1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. SCI.PHYSICS.RELATIVITY

  • Einstein versus =?UTF-8?Q?Poincar=C3=A9?=

    From Richard Hachel@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 4 16:19:27 2025
    Many people have reported the Einstein scam, a primarily political scam at
    a time when preparations were underway for one of humanity's most
    devastating conflicts, and when, precisely, the French, English, and
    Germans were glaring at each other.
    What happened? For several years, a French genius had been introducing a
    brand new theory, writing philosophical, mathematical, and physical texts
    of prime importance (Henri Poincaré was considered the last man in
    humanity to still master the entire science of his time, something that
    would no longer be possible today). In June 1905, he published an article
    on "On the Dynamics of the Electron" which he sent to Bern. In Bern, an anonymous copyist (don't laugh, friends) then published an article in
    September entitled "Dynamics of the Electron."
    LOL.
    I don't believe Albert Einstein wrote a single line of this article, but
    that it was written by the best German specialists, and that he simply
    served as a front. Their goal wasn't to glorify Einstein, but to show that Poincaré hadn't discovered anything special. The goal of Einstein's
    article was to pull the rug out from under Poincaré and France.
    We couldn't afford a France illuminating the world with a completely revolutionary theory.
    It's as simple as that.
    The most fantastic thing (because God doesn't give credit) is that when
    the physicists met in Oslo (it's beautiful, get out your handkerchiefs,
    it's so beautiful), it was decided that the Nobel Prize in Physics would
    be awarded to the theory of relativity, which was considered an
    exceptional advance. And they said: "We'll award it to Mr. Einstein."
    There, stunned, the French leave the room, disgusted. Once the French have left, we're in deep shit. Ooooh, we're in deep shit. What can we do? We
    call the French back, saying that, after all, we're going to award the
    Nobel Prize to Mr. Einstein, but NOT FOR THE THEORY OF RELATIVITY, but for
    a grim half-page article on the photoelectric effect.
    The conclusion is then obvious, and if we consider that the Nobel
    committee didn't give a damn about a 27-year-old little pisser, and that
    it wasn't for him that the Nobel was being awarded, nor for his half-page article on the photoelectric effect, we realize a miraculously obvious
    fact: it was so as not to award it to Poincaré.

    R.H.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 7 09:01:46 2025
    Am Mittwoch000004, 04.06.2025 um 18:19 schrieb Richard Hachel:
    Many people have reported the Einstein scam, a primarily political scam
    at a time when preparations were underway for one of humanity's most devastating conflicts, and when, precisely, the French, English, and
    Germans were glaring at each other.
    What happened? For several years, a French genius had been introducing a brand new theory, writing philosophical, mathematical, and physical
    texts of prime importance (Henri Poincaré was considered the last man in humanity to still master the entire science of his time, something that
    would no longer be possible today). In June 1905, he published an
    article on "On the Dynamics of the Electron" which he sent to Bern. In
    Bern, an anonymous copyist (don't laugh, friends) then published an
    article in September entitled "Dynamics of the Electron."
    LOL.
    I don't believe Albert Einstein wrote a single line of this article, but
    that it was written by the best German specialists, and that he simply
    served as a front. Their goal wasn't to glorify Einstein, but to show
    that Poincaré hadn't discovered anything special. The goal of Einstein's article was to pull the rug out from under Poincaré and France.
    We couldn't afford a France illuminating the world with a completely revolutionary theory.
    It's as simple as that.

    I would mostly agree, but would exchange 'Swiss' or 'Switzerland' with 'German'.

    I actually do think, that Einstein wasn't a German, but most likely
    Swiss. Possibly he wasn't even a Jew and possibly his name wasn't
    'Einstein'.

    I had also doubts about the sources of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' and especially about the alleged date.

    I think, that Einstein's text contains actually quotes from "On the
    Dynamics of the Electron", which was published two weeks later.

    Einstein had most likely also quoted Heinrich Hertz, but without
    reference and also incorrectly.


    ...

    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)