• Re: Unlawful presence is not a crime

    From Tariffying@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 14 20:54:41 2025
    XPost: alt.politics.immigration, alt.politics.republicans, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, sac.politics

    On 13 Apr 2025, Michael A Terrell <[email protected]> posted
    some news:oJVKP.98127$[email protected]:

    On 4/13/2025 12:31 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted
    another content-free batch of lies:

    In article <xzSKP.1986908$[email protected]>,
    [email protected] says...

    On 4/13/2025 10:28 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off
    Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking
    do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies:

    In article <y%RKP.2203483$[email protected]>,
    [email protected] says...

    On 4/12/2025 9:12 PM, c186282 wrote:
    On 4/12/25 10:47 PM, awinstead wrote:
    On 12 Apr 2025, c186282 <[email protected]> posted some
    news:[email protected]:

    On 4/12/25 4:38 PM, Skeeter OG wrote:
    In article <RsyKP.532043$[email protected]>,
    [email protected] says...

       From the Supreme Court:

           As a general rule, it is not a crime for a
    removable alien to        remain in the United
    States.

           United States Supreme Court - Arizona v.
    United States       
    https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182


    Unlawful presence:

           https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227 >>>>>>>>>>

    It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful >>>>>>>>>> presence is not.

    The border is now considered military property. Cross now
    and you get no breaks.


        Rudy also seems to miss the significance of "unlawful" >>>>>>>>     in "unlawful presence" .........

    He misses the toilet a lot when he pees too.


      Well, not SO unusual for males ... but is Rudy
      actually 'male', at least anymore ?   :-)

      Rudy's beloved Mex cartels/invaders

    I have never expressed support for drug cartels *or* improper
    entry. I just oppose the racist demonization of undocumented
    immigrants, blaming them both for fictitious problems as well as
    real problems that they don't cause.


    Improper entry? You do support that you liar.
    No, I have never supported it. But I recognize that those who do it
    are a net plus for the U.S. This is not in rational dispute.

    So you admit [sic] they break the law.
    I never said otherwise.
    In other words you're a co-conspirator against the USA.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)