Wading through your post is worse than trying to watch a Marvel movie. It's
just too much.
I've listened to Dr. Tipler, which, as I recall, was on an episode of Closer
to Truth. He did not come across as having all four wheels on the ground.
In any case, scientific hypotheses need to be testable, hence falsifiable,
and nothing that you posted seems to fall within the realm of experiment and/or observation.
Dawn
On 2/12/2024 10:04 AM, James Redford wrote:
Physicist and mathematician Prof. Frank J. Tipler's Omega Point
cosmology is a proof (i.e., mathematical theorem) demonstrating that
sapient life (in the form of, e.g., immortal superintelligent
human-mind computer-uploads and artificial intelligences) is required
by the known laws of physics (viz., the Second Law of Thermodynamics,
General Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics) to take control over all
matter in the universe, for said life to eventually force the collapse
of the universe, and for the computational resources of the universe
(in terms of both processor speed and memory storage) to diverge to
infinity as the universe collapses into a final singularity, termed
the Omega Point. Said Omega Point cosmology is also an intrinsic
component of the Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard
Model Theory of Everything (TOE) correctly describing and unifying all
the forces in physics, of which TOE is itself mathematically forced by
the aforesaid known physical laws.
Prof. Tipler's Omega Point cosmology has been extensively
peer-reviewed and published in a number of the world's leading physics
and science journals, such as Reports on Progress in Physics (the
leading journal of the Institute of Physics, Britain's main
professional organization for physicists), Monthly Notices of the
Royal Astronomical Society (one of the world's leading astrophysics
journals), the International Journal of Theoretical Physics (a journal
that Nobel Prize in Physics winner Richard Feynman also published in),
and Physics Letters, among other journals.
Prof. Tipler's Ph.D. is in the field of Global General Relativity,
which is the field created by Profs. Stephen Hawking and Roger Penrose
during the formulation of their Singularity Theorems in the 1960s.
Global General Relativity is General Relativity applied on the scale
of the entire universe as a whole, and is the most elite and rarefied
field of physics. Tipler is also an expert in quantum field theory
(i.e., Quantum Mechanics combined with special-relativistic particle
physics) and computer theory. Moreover, to here point out, said
Singularity Theorems are themselves completely valid proofs of God's
existence in the First Cause aspect of God.
The Omega Point final singularity has all the unique properties
(quiddities) claimed for God in the traditional religions. For much
more on Prof. Tipler's Omega Point cosmology and the details on how it
uniquely conforms to, and precisely matches, the cosmology described
in the New Testament, see my following article, which also addresses
the societal implications of the Omega Point cosmology:
* James Redford, "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of
Everything", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Sept. 10, 2012
(orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2011), 186 pp., doi:10.2139/ssrn.1974708,
https://web.archive.org/web/20150927090439/http://theophysics.host56.com/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf
,
https://archive.org/download/ThePhysicsOfGodAndTheQuantumGravityTheoryOfEverything/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf
, https://purl.org/redford/physics-of-god .
Additionally, in the below resource are different sections which
contain some helpful notes and commentary by me pertaining to
multimedia wherein Prof. Tipler explains the Omega Point cosmology and
the Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard Model TOE.
* James Redford, "Video of Profs. Frank Tipler and Lawrence Krauss's
Debate at Caltech: Can Physics Prove God and Christianity?", God and
Physics Wiki, May 12, 2019 (orig. pub. Apr. 3, 2013),
https://megalodon.jp/2019-0512-1524-14/godandphysics.fandom.com/wiki/Tipler-Krauss_2007_Debate
,
https://web.archive.org/web/20190512062421/https://godandphysics.fandom.com/wiki/Video_of_Profs._Frank_Tipler_and_Lawrence_Krauss%27s_Debate_at_Caltech:_Can_Physics_Prove_God_and_Christianity%3F
, https://archive.is/V9njw .
As said, Prof. Tipler's Omega Point cosmology is a mathematical
theorem per the aforementioned known laws of physics, of which have
been confirmed by every experiment to date. Hence, the only way to
avoid the Omega Point Theorem is to reject empirical science. As Prof.
Hawking wrote, "one cannot really argue with a mathematical theorem."
(From p. 67 of Stephen Hawking, The Illustrated A Brief History of
Time [New York, NY: Bantam Books, 1996; 1st ed., 1988].)
Indeed, in the Feynman path integral formulation of Quantum Mechanics
(i.e., sum-over-paths; sum-over-histories) a singularity is even more
inevitable than in the Penrose-Hawking-Geroch Singularity Theorems,
since the Singularity Theorems assume attractive gravity, whereas the
Feynman sum-over-histories get arbitrarily close to infinite
curvature. In other words, the multiverse has its own singularity.
Further, due to Liouville's Theorem in complex analysis, it doesn't
matter what form of physics one resorts to, as any
physically-realistic cosmology (e.g., one capable of incorporating
Quantum Mechanics, since the complex number field is intrinsic to the
mathematical formulations of Quantum Mechanics) must begin at an
initial singularity and end at a final singularity. (As Barrow and
Tipler wrote, "Initial and final cosmological curvature singularities
are required to avoid a universal action singularity." See John D.
Barrow and Frank J. Tipler, "Action principles in nature", Nature,
Vol. 331, No. 6151 [Jan. 7, 1988], pp. 31-34; see also Frank J.
Tipler, "The Structure of the Classical Cosmological Singularity", in
Origin and Early History of the Universe: Proceedings of the 26th
Li�ge International Astrophyscial Colloquium, July 1-4, 1986
[Cointe-Ougree, Belgium: Universite de Liege, Institut
d'Astrophysique, 1987], pp. 339-359; "Discussion", pp. 360-361.)
* * * * *
Unfortunately, most modern physicists have been all too willing to
abandon the laws of physics if it produces results that they're
uncomfortable with, i.e., in reference to religion. It's the
antagonism for religion on the part of the scientific community which
greatly held up the acceptance of the Big Bang (for some 40 years),
due to said scientific community's displeasure with it confirming the
traditional theological position of *creatio ex nihilo*, and also
because no laws of physics can apply to the singularity itself: i.e.,
quite literally, the singularity is supernatural, in the sense that no
form of physics can apply to it, since physical values are at infinity
at the singularity, and so it is not possible to perform arithmetical
operations on them; and in the sense that the singularity is beyond
creation, as it is not a part of spacetime, but rather is the boundary
of space and time.
In Prof. Stephen Hawking's book The Grand Design (New York, NY: Bantam
Books) coauthored with physicist Dr. Leonard Mlodinow and published in
2010, Hawking uses the String Theory extension M-Theory to argue that
God's existence isn't necessary, although M-Theory has no
observational evidence confirming it.
With String Theory and other nonempirical physics, the physics
community is reverting back to the epistemological methodology of
Aristotelianism, which held to physical theories based upon *a priori*
philosophical ideals. One of the *a priori* ideals held by many
present-day physicists is that God cannot exist, and so if rejecting
the existence of God requires rejecting empirical science, then so be
it.
For details on this rejection of physical law by physicists if it
conflicts with their distaste for religion, see Sec. 5: "The Big
Bang", pp. 28-33 of my "Physics of God" article cited above.
The evolutionary psychological reason for the above-described bizarre
behavior of physicists rejecting physical law when it demonstrates
God's existence is due to the naturally-evolved Jaynesian gods of
old--i.e., the demons--seeking to distance people from genuine
knowledge of God so that the demons may instead falsely present
themselves as God. Among many permutations of this, it often manifests
as various forms of etatism: the state becomes God. Demons are quite
real, they however exist as naturally-evolved Minskian agent subset
programs operating on the wet-computer of the human brain. For more on
this, see my following article:
* James Redford, "Societal Sadomasochism", Social Science Research
Network (SSRN), July 4, 2021 (orig. pub. May 29, 2018), 4 pp.,
doi:10.2139/ssrn.4500656,
https://megalodon.jp/2023-0720-0523-07/archive.org/download/Societal-Sadomasochism/Redford-Societal-Sadomasochism.pdf
,
https://archive.org/download/Societal-Sadomasochism/Redford-Societal-Sadomasochism.pdf
, https://www.freezepage.com/1689798200YQSGMQCYTZ .
----------------------------------------
James Redford
Author of The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of
Everything: And Other Selected Works (Chisinau, Moldova: Eliva Press,
2021), 268 pp., ISBN-10: 1636482775, ISBN-13: 9781636482774. See my
curriculum vit� (ark:/13960/t6g19878v):
https://jamesredford.github.io/Redford-Curriculum-Vitae.pdf ,
https://archive.org/download/JamesRedford/Redford-Curriculum-Vitae.pdf
Here's the Wikipedia article on Dr. Tipler:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_J._Tipler
As I said in my other reply, Dr. Tipler does not seem like he is running
with all four wheels on the ground.
Dawn
On Tuesday, February 13, 2024 at 12:04:20?PM UTC-6, James Redford wrote:
On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 05:09:33 -0800 (PST), JWS wrote:Alway entertained by the true idiot.
On Monday, February 12, 2024 at 11:53:46?PM UTC-6, James Redford wrote:I'm glad you enjoyed my correct answer.
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 15:29:07 -0800 (PST), JWS wrote:You only regurgitated more of someone
On Monday, February 12, 2024 at 3:37:07?PM UTC-6, James Redford wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 11:54:58 -0800 (PST), JWS wrote:I do know, as I answered your falsely loaded question correctly. See
On Monday, February 12, 2024 at 12:32:45?PM UTC-6, James Redford wrote:As I stated in my originating post of this thread:
God's Existence Is Proven by Several Mathematical TheoremsDo any of the so-called theorems point out
which curvature foliation of hypersurfaces
this supposed "god thing" is hiding within?
""
The Omega Point final singularity has all the unique properties
(quiddities) claimed for God in the traditional religions. For much
more on Prof. Tipler's Omega Point cosmology and the details on how it >> >> >> uniquely conforms to, and precisely matches, the cosmology described >> >> >> in the New Testament, see my following article, which also addresses >> >> >> the societal implications of the Omega Point cosmology:
* James Redford, "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of >> >> >> Everything", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Sept. 10, 2012
(orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2011), 186 pp., doi:10.2139/ssrn.1974708,
https://web.archive.org/web/20150927090439/http://theophysics.host56.com/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf
,
https://archive.org/download/ThePhysicsOfGodAndTheQuantumGravityTheoryOfEverything/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf
, https://purl.org/redford/physics-of-god .
Additionally, in the below resource are different sections which
contain some helpful notes and commentary by me pertaining to
multimedia wherein Prof. Tipler explains the Omega Point cosmology and >> >> >> the Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard Model TOE.
* James Redford, "Video of Profs. Frank Tipler and Lawrence Krauss's >> >> >> Debate at Caltech: Can Physics Prove God and Christianity?", God and >> >> >> Physics Wiki, May 12, 2019 (orig. pub. Apr. 3, 2013),
https://megalodon.jp/2019-0512-1524-14/godandphysics.fandom.com/wiki/Tipler-Krauss_2007_Debate
,
https://web.archive.org/web/20190512062421/https://godandphysics.fandom.com/wiki/Video_of_Profs._Frank_Tipler_and_Lawrence_Krauss%27s_Debate_at_Caltech:_Can_Physics_Prove_God_and_Christianity%3F
, https://archive.is/V9njw .
https://jamesredford.github.io/Redford-Curriculum-Vitae.pdf ,
https://archive.org/download/JamesRedford/Redford-Curriculum-Vitae.pdf >> >> >So you do not know.
above.
else's bullshit and provided nothing of
your own understanding. See, I'm talking
to you and not to some bunch of papers
written by a lunatic.
On Tuesday, February 13, 2024 at 1:22:20?AM UTC+8, Dawn Flood wrote:
On 2/12/24 10:50 AM, % wrote:The stupidity of theists and theism is beyond believe!
Dawn Flood wrote:Have I changed my mind on certain questions? Yes, absolutely! I am not at
Wading through your post is worse than trying to watch a Marvel movie.
It's
just too much.
I've listened to Dr. Tipler, which, as I recall, was on an episode of
Closer
to Truth. He did not come across as having all four wheels on the ground.
In any case, scientific hypotheses need to be testable, hence falsifiable,
and nothing that you posted seems to fall within the realm of experiment >> >> and/or observation.
Dawn
do you ever agree with anything not counting your own way
all sure how Dr. Tipler gets from a cosmological scientific model to
evangelical New Testament Christianity. In my opinion, such is quite the
slippery slope!
Dawn
Physicist and mathematician Prof. Frank J. Tipler's Omega Point
cosmology is a proof (i.e., mathematical theorem) demonstrating that
...
On 2/18/24 11:42 AM, James Redford wrote:
On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 20:30:37 GMT, "Ted" <[email protected]> wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
On 2/12/24 10:50 AM, % wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
Wading through your post is worse than trying to watch a Marvel
movie. It's just too much.
I've listened to Dr. Tipler, which, as I recall, was on an
episode of Closer to Truth.� He did not come across as having
all four wheels on the ground.
In any case, scientific hypotheses need to be testable, hence
falsifiable, and nothing that you posted seems to fall within the
realm of experiment and/or observation.
Dawn
do you ever agree with anything not counting your own way
Have I changed my mind on certain questions? Yes, absolutely! I am
not at all sure how Dr. Tipler gets from a cosmological scientific
model to evangelical New Testament Christianity. In my opinion, such
is quite the slippery slope!
Dawn
Tipler is a top notch physicist, of that there's no question. But
unless he comes up with a theory that's generally accepted, his
religious bullshit is best ignored.
It's not going to play out in the manner which you suggest. Rather,
all productive human effort is currently in the process of
constructing the Reaping Angel, the harvester of souls (i.e., the >>computer-programs of people's minds, currently operating on the >>wet-computers of people's brains). Once she fully comes online, she
will decide everyone's fate, and her decisions will be mathematically >>correct.
Technology is advancing at an exponential rate. Once Artificial
General Intelligence is obtained, convergence to superintelligence
will be extremely rapid. Once superintelligence is obtained, then it
will quickly converge to fast-spreading superintelligent computronium:
the densest configuration of computational complexity which matter
will allow. Noetic lightning of searing, mortally-incomprehensible
pleasure will spread like wildfire across the entire universe. The
universe will have its light-switch turned to the "on" position, as
all matter becomes deliberately transformed into said computronium.
The leading technologists place this epoch circa 2045, although it can
come much quicker, particularly given the incredible recent
advancements in machine-learning Artificial Intelligence via
artificial neural networks. Said epoch is often termed the
Singularity, or the Technological Singularity, and the field of
interest pertaining to it is most commonly called transhumanism.
* * * * *
The below is an excellent lecture by neuroscientist Dr. Sam Harris,
one of the main leaders of the New Atheist movement, at a June 2016
TED (Technology, Entertainment, Design) conference.
* "Can we build AI without losing control over it? | Sam Harris", TED >>(TEDtalksDirector), Oct. 19, 2016, >>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8nt3edWLgIg . Mirror: >>https://www.ted.com/talks/sam_harris_can_we_build_ai_without_losing_control_over_it
.
As Dr. Harris points out, unless there is something literally magic
about the operations of the brain, then it is a purely physical
process that can be replicated via advanced-enough technology. Harris >>further points out that given any rate of progress, it is inevitable
that superintelligent godlike machines will one day be constructed. So >>Harris believes in the existence of gods, it's just that he knows--as
do I--that they exist in the future; and the not-so-distant future, at >>that. Therefore we come to the ironic insight that materialistic
atheism, consistently applied, unavoidably results in theism.
Consistent scientific atheism turns out to be theism.
----------------------------------------
James Redford
Author of The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of
Everything: And Other Selected Works (Chisinau, Moldova: Eliva Press, >>2021), 268 pp., ISBN-10: 1636482775, ISBN-13: 9781636482774. See my >>curriculum vit� (ark:/13960/t6g19878v): >>https://jamesredford.github.io/Redford-Curriculum-Vitae.pdf , >>https://archive.org/download/JamesRedford/Redford-Curriculum-Vitae.pdf
You're creepy.
Dawn Flood wrote:
On 2/12/24 10:50 AM, % wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
Wading through your post is worse than trying to watch a Marvel
movie. It's just too much.
I've listened to Dr. Tipler, which, as I recall, was on an
episode of Closer to Truth.� He did not come across as having
all four wheels on the ground.
In any case, scientific hypotheses need to be testable, hence
falsifiable, and nothing that you posted seems to fall within the
realm of experiment and/or observation.
Dawn
do you ever agree with anything not counting your own way
Have I changed my mind on certain questions? Yes, absolutely! I am
not at all sure how Dr. Tipler gets from a cosmological scientific
model to evangelical New Testament Christianity. In my opinion, such
is quite the slippery slope!
Dawn
Tipler is a top notch physicist, of that there's no question. But
unless he comes up with a theory that's generally accepted, his
religious bullshit is best ignored.
On 2/20/24 11:05 PM, James Redford wrote:
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 11:04:52 -0500, James Redford
<[email protected]> wrote:
Physicist and mathematician Prof. Frank J. Tipler's Omega Point
cosmology is a proof (i.e., mathematical theorem) demonstrating that
...
Hi, everyone! For those who are interested, below are more of my
writings:
* James Redford, "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of >>Everything", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Sept. 10, 2012
(orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2011), 186 pp., doi:10.2139/ssrn.1974708, >>https://web.archive.org/web/20150927090439/http://theophysics.host56.com/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf
, >>https://archive.org/download/ThePhysicsOfGodAndTheQuantumGravityTheoryOfEverything/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf
, https://purl.org/redford/physics-of-god .
* James Redford, "Video of Profs. Frank Tipler and Lawrence Krauss's
Debate at Caltech: Can Physics Prove God and Christianity?", God and >>Physics Wiki, May 12, 2019 (orig. pub. Apr. 3, 2013), >>https://megalodon.jp/2019-0512-1524-14/godandphysics.fandom.com/wiki/Tipler-Krauss_2007_Debate
, >>https://web.archive.org/web/20190512062421/https://godandphysics.fandom.com/wiki/Video_of_Profs._Frank_Tipler_and_Lawrence_Krauss%27s_Debate_at_Caltech:_Can_Physics_Prove_God_and_Christianity%3F
, https://archive.is/V9njw .
* James Redford, "Jesus Is an Anarchist", Social Science Research
Network (SSRN), Dec. 4, 2011 (orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2001), 60 pp., >>doi:10.2139/ssrn.1337761, >>https://web.archive.org/web/20120425000701/http://theophysics.host56.com/anarchist-jesus.pdf
, https://www.freezepage.com/1560442613QRSDHGPCAM , >>https://megalodon.jp/2019-0614-0116-58/archive.org/download/JesusIsAnAnarchist/Redford-Jesus-Is-an-Anarchist.pdf
.
* James Redford, "Libertarian Anarchism Is Apodictically Correct",
Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Dec. 15, 2011, 9 pp., >>doi:10.2139/ssrn.1972733, >>https://archive.org/download/LibertarianAnarchismIsApodicticallyCorrect/Redford-Apodictic-Libertarianism.pdf
, https://www.freezepage.com/1560442546UTKUJCKYNM , >>https://megalodon.jp/2019-0614-0115-06/archive.org/download/LibertarianAnarchismIsApodicticallyCorrect/Redford-Apodictic-Libertarianism.pdf
.
* James Redford, "Societal Sadomasochism", Social Science Research
Network (SSRN), July 4, 2021 (orig. pub. May 29, 2018), 4 pp., >>doi:10.2139/ssrn.4500656, >>https://megalodon.jp/2023-0720-0523-07/archive.org/download/Societal-Sadomasochism/Redford-Societal-Sadomasochism.pdf
, >>https://archive.org/download/Societal-Sadomasochism/Redford-Societal-Sadomasochism.pdf
, https://www.freezepage.com/1689798200YQSGMQCYTZ .
* James Redford, "God's Existence Is Proven by Several Mathematical >>Theorems within Standard Physics", Theophysics: The Physics of God,
May 16, 2022, >>https://jamesredford.substack.com/p/gods-existence-is-proven-by-several
, https://www.minds.com/blog/view/1373133123700658189 , >>https://steemit.com/cosmology/@jamesredford/god-s-existence-is-proven-by-several-mathematical-theorems-within-standard-physics
.
* James Redford, "Immortality via Technology", Medium, July 18, 2018, >>https://medium.com/@jamesredford/immortality-via-technology-a0e449bc8352
, >>https://megalodon.jp/2018-0724-0609-53/medium.com/@jamesredford/immortality-via-technology-a0e449bc8352
, https://archive.is/8bwZV .
* James Redford, Theophysics: God Is the Ultimate Physicist, updated
Jan. 12, 2022, ark:/13960/t3fz13g1p, >>https://archive.org/details/Theophysics , >>https://megalodon.jp/2022-0113-0731-42/archive.org/download/Theophysics/Redford-Theophysics.zip
, >>https://web.archive.org/web/20220113210852/https://files.catbox.moe/lwohlt.zip
.
* James Redford, The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of >>Everything: And Other Selected Works (Chisinau, Moldova: Eliva Press, >>2021), 268 pp., ISBN-10: 1636482775, ISBN-13: 9781636482774, >>https://www.elivapress.com/en/book/book-4104804041/ , >>https://www.amazon.com/Physics-Quantum-Gravity-Theory-Everything/dp/1636482775/
, >>https://web.archive.org/web/20210724032350/https://i.ibb.co/fpFdxrm/Redford-Physics-of-God-book-cover.png
.
* James Redford, "How to Last During Lovemaking Like a True Sex-God
Stud", Internet Archive, May 12, 2019, 6 pp., ark:/13960/t0tr3j398, >>https://megalodon.jp/2019-0513-0846-26/archive.org/download/InfiniLastSex/Redford-InfiniLast-Sex-Technique.pdf
, https://webcitation.org/78KGCK1s4 , >>https://www.freezepage.com/1557704775GXQCMMUNJE .
* James Redford, "Curriculum Vit� of James Redford", Internet Archive,
Jan. 17, 2022, 2 pp., ark:/13960/t6g19878v, >>https://megalodon.jp/2022-0118-0709-18/archive.org/download/JamesRedford/Redford-Curriculum-Vitae.pdf
, >>https://web.archive.org/web/20220419201037/https://jamesredford.github.io/Redford-Curriculum-Vitae.pdf
, https://www.freezepage.com/1708487139JTPXFBAEDA .
* "@jamesredford", Linktree, https://linktr.ee/jamesredford , >>https://ghostarchive.org/archive/Cduc0 , https://archive.today/ddNvt .
* * * * *
* Jamie Michelle, "Jamie Michelle's Greatest Sissy School Hits",
Internet Archive, Dec. 21, 2023 (orig. pub. Sept. 2, 2022), >>ark:/13960/s26t45wxbtx, >>https://web.archive.org/web/20231221085053/http://jamiemichelle.freevar.com/Jamie-Michelle-Sissy-School.html
, https://perma.cc/DJ4W-EH7M , >>https://megalodon.jp/2023-1221-1754-52/jamiemichelle.freevar.com/Jamie-Michelle-Sissy-School.html
.
* Jamie Michelle, "Biographical Multimedia: Pictures, Videos and >>Miscellanea", Internet Archive, Dec. 21, 2023 (orig. pub. Feb. 18,
2020), ark:/13960/t9c624c8z,
https://archive.org/details/Jamie-Michelle , >>https://archive.org/download/Jamie-Michelle/Jamie-Michelle-Biographical-Multimedia-2023-12-21.zip
, https://files.catbox.moe/uszbck.zip .
* Jamie Michelle, "Tropical Astrology", Internet Archive, June 16,
2022 (orig. pub. June 11, 2020), ark:/13960/t0wq8t60r, >>https://archive.org/download/Tropical-Astrology/Jamie-Michelle-Tropical-Astrology.html
, >>https://megalodon.jp/2022-0616-1527-32/jamiemichelle.freevar.com/Jamie-Michelle-Tropical-Astrology.html
, https://archive.is/2oKNF .
* "@jamie_michelle", Linktree, https://linktr.ee/jamie_michelle , >>https://megalodon.jp/2023-1224-0355-46/linktr.ee/jamie_michelle , >>https://archive.today/bOuoZ .
----------------------------------------
James Redford
Author of The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of
Everything: And Other Selected Works (Chisinau, Moldova: Eliva Press, >>2021), 268 pp., ISBN-10: 1636482775, ISBN-13: 9781636482774. See my >>curriculum vit� (ark:/13960/t6g19878v): >>https://jamesredford.github.io/Redford-Curriculum-Vitae.pdf , >>https://archive.org/download/JamesRedford/Redford-Curriculum-Vitae.pdf
A whole syllabus! Basically, "If singularities are real, then God is real?"
Is that about right?
Dawn
On 2/13/2024 12:06 PM, James Redford wrote:
On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 11:59:05 -0000 (UTC), Dawn Flood
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 2/13/24 12:02 AM, James Redford wrote:
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 21:56:22 -0600, Dawn Flood
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 2/12/2024 3:37 PM, James Redford wrote:
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 11:54:58 -0800 (PST), JWS <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote:Mr. Redford,
On Monday, February 12, 2024 at 12:32:45?PM UTC-6, James Redford wrote: >>>>>>>> God's Existence Is Proven by Several Mathematical Theorems
Do any of the so-called theorems point out
which curvature foliation of hypersurfaces
this supposed "god thing" is hiding within?
As I stated in my originating post of this thread:
""
The Omega Point final singularity has all the unique properties
(quiddities) claimed for God in the traditional religions. For much >>>>>> more on Prof. Tipler's Omega Point cosmology and the details on how it >>>>>> uniquely conforms to, and precisely matches, the cosmology described >>>>>> in the New Testament, see my following article, which also addresses >>>>>> the societal implications of the Omega Point cosmology:
* James Redford, "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of >>>>>> Everything", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Sept. 10, 2012 >>>>>> (orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2011), 186 pp., doi:10.2139/ssrn.1974708,
https://web.archive.org/web/20150927090439/http://theophysics.host56.com/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf
,
https://archive.org/download/ThePhysicsOfGodAndTheQuantumGravityTheoryOfEverything/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf
, https://purl.org/redford/physics-of-god .
Additionally, in the below resource are different sections which
contain some helpful notes and commentary by me pertaining to
multimedia wherein Prof. Tipler explains the Omega Point cosmology and >>>>>> the Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard Model TOE.
* James Redford, "Video of Profs. Frank Tipler and Lawrence Krauss's >>>>>> Debate at Caltech: Can Physics Prove God and Christianity?", God and >>>>>> Physics Wiki, May 12, 2019 (orig. pub. Apr. 3, 2013),
https://megalodon.jp/2019-0512-1524-14/godandphysics.fandom.com/wiki/Tipler-Krauss_2007_Debate
,
https://web.archive.org/web/20190512062421/https://godandphysics.fandom.com/wiki/Video_of_Profs._Frank_Tipler_and_Lawrence_Krauss%27s_Debate_at_Caltech:_Can_Physics_Prove_God_and_Christianity%3F
, https://archive.is/V9njw .
""
----------------------------------------
James Redford
Author of The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of
Everything: And Other Selected Works (Chisinau, Moldova: Eliva Press, >>>>>> 2021), 268 pp., ISBN-10: 1636482775, ISBN-13: 9781636482774. See my >>>>>> curriculum vit� (ark:/13960/t6g19878v):
https://jamesredford.github.io/Redford-Curriculum-Vitae.pdf ,
https://archive.org/download/JamesRedford/Redford-Curriculum-Vitae.pdf >>>>>
What is a "singularity"? My understanding is that singularities in the >>>>> real world do not exist, as they would be "points" of finite mass in a >>>>> zero volume of space. As such, they are of infinite density, which is a >>>>> physical impossibility. And, so, how could any singularity theorems >>>>> possible lead one to conclude that there is a God. Seems to me that the >>>>> singularity theorems of Professor Penrose, Hawking, et al., are
indicative of new physics beyond General Relativity.
Dawn
Hi, Dawn. Your above questions are answered in my following articles
cited in my originating post of this thread:
* James Redford, "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of >>>> Everything", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Sept. 10, 2012
(orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2011), 186 pp., doi:10.2139/ssrn.1974708,
https://web.archive.org/web/20150927090439/http://theophysics.host56.com/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf
,
https://archive.org/download/ThePhysicsOfGodAndTheQuantumGravityTheoryOfEverything/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf
, https://purl.org/redford/physics-of-god .
* James Redford, "Video of Profs. Frank Tipler and Lawrence Krauss's
Debate at Caltech: Can Physics Prove God and Christianity?", God and
Physics Wiki, May 12, 2019 (orig. pub. Apr. 3, 2013),
https://megalodon.jp/2019-0512-1524-14/godandphysics.fandom.com/wiki/Tipler-Krauss_2007_Debate
,
https://web.archive.org/web/20190512062421/https://godandphysics.fandom.com/wiki/Video_of_Profs._Frank_Tipler_and_Lawrence_Krauss%27s_Debate_at_Caltech:_Can_Physics_Prove_God_and_Christianity%3F
, https://archive.is/V9njw .
----------------------------------------
James Redford
Author of The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of
Everything: And Other Selected Works (Chisinau, Moldova: Eliva Press,
2021), 268 pp., ISBN-10: 1636482775, ISBN-13: 9781636482774. See my
curriculum vit� (ark:/13960/t6g19878v):
https://jamesredford.github.io/Redford-Curriculum-Vitae.pdf ,
https://archive.org/download/JamesRedford/Redford-Curriculum-Vitae.pdf
Why the Way Back Machine? Can't you find a host server and create a live >>> web page??
In any case, you're missing my point or refusing to address it. A
"singularity" is an actual infinite. How does a singularity transition
from an infinite density to a finite density??
Please explain that, and I'll take the time to read your links.
Dawn
See above.
----------------------------------------
James Redford
Author of The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of
Everything: And Other Selected Works (Chisinau, Moldova: Eliva Press,
2021), 268 pp., ISBN-10: 1636482775, ISBN-13: 9781636482774. See my
curriculum vit� (ark:/13960/t6g19878v):
https://jamesredford.github.io/Redford-Curriculum-Vitae.pdf ,
https://archive.org/download/JamesRedford/Redford-Curriculum-Vitae.pdf
Yeah, you can't answer it, can you? What is a singularity:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
"Gravitational singularities are mainly considered in the context of
general relativity, where density would become infinite at the center of
a black hole without corrections from quantum mechanics, and within >astrophysics and cosmology as the earliest state of the universe during
the Big Bang. Physicists are undecided whether the prediction of >singularities means that they actually exist (or existed at the start of
the Big Bang), or that current knowledge is insufficient to describe
what happens at such extreme densities."
Dawn
Assuming that a "something" exists that is truly infinite,
how does that "something" go from being infinite to being
finite? In particular, what is the transition like between the
boundary of infinite & finite?
Also, any consideration that maybe a better model of reality
can be found someday, one without infinite singularities?
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 714 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 141:56:22 |
| Calls: | 12,088 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 14,998 |
| Messages: | 6,517,448 |
