XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.society.liberalism, alt.politics.democrats.d XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.abortion

On 03 Nov 2021, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> posted some news:[email protected]:

"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in news:slu0rg $8jh$[email protected]:

"Mitchell Holman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:slrgpb$fqg$[email protected]:

"Mitchell Holman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

"Scout" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:sle9pj$tb8$[email protected]:

"Mitchell Holman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

David Hartung <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:

On 10/27/21 10:54 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:

On 10/27/2021 8:39 AM, David Hartung wrote:

On 10/27/21 10:29 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:

On 10/27/2021 8:07 AM, Scout wrote:

"Klaus� Schadenfreude"
<[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]...

On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 12:02:54 -0700, Rudy Canoza
<[email protected]> wrote:

That's not trying to change the government.� Trump's

insurrection

mob was trying
to do just that.

Proof, kook?

Not trying to change the government? That is exactly what

they

were demanding occur.

No, the George Floyd protests were *never* about changing the >>>>>>>>>>> government, scooter.� They were demanding that *actual* state >>>>>>>>>>> and local governments reform their corrupt police departments, >>>>>>>>>>> scooter. That's not a "change" in the government, scooter. >>>>>>>>>>

Really? It seemed to me

LOL!

that they were about defending criminal behavior.

They were not. They were wholly about reforming the corrupt
police departments all over the country. What happened to George >>>>>>>>> Floyd

happens

routinely all over the country. You know this.

So you claim, but have never proven.

The protesters want that

to stop.

Trump's insurrection was *absolutely* about changing the >>>>>>>>>>> government, scooter. It was about keeping the loser of the >>>>>>>>>>> presidential election in office through violence. You know >>>>>>>>>>> this, scooter, and so does that squat-to-piss faggot buddy of >>>>>>>>>>> yours kleine klauschen.

Through violence?

Yes, through violence. Trump's insurrection was violent, and of >>>>>>> course,
it *was* about illegally changing the government. Biden won, and >>>>>>>>> Trump and his insurrection mob were trying to keep him from

being

inaugurated

by *violently* preventing Congress from certifying Biden's
victory.

No matter how many time you claim otherwise, there was no
insurrection.

Fox News calls it an insurrection:



Senate holds hearing on Capitol insurrection
Feb 23
https://tinyurl.com/wa8d5hh3

And on Jan 5th they were calling it a rally, or at most a protest. >>>>>>

The day BEFORE the insurrection they
already knew it WASN'T an insurrection?

You've been telling us this 'insurrection' was planned by Trump.

Wrong.

How
can it have been planned if no one knew it?

So now that we've established it wasn't a planned insurrection, you
get to show how a FEW people breaking into a building amounts to the
insurrection you claim occurred, was planned and Trump was
responsible.

If Trump had no involvement why is he
so desperate to hide all the documents and
logs relating to his activities that day?

And just like that you try to change the subject.

Besides as Hillary Clinton established, politicians can't be required

to

turn over their records.

Ahem.

Trump was a public servant, he was
working for US, WE have a right to know
what he was doing.

When he was working for the government you have the right to ask about his government accomplishments during that period.

You do not have the right to toss out fishing poles for everything in his
life before and after that.

That petty revenge bullshit just cost you communists Virginia and it's not
over yet.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)