[continued from previous message]

DOLF @ 2026 HOURS ON 14 JUNE 2024: "No you are confused with the #306
- IRISH CATHOLIC disease of mind which has overtaken the US
PRESIDENT... "

P. COONAN <[email protected]> @ 0833 HOURS ON 15 JUNE 2024: "Joe
still has a mind left?"

DOLF @ 1805 HOURS ON 15 JUNE 2024: "He is a certifiable headbanger
(ie. a person who is wildly irrational)."




<https://x.com/lopezunwired/status/1801770387979780434>

X:TWITTER (CBS) @ 1015 HOURS ON 15 JUNE 2024: "Pope Francis met with
President Biden and other world leaders on Friday 14 JUNE 2024 at the
Group of 7 summit in Italy. The pontiff urged them to establish
stronger global guardrails for the development of artificial
intelligence. Nancy Cordes reports from Borgo Egnazia."

#985 as [#80, #100, #70, #200, #20, #400, #50, #5, #10, #50] =
proskynéō (G4352): {UMBRA: #1725 % #41 = #3} 1) to kiss the hand to
(towards) one, in token of reverence; 2) among the Orientals, esp.
the Persians, to fall upon the knees and touch the ground with the
forehead as an expression of profound reverence; 3) in the NT by
kneeling or prostration to do homage (to one) or make obeisance,
whether in order to express respect or to make supplication; 3a)
*USED* *OF* *HOMAGE* *SHOWN* *TO* *MEN* *AND* *BEINGS* *OF*
*SUPERIOR* *RANK*; 3a1) to the Jewish high priests; 3a2) to God; 3a3)
to Christ; 3a4) to heavenly beings; 3a5) to demons;

Along with popularity and state sanction came controversy and
problems: claims of extraordinary abilities bordering on the
supernatural, pseudoscience explanations to build credibility, a
mental condition labeled qigong deviation, formation of cults, and
exaggeration of claims by masters for personal benefit.

In 1999, as response to widespread revival of old traditions of
spirituality, morality, and mysticism, and perceived challenges to
State control, the Chinese government took measures to enforce
control of public qigong practice, including shutting down qigong
clinics and hospitals, and banning groups such as Zhong Gong and
Falun Gong. <https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qigong>

ONE <[email protected]> @ 2306 HOURS ON 15 JUNE 2024: "How much
weight is to be given to experiences could be a question in terms of
metaphysicals.

If a so-called, individual, knows of an experience yet that
phenomenon is unable to be replicated, what does the lack thereof
constitute.

Some physicalists may insist, determinism and / or super-determinism
exists. If so then to know what exists might be possible.

Do force-fields exist. Can there be a force of good. Does evil happen
to be a happening."

AYE <[email protected]> @ 0352 HOURS ON 16 JUNE 2024: "Hypothetical
beings for whom time is not linear might view various so-called,
events, all at once.

At the same time, being time beings, trapped within three-dimensional
spacial structures for whom time is linear, are unable too.

Non-dualists who transcend parameters, being eternal beings, could
known all of time and space, space-time as it were."

DOLF @ 0643 HOURS ON 16 JUNE 2024: "So for instance if one had access
to a noumenon by which the temporal phenomenon is referenced and
apprehended such causality by corresponding COGITO arrays #40 - LAW /
MODEL (FA) - 𝌭法 = #491 as [#7, #78, #35, #80, #10]

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&tetra:78>

#411 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #144 as [#300, #100, #10, #1] = treîs
(G5140): {UMBRA: #615 % #41 = #41} 1) *THREE*;

#321 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #130 as [#30, #1, #200, #90] /
#341 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #130 as [#30, #1, #200, #90, #20] /
#343 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #235 as [#6, #40, #1, #200, #90, #6] /
#743 - FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #176 / DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #235 as [#6,
#40, #1, #200, #90, #6, #400] = ʼerets (H776): {UMBRA: #291 % #41 =
#4} 1) land, earth; 1a) earth; 1a1) whole earth (as opposed to a
part); 1a2) earth (as opposed to heaven); 1a3) earth (inhabitants);
1b) land; 1b1) country, territory; 1b2) district, region; 1b3) tribal
territory; 1b4) piece of ground; 1b5) land of Canaan, Israel; 1b6)
inhabitants of land; 1b7) Sheol, land without return, (under) world;
1b8) city (-state); 1c) ground, surface of the earth; 1c1) ground;
1c2) soil; 1d) (in phrases); 1d1) people of the land; 1d2) *SPACE* or
distance of country (in measurements of distance); 1d3) level or
plain country; 1d4) land of the living; 1d5) end(s) of the earth; 1e)
(almost wholly late in usage); 1e1) lands, countries; i) often in
contrast to Canaan;

And if one was mindful of each of the meta descriptor stasis such as
TETRAD #78 that both comprises and comprehends the temporal fabric by
which one's presence of being is steeped (ie. #78 - ON THE VERGE
(CHIANG)) and must be known to itself in all instances at once
although that does not preclude a continual #549 - MORPHOSIS of #540
- KNOWING predicated upon a #579 - qì (氣): METAPHYSICAL CONCEPT OF
'VITAL ENERGY' as instantiation within the here and now.

#492 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #235 as [#2, #400, #40, #10, #40] /
#1106 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #579 as [#6, #400, #40, #10, #40, #10,
#600] = tâmîym (H8549): {UMBRA: #490 % #41 = #39} 1) complete, whole,
entire, sound; 1a) complete, whole, entire; 1b) whole, sound,
*HEALTHFUL*; 1c) complete, *ENTIRE* (*OF* *TIME*); 1d) sound,
wholesome, unimpaired, innocent, having integrity; 1e) what is
complete or entirely in accord with truth and fact (neuter adj/subst);

To be @1 - SELF aware in conformity to the universe's #491 - MODEL
(FA) = #492 (12 x 41) seems to meet the situation "HYPOTHETICAL
BEINGS FOR WHOM TIME IS NOT LINEAR MIGHT VIEW VARIOUS SO-CALLED,
EVENTS, ALL AT ONCE."

     #409 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 16 JUNE 2024 as [#1, #8, #400] /
     #414 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 16 JUNE 2024 as [#5, #1, #8, #400] >>> = ʼechâd (H259): {UMBRA: #13 % #41 = #13} 1) one (number); 1a) one
(number); 1b) each, every; 1c) a certain; 1d) an (indefinite
article); 1e) only, once, once for all; 1f) one...another, the
one...the other, one after another, one by one; 1g) first; 1h) eleven
(in combination), eleventh (ordinal);

If not, then what do you mean?"

#491 as [#6, #5, #6, #4, #70, #400] / [#6, #400, #4, #70, #5, #6] /
#540 as [#50, #6, #4, #70, #400, #10] / [#6, #10, #4, #70, #400, #50]
= yâdaʻ (H3045): {UMBRA: #84 % #41 = #2} 1) to know; 1a) (Qal); 1a1)
to know; i) to know, learn to know; ii) to perceive; iii) *TO*
*PERCEIVE* *AND* *SEE*, *FIND* *OUT* *AND* *DISCERN*; iv) to
discriminate, distinguish; v) to know by experience; vi) to
recognise, admit, acknowledge, confess; vii) to consider; 1a2) to
know, be acquainted with; 1a3) to know (a person carnally); 1a4) to
know how, be skilful in; 1a5) *TO* *HAVE* *KNOWLEDGE*, *BE* *WISE*;
1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be made known, be or become known, be revealed;
1b2) to make oneself known; 1b3) to be perceived; 1b4) to be
instructed; 1c) (Piel) to cause to know; 1d) (Poal) to cause to know;
1e) (Pual); 1e1) to be known; 1e2) known, one known, acquaintance
(participle); 1f) (Hiphil) to make known, declare; 1g) (Hophal) to be
made known; 1h) (Hithpael) *TO* *MAKE* *ONESELF* *KNOWN*, *REVEAL*
*ONESELF*;

This metalogic categorical imperative is more properly someone's PhD
and a productivity gain for JUDICIAL process which has a maxim "DIEU
ET MON DROIT" where in a world of GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
to then theoretically as JURISPRUDENT $$$ TRANSACTION, apply a test
as conformity to any OATH OF CITIZENSHIP whereby a person with a
deficient threshold of conformity then has no LOCUS STANDI within a
COURT OF LAW and no capability for LEGAL AID to then purvey an
endless possibility as promulgation of deception and the
instantiation of ORGANISED CRIME.

A revision of this document may be obtained from the following URL:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Difficult%20Epistemological%20Question.pdf>

Draft Revision: 16 June 2024

At the same time, being time beings, trapped
within three-dimensional spacial structures
for whom time is linear, are unable too.

Non-dualists who transcend parameters,
being eternal beings, could known all
of time and space, space-time as it were.

Such as pronouns argh.

- thanks! aye. Cheers!

--
Check out our SAVVY module prototype that facilitates a movable /
resizable DIALOG and complex dropdown MENU interface deploying the third
party d3 library.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/Savvy.zip> (Download resources)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

[continued from previous message]

#495 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #297 as [#5, #80, #5, #20, #5, #10, #300,
#70] = epíkeimai (G1945): {UMBRA: #181 % #41 = #17} 1) to lie upon or
over, rest upon, be laid or placed upon; 1a) on the *BURNING* *COALS*;
2) metaph.; 2a) of things, of the pressure of a *VIOLENT* *TEMPEST*;
2b) of men, to press upon, *TO* *BE* *URGENT*;

Thusly if in the past @ TETRA #35, I undertook an optimal COGITO
referencing action relative to the noumenon where an information
exchange took place, then it ought to be still viable within this
present reality where the referencing reoccurs.

Is that causality process of foreseeing in conformity with temporality
either supernatural or supra-natural?

supernatural: (of a manifestation or event) attributed to some force
beyond time but conformity to number / laws of nature

supra-natural: is a term that means transcending the natural or
violating the laws of nature, often attributed to inter-dimensional or
extra-dimensional beings

Is it entirely 4th dimensional or does it have a stasis beyond such?

I'm not an expert in linguistics and whether the term pertaining to
autonomous systems is as a priori considered AUTOTASIS (result of
action as intensity, effectiveness and force) or AUTOSTASIS (grounding
for action) is not within my remit to resolve. However any viable
conformity to linguistic convention might also consider AUTOCTISIS and
ALLOSTASIS.

Thus we have semantical confusion where when you hear a word, your
experience is a stupidly.

So such #139 - "SET OR PUT OR LAY IN ORDER" might involve placing a
document within the cloud ☁️ -- everything so far is entirely
scientific excepting your stubborn irrationality is not.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:斂>

[#35, #47]

liǎn (斂): 1. to collect, 2. to draw back; to fold back, 3. *TAX*
*COLLECTION*, 4. *TO* *DECREASE*, 5. to shrink back; to retreat, 6.
beautification of the body for a funeral, 7. Lian

#984 = #451 x 2 + [#35, #47] as [#10, #8, #60, #200, #6, #700] =
châçêr (H2637): {UMBRA: #268 % #41 = #22} 1) to lack, be without,
*DECREASE*, be lacking, have a need; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to lack; 1a2) to
be lacking; 1a3) to diminish, decrease; 1b) (Piel) to cause to lack;
1c) (Hiphil) to cause to be lacking;

#984 as [#70, #4, #400, #10, #500] = ʻêdâh (H5713): {UMBRA: #79 % #41
= #38} 1) testimony, witness; 1a) always plural and *ALWAYS* *OF*
*LAWS* *AS* *DIVINE* *TESTIMONIES*;

IMMANUEL KANT (1783) PROLEGOMENA COMMENTARY AS MARGIN IDEA #297: "A
judgment of perception can never be considered as valid for experience
without the law, that if an event is perceived then it is always
referred to something preceding from which it follows according to a
universal rule; or if I express myself in this way: Everything of
which experience shows that it happens must have a cause.

It is nonetheless more appropriate to choose the first formulation.
For since we can indeed, a priori and previous to any objects being
given, have a cognition of those conditions under which alone an
experience regarding objects is possible, but never of the laws to
which objects may be subject in themselves without relation to
possible experience, we will therefore be able to study a priori the
nature of things in no other way than by investigating the conditions,
and the universal (though subjective) laws, under which alone such a
cognition is possible as experience (as regards mere form), and
determining the possibility of things as objects of experience
accordingly; for were I to choose the second mode of expression and to
seek the a priori conditions under which nature is possible as an
object of experience, I might then easily fall into misunderstanding
and fancy that I had to speak about nature as a thing in itself, and
in that case I would be wandering about fruitlessly in endless
endeavours to find laws for things about which nothing is given to me.

We will therefore be concerned here only with experience and with the
universal conditions of its possibility which are given a priori, and
from there we will determine nature as the whole object of all
possible experience. I think I will be understood: that here I do not
mean the rules for the observation of a nature that is already given,
which presuppose experience already; and so do not mean, how we can
learn the laws from nature (through experience), for these would then
not be laws a priori and would provide no pure natural science; but
rather, how the a priori conditions of the possibility of experience
are at the same time the sources out of which all universal laws of
nature must be derived." [page 49]

#984 as [#4, #5, #10, #600, #9, #5, #50, #300, #1] = deiknýō (G1166):
{UMBRA: #1289 % #41 = #18} 1) to show, expose to the eyes; 2) metaph.;
2a) *TO* *GIVE* *EVIDENCE* *OR* *PROOF* *OF* *A* *THING*; 2b) to show
by words or teach;

#984 as [#5, #300, #10, #40, #8, #200, #1, #50, #300, #70] = timáō
(G5091): {UMBRA: #1151 % #41 = #3} 1) *TO* *ESTIMATE*, *FIX* *THE*
*VALUE*; 1a) for the value of something belonging to one's self; 2) to
honour, to have in honour, to revere, venerate;

#984 as [#200, #300, #8, #100, #10, #60, #1, #300, #5] = stērízō
(G4741): {UMBRA: #1425 % #41 = #31} 1) to make stable, place firmly,
set fast, fix; 2) *TO* *STRENGTHEN*, *MAKE* *FIRM*; 3) *TO* *RENDER*
*CONSTANT*, *CONFIRM*, *ONE'S* *MIND*;

Such action is called foresight in both planning and the making of
provision."

#491 as [#6, #5, #6, #4, #70, #400] / [#6, #400, #4, #70, #5, #6] /
#540 as [#50, #6, #4, #70, #400, #10] / [#6, #10, #4, #70, #400, #50]
= yâdaʻ (H3045): {UMBRA: #84 % #41 = #2} 1) to know; 1a) (Qal); 1a1)
to know; i) to know, learn to know; ii) to perceive; iii) *TO*
*PERCEIVE* *AND* *SEE*, *FIND* *OUT* *AND* *DISCERN*; iv) to
discriminate, distinguish; v) to know by experience; vi) to recognise,
admit, acknowledge, confess; vii) to consider; 1a2) to know, be
acquainted with; 1a3) to know (a person carnally); 1a4) to know how,
be skilful in; 1a5) *TO* *HAVE* *KNOWLEDGE*, *BE* *WISE*; 1b)
(Niphal); 1b1) to be made known, be or become known, be revealed; 1b2)
to make oneself known; 1b3) to be perceived; 1b4) to be instructed;
1c) (Piel) to cause to know; 1d) (Poal) to cause to know; 1e) (Pual);
1e1) to be known; 1e2) known, one known, acquaintance (participle);
1f) (Hiphil) to make known, declare; 1g) (Hophal) to be made known;
1h) (Hithpael) *TO* *MAKE* *ONESELF* *KNOWN*, *REVEAL* *ONESELF*;

This metalogic categorical imperative is more properly someone's PhD
and a productivity gain for JUDICIAL process which has a maxim "DIEU
ET MON DROIT" where in a world of GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
to then theoretically as JURISPRUDENT $$$ TRANSACTION, apply a test as
conformity to any OATH OF CITIZENSHIP whereby a person with a
deficient threshold of conformity then has no LOCUS STANDI within a
COURT OF LAW and no capability for LEGAL AID to then purvey an endless
possibility as promulgation of deception and the instantiation of
ORGANISED CRIME.

A revision of this document may be obtained from the following URL:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Difficult%20Epistemological%20Question.pdf>

Draft Revision: 17 June 2024

On 16/6/2024 22:46, one wrote:

dolf wrote and asked:

If not, then what do you mean?"

What was meant was simply that
experiences of a future event may
be possible at times.

What are your plans for 1400 hours?

At the same time, such experiences are
not subject to scientific experimentation.

Such could be called, synchronicity.
Meaningful events, etc.

In terms of qi, xin  and shen, a thought emerged
given: The Zhuangzi and Daojia.

https://terebess.hu/english/tao/Zhuangzi-Burton-Watson.pdf

<< “May I ask what the fasting of the mind is?”

Confucius said, “Make your will one! Don’t listen with
your ears, listen with your mind. No, don’t listen with your
mind, but listen with your spirit. Listening stops with the
ears, the mind stops with recognition, but spirit is empty
and waits for all things. The Way gathers in emptiness
alone. Emptiness is the fasting of the mind.” >>

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09552367.2015.1136201

<< ABSTRACT
In contrast to his contemporaries who take the heart–mind
as the ruler of a person, Zhuangzi suggests that one’s action is
guided by the spirit (shen). Questions arise as one articulates the
function of spirit and its relationship with the heart–mind. In this
article, I articulate the relationship between heart–mind and spirit
to show three points: first, spirit is a kind of qi that can be tied
or run smoothly, or rather the mechanism triggered by the functioning
of smooth qi. This reading brings the skill passages together with the
fasting of heart–mind (xin zhai) passage. Second, the proceeding of
spirit admits no fixed ways and is not confined to any particular
organ or faculty, so it avoids the problem of self-assertion mentioned
in Qiwulun. Third, the proceeding of spirit implies that one’s
practice takes as many particularities of the context as possible into
account, so the person has a higher chance to reduce conflict in
interacting with things and other people and bring out their
potential. This is a reason why skilful practices are related to
Zhuangzi’s ideal of nourishing life, both physiologically
and psychologically. >>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zuowang

<< Apophatic meditation practice can also be seen in the following
Zhuangzhi passages which speak of "fasting the heartmind":

"You must fast! I will tell you what that means. Do you think that it
is easy to do anything while you have a heart-mind? If you do, the
luminous cosmos will not support you...Make your aspirations one!
Don't listen with your ears; listen with your heart-mind. No, don't
listen with your heart-mind; listen with qi. Listening stops with the
ears, the heart-mind stops with joining, but qi is empty and waits on
all things. The Dao gathers in emptiness alone. Emptiness is the
fasting of the heart-mind." >>

People who happen to experience paranormal phenomena
have bins known to them. Skeptics may call such, false positives.

The knack-masters in the Zhuangi varied.
Some sayers may say they all used the same Dao.

Some sayers say the dao that is said is not the Dao.

Interpretations of the saying, dao ke dao fei chang dao, vary.

- thanks! Cheers!

--
Check out our SAVVY module prototype that facilitates a movable /
resizable DIALOG and complex dropdown MENU interface deploying the third
party d3 library.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/Savvy.zip> (Download resources)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

[continued from previous message]

desiring, deciding, and acting; 3a) a life giving spirit; 3b) a human
soul that has left the body; 3c) a spirit higher than man but lower than
God, i.e. an angel; 3c1) used of demons, or evil spirits, who were
conceived as inhabiting the bodies of men; 3c2) the spiritual nature of
Christ, higher than the highest angels and equal to God, the divine
nature of Christ; 3d) *THE* *DISPOSITION* *OR* *INFLUENCE* *WHICH*
*FILLS* *AND* *GOVERNS* *THE* *SOUL* *OF* *ANY* *ONE*; 3d1) *THE*
*EFFICIENT* *SOURCE* *OF* *ANY* *POWER*, *AFFECTION*, *EMOTION*,
*DESIRE*, etc.; 3e) a movement of air (a gentle blast); 3e1) of the
wind, hence the wind itself; 3e2) breath of nostrils or mouth;

#1470 - FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #417 as [#200, #400, #40, #40, #70, #100,
#500, #70, #50] = sýmmorphos (G4832): {UMBRA: #1620 % #41 = #21} 1)
*HAVING* *THE* *SAME* *FORM* *AS* *ANOTHER*, similar, conformed to;

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?male:507&feme:417&ontic:136&idea:417>

HAVING THE *SAME* 3x3 *LOCUS* AS SUGGESTING AN ACT OF FUSION (#308 =
#136 + #172) BETWEEN MATRICES #308 - COELUM AS MEDIEVAL LATIN AND NEW
LATIN SPELLING OF CAELUM (“SKY, HEAVEN”) WITHIN ROMAN MYTHOLOGY CAELUS
IS THE PERSONIFICATION OF THE SKY AND HEAVENS AS HUSBAND OF TERRA

LUO SHU SQUARE PROTOTYPE #TWO (#114)

#29 #74 #11
#20 #38 #56
#65 #2 #47

#2
#31
#87
#98
#136
#201
#221
#268
#342

COURSE OF NATURE (#108)

#26 #27 #28
#35 #36 #37
#44 #45 #46

#45
#71
#108 – AETHER / SPIRIT / CONSCIOUSNESS
#136
#172
#216 - *POLITICAL* *INSTABILITY* / DANGERS OF A PHANTOM GOVERNMENT
#251
#297
#324

#78 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #136 as [#30, #8, #30, #10] = chŏlîy
(H2483): {UMBRA: #48 % #41 = #7} 1) *SICKNESS*;

#260 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #136 as [#100, #30, #100, #30] = qâlal
(H7043): {UMBRA: #160 % #41 = #37} 1) to be slight, be swift, be
trifling, be of little account, be light; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to be slight,
be abated (of water); 1a2) to be swift; 1a3) to be trifling, be of
little account; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be swift, show oneself swift; 1b2)
to appear trifling, be too trifling, be insignificant; 1b3) to be
lightly esteemed; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) to make despicable; 1c2) to curse;
1d) (Pual) to be cursed; 1e) (Hiphil); 1e1) to make light, lighten; 1e2)
*TO* *TREAT* *WITH* *CONTEMPT*, *BRING* *CONTEMPT* *OR* *DISHONOUR*; 1f) (Pilpel); 1f1) to shake; 1f2) to *WHET*; 1g) (Hithpalpel) to shake
oneself, be moved to and fro;

#230 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #136 as [#5, #8, #7, #10, #200] = chăzîyr (H2386): {UMBRA: #225 % #41 = #20} 1) hog, swine, boar; 1a) *SWINE*
(*AS* *FORBIDDEN* *FOOD*); 1b) wild boar;

Is that causality process of foreseeing in conformity with temporality
either supernatural or supra-natural?

On 17/6/2024 08:48, dolf wrote:

We haven't yet entered a suitable frame of mind whereby we'll begin our coding tasks...  This is partially due to distractions as the
disruptions by others then necessitating substantial administrative
actions and the need to some further formative thinking.

For instance in the example of the OATH / PLEDGE as a meta descriptive concept, the GRUMBLE dialectic as plausible rule was obtained by using
the NEURAL LINGUISTIC PARADIGM as our own INFORMAL RESEARCH whereby we
made a logical premise on the xiān jiàn zhī míng (先見之明): *FORESIGHT*
/ xiān jiàn (先見) *PRESCIENCE* conception circumscribing to the #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY as the ontic nucleus of conscious intention.

Thusly in conclusion, to restate the provisional INFORMAL RESEARCH proposition is that the function of *PRESCIENCE* occurs within the
spectrum of a conformity LIMIT (eg: #451 x 2 = #902 - RULE OF LAW + #67
+ #17) to the rationality of being itself:

GRUMBLE (#391, #352)@[80, 60, 73, 34, 48, 56, 15, 81, 81, 49, 27, 55,
67, 17] <-- OATH / PLEDGE RULE

How might this be then applied to that elusive creature called the
journalist as self-referencing integrity especially applied to the #451
- PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY SPECTRUM and its resolution dynamic as PROBLEM PAIRING and determination of either a CONJURED (ie. cause of esprit de
corps to appear) SCENARIO or a HYPOTHETICAL / CONTINGENT QUESTION which
is one based on supposition, not facts. They are typically used to
elicit opinions and beliefs about imagined situations or conditions that don't exist.

From a metalogic perspective (ie. probability is concerned with the likelihood of occurrence) as the capability of occurrence we ought to
have sufficient dialectic category sampling from the new media articles
to obtain some case study examples of the *FORESIGHT* / *PRESCIENCE*
(#902 - RULE OF LAW ... #1065 - agnōsía (G56): *NOT* *KNOWING*, *IGNORANCE*) DYNAMIC function.

#1064 as [#80, #100, #70, #10, #4, #800] = proeídō (G4275): {UMBRA:
#1064 % #41 = #39} 1) *TO* *FORESEE*;

Simply put it isn't sufficient to make an appraisal of the dialectic categories as strata of conformity as speech and action cohesion
dynamic, but in the example of the OATH / PLEDGE RULE:

#986 = #902 - RULE OF LAW + #67 - DARKENING (HUI) + #17 - HOLDING BACK
(JUAN) as [#400, #80, #1, #20, #70, #400, #5, #10] = hypakoúō (G5219): {UMBRA: #1771 % #41 = #8} 1) to listen, to harken; 1a) of one who on the knock at the door comes to listen who it is, (the duty of a porter); 2)
to harken to a command; 2a) *TO* *OBEY*, *BE* *OBEDIENT* *TO*, *SUBMIT*
*TO*;

We want to specifically observe the CONTINGENT nature of the FORESIGHT CATEGORY #986 and if such is not quantified appropriately or in
possessing insufficient resonance, then the circumstance may be
conforming with the maxim "DO AS I SAY, NOT AS I DO" which means that
while the speaker may have imperfections or mistakes, they want the
listener to follow their advice and instructions rather than imitating
their own actions.

In other words it is perfidious as self justification where the actions
are not in accordance with the words as then a probable breach of their
OATH.

A revision of this document may be obtained from the following URL:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Difficult%20Epistemological%20Question.pdf>

Draft Revision: 17 June 2024

On 17/6/2024 07:36, dolf wrote:

And if one was mindful of each of the meta descriptor stasis such as
TETRAD #78 that both comprises and comprehends the temporal fabric by
which one's presence of being is steeped (ie. #78 - ON THE VERGE
(CHIANG)) and must be known to itself in all instances at once
although that does not preclude a continual #549 - MORPHOSIS of #540 -
KNOWING predicated upon a #579 - qì (氣): METAPHYSICAL CONCEPT OF
'VITAL ENERGY' as instantiation within the here and now.

#492 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #235 as [#2, #400, #40, #10, #40] /
#1106 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #579 as [#6, #400, #40, #10, #40, #10,
#600] = tâmîym (H8549): {UMBRA: #490 % #41 = #39} 1) complete, whole,
entire, sound; 1a) complete, whole, entire; 1b) whole, sound,
*HEALTHFUL*; 1c) complete, *ENTIRE* (*OF* *TIME*); 1d) sound,
wholesome, unimpaired, innocent, having integrity; 1e) what is
complete or entirely in accord with truth and fact (neuter adj/subst);

To be @1 - SELF aware in conformity to the universe's #491 - MODEL
(FA) = #492 (12 x 41) seems to meet the situation "HYPOTHETICAL BEINGS
FOR WHOM TIME IS NOT LINEAR MIGHT VIEW VARIOUS SO-CALLED, EVENTS, ALL
AT ONCE."

     #409 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 16 JUNE 2024 as [#1, #8, #400] /
     #414 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 16 JUNE 2024 as [#5, #1, #8, #400] >> = ʼechâd (H259): {UMBRA: #13 % #41 = #13} 1) one (number); 1a) one
(number); 1b) each, every; 1c) a certain; 1d) an (indefinite article);
1e) only, once, *ONCE* *FOR* *ALL*; 1f) one...another, the one...the
other, one after another, one by one; 1g) first; 1h) eleven (in
combination), eleventh (ordinal);

If not, then what do you mean?"

ONE <[email protected]> @ 2246 HOURS ON 16 JUNE 2024: "What was meant
was simply that experiences of a future event may be possible at times."

DOLF @ 0110 HOURS ON 17 JUNE 2024: "What are your plans for 1400 hours?"

ONE <[email protected]> @ 2246 HOURS ON 16 JUNE 2024: "At the same
time, such experiences are not subject to scientific experimentation.

Such could be called, synchronicity. Meaningful events, etc."

DOLF @ 0110 HOURS ON 17 JUNE 2024: "We want clarity and not vagueness
-- do you have any awareness of time?

The COGITO: #40 - LAW / MODEL (FA) - 𝌭法 = #491 as [#7, #78, #35, #80, >> #10] / RANGE: noon 15 to 19 JUNE dynamic is a spacial matrix that has
vectors as temporal associative.

Your comment was at TETRA #78 on 16 JUNE 2024 but my reply was from
TETRA #35 on 17 JUNE 2024 where the temporal relativity reference is
in the past and I then will extrapolate the poem appraisal #NINE which
is believed written in 4 BCE, but with Hebrew / Greek corresponding
IDEAS written much earlier and have done so by utilising a
mathematical method of idea cohesion which deploys a neural linguistic
pragma selector.

Unless you can grasp such a cognition (ie. is YANG HSIUNG the seminal
author of the T'AI HSÜAN CHING and did he deploy any COGITO array as
scaffolding or perhaps preassembled essential IDEAS which were then
dispersed within the appraisals?) as unity of apperception there isn't
any need to discuss this further.

The difference in perspective is either having the globe 🌎 in one's
hand or being somewhere upon it.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&tetra:35>

#35 - 𝌨斂 = #486
COGITO: [#33, #32, #32, #28, #14] as #35 - GATHERING (LIEN)
RANGE: 24 to noon 28 MAY

[#33 {@1: Sup: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#33); Ego: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#33)}
#32 {@2: Sup: 65 - INNER: NEI (#98 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%24}); Ego:
32 - LEGION: CHUANG (#65)}
#32 {@3: Sup: 16 - CONTACT: CHIAO (#114); Ego: 32 - LEGION: CHUANG (#97)}
#28 {@4: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23});
Ego: 28 - CHANGE: KENG (#125)}
#14] {@5: Sup: 58 - GATHERING IN: HSI (#216); Ego: 14 - PENETRATION:
JUI (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS {%13})}

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?male:216&feme:139&ontic:297&idea:139>

TELOS TOTAL: #139 as [#80, #30, #8, #3, #8, #10] = plēgḗ (G4127):
{UMBRA: #129 % #41 = #6} 1) a blow, stripe, a wound; 2) *A* *PUBLIC*
*CALAMITY*, heavy affliction, plague,;

ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #297
DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #98

APPRAISAL #9: *TAXING* *IN* *SEASON* (斂于時)
Helps forestall utter ruin. (利圉極菑)
FATHOMING #9: Collecting taxes when timely (斂于時)
MEANS: How could disaster be imminent? (奚可幾也)

kě (可): 1. can; may; permissible, 2. but, 3. such; so, 4. able to;
*POSSIBLY*, 5. to approve; to permit, 6. to be worth, 7. to suit; to
fit, 8. khan, 9. to recover, 10. to act as, 11. to be worth; to
deserve, 12. *APPROXIMATELY*; *PROBABLY*, 13. expresses doubt, 14.
really; truely, 15. used to add emphasis, 16. beautiful, 17. Ke, 18.
used to ask a question

jǐ (幾): 1. several, 2. how many, 3. Kangxi radical 16, 4. *SUBTLE*;
*INVISIBLE*; *IMPERCEPTIBLE*, 5. *SIGN*; *OMEN*, 6. nearly; almost, 7.
near to, 8. imminent danger, 9. circumstances, 10. duration; *TIME*,
11. opportunity, 12. never has; hasn't yet, 13. a small table, 14.
[self] composed, 15. ji

#411 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #216 as [#20, #1, #10, #100, #70, #10,
#200] = kairós (G2540): {UMBRA: #401 % #41 = #32} 1) due measure; 2) a
measure of time, a larger or smaller portion of time, hence:; 2a) a
fixed and definite time, *THE* *TIME* *WHEN* *THINGS* *ARE* *BROUGHT*
*TO* *CRISIS*, the decisive epoch waited for; 2b) *OPPORTUNE* *OR*
*SEASONABLE* *TIME*; 2c) the right time; 2d) a limited period of time;
2e) *TO* *WHAT* *TIME* *BRINGS*, *THE* *STATE* *OF* *THE* *TIMES*,
*THE* *THINGS* *AND* *EVENTS* *OF* *TIME*;

#301 - FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #139 as [#70, #200, #6, #20, #5] = ʻârak
(H6186): {UMBRA: #290 % #41 = #3} 1) to arrange, *SET* *OR* *PUT* *OR*
*LAY* *IN* *ORDER*, set in array, prepare, order, ordain, handle,
furnish, esteem, equal, direct, compare; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to arrange or
set or lay in order, arrange, state in order, set forth (a legal
case), set in place; 1a2) to compare, be comparable; 1b) (Hiphil) *TO*
*VALUE*, *TAX*;

#266 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #98 as [#20, #40, #200, #1, #5] = marʼeh
(H4758): {UMBRA: #246 % #41 = #41} 1) sight, appearance, vision; 1a)
sight, phenomenon, spectacle, appearance, vision; 1b) what is seen;
1c) *A* *VISION* (*SUPERNATURAL*); 1d) *SIGHT*, *VISION* (*POWER* *OF*
*SEEING*);

#411 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #98 as [#1, #100, #300, #10] = árti
(G737): {UMBRA: #411 % #41 = #1} 1) *JUST* *NOW*, *THIS* *MOMENT*; 2)
now at this time, at this very time, this moment;

#495 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #297 as [#5, #80, #5, #20, #5, #10, #300,
#70] = epíkeimai (G1945): {UMBRA: #181 % #41 = #17} 1) to lie upon or
over, rest upon, be laid or placed upon; 1a) on the *BURNING* *COALS*;
2) metaph.; 2a) of things, of the pressure of a *VIOLENT* *TEMPEST*;
2b) of men, to press upon, *TO* *BE* *URGENT*;

Thusly if in the past @ TETRA #35, I undertook an optimal COGITO
referencing action relative to the noumenon where an information
exchange took place, then it ought to be still viable within this
present reality where the referencing reoccurs.

Is that causality process of foreseeing in conformity with temporality
either supernatural or supra-natural?

supernatural: (of a manifestation or event) attributed to some force
beyond time but conformity to number / laws of nature

supra-natural: is a term that means transcending the natural or
violating the laws of nature, often attributed to inter-dimensional or
extra-dimensional beings

Is it entirely 4th dimensional or does it have a stasis beyond such?

I'm not an expert in linguistics and whether the term pertaining to
autonomous systems is as a priori considered AUTOTASIS (result of
action as intensity, effectiveness and force) or AUTOSTASIS (grounding
for action) is not within my remit to resolve. However any viable
conformity to linguistic convention might also consider AUTOCTISIS and
ALLOSTASIS.

Thus we have semantical confusion where when you hear a word, your
experience is a stupidly.

So such #139 - "SET OR PUT OR LAY IN ORDER" might involve placing a
document within the cloud ☁️ -- everything so far is entirely
scientific excepting your stubborn irrationality is not.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:斂>

[#35, #47]

liǎn (斂): 1. to collect, 2. to draw back; to fold back, 3. *TAX*
*COLLECTION*, 4. *TO* *DECREASE*, 5. to shrink back; to retreat, 6.
beautification of the body for a funeral, 7. Lian

#984 = #451 x 2 + [#35, #47] as [#10, #8, #60, #200, #6, #700] =
châçêr (H2637): {UMBRA: #268 % #41 = #22} 1) to lack, be without,
*DECREASE*, be lacking, have a need; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to lack; 1a2) to
be lacking; 1a3) to diminish, decrease; 1b) (Piel) to cause to lack;
1c) (Hiphil) to cause to be lacking;

#984 as [#70, #4, #400, #10, #500] = ʻêdâh (H5713): {UMBRA: #79 % #41
= #38} 1) testimony, witness; 1a) always plural and *ALWAYS* *OF*
*LAWS* *AS* *DIVINE* *TESTIMONIES*;

IMMANUEL KANT (1783) PROLEGOMENA COMMENTARY AS MARGIN IDEA #297: "A
judgment of perception can never be considered as valid for experience
without the law, that if an event is perceived then it is always
referred to something preceding from which it follows according to a
universal rule; or if I express myself in this way: Everything of
which experience shows that it happens must have a cause.

It is nonetheless more appropriate to choose the first formulation.
For since we can indeed, a priori and previous to any objects being
given, have a cognition of those conditions under which alone an
experience regarding objects is possible, but never of the laws to
which objects may be subject in themselves without relation to
possible experience, we will therefore be able to study a priori the
nature of things in no other way than by investigating the conditions,
and the universal (though subjective) laws, under which alone such a
cognition is possible as experience (as regards mere form), and
determining the possibility of things as objects of experience
accordingly; for were I to choose the second mode of expression and to
seek the a priori conditions under which nature is possible as an
object of experience, I might then easily fall into misunderstanding
and fancy that I had to speak about nature as a thing in itself, and
in that case I would be wandering about fruitlessly in endless
endeavours to find laws for things about which nothing is given to me.

We will therefore be concerned here only with experience and with the
universal conditions of its possibility which are given a priori, and
from there we will determine nature as the whole object of all
possible experience. I think I will be understood: that here I do not
mean the rules for the observation of a nature that is already given,
which presuppose experience already; and so do not mean, how we can
learn the laws from nature (through experience), for these would then
not be laws a priori and would provide no pure natural science; but
rather, how the a priori conditions of the possibility of experience
are at the same time the sources out of which all universal laws of
nature must be derived." [page 49]

#984 as [#4, #5, #10, #600, #9, #5, #50, #300, #1] = deiknýō (G1166):
{UMBRA: #1289 % #41 = #18} 1) to show, expose to the eyes; 2) metaph.;
2a) *TO* *GIVE* *EVIDENCE* *OR* *PROOF* *OF* *A* *THING*; 2b) to show
by words or teach;

#984 as [#5, #300, #10, #40, #8, #200, #1, #50, #300, #70] = timáō
(G5091): {UMBRA: #1151 % #41 = #3} 1) *TO* *ESTIMATE*, *FIX* *THE*
*VALUE*; 1a) for the value of something belonging to one's self; 2) to
honour, to have in honour, to revere, venerate;

#984 as [#200, #300, #8, #100, #10, #60, #1, #300, #5] = stērízō
(G4741): {UMBRA: #1425 % #41 = #31} 1) to make stable, place firmly,
set fast, fix; 2) *TO* *STRENGTHEN*, *MAKE* *FIRM*; 3) *TO* *RENDER*
*CONSTANT*, *CONFIRM*, *ONE'S* *MIND*;

Such action is called foresight in both planning and the making of
provision."

#491 as [#6, #5, #6, #4, #70, #400] / [#6, #400, #4, #70, #5, #6] /
#540 as [#50, #6, #4, #70, #400, #10] / [#6, #10, #4, #70, #400, #50]
= yâdaʻ (H3045): {UMBRA: #84 % #41 = #2} 1) to know; 1a) (Qal); 1a1)
to know; i) to know, learn to know; ii) to perceive; iii) *TO*
*PERCEIVE* *AND* *SEE*, *FIND* *OUT* *AND* *DISCERN*; iv) to
discriminate, distinguish; v) to know by experience; vi) to recognise,
admit, acknowledge, confess; vii) to consider; 1a2) to know, be
acquainted with; 1a3) to know (a person carnally); 1a4) to know how,
be skilful in; 1a5) *TO* *HAVE* *KNOWLEDGE*, *BE* *WISE*; 1b)
(Niphal); 1b1) to be made known, be or become known, be revealed; 1b2)
to make oneself known; 1b3) to be perceived; 1b4) to be instructed;
1c) (Piel) to cause to know; 1d) (Poal) to cause to know; 1e) (Pual);
1e1) to be known; 1e2) known, one known, acquaintance (participle);
1f) (Hiphil) to make known, declare; 1g) (Hophal) to be made known;
1h) (Hithpael) *TO* *MAKE* *ONESELF* *KNOWN*, *REVEAL* *ONESELF*;

This metalogic categorical imperative is more properly someone's PhD
and a productivity gain for JUDICIAL process which has a maxim "DIEU
ET MON DROIT" where in a world of GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
to then theoretically as JURISPRUDENT $$$ TRANSACTION, apply a test as
conformity to any OATH OF CITIZENSHIP whereby a person with a
deficient threshold of conformity then has no LOCUS STANDI within a
COURT OF LAW and no capability for LEGAL AID to then purvey an endless
possibility as promulgation of deception and the instantiation of
ORGANISED CRIME.

A revision of this document may be obtained from the following URL:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Difficult%20Epistemological%20Question.pdf>

Draft Revision: 17 June 2024

On 16/6/2024 22:46, one wrote:

dolf wrote and asked:

If not, then what do you mean?"

What was meant was simply that
experiences of a future event may
be possible at times.

What are your plans for 1400 hours?

At the same time, such experiences are
not subject to scientific experimentation.

Such could be called, synchronicity.
Meaningful events, etc.

In terms of qi, xin  and shen, a thought emerged
given: The Zhuangzi and Daojia.

https://terebess.hu/english/tao/Zhuangzi-Burton-Watson.pdf

<< “May I ask what the fasting of the mind is?”

Confucius said, “Make your will one! Don’t listen with
your ears, listen with your mind. No, don’t listen with your
mind, but listen with your spirit. Listening stops with the
ears, the mind stops with recognition, but spirit is empty
and waits for all things. The Way gathers in emptiness
alone. Emptiness is the fasting of the mind.” >>

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09552367.2015.1136201

<< ABSTRACT
In contrast to his contemporaries who take the heart–mind
as the ruler of a person, Zhuangzi suggests that one’s action is
guided by the spirit (shen). Questions arise as one articulates the
function of spirit and its relationship with the heart–mind. In this
article, I articulate the relationship between heart–mind and spirit
to show three points: first, spirit is a kind of qi that can be tied
or run smoothly, or rather the mechanism triggered by the functioning
of smooth qi. This reading brings the skill passages together with the
fasting of heart–mind (xin zhai) passage. Second, the proceeding of
spirit admits no fixed ways and is not confined to any particular
organ or faculty, so it avoids the problem of self-assertion mentioned
in Qiwulun. Third, the proceeding of spirit implies that one’s
practice takes as many particularities of the context as possible into
account, so the person has a higher chance to reduce conflict in
interacting with things and other people and bring out their
potential. This is a reason why skilful practices are related to
Zhuangzi’s ideal of nourishing life, both physiologically
and psychologically. >>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zuowang

<< Apophatic meditation practice can also be seen in the following
Zhuangzhi passages which speak of "fasting the heartmind":

"You must fast! I will tell you what that means. Do you think that it
is easy to do anything while you have a heart-mind? If you do, the
luminous cosmos will not support you...Make your aspirations one!
Don't listen with your ears; listen with your heart-mind. No, don't
listen with your heart-mind; listen with qi. Listening stops with the
ears, the heart-mind stops with joining, but qi is empty and waits on
all things. The Dao gathers in emptiness alone. Emptiness is the
fasting of the heart-mind." >>

People who happen to experience paranormal phenomena
have bins known to them. Skeptics may call such, false positives.

The knack-masters in the Zhuangi varied.
Some sayers may say they all used the same Dao.

Some sayers say the dao that is said is not the Dao.

Interpretations of the saying, dao ke dao fei chang dao, vary.

- thanks! Cheers!

--
Check out our SAVVY module prototype that facilitates a movable /
resizable DIALOG and complex dropdown MENU interface deploying the third
party d3 library.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/Savvy.zip> (Download resources)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

[continued from previous message]

(#902 - RULE OF LAW ... #1065 - agnōsía (G56): *NOT* *KNOWING*, *IGNORANCE*) SPECTRUM DYNAMIC.

#1064 as [#80, #100, #70, #10, #4, #800] = proeídō (G4275): {UMBRA:
#1064 % #41 = #39} 1) *TO* *FORESEE*;

Simply put it isn't sufficient to make an appraisal of the dialectic categories as strata of conformity by the speech and action cohesion
dynamic, but in the example of the OATH / PLEDGE RULE:

#986 = #902 - RULE OF LAW + #67 - DARKENING (HUI) + #17 - HOLDING BACK
(JUAN) as [#400, #80, #1, #20, #70, #400, #5, #10] = hypakoúō (G5219): {UMBRA: #1771 % #41 = #8} 1) to listen, to harken; 1a) of one who on the knock at the door comes to listen who it is, (the duty of a porter); 2)
to harken to a command; 2a) *TO* *OBEY*, *BE* *OBEDIENT* *TO*, *SUBMIT*
*TO*;

We want to specifically observe the CONTINGENT nature of the FORESIGHT CATEGORY #986 and if such is not quantified appropriately or in
possessing insufficient resonance, then the circumstance may be
conforming with the maxim "DO AS I SAY, NOT AS I DO" which means that
while the speaker may have imperfections or mistakes, they want the
listener to follow their advice and instructions rather than imitating
their own actions.

In other words it is perfidious as self justification where the actions
are not in accordance with the words as then a probable breach of their
OATH.

A revision of this document may be obtained from the following URL:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Difficult%20Epistemological%20Question.pdf>

Draft Revision: 19 June 2024

On 19/6/2024 05:20, one wrote:

dolf wrote to a point saying:

Unless you can grasp such a cognition (ie. is YANG HSIUNG the seminal
author of the T'AI HSÜAN CHING and did he deploy any COGITO array as
scaffolding or perhaps preassembled essential IDEAS which were then
dispersed within the appraisals?) as unity of apperception there isn't
any need to discuss this further.

Needs are curious critters.

Cognitions remind one of gears and w'hat knots.

Without cogs, knitting ions may be possible given
a stretch of yarn and a blarney stone.

Tis a funny Ting, imo, carving
uncarved oxen in a bamboo grove.

Ting can be said to have practiced wei-wu-wei.
How he knew how to carve evolved naturally.

Other knack-masters used various techniques
in the Chuang-tzu from time to time as wells.

- thanks! Cheers!

--
Check out our SAVVY module prototype that facilitates a movable /
resizable DIALOG and complex dropdown MENU interface deploying the third
party d3 library.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/Savvy.zip> (Download resources)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

[continued from previous message]

    /         #340 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 16 / 19 JUNE 2024 as [#7,
#8, #200, #70, #40, #5, #9, #1] /
#75 - FAILURE (SHIH) as [#7 - ASCENT (SHANG), #8 - OPPOSITION (KAN), #10
- DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION (HSIEN), #50 - VASTNESS / WASTING (T'ANG)] = záō (G2198): {UMBRA: #808 % #41 = #29} 1) to live, breathe, be among the living (not lifeless, not dead); 2) to enjoy real life; 2a) *TO* *HAVE* *TRUE* *LIFE* *AND* *WORTHY* *OF* *THE* *NAME*; 2b) active, blessed,
endless in the kingdom of God; 3) to live i.e. pass life, in the manner
of the living and acting; 3a) of mortals or character; 4) *LIVING*
*WATER*, *HAVING* *VITAL* *POWER* *IN* *ITSELF* *AND* *EXERTING* *THE*
*SAME* *UPON* *THE* *SOUL*; 5) metaph. to be in full vigour; 5a) to be
fresh, strong, efficient,; 5b) as adj. active, powerful, efficacious;

From a metalogic perspective (ie. probability is concerned with the likelihood of occurrence) as the capability of occurrence we ought to
have sufficient dialectic category sampling from the news media articles
to obtain some case study examples of the *FORESIGHT* / *PRESCIENCE*
(#902 - RULE OF LAW ... #1065 - agnōsía (G56): *NOT* *KNOWING*, *IGNORANCE*) SPECTRUM DYNAMIC.

#1064 as [#80, #100, #70, #10, #4, #800] = proeídō (G4275): {UMBRA:
#1064 % #41 = #39} 1) *TO* *FORESEE*;

Simply put it isn't sufficient to make an appraisal of the dialectic categories as strata of conformity by the speech and action cohesion
dynamic, but in the example of the OATH / PLEDGE RULE:

#986 = #902 - RULE OF LAW + #67 - DARKENING (HUI) + #17 - HOLDING BACK
(JUAN) as [#400, #80, #1, #20, #70, #400, #5, #10] = hypakoúō (G5219): {UMBRA: #1771 % #41 = #8} 1) to listen, to harken; 1a) of one who on the knock at the door comes to listen who it is, (the duty of a porter); 2)
to harken to a command; 2a) *TO* *OBEY*, *BE* *OBEDIENT* *TO*, *SUBMIT*
*TO*;

We want to specifically observe the CONTINGENT nature of the FORESIGHT CATEGORY #986 and if such is not quantified appropriately or in
possessing insufficient resonance, then the circumstance may be
conforming with the maxim "DO AS I SAY, NOT AS I DO" which means that
while the speaker may have imperfections or mistakes, they want the
listener to follow their advice and instructions rather than imitating
their own actions.

In other words it is perfidious as self justification where the actions
are not in accordance with the words as then a probable breach of their
OATH.

A revision of this document may be obtained from the following URL:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Difficult%20Epistemological%20Question.pdf>

Draft Revision: 19 June 2024

On 19/6/2024 05:20, one wrote:

dolf wrote to a point saying:

Unless you can grasp such a cognition (ie. is YANG HSIUNG the seminal
author of the T'AI HSÜAN CHING and did he deploy any COGITO array as
scaffolding or perhaps preassembled essential IDEAS which were then
dispersed within the appraisals?) as unity of apperception there isn't
any need to discuss this further.

Needs are curious critters.

Cognitions remind one of gears and w'hat knots.

Without cogs, knitting ions may be possible given
a stretch of yarn and a blarney stone.

Tis a funny Ting, imo, carving
uncarved oxen in a bamboo grove.

Ting can be said to have practiced wei-wu-wei.
How he knew how to carve evolved naturally.

Other knack-masters used various techniques
in the Chuang-tzu from time to time as wells.

- thanks! Cheers!

--
Check out our SAVVY module prototype that facilitates a movable /
resizable DIALOG and complex dropdown MENU interface deploying the third
party d3 library.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/Savvy.zip> (Download resources)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)