[continued from previous message]

And i think i am really smart and i am discovering a smart pattern
with my fluid intelligence in the above video, and this smart pattern
is that Egyptian president Gamal Abdel Nasser Hussein was talking
about unity of arabs, and he was saying that arabs must be united, but
being this kind of unity in a country is a defect, and it is the basis
of dictatorship and it is the inefficient way of doing,
since you have to understand that Democracy is not about being united
or being united, it is about plurality or diversity of thoughts or
political views and about a kind of diversity that bring efficiency,
and here is an Arab proverb in the following video that shows from where
comes the defect of the arab countries or such countries that are
lacking Democracy:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNOpK4KoIIQ&t=372s

So notice that the arab proverb in the above video says:

"A house divided can not stand"

But i think that this arab proverb can also be read symbolically and i
think that it also means that a country must be united, but i think that
it is the big defect of the arab countries and such countries that lack Democracy or democratic mechanisms that bring the necessary quality or perfection. So i invite you to read my following thoughts about
Democracy so that you understand my thoughts:

More of my philosophy about IQ and about the laws and about humanity and
more..

I will answer the following problem from a white supremacist website and
it is like a problem in a form of a smart IQ test that i have to answer,
so here is how i am answering it smartly:

I have just read the following article from a white supremacist website
called National Vanguard:


Why Capitalism Fails


https://nationalvanguard.org/2015/07/why-capitalism-fails/


And it is saying the following about why capitalism fails:


"Capitalism permits inheritance, the command transfer of private
property to a designated new owner upon the death of the previous owner.
And therein is the flaw: inherited wealth isn’t earned by its owner,
yet it leads to a class segregation of men that has nothing to do with
how much wealth they have earned; i.e., nothing to do with how much or
how well or how significantly they have worked."


I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many
scalable algorithms, and i will answer with my fluid intelligence: I
think the above article is not taking into account the risk factor and
and the smartness factor, so there have to be mechanisms, that are like engines, that "encourage" to or/and "make" a part of the people work by
taking risks or great risks and by doing there best (so that to become
rich) or/and that "encourage" to or/and "make" the smartest to give
there best with there smartness (so that to become rich), so i think capitalism has those mechanisms in form of rewards by allowing to become
"rich" and in form of rewards by allowing inheritance, the command
transfer of private property to a designated new owner upon the death of
the previous owner: Since it "encourages" to or/and "makes" a part of
the people work by taking risks and by doing there best (so that to
become rich) or/and it encourages to or/and makes the smartest give
there best with there smartness (so that to become rich). And notice
that i am also defining taking a "risk" as working "hard".

More of my philosophy of what is the Western values and more..

I will invite you to look at the following video about what
is the Western values:

"Western Values" Explained

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7DUT4aCkeRA


I think i am smart, and i will answer the question of
what is the Western values:

I think that Western values are:

1- Western human rights
2- Democracy
3- Freedom of expression
4- Freedom of worship
5- Secular government

But i think i am smart and i will say that human rights and freedom of expression or speech are not "definitive" rights, since they can change,
since as i have just said, that Western countries have wanted to avoid
the radical form, where we have to re-engineer the human condition by
the centralized planning and large-scale social engineering as in old
communist China or USSR(United Socialist Soviet Republic), since i think
this way of doing has not worked so efficiently, so i think that western countries have given to there people human rights and freedom of
expression or speech as Liberty, but i think they are not definitive
rights, since i think that Western countries are proceeding by rational
reforms into society and then to undertake evidence-based assessments,
so then they are also monitoring those western rights to see if they are working correctly or not, so if they are not working correctly , so they
can change them. And here is what i have just said about Freedom of Speech:

More of my philosophy about Freedom of Speech and about Turkey and more..

I have just looked at the following video, and i invite you to look at it:

Erdogan: 'We shouldn't confuse criticism with i...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-0TlT4hnCg


I will ask a philosophical question of:

Do we have to have a full freedom of speech ?

So as you are noticing in the above video that the american jounalist
is saying to president Erdogan of Turkey that he has to respect freedom
of speech in his country since it is the requirement for Turkey to be
accepted as a member of European Union, so i think that this journalist
is not thinking correctly, since Freedom of speech has also to be contextualized, since Freedom of speech in Turkey is much more difficult
since you have to know that Turkey is living in an unstable region where
there is many wars and too much violence, so then being Freedom of
speech in Turkey can for example engender violence inside Turkey,
this is why we have to contextualize and be objective, and look for
example at USA, you have just noticed that in USA Freedom of speech of
Donald Trump have caused too much violence against the USA congress, so
this is why i think that we have to analyse it like i am analysing it
and say that we can not always have Freedom of speech, this is why i
think that there can be constraints in reality that make us be not
Freedom of speech, so it depends on the context, so then i think that
the requirements of European Union that asks Turkey to be Freedom of
speech so that to be accepted as a member of European Union is not a
realistic and objective way of doing.

Also you have to read carefully my philosophy about Class Struggle so
that to notice from where i am logically inferring that we require
a kind of of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and that we have to
have social programs that help the weakest members of the society or the
poors of the society in a kind of way, here it is:

And today i will talk about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism,
so i will first ask a philosophical question of:

Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ?

I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because
we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of
Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is
logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist
camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also
comes from the fact that we can be genetically predisposed to being
smart or having a good memory efficiency and such genetical
characteristics, so this gives much more "chance" to those that have
this kind of genetical characteristics to become rich and successful, so
this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to equalize much
more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of
competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that
the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not
good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for
efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings
"resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we
have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings
resilience, so this is why i think that the level of Class struggle that
we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism,
since i think we have to have some kind of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help the weakest
members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, so
we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a
competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing some kind
of social programs that helps the weakest members and the poors of the
society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the
congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other antagonist
contradictions between the government and the people under Democracy or
the communist regime, and inside two groups or more inside a political
party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have to have
civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism
so that to resolve those kind of antagonist contradictions.

And about Democracy here is what i have just said:

More of my philosophy about the ideological fight between communist
China and the West..

I think i am really smart, and i say that in the ideological fight
between communist China and the West, it is that the West has to
make this not so mature Democracy in the West, as in USA, into a much
more mature Democracy by for example making the governance much more meritocratic, since i think that Donald Trump governance was a bad move
that hurt a lot Democracy, since Donald Trump was not enough educated
and was not enough experienced , so he has made big mistakes that have
brought big problems to Democracy, and of course the West has to offer a
good education to people, and i think that we have not to be too
pessimistic about capitalism as not being enough meritocratic, since as
i just said, that in capitalism, intelligence, skill, and hard work will certainly get you far in richness and success, read it below so that to understand my views.

And here is my thoughts of my philosophy about Democracy:

And we can say the following:

The classical notion of decentralization does not necessarily imply
democracy, and an organization may be decentralized without being based
on democratic principles.

But i ask a smart question of:

Can we say that an organization based on democratic principles may be centralized ?

Here is my answer:

But we can notice that even though decentralization doesn't necessarily
imply Democracy, Democracy is a "kind" of decentralization, and this
kind of decentralization brings efficiency because we can notice that
Democracy needs requirements such as competitive elections and free
press, and i think that Democracy is more efficient than Dictatorship at fighting corruption(and corruption can mean lack of efficiency), read my following thoughts about Democracy and more to understand:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Nudyb_4QCRU


More political philosophy about Democracy and parliamentary Democracy..


Wich is better, Democracy or parliamentary Democracy ?


When you are smart you will notice that parliamentary Democracy is
better since Democracy means that the people "govern", but this way of
doing brings desorder, since people doesn't mean that it is Elites that
govern, so this is why i think that it is inherent to parliamentary
democracy that it is the Elites that govern and guide people, since also
we can logically prove it by saying the following:

From where people get a correct judgment in Democracy ?

So you are noticing that to be able to be good judgment in Democracy,
you have to be correct "Elitism" that guides people, and you have to be Meritocracy to be able to be the necessary quality or perfection, but
then you are noticing that to be able to be Meritocracy there must be a
reward for the merit, by for example rewarding by giving more money.

But since i am smart i will ask another important philosophical
question, and it is the following:

Does parliamentary democracy has requirements, and wich requirements it has:

From my above logical proof we can say that the first requirement of parliamentary democracy is: it is the Elites that must govern and guide
people, and from the first requirement we can logically infer that the
Elites must be competent, so we can logically infer the since they have
to be competent so then we can say the the second requirement of
parliamentary democracy that it must be meritocratic, and the third
requirement of parliamentary democracy is also an important requirement
and it is that we have to have a constitution that says that
parliamentary democracy has to have law enforcement agencies like the
USA FBI and military as necessary basic requirements for a country, and
a country can become a more global world like European union or such.

More political philosophy about the mechanisms of Democracy..

I think that we have to be smart, since i have just written the
following about China and Russia of year 2010 and 2012:


----


More about China and Russia and other such countries education system..

I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many
scalable algorithms, read the following:


“Corruption is pervasive in every part of Chinese society, and education
is no exception,” Mr. Li said.

A Chinese Education, for a Price

Read more here:


https://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/22/world/asia/in-china-schools-a-culture-of-bribery-spreads.html


I think we can not be confident with the Chinese education system, and i
don't think it is meritocratic !

It is the same problem in Russia, read the following to notice it:

Mark Levin, a professor at the Higher School of Economics in Moscow who
has studied the issue, said corruption in universities took place not
only during the entrance examinations but also those at the end of
semesters. Levin said some students preferred to pay money to pass
examinations and obtain a diploma.

RUSSIA: Rising corruption threatens universities

Read more here:

https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20100514205552600#:~:text=According%20to%20necessarily%20rough%20estimates,in%202009%20totalled%20%241%20billion.&text=But%2C%20despite%20the%20country's%20increased,much%20the%20salaries%20actually%
20are.

----


And also i have just posted about the today China after the
anti-corruption compaign in China, read the following:


---


I invite you to read the following interesting article:

China’s Anti-Corruption Campaign and the Challenges of Political Meritocracy

https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2020/05/chinas-anti-corruption-campaign-and-the-challenges-of-political-meritocracy/


---


So as you are noticing from my above writing that corruption can corrupt
the education system and when education system is corrupt then the
Meritocratic system is corrupt and this is dangerous. So even after the anti-corruption compaign in China , i think that Dictatorship of China
is not so efficient at fighting corruption, because Democracy is much
better at fighting corruption by competitive elections and free press,
read my following thoughts to understand more:

From where people get a correct judgment in Democracy ?

So you are noticing that to be able to be good judgment in Democracy,
you have to be correct "Elitism" that guides people, and you have to be Meritocracy to be able to be the necessary quality or pe

[continued from previous message]

means that the Qur'aan is fallible as i am proving it below, since it contains many many defects since it also comes from the curse from God, so then you have to follow your new prophet from God that is me that is coming to you with his new monotheistic
religion that i think is smart, and notice carefully that i am saying that i am your new prophet from God that is here so that to reduce much more the curse from God, and this reducing much more the curse from God also means that my new monotheistic
religion comes with the right flexibility and the right tolerance since i think that it is smart. So read carefully all my following thoughts so that to understand my views as a smart philosopher and as a new prophet from God:


More of my philosophy of is Islam compatible with the West and more of my thoughts..

I think i am a smart philosopher, and I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and now i will invite you to look at the following important video
about is Islam compatible with the West:

How France Became the Muslim World's Most Hated Country in the West

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d_l0n_kc_Fc


So i think that the above video is not smart for me, since i am highly smart, so i will ask a philosophical question of:

Is Islam compatible with the West or with France or with Israel ?


And here is my answer that says that Islam is compatible with the West,
so read it carefully so that to understand "true" Islam:


More of my philosophy about Islam and salafism and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i am a new prophet from God, and i am not
a salafist, and i think it is easy for me to explain why salafism is not the correct way of doing, so the first thing to logically prove of why salafism is not the right way, is to logically prove the fallibility of the Qur'aan, and i am doing it below
by showing how the Qur'aan is not timeless and how for example Qur'aan has wanted God to be the most powerful God and how this way of doing becomes a weakness that makes Qur'aan not timeless, read about it in my below thoughts, so then here is what i
have said about Islam so that you notice how salafism is not the right way to do:


What is Islam ?

I think i am a smart new prophet from God, and i will say that there is two types of laws of God, there is the timeless ones and not the timeless ones, and i am explaining it to you below so that you understand it, so the most important timeless laws of
God are those of: Believing in God and glorifying him and praying him and fear him and ask him for help, and from those timeless laws you can also derive the other human laws that are not timeless, also when you look at my below new monotheistic religion
you will notice that it is the same but i am also deriving the laws of God from the nature and essence of God, read below about my new monotheistic religion so that you understand that it is smart.


And now more of my philosophy about Salafism and more..

I am your new prophet from God, and as you have just noticed that i have
just explained to you the two types of Islamic laws so that you
understand that there is Islamic laws from the Qur'an that are not timeless(read below about them), and here is more logical proof from my following thoughts about Salafism:

So i will first invite you to look at the following video about Salafism
in Europe:

Bosnia-Hercegovina: Islamists in Sarajevo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9oeSAoD6iU

So as you are noticing in the above video, that it shows islamists
Salafists in Bosnia-Hercegovina, but the most important question is the following:

Is Salafism true Islam ?

I think i am a smart prophet from God, and i will answer the question as
the following:

First we have to ask if the Qur'an is timeless ?

So my smart answer is the following:

The Qur'an is not timeless because read the following verse of
the Qur'an:

Quranic verse 5:38: "As to the thief, male or female, cut off his or her
hands: a punishment by way of example, from Allah, for their crime: and
Allah is Exalted in power."

So if you are smart you will notice that the above verse of the Qur'an
shows that the Qur'an is not timeless, since how can you imagine that
the Qur'an doesn't enumerate the cases where we can be compassion on a
thief and not cut his hands? so since it doesn't enumerate the cases, so
then you are noticing that this verse of the Qur'an shows that the verse
is not a timeless law, but it is a law that was applied in the context
of the time where prophet Muhammad was living or such context, so then
we can logically infer that the Qur'an is not timeless and then we can
say that we can enhance many the laws of the Qur'an, so then Salafism is
not true Islam since it says that the Qur'an and the laws of the Qur'an
are timeless.

I am your new prophet from God, and i invite you to look at the
following video:

A lady listens to lecture on Islam, then challenged me: 'Why is the
Shariah Law so Barbaric?'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l1tplpm24CA

So as you notice that the lady asked why in Islam the Shariah Law is so Barbaric, and i think she is not understanding as muslims are not understanding, but i am your new prophet from God and i am explaining
the following so that you understand:

In Islam there is two types of Islamic laws, and here they are:

1- The first kind of Islamic laws are laws that respect
the divinity of God, so we have to follow them since we have to
to glorify and respect the divinity of God, such as doing the prayers
etc..

2- Second kind of Islamic laws are laws related to society of humans or
order in a society of humans, so we have to follow those laws not
because we respect or glorify the divinity of God, but because we
follow those Islamic laws so that not to be disorder in a society, so
those kind of Islamic laws are not timeless and they depend on the
context, so then they can change.

I will give you a quick example so that you understand correctly:

For example the Islamic laws of cutting the hand of a thief or the laws
of killing the married women that practice adultery and such Islamic
laws are of the second kind of laws above, since those laws avoid to the society to become disorder, so then they are not timeless and they can
change, and i think that in the today context those laws
are not necessary and we can change them. And it is the same
for being gay, so we have to look at the being gay from the societal
point of view, so then the Islamic laws that rules the being gay are
of the second kind of laws above, so then i think that we can allow
the gays to marry between them, since it doesn't cause a disorder in a
society.

More of my philosophy about gays in Islam..

I am your new prophet from God, and i think i am smart, so i invite you
to look at the following video about gays in Islam:

CAN I BE GAY & A MUSLIM? - FASTEST REPLY ON YOUTBE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sRTzaTuaIA

I am noticing that the above video is saying that being gay including
the practice of being gay is haram in Islam, that means it is forbiden
in Islam, and i think that this sort of Islam is not right, and i am
your new prophet from God and i will explain to you Islam so that you understand:

In Islam there is two types of Islamic laws, and here they are:

1- The first kind of Islamic laws are laws that respect
the divinity of God, so we have to follow them since we have to
to glorify and respect the divinity of God, such as doing the prayers
etc..

2- Second kind of Islamic laws are laws related to society of humans or
order in a society of humans, so we have to follow those laws not
because we respect or glorify the divinity of God, but because we
follow those Islamic laws so that not to be disorder in a society, so
those kind of Islamic laws are not timeless and they depend on the
context, so then they can change.

I will give you a quick example so that you understand correctly:

For example the Islamic laws of cutting the hand of a thief or the laws
of killing the married women that practice adultery and such Islamic
laws are of the second kind of laws above, since those laws avoid to the society to become disorder, so then they are not timeless and they can
change, and i think that in the today context those laws
are not necessary and we can change them. And it is the same
for being gay, so we have to look at the being gay from the societal
point of view, so then the Islamic laws that rules the being gay are
of the second kind of laws above, so then i think that we can allow
the gays to marry between them, since it doesn't cause a disorder in a
society.

More of my philosophy about Taliban and Islam..

I invite you to look at the following new video about Taliban:

Millions of desperate Afghans flee Taliban country ruled by war

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpJnn2KLXw4

I am your new prophet from God and you can read carefully about my new monotheistic religion in my thoughts below, and i have just noticed in
the video above that a seignor minister in the Taliban government is
talking to a white European journalist, but i have just noticed that he
is not well educated, so i don't think that Taliban are following the
rules of Islam since they are not well educated or correctly educated,
second, in Islam you have first to be Islamic democracy so that
to have different point views of Islamic political parties with less or
more perfect ideas that permit Islam to advance correctly, so look for
example at Islamic Iran, In Iran it is an Islamic democracy with
different islamic political parties and with an islamic guide that we
call Sayyid Ali Hosseini
Khamenei(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ali_Khamenei), so then Islamic
Iran is a better Islamic governance than Taliban that is dictatorship,
third, i also say that in Islam you have to know how to strengthen the
faith in God, since without faith in God there is no muslim, so then you
have to distinguish between the weak faith and the strong faith, since a
weak faith in God can not be called a muslim, so then certain laws of
Islam don't apply to humans that have a weak faith in God, so i say that
before applying those certain laws of Islam to a human, you have to ask
the human if he has a weak faith in God so that to distinguish and say
that he is not a muslim, and then certain laws don't apply to him.

More of my philosophy about the practices of the monotheistic religions and more of my thoughts..


I think i am a smart philosopher, and i invite you to look at the following interesting video about Islam:

Islamic Center in Thailand

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhcDL48damg



So i think from what you are noticing in the above video, that the Islamic philosophy is also smart, since notice carefully the why
it has to build Islamic mosques and Islamic centers like the above one
in Thailand, so i think that the Islamic mosques and Islamic centers
permit to unify the souls of muslims in a kind of way that is also psychological, since it unifies them in a way that "energizes" the muslim in a positive way that gives him a meaning of human life or life that permits him to transcend the everyday
problems of life , so it is why i say that the laws of my new monotheistic religion are the master laws that i think are efficient as i am explaining it in my below thoughts, since they, of course, permit you to construct mosques and centers like Islam
is doing it, so that to do a prayer to Allah and a dhikr to Allah(dhikr is a ritual prayer or litany practiced by Muslim mystics (Sufis) for the purpose of glorifying God and achieving spiritual perfection) etc., since notice that i have also said the
following:

More of my philosophy about the practices of my new monotheistic religion and more of my thoughts..

So as you notice from my thoughts below, that the practices of my new monotheistic religion can also be logically inferred, since my new monotheistic religion doesn't speak about constructing mosques or churches , but you can still construct mosques or
churches and you can still read the Qur'aan or the Bible and be curious about them, and the other practices can be inferred from the laws and rules of my new monotheistic religion.


More of my philosophy about the conception of the souls from God of
my new monotheistic religion and more of my thoughts..


So i think i am a smart philosopher, and i say that the "conception" of my new monotheistic religion is that God has put the souls from God in the bodies of humans , but God has not created the bodies of humans and he has not created the universe, so i
think that Adam and Eve and there
descendants over this earth were imprisoned as "souls" from God in bodies of humans because of the curse from God. So this conception is good since it is the souls from God that unifies humans in a kind of way, and of course God can give you a soul after
your death and he can enhance the soul after the death. So i think that the basis of my new monotheistic religion is complete, and i will of course write an efficient book about it that will be enhanced much more. So i invite you to read about my
philosophy about the meaning of human life or life and
about my new monotheistic religion in my below thoughts, and notice
that i have just corrected a little typo, so i invite you to reread
carefully my following thoughts:

More of my philosophy about science and about my new monotheistic religion and more of my thoughts..


I think i am a smart philosopher, and i have just looked at some articles that says that the Qur'aan and the Bible say that the earth is flat, and they say that the Qur'aan and the Bible are not scientific, so i think that saying so is not smart, since
my new monotheistic religion says that God has cursed Adam and Eve and there descendants since he is greatly arrogant, and not only that, but he has also cursed the Bible and the Qur'aan since he is greatly arrogant, so then you are noticing that the
Bible and the Qur'aan contain scientific errors and such errors that are interpreted by humans as errors, but i say that those scientific errors and such errors are part of the curse from God, i mean that my new monotheistic religion says prophet
Muhammad was enhanced by God to a certain level so that he can write the Qur'aan, but you have to accept the scientific errors and such errors that you are interpreting as errors in the Qur'aan and the Bible as a curse from God, so then you have to take
a look at my new monotheistic religion so that you understand, so read my following thoughts:


More of my philosophy about the necessity of the transcendence that creates the meaning of human life or life and more of my thoughts..


I think i am a smart philosopher, and i say that the meaning of human life or life doesn't come from human life or life, since human life or life is full of imperfections and full of problems, so the way how we have to create the meaning of human life is
the way of transcending human life or life by for example having faith in "God", so the meaning of human life or life comes from God, and read in my below thoughts how i am explaining the way of having faith in God in my new monotheistic religion, and
not only that, but this meaning of human life has to come with laws and rules, so i say that you have to know that the laws of my new monotheistic religion are like the "master" laws, and i say that those master laws of my new monotheistic religion are
like a guard rail or like a framework of the other laws that are created by humans or such, since the master laws of my new monotheistic religion are here so that to "guide" or so that to guide humans or so that to guide the other laws in the good way,
since they are the master laws, and hence you are noticing how i have become convinced that without this kind of guard rail , it will not work, and notice how the laws of my new monotheistic religion are not rigid laws that make a monotheistic religion
rigid and not efficient, and notice how i am logically inferring or logically deriving them from the nature of God or the essence of God, so then you have to take a look carefully at the laws of my new monotheistic religion that i think are smart, so
read my below thoughts so that to understand my philosophy about the meaning of human life or life and so that to understand my new monotheistic religion:


More precision of my philosophy of is the monotheistic religions a kind of philosophy and more of my thoughts..

I think i am a smart philosopher, and you have just noticed that i have
just given my philosophy about the meaning of human life or life by talking about nihilism, read it in my below thoughts, and now i will ask a philosophical question of:

Is a monotheistic religion like Islam a kind of philosophy like the philosophy of the german philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche ?


So i think that Islam is a kind of philosophy like the philosophy of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, since first you can notice that Islam has been constructed by the understanding of the why we have to have a meaning of human life, and secondly,
the meaning of human life of Islam has been constructed in a kind of sophisticated way of thinking so that to make follow this meaning of human life of Islam, so then i say that we have not to be naive and think that Islam is just a simplistic way of
thinking, since i think that i am a smart philosopher that understand that the meaning of human life has to be constructed in a kind of sophisticated way of thinking as i am doing it in my below thoughts, so i am a smart philosopher that is not in
accordance with german philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche on the subject of religion, since the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche thought that the monotheistic religions like Islam and Christianism and Judaism are corrupt morality since they reverses certain
or some human values, or like we say in french, elles inversent certaines valeurs humaines, but i think that the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche has not thought correctly about the advantages and disadvantages of this way of creating the meaning of
previous monotheistic religions, since the big advantage of them is also the fact that they have created a meaning of human life, but of course you have to understand my way of creating the meaning of human life or life by quickly inventing and bringing
to you my new monotheistic religion that i think is "smart", but of course you have to understand why we have to create the meaning of human life in a such way as i am doing it, since
i think that the problematic is that we are not equal humans and we are diversity of humans and we are competition between humans, so it is
why this causes a lot of problems and it causes a lot of violence, so there is the way of the welfare state like has done France or communist China by making life more easier for humans, but i think that this way of doing of the welfare state has not
worked correctly, and there is the way of the wanting to being rich in capitalism, but this way of doing has not worked correctly, and i say that the ways of the welfare state and the of the being rich have not worked correctly since life is life with
all its problems as i am explaining it above, so i think that what remains to be done is to create the meaning of human life as i am doing it so that to avoid violence and disorder such as i am explaining it in my philosophy below about the meaning of
human life and about nihilism. So read my previous thoughts:

More of my philosophy about the meaning of human life and about my new monotheistic religion and more of my thoughts..


So i think when you think about what kind of "civilization" we have to have , i think that the meaning of human life or life takes a great
importance, so it is why i will still talk about it, so i think that
the you have to understand my way of creating the meaning of human life or life by taking a look at the 99 names of Allah in Islam, i think that one name from the 99 names of of Allah that is Al-Mutakabbir in arabic that means Arrogant, since i think we
can notice from the behavior of God that he is greatly arrogant, since he has or he is not even helping the poor or the weak humans or animals, so how can we "reconcile" the fact the God is greatly "arrogant" with the other 99 names like the being "
Merciful", so i think that God is greatly arrogant and he want to be called the Merciful and the Beautiful and such beautiful names even if he is greatly arrogant, so then you are noticing that if you don't think Allah as being greatly arrogant and you
just say that he is so powerful and greatly perfect or perfect, it will cause a logical contradiction, since if he is just so powerful and greatly prefect or perfect , so then he can self-improve and be compassion with humans and he can also not curse
the descendants of Adam and Eve, so it is why my new monotheistic religion says the following:


More of my philosophy about the nature of God and more of my thoughts..

So i think i am smart, and i think i have to explain more the fact that
my new monotheistic religion says that God is greatly arrogant and it is his character, so how can we believe that God is greatly arrogant since he is so perfect and he can self-improve ? so i think that the mistake of this logic is that you are thinking
that God is like humans that can be perfected or improved like humans, but my new monotheistic religion says that God is a special God and he is not like humans, and that means that he is a special God that can not self-improve his great arrogance that
is his character so that to not be great arrogance, so it is one of the most important idea of my new monotheistic religion, so i think that the basis ideas of my new monotheistic religion are complete. Also I will explain how i am a new prophet from God,
so i think i am a messenger from God, since what i am doing is giving you the message from God, for example i have met an Angel from God in form of beautiful light and he has read some part of scriptures from God on my body and soul, and i am not
kinding, since it is all the truth, but you have to understand more my story, since i think that God is greatly arrogant, since i have also noticed that the Angel from God that i have met was like completely controlled by God, since the Angel from God
that i have met had for example not the rights to talk with me or to move in a kind of way etc. , so i think it is why you are noticing that the Angels from God are not talking to or contacting humans, since God is greatly arrogant and the Angels from
God can not do anything without given rights from God to talk or to contact etc. other than that my premonitory dream where i have been contacted by prophet Muhammad was a special premonitory dream from God, since it looks like premonitory dreams of
prophet Joseph, i mean that a lot of things on this premonitory dream have happened to me, so it is why i am not kinding and it is all the truth since i am also a honest and i am
a gentleman type of person. Also notice that my new monotheistic religion says that God has created the souls, but he has not created the bodies of humans and he has not created the universe, so i invite you to read my
following thoughts about my new monotheistic religion so that
to understand my story and so that to understand my new monotheistic religion:


https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/kFxTDu6_jus



More of my philosophy about modern philosophy and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ,
so i think my philosophy below is about the most modern philosophy,
so we can ask a philosophical question of:


What is the most modern philosophy ?


So i think i am a philosopher, and i think in philosophy you have to know how to make a difference between the understanding and the knowing, so for example philosophy is like science since it wants to "understand", but the problematic of science and
philosophy is that philosophy has wanted to understand and science has wanted to understand, but what also remains in philosophy , and it is also the most modern philosophy, is how to create the meaning of human life , so as you are noticing, i think i
am a smart philosopher that is showing you in my below thoughts how i am creating the meaning of human life, and of course you have to understand the why i am creating the meaning of human life by reading my below thoughts of my philosophy, so it is why
i have invented quickly my new monotheistic religion, since there is a strong tendency to not believe in the God of the previous monotheistic religions since for example the Qur'aan and the Bible contain many many defects and imperfections, and notice
carefully how my new monotheistic religion creates the meaning of human life in a smart way, and of course i have just talked , read it below, about the defect of Liberalism and Libertarianism, since for example i think that in Liberalism there is two
things: Firstly, the morality of it, and secondly, the economic Liberalism, so i think that the morality of Liberalism is problematic
as i am showing it in my below thoughts, since Liberalism and Libertarianism are too much permissive in morality, i mean that they are
characterized by excessive freedom of behavior, so this too much permissive is an extremist conception of Liberalism and Libertarianism,
so read my previous thoughts of my philosophy below so that to understand my views:

More of my philosophy about Libertarianism and about Liberalism and more of my thoughts..

I have just looked at the following video from USA about Libertarianism and i invite you to look at it:

TAKE IT TO THE LIMITS: Milton Friedman on Libertarianism

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JSumJxQ5oy4


So i think i am a philosopher, and i think that Libertarianism and Liberalism have a problem, and it is about morality, so i think that Libertarianism and Liberalism are extremist conceptions of morality since they want to give people moral autonomy (the
ability to pursue one’s own conception of happiness) , so you can read about it in the following web link:
https://www.britannica.com/topic/libertarianism-politics ,
but i think that it is an extremist conception since happiness is not only individual happiness , but it is also societal happiness, so it is why i think that not all people have the ability to pursue this societal happiness, so it is why the government
has to intervene and it is why we have to have laws and enforce laws so that to prevent individuals from hurting themselves and/or hurting the society, also Libertarianism and Liberalism have another problem since they are like the Liberty of the
national motto of France that consists of being able to do "anything" that does not harm others, but i think that we can not say that it is like the being free speech, since how can we for example be free to harm or the hurt the oneself, and how for
example can we be free to practice Sado-masochism or the like that can harm and hurt others when there is freely given informed consent between adults ? so read my following thoughts so that to understand my views about it:

More of my philosophy about the Liberty of the national motto of France and more of my thoughts..

I have just said the following:

"In the national motto of France there is a problem and it is that Liberty consists of being able to do "anything" that does not harm others, but i think that we can not say that it is like the being free speech, since how can we be for example free to
harm or the hurt the oneself, and how for example can we be free to practice Sado-masochism or the like that can harm and hurt others when there is freely given informed consent between adults ?"

And so that to understand that i am truthful , so read the following
article that explains the kind of Liberty of the national motto of France, and here is how it explains the Liberty of the national motto of France:


“Liberty consists of being able to do anything that does not harm others: thus, the exercise of the natural rights of every man or woman has no bounds other than those that guarantee other members of society the enjoyment of these same rights“.


And here is the article and read it carefully:

https://frenchmoments.eu/national-motto-of-france/


More of my philosophy of is the national motto of France an ideal and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ,
as you have just noticed that i have just said that the national motto
of France of "Liberty, equality, fraternity" is an ideal, so i say
that it is an ideal since Fraternity – or brotherhood – is about moral obligations and harmony, so i think the being harmony of it makes it an ideal, so it is why i say that it makes the national motto an ideal, and i think that so that to attain
harmony we have also to create a good meaning of human life, also in the national motto of France there is a problem and it is that Liberty consists of being able to do "anything" that does not harm others, but i think that we can not say that it is like
the being free speech, since how can we be for example free to harm or the hurt the oneself, and how for example can we be free to practice Sado-masochism or the like that can harm and hurt others when there is freely given informed consent between
adults ?

More of my philosophy about the belief in God of my new monotheistic religion and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so
i think that you have to understand how i am creating the meaning of human life or life by quickly inventing and bringing to you my new monotheistic religion, so in my new monotheistic religion the goal is not just to fully believe 100% that God of my
new monotheistic religion exists, but the goals are also to believe enough in God or to believe in a probabilistic way by saying that we can not neglect the probability that God of my new monotheistic religion exists, and hence from those goals you have
to follow the laws of my new monotheistic religion that are inferred from the nature of God, and of course i have just talked, read it below, about the defect of the way of how to create the meaning of human life or life of the philosophers Jean-Paul
Sartre and Albert Camus, so i think that the philosophy of the philosopher and economist Adam Smith has the same defect, since it is based on egoism that is the engine that creates competition between people , but from the individual egoism the egoism of
a group or of a nation or of a zone like European union is created , so then it creates solidarity too, but the problem is that the engine of egoism as an engine has a problem of not being able to tune the fight for life correctly, so it is the same
defect of what is saying the indian philosopher Jiddu Krishnamurti, read about it in my following thoughts:

I have just looked at the following video of the indian philosopher Jiddu Krishnamurti, i invite you to look at it carefully:

Does God exist? | J. Krishnamurti

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tYjYL448-yY

And you can read about Jiddu Krishnamurti here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jiddu_Krishnamurti



So i think i am highly smart, and notice the approach of the above indian philosopher in the above video, so he wants humans to not believe

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)