Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from Wikipedia “educates
individuals and groups about blasphemy laws and defends freedom
of expression, especially the open criticism of religion which is criminalized in many countries”.
Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from Wikipedia “educates
individuals and groups about blasphemy laws and defends freedom
of expression, especially the open criticism of religion which is criminalized in many countries”.
David Dalton wrote:
Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from Wikipedia �educates
individuals and groups about blasphemy laws and defends freedom
of expression, especially the open criticism of religion which is
criminalized in many countries�.
religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 years ago is no longer
relevant.
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by sora <[email protected]>:
David Dalton wrote:Relevant to what?
Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from Wikipedia “educates
individuals and groups about blasphemy laws and defends freedom
of expression, especially the open criticism of religion which is
criminalized in many countries”.
religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 years ago is no longer
relevant.
Bob Casanova wrote:
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by sora <[email protected]>:
David Dalton wrote:Relevant to what?
Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from Wikipedia “educates
individuals and groups about blasphemy laws and defends freedom
of expression, especially the open criticism of religion which is
criminalized in many countries”.
religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 years ago is no longer
relevant.
relevant to helping people navigate life in 2020s and post.It's relevant if you live anywhere in the Islamic controlled world, and
On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ
<[email protected]d>:
shogun <[email protected]> writes:Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly
Bob Casanova wrote:It's relevant if you live anywhere in the Islamic controlled world, and
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by sora <[email protected]>:
David Dalton wrote:Relevant to what?
Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from Wikipedia “educates
individuals and groups about blasphemy laws and defends freedom
of expression, especially the open criticism of religion which is
criminalized in many countries”.
religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 years ago is no longer
relevant.
relevant to helping people navigate life in 2020s and post.
many other places as well.
parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate social circle,
therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and everywhere".
shogun <[email protected]> writes:
Bob Casanova wrote:It's relevant if you live anywhere in the Islamic controlled world, and
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by sora <[email protected]>:
David Dalton wrote:Relevant to what?
Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from Wikipedia �educates
individuals and groups about blasphemy laws and defends freedom
of expression, especially the open criticism of religion which is
criminalized in many countries�.
religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 years ago is no longer
relevant.
relevant to helping people navigate life in 2020s and post.
many other places as well.
Bob Casanova wrote:
On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ
<[email protected]d>:
shogun <[email protected]> writes:Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly
Bob Casanova wrote:It's relevant if you live anywhere in the Islamic controlled world, and
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by sora <[email protected]>:
David Dalton wrote:Relevant to what?
Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from Wikipedia �educates
individuals and groups about blasphemy laws and defends freedom
of expression, especially the open criticism of religion which is >>>>>>> criminalized in many countries�.
religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 years ago is no longer
relevant.
relevant to helping people navigate life in 2020s and post.
many other places as well.
parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate social circle,
therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and everywhere".
i would regard religious people as fundamentally wrong, being on
the wrong side of history. being wrong also means it provides no
benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to become obsolete.
On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:59:04 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:There was no need to confirm what I wrote; I already knew I
On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ
<[email protected]d>:
shogun <[email protected]> writes:Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly
Bob Casanova wrote:It's relevant if you live anywhere in the Islamic controlled world, and >>>> many other places as well.
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by sora <[email protected]>:
David Dalton wrote:Relevant to what?
Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from Wikipedia “educates
individuals and groups about blasphemy laws and defends freedom >>>>>>>> of expression, especially the open criticism of religion which is >>>>>>>> criminalized in many countries”.
religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 years ago is no longer
relevant.
relevant to helping people navigate life in 2020s and post.
parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate social circle,
therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and everywhere".
i would regard religious people as fundamentally wrong, being on
the wrong side of history. being wrong also means it provides no
benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to become obsolete.
was correct.
Bob Casanova wrote:
On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:59:04 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:There was no need to confirm what I wrote; I already knew I
On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ
<[email protected]d>:
shogun <[email protected]> writes:Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly
Bob Casanova wrote:It's relevant if you live anywhere in the Islamic controlled world, and >>>>> many other places as well.
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by sora <[email protected]>:
David Dalton wrote:Relevant to what?
Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from Wikipedia �educates
individuals and groups about blasphemy laws and defends freedom >>>>>>>>> of expression, especially the open criticism of religion which is >>>>>>>>> criminalized in many countries�.
religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 years ago is no longer >>>>>>>> relevant.
relevant to helping people navigate life in 2020s and post.
parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate social circle,
therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and everywhere".
i would regard religious people as fundamentally wrong, being on
the wrong side of history. being wrong also means it provides no
benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to become obsolete.
was correct.
nice. so are you a pious person?
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 02:06:06 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Why do you ask? It wouldn't affect the accuracy of my
On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:59:04 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:There was no need to confirm what I wrote; I already knew I
On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ
<[email protected]d>:
shogun <[email protected]> writes:Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly
Bob Casanova wrote:It's relevant if you live anywhere in the Islamic controlled world, and >>>>>> many other places as well.
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by sora <[email protected]>:
David Dalton wrote:Relevant to what?
Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from Wikipedia “educates >>>>>>>>>> individuals and groups about blasphemy laws and defends freedom >>>>>>>>>> of expression, especially the open criticism of religion which is >>>>>>>>>> criminalized in many countries”.
religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 years ago is no longer >>>>>>>>> relevant.
relevant to helping people navigate life in 2020s and post.
parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate social circle,
therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and everywhere".
i would regard religious people as fundamentally wrong, being on
the wrong side of history. being wrong also means it provides no
benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to become obsolete.
was correct.
nice. so are you a pious person?
comment either way.
Bob Casanova wrote:
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 02:06:06 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Why do you ask? It wouldn't affect the accuracy of my
On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:59:04 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:There was no need to confirm what I wrote; I already knew I
On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ
<[email protected]d>:
shogun <[email protected]> writes:Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly
Bob Casanova wrote:It's relevant if you live anywhere in the Islamic controlled world, and >>>>>>> many other places as well.
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the following appeared in >>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by sora <[email protected]>:
David Dalton wrote:Relevant to what?
Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from Wikipedia �educates >>>>>>>>>>> individuals and groups about blasphemy laws and defends freedom >>>>>>>>>>> of expression, especially the open criticism of religion which is >>>>>>>>>>> criminalized in many countries�.
religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 years ago is no longer >>>>>>>>>> relevant.
relevant to helping people navigate life in 2020s and post.
parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate social circle,
therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and everywhere".
i would regard religious people as fundamentally wrong, being on
the wrong side of history. being wrong also means it provides no
benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to become obsolete.
was correct.
nice. so are you a pious person?
comment either way.
i have no qualms with its accuracy. i am curious and want to know
the kind of views believers and non-believers espouse.
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:00:25 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Hopefully, both "espouse" the same reality, the facts of
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 02:06:06 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Why do you ask? It wouldn't affect the accuracy of my
On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:59:04 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:There was no need to confirm what I wrote; I already knew I
On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ
<[email protected]d>:
shogun <[email protected]> writes:Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly
Bob Casanova wrote:It's relevant if you live anywhere in the Islamic controlled world, and
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the following appeared in >>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by sora <[email protected]>:
David Dalton wrote:Relevant to what?
Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from Wikipedia “educates >>>>>>>>>>>> individuals and groups about blasphemy laws and defends freedom >>>>>>>>>>>> of expression, especially the open criticism of religion which is >>>>>>>>>>>> criminalized in many countries”.
religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 years ago is no longer >>>>>>>>>>> relevant.
relevant to helping people navigate life in 2020s and post.
many other places as well.
parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate social circle,
therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and everywhere".
i would regard religious people as fundamentally wrong, being on
the wrong side of history. being wrong also means it provides no
benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to become obsolete.
was correct.
nice. so are you a pious person?
comment either way.
i have no qualms with its accuracy. i am curious and want to know
the kind of views believers and non-believers espouse.
which are not subject to belief or disbelief.
Bob Casanova wrote:
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:00:25 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Hopefully, both "espouse" the same reality, the facts of
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 02:06:06 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Why do you ask? It wouldn't affect the accuracy of my
On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:59:04 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:There was no need to confirm what I wrote; I already knew I
On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ
<[email protected]d>:
shogun <[email protected]> writes:Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly
Bob Casanova wrote:It's relevant if you live anywhere in the Islamic controlled world, and
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the following appeared in >>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by sora <[email protected]>:
David Dalton wrote:Relevant to what?
Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from Wikipedia �educates >>>>>>>>>>>>> individuals and groups about blasphemy laws and defends freedom >>>>>>>>>>>>> of expression, especially the open criticism of religion which is >>>>>>>>>>>>> criminalized in many countries�.
religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 years ago is no longer >>>>>>>>>>>> relevant.
relevant to helping people navigate life in 2020s and post. >>>>>>>>>>
many other places as well.
parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate social circle,
therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and everywhere".
i would regard religious people as fundamentally wrong, being on >>>>>>> the wrong side of history. being wrong also means it provides no >>>>>>> benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to become obsolete.
was correct.
nice. so are you a pious person?
comment either way.
i have no qualms with its accuracy. i am curious and want to know
the kind of views believers and non-believers espouse.
which are not subject to belief or disbelief.
that's a nice dream.
Bob Casanova wrote:
On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ
<[email protected]d>:
shogun <[email protected]> writes:Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly
Bob Casanova wrote:It's relevant if you live anywhere in the Islamic controlled world, and
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by sora <[email protected]>:
David Dalton wrote:Relevant to what?
Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from Wikipedia “educates
individuals and groups about blasphemy laws and defends freedom
of expression, especially the open criticism of religion which is >>>>>>> criminalized in many countries”.
religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 years ago is no longer
relevant.
relevant to helping people navigate life in 2020s and post.
many other places as well.
parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate social circle,
therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and everywhere".
i would regard religious people as fundamentally wrong, being on
the wrong side of history. being wrong also means it provides no
benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to become obsolete.
On 2024-10-02, shogun <[email protected]> wrote:
Bob Casanova wrote:
On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ
<[email protected]d>:
shogun <[email protected]> writes:Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly
Bob Casanova wrote:It's relevant if you live anywhere in the Islamic controlled world, and >>>> many other places as well.
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by sora <[email protected]>:
David Dalton wrote:Relevant to what?
Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from Wikipedia “educates
individuals and groups about blasphemy laws and defends freedom >>>>>>>> of expression, especially the open criticism of religion which is >>>>>>>> criminalized in many countries”.
religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 years ago is no longer
relevant.
relevant to helping people navigate life in 2020s and post.
parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate social circle,
therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and everywhere".
i would regard religious people as fundamentally wrong, being on
the wrong side of history. being wrong also means it provides no
benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to become obsolete.
The closest to a religion I'd believe would be synchronicity+pansichysm, but far from
any judeo-christian/islamic sect or dogma.
anthk wrote:
On 2024-10-02, shogun <[email protected]> wrote:
Bob Casanova wrote:
On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ
<[email protected]d>:
shogun <[email protected]> writes:Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly
Bob Casanova wrote:It's relevant if you live anywhere in the Islamic controlled world,
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by sora <[email protected]>:
David Dalton wrote:Relevant to what?
Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from Wikipedia “educates
individuals and groups about blasphemy laws and defends freedom >>>>>>>>> of expression, especially the open criticism of religion which is >>>>>>>>> criminalized in many countries”.
religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 years ago is no longer >>>>>>>> relevant.
relevant to helping people navigate life in 2020s and post.
and
many other places as well.
parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate social circle,
therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and everywhere".
i would regard religious people as fundamentally wrong, being on
the wrong side of history. being wrong also means it provides no
benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to become obsolete.
The closest to a religion I'd believe would be
synchronicity+pansichysm, but far from
any judeo-christian/islamic sect or dogma.
there might be something to synchronicity, but panpsychism.... ehhh dont think so.
jojo wrote:
anthk wrote:
On 2024-10-02, shogun <[email protected]> wrote:
Bob Casanova wrote:
On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ
<[email protected]d>:
shogun <[email protected]> writes:Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly
Bob Casanova wrote:It's relevant if you live anywhere in the Islamic
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by sora <[email protected]>:
David Dalton wrote:Relevant to what?
Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from Wikipedia “educates >>>>>>>>>> individuals and groups about blasphemy laws and defends
freedom
of expression, especially the open criticism of
religion which is
criminalized in many countries”.
religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 years ago is no
longer
relevant.
relevant to helping people navigate life in 2020s and post.
controlled world, and
many other places as well.
parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate social circle,
therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and everywhere".
i would regard religious people as fundamentally wrong, being on
the wrong side of history. being wrong also means it provides no
benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to become obsolete.
The closest to a religion I'd believe would be
synchronicity+pansichysm, but far from
any judeo-christian/islamic sect or dogma.
there might be something to synchronicity, but panpsychism....
ehhh dont think so.
No one's saying there's synchronicity jojo.
On 9/30/2024 2:21 AM, Jan Poulsen wrote:
On 30/09/2024 01.39, David Dalton wrote:
Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from Wikipedia “educates
individuals and groups about blasphemy laws and defends freedom
of expression, especially the open criticism of religion which is
criminalized in many countries”.
Blasphemy: A law to protect an all-powerful, supernatural deity
from getting its feelings hurt -- Ricky Gervais
--
Jan Poulsen
"Blasphemy is a Victimless Crime." -- Professor Richard Dawkins
On 10/4/2024 11:10 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 10:45:56 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Isn't it, though?
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:00:25 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Hopefully, both "espouse" the same reality, the facts of
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 02:06:06 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Why do you ask? It wouldn't affect the accuracy of my
On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:59:04 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:There was no need to confirm what I wrote; I already knew I
On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the following appeared >>>>>>>>>> in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ
<[email protected]d>:
shogun <[email protected]> writes:Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly
Bob Casanova wrote:It's relevant if you live anywhere in the Islamic
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the following
appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by sora <[email protected]>:
David Dalton wrote:Relevant to what?
Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from Wikipedia
“educates
individuals and groups about blasphemy laws and
defends freedom
of expression, especially the open criticism of
religion which is
criminalized in many countries”.
religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 years ago >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is no longer
relevant.
relevant to helping people navigate life in 2020s and
post.
controlled world, and
many other places as well.
parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate social circle, >>>>>>>>>> therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and everywhere".
i would regard religious people as fundamentally wrong,
being on
the wrong side of history. being wrong also means it
provides no
benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to become
obsolete.
was correct.
nice. so are you a pious person?
comment either way.
i have no qualms with its accuracy. i am curious and want to
know
the kind of views believers and non-believers espouse.
which are not subject to belief or disbelief.
that's a nice dream.
Have a nice day, and try to expand beyond your parochialism
WRT the relevance of religion; the world isn't identical to
your social circle.
Hey Bob,
Heads up about Jojo -- Mom needs to take his (her?) Internet
away, and until that happens, discretion is advised.
Dawn
jojo wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:where did you get it , by the train tracks
On 10/4/2024 11:10 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 10:45:56 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Isn't it, though?
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:00:25 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Hopefully, both "espouse" the same reality, the facts of
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 02:06:06 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Why do you ask? It wouldn't affect the accuracy of my
On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:59:04 +0000, the following
appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:There was no need to confirm what I wrote; I already
On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the following
appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ
<[email protected]d>:
shogun <[email protected]> writes:Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly
Bob Casanova wrote:It's relevant if you live anywhere in the Islamic
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the following >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by sora <[email protected]>:
David Dalton wrote:Relevant to what?
Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from Wikipedia >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “educates
individuals and groups about blasphemy laws and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> defends freedom
of expression, especially the open criticism of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> religion which is
criminalized in many countries”.
religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 years >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ago is no longer
relevant.
relevant to helping people navigate life in 2020s
and post.
controlled world, and
many other places as well.
parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate social
circle,
therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and everywhere". >>>>>>>>>>>
i would regard religious people as fundamentally
wrong, being on
the wrong side of history. being wrong also means it
provides no
benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to become
obsolete.
knew I
was correct.
nice. so are you a pious person?
comment either way.
i have no qualms with its accuracy. i am curious and want
to know
the kind of views believers and non-believers espouse.
which are not subject to belief or disbelief.
that's a nice dream.
Have a nice day, and try to expand beyond your parochialism
WRT the relevance of religion; the world isn't identical to
your social circle.
Hey Bob,
Heads up about Jojo -- Mom needs to take his (her?) Internet
away, and until that happens, discretion is advised.
Dawn
dawn, dont be rude!!! also, i have a penis.
jojo wrote:
% wrote:that's no reason
jojo wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:where did you get it , by the train tracks
On 10/4/2024 11:10 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 10:45:56 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Isn't it, though?
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:00:25 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Hopefully, both "espouse" the same reality, the facts of
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 02:06:06 +0000, the following
appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Why do you ask? It wouldn't affect the accuracy of my
On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:59:04 +0000, the following
appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:There was no need to confirm what I wrote; I already
On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the following
appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ
<[email protected]d>:
shogun <[email protected]> writes:Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly >>>>>>>>>>>>>> parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate social >>>>>>>>>>>>>> circle,
Bob Casanova wrote:It's relevant if you live anywhere in the Islamic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> controlled world, and
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the following >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by sora <[email protected]>:
David Dalton wrote:Relevant to what?
Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from
Wikipedia “educates
individuals and groups about blasphemy laws >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and defends freedom
of expression, especially the open criticism >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of religion which is
criminalized in many countries”.
religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 years >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ago is no longer
relevant.
relevant to helping people navigate life in 2020s >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and post.
many other places as well.
therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and
everywhere".
i would regard religious people as fundamentally
wrong, being on
the wrong side of history. being wrong also means it >>>>>>>>>>>>> provides no
benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to
become obsolete.
knew I
was correct.
nice. so are you a pious person?
comment either way.
i have no qualms with its accuracy. i am curious and
want to know
the kind of views believers and non-believers espouse.
which are not subject to belief or disbelief.
that's a nice dream.
Have a nice day, and try to expand beyond your parochialism
WRT the relevance of religion; the world isn't identical to
your social circle.
Hey Bob,
Heads up about Jojo -- Mom needs to take his (her?) Internet
away, and until that happens, discretion is advised.
Dawn
dawn, dont be rude!!! also, i have a penis.
i got it because my cells differentiated because i have a y
chromosome.. aaa capiche?
jojo wrote:
% wrote:sorry , you have to post a pic with it beside your face
jojo wrote:
% wrote:that's no reason
jojo wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:where did you get it , by the train tracks
On 10/4/2024 11:10 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 10:45:56 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Isn't it, though?
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:00:25 +0000, the following
appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Hopefully, both "espouse" the same reality, the facts of
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 02:06:06 +0000, the following
appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Why do you ask? It wouldn't affect the accuracy of my
On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:59:04 +0000, the following
appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:There was no need to confirm what I wrote; I
On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the following >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ
<[email protected]d>:
shogun <[email protected]> writes:Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate
Bob Casanova wrote:It's relevant if you live anywhere in the
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the
following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by sora <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
David Dalton wrote:Relevant to what?
Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wikipedia “educates
individuals and groups about blasphemy laws >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and defends freedom
of expression, especially the open criticism >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of religion which is
criminalized in many countries”.
religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> years ago is no longer
relevant.
relevant to helping people navigate life in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020s and post.
Islamic controlled world, and
many other places as well.
social circle,
therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and
everywhere".
i would regard religious people as fundamentally >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrong, being on
the wrong side of history. being wrong also means >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it provides no
benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to
become obsolete.
already knew I
was correct.
nice. so are you a pious person?
comment either way.
i have no qualms with its accuracy. i am curious and
want to know
the kind of views believers and non-believers espouse.
which are not subject to belief or disbelief.
that's a nice dream.
Have a nice day, and try to expand beyond your parochialism
WRT the relevance of religion; the world isn't identical to
your social circle.
Hey Bob,
Heads up about Jojo -- Mom needs to take his (her?)
Internet away, and until that happens, discretion is advised.
Dawn
dawn, dont be rude!!! also, i have a penis.
i got it because my cells differentiated because i have a y
chromosome.. aaa capiche?
that is all the reason and the only reason.
Xx/v]andrak|≡xX wrote:
jojo wrote:
anthk wrote:
On 2024-10-02, shogun <[email protected]> wrote:
Bob Casanova wrote:
On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ
<[email protected]d>:
shogun <[email protected]> writes:Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly
Bob Casanova wrote:It's relevant if you live anywhere in the Islamic controlled
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the following appeared in >>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by sora <[email protected]>:
David Dalton wrote:Relevant to what?
Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from Wikipedia “educates >>>>>>>>>>> individuals and groups about blasphemy laws and defends freedom >>>>>>>>>>> of expression, especially the open criticism of religion >>>>>>>>>>> which is
criminalized in many countries”.
religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 years ago is no longer >>>>>>>>>> relevant.
relevant to helping people navigate life in 2020s and post.
world, and
many other places as well.
parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate social circle,
therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and everywhere".
i would regard religious people as fundamentally wrong, being on
the wrong side of history. being wrong also means it provides no
benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to become obsolete.
The closest to a religion I'd believe would be
synchronicity+pansichysm, but far from
any judeo-christian/islamic sect or dogma.
there might be something to synchronicity, but panpsychism.... ehhh
dont think so.
No one's saying there's synchronicity jojo.
you are saying it, you are saying there is panpsychism.
On 10/4/2024 11:10 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 10:45:56 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Isn't it, though?
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:00:25 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Hopefully, both "espouse" the same reality, the facts of
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 02:06:06 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Why do you ask? It wouldn't affect the accuracy of my
On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:59:04 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:There was no need to confirm what I wrote; I already knew I
On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the following appeared >>>>>>>>>> in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ
<[email protected]d>:
shogun <[email protected]> writes:Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly
Bob Casanova wrote:It's relevant if you live anywhere in the Islamic controlled >>>>>>>>>>> world, and
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the following appeared in >>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by sora <[email protected]>:
David Dalton wrote:Relevant to what?
Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from Wikipedia “educates >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> individuals and groups about blasphemy laws and defends >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> freedom
of expression, especially the open criticism of religion >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is
criminalized in many countries”.
religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 years ago is no >>>>>>>>>>>>>> longer
relevant.
relevant to helping people navigate life in 2020s and post. >>>>>>>>>>>>
many other places as well.
parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate social circle, >>>>>>>>>> therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and everywhere".
i would regard religious people as fundamentally wrong, being on >>>>>>>>> the wrong side of history. being wrong also means it provides no >>>>>>>>> benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to become obsolete. >>>>>>>>>
was correct.
nice. so are you a pious person?
comment either way.
i have no qualms with its accuracy. i am curious and want to know
the kind of views believers and non-believers espouse.
which are not subject to belief or disbelief.
that's a nice dream.
Have a nice day, and try to expand beyond your parochialism
WRT the relevance of religion; the world isn't identical to
your social circle.
Hey Bob,
Heads up about Jojo -- Mom needs to take his (her?) Internet away, and
until that happens, discretion is advised.
jojo wrote:
Xx/v]andrak|≡xX wrote:
jojo wrote:
anthk wrote:
On 2024-10-02, shogun <[email protected]> wrote:
Bob Casanova wrote:
On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ
<[email protected]d>:
shogun <[email protected]> writes:Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly
Bob Casanova wrote:It's relevant if you live anywhere in the Islamic
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the following
appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by sora <[email protected]>:
David Dalton wrote:Relevant to what?
Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from Wikipedia
“educates
individuals and groups about blasphemy laws and
defends freedom
of expression, especially the open criticism of
religion which is
criminalized in many countries”.
religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 years ago is
no longer
relevant.
relevant to helping people navigate life in 2020s and post.
controlled world, and
many other places as well.
parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate social circle,
therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and everywhere".
i would regard religious people as fundamentally wrong,
being on
the wrong side of history. being wrong also means it
provides no
benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to become
obsolete.
The closest to a religion I'd believe would be
synchronicity+pansichysm, but far from
any judeo-christian/islamic sect or dogma.
there might be something to synchronicity, but
panpsychism.... ehhh dont think so.
No one's saying there's synchronicity jojo.
you are saying it, you are saying there is panpsychism.
I don't know what that is.
jojo wrote:
% wrote:and make sure to wear your top hat
jojo wrote:
% wrote:sorry , you have to post a pic with it beside your face
jojo wrote:
% wrote:that's no reason
jojo wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:where did you get it , by the train tracks
On 10/4/2024 11:10 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 10:45:56 +0000, the following appeared in >>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Isn't it, though?
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:00:25 +0000, the following appeared in >>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Hopefully, both "espouse" the same reality, the facts of >>>>>>>>>>>> which are not subject to belief or disbelief.
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 02:06:06 +0000, the following appeared in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Why do you ask? It wouldn't affect the accuracy of my >>>>>>>>>>>>>> comment either way.
On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:59:04 +0000, the following >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:There was no need to confirm what I wrote; I already knew I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was correct.
On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the following >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ
<[email protected]d>:
shogun <[email protected]> writes:Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate social >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> circle,
Bob Casanova wrote:It's relevant if you live anywhere in the Islamic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> controlled world, and
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the following >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by sora <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
David Dalton wrote:Relevant to what?
Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from Wikipedia >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “educates
individuals and groups about blasphemy laws and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> defends freedom
of expression, especially the open criticism of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> religion which is
criminalized in many countries”. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 years ago >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is no longer
relevant.
relevant to helping people navigate life in 2020s >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and post.
many other places as well.
therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and everywhere". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
i would regard religious people as fundamentally wrong, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being on
the wrong side of history. being wrong also means it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> provides no
benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to become >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obsolete.
nice. so are you a pious person?
i have no qualms with its accuracy. i am curious and want >>>>>>>>>>>>> to know
the kind of views believers and non-believers espouse. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
that's a nice dream.
Have a nice day, and try to expand beyond your parochialism >>>>>>>>>> WRT the relevance of religion; the world isn't identical to >>>>>>>>>> your social circle.
Hey Bob,
Heads up about Jojo -- Mom needs to take his (her?) Internet >>>>>>>>> away, and until that happens, discretion is advised.
Dawn
dawn, dont be rude!!! also, i have a penis.
i got it because my cells differentiated because i have a y
chromosome.. aaa capiche?
that is all the reason and the only reason.
lol i am not posting it here or anywhere! now that i think about it, i
have never taken its pic...
% wrote:
jojo wrote:
% wrote:and make sure to wear your top hat
jojo wrote:
% wrote:sorry , you have to post a pic with it beside your face
jojo wrote:
% wrote:that's no reason
jojo wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:where did you get it , by the train tracks
On 10/4/2024 11:10 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 10:45:56 +0000, the following
appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Isn't it, though?
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:00:25 +0000, the following
appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Hopefully, both "espouse" the same reality, the
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 02:06:06 +0000, the following >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Why do you ask? It wouldn't affect the accuracy of my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comment either way.
On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:59:04 +0000, the following >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Bob Casanova wrote:There was no need to confirm what I wrote; I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already knew I
On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the
following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ
<[email protected]d>:
shogun <[email protected]> writes:Yep. The answer to which you replied is
Bob Casanova wrote:It's relevant if you live anywhere in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Islamic controlled world, and
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by sora <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
David Dalton wrote:Relevant to what?
Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wikipedia “educates
individuals and groups about blasphemy >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> laws and defends freedom
of expression, especially the open >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criticism of religion which is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criminalized in many countries”. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> years ago is no longer
relevant.
relevant to helping people navigate life in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020s and post.
many other places as well.
hopelessly
parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> social circle,
therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everywhere".
i would regard religious people as
fundamentally wrong, being on
the wrong side of history. being wrong also >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> means it provides no
benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> become obsolete.
was correct.
nice. so are you a pious person?
i have no qualms with its accuracy. i am curious
and want to know
the kind of views believers and non-believers espouse. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
facts of
which are not subject to belief or disbelief.
that's a nice dream.
Have a nice day, and try to expand beyond your
parochialism
WRT the relevance of religion; the world isn't
identical to
your social circle.
Hey Bob,
Heads up about Jojo -- Mom needs to take his (her?)
Internet away, and until that happens, discretion is
advised.
Dawn
dawn, dont be rude!!! also, i have a penis.
i got it because my cells differentiated because i have a
y chromosome.. aaa capiche?
that is all the reason and the only reason.
lol i am not posting it here or anywhere! now that i think
about it, i have never taken its pic...
And your gay sweater
jojo wrote:
Xx/v]andrak|≡xX wrote:yes in a top hat
% wrote:
jojo wrote:
% wrote:and make sure to wear your top hat
jojo wrote:
% wrote:sorry , you have to post a pic with it beside your face
jojo wrote:
% wrote:that's no reason
jojo wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:where did you get it , by the train tracks
On 10/4/2024 11:10 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 10:45:56 +0000, the following
appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Isn't it, though?
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:00:25 +0000, the following >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Hopefully, both "espouse" the same reality, the
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 02:06:06 +0000, the following >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Bob Casanova wrote:Why do you ask? It wouldn't affect the accuracy >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of my
On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:59:04 +0000, the
following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Bob Casanova wrote:There was no need to confirm what I wrote; I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already knew I
On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]d>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
shogun <[email protected]> writes:Yep. The answer to which you replied is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hopelessly
Bob Casanova wrote:It's relevant if you live anywhere in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Islamic controlled world, and
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by sora <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
David Dalton wrote:Relevant to what?
Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wikipedia “educates
individuals and groups about blasphemy >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> laws and defends freedom
of expression, especially the open >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criticism of religion which is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criminalized in many countries”. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> years ago is no longer
relevant.
relevant to helping people navigate life >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 2020s and post.
many other places as well.
parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> social circle,
therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everywhere".
i would regard religious people as
fundamentally wrong, being on
the wrong side of history. being wrong also >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> means it provides no
benefit to its adherents. they are choosing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to become obsolete.
was correct.
nice. so are you a pious person?
comment either way.
i have no qualms with its accuracy. i am curious >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and want to know
the kind of views believers and non-believers
espouse.
facts of
which are not subject to belief or disbelief.
that's a nice dream.
Have a nice day, and try to expand beyond your
parochialism
WRT the relevance of religion; the world isn't
identical to
your social circle.
Hey Bob,
Heads up about Jojo -- Mom needs to take his (her?)
Internet away, and until that happens, discretion is
advised.
Dawn
dawn, dont be rude!!! also, i have a penis.
i got it because my cells differentiated because i have
a y chromosome.. aaa capiche?
that is all the reason and the only reason.
lol i am not posting it here or anywhere! now that i think
about it, i have never taken its pic...
And your gay sweater
i dont think i will take a photo of my penis.
jojo wrote:
% wrote:both
jojo wrote:
Xx/v]andrak|≡xX wrote:yes in a top hat
% wrote:
jojo wrote:
% wrote:and make sure to wear your top hat
jojo wrote:
% wrote:sorry , you have to post a pic with it beside your face
jojo wrote:
% wrote:that's no reason
jojo wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:where did you get it , by the train tracks
On 10/4/2024 11:10 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 10:45:56 +0000, the following >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Isn't it, though?
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:00:25 +0000, the following >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Bob Casanova wrote:Hopefully, both "espouse" the same reality, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> facts of
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 02:06:06 +0000, the
following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Bob Casanova wrote:Why do you ask? It wouldn't affect the
On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:59:04 +0000, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Bob Casanova wrote:There was no need to confirm what I wrote; I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already knew I
On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]d>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
shogun <[email protected]> writes:Yep. The answer to which you replied is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hopelessly
Bob Casanova wrote:It's relevant if you live anywhere in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Islamic controlled world, and
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by sora <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
David Dalton wrote:Relevant to what?
Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wikipedia “educates
individuals and groups about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blasphemy laws and defends freedom >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of expression, especially the open >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criticism of religion which is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criminalized in many countries”. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 50 years ago is no longer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relevant.
relevant to helping people navigate life >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 2020s and post.
many other places as well.
parochial; "it's irrelevant to my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> immediate social circle,
therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everywhere".
i would regard religious people as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fundamentally wrong, being on
the wrong side of history. being wrong also >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> means it provides no
benefit to its adherents. they are choosing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to become obsolete.
was correct.
nice. so are you a pious person?
accuracy of my
comment either way.
i have no qualms with its accuracy. i am
curious and want to know
the kind of views believers and non-believers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> espouse.
which are not subject to belief or disbelief. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
that's a nice dream.
Have a nice day, and try to expand beyond your
parochialism
WRT the relevance of religion; the world isn't
identical to
your social circle.
Hey Bob,
Heads up about Jojo -- Mom needs to take his (her?) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Internet away, and until that happens, discretion
is advised.
Dawn
dawn, dont be rude!!! also, i have a penis.
i got it because my cells differentiated because i
have a y chromosome.. aaa capiche?
that is all the reason and the only reason.
lol i am not posting it here or anywhere! now that i think
about it, i have never taken its pic...
And your gay sweater
i dont think i will take a photo of my penis.
hat or no hat.... wait top hat for the penis or the head?
On 10/4/2024 11:10 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 10:45:56 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Isn't it, though?
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:00:25 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Hopefully, both "espouse" the same reality, the facts of
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 02:06:06 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Why do you ask? It wouldn't affect the accuracy of my
On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:59:04 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:There was no need to confirm what I wrote; I already knew I
On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the following appeared >>>>>>>>>> in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ
<[email protected]d>:
shogun <[email protected]> writes:Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly
Bob Casanova wrote:It's relevant if you live anywhere in the Islamic controlled world, and
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the following appeared in >>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by sora <[email protected]>:
David Dalton wrote:Relevant to what?
Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from Wikipedia �educates >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> individuals and groups about blasphemy laws and defends freedom >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of expression, especially the open criticism of religion which is
criminalized in many countries�.
religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 years ago is no longer >>>>>>>>>>>>>> relevant.
relevant to helping people navigate life in 2020s and post. >>>>>>>>>>>>
many other places as well.
parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate social circle, >>>>>>>>>> therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and everywhere".
i would regard religious people as fundamentally wrong, being on >>>>>>>>> the wrong side of history. being wrong also means it provides no >>>>>>>>> benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to become obsolete. >>>>>>>>>
was correct.
nice. so are you a pious person?
comment either way.
i have no qualms with its accuracy. i am curious and want to know
the kind of views believers and non-believers espouse.
which are not subject to belief or disbelief.
that's a nice dream.
Have a nice day, and try to expand beyond your parochialism
WRT the relevance of religion; the world isn't identical to
your social circle.
Hey Bob,
Heads up about Jojo -- Mom needs to take his (her?) Internet away, and
until that happens, discretion is advised.
Xx/v]andrak|≡xX wrote:
jojo wrote:
Xx/v]andrak|≡xX wrote:
jojo wrote:
anthk wrote:
On 2024-10-02, shogun <[email protected]> wrote:
Bob Casanova wrote:
On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ
<[email protected]d>:
shogun <[email protected]> writes:Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly
Bob Casanova wrote:It's relevant if you live anywhere in the Islamic controlled >>>>>>>>> world, and
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the following appeared in >>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by sora <[email protected]>:
David Dalton wrote:Relevant to what?
Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from Wikipedia “educates >>>>>>>>>>>>> individuals and groups about blasphemy laws and defends >>>>>>>>>>>>> freedom
of expression, especially the open criticism of religion >>>>>>>>>>>>> which is
criminalized in many countries”.
religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 years ago is no longer >>>>>>>>>>>> relevant.
relevant to helping people navigate life in 2020s and post. >>>>>>>>>>
many other places as well.
parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate social circle,
therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and everywhere".
i would regard religious people as fundamentally wrong, being on >>>>>>> the wrong side of history. being wrong also means it provides no >>>>>>> benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to become obsolete.
The closest to a religion I'd believe would be
synchronicity+pansichysm, but far from
any judeo-christian/islamic sect or dogma.
there might be something to synchronicity, but panpsychism.... ehhh
dont think so.
No one's saying there's synchronicity jojo.
you are saying it, you are saying there is panpsychism.
I don't know what that is.
it means you are connected with everyone and everything in the universe through some substrate.
On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 17:05:02 -0500, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Dawn Flood
<[email protected]>:
On 10/4/2024 11:10 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:No worries; flakes are always among us. I was inoculated
On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 10:45:56 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Isn't it, though?
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:00:25 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Hopefully, both "espouse" the same reality, the facts of
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 02:06:06 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Why do you ask? It wouldn't affect the accuracy of my
On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:59:04 +0000, the following appeared in >>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:There was no need to confirm what I wrote; I already knew I
On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the following appeared >>>>>>>>>>> in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ
<[email protected]d>:
shogun <[email protected]> writes:Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly
Bob Casanova wrote:It's relevant if you live anywhere in the Islamic controlled world, and
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the following appeared in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by sora <[email protected]>:
David Dalton wrote:Relevant to what?
Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from Wikipedia “educates >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> individuals and groups about blasphemy laws and defends freedom
of expression, especially the open criticism of religion which is
criminalized in many countries”.
religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 years ago is no longer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relevant.
relevant to helping people navigate life in 2020s and post. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
many other places as well.
parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate social circle, >>>>>>>>>>> therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and everywhere". >>>>>>>>>>>>
i would regard religious people as fundamentally wrong, being on >>>>>>>>>> the wrong side of history. being wrong also means it provides no >>>>>>>>>> benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to become obsolete. >>>>>>>>>>
was correct.
nice. so are you a pious person?
comment either way.
i have no qualms with its accuracy. i am curious and want to know
the kind of views believers and non-believers espouse.
which are not subject to belief or disbelief.
that's a nice dream.
Have a nice day, and try to expand beyond your parochialism
WRT the relevance of religion; the world isn't identical to
your social circle.
Hey Bob,
Heads up about Jojo -- Mom needs to take his (her?) Internet away, and
until that happens, discretion is advised.
long ago. ;-)
Xx/v]andrak|≡xX wrote:
% wrote:
jojo wrote:
% wrote:and make sure to wear your top hat
jojo wrote:
% wrote:sorry , you have to post a pic with it beside your face
jojo wrote:
% wrote:that's no reason
jojo wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:where did you get it , by the train tracks
On 10/4/2024 11:10 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 10:45:56 +0000, the following appeared in >>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Isn't it, though?
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:00:25 +0000, the following appeared in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Hopefully, both "espouse" the same reality, the facts of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> which are not subject to belief or disbelief.
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 02:06:06 +0000, the following >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Why do you ask? It wouldn't affect the accuracy of my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comment either way.
On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:59:04 +0000, the following >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Bob Casanova wrote:There was no need to confirm what I wrote; I already >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> knew I
On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the following >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ
<[email protected]d>:
shogun <[email protected]> writes:Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate social >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> circle,
Bob Casanova wrote:It's relevant if you live anywhere in the Islamic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> controlled world, and
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the following >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by sora <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
David Dalton wrote:Relevant to what?
Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from Wikipedia >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “educates
individuals and groups about blasphemy laws and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> defends freedom
of expression, especially the open criticism of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> religion which is
criminalized in many countries”. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 years >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ago is no longer
relevant.
relevant to helping people navigate life in 2020s >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and post.
many other places as well.
therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and everywhere". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
i would regard religious people as fundamentally >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrong, being on
the wrong side of history. being wrong also means it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> provides no
benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to become >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obsolete.
was correct.
nice. so are you a pious person?
i have no qualms with its accuracy. i am curious and want >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to know
the kind of views believers and non-believers espouse. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
that's a nice dream.
Have a nice day, and try to expand beyond your parochialism >>>>>>>>>>>> WRT the relevance of religion; the world isn't identical to >>>>>>>>>>>> your social circle.
Hey Bob,
Heads up about Jojo -- Mom needs to take his (her?) Internet >>>>>>>>>>> away, and until that happens, discretion is advised.
Dawn
dawn, dont be rude!!! also, i have a penis.
i got it because my cells differentiated because i have a y
chromosome.. aaa capiche?
that is all the reason and the only reason.
lol i am not posting it here or anywhere! now that i think about it,
i have never taken its pic...
And your gay sweater
i dont think i will take a photo of my penis.
Dawn Flood wrote:
On 10/4/2024 11:10 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 10:45:56 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Isn't it, though?
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:00:25 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Hopefully, both "espouse" the same reality, the facts of
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 02:06:06 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Why do you ask? It wouldn't affect the accuracy of my
On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:59:04 +0000, the following
appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:There was no need to confirm what I wrote; I already knew I
On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the following
appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ
<[email protected]d>:
shogun <[email protected]> writes:Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly
Bob Casanova wrote:It's relevant if you live anywhere in the Islamic
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the following
appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by sora <[email protected]>:
David Dalton wrote:Relevant to what?
Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from Wikipedia >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “educates
individuals and groups about blasphemy laws and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> defends freedom
of expression, especially the open criticism of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> religion which is
criminalized in many countries”.
religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 years ago >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is no longer
relevant.
relevant to helping people navigate life in 2020s
and post.
controlled world, and
many other places as well.
parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate social
circle,
therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and everywhere".
i would regard religious people as fundamentally wrong,
being on
the wrong side of history. being wrong also means it
provides no
benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to become
obsolete.
was correct.
nice. so are you a pious person?
comment either way.
i have no qualms with its accuracy. i am curious and want
to know
the kind of views believers and non-believers espouse.
which are not subject to belief or disbelief.
that's a nice dream.
Have a nice day, and try to expand beyond your parochialism
WRT the relevance of religion; the world isn't identical to
your social circle.
Hey Bob,
Heads up about Jojo -- Mom needs to take his (her?) Internet
away, and until that happens, discretion is advised.
I don't think a ban is necessary. He is fixed in his atheism.
Utter sacrilege and blasphemy. Blasphemy is a victimless crime.
jojo wrote:
% wrote:
jojo wrote:
% wrote:both
jojo wrote:
Xx/v]andrak|≡xX wrote:yes in a top hat
% wrote:
jojo wrote:
% wrote:and make sure to wear your top hat
jojo wrote:
% wrote:sorry , you have to post a pic with it beside your face
jojo wrote:
% wrote:that's no reason
jojo wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:where did you get it , by the train tracks
On 10/4/2024 11:10 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 10:45:56 +0000, the following >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Bob Casanova wrote:Isn't it, though?
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:00:25 +0000, the
following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Bob Casanova wrote:Hopefully, both "espouse" the same reality, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the facts of
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 02:06:06 +0000, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Bob Casanova wrote:Why do you ask? It wouldn't affect the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accuracy of my
On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:59:04 +0000, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Bob Casanova wrote:There was no need to confirm what I wrote; >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I already knew I
On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]d>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
shogun <[email protected]> writes: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Yep. The answer to which you replied is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hopelessly
Bob Casanova wrote:It's relevant if you live anywhere in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Islamic controlled world, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many other places as well. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the following appeared in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by sora >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>:
David Dalton wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from Wikipedia “educates >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> individuals and groups about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blasphemy laws and defends freedom >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of expression, especially the open >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criticism of religion which is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criminalized in many countries”. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Relevant to what?
religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even 50 years ago is no longer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relevant.
relevant to helping people navigate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> life in 2020s and post.
parochial; "it's irrelevant to my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> immediate social circle,
therefore it's irrelevant for everyone >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and everywhere".
i would regard religious people as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fundamentally wrong, being on
the wrong side of history. being wrong >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also means it provides no
benefit to its adherents. they are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> choosing to become obsolete.
was correct.
nice. so are you a pious person?
comment either way.
i have no qualms with its accuracy. i am >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> curious and want to know
the kind of views believers and non-believers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> espouse.
which are not subject to belief or disbelief. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
that's a nice dream.
Have a nice day, and try to expand beyond your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parochialism
WRT the relevance of religion; the world isn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> identical to
your social circle.
Hey Bob,
Heads up about Jojo -- Mom needs to take his
(her?) Internet away, and until that happens,
discretion is advised.
Dawn
dawn, dont be rude!!! also, i have a penis.
i got it because my cells differentiated because i
have a y chromosome.. aaa capiche?
that is all the reason and the only reason.
lol i am not posting it here or anywhere! now that i
think about it, i have never taken its pic...
And your gay sweater
i dont think i will take a photo of my penis.
hat or no hat.... wait top hat for the penis or the head?
i dont have any hats, who wears hats anyway? i have never seen
anyone wearing a hat. these days people wear caps, and i dont
like those anyway.
its not about what you have seen ,
it's not about what you would do ,
it's about helping people navigate life
jojo wrote:
Xx/v]andrak|≡xX wrote:because you're a mouthy little dick face
Dawn Flood wrote:
On 10/4/2024 11:10 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 10:45:56 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Isn't it, though?
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:00:25 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Hopefully, both "espouse" the same reality, the facts of
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 02:06:06 +0000, the following
appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Why do you ask? It wouldn't affect the accuracy of my
On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:59:04 +0000, the following
appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:There was no need to confirm what I wrote; I already
On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the following
appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ
<[email protected]d>:
shogun <[email protected]> writes:Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly
Bob Casanova wrote:It's relevant if you live anywhere in the Islamic
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the following >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by sora <[email protected]>:
David Dalton wrote:Relevant to what?
Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from Wikipedia >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “educates
individuals and groups about blasphemy laws and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> defends freedom
of expression, especially the open criticism of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> religion which is
criminalized in many countries”.
religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 years >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ago is no longer
relevant.
relevant to helping people navigate life in 2020s >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and post.
controlled world, and
many other places as well.
parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate social
circle,
therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and everywhere". >>>>>>>>>>>>
i would regard religious people as fundamentally
wrong, being on
the wrong side of history. being wrong also means it
provides no
benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to become
obsolete.
knew I
was correct.
nice. so are you a pious person?
comment either way.
i have no qualms with its accuracy. i am curious and want
to know
the kind of views believers and non-believers espouse.
which are not subject to belief or disbelief.
that's a nice dream.
Have a nice day, and try to expand beyond your parochialism
WRT the relevance of religion; the world isn't identical to
your social circle.
Hey Bob,
Heads up about Jojo -- Mom needs to take his (her?) Internet
away, and until that happens, discretion is advised.
I don't think a ban is necessary. He is fixed in his atheism.
Utter sacrilege and blasphemy. Blasphemy is a victimless crime.
i dont understand why dawn insists on oppressing me!!
jojo wrote:
% wrote:no , showing the photos i know you have some
jojo wrote:
% wrote:
jojo wrote:
% wrote:both
jojo wrote:
Xx/v]andrak|≡xX wrote:yes in a top hat
% wrote:
jojo wrote:
% wrote:and make sure to wear your top hat
jojo wrote:lol i am not posting it here or anywhere! now that i
% wrote:sorry , you have to post a pic with it beside your face >>>>>>>>>>>
jojo wrote:
% wrote:that's no reason
jojo wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:where did you get it , by the train tracks
On 10/4/2024 11:10 AM, Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 10:45:56 +0000, the
following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Bob Casanova wrote:Isn't it, though?
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:00:25 +0000, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Bob Casanova wrote:Hopefully, both "espouse" the same reality, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the facts of
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 02:06:06 +0000, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Bob Casanova wrote:Why do you ask? It wouldn't affect the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accuracy of my
On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:59:04 +0000, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:There was no need to confirm what I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote; I already knew I
On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]d>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
shogun <[email protected]> writes: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Yep. The answer to which you replied >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is hopelessly
Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the following appeared in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by sora >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>:It's relevant if you live anywhere in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Islamic controlled world, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many other places as well. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
David Dalton wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from Wikipedia “educates >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> individuals and groups about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blasphemy laws and defends freedom >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of expression, especially the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> open criticism of religion which is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criminalized in many countries”. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Relevant to what?
religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even 50 years ago is no longer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relevant.
relevant to helping people navigate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> life in 2020s and post. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
parochial; "it's irrelevant to my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> immediate social circle, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> therefore it's irrelevant for everyone >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and everywhere".
i would regard religious people as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fundamentally wrong, being on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the wrong side of history. being wrong >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also means it provides no
benefit to its adherents. they are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> choosing to become obsolete. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
was correct.
nice. so are you a pious person? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
comment either way.
i have no qualms with its accuracy. i am >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> curious and want to know
the kind of views believers and
non-believers espouse.
which are not subject to belief or disbelief. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
that's a nice dream.
Have a nice day, and try to expand beyond your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parochialism
WRT the relevance of religion; the world isn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> identical to
your social circle.
Hey Bob,
Heads up about Jojo -- Mom needs to take his >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (her?) Internet away, and until that happens, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> discretion is advised.
Dawn
dawn, dont be rude!!! also, i have a penis.
i got it because my cells differentiated because i >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have a y chromosome.. aaa capiche?
that is all the reason and the only reason.
think about it, i have never taken its pic...
And your gay sweater
i dont think i will take a photo of my penis.
hat or no hat.... wait top hat for the penis or the head?
i dont have any hats, who wears hats anyway? i have never
seen anyone wearing a hat. these days people wear caps, and i
dont like those anyway.
its not about what you have seen ,
it's not about what you would do ,
it's about helping people navigate life
huh??? navigate life by taking penis photos and wearing hats?
jojo wrote:
% wrote:she doesn't support your theories and it's her right not too ,
jojo wrote:
Xx/v]andrak|≡xX wrote:because you're a mouthy little dick face
Dawn Flood wrote:
On 10/4/2024 11:10 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 10:45:56 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Isn't it, though?
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:00:25 +0000, the following
appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Hopefully, both "espouse" the same reality, the facts of
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 02:06:06 +0000, the following
appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Why do you ask? It wouldn't affect the accuracy of my
On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:59:04 +0000, the following
appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:There was no need to confirm what I wrote; I already >>>>>>>>>>>>> knew I
On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the following >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ
<[email protected]d>:
shogun <[email protected]> writes:Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate social >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> circle,
Bob Casanova wrote:It's relevant if you live anywhere in the Islamic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> controlled world, and
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the
following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by sora <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
David Dalton wrote:Relevant to what?
Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from
Wikipedia “educates
individuals and groups about blasphemy laws >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and defends freedom
of expression, especially the open criticism >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of religion which is
criminalized in many countries”.
religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 years >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ago is no longer
relevant.
relevant to helping people navigate life in
2020s and post.
many other places as well.
therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and
everywhere".
i would regard religious people as fundamentally
wrong, being on
the wrong side of history. being wrong also means
it provides no
benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to
become obsolete.
was correct.
nice. so are you a pious person?
comment either way.
i have no qualms with its accuracy. i am curious and
want to know
the kind of views believers and non-believers espouse.
which are not subject to belief or disbelief.
that's a nice dream.
Have a nice day, and try to expand beyond your parochialism
WRT the relevance of religion; the world isn't identical to
your social circle.
Hey Bob,
Heads up about Jojo -- Mom needs to take his (her?)
Internet away, and until that happens, discretion is advised.
I don't think a ban is necessary. He is fixed in his
atheism. Utter sacrilege and blasphemy. Blasphemy is a
victimless crime.
i dont understand why dawn insists on oppressing me!!
you dont think she is being totally unfair to me? i will go mad
without net.
she don't think much of me either but she doesn't ,
say the things to me she says to you
jojo wrote:
% wrote:she has that option there's nothing in the faq's about liking
jojo wrote:
% wrote:she doesn't support your theories and it's her right not too ,
jojo wrote:
Xx/v]andrak|≡xX wrote:because you're a mouthy little dick face
Dawn Flood wrote:
On 10/4/2024 11:10 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 10:45:56 +0000, the following
appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Isn't it, though?
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:00:25 +0000, the following
appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Hopefully, both "espouse" the same reality, the facts of >>>>>>>>>>> which are not subject to belief or disbelief.
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 02:06:06 +0000, the following
appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:Why do you ask? It wouldn't affect the accuracy of my >>>>>>>>>>>>> comment either way.
On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:59:04 +0000, the following >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
Bob Casanova wrote:There was no need to confirm what I wrote; I
On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the
following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ
<[email protected]d>:
shogun <[email protected]> writes:Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate
Bob Casanova wrote:It's relevant if you live anywhere in the
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by sora <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
David Dalton wrote:Relevant to what?
Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wikipedia “educates
individuals and groups about blasphemy laws >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and defends freedom
of expression, especially the open >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criticism of religion which is
criminalized in many countries”. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> years ago is no longer
relevant.
relevant to helping people navigate life in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020s and post.
Islamic controlled world, and
many other places as well.
social circle,
therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and
everywhere".
i would regard religious people as fundamentally >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrong, being on
the wrong side of history. being wrong also means >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it provides no
benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> become obsolete.
already knew I
was correct.
nice. so are you a pious person?
i have no qualms with its accuracy. i am curious and
want to know
the kind of views believers and non-believers espouse. >>>>>>>>>>>>
that's a nice dream.
Have a nice day, and try to expand beyond your parochialism
WRT the relevance of religion; the world isn't identical to
your social circle.
Hey Bob,
Heads up about Jojo -- Mom needs to take his (her?)
Internet away, and until that happens, discretion is
advised.
I don't think a ban is necessary. He is fixed in his
atheism. Utter sacrilege and blasphemy. Blasphemy is a
victimless crime.
i dont understand why dawn insists on oppressing me!!
you dont think she is being totally unfair to me? i will go
mad without net.
she don't think much of me either but she doesn't ,
say the things to me she says to you
yeah, she is acting like a dictator with me, throwing me in the
gulag and telling others to guard the gate.
someone
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 166:50:09 |
| Calls: | 12,096 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 15,003 |
| Messages: | 6,517,810 |