[continued from previous message]

in the past.
Another set of fact can be interpreted as evidence for Design.
That is the fact
that the fossil record, according to the late S.J. and N.
Eldredge is one where
most new species appear abruptly in the fossil record, then
remain in a state of
_stasis_during their tenure on the planet; followed by sudden
disappearance
from the record. This is exactly what intelligent design would
expect to find.
Of course there were exceptions to the rule, the few that did not >>>>>>> go extinct. It
should be remembered that 99% of all species that ever lived died >>>>>>> out.
What were some of the 1% of organisms that survived reproduced
and evolved
into living modern species. Certainly, among the survivors, would >>>>>>> include the
numerous so called "living fossils" that changed little or none. >>>>>>>
It's rarely mentioned in TO discussions and virtually unknown in >>>>>>> public circles
and few if any Idest know anything regarding this topic. I'm in
reference to the
proof reading and repair mechanisms that's built into the DNA
molecule.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODsBTJ1KZY0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vP8-5Bhd2ag

This is utterly incredible. No one knows, beyond doubt, of
course, there are
theories and hypothesis as to  how life started or  where
information in cells
originated. In this mindless, purposeless, careless, thoughtless >>>>>>> and blind
universe what "Cared" whether or not DNA had mutations. Indeed, it's >>>>>>> random mutations and natural selection that drives evolution, So >>>>>>> it's the
fittest that survive and natural selection weeds out the unfit.
So, why did
a mindless, careless nature "see" a purpose for and "design"
these several
(5) proofreading  and repair  mechanisms. After RNA expresses
protein
and the body, organs, limbs etc are formed, Information from DNA to >>>>>>> RNA to protein is a one way street. So, if according to the
"central dogma"
there is no possible way for DNA to "know" anything about the
fitness or
lack of  fitness regarding organisms expressed by mRNA. In this >>>>>>> mindless,
careless universe the DNA is blind to it's final results. So, is >>>>>>> this is the case
there's nothing that keeps DNA from countless, unlimited wild
swings of
massive numbers of  random mutation.

As far as I'm concerned, this strongly implies forethought,
purpose, plan
and deliberate design.  There's no reason to think these
proofreading and
repair systems just happened. If it was not purpose and plan then >>>>>>> the only alternative is, it was purely accidental. But somewhere, >>>>>>> somehow there had to be purpose.

How exactly did these 5 proofreading and repair mechanisms arise? >>>>>>> Why and how could random mutations detect faulty mutation then
devise (solutions)  >> through random
mutations and natural selection?



  - that's because they are not doing science. Indeed that's why >>>>>>> it is obvious that their agenda is not scientific.

;

It's not that G & E discovered this characteristic in the
fossil record. I was known in Darwin's time, but it had been >>>>>>>>> relegated to the dust bowl of history. And even today there's >>>>>>>>> been efforts to explain away this observation.

What is the difference between explaining and explaining away? >>>>>>>>>

Peter Nyikos

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)