously, the challenge is not to identify a code, but to cause one
to form spontaneously in real time.
Ron Dean may have provided the wrong link. If my memory serves me
correctly there's a creationist "prize" on superficially similar
lines.
A couple of other comments. I wondered what would happen if someone
submitted ChatGPT as a contender for the prize, but reading the finer
print, the requirement is for a chemical process. Spiegelman's monster
is a chemical, and similar structures form spontaneously from systems
of nucleotides and a RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, but I guess that
doesn't qualify as a code. Other out of the box ideas are index
minerals and Fraunhofer lines in stellar spectra (but the latter works
on the atomic, rather than the molecular level).
This also reminds me of Kaufmann's self-organisation research program,
which I have the impression gave better results in relation to ecology
that to abiogenesis.
On 19/03/2024 17:42, John Harshman wrote:
On 3/19/24 10:01 AM, Ron Dean wrote:
How would you recognize a naturally occurring code? And why isn't
THIS IS A GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY TO BECOME WEALTHY. A $10,000.000 PRIZE.
IF EVOLUTION IS A REALITY OF NATURE. THERE IS NO REASON FOR
SOMEONE _NOT_ TO WIN THIS PRIZE.
EVOLUTION 2.0 PRIZE KEY FACTS:
Evolution 2.0 is a $10 million technology prize backed by a private
equity investment group formed to identify a naturally occurring
code.
The Prize came about from the group’s inaugural meeting May 31,
2019, at The Royal Society of Great Britain.
The judges are:
George Church. Denis Noble, Michael Ruse
https://evo2.org/theprize/
the genetic code an example therof?
The prize isn't for identifying a naturally occurring code. It's for
causing one to spontaneously form.
On 19/03/2024 17:42, John Harshman wrote:
On 3/19/24 10:01 AM, Ron Dean wrote:
How would you recognize a naturally occurring code? And why isn't the
THIS IS A GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY TO BECOME WEALTHY. A $10,000.000 PRIZE.
IF EVOLUTION IS A REALITY OF NATURE. THERE IS NO REASON FOR SOMEONE
_NOT_ TO WIN THIS PRIZE.
EVOLUTION 2.0 PRIZE KEY FACTS:
Evolution 2.0 is a $10 million technology prize backed by a private
equity investment group formed to identify a naturally occurring code.
The Prize came about from the group’s inaugural meeting May 31, 2019,
at The Royal Society of Great Britain.
The judges are:
George Church. Denis Noble, Michael Ruse
https://evo2.org/theprize/
genetic code an example therof?
The prize isn't for identifying a naturally occurring code. It's for
causing one to spontaneously form.
Ernest Major <{$to$}@meden.demon.co.uk> writes:
On 19/03/2024 17:42, John Harshman wrote:
On 3/19/24 10:01 AM, Ron Dean wrote:
How would you recognize a naturally occurring code? And why isn't
THIS IS A GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY TO BECOME WEALTHY. A $10,000.000 PRIZE.
IF EVOLUTION IS A REALITY OF NATURE. THERE IS NO REASON FOR
SOMEONE _NOT_ TO WIN THIS PRIZE.
EVOLUTION 2.0 PRIZE KEY FACTS:
Evolution 2.0 is a $10 million technology prize backed by a private
equity investment group formed to identify a naturally occurring
code.
The Prize came about from the group’s inaugural meeting May 31,
2019, at The Royal Society of Great Britain.
The judges are:
George Church. Denis Noble, Michael Ruse
https://evo2.org/theprize/
the genetic code an example therof?
The prize isn't for identifying a naturally occurring code. It's for
causing one to spontaneously form.
Bird song is a naturally occuring code, and I could cause it to
spontanously form by removing the elastic band from the bird's beak
which I had previously placed there. I claim my £10,000,000 (or
$10,000.000) prize again.
On 2024-03-19 1:55 PM, Richmond wrote:
Ernest Major <{$to$}@meden.demon.co.uk> writes:But if you "caused" it, it ain't "spontaneous". {:p
On 19/03/2024 17:42, John Harshman wrote:Bird song is a naturally occuring code, and I could cause it to
On 3/19/24 10:01 AM, Ron Dean wrote:
How would you recognize a naturally occurring code? And why isn't
THIS IS A GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY TO BECOME WEALTHY. A $10,000.000 PRIZE. >>>>>
IF EVOLUTION IS A REALITY OF NATURE. THERE IS NO REASON FOR
SOMEONE _NOT_ TO WIN THIS PRIZE.
EVOLUTION 2.0 PRIZE KEY FACTS:
Evolution 2.0 is a $10 million technology prize backed by a private
equity investment group formed to identify a naturally occurring
code.
The Prize came about from the group’s inaugural meeting May 31,
2019, at The Royal Society of Great Britain.
The judges are:
George Church. Denis Noble, Michael Ruse
https://evo2.org/theprize/
the genetic code an example therof?
The prize isn't for identifying a naturally occurring code. It's for
causing one to spontaneously form.
spontanously form by removing the elastic band from the bird's beak
which I had previously placed there. I claim my £10,000,000 (or
$10,000.000) prize again.
On 3/19/24 11:42 AM, Ernest Major wrote:
On 19/03/2024 17:42, John Harshman wrote:But if you cause it, it isn't spontaneous.
On 3/19/24 10:01 AM, Ron Dean wrote:
How would you recognize a naturally occurring code? And why isn't the
THIS IS A GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY TO BECOME WEALTHY. A $10,000.000 PRIZE.
IF EVOLUTION IS A REALITY OF NATURE. THERE IS NO REASON FOR SOMEONE
_NOT_ TO WIN THIS PRIZE.
EVOLUTION 2.0 PRIZE KEY FACTS:
Evolution 2.0 is a $10 million technology prize backed by a private
equity investment group formed to identify a naturally occurring code. >>>> The Prize came about from the group’s inaugural meeting May 31,
2019, at The Royal Society of Great Britain.
The judges are:
George Church. Denis Noble, Michael Ruse
https://evo2.org/theprize/
genetic code an example therof?
The prize isn't for identifying a naturally occurring code. It's for
causing one to spontaneously form.
On 3/19/24 11:29 AM, Ernest Major wrote:
On 19/03/2024 17:33, Richmond wrote:
erik simpson <[email protected]> writes:
On 3/19/24 10:06 AM, Richmond wrote:
Ron Dean <[email protected]> writes:I have sneaking suspicion nobody's going to win this. This isn't new; >>>> it's been around since 2006, maybe earlier. There's even a book:
THIS IS A GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY TO BECOME WEALTHY. A $10,000.000 PRIZE. >>>>>>What do you mean by code? Like a dress code?
IF EVOLUTION IS A REALITY OF NATURE. THERE IS NO REASON FOR SOMEONE >>>>>> _NOT_ TO WIN THIS PRIZE.
EVOLUTION 2.0 PRIZE KEY FACTS: Evolution 2.0 is a $10 million
technology prize backed by a private equity investment group
formed to
identify a naturally occurring code. The Prize came about from the >>>>>> group’s inaugural meeting May 31, 2019, at The Royal Society of Great >>>>>> Britain.
The judges are: George Church. Denis Noble, Michael Ruse
https://evo2.org/theprize/
https://www.amazon.com/Evolution-2-0-Breaking-Deadlock-Between/dp/1940363802
The usual "atheists vs. ID proponents" are featured.
That page appears to have the answer, DNA is a code. DNA is naturally
occuring. I claim my $10 million dollars. I'd like it paid in
gold.
Ron Dean conflated abiogenesis and evolution. The challenge is to
cause the equivalent of the genetic code to spontaneously form in real
time. You can't point to the evolution of SARS-COV-2 in real time to
win the prize, but that doesn't mean that the evolution of SARS-COV-2
isn't part of the reality of nature. (Alternatively, stellar evolution
is part of the reality of nature, but that doesn't mean that one can
reasonably expect to form a star in the laboratory.)
Ron Dean also misrepresented the criterion for winning. As stated
previously, the challenge is not to identify a code, but to cause one
to form spontaneously in real time.
Now there's an oxymoron.
Ron Dean may have provided the wrong link. If my memory serves me
correctly there's a creationist "prize" on superficially similar lines.
A couple of other comments. I wondered what would happen if someone
submitted ChatGPT as a contender for the prize, but reading the finer
print, the requirement is for a chemical process. Spiegelman's monster
is a chemical, and similar structures form spontaneously from systems
of nucleotides and a RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, but I guess that
doesn't qualify as a code. Other out of the box ideas are index
minerals and Fraunhofer lines in stellar spectra (but the latter works
on the atomic, rather than the molecular level).
This also reminds me of Kaufmann's self-organisation research program,
which I have the impression gave better results in relation to ecology
that to abiogenesis.
Is there anything which has no cause?
On 2024-03-19 3:28 PM, John Harshman wrote:
On 3/19/24 11:42 AM, Ernest Major wrote:There you go. *Proof* that i"m just one of John's innumerable sock puppets.
On 19/03/2024 17:42, John Harshman wrote:But if you cause it, it isn't spontaneous.
On 3/19/24 10:01 AM, Ron Dean wrote:
How would you recognize a naturally occurring code? And why isn't
THIS IS A GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY TO BECOME WEALTHY. A $10,000.000 PRIZE. >>>>>
IF EVOLUTION IS A REALITY OF NATURE. THERE IS NO REASON FOR
SOMEONE _NOT_ TO WIN THIS PRIZE.
EVOLUTION 2.0 PRIZE KEY FACTS:
Evolution 2.0 is a $10 million technology prize backed by a
private equity investment group formed to identify a naturally
occurring code.
The Prize came about from the group’s inaugural meeting May 31,
2019, at The Royal Society of Great Britain.
The judges are:
George Church. Denis Noble, Michael Ruse
https://evo2.org/theprize/
the genetic code an example therof?
The prize isn't for identifying a naturally occurring code. It's
for causing one to spontaneously form.
erik simpson <[email protected]> writes:
On 3/19/24 10:06 AM, Richmond wrote:
Ron Dean <[email protected]> writes:I have sneaking suspicion nobody's going to win this. This isn't new;
THIS IS A GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY TO BECOME WEALTHY. A $10,000.000 PRIZE.What do you mean by code? Like a dress code?
IF EVOLUTION IS A REALITY OF NATURE. THERE IS NO REASON FOR SOMEONE
_NOT_ TO WIN THIS PRIZE.
EVOLUTION 2.0 PRIZE KEY FACTS: Evolution 2.0 is a $10 million
technology prize backed by a private equity investment group formed to >>>> identify a naturally occurring code. The Prize came about from the
group’s inaugural meeting May 31, 2019, at The Royal Society of Great >>>> Britain.
The judges are: George Church. Denis Noble, Michael Ruse
https://evo2.org/theprize/
it's been around since 2006, maybe earlier. There's even a book:
https://www.amazon.com/Evolution-2-0-Breaking-Deadlock-Between/dp/1940363802 >>
The usual "atheists vs. ID proponents" are featured.
That page appears to have the answer, DNA is a code. DNA is naturally occuring. I claim my $10 million dollars. I'd like it paid in
gold.
On 3/19/24 5:25 PM, Ron Dean wrote:
erik simpson wrote:Zero.
On 3/19/24 10:06 AM, Richmond wrote:What do you know about the the 3 judges or the Royal Society of Great
Ron Dean <[email protected]> writes:I have sneaking suspicion nobody's going to win this. This isn't
THIS IS A GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY TO BECOME WEALTHY. A $10,000.000 PRIZE. >>>>>
IF EVOLUTION IS A REALITY OF NATURE. THERE IS NO REASON FOR SOMEONE >>>>> _NOT_ TO WIN THIS PRIZE.
EVOLUTION 2.0 PRIZE KEY FACTS: Evolution 2.0 is a $10 million
technology prize backed by a private equity investment group formed to >>>>> identify a naturally occurring code. The Prize came about from the >>>>> group’s inaugural meeting May 31, 2019, at The Royal Society of Great >>>>> Britain.
The judges are: George Church. Denis Noble, Michael Ruse
https://evo2.org/theprize/
What do you mean by code? Like a dress code?
new; it's been around since 2006, maybe earlier. There's even a book:
https://www.amazon.com/Evolution-2-0-Breaking-Deadlock-Between/dp/1940363802
The usual "atheists vs. ID proponents" are featured.
Britain?
On 20/03/2024 03:36, erik simpson wrote:
On 3/19/24 5:25 PM, Ron Dean wrote:What is puzzling me is why it is referred to as the Royal Society of
erik simpson wrote:Zero.
On 3/19/24 10:06 AM, Richmond wrote:What do you know about the the 3 judges or the Royal Society of Great Britain?
Ron Dean <[email protected]> writes:I have sneaking suspicion nobody's going to win this. This isn't new; >>>> it's been around since 2006, maybe earlier. There's even a book:
THIS IS A GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY TO BECOME WEALTHY. A $10,000.000 PRIZE. >>>>>>
IF EVOLUTION IS A REALITY OF NATURE. THERE IS NO REASON FOR SOMEONE >>>>>> _NOT_ TO WIN THIS PRIZE.
EVOLUTION 2.0 PRIZE KEY FACTS: Evolution 2.0 is a $10 million
technology prize backed by a private equity investment group formed to >>>>>> identify a naturally occurring code. The Prize came about from the >>>>>> group’s inaugural meeting May 31, 2019, at The Royal Society of Great >>>>>> Britain.
The judges are: George Church. Denis Noble, Michael Ruse
https://evo2.org/theprize/
What do you mean by code? Like a dress code?
https://www.amazon.com/Evolution-2-0-Breaking-Deadlock-Between/dp/1940363802
The usual "atheists vs. ID proponents" are featured.
Great Britain. It's the The Royal Society of London for Improving
Natural Knowledge, commonly referred to as the Royal Society. (To disambiguate from the Royal Societies of Edinburgh and New Zealand one
would normally refer to it as the Royal Society of London.)
Richmond wrote:
DB Cates <[email protected]> writes:Please explain exactly where in the wording in the site where the prize depends on spontaneously forming. The genetic code exist, There can be
On 2024-03-19 1:55 PM, Richmond wrote:
Ernest Major <{$to$}@meden.demon.co.uk> writes:But if you "caused" it, it ain't "spontaneous". {:p
On 19/03/2024 17:42, John Harshman wrote:Bird song is a naturally occuring code, and I could cause it to
On 3/19/24 10:01 AM, Ron Dean wrote:
How would you recognize a naturally occurring code? And why isn't
THIS IS A GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY TO BECOME WEALTHY. A $10,000.000 PRIZE. >>>>>>>
IF EVOLUTION IS A REALITY OF NATURE. THERE IS NO REASON FOR
SOMEONE _NOT_ TO WIN THIS PRIZE.
EVOLUTION 2.0 PRIZE KEY FACTS:
Evolution 2.0 is a $10 million technology prize backed by a private >>>>>>> equity investment group formed to identify a naturally occurring >>>>>>> code.
The Prize came about from the group’s inaugural meeting May 31, >>>>>>> 2019, at The Royal Society of Great Britain.
The judges are:
George Church. Denis Noble, Michael Ruse
https://evo2.org/theprize/
the genetic code an example therof?
The prize isn't for identifying a naturally occurring code. It's for >>>>> causing one to spontaneously form.
spontanously form by removing the elastic band from the bird's beak
which I had previously placed there. I claim my £10,000,000 (or
$10,000.000) prize again.
I set up the laboratory conditions which allowed it to spontaneously
form. :>
no life and no evolution without genetic information.
As everyone knows, the information in the parents genetics is passed
from parents to offspring, that expresses for body shape, parts, organs,
- that work together in harmony, eye color, hair color etc.etc.etc.
This, requires highly complex information. The prize in my opinion (for
what it's worth) is in regards the the origin of the DNA-RNA and the
source of the information contained. It's a issue I've raised before.
"If the present is the key to the past", then at the present time highly complex information comes _only_ from mind. Show that how the DNA/RNA
and the complex information contained is derived through and from
natural processes.I _personally_believe_ this is the basis for the
prize. The human brain is considered the most complex object on the planet. This brain should be equipped to resolve this issue and win the prize.
On 3/19/24 5:25 PM, Ron Dean wrote:
erik simpson wrote:Zero.
On 3/19/24 10:06 AM, Richmond wrote:What do you know about the the 3 judges or the Royal Society of Great Britain?
Ron Dean <[email protected]> writes:I have sneaking suspicion nobody's going to win this. This isn't new;
THIS IS A GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY TO BECOME WEALTHY. A $10,000.000 PRIZE. >>>>>
IF EVOLUTION IS A REALITY OF NATURE. THERE IS NO REASON FOR SOMEONE >>>>> _NOT_ TO WIN THIS PRIZE.
EVOLUTION 2.0 PRIZE KEY FACTS: Evolution 2.0 is a $10 million
technology prize backed by a private equity investment group formed to >>>>> identify a naturally occurring code. The Prize came about from the >>>>> group’s inaugural meeting May 31, 2019, at The Royal Society of Great >>>>> Britain.
The judges are: George Church. Denis Noble, Michael Ruse
https://evo2.org/theprize/
What do you mean by code? Like a dress code?
it's been around since 2006, maybe earlier. There's even a book:
https://www.amazon.com/Evolution-2-0-Breaking-Deadlock-Between/dp/1940363802
The usual "atheists vs. ID proponents" are featured.
erik simpson wrote:
I have sneaking suspicion nobody's going to win this.
Now close the circle: It's as worthless as Randi's
prize for "Proving" the paranormal. It's equally as
impossible to force a payout.
Richmond wrote:
DB Cates <[email protected]> writes:Please explain exactly where in the wording in the site where the
On 2024-03-19 1:55 PM, Richmond wrote:laboratory conditions which allowed it to spontaneously form. :>
Ernest Major <{$to$}@meden.demon.co.uk> writes:But if you "caused" it, it ain't "spontaneous". {:p I set up the
On 19/03/2024 17:42, John Harshman wrote:
On 3/19/24 10:01 AM, Ron Dean wrote:
How would you recognize a naturally occurring code? And why isn't
THIS IS A GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY TO BECOME WEALTHY. A $10,000.000
PRIZE.
IF EVOLUTION IS A REALITY OF NATURE. THERE IS NO REASON FOR
SOMEONE _NOT_ TO WIN THIS PRIZE.
EVOLUTION 2.0 PRIZE KEY FACTS: Evolution 2.0 is a $10 million
technology prize backed by a private equity investment group
formed to identify a naturally occurring code. The Prize came
about from the group’s inaugural meeting May 31, 2019, at The
Royal Society of Great Britain.
The judges are: George Church. Denis Noble, Michael Ruse
https://evo2.org/theprize/
the genetic code an example therof?
The prize isn't for identifying a naturally occurring code. It's
for causing one to spontaneously form. >>>> Bird song is a
naturally occuring code, and I could cause it to >>>> spontanously
form by removing the elastic band from the bird's beak >>>> which
I had previously placed there. I claim my £10,000,000 (or >>>>
$10,000.000) prize again.
prize depends on spontaneously forming. The genetic code exist, There
can be no life and no evolution without genetic information.
As everyone knows, the information in the parents genetics is passed
from parents to offspring, that expresses for body shape, parts,
organs, - that work together in harmony, eye color, hair color
etc.etc.etc. This, requires highly complex information. The prize in
my opinion (for what it's worth) is in regards the the origin of the
DNA-RNA and the source of the information contained. It's a issue I've
raised before. "If the present is the key to the past", then at the
present time highly complex information comes _only_ from mind. Show
that how the DNA/RNA and the complex information contained is derived
through and from natural processes.I _personally_believe_ this is the
basis for the prize. The human brain is considered the most complex
object on the planet. This brain should be equipped to resolve this
issue and win the prize.
Ernest Major <{$to$}@meden.demon.co.uk> writes:
The prize isn't for identifying a naturally occurring code. It's for >>>>> causing one to spontaneously form.
Please explain exactly where in the wording in the site where the
prize depends on spontaneously forming. The genetic code exist, There
can be no life and no evolution without genetic information.
JTEM <[email protected]> wrote:
erik simpson wrote:
I have sneaking suspicion nobody's going to win this.
Now close the circle: It's as worthless as Randi's prize for
"Proving" the paranormal. It's equally as impossible to force a
payout.
Of course it was impossible to win Randi's prize, you had to
demonstrate psychic or paranormal powers, and no such thing exists.
Ron Dean <[email protected]> writes:
Ernest Major <{$to$}@meden.demon.co.uk> writes:
The prize isn't for identifying a naturally occurring code. It's for >>>>>> causing one to spontaneously form.
Please explain exactly where in the wording in the site where the
prize depends on spontaneously forming. The genetic code exist, There
can be no life and no evolution without genetic information.
I was responding to Ernest Major. I haven't even visited the site as I
am not in the habit of clicking on links willy-nilly.
On 3/19/24 1:54 PM, Richmond wrote:
DB Cates <[email protected]> writes:James Dean?
On 2024-03-19 3:28 PM, John Harshman wrote:Is there anything which has no cause?
On 3/19/24 11:42 AM, Ernest Major wrote:There you go. *Proof* that i"m just one of John's innumerable sock puppets. >>
On 19/03/2024 17:42, John Harshman wrote:But if you cause it, it isn't spontaneous.
On 3/19/24 10:01 AM, Ron Dean wrote:
How would you recognize a naturally occurring code? And why isn't
THIS IS A GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY TO BECOME WEALTHY. A $10,000.000 PRIZE. >>>>>>>
IF EVOLUTION IS A REALITY OF NATURE. THERE IS NO REASON FOR
SOMEONE _NOT_ TO WIN THIS PRIZE.
EVOLUTION 2.0 PRIZE KEY FACTS:
Evolution 2.0 is a $10 million technology prize backed by a
private equity investment group formed to identify a naturally
occurring code.
The Prize came about from the group’s inaugural meeting May 31, >>>>>>> 2019, at The Royal Society of Great Britain.
The judges are:
George Church. Denis Noble, Michael Ruse
https://evo2.org/theprize/
the genetic code an example therof?
The prize isn't for identifying a naturally occurring code. It's
for causing one to spontaneously form.
On 2024-03-20 08:09:15 +0000, Ernest Major said:
On 20/03/2024 03:36, erik simpson wrote:
On 3/19/24 5:25 PM, Ron Dean wrote:What is puzzling me is why it is referred to as the Royal Society of
erik simpson wrote:Zero.
On 3/19/24 10:06 AM, Richmond wrote:What do you know about the the 3 judges or the Royal Society of
Ron Dean <[email protected]> writes:I have sneaking suspicion nobody's going to win this. This isn't
THIS IS A GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY TO BECOME WEALTHY. A $10,000.000 PRIZE. >>>>>>>
IF EVOLUTION IS A REALITY OF NATURE. THERE IS NO REASON FOR SOMEONE >>>>>>> _NOT_ TO WIN THIS PRIZE.
EVOLUTION 2.0 PRIZE KEY FACTS: Evolution 2.0 is a $10 million
technology prize backed by a private equity investment group
formed to
identify a naturally occurring code. The Prize came about from the >>>>>>> group’s inaugural meeting May 31, 2019, at The Royal Society of >>>>>>> Great
Britain.
The judges are: George Church. Denis Noble, Michael Ruse
https://evo2.org/theprize/
What do you mean by code? Like a dress code?
new; it's been around since 2006, maybe earlier. There's even a book: >>>>> https://www.amazon.com/Evolution-2-0-Breaking-Deadlock-Between/dp/1940363802
The usual "atheists vs. ID proponents" are featured.
Great Britain?
Great Britain. It's the The Royal Society of London for Improving
Natural Knowledge, commonly referred to as the Royal Society. (To
disambiguate from the Royal Societies of Edinburgh and New Zealand one
would normally refer to it as the Royal Society of London.)
Come on. This is Ron Dean, what do you expect?
Ron Dean <[email protected]> writes:
THIS IS A GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY TO BECOME WEALTHY. A $10,000.000 PRIZE.
IF EVOLUTION IS A REALITY OF NATURE. THERE IS NO REASON FOR SOMEONE
_NOT_ TO WIN THIS PRIZE.
EVOLUTION 2.0 PRIZE KEY FACTS: Evolution 2.0 is a $10 million
technology prize backed by a private equity investment group formed to
identify a naturally occurring code. The Prize came about from the
group’s inaugural meeting May 31, 2019, at The Royal Society of Great
Britain.
The judges are: George Church. Denis Noble, Michael Ruse
https://evo2.org/theprize/
What do you mean by code? Like a dress code?
THIS IS A GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY TO BECOME WEALTHY. A $10,000.000 PRIZE.
IF EVOLUTION IS A REALITY OF NATURE. THERE IS NO REASON FOR SOMEONE
_NOT_ TO WIN THIS PRIZE.
EVOLUTION 2.0 PRIZE KEY FACTS:
Evolution 2.0 is a $10 million technology prize backed by a private
equity investment group formed to identify a naturally occurring code.
The Prize came about from the group’s inaugural meeting May 31, 2019, at The Royal Society of Great Britain.
The judges are:
George Church. Denis Noble, Michael Ruse
On 20/03/2024 03:36, erik simpson wrote:
On 3/19/24 5:25 PM, Ron Dean wrote:
erik simpson wrote:
On 3/19/24 10:06 AM, Richmond wrote:
Ron Dean <[email protected]> writes:
What is puzzling me is why it is referred to as the Royal Society ofZero.What do you know about the the 3 judges or the Royal Society of
Great Britain?
Great Britain. It's the The Royal Society of London for Improving
Natural Knowledge, commonly referred to as the Royal Society. (To disambiguate from the Royal Societies of Edinburgh and New Zealand one
would normally refer to it as the Royal Society of London.)
On 3/19/24 11:42 AM, Ernest Major wrote:
On 19/03/2024 17:42, John Harshman wrote:But if you cause it, it isn't spontaneous.
On 3/19/24 10:01 AM, Ron Dean wrote:
How would you recognize a naturally occurring code? And why isn't the
THIS IS A GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY TO BECOME WEALTHY. A $10,000.000 PRIZE.
IF EVOLUTION IS A REALITY OF NATURE. THERE IS NO REASON FOR SOMEONE
_NOT_ TO WIN THIS PRIZE.
EVOLUTION 2.0 PRIZE KEY FACTS:
Evolution 2.0 is a $10 million technology prize backed by a private
equity investment group formed to identify a naturally occurring code. >>>> The Prize came about from the group’s inaugural meeting May 31,
2019, at The Royal Society of Great Britain.
The judges are:
George Church. Denis Noble, Michael Ruse
https://evo2.org/theprize/
genetic code an example therof?
The prize isn't for identifying a naturally occurring code. It's for
causing one to spontaneously form.
G <[email protected]d> writes:
JTEM <[email protected]> wrote:
erik simpson wrote:
I have sneaking suspicion nobody's going to win this.
Now close the circle: It's as worthless as Randi's prize for
"Proving" the paranormal. It's equally as impossible to force a
payout.
Of course it was impossible to win Randi's prize, you had to
demonstrate psychic or paranormal powers, and no such thing exists.
How do you know? Can you prove it?
On 2024-03-20 10:04:24 +0000, Richmond said:
Ron Dean <[email protected]> writes:
Ernest Major <{$to$}@meden.demon.co.uk> writes:
The prize isn't for identifying a naturally occurring code. It's for >>>>>>> causing one to spontaneously form.
Please explain exactly where in the wording in the site where the
prize depends on spontaneously forming. The genetic code exist, There
can be no life and no evolution without genetic information.
I was responding to Ernest Major. I haven't even visited the site as I
am not in the habit of clicking on links willy-nilly.
I made that mistake this morning. I clicked on a plausible-looking link
in Wikipedia and found myself on a pornography site, from which it
proved very difficult to escape.
On 3/20/24 1:46 AM, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
On 2024-03-20 03:36:48 +0000, erik simpson said:Florida has that effect on many. Except for historical context, I find
On 3/19/24 5:25 PM, Ron Dean wrote:
erik simpson wrote:Zero.
On 3/19/24 10:06 AM, Richmond wrote:What do you know about the the� 3 judges or the Royal Society of
Ron Dean <[email protected]> writes:I have sneaking suspicion nobody's going to win this.� This isn't
THIS IS A GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY TO BECOME WEALTHY. A $10,000.000 PRIZE. >>>>>>>
IF EVOLUTION IS A REALITY OF NATURE.� THERE IS NO REASON FOR SOMEONE >>>>>>> _NOT_ TO WIN THIS PRIZE.
EVOLUTION 2.0 PRIZE KEY FACTS: Evolution 2.0 is a $10 million
technology prize backed by a private equity investment group
formed to
identify a naturally occurring code.� The Prize came about from the >>>>>>> group�s inaugural meeting May 31, 2019, at The Royal Society of Great >>>>>>> Britain.
The judges are: George Church. Denis Noble, Michael Ruse
https://evo2.org/theprize/
What do you mean by code? Like a dress code?
new; it's been around since 2006, maybe earlier.� There's even a book: >>>>> https://www.amazon.com/Evolution-2-0-Breaking-Deadlock-Between/dp/1940363802
The usual "atheists vs. ID proponents" are featured.
Great Britain?
George Church, likewise. Denis Noble is a distinguished physiologist,
but his views on evolution are, shall we say, a bit special. Michael
Ruse seemed to be sensible when he wrote Darwinism Defended, but he's
gone a bit over the rails since he moved to Florida.
the words "Darwinism" or "Darwinist" to be red flags.
On 3/20/24 1:46 AM, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
On 2024-03-20 03:36:48 +0000, erik simpson said:Florida has that effect on many. Except for historical context, I find
On 3/19/24 5:25 PM, Ron Dean wrote:
erik simpson wrote:Zero.
On 3/19/24 10:06 AM, Richmond wrote:What do you know about the the 3 judges or the Royal Society of Great Britain?
Ron Dean <[email protected]> writes:I have sneaking suspicion nobody's going to win this. This isn't new; >>>>> it's been around since 2006, maybe earlier. There's even a book:
THIS IS A GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY TO BECOME WEALTHY. A $10,000.000 PRIZE. >>>>>>>
IF EVOLUTION IS A REALITY OF NATURE. THERE IS NO REASON FOR SOMEONE >>>>>>> _NOT_ TO WIN THIS PRIZE.
EVOLUTION 2.0 PRIZE KEY FACTS: Evolution 2.0 is a $10 million
technology prize backed by a private equity investment group formed to >>>>>>> identify a naturally occurring code. The Prize came about from the >>>>>>> group’s inaugural meeting May 31, 2019, at The Royal Society of Great >>>>>>> Britain.
The judges are: George Church. Denis Noble, Michael Ruse
https://evo2.org/theprize/
What do you mean by code? Like a dress code?
https://www.amazon.com/Evolution-2-0-Breaking-Deadlock-Between/dp/1940363802
The usual "atheists vs. ID proponents" are featured.
George Church, likewise. Denis Noble is a distinguished physiologist,
but his views on evolution are, shall we say, a bit special. Michael
Ruse seemed to be sensible when he wrote Darwinism Defended, but he's
gone a bit over the rails since he moved to Florida.
the words "Darwinism" or "Darwinist" to be red flags.
G <[email protected]d> writes:
JTEM <[email protected]> wrote:
erik simpson wrote:
I have sneaking suspicion nobody's going to win this.
Now close the circle: It's as worthless as Randi's prize for
"Proving" the paranormal. It's equally as impossible to force a
payout.
Of course it was impossible to win Randi's prize, you had to
demonstrate psychic or paranormal powers, and no such thing exists.
How do you know? Can you prove it?
Richmond <[email protected]> wrote:
G <[email protected]d> writes:
JTEM <[email protected]> wrote:
erik simpson wrote:
I have sneaking suspicion nobody's going to win this.
Now close the circle: It's as worthless as Randi's prize for
"Proving" the paranormal. It's equally as impossible to force a
payout.
Of course it was impossible to win Randi's prize, you had to
demonstrate psychic or paranormal powers, and no such thing exists.
How do you know? Can you prove it?
Of course. Can you prove that the proof that no paranormal or psychic powers exist does not exists?
If not that should mean that it exists, at least according to your way of thinking, and that should be enough to satisfy you.
On 20/03/2024 03:36, erik simpson wrote:
On 3/19/24 5:25 PM, Ron Dean wrote:What is puzzling me is why it is referred to as the Royal Society of
erik simpson wrote:Zero.
On 3/19/24 10:06 AM, Richmond wrote:What do you know about the the 3 judges or the Royal Society of Great
Ron Dean <[email protected]> writes:I have sneaking suspicion nobody's going to win this. This isn't
THIS IS A GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY TO BECOME WEALTHY. A $10,000.000 PRIZE. >>>>>>
IF EVOLUTION IS A REALITY OF NATURE. THERE IS NO REASON FOR SOMEONE >>>>>> _NOT_ TO WIN THIS PRIZE.
EVOLUTION 2.0 PRIZE KEY FACTS: Evolution 2.0 is a $10 million
technology prize backed by a private equity investment group formed to >>>>>> identify a naturally occurring code. The Prize came about from the >>>>>> group’s inaugural meeting May 31, 2019, at The Royal Society of Great >>>>>> Britain.
The judges are: George Church. Denis Noble, Michael Ruse
https://evo2.org/theprize/
What do you mean by code? Like a dress code?
new; it's been around since 2006, maybe earlier. There's even a book: >>>> https://www.amazon.com/Evolution-2-0-Breaking-Deadlock-Between/dp/1940363802
The usual "atheists vs. ID proponents" are featured.
Britain?
Great Britain. It's the The Royal Society of London for Improving
Natural Knowledge, commonly referred to as the Royal Society. (To disambiguate from the Royal Societies of Edinburgh and New Zealand one
would normally refer to it as the Royal Society of London.)
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 10:06:39 +0000, the following appeared<crickets>
in talk.origins, posted by Richmond <[email protected]>:
G <[email protected]d> writes:That's a bit disingenuous. Can you prove there's no
JTEM <[email protected]> wrote:
erik simpson wrote:
I have sneaking suspicion nobody's going to win this.
Now close the circle: It's as worthless as Randi's prize for
"Proving" the paranormal. It's equally as impossible to force a
payout.
Of course it was impossible to win Randi's prize, you had to
demonstrate psychic or paranormal powers, and no such thing exists.
How do you know? Can you prove it?
invisible, impalpable elephant in your front yard?
Rationally, "proving" the nonexistence of something which
has never been demonstrated to exist is trivial; simply
point to the lack of evidence of its existence, and invite
the claimant of existence to show you are wrong by providing
such evidence.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 04:28:33 |
| Calls: | 12,099 |
| Calls today: | 7 |
| Files: | 15,003 |
| Messages: | 6,517,894 |