1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. TALK.BIZARRE

  • supercivilization

    From Peter Steele@21:1/5 to All on Sat Dec 28 17:50:32 2024
    I think we need to look closer at the Roman civilization. This was no backwards backwoods palisade. That they had writing is what seals it
    for me. You know all that discussion of atmospheric space debris, how
    much of that is due to Roman satellite installations from 100 BC?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Creon@21:1/5 to Peter Steele on Sun Dec 29 14:23:20 2024
    On Sat, 28 Dec 2024 17:50:32 -0600, Peter Steele wrote:

    I think we need to look closer at the Roman civilization. This was no backwards backwoods palisade. That they had writing is what seals it
    for me. You know all that discussion of atmospheric space debris, how
    much of that is due to Roman satellite installations from 100 BC?

    But how much was launched from the Nasca plains?

    --
    -c

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Peter Steele@21:1/5 to Creon on Sun Dec 29 13:08:44 2024
    Creon wrote:
    On Sat, 28 Dec 2024 17:50:32 -0600, Peter Steele wrote:

    I think we need to look closer at the Roman civilization. This was no
    backwards backwoods palisade. That they had writing is what seals it
    for me. You know all that discussion of atmospheric space debris, how
    much of that is due to Roman satellite installations from 100 BC?

    But how much was launched from the Nasca plains?



    All of them, but that still doesn't discount the theory.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)