1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. TALK.ORIGINS

  • Re: testing

    From Pro Plyd@21:1/5 to jillery on Fri Jan 20 20:24:28 2023
    jillery wrote:
    On Mon, 2 Jan 2023 22:45:42 -0700, Pro Plyd <[email protected]d>
    wrote:
    jillery wrote:
    On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 21:01:19 -0700, Pro Plyd <[email protected]d>
    jillery wrote:
    On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 17:12:52 -0500, WolfFan <[email protected]>
    On Nov 25, 2022, Bob Casanova wrote
    On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 10:52:27 -0500, the following appeared
    in talk.origins, posted by WolfFan<[email protected]>:

    New machine. Can I post? Testing, testing...
    OK.

    Took three tries before it went through.

    Ah, but do you know which one of the three went through?

    The wave functions of the other two collapsed when the one (/*The* One?/) >>>> made it through. Perhaps checking the quantum time signature...

    Ah, but do you know which two collapsed?

    Yes, by having the Observer check the system logs and match sends with
    receives ;)

    You comment above illustrates why quantum entanglement doesn't allow
    FTL transmission; no one observer has access to both send and receive
    logs untill the missing log is sent at ordinary lightspeed.

    Wipe the logs after each transmission, both observer/receiver and
    sender. If a receive log is created, you have a successful event.

    (what, realities have logs? why not!)

    As an Everettian, I would say there exist parallel realities where
    every combination did and did not get through. We just happen to live
    in this reality where just one went through...

    ... and we still don't know which one.

    I pick - THIS one


    Like they say, you can pick your friends, you can pick your nose, but
    you ought not pick your friend's nose.


    Otto from A fish Called Wanda was ahead of the times, by asking
    what was the middle one, he expected superpositioning. As in, both
    states at the same time.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob Casanova@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jan 31 23:49:49 2023
    On Wed, 01 Feb 2023 01:34:47 -0500, the following appeared
    in talk.origins, posted by jillery <[email protected]>:

    T.O. down again?

    Seems to be OK.

    --

    Bob C.

    "The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
    the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
    'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"

    - Isaac Asimov

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jillery@21:1/5 to All on Wed Feb 1 01:34:47 2023
    T.O. down again?

    --
    You're entitled to your own opinions.
    You're not entitled to your own facts.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jillery@21:1/5 to All on Wed Feb 1 02:15:23 2023
    On Wed, 01 Feb 2023 01:34:47 -0500, jillery <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    T.O. down again?

    OK, not down. Perhaps just a little depressed.

    --
    You're entitled to your own opinions.
    You're not entitled to your own facts.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From *Hemidactylus*@21:1/5 to jillery on Wed Feb 1 09:50:23 2023
    jillery <[email protected]> wrote:
    T.O. down again?

    I think with absence of certain people the activity stalls and time stamps
    get gappy. I thought the same thing various times, that Beagle was at the
    vet. Just gaps and flurries.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)