Arindam:

The speed of light varies with the speed of emission, so the physicists are all liars or fools. As they are clever enough, to get PhDs, they cannot be called fools, but unscupulous careerist scoundrels thriving on lies.

Thank you for sharing your insight. I think the variance in the speed of light is taken into account in the case of black holes. Is there any "object" with mass that is moving at the speed of light except near a BH? To answer myself, perhaps the

galaxies that have already receded from our telescopes. Hence the research into "expanding universe" by the Nobel laureate Schmidt et al. is significant. Sorry for my astute observation that you and the rest of the physicists, on a macro scale, are
twisting physics so as to satisfy your individual tastes. From a layman's perspective both of you are telling the same thing without doing experiments such as Newton and Copernicus, to mention a few.

Stars continually emit radiation, which at any point in the universe is noise containing all frequencies. Energy is simply a way to use force to do work.

Force is the word. For real physicists, not bunny-ahs.

The universe is so designed that the interstellar distances are so very large that at any point the radiant electromagnetic forces at all frequencies from all stars add up to a force vector which when squared gives an energy value, which is

reasonably constant.

If force is amenable to arithmetic, and can be a zero sum,

It is not a zero sum for background noise, which is what I said.

My comment was about the commonly observed forces that can be zero sum. I remember you mentioning an experiment where a submerged object, at a great depth of an ocean, would not break up if the forces from all sides are balanced with the forces from

within.

Yes, at the centre of the Earth there is no net force, as matter pulls symmetrically from all sides. so no pressure, so no temperature, so superconducting currents are possible leading to the magentic field we know. Not just for Earth, but the sun and
dark stars.

Yes, we are not crushed by air pressure as it acts equally on all sides.
But at any given point is space the electric fields evidently do not add up to zero for there is noise as its square, and that shows it has to be nonzero. In my electronics lab I asked why the oscillator oscillates with positive feedback. The answer is
cosmic radiation. The little energy from the flat spectrum will multiply to give us oscillation.

Now the universe is moving, so its symmetry is always changing. So the net field from all the stars will not be zero, the fields cannot add up to zero, but a small finite.

I interpreted it as zero sum (may be the misunderstanding is mine). As per your statements, energy is proportional to the square of force. I can't derive by myself because you are talking about radiation. A long time ago in college physics I read about

radiation pressure. I believe Einstein is the one who studied it and had written papers on it. Are you accepting his theory on radiation pressure?

Einstein bungled as usual.

Radiation which is a wave and not momentum of any kind creates current on one side, the sun facing side,of a space sail, heating one side and thus causing a heat flow within the sail which transforms to motion. Meaning acceleration, force, pressure is
created. Nothing to do with quantum mechanics, just internal motion from conducting heat, pushing against the far side.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)