• Re: How The Parthenon Marbles Ended Up In The British Museum

    From Steve Hayes@21:1/5 to All on Sat Feb 11 08:58:10 2023
    XPost: alt.culture, alt.history

    On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 10:49:34 +0000, "Open Culture"
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    Last month, we delved into a proposal to use digital technology to
    clone the 2,500-year-old Parthenon Marbles currently housed in the
    British Museum.

    The hope is that such uncanny facsimiles might finally convince museum
    Trustees and the British government to return the originals to Athens.

    Today, we';ll take a closer look at just how these treasures of
    antiquity, known to many as the Elgin marbles, wound up so far afield.

    The most obvious culprit is Thomas Bruce, the 7th Earl of Elgin, who
    initiated the takeover while serving as Britain's ambassador to the
    Ottoman Empire from 1798-1803.

    Prior to setting sail for this posting, he hatched a plan to assemble
    a documentary team who would sketch and create plaster molds of the
    Parthenon marbles for the eventual edification of artists and
    architects back home. Better yet, he';d get the British government to
    pay for it.

    The British government, eying the massive price tag of such a
    proposal, passed.

    So Elgin used some of his heiress wife's fortune to finance the
    project himself, hiring landscape painter Giovanni Battista Lusieri -
    described by Lord Byron as "an Italian painter of the first eminence"
    -  to oversee a team of draftsmen, sculptors, and architects.

    As The Nerdwriter's Evan Puschak notes above, political alliances and expansionist ambition greased Lord Elgin';s wheels, as the Ottoman
    Empire and Great Britain found common cause in their hatred of
    Napoleon.

    British efforts to expel occupying French forces from Egypt generated
    good will sufficient to secure the requisite firman, a legal document
    without which Lusieri and the team would not have been given access to
    the Acropolis.

    The original firman has never surfaced, and the accuracy of what
    survives - an English translation of an Italian translation - casts
    Elgin';s acquisition of the marbles in a very dubious light.

    Some scholars and legal experts have asserted that the document in
    question is a mere administrative letter, since it apparently lacked
    the signature of Sultan Selim III, which would have given it the
    contractual heft of a firman.

    In addition to giving the team entry to Acropolis grounds to sketch
    and make plaster casts, erect scaffolding and expose foundations by
    digging, the letter allowed for the removal of such sculptures or
    inscriptions as would not interfere with the work or walls of the
    Acropolis.

    This implies that the team was to limit itself to windfall apples, the
    result of the heavy damage the Acropolis sustained during a 1687
    mortar attack by Venetian forces.

    Some of the dislodged marble had been harvested for building materials
    or souvenirs, but plenty of goodies remained on the ground for Elgin
    and company to cart off.

    In an article for Smithsonian Magazine, Hellenist author Bruce Clark
    details how Elgin's personal assistant, clergyman Philip Hunt,
    leveraged Britain's support of the Ottoman Empire and anti-France
    position to blur these boundaries:
    Seeing how highly the Ottomans valued their alliance with the British,
    Hunt spotted an opportunity for a further, decisive extension of the
    Acropolis project. With a nod from the sultan's representative in
    Athens-who at the time would have been scared to deny a Briton
    anything-Hunt set about removing the sculptures that still adorned the
    upper reaches of the Parthenon. This went much further than anyone had
    imagined possible a few weeks earlier. On July 31, the first of the high-standing sculptures was hauled down, inaugurating a program of
    systematic stripping, with scores of locals working under Lusieri's enthusiastic supervision.

    Lusieri, whose admirer Lord Byron became a furious critic of Elgin's
    removal of the Parthenon marbles, ended his days believing that his
    commitment to Lord Elgin ultimately cost him an illustrious career as
    a watercolorist.

    He also conceded that the team had been "obliged to be a little
    barbarous", a gross understatement when one considers their vandalism
    of the Parthenon during the ten years it took them to make off with
    half of its surviving treasures - 21 figures from East and West
    pediments, 15 metope panels, and 246 feet of what had been a
    continuous narrative frieze.

    Clark notes that although Elgin succeeded in relocating them to
    British soil, he "derived little personal happiness from his
    antiquarian acquisitions."

    After numerous logistical headaches involved in their transport, he
    found himself begging the British government to take them off his
    hands when an acrimonious divorce landed him in financial straits.

    This time the British government agreed, acquiring the lot for £35,000
    - less than half of what Lord Elgin claimed to have shelled out for
    the operation.

    The so-called Elgin Marbles became part of the British Museum's
    collection in 1816, five years before the Greek War of Independence's
    start.

    They have been on continual display ever since.

    The 21st-century has witnessed a number of world class museums
    rethinking the provenance of their most storied artifacts. In many
    cases, they have elected to return them to their land of origin.

    Greece has long called for the Parthenon marbles in the British Museum
    to be permanently repatriated to Athens, but thusfar museum Trustees
    have refused.

    In their opinion, it';s complicated.

    Is it though? Lord Elgin';s ultimate motivations might have been, and
    Bruce Clark, in a brilliant ninja move, suggests that the return could
    be viewed as a positive stripping away, atonement by way of getting
    back to basics:
    Suppose that among his mixture of motives-personal aggrandizement,
    rivalry with the French and so on-the welfare of the sculptures actually had been Elgin's primary concern. How could that purpose best
    be served today? Perhaps by placing the Acropolis sculptures in a
    place where they would be extremely safe, extremely well conserved and
    superbly displayed for the enjoyment of all? The Acropolis Museum,
    which opened in 2009 at the foot of the Parthenon, is an ideal
    candidate; it was built with the goal of eventually housing all of the surviving elements of the Parthenon frieze…. If the earl really cared
    about the marbles, and if he were with us today, he would want to see
    them in Athens now.

    Related Content 

    The Metropolitan Museum of Art Restores the Original Colors to Ancient
    Statues

    Robots Are Carving Replicas of the Parthenon Marbles: Could They Help
    the Real Ancient Sculptures Return to Greece?

    John Oliver's Show on World-Class Art Museums & Their Looted Art:
    Watch It Free Online

    Take a Virtual Reality Tour of the World's Stolen Art
    - Ayun Halliday is the Chief Primatologist of the East Village
    Inky zine and author, most recently, of Creative, Not Famous: The
    Small Potato Manifesto and Creative, Not Famous Activity Book. Follow her @AyunHalliday.

    https://www.openculture.com/2023/02/how-the-parthenon-marbles-ended-up-in-the-british-museum.html

    (reformatted for legibility)


    --
    Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
    Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
    Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com
    E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)