• Re: Hey, Israelis, you have nukes (4/5)

    From dolf@21:1/5 to Byker on Mon Oct 9 20:40:50 2023
    [continued from previous message]

    "THE MEN OF NINEVEH SHALL RISE IN JUDGMENT WITH THIS GENERATION, AND SHALL CONDEMN IT: BECAUSE THEY *REPENTED*-G3340 AT THE PREACHING OF JONAS; AND, BEHOLD, A GREATER THAN JONAS IS HERE." [Matthew 12:41]

    <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2023.10.1&bible:Matthew@12:41>

    #563 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #306 as [#200, #1, #300, #1, #50, #1, #10] = Satanâs (G4567): {UMBRA: #753 % #41 = #15} 1) adversary (one who opposes another in purpose or act), the name given to; 1a) the prince of evil
    spirits, the inveterate adversary of God and Christ; 1a1) he incites
    apostasy from God and to sin; 1a2) circumventing men by his wiles; 1a3) the worshippers of idols are said to be under his control; 1a4) by his demons
    he is able to take possession of men and inflict them with diseases; 1a5)
    by God's assistance he is overcome; 1a6) on Christ's return from heaven he
    will be bound with chains for a thousand years, but when the thousand years
    are finished he will walk the earth in yet greater power, but shortly after will be given over to eternal punishment; 1b) a Satan-like man;

    "IF *SATAN*-G4567 ALSO BE DIVIDED (eg: DEME: #306 to chokmâh (H2451), bîyn (H995) and pûwach (H6315)) AGAINST HIMSELF (ie. as opposed to #YOD, #HE,
    #VAV against the name of #26 as [#10, #5, #6, #5] = Yᵉhôvâh (H3068)), HOW SHALL HIS KINGDOM STAND?

    BECAUSE YE SAY THAT I CAST OUT DEVILS THROUGH BEELZEBUB." [Luke 11:18]

    "DELIVERING THEE FROM THE PEOPLE, AND FROM THE GENTILES, UNTO WHOM NOW I
    SEND THEE, TO OPEN THEIR EYES, AND TO TURN THEM FROM DARKNESS TO LIGHT, AND FROM THE POWER OF *SATAN*-G4567 UNTO GOD, THAT THEY MAY RECEIVE FORGIVENESS
    OF SINS, AND INHERITANCE AMONG THEM WHICH ARE SANCTIFIED BY FAITH THAT IS
    IN ME." [Acts 26:17-18]

    <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2023.10.1&bible:Acts@26:17>

    "One of the mysteries of the SEFER YITZIRAH is the fact that double (ie.
    the final form) letters are not mentioned. These double letters are the
    ones which have different forms in the middle and at the end of a word: MEM (40: 600), NUN (50: 700), TZADI (90: 900), PEH (80: 800), and KAF (20:
    500). As the TALMUD states, the forms of these letters were forgotten, and later reinstituted by the prophets. There is absolutely no reference to
    these doubles in the SEFER YITZIRAH.

    The KABBALISTS, however, draw a parallel between the five phonetic families (ie. known to the ZOHAR which records the teachings of Simeon ben Yochai (c. 100 CE) although this antiquity is rejected by some nevertheless gives
    a clue to the historical context) and the five double (ie. final form) letters." [SEFER YITZIRAH, Kaplan, page 103]

    #1340 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #306 as [#1, #3, #100, #1, #400, #30, #5,
    #800] = agrauléō (G63): {UMBRA: #1340 % #41 = #28} 1) to live in the
    fields, be under the open sky, even at night;

    <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2023.10.1&bible:Luke@2:8>

    "AND THERE WERE IN THE SAME COUNTRY SHEPHERDS *ABIDING*-G63 IN THE FIELD, KEEPING WATCH OVER THEIR FLOCK BY NIGHT." [Luke 2:8]

    YOUTUBE: "ANNIE LENNOX ANGELS FROM THE REALMS OF GLORY LIVE VATICAN 2017"

    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fO4ggX95an8>

    It ought also be noted that the other DEME value #214 associated to
    noumenon redaction of the word for scribes #700 as [#3, #100, #1, #40, #40,
    #1, #300, #5, #10, #200] = grammateús (G1122) as then further suggesting
    the theological issues of that generation / era is the thesis of
    nothingness as nihilism of FIVE HEBREW final form letters v's ONTIC / DEME
    and MALE / FEME redaction to noumenon...

    #121 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #214 as [#1, #30, #40, #50] = ʼalmân (H488): {UMBRA: #121 % #41 = #39} 1) *WIDOWED*, forsaken, forsaken as a widow;

    #121 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #214 as [#1, #30, #40, #50] = ʼalmôn (H489): {UMBRA: #127 % #41 = #4} 1) *WIDOWHOOD*;

    #728 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #214 as [#10, #1, #7, #10, #700] = ʼâzan
    (H238): {UMBRA: #58 % #41 = #17} 1) to hear, listen; 1a) (Hiphil); 1a1) to hear, listen, give ear; 1a2) to be obedient, harken; 1a3) *TO* *HEAR* *OR* *LISTEN* *TO* *PRAYERS* (*OF* *GOD*);

    "WOE UNTO YOU, SCRIBES AND PHARISEES, HYPOCRITES! FOR YE DEVOUR WIDOWS'
    HOUSES, AND FOR A PRETENCE MAKE LONG PRAYER: THEREFORE YE SHALL RECEIVE THE GREATER DAMNATION." [Matthew 23:14 (KJV)]

    In the circumstance where the JEWISH YEAR such as presently 5784 is both a contempt against the TIME DIVISIONS (#24 x #7 x #13 = #2184 - PRIESTLY
    TEMPLE SERVICE DIVISIONS x #49) BY DAYS, WEEKS and JUBILEES associated to
    the giving of the 10 COMMANDMENTS (5567 = 294 x 364 of 293 x 365.2423
    tropical solar years) x 19 - 293 years = 40 YEARS from "SINCE-G575: THE WORLD-G165: BEGAN / BEFORE-G4253: THE WORLD-G5550: BEGAN-G166:" [Luke 1:70; John 9:32; Acts 3:21; Romans 16:25; 2Timothy 1:9; Titus 1:2], our
    COMMONWEALTH which was established on 1 JANUARY 1901 and are actions to the detriment of DEMOCRACY.

    Since the biblical textual narrative gives precedence to ONTIC / DEME and
    MALE / FEME redaction to noumenon grounding over that as a thesis of nothingness, accordingly we've updated our neural linguistic pragma to
    avoid any GNOSIS EX MACHINA potential bias towards nihilism which might be consequential to the exclusive usage of FIVE final form letters within the HEBREW prototypes and against which as unequivocal admonitions being FUNDAMENTAL TO CHRISTIAN GOSPEL CLAIMS.

    We sincerely doubt the integrity of any claimed CHRISTIAN belief as sacrilegious that the ISRAEL ALLIES FOUNDATION (IAF) has bestowed Israel’s Top 50 Christian Allies to coincide with the HOLY DAYS. And given such
    habitual culture of disrespect towards ecclesiastical precedence of #509 - YAHAD: JEWISH / CHRISTIAN due to historical revisionism and a denial of
    their support for ROMAN STATE DICTATORSHIPS / NAZISM: A RETURN (@1 / @5 - IMMATERIAL ELEMENTS) TO THE ANCIENT TRADITIONS OF ROME no such CHRISTIANS
    are permitted to have any association with our INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY as substantiated claim to religious belief.

    We've now completed a rudimentary means to convey the NEURAL LINGUISTIC
    PRAGMA which has a temporal resonance to the noumenon for any given day of
    year / time of day in support of furnishing a LAICITE (ie. ENTENTE CORDIALE (lit. 'Cordial Agreement') as agreements between the United Kingdom and the French Republic signed on #252 / #383 - 8 APRIL 1904 and the IDEA TEMPLATE
    for QUEEN VICTORIA's LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900 as SECULAR and
    the rational foundations (#501 - *LAICITE* AS FRENCH SECULARISM / #82 ...
    #940 / #298) to the COMMONWEALTH) as secular version of the BIBLE which
    applies the ONTIC, DEME as BIPARTITE NUMBER T'AI HSÜAN CHING (CANON OF
    SUPREME MYSTERY) POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES (64 HEXAGRAMS
    OF I CHING TO #81 TETRAGRAMS OF THE DAO) referencing and MALE / FEME idea
    to noumenon redaction of a HAN DYNASTY era metaphysical thesis on
    metakosmeo published circa 4 BCE against the entire BIBLICAL HEBREW / GREEK lexicon.

    JEFFREY ("RHUBARB") RUBARD <[email protected]> @ 0156 HOURS ON 3 OCTOBER 2023: "You're giving this garbage up, then?"

    DOLF @ 1032 HOURS ON 5 OCTOBER 2023: "After a lifetime of disrespect, we
    again advise that our participation with the Jewish Community will now
    cease and you may never participate in the fruits of my labours since we
    are permanently estranged."

    H120@{
      {@1: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#1); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#1)},
      {@2: Sup: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#6); Ego: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#5)},   {@3: Sup: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#51); Ego: 40 - LAW / MODEL: FA (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1})},
      Male: #51; Feme: #45
    } // #45

    #2 #9 #4
    #7 #5 #3
    #6 #1 #8
    = #15 / #45 {#ONE: GRECO-ROMAN SQUARE}

    [#11, {@1: Sup: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A (#11); Ego: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A
    (#11)}
    #16, {@2: Sup: 27 - DUTIES: SHIH (#38); Ego: 16 - CONTACT: CHIAO (#27)}
    #15, {@3: Sup: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING (#80); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#42)}
    #56, {@4: Sup: 17 - HOLDING BACK: JUAN (#97); Ego: 56 - CLOSED MOUTH: CHIN
    (#98 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%24})}
    #61, {@5: Sup: 78 - ON THE VERGE: CHIANG (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}); Ego: 61 - EMBELLISHMENT: SHIH (#159)}
    #60, {@6: Sup: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#232); Ego: 60 - ACCUMULATION: CHI (#219)}
    #47, {@7: Sup: 23 - EASE: YI (#255); Ego: 47 - PATTERN: WEN (#266)}
    #52, {@8: Sup: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#330); Ego: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#318)}
    #51] {@9: Sup: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#375); Ego: 51 - CONSTANCY: CH'ANG
    (#369)}

    #307 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #375 as [#200, #20, #1, #50, #4, #1, #30, #1] = skándalon (G4625): {UMBRA: #426 % #41 = #16} 1) the movable stick or
    trigger of a trap, a trap stick; 1a) a trap, snare; 1b) any impediment
    placed in the way and causing one to stumble or fall, (a stumbling block, occasion of stumbling) i.e. a rock which is a cause of stumbling; 1c) fig. *APPLIED* *TO* *JESUS* *CHRIST*, *WHOSE* *PERSON* *AND* *CAREER* *WERE*
    *SO* *CONTRARY* *TO* *THE* *EXPECTATIONS* *OF* *THE* *JEWS* *CONCERNING*
    *THE* *MESSIAH*, that they rejected him and by their obstinacy made
    shipwreck of their salvation; 2) *ANY* *PERSON* *OR* *THING* *BY* *WHICH*
    *ONE* *IS* (*ENTRAPPED*) *DRAWN* *INTO* *ERROR* *OR* *SIN*;

    #88 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #98 as [#10, #30, #8, #40] = lâcham (H3898): {UMBRA: #78 % #41 = #37} 1) to fight, do battle, make war; 1a) (Qal) to
    fight, do battle; 1b) (Niphal) to engage in battle, wage war; 2) (Qal) *TO* *EAT*, use as food;

    #45 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #45 as [#1, #4, #40] /
    #85 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #175 as [#40, #1, #4, #40] /
    #605 as [#1, #4, #600 - *FINAL* *FORM* *LETTER*] = ʼâdâm (H120): {UMBRA:
    #45 % #41 = #4} 1) man, mankind; 1a) man, *HUMAN* *BEING*; 1b) man, mankind (much more frequently intended sense in OT); 1c) *ADAM*, first man; 1d)
    city in Jordan valley;

    #38 #45 #40
    #43 #41 #39
    #42 #37 #44
    = #123 / #369 {#FIVE /#CENTRE: GRECO-ROMAN SQUARE / #195 - tsâdaq (H6663): *TO* *BE* *JUST*, *BE* *RIGHTEOUS* (*IN* *CONDUCT* *AND* *CHARACTER*)}

    H120@{
      {@1: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#1); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#1)},
      {@2: Sup: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#6); Ego: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#5)},   {@3: Sup: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#44); Ego: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#38)},   Male: #44; Feme: #38
    } // #605

    EDUARD SHYFRIN @ 1228 HOURS ON 2 FEBRUARY 2023: "The expression of these above-mentioned principles in our reality, namely the family of “minimal” principles:

    1) Fermat Principle
    2) Principle of Least Action - PLA
    3) Ockham’s Razor
    4) Principle of Sufficient Reason - PSR
    5) Theories of Algorithmic Complexity
    6) Minimum Energy Principle
    7) Ground State
    8) Minimum Work Principle

    II. I will attempt to answer the question, ‘What is the nature of G-d’s work?’

    III. I will consider the connection between the “minimal principles,” causality and Divine Providence, the essence of Shabbat and the path of the Torah in the information space.

    IV. The influence of Man on the amount of G-d’s work.

    V. The information nature of the ‘physical’ laws and their connection with the punishment of Adam.

    <https://x.com/Jerusalem_Post/status/1709561508848693532>

    In simple language, this PRINCIPLE OF LEAST ACTION The efficient cause,
    (PLA) is ingeniously described in the book of Nobel prize winner Richard Feynman “The Character of Physical Law:”

    “When you have a number of particles, and you want to know how one moves
    from one place to another, you do it by inventing a possible motion that
    gets from one place to the other in a given amount of time. Say the
    particle wants to go from X to Y in an hour, and you want to know by what
    route it can go. What you do is to invent various curves and calculate on
    each curve a certain quantity. (I do not want to tell you what the quantity
    is, but for those who have heard of these terms, the quantity on each route
    is the average of the difference between the kinetic and the potential
    energy.) If you calculate this quantity for one route, and then for
    another, you will get a different number for each route. There is one route which gives the least possible number, however, and that is the route that
    the particle in nature actually takes.”

    Initially, the PLA was proposed by Pierre Louis Maupertius in 1744 and elaborated by the great mathematician Leonhard Euler in the same year. In
    1760, Joseph-Louis Lagrange proposed the way of mathematical description of
    the mechanical systems known today as Lagrangian. Lagrangian is known as
    the difference between the kinetic and potential energies, and the action
    is the integral of the Lagrangian over time. It is important to note that action is a scalar. It doesn’t describe what happens at a certain moment in time. It is a parameter of the trajectory.

    The Principle of Least (stationary) Action is central in modern physics. It
    was applied in Thermodynamics, General Theory of Relativity, Quantum
    Electro Dynamics (QED), Particle Physics and String Theory.

    It is well described in the article “The Principle of Least Action” (David Dalrymple, Edge): “Nature is lazy. Scientific paradigms and “ultimate” visions of the universe come and go, but the idea of “least action” has remained remarkably unperturbed.”"

    Max Planck, founder of quantum physics, wrote: “The least-action principle introduces a completely new idea into the concept of causality:

    The efficient cause, which operates from the present into the future and
    makes future situations appear as determined by earlier ones, is joined by
    the final cause for which, inversely, the future - namely, a definite goal
    - serves as the premise from which there can be deduced the development of
    the processes which lead to this goal.”

    Also, he wrote, “the most adequate formulation of this law creates the impression in every unbiased mind that nature is ruled by a rational,
    purposive will.”

    From the point of view of the mathematical description of the physical
    systems, PLA and formulations based on the physical laws – for example, Newton’s second law – give the same result. We again refer to Richard Feynman’s book. Feynman gives three equal descriptions of gravity - the famous Newton’s Law of Gravity, the local field method, and the PLA. He writes:

    “This is an example of the wide range of beautiful ways of describing
    nature. When people say that nature must have causality, you can use
    Newton’s law; or if they say that nature must be stated in terms of a
    minimum principle, you talk about it this last way; or if they insist that nature must have a local field - sure, you can do that. The question is:
    which one is right? If these various alternatives are not exactly
    equivalent mathematically, if for certain ones there will be different consequences than for others, then all we have to do is to experiment to
    find out which way nature actually chooses to do it.

    “But in the particular case I am talking about, the theories are exactly equivalent. Mathematically, each of the three different formulations, Newton’s law, the local field method and the minimum principle, give
    exactly the same consequences. What do we do then? You will read in all the books that we cannot decide scientifically on one or the other. That is
    true. They are equivalent scientifically. It is impossible to make a
    decision because there is no experimental way to distinguish between them
    if all the consequences are the same. But psychologically, they are very different in two ways. First, philosophically you like them or do not like them; and training is the only way to beat that disease. Second, psychologically they are different because they are completely inequivalent when you are trying to guess new laws.”

    The principal and most important difference between the description of the system by PLA or by the physical laws is in causality. The PLA implies teleology (finality) - an explanation for something which serves as a
    function of its end, its purpose, or its goal - actually backward
    causality.

    Formulation by the law implies efficient cause - straightforward causality.


    The answer to the question, “Which type of causality actually takes place
    in the Creation?” is of utmost importance since it affects our
    understanding of G-d’s plan, Divine Providence and freedom of choice.

    Both approaches demand certain explanations.

    In the case of PLA, the standard question is, “How does the particle ‘know’
    which trajectory to choose?”

    When the founding father of quantum mechanics, Niels Bohr, visited Ernest Rutherford in Cambridge and told him that when an electron emits a photon,
    it jumps to the lower energy orbit, Rutherford inquired, “How does an electron know to which orbit to jump?”

    Any type of causality is effected through the transfer of energy,
    information or momentum.

    Since PLA implies backward causality, the mechanism should be explained.
    Also, we should ask a question about the connection between PLA and Divine Providence.

    In the case of the “law approach,” there are many unanswered questions. Where do the laws come from? What is their nature? How can we account for
    the mutability of the laws?

    In his book “At Home in the Universe,” John A. Wheeler writes:

    “No laws. So far as we can see today, the laws of physics cannot have
    existed from everlasting to everlasting. They must have come into being at
    the big bang.”

    He also writes: “How can one see the lesson of gravitational collapse - whether big bang or black hole or big crunch - in a larger framework? No concept puts itself forward with greater force than ‘mutability.’”

    There exists a distinction between the attitude of different schools of
    thought towards the problem of causality.

    One of the most ardent supporters of teleology (final causes) was Gottfried Leibnitz with his famous Principle of Sufficient Reason (PSR), which in
    concise form could be laid out as “nothing happens without a reason.” Here Leibnitz meant reason of G-d. He writes:

    “I grant that particular effects of nature could and should be explained mechanically.…but the general principles of physics, and even of mechanics depend on the conduct of a sovereign intelligence and cannot be explained without taking it into consideration.”

    Actually, the essence of the principle is that the Creation is a “goal-directed activity,” as it was put forward by William of Auvergne, Bishop of Paris, much earlier than Leibnitz put forward his PSR. Long
    before William of Auvergne, Talmudic sages expressed the idea of backward causality in a very concise form: “What was conceived first was created last.”

    According to Descartes, Divine reasons exist, but are forever hidden from
    the human mind. (Yemima Ben-Menahem, “Causation in Science”). She writes: “According to Descartes, the natural laws are decreed by G-d and are
    humanly inexplicable. G-d’s reasons cannot be used for scientific explanations. The Cartesian school of thought rejected teleology and
    accepted the principles of straightforward causality.”

    It’s an established tradition in contemporary science to follow the
    Cartesian line of thought and to refute teleology, which is not surprising, taking into account the principle which says that “G-d is not a business of science, and He cannot be measured or computed.”

    The “law approach” has a number of weak points. Scientists can observe the pattern, express it in mathematical form and call it a law but science
    cannot explain the law. Isaac Newton admitted that he had no explanation
    for the Law of Universal Gravitation. He also admitted the problem of
    initial conditions which are not known to science. As John A Wheeler put it (“At home in the Universe” ):

    “Never has physics come up with a way to tell with what initial conditions the Universe was started.”

    The problem of initial conditions has a general character. In his seminal
    work “From Strange Simplicity to Complex Familiarity,” Nobel prize winner Manfred Eigen writes: “Darwin excluded any application of his theory to the origin of life, insisting that it dealt exclusively ‘with the manner of succession.’ Darwin derived his principle from observations in nature. Only once, many years later, did he think of a more general theoretical
    foundation. In a letter written in 1882 (during the last month of his life)
    to the zoologist and surgeon George C. Wallich, Darwin confirmed that his
    work was concerned only with the manner of succession, and he ‘left the question of the origin of life uncanvassed as being altogether in the
    present state of our knowledge.’” <https://www.jpost.com/kabbalah/article-730015>

    To purchase EDUARD SHYFRIN’s book ‘From Infinity to Man: The Fundamental Ideas of Kabbalah Within the Framework of Information Theory and Quantum Physics’ please click here.

    YOUTUBE: "My Sweet Lord (George Harrison)"

    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04v-SdKeEpE>

    JEFFREY ("RHUBARB") RUBARD @ 0937 HOURS ON 8 OCTOBER 2023: "Do you think
    you might 'moderate your talk', now?"

    DOLF @ 1940 HOURS ON 8 OCTOBER 2023: "Unless the designated PALESTINIAN terrorist organisation known as HAMAS (established in 10 DECEMBER 1987) immediately differentiates from GERMAN NAZISM #ONE: #213, #TWO: #218,
    #FOUR: #228, #FIVE: #233, their PYTHAGOREAN BIPARTITE (@1, @5 - IMMATERIAL ELEMENTS) #1080 - HETEROS NUMBER MYSTICISM as foundation to such
    institutional religious / political ideology, then a commensurate
    recompense for crimes against humanity can be systematically undertaken
    against them."

    ADOLF HITLER met with THE GRAND MUFTI OF JERUSALEM AMIN AL-HUSSEINI (ie. he
    was granted honorary Aryan"status by the Nazis for his close collaboration
    with Hitler and the Third Reich) on #228 (#FOUR) / #248 (#EIGHT) - 28
    NOVEMBER 1941. The official German notes of that meeting contain numerous references to combatting Jews both inside and outside Europe. The following excerpts from that meeting are statements from HITLER to AL-HUSSEINI:

    “Germany stood for uncompromising war against the Jews. That naturally included active opposition to the Jewish national home in Palestine, which
    was nothing other than a center, in the form of a state, for the exercise
    of destructive influence by Jewish interests. ... This was the decisive struggle; on the political plane, it presented itself in the main as a
    conflict between Germany and England, but ideologically it was a battle
    between National Socialism and the Jews.

    #EIGHT: #248 = [#72, #48, #24, #64, #40]

    #48 #8 #64
    #56 #40 #24
    #16 #72 #32
    = #120 / #360 {#EIGHT: JEWS WERE ABLE TO MOBILIZE ALL OF ENGLAND'S POWER
    FOR THEIR ENDS / IDEA #248 IN REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM TABLE TALK (1941-1944)}

    REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM AS TABLE TALK IDEA #248 - 4 JULY 1942: "Should we
    decide to recall our present representative from the Vatican, I can see no adequate reason for sending any fresh incumbent to this Embassy. The
    relations between Germany and the Vatican are based on the CONCORDAT [#38 - FULLNESS (SHENG) + #33 - CLOSENESS (MI) = #71 - DOMINION + #40 - LAW /
    MODEL (FE) = #111]. But this same CONCORDAT is no more than the survival of agreements reached between the Vatican and the different German States,
    and, with the disappearance of the latter and their incorporation in the
    German Reich, it has become obsolete. It is true that it has as its basis
    these various agreements, but it is a confirmation of past agreements
    rather than a current agreement in force. I am therefore of the considered opinion that the juridical consequence of the disappearance of the
    sovereignty of the individual German States and its incorporation in the sovereignty of the Reich render the continuation of diplomatic relations
    with the Vatican redundant.

    From military reasons connected with the war I have so far refrained from translating this conception into fact. Equally, however, I have shown
    myself unresponsive to the attempts of the Vatican towards extension of the provisions of the CONCORDAT to embrace the newly acquired territories of
    the Reich.

    … Regulations framed to cover the whole Reich cannot but make more
    difficult the clarification of relations between State and Church, at which
    we are aiming; for the Catholic Church strives always to seek advantage
    where we are weakest by demanding the application to the whole Reich of
    those of the various CONCORDATs which conform most closely to its
    aspirations.

    Therefore, as regards future relations between State and Church, it is very satisfactory from our point of view that in nearly half the Reich
    negotiations can now be conducted by the appropriate Reichsstatthalter, unfettered by the clauses of the central CONCORDAT.” [pages 551, 522]

    It went without saying that Germany would furnish positive and practical
    aid to the Arabs involved in the same struggle, because platonic promises
    were useless in a war for survival or destruction in which the JEWS WERE
    ABLE TO MOBILIZE ALL OF ENGLAND'S POWER FOR THEIR ENDS....the Fuhrer would
    on his own give the Arab world the assurance that its hour of liberation
    had arrived. Germany's objective would then be solely the destruction of
    the Jewish element residing in the Arab sphere under the protection of
    British power. In that hour the Mufti would be the most authoritative
    spokesman for the Arab world. It would then be his task to set off the Arab operations, which he had secretly prepared. When that time had come,
    Germany could also be indifferent to French reaction to such a declaration.

    AMIN AL-HUSSEINI became the most prominent Arab collaborator with the Axis powers. He developed friendships with high-ranking Nazis, including
    Heinrich Himmler, Joachim von Ribbentrop, and (possibly) Adolf Eichmann He contributed to Axis propaganda services and he also contributed to the recruitment of Muslim and Arab soldiers for the Nazi armed forces,
    including three SS divisions which consisted of Bosnian Muslims. He was involved in planning "wartime operations directed against Palestine and
    Iraq, including parachuting Germans and Arab agents to foment attacks
    against the Jews in Palestine." [ref: wikipedia Relations_between_Nazi_Germany_and_the_Arab_world]

    GRÁINNE NÍ AODHA (IRISH INDEPENDENT) @ 2346 HOURS ON 8 OCTOBER 2023: “Sinn Féin has written to the Ceann Comhairle and the parliamentary business committee to request that the parliament reconvenes as soon as possible to discuss hostilities in Gaza and Israel.

    Asked whether Sinn Féin condemns the attack by Hamas, TD Mairéad Farrell
    said “of course we condemn… any targeting of civilians”.

    Asked about a tweet sent by her parliamentary party colleague Chris Andrews
    who said the attack was “a direct result of years of apartheid” in Palestine, as well as Ireland and the EU not holding Israel to account, Ms Farrell said said Ireland and the EU did need “to speak out loudly in relation to any breaking of international law”. <https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/irish-minister-urges-proportionate-response-from-israel-to-outrageous-hamas-attack/a393593499.html>

    <https://x.com/geertwilderspvv/status/1711021277379453020>

    GEERT WILDERS (@geertwilderspvv) @ 0110 HOURS ON 9 OCTOBER 2023: "The
    support base of @groenlinks appears to be filled again with Israel haters.
    We already saw that with KAUTHAR BOUCHALLIKHT (IN THE PHOTO [ABOVE] WITH A *RED* *HEADSCARF*), but there are many, many more. Disgusting!"

    FRANCESCA GILLETT (BBC) @ 0705 HOURS ON 9 OCTOBER 2023: "MORE THAN 250 CIVILIANS #419 - SLAUGHTERED AT MUSIC FESTIVAL:

    About 250 bodies have reportedly been removed from the site of a music
    festival in southern Israel which came under attack.

    The Supernova music festival was on SATURDAY 7 OCTOBER 2023 happening in a desert in southern Israel, near where Hamas militants entered Israel from
    the Gaza Strip. Gunmen opened fire, and people attempted to flee in panic.

        #150 - NOUMENON / GODHEAD RESONANCE FOR 7 OCTOBER 2023 as [#6, #40, #8, #6, #90]
    #512 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #110 as [#2, #8, #6, #90, #6, #400] = chûwts (H2351): {UMBRA: #104 % #41 = #22} 1) outside, outward, street, the
    outside;

    "They turned off the electricity and suddenly out of nowhere they
    [militants] come inside with gunfire, opening fire in every direction," she told Israel's Channel 12.

    "Fifty terrorists arrived in vans, dressed in military uniforms," she said.

        #419 - NOUMENON / GODHEAD RESONANCE FOR 7 OCTOBER 2023 as [#9, #2, #8, #400] /
    #55 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #110 as [#30, #9, #2, #6, #8] = ṭâbach (H2873): {UMBRA: #19 % #41 = #19} 1) *TO* *SLAUGHTER*, *SLAY*, *BUTCHER*, *KILL* *RUTHLESSLY*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to slaughter, butcher; 1a2) to slay, kill ruthlessly (fig.);

    People tried to flee the site, she said, #296 / #306 - *RUNNING* across the sand and getting into their cars to drive away - but partygoers said there
    were jeeps full of gunmen, shooting at the cars.

    YOUTUBE: "BRONSKI BEAT: SMALLTOWN BOY (1984) [MORENO J REMIX]"

    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQ1ie_ZUZ7k>

    "AND AS HARD AS THEY WOULD TRY THEY'D HURT TO MAKE YOU CRY
    BUT YOU NEVER CRIED TO THEM, JUST TO YOUR SOUL
    NO, YOU NEVER CRIED TO THEM, JUST TO YOUR SOUL"

    <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2023.10.7&idea:296,327,346,436&lexicon:H7323,H7121,H8034,H5315,H4758>

    {@6: Sup: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN (#327); Ego: 80 - LABOURING: CH'IN (#346)}

        #306 - NOUMENON / GODHEAD RESONANCE FOR 7 OCTOBER 2023 as [#100, #200, #1, #5] /
        #322 - NOUMENON / GODHEAD RESONANCE FOR 7 OCTOBER 2023 as [#6, #10, #100, #200, #1, #5] / [#1, #100, #200, #1, #20] /
    #327 as [#20, #100, #200, #6, #1] = qârâʼ (H7121): {UMBRA: #301 % #41 =
    #14} 1) to call, call out, recite, read, cry out, proclaim; 1a) (Qal); 1a1)
    to call, *CRY*, utter a loud sound; 1a2) to call unto, cry (for help),
    *CALL* (*WITH* *NAME* *OF* *GOD*); 1a3) to proclaim; 1a4) to read aloud,
    read (to oneself), read; 1a5) to summon, invite, call for, call and
    commission, appoint, call and endow; 1a6) to call, name, give name to, call
    by; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to call oneself; 1b2) to be called, be proclaimed,
    be read aloud, be summoned, be named; 1c) (Pual) to be called, be named, be called out, be chosen;

        #346 - NOUMENON / GODHEAD RESONANCE FOR 7 OCTOBER 2023 as [#300, #40, #6] / [#6, #300, #40] /
        #352 - NOUMENON / GODHEAD RESONANCE FOR 7 OCTOBER 2023 as [#6, #300, #40, #6] / [#2, #300, #40, #10] /
        #354 - NOUMENON / GODHEAD RESONANCE FOR 7 OCTOBER 2023 as [#6, #2, #300, #40, #6] /
        #366 - NOUMENON / GODHEAD RESONANCE FOR 7 OCTOBER 2023 as [#20, #300, #40, #6] / [#6, #300, #40, #20] /
        #380 - NOUMENON / GODHEAD RESONANCE FOR 7 OCTOBER 2023 as [#30, #300, #40, #10] / [#300, #40, #40] = shêm (H8034): {UMBRA: #340 % #41 = #12} 1) name; 1a) name; 1b) reputation, fame, glory; 1c) *THE* *NAME* (*AS* *DESIGNATION* *OF* *GOD*); 1d) memorial, monument;

        #296 - NOUMENON / GODHEAD RESONANCE FOR 7 OCTOBER 2023 as [#200, #6, #90] /
        #306 - NOUMENON / GODHEAD RESONANCE FOR 7 OCTOBER 2023 as [#6, #10, #200, #90] / [#10, #200, #6, #90] /
        #322 - NOUMENON / GODHEAD RESONANCE FOR 7 OCTOBER 2023 as [#6, #10, #200, #10, #90, #6] /
        #355 - NOUMENON / GODHEAD RESONANCE FOR 7 OCTOBER 2023 as [#5, #200, #90, #10, #50] = rûwts (H7323): {UMBRA: #296 % #41 = #9} 1) to *RUN*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to run; 1a2) runners (participle as subst); 1b) (Polel) to run swiftly, dart; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to bring or move quickly, hurry; 1c2) to drive away from, cause to run away;

    ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #436 as [#50, #80, #300, #6] / [#6, #50, #80, #300] = nephesh (H5315): {UMBRA: #430 % #41 = #20} 1) *SOUL*, self, *LIFE*,
    creature, person, appetite, mind, living being, desire, emotion, passion;
    1a) that which breathes, the breathing substance or being, soul, the inner being of man; 1b) living being; 1c) living being (with life in the blood);
    1d) the man himself, self, person or individual; 1e) seat of the appetites;
    1f) seat of emotions and passions; 1g) activity of mind; 1g1) dubious; 1h) activity of the will; 1h1) dubious; 1i) activity of the character; 1i1) dubious;


    [continued in next message]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)