Look at a clock.
No, NOT a digital clock! Look at a real clock,
a traditional clock with a round face and the
moving hands...
The clock strikes 12.
There. That's the climate. (It's a metafive no
I mean four. Metaphor. The clock is a
metaphor)
The clock strikes 12.
Now, every second, every minute that tics
by moves the hands further and further away
from 12... EVEN AS they move closer and
closer to striking 12 again.
This is the glacial/interglacial cycle, which
characterizes the planet's climate and will
continue to characterize it until the
Quaternary Period ends. And to do that, in
order to end it would require some pretty hefty
geoengineering.
We'd have to alter the currents, we'd have
to change the way the planet distributes
warmth from the sun. Energy, baby.
But that's your "Climate Model": A clock.
And it's accurate. Unlike Gwobull Warbling
models which have never ever predicted
anything in advance.
They're like Nostradamus "Predictions" or
"Postecies" as many of us like to call them.
Something WILL HAPPEN and only then,
only AFTER it has happened they start
shrieking and jumping up & down; "See?
See that? We were right!"
Here:
https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/102074798
Back in 1988 he Maldives were going to be drowned
under rising sea levels in the next 30 years -- so by
the year 2018. That didn't happen. Their models
were proven dead wrong and the AGW propaganda
machine wasted no time:
https://therealnews.com/sea-level-rise-three-times-worse-previous-estimate
AGW PREDICTION: Maldives will drown under the
rising seas by 2018!
OBSERVED FACTS: 2018 has come & gone and the
Maldives are thriving.
CONCLUSION; "SEA LEVEL RISE IS WORSE THAN
WE THOUGHT!!!"
This is exactly how Nostradamus "Predictions"
work: Wait and see what eventually happens and
then take credit for it... no, wait. THIS IS WORSE!
This is waiting to see how things turned out and
STILL getting it wrong!
This is the furthest you can get from science. This
his faux "History" level crap -- right up there with
Pawn Stars and Ancient Aliens.
AGW PREDICTION: Maldives will drown under the
rising seas by 2018!
OBSERVED FACTS: 2018 has come & gone and theCite.
Maldives are thriving.
CONCLUSION; "SEA LEVEL RISE IS WORSE THAN
WE THOUGHT!!!"
This is exactly how Nostradamus "Predictions"
work: Wait and see what eventually happens and
then take credit for it... no, wait. THIS IS WORSE!
This is waiting to see how things turned out and
STILL getting it wrong!
This is the furthest you can get from science. This
his faux "History" level crap -- right up there with
Pawn Stars and Ancient Aliens.
Most people in the Maldives live on
jillery wrote:
AGW PREDICTION: Maldives will drown under theCite.
rising seas by 2018!
OBSERVED FACTS: 2018 has come & gone and the
Maldives are thriving.
CONCLUSION; "SEA LEVEL RISE IS WORSE THAN
WE THOUGHT!!!"
This is exactly how Nostradamus "Predictions"
work: Wait and see what eventually happens and
then take credit for it... no, wait. THIS IS WORSE!
This is waiting to see how things turned out and
STILL getting it wrong!
This is the furthest you can get from science. This
his faux "History" level crap -- right up there with
Pawn Stars and Ancient Aliens.
Most people in the Maldives live on
What is that twisted, disordered excuse for a mind thinking
that you're contradicting?
To refresh your convenient amnesia:
"OBSERVED FACTS: 2018 has come & gone and the
Maldives are thriving."
Cite how the Maldives are thriving.
Mentally unhinged jillery wrote:
To refresh your convenient amnesia:
"OBSERVED FACTS: 2018 has come & gone and the
Maldives are thriving."
Cite how the Maldives are thriving.
Lol!
You're insane. You're literally insane. You don't even know WHAT
an argument is, never mind how to make one.
Google it. Look.
The Maldives were never destroyed by 2018. It's 2023. They're
thriving. They've been the recipient of massive foreign investment.
Google.
So you can't back up your own claim, and
Eats snot, jillery wrote:
So you can't back up your own claim, andYou're a raging narcissist.
Post your cites. You Googled it and found... what?
You're not asking for cites because you're curious. You're mentally
ill. You're trying desperately to fool yourself into believing that
you're not the waste product you know you are, and I'm here to
ensure you that, yes, you are a waste product.
#1: "The Maldives will be underwater by 2018"
#2: 2018 has come and gone, the Maldives are thriving, the
AGW hypothesis is falsified.
THIS IS HOW science works. A hypothesis is the basis for
predictions. These predictions are tests. Fail the test and the
hypothesis is falsified, discarded.
You don't know what science is. You have no clue how it
works or even WHY is exists. You parrot headlines.
Obediently.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_level_rise It says that
Scientists predict by 2100
Öö Tiib wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_level_rise It says thatWhat you're saying here -- the unstated or unenumerated portion
Scientists predict by 2100
of your statement is -- that their past history of predictions, their
proven record of accuracy (inaccuracy) is of vital importance here.
Do you not grasp this?
Their "Predictions" only matter, we can only care if they have a
history of making accurate predictions WHICH THEY DON'T.
So let's ACCURATELY rephrase your words: "This nameless,
faceless entity which has never been anything but spectacularly
wrong about everything, these last 40 years, is now demanding
that we redraw our economy, redraw society and invent energy
poverty with highly regressive taxes, because of something that
never happened but they claim will happen in maybe 80 years."
And you think it's science?
You think you're acting rationally?
Honey, you're well trained, not well informed.
I do not grasp
Eats snot, jillery wrote:
So you can't back up your own claim, and
You're a raging narcissist.
Post your cites. You Googled it and found... what?
You're not asking for cites because you're curious. You're mentally
ill. You're trying desperately to fool yourself into believing that
you're not the waste product you know you are, and I'm here to
ensure you that, yes, you are a waste product.
#1: "The Maldives will be underwater by 2018"
#2: 2018 has come and gone, the Maldives are thriving, the
AGW hypothesis is falsified.
THIS IS HOW science works. A hypothesis is the basis for
predictions. These predictions are tests. Fail the test and the
hypothesis is falsified, discarded.
You don't know what science is. You have no clue how it
works or even WHY is exists. You parrot headlines.
Obediently.
Since you asked, and once again I post the cite and quote you deleted:
Öö Tiib wrote:
I do not grasp
NO. You don't. You don't grasp how when 40 solid years of
Gwobull Warbling predictions have been proven false, you
can't quote a prediction for the future as evidence for
anything but your own gullibility.
Go back. Read the initial post in this thread for the first
time.
You're asking for proof when the thread began with proof.
You're clueless.
jillery wrote:
Since you asked, and once again I post the cite and quote you deleted:
You're fucked up. No, you are REALLY fucked up. You're not just stupid
you're mentally unhinged. And I'll point out why in this instance.
You cite establishes your agreement with me: The Maldives are still
there! You agree! Yes, you agree with me that 2018 has come and
gone, the Maldives are thriving and the "Climate Models" are all
bullshit.
JTEM is my hero wrote:
You can not cite
Öö Tiib wrote:
JTEM is my hero wrote:
You can not cite
The thread began with two cites.
You're a fucking idiot.
You just confessed to lacking reading comprehension and
retention.
AGAIN: The thread began with two cites.
The first one established that the "Climate models" predicted
the Maldives would be gone by 2018.
The second established
that everything is a lie. It said that sea level was WORSE than
they thought!
Öö Tiib wrote:
JTEM is my hero wrote:
You can not cite
The thread began with two cites.
You're a fucking idiot.
You just confessed to lacking reading comprehension and
retention.
AGAIN: The thread began with two cites.
The first one established that the "Climate models" predicted
the Maldives would be gone by 2018. The second established
that everything is a lie. It said that sea level was WORSE than
they thought!
AGAIN: The thread began with two cites.
The first one established that the "Climate models" predicted
the Maldives would be gone by 2018.
No cites to
AGAIN: The thread began with two cites.
The first one established that the "Climate models" predicted
the Maldives would be gone by 2018. The second established
that everything is a lie. It said that sea level was WORSE than
they thought!
Posting
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 162:53:49 |
| Calls: | 12,095 |
| Calls today: | 3 |
| Files: | 15,000 |
| Messages: | 6,517,780 |